1
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:08,000
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

2
00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:12,800
Speaker 2: As we have said multiple times, our border enforcement plan works.

3
00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:17,200
Speaker 2: It is deterrence, a diplomacy and enforcement. We have seen

4
00:00:17,720 --> 00:00:20,599
Speaker 2: that plan working on lawful border crossing have come down

5
00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:22,840
Speaker 2: to the lowest that we have seen in the past

6
00:00:23,200 --> 00:00:23,800
Speaker 2: two years.

7
00:00:24,200 --> 00:00:28,960
Speaker 1: The Biden Administration's new enforcement plan to reduce illegal crossings

8
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:32,400
Speaker 1: on the US Mexico border does seem to be working,

9
00:00:32,880 --> 00:00:36,960
Speaker 1: just as White House Press Secretary Kareem Jean Pierre said. However,

10
00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:40,320
Speaker 1: that success played no part in a federal judge's decision

11
00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:43,920
Speaker 1: on Tuesday to block the rule that denies asylum to

12
00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:48,000
Speaker 1: migrants who arrive at the border without first applying online

13
00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:51,320
Speaker 1: or seeking protection in a country they passed through. The

14
00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,880
Speaker 1: Biden administration immediately appealed the judge's order, which is on

15
00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,920
Speaker 1: hold for two weeks. Joining me is immigration law expert

16
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:02,320
Speaker 1: Leon Fresco, partner at Holland and Knight. How big a

17
00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:06,800
Speaker 1: blow is Judge Tiger's decision to the Biden administration and

18
00:01:06,840 --> 00:01:08,920
Speaker 1: its efforts to control the border.

19
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,360
Speaker 3: Well. If the decision is allowed to stand, it would

20
00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:16,280
Speaker 3: be a significant blow to the Biden administration's ability to

21
00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:20,399
Speaker 3: control the border, because right now the Biden administration is

22
00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:23,760
Speaker 3: using what's called a carrots and six approach along the border,

23
00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:26,920
Speaker 3: which is to say, here are the carrots. Either come

24
00:01:26,959 --> 00:01:30,160
Speaker 3: in legally through one of our parole programs, or at

25
00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:32,640
Speaker 3: least apply it to the ports of entry with an

26
00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:35,840
Speaker 3: appointment at one of our ports so that we know

27
00:01:35,959 --> 00:01:38,919
Speaker 3: you're coming and complain on it. But don't just walk

28
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:42,360
Speaker 3: in between the ports through the border illegally where we

29
00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:44,480
Speaker 3: don't know how many people are coming on what date,

30
00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:47,520
Speaker 3: We can't plan for it, and it creates chaos. And

31
00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:49,240
Speaker 3: what it's saying is is if you do do that,

32
00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,800
Speaker 3: we're going to ban you from getting asylum and place

33
00:01:52,880 --> 00:01:56,400
Speaker 3: you in the expedited removal process. So most people so

34
00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:00,000
Speaker 3: far have acted in accordance with this charts and stay

35
00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:03,480
Speaker 3: approach and use the carrots space approach because they know

36
00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:06,720
Speaker 3: that the sticks are there. If the sticks aren't taken away,

37
00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:10,560
Speaker 3: it's unclear whether the benefits of the cats will still

38
00:02:10,720 --> 00:02:15,960
Speaker 3: be sufficient to dissuade people from coming across the border illegally,

39
00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:19,080
Speaker 3: and so if the decision is allowed to stand, it

40
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:21,919
Speaker 3: will be a big problem for the Biden administration. As

41
00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:24,880
Speaker 3: soon as the weather becomes a little less hot on

42
00:02:24,919 --> 00:02:25,720
Speaker 3: the southern border.

43
00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:29,680
Speaker 1: The judge said that the rules were not lawful because

44
00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:34,120
Speaker 1: they imposed conditions on asylum seekers that Congress did not intend.

45
00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:38,320
Speaker 3: How So, there's actually two congressional statues and they're in

46
00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:41,960
Speaker 3: one hundred percent tension with one another. There's a congressional

47
00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:44,679
Speaker 3: statue which is pretty clear and is the one the

48
00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:48,720
Speaker 3: judge is relying upon, which says that it doesn't matter

49
00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:52,919
Speaker 3: whether you crossed legally or illegally, anybody inside the United

50
00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:56,920
Speaker 3: States is eligible to apply for asylum. It is essentially

51
00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:00,040
Speaker 3: written as clear as day that the fact that you

52
00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:04,720
Speaker 3: crossed illegally cannot be held against you for applying for asylum.

53
00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:08,720
Speaker 3: So people might think, well, that means case closed. You

54
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:12,160
Speaker 3: shouldn't be able to have an administration ban asylum for

55
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:16,240
Speaker 3: people who crossed illegally. But by the same token, there's

56
00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:21,720
Speaker 3: another statute that Congress also wrote, which says that the

57
00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:27,200
Speaker 3: administration can, as a matter of discretion, pick any factor

58
00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:30,400
Speaker 3: that it wants to add to the list of reasons

59
00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:32,920
Speaker 3: why you can be denied a sylum and it doesn't

60
00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:35,640
Speaker 3: limit it in any way. And so hence, both the

61
00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:39,400
Speaker 3: Trump administration and the Biden administration have said, well, we're

62
00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:42,760
Speaker 3: going to use the factor that you've crossed illegally after

63
00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:45,440
Speaker 3: being told not to do it, and in the Biden

64
00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:50,600
Speaker 3: administration's case, after being given numerous legal alternatives of how

65
00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:52,880
Speaker 3: to do it. So the point is, if you're choosing

66
00:03:52,920 --> 00:03:56,920
Speaker 3: to brazenly cross illegally anyway, when there's a legal way

67
00:03:57,000 --> 00:03:59,560
Speaker 3: to do it, we should be able to use this

68
00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:03,920
Speaker 3: as a discretionary factor to deny you asylum. And so

69
00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:08,480
Speaker 3: that was the Biden administration's argument. The judge here ruled, well,

70
00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:11,960
Speaker 3: it's not exactly clear that everybody's going to be able

71
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:15,080
Speaker 3: to have an access point to asylum, and so because

72
00:04:15,120 --> 00:04:17,599
Speaker 3: of that, then we are going to say that the

73
00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:21,400
Speaker 3: statue where Congress says that you can't block asylum based

74
00:04:21,400 --> 00:04:25,000
Speaker 3: on illegal entry is the one that's the winner here,

75
00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:28,320
Speaker 3: and I'm going to prevent the Biden administration from having

76
00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:30,880
Speaker 3: this stick that says don't cross illegally.

77
00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:34,200
Speaker 1: The judge wrote that while they wait for an adjudication,

78
00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:38,279
Speaker 1: applicants for asylum must remain in Mexico, where migrants are

79
00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:41,440
Speaker 1: generally at heightened risk of violence by both state and

80
00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:45,400
Speaker 1: non state actors. Is that true, Well.

81
00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:48,400
Speaker 3: It depends how long it's going to take and under

82
00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:51,919
Speaker 3: what conditions the person is waiting. It is true that

83
00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:56,440
Speaker 3: the longer a person is waiting in Mexico and the

84
00:04:56,560 --> 00:05:00,479
Speaker 3: less resources that the person has, this means it is

85
00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:02,719
Speaker 3: more likely that something bad is going to happen to

86
00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:06,320
Speaker 3: them in Mexico while they're waiting, which can include having

87
00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:10,159
Speaker 3: just random street crime where the person's resources are taken

88
00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:13,279
Speaker 3: away from this. That is very common in Mexico and

89
00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:16,080
Speaker 3: is likely to occur to anybody who's just sitting around

90
00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:19,680
Speaker 3: there waiting for months. So that's the question. It's sort

91
00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:23,200
Speaker 3: of a really effectual question, which is the Biden administration

92
00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:25,839
Speaker 3: tries to say, no, one's going to be lingering in

93
00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:29,200
Speaker 3: Mexico waiting for an appointment at the port of entry,

94
00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:33,800
Speaker 3: because we have sufficient number of appointments through our CBP

95
00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:37,799
Speaker 3: one app and through the parole program. But the plane

96
00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:39,839
Speaker 3: has said no, there are still people waiting and they're

97
00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:44,160
Speaker 3: subject to danger. And so because they shouldn't be expected

98
00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:46,480
Speaker 3: to have to wait and have to subject themselves to

99
00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:50,840
Speaker 3: this danger, then again we're going to choose the part

100
00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:54,880
Speaker 3: where Congress says you don't have to wait outside the

101
00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,720
Speaker 3: United States. You can come in and apply for asylum,

102
00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:01,159
Speaker 3: as opposed to saying that this is a permissible discretionary

103
00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:05,520
Speaker 3: factor for an administration to use the ban people from

104
00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:08,400
Speaker 3: seeking a silo, which is, hey, there's a legal way

105
00:06:08,440 --> 00:06:11,680
Speaker 3: that we just created, use that. The only reason you

106
00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:14,360
Speaker 3: would use the illegal way is because you're trying to

107
00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:17,440
Speaker 3: cause problem for the US government. So the judge doesn't

108
00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:21,120
Speaker 3: believe that. The judge believe someone using the illegal way

109
00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:24,160
Speaker 3: might be just trying to protect their safety because they

110
00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:27,880
Speaker 3: don't have a sufficiently quick pathway to avoid having to

111
00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:32,039
Speaker 3: sit there in Mexico and potentially risk being in some

112
00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:34,600
Speaker 3: way harmed by gang members or others.

113
00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:39,000
Speaker 1: So leon is this Biden program similar to the Trump

114
00:06:39,040 --> 00:06:40,680
Speaker 1: Remain in Mexico program?

115
00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:44,039
Speaker 3: Well, it isn't it is. In this sense, Trump did

116
00:06:44,120 --> 00:06:49,520
Speaker 3: not have a mechanism in play like the CBP one

117
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:54,920
Speaker 3: app and the parole program that was designed to legalize

118
00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:58,000
Speaker 3: the flow so that they could make the argument that

119
00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:02,279
Speaker 3: it would be a permissible discritiontionary reason to ban people

120
00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:05,400
Speaker 3: from asylum that they were crossing across the border illegally.

121
00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:09,039
Speaker 3: Meaning Trump just said stay out, and I'm allowed to

122
00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:11,280
Speaker 3: tell people to stay out, and if they don't want

123
00:07:11,320 --> 00:07:14,200
Speaker 3: to stay out and do it through Vexico. I'm allowed

124
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,040
Speaker 3: to ban them from seeking asylum. So he was making

125
00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:22,520
Speaker 3: the A versus b one versus two binary analysis, and

126
00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:25,880
Speaker 3: I banned some poken, I got banned people from asylum.

127
00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:29,480
Speaker 3: He was trying to make that very binary analysis, whereas

128
00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:31,920
Speaker 3: the Biden administration was saying, no, no, no, this is

129
00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:35,040
Speaker 3: not a binary analysis. The reason ours is different is

130
00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:39,960
Speaker 3: because every person can legally access our asylum system, and

131
00:07:40,040 --> 00:07:42,640
Speaker 3: the only reason they would cross illegally is to cause

132
00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:46,360
Speaker 3: problems for our US government. And if they're doing that intentionally,

133
00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:49,880
Speaker 3: they should face the punishment of being banned from being

134
00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:52,640
Speaker 3: able to speak a sylum. So that's the difference the

135
00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:56,520
Speaker 3: Biden administration was trying to make. And the Biden administration

136
00:07:57,040 --> 00:08:00,840
Speaker 3: reasoning was not viewed as credible by the Federal court

137
00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:01,360
Speaker 3: judge here.

138
00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:05,520
Speaker 1: So the Biden administration immediately appealed. The appeal will go

139
00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:08,120
Speaker 1: to the Ninth Circuit, where would you say it may

140
00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:09,680
Speaker 1: not farewell well.

141
00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,160
Speaker 3: The Ninth Circuit is now a fifty to fifty court.

142
00:08:12,200 --> 00:08:15,080
Speaker 3: It used to be considered a liberal court because it was.

143
00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:18,840
Speaker 3: But President Trump actually was quite successful in putting in

144
00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:21,000
Speaker 3: judges in the Ninth Circuit. So now it's a fifty

145
00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:24,040
Speaker 3: to fifty court, it's a court with many judges, and

146
00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:27,320
Speaker 3: so you could easily get three Trump appointees on a panel,

147
00:08:27,720 --> 00:08:30,440
Speaker 3: or you could get three Biden appointees on a panel

148
00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:33,080
Speaker 3: now or three Obama appointees on a panel. So you

149
00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:35,520
Speaker 3: have no idea what kind of panel you're going to

150
00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:39,080
Speaker 3: be able to get. And so from that standpoint, that's

151
00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:42,280
Speaker 3: what's going to be complicated in terms of predicting the outcome.

152
00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:46,400
Speaker 3: But I will say this, the Trump administration had in

153
00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:49,320
Speaker 3: this litigation, been able to make some headway in the

154
00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:52,200
Speaker 3: Ninth Circuit. They were able to get this decision from

155
00:08:52,280 --> 00:08:55,800
Speaker 3: the same judge as Tigaer overturned, and it was working

156
00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:58,600
Speaker 3: its way up to the Supreme Court before the Trump

157
00:08:58,640 --> 00:09:01,240
Speaker 3: administration ended. I don't know how this case would have

158
00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:05,240
Speaker 3: been resolved, but what I imagine what happened here is

159
00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:07,880
Speaker 3: that the Supreme Court is probably going to allow the

160
00:09:07,920 --> 00:09:11,440
Speaker 3: Biden administration to have this policy. If I had to

161
00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:14,760
Speaker 3: make a prediction, you know, I would say that that

162
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:17,960
Speaker 3: the Biden administration is going to be allowed to keep

163
00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:20,160
Speaker 3: this policy in place by the US Supreme Court.

164
00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:22,600
Speaker 1: At the end of the day, explain why you think

165
00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:24,880
Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court would allow it to remain in place.

166
00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:28,199
Speaker 3: First of all, what we've now seen for the last

167
00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:30,880
Speaker 3: three years of the Biden administration is that the Supreme

168
00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:36,000
Speaker 3: Court has been very deferential to the administration period writ large,

169
00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:38,960
Speaker 3: with regards to issues of immigration, and it's setting that

170
00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:41,360
Speaker 3: up not just for Biden, because I don't think they're

171
00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:45,120
Speaker 3: particularly fond of Biden, let's say, but just because they

172
00:09:45,160 --> 00:09:48,160
Speaker 3: want this to be the norm for immigration rid lards

173
00:09:48,160 --> 00:09:50,880
Speaker 3: moving forward, to return it to what had been the

174
00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:55,120
Speaker 3: traditional one hundred years of jurisprudence before the period let's

175
00:09:55,120 --> 00:09:59,679
Speaker 3: say between nineteen ninety and twenty sixteen, where there was

176
00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:02,959
Speaker 3: a lot of activism in this area of immigration in

177
00:10:03,040 --> 00:10:06,320
Speaker 3: the judiciary. Now they're trying to resort back to the

178
00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:10,240
Speaker 3: don't sue because the administration has a lot more authority

179
00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:12,480
Speaker 3: than you think. And I think that will be the

180
00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:15,520
Speaker 3: case here where I think the Supreme Court will be

181
00:10:15,559 --> 00:10:19,040
Speaker 3: sympathetic to all of the legal options that the Biden

182
00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:23,320
Speaker 3: administration is offering people in order to come here legally,

183
00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:27,120
Speaker 3: which is the parole program for the CDP one app

184
00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:30,480
Speaker 3: and saying to people if you want to come across

185
00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:36,480
Speaker 3: the border without using any offeasset mechanisms. Then you are

186
00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:40,080
Speaker 3: going to have to risk that you will be denied asylum.

187
00:10:40,080 --> 00:10:43,160
Speaker 3: And by the way, there isn't even then a complete

188
00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:46,360
Speaker 3: ban on asylum. If you could prove that your life

189
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:49,720
Speaker 3: or safety were in danger in Mexico and that's why

190
00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:52,360
Speaker 3: you had to cross it, it's an imminent manner, then

191
00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:55,040
Speaker 3: you can even overcome this ban. So it's not even

192
00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:58,280
Speaker 3: a one hundred percent fan in that situation. And so

193
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:00,360
Speaker 3: for that reason, I think the Supreme Court is going

194
00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:03,920
Speaker 3: to have sympathy about it. And for the same reason

195
00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:08,920
Speaker 3: they actually upheld the Trump travel ban back in the day,

196
00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:13,439
Speaker 3: they will use that same logic here and uphold the

197
00:11:13,600 --> 00:11:17,320
Speaker 3: Biden transit ban visa via pilumce Leon.

198
00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,240
Speaker 1: Let's turn now to the fight between the state of

199
00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:24,640
Speaker 1: Texas and the Biden administration over migrants crossing the border,

200
00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:28,720
Speaker 1: which is escalating and is now visually represented by a

201
00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:32,960
Speaker 1: thousand foot stretch of bright orange, wrecking ball sized tethered

202
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:36,000
Speaker 1: buoys in the middle of the Rio Grande, the river

203
00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:39,160
Speaker 1: that serves as the border between the United States and Mexico.

204
00:11:39,840 --> 00:11:43,480
Speaker 1: Texas Governor Greg Abbott defended the state's right to install

205
00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:46,680
Speaker 1: the barrier, issuing his own demand on Fox News.

206
00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,559
Speaker 3: All about administration has to do is to enforce the

207
00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,920
Speaker 3: laws already on the books to prevent people from crossing

208
00:11:53,080 --> 00:11:54,720
Speaker 3: between the ports of entry.

209
00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:58,240
Speaker 1: Texas will see you in court, mister, President Abbott wrote

210
00:11:58,280 --> 00:12:01,640
Speaker 1: in a letter. White House Press Secretary Kareem Jean Pierre

211
00:12:01,760 --> 00:12:03,800
Speaker 1: called it another political stunt.

212
00:12:04,520 --> 00:12:07,000
Speaker 2: Let the Department of Justice speak to this. They've been

213
00:12:07,080 --> 00:12:12,000
Speaker 2: very clear last week that they also will see Governor

214
00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:15,079
Speaker 2: Abbott in court for his unlawful actions. We've been very

215
00:12:15,120 --> 00:12:15,720
Speaker 2: clear about that.

216
00:12:16,040 --> 00:12:20,439
Speaker 1: And so the administration sued Texas over the buoys, certainly

217
00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:23,280
Speaker 1: not its first lawsuit against the state. I've been talking

218
00:12:23,280 --> 00:12:26,440
Speaker 1: to Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland and Knight and

219
00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:30,120
Speaker 1: former director of the Justice Department's Office of Immigration Litigation.

220
00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:33,400
Speaker 1: Leon tell us about these booys that the federal government

221
00:12:33,520 --> 00:12:34,280
Speaker 1: is suing over.

222
00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:38,360
Speaker 3: Well. The federal government is complaining about the floating barrier,

223
00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:41,440
Speaker 3: which are about a string of buoys that are between

224
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:45,640
Speaker 3: about four and six feet a diameter. The orange looking buoys,

225
00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:49,400
Speaker 3: which may streatch for at least one thousand feet between

226
00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:54,600
Speaker 3: the Eagle Path International Bridge and about a couple miles

227
00:12:54,679 --> 00:12:59,200
Speaker 3: south there, and they include some infrastructure designs to anchor

228
00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:01,960
Speaker 3: it or fix it in the middle of the Rio

229
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:06,200
Speaker 3: Grand River separating Mexico and the United States there near

230
00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:09,480
Speaker 3: ego paths, And the idea is that these floating barriers

231
00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:12,360
Speaker 3: that people won't be able to walk across the river

232
00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:15,520
Speaker 3: in order to get to the United States and evade

233
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:18,160
Speaker 3: the border patrol so that they can get their bodies

234
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:22,120
Speaker 3: inside the United States and avoid the bands that the

235
00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:24,880
Speaker 3: Biden administration is trying to do, where they're trying to

236
00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:29,000
Speaker 3: basically push people back into Mexico and get them to

237
00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:32,040
Speaker 3: use the CBP one app so that they don't have

238
00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:35,800
Speaker 3: to do the whole expedited removal process for these people.

239
00:13:36,080 --> 00:13:38,600
Speaker 1: And what is the claim in this lawsuit? You know

240
00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:40,680
Speaker 1: what law do? They say Texas has broken?

241
00:13:41,840 --> 00:13:44,320
Speaker 3: Well, so what's very interesting is this is sort of

242
00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:48,000
Speaker 3: pretty obscure stuff for the immigration world. I'm sure for

243
00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:52,520
Speaker 3: the environmental and natural resources world, this is a very

244
00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:56,360
Speaker 3: common thing. But obviously, if you're a normal immigration lawyer,

245
00:13:56,520 --> 00:14:01,000
Speaker 3: you don't necessarily deal with everyday the Rivers an Harbor's Act.

246
00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:03,480
Speaker 3: But the law that's in play is called the Rivers

247
00:14:03,480 --> 00:14:07,400
Speaker 3: and Harbor's Appropriation Act. Of eighteen ninety nine, which unlike

248
00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:10,720
Speaker 3: the Immigration Code, which is in Title eight of the

249
00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:13,600
Speaker 3: US Code, this is entitled thirty three of the Code,

250
00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:17,160
Speaker 3: and basically what it says in plain English is, look,

251
00:14:17,200 --> 00:14:20,800
Speaker 3: there's navigable waters all around the United States, and the

252
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:24,680
Speaker 3: whole point of these is that they're connecting interstates and

253
00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:29,760
Speaker 3: foreign state commerce. And if you want to build barriers

254
00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:34,480
Speaker 3: that prevent people from using these waterways, then you have

255
00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:37,320
Speaker 3: to get the Army Corps of Engineer's approval to do this.

256
00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:40,240
Speaker 3: You can't just be taking matters into your own hands

257
00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:43,280
Speaker 3: and whatever you want with the waterways of the United States.

258
00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:46,560
Speaker 3: That's the province of the federal government, and so it's

259
00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,440
Speaker 3: the position of the Department of Justice, the Environment and

260
00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:53,000
Speaker 3: the Natural Resources Division. And they told this to the

261
00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,280
Speaker 3: State of Texas before the laws that was filed. Look,

262
00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:58,800
Speaker 3: you have to get approval and a permit from the

263
00:14:58,960 --> 00:15:00,840
Speaker 3: Army Corps of Engineers. You didn't get it. You have

264
00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:03,800
Speaker 3: to take this down. And Texas said, we won't take

265
00:15:03,800 --> 00:15:07,160
Speaker 3: this down. We have sovereign authority to protect our border.

266
00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:10,320
Speaker 3: And so now this loss has been filed in Austin,

267
00:15:10,440 --> 00:15:13,920
Speaker 3: Texas in the federal court seeking injunctive release in the

268
00:15:13,960 --> 00:15:16,560
Speaker 3: form of a court order saying, Hey, Texas, take down

269
00:15:16,640 --> 00:15:19,960
Speaker 3: these bullies, these barriers, and you'll have to pay to

270
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:20,240
Speaker 3: do this.

271
00:15:21,320 --> 00:15:26,000
Speaker 1: Governor Abbott was anticipating this lawsuit. He sent the President

272
00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:31,080
Speaker 1: a letter on Monday defending Texas's right to install the barrier. So,

273
00:15:31,160 --> 00:15:34,080
Speaker 1: as you said, he said that Texas has the sovereign

274
00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:37,320
Speaker 1: authority to defend its border, and they've been using the

275
00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:41,960
Speaker 1: Texas Disaster Act as the legal bedrock for some of

276
00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:42,840
Speaker 1: these measures.

277
00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:48,160
Speaker 3: Right, they believe that they have basically a natural disaster

278
00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:51,120
Speaker 3: that's going on on the border, which, by the way,

279
00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:56,080
Speaker 3: what's complicated about this is that the border numbers are

280
00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:58,960
Speaker 3: way down. All of the questions of what was going

281
00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:02,000
Speaker 3: to happen after Tayle forty two was listed have been

282
00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:04,800
Speaker 3: answered in quite a positive way by the Biden administration.

283
00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:08,640
Speaker 3: But nevertheless, the governor of Texas, Governor abbit is taking

284
00:16:08,680 --> 00:16:11,560
Speaker 3: the position that he's in a state of emergency, and

285
00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:16,280
Speaker 3: that state of emergency permits him under his authority to

286
00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:20,000
Speaker 3: deter the people coming into the United States because he

287
00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:23,800
Speaker 3: has the authority to do that. Now he's being sued

288
00:16:23,840 --> 00:16:26,920
Speaker 3: by private actors and now the Department of Justice saying

289
00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:30,520
Speaker 3: that the Texas disaster as of nineteen seventy five doesn't

290
00:16:30,560 --> 00:16:35,240
Speaker 3: give the authority defined here a lawful immigration was not

291
00:16:35,280 --> 00:16:38,840
Speaker 3: within the definition of disaster and was not intended to

292
00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:42,280
Speaker 3: be classified as such. So you know, it was meant

293
00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:46,360
Speaker 3: to basically protect human life and allow Texas to take

294
00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:50,400
Speaker 3: measures to do that, but not for the purposes of

295
00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:54,640
Speaker 3: basically using immigration as a quarte unquote disaster.

296
00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:57,800
Speaker 1: Does it sound like he has an arguable case.

297
00:16:58,440 --> 00:17:01,600
Speaker 3: Here's basically how this will work. It's one of these

298
00:17:01,600 --> 00:17:05,840
Speaker 3: things where had the case been brought in certain divisions

299
00:17:05,840 --> 00:17:09,399
Speaker 3: in Texas, probably Texas would have won. In the district

300
00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:12,400
Speaker 3: court in Austin. It's a little bit more likely that

301
00:17:12,480 --> 00:17:15,560
Speaker 3: the DOJ is going to get an injunction here. The

302
00:17:15,600 --> 00:17:19,560
Speaker 3: Fifth Circuit, depending on the panel, may say that State

303
00:17:19,600 --> 00:17:21,560
Speaker 3: of Texas can do it or it can't do it,

304
00:17:21,560 --> 00:17:24,320
Speaker 3: depending on which panel they get. I can see panels

305
00:17:24,359 --> 00:17:27,680
Speaker 3: going either way. But I do think once you get

306
00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:30,879
Speaker 3: to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court has been getting

307
00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:35,480
Speaker 3: more and more frustrated with these state efforts to co

308
00:17:35,560 --> 00:17:39,760
Speaker 3: opt immigration law and essentially to say, look, we're tired

309
00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:41,800
Speaker 3: of what the Biden administration is doing. We're going to

310
00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:45,119
Speaker 3: take matters in our own hands. And if they didn't

311
00:17:45,320 --> 00:17:47,920
Speaker 3: like some of the other stuff, like to remain in

312
00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:52,080
Speaker 3: Mexico stuff and the Title forty two stuff and the

313
00:17:52,160 --> 00:17:57,520
Speaker 3: prosecutorial discretion stuff. I think that putting barriers in an

314
00:17:57,720 --> 00:18:02,520
Speaker 3: international waterway with Mexico is probably going to be deemed

315
00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:07,240
Speaker 3: to be a bridge too far. So to speak for

316
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:09,359
Speaker 3: the Supreme Court, I don't think they're going to be

317
00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:12,720
Speaker 3: recessive to allowing Texas to do this because what is

318
00:18:12,760 --> 00:18:16,520
Speaker 3: basically the limiting principles then on what Texas can do

319
00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:18,920
Speaker 3: with the Rio grand And that's going to be the problem.

320
00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:23,199
Speaker 1: Mesco asked the Biden administration to remove the boys and

321
00:18:23,320 --> 00:18:27,400
Speaker 1: razor wire, saying it violates treaties. Does that play any

322
00:18:27,440 --> 00:18:32,920
Speaker 1: part in the Biden administration's lawsuit against Texas.

323
00:18:31,720 --> 00:18:34,359
Speaker 3: Well, it's not in the lawsuits. The lawsuit is just

324
00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:37,800
Speaker 3: talking about the principle that you need a permit from

325
00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:41,560
Speaker 3: the Army Corps of Engineers. But the larger question of

326
00:18:41,600 --> 00:18:44,080
Speaker 3: why you need a permit from the Army Corps of

327
00:18:44,119 --> 00:18:47,679
Speaker 3: Engineers is because Congress realized there the events like this,

328
00:18:47,880 --> 00:18:50,560
Speaker 3: and again, the Rio brand is covered by the famous

329
00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:54,639
Speaker 3: Treaty of Wataloupe Hidalgo and that's the water that is

330
00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:57,920
Speaker 3: part of both nations, and it's one of these things

331
00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:01,040
Speaker 3: that's a very sensitive issue about Mexico and the United

332
00:19:01,040 --> 00:19:05,000
Speaker 3: States having sort of joint sovereignty over that river. And

333
00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:08,520
Speaker 3: for that reason, that's just not something that the State

334
00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:11,000
Speaker 3: of Texas can just get in. Again, you would be

335
00:19:11,040 --> 00:19:14,479
Speaker 3: the point, what is the limiting principles about what Texas

336
00:19:14,600 --> 00:19:18,479
Speaker 3: can do there? Can they put in huge seal things

337
00:19:18,680 --> 00:19:22,040
Speaker 3: that are causing to injure people there? What is the

338
00:19:22,040 --> 00:19:24,160
Speaker 3: limit of what they can they put bombs in the river?

339
00:19:24,800 --> 00:19:27,639
Speaker 3: And so there's all these kinds of questions about where

340
00:19:27,680 --> 00:19:30,560
Speaker 3: the line is and why that's happening. And I don't

341
00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:32,640
Speaker 3: think again, the Supreme Court is going to be very

342
00:19:32,680 --> 00:19:36,560
Speaker 3: sacious if this case gets to the Supreme Court about

343
00:19:36,600 --> 00:19:39,000
Speaker 3: what Texas is doing with regards to the Rio brand.

344
00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:41,840
Speaker 3: And this is all part of a larger operation that

345
00:19:41,880 --> 00:19:44,960
Speaker 3: they have to cause, Operation Long Star that also has

346
00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:47,520
Speaker 3: to do with the bossing of people and have to

347
00:19:47,560 --> 00:19:51,520
Speaker 3: do with sort of this draconian tactics when Texas law

348
00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,840
Speaker 3: enforcement meet people up at the border to try to

349
00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:57,679
Speaker 3: push them back into Mexico. And so this is just

350
00:19:57,720 --> 00:20:02,480
Speaker 3: a larger operation basically designed to create havoc on the

351
00:20:02,560 --> 00:20:03,640
Speaker 3: southern borders.

352
00:20:03,520 --> 00:20:07,119
Speaker 1: And part of that operation includes that razor wire strung

353
00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:12,639
Speaker 1: across private property without permission, bulldozers changing the terrain. The

354
00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:17,120
Speaker 1: Texas Military Department cleared out kine, which should called invasive,

355
00:20:17,240 --> 00:20:22,639
Speaker 1: and change the landscape affecting the river's flow. So why

356
00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:26,760
Speaker 1: hasn't the Biden administration acted on those things as well?

357
00:20:27,440 --> 00:20:30,600
Speaker 3: I think the question is I think they thought that

358
00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:34,800
Speaker 3: perhaps Texas would make its points and move on, but

359
00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:36,960
Speaker 3: now they're seeing they're actually going to have to litigate

360
00:20:37,000 --> 00:20:39,800
Speaker 3: these things. I think depending on how this one goes,

361
00:20:40,280 --> 00:20:43,360
Speaker 3: you'll see more of this, And so I do think

362
00:20:43,400 --> 00:20:45,159
Speaker 3: you're gonna see more of this. I do think this

363
00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:48,520
Speaker 3: was just the first set, the one that's the largest problem,

364
00:20:49,080 --> 00:20:51,320
Speaker 3: and I do think guilty others. I don't think they

365
00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:55,359
Speaker 3: wanted to do a bunch of these lawsuits all at once,

366
00:20:55,440 --> 00:20:57,359
Speaker 3: but there are certainly others that have to do with

367
00:20:57,440 --> 00:21:00,880
Speaker 3: a trusting federal agent, from being a both to process

368
00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:06,199
Speaker 3: people and perhaps other environmental violations that they're causing that

369
00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:09,080
Speaker 3: you could see other lawsuits getting filed. But again, I

370
00:21:09,080 --> 00:21:12,280
Speaker 3: think that the larger problem is the Department of Justice

371
00:21:12,280 --> 00:21:14,960
Speaker 3: doesn't want to have ten twenty lawsuits against the State

372
00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:18,560
Speaker 3: of Texas. So Texas is properly, if you think about it,

373
00:21:18,560 --> 00:21:22,240
Speaker 3: in the political sphere, flooding the zone with as many

374
00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:25,800
Speaker 3: different things as they can do and then trying to

375
00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:29,399
Speaker 3: have the Department of Justice basically either sue them on

376
00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:32,399
Speaker 3: all of them or have the or just keep the

377
00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:36,240
Speaker 3: fight perpetuating, which is really the only interest of Texas

378
00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,320
Speaker 3: here at the end is to just have this fight

379
00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:41,040
Speaker 3: go on ad Infinaida.

380
00:21:41,119 --> 00:21:45,760
Speaker 1: Apparently, there is some blowback over the tactics, including from

381
00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:49,680
Speaker 1: within Texas, and especially in light of that state troopers

382
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:55,639
Speaker 1: account of razor wire leaving asylum seekers bloodied, officers deny

383
00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:58,960
Speaker 1: migrants water in a one hundred degree heat.

384
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:02,440
Speaker 3: I do think he's getting a lot more criticism about it,

385
00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:05,960
Speaker 3: that is true, from private folks, from people in the

386
00:22:06,000 --> 00:22:10,160
Speaker 3: Department of Public Safety, from people in the Mexican government,

387
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:14,679
Speaker 3: and there's people that are starting to speak out against this.

388
00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:17,280
Speaker 3: But I think at the end of the day, the

389
00:22:17,280 --> 00:22:20,600
Speaker 3: political issue of immigration is just so hot right now

390
00:22:21,080 --> 00:22:26,040
Speaker 3: that I don't see a long term abandonment of this issue.

391
00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:28,679
Speaker 3: But I do think it will be very interesting to

392
00:22:28,760 --> 00:22:33,840
Speaker 3: see long term, the outcome of the parole case, which

393
00:22:33,880 --> 00:22:36,600
Speaker 3: is sort of the lynchpin of the entire Biden administration

394
00:22:36,680 --> 00:22:40,480
Speaker 3: border policy, if that's allowed to continue, it's going to

395
00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:42,800
Speaker 3: be very hard. The numbers are what they are, they're

396
00:22:42,840 --> 00:22:46,600
Speaker 3: weight down for the Governor of Texas to keep saying

397
00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:49,520
Speaker 3: there's a crisis compared to what compared to which month,

398
00:22:49,760 --> 00:22:52,359
Speaker 3: and it's going to be very hard to say. But

399
00:22:52,680 --> 00:22:55,800
Speaker 3: if the parole program goes away, then and then the weather,

400
00:22:55,920 --> 00:22:58,679
Speaker 3: which is the other big thing, changes from the record

401
00:22:58,720 --> 00:23:02,080
Speaker 3: heat that we have now to the falls, I do

402
00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:05,480
Speaker 3: think you'll start to see the numbers starts to go

403
00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:08,760
Speaker 3: off pretty dramatically, and then that's where you'll start to

404
00:23:08,800 --> 00:23:11,000
Speaker 3: see more of viztforst rather than less.

405
00:23:11,560 --> 00:23:14,560
Speaker 1: The Biden administration has been talking about how the numbers

406
00:23:14,560 --> 00:23:17,360
Speaker 1: at the border are so low. Do we know if

407
00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:20,320
Speaker 1: it's the parole program or is it the heat.

408
00:23:20,840 --> 00:23:23,280
Speaker 3: I think it's a combination of three things. It's the

409
00:23:23,320 --> 00:23:25,879
Speaker 3: combination of the record heat, no doubt, one hundred and

410
00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:30,160
Speaker 3: fifteen degrees on the border right now is absolutely unbearable

411
00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:34,040
Speaker 3: for anybody to try to make these very difficult tricks

412
00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:36,960
Speaker 3: all the way through the southern border. It's life threatening.

413
00:23:36,960 --> 00:23:40,439
Speaker 3: People know that. But then you take that and compare

414
00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:43,320
Speaker 3: it to the option of a CBP one app where

415
00:23:43,359 --> 00:23:46,479
Speaker 3: you can make this same claim without having to do

416
00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:48,080
Speaker 3: all of that. You just show up at the app

417
00:23:48,119 --> 00:23:51,080
Speaker 3: appointment at the Board of Entry, or you can get

418
00:23:51,119 --> 00:23:54,640
Speaker 3: parole for the parole program, or you know that if

419
00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:56,720
Speaker 3: you do cross the border illegally, you have to do

420
00:23:56,800 --> 00:23:59,560
Speaker 3: the record heat and you'll be put in this expedited

421
00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:03,040
Speaker 3: removal programs and you might not be able to qualify

422
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:06,560
Speaker 3: for asylum anyway. All those things are being weighed at

423
00:24:06,560 --> 00:24:09,520
Speaker 3: a point where we're now talking about for the first

424
00:24:09,520 --> 00:24:12,320
Speaker 3: time in a long time, first time since I would

425
00:24:12,359 --> 00:24:17,400
Speaker 3: say twenty fifteen. That doesn't count the COVID months where

426
00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:22,080
Speaker 3: we're legitimately at eighty ninety thousand people per month, which

427
00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:25,080
Speaker 3: is a lot less than the two hundred thousand a

428
00:24:25,080 --> 00:24:27,920
Speaker 3: month we were seeing just you know recently, and so

429
00:24:28,359 --> 00:24:31,200
Speaker 3: we have some pretty dramatic reduction here.

430
00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:34,480
Speaker 1: There's certainly a lot of legal action about the southern

431
00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:37,480
Speaker 1: border lately. Thanks so much for being on the show, Leon,

432
00:24:37,640 --> 00:24:42,600
Speaker 1: As always, I appreciate your immigration expertise. That's Leon Fresco,

433
00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:44,840
Speaker 1: a partner at Holland and Knight, and that's it for

434
00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:47,479
Speaker 1: this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can

435
00:24:47,520 --> 00:24:50,760
Speaker 1: always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law Podcast.

436
00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:54,080
Speaker 1: You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at

437
00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:59,280
Speaker 1: www dot bloomberg dot com slash podcast Slash Law, And

438
00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:02,399
Speaker 1: remember to to to The Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight

439
00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:05,919
Speaker 1: at ten pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso and

440
00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:07,440
Speaker 1: you're listening to Bloomberg