WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Leigh Ann Caldwell - Trump 2.0 Has Made Capitol Hill Irrelevant 

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's sponsorship time. But you know what, it's really great

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>when you get a sponsor that you already use. And

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>guess what. Quint's is something that in the Todd household

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we already go to. Why do we go to Quint's

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Because it's a place you go where you can get

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>some really nice clothes without the really expensive prices. And

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I've been going through is I've

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>transitioned from being mister cot and ty guy to wanting

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more casual but to look nice doing it.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Is I've become mister quarter zip guy. Well guess what.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Guess who's got amazing amounts of quarter zips? It is Quints.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I have gotten quite a few already from there. The

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff's really nice. They have Mongolian cashmere sweaters for fifty dollars.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I just know, hey, cashmere, that's pretty good. You don't

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>normally get that for fifty bucks or less. Italian wool

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>coats that look and feel like designer the stuff. I'll

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, right, you look at it online, you think, okay,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is this really as nice as it looks? Well, when

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I was like, oh, this is real quality.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm going to end up making sure I

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take it to my dry cleaner so I don't screw

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it up when I clean it. But I've been quite impressed.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>In Hey, it's holiday season. It is impossible to shop

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for us middle aged men. I know this well. Tell

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>your kids, tell your spouses, tell your partners. Try Quints.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're trying to figure out what to get

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your adult child, what to get your mom or dad,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you you're gonna find something that is going

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable for them on Quints. So get your

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>wardrobe sorted and your gift list handled with quints. Don't wait.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Go to quins dot com slash chuck for free shipping

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>on your order and three hundred and sixty five day

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>returns now available in Canada as well. That's qui nce

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash chuck, free shipping and three hundred and

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck. Use

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that code. Well, joining me now for a little end

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Where the hell is Congress headed? Next

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is a good conversation with my friendly and Caldwell. She's

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the chief should the correspondent for Puck, which is more

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and more becoming a must read these days, Puck one

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of my Yeah, it's one of my look in this

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>day and age of independent you know, where we have

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people questioning corporate owned media, shareholder controlled media,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>all of that nonsense. Independent owned news operations, I think

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>are should be having a moment, and let's just say

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Puck's having a moment. How do you enjoy it?

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>I love it. It's great. Actually, it's a good place

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to work. I get to cover what I want to cover. No, yeah,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 2>it's it's great. It's I don't really.

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Have You've been at the Washington Post at NBC. Right,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't get more mainstream media than that. You and

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I got to know each other at NBC.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hired me at NBC.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I hired Well. I wasn't going to be so presumptuous,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>but I'd like to think I had good judgment here.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>What how do you answer the question of, hey, what's

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the difference between LeAnn called Well the reporter for Puck

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and Leanne called Well, the reporter for NBC and the

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post. How do you answer that question?

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my gosh, that's that No one's actually asked me

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>that question in that way. I would say, there is

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>not actually a lot of difference in my and how

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I approach my job specifically. I am still covering the hill,

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>still covering politics. I think what is different is that

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I have changed my focus completely away from the incremental

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and I now think more deeply about the impacts of

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>what's happening on the hill. I think about the big

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 2>picture a lot more, and I really get to lean

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>into kind of the conversations that are happening behind the

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>scenes instead of what everyone is just saying publicly. You know.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>So I think that rather than my approach, it's more

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of the angle that's different.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I sort of answer it very similarly. I'll say,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, look it, I don't have to worry about

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the busy work of Washington reporting. And what do we

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>mean by the busy work of art? Look what you

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just described as incrementalism, like what time is this brief

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and going to be? Is this going to happen the

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>next tomorrow or the next day? All important information that

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>major news organizations it might be planning planning specials around it,

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or planning coverage or trying to These are all important

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>things that you know, people didn't really understand that part

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>of our job is when I was Chief White House correspondent,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I felt it a lot more there than I did

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously meet the press. But which was and you certainly understood,

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>which was the amount of logistics an operational information we

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had to spend our time gathering in order to help

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and again all necessary for the larger organization. And I'm

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not you know, oh the president, you know, take the

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>presidential address. Well, suddenly I would have been working with

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>our executives. What what are they looking for? What time?

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>How much are they asking for? And it's like suddenly

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>half my day is being chewed up by this logistical thing.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like at home spending half your day

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>on hold with the cable company while you're trying to

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out how you're getting, you know, how they're going

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>to come over to fix something, to not have to

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>you know that was there are times that that would

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be thirty percent of your job.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Right absolutely, yes, yes, because you have to as you

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 2>well know, there's this production element that you have to

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 2>be that the network needs and so you know, and

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>my job as a reporter, of.

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Course, you and I are a questioning do they need it?

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, the amount I mean, I think that's

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing, Like, I mean, I didn't mean to cut

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you off there, but it's like, yes, if you think

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>through if you think about the network through the prism,

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the older prism, then yeah, it makes sense. When you

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think about how consumers get information, it made no sense.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I mean that's that's an absolutely great point.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>And also it's like, you know, from a reporter standpoint,

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 2>it was a lot of making sure you had what

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 2>someone else had, and so there was very little ability

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 2>to do original thought because it was always making sure

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 2>that everyone, every network or every outlet was in the

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>same place jaistically with the content.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And oh, well, that's an important it's an important point.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me put a put a signpost on that wall.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Street journal is reporting that there's going to be a

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>vote tomorrow on the ACA subsidies. Hey, Leanne, can you

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>go check that out? Is it tomorrow? Right?

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Like you're like, can you confirm that?

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes? And it's like yeah, and maybe in the maybe

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>confirming that information might get you another piece of information

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that can't help your reporting. Don't get me wrong, Like

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>doing that was a totally useless exercise, you know, because

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you were then suddenly all right, well maybe you know

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what else can you tell me? And then suddenly you're like, Okay,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>now I learned a little bit something else. But if

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>people wonder why the mainstream media sounds like group think, well,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's because all of our bosses are constantly asking us

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>could we're constantly asking us to confirm everybody else's stories

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and that it would be kind of a circle jerk sometime.

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Totally. That's exactly what I tell people, you know, when

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>you they ask a different version of the question you

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>asked me. No one at PUCK has ever said, can

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>you can affirm this? Like not once it's been It's amazing.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I have spent zero time confirming other people's reporting.

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about Congress this year. There are days

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you think, oh my god, the sky is falling, and

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there are days you're like, yeah, this is just another

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>day in the life at Congress, and you know this

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is is this your fifth year covering Capitol Hill?

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>No? Oh my godcha longer than that.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Everything, the time space time continuum is just done for me.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>With Covidney right the day after Trump got elected first term.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 2>So what's that?

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost about nine years, So you're nine years,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>nine years you've been covering the Hill nine years. I

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>could sit here and say you've covered a more dysfunctional

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>version of Congress than when I started covering Capitol Hill

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety three and ninety four going through there.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet there were veterans back then who'd say, oh,

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea, you're covering a very this Gingrich era,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so dysfunctional. Da da da da da. Right, like every

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there's always I'm mindful of the following fact everybody thinks

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they're time covering Congress specifically is the there's never been

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a time like this, And there's truth to that, right

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that we are sort of increasingly like out each Congress

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>outdues the previous one in its dysfunctionality. So you've done

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it nine years, So you walk me through your nine

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>years of dysfunctionality.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me just say I'm gonna expand that a

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit. A lot of people do blame the Gingrich

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>years for like going off the cliff. So I guess

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you were there at the beginning of what people now

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's real.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what the Gingrit's apologists would say, It started

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with Jim Wright, and it started with the Democrats in

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty six when they insisted on seating that's called it's

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this fight called the Bloody Eighth, Indiana's eighth congressional district.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>A recount indicated that the Republican won. The Democrats didn't

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>accept the recount, and they literally seeded the Democrat even

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>though the recount had So the point is is that

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just like the judiciary wars, Terry Read's fault, It's

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>bitch mcconno's fault. Guess what, guys, you all, you all

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>broke it and you all have to pay the pottery

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>barn Bill.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. So the past nine years during Trump, I guess,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, Trump and then Biden and then Trump again.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Now it's just you know, first four years of Trump,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the story was what everyone how every Republican secretly hates Trump.

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Like the story would always be, can you react to

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>whatever Trump tweeted it was Twitter back then, or whatever

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>he said, and people would start to say, oh, I

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't see it, you know, try to dodge, but it

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 2>was there was so little respect for the man, and

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that was always the story. Now and this Trump era,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I almost feel like what people say about Trump behind

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the scenes doesn't even matter because they are doing whatever

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 2>he wants publicly, handing away you know, so much of

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>their congressional authority to Trump. Even if they don't like

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 2>it and they complain about it, they're doing it and

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>that's what matters, you know. The the first Trump term,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:43.599
<v Speaker 2>of course, we went through an impeachment, all the investigations

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>January sixth, which I was there for. Uh, and it that,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, all of that has changed Congress so much,

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the lack of trust between the part parties. People just

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 2>really don't like each other, you know, of.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Course, and it's no longer theater. It used to be theater. Yeah,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. Boy, let me tell you Tom Cole

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>he gets along with everybody, and he may still get

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>along with everybody right by the way, for what he's

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>probably right. Everybody loves Tom Cole. You know, he's too

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't know how to be mean, which you know,

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, you would hear it seemed

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>more theater than not. And now it seems real, like

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff's personal.

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>It feels well, yeah, it's it's very personal. And it's

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 2>not just for the member level too. The staffs don't

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>really like each other like and that's like another layer

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>where the staffs. You know, everyone kind of got the joke.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And now, for the most part, there are very few

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 2>people who hang Republicans who hang out with Democrats and

0:12:58.559 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 2>vice versa. Yes, there are some.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that just is that a generational phenomenon. I've gotten

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense that the younger congressional staffers are a bit

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>more are well, I mean they were, they were They've

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>learned politics in the social media era, which is a

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>very which is to me, a very awful way to

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have learned politics. But they they sort of believe that

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>their counterparts are what the social media caricature has created

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of them.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I think that. I think that there is

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 2>a lot of generational component to that. The people who

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 2>have been there for a very long time, you know.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Still they know how to still like work with the

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>other side, or at least at least they know somebody

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they can work with on the other side.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, totally. And there's like the appropriators, you know,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>they have to work with each other, et cetera. But

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>it's just, you know, January sixth did a lot a

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of damage, and it took years for it to

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of get back to a base level. And then

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>now It's just I think that the Congress story is,

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, how diminished of an institution will Congress be

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>by the end of Trump's first term. You know, I

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>always question what if Mike Johnson's legacy is, if that's

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>what it's going to be, if he's just going to

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of hand over the keys to the capital to

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the president.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was interesting. We were you know, we've gone

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>through these fits and starts of strong speakers and week speakers.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a strong speaker, Tom Foley was a week

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Jim Wright. Tom Jim Wright wanted to be a strong speaker.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It sort of got him out, It sort of cost

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>him the speakership. Fully was a week speaker. Gingrich was

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a strong speaker. Then we had hasted extraordinarily weak speaker.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Very much more in the lines of the Mike Johnson right, Uh,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi brought strength again to the speakership, and then it

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of was trying to encourage Bayner wanted to be

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a strong speaker. He got thrown out for being one. Right,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Ryan wanted to try to you know, he was trying

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to it sort of re establish the speakership. It all,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it sort of arguably why he left slash

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>cost him his role. So I agree with you on Johnson,

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know whether I mean, I think he's

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go down as probably an even weaker speaker

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>than Dennis Aster. I think it's just saying something.

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so. I mean, especially how this Congress,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>this session of this Congress ended up.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>We're not and we're not done, right, Like, I mean

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this Congress, you know, this.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Year of this Sea Congress. Yeah, right, and the last

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>week was tumultuous.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, and it's been tumultuous arguably for the last two months. Right.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>There was that day where you had a party on

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>party crime, right, you had the Democrats trying to censure

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>another Democrat. Republicans were met. I mean, it seemed I

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was talking with Mike Turner the day after it happened,

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, he said, the only thing missing were

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the canes, you know, where they were just going to

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>start like actually physically assaulting each other. But that, I mean,

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the damage Johnson did to the Institution by keeping them

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>away during the government shutdown, I mean that turned out

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to be just a massive miscalculation by his part, wasn't it.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he literally wrote the Institution irrelevance and it I

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>was shocked at the number of Republicans who were okay

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>with it, but it proved it. Yeah, it proved to

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 2>be a massive mistake. They are going to come out

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>as being extremely unproductive. They could have been working on

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>other things. They're way behind, and it just broke a

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of trust within the party because one thing, a

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 2>couple of Republicans actually during that process had said to

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>me that one of the things that happens, especially like

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>during a government shutdown, and you know, the leaders aren't

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 2>talking to each other and everything stalemated, but then it's like,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, all the rank and files they're bored, and

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 2>so they start talking to each other and they're like,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>we're over this. Let's not that their bipartisan plans ever

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 2>become reality, but they're talking. Starts to put pressure on leaders,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and he completely eliminated that aspect of what legislators want

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 2>to feel is like they are having some sort of

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 2>input or say or impact, and he negated that entire

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 2>underspoken element of what the shutdown and what just kind

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 2>of like the day to day job is.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So, why do I think we are underplaying the possibility

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of another shutdown? In January. Why do we assume there

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>won't be one. It feels like to me all the

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ingredients are there for another shutdown in January.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that based on my discussions with Democrats so far,

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>very preliminary, but they feel like they came out so

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 2>much on top of the last shutdown. They completely changed

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the narrative to healthcare, obviously an issue that they are

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>very comfortable with, and Republicans, as we see, cannot just

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a mess, yeah, not deal with and so the risk

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of another shutdown the base might get mad, but the

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>risk of another shutdown could absolutely like eliminate all of

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>this goodwill with voters that they have built up by

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 2>fighting quote fighting for health care.

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother, single mother, now widow, myself

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>require you just answer a few health questions online. You

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>can get a quote in as little as ten minutes,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, and some policies start as low as two

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>quot at ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is something you should really think about it,

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if you've got a growing family. Let me ask

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it this way, though, do they everything that they've gained

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>by sounding the alarm about healthcare at the time? Right

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole? Though? You know, in theory, why did they

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Why did they instigate the shutdown to sound the alarm

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on healthcare subsidies? So if we still don't have if

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we have an alarming problem on healthcare premium skyrocketing, which

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be, and already being quoted on huge

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>prices for people, how do you not do whatever it

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>takes in January when there's an opportunity to essentially corner

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the Republican majority to get them you know, the point

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is do you just want the issue or do you

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>want to put it, you know, force them to deal

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with this problem? Now?

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think Democrats absolutely want the issue. It's

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>good politics for them. You know, they would never say

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>that or admit it, but they do know that the

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>issue helps them. But there is actually some I think

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>overly optimistic belief that there are some chances for some

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan agreement and anyway, I.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Think something's coming. I do, well, this is a I

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>think that is coming. But b I think you have

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to use the threat of a shutdown to get it done.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that they, you know, maybe they

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 2>go there. Like I said, it's it's it's early. They

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>definitely do not want people to start, any of their

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 2>members to start threatening a shutdown right now, because then

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 2>they look like arsonists and and so, you know, obviously

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 2>it's very much it's very much a possibility. I personally,

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they're going to do it. I

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 2>think that they're too risk averse to do it.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But I expected Trump to flip on this and he hasn't.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>He's digging in and he dug in again last night,

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's like I, I, you know, there's a part

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of me that's you know, it sits there and says, well, yeah,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to you. I would beat up the insurance

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>companies too, like why do we want to give more

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>money that? But then my response, my follow up is

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the alternative system to insurance companies? Mister president? Right, Like,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the problem the Republicans have, Well, we don't

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>want to subsidize insurance companies. How else are we giving

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>people healthcare?

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? No, you're going to give them money to the

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>people instead, but you still have to pay the insurance company.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Right like the people, right, not of it. Really, it

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>feels like a great it feels good to say it.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to give it directly to the insurance companies.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to give it to you to give directly

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to the insurance companies.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 2>I know. I was actually surprised too, because there's the

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 2>populis strain in the Republican Party that Trump purportedly believes in,

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>which we all know he doesn't.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 1>That.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Thinks that these Obamacare subsidies need to be extended, at

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 2>least for now, until there's another plan or whatever. You know.

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Josh Holly is one of those people who's really been

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 2>pushing it, and I thought that he was going to

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 2>give into but he did not, And I you know,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'm.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, it's his own polster telling everybody that

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a disaster in the making.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Yah.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It's Tony Fabrizio that has been sounding this alarm, which

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is why I expected him to flip.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, yeah, no, I was gonna say. But I think

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>that I'm only speculating here, But you know, I think

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of it has to do with the

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 2>fact that it is Obama Care, that there is a

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of disdain for anything Biden. I mean, his whole

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 2>presidency so far has been undoing what Biden did, and

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 2>he obviously hates Barack Obama and so not wanting to

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>prop up something that his predecessor did and like creating

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>this healthcare system, and that that is a big that's

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a big issue on the Hill too. A lot of

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 2>a reason I've been told by multiple Republicans that they

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 2>were so resistant for extending these subsidies is because fifteen

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>years ago they vowed to never do anything to support

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the Affordable Care Act, and that stance from you know,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 2>almost two decades ago is staying with them now. So

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you could say, regardless of what the Affordable Care Act

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>issue is, so there's some Republicans who will not do anything.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So basically, while Donald Trump thinks everybody's got Trump Arrangement syndrome,

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is that there are a lot of

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who still have Obama derangement syndrome.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, yeah, absolutely.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>That ultimately is the virus that has not been cured.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, I mean, and actually Josh Holly will say

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 2>that on the record too. He'll say, look in these

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 2>private meetings, the closed door meetings with Senate Republicans, there

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 2>are just people who are so dug in on anything

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 2>anti Obamacare that they just won't even consider it.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It really is such an intell it's such an intellectual, intellectual,

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>dishonest argument, right, because what Obamacare turned out to be

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was was essentially not government health care, but government support

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>supporting a market based system that was essentially run by

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. Because what Democrats wanted to do they

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't because the insurance companies made it clear that they

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>were going to destroy any you know, they just you

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, Clinton tried to take the insurance companies out

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of this. Well, guess what, right it just they lost

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that argument. And the irony is that this was a

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this was a Heritage Foundation idea that Mitt Romney put

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Massachusetts that Bama Obama ends up implemating. I mean,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the anger that these Republicans have had an idea that

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>was originally incubated at the Heritage Foundation when it was

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an actual conservative think tank and not what it's turned

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>into in the last year or two is is still

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like this this ironic pill that none of them seem

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to want to want to admit to.

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Take and admit yeah, because remember Obamacare, the compromise is

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 2>what Democrats wanted was a single payer plan and this

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 2>is the best that they could get. They literally, like

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you said, and.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>You know what Trump wants. What Trump has been advocating

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is a form of a single payer plan. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he actually had. Anytime he talks about it, it's the

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>closest you know, he comes to. You know, it is

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is amazing to me how often that

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they messed this up, right, Like, you know, look, Democrats

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>seem to be allergic to border security. Right, there is

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>just some right you see it. You know, sometimes you're like,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>how is it that you guys don't see that the

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>public is pro immigration, legal immigration, but wants some border security.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Like it's okay to lead with that. It's the same

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thing with Republicans and there it's there's something right, like

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>both parties have this, and to me, these are the

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>two issues that do the right where they don't think straight.

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>They never think like the average person. They're so dug

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in on a specific piece of their you know, their

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>rationale for obstructing on that issue that they can't acknowledge another.

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Part of this, you know, yeah, I mean it's a

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>great This is an issue that is obviously confounded Republicans

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 2>for decades. I mean, this is a hard issue. It

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 2>took Democrats really, I mean, you know, Hillary Kinkin, like

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you said, had her plan that didn't go anywhere.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>If you if you're going to let the private sector

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with healthcare, there, you know the system is going

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to always look this gobbledly good. You know, we're allergic

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to government run stuff here, right, unless it's so security,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>unless it's better, you know, but it is, you know,

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they're all I am surprised that Trump didn't just expand

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Medicare and call it trump Care.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean he could have brought it down to fifty plus,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>said no to the subsidies, but brought that down to

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus, that letting people buy into Medicare at fifty

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>years old, rather than the you know, you'd had Democrats

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>supporting that idea. I mean, like there was a way

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for them to put their own Yeah, there's a way

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to put their own signature on this in a way

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that could you know, that would appease certain parts of

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the left, absolutely, but would also make up for a

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more sensible system that actually business wouldn't hate well.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>And also that's why during the government shutdown, Democrats I

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>thought it was kind of lame at first or dumb

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>at first that they were so focused on what Trump

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 2>was saying and what Trump was going to do. But

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I came to realize towards the end that Republicans couldn't

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>do anything without Trump, and so they put all of

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>their focus on and well, what, you know, what is

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump gonna do? And when Trump, you know, didn't come

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 2>out in support of, you know, the bipartisan efforts, then

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they knew it was just it was just it was

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 2>just done. But you know, I think that this also

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 2>gets into which I wrote about for Sunday, is how

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 2>little Trump thinks about Congress in the sense of he

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't think any more legislation needs to come through the Hill.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 2>He said in October that he's done with legislating. He

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>said it again in December, He's done. They don't need

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>another bill. And you know, Trump just thinks that he

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>can do everything that matters through executive order. And the

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 2>reality is that Republicans cannot get anything through Congress without Trump,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and so they're in this position where they need the president,

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>but the press resident is done with them. He got

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>his tax extenders, he got his money for immigration enforcement,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and he was able to reverse like all the clean

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>clean energy stuff through the one big, beautiful bill. And

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 2>so there's nothing else that he cares about on the Hill.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's not going to be another reconciliation, huh.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean members of Congres like Speaker Johnson says that

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 2>there he's going to try. He wants one, other members

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 2>of Congres, other Republicans want it, but if Trump's not involved,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>they can't get it. That's why healthcare fell apart, is

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 2>because Trump completely absent.

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's because you know, I've been calling Mike Johnson

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a Spino speaker in name only.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, yes, you know.

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I keep I keep hoping this will, you know, the

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>way Scotis and Potus takes off Rhino and Dino Spino

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right speaker, And I keep waiting for that to to

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>get some traction. But it is, it's up to Trump

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and there so if Trump's got I mean, the only

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>thing he wants from Congress, I'm guessing is him is

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a Congressional order changing the name of the Kennedy Senator

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Trump Kennedy Center, right, like that that that's

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>about all he would care about getting out of Congress.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean look at the look at the

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 2>military pay that he announced.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>That's money that was already appropriated to the Defense Department.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's discretionary. It's essentially discretionary housing allowance, right.

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, And he is claiming that it's tariff revenue money.

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.479
<v Speaker 2>He's not even admitting that Congress passed this because like

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>he just is not.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not the first president to try to

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>take something that was already done and put a new

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>label on it and stamp it. Hey, look at I've done, right, Like,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, oh, we're giving the military extra money. Well

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>let's call it my pay raise, you know, or my bonus.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Or right totally. But like, why don't you just say,

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 2>look at what we passed or whatever, rather than say

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>it's from tariff revenue, which actually is a I don't

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>know why he would say it anyways, because then he'd

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 2>have to take them, well, repay their tariff money if

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court rules.

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So this gets to a question about the next six months,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's interesting, you don't think there's really much legislating

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen other than what they have to

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the have to stuff that we're not going to see

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>an a want twos. Okay, Well, one of the half

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>twos that might come is if the Supreme Court rules

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the way most of us expect the Supreme Court rule

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the president's tariff authority or lack thereof, and he

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>will need you know, in theory, he has appliant appliant House,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at least a House Republican conference that I think in

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>probably he can get anything out of them. Senate's going

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a harder lift on tariffs. I mean, I

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>think we all know that. Does that not change his

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>tune about the necessity of and he would want reconciliation

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on terif authority because you know, he needs to afford

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to lose Republican votes on those.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yes, So I had heard from you know,

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 2>outside from lobbyists who say that they are already considering

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>like how to go to Congress for for how to

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 2>pass the tariffs. I you know, I don't even know

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 2>if House Republicans will do it, though.

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Check.

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that as polling is continuing to as polling

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 2>is suggesting that people are starting to tie tariffs with

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 2>high costs. These Republicans who are facing voters in you know,

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 2>a few months from whenever this tariff decision comes out,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I just don't see them giving Trump like blanket authority

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 2>to continue this tariff regime. Definitely in the Senate and

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>even in the House, we'll see. But I just I

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 2>really think that, you know, outside circumstances are going to

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 2>dictate this, the play circumstances and the economic circumstances. But

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 2>if things are how they are now, I'm not sure

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 2>if even they'd be on board.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, I do expect the White House to find other

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean even the President has sort of hinted, he goes, well,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if they take it away, I've got other ways to

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>do this. But it will be harder, and it will

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be more complicated, and it will get in the way

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of his so called deal making that he's done, that's

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So if if if there really isn't going

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to be much legislating, then how many more retirements are

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know? I mean to me, that's the that's going

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the the the story of the next three weeks,

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>right is how many members decide over the holidays. I'm out,

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm done.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know. So I wrote and reported a couple

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago that people were Republicans were really bracing

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:55.919
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of retirements.

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>What is a lot another dozen?

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was told at least twenty.

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Another twenty. We already are at a fairly Look this

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is we're in the higher end of the retirements. It's

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near the all time record, but we're at the

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>higher end. Another twenty would put us in an all

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>time situation.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we'll see if that plays out. I was

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 2>told that obviously a lot of these people are still

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 2>making their decisions but serving, you know. And the Republicans

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that some of the Republicans I talked to, they were like, look,

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>don't don't don't make this a a that most of

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 2>these people are from safe seats really or maybe that

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 2>second or third tier competitive seat, but it is an

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 2>indictment on what it's like to serve in Congress right now?

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to put up if you have any

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of familial strife or member is sick, or there's

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, things going on in your family that's not perfect,

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 2>in your life that's not perfect, Why would you do

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>this like in a when The job is fun when

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 2>you're successful, when you're passing legislation, you can overcome that stuff.

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>But then you're you start to weigh things differently, and

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm told that like the Texas Republicans are,

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 2>and of course the California Republicans are just pissed. They

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 2>are mad about the redistricting effort.

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We're mad at the White House and Johnson. Right, they're

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>somehow mad that Johnson can't tell the President no, that's

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess what they're mad at him at right.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, they are not standing up for them, especially

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 2>on the redistricting effort. Even though some of these seats

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 2>were made safer for Republicans. People don't like to.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>But they're new districts. You have to be.

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 2>New with new lines and meet new people and fundraising.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is one of those perfect storms. The times

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 1>that we've had record breaking retirements are when we've had

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>both an unpopp the majority party is in the White

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>House and it's unpopular, coupled with a reapportionment. Right, it's

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a redistricting year. Nineteen ninety two is one of the

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety four cycle sort of was a big one on

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that both ninety two and ninety fourths or two cycles

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in a row, and here we are in a mid decade.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's both an unpopular majority party that they're facing,

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of the typical six year itch type

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of mindset, and it happens to there's a whole bunch

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of redistricting that happened, and so you don't want to

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you already fighting an uphill battle, and you know, do

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I really I know I'm in a fifty nine percent district,

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but fifty nine percent districts might be swing districts. I

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have to raise ten million dollars.

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 2>This cycle, right, totally, totally. And one member from a

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 2>swing district, you know, said that they're going to have

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 2>to raise tens of millions of dollars for you know,

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 2>they're in a big media market whatever. But you know,

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 2>they just said that they're race could be a sixty

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>million dollar race for not you know, total, but for

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a district, which is which is mind boggling these days.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you know, I've never been like a

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>huge the whole money in politics thing like I've I've

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I've I empathized with those that fight, you know, that

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>are in that advocacy world, and it's just like, hey man,

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>money in politics, it's just you're never going to you know,

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>get rid of it. But but you do. You're like, Okay,

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this is getting crazy because North Carolina Senate, it's probably

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be our first billion dollar centuri one billion

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with a B. Main's going to be six hundred million

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is an estimate. Maine, Okay, Like no, ma, right, and

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it like you're going to buy Boston to get the

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>tiniest piece of like of the southern tier of Portland. Right,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it is we are we have hit absurd levels on

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>money where if you don't have access to rich people,

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't run for office. And that is where suddenly

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>when Bernie Sanders runs around saying oligarchy, you're like, well,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I how do you, holse? Do you what do you

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>call it? Where everybody that runs for office has to

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have a rich person on their side in order to win.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or be rich. It's you know, I was talking

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to a couple members the other day and they said

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 2>that now fifty percent of their time is spent fundraising.

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I mean, I don't even know how

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 2>you find the time. You barely sleep, But that is

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 2>just miserable to have to sit there and call people

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and call people, and you know, and there's a point

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of everyone admits that there's a point of diminishing returns,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 2>that too much money actually stops working, but you still

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>have to raise it, and you still have to spend it.

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, well, say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social bus uzz without the

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>next day regret. Their best selling Out Office gummies were

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe. From a

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro doose to their newest

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.919
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THHD and CBD products all designed

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine. So

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, SOL also

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy Gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep.

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Soul today. Right now, SOL is offering my audience thirty

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order. So go to get sold

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code.

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>That's get sold dot Com promo code toodcast for thirty

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>percent off. And all those donors, you know, it's funny

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>now the million dollar donor thinks, hey, I give a

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, I expect some I expect something I expect,

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, And the average member of Congress going, yeah,

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll jump, I'll uh, I'll jump if you're

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a ten million dollar donor. But a million dollar donors,

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a get you know, I joke. I give a

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit of money to the nursery of Miami Athletic Department.

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I also give money to my alma Monter GW basketball.

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I give less GW basketball, but they're more grateful because

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a It's a smaller pool, right when you're part

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of you think you think you're giving a lot of money,

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, yeah, there's there's fifty people ahead of

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you that give all the you know, and they going

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to get the priority, and they're going to get the

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>attention and they're going to get the love and affection

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of that stuff. So a million dollars doesn't

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>even buy what it used to buy anymore when it

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 1>comes to donors, which is just perverted. I'm sorry, just

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>perverting the system. The system's already a mess.

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, then Trump has, you know, a billion dollars of

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 2>his own money that he could spend to help House

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Republicans keep the majority. He hasn't yet. He has said

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that he will help, but they have not yet gotten

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 2>a commitment as to how much, how what that's going

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to look like. And I'm really interested. I don't know

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the answer to this yet, but I'm really interested, Like,

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 2>is he going to spend a bunch of money to

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 2>try to primary state senators who don't go along with redistricting,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 2>which will have no impact on control of the House.

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But no, you're probably just dividing your own party and

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just making it that much harder to have a good

0:43:58.640 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>mature Yeah.

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely. And you know, and getting back to the

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 2>lack of legislating. Trump is so determined to keep control

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>of the House that he unleashed this entire bloody redistricting

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 2>war for what not to legislate because he does not

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 2>want to get impeached again.

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Like, so, what's the likelihood of that? I mean, I

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>find it.

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 2>I think I think it's low.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I think it's I can't think of

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a dumber idea for House Democrats in the seventh year

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of Trump being in president of the United States to

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>impeach him. I mean, look, I'm not saying you might

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>have grounds to do it. I'm not saying to me,

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>if if the next group, if if people want to

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>impeach him, let the Republicans impeach him.

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I agree, And I think that it's I

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 2>think that Democrats aren't going to do it. We'll see

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 2>what Trump does. But yeah, so he's operating. Trump is

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 2>operating out of this PTSD from his first term in

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 2>these impeachments, and that's why he wants to prevent Democrats

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 2>from winning the House has nothing to do with his

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>agenda or his goals or what he wants to do

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 2>for the country.

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, of the let's talk about the four leaders, Yeah,

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Johnson Jeffrey Schumer. Soon, let's start with who I think

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>are the two most unpopular within their own party these

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>days for a variety of reasons. Johnson on the Republican side,

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Schumer on the Democratic side. Who's more likely to return

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>as leader of their of You know, in this case,

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Johnson might be the minority leader, but he would still

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be the leader if Republicans lose the House come January fourth,

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty seven. I mean, who's still going to be there,

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Schumer or Johnson?

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Schumer I don't think he'll be there, Yeah,

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and Johnson won't Yeah. I mean, of course, it all

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 2>will depend on the outcome of the.

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Miss Johnson only come back if they somehow hold the House.

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. If they lose the House, I think that

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be a huge shake up in leadership.

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>On likelihood that Johnson seeks reelection, so.

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 2>He'll serve you know for twenty eight you mean, no,

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I think for you think he definitely runs through re

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 2>election this cycle, right, I think he definitely runs.

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Because that would send does he because remember Paul Ryan

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>announced in April, right of eighteen he wasn't coming back. Yeah,

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't expect something like that from Johnson.

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't. Johnson thinks way too highly of himself and

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 2>his ability to bow out. Now. Yeah, I think he's

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 2>in it for this cycle. I think that if Republicans

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>lose the House, you know, they lose that slot, and

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 2>so there's not a spot for him unless he becomes

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 2>leader minority leader. But then there's that's the person. I

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know if he's going to run for reelection as Scalise.

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a higher probability of not than Johnson.

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:08.359
<v Speaker 2>For sure.

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>He's already found out he's never gonna be speaker, yea, right,

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he learned that the hard way in his was he

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>six hours that he tried to get the votes. Was

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that what it was about, right, like, okay, go ahead,

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you get about six hours so you can get the

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>votes and get the votes. Okay, let's move on.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, yeah, he's not going to be speaker. He

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 2>just hasn't. He doesn't have the allies among the conference

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that you need. He has made a lot of people angry.

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 2>And then who does.

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Who would be Is there a committee chair? In fact,

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is there a committee chair that just gets shipped done

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Republican side that would be like like I

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>remember one of the reasons, but Bob Livingston was supposed

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the person to replace kingrig and the reason

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>was I think he was on ways and me just

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, he gets stuff done, Like you know

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the idea that a committee chair that can get stuff done,

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>especially in a tough committee like ways and Means or

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>approbes or something like that, or even rules that it like, Okay,

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 1>if you know how to do that, then maybe you've

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>got the skill set to be to be Speaker or

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to be leader of the caucus. Who's the committee chair

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that knows what they're doing?

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Jim Jordan, He's He's he's the quiet, which is crazy

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that he's quiet if you know quiet, and that's why

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 2>he is subtle.

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>He's very He's going to give this one more college

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:36.439
<v Speaker 1>tries to be leader of the House Republicans.

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 2>In Yeah, So I think it's Jim Jordan. I think

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that Tom Emmer he has some enemies too, But he

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 2>really has a good relationship with the Freedom Caucus, and

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 2>so I think he could have a shot. He has

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 2>built he's like worked really hard to build that relationship

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 2>with Trump and so those are this just.

0:48:58.200 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Still shaky, though, isn't it.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I think it's gotten a lot

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>better this year, especially with he's the guy who kind

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of has to clean up Johnson's mess a lot, or

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 2>try to. And Richard Hudson, Yeah, you know Richard Hudson.

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's the one that I get, like, I hear good,

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I hear people don't have bad words to say about him,

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>whether they're mega or non mega.

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and everyone like really likes him. He's like a

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 2>fun person. I don't want the job, but but yeah,

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, I forgot about him actually, but yeah, he's

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:39.839
<v Speaker 2>someone that you can keep in mind. But as far

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 2>as like Schumer is concerned, you know Schumer, I do

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 2>not think he's running for reelection. No one on the hill,

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 2>no Democrat thinks he's running for reelection.

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine him doing it. Nobody have talked to

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>New York. I think people would be shocked if he did.

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>And I assume the only way he does is if

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 1>somehow Democrats get the Senate and he's a majority leader again,

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>then you might not want to give it up.

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think that's a possibility. But I

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 2>think that he's just like too damaged within the party,

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I think. But I think the reason he's going to

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 2>be leader after twenty six, you know, if they win

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the majority, then absolutely. If they don't, I think he'll

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 2>still be leader kind of let them.

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.879
<v Speaker 1>But there might be a real challenge if they don't, right,

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>especially if like that, Let's say Democrats win forty seats

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>again in the House. Yeah, right, it's a forty seat

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 1>pickup in the House, thirty to forty. The new forty

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>would be thirty. So let's say it's thirty, right, twenty

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>five to thirty, which I think is the highest end

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be, and Democrats only pick up two sentences, right,

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I imagine there's a little bit of do

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys know what you're doing, you know, with when

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:53.239
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Senate races, et cetera, et cetera.

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean there's already that people are mad about

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the primaries and the heavy handed of like Grandpaton, you know,

0:50:59.080 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 2>but there's.

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's about it is that where they're heavy handed

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is stupid, and where they're not heavy handed, it's stupid,

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Like like Texas, how did you let that happen? And

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>then you tried to get involved in Iowa and Maine,

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it makes no sense to have gotten involved in

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Iowa in particular, you know, I with Maine. I kind

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of get it now. How they how they how they

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>leak that. I just think the way they handled the

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>OPO on Platner was just stupid. They were like, look

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at all the fluff we got, you actually turned ament.

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>You wasted all of that ammunition, just completely just absolute

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>political research practice. It was stupid. I don't know who

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>made that decision. Was that a d SEC decision or

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a Janet Mills campaign decision? It was just stupid.

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I heard it was a DS decision. I don't I

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 2>you know again, I'm just every but I was I

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:55.439
<v Speaker 2>was told that, like the Janet Mills operation, like they're

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're good, you won governor, but they're not

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.760
<v Speaker 2>like they're not DS material.

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it really is DS is DS material. I'm sorry,

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>what proof has the DS been anything? Some of those

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>guys I love over there, and they've been good sources

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for me for decades. But that's the problem. I think

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that they still think everything looks like two thousand and

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:21.720
<v Speaker 1>six or twenty twelve. I just think that they've lost

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they've lost touch on where today's Democratic Party

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and today's swing voter is. And then there's conceding defeat

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in all of these light red states. They just are

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>conceding defeat. Where are they in Kansas? Where are they

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in Florida? Where are they in some of these states

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that they've got to put on the map even if

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't get to fifty.

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, there's obviously, I mean, you are just expressing

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the frustration with a Democratic caucus who was thinking the

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 2>exact same thing. But Jillibrand is an ally of Schumer.

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 2>She's a loyal soldier, and it's really Schumer who's running it. Obviously.

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, the fact that you don't see jail Brand ever

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.359
<v Speaker 1>speak about Center racist publicly, I mean she keeps a

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>very low profile. Yeah, it has always been right. It's

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting how low of a profile she's kept on this.

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it actually is. I hadn't even thought about that,

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 2>but it is, I think because my brain just always

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 2>goes to Schumer. I don't even didn't even realize it.

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Which is what makes the which was what made that decision.

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I would semi surprise that the rest of the Senate

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats wanted to concentrate all of that with the two

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:34.879
<v Speaker 1>New Yorkers.

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they didn't.

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Jeffries. He's going to get a shot

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at being speaker, it seems like. But there I feel

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:51.319
<v Speaker 1>like there's creeping doubts about whether he's got it, But

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody's going to challenge him per se if it's stepped

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in front of him, unless they somehow didn't win the House, right.

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:04.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that he is being given a very

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 2>long runway. But I will also say I feel like

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 2>last week, with the whole health care debacle in on

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the Republican side, that Democrats that that could be the

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 2>week that Haakim Jeffries became Speaker of the House. Like

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that maybe you can point and you know,

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll obviously see that happens in the next ten months.

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like that was a really critical week

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>for Jeffries. It his long shot messaging bill of a

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 2>three year extension of the Obamacare subsidies, which no one

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 2>had thought had any chance now has support from Republicans

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 2>because the Republicans messed it up so much. And you know,

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 2>throughout this process, some Democrats were telling me outside Democrats

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 2>were telling me that Jeffries had not been given enough

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 2>credit for the strategy. And I feel like they or

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 2>they feel like they are validated now. You know, Jeffries

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 2>has a lot of challenges.

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't envy. I think he's got the toughest job

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of anybody right now in leadership outside of Johnson. Johnson's

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 1>got his own, but he sort of he's he allows

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:18.360
<v Speaker 1>himself to be put in a box. Jeffries has got.

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>You know. Look, I think Jeffries and Schumer should take

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more incoming for for mismanaging the New York City mayors race,

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like just completely screwing up the Cuomo thing. You know

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.839
<v Speaker 1>how they mismanage that is to me on the two

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:35.760
<v Speaker 1>leaders of the Democratic Party both are from New York City,

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and they buried their head in the sand when Andy

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Cuomo decided that he was going to run. What the

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 1>f were they thinking? Right? Like, they just didn't It's

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 1>not about mom, Donnie, Mam Donnie. To me, is a

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>symptom of the mismanagement of the Cuomo situation.

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Well also totally. I mean, and the funny thing is

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is that Schumer and Cuomo have a horrific relationship. Schumer

0:55:57.800 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 2>like Yo Cuomo, and and the fact that yeah, and

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:06.760
<v Speaker 2>then they still didn't do more. So it was really

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 2>really mystifying I and that you never really got a

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 2>good answer about it. I will say that in my reporting,

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 2>New Yorkers didn't really care about what Humor did. It's

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 2>just like whatever, No.

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I get that, but it's not about the public perception.

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's about you want to be a leader of your party. Yeah,

0:56:28.360 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you should have jumped in front of the

0:56:31.719 --> 0:56:34.439
<v Speaker 1>freight train. That was Andy Quaman, say sorry, buddy, no

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and found a found a candidate and got behind somebody

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>else or done something differently maybe, you know, you could say.

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But the the way they they behaved as if they

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>were paralyzed by the situation.

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:50.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was. It was very very odd. And it

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 2>was the donors. It came down to the donors.

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And I guess, yeah, you know, you're right, Well that

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>tells you, right, And they sau out that Cuomo's the

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 1>only one that could be pro Israel anyway. I just

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is just sort of bizarre to me.

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you out of here on this is

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>John Thune the tallest little person? Or does he really

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>has he actually started to develop a power base and

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a power structure, I asked, because I've heard crankiness about Thune,

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they wish Thune. Would they miss Mitch McConnell

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 1>protecting them from tough volts and John. One thing John

0:57:32.160 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Thune won't do is sorry, guys, I'm not standing in

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the way of this vote that Trump wants, you know,

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>but the but he did shut down the the filibuster

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talk right getting of the filibuster, so that I assume

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 1>won him some plaudits. But where's the how would you

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:50.919
<v Speaker 1>assess Thunes? Uh hold on his position right now?

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Good? I think that that's why you see the least

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 2>amount written about Thune is because it's hard to come

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:01.600
<v Speaker 2>up with like a good story about Thune. People generally

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 2>like him. The filibuster was a huge test, will continue

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to be a huge test. The blue slips, I know

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Grassley is kind of leading that, but you know, some

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 2>other kind of disinstitutional stuff and also how the NRSC,

0:58:18.640 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 2>like how these primaries go there's some frustration that the

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 2>NRSC vis a vi fune is also not being tough

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 2>enough in some of these primaries, like in Texas.

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>No I could I could hear an argument. You know,

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think Cornyn was going to file because I

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:39.960
<v Speaker 1>thought he would feel pressure not to file. Yeah, because

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Pax didn't be in the nominee is a huge problem.

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's an absolutely huge problem. But he filed and

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 2>they yeah, they've really mismanaged that and they were unable

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 2>to keep Wesley Hunt out of the out of the race,

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and so, you know, it is it's a big test

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:07.920
<v Speaker 2>for thoone. It's interesting because McConnell in twelve and fourteen,

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 2>after fourteen, I think it was that's when he really

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 2>became involved in primaries and in the Purpople operation because

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 2>he was screwed so badly in the primaries and John

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Cornyn ironically was the NRSC chair in twelve and fourteen

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:28.040
<v Speaker 2>having to deal with, you know, taking a back seat

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 2>in these crazy primaries, and then McConnell stepped in after

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:34.720
<v Speaker 2>that and is like, no, I'm running this operation. So

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Dune hasn't seemed to do that yet, and people are

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of wanting him to put a little muscle. But

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:43.439
<v Speaker 2>that's really the biggest complaint I've heard.

0:59:44.080 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, Well, it's the best beat in Washington, still, isn't it?

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Leantes It is, Yes, it is.

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, It's always been my mantra. It's the best

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>beat in Washington, don't you know. Don't try to go

0:59:56.560 --> 0:59:59.160
<v Speaker 1>cover the White House. It sucks covered. The White House

0:59:59.240 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is born. Yeah, the Hill is awesome.

1:00:01.680 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Now the White House is more prestigious, but the Hill

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 2>is the best.

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where you actually find news. Let me get you

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>out of here on this. How do you describe when

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to tell people what Puck is that aren't

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>familiar with it, how do you describe it?

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I describe it as an email subscription newsletter. That the

1:00:26.680 --> 1:00:31.760
<v Speaker 2>easiest way to describe it, I tell say is it's

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 2>like a newer vanity fair, like a new version of vanity.

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Interesting because because there's you know, there's some culture, there's business,

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:48.959
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's even sports now, right, It's it's sort

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of the the look I like the idea of the

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>four Corners, Silicon Valley, New York, Washington, LA. Right, like

1:00:56.640 --> 1:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all of the cultural touchstones of America. That's sort of

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>make us, you know, uh, make things run. But it's

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a I get it, but I imagine it is sometimes

1:01:08.600 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to.

1:01:08.920 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Describe, right, Yeah, And that's why I say that because

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>also the writing, you know, the writing matters. They really

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>take a lot of we will take a lot of

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>pride in in the presentation. And I feel like I'm

1:01:23.600 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>writing a mini magazine piece every time I write. And

1:01:26.840 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 2>so it just you know, our editors, you know John

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Kelly who started it, the top editor. They both came

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>from Vanity Fair, like so many people grew up in

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that Vanity Fair heyday world, and so it's like a

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>modern version of that.

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Well it's funny you say Vanity Fair even though Vanity

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Fair was was a monthly and so didn't you know,

1:01:49.360 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I would argue what you what you guys, because I

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>agree it's that it reminds me more of the weekly

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>pieces that Time and Newsweek used to produce, that were

1:01:57.960 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>filled with because Time and Newsweek didn't have to worry

1:02:01.360 --> 1:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about the day to day Manu Shaw, they got to

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>take a step back and sort of have that. And

1:02:05.880 --> 1:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so to me, you most emulate Howard Feinneman from the nineties,

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>oh where, because Howard Fineman was the chief political correspondent

1:02:13.720 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for Newsweek, and he always sort of authored the big picture.

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Gibbs was the person that Time magazine, you know,

1:02:20.480 --> 1:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and she eventually became editor of Time, but she also

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>was you know, there were these who could write it,

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's tremendous skill and it is what I think smart,

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the way smart people want to consume this information.

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So well, thanks. Yeah, I think that it's like a

1:02:37.080 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 2>great niche and I think it was missing, especially in

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>this like you know, cable news, yeah, and punch Bowl

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>News of like every minute this is happening.

1:02:50.320 --> 1:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to bring up the there's two news

1:02:52.480 --> 1:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>organizations that should have been filling this vacuum and chose

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not to, and you used to work on one of them.

1:02:57.440 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll leave it there, Leah Caldwell, always a pressure.

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the holidays, enjoy your break.

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks you seek deck.

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

1:03:11.080 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason. Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing,

1:03:24.680 --> 1:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

1:03:27.560 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

1:03:34.320 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred fifty thousand dollars.

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So with more than one thousand lawyers across the country,

1:03:46.600 --> 1:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured,

1:03:49.320 --> 1:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer. You need somebody to get your back.

1:03:52.320 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Check out for the People dot com, Slash podcast or

1:03:55.480 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>dial pound law Pound five two nine law on your

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same,

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>unless they win