WEBVTT - Marathon’s Richards Predicts Asset-Based Lending Boom

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumby. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're very pleased to welcome Bruce Richards, chairman

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Marathon Asset Management, a twenty three billion

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar asset manager.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>How are you, Bruce, I'm doing well.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 3>Hello, James, Thank.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You so much for joining us today. We're really looking

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>forward to getting your take on credit markets and real estate.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Also delighted to see Bloomberg's very own Lisa Lee covering

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>credit markets from London. How's it going, Lisa.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 4>Going well here? Thank you so much.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>James, and our banks guru, Arnold Kakuda with Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>also here in the studio in New York. How's it going, Arnold?

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Awesome, excited to be here.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with you, Bruce. It's great to have

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you on the Credit Edge. You're a real estate bear,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to offices and all the debt

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that's outstanding. There's almost a trillion dollars of commercial real

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>estate loans coming due this year and banks are mostly

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on the hook. They hold a lot of those loans.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But recently we've heard FED Chair j Powell and Treasury

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Janet Yellen talking about commercial real estate risks, as

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>well as executives at regional banks and analysts. They're all

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>using the word manageable. It's going to be okay. What

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that, Bruce? Are they protesting too much?

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What's your take?

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a big subject, Tom, I think it is

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be okay. Christianity Jan's drawing the line in

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>the sand, and she said she's the facto made a

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>statement after March of last year that no deposit will

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>lose a penny, and indeed, no deposit will lose a penny.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>So the big banks have never been safer than what

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>they are today. I'm talking about the Big four and

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>also the largest banks here in the United States. But

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>as you know, there is more to it than that.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>And so when you peel back the Onion City, well

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>you see that the bigger banks have about ten percent

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>exposure of commercial real estate, and the smaller banks and

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the regional size banks have an average about forty percent

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 2>exposure to commercial real estate. That is a huge number

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>relative to their capital base. So let me point out

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>a few things. Number one is Bosle three endgame, or

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 2>what we call in other parts of the world Basil

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>four is going to start next summer, and they're not

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 2>going to push.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Out the data. I don't believe.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 2>And despite pal in his most recent statements having softened

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 2>up a stance and opened up the door to potentially

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 2>a little less capital requirement that might take you from

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>sixteen to twenty percent capital race increases down to round

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>ten to fifteen percent, but it's not going to push

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>up to date and it's not going to negate the

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>fact that you'll need more capital against risk assets.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>That's number one. And with that, banks.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>Will look to a do asset sales b uh DE

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>risk by raising more CT court tier one equity capital

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 2>that's both in the form of long debt as well

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 2>as equity, but mostly in the form of retained earnings

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to build that base, and they'll probably just lend a

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>little less and a little bit more selectively at more

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 2>conservative attachment points in terms of where the lt V

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 2>lending points are.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 3>So what we're seeing as result is a lot of

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>these SRT transactions and CRT Transactionally. Sr T is the

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>significant risk transfer uh the credit risk transfers as well.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Where banks are transferring their first loss or mezzanine trances

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>of their portfolio of loans to buyers like Marathon. And

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>so we've been very, very active dealing with the large

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>savvy banks in Europe and the large banks in the

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>United States and buying into these pools through CRT and

0:03:59.080 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 3>s r T.

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, last year alone, the European banks did two

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion of worth of portfolios of credit risk transfers

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>last year alone. And you know, in the September, you know,

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>just a few months ago, the feveral Lyster statement that

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 2>you talked about the SRT merits and complying with reg Q,

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>they basically blested here in the States, and so the

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>United States we've seen the banks really ramp up. And

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>so with BOSEL three endgames that just set to start

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>July next year, we believe that is a huge amount

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 2>probably for US banks, you know, you know that did

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.559
<v Speaker 2>thirty five billion last year upwards of one hundred billion

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 2>this year. And so I think, you know, we have

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 2>all the tools in the toolbox to make the banks safe.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>First of all, again, the biggest banks are perfectly safe,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>but it's the smaller banks than that you now want

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 2>to start to focus in on So in the United States,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have four thousand, two hundred banks here

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, four two hundred.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Just wrap your head around that for a second.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 2>So what do you have in Germany and France and

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 2>UK and Korea and Japan and Canada one hundred to

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 2>three hundred banks and we have four.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Thousand, two hundred.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, back in the nineteen eighties, before the SNL crisis,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 2>there was over fourteen thousand banks here in the United States,

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>fourteen thousand, and we're down to four thousand, four hundred.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So you obviously need you know, kind of the top four,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 2>but beyond the top four, or you can drill down

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to the top thirty, which are at the top thirty banks,

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 2>there's an exact number who have one hundred billion assets

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 2>for more. You obviously don't need those banks to be

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>strong and viable. But outside of that, do you need

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, twenty banks per state here in the

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>United States, which is one thousand banks.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So much information in that, and it's you know, that

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>opened up so many questions. But first of all, on

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the banks you mentioned, there are a lot of banks,

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe there are too many in the US. Do

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you expect bank failures as a result of this, commercial

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>real estates, mess, trouble, whatever you want.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>To call it.

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>And to what level does it go? Is it just

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 1>very small regional banks, is it like savings and loans,

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>or does it rise to a level of a much

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>larger institution.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I think now that the deposits have been backstopped by

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the Treasury Secretary at the ELM, which I thought was

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant move.

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Sorry I applaud her for that.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I think you're not going to have any run on deposits,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>So that takes a lot of risk off the table

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and panic off the table, and now it becomes just

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a matter of are you solvent or are you not solvent?

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>How many banks do I think are not solvent today?

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>My best guesstimate is around three hundred based upon and

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>these are small regional banks. There's over four thousand of them,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think anywhere around two to three hundred are

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>not solvent today. And I think if the fault rates

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 2>and commercial rows, they go up to ten percent, and

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>they've currently you know, just increased from two percent where

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>it was two years ago, actually less than two percent

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 2>just two years ago. To over six percent today. But

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>if they go to ten percent, which I think it

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>will be what they get to, I think that number

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>rises to four hundred. So what happens there, it's just

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>simply a resolution. The bank just gets wound down. It

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>won't be a panic, it'll just be FDIC comes in

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, takes over, the bank, sells off their assets,

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>transfers deposits, you move on. And so there's a lot

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 2>of cleanup that the regulators have to do.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 3>They know that.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>And so in the you know, National Bureau of Economic

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Research working paper series it just came out on c

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>e ORE and bank fragility, you know, it highlights this

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 2>exact this exact point talking about the forty percent exposure

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>that small and regional banks have to commercial real estate.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>So let's all about commercial real estate. I mean, you know,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, delinquency rates are up and property values are down,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and difically, when cap rates go up, you know, one

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred to one hundred and fifty basis points on a property,

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 2>then the value can decline twenty five to thirty percent,

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>and so all that extra you know, one hundred million

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>dollar properties, seventy million dollars loan, you decline thirty percent,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>there's no equity left, and so there's a lot of

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that resolution to do. Taking the pick through the python

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to take some time in terms of working

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>this all out. I think commercial real estate represents a

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of distress in the marketplace, but also one of

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 2>the greatest opportunities in the marketplace right now. So as

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the banks pull back from because remember banks are fifty

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 2>percent five zero fifty percent of all commercial real estate

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 2>lending is five point six trillion dollars of commercial real

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 2>estate loans here in the United States, and they're fifty

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>percent of that book.

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>And so why did the debt wall.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 2>The maturity debt wall just increase from five hundred and

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 2>forty billion this year on commercial real estate loans to

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred billion Because all the loans coming due last year,

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>very few of them paid off, most of them got

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>extended into this year, and so it's extending pretend game

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>going on right now, and a lot of that's going

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to get resolved, and as it gets resolved, losses are

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 2>going to get pushed through to the system for both

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 2>the lender as well as you know, as well as

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the prior owner. And so it's an opportunity for firms

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>like Marathon to step up as banks exit commercial real

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>estate lending and exit. When I say exit, not go

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>from forty percent to zero, but go from forty percent

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>to where they should be fifteen to twenty percent. That's

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>where they should be. So that holds it, so that

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 2>big void, we're going to step up and make these loans.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>And so the amount of the amount of capitalists needed

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>from private crapal capital to solve.

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 3>For this is enormous.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 2>And so we're getting paid really nice returns and I

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 2>love it because it's at the current cap rates with

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the current cash flow, not at the bubble pricing periods

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that we had.

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, Lisa, Oh, yes, you mentioned the SRT and

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 4>CRT some of these balance sheet movements that banks are

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 4>doing to raise their capital. Are all of these sort

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 4>of performing credits or is some of the distress stuff

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 4>that you just mentioned right now?

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it would never at least it would never

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 2>be distressed. It all has to be performing. If it's

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 2>not performing, crystal clear clean like, none of us are

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 2>going to touch it. So we're scrubbing these portfolios. You're

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about hundreds of loans to thousands loans that we're

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>scrubbing through at a low level detail to make sure

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 2>everything is performing going and you're talking about an average

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of a triple B credit going in and then triple

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>triple B minus, so nothing is not performing.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 4>No, And then you said two hundred billion last year

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 4>from Europe and then US banks are wrapping up. Given

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 4>the size of the US market, where do you think

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 4>the greater opportunity would be this year to continue from

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 4>the europeans or where with the new US mandate twos

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 4>to do these kind of deals.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 2>An equal opportunity employer, We love it and we love

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 2>both markets. And so dealing with the top banks in

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 2>Europe and dealing with the top banks in US, we

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>have all those relationships. They're very very selective who they'll

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>go to in you know, these transactions. It's you know,

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>signing NDAs, is looking into portfolios and it's being there

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>to a price risk appropriately and then take size. I'm

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about you know, one hundreds of millions per transaction.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's you know a huge opportunity in Europe.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Europe has been doing this for twenty plus years, the

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>US hasn't. But now the FED has blessed the US

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 2>banks to de risk knowing that the methodology and technology

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>UH through these off balance sheet types of curizations and

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>risk transfers has been well in trans in Europe, they've

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 2>studied the model, they see the merits in it. As

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the US is just starting this out, so the US

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>will converge to I think where Europe is and it

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>being hundreds of billions on an annual basis, on a

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 2>go forward basis.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 5>Great, thanks Bruce. Hey, this is Arnold Cokuda b I

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 5>credit analyst covering banks, and you know, I agree with

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 5>you in terms of these increased regulatory pressures moving some

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 5>of the risk out of out of banks, right and

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 5>let's call it into you know, the shadow bank system.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 5>So you know, Bruce, you talked about the opportunity there,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 5>but what do you think is the right amount of

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 5>of you know, this this risk moving to the shadow

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 5>banks and whatnot out of the banking system. You know,

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 5>it's an opportunity for marathon, but but how much is

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 5>too much?

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I view that, Thank you, Arnold, and nice to talk

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to you. I view that as a toolbox or playbook

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that they have. So to Lisa's prior question, when you

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 2>have just trust situations that the banks involved in terms

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of loans built that results in an asset sales, so

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 2>they'll sell those loans. So that's an outright it's not

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a risk transfer per se, it's just a loan sale.

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>And so yes, we're involved in that, Lisa and Arnold.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Second is in terms of these partnerships, these SRT CRT transfers,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I think kind of the pace that Europe has been running,

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>because they're way ahead on this is probably the right

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>pace for the Europe to continue running and the US

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>to continue running. I don't think it goes up much

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 2>from there. I just think it goes up a lot

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>for the US from where it was. And Europe is

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, steady Eddy, because they've had such

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 2>an efficient frontier and how they've been managed this again

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 2>for years and years and years to go back, you know,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. And so I'll give you an example, so

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you take it. You know, uh, you know, three hundred

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>corporate loans are ready to triple B minus and you

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>can do this of course with other types of loans.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Were taking commercial corporate loans in this case, and the

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>banks you know, want to keep their relationships right because

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>these are important relationships and so although those transfer the

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 2>first cure of risk.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, these relationships for the banks.

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>For their clients are important account management, you know, term loans,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>credit facilities, cast management, FX, trade for the investment, banking services, custody,

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 2>payment solutions. There is so much the banks do and

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the bank will never exit. That is the core of

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.239
<v Speaker 2>what they do. But they don't want, given the capital constraints,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 2>this extra layer of risk. And so how do we

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>de risk given the capital charges that the regulators are

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>going to impose for that extra layer of risk for

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>keeping some of these risk assets or you know non

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 2>government and non agency and you know lower investment greater

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>or non investment great risk. So how they do that is,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>let's say they sell to US zero to ten percent

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>SRT trunch of the package of those three hundred let's

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>say corporate you know loans, they're both funded and unfunded,

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>including the revolvers and the loans. So they transferred that

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>to us, and you know, it reduces their risk waiting

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>from something like x amount to like zero point two

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>x amount. It'll go down by like seventy five eighty

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>percent reduction of capital by just selling that Tronshof and

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>so allows them the banks to originate to continue to

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 2>service their clients, but really arbitrage the capital requirements for

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the lower tier risk as firms like US come in

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 2>to provide that capital. So it's a beautiful marriage of

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you know where banks and you know private credit partner

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and again there's other partnership arrangements, you know, portfolio sales,

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you know them providing the bank providing the senior will

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>provide them as on that capital solution as their borrower

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 2>on the commercial real estate loan wants to roll, but

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>they want to roll at a more conservative LTV, so

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>plug that gap. So there's all kinds of ways that

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>we work together us in the banks, and and and

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>what you also see is banks also wanting back into

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>private credit and striking up partnership agreements with the investment

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>managers that do credit to form partnerships to run a

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>program together. So it's also something you're starting to see.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's really interesting to see, you know, how the

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>banks and private finance are now converging to a degree.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 5>So pretty interesting on that front. But to go more

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 5>specifically in terms of you know, the increased opportunity in

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 5>US uh, you know, synthetic risk transfers. Do you feel like,

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, we have the regional banks that need to

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, raise their capital levels right incorporating their unrealized losses,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 5>and then the potential and capital requirement increases for the

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 5>biggest banks you know going forward. So where do you

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 5>see the you know, bigger opportunities going forward. Is it

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 5>more with the regional banks or some of these you

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 5>know bigger JP Morgans in BA as well.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention bank specifically by name, but I think

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 2>you know here in the United States, it's four thy

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 2>two hundred banks that are in existence, and there's thirty

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>that's exact number that if you want to drill down

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and look at the total number of assets that they

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>have in their balance sheet, there's thirty with one hundred

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>billion or more. And so kind of the target list

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 2>for US is really the top and we go a

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 2>little bit below that the top fifty banks in this country.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>What's really critical is credit risk. We don't want to

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 2>have counterparty credit risk with the institution itself, and so

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>it have to be a super safe, you know bank

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>that is a super regional slash megabank for US to

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 2>do an SRT transaction with if that helps answer your question,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>give you clarity. So it won't be with like the

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>next four thousand right now there, when we deal with

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 2>that next four thousand, will buy loans from them, will

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 2>be partners with them. If you know, you know they'll

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 2>do the first out, we'll do this second. You know,

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 2>there's different things we can do together with the banks,

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the partner up to help them think about the risking,

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>but not through a national team transaction.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So in general, Bruce, the opportunity from this commercial real

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>estate mess. You're saying it's the greatest opportunity in the

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>market right now, you're saying it needs a ton of capital.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a bit about how much capital. We've

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>had other guests on this show talk about a trillion

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar opportunity in real estate right now. Can you talk

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>about how you know what the magnitude of that opportunity

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is and also what are the returns? What are you

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>buying these loans off the banks for? I mean, how

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>much of a discount are you getting?

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's multi faster, so let me let me unpack

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it for you for just a second. So how big

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>is the opportunity? You know, let's look at the biggest

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>framework for commercial real state. And I'll focus on the

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 2>United States for just now. But the biggest framework I'm

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 2>looking commercial state is commercial state has their property value

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>across this country, the commercial real estate side of around

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty two trillion. That's the number that we have, twenty

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>two trillion. And of that twenty two trillion, eight trillion

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 2>has debt on it, fourteen trillion doesn't. So that fourteen

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 2>trillion is not a problem. Like you know, your Bloomberg

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 2>go across town, you know, to your Bloomberg headquarters.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 3>Do they have a commercial real estate loan against their building?

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>No. JP Morgan is building their new headquarter building on

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Park Avenue. Do they have commercial real estate loan against

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>that building? Absolutely not. You'll do that at the corporate level.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>You'll have, you know, debt, maybe a corporate level. JP

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Morgan have debt at the corporate level, but they're not

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 2>going to finance the property per se. A lot of

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>property here is simply not financed. Some of the biggest

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>properties just simply not finance. Is financed at the corporate

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 2>level and through whole code debt are not through a

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 2>real estate loan. So of the five point six trillion

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 2>dollars of debt that's there, you know, outstanding here in

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the United States, that's probably around I don't know, eight

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars of property value. That's where the problem is

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's where the opportunity is.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Of that five point six trillion of debt, how much

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>will be a problem in terms of extending and mending,

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, potentially being restructured or default. The number could

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>be as high as a trillion. I don't think that's

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>an exaggeration. I think that's actually a healthy number. Is

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a trillion where it's gonna have to be recapitalized or

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna be flipping the keys.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's gonna have to get restructured somehow.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 2>It's about a trillion unless if and it's wishful thinking

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of commercial estate players have. Unless if

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the FED brings rates down really really quickly and commercial

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 2>estate pops a lot and a lot of capital there

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>is available to But we think the numbers up to

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>a trillion, so.

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Separate away from that. Of the five point.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Six trillion two point six trillion, the biggest lender are

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the banks, and the rest of it is in different places.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>The second place that it's in is excuisation. So there's

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 2>over a trillion dollars, like one point zero five trillion

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 2>of commercial real estate loans that are insecure taste excurization today.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 2>So now your question is where do we see the opportunity.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Where we see the opportunity is multifests Number one as

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>one hundred million dollars. Property that has seventy million dollar

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>loan and it's only worth one hundred million. It's no

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>longer worth a hundred million. It's now worth seventy million.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 2>The property that loan. When that rolls, you're not gonna

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 2>get seventy million dollar long because properly is worth seventy million.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna get sixty percent LTV. This time around, you're

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna get forty two million dollars long. And so that

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>gap between seventy million on the old loan and forty

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>two million on the new LONGUS twenty eight million dollars gap.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Who's coming up with that money?

0:21:58.560 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>And so I had to come up with that money?

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Where is What kind of returns are we looking at here?

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 4>You said, this is one of the best opportunities ever.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I think the returns have have got to be preferred

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>equity kind of returns, sweeping all the cash flow from

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 2>the property and basically extracting control while keeping you know,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the lender will keeping the equity owner in place.

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 4>And so preferred equity we're thinking maybe definitely double digits,

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe even in the two handle.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Like fifteen to low twenties. Is kind of like that range,

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>depending upon the property, depend upon the situation. So that's

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>number one. Number two is is, you know, let's say

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the borrower comes up with new money in the bank,

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 2>won't roll you know, us extending that new loan and

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>making a really nice return on that, and so being

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the lender, not of last resort, but being the lender

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>because the banks are going to be pulling back at

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>least a huge portion of the capital go for a basis,

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and so private capital has to step up for that.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Number Number three, there is new development going on and

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>new acquisitions and so being the you know, acquisition finance

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 2>as well as all these refinancings.

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 3>That's next.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>And what I also add is I think CMBs is

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the great opportunities because as loans go sideways

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 2>within a deal, you know, there's going to be losses

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 2>going to flow through to some of the junior classes,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 2>and for us to buy what we consider be above

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the fall from is an amazing opportunity. So the dislocated

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>CNBS opportunity, which is liquid you know, T plus two securities.

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 2>We model every single property in each one of the

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 2>one thousand, five hundred and sixty different CMBs transactions. So

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>you talk about like six tranches per securization, you're talking

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 2>about like not was it nine three hundred? You know,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 2>securizations trunches that exist and just cmbas alone and figuring

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 2>out what truants to buy. There's a lot of data

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 2>science that goes with property analysis and cash flow analysis

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 2>that we have modeled out here at Marathon. And what

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 2>we do is we buy the tranche above the folk group.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 2>We don't want to have anything.

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Right now above the fulcrum, which.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 2>It could be the double B class, it could be

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the triple V class, would be the signal A class.

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not a generic answer to that because it's a

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 2>function of the loan collateral and how the classes were

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>cut in terms of the thickness of the securization and so,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>but we're we the.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 4>Mes level, right, You're thinking in the mes level, well,

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 4>would be triple A and.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Double as in places. Yes, so it's be somewhere between

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 3>single a's and double b's and.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 2>And and for that we expect to make a mid

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 2>to upper teams I R R on T plus two

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 2>securities over a multi year holding period. So you're talking

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 2>about like really nice multiple on your money, and it's

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, very very specific. It's you know, we have

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>our you know, night vision goggles on and we're looking

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>for that you know, needle in the haystack by buying

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>those tranches off of you know, a very big securitization marketplace,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>knowing full well the information the property, the cash flow,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>the cuts on the train, on the transaction, and where

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the falcon is going to lie based upon how the

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>workout is going to flow through in terms of loss

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>rates to a securitization.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So, Bruce, a lot of this stuff is distressed for

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a reason, right, and it is very risky, and it

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>really varies by geography and by type, and it's you know,

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>all over the map, and you do travel, you do

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have a global view. I was just wondering, you know,

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>how you see this breaking down? You know, what what

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what are the good sectors to look at in terms

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of really state what are the ones you absolutely have

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to avoid a country and sector.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, we we we we're avoiding office, and that's

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of top a less top of mind. But you know,

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>if there's office in a securitization, it doesn't matter.

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Just falls through.

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 2>The loss were just by you know, the right trans

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 2>given that you know that factor. And more important, it's

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 2>not a generic statement. It's very clean math of what

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 2>loss factor you're going to have and how that flows

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 2>through the excusation. In any excusation, you might have some

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 2>losses and loans. It doesn't mean you're run for the

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 2>for the hills. It means you figure out exactly how

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>much flows through and what is left, and what is

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>left we can buy that diskound of security at a

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 2>nice secretion. You know, when it pulls the par just

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 2>into your cash flow, it'll be a great buy for us.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 3>But you know, beyond real estate commercial state.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 2>There's also the dislocation and you know distress that you

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>see on the corporate side as well. Uh, maybe not

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>as severe, but there's still you know, a healthy case

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 2>load workload on the on the corporate side as well.

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 4>So, Bruce, you mentioned earlier that lenders are in some

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 4>cases extending, extending, and amending what is you can talk

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about what the impact of that is

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 4>zombie in real estates and also zombie in corporate because

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 4>we have a similar well, as you said, less severe

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 4>issue amount corporate did as well. Default rates are really

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 4>really low because of this tendency to just close take

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 4>a blind eye. Can you address a little bit about

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 4>your thoughts about how, why and how this is happening

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 4>and what the ramifications are.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Sure, let me just step back for your listeners and

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of define the marketplace. When I think about private credit,

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I think are three segments of private credit. Number one,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 2>and the biggest actionable segment is direct lending, which we

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 2>just to call it middle market lending, but it's also

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, lower middle market, upper middle market. Now, these

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>are broadly syndicated private deals that are happening. They're taking

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>deal full from the broadly syndicated market. So that's the

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:56.239
<v Speaker 2>first big segment of you know, corporate.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Private credit.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 2>The second biggot segment of corporate private credit, which we

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>haven't talked about, which is huge and going to get

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>much much bigger and I'm super excited about, is asset

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 2>based lending. Now, the third component of private credit is

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 2>what now you know, your question revolves around, which is

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the you know, opportunistic situations in.

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Uh in the credit market.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 2>And and I think there's a couple of segments when

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 2>you kind of you know, unpack that that you.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Really want to focus on.

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Number one is providing capital solutions and creative financing options

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to companies to help them preserve value and to help

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 2>them grow and to help them get over.

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Some type of you know, choppy water. And so it's

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 3>the bridge to the other side.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>And we do a lot of these capital solutions, and

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that's you know, a fantastic opportunity to help companies that

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>are you know, maybe a little over leverage or stress or.

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 3>If the two distress you help of the capital solution,

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 3>it'll just go down that path.

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, in the US and Europe, you know,

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>we have hundreds of billions of dollars of debt that's

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 2>existing today whose debt trades below like an eighty dollars price.

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, on my radar list today, I have one

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty five companies that we're tracking, tolling around

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and fifty billion that looks like that on

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>top of the one hundred and eighty two billion of

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>companies debt, which is one hundred and five companies that

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>defaulted the last calendar year in twenty twenty three.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And so so what's causing this.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, in two thousand and eight, two thousand and eight,

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>during a DFC high, you bonds, leverage, loans, you know,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 2>direct lending on the private side, there was one point

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 2>seven trillion dollar credit market one point seven trillion. Today

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>that market size is zie point one trillion, so it's

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>growing three times where it was then. And through all

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the exhiberance and the zerp world that we lived in

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 2>when companies borrowed maybe too much and money was too

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>free flowing and a lot of people folks chose to

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 2>you know borrow floating rate and you know, realizing that

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, FED funds is up five hundred twenty five

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 2>based punts, so the base boring rate, which is now

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>sofur is up five hundred twenty five basis points. The

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>funny costs have become too high and there's a lot

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of leverage. So the company may have cut you know,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, fifty LTV loan, but given the purchase price

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>multiple may been six times that even a finance when

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>it was originally issued, but that includes ad backs and adjustments.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 2>You take out those adbacks and adjustments and your at

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 2>least eternal leverage higher than that. So you can look

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 2>at the software company that came in at like seven

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>turns of debt leverage, that really looks closer to ten times.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Or healthcare company that came in at five and a

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>half turns of debt that's really more close than eight

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 2>turns of debt data up today. And so when you

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about like ibada is before debt service and now

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 2>debt service has doubled, right, so you know, livebar plus

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a spread has become sofur plus that same spread.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 3>But the sofa rates.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Of five hundred and twenty five basbooks, so the financial

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>cost that the company occurs is two x what it was.

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>And so a lot of these companies are burning cash,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 2>actual cash flow, burning cash just to service their debt,

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>just the service their death. And what segment of the marketplace, Well,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the leverage loan marketplace and you

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>read what movies have to say, it's over fifty percent

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 2>of the companies are B three rated are now in

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 2>that category.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Current sofa barn rates.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, there is an easy financial conditions

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>that have occurred over those last many months, and it's

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 2>fantastic and it's helped companies through finance out and so

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>you don't have the same debt maturity wall in corporate

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>finance that you do in real estate finance, but you

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>still have a lot of cash burner going on. And

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the default rate won't get to ten or

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent like it was in LA, but it is

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 2>going to get to four percent in this current marketplace,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and four percent of five point one trillion, the current

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 2>size is over two hundred billion dollars of the faults

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and select of the faults, we're ten percent of one

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>point seven trillion. Back in two thousand and eight, you know,

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, it took you to about one hundred and

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 2>eighty to two hundred billion, So you'll end up at

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the same place in terms of the sizeable opportunity for

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 2>distress dislocation. And most importantly, what we're doing is capital

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to help these good companies with overlovered balancies make it through.

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 4>What I am more excited about was what you said

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 4>about abs lending, because you seem excited and we haven't

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 4>touched on it, So a lot of people are now

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 4>looking at that as the next frontier private credit. To you, Bruce,

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 4>what does that ABS lending mean to you?

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And where Well, let's talk about WID's coming and then

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 2>let me answer your question, because it's really important to understand,

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 2>like whites come in to kind of put a ribbon

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>on it and to kind of, you know, complete the circle.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.719
<v Speaker 2>So let's go back to the banks for a second.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 2>The banks have been the biggest ABL lenders and when

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 2>they exited doing a lot of the corporate lending back

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>in eight because of the basel free regulations that came

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>in that put cop requirements on those type of risk

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 2>loans in place, they then doubled down an ABL lending

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's when some of the ABL loans like really

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 2>took off in the balance as a it's a balance

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>sheet for these banks. Now fast forward to twenty twenty

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 2>four or twenty twenty five, one buzzle free endgame comes

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>into place, and the banks now have to have more

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 2>capital against those types of loans and so to de risk,

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the bank's going to make less of those loans and

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing it across the system. And so now let's

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about ABL. What is ABL as opposed to making

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.720
<v Speaker 2>a loan based upon a company's cash flow, We're making

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 2>a loan based upon the collateral. So it's an senior

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 2>secured asset based loan where we have a perfected interest

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>in that underlying collateral at a certain LTV, a tasking point,

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and a certain debt service coverage ratio. A slightly different

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 2>way of thinking about it, but it's opposed to lending

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>against op cooho co of company, we're lending against hart assets.

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>And let me break it down the four categories for you, Uh, Lisa,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 2>So a b L I think is a nine trillion

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>dollar marketplace, nine trillion and it's a small fraction of

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that now, and what's been put in security form securitizations

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 2>is four trillion, so I think in private form it's

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a five trillion dollar marketplace.

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 3>And what is it?

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Number one, in no particular order. Number one, it's corporate ABL.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 2>So you're talking about lending its plant, equipment, inventory, uh,

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 2>intellectual property, receivables, trade, it's whatever's in corporate a BL.

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 2>But again, you have a perfected interest against those assets,

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 2>and so if anything has happened, you have a lean

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>on it that they're yours. The second category, i'd say

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>is what I call, you know, consumers. Last specialty finance,

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 2>and there you have everything from like all those consumers

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you know to you know, s rts and c rts

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 2>that put that there, certain type of you know, royalties

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>you can put like music royalties in there, or healthcare

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 2>you know royalties in there, and so specialty finances Category two.

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Category three you mentioned it, so I'll emphasize it. It's

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:12.479
<v Speaker 2>transportation and under transportations aviation, and we've done not only

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Airbus and Airbus three twenties and Bowing

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 2>seven thirty sevens and all the series, and we have

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 2>you know four coming through committee you know this week,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and we've done.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Over one hundred and fifty aircraft with the big.

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Airlines, you know, the big airlines that everyone travels, and

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 2>we on the we on the metal, we lease it

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 2>to them. We get paid the structure cash flow. We

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 2>also do this with engines, because an airplane has about

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty year useful life, and engine you know, last year

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 2>around seven years, and so we've done engine leasing as well.

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, when you're buying.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 2>New, brand new Airbus three twenty neo, you might pay

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 2>sixty five million for it, you know from Airbus. And

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 2>the engines are two engines that you know on each wing,

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>one in each one that costs like thirty five million,

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 2>that costs like more than half the plane. And so

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>engine leasing is also a segment of what we do.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>We do a lot in maritime. This week, we just

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 2>did it joins that deal, you know, tug and barge.

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 2>We've done international shipping. There's there's rail and road. We've

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 2>done trucking deals, transportation equipment, infrastructure type loans that support

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>all this. And then the fourth category is property. And

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we had over fifty thousand residential loans, the

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>whole loans out of side of the scarization that we

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 2>own to hear at Marathon, Second lean, first lane loans,

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 2>commercial real estate property, everything from parking lots to infrastructure

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>we've done here at Marathon and it all fits into

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>the rainbow, this beautiful mosaic of ASCID based lending. And

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 2>we have a teams of teams approach because each team

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>is dedicated this year. Team's different from the RESI team,

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 2>it's different from the aviation team, different from the maritime team,

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 2>different from those that are doing you know against plant equipment,

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a crane in the sky or farm equipment

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 2>or forklifts, or whether it's all the loans are all

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 2>different teams rolling up into ABL program here at Marathon.

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So I love ABL and mark my words, it's a forecast.

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 2>So who knows that the one.

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Hundred billion dollar.

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Middle market lending and private credit lending business in OA,

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 2>which grew to one point seven trillion dollars where it

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 2>is today seventeen fold increase, you'll see the same thing

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 2>happening in ABL in this next decade.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Wow, it's pretty amazing. I think one thing, you know,

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 5>we're in New York. One thing we didn't talk about

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 5>is uh multifamily and you know an NYCB has been

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty volatile over the past couple of weeks, so though

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 5>we've had a little mini bailout, what are your thoughts

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 5>on that sector? Bruce, multifamily and and and maybe rent regulated?

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Do you see risk in there or is it just

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of one off specific for NYCB.

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't want to talk politics. I host

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 2>it as far away as politics possible, But you know,

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 2>rent controlled and got bust people that you know, you

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>know reside in all these properties but rent controls a

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 2>problem for you know, investor. When the city comes and

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 2>any city, New York City particularly when any city comes

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and says you can't raise rates rents, then what do

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you think that's sponsor's going to do. They're gonna put

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 2>any money in the property to improve it, They're going

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to try to maintain it. And their model, their financial

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 2>model is based upon raising rates, and they have a

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of extra costs to maintain it, including financing costs.

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 2>So it puts them upside down. So it's a real

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 2>problem for you know, banks that have leaned into and

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 2>lenders that leaned into rent control, rents stabilized, and I

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't touch that sector as a result, wouldn't touch it

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 2>as a lender because I think it's a very difficult

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 2>loan to make. And you know, in terms of multi family, no,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>you got to love multifamily. You know, it's a it's

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful thing. Talk about home, you know, homes themselves.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>The simple factor matter is home prices over the last

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>three years have increased twenty five percent nationally.

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge run up.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 2>That run up is bigger than the run up leading

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 2>into the housing crisis in a way the price appreciation

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen among homeowners, and so with that, financing

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 2>rates have gone up. And because financing rates have gone up,

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 2>the price to own a home now with your rent

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and that price increase is now eighty percent higher than

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it was three years ago. That is remarkable, and it's

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the highest point to own relative to rent. So I

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 2>love as much as OER as much as that's keeping

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 2>a firm based under CPI, as much of rent roles

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 2>have increased. For a multifamily, it is the cheapest it's

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>been that I've ever seen it in tracking. It decades,

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 2>the price to rent versus the price to own.

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to follow up on where we started

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. Banks are going to take losses, and you

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>know some are going to disappear potentially, given that you

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>think there are too many, what impact does that have

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more broadly on financial markets and the economy. I'm surely

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to just be contained.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the banks are safe. I think the banks

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 3>are safe.

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that the biggest opportunity will be in commercial

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 2>real estate, followed by filling in any void that the

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 2>banks are going to dial back during Basel three endgame,

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 2>which is to be a lender in abl and also

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to play the SRT and asset acquisition game, and that's

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a big part of our playbook. I think there's a

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 2>big opportunity in credit, in liquid credit markets. We run

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a program called MATS, which is a multi asset credit

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 2>strategies and it's across you know, the structured credit world

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 2>em but high yield and leverage loans and its multi

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 2>strategy approach to what is eleven trillion dollar market credit.

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 2>The private credit markets are big, and they're going to

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>get bigger and bigger and bigger because the bank's pulling back.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And although ninety five percent of the corporate credits are

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 2>fine in terms of credit, there's the other five percent

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 2>that needs capital solutions that results in distressed and dislocation.

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 2>But the end of the day, the banking system is solid,

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 2>both in Europe and the US. Not so much in China,

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 2>but in the US and Europe, and so I'm not

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 2>concerned at all about banking. And the most impressive thing

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 2>about this cycle is to fed to raise rates five

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty five piece points, keep it there for

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:53.240
<v Speaker 2>an extended period of time, and the cracks are actually

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>rather minuscule. It tells you how robust the financial system is.

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not only because of the strength of the bank

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.879
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Buzzle three and all the regulations and what's

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 2>coming next for Buzzle three endgame, but it's also due

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to the robustness of capital among the private credit lending

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 2>community and the financial markets.

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 3>It's really impressive to see.

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 1>And the last question, Bruce, I know out of time,

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but you've been doing this a long time. As you say,

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>when have you last seen such a great opportunity? You

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>sound so bullish.

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the Goalden there of credit. Right rates are

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and twenty five basis points. We haven't seen

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 2>this in a generation. So you have to go back

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 2>to earlier in my career when you saw rates as

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 2>high as they are.

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Number one.

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Number two, you've never seen the credit markets as large

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 2>as they are now. Equity market globally it's over one

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred trillion of fixed income and credit market globally of

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred trillion, and we have eleven trillion dollars

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 2>here at Marathon of credit of the credit market that

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 2>we invest in, and so it's a big market at

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the highest rates that you know we've seen.

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.760
<v Speaker 3>In a generation. And meanwhile, the comm is going well.

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Earners have popped back up, and so the earnings recessions

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 2>over equi markets are trading all time highs.

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 3>But when you talk about.

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Our clients, the LPs, we invest money for the pension plans,

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the ariski plans, the sid wealth funds and downments foundations,

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 2>insurance companies, the consultants that advise them, these wealth platforms,

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and the bank private banks and so forth. Look, they

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 2>can invest in the credit markets and along the credit

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 2>curve and liquid credit and get an eight to nine

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 2>percent yield that's magnificent. And in private credit add three

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred basis points to that double digit returns. And so

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.879
<v Speaker 2>when you have liability management, you're managing against and your

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 2>actoral return requirements like a six percent return. And if

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 2>you do this in credit, a lot of folks that

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 2>come to conclusion, why do we need the equity risk

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and so well, let me better balance. Finally, because the

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 2>financial repression is over, the zup environment, it is over,

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and rachel returns are rather healthy in credit. Let me

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 2>now better balance my portfolio. And that's what we're doing

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 2>with our clients. That's why We're so jazzed, you know,

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>and when you have an error like this the golden

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 2>era of credit, it's just our sweet spot for what

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 2>we do for our clients.

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Bruce Richards, Chairman and CEO of Marathon Asset Management.

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you on the Credit Edge. Please come

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>back again soon.

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, James, thank you Arnold, and thank you Lisa.

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Also want to say big thanks to Lisa leaving Bloomberg

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>News in London. Brilliant to see you again, cheers. And

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to Arnold Kakuda with Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you so much

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for being here. Read all of Ronold's brilliant analysis on

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal. It's really great. Check it out. Please

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. We're on Apple,

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and all good podcast providers, including the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Give us a review, tell your friends, or email me

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>directly at Jcrumby eight at Bloomberg dot net. I'm James Cromby.

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pleasure having you join us again next

0:45:55.120 --> 0:46:12.879
<v Speaker 1>week on the Credit Edge.