WEBVTT - Argentina Selloff Is A Buying Opportunity, Turkey Not So Much

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Let's

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention now to Argentina or the central Bank

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>has risen interest rates three times in the past week

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just to support its currency. The result it is not working.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now, Paul McNamara, investment director for Emerging Markets

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>at gam UK Limited, overseeing about eleven billion dollars in

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>developing world assets. Paul, thank you so much for being here.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at a lira that is tanking. We're looking

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>at that yields are absolutely skyrocketing on Argentinean bonds. Is

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this a buying opportunity? We think it is. Sorry you

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>said lira. The lira is the one that we don't

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think is buying opportunity. Turkey has quite similar problems to Argentina. Sorry,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting my troubles back. Confused, Sorry, no, no, the

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>different the differences really favor Argentina. Argentina is a much

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>less indebted economy. So you know, the the Argentines did

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>three percent last Friday, they did three percent yesterday, they

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>did six and three quarter percent today. But you know,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an economy with a very low level of leverage,

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>where the burden of hiking rates is much less severe

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on the real economy. Um, it's you know, it's something

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that can translate relatively smoothly to currency strength, unlike you know,

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>most countries in the developed world, almost countries in e M,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>where you know, obviously the conflicts between the damage done

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>by higher rates and the damage done by a weaker currency.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>In Argentina, I think it's fairly here that that all

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the all the burden, all the damage comes from a

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>weaker paco. Um, so everything favors that the the the

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Argentine authorities doing everything they possibly can to keep the

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>paco in place. Well, just to push back a little bit,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because if you see, this is a buying opportunity for

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Argentine paco or perhaps some of the debt that's

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>selling off. I'm just wondering about the root of the

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>weakness here, which is the fear that the right leaning

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>leadership isn't doing as much as it needs to be

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>doing to support the nation's economy and its finances. What's

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>your take on that. No, I mean, you know, we've

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>got right wing governments or populist governments all over the

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>world sort of not supporting the economy. The economy, you know,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Russia, if you look at Poland,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look pretty much everywhere. I mean, the reason

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that Argentina and again Turkey are getting hammered is not

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so much to do with economic strength. It's to do

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with the external balances. These are both countries where imports

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are are rising much faster than exports. You know, that

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the currency has become competitive, um, you know, and the

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>way to address that is to you know, is to

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bring import demands down a bit and give people a

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>reason to hold their money in local currency, which I

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think higher rates will help with. Um. You know, growth

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>growth in Argentina is respectable. It's you know, it's not

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>outrageously high, but I think it's you know, it's it's

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>positive that the authorities are willing to hike rates and

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for stability ahead of a dash for growth. Paul,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>why did this happen. I mean, what's the reason. Doesn't

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this go back to something that happened in December? I

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>think the rate hikes at the end of last year

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and the start of this year. Yes, that that that

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a perception that the you know that that

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the Argentines were kind of engaging in this dash for growth,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know that stability and lower inflation had taken

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>second place. But you know, the rate cuts that they did,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, across the turn of the year have been

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>more than reversed since then. So I think it would

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be fair to say that the Argentines has got the

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>message gay. So you think it's a buying opportunity, what's

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the best opportunity? Is it the paco? Is it a

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>certain bond issuance? I mean, you know, as ever, if

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you say something something is a buy, I mean, as

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's running an e M portfolio, we think relative

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to other emerging markets, it looks like goodbye. We think

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that the pacer has overshot here, that you're

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>getting an interest interest rates up at around on Argentine

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>paco assets. We prefer paco assets here. Yes, okay, what

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>about let's talk about Turkey because that's the other big,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>big name in the news, and you're saying that you

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are not positive on the lira there, which is tanking.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe in some measures to its weakest levels, uh

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in near history. What's your take on what's happening there? Well,

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I beat the problems in Turkey look to us fairly severe.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. Above all, you know, the one thing you

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see an emerging market is a huge

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>build up of foreign debt to support ought activity, which

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>only generates local currency. You know, we saw its an Asia,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it in lots of countries along the way,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>because what happens is as the currency falls, the ability

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of the banks and the core protector to to pay

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that debt falls um. You know. And unlike Argentina, you know,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the level of foreign debt in Turkey is extremely high

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time activity in business activity in

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Turkey is falling very slowly. Plus you have political changes

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>which I think militates in favor of capital flight and

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>moving money out of the country, and a very low

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>level of foreign exchange reserves. If you take that mix together, uh,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think that there's a real possibility of

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a major economic crisis in Turkey this year, So what

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>would you do? Go short Turkey, go along Argentina. Would

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that be a good trade? I think we'd find it

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>an attractive trade. But it's it's definitely one for the brave,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is this is not one for widows

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and orphans. Just really quick. I'm wondering just in general,

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>we've seen two weeks of outflows from emerging market funds,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the most since December. Are you concerned about general broader

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>weakness due to the stronger dollar? M Well, yeah, I

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>mean if somebody, you know, kind of makes their living

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in this market, I think we have to be concerned.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we've seen is, you know, after two

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>years of quite a week dollar, we've seen the dollars

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>snap back. And it's always been the case that, you

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>know that when the dollar rallies against d M, it

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>rallies stronger against EM and everything we've seen since then

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>has been in line with that. Unlike you know, say

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and thirteen or two thousand and eight, we

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>don't see weakness in EM We're not seeing external deficits,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so we think that the fundamentals in them this time

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>are much more supportive. Thanks very much. Paul McNamara, Investment

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>director for Emerging Markets for gam UK, helping to manage

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>about eleven billion dollars in developing world assets, earning us

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from London. Right now, let's turn our

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>attention to the jobs data that we got out from

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the US this morning. Yes, we saw the jobless rate

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>fall to three point nine percent, the lowis and April

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, but wages did not increase as much as

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>many people had expected. Tom Gimble joins US now. He

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is founder and chief executive officer of LaSalle Network. And Tom,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad you're here. You're the person I want

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to speak with. I want to talk about why we

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are not seeing bigger increases in what we earn. Well.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we've got a labor market that um is,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as you said, the best labor market we've had since

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, with unemployment below four. So the question is

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing in the hourly wages reflecting the service wages.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So we haven't seen the influx from the municipalities increasing

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage, and I think we'll start to see that

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>as that minimum wage continues to grow, But the service

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>positions are still not are still driving the unemployment ranked down,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and what we're not seeing is when people get hired

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in white collar jobs and someone goes from making fifty

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand to sixty thousand, they're also being replaced by people

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>coming in at lower salaries. So it's not as easy

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>as saying, oh, well, if unemployments low, then everybody's making

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>more money. That's not where the markets at right now.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's because of the global economy in a sense

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, that we can there's so much production being

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>done around the globe that we're not competing against the

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>neighbor and that we're not getting more money tomorrow than

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we were yesterday. That's the channel. But the good news

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is there's more jobs, but there's there's no one should

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be out of work right now. Well okay, but but Tom,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to push back a little bit because you're

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that that basically people don't have to pay more.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Companies don't have to pay more unless the minimum wage

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>rules are are changed. But aren't a lot of ceo

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is saying that they have trouble finding qualified workers right now,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and wouldn't they have an easier time if they just

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>offered more money. No, So, so paying more doesn't get

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody more qualified, So to pay more with the vision

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of most CEOs and CFOs are not the vision. The

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>reality is they're not going to pay more for the

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>exact same person they can get. This is what happened

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two until two thousand and eight,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is that that boom was fueled by companies were paying

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>more for people just for the sake of saying we

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>need more people, We're gonna pay outrageous amounts of money,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't work. Right now, I'm not saying that

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the housing market wasn't the driver for that crash, but

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we have now is a more responsible group of lead

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>corporate leaders, and they're saying that we're not going to

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>pay more just for the sake of paying more unemployment

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at three point to go hire some who's unemployed and

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just pay them more, that doesn't make fiscal sense. Tom uh.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>There are five point nine million open jobs in the

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>United States at least that's according to Lasal Network. Right, Okay,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>where are the most Where's the most demand? And I

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>mean demand, not that you need a PhD in you know,

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>astrophysics or mathematics. Where's the biggest demand? Right now? So

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest demand is in sales in computer and technology developers,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>coders and programmers, and then in healthcare, right and that's

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>been the same way going on for half a decade.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that those are the drivers sales really more in

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the past three years. To keep fueling this economy, corporations

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>want to increase revenue. Where I think we're gonna get

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at births. I think the July numbers and the August

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers are going to be really good because you're gonna

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>see it's a great time to be graduating college right now,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, And that's why, Well, I'm glad you mentioned

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>graduating college because I'm wondering these entry level positions or

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>these positions for which you need a lot of experience,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>or would even internships qualify you. Yeah, no, it's it's

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's for all of the above. And so that's

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the big difference is that companies would love to hire

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>some experienced people. However, the ones who are unemployed, that's

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>where the skills gap exists. The long term unemployed don't

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have the skills to be hired in this market. So

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>what companies do is they hire younger people out of college,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't increase the wages because those people are

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>coming in at entry level salaries, and so we'll see

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>as a boost. My guess is July, August, September numbers

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be well over two hundred thousand a month

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>because this economy engine is gonna keep going, and you're

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna see higher volumes of people being hired because they're

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>more available. So what do you think the unemployment rate

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>will be by the end of the year. I think

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it stays around the same. It really the Even if

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the FED raises interest rates by another quarter of a point,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that moves the needle on hiring. I

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>think it can't really get much lower. What what used

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a rule of thumb twenty years ago that

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to three percent was the acceptable

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate. That's that there's just a certain number of

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>people that are unemployable. I think that number today is

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>probably right around three to three and a half. So

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we get much lower than three nine,

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe three eight. Tom. The cover story of Bloomberg Business

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Week this week, Just Out, is about the workplace. It

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>says the workplaces complicated the business of equality. What a

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>graduates want out of their jobs. The number one thing

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's really been a change is that and this

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is one thing that will probably they could go counter

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to what I just said, is that graduates now are

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing the market and they're seeing that they can probably

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>get a higher wage. So more than ever before since

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>pre crash in two thousand and eight, you're seeing graduates

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not accepting jobs early into their senior year. So they're

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting until after graduation and see how the market. The

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>market checks out, so they want compensation, They want location,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so they want to work in cities, major metropolitan areas

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of where they want to go. So death the Nation

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is number two. And really culture continues to be. They

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>want to work in a plant that the company appreciates

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the employees, We appreciate you being with us. Tom Gimble,

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the founder, the chief executive a list solum that we're

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about today's non farm paywall report. Two days of

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>US and China trade discussions ended in Beijing with little accomplished.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk about the sort of escalating rhetoric between

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the US and China, at what point it will tip

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>into a more severe trade war is Mike McDonough, chief

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>economist for Financial Products here at Bloomberg LP. Mike, you

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you pend an opinion piece that I thought was fascinating

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at how a bankruptcy of a major tech company

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in China could be the real tipping point for a

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>true trade war. Can you explain? Yeah, I think you know,

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>every everyone's focusing on the trade delegation that just visited Beijing,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think very few people thought we would get

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>something meaningful out of this visit. Right, at best, you

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>would get an agreement to keep talking, and that's more

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or less what we got, UH. And I think everyone's

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>missing the real front line of a potential trade war,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>which was the decision the US government made UH in

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>mid April to ban the exports of any US products

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to z T the telecommunications maker. It's one of the

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest telecommunications equipment makers and it's definitely one of the

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest in China, and it's a very important, very important company. Now.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you know the U S World implements,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know there's some tariff and tariffs on alluminum and steel.

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>They're mostly inconsequential in the global scheme of things, especially

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when you look at all the countries that had gotten exemptions. UM,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a list of tariffs that could be put on

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese goods. They're a bit more meaningful, but again

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in the scheme of things, not not that pertinent. Where

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>China is going to be troubled is if U S

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>policy leads to the bankruptcy of a Chinese technology company.

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a critical sector in China. They have big

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>plans for the technology sector. It's an important part of

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the future. So if if the US government starts implementing

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>policy that's going to bankrupt these companies or meaningfully disrupt

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>these companies, that is what could actually trigger a trade ward,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not these tariffs. Mike McDonough looking at the most recent

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>issue of China Daily dot Com, one of the stories

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is headlined China US agree on some trade issues. Indeed,

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they even mentioned ZTE Corps. They say China made solemn

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>representations to the U S side regarding the case of

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>z t E and that the U S side expressed

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that they will pay attention to these representations and will

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>report China's position to the President of the United States.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>That sounds a little bit concilius, where it doesn't. I

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I the first headline I saw about the trade talks

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>where they agreed on some things and disagreed on other things,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>which is not incredibly useful. UH. You know, sure, if

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they go back to the President and the President changes

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>as rhetoric or or they change the ruling on ZT,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that would be quite positive. But at the same time,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there's UH it's been reported that they're working on executive

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>orders that would ban the sale of telecom equipment in

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the US by other Chinese firms. UH. And the most

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>important telecom communications maker in China is Hawei. UH. And

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there's I think the Wall Street Journal first reported that

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they have opened a similar investigation against Hawei that they

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>had on ZT that led to this band UH. A

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>similar move against Hawei would have I think pretty significant repercussions.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean. The other thing to think about is it's

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>an important part of China's economy. China is leading the

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>world right now when it comes to mobile payments these

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, this telecom equipment is an important part of that. UH.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So this could be very disruptive for the entire Chinese economy,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>which has the UH. You know, you could see a

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>rise in sort of nationalistic tendencies against the US. When

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>when you do have this disruption the ZT stock, for example,

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>has been I halted I believe in Hong Kong and

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Shenzen since April seventeen. So if you're a shareholder of ZT,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you right now don't know what's going on and you

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>can't get out, and that's the US fault. Well, that's

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I was going to ask about. I mean,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>using z T E as sort of a poster child

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of what could happen, and just give a little more. Caller,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>we were talking. You said, uh that the ban on

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>their gun selling goods to them and selling their goods

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>came from they're providing goods North Korean arm. They are

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>not an innocent victim, right, Okay, So this is this

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is part of what's going on. But do we have

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>any sense of the financial impact on z T E

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>so far and whether they have any recourse to overturn

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this ban? Uh? You know, one of the recourses they

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>had the conversation with the trade delegation to bring message

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to the president. Uh, you know, in terms of long

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>term health, I can't speak to that as well. There's

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>various reports of like ranging from they'll be okay, so

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>they could potentially go bankrupt to I think they have

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>some loans that are are coming due in the near future.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But can you give a sense of just how vast

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this band is and who it could affect the US? Well,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Intel is a big provider, Micron

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Technologies is a big provider. Microsoft. Um, there's one company

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how to pronounce it as communication about

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>forty of their revenue comes from ZT. So this does

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty big impact on this. You know, I

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know the full number. I think there's something like

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>fifties fifty or so suppliers that we have on the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal SPLC go for anyone listening where you could

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>actually go see all those suppliers UH and and their

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>exposure to ZT. So you get an idea. And then

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's on the input side. And then of course there's

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the UH stores that sell ZT equipment, right, that actually

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>sell their phones UH and sell the phones of other

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese technology company is that pending how this goes could

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>also be impacted just quickly, you go to China, you

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>don't use your own mobile phone, and you don't use

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>your corporate laptop, right, I use my my corporate lab

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I have my phone in my laptop. When I go

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to China and you use it, I use it and

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't worry about it being hacked. I'm not I'm

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>not doing anything that I'm okay. I'm just saying because

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, no, no, but I'm serious. I mean, pretty

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>substantial corporate policy is around the United States. Beware when

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you go to places like that and be careful with

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>your I try to remain aware everywhere honestly nowadays. All right,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll leave it there. Well done. Mike McDonough he's an

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>expert in all things economic, chief economist Financial Products for

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP. Check out his column about the trade in

0:19:46.680 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>China how China has a decided advantage. The value of

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gold has dropped about four percent since mid April. Indeed,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>at thirteen hundred and eleven dollars an ounced, gold is

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty where near it was at the beginning of the year.

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us about the precious metal and more

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>commodities is Will Ryan. He is the founder and the

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>chief executive of Granite Chairs. He joins us here in

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>our eleven three oh studios. Well, thanks for coming in.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Why has gold fallen in value since so, let's say

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>mid April. Is it because of dollar strength? Primarily from

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the dollar strength, yes, um, there there haven't really been

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>any catalysts to speak of that would have driven the

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>price higher. You know, the potential geopolitical tensions that people

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>were expecting to blow up have actually gone in the

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>other direction, namely North Korea, and so the Korean penincia

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>now looking to be much safer than a proposition than

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a year ago. So that that's sort of

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>taken the shine off gold a little bit. How about

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that inflation expectations also have kind of tempered

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, given the fact that we haven't seen

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the wage increases that many people were expecting. I think

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But there's still kind of bubbling under

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the surface that you know, we have the strongest inflationary

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>platform for last ten years, and so while in the

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>short term, you know, the numbers off of you know,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the February numbers weren't as strong as as people expected,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there are more kind of forces at work that are

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>giving people pause on the inflation side. So is there

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a bullish case to be made for goal at eleven

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars an ounce? I think yes, because in my view,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this the dollar strength is temporary. Um that this is

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not a longer term thing. UM. I think that you know,

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>in an environment of rising interest rates and you know,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>increasing inflation expectations UM, plus the higher volatility, the gold

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and commodities more broadly are a a place to be.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, people are looking at uncorrelated or low

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>correlated assets right now in order to take some risk

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the equity or bomb market, and gold is

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those places. I want to shift focus to

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>oil simply because prices there have risen to the highest

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>since and there's a big question of how much higher

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>they can possibly go, nearly at the seventy barrel mark.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>What's your taken on that, well, I mean this is

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting story. And you know, if you go

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>back to last summer when I launched granite shares in

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the market, I mean some of our ETFs have oil exposure,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and a common thing I would hear from people as

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>oil is never going to go above forty dollars again.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And that was just last summer, and since then we've

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>had this huge rally, and really the main reason is

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>because there's been a huge amount of demand synchronized global

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. But these opeque cuts that they've put in

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>place have really kind of bitten back on the supply.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And then I think more recently, the dollar weakness and

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>tensions again in the Middle East, particularly with Syria and Iran,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have sort of kept momentum going right, But but to

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>some degree that's already being all baked in. Should those

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>tensions ease, should the dollar strengthen as we're seeing it

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>do so today it's actually at the highest levels of

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the year. Now, I'm just trying to understand at what

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>point do people start to say, wait a second, this

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>seems unsustainable. At some point production from from from shale

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>drillers and from you know, Iraq you've been, you know,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>might might off set this. Yeah, I mean I think

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>people thought that at fifty dollars, they thought that at

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars, and I thinking it's seventy dollars. And yeah.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>The point is that a lot of you know, when

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>commodity moves happen, a lot of its momentum driven. And

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what's different about oil is that there is

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>there is a strong fundamental demand there the markets and vaquidation,

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which means that people are willing to pay a premium

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>for oil of the delivery now versus in the future.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a real strong underpinning underpinning for gold

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>demand right now. And you know how far it can go. Obviously,

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>who knows, but certainly it's a market that's caught a

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people by surprise. All right. But the same

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>reason that you said the goal was down in price

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>since mid April, wouldn't that apply all sort of oil?

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't you just say that oil has reached a sort

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of near term peak at seventy dollars a barrel, particularly

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>when you know you have, as Lisa said, you've got

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>share producers who can turn on this bigot and they

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>can produce as much oil as you want. The only

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>constraint is actually the pipeline system and the logistics of

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>getting it to the marketplace. Yeah, I think that's true.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But the lesson that they've learned from last time is

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that if they do that, that that's one shore fire

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>way to make the price go lower again, which reticent

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to do after what happened in the can make a

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of shell producers can make money, can make pretty

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>good money at forty and fifty dollars a barrel. Well,

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd say if fifty. Most people are making good money now,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's seventy seventy dollars a barrel. They're making really

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>good money. Um, And I think people are just a

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more cautious. Certainly the bigger producers about increasing production.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, well you may see production coming on board.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Is actually the small or startup producers who are thinking

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you were saying. Hang on a minute, if

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we put the money in that we can get capital,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we can start drilling, and we can produce and we

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>can make money. That's I think where there's a potential risk.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>How do you think it could go? Um, honestly, no idea.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, let's let's move to aluminum, because

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that's been in the news very much recently. It was

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>huge run up as Roussel came into the crosshairs of

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>US regulators. I'm wondering your view given the tremendous rally here,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think that, uh, you don't really want to

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>be holding aluminium right now? Yeah, I mean I think that,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these things, there was a big

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>hype um when the sanctions you know, came in um

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and aluminum, steel, palladium. To a lesser extent, but the

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia metals, if you want to call them, that got

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>bit up a lot and a lot of analysts we're

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, I'm still talking about you very

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>very high prices for aluminum and some of the other metals.

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably a little bit overblown at the

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>moment um, but certainly there was a lot of fever

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because by definition and all these sanctions when they happen,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they're inflationary for the underlying commodity markets. Well, we're gonna

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of see what happens because the European

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Union is also negotiating with the United States on steel

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and aluminum tariffs as well, right, so that would affect

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the price as much as the Russian issue,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but it would certainly affect the supply in the United States. Correct,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of that comes from outside of the States.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, Canada is obviously a big producer for the

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for the States, um as is Brazil career as well.

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, of course, any kind of trade war affects

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the baseline commodities or whatever piece of legislation is being

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about at that time. Now, I know that you

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>were talking to Lisa offline, about platinum, right, you want

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to give us your thoughts on platinum, another precious metal

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>used particularly in the automobile industry and also in fuel

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>cell technology. Correct, So one one story that you know

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get talked about a lot because the conversation here

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>around future metals and largely tends itself or lends itself

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to lithium and cobalt, manganese, other sort of components of

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the lithium ion battery. And of course that there's a

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>big ground swell of support and a huge momentum around

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>battery technology, particularly for cars, but a lot of people

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily realize that there's also a lot of technology

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>around hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Now it's not happening in

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the US, the same extent is happening in China and

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>other places. But the battery argument sort of goes to

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the point where it's binary. You believe that the market

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>becomes all electric, and therefore there's huge demand for battery

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and the metals associated with it, but there's no demand

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for any other technology. I believe that there will be

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a market for hydrogen fuel cells, and you don't have

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to increase that by much for that to dramatically increased

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>demand for platinum for example. Thanks very much. Yeah, this

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>is really fabulous. We really appreciated. Thank well. Ryan Founder,

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive Granted shares interesting conversation issue. Thanks for listening

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio