WEBVTT - Sen. Amy Klobuchar Talks Trump Transition, AI

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. I'd like to welcome

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>our global Bloomberg television and radio audiences. I'm joined in

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>conversation by Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, live from

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill. Senator, thank you very much for being here.

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.159
<v Speaker 1>You are leading a subcommittee hearing today titled Continuing a

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Bipartisan Path Forward for Antitrust Enforcement and Reform. And I

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>do wonder, in what will become January, a Republican control

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of Congress and Billa versus and White House, what that

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan path actually looks like.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, first of all, thanks for having me on, Kayley.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be on. And I think what you've

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>seen in this area of antitrust, you've seen some broad

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan agreement on a number of these cases. Right. For instance,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the Google case started under the Trump administration, the first

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration, as did the Facebook case that was at

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the FTC. Google was at the Justice Department. Then it

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>proceeded through the Biden administration. Biden administration also brought some

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>major cases, for instance against Ticketmaster and other companies, and

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 2>so you've seen a more aggressive anti trust enforcement over

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the last few years now, you have a new appointees

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>going in place, and at least one of them I

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>have heard the belief is over at the Justice Department

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>with some former Democratic anti trust enforcers that she knows

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>what she's doing. I'm looking forward to meeting with her,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Gail Slater, and I'm hoping that we will continue those cases.

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I love competition, Okay, I like capitalism. That's why I'm

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 2>for anti trust enforcement.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, you've mentioned Gail Slater. What about Andrew Ferguson. Do

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you think he loves the issue of competition in the

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>same way that you do. Do you trust that the

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>FTC will be in good hands under his leadership?

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I am looking forward to meeting with him.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Interestingly enough, we do not confirm that position because he

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.279
<v Speaker 2>was already on the commission. There is a new member

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>that is being appointed on the Republican side. I'll note

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that he also he wrote a piece on the breakup

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of Ticketmaster in which he favored that. So I just

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>think with anti trust because at its core, it is

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 2>about competition, and it's been laggered for many decades, and

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 2>as a result, we're seeing more and more consolidation. It

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't that big companies are bad. It's that sometimes when

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you have no competition, then you start getting less innovation,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 2>more high prices, et cetera, et cetera. So I'm actually

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>really excited about this. Center Lee and I are doing

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>this together. This hearing. Sena Grassley and I have passed

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>our bill together, and I think you're going to continue

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>to see interest in tech. Fact, Center Cruise and I

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 2>did a joint interview this morning and a bill that

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>we have gotten through the Senate on taking online porn

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 2>off the Internet. Different than anti trust, However, you're just

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to see bipartisan and work on tech.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm glad that you have brought up the Take

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It Down Act, which you co sponsored with Senator Cruz.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that trying to tackle symptoms of an underlying disease

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than the disease itself. And the disease I'm referring

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to here is unregulated artificial intelligence.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, I really would like to put in some rules

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 2>of the road on AI. And this bill is actually

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>broader than just AI pornographic issue pictures. It's actually also

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>real pictures as well as AI created ones. We're now

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 2>seeing one in twelve Americans saying that they have been

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>a victim or no, someone that's a victim of this.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>We've had twenty suicides in one year of young kids.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Twenty suicides because someone a girlfriend, boyfriend, someone they knew

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>put up their photo. They were embarrassed that their friends

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and their family would know, and they killed themselves. These

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>are FBI statistics. So Senator Cruse and I came together

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to build us two things. One make it clearly a

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>crime to use pornographic imagery of someone else, whether it's

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>AI created or real. And then number two, that the

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>platforms have to take it down. That's why it's called

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the Take It Down Act. They take down other violations

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of intellectual property and the fact that people can be

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>abused in this way to the point of committing suicide.

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 2>And in one case that I know of, Senator Cruz's case,

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 2>he actually had a call Snapchat to get the image

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>down after months of this victim from his state dealing

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>with it. That's just wrong.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Senator, I'd like to ask you about another one of

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues, your fellow Democrats, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote a letter we understand, to President elect Donald Trump

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>asking for firm conflict of interest rules to be put

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>into place. Related to Elon Musk, who, of course has

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>been tapped to co lead this new Department of Government Efficiency,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have you had any conversations with Senator Warren about that,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least you share in that sentiment.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I haven't seen this letter, but I will say

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.119
<v Speaker 2>that I believe that we need con inflictive interest rules

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 2>in place for people who are making major decisions in

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the government. That is what our people have done voluntarily

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>for years now. And you have a number of very

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>wealthy people going into the Trump administration. There's been wealthy

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>people as well under democratic administration, but you have a

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>number of them coming in and we need the conflict

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>rules in force, and we need to know that the

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>decisions they are making are not for their own interest

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>but for the interests of the American people. And I

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>would hope that President elect Trump agrees.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Finally, President Elect Trump yesterday met with the CEO of TikTok,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Show Chew at mar A Lago, after saying in a

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>news conference Senator that he is a warm spot in

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>his heart for TikTok. When asked if you would like

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to see the ban go through or will try to

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>stop it. Given some of the issues we have already

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>discussed around technology in particular and what is propagated on

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>these platforms, what is your view about whether that band

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>should be enforced come January.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Of course, out of Congress with strong bipartisan support. And

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 2>there are two avenues here. One is that they can

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>follow the law and divest and find a buyer for

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 2>the company, and the second is that they still are

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 2>appealing to the Supreme Court. So my view has been

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that we should have rules of the road in place,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>by the way, for all platforms. I have been way

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>out there, as I think you know, in terms of

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 2>getting not just pornography off the Internet, but other very

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 2>very difficult things that are on there right now, and

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 2>that we should have a better policing of that, and

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 2>people should have the right to protect their own intellectual properties,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 2>and also that we should have antitrust enforcement. You just

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>can't have, say Google, with a ninety percent market share

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 2>on the search engine and not have any competition and

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>then allow them to self preference, as we see with

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Amazon and other companies their own products at the top.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 2>That's why the NFIB, which is not a liberal organization,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the National Federation of Independent Businesses, is strongly supporting the

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 2>bill that I have with Senator Grassley, which simply put

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>some rules in the road in place for competition on

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the Internet. All right.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senator Amy Clobaschar of Minnesota joining us live from

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill on Bloomberg Television and Radio. Thank you so much.