WEBVTT - Paramount CEO Is Out and Amazon, AMD Report Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Hein and Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 4>and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 4>Coming up paramount for places at CEO as M and

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 4>a buzz over shadows results.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Full coverage ahead, plus.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 7>We push ahead to result from Amazon, AMD and Pinterest,

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 7>all reporting after the belt.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 6>And former finance CEO at CZ heads.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 4>To court as prosecutors seek three years in prison. Will

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 4>bring you the latest headlines as they cross, but first

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 4>a check in on these markets and look, the macro

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 4>picture not looking so pretty today and it forces stocks lower.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 4>You get well the cost of labor at the moment,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the ECI number coming in higher than expected, and well

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 4>overall confidence from a consumer plunging.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 6>That means we're not looking so pretty.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Heading into a Federal Reserve meeting that of course ends tomorrow,

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 4>and we hear from Jaypower off by four ten percent

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 4>on the NASDAK tenure yield pushing higher of course, where

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 4>boring costs rise, So stock's full.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 6>We're at four point sixty six, that's what usually the

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 6>trend is.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing dollar stronger versus the Japanese end today, a

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 4>completely flip reverse from yesterday. Looks as though Japan did

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 4>indeed have some intervention into the markets to try and

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 4>prop up the yen. For now it's weaker against the

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>US dollar. Let's move on to have a look at

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 4>what's also we could get versus the US dollar. Bitcoin

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 4>along with other risk asset said on the downside, rob

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>by two point percent, sixty one thousand. This is wrapping

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 4>up to be a pretty poor month of April, the worst.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Since, of course the FTX scandal.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Down somewhat sixteen percent over the course of April for bitcoin,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>and indeed we're seeing a pretty.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Poor month for stocks.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 4>More overall, Nasdaq I think having its worst months since October.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 6>What do you think of the micro today?

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so there's a lot going on real quick.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 7>Tesla is down more than four percent, the information reporting

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 7>the entire supercharger team is gone. But remember twenty four

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 7>hours ago in Monday session, fifteen percent gain, biggest jump

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 7>since March of twenty twenty one on FSD tentative approval

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 7>on China. We'll dig into that later. Then there's earnings

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 7>AMD after the Bell. We know the story how well,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 7>but above or below is the mi I three hundred

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 7>x done relative to expectations. Then you've got Amazon after

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 7>Alphabet and Microsoft Cloud growth driven by AI. We know

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 7>those stories and were look ahead to that later in

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 7>the program. Our top story is Paramount Global, so CEO

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 7>Bob Bakish is gone, replaced by basically a committee of executives.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 7>They release earnings. No one seems to care. The question

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 7>is about M and A in the future. The stockdown

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 7>three point three percent. Let's go right to Bloomberg Intelligence

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 7>and this guita rangon Nathan to try and understand what's

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 7>going on. I love the kind of headline of your

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 7>research overnight, basically earnings and non.

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 5>Av I on M and A.

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 7>But just summarize what last night was like for you

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 7>and what you learned.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, the earnings call ed was was kind of

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>really bizarre. I mean it was, you know, a seven

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>to eight minute call, basically one of the shortest I've

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 3>ever seen in the history of media earnings. There were

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 3>no questions from the analyst or the investment community, and

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>it was just basically the CFO outlining the details of

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the quarter, and you know, the three person committee kind

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 3>of giving their little spiel. But I think yes, there

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 3>were some encouraging elements from the first quarter results, but

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of course M and A is stop and center overall.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that the key takeaway is that this is

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>peak uncertainty right now at Paramount. We really don't know

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 3>what's happening with ownership. We don't know what's happening with

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 3>leadership other than there is this committee. But obviously it's

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 3>a stop gap arrangement and there's no clue in terms

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>of what the future direction or the strategy is.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Have you ever experienced this, Ketha, this lack of clarity

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 4>coming from leadership, coming from the company itself.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean this is kind of one of a

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>kind situation, Caroline. I mean, obviously, Sherry Redstone here is

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>desperately trying to get a deal done with sky Dance,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 3>which is why she had to get rid of Barb Bakish,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 3>who was opposing the deal pretty vocally from the get go.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, there is a looming deadline.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>May third is the day which is Friday is the

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 3>day when the period of exclusive negotiations ends, and so

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to do everything in their power to get

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>to that finish line as quickly as possible.

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, we dig into what is a very evolving story,

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 4>but ultimately with some decent streaming numbers come from Paramount,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 4>we want to dig into all of that. First, we

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 4>thanks Bloomberg Intelligence ANALYSTKEITHA. Rangnath, and let's continue the conversation

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 4>with an expert in the field of media and ultimately

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 4>what on earth this landscape is like to try to

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 4>evolve Paramount. Going forward John Clines with US co founder

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 4>SEO of the sports streaming platform Handed Media. We'll also

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 4>form a president of CNN executive VP of CBS New Boyd.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you understand the internal workings of these sorts of

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 4>companies And I put it to you again, I mean,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 4>there's a corporate governance issue going on at the moment.

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 4>But what should Paramount try you to be doing in

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 4>terms of its fundamentals right now?

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know I have experienced this before because I

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>was the media advisor to the show Succession, and I

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 2>have to tell you if you know so.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Mayhem was our middle name. But if they'd come.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>To me with a plot twist that said they were

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 2>going to dump the CEO two hours before earnings, I

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 2>would have thrown it right back in their faces. I

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>would have said, no way anyway. You know, look, every

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>acquirer feels they can either grow an asset, or squeeze

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 2>additional profit out of the distressed parts, or just sell

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>off the parts. I wouldn't be surprised if David Ellison

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>feels that he lands in the growth camp. You know,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>he's young, he's energetic, he has excellent taste. I love

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>some of the movies that he's produced, and he's got

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Shell as a partner in Jeff is a really

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>savvy operator, you know, as he was when he was

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 2>CEO of NBC Universal. I think that the challenge for

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>any traditional media company in a landscape that is dominated

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>by the tech giants, right Apple, Amazon, Google. You know,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 2>YouTube alone accounts for ten percent of the of the

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 2>TV viewing now on televisions, not not on devices. The

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 2>tech giants are dominating the media landscape, and so whoever

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>ends up owning Paramount has to think hard about that.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 2>They have to think about streaming as a strategy you know,

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 2>because what streaming does is on the line.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 7>Let me just jump in real quick, John, because I

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 7>get that that they're technology companies. They're good at technology.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 7>Caroline and I were discussing before the show. I quite

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 7>like Paramount. I like the streaming platform. I watch all

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 7>my Champions League football on Paramount Plus. I liked Taylo

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 7>it was pretty good. I like some of the Paramount movies.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 7>Top Gun as an example of the Transformers movies. Who

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 7>doesn't what's missing, then what's the fix?

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what's missing.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 2>AI AI is what's driving streaming because it powers all

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>those deep audience insights that allow you to make smarter

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>programming decisions, more precision targeted marketing decisions. On my streaming

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.119
<v Speaker 2>platform has seen our cost of acquiring a customer drop

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>from thirty four dollars to two dollars in one year's

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>time thanks to precision targeting AI. And David Ellison knows

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 2>somebody who is pretty good at the aipiece of it,

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's his dad. And his dad is one of

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the investor. Or Oracle is going to be among the

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>investors in this. And if you add Oracle AI power

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to some of the assets that paramount owns you inch

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>closer anyway toward the giants.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You're not a giant yet.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Their market cap, I think is three hundred and fifty

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 2>times smaller than the big boys, but you're heading in

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the right direction and that would be a smart thing

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>for them to do.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 4>So for you, this is a tech growth perspective coming

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>from Skydance Media. A lot of investors, though, have completely

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 4>seen an erosion in the value of their non voting stock.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 4>They're frustrated that this isn't going to be some more

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 4>open bidding competition going on. John, is there a better,

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 4>more clear way of doing this to try? And we'll

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 4>hear clarity from Skydance and then see what others say.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 4>The reports of an Apollo and a Sony could add themselves.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, Skydance, you know, needs to play its

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>cards close to the vest in the short run. And

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 2>of course, if they end up winning the prize versus

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Apollo slash Sony, you know, then they've got to lay

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>out a strategy and you know that's what the street

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to be looking for work. And you know,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 2>AI can't be ignored and you know, should obviously be

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a central part of things. But look, family controlled or

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>single entity controlled companies invariably lead.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>To this kind of messiness.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>And if whoever ends up with it, at least you

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.359
<v Speaker 2>would hope that things will the operation will run more cleanly.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 7>Moving forward, John, Of all the subscriptions you can have,

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 7>where does powamount rank?

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Look, I'm not alone in saying I churn constantly. Did

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you know that only seven percent of people will tell

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you that they plan to stick with the streaming platform

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that they currently subscribe to. This month, ninety three percent

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>of viewers intend to leave. And that's because people watch

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 2>shows and stars, they don't watch platforms. That's equally applicable

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to Netflix and Disney Plus and all of them. And

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 2>so you know, you've got to think in terms of

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 2>franchises that are driving the bus for a business. So,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, for paramount, the first one that jumps into

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 2>my mind.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the NFL.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the NFL dominates viewership on whatever platform at Arizona,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>whether it's streaming on Amazon Prime or it's the traditional

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>broadcast networks.

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, they news.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Streaming services are also drivers of streaming, and CBS just

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>rebranded their entire CBS News Streaming entity into CBS News

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty four to seven, and so they've got to be

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 2>thinking streaming first, direct to consumer first, AI.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 5>Right, and the masters as well.

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 7>Good example, if you're going to get one chunk off

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 7>or divest a bit, what would it be.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>The cable channels just you know, they're they're they're kind

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of hopeless.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've lost their luster.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, they tend to just play the

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 2>same show fifty thousand times in a row and a block,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>which I like as a consumer. I can put the

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Office on on other channels, you know, and all that.

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>But it's a dwindling asset. Everyone knows that. It's not

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 2>a surprise. I think they had some offers for some

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 2>of the cable channels in the past year. Part of

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the friction between Redstone and Backish was that he didn't

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>sell some of.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Them fast enough or at all. But that's where you'd

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>have to look.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 6>John.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm just going to go bigger here because it's so

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 4>interesting what you bring about the technology story that needs

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 4>to be injected into Powermount. Of course, you were at

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 4>berninks AI, which was sold to Apple. You've got a

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 4>big focus on the AI compartment, but do you think

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 4>were broadly this is going to be happening elsewhere in

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 4>the industry. Paramount is a but one where we think

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 4>m and A or rejuvenation is needed within some of

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 4>these legacy businesses.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean, look, the market cap gap is

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>just enormous.

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the tech.

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Giants are three hundred and fifty times bigger than even

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the biggest, most well known traditional media companies,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers, Discovery, you know, Netflix, even I think we

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 2>have to start thinking of as a traditional media company

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>because the only thing they do is entertainment programming and

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>now they're introducing sports, but they have no tech component.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>They have no theme parks, you know, to mitigate risk

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 2>or anything. So they're a pure playing media company. I

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>think there's bound to be consolidation amidst those and if

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Paramount is smart about pursuing the AI and streaming opportunities,

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>they become a more attractive merger or acquisition target as

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>those smaller players, the smaller planets come.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 7>Together joining Bloomberg Technology, a show available live and on

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 7>demand on lots of platforms. Looking around for a long time.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 7>Hang Media co founder and CEO John Klin. Great to

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 7>have your perspective. Thank you, know, coming up, we're going

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 7>to take a look at the intensifying tech war between

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 7>the US and China. Just days after Elon Musk reached

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 7>that big milestone on FSD. That conversation coming up, this

0:12:52.480 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 7>is Bloomberg technology. The law requiring TikTok to divest or

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 7>be banned could be a pivotal moment in what is

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 7>an escalating rivalry between the US and China in the

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 7>context of technology. TikTok for the US would almost certainly

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 7>head to the Supreme Court, which would have to weigh

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 7>the government's security concerns against the free speech of the company.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 7>And it's all but certain that China will retaliate against

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 7>the US. And that is according to those that watch

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 7>China's government in its responses closely. There's a lot to

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 7>discuss right now in the relationship between China and US

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 7>in the context of tech.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 5>And to do that we bring in Jen Haglee.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 7>The CEO and founder and head of researcher JL Warren Capital.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 7>Let's just start with the TikTok case study. You know,

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 7>byte Dance is the world's most valuable startup, a Chinese giant,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 7>but private, and it's said we have no plan to

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 7>sell divest TikTok in the States, but it's somewhere that

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 7>the States is just not going to accept your view

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 7>on that outcome.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think it's inevitable that the two entities US

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 8>operation will be separated from the parent because consumer data

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 8>in US are just way too way too rich in

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 8>content and the way too sensitive for the same poken.

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think the.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 8>Reason announcement of Testda Bayd is a very case specific situation.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 8>It's not applicable to sort of the broad de escalating

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 8>tension between the US and China China argument.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's so interesting because it feels as though there

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 4>are these two different narratives. If you're a company that's

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>already within China that's able to do ultimately partnerships within China,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 4>as we've seen Tesla and Minding, for example, you will

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 4>be allowed to continue and indeed potentially to thrive. But

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 4>others this is not going to be occurring. What do

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 4>you think of some of the Chinese companies trying to

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 4>make their presence known here in the United States team

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 4>and for example, become quite the addiction.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Will that be allowed?

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 6>Do you think it is right case by case.

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think it's okay if you are small and

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 8>you are under the radar, but when you get to

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 8>a certain scale and when you catch at tension, that

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 8>it becomes sensitive.

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And topical and political.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 8>And I think the broad sort of the political tension

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 8>definitely is a headwing and it's unlikely to be resolved

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 8>in any time soon.

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 7>Jinang, your specialty, Your research is largely on US companies

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 7>with exposure to China. So what was your reaction to

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 7>Tesla getting tentative approval for FSD.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 8>I think the market runs ahead of yourself by so much.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>The partnership.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 8>You can say it's a milestone, but it's really light

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 8>in the terms. So think about twenty five years ago

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 8>when Ford, the gm BMW mer Cites came to the

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 8>came to China need to have a joint venture to

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 8>gain the license or ability to manufacture and sell cars

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 8>to China. So in this case it's kind of similar.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 8>So Tesla is a foreign entity. To be able to

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 8>collect data and do what it does in the US,

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 8>which is oftens striving, it needs a local partner. So

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 8>in this case it's by doing it can be anyone,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 8>So by do will be storing all the data Tesla

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 8>collects on the road and supervise the data usage and

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 8>the filtered before the data gets returned to Tesla for

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, for computing. And what we do not know,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 8>and it's critical to this puzzle, is that how the

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 8>data will be computed, whether it's onshore or offshore, and

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 8>using what capability. So I mean, I think that's the

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 8>critical sort of piece that's missing.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And yet the market just runs ahead of yourself.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 7>It's in It's such an interesting point to Caro's question

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 7>on partnership. You know, in my study of China's autonomous

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 7>driving landscape, you know, by Doo is a domestic champion.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 7>Bydo has its own ambitions for autonomous driving, and Tesla

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 7>could have gone with anyone. As you point out, why

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 7>do you think they went with Baydoo as opposed to

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 7>another robotaxi company.

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 8>I think it could be anyone. It could be by Do,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 8>it could be Pencent, it could be any mapping company.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 8>By Do is just the gatekeeper on behalf of the government.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 8>And what's also unknown is whether this kickoff of f

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 8>SE program in China, whether it's broadly applicable to all

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 8>Tesla vehicles on the road in China, or whether it's

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 8>just applicable to a group of demo demo fleet, which

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 8>is about a couple of dozens of you know, driving

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 8>by do stuff supervising or understanding the data collection process.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>That's unknown and that's critical.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>And it's critical for its long term value as a

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 4>business that's going to be standing apart from other auto companies,

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 4>legacy businesses because of its AI plan. And I'm interested

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 4>in therefore, whether you think there's that much value with

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 4>what's just going on between Tesla and China, and if

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 4>or that's a sacrifice that ultimately has to be made.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 8>Okay, in China, Tesla is actually not the leader in

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 8>a f speed because it didn't or automs atas autons driving,

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 8>because it doesn't have the license to collect data. It

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 8>doesn't have the data. Where it adds the competition Huawei

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 8>x pun meal, they all have their you know, uh

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 8>autians driving.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>System uh that's on the road.

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 8>So they use ambidious orange chip with in house coding, right,

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 8>So that's their respective solution. So I think this partnership

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 8>is Beijing expressing sort of the relaxation of discrimination against

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 8>American companies. Say now we allow you to have access

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 8>to the marking data under the supervision of a Chinese entity,

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 8>and you can you know, make good use of the

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 8>data so that you are on the equal footy. Where's

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 8>your competition in China. That's the extent of that.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 4>It's an interesting landscape that you continue to bring clarity

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 4>on Jail. Warren Capital CEO and founder Trinhangmi, thank you

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 4>for deep diving. Now, colleges in the United States, many

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 4>are rushing to confront some pro Palestinian demonstrations on campuses,

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 4>with disciplinary actions escalating and campus life really thrown into turmoil.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 4>So as the academic year comes to a close. Over

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Columbia and New York, dozens of students entered a campus

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 4>building known as Hamilton Hall after midnight on Tuesday. Marracaded

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 4>themselves in side piling tables, chairs to brock doors and

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 4>covering security cameras. We want to go live to Columbia

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 4>University on the ground as Bloomberg Scarlet Foo and want

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 4>to make clear this is something that's happening across the US,

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 4>but it's also happening across Europe. Outside German Parliament at

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 4>the moment, we're seeing it happen at the Sorbonne in

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Paris is a global element. But what's happening on the

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 4>ground right now with you, Scarlet.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, this is ground zero, Carol line for the pro

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 9>Palestinian protests sweeping across the US college campuses and around

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.479
<v Speaker 9>the world. As you said, about eleven hours ago, dozens

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 9>of Columbia students entered Hamilton Hall, which is behind me here.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 9>They've unfurled banners, one is Free Palestine. On the other side,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 9>there's another banner in front of Hamilton Hall that says

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.479
<v Speaker 9>into Fada in red. As you mentioned, they've barricaded themselves inside.

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 9>They're occupying the building. They've covered security cameras with black

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 9>trash bags. And this is a building that is of

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 9>course a story because it has a history of student occupation.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 9>In nineteen sixty eight, students protested against the Vietnam War.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 9>In nineteen eighty five, students took over Hamilton Hall to

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 9>demand that Columbia divests from companies that do business in

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 9>South Africa during apartheid, and it is from that that

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 9>they take inspiration in making their demands this time around. Clearly,

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 9>this is an escalation, Caroline, and ed from the encampments

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 9>that Columbia and Barnard students set up about two weeks

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 9>ago out on the south lawn in front of Hamilton Hall.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 9>When the President of Columbia, Manusha Figue, testified before Congress,

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 9>the school had given students a deadline of two pm

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 9>Monday yesterday to clear the encampments. Some did, but clearly

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 9>some had chosen to double.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Down Scarlet real quick.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 7>What specifically they're demanding, I just don't get it.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, what they're demanding is financial transparency when it comes

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 9>to the almost fourteen.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Billion dollar endowment.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 9>That Columbia has, as well as divestment divesting from Israeli

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 9>companies and companies that do business with the Israeli government.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 9>Now that's obviously are said than done, given that endowments

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 9>don't just invest in companies and bonds directly, they invest

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 9>in private equity, hedge funds, hard assets. So it's difficult

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:09.239
<v Speaker 9>to entangle all of that.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Scarlett food on the ground at Columbia. Thank you

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 7>say with us, We'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 4>We welcome now our Bloomberg TV and radio audiences worldwide

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 4>to discuss what is occurring at Paramount. Currently, we'll shine

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 4>a light on how shares have been trading lower after

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 4>well first quarter earnings.

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 6>Actually beat expectations.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 4>But what's actually taken the focus of Wall Street is

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 4>a CEO, Bob Backish stepping down, being replaced by a

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 4>trio of executives now being depended on, seemingly on an

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 4>interim basis to lead Paramount amid what seems to be

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 4>ongoing speculation of a deal with Skydance. We want to

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 4>get to a key long term investor in Paramount who's

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 4>been in the name since two thousand and six, who

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 4>believe eves in the streaming opportunity and the value of

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 4>its content. It's John Rodgers, a real investments founder co CEO.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 4>You've been throughout this business in its many iterations, and

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 4>I just want to focus first John, on yesterday growth

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 4>being born out being shown by the business, particularly in

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 4>its streaming, thanks in many ways to the Super Bowl,

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.479
<v Speaker 4>but it was overshadowed by the departure of Bob Backish.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 6>What did you make of the move now?

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty shocking to us.

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 10>I've been Ariel's been in business for forty one years.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 10>We've not seen anything remotely like this. It's just extraordinary,

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 10>and it can't be good for shareholders to be able

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 10>to have all this uncertainty at earning season. You're in

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 10>the middle of a merger and acquisition transaction, you're negotiating

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 10>with Charter Communications. All these important things are happening all

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 10>at once, and you need the CEO in place. So

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 10>this has just been very very disappointing, disheartening, and also,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 10>in the context of what you said, business has been

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 10>getting better. A lot of the initiatives that Bob and

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 10>Bob and his executive team have worked on are really

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 10>starting to show fruition. So the timing just seems extremely,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 10>extremely problematic.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's just talk about probably why Bob Backish has exited,

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 4>and it is because he felt that the negotiations reportedly

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>underway with Skydance were not within his agreement. Now, Sherry

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Redstone is a controlling shareholder at the moment with FUS

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 4>National Amusements. It seems to be the deal that she's

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 4>looking for with skuy Dance. How are you currently dealing

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 4>with the reports of a so called sweetened deal. What

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 4>would you make of a combination of paramount with Skuydance.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, we don't know enough We've read all the same

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 10>pieces that have been written about this, and institutions like

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 10>Puck have had really good information that we've had confirmed.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 10>And so this transaction is really is focused on Skydance.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 10>We think that that may possibly have a chance to work,

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 10>but we really would much rather see the Apollo deal

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 10>with Sony that's been so rumored to be out there,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 10>to get certainty of a you know, Apollo's a world

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 10>class firm with extraordinary resources. Sony has proven to be

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 10>so successful, you know, in this industry that seems like

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 10>a marriage made in heaven, and so we wouldn't rush

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 10>to the altar with a smaller company that's not as

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 10>proven as the Apollo and Sony.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 5>John, Good morning, it's ed in San Francisco.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 7>Do you get any sense because you've held this idea

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 7>that we should look at other offers on the table

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 7>for a while.

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Do you still hold.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 7>That belief but actually the hope that other offers will

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 7>be looked at, Well.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 10>That's we hear.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>We have.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, we had a lot of confidence in management

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 10>that's been nothing but straightforward and candidate with us, that

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 10>they cared about all shareholders and you know, as you know,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 10>the employee bases all own the secondary shares, So we

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 10>really have been very, very hopeful that they were going

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 10>to do the right thing for shareholders, and that's been

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 10>something that's been committed to us consistently, and we believe them,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 10>and we just continue to think that you don't need

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 10>to rush when things are getting going well. This is

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 10>not a melting ice cube. This is a company in recovery,

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 10>in a turnaround mode. We want to make sure that

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 10>all shareholders get to be able to take advantage of that.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 10>And the price that Skuydance is suggesting seems to us

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 10>what we've read, much lower than what we would get

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 10>from the Apollo Sony deal and many others that could

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 10>possibly be out there if this company was truly shopped around.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 10>And the final thing I would say is the directors.

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 10>We know several as independent directors, and we know that

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 10>they're committed to doing what's fair for all shareholders. So

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 10>I'm hoping they'll be able to get to the finish line.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 7>John, what does a change of ownership structure or this

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 7>M and a path fix to Paramount?

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think that with Apollo and Sony you would

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 10>end up with enormous resources. It would help them with

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 10>their balance sheet that has, you know, gotten higher than

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 10>we would have hoped. You'll be able if you're working

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 10>with Sony. Sony has been an expert of being an

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 10>arms dealer, being able to use content and ways to

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 10>generate cash flow and profits, and have the extraordinary library

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 10>that Paramount brings, the history of Paramount's lot where they

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 10>have been able to make movies for generations, and there'll

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 10>be enormous synergies, you know. I think the synergies between

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 10>Sony and Paramount Paramount are much much greater than you

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 10>can imagine with a smaller company like Skydance. So we're

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 10>really hopeful that you'd be able to get great synergies,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 10>higher cash flow and an experienced management team that will

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 10>be able to make those tough calls of what happens

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 10>with Pike Paramount, plus how much do you use content there?

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 10>How do you use it in selling into other competing

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 10>services like Netflix. We want that kind of experience leadership

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 10>that has been proven, and I know there are some

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 10>other large streamers out there they could possibly also get

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 10>into the mix.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 4>We are of course with John Rogers of Aerial Investments

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 4>found of Coco to our radio and TV audience. John,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 4>regulatory issues though with both potential tie ups, is that

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 4>a concern for you?

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a modest concern for the real large

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 10>guys that are out there. I understand that people would

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 10>be worried if Netflix, for example, was to buy Paramount Global.

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 10>But ultimately, I think if people are really looking this

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 10>for the long run, you know, there's been lots of

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 10>litigation around some of the regulatory constraints that are out

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 10>there in today's economic system, I think ultimately rational people

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 10>will see do you want to see Paramount Plus collapse?

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 10>Do you want to see all those jobs lost? Do

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 10>you want to see a world class American company in disarray?

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 10>Or do you want to see it find a great

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 10>parent where they can merge and have a successful, growing

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 10>business over over the next decade or so. So I

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 10>think I'm hopeful that regulators will be able to make

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 10>the right decision, have it open mind about all the

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 10>various different possible combinations that are out there, And I

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 10>certainly think the Apollo a Sony deal should not have

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 10>any significant regulatory concerns.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 4>John, You've written to your own investors in your Q

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 4>one report really saying, look, you're not an activist investor,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 4>but you feel it's your fiduciary duty to raise concerns,

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 4>particularly from a corporate governance perspective here. And I want

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 4>to go back to the fact that you have held

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 4>this stock throughout these iterations, and you've seen the fact

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 4>that there was this controlling shareholder. Did you sort of

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 4>worry this might ever evolve from this corporate governance structure?

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 6>That particularly you're worry was.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 4>The fact that three independent board members have recently stepped

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 4>down amid this m and A speculation.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, over the years, I've mentioned, you know, the

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 10>forty one years, we've not seen anything like this. I've

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 10>never in all the years of owning stocks that have

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 10>dual class shares, I've never seen a scenario where the

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 10>A shareholders were going to get a significantly larger premium

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 10>than the B shareholders. And that's just something we've never

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 10>seen before. And there's been a lot of smart investors,

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 10>it's youeno factual over the years. You know, Warren Buffett's

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 10>been a shareholder, We know Mario Gabelly, my friend Mario

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 10>has been a shareholder. We had other several good, smart

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 10>people looking at this and we've always felt that people

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 10>would do the rational thing and do the right thing

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 10>for all shareholders. That's what management's told us, Frankly, that's

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 10>what Sherry has said over time. And so we think

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 10>that this is something that came as a real, true surprise,

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 10>and it's something again like we've never seen before.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 7>John, I watched The Masters on Paramount Plus. I get

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 7>my Champions League football through Paramount Plus.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 5>I liked Halo.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 7>What is it that you like about paramounts existing portfolio

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 7>and offering.

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, you started at the right place. They have extraordinary

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 10>content that you know you must see. The super Bowl,

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, had great, great ratings, Grammys were great. You

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 10>mentioned the Masters.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 5>They've got great scripted shows.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 10>The CSI franchise, the news franchise, CBS Sunday Morning sixty Minutes,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 10>CBS Evening News, and this is robust history. But then

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 10>you put on top of it this extraordinary library with

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 10>the Paramount Greats, Mission Impossible and The Godfather. You could

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 10>go on and on and on. They've got Pluto, which

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 10>is an extremely successful streaming service. You've got worldwide assets

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 10>the Bob Backish used to run that are extremely valuable

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 10>and seem to get ignored by the analyst community and

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 10>the value that's there. So they have a well diversified

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 10>group of assets, many hidden assets, real estate that it

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 10>hasn't completely been utilized, institutions like Showtime and BT that

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 10>I wish they had found a way to have sold earlier.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 10>But these are real, true assets to this company. And

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 10>I think sometimes people get into the group think of

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 10>the moment, they're worried about the cord cutting, and they're

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 10>forgetting to value all of the assets that Paramount Global has.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 4>You're a value investor, you look at the value. John,

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 4>You'll also say, you don't sell into chaos. What do

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 4>you do though, if a deal with Skuydance goes ahead.

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, we have been looking at all of our options.

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 10>We did write a letter to the board of directors

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 10>explaining our position. We've been, of course talking to expert

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 10>legal counsel, and our general counsel is terrific and she's

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 10>been on top of those issues. So we're looking at

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 10>all of our alternatives and we'll see how this all

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 10>plays out. But we would like to see this play

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 10>out in a way that is very constructive because it

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 10>would be not a good thing for a sky dancer

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 10>trying to buy a company where you're in litigation with

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 10>all of your shareholders or many of your shareholders, I

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 10>should say many of your shareholders, and at the same time,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 10>your senior management is not going to be happy if

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 10>the deal isn't fair for the b shareholders. That's the

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 10>management team owns. And we all know M and A

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 10>is difficult in the best of circumstances getting all the

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 10>synergies done and all the tough calls that have to

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 10>be made, and it would be a difficult environment I

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 10>think for them to be able to be successful, while

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 10>you could have such a cleaner deal with an extraordinary

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 10>company like Apollo and Sony.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 7>John Rogers, Aerio Investments, founder and co CEO, grateful for

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 7>your time, Thank you, Welcome back to Member of Technology.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 7>A quick check on the markets and three names that

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 7>we're looking because they report earnings after the bell. You're

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 7>either an AI or advertising story or you're both. AMD

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 7>up four ten to percent. The story is really clear.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 7>The three hundred X is their current generation AI accelerator.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 7>They were on track to do three and a half

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars of sales this year. Will they catch up

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 7>with Nvidia? Will they pull ahead of Intel? The above

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 7>or below. That's the story. Then Amazon's down a percentage point.

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 7>It is interesting the bar so high following alphabet the

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 7>parent of Google and Microsoft earnings because both showed growth

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 7>in their cloud sales, but both gave us either numbers

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 7>or evidence that contrab to cloud growth specifically came from AI.

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 7>In Amazon's case, advertising is also really interesting, right, so

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 7>twelve percent overall top line growth, but it's the first

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.280
<v Speaker 7>quarter where since January they've included ads in Prime Video?

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Does that show up as revenue? Really interesting?

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 7>In mpinterest they're not seeing any user growth, but the

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 7>street car I thinks they might be okay because it's

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 7>been a mixed picture so far. But on the whole,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:25.479
<v Speaker 7>maybe advertising not so bad.

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Pinterest is just a different type of a business, isn't it.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Aired Then the fact that we've seen pinterest try to

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 4>really focus in on, well, this is a safe space,

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 4>an optimistic place, particularly in the current political narrative.

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 5>I'd say yeah.

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 7>And one thing I want to know as well is

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 7>like ads, meaning what like AI, ads ads or AI?

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 5>I still don't quite get that story.

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 4>We've got someone who knows everything about ads and AI

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 4>luckily joining us now Integral Ads Science CEO Lisa Uchneiner,

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 4>Integral ad Science actually helps advertisers at Fortune five hundred

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 4>brands measure if their campaigns are appearing next to safe,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 4>suitable content across Metro, Instagram, TikTok, yout Pinterest, We're just

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 4>talking about Spotify, linkedins.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Now, you name it, you measure it.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 4>And I'm really interested by what ultimately your bread and

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 4>buster business been looking like of late. Have brands felt

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 4>more secure through your data to come and align the

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 4>ads next to those of well use more Metapinterest, Snap

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 4>and I like.

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 11>Sure Integral ads Science and thank you for having me.

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 11>We're a leading digital media quality company and we focus

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 11>on exactly what you're speaking to measurement optimization for over

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 11>two thousand brands worldwide. We work with the leading platforms

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 11>and publishers and we built a technology back by AI.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 11>It's multimedia classification technology. We're in the live feeds of

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 11>all the major social platforms. We are classifying video, image,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 11>audio and text ensuring that the brands are running adjacent

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 11>to brand safe and suitable.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 6>Content and has the date to have been getting better.

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 11>The data is absolutely getting better. Our technology is highly sophisticated.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 11>We're classifying frame by frame and what I mean by that,

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 11>if there's let's say a thirty second TikTok video running,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 11>we are classifying every single second of that thirty second

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 11>TikTok video to ensure brands aren't running adjacent to unsuitable

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 11>content like hate speech, violence, and as we rolled out recently, misinformation.

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 7>Lisa is Pinterest a platform you take seriously in the

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 7>context of ads.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 11>The brands take all of the platforms seriously, including Pinterest,

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 11>And as you look at the size of the digital

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 11>advertising market space and the fact that advertisers they're pouring

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 11>billions and billions of dollars into digital advertising, they want

0:36:56.200 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 11>to ensure that an independent verification company like Integral ad Science,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 11>we are classifying and verifying the quality of the media,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 11>and that we're holding the platforms accountable and responsible again,

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 11>ensuring that we're identifying the inappropriate stuff and helping advertisers

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 11>run their brands adjacent to more appropriate, brand suitable content.

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 4>And we'll see how those social media companies have benefited

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 4>from some of that growing confidence research.

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 6>Snider, we thank you for being hit Intagled ad Science.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 7>CEO Changpeng cz Jow, the billionaire founder of the Binance

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 7>Crypto Exchange is starting his sentencing hearing today on anti

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 7>money laundering charges and prosecutors recommending the court give him

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 7>three years in prison, double the maximum that guidelines prescribe.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 7>Let's go out to Bluebo's Olga Krief, who has all

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 7>the details of what are we expecting.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 12>So we are expecting the hearing perhaps to last not

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 12>very long, in a couple of hours. CZ will probably

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 12>speak at the hearing, and his lawyers are pushing for

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:19.240
<v Speaker 12>probation and sort of much you know, less harsh sentence

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 12>than what the prosecution has asked for. And of course

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 12>you'll recall that in November CZ pled guilty to a

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 12>number of charges and he agreed to pay a fifty

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 12>million dollar fine, and Binance agreed to a four point

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 12>three billion dollar fine, and today we'll find out sort

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 12>of what happens to him. He still retains his ownership

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 12>of Finance, which has been doing extremely well, especially in

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 12>this year's sort of cryptoble market, driven by the introduction

0:38:54.920 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 12>of US Spot bitcoin exchange exchange traded funds.

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, Olga Curf, we thank you for really an amazing read.

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 6>It's the big take today, go online, go check it out.

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 6>Because it really is about.

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately the fortune of cz and how that doesn't seem

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 4>to be being vented anytime soon, whether he says prison

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 4>time or not. Meanwhile, though, there is a whole raft

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 4>of other crypto news to be getting into in a

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 4>batch of ets. So we're just talking about investing directly

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 4>in crypto just debuted over.

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 6>In Hong Kong.

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 4>So is this competition to the US bitcoin products? Is

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 4>this going to bring in new investors, particularly.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Over in Asia?

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Still Mark founder and managing partner and ease Colleen joins us. Now,

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 4>look still coin. Still Mark is a bitcoin focus venture

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 4>capital firm. We got eighty five million dollars in assets

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 4>on a management You've been doing this for a long time,

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 4>looking at the protocols, the real use cases of bitcoin.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 4>This is eth and Bitcoin spot ETF. What does this

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 4>mean for the industry.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 13>Well, it's the first time we're seeing the ETF perform

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 13>against Bitcoin ETF. And what we saw in Hong Kong's

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 13>day one launch was that much of the activity, the

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 13>vast majority of the activity was in the Bitcoin ETF.

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 13>We saw about just under thirteen million dollars of trading activity,

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.800
<v Speaker 13>which is a lot for the Hong Kong market sized

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:17.280
<v Speaker 13>at fifty billion. Issuer China AMC has reported one hundred

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 13>and forty one million dollars in assets under management after

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 13>day one, and eighty six percent of that is in

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 13>the Bitcoin spot ETF.

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 7>At least, Why is it important that we have multiple

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 7>markets New York, Hong Kong. We talked the other day

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 7>about Australia thinking about its place in this market.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 13>First of all, of course, Bitcoin's price is a product

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 13>of adoption and expansion of its utility set. As esetfs

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 13>are introduced in new markets and new geographies, we are

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 13>advancing adoption. We're bringing a new group of users into

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 13>bitcoin through a regulated product, albeit one that relies, of

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:01.359
<v Speaker 13>course on a custodian We're also moving closer to having

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 13>a twenty four to seven spot ETF market. Of course,

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 13>with the addition of Hong Kong.

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested in Hong Kong specifically because of his relationship

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 4>with China and the regulatory oversight. What does this mean

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 4>for China's relationship with crypto, Yes, exactly.

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 13>Many are interested for exactly the same reason now, of course,

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 13>in the launch of the Bitcoin and East Spot ETFs

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 13>in Hong Kong. People in China do not have access,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 13>so it's a more curtailed audience. Of course, that said,

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:43.320
<v Speaker 13>we are still introducing an entirely new audience, and one

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 13>that one that thinks differently, has different has exposure to

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 13>different media sources, and we expect that this is a

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 13>positive sign for broader proliferation of bitcoin products in Hong

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 13>Kong and in the reg and exposed to this product still.

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 7>Mark founder and managing partner Elisa Colleen, we really appreciate

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 7>your real time global perspective, and fortunately for our audience,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 7>there's more coverage of those ETFs and the CZ sentencing

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 7>at the top of the next hour on Bloomberg Crypto.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 7>The understanding is that in the CZ hearing at least

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 7>carow a lot of that will kick off around midday

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 7>New York time, which is nine am out here on

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 7>the West.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Pretty perfect if you want to be digesting that in

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 4>real time with a crypto show, but we sort of

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 4>tease ahead to it, but for now, that's our job

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 4>done on this edition of Bloombog Technology.

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, a really massive after market earning situation that we're

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 7>going to be tuned into and tomorrow is going to

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 7>be a big discussion on that. The pod on Apple, Spotify.

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 7>iHeart the Bloomberg platforms. Thank you to listening to the podcast.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg Technology.