WEBVTT - Week 3: Wide Receiver Catastrophes!

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>advice Leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Welcome to Fantasy

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. It is week number three. We are here

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to help you notch a victory. I am Paul Chargy

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and my co host Sayer, Brian Johnson, and Matt Harrison.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Hello guys, Hello governor. That's what I was gonna say.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of the show, we will give you

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>nine players upon whom you can take a chance. We'll

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>answer three tough questions and give you three players that

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>we believe you should speculate on prematurely this week that

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody else will be trying to pick up next week.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell you who they are. Near the end of the show,

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>will break down every match up fantasy style with letter

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>grades on every meaningful player. And we begin with the

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals taking on the Philadelphia Eagles. Last time we

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>saw Cincinnati, Joe Burrow was throwing his arm out of

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>socket practically and with repetitions. Joe Mixon wasn't doing a lot.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the key players for the Bengals.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Yeah, I'll start with Mixing. Remember last year he

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>had an incredibly slow start to Uh. He only scored

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one time through Week six of last season, but it

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was Week three of the year last year where he

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>had his little peak of his early season slump. This

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>year has been odd because he's had twenty one and

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty touches in his first tame plenty to work with.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just he's come up a little empty handed. Uh.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>The Philly matchup looked tough last year, but through two weeks,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles have allowed forty more yards per game to

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>opposing runners, as well as three touchdowns in the first

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>two weeks to opposing running backs. So I'm giving Mixing

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a C. It's probably you know, uh high see like

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>an Ecto cooler. I think that it sounds like he's

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a B. He's getting plenty of work and there's a

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bad defense. You know, if there was something between a

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>B and A see, definitely give him one Ecto Cooler. Yeah.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow, he gets a B grade. Burrow has kept

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>things conservative and his first two starts, but he's been successful.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging only eight and a half yards per completion,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's completing his passes. It's very good for us

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to start rookie similar to fellow first overall picked Jared Goff.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>That's how Jared Goff plays, by the way, Jared Goff

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>had two sixty seven and three against this defense last week.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So Burrow is a solid be uh. Tyler Boyd. I'm

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>giving a B grade to A. J. Green gets a C.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Green has had twenty two targets to Boyd's thirteen, but

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Green's then basically nothing, averaging four catches and forty yards

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>per game. Well, Boyd is securing five and a half

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>catches for fifty three yards. Boyd and Green this week

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>said that he still doesn't feel like he really knows

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the playbook and feels in sync with this offense. That's why,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I understand he missed last year, but that

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was last year. You had all off season everything else. Yeah,

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like hearing that from A. J. Green. He's

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>averaging eleven targets per game, though, so you kind of

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have to leave him in lineups even though it's not

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going well because he's gonna catch more of those. Eventually,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. So Boyd has a better matchup

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this week, as Cooper Cup and Steven Sims total one

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty one from the slot. Well, Terry McLaurin and Robert

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Woods only managed seventy five from the perimeter. So I

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like Boyd better. We're not going as far as Mike

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Thomas or Drew sample. Uh c j Uzoma on I

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>r with a torn achilles May he rest in peace?

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh Miles Sanders on the other side, he gets an

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>A grade while Boston Scott is on the bench. I

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like Scott more if he wasn't so past dependent. Chargers

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>backs combined for twenty four yards and a score on

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Brown's backs to ten and three on the ground,

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but both teams only five receptions in twenty seven yards total,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so Boston Scott's out Sanders had twenty of the twenty

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>four rushing attempts last week too. Carson Wentz he gets

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Everyone was all excited about Baker last Thursday.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He only put up to nineteen and two against the Bengals,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>but he did look good because it's the Bengals terrible

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pass rush. They gave him all the time in the world.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals only have two sacks on the season so far,

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'd like to see when's kind of get it going.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But the running matchups just so juicy, and he's got

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>injuries all up and down the wide receiver corps. Jalen

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Reagor probably not gonna go with a thumb injury. He

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is he on I are now that's new to me.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Al Sean questionable with the foot. He might come back,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're both on your bench. And Deshaun Jackson, he's

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>only a C grade. He's averaging eight targets per game

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but has done barely anything and the only only one

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers hit the eight yard mark against the Bengals

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in their last six games. But Zach Ertz and Dallas

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Goddard are the guys you want to play. I'm giving

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>arts An and got heart be there's still the best

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>receivers on the roster. Goddard has seven teen targets on

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the season, Urtsys has seven in each game. Hunter Henry

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>had five catches for seventy three in the first week

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>against this defense, which is fine. That wasn't a particularly

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>little tough match up against the tight end either. They're

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be just fine in this game. Yeah, I think so. Too.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They're effectively the Philadelphia tight ends are basically wide receiver.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Wanted wide receiver too. Absolutely, let's go to Houston taking

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on Pittsburgh gets the third in three straight brutal matchups

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for your Texans. And if there's ever a time you're

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>going to buy low on Texans, this is it heading

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>into Pittsburgh when the owners have got nothing out of

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>their Texans and they're looking at Pittsburgh going I can't

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>even start my Texans right now. What tysans are there

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there that you want to buy low on? But basically

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>all of them because you'll pay pennies on the dollar

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for Deshaun Watson, Fuller Johnson, because because right now now,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if you wait a week, the new the owner is

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at the schedule, which turns very soft and

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out and go, well, you know, I've waited out these

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>three impossible weeks. This is the time to strike, I believe,

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>before Sunday's games. Anyway, With that free amble, I just

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just killed all of your time to talk about the

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans foibles against the Putils pretty much. But yeah,

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>let's pretend the owner just looks at Sunday's box scores

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and not the forthcoming schedule, and then you can really

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>buy low on your Texans because it's a brutal matchup

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for basically everyone. Will start with DeShawn Watson, who is

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the most pressured quarterback in the NFL, and these Steelers

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lead the league and pressure rate and are the most

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>splits happy team out there. So I quite frankly fear

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>for Deshaun Watson. And when I envisioned, like you know,

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>when Sonic the Hedgehog would get hit and all his

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>rings would fly out, that's all the money DeShawn Watson

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is to me. He's gonna fly out his pockets. That'd

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>be pretty cool. So over to his pass catchers, it

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get much better. I'm gonna give Will Fuller a

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>c desplite zero targets last week, squad dooche, but he

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was hurt then in his healthy now the story the

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>song remains the same for wolf Fuller here. Um, it's

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a brutal matchup, though, despite the fact that Darius Slayton

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>roasted the Pittsburgh secondary for one oh two and two

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in Week one, only one wide receiver top the

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and scored multiple touchdowns against the Steelers. All

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of last season and they weren't even the same person.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>It was Tyler Boyd with the yards and Philip Door

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>set of all people in week one with two touchdowns

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>before the acquired makeup Fitzpatrick. So just to see for Fuller,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and I got Brandon Cooks on the bench despite the

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>upticking targets last week because Fuller saw zero. I'm just

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to Brandon Cooks either. It's it's a brutal

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup and the tight ends. I was tempted to start one,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>but I got them both on the bench despite the

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>fact Darren Fell Darren Fell scored last week, Jordan Aikins

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>had seven catches. Jon Nakins is emerging. Yeah, but the

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end usage is very intriguing in Houston. If one

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of these guys goes down, we might have a top

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve tight end on our hands. But they're both on

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the bench this week. And I should say, Brandon cook

0:07:58.280 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so put them in your line up for next week

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>when they got the Vikings. But Benson this week and

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>um David Johnson also gets to see The Steelers have

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed just ninety seven rushing yards on thirty eight carries

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so far the season. That's two point six yards per carry.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We all watch Sa Kwon get shut down in Week one,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but Philip Lindsay managed ninety four combo yards and a

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdown catching garbage time last week. Johnson has that potential

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, so he gets a sea over to Pittsburgh.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>James Conner gets the A, even though I'm worried about

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>him finishing the game. The bell cow was back for now.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>He also gets right guard David de Castro back who

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>missed the first two games this year. Houston allowing six

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>point four yards per carries to imposing back, So an

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>easy A for James Conner and an easy A for

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Deonta Johnson. I'm talking about him first before Juju Man,

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Well you should, yeah. Thirty two point three percent of

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's targets in Week one, thirty one point seven in

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>week to the third highest target share percentage in the NFL.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore wide receivers were quiet against Houston last week, but

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>that was dictated by game script. Both Sammy Watkins and

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Tyree Hill caught a touchdown in Week one against Houston.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>So I love Deonta Johnson and I love the Juju

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in Week one gave him an a pacock no time

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for that, I know, but I'm gonna gieve him a

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>be this week. He will play with the knee injury.

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>His target share is south at which is troubling, but

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the explosion is clearly back. Two touchdowns in week one,

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>seven catches last week. You cannot sit him right now,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>especially against the Texans. You can sit James Washington, though,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>got him on the bench. Game script for reads me here,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but I would still roster him, hold on to him

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in the most of leagues Eric he run on the bench,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>target totals of two and five so far this season.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews was quiet against Houston last week, so he

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>run on the bench. And lastly, Big Ben gets a b.

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>He looks really good. That arm strength is only gonna

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>get better following Tommy john surgery. Again, I'm just worried

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about the game script here. It could be a Connor day.

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But Patrick Mahomes had three passing touchdowns only two hundred

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven yards, and Lamar Jackson didn't blow up the box

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>score either against Houston. That's a little troubling. You can't

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>convince me Houston is suddenly a great second Oh no,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not just well, Ben Ben. I think he's capped

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at thirty thirty pass attempts. That's my only concern here.

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He still gets a very solid B no plus though.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Charge At some point we'll we'll talk more about Deonte Johnson,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think he is a top ten Fantasy wide

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver overall. Washington takes on Cleveland in our final matchup

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of this segment, and for Washington, there's just a couple

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of guys you want to talk about. But I want

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to start with Logan Thomas, who I love this week,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've got to be grade on Loto Loto one

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the many quarterback turned tight ends

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in history. Like, um, all right, well, I guess nobody's

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ever a quarterback turned tight end. The Browns are the opponent.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>They've already allowed three tight end touchdown Marquis Gray quarterback.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, there he turned tight end and like that,

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Like how that turned out? Browns have allowed the second

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>most receptions and six most yards to tight ends. And

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get this, Thomas on the field for percent of Washington

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>plays last week, only Darren Waller and Travis Kelsey have

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>seen more targets than Logan Thomas. In a juicy man

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>jump B grade, staying with the passing attack Terry McLaurin.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Through two weeks, he's accounted for forty six percent of

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington's passing yards just for him, Barry mclard. This week

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he faces a battered Brown secondary that's going to be

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.479
<v Speaker 1>without Greedy Williams. They've allowed the eighth most yards to receivers.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh and that was despite facing you know, the Bengals

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>with Rickie, Joe Burrow and a run centric Ravens team.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So we'll we'll start Verry Terry McLaurin with a B

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>grade and then the only other player I want to

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about for Washington is they're starting running back in

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson. He experienced a huge uptick in usage last

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>week and hopefully that continues here. The Browns are allowing

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the third fewest rushing yards on a smothering two point

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>nine yards per carry. Who are these Browns? If mark

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Ingram and Joe Mixon can't top forty six rushing yards

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>or score, then I can't give a starting grade to

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson. This week, j K. Dobbins had a good

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>game against them, and I believe Jio. Look, okay, just stoke.

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's the second running back and that may pay.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I hope not. I hope not. Let's go to the

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland side. We'll start with a running game. Nick Chubb

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. No team has allowed fewer Fantasy points

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>to running backs and Washington's there's a little danger here.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>No runners scored and they held Kenyan Drake and Check

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>last week. Still Washington's just the middle of the pack

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>run defense, their middle of the packing yards per carry.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Chubb continues to get all the money carries near the stripes,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>so we'll give him the B. Kareem Hunt gets just

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to see only had a twelve touches and twenty snaps

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>last week, but still turn it into a good game.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>But you worry if that's all the touches he's gonna get,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be hard to keep scoring two touchdowns a game.

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Washington was terrible stopping runners through the air.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>This year they've looked better, but I doubt they've transformed

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>doing a shutdown unit against guys at Kareem Hunts skill level.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So he's still startable with a CE gright. Let's go

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game. Baker Mayfield looked incredibly poised and

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>comfortable last time. We saw him to thursdays ago. I

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think it continues here if Cleveland's overall overhauled offensive line

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is truly improved, because they're going up against this terrific

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington front four, a group that Profobot focuses ranks as

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the fifth best pass rush. Remember, they got four first

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>round picks on Washington's defensive front line. The Washington secondary

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>looks improved, but the personnelity personal really isn't improved. I

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just think they're they look improved because the pass rush

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>has been good. I think if Baker's line can just

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>hold up, I think he'll do okay here. I've got

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on Baker Mayfield, a B grade for

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. Against Washington, no receiver's topped sixty eight yards,

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>but already five receivers have topped fifty yards, so I'd

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>see an okay game coming for Odell Beckham. Jarvis Landry

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>playing hurt. He's scored one time in his last seven games,

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's um he's been. He goes up against the

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>slot cornerback Jimmy Moreland, who struggled and last week alone

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gave up ten catches for a hundred six yards. So

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis land remained startable with a C grade. We've dropped

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>off Austin Hooper out of our rosters entirely. We're not

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>going to spend time on him. When we come back,

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Nine players upon whom you

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>can take a chance. These are guys not normally in

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>your starting line up. Many of these are available on

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire, and man, do we need receivers this week.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So many guys are out. We'll tell you who you

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>can count on to pick up off the waiver wire

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and plug into your starting lineup. When we return to

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, getting you

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>ready for Sunday's action. There is a segment week call

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. We give you nine players

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>upon whom you can take a chance. These are players

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not normally in your starting lineup, but they can be.

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>This week. We beginning at the quarterback position and Brian Johnson,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I have Philip Rivers at home against the Yets, and

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this is quite simply a professional quarterback against the worst

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>team in professional football, the Jets. Second. Yeah, yeah, the

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>verdicts still out there, but I'm still giving Jets the

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>edge here. The Jets secondary has gone way South since

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>jettisoning JOm All Adams. They're awful ran pass coverage by

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a pro football focus, and they have surrendered two passing

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>scores in each game so far. That feels like a

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty safe floor for Philip rivers and this one. So

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>why not? All these kids will be cheering for this

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>big game. Okay, Matt, you'll take a chance at the

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Nick Mullins of the San Francisco forty Niners spent

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a while since we've seen him, Oh the Mulligan. Uh.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>He started eight games for the Niners and twousand eighteen

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he averaged two four passing yards per game, and those

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>eight contests and through for multiple scores and four of eight.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins is a good quarterback, and he gets Kyle

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan as his offensive coordinator and head coach who gets

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to scheme for him for a week. He's facing off

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>against the lowly Giants as well. The Giants have allowed

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>over two yards or multiple touchdown passes to six of

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the last seven quarterbacks they've faced, and they've already allowed

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>five touchdown passes this season. Nick Mullins, go get him

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm I'm with you on that and it's

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>got to be a fantastic DFS. He is DraftKings the

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>cheapest starting quarterback this week. There you go, my quarterback,

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>There we go. It's Happy Trombone Ski. I am surely

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>jaxing the hell out of Happy Trombone Ski with his

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>third straight starting grade and second appearance in this segment.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm doing it anyway because the matchup is so tantalizing.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons have been blasted for almost eight hundred passing

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and another fifty rushing yards by quarterbacks so far,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and that includes eight touchdowns to opposing quarterbacks and three

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of them on the ground to Dak Prescott. And you

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, Happy Trombone Sky fleet of a rushing touchdown

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>possibility here too. He's got great matchups, including Allen Robinson

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he can throw out of the backfield against a team

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>that always struggles against running backs as receivers. By the way,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>every Falcons game this year, if you add up all

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>the passing yards from Matt Ryan and opposing quarterbacks, it

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>might be the most passing yards in history in games.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>In games, it's gonna be eight hundred yards of game

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>like almost every game I I contest. Just let the

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Falcons score three touchdowns if you're the opposing head coach,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna you're gonna put up even more

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>points against him if you super weak on side kick

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at them. This reminds me of the old Layola Marre

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Amount basketball All team Hank gathers Um that would say

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we would let them score so we could get the

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>ball back. But I'm down for it. Let's go to

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the running back position, Brian. They say it's your birthday,

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Dion Lewis, baby at home against the forty Niners. Birthday

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty Burger on the way. Yeah, I know. They just

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.239
<v Speaker 1>signed DeVante Freeman, and the narrative all summer was like,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>when is Deonta gonna choose someone to sign with. I'm

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure no one wanted to sign Deonta DeVante Freeman. No,

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because he looked cooked as all hell last year. There's

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>no way it comes in after five days and leads

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>his team in touches. So I'm going the way of

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Dion Lewis against the forty Niners, who are basically missing

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>everyone on defense right now, and the Jets running backs

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are awful who they faced the forty Niners last year,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>but they combined for twenty eight touches. Fifteen is a

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>lock for Lewis, who will get most of the work

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in the passing games. Chase Edmonds caught a touchdown against

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>San fran And week one, So Dion Lewis is playable,

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all right. I'm staying with the Niners and I'm going

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>with Jet McKinnon. Mullins favorite target could very well be McKinnon. Uh.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>The Niners have had a league high thirty seven percent

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of their targets go to running back so far this year,

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and McKinnon takes over for an injured raheem most dirt

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and even and even more injured Tevin Coleman, and he's

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>been electric in his first two games, accounting for scores

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in each week, including a long touchdown run last week.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Plus last week, the Bears backs totaled seven catches for

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards and a score through the air against the Giants.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be Mullins to McKinnon all day long. Yeah.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And if McKinnon's gone in your league, and he's gone

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in many, Jeff Wilson is a good start as well.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about that in the match up. They

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>always roll in that second running back at San France.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Second running backs always relevant and he'll get the goal

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>line work. My take a chance of your running back

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is Josh Kelly of the Chargers going up against Carolina,

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>ostensibly the backup, but it's really more of a one

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>two punch there, and both guys will have a great opportunity.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Austin Ekeler as well. The Panthers historic bad

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>run defense. They now have allowed running back touchdowns in

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen straight games, and over those fourteen straight games, they're

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>averaging two and a half running back touchdowns per game.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So both of them get paid here. Kelly's actually getting

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>more looks inside the ten yard line than Austin Ekeler,

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like a touchdown here is all but

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>inevitable for Josh Kelly. Let's go to the receivers, Brian

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>who you got Cool Beasley at home against the Rams

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>who are definitely going to bring bring the pressure in

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the toughest matchup for the Bills, who look great. Uh,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a game where Beasley season at

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>least eight targets easily. He has back to back double

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>digit PPR games to start the season. The Rams have

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed the eighth most catches to wide receivers. Jalen Ramsey

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>will certainly be locked on Stefon Diggs and Beasley's matchup

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>with Troy Hill is plus. Till has allowed catch rate

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage so far this season. Okay, Matt, go

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to t J. Hockenson of the Lions. He's the only

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Detroit tight end with a target this year and he's

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>come up with five fifty six and one in Week one,

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>four for sixty two you in Week two. Good numbers.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a lack of shab right there in

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>those numbers. Uh. And he gets the Cardinals and while

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they haven't allowed a touchdown to a tight end yet

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this year, they're do And it was Hockinson who started

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that party in Week one when he had six catches

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and thirty one yards and a score

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in the meeting in the Desert. Last year, they went

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on to give up fifteen more touchdowns the tight ends

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. So the Cards are better, but it's not

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>night and day. T J. Hockenson's a sure start this week.

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got Adam Humphreys going up to Minnesota where he

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>will perform well. He's been targeted six and seven times

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in the two games, including a touchdown reception. Last week,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he goes up against an injury battered secondary without its

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>starting slock cornerback Mike Hughes, and we don't even know

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who the replacement is for Hughes because the depth chart

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is so wobbly in the Vikings secondary. It could be

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>rookie Harrison Hand, who has never played a snap in

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Hey, I'm Humphrey. We're gonna give him the

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison hand right there. Yeah, Harrison hand. Yeah nice,

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I like it. Let's let's go to

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>one more matchup, maybe even two. Las Vegas takes on

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots and Matt. For a while there

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>looked like Josh Jacobs might not go, but he's going

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to go in this game. How do you feel about

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the running game against New England? Well, he is probably

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>bruised up a little bit because he leads the league

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in touches through the first two weeks with fifty nine.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot, that's a ton. Luckily, Jacobs is also

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>second on the team and targets because the Patriots are

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>still a tough run customer, allowing only three point nine

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry and four rushing touchdowns over their last

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty three games. But Chris Carson was able to score

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>through the air last week on the Patriots, and Jacob's

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>usage is great there, so uh, he's a b start.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I am putting Derek Carr on the bench. Twelve of

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the last fourteen quarterbacks to face the Patriots have been

0:22:55.520 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>held under three yards. That list includes Patrick Mahomes, Josh

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Allen twice, Dak Prescott, Lamar Jackson, Deshaun Watson. Derek Carr

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is none of those guys. Car has h only topped

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>three yards once in his last twenty one games. By

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's not He's not that good, even though

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he looked great on Monday night. Brian Edwards still questionable.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Henry Ruggs is out, but they're all on your bench,

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so is Hunter Renfro. Four different Seattle wide receivers scored

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, but that was Russell Wilson at the Helm.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Car is a bit closer to stew Beard than Wilson,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, he's not even close to stew Beard. The

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Miami wide receivers were all held under fifty yards and

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>none scored in the first week. I think that that's

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>what's on the docket for the Raiders. Wide receivers Darren Waller,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets a B grade, also missed some time in

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>practice this week, but was a full participant on Friday.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Four yard games in his last seven games played, including

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen targets and twelve receptions last week. Waller has more

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>targets this season than Henry Ruggs, Hunter, Renfro, Brian Edwards,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Aghilar, Jason Witten, Foster Moreau, and Za Jones combined,

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>basically the whole team. Yes, it's it's crazy. Cam Newton

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Patriots side, he gets an A grade. He's

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>averaging two rushing touchdowns per game. He's averaging sixty one

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game. No one else on the rosters

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>averaging thirty rushing yards. He's you're starting running back for

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. There's no running back that you're going to play,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>even with James White out this week. Again, outside of

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, Derrick Henry, and Alvin Kamara, no running back

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>has topped fifty three yards against the Raiders since Week

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>ten of last year. The wide receivers Julian Edelman and

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>nikkil Harry. I'm giving them both a B even though

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they're both Patriots questionable. Edelman has been Cam's guy so far,

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about Harry and his matchup. Boundary receivers

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have torched the Raiders so far, with Robbie Anderson going

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and fifteen yards in a score. Tray

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Smith even had five catches for eight six yards.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Nice called by Scott Fish by the way, last week.

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Harry is at twenty nine percent of the Pats targets

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. That's enough to keep him in play.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>And there is no tight end that you want to

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>play on the Patriots. No, there is not. That's it.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That is it. Let's try to work in one more

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>matchup into this segment, but it's it's got to be

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>fast Rams taking on Buffalo. Brian sorry with the Rams

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>running backs, by the way, the most rush attempts at NFC,

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Rams had right now, But it's Sarell

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Henderson the only one you want to start. He led

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the way last week, the only running back targeted Buffalo.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a great matchup al though the they've allowed four

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry thus far, But it was the Dolphins

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and Jets running backs. Not much to write home about there,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>so I'm giving Henderson to see. Tyler he could be.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Higby gets to see as well, dominating the Snaps a

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end, playing over eighty percent of them. The Bills

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just gave up a monster game to Mikeasicki, but they

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>were without linebackers Matt Mlano and Tremaine Edmonds. If they returned,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that lessons Higby's prospects a little bit. But Chris Herndon

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>had six catches in Week one, so Higbie's got a

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>safe floor. He's the top twelve of tight end options.

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He's only a C. Only a C. If the linebackers

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>come back, I'm gonna get to the quarterback, which I'm

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not sold on. Who's throwing the ball to Higbee and

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>his name, well, we'll get to him. Cooper Cup, though,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>gets a blot. Slot receivers, I've had success against Buffalo.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Jameson Crowder had a hundred and fifteen yards and a touchdown.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Ford even had seven catches for seventy six yards

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills. I like Cup with a B. I

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like Robert Woods as much, sadly in a revenge game,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>just to see for Robert Woods likely to see tret

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Davias White on the outside for the most of the

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>day and therein lies the rub for Woods. Davante Parker

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 1>did manage five catches for fifty six yards and a

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdown against the Bill so Woods is startable, but just

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>to see for him, and even though he's off to

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a hot start, it's a dangerous spot for Jared Goff.

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>He's on the bench for me. Stu Beard through three

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus and two touchdowns against Buffalo last week, but

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins were in comeback mode and that game was

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. Going back to the start of last season,

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>just one quarterback has thrown for more than one touchdown

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and Buffalo and that was Lamar Jackson. And the Rams

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have only played the JV teams in the nfc E

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>so far. This is a true test. So Goff is

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>on your bench, don't don't be fooled. Josh Allen not

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on your bench though, Just to be though, Wentz was

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>blanked from a passing perspective last week by the Rams

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>did run into touchdown. Deck was quiet in Week one

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>against them as well, But you cannot bench Allen right now.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of tape, of course, but l A

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was flamed by flamed by mobile quarterbacks last season. Russell Wilson,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, Kyler Murray all went off against them. Josh

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Allen can certainly do the same. Stefon Diggs talk about

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a hot start just to see for him though, why

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey. That's about it, and Ramsey will shadow him?

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh all day. Marie Cooper did have ten catches and

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey's coverage in Week one on fourteen targets. So if

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Diggs can get peppered like that, he could produce. I

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't bend him, but temper your expectations. They're also temperate

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 1>your expectations for John Brown. Just to see Darius Williams

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>is no slouch at the other outside corner spot for

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>l A. But the Rams have allowed the eighth most

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>catches to wide receivers and fellow roadrunner wide receiver to

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Jackson managed six for sixty six for sixty four

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>against l A last year, which should be a safe

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>floor for Brown. I like Cole Beasley the most at

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>all the receivers, to be honest, that's why he was

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me wide receiver and to

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the running backs. Zack Moss is out, Dak Moss is out,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Killing Singletary is gonna get a lot of work here. Yeah,

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't t j Yelden will be in the mix,

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>but we're not gonna talk about him. But the Rams

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>have allowed a hundred and sixty seven columbo yards per

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing running backs three total touchdowns. So if

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there's ever a time to start Devon Singletary with, it's

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.239
<v Speaker 1>it so b for Singletary. We'll see if they give

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>him a red zone carry though I don't know, well

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen is going to get the better because I

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna throw for much. We need him

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to pass no often. We are still creating brand new

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues at guillotine leagues dot com. This is the

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>exciting format where fifteen now fifteen players start the season

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and every week the low scoring team gets cut out

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of the league and their entire roster goes to the

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire where you get to bid on a whole

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>roster's worth of players. It's an exciting new format. The

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>last team standing wins. You can play at Guillotine leagues

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com. When we come back Tennessee Travels to Minnesota

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to face a battered defense. Are there any Titans you're

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not playing? Find out when we come back. Fantasy Football

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Weekly returns Paul charge In, Brian Johnson, and Matt Harrison

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>from Shock Fantasy. I encourage you to check out Matt's

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>work at chock fantasy dot com, including your waiver wire stuff.

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, we have a I have a podcast. Now

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just me. It's all alone. Usually I'm recording it

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from my car with nice sounding equipment, at least in

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a parking lot at a hockey arena as one of

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>my kids is waiting for hockey practice. I love it.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Shock Fantasy dot Com promo code Peacock gets

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you in the door for bucks for the rest of

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the year. Tennessee takes on Minnesota and the battered Minnesota secondary,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>which may be starting cornerbacks Holton Hill, who ranked Pro

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus ranks is the one hundred seventh best cornerback

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Jeff Gladney, who ranks eight six and

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is allowing a passer rating of one forty three, and

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Hand who has never played an NFL snap. So

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I ask you, co host, who do you suppose is

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the highest scoring tight end in fantasy football? John new Smith?

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Which tight end has scored the most touchdowns? John new Smith?

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Which tight end is the most yards per reception? John

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>new Smith? Is there a super peacock sound you can play?

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Which which tight end faces a Vikings defense without its

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>strong side linebacker Anthony Barr or Anthony Bar's replacement, Anthony Ferkser.

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>John U. Smith? Which team which tight end faces a

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>team that just allowed a third string tight end to

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>roll up one yards last week? John U? Smith? Yes,

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>John Eu with an A grade this week. I didn't

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>know we set aside five minutes for the John Smith matchup,

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely because we don't have to talk about Derrick Henry

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was an obvious A against the Vikings run defense that's

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bottom five in every meaningful rushing category. Ryan Tannhill a

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>great as well, and the only thing that really hurts

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>him here is Derrick Henry, his own teammate. No no

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>problem with the Vikings defense here, but Henry might just

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>leave not enough on the table for Tannehill. Still a

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>grade because if Henry doesn't take it. Tannehill's got the

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>same four touchdown upside he had last week, and Corey

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Davis gets an A grade with a j Brown out,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he'll face a secondary as I mentioned, filled with litterd

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with backups at the cornerback position. He's already uh and

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 1>even when he gets their ostensible well, they've got at

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>any rate, Corey Davis sitting out a great game. By

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, I don't know, fire up the peacock for

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis. One of my summer sleepers said, do not

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>give up on Corey Davis. Peacock Roll and Tannehills might

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>take a chance to meet quarterback last week, and Adam

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Humphreys might take a chance and for this week, get

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that peacock a lozenge. We're pre cocking for Adam Humphreys.

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Now the Vikings side, there's only two players you care about.

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Dalvin Cook, who I feel like this is same

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>script for Dalvin Cook as it has been the last

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, which is the Vikings will be way behind

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>throughout much of this game. They're not gonna be able

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to run very much and hopefully Cook just gets enough

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>volume to do Okay. I don't think you're gonna get

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>gaudy stats because the Vikings just aren't going to be

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>able to run enough for him to get there still

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if he can get to like fifteen touches, that probably

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gets him to eighty yards and maybe a touchdown. So

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Dalvin Cook, C Grade and Adam Thelan.

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You know last week the Cold sent extra coverage to

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Theeling and it worked marvelously, holding him to just thirty

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one yards. You figured the Titans do the same thing here.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Darn kirk Cousins to go to old A B. C.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson or Justin Jefferson, something he was unwilling to do

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>last week. Theland runs predominantly from the right side of

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the field, or he matches up with ancient cornerback Jonathan Joseph.

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Titans have only allowed one wide receiver touchdown on the year.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>C grade for him. Let's go to San Francisco taking

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Giants. Matt, you already talked about a couple

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of Niner players that you like. Yeah, McKinnon was, might

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>take a chance to me, Runner mullins was, might take

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Throw our will mention. Jeff Wilson. Uh,

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a capable backup. He's been trusted as the goal

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>line guy in in in times pasted when Matt Breeder

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman were out with injury last year. If you're desperate,

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>he's a S grade. I think he's startle Uh. There's

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>no other starter on the Niners except for Jordans Reid,

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>who gets a be read scored last week kittles out again.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The Giants have held Eric Ebron and Jimmy Graham in check,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>but those two teams have healthy wide receivers. Through the

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks of the Giants gave up five touchdowns

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 1>to the tight end position, and James Bradberry is a

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>good corner by the way, He's gonna shadow either Kendrick

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Borne or Brandon a Uk. So there's not enough. There's

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>not enough injuries that would make you go all the

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>way to them right now. Uh. Dion Lewis was Brian's

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me runner. DeVante Freeman's on the bench,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>though after replacing se Quan Is only averaging one point

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>eight yards per carry. With this line, what makes you

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>think that three days after being signed, DeVante Freeman, by

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, was bad last year, can do better than

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>say Kwan Now, Daniel Jones, I'm giving him a C grade.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Even without Nick Bosa, d Ford and Solomon Thomas on

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the d line, The Niners still have a decent pass rush.

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Kyler and Donald were each held under two fifty passing

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>yards and only managed one passing score. Jones will likely

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>be forced to throw more, but Sterling Shepherd hits I

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>R with a toe injury, leaving Darius Slayton as a

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>possible B start, maybe slightly worse than a B. How

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about like a reduced B. Is there like a reduced be? Okay,

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a bee. Uh. DeAndre Hopkins did manage a huge

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>day against this defense just two weeks ago. Chris Hogan

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>put up respectable numbers from the outside as well. All right,

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll just give him a solid bee for Darius Slayton. Uh,

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And the Niners are still without Richard Sherman. Two. Yeah,

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I are Yeah. So Slayton has nine scores in his

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>past ten games as well. Golden Tat's in the slot.

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>How about this? In games without Shepherd last year, Golden

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Tate averaged six catches for seventy five yards per game.

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Not bad, not bad, And Braxton Barrios had six forty

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>nine and one from the slot last week, So that's

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>attainable for Tate. He gets to see, I'm only given

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram a C grade, though you'd think with se

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Kwan and Shepherd out had like Ingram Moore. But the

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Niners are really good against the tight ends. They've only

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>allowed three receptions to the position this year. They held

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon to one catch for five yards last week

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 1>in a spot they were behind the whole They were

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>behind the whole time. No wide receivers. Oh, it's kind

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of like this week, but you know the Giants have

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a few more receivers. Evan Ingram's only a sea perfect

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>segue to the Jets taking on Indianapolis? Are there any

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Jets to play here? They're wider, there's no wide receivers

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>left standing. Well, it might be Braxton Burriosrouder last week

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ruled out Brashad Perriman not gonna play. They're both on

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the bench. The running backs are on the bench. Of course,

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>even if Frank Gore gets twenty one, he's again last week.

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know. I don't want to even get

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>into that. But Braxton Barrios, I'm gonna give a C

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to Keelan Cole and Justin Jefferson both led their team

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and receiving yards against the Colts, and they run primarily

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>from the slot. The Jets will certainly be forced to

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>throw in this one, so Braxton Barrios his PPR garbage

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>time savior. Also, he kind of just filled the Jamison

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Crowder rolling Crowder gets all those targets from the slide point.

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm listening to that. You told me I'm

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say start. Chris Hogan, who was the thing

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>again playing for Game NFC's team, so he's on the bench,

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris earning him give him a ce. Tight Ends haven't

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>done much against the Colts, but it was the Jagson Vikings,

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>so not much to say. They're free safety and Lee

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Cooker did Terrorist Achilles last week, so that will help

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>herned In Adam Gates needs to stop using him as

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a blocker, but I'm gonna get herned in the see here,

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald on the bench, I just feel bad for

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Nothing to work with. Poor Sam. Over to

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the Colt side, Jonathan Taylor, easy a. I'm giving him

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a Fonzie a instant bell cow status. The Colts are

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>huge favorites at home, and the vaulted Jets run defense

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is fading, allowing five point yards per carry so far.

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry if you've spent a bunch of your fab

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>by Naheim Hines. He's on the bench this week, even

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in a in a blowout blowout spot. I don't know.

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's he'll clearly have more work than last week,

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can't trust him in seasonal he's like a

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a DFS dart throw you. There's no guarantee touches

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for Hines. I don't know if you charge, says behind

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Sea tweaked to him when he got me. I got

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench though. T Y Hilton, though, I'm

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 1>going back to the well for the third time. He

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>gets an a saw lesson of the snaps last week

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that was troubling, but he did drop a long touchdown

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>pass which would have surely salvage his stat line. I'm

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>removing the San Francisco wide receivers from this equation because

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they basically don't exist. But in Week one Buffalo white

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Outs total twenty three catches, so there's enough to go

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>around for t Y Hilton and Michael Pittman. With Paris Hilton,

0:38:55.880 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Paris Campbell out. Also out, Paris Hillton would

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be a hell of it number two receiver for the

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Jets if she's available. I don't know if you're out there, Paris,

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>but Michael Pittman gets a see saw. I saw six

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 1>targets when Paris Campbell went down last week. Should see

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>steady work against the Jets would allow the third most

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets to wide receivers. Pittman has the size

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to thrive in the red zone and the tight ends.

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna give Moalley Cox to starting grade, but

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's sounding like Jack Oil's gonna play, so that that's

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>uh muddied Waters and Philip Rivers. Might take a chance

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of me quarterback against the most garbage team in the NFL,

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>unless the Vikings deciety changed that on Sunday. Alright, our

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>final matchup of this segment is Chicago taking on Atlanta,

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and hey, that's me happy. Drom bon Ski was might

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me where it's happy to have

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>me try to take chance quarterback. I love Alan Robinson

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. This might be his best matchup of the

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>year as he goes up against the hapless Falcons defense.

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed the second most yards to receivers, including multiple

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers to top ninety yards in both weeks. So then

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I must like multiple Bears receivers, so you'll find b

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>great on Anthony Miller, who dropped the touchdown last week

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but remained startable in a favorable matchup against slot cornerback

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>dark keys dennerd Dennard has already allowed fifteen sixteen receptions

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage. That's the most in the NFL. And

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the matchup for Anthony Miller, a fantastic dark horse

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this week. And Darnell Mooney also getting into this act.

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Remember last week I told you to put him on

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>your watch list and he ended up scoring. They we're

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>putting him in the starting light up of the C

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>grade this week against this struggling secondary. Let's go to

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the running backs. David Montgomery B grade here. Falcons have

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed the eleventh fewest rushing attempts in seventh fewest rushing

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>yards UH to opposing running backs. That's pretty impressive. And

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.959
<v Speaker 1>they faced his equality and Chris Carson, who are very good.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But Montgomery has been very active in the passing game.

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>He's actually out targeted Tarik Cohen in both games so far,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and he's holding a touchdown via the air. And the

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are struggling with running back receptions like they do

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>every year for the past five years. So I like

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery as a ground air threat Tariko and gets a

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>C grade here for the same reason. Again, even even

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>though he's not getting a lot of usage, I do

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that he will should be involved in

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>this passing game against a bad falcons Uh defense against

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>receiving running backs in case Mattnege comes to his senses

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and decides to throw to Kurt Rio, and I want

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to give him the C grade here. Let's go to

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta side. Matt Ryan has been fantastic and get

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to the A grade here. And the Chicago secondary sounds intimidating,

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but they've got these spots that you can exploit. For example,

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>buster screen, their slack cornerback got worked by Danny Danny

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Amndola in the opener, and cornerback Jalen Johnson is making

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>his third career start and to Shaun Gibson as a journeyman,

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>so he's got spots that I think he can work

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with here. Julio Jones not expected to play in this game,

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>and that does drop a little bit of my my

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>esteem for Ryan, but he's still got so many good

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>targets that I think you can still can you to

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>play him here? Calvin Ridley with an A grade. He'll

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>get some extra work when Julio can't go in this game.

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh He's posted over one yards and multiple touchdowns in

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>back to back games, and Hayden Hurst we'll see some

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>extra targets as well. The Bears have allowed two solid

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>games to two solid tight ends t J. Hockenson and

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram. Hurst went off last week against Dallas and

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is locked in as the focal point a focal point

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of Atlanti's high powered offense, and I think he gets

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a few extra looks in this game. Todd Gurley C grade.

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Gurly only managing three point three yards per carry and

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>has a whopping one receiving yard. So far, things don't

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 1>get a lot easier against the Bears team that's giving

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>up the eighth fewest rushing attempts, the tenth fewest rushing

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, and they haven't allowed a running back

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to have more than four receptions. So I don't think

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Gurley's gonna help you much through the air either. So

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>really just the C grade on Gurley, who has been

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a disappointment to this point. Guys who've got about one

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>minute left. Is James Robbins in and every week starter

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Yeah, I mean we said Chris Thompson was

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna steal the third down work wrong. Nope, we said

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville is not going to run the ball. Yeah, he's

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville too far behind in every game to run the ball. Nope,

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't worked out. I think he's an every week starter.

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's an every week starter. I think

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that you're gonna wonder about and you're

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna have better matchups and play. Uh, they've played some

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy teams so far this year. So and and

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you gotta remember, right well, Armstead and Divine Ozigbo, we're

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>both ahead of him on the depth chart until both

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of them hit. I R when those guys come back,

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 1>there could be Yeah, there could be a little bit there.

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>He's not an every week starter that I see the

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>next Arian Foster on our hands. Maybe just maybe you

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>mean his han he's gonna blow out his hands. Well,

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, it's that what you mean, Jackson's might

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have found gold in the in a big pile of

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>dung man. It's it's it's it's what you called Jacksonville

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as possible, I think, except against the the truly elite defenses.

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson's gonna be a starter every week. Uh, you

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know you can be a starter every week if you

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>go to Guillotine leagues dot com and check out all

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>my free player rankings. Every meaningful player rated graded and

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>most of them have explanations for how they got those

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>grades as well, and they're available for free Guillotine leagues

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We'll be back to play three tough questions

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>coming up next. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison with you. This is

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a game we paw call three tough questions. Try to

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.959
<v Speaker 1>go three and oh I'll be peppering my co host

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with three brain busting questions. Begin with tough question number one.

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>In single quarterback leagues, can you drop Drew Breese outright? Brian? Personally,

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I cannot because I was not drafting him all summer long.

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm reusing notes from this very show when I

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>said Drew Brees past attempts sorry in have gone down

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>from six seventy three to five thirty six to eight

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>nine to three seventy eight last year. During that same

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>time span, his yard has gone down from d tot

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>three to four thousand to under three thousand passing yards

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>last year. He looks awful already. Taysom Hill probably is

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the better quarterback right now, no Michael Thomas for an

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>extended period of time, and going into the season. The

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Saints have the twenty three hardest schedule when it comes

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to quarterbacks, and these first two maps matchups are supposed

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to be easy with the Raiders and the Bucks and

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Breeze pretty much what the beds, So yes, you can

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>drop the Drew Brees in one quarterback Leaga. He's still

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>putting up some decent stats, but as I mentioned, the

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas high ankle sprain. Those can linger all season.

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Plus Emmanuel Sanders isn't a good player anymore, and Taysom

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Hill stealing snaps something you shouldn't worry about from your

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback on a fantasy team. Um, they're having Hill

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>throw the deep throws, by the way, because breeze is

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>range isn't what it used to be. He's only averaging

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>seven point two air yards per attempt. That's Teddy Bridgewater.

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the guy they just got rid of if you're

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 1>going to drop him, you might want to do it

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>right before a waiver period. I wonder what we might

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>call a drop right before a fab run would go off. Oh,

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I think charges got it? Yeah, we do. It is

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>time to sabotage drop Drew Brees. Yeah, for all the

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons you guys mentioned. He is all name and he

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>has no production. I continue to believe Michael Thomas won't

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>be until after the Week six bye. That puts him

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>all the way out to week seven, and that in

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:10.240
<v Speaker 1>two of the next three games for the Saints, including

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this week, are very difficult. And then there's the bye

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>week mixed in. You got like one shot to use

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees for the next month of play. No way

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>am I sitting on that roster spot. He will be

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>available in week seven again if you want to pick

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 1>him up. Only a matter of time before Saints fans

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>add an h to the end of the name plate

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Doe Drew Brees, Jersey breech Uh, you guys,

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm on it. Sometimes. Washington running back Antonio Gibson saw

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a big uptick and uses last week going forward, is

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson a running back to a flex or a

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>bench player. Matt, oh, you're going to me first after

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the Briech, Yes, I don't. I don't want. I want.

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I want Brand to turn his mic off. That's what

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I really want. It's in interesting to note that when

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they won against Philly, it was Peyton barber toating the rock,

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and in catchup modor garbage time, it was Gibson. Maybe

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gibbage time. Can I turn your seriously? Drew Brees's gold? Alright,

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>So which mode will they be in more often? It's

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 1>probably catch up mode. After this week's matchup with Cleveland,

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they get Baltimore, the Rams, the Giants, and then the

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys in the following four weeks. Three of those four

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:34.800
<v Speaker 1>matchups don't look like WS for the W's, so Gibson

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>should see the field a lot. I've only got him

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as a flex though, Okay, Brian, Yeah, Looking all the

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>way throughout the season, there was some great spots for

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for Antonio Gibson, who has to be the guy right

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 1>now and watching in his backfield. They're only passing the

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ball at the time. I was thinking would be like

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at this point, that's that's that's true as well, But

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there are two games coming up with the Giants, which

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of smashpots the schedule of Detroit Cincinnati,

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'll hold any Washington running back as long as possible,

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>especially Antonio Gibson for the Week six team matchup against Carolina.

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Right so, he's a flex player in my mind the

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the season, he could be here Championships back winner.

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Right there. He is a flex player, dynamic guy who

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>can raise some eyebrows with his running, and he can

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>catch as well, especially if you give him some space.

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And I worry a little bit about an offensive line

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that's below average, not a lot of threat from the

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>passing game. The big problem though, Frantonio Gibson is not

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who he is. It's not this offense. It's that when

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>they want to pass, they throw to j. D. Mcsuckett.

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>When they want the touchdowns they go to Peyton Barber.

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that just leaves Gibson sort of in the

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>middle of the rest of all of that. And unless

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>his talent makes it so, it's so talented that they

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:50.799
<v Speaker 1>just can't get those guys on the field. Um, I

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>worried that debt just leaves him as a flex guy

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>where you gotta pick your spots like Week sixteen gibbage time.

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>No not, Dalvin Cook has produced solid fantasy games despite

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the failings of every other part of the Vikings. Are

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you selling now while his value is still high? Or

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are you keeping Dalvin Cook, Ryan Breech. Do the Vikings

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>look bad, bear and shambles and everywhere? Yeah, they look

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 1>like gibbage, including including their own line. Are we gonna

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:23.959
<v Speaker 1>restart the show now? But I'm holding onto Dalvin Cook.

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Just look at the running back landscape right now, healthy

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bell cot running back. I'm holding onto him and Cook,

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>despite how bad the Vikings have looked, has matchups on

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the horizon that he can win you weeks on his own.

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>They are so juicy. And those are the Texans, the Falcons,

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, the Panthers, and the Jaguars. Those are all

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in coming weeks. So I'm holding on to Cook and

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he stays healthy and the Vikings can figure their

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.240
<v Speaker 1>s out. All right. The Vikings don't need to figure

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>anything out. They stick with their game plan. They do

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>their thing. They run the ball, they play bad defense.

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.439
<v Speaker 1>They run the ball, they play bad defense, they throw

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it down. Feel old. They get tackled at the one

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin runs it in for a touchdown and then they

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>give him a two point conversion because they're down by

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.359
<v Speaker 1>three scores. The matchups are tough. Dalvin gets injured every

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>stink in year, but after this week it's Houston, Seattle, Atlanta,

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and Green Bay. He's going to continue to put up points.

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is he gets hurt once a year, and

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>his bad matchups are in the next few weeks. So

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if I can trade him right now and get value

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 1>back for him, I'm trading him right now. Yeah, we're

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 1>trading him right now. The Vikings defense could be the

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL's worst, and that means that there's negative game scripts

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>in almost every game. And granted, the Vikings will never

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>fully go away from the running game because that's just

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who they are. They will be stubborn there. But what

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen is that the volume just isn't there for

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin to put up the big numbers that you want

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 1>from an RB one. And he still has name brand

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:51.240
<v Speaker 1>value as a first round pick who has performed okay

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first two weeks. You can trade him for

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>another first round pick right now, so you should. I

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 1>don't believe he can keep up this current level of

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>production even though it isn't even all that high. And

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as a reminder you you brought up the injury part,

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention this Vikings offensive line is just wayfa wafer thin.

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of Mr Creaso, but I can't do my brittant,

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 1>my French accent. You could totally trade him then for

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.840
<v Speaker 1>s Kwon Barkley Michael Thomas. Yeah, I agree with you

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there for a fellows round pick. I bet you could

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 1>trade him for Derrick Henry right now, anything happened any

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to. He hasn't scored a touchdown

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to trade Derrick Henry for Dalvin Cook. But that's the

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>trades and still makes got more fantasy. I don't think

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I am make correct answers. Yes, we're moving on from doubta. Uh,

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Dallas takes on Seattle, Matt. This has been an explosive

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Dallas offense and a Seattle secondary that's really struggled. Do

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you love Dak Prescott as much as I do? This

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is uh what Brian and I on the old Fantasy

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Football Almost Daily podcast used to call a game stag.

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You get everybody in this game. Zeke gets an a,

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Dak gets an a by the way. Dak had three

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns last week. Seahawks gave up two rushing touchdowns

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the cam last week. You don't think that Dad's gonna

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:22.479
<v Speaker 1>get another rushing score this week. He is for sure.

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh Amari Cooper A grade, Ceedee Lamb A grade, Michael

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Gallop B grade. Uh Cooper has percent of the targets

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty scent of the air yards. Lamb is second on

0:53:35.560 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the team with fifteen targets and mostly stays in the slot.

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Gallop has only ten targets, but thirty percent of the

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>team's are yards, so he's gonna go off soon. And

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:47.799
<v Speaker 1>six different wide receivers have had seventy two or more

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 1>yards against the Seahawks this year, with four of them

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>topping one and both slot receivers Julian Edelman and Russell

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Gauge each top two hundred yards. That bodes well for Lamb,

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Seahawks have allowed a eleven yards per pass

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:04.360
<v Speaker 1>attempt to slot receivers that's the most in the NFL.

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Even Dalton Schultzel on the board here. He's third on

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the team with fourteen targets. Blake Jarwin was just keeping

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the seat warm for Dalton silt. He likely won't total

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the nine for eight eight and a score that he

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 1>had last week, as the Seahawks have been decent against

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the tight end, allowing just under twenty nine yards per

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>game to the position. On the other side, Russell Wilson

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>gets an a DK Metcalf and Tyler Lockett get an a.

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas lost slot corner Anthony Brown to a rib injury,

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so Lockett is locked in. Metcalf just beat the defensive

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>player of the year for nine two and a score,

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and it scored in five of his last seven bomb

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 1>two d dk Metcalf was gorgeous, a perfectly thrown pass,

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and Gilmore had really good cover John him. I mean

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he's he's right, right I DK Metcalf. The past was

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>just too perfect. DK Metcalf will be a top two

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:06.399
<v Speaker 1>receiver in next year's drafts. Watching watch top ten for sure.

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm going top I think he's

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>top top two. Saucy Um avoid the tight ends. Will

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Disley and Greg Olsen are essentially splitting time and averaging

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one target per game. Chris Carson does get a B

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>grade uh still out snapping and out touching Carlos Hide

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>three to one, but all of his touchdown production has

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 1>come through the air, which is weird. Malcolm Brown did

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have two goal line plunges against the Cowboys in Week one,

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and I expect Carson to hit pay dirt with a

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:36.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing score this week too, So he gets the B grade.

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for this game. Start everybody, all right,

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>we will start everybody. We encourage you to check out

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com. It's the freshest new way to

0:55:43.680 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>play fantasy football. You start with normally seventeen teams at

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year, but now we're two weeks in,

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna start with fifteen teams for leagues that

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 1>start now. And every week the low scoring team gets

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>cut and their players all go to the waiver wire,

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>where you get to feast on a whole draft. It's

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>worth of players. Every week the low scoring team gets cut.

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That means the last team standing is the winner. You

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be the best team, just don't be

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in any given week. If you a

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>last year last or first that last first, I like it.

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Well incorporate that at the quote leagues dot com. When

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we came back Tampa Bay takes on Denver. We'll tell

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you about what's happening in the Tampa Bay backfield and

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if you can trust Ronald Jones and or Leo for Net.

0:56:55.880 --> 0:57:00.359
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul In, Brian John's In and

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison with you back to some matchups for this segment.

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>A little later on, we're gonna get too premature speculation.

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay takes on Denver, Brian. Last week, Ronald Jones

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>started the game and had some success, but then Leo

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Fournette came in and had way more success. So who

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do you dare go with this week as they take

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on Denver. It's gotta be four Net. But yeah, the

0:57:26.440 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>stars were aligning for Jones a touchdown on like the

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:30.960
<v Speaker 1>first drive at the game, and then he fumbles and

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>here comes Leonard four NET scoring two touchdowns a hundred

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:37.520
<v Speaker 1>plus yards on twelve carries. H Jones finished the game

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 1>last week with seven carries. It looks like four NET

0:57:39.880 --> 0:57:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is the guy going forward against the Broncos. And then

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 1>both lead runners to face Lebroncos so far topped a

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:49.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and don't forget for Net looks like to

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 1>be lead back for a Buccaneers team that wasn't at

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:55.000
<v Speaker 1>full force this season when it comes to the offensive weapons,

0:57:55.000 --> 0:57:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So and Denver could be without two starters on their

0:57:57.960 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>D line, Draymond Jones and DeMarcus Wall or Von Miller.

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course, on I R so, Leonard Fournett is safety,

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but I've got I've got Jones on the bench. He

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's gonna be taking in the back seat

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the four net. The only thing that worries me, it's

0:58:09.400 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>just Bruce arians so inscrutable. He wants Shawn Vaughan to

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>get involved now apparently, but I don't remember the exact

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>stat but there's like no Bucks running back who's had

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen touches in a game and back to back games

0:58:23.680 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in like two years. I wouldn't surprise me. It's just

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's so Ronald Jones is the way to go this

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>week because it doesn't make sense. He he isn't in

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 1>daily U zig while other zag and that's what you

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>should done. Last week when people all over Jones have

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:38.200
<v Speaker 1>been for net went off. But anyway where there are

0:58:38.200 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>no question marks is a wide receiver for the Bucks.

0:58:40.600 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, he gets an a d percent healthy right

0:58:43.560 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 1>now in a smash spot with a J. Bouyer now

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on I R for Denver per Pro Football focuses Jared Evans.

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>The Broncos have given up the league high and targets,

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>catches and yards to opposing outside wide receivers Corey Davis

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and Deonte Johnson both when off against Denver. So so so

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 1>love Mike Evans here, love Chris Godwin to gonna give

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>him an A. He will make his return from injury

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:09.320
<v Speaker 1>running primarily from the slot. Fellow slot receiver slot receivers

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphreys and Juju Smith Schuster both that solid catch

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 1>totals against Denver six and seven, respectively. So I like

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 1>god One here. As for the tight ends for Tampa Bay,

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I do not like them. Both are on the bench.

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Bruce arians quote said his offense isn't built for tight

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 1>ends to see consistent targets the end. And if John

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.200
<v Speaker 1>new Smith can only catch four passes against the Broncos,

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>albeit one was for a touchdown, you got both the

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>books tight ends on the bench. Sorry, gronk Uh. Tom Brady,

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.080
<v Speaker 1>though he gets a B, has both of his top

0:59:41.080 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>receivers healthy for the first time this season. Don't forget

0:59:43.600 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Von Miller on I are, like I said earlier, Denver

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>has got a laundry list of injuries on defense, and

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they have surrendered two passing touchdowns in each game so far,

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's a safe floor for Brady and this one

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>over to the Broncos. Philip Lindsay thought he was gonna

0:59:57.000 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be ruled out, but there's a chance he might play,

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>even if he does. Brutal matchup. Brutal matchup, I'm going

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on the assumption he's not playing. When I'm gonna talk

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>about Melvin Gordon here, I'll give Gordon a b if

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay's out. To see if Lindsay plays. The Bucks were

1:00:11.040 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>brutal against the run last year, and that appears to

1:00:13.080 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be the case as really good. They held Alvin Kamara

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and Christian McCaffrey to paltry rushing totals. When it comes

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to yardage, both did manage to combine for three rushing

1:00:23.880 --> 1:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns on the ground, though the Bucks have yielded the

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>most red zone touches to opposing running backs, uh and

1:00:29.280 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs have had good days through the air,

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, but Mike Davis the best of

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>them all with the patches for seventy four yards and half. Yeah,

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so Gordon will get bell cow usage. If Lindsay is out,

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he could certainly catch the ball. So based on expected

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>volume and be if Lindsay's out, see if Lindsay is in. Uh.

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Over to the receivers for Denver, Jerry Judy gets to see.

1:00:53.080 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>No one questioning the Broncos taking a wide receiver in

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the first round. Now are they he still took the

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong one? It should have been ceedee lamb not Jerry

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Judy has three drops on fifteen targets, already has been

1:01:05.120 --> 1:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>limited by a rib injury. Should play the better. Not

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>let the Chargers team doctor doctor administer that painkilling shot

1:01:11.320 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>though nobody did to uh Tyrod Taylor punctured aslong great

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>DJ Moore and Robby Anderson both top two hundred yards

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>against um. Excuse me? Who they playing again? The Broncos

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>last week has been talking about Yes, the Bucks I mean,

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm giving Judy a ce not going by the

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>way of Tim Patrick. Will talk about kJ Hamler or

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the other rookie wide receiver on Denver a little later,

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and no a fan the last guy I'll talk about.

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>He'll get a se touchdowns in both games to start

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the season. Chris mann Hurts of Carolina did nothing last week, understandably,

1:01:41.680 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but Jared Cook had a decent line in Week one

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>five catches for eight yards. The Bucks did allow the

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>sixth most yards and fifth most touchdowns. Too tight ends

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>last season, so you can start fant with confidence. Alright,

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Carolina takes on the Chargers. Only a couple of Panthers

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here, Mike Davis. Everybody went to the

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire when grabbed Mike Davis. You only get a

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>C grade this week. What I loved was that he

1:02:00.920 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was targeted eight times in the second half and he

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>caught all eight and put up seventy four receiving yards UM.

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And the Charges are allowing the eighth most receptions to

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs on nine targets per game on average,

1:02:11.640 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and all nine could end up going to Mike Davis.

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So from a PPR standpoint, he's safe. But this is

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a very good run defense that's already shut down far

1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>better runners Joe Mixing and Clyde Edwards a layer, so

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect Davis to get anything done on the

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>ground just to C grade for him. D J. Moore

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>also the C grade without any real threat of a

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>running game. I think the Charges are going to emphasize

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>pass coverage and pass rush and make an already difficult

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup even harder for DJ Moore. More will most often

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>see corner Michael Davis, who has the speed to hang

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with more and is averaging less than forty yards allowed

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage. So just the C grade on d

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>J Moore. Let's go to the charger side. Already told

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you that Josh Kelly was might take a chance on

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>me running back, and I love him this week. But

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I also love Austin Ekeler. Both guys. It's the rare

1:02:56.280 --> 1:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>A grade for both running backs in a game. It

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>happens like twice a year. It happens every week that

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina That's just that, even though they'll cannibalize a

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>little each other a little bit. I'll just reiterate some

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of the stats from earlier in the show. Carolina's last

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>fourteen games, they've allowed a running back touchdown and every

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them, and an average of almost two and

1:03:20.960 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a half scores per game. It's just SIT's staggeringly bad. Actually,

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Eckler is getting plenty of work. He's His thirty five

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>carries in the first two games are the most he's

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ever had in a two game stretch, so he's getting

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>plenty of work and he is still in a grade

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for this game. Going to the passing game. I've got

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Keenan Allen. It's only a one

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>game sample, but Alan was much more productive with Justin Herbert,

1:03:46.400 --> 1:03:47.919
<v Speaker 1>who was going to be under center in this one,

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and he notched nine yards and ten targets. And Herbert's debut.

1:03:53.800 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Carolina deploys rookie safety Jeremy Chin in the slot a lot,

1:03:57.640 --> 1:04:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and he's been very good. But he's also never seen

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>anybody like Keenan Allen. So far, He's covered Hunter Renfrow

1:04:03.720 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Watson. Obviously, Keenan Allen's way better, so he

1:04:07.000 --> 1:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>gets a B grade here. Mike Williams has really impressed me. Now,

1:04:11.400 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get a ton of attention last week, but

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that was the first game for Justin Herbert, who found

1:04:16.240 --> 1:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>out he was the starting quarterback. When I found out

1:04:19.080 --> 1:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he was the starting quarterback last week, did you hear

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>he thought it was a joke. Why wouldn't Anthony Lynn

1:04:24.920 --> 1:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>walked up to him and he goes get your helmet,

1:04:26.480 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, yeah, whatever, right, you find out I'm

1:04:30.720 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>during the coin toss that you're going to be the quarterback. Anyway,

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our team doctor killed the start the needle. This reminds

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>me of Alvin Harper where the the team trainers cut

1:04:43.040 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of his finger off, taking tape off of

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>his hand. I wouldn't like that either. I don't regrab

1:04:50.160 --> 1:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the punctured lung or to have the end of my

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>finger cut off by the team trainer. By the way,

1:04:54.760 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is this the best way for a rookie to make

1:04:56.480 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>his first start? Surprise? It probably don't think about right

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't you have all this time to think about it.

1:05:01.960 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something to do that. Mike Williams runs

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from all over the field, and when he's on cornerback

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Dante Jackson, he's got six inches and forty pounds on Jackson.

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike Williams is a sneaky play this week.

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>He is a C grade Hunter Henry a B grade.

1:05:15.880 --> 1:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been easily the most consistent receiver on the team,

1:05:18.600 --> 1:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>regardless of quarterback, and he gets a match up against

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>um rookie linebacker. Um. Oh wait uh, that's a weird name.

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>That is a weird day. I have a type in

1:05:29.680 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>my note. Sorry, Tampa Bay's Tampa Bay's uh. Tampa Bay

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:36.959
<v Speaker 1>tight ends just totaled one catch against Carolina last week

1:05:37.360 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>UH with Rob Gronkowski, but Darren Waller posted a solid

1:05:40.640 --> 1:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>forty five yards and in Week one against them, So

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think counter Henry is still a safe start with

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a B grade for him. I don't know that I

1:05:48.800 --> 1:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>want to go all the way down to starting Justin

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Herbert in his second start, in part because of Panthers

1:05:52.880 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>have now get a whole game of tape on him.

1:05:54.760 --> 1:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>No surprise factor in this one, um, and so I

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have a pant even though I do like some

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of those receiving options this game. I got the name.

1:06:04.280 --> 1:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It's linebacker mclineback face. Thank you, we'll go. We'll run

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with that linebacker, mclinebacker face. Yeah, we'll go. We'll go

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>with that guy. He's Irish. Yeah, thank you very much. UM,

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Premature speculation. Three guys you can

1:06:19.520 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>pick up now that everybody else is gonna be trying

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to pick up next week, but they're already on your team.

1:06:25.320 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Find out when you go on the time machine. With

1:06:27.840 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Premature Speculation. Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchie and Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison with you.

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We have three matchups to get to, but first a

1:07:12.280 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>segment we like to call premature speculation. These are three

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>players that you can pick up now that we think

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>people will be trying to pick up next week, but

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they are already on your team. It's like you've gone

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:29.439
<v Speaker 1>forward in time. It's almost as if we've jumped into

1:07:29.480 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a time machine. That sounds that's our time, and that's

1:07:35.040 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what his time machine sounds like. We've decided yes, Um,

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we begin with Brian Johnson, who is your premature speculation player.

1:07:42.480 --> 1:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Briefly mentioned him in the last segment. I'm going with

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>kJ Hamler, wide receiver for the Denver Broncos, rookie out

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of Penn State, drafted in the second round by Denver.

1:07:51.000 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>As you should know by now, Courtland Sutton has been

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>put on I R, which should open up the door

1:07:55.120 --> 1:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for Hamdler. Probably not this week against Tampa Bay. I

1:07:57.600 --> 1:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't give him a starting grade, but moving forward, like

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>him to move into that starting role. Uh usurped Tim Patrick,

1:08:03.800 --> 1:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>who's starting opposite Jerry Judy right now, and uh it's

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's there's some really good matchups on the horizon for Denver,

1:08:10.320 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're hoping that Drew lock will come back. He's

1:08:12.280 --> 1:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>not on the shelf for the season, but matchups on

1:08:15.120 --> 1:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the rising for Hamlet to look nice. The Jets, Miami, Atlanta,

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas all in coming weeks and he should see

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>seven eight targets once he's put in the starting lineup,

1:08:24.240 --> 1:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So kJ Hamler, even in redraft, intriguing prospect, and once

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortles is in the game. I wanted I thought,

1:08:31.960 --> 1:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was pressed for time. I wanted to

1:08:34.160 --> 1:08:36.599
<v Speaker 1>I said, I wanted to say Jeff Driscoll on the

1:08:36.600 --> 1:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bench for the Broncos, especially because border Potty on roster,

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and you just wanted to get that. You love that name.

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Some of my finest work is the border Potty. I feel.

1:08:47.080 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Who is your premature speculation player, Matt I mentioned it

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. The Colts love Trey Burton there. Their

1:08:54.800 --> 1:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>staff has been raving about him all throughout the preseason,

1:08:57.600 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and he got hurt right before the season start. He's

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:02.519
<v Speaker 1>on I R. But he can come back in week

1:09:02.640 --> 1:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>four and this is the team that Eric Ebron and

1:09:05.800 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle were both fantasy viable tight ends, and they

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>brought Burton into play that Eric Ebron role. And what's more,

1:09:13.080 --> 1:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell is out for the year with an injury,

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jack Doyle is already dinged up and he's been

1:09:18.760 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>oft injured in the past. They made mo Alie Cox

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>look really good. Philip Rivers loves tight ends. After this week,

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Colts have the Bears, Browns, and Bengals. None of

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the above is proving to be a tough tight end matchup.

1:09:33.000 --> 1:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Trey Burton is gonna be a sneaky tight

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>end starter in some upcoming weeks. I like it, you know,

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with the end you Paris Campbell was going to cover

1:09:41.320 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the middle of the field and he's

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be out. They didn't put it in. He's on

1:09:44.960 --> 1:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>i R. He's email for a while. I don't think

1:09:47.240 --> 1:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he comes back before I don't know, Thanksgiving. So I

1:09:50.800 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the Trey Burton's team. I've got four

1:09:54.120 --> 1:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>options for you, come on a few, but I'm gonna

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>go with Damien hair Rid who's coming off i R

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>after this week, Sony Michelle, Sony Walkman averaging three point

1:10:08.080 --> 1:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>three yards per carry. That's it, even by his lackluster standards.

1:10:14.400 --> 1:10:16.639
<v Speaker 1>You know it's bad. You don't even have to walk

1:10:16.720 --> 1:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to get three point three yards per full three three

1:10:20.880 --> 1:10:25.479
<v Speaker 1>yards per car, that's right from a new ball. So

1:10:26.000 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris was the best looking running back the Patriots

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>had in training camp. Which hand and Cam Newton is

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna siphon off a lot of rushing touchdowns. I get that.

1:10:39.400 --> 1:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying Damian Harris is going to score ten

1:10:42.040 --> 1:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns the rest of the way, But man, is that

1:10:44.640 --> 1:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>starting job open? And in thirty two teams, there isn't

1:10:48.760 --> 1:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a better prospect to steal a starting running back from

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire than there is with Damian Harris right now.

1:10:55.920 --> 1:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>So let's go pick him up. Remember second round pick

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:01.879
<v Speaker 1>last year didn't get used for a variety of reasons

1:11:02.040 --> 1:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and then looked like a different player in training camp.

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he performs well here and then I'm gonna

1:11:07.320 --> 1:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>give one more name. While we're talking about guys coming off,

1:11:10.280 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I r Deebo Samuel available in a lot of leagues. Man,

1:11:13.800 --> 1:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>do they need somebody to catch a freaking pass for

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco? So there's an opportunity there as well. All right,

1:11:22.479 --> 1:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>let's go to our final set of matchups, beginning with

1:11:24.880 --> 1:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Detroit taking on Arizona. Matt, do you like the passing

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>game here? Maybe with Kenny Golladay or maybe not with

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay. Um, it looks like Kenny Golladay is going

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to go. He says he's gonna try. If if Goladays

1:11:43.280 --> 1:11:47.519
<v Speaker 1>in and he's gonna go, I'm giving him an A grade. Uh,

1:11:47.600 --> 1:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you can roll right in with him against Patrick Peterson

1:11:51.320 --> 1:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>who allowed seven catches for a hundred and twenty five

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>yards and a score to Terry McLaurin last week. So

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Golladay is in, he's an A grade. If if Glad

1:12:02.360 --> 1:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is going, Stafford is an A grade too. If not,

1:12:05.439 --> 1:12:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a B because I think that they're

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to be in catchup mode. Uh. Last year

1:12:10.400 --> 1:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Stafford torched this defense for three, eight, five and three,

1:12:15.320 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals second. The Lions secondary is in shambles,

1:12:19.200 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>which means they're going to give up a ton of points.

1:12:22.160 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>A shootout is on, and you want to have Stafford

1:12:24.160 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in a shootout. If Golladay does go, Marvin Jones gets

1:12:27.880 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a B. If not, we downgrade him to a C.

1:12:31.040 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It's science. Jones is just better with Golliday on the field. Sure,

1:12:34.840 --> 1:12:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Jones is a number two receiver, not a number one receiver.

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He did catch a short touchdown last week in Green Bay.

1:12:41.160 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>If Golladay's return does come, Quintess c fests back to

1:12:44.400 --> 1:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the bench. If not, I think he's startable with a

1:12:46.920 --> 1:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Uh t J Hockenson was might take a

1:12:49.640 --> 1:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>chance on me tight end as well, So the rationale

1:12:52.920 --> 1:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is good. I like Hockinson in this game. Yeah, I

1:12:54.880 --> 1:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot. He's gonna be a good daily

1:12:57.040 --> 1:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite of mine this week. To the second best tight

1:12:59.439 --> 1:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>end in this game, it's weird. Uh. The Lions running

1:13:05.240 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>backs are all on the bench. Carry On led the

1:13:08.000 --> 1:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>team and snaps with twenty. Swift had nineteen snaps. Peterson

1:13:12.320 --> 1:13:15.639
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen snaps. That's a full time share right there.

1:13:16.040 --> 1:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>If you're starting one. It's Swift who led the team

1:13:19.640 --> 1:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>with ten touches. Ten touches and only five targets last week.

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe if memory serves well, he can't drop anymore,

1:13:29.640 --> 1:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they won't let him. Uh. And what should be a

1:13:31.960 --> 1:13:34.519
<v Speaker 1>heavy passing game script, Swift has the best chance of

1:13:34.560 --> 1:13:37.639
<v Speaker 1>success where heem Mostert and Jerick McKinnon each scored through

1:13:37.640 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the air on the Cardinals in Week one. On the

1:13:40.200 --> 1:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Cardinal side, Kyler gets an A and I don't need

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to explain it anymore. DeAndre Hopkins gets an A as well.

1:13:46.600 --> 1:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk has a groin injury and he is out

1:13:49.640 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this week, which brings Larry Fitzgerald and and both are

1:13:56.400 --> 1:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Sea grades this week. Desmond Truffont still dealing at the hammy.

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned that they lost starting quarterback Justin Coleman last week.

1:14:05.040 --> 1:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Fits had eight catches for one thirteen and a score

1:14:07.880 --> 1:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>last year against this Lion's defense. That was probably better.

1:14:13.360 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, get to the good stuff. Uh, Kenyan Drake

1:14:16.680 --> 1:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>gets an A grade. Uh Drake had twenty two touches

1:14:20.120 --> 1:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>last week, and Chase Edmonds was on the sideline a

1:14:22.240 --> 1:14:26.639
<v Speaker 1>bunch More had only six touches. Yes, Drake hasn't scored. Yes,

1:14:26.720 --> 1:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>those who drafted him are freaking out. But Aaron Jones

1:14:30.280 --> 1:14:33.479
<v Speaker 1>just had two d thirty four total yards and three

1:14:33.479 --> 1:14:36.759
<v Speaker 1>scores against Detroit last week. This is a big Kenyan

1:14:36.840 --> 1:14:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Drake game right here. Um And finally, best for last,

1:14:42.439 --> 1:14:45.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a Cardinals tight end that we need to talk about.

1:14:45.560 --> 1:14:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Max Williams hits I R this week, So Dan Arnold,

1:14:49.760 --> 1:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess is a desperation C grade. Bob Tanyan and

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Jim Graham each scored a touchdown against the Lions this

1:14:59.479 --> 1:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>year from the tight end position. Dan Arnold might get

1:15:02.880 --> 1:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown to damn A Are you calling it? Sure?

1:15:07.000 --> 1:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you? Brian? Are you calling it? It's coming? For

1:15:12.280 --> 1:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>green Bay takes on the New Orleans Saints. And for

1:15:15.120 --> 1:15:17.679
<v Speaker 1>green Bay, they could have had a softer two weeks

1:15:17.720 --> 1:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule facing the battered defenses in Minnesota and Detroit. Now

1:15:22.040 --> 1:15:24.599
<v Speaker 1>they get a real defense in the New Orleans Saints.

1:15:25.040 --> 1:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think their level of success continues? Brian, Yeah,

1:15:28.439 --> 1:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>don't chase last week's box score too much. Starting with

1:15:31.439 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, we all know he blew up, but just

1:15:33.400 --> 1:15:35.439
<v Speaker 1>giving him a bee here, he's gonna come down to

1:15:35.479 --> 1:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>earth just a little bit against the Saints, most likely,

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>who are allowing just three point four yards per carry.

1:15:41.360 --> 1:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>No surprise. Aaron Jones leads the league in rushing yards,

1:15:44.120 --> 1:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but he also has the most red zone targets among

1:15:46.960 --> 1:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>all players in the NFL as of right now, and

1:15:49.760 --> 1:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders back Raiders backs just combined for six catches.

1:15:53.479 --> 1:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Against the Saints last week, alec Ingold had a touchdown catch,

1:15:57.400 --> 1:15:59.599
<v Speaker 1>so Jones can certainly get something done through the air

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:03.599
<v Speaker 1>be for him. Davante Adams is pretty much doubtful at

1:16:03.600 --> 1:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this point. He's not gonna play. I'm glad. I was

1:16:05.640 --> 1:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>fearing the decoy status for Adams if he did suit up,

1:16:08.800 --> 1:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but you just have to go on the assumption Adams

1:16:11.320 --> 1:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna play, So he's on the bench. And

1:16:14.280 --> 1:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna give Alan Lazard and Mvs a c

1:16:17.880 --> 1:16:21.439
<v Speaker 1>if Adams sat, but I preferred Adams played and active

1:16:21.560 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>as a decoy here. But I will still give him

1:16:24.520 --> 1:16:27.479
<v Speaker 1>both the Sea Lazard and Elds scant length. The Raiders

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>receivers were quiet last week against Orleans, very quiet because

1:16:31.040 --> 1:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs just going off and Darren Waller. But in

1:16:35.680 --> 1:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>week one both Scottie Miller and Chris Godwin topped seventy

1:16:39.320 --> 1:16:43.879
<v Speaker 1>yards with essentially no Mike Evans. So with no Davante Adams,

1:16:43.880 --> 1:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Alan Lazard and MVS are startable as Aaron Rodgers top

1:16:47.920 --> 1:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>two wide receiver options. Speaking of Rogers, just to see

1:16:51.360 --> 1:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>for him. Without Davante Adams probably would be a B

1:16:54.880 --> 1:16:57.519
<v Speaker 1>with a healthy Davante, But I'm a little nervous for

1:16:57.560 --> 1:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a a Ron here. Both quarterbacks you New Orleans have

1:17:00.960 --> 1:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fared well so far this season. Tom Brady to thirty

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>nine and two tacked on a rushing touchdown. Derek Carr

1:17:07.200 --> 1:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>had two eighty four and three. But man, no Davante

1:17:10.479 --> 1:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Adams gotta make it nervous for Aaron Rodgers him. I've

1:17:13.280 --> 1:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>got him ranked in the twenties. Do you guys think

1:17:15.280 --> 1:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams is a sneaky play? When Adams was out

1:17:19.120 --> 1:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, Williams is targeted a lot inside the red zone.

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I can dig that angle. I probably probably keep it

1:17:25.520 --> 1:17:28.599
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, but he is take m fringe worthy

1:17:28.720 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. With Adams out, I'm not going to talk

1:17:31.240 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about the green Bay tight ends. There's like five of them,

1:17:33.320 --> 1:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so we're not gonna go there. Over to the Saint side,

1:17:35.360 --> 1:17:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara, he gets an a it is a tougher

1:17:38.640 --> 1:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup for him, but this offense will run end pass

1:17:42.320 --> 1:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>through Camara. Green Bay is allowing four point nine yards

1:17:45.400 --> 1:17:48.759
<v Speaker 1>per carry and five catches per game to opposing running backs.

1:17:49.000 --> 1:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Camara leads all running backs and targets and catches so

1:17:51.720 --> 1:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>far this season. Easy a for him. Jared Cook can

1:17:54.840 --> 1:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>give him a b uh, Michael Thomas. They haven't ruled

1:17:58.240 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 1>him out. They just okay, finally they ruled them out,

1:18:01.520 --> 1:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and they can rule him out for the next two

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks as well, probably while we're at it.

1:18:05.400 --> 1:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But so no Michael Thomas from New Orleans means Cook

1:18:08.280 --> 1:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>should get the first read more than off more than

1:18:11.280 --> 1:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>usual in that offense. Green Bay has allowed only seven

1:18:14.439 --> 1:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>catches to tight end so far, but the pretty comparable T. J.

1:18:17.840 --> 1:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Hockenson had a decent outing against Green Bay last week.

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Four catches for sixty two probably a safe floor for Cooking.

1:18:23.880 --> 1:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>This one over to the wide receivers for New Orleans

1:18:26.439 --> 1:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and Manuel Sanders. He looked awful. He and tray Kwon Smith.

1:18:31.400 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a sea with no Mike Thomas in

1:18:34.080 --> 1:18:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the lineup. Sanders wasn't visible last week against Las Vegas.

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>One catch on three targets and two drops and two drops.

1:18:41.320 --> 1:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith had the much better outing with seven targets five

1:18:44.280 --> 1:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>catches for eighty six yards. I guess Sanders is still

1:18:47.640 --> 1:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the number one guy, but I don't know. I think

1:18:49.720 --> 1:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he might just be cooked. I know that he looks bad,

1:18:52.800 --> 1:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna give him both the sea here. It

1:18:54.479 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is a good matchup on paper. The Packers have allowed

1:18:57.240 --> 1:19:00.120
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver touchdowns already. That's a lot for two

1:19:00.160 --> 1:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks into the season. So they both get to see, well, garbage,

1:19:03.160 --> 1:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the garbage time. And then I don't think there's

1:19:04.640 --> 1:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be garbage time in this game. I mean that's

1:19:07.720 --> 1:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a good Packer. Well, with Drew Breeze and quarterback, there

1:19:11.439 --> 1:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just might be some garbage time. But I'm gonna give

1:19:14.439 --> 1:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Breeze a see here. I'm not gonna put them on

1:19:16.240 --> 1:19:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Uh. Kirk Cousins and Matt Stafford both tossed

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to two touchdown passes against the Packers, but that's probably

1:19:23.880 --> 1:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the absolute ceiling for Drew Brees at this point in

1:19:26.680 --> 1:19:29.599
<v Speaker 1>his career. Without Michael Thomas, he's gonna need Alvin Camaro

1:19:29.680 --> 1:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to do all the dirty work in this one to

1:19:31.200 --> 1:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>live up to that se grade. The Monday night game

1:19:34.040 --> 1:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is Kansas City and Baltimore a possible preview of what

1:19:37.560 --> 1:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's such a fun game. I'm so jealous that you

1:19:39.960 --> 1:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>get to preview of this game. It's uh, it's a

1:19:42.080 --> 1:19:44.519
<v Speaker 1>possible preview of the a f C championship game. Although

1:19:44.600 --> 1:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the Steelers are going to find their way

1:19:46.200 --> 1:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>into this spot. But we'll say Buffalo might have something. Well,

1:19:49.479 --> 1:19:52.479
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out. Um, the Vegas number on this is

1:19:52.560 --> 1:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty four, and that's wrong. This These are two really

1:19:56.240 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>good defenses. And to get ready to hear numbers, you're

1:20:00.040 --> 1:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>your grades that you are not necessarily expecting to hear.

1:20:03.600 --> 1:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Tyreek Hill, Travis Kelsey, let's talk about all

1:20:06.600 --> 1:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. You're gonna start them all no matter what

1:20:08.800 --> 1:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I say. But this is a difficult matchup. The Ravens

1:20:12.240 --> 1:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>completely shut down the passing of Cleveland and Houston so

1:20:15.280 --> 1:20:17.519
<v Speaker 1>far this year, and Cleveland went on to looked very

1:20:17.520 --> 1:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>good after they got done. Since Week three of last year,

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are allowing one touchdown pass per game. That's it. Now.

1:20:26.400 --> 1:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What happened in Week three last year, Well, Patrick Mahomes

1:20:29.000 --> 1:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>surer for three seventy four yards and three scores. But

1:20:31.600 --> 1:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>since then they've been really, really good. Kelsey remains very safe.

1:20:36.439 --> 1:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore has allowed tight end scores in both games, and

1:20:39.800 --> 1:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that was Darren Fells and David and Joku. And they're

1:20:43.240 --> 1:20:46.519
<v Speaker 1>hardly you know, it's hardly Travis Kelsey, soh Kelsey remains

1:20:46.640 --> 1:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>very safe in my mind. Tyreek Hill I have a

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>B grade on in this matchup because of the difficulty

1:20:54.200 --> 1:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with both of the excellent cornerbacks that the

1:20:57.800 --> 1:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens give you. Now, if he works out of

1:20:59.800 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the lot, he's got a better opportunity, but I'm not

1:21:02.160 --> 1:21:04.559
<v Speaker 1>positive that this is one of his better games coming up.

1:21:04.680 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes also just the B grade, which is unusual. Again,

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but we're talking about a Baltimore defense that's giving up

1:21:10.439 --> 1:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven points per game. Clyde Edwards a layer, just a

1:21:15.800 --> 1:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Baltimore is allowed a running back rushing score

1:21:19.120 --> 1:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and six of their last nine home games. I like

1:21:21.120 --> 1:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that part. When the Chiefs played Baltimore last year, Lashawn

1:21:24.160 --> 1:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>McCoy and Darryl Williams put up a hundred nine combo

1:21:27.880 --> 1:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>yards and seven yards per carry. And this year Kareem

1:21:30.960 --> 1:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Hunt and Nick Chubb combined for a hundred thirty two

1:21:32.960 --> 1:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards against Baltimore and the opener. Still, this is

1:21:36.160 --> 1:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good run defense despite everything I just said.

1:21:38.920 --> 1:21:40.599
<v Speaker 1>And they have not allowed a running back to score

1:21:40.640 --> 1:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ground or through the air this year, and

1:21:43.400 --> 1:21:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I do believe there will be an emphasis to get

1:21:45.640 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards a layer going in this game, because Baltimore

1:21:48.400 --> 1:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is easier to run on than pass on. And uh,

1:21:52.400 --> 1:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get Clyde going last week and they struggled

1:21:56.120 --> 1:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and kept the Chargers team in it until the very end.

1:21:58.920 --> 1:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a nickname submission for review. Are you guys ready?

1:22:02.160 --> 1:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready. He's got to have a good game, but

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>if he does, we can call him Clyde Edwards Governor.

1:22:10.400 --> 1:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>That would only work if it was a London game,

1:22:13.720 --> 1:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a game, and Colin mccockney needs to

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>actually give that nickname. I think we'll have to. We'll

1:22:21.240 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have to find Colin and ask him to to certify

1:22:24.439 --> 1:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that nickname for Clyde Edwards. Hilaire, let's go to the

1:22:27.439 --> 1:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore side with Lamar Jackson getting Lamar Jackson's got an

1:22:32.160 --> 1:22:34.360
<v Speaker 1>A grade in this game. But again, I'm kind of

1:22:34.360 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>nervous here. He faced the Chiefs in Week three last

1:22:36.520 --> 1:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>year he had zero touchdowns through the air. He ran

1:22:39.400 --> 1:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>one in which helps salvage a fantasy game that all

1:22:41.880 --> 1:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the ways would have been miserable. Maybe it's the same

1:22:44.160 --> 1:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing this week. Over Kansas City's last nine games.

1:22:47.520 --> 1:22:50.559
<v Speaker 1>They're giving up just one passing touchdown per game. But

1:22:50.760 --> 1:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>both the quarterbacks to face the Chiefs have rushed in

1:22:52.720 --> 1:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to score already this year. Man, so I guess we'll

1:22:55.360 --> 1:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>count on him to rush one in. Jackson's receivers, um

1:22:58.680 --> 1:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are not as good as the cornerbacks they're gonna face

1:23:01.160 --> 1:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna That's why I've got just a C

1:23:03.120 --> 1:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>grade on Markis Brown. He was at exactly five catches

1:23:06.920 --> 1:23:09.479
<v Speaker 1>in both games thus far. One of those games of

1:23:09.560 --> 1:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>five catchess, the other one forty two yards. Marks Brown

1:23:15.320 --> 1:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to hit that home run to be fantasy relevant.

1:23:18.400 --> 1:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>He's the next Will Fuller. Basically, he is a bit

1:23:20.760 --> 1:23:25.559
<v Speaker 1>of hopefully slightly stronger hamstrings, very much stronger, let's hope.

1:23:26.000 --> 1:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Um it really it highlights the need for big place

1:23:28.160 --> 1:23:30.519
<v Speaker 1>here and there's a team that doesn't often give them up. Now,

1:23:30.680 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>he will run generally from the side of the field

1:23:33.160 --> 1:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that is manned by fourth round rookie Ladarius Snead. You

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>would think fourth round rookie, this should be a very

1:23:39.920 --> 1:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>positive matchup for Marcus Brown. But sneed was was has

1:23:43.479 --> 1:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>been pressed into service when self described a marijuana enthusiast

1:23:47.400 --> 1:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Brashod Brelan got suspended. Now here's the thing. Sneed has

1:23:51.040 --> 1:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>been great. He's got interceptions in both games and is

1:23:55.439 --> 1:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>allowing a passer rating of twenty nine in his coverage.

1:23:58.960 --> 1:24:02.599
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Willie sne It. I'm confused. No, this

1:24:02.680 --> 1:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is the other other side of the field, Darius Sneed,

1:24:06.800 --> 1:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so advantage Snead Comma Ladarius over Marquis Brown. Just the

1:24:12.800 --> 1:24:15.599
<v Speaker 1>C grade there, Uh, stick you with the passing game.

1:24:15.720 --> 1:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews gets a B grade. He was almost invisible

1:24:19.040 --> 1:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>last week, although they did throw to him in the

1:24:21.040 --> 1:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>end zone once then and it was not a good

1:24:22.840 --> 1:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>past and he wasn't able to come up with it.

1:24:24.760 --> 1:24:27.759
<v Speaker 1>This is a tricky matchup against Honey Badger Tyrone Matthew,

1:24:27.760 --> 1:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>who generally fares very well against tight ends but well

1:24:31.120 --> 1:24:34.799
<v Speaker 1>note Hunter Henry logged six catches for eighty three yards

1:24:34.840 --> 1:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City last week. So success can definitely happen

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for Mark Andrews in this game, and he gets the

1:24:40.760 --> 1:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Now let's go to this frustrating set of

1:24:43.800 --> 1:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs. So for Mark for mark Ingram. He hammered

1:24:49.320 --> 1:24:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs last season in the matchup for one thirty

1:24:52.560 --> 1:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>five combo yards and three touchdowns, but this year, in

1:24:56.240 --> 1:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the first two games, he's averaging nine kerry nine times. Meanwhile,

1:25:04.200 --> 1:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards is averaging almost seven yards per carry and

1:25:08.479 --> 1:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>j K. Dobbins has siphoned off gold line carries and

1:25:11.080 --> 1:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>some garbage time usage. The Chiefs are a middle of

1:25:14.200 --> 1:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the pack run defense in virtually every single way, and

1:25:17.720 --> 1:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Ravens will have some success running the ball,

1:25:19.880 --> 1:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but does it come via Ingram and does he get

1:25:23.040 --> 1:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>enough volume? So really just the C grade on mark

1:25:26.000 --> 1:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Ingram and I can't go to J. K. Dobbins or

1:25:29.040 --> 1:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards. Dobbins just three touches last week. Maybe gets

1:25:33.760 --> 1:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>helped out through the passing game as a receiver, but

1:25:35.920 --> 1:25:38.479
<v Speaker 1>then he's a very He's a very accomplished receiver in college,

1:25:38.479 --> 1:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but they don't use him that way so far. Maybe

1:25:40.800 --> 1:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they have furl him here in the receiving game, but

1:25:42.720 --> 1:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't count on that. So I got Dobbins on

1:25:44.920 --> 1:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the bench, Gus Edwards not getting enough use, even though

1:25:47.280 --> 1:25:49.759
<v Speaker 1>he looked really good last week, He's on the bench

1:25:49.880 --> 1:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think this is gonna be a far

1:25:53.200 --> 1:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>lower scoring team game than Kansas City versus Baltimore Monday night.

1:25:58.560 --> 1:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like, and I've got it's gonna be like that

1:26:00.960 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Rams Mexico game where they scored a hundred points.

1:26:05.439 --> 1:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it ends up working out that way. I want

1:26:08.000 --> 1:26:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to touch on the Thursday night game. Miles Gaskin running

1:26:12.760 --> 1:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the ball very, very well for Miami. Do you believe

1:26:16.720 --> 1:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Miles Gaskin has moved into a stratosphere where he becomes

1:26:20.560 --> 1:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a starter most weeks. Yeah, he looks like the best

1:26:24.479 --> 1:26:26.559
<v Speaker 1>running back on roster right now. I'm a little worried

1:26:26.600 --> 1:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>about Jordan Howard as bad as he looks, being a

1:26:30.439 --> 1:26:34.519
<v Speaker 1>touchdown vulture. I gotta give vulture sound effect because he

1:26:34.880 --> 1:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>is the vulture. I gotta give credit to Evans Silva

1:26:39.000 --> 1:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>on this tweet. He extrapolated Howard's numbers moving forward. Howard

1:26:44.240 --> 1:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is on pace for like eighties six carries for sixty

1:26:46.760 --> 1:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>four yards and sixteen touchdowns. But outside of that, yeah,

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Gaskins is gonna be the guy. He'll still get some

1:26:53.040 --> 1:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>red red zone work he did on Thursday night. Uh.

1:26:55.960 --> 1:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>The encouraging thing is he's averaging uh, seventeen and a

1:26:59.320 --> 1:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>half touch is per game. That amazing. That's very encouraging.

1:27:02.920 --> 1:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Considering everybody kind of thought Matt Brita would be really

1:27:06.200 --> 1:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>involved in in at least the passing office. And Scott

1:27:09.920 --> 1:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>fish nailed this in the preseason when he said the

1:27:12.520 --> 1:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>vacated targets for the running back position for the Dolphins

1:27:16.560 --> 1:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>was just absolutely huge. And that's why four receptions, six receptions,

1:27:21.360 --> 1:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>five receptions for Gaskin. That keeps him in play. Now.

1:27:24.880 --> 1:27:27.519
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't scored yet, and he's only averaging eighty one

1:27:27.560 --> 1:27:31.479
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, but he's in play at all times.

1:27:31.760 --> 1:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's going to become better when ta

1:27:34.760 --> 1:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes the quarterback and adds a little bit more of

1:27:37.160 --> 1:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a running element to the quarterback position. Miles Gaskin passes

1:27:40.479 --> 1:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the eye test. He is an NFL running back and

1:27:43.160 --> 1:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I like what I see there. Let's pivot for a

1:27:45.600 --> 1:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>minute to Tua going into the season. I think most

1:27:48.960 --> 1:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>people believe to his time was coming sooner than later.

1:27:52.680 --> 1:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick's been good, and but you know that guy

1:27:55.960 --> 1:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>is he stone cold gamer, has nothing but fight. The

1:28:00.520 --> 1:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>team loves him too that you absolutely love playing for

1:28:03.760 --> 1:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that and to it loves him too from the way

1:28:05.960 --> 1:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds. So I think at this point we are

1:28:09.040 --> 1:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>looking closer to like a Halloween or Thanksgiving. It might

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>take an injury, and it might maybe it's even all season.

1:28:15.080 --> 1:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It could be all season, It could be and we

1:28:17.280 --> 1:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>may not see two effects. Painful, But is it? It's

1:28:20.840 --> 1:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>painful for me? For you? Who was my premature speculation

1:28:24.520 --> 1:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>last week? It didn't really work out. No, I don't

1:28:27.640 --> 1:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>think it has briech did you? If you missed any

1:28:31.439 --> 1:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the show, I encourage you to rewind back

1:28:33.240 --> 1:28:35.759
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast. We encourage you to go to Guillotine

1:28:35.920 --> 1:28:38.439
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com for all of my player rankings available

1:28:38.439 --> 1:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for free and explanations. Also so you can decide whether

1:28:42.320 --> 1:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>or not we've got our head on straight with all

1:28:44.160 --> 1:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of our rankings if you agree with them and help

1:28:45.920 --> 1:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>your bench start considerations. Will be back next week for

1:28:49.160 --> 1:28:58.439
<v Speaker 1>more Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production

1:28:58.439 --> 1:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from my Heart Radio,

1:29:01.320 --> 1:29:04.479
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:29:04.520 --> 1:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.