WEBVTT - UPS Shares Fall, Harris Campaign

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch US live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple card playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's switch gears to logistics.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Transportation UPS still having some challenges. US misses profit estimates

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>amid heavy costs and uneven demand. Can't catch a break

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>stock down double digits here, Lee Clasical joins US senior

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>transport logistics and shipping analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Lee A,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>get another tough quarter for UPS?

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>What's the story there?

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think it's a lot of things. You know,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 4>they are seeing buying growth, which is good, but that

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 4>mix of growth is not good. What they're seeing is

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 4>their shippers trading down. So if you were going to

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 4>maybe send something via air, maybe you decide to go

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 4>on the ground, which is you know, cheaper and lower margin.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 4>And then if you're using ground, maybe you're going to

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 4>use one of their products like sure Posts, which is

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 4>like an economy product, which is cheaper and again lower

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 4>margin business. So you are seeing, you know, folks trading down.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>You're also seeing the mix.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Of B B two B two C outpacing growth of

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 5>B to B. B two C growth was around four percent,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 5>and B to B growth was down four percent and

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 5>B to B.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 4>So think like a lawyer sending documents to another lawyer's

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 4>office that business tends to have better margins because of

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>the inherent density that follows that business, and density is

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 4>really good for asset intensive networks like ups is. And

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 4>then you also, you know, have another negative mixed impact.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 4>You had two you know, they called out on their

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 4>call to large e commerce companies. I'm assuming that you know,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>these are companies out of China that are you know,

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>are kind of using more economy services, so you're seeing

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 4>a surge in that demand from from there as well

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>as addition to the trade down trade that we were

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 4>that I mentioned earlier.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Is this the trough? Is this sort of the worst

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 6>it's going to get?

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. I mean, you know, I think so,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think it feels like it's this is

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 4>the worst. I mean, you know, the company has done

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 4>pretty well in terms of meeting expectations or beating expectations.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 4>This is the first myths since I believe the first

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 4>quarter of twenty twenty. So you know, Carol Toon May

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 4>and her team have been on quite a role. They

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 4>also have some easier comparisons going into the second half.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, some of your listeners might have remembered they

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 4>had a really you know, tough negotiation with their labor unions.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 4>They had a new contract that was really you know,

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 4>heavily weighted in the first year that gets anniversaried in

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>August first, So therefore, you know, those higher labor costs,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the comparables will ease significantly, you know, after August first,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 4>so that should provide a better cost for them in

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 4>a third quarter and going forward. Also, you know peak

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 4>seasons here right, You know a lot of the companies

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 4>that we cover are talking about we you know, most

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 4>of them are expecting a real peak season and we're

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 4>not talking about, you know, the peak seasons that maybe

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 4>we've seen the nineteen nineties or early two thousands, but

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 4>you're definitely going to see seasonal increase in demand. And

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 4>that peak season is one of the shortest on record.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's around seventeen days between Thanksgiving and Christmas,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 4>and that will allow ups to implement surcharges because they're

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>going to have to you know, get those resources in

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 4>a short amount of time for a short amount of

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 4>time to make sure that you know, they're able to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 4>deliver at high service levels. So you should see probably

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 4>some good volume I'm sorry, some good demand revenue growth

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>in the fourth quarter from those surcharges. So you know

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 4>that coupled with a lot of their cost cutting measurements. Uh,

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 4>they they've they've reduced a lot of heads. You know,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of things are going to turn

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>for this company once You're going to see you know,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>that B two B volume return and the company is

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 4>doing a lot of things I think to position itself

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 4>longer term, you know, whether that's you know, focusing on

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 4>the healthcare logistics. Healthcare logistics obviously there's a lot of

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 4>value add there and those margins are pretty high relative

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 4>to you know, someone throwing a package on your porch,

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 4>and so you know, they're really looking to grow that

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 4>business and they want to be a leader in that business.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 4>Uh And and to be frank, it's it's it's a

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>fantastic uh business to be in if you're a logistics provider.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>And then you know they're also trying to do new

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 4>things with or more things, I should say, with what

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 4>we call SMBs, which are small and medium sized businesses.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 4>You know that tends to have better margins than you know,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 4>dealing with these super large companies like Amazon, which you know,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 4>the business is good, but the margins could be better, right.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, I had absolutely no loyalty between these two companies.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean I have actually no loyalty between these two services.

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean the FedEx store and the UPS store kind

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>of right next to each other in my little strip malls.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Whichever's got the shorter line, that's kind of where I go.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>But well, you look at the stocks over the last

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 3>five years, UPS is up about seven percent per year.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 3>FedEx is up almost fourteen percent, so twice the stock

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>price performance. So lee from an investor's perspective, you know,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 3>you got thirty seconds herea what's the difference between these

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 3>two companies from an investor perspective.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's interesting. So like on fed X, I think

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 4>they're dealing with more structural issues because that was a

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 4>company that I would say was extremely bloated, you know,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 4>over the last decade, and they're kind of right sizing

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 4>their network they're both making changes to their networks to

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 4>kind of meet the new demands, you know, that change

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 4>of increase in the home delivery versus you know, delivering

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 4>to lawyers or doctors' offices or corporations.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 4>I think the biggest difference is, you know, there might

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 4>be more margin expansion opportunity at FedEx, just because they're

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 4>starting from a lower base than the new ps.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 4>But you know, these are two what I would consider

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 4>blue chip companies that are you know, should benefit with

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 4>the economy and they should probably be able to grow

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 4>top line well passed Global GDP, just given some of

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 4>the self help things that they have in front of them.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 7>All right, pley, super appreciated, Thank you so much. With Klasgow,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 7>he joins us from a Boomberg Intelligence. He covers all

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 7>the logistics and transportation stuff for us.

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Pod. Catch us live

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 7>Alex Steel alongside Paul Sweeney and John Tucker. Yeah, crude

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 7>really getting hit by weaker China demand. We're going to

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 7>talk about that in the next hour. This is Bloomberg

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 7>Intelligence Radio. We bring you all the top news in business, economics, politics,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 7>and finance. We are broadcasting to live Interactor Broker Studio

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 7>right here in rainy Midtown Manhattan. The latest news on

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 7>the political front is Kamala Harris now has more than

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 7>enough pledged delegates to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination after

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 7>just a two day blitz that saw the Vice president

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 7>consolidate her parties, backing to challenge Donald Trump in November.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 7>Want to get more details on all of this with

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 7>Henrietta Trace, Managing partner and director of Economic Policy at

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 7>Beta Partners. Henrietta, now, what happens? What does pledge delegates mean?

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Edge delegates basically means so the field is clear for

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 8>Kamala Harris. She will be the Democratic nominee as expected.

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 8>We will get that confirmed around August seventh. They're going

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 8>to start virtual roll call voting at the DNC in

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 8>the beginning of August and carried through until about the

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 8>seventh when it'll become relatively official, and then we will

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 8>have the convention on the nineteenth around then we should

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 8>get to understand who her vice presidential pick is. So

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 8>it's really all eyes on Democrats for the foreseeable future.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta, can you give us a sense of the timing

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>associated with the VP pick? Is there any rush to

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 3>get it done sooner rather than later as it relates

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 3>to maybe that virtual role call.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 8>No, not really and based on what we're seeing from

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 8>the Democratic Party right now. And I would think back

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 8>to know how long it took for President Biden to

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 8>come to the conclusion that he was going to step aside,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 8>the slow approach that Speaker Meredith Nancy Pelosi took to

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 8>President Biden, the slow approach that.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 9>The donor took.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 8>This is all orchestrated, not you know, necessarily on purpose,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 8>but designed to keep the attention on the democratic process

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 8>that's playing out in the Democratic Party. Make sure that

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 8>they're vetting a lot of these guys, the people that

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 8>they're considering. The governors from the swing states, Mark Kelly

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 8>and Arizona. These are folks that have very low name

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 8>recognition outside of their state. So a lot of the

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 8>vetting process is being done in real time. We're watching

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 8>it all unfold, and I think it's going to take

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 8>the remainder of this month and into the beginning of

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 8>next month. Let's recall that former President Trump announced his

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 8>by pick P pick on the Monday.

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 9>Of his convention.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 8>I wouldn't be surprised if that's the set of timing

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 8>that we get on the Democratic side as well, which

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 8>means we've got another couple of weeks before we know

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 8>for sure who it's going to be.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 7>We also keep hearing, you know, these rumors that Republicans

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 7>are talking about. You know, we're hijacking democracy here. This

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 7>is not democratic, which leads me to think, are we

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 7>going to see lawsuits in relation to Kamala Harris being

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 7>on the ballot? Are we going to see lawsuits concerning

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 7>campaign funds? Are we going to see lawsuits preventing her

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 7>from getting on the ballot in certain states?

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 6>Is all of this just talking points? There is any

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 6>of this real?

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 8>No, These are all relatively frivolous lawsuits. The Democratic Party

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 8>has until the convention to name a nominee. Once they do,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 8>I think the concerns around the democratic process or what

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 8>you're seeing in terms of slow walking endorsements from former

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 8>President Obama from Majority Leader Schumer from Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 8>this is Democrats trying to explain to American voters through

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 8>illustration that they're going to take their time and not

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 8>necessarily have an anointment of Kamala Harris. They chose the

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 8>direction that I think was the only conceivable conclusion, which

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 8>was that Kamala Harris, the current Vice President, who you

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 8>know millions of people have already voted for to.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 9>Go into the White House, is going to be at

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 9>the top of the ticket.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 8>And the endorsement from President Biden really sealed that when

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 8>he wrote his letter over the weekend.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 9>So I think that the.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 8>Direction we're getting from the Democratic Party is clearly indicative

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 8>of La Harris winning the delegation. There was no real primary,

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 8>but the process has been playing out for so long now,

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 8>even though it's only been a couple of weeks, it

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 8>feels like an eternity, and I think the Democratic voters,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 8>as evidenced by their fundraising numbers, are clearly enthusiastic and

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 8>happy to have Kamala at the top. There was some

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 8>morning console pulling that came out this morning showing the

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 8>Democrats prefer her to be at the top of the ticket.

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 8>Petevodajin was next in line, but she clearly wins the

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 8>majority of the Democratic voters, So I don't think there

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 8>will be an uprising against Kamala from the Democratic voter base.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>And let's talk money.

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Just reading your notes here, I mean, like eighty one

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 3>million dollars was raised just in the twenty four hours

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 3>after President Biden endorsed VP Harris. Here, give us a

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>sense of the magnitude of the fundraising and what it

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 3>tells you, I guess about her candidacy and the support

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 3>of the Democratic Party.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 10>Man.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the numbers are staggering in and of themselves.

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 8>They broke Democratic records, presidential records for a twenty four

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 8>hour haul. She's up over one hundred and one million

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 8>dollars as of right now. But the real said is

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 8>the fact that sixty percent of those donors are new

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 8>to the twenty twenty four CYC ball. That is, grassroots

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 8>engagement momentum on par with, if not exceeding, what you

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 8>see on the demo on the Republican side in terms

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 8>of galvanization from Trump supporters. One of the reasons that

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 8>my odds are sixty forty for Trump right now is

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 8>because we don't have any hard data from polling to

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 8>suggest that Kamala Harris has a shot to win in

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 8>the swing states yet, But the fundraising numbers and the

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 8>heat map that you see from the Act Blue campaign

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 8>suggests that those same states that Kamala Harris would need

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 8>to win are the ones that are donating amongst the

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 8>highest mounts.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 7>What do you think is going to wind up happening? Like,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 7>how do you game out now? Like what happens in

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 7>November and beyond? I mean, moving sort of money into

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 7>any kind of asset class to been on it now

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 7>seems crazy?

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 6>How do you think about it?

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 8>I really think that investors should focus on the momentum play.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 8>That is the main focus of my note from Life

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 8>last night. The momentum story is now has been with

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 8>the Republican Party on things that were planned and unplanned. Obviously,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 8>Trump winning the first presidential debate, you know, getting a

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 8>failed assassination attempt was extraordinarily galvanizing. I think it's insane

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 8>that you know, that's not the number one news story

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 8>of the day. But the reality is, and I talk

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 8>about this with clients a lot, the Republican momentum came

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 8>and is now gone, and now it's all with the

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 8>Democratic Party. And of course it would be ridiculous to

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 8>assume in twenty twenty four that there won't be another

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 8>wrench thrown in the gears here. But for right now

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 8>and for the remainder of this month and next month

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 8>going into the DNC, you know, we haven't even gotten

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 8>to those events yet. So not only is the Democratic

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 8>Party galvanized in a new way that we haven't seen

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 8>for two years, but the groundswell of support, the pent

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 8>up demand is so robust that I suspect it will

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 8>compel Kamala Harris well into August and then into the

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 8>critical months and the final countdown of the election into

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 8>mid September. What's fascinating is twenty four percent of Independence

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 8>don't decide how they're going to vote until after Labor

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 8>Day historically, so even though we're, you know, only one

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 8>hundred days out from the election, there's shockingly.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 9>There's a shockingly large amount of time still left in

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 9>this race.

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 3>What do you think the I guess the debate strategy

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 3>should be for Kamala Harris and the president former President Bush.

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 8>I mean sorry, I oh, can't go that back that far.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 8>I think at this point you just got to get

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 8>Trump to the stage. I think that if you read

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 8>his true social pronouncements, he is really definitely attempting to

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 8>move the needle on the debates, and.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 9>The question is really whether he shows or not.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it's optically possible for him not to

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 8>debate the vice president and the ultimate Democratic kick nominee.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 8>That debate is tentatively set for September tenth. Kamala Harris,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 8>when she was vice president, has set a couple of dates,

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 8>the twelfth and thirteenth, if I'm not mistaken, of September

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 8>for a vice presidential debate, but the Republican ticket hasn't.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Committed to any of those.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 8>I think the American public is going to demand the

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 8>Trump debate Kamala Harris, and I think it would be

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 8>a material show of weakness if you did it.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 7>Just some breaking news for US, confirmed by AP as

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 7>well as ABC News, the Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 7>has now resigned. This comes, of course, after the attempt

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 7>assassination attempt on president former President Trump's life.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 6>Henrietta, are you surprised by that news?

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 8>Not really, I'm surprised that it lasted as long as

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 8>it did.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 9>The Secret Service has come.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 8>Under fire for years now, and I think in the

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 8>wake of the attempted assassination attempts, which was so shocking

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 8>to so many Americans we haven't seen that, you know,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 8>in my lifetime, is really something that required a shake

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 8>up at the top. The Republican Party has come out

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 8>very strongly against her and has been very focused on

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 8>the Secret Service. There are investigations that they're waiting for

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 8>with a couple of different deadlines sixty days out from

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 8>now for a thorough account of what went on.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 9>It makes sense that she would resign.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Henrietta Trees, thank you so much. We really appreciate it.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>As always Henrietta Trees, she's a managing partner and director

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of Economic Policy at Data Partners, really one of our

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>go to voices of all things political, and I think

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna be talking to her very frequently between now

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and election day, because, as Henrieta said, there's found to

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>be more wrenches turned into the whole process.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 6>And then as an investor, what do you do?

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 7>Gina Martin Adams and Boomberg Intelligence had a great point

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 7>that said that high tax companies have underperformed low tax companies,

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 7>and if you're betting on President Trump, you would probably

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 7>buy high tax companies with the idea that those would

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 7>be cut, that those taxes would be cut. Therefore, maybe

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 7>what we're seeing in the market isn't based on the election,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 7>but on earnings and fundamentals, which brings us full circle

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 7>back to a day where we get almost six trillion

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 7>dollars at market cap earnings coming out.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Effo, car Playing and

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>broun Otto with the Bloomberg Business. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's switch gears in. Let's get right to the media space.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Are we it's media companies reporting. We're also gonna have

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Google reporting air for the Clothes tonight. Keith Rong and

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Nathan joins us. She is the media analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Keith,

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 3>I know we had comcasts today in that stocks shorting down,

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.719
<v Speaker 3>but let's let's go with a winner, a good story. Spotify. Now,

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a Spotify customer, per se. I'm going to

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 3>venture that John Tucker neither is probably not as.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, because here is his cassette tape.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this cassette tapes.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Very good.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>No, I just.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Refuse to pay for it when I can get it free.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 6>No, you have cassette tapes?

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thank you, Yes, very good.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 6>I have eight track tapes.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I have eight tract tape.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 6>And this is why we love you exactly.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 3>Keith. It talk to us about Spotify stocks really rallying today.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, thank you so much, Paul and Alex. So Spotify

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 11>really blew it out of the park. You're absolutely right there. Up,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 11>I think now thirteen fourteen percent, and really the number

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 11>here for Spotify, and the main story has not just

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 11>been great subscriber growth, so they've been adding a solid

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 11>five six seven million premium subscribers every quarter. But for them,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 11>what it really has been over the past few quarters

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 11>has been this inflection and profitability. Remember what we're now

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 11>looking for streamers across the board, and this goes to

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 11>Netflix and everybody else in video streaming, as well as Spotify,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 11>which is, you know, the main audio streamer with a

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 11>thirty five percent market share. The narrative has really shifted

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 11>now to profitability, and they absolutely blew it out of

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 11>the park. So the gross margin guidance that they had

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 11>given was twenty eight percent. They came in at twenty

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 11>nine percent. But even better was the outlook. So for

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 11>the longest time Spotify was stuck at like a twenty

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 11>five percent gross margin. They were pointing to like longer

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 11>term margins of thirty percent. But looks like they're going

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 11>to be able to hit it right in the third quarter,

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 11>and that's why we see the stock reacting the way

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 11>that it is.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 7>So did it take anyone else's lunch or this was

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 7>just a really good sort of management cost issue, Yeah.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 11>It's excellent manage. More importantly, it's also price increases they've done.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 11>They hadn't taken any price increase alex for more than

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 11>ten years, and then in a span of two years,

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 11>they've raised prices by twenty percent. And that's just because

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 11>they know that people love Spotify. Nobody is going to

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 11>churn from Spotify to let's say, Apple Music or YouTube Music.

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 11>They have a thirty six thirty seven percent share of

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 11>the global audio market and they're just adding so many

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 11>features and so many new verticals that they're able to

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 11>take those price increases. But of course, apart from that,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 11>you know It's also been a very good story when

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 11>it comes to cost cuts. So they were investing heavily

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 11>in their podcasting business, you know, like with the Joe

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 11>Rogan Show and adding all these other exclusive podcasts. They're

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 11>being much more prudent now on that front, and those

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 11>cost cuts again have really driven profitability.

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>How much of their revenue is subscription versus advertising versus

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 3>other these days.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 11>Almost all of their revenue, Paul, is subscription. It's a

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 11>very Yeah, it's a very very heavy subscription based business.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 11>They are trying to build the advertising business, but as

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 11>you know, again that takes time. You know, that will

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 11>drive the longer term margin story. But as of right now,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 11>the mixshift is really subscriptions.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 6>That's pretty impressive.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 7>Hey, can I ask you about Comcast and what you

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 7>made of their earnings that came out earlier, reported second

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 7>quarter revenue that misanalyst estimates they had. It was the

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 7>movie season, you got theme parks, the whole thing.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So Comcast is an interesting story. So Comcast is actually,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 11>you know, your typical media conglomerate. They own both video distribution,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 11>broadband connectivity as well as the media side of the business.

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 11>With NBC eighty percent of their ibida actually is related

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 11>to just broadband subscriptions, and so what happened this quarter,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 11>we were expecting a little bit of softness in broadband,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 11>and as expected, yes, they did loose subscribers. Remember, the

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 11>whole cable industry is really in a slump because of

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 11>very very intense competition from some of the telecom offerings,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 11>both with fiber and fixed wireless acts. So we're kind

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 11>of seeing that slump and it looks like Comcast is

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 11>really not going to be able to get out of

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 11>that slump. More interestingly, however, for both Comcasts as well

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 11>as Disney, is that the theme park attendance is actually

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 11>flailing and you know, a twenty four percent decline in

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 11>their theme park ibadah. Yeah, and that's really because huge

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 11>pull forward or what they're saying was a huge pull

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 11>forward post COVID and now we're kind of seeing normalization.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 11>So that was a little bit of a disappointment, But

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 11>I think overall the business is fine, but we are

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 11>going to see some extended softness over the next few quarters.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the stock is down about almost six

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 3>percent today, down fifteen percent year to date. When you

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 3>look at Comcasts, you know, great collection of assets, but

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>none of which are really they're all facing serious headwinds.

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Is there a what's the feeling among analysts and investors

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 3>you talk to, like, what can a Comcast actually do

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>to become, you know, an attractive stock.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 11>So Comcast, of course, Paul, as you well know, it's

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 11>always kind of been saddled by this conglomerate discount, I mean,

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 11>the big question. And we know Brian Roberts has always

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 11>been hungry for some kind of deals. So the wildcard

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 11>of theyre obviously a wildcard when it comes to M

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 11>and A. I guess once if the if the administration changes,

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 11>and if it's more favorable for deals, I think Comcast

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 11>will be a major player. I mean, we don't know

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 11>whether they'll look to do some kind of joint venture

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 11>with you know, Warner Brothers or Fox. It remains to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 11>be seen, but of course they will be a major

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 11>player in the space. You know. Again, in terms of

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 11>what would move their stock, maybe if they spin off

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 11>their NBC business. I mean, Brian Roberts has not indicated

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 11>any such thing, but I think over the near term,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 11>what really needs to happen to kind of move the

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 11>sentiment on the stock is they have to show positive

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 11>broadband subscriber growth.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, great stuff, great analysis is always rock and Aathan.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>She covers all the media business for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 3>done in our Princeton office. And you kind of look

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>at those two stocks. Spotify kind of the new met

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 3>if you will, Comcast kind of the old media, if

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 3>you will. When there's a time when I was covering Comcast,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 3>it was the new media versus some of the traditional

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 3>media like newspapers, magazine.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>That kind of thing.

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 3>But it's just this evolution and what technology is brought

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 3>to the entertainment communications businesses. A lot of these traditional

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>media comes happened really hard time at evolving.

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and then how do you break it up when

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 7>like one area is your revenue stream with the other

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 7>areas your growth.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 6>Like I'm glad I'm not in their shoot.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Let's go to energy for a moment. There's a couple

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 7>different threads here that we kind of want to unravel here.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Oil is trading a little heavy again, down by almost

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 7>two percent. We're now at seventy six ninety eight on WTI.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 7>Chris Wright is CEO of liber Energy. He's very outspoken

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to how he thinks oil policy should be,

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 7>and we love that about him.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 6>Chris.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 7>We're going to get to that in a moment. But

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 7>I wanted to understand what's happening with crude. It's had

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 7>a real meltdown over the last couple of weeks, along

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 7>with copper, along with aluminum and nickel and iron ore.

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 7>What is this telling us right now.

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 12>Alex, I think it's fear of slowing economic growth ahead

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 12>of US. China's the biggest buyer of hard commodities. They're

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 12>by far the biggest importer of oil. They're building big

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 12>strategic patrol strategic storage reserves for all commodities, including oil

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 12>and so in China. You saw as cut interest rates recently.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 12>People are fearful of Chinese economic growth. If they slow down,

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 12>that marginal buyer of oil and iron ore and copper

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 12>is going to pull back a little bit. So oil

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 12>prices are still around eighty dollars. I don't think they're

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 12>in a bad place, but I think fear about economic growth,

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 12>and specifically fear about China is probably the cause of that.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Christian, in case you maybe didn't notice out there

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>in Montana, but we're actually this is an election year.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 3>What is the energy industry? What are you and your

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 3>energy industry palace? What do you think about? You know,

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Republican versus a democratic administration here as it relates to

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 3>your industry.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 12>Look, I've been outspoken on my visits to Washington that

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 12>the efforts of the current administration to make it harder

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 12>to get a drilling permit, or to get a pipeline

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 12>or to drill on these lands. What does that do?

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 12>In fact, it just means we produce a little less

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 12>oil and natural gas. It doesn't change demand at all,

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 12>So it just pushes prices up. So look, our industry

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 12>has been at record profitability. That's great for me, that's

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 12>great for our industry, but that's not great for our country.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 12>If you have higher prices, it just makes people's lives

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 12>a little bit tougher. And nothing the government does really

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 12>impacts demand. Demand for hydrocarbons has grown at one point

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 12>six percent compound annual growth rate for fifty years, a

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 12>little faster than that in the last decade or two.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 12>So the president are not going to impact demand, but

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 12>they are going to impact how much of that's produced

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 12>in the United States and how much that's produced overseas.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 7>So here's my thing with that I don't quite understand

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 7>is that oil production in the US is at a

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 7>record high. It's higher than it was when President Trump

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 7>was in office, So what's the problem.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 12>It would be higher, but you're right. You're right. Most

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 12>of the productions on private lands here, so there's still

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 12>room to grow production. We are at record high, will

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 12>continue to set record highs, probably for another couple decades.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 12>The questions the pace at which US production grows, and

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 12>how does that compare to growth in global oil demand,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 12>which is a little one to one and a half

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 12>million barrels a day during the boom years of the

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 12>Shelle Revolution. US production we're growing as fast as global demand.

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 12>That really keeps oil prices down. If US oil production

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 12>goes much slower than global oil demand, so other countries

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 12>have to meet those incremental barrels. That's an upward. That's

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 12>an upward push on prices. Good for our industry, but

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 12>not necessarily great for the country.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Where are we as an industry in terms of the

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 3>fracking evolution, if you will, because it was such a

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>such an amazing story to turn this country from a

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 3>net importer to a net exporter. Where are we net

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 3>process I.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 12>Would say midstream, mid inning, mid innings. There's still a

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 12>lot of technology improvement going on, but the low hanging

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 12>fruit in the first couple of decades, most of that's

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 12>been picked, so the rise in productivity is much slower

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 12>these days. We're still getting better at making each well better.

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 12>But of course you drill the best locations first, the

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 12>rocks and oil. You know that give up oil and

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 12>gas the easiest. Most of those have been drilled, so

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 12>we're drilling slightly lower quality rock, and we're trying to

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 12>offset that by improving fracking technology. For many years, fracking

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 12>technology out leaped to the decline in rock quality. Now

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 12>you're seeing a slight decline in the productivity of each

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 12>well because that degradation and rock qualities running a little

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 12>faster than technology, but you know, not a huge change.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 12>A lot of room to run for US production.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 7>So, Chris, if President Trump gets in the White House

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 7>and he opens up all federal land to drilling, really

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 7>sort of opens up things in Alaska.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 6>Et cetera.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 7>If that really invites more production, then won't the oil

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 7>price fall even more? Which then doesn't that hurt the

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 7>break even So there's got to be some kind of

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 7>middle ground.

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 12>Exactly. The markets always find a balance. But there's no question,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 12>you know what, Trump administration would make it easier to

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 12>produce US oil and gas product US oil and gas,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 12>so our production would grow. You'd see some offsetting factors though,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 12>We'd see faster permitting on LNG export terminals, so the

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 12>US exports of natural gas would grow. I think you'd

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 12>likely also see more industry relocated in the United States. Like,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 12>our natural gas resources in this country are just awesome,

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 12>but yet most of the energy intensive manufacturing think steel

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 12>and cement and solar panels that's done in China and

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 12>that's powered by coal. If you brought more of that

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 12>industry back to the US, it would be powered by

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 12>US natural gas. You'd see lower air pollutant, lower greenhouse

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 12>gas emissions, and more American jobs. So Trump administration, which

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 12>certainly lead to more growth in US oil and natural

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 12>gas production, but it might also lead to more consumption,

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 12>more domestic consumption of those products as well.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Chris, I'm looking at your balance sheet here. I'm going

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 3>to call them not an industry analyst for energy. It

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>looks really.

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Conservative to me.

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Four hundred and sixty seventy billion dollars of total debt,

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 3>you got a billion of EBITDAH free cash flow positive?

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you do with that? That kind of dry powder,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 3>if you will.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 6>Are you media investment banker pitching him right now?

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I am something. I can do a lot of stuff

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 2>with this balance sheet.

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 7>So Chris, just so you know, Paul is a former

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 7>investment banker for media, so you know, just set you

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 7>up there.

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 12>I appreciate that, Paul. But yeah, we always keep a

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 12>conservative balance sheet because, look, our industry is very cyclical.

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 12>We've had two violent downturns that have both been opportunities

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 12>for US to buy distressed but good companies at cheap prices.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 12>So we're always ready for a downturn to be aggressive.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 12>And also, you're seeing a degradation in the US electricity market.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 12>Electricity is becoming more expensive and less reliable. That's very

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 12>unfortunate for our country, another one of those bad energy policies.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 12>But it's an opportunity for Liberty to start selling electricity

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 12>into the grid. We power our fract fleets, burning natural

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 12>gas to generate electricity to power fract fleets, we can

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 12>we can take that same electricity and sell it to

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 12>data centers or towns that are struggling with an unstable grid.

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 12>So I think you're going to see it a broadening

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 12>of the shoulders of Liberty's business, and we're going to

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 12>deploy a lot of our excess cash flow into a

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 12>new business line, and we'll continue to buy back our stock.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 12>Of course, we still traded a single digit price or

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 12>earnings ratio.

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 7>Chris, that's actually tremendously interesting because sort of the conversation

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 7>that was emerging at Sarah Week this last year was

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 7>do energy companies need to rethink the kind of company

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 7>that they are, that they can't just be a straight

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 7>up oil and gas producer. Do they have to sort

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 7>of become power providers? And that's a different business, it's

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 7>a different outlook. It's kind of rethinking the structure of

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 7>what a business looks like. It sounds like you are

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 7>deeper in those conversations than maybe some of your peers

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 7>would that be true.

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 12>Yes, Look, I think most will not and most should not.

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 12>You know, oil and gas is at an all time

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 12>record high market share for US consumption. The sort of

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 12>fears that oil and gas is going to be gone

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 12>or demand will be gone in twenty or thirty years

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 12>are just nonsense. So I don't think it's a necessary thing.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 12>But in our company, Liberty, we developed power production technologies

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 12>the highest thermal efficiency, meaning most of the energy for

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 12>burning natural gas turns into electricity on the planet. So

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 12>we have these mobile power plants we're using in the industry.

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 12>We already developed that technology. Of course, we're going to

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 12>go ahead and deploy it outside of the oil and

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 12>gas industry.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Chris, do you have any appetite for being an acquirer

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 3>of assets at this point?

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know where I would say we're mid cycle,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 12>maybe a little below mid cycle. We look at stuff

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 12>all the time, but we only you know, we're mostly

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 12>an organic builder. We only buy stuff if it's compelling.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 12>But you know, a different technology, a different business that

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 12>maybe leveraged us faster into where we want to go. Sure,

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 12>we're open to that. We're always looking at opportunities, and.

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 7>Would that be in sort of the oil space to

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 7>ramp up current positions. Would it be more to acquire

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 7>some new technology since we already talked about how current

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 7>wells not tapped out, but you know they're they're nearing

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 7>that top out cycle. But it be more natural gas

0:32:58.040 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 7>would be infrastructure, would be power?

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 12>Power is certainly a possibility. We're going that direction anyway.

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 12>Might we buy a smaller player to speed that entry.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 12>That's a real possibility. Technology is something we always look at.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 12>Or we frack twenty percent of all the wells drilled

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 12>in the US and Canada, so you know, we're not

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 12>really going to acquire to get market share. We're already

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 12>the biggest and I would say, by a fair margin,

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 12>the highest ranked quality provider in our space. So probably

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 12>not in our core business, but certainly in peripheral businesses.

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Is possible.

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, Chris, thanks so much for joining us. Really

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>appreciate getting some of your time. Chris Wright, he's the

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 3>CEO and chairman of the board of Liberty Energy. That's

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 3>a public traded company. Lb RT is the ticker stocks

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 3>up about the fifteen percent year to date, so putting

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 3>in some decent numbers. I got about equal number buys

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 3>versus holds on Wall Street, so the street's kind of

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of mixed on that, which is probably true for

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 3>energy in general.

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 7>Also see, here's the interesting part is that if you're

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 7>a portfolio manager or a big investor, you can't own

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 7>a lot of energy stocks like you really can't anymore.

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 7>So you have to really pick and choose which ones

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 7>you're gonna buy, which means the bigger have to get bigger,

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 7>the mediums definitely have to get bigger.

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 6>You have to really.

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 7>Appeal to shareholders of why you are that one stock,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 7>which is why I also thought that his information about

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 7>Power was interesting too, because that's a totally different type

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 7>of company and a different business line and who would

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 7>be good at and who would not be And that

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 7>was definitely part of the conversation, do these guys really

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 7>need to rethink who they are fundamentally right?

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 3>And at three point five billion dollars in market cap,

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>are you a natural buyer of more assets or seller?

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 3>And he says, well, they're already roughly twenty percent of

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the francking in this country.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 2>So probably not gonna get much bigger. In that line,

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>of business.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 3>So interesting to keep an eye on that company based

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 3>in Texas.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 2>No, it's based in Denver, Colorado.

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 6>Actually, you know it's in the Colorado.

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business A. You can also

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steel, Paul Swiney live here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Brokers studio, streaming live on YouTube as well. Well, you

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>look at Tesla the reporting after the close tonight. Stock

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 3>you're to date is absolutely.

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Unchanged, But that does not tell the story.

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, through kind of the end of April, that's

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>not getting declined fifty percent, but since then it's up

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 3>seventy five percent, So go figure. I think the market's

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out what this company is here. Kevin Tynan,

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>he knows. He's been covering the auto industry for decades.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 3>He's director of research at Presidio Group. Uh, Kevin, what

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 3>are you looking for after the close here?

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Today?

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 3>When Tesla reports, it's kind of a mystery, Jeff.

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, then the good thing, Paul is that they they

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 10>their throughput was above one hundred percent, meaning they sold

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 10>more than they produced for the first time in you know,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 10>several quarters. And what that does is, you know, it

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 10>helps margins essentially. So what you've had is a lot

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 10>of output difficulties selling it, and that's very You know

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 10>that you're paying your cost of goods, but you're not

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 10>booking any of that revenue as a direct seller. So

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 10>what Tesla and all the direct seller and pure playev

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 10>companies need to do is to distribute everything that they produce,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 10>and that's been a problem, but most of them are

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 10>all three Rivian, Loocid and Tesla were able to do

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 10>it in the second quarter. Now, the way they get

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 10>there is by cutting production. So while it helps in

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 10>terms of cost of goods, revenue, your income statement, and

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 10>even your balance sheet, because you're not carrying that inventory

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 10>as a growth company and trying to ramp your output,

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 10>you're you're actually taking a step back. And I think

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 10>Tesla's production in the second quarter was at actually the

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.959
<v Speaker 10>lowest it's been since the third quarter of twenty twenty two.

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 10>So tightening up the throughput, but at much lower production rates.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 7>What is the main thing that I'm supposed to care

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 7>about interning? So you're mentioning production throughput rate. Then there's

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 7>like AI stuff. It's trying to position itself as an

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 7>AI company. There's robots that are going to make cars.

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 7>There may be a robot that's going to drive a car.

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I'm legit confused as to what the multiple

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 7>is trading on and what I should care about come

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 7>four h five.

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's exactly what you're supposed to think is as

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 10>an automaker, right right, you're cutting production. So Tesla has

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 10>the ability to distract in that way to say, hey,

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.240
<v Speaker 10>there's all these other great things coming. We're not simply

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 10>a metal bending automaker like everybody else's. We can do

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 10>these other things, and that's what our valuation is based on.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 10>Because as an automaker, again, you're in this cycle where

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 10>inventory is getting very frothy and you need to cut production. Well,

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 10>now you're not a growth company, but you're not an

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 10>automaker either, right, so you can you can point to

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:10.959
<v Speaker 10>these non disprovables such as the robotaxi business or full

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 10>self driving or whatever else is down the road that

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 10>you can pin your valuation to that isn't really the

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 10>nuts and bolts of auto manufacturing, and and for GM

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 10>Stilantis basically everybody else doesn't have that benefit to distract

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 10>to those other business units.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.919
<v Speaker 3>All Right, you mentioned GM the stocks down six point

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 3>seven percent today, but I thought that they're beat their numbers.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 2>So what's going on with General Motors?

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean when you look at it, perhaps it's

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 10>backing off the EV commitment a little bit. You know,

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 10>if if you look at some of that Tesla valuation

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 10>being tied to the EV market and most of the

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 10>legacy automakers kind of taking a at least a half

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 10>step back or extending the timeline in that, you know.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 10>But another one where GM's actually in a reasonably good

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 10>spot at least when you look at North America and

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 10>the US, you know, not oversupplied. They did increase production

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:13.720
<v Speaker 10>in the second quarter by about eight percent, So looking

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 10>into the third quarter, there may be a little bit

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 10>of price issue and profit margin issue because they are

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 10>getting a little bit oversupplied, specifically in evs. I looked

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 10>at it just now and there's about one hundred and

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 10>fifty days supply of evs for General motors. It's about

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 10>nine percent of their supply on the ground at the dealerships,

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 10>but it only represents about three percent of their sales.

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 10>So I think as we go through July and August,

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 10>they're going to try and quietly sell that down and

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 10>get that supply better aligned with demands.

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 7>Right, so then them pushing out production of the factory,

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 7>the EV factory, like pushing that out in Detroit, etc.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 6>Like this is good. Right for GM, it is.

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 10>Good, And it seems like it being more acceptable to

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.479
<v Speaker 10>say those things and that it's not you know, full

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 10>throttle EV. All the time we saw the announcement from

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 10>Ford about, you know, trading an EV factory for a

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 10>super duty factory. So it's starting to be acceptable to

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 10>say like, and that's what the business is, and it

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 10>always has been, right, it's that trade off. You have

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 10>some models or business units or regions that are deficient

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 10>in terms of profitability, and the question is where do

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 10>you make it up? And we've sort of moved to

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 10>this period now where the EV business is the deficient business.

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 10>Also for GM, the cruise unit was a significant loss

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 10>in the quarter too, so you're you're how do you

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 10>make that up? And for gm Ford, even Stilantis. It's

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 10>on the truck side of the business and that's where

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 10>it comes from, and it's starting to be acceptable to

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 10>talk about trucks again.

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 3>So, Kevin, what's the updated consensus out of Detroit as

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to the timing of this transition to EV's It obviously

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 3>feel like we've hit a significant bump in the road

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and it's going to be delayed in this evolution. What's

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 3>the current thinking out of Detroit.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and I think there's been a little bit of

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 10>a tailwind when you think about, you know, what's happening

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 10>with the election in November, right, So.

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 13>I think it feels like in Detroit that the pressure

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 13>is off that we have to get to these targets

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 13>by these dates, that there's a little bit more room

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 13>to stretch it out and to say, hey, we can

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 13>do the profitable things right now and work our way

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 13>towards the ev thing and hope that those profit dynamics

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 13>level out a little bit at some point.

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 10>But it's really a little bit of breathing room.

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 9>I think that the industry.

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 10>Feels like it's getting and again there may be some

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 10>some more uplift in November, depending how the election goes.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 7>Hey, Kevin, really appreciate it. It's so fun to chat

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 7>with you. Congrats on the new gig. Kevin Tynan, director

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 7>of Research at the Presidio Group, joining us on GM

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 7>as well as Tesla.

0:41:58.320 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 6>What to look out after the Closing Bell.

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal