Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: and Twitter. Oh so now we're supposed to think that
Speaker 1: a mediocre, below expectations jobs report is something to celebrate.
Speaker 1: Is this what the media is really going to tell us?
Speaker 1: You know, it's good. Joe Biden can go around it.
Speaker 1: It's your great economy. I saw the things the charts.
Speaker 1: You know, they got all the smart people around me.
Speaker 1: And you know, social justice blah blih blah, equality blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. I'm gonna go play golf. Right, That's who's
Speaker 1: running the country now. Isn't that exciting? Now? We are
Speaker 1: seeing a repeat of the eight years of Obama, when
Speaker 1: weak economic growth, weak job growth was somehow celebrated. Oh,
Speaker 1: because it's better than it was, They're gonna be telling
Speaker 1: you soon. Look at the comparison between now and in
Speaker 1: the middle of the pandemic. Look at how much better
Speaker 1: it is. Biden's great And we'll all be saying that's
Speaker 1: because there's not a pandemic. It has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden. But we'll get into that. You know,
Speaker 1: my friends, you know how important it is to help
Speaker 1: small businesses these days. You know how much they matter
Speaker 1: to me, and for a few weeks now I've been
Speaker 1: telling you about a great company based on a Charleston,
Speaker 1: South Carolina called Allegiance Flag Supply. I love their story.
Speaker 1: Three friends who noticed that the American flags they had
Speaker 1: in front of their houses were constantly getting tangled, mildewed,
Speaker 1: torn or shredded after just a few months in flight.
Speaker 1: They searched high and low for a better flag, but
Speaker 1: big box stores and Amazon purchases only turned up flags
Speaker 1: that were made in China, or even if they were
Speaker 1: made here in the US, felt mass produced or spit
Speaker 1: out of some big machine, making thousands at a time
Speaker 1: with cheap materials. Like you and me, the flag means
Speaker 1: more to them, so they decided to do something about it.
Speaker 1: They started Allegiance Flag Supply out of their own garage
Speaker 1: and have built the company from the ground up. No investors,
Speaker 1: no loans, just their blood, sweat, tiers and time, and
Speaker 1: today they make the best American flags and accessories you
Speaker 1: can find on the market. So if you've been looking
Speaker 1: to purchase a flag for your home, or you're too
Speaker 1: tired of the flag getting tangled or torn or shredded,
Speaker 1: so quickly go to show Allegiance dot com. Just go
Speaker 1: to that website show Allegiance dot com and you'll find
Speaker 1: the highest quality American flags. Show Allegiance dot Com. Make
Speaker 1: sure you enter promo code buck that I'll get you
Speaker 1: ten percent off your purchase. Flag days coming up June fourteenth.
Speaker 1: Get your flag for the summer season by going to
Speaker 1: show allegiance dot com and enter promo code buck for
Speaker 1: ten percent off. US employers added five hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: nine thousand jobs last month, well below what was expected,
Speaker 1: and the unemployment rate dip down from six point one
Speaker 1: percent to five point eight percent. So we're crawling in
Speaker 1: the right direction. But we're supposed to think that this
Speaker 1: is great. Why Well, because there's a Democrat in office.
Speaker 1: And because when there are Democrats who spend a lot
Speaker 1: of time talking about climate change and social justice and
Speaker 1: critical race theory and Marxism and its various iterations, businesses
Speaker 1: people who actually have to function in the private sector.
Speaker 1: They make decisions that are a response to exactly what
Speaker 1: the Democrats are doing. That means slower growth, less investment,
Speaker 1: less hiring. We all know this, but the American people forget.
Speaker 1: You See, they have a Republican pro business leave you alone,
Speaker 1: let the American people prosper president. And then enough of
Speaker 1: them forget, and they're told, oh, there's more free stuff
Speaker 1: out there. We're going to give you more free things.
Speaker 1: Just vote Democrat, and we just keep going through this cycle.
Speaker 1: I really wish that well, we'd have to break through
Speaker 1: the generally, now, the social media monopoly as well as
Speaker 1: the mainstream corporate media is fire hose of disinformation to
Speaker 1: get people to understand what the truth is about the
Speaker 1: American economy and what the Democrats are actually doing to it.
Speaker 1: But it's okay. We have a party, the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: that has run effectively for the elites and the dependent
Speaker 1: class and special interests. People who are trying to make it,
Speaker 1: who are trying to build financial stability and then security,
Speaker 1: and then even wealth people that are in the fight.
Speaker 1: They don't matter to the Democrat Party. You want to
Speaker 1: be rich living in Malibu, or you want to be
Speaker 1: a bureaucrat getting paid more than you're worth working for
Speaker 1: the government somewhere, or you want to be demanding free college,
Speaker 1: free healthcare, free everything. That's the Democrat economic mantra. But
Speaker 1: I wanted to switch gears here for a second, because
Speaker 1: it's it's troubling that we have to go through so many,
Speaker 1: so many different versions of this same story, and we're
Speaker 1: going to continue to suffer through this before eventually enough
Speaker 1: people in the Democrat Party and of those who work
Speaker 1: in the media will have to relent from the madness
Speaker 1: of defund the police. It's going to take time, it's
Speaker 1: going to require suffering. That's one of the big problems
Speaker 1: of having the left in charge. They have quite a
Speaker 1: high tolerance for the suffering of others. You have to
Speaker 1: start with that, and they also create excuses for the
Speaker 1: suffering they create because it's all about their intentions, not
Speaker 1: about results. Oh, we wanted to create total equity among
Speaker 1: all people in America. So the fact that what we
Speaker 1: really did was make people less free, poorer, more dependent,
Speaker 1: more angry, that doesn't matter. You've seen this in plenty
Speaker 1: of centrally planned society es centrally planned economies, and it
Speaker 1: plays out exactly as expected. With law enforcement these days,
Speaker 1: we all know what's going to continue to happen. They
Speaker 1: undermined the cops. You have big spikes in murders and
Speaker 1: shootings all across the country. You have major challenges now
Speaker 1: for cities it's not even really worth it to name them.
Speaker 1: The top fifty cities in America basically are deteriorating, going
Speaker 1: through greater crime, greater dysfunction. And what do they offer
Speaker 1: us in response, Well, the media continues to look for
Speaker 1: every opportunity to find some story of prejudice somewhere, some
Speaker 1: instance of a cop behaving badly, using excessive force. And
Speaker 1: because there's such a focus on that, there is a disconnect.
Speaker 1: There is a sense among many that law enforcement is
Speaker 1: not doing a good job. They are, in fact the
Speaker 1: problem that they are causing violence all across America, when
Speaker 1: they are the solution to that violence, largely the solution.
Speaker 1: There's many things we could talk about that would help.
Speaker 1: But I'm seeing this story about a fiery riot in
Speaker 1: George Floyd Square in Minneapolis, because, as you know, Saint
Speaker 1: George George Floyd is now elevated, has been elevated to
Speaker 1: the status of a religious icon. A man who was
Speaker 1: a convicted felon and had a long rap sheet, who
Speaker 1: was killed by a police officer in Minneapolis is now
Speaker 1: truded as though he is a civil rights hero. This
Speaker 1: is the way that the story goes. Now, So he
Speaker 1: has a square there are people that go there, there
Speaker 1: are vigils by candlelight or whatever. Well, now we have
Speaker 1: George Floyd Square smoldering because a number of BLM activists, rioters, protesters,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call them, very angry. Why were
Speaker 1: they so upset, Well because there was a man who
Speaker 1: was shot by police in Minneapolis, Winston Boogie Smith, thirty
Speaker 1: two years old, wanted for possession of a firearm by
Speaker 1: a felon, which is in itself a felony. He was
Speaker 1: outside of parking garage at about two o'clock yesterday, three
Speaker 1: miles from George Floyd Square. US marshals I've worked with
Speaker 1: some of those individuals. I know them well. US marshals
Speaker 1: swooped in to arrest him. He was in a parked
Speaker 1: car and he according to police, and yes, there will
Speaker 1: be in should be an investigation and we should make
Speaker 1: sure that this is what happened. But they say that
Speaker 1: he pulled a handgun and then they fired on him. Now,
Speaker 1: mister Smith had twenty arrests. Was somebody who was via
Speaker 1: eating his probation for aggravated robbery. So this is a
Speaker 1: man who's been in trouble with the law many, many times.
Speaker 1: He's a felon in possession of a firearm, he's committed robberies,
Speaker 1: committed serious crimes, aggravated robbery, and the police try to
Speaker 1: arrest him, he pulled a gun, they shot him. If
Speaker 1: the police are not able to use force in a
Speaker 1: situation like this, again, assuming that the investigation finds that
Speaker 1: that is what happened, but we have no reason to
Speaker 1: believe as of now, that is not what happened. If
Speaker 1: the police can't use force in that situation, then they
Speaker 1: are effectively incapable of doing their jobs, and they won't
Speaker 1: want to do their jobs. They're not going to show up.
Speaker 1: Why would they Why put your life on the line
Speaker 1: in such a way you can't even defend yourself. It's
Speaker 1: dangerous enough when you can use lethal force, But now
Speaker 1: if you have to use your service weapon, whether you're
Speaker 1: a US mar shoal or state or local police or
Speaker 1: whatever law enforcement agency you're with, if you can't respond
Speaker 1: to a lethal threat with lethal force, you got to
Speaker 1: find another job. What does that mean for society? But
Speaker 1: I also want to know why do we not have
Speaker 1: a disdain? Why is there not vitriol? There should be
Speaker 1: such a repudiation of the kind of actions that we
Speaker 1: see here in George Floyd Square. Afterwards, they're they're looting stores,
Speaker 1: they looted a CVS. They're they're lighting dumpsters on fire.
Speaker 1: For what what does that accomplish? What does that show?
Speaker 1: Is this really now just a movement that's an excuse
Speaker 1: for people who are angry, who are frustrated, who are
Speaker 1: often acting in a way that is childish, that is selfish,
Speaker 1: looting stores, destroying buildings, destroying property because something happened, quite honestly,
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with any of these individuals. They
Speaker 1: weren't there, They don't know what happened. But they loot
Speaker 1: and they riot and they burn anyway, And does anyone
Speaker 1: in the corporate media aligned with the Democrat Party show disgust?
Speaker 1: Does anybody go on TV and say this is grotesque.
Speaker 1: You are dishonoring the member of the memory of Saint
Speaker 1: George Floyd. You're dishonoring whatever the BLM movement actually stands for.
Speaker 1: As you know, it's an anti cop movement, but sometimes
Speaker 1: they pretend it's about police reform or something like that,
Speaker 1: and that this is not acceptable in a civilized country.
Speaker 1: You don't just respond to reports of a police involved
Speaker 1: shooting by burning down, looting and destroying. You don't do that.
Speaker 1: It's it's never okay. It's not okay now and won't
Speaker 1: be okay in the future. They won't say that, Oh,
Speaker 1: there's so much pandering. Oh the BLM activists, We don't
Speaker 1: want to upset them. The corporate media, so many of
Speaker 1: them millionaires who live in not diverse neighborhoods, I might add,
Speaker 1: and send their children to not diverse schools, private schools,
Speaker 1: and then go on TV and lecture all the rest
Speaker 1: of you about criminal justice and the need to do
Speaker 1: more for BIPOC communities. And you say, what are you doing,
Speaker 1: CNN anchor, what are you doing New York Times editorial
Speaker 1: board other than feeding into false narratives and lies that
Speaker 1: lead to this kind of completely unacceptable conduct. This is
Speaker 1: just pathetic. It's pathetic. It's a babyish tantrum in the
Speaker 1: name of justice. Yeah, I'm sure the people who work
Speaker 1: at CBS who have to clean up the mess the
Speaker 1: next day after the looting happens, I'm sure they feel
Speaker 1: like it's really about justice. Do they count too? Never
Speaker 1: mind all the law enforcement officers that will have to
Speaker 1: deal with the rioters that they have to wrestle to
Speaker 1: the ground, that throw things at them, that just resist arrest.
Speaker 1: All of this stress and anger and destruction for what
Speaker 1: Because some people refuse to live in the real world,
Speaker 1: and the Democrat Party has concocted a very convenient narrative
Speaker 1: for those who don't want to be held accountable, who
Speaker 1: don't want to show individual responsibility and initiative for their actions.
Speaker 1: BLM activists running around telling lies about law enforcement helps nobody.
Speaker 1: And I just wish the Democrats would knock the crap
Speaker 1: off and be honest about this, but it's not going
Speaker 1: to happen. Essential for their power to continue this lie.
Speaker 1: It's always good to hear voices out there that will
Speaker 1: speak the truth, even when it's not fashionable in much
Speaker 1: of our culture, even when it's not going to get
Speaker 1: you a lot of praise by the corporate media, by
Speaker 1: the hashtag brigades in these left wing social media giant corporations.
Speaker 1: But it's still good to hear the truth, isn't it?
Speaker 1: And I have no illusions here. I always tell people,
Speaker 1: if you believe that the truth is what people want
Speaker 1: to hear, you haven't spent a lot of time walking
Speaker 1: around America. Lately, some people want to hear it. I
Speaker 1: would certainly make the case that they listen to shows
Speaker 1: like this one they want to hear the truth. Not
Speaker 1: everybody wants to hear the truth though, Oh no, definitely not.
Speaker 1: But when you hear it, and and you're somebody who
Speaker 1: does appreciate it, oh it is sweet, isn't it. Here
Speaker 1: is a father, a black father, with his daughter speaking
Speaker 1: about his view of individuals and race and critical race theory,
Speaker 1: and it's just brilliant. He just he makes so much
Speaker 1: sense and all of it, it all comes together so well.
Speaker 1: I just want to let you listen to that. If
Speaker 1: we find out this gentleman's name, by the way, I
Speaker 1: want to give him credit for it. But it was
Speaker 1: just a video, a viral video that's been making the
Speaker 1: rounds the last couple of days. Here's what he says,
Speaker 1: play twelve. Daddy teaches you can be anything in this
Speaker 1: world that you want to be, right, don't daddy teach
Speaker 1: you that? Yeah, And it doesn't matter if if you're
Speaker 1: a black or white or any color. Doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: you're black, white, brown, yeah, right, black, And how we
Speaker 1: treat people is based on who they are and not
Speaker 1: final and if they're nice to night. You see, this
Speaker 1: is how, This is how you can think. Right. Ye,
Speaker 1: critical race theory wants to end that now with my children,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna happen. My baby's gonna know that no
Speaker 1: matter what she wants to be in life, all she
Speaker 1: has to do is work hard, and she can become that.
Speaker 1: Work hard even though you don't know anyone. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: can make friends no matter what color they are. So
Speaker 1: we need to stop crt period, point blank. Children do
Speaker 1: not see skin color. Man. They love everybody. If they're
Speaker 1: good people, they love them. If they're good people, they
Speaker 1: love them. What matters is are you nice? Are you smart?
Speaker 1: These are some of the most basic messages. I remember
Speaker 1: being a preschooler and this was what we were all
Speaker 1: being instructed about. We're all being told all that matters
Speaker 1: is how a person is, how they treat you, how
Speaker 1: they treat other people. And this gentleman's name is Corey Yeshua.
Speaker 1: This was posted on TikTok, the social media platform that
Speaker 1: I know some of you are concerned about Chinese surveillance
Speaker 1: via TikTok, but anyway, I'm actually I use TikTok. I
Speaker 1: don't really post on there, but I'm on it sometimes.
Speaker 1: Corey Issua went viral of this video with his daughter Royalty,
Speaker 1: who is particularly adorable. If you watch the video, she's
Speaker 1: really cute and she's six years old, and he's just
Speaker 1: speaking simple truths. He's just saying things that we had
Speaker 1: all thought in America. We had come to this point
Speaker 1: where we agreed that these things were universal, they were
Speaker 1: obvious in fact and essential. That a person's skin color
Speaker 1: does not matter. That treating every human being as a
Speaker 1: human being, and that judging them by, yes, the content
Speaker 1: of their character instead of the color of their skin,
Speaker 1: to borrow from Martin Luther King, is what matters. But
Speaker 1: we are going we're being pushed in this opposite direction
Speaker 1: now as a country where we have to think of
Speaker 1: of racial identity in everything that is going on around
Speaker 1: us all the time, and that there should be decisions
Speaker 1: distinctions made based upon skin color. This is a This
Speaker 1: is a a moral failing. This is not something that
Speaker 1: we can allow to continue as it is. And when
Speaker 1: you have individuals like Corey Isshua, who's who is black,
Speaker 1: and his daughter who's black and you know, six years old,
Speaker 1: who are seeing things with this clarity, it's just it's encouraging.
Speaker 1: It makes me think that maybe we will be able
Speaker 1: to push back this tide of CRT nonsense. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so many there's so many levels where it's wrong.
Speaker 1: It all falls apart. I always wonder, you know, I
Speaker 1: have you know, in my own family, my little nephew
Speaker 1: would be somebody of two races. My adorable little nephew
Speaker 1: is of two races? So is he bipoc when he
Speaker 1: grows up? Is he gonna be tolds to be bipoc? Does?
Speaker 1: Does he choose one for identity purposes over the other
Speaker 1: or the whole thing? This is just all a construct
Speaker 1: used by people who want to sew division and pull
Speaker 1: us apart and control. This is for power for those
Speaker 1: who are pushing this narrative, this is because they want
Speaker 1: to tell you what to do, and they want things
Speaker 1: for themselves. And I'm talking about people like Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: and Chuck Schumer and many others, right. This is this
Speaker 1: is the entire left. People who are on the left
Speaker 1: of all races. They view critical race theory and the
Speaker 1: social justice left as a mechanism for achieving power, as
Speaker 1: a mechanism for advancing themselves at the expense of others
Speaker 1: in society and using the state to accomplish that, using
Speaker 1: the government and the force of the government to those ends.
Speaker 1: It's troubling to see. But as long as we have
Speaker 1: enough corey isshuas and royalty ishuas in this country who
Speaker 1: are willing to speak the truth we've got, we've got
Speaker 1: a fighting shot at being the America I know we
Speaker 1: can be. Your online data and online identity is constantly
Speaker 1: under attack. That much we know for sure. Big tech
Speaker 1: is constantly looking for ways to withhold and use your
Speaker 1: information to sell. So what's the best way to keep
Speaker 1: your privacy and operate in business and your personal life
Speaker 1: when you're doing anything online? Introducing Secure, the one hundred
Speaker 1: percent privacy and security focused instant messaging and email platform
Speaker 1: located in Switzerland. Why in Switzerland, that's the country with
Speaker 1: the world's strictest data privacy laws. In effect, Secure, that's
Speaker 1: s e K you are very important. We get the
Speaker 1: spelling here. SEK you are Secure is held by privacy
Speaker 1: advocates globally and the assurance that their data is truly
Speaker 1: kept safe by proprietary technology, independent platform and military grade
Speaker 1: encryption methods. Your data is yours alone. Secure does not
Speaker 1: data mine, use, or sell your data. Experience the ultimate
Speaker 1: bliss of knowing that your privacy is not in jeopardy
Speaker 1: from the prying hands of big tech. It's time to
Speaker 1: take back your privacy. Welcome to Secure. Go to this
Speaker 1: website now secure dot com. That's sek you are secure
Speaker 1: dot com. Use the coupon code buck for one week
Speaker 1: free and twenty five percent off. It's a great deal.
Speaker 1: Be sure to use coupon code buck. Go to secure
Speaker 1: seku are dot com and regain your privacy online. And
Speaker 1: so in Florida, we chose freedom over fauciism, and we're
Speaker 1: much better off for doing that. I think his lockdown
Speaker 1: policies were not just a fed by the scientific data.
Speaker 1: He was somebody that fear mongered about schools. He did
Speaker 1: not support Florida when we had our kids in school.
Speaker 1: In person, I think he was wrong about mass and
Speaker 1: asymptomatic spread. And then obviously he does so many interviews
Speaker 1: that it was pretty clear to me after a pretty
Speaker 1: short time, you know this was all about himself and
Speaker 1: his own image. And for me, you look at that
Speaker 1: magazine cover with him lounging by the pool with the
Speaker 1: sunglasses on you right in the midst of a pandemic.
Speaker 1: I mean it was almost like a Lethemic Cake moment
Speaker 1: for all the people who were chafing under his lockdowns,
Speaker 1: and yet he seemed to be having the time of
Speaker 1: his life. I can't tell you how proud I am,
Speaker 1: not just of what we've done on this show during
Speaker 1: the course the pandemic to come bat Faucism, but how
Speaker 1: many of you listening were really supportive, told me to
Speaker 1: keep it going, stay in the fight, don't drop this issue,
Speaker 1: don't shy away from it, don't get weak on it,
Speaker 1: go right into it. You know what's true. So thank
Speaker 1: you to all of you that were writing in and
Speaker 1: sending us words of encouragement and support, because now, yeah, now,
Speaker 1: anybody who's reasonable and honesty is that Faucci is a smug,
Speaker 1: little totalitarian lab coat fraud. But there was a long
Speaker 1: time when social media would shut you down for contradicting Faucism,
Speaker 1: for criticizing for saying that it was wrong. There was
Speaker 1: a long time when you were considered some kind of
Speaker 1: conspiracy nut, a loon for even questioning Saint Fauci. I
Speaker 1: do think we can all see now what an utter disaster.
Speaker 1: This guy has been and it didn't have to be
Speaker 1: this way at all. I don't just mean it didn't
Speaker 1: have to be this way for the country, with the
Speaker 1: bad decisions that were pushed on all of us by Faucism.
Speaker 1: I mean that he could have been a bureaucrat in
Speaker 1: the background doing his job. There was no reason for
Speaker 1: him to come forward and be the face of our
Speaker 1: response to the pandemic. But this guy loved the limelight.
Speaker 1: You know, he's he's older. What else, what else is
Speaker 1: he waiting for? Right this? This was his big chance.
Speaker 1: This was his big moment, and he seized it and
Speaker 1: then some. But unfortunately he was weighed and found wanting.
Speaker 1: Not a good showing from from Fauci at all. And
Speaker 1: that's why people like ron De Santis are now pointing
Speaker 1: out that this was not necessary and Ronda Santis has
Speaker 1: done such an incredible service for the country because if
Speaker 1: it was not for if it wasn't for Florida, we
Speaker 1: would not be in a position that we're currently in
Speaker 1: where reasonable rational people are going are just living their
Speaker 1: lives now. People who are no longer or people rather
Speaker 1: who are still living with lockdown restrictions voluntarily in any capacity.
Speaker 1: They're suffering from an anxiety disorder. They have a mental illness,
Speaker 1: perhaps low grade, but they have a problem because there's
Speaker 1: no basis for this anymore. There's no basis in reality,
Speaker 1: in real risk factors, in real risk mitigation. But that's
Speaker 1: what happens when you have a steady diet of absurdity
Speaker 1: from Fauci and the rest. Here's the statement by Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: forty fifth President of the United States on this one.
Speaker 1: I just want to read this to you, or this
Speaker 1: just came out yesterday after seeing the emails. Our country
Speaker 1: is fortunate. I didn't do what doctor Fauci wanted me
Speaker 1: to do. For instance, I closed our borders to China
Speaker 1: very early, despite his not wanting them closed. The Democrats
Speaker 1: and the fake news media even called me a xenophobe.
Speaker 1: In the end, we saw this was a life saving decision,
Speaker 1: and likewise with closing our borders to Europe, specifically to
Speaker 1: certain heavily infected countries, I was later given credit even
Speaker 1: by Tony for saving hundreds of thousands of lives. Doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci also didn't put an emphasis on speed of vaccine
Speaker 1: production because he thought it would take three to four
Speaker 1: or maybe even five years to create. I got it
Speaker 1: done in less than nine months with operation warp speed.
Speaker 1: In retrospect, the vaccine is saving the world. Then I
Speaker 1: placed the greatest bet in history. We ordered billions of
Speaker 1: dollars worth of vaccines before we knew it even worked.
Speaker 1: Had that not been done, our wonderful vaccines would not
Speaker 1: have been administered until October of this year. No one
Speaker 1: would have had the shot that has now saved the
Speaker 1: world and millions of lives. This is very important. What
Speaker 1: is the one truly successful component of our response to
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen The vaccine? The vaccine. Now that's not to
Speaker 1: say that I'm telling everybody all you have to get
Speaker 1: the vaccine or everything else. I'm just saying the one
Speaker 1: thing that does work. If you are a senior citizen,
Speaker 1: this vaccine brought your risk down tremendously and made it
Speaker 1: much much safer for you to just live your life normally.
Speaker 1: You know, if you're seventy five and up. This vaccine
Speaker 1: was certainly a lifesaver for many of them, and for
Speaker 1: other people too who had comorbidities or at high risk.
Speaker 1: And it looks like now we are getting to a
Speaker 1: place closer to herd immunity where there won't even there
Speaker 1: just won't be the room for this virus to spread
Speaker 1: in the way it had in the past, which means
Speaker 1: that everybody will be at lower risk too. That's part
Speaker 1: of the premise of herd immunity, right if there are
Speaker 1: fewer vectors for the disease in the first place because
Speaker 1: of people having protection, including from natural immunity, which doesn't
Speaker 1: get factored into anything the BIDE administration is talking about.
Speaker 1: We're all better off. But the vaccine an operation warp
Speaker 1: speed was an enormous success. The lockdowns, the mask mandates,
Speaker 1: all this stuff was an enormous failure. We should all
Speaker 1: be very honest about that. We should see it for
Speaker 1: what it is. What they told us did not work.
Speaker 1: It did not work. And now that the truth seems
Speaker 1: to be coming out or beginning to come out about
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci, I'm glad that people are finally willing to
Speaker 1: ask questions about this whole process. The cover up, which
Speaker 1: we talked about a lot yesterday, of the origins or
Speaker 1: the the thinking in the early days about the origins
Speaker 1: of COVID nineteen. That cover up is remarkable. When you
Speaker 1: really start to piece it all together. And pretty terrifying
Speaker 1: that the scientific community could move so quickly to this
Speaker 1: kind of false consensus for what are obviously political reasons
Speaker 1: should give everybody a chill up their spine. Really, we
Speaker 1: were supposed us to believe that scientists were better than this.
Speaker 1: That's at least that was the public perception of all.
Speaker 1: We're supposed to believe that. But the truth is it's
Speaker 1: a shame. But the same leftist indoctrination that has overtaken universities, journalism,
Speaker 1: corporate boardrooms has also turned out new generations of looke
Speaker 1: scientists and social justice obsessed doctors. And now these are
Speaker 1: all professions that the public will generally trust less going forward,
Speaker 1: and rightfully so. I mean, if you need a refresher
Speaker 1: on this, never forget that our blue check public health experts,
Speaker 1: the ones appearing on CNN and MSNBC nine after Night,
Speaker 1: told us that paddling a surfboard alone at the beach
Speaker 1: in California was basically murdering old people. But thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of BLM protesters and rioters in close quarters, hundreds
Speaker 1: and hundreds of times, all across the country, screaming at police,
Speaker 1: spittle flying out of their mouths, well that was somehow
Speaker 1: saving lives during the pandemic. According to the public health experts,
Speaker 1: do not trust journalists and do not trust any public
Speaker 1: health bureaucrat. Check their work always. If you take it
Speaker 1: on faith, you are going to be fooled. Check their work.
Speaker 1: Check the work of doctor Fauci, specifically, former Secretary of
Speaker 1: State Pompeo had quite an observation, and that is, Faucci
Speaker 1: has a strange habit of sounding very much like talking
Speaker 1: points from the Chinese Communist Party. Faucci seems to take
Speaker 1: a very pro Chinese government position. He keeps acting like
Speaker 1: the scientists who work in work in state funded laboratory,
Speaker 1: state run laboratories in China. Oh, they're fine, They're not
Speaker 1: subject to any pressures or anything. There is treasured colleagues,
Speaker 1: This is Fauci. Isn't that quite strange? It's bothersome, isn't it.
Speaker 1: Here we have Pompeio saying exactly that play ten when
Speaker 1: you heard doctor Faucci this morning, Lord of those are
Speaker 1: the exact same words, the exact same excuses, the exact
Speaker 1: same theories that the Chinese Communist Party has presenting for
Speaker 1: over a year now. But we can all draw our
Speaker 1: own conclusions. I know this. We had a group inside
Speaker 1: the State Department, Miles you, a handful of others working
Speaker 1: diligently to get this information out to the American people
Speaker 1: so the world could see what the Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 1: had done to all of us. Yes, the world should
Speaker 1: see that. But remember this, because I think that this
Speaker 1: has gotten lost in a lot of this discussion. While
Speaker 1: we see everything going on here, it was clear that
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party and federal Health Bureaucracy, which are really
Speaker 1: the same thing, were so interested in protecting China's government
Speaker 1: from blame for the COVID nineteen outbreak, that it was
Speaker 1: more important to them to blame Trump and win the
Speaker 1: election of twenty twenty then to get it right and
Speaker 1: hold the CCP accountable. They would rather lie to all
Speaker 1: of you and the whole world about the origins of
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen, even though that means we're more susceptible to
Speaker 1: another outbreak. We're not as able to understand how this happened,
Speaker 1: how we should deal with it. That didn't matter. All
Speaker 1: that mattered to the Democrat Party and their aligned media
Speaker 1: mouthpieces was defeating Trump in twenty If that meant running
Speaker 1: cover for China. They were fine with that, They had
Speaker 1: no problem with that. In fact, they saw it as
Speaker 1: an opportunity. As disgraceful as that is, they saw it
Speaker 1: as an opportunity. They managed to convince just enough people
Speaker 1: to blame Trump for covids, as if you know, he
Speaker 1: was serving bat soup himself, were experimenting with gain of
Speaker 1: function research at Mara Lago. These people are nuts for
Speaker 1: generally peacemakers, right, But that's our problem. Our campaign in
Speaker 1: electioneering a cemetery has left us in the position where
Speaker 1: we are watching democracy collapse. So you know, it is time.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like being you know, attacked in Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 1: We had Pearl Harbor, all right, We've been living through it.
Speaker 1: It's been a slow running event. But you know, with
Speaker 1: Trump's um, you know, comments about election integrity from the beginning,
Speaker 1: i mean beginning of the presidential cycle, we now see
Speaker 1: about thirty five percent of our fellow Americans think that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden stunned up, the stole the presidency. And they're
Speaker 1: seeing that message reinforced all for their ecosystem, right, And
Speaker 1: what our side is seeing is not that stuff. Right.
Speaker 1: Many people who vote voted in this like what I
Speaker 1: call the Trump against Trump coalition. They've tuned back out.
Speaker 1: They are complacent. Two thousand, four hundred and three people
Speaker 1: Americans were killed at Pearl Harbor. Okay, can we stop
Speaker 1: with the idiocy about the January sixth insurrection. It was
Speaker 1: like worse than nine eleven, worse than Pearl Harbor. It
Speaker 1: was the worse than the than the Lubonnet plague. It
Speaker 1: was the worst thing. I mean, can they just stop? No?
Speaker 1: They won't though I say that, I know you're saying no, Buck,
Speaker 1: They're not going to stop because their emotion These are
Speaker 1: emotionally damaged, deeply unhappy people that are popping up all
Speaker 1: over you know, MSNBC and CNN, These libs, these sad
Speaker 1: mark cists have to find a way to explain their
Speaker 1: constant need to both control you and to live in
Speaker 1: abject fear. They want to tell you what to do
Speaker 1: all the time and how you have to do everything.
Speaker 1: But also, oh my gosh, I'm so scared of you.
Speaker 1: You know, what is this this whole storyline that you know,
Speaker 1: we're in this crisis of democracy because of people who
Speaker 1: think that Donald Trump won the election or whatever it is.
Speaker 1: Sixty percent. Maybe you've been as high as seventy percent
Speaker 1: of Democrats thought that Russia stole the election from Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: The year after the twenty sixteen election, huge majorities of
Speaker 1: Democrats believed that crap. Okay, they believed it a large percentage.
Speaker 1: I've got to go back and check the numbers. A
Speaker 1: large percentage of Democrats thought that Russia actually changed votes
Speaker 1: in the voting machines. You can go back. You can
Speaker 1: go back and see these numbers yourself. And now, after
Speaker 1: four years of that, which is, you know, a completely
Speaker 1: Looney Tunes insane conspiracy theory, after four years of that,
Speaker 1: now they turn around and say, oh, but but but
Speaker 1: people don't people think that Democrats cheated to get Joe
Speaker 1: Biden to win. Our democracies and crisis. Our Republicans out
Speaker 1: burning stuff and lighting things on fire and freaking out
Speaker 1: and acting like maniacs. No, we're doing our jobs, taking
Speaker 1: care of our families, obeying the law, and you know,
Speaker 1: hopefully tuning into the Bucks Exton Show, especially at the
Speaker 1: Clay and Buck Show starting in a few weeks twelve
Speaker 1: to three on four hundred plus stations roughly across the country.
Speaker 1: That's hopefully what they're doing. That's what we well, that's
Speaker 1: what we're doing, and hopefully you'll join me. You're doing
Speaker 1: all the other stuff. No, we're responsible, well adjusted human beings,
Speaker 1: all right. They don't get to do this thing. They
Speaker 1: riot and loot and pillage and act like mediacs all
Speaker 1: the time on the left. And one time there was
Speaker 1: a riot and people got out of hand and broke
Speaker 1: the law, and they were on the ideological right, and
Speaker 1: we get to hear about it always in forever. This
Speaker 1: is I told you as soon as it happened, We're
Speaker 1: gonna this is gonna be you know, nine to eleven
Speaker 1: for the next ten years. You hear about this all
Speaker 1: the time, and they'll use it to justify whatever truly abhorrent, thuggish,
Speaker 1: destructive behavior the Democrat bass and the Marxist left wants
Speaker 1: to engage in. I knew it would happen as soon
Speaker 1: as I saw it on Oh my god, playing right
Speaker 1: into their hands, that's what the people on that day
Speaker 1: who engaged in the riots where they did, played right.
Speaker 1: The biggest help they could have given the authoritarian democrats imaginable.
Speaker 1: And I just you know, it's so what's so sad,
Speaker 1: it really is, And I know there were so many
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of people who were just in DC
Speaker 1: that day, who were there to peacefully protest and enjoy
Speaker 1: their First Amendment rights. But you know, we don't. We
Speaker 1: don't live in a fair media environment where that context
Speaker 1: is ever given. We don't get the mostly peaceful protest
Speaker 1: designation on the right. We don't even get the what
Speaker 1: we should get, which is the ninety nine point nine
Speaker 1: percent of our protests, of our gatherings, whether it's tea
Speaker 1: party or any number of things, are lawful and law abiding.
Speaker 1: You know, But one time, and this is all we
Speaker 1: hear about one time, and it's like Pearl Harbor, And
Speaker 1: how could someone go on TV and say something so
Speaker 1: stupid and not be laughed at by everybody regardless of
Speaker 1: political party, across the country. Well, because the Democrats are
Speaker 1: living in a mass illusion. The Biden administration formally ended
Speaker 1: the Remain in Mexico policy of a Trump administration this
Speaker 1: week at our southern border. We've got that and other hot,
Speaker 1: hot topic political issues to get into here with our
Speaker 1: friend Ryan Grudusky. He's a political consultant and author of
Speaker 1: They're Not Listening. How the elites created a national populist revolution,
Speaker 1: mister Grudusky, always good to have you, thank you for
Speaker 1: having me back. So the Biden administration response to what's
Speaker 1: going on to the border is to really clarify that
Speaker 1: they don't want this to stop. And Kamala Harris is
Speaker 1: now saying she's going to be like the voting rights
Speaker 1: are instead of the borders are. She wants no part
Speaker 1: of it. What's going on here right well, she has
Speaker 1: never visited the border while she's been vice president, so
Speaker 1: that's very discouraging, and either has Joe Biden. You know,
Speaker 1: to listeners who don't understand, the border situation is the
Speaker 1: worst it's been in decades. It is fundamentally an open border.
Speaker 1: There are so many people crossing into the border right
Speaker 1: now that to kind of mitigate the situation and make
Speaker 1: it go faster, they've stopped issuing court dates to migrants.
Speaker 1: So they say to them, go to your city of
Speaker 1: destination where you're going, New York, Chicago, wherever it may be,
Speaker 1: find an ice office, say you're here illegally, and then
Speaker 1: get a court date, which of course will never happen.
Speaker 1: Is functionally an open border right now. And what the
Speaker 1: New York Times said this week. Which was shocking was
Speaker 1: that they've discovered so many people from India, a Southeast Asia,
Speaker 1: the Middle East, Africa coming through our southern border going
Speaker 1: and flying to Mexico, I mean, crossing the southern border
Speaker 1: where they know they can get in, which is ironic
Speaker 1: because Joe Biden has issued no travel advisory stuff towards
Speaker 1: a lot of these countries because a coronavirus, So you
Speaker 1: cannot fly directly to India, but you can fly from
Speaker 1: India to Mexico and then from Mexico walk to the
Speaker 1: United States. And that's what is happening. Time and timing,
Speaker 1: and they found already I think two Yemeni people who
Speaker 1: are on the terror watch list. There's warnings that many
Speaker 1: many more could be coming in there on the terror
Speaker 1: and no fly list. The terror watch list and no
Speaker 1: fly list, it's a functional open border, and it's so manufactured.
Speaker 1: This was not this was not the case before Joe
Speaker 1: Biden won the elected office because they know he's not
Speaker 1: going to do anything about it. And for decades we've
Speaker 1: heard Democrats and we've heard progressives sit there and say,
Speaker 1: you know, we want to help the situation. It's just
Speaker 1: people who are here illegally already. No, they want to
Speaker 1: sit there and exacerbate the situation and make sure we're
Speaker 1: in a full on humanitarian crisis, you know. And I
Speaker 1: was on a plane flight to New Orleans a few
Speaker 1: weeks ago, and I saw a miner who was clearly
Speaker 1: here illegally. He didn't speak English, he had a translator.
Speaker 1: They escorted him on the plane. He got one of
Speaker 1: those comfort seats on taxpayer money, and they escored him
Speaker 1: off the plane first. And so many liberals like, look
Speaker 1: at a kid like this, you know, probably twelve or
Speaker 1: thirteen years old, and I think, oh, it's so much better.
Speaker 1: He'll have an opportunity for a better life than he
Speaker 1: did in Honduras or El Savade or Guatemala. Those teenagers
Speaker 1: are the primary primary targets for MS thirteen and the
Speaker 1: Latin Kings and the Thirteenth Street Gang, all the gangs
Speaker 1: of made up reminds of large portions of non citizens
Speaker 1: in this country. Look at that as a recruiting method.
Speaker 1: They look at a lot of these kids as recruiting
Speaker 1: methodists for new members. And most of the people, by
Speaker 1: the way, who are coming are not coming as women
Speaker 1: and children. They are men of working age coming for
Speaker 1: jobs but carrying diseases. We have no idea. They're not
Speaker 1: being tested for medical diseases. They're not being seen if
Speaker 1: they have coronavirus or new strands of the coronavirus that
Speaker 1: are you know that would work against vaccines or not
Speaker 1: work with vaccines. And people clearly have been arrested on
Speaker 1: the terror watch list. It is a huge national security,
Speaker 1: economic humanitarian crisis is made billions of dollars for the
Speaker 1: cartel and coyotes and human smugglers. It is so irresponsible,
Speaker 1: and it just shows that anyone pretending that there's some
Speaker 1: kind of bipartisan compromise that we could have on the
Speaker 1: issue of immigration and border are lying to you because
Speaker 1: if they were listen, I mean, because of our fourteenth Amendment,
Speaker 1: an I legal alien cannot give birth to another legal
Speaker 1: and they become American citizens. If we were to just
Speaker 1: stop any future legal immigration, the situation will go away
Speaker 1: on its own over the course of decades, as people
Speaker 1: die or they move back home. It would not be
Speaker 1: a situation. The fact that the administration has turned a
Speaker 1: blind eye to that, bringing over tens of thousands per month,
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands per month in one case, or one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand plus per month in one case across the
Speaker 1: border and are turning a blind eye to it and
Speaker 1: are taking away the controls. The Trump administration had to
Speaker 1: sit there and stop this. The Safe Third Country Agreement's
Speaker 1: brain membermain in Mexico. These were wildly successful things that
Speaker 1: he did on an illegal immigration, wildly successful, and they're
Speaker 1: being ripped apart, you know, point by point for nothing
Speaker 1: besides political reasons. We're speaking of Ryan Grdusky, author of
Speaker 1: They're not listening how the elites created a national populist revolution.
Speaker 1: He's a political consultant and to that end, Ryan, are
Speaker 1: we seeing any indicators I know, it's early midterms or
Speaker 1: people are like, oh, the mid term, you know that
Speaker 1: they're not gonna want talk about it until we're really
Speaker 1: in the cycle. But it's gonna come pretty quickly here.
Speaker 1: But from any of the indicators polling we can see,
Speaker 1: or even just what you pick up from from other
Speaker 1: people who are thinking about or or already working on campaigns,
Speaker 1: you know, at the ground level, this is this costing Democrats.
Speaker 1: It feels like the borders open, the media tries to
Speaker 1: avoid covering it, and a lot of Americans don't care
Speaker 1: because they don't know how bad it is. Is that
Speaker 1: what's going on here right Well, in Arizona, the number
Speaker 1: one issue now is immigrations. It's replaced coronavirus in the
Speaker 1: economy and a lot of border areas, it's immigration. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, I think that they don't they don't see it,
Speaker 1: so they don't know how bad is happening. And it's
Speaker 1: funny when you look at polling for Joe Biden, it's
Speaker 1: pretty much a mixed bag on a few issues like
Speaker 1: the economy and foreign policy. It's very negative on Israel,
Speaker 1: it's very negative on immigration. And the one thing that
Speaker 1: he is benefiting from, the one thing that's saving the
Speaker 1: Democrats is the coronavirus vaccine, which was created under Trump.
Speaker 1: It's the biggest I earning the entire world. I just
Speaker 1: don't know how long he can possibly milk that four.
Speaker 1: Given that our job numbers which came out today were
Speaker 1: pretty horrendous. I think they underreported for a second straight
Speaker 1: month by by by a huge number, huge margins. The
Speaker 1: amount of workers in the people in the workforce is
Speaker 1: you know, lower than it's been in a very long time.
Speaker 1: People are not looking for jobs because they have a
Speaker 1: higher unemployment. It is, it is, it's it's a dire situation.
Speaker 1: So well, how it's going to affect the coresh of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two elections, No one really knows. Yet they
Speaker 1: keep looking to these special elections like the like their
Speaker 1: tea leaves. I'm telling you, most special elections do not
Speaker 1: guarantee the outcome of a presidential election or a midterm election.
Speaker 1: They can show signs, but it's it's very often they
Speaker 1: don't show anything. The election in New Mexico, where Democrats
Speaker 1: have a big victory last week, it is probably not
Speaker 1: a guarantee for anything because only thirty eight percent or
Speaker 1: thirty nine percent of the population they vote in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty showed up in that election. In Texas six in
Speaker 1: a suburb of Dallas, Republicans had a big victory three
Speaker 1: weeks before. Republicans also had a big victory in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: The midterms are going to come down to, essentially, especially
Speaker 1: in the Senate, They're going to come down to a
Speaker 1: handful of states. North Carolina, there's a retiring Republican, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: Those are all Republican health seats and the Democrats seats
Speaker 1: will be New Hampshire, Nevada, Arizona, and Georgia, and those
Speaker 1: eight or nine races, maybe Missouri if there's a fluke,
Speaker 1: and Democrats one a lot, but those eight or nine
Speaker 1: races decide the entire United States Senate. We don't have
Speaker 1: a redistricting map yet, so we have to see how
Speaker 1: much they redistrict in the other states and make you
Speaker 1: swing things for Democrats Republicans, depending on who controls the
Speaker 1: redistricting process. So it's a little too early now to
Speaker 1: sit there and make the claim that we're going to
Speaker 1: have things move one way or the other, you know,
Speaker 1: but certainly things are not looking as rosie for Democrats
Speaker 1: as they were just a few months ago. I think
Speaker 1: the election national electus like D plus like four or
Speaker 1: D plus five. It's looking more and more now like
Speaker 1: it's D plus two. And we're still a year and
Speaker 1: a half away. And if that happens and it becomes
Speaker 1: a dead even raise, you'll look at Republicans taking the
Speaker 1: House definitely, and we'll wait and see what happens with
Speaker 1: the Senate. We're speaking of Ryan Grduski. He's a political consultant,
Speaker 1: author of They're not listening, Ryan the maniacal fixation from pundits,
Speaker 1: the media, and the Democrat you know, the Democrat ruling elites.
Speaker 1: On January sixth, it seems like they're running a contest
Speaker 1: every day to come up with the most outrageous and
Speaker 1: absurd thing to say. It's like nine to eleven, It's
Speaker 1: like Pearl Harbor. It's the worst thing to happen in
Speaker 1: America since the Civil War, Right, I mean, these are
Speaker 1: things that they're directly saying. I'm not exaggerating or I mean,
Speaker 1: those are all quotes in one form or another, and
Speaker 1: those are all the kinds of comparisons that are being made.
Speaker 1: Does this is this one of these things where it's
Speaker 1: like Russia collusion, which was an enormous fixation for the media,
Speaker 1: but actually in the midterms people cared about healthcare or
Speaker 1: do you think that this is actually, you know, a
Speaker 1: tool for the Democrats to mobilize their base and to
Speaker 1: get votes. Is this like a preoccupation of the elites
Speaker 1: or is this real? No, this is all fake. I mean,
Speaker 1: no one outside of the Virginia Maryland DC corridor actually
Speaker 1: care about this issue whatsoever, and no one cares this
Speaker 1: is what they're hoping listen. It's like the old expression
Speaker 1: of God. This would have to make him up. Well,
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't exist on social media. Mean now he does
Speaker 1: on Instagram and Facebook, I guess, but he really doesn't
Speaker 1: exist on social media. He's not what he was not
Speaker 1: in the presidency anymore. So they've had to stir up
Speaker 1: you know that Matt Gates and Marjorie Taylor Green are
Speaker 1: you know in Lauren Faubert, they're the new Trump's and
Speaker 1: they're they're having to sit there and create this you know,
Speaker 1: national anxiety again over issues because for a year, I mean,
Speaker 1: ratings were super high. The press was full of election
Speaker 1: stories and Trump's stories in January sixth and coronavirus stories.
Speaker 1: And now look at the ratings. I mean, CNN regularly
Speaker 1: does not have a million people watch their show at
Speaker 1: any given time. Um. And I think that they're looking
Speaker 1: for something to sit there in GNP people into a
Speaker 1: national anxiety. But people can't live like that for years
Speaker 1: and years and years and years. And uh. And I
Speaker 1: think that a lot of people are just exhausted with
Speaker 1: the amount of chaos. And I've been I've been all
Speaker 1: over the country and at this point, I mean a
Speaker 1: lot of people have just they've checked out of the
Speaker 1: coronavirus hype, they've checked out of of the political hype. So,
Speaker 1: you know, Joe Biden being this innocuous figure who very
Speaker 1: really gives press conferences, no one really sees what he does.
Speaker 1: Um has been to their benefit, but it's been to
Speaker 1: the media's. Uh, it's been worse for the media. That's
Speaker 1: why I think. I think every major show on CNA
Speaker 1: and MSNBC covered that Trump shut down his blog. This
Speaker 1: is not a major news story, and in the slightest,
Speaker 1: but they have to sit there in you end up
Speaker 1: something that they need something to sit there and keep
Speaker 1: you know, the chardonnay Antifa resistance moms clicking onto their network.
Speaker 1: So they got really nothing right now. Yeah, it is
Speaker 1: amazing how much they still really want to talk about Trump,
Speaker 1: which is quite odd because even people that support and
Speaker 1: voted for Trump are like, Okay, we're not talking about
Speaker 1: Trump right now. We got other things we're trying to
Speaker 1: talk about. But they still they want to go back
Speaker 1: to that. Well, they haven't given it up yet, and
Speaker 1: I think I think this upcoming election is probably the
Speaker 1: most important election for the Republican Party since nineteen eighty
Speaker 1: and I'll say this, well, or maybe since twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: and nineteen eighty, because now the Trump is no longer
Speaker 1: in office. I mean Trump really went after some traditional
Speaker 1: Republican orthodoxy for a very long time as far as
Speaker 1: what it's like to believe in an industrial policy and
Speaker 1: immigration policy of foreign policy different than George W. Bush
Speaker 1: and from John McCain and Mit Romney and previous Republicans.
Speaker 1: And there are going to be candidates who are really
Speaker 1: who are running from is that really believe in those values,
Speaker 1: that really want to change the system. There's a lot
Speaker 1: that I've spoken to, and then there's other ones who
Speaker 1: are going to sit there and have a magabumper sticker
Speaker 1: on their campaign bus. But they're gonna be the same
Speaker 1: old thing. And depending on who wins a lot of
Speaker 1: these primaries, these Senate offices and these governorships, these House candidates,
Speaker 1: we will see a new Republican Party, or we will
Speaker 1: see the same Republican party with a magabumper sticker on
Speaker 1: there on their bustor right now, someone forces you to
Speaker 1: answer the question, is Trump really going to run again?
Speaker 1: What's your feeling? No, I've said this, I've said I've
Speaker 1: been I'm on the record. No, he branded the term
Speaker 1: forty five, which is if you're branding the number rather
Speaker 1: than the member, rather than the candidate, assumes that he's
Speaker 1: not going to run again. There's so much excitement behind
Speaker 1: Ron de Santas right now in Florida. I think the
Speaker 1: base really really wants him. I was saying to Polser yesterday.
Speaker 1: I said, you know, no one realized this, but it's
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy eight and Ron to Santas is Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and which is waiting for him to run. I don't
Speaker 1: think that there's any kind of confusion behind it. I
Speaker 1: think we all really know who we want. And you know,
Speaker 1: there's there's not support for other people like Nicky Hailey
Speaker 1: or you know, other nonsense candidates. But we have our
Speaker 1: guy who's right on almost every issue and is willing
Speaker 1: to at least at least if he's not right, he's
Speaker 1: willing to sit. They're in try and maybe doesn't a
Speaker 1: perfect answer and everything, he's willing to go to bat
Speaker 1: And I just don't see how it's not. I just
Speaker 1: don't see how it's not. Ron de santists at this point.
Speaker 1: I mean, something could randomly happen and they'll be a
Speaker 1: huge scandal or he could lose the governorship re election.
Speaker 1: I find it very, very very difficult to sit there
Speaker 1: and see a way that it's not. Yeah, I've been
Speaker 1: I've been waiting for Ron Descantists to know me, and
Speaker 1: it hasn't happened. Where you go, oh, okay, so you
Speaker 1: actually aren't what we thought you are and aren't willing
Speaker 1: to fight. He hasn't done it yet, so it's hard
Speaker 1: to you want to. You don't want to get excited
Speaker 1: about a politician because they disappoint you so often. But yeah,
Speaker 1: he hasn't, and I'm just it gives me more anxiety
Speaker 1: that he hasn't then it I feel exactly. I was
Speaker 1: just talking with this like a couple of weeks ago,
Speaker 1: how I feel like I gotta say something negative about
Speaker 1: him just for my own my own head, because every
Speaker 1: day I'm just doing like the Ron Descantists, you know,
Speaker 1: celebration party here, and that's not how That's not the
Speaker 1: kind of show I do for anybody. But he keeps right,
Speaker 1: he's not tired of winning, Ryan, He's actually not tired
Speaker 1: of winning. I'm like, so there's that Ryan, your dusky
Speaker 1: everybody check out, they're not listening is book My Man
Speaker 1: the Political Consultant. Good to see You, Thank You. We
Speaker 1: shows the connection between what happened after the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: election and what is continuing to escalate in new battlefronts
Speaker 1: around the country and in new ways. And Anderson, I
Speaker 1: think it's really important to note this is no longer
Speaker 1: about the former president and whether or not he's happy
Speaker 1: with the results of the election. This is about the
Speaker 1: future of our democracy. And you know, hear a lot
Speaker 1: of talk about efforts to right the wrongs of November,
Speaker 1: and what that is really talking about is that actually
Speaker 1: what you just pointed out, which is that the November
Speaker 1: election success was in the fact that more people voted
Speaker 1: than ever before, extraordinary high turnout. And we have to
Speaker 1: see this spread of misinformation as an effort not just
Speaker 1: to play Kate a former candidate or former president, but
Speaker 1: to sup press the vote in the future, to deter
Speaker 1: people from participating, cause people to lose faith in our
Speaker 1: democracy and disengage so that people don't turn out is
Speaker 1: in high numbers in the future. It's about the future
Speaker 1: of our democracy. Michigan Secretary of State, there someone you've
Speaker 1: never heard of before, But yeah, it's about the future
Speaker 1: of democracy. Everything, everything now about the Democrat Party is
Speaker 1: the future of our democracy. I mean, it's it's astonishing
Speaker 1: how easy it is to get Democrats to all just
Speaker 1: repeat the same talking points and hysteria. But people who
Speaker 1: have really lost a perspective on reality are are very
Speaker 1: easy to get worked up about something the country, our
Speaker 1: system of government and all this. It's it's fine. They
Speaker 1: really need to take a deep breath. There's no insurrection coming.
Speaker 1: There was no insurrection, all right. There was a riot
Speaker 1: that was handled quickly by Capitol Hill police and whatever.
Speaker 1: You know, backup arrived and Congress was in session a
Speaker 1: couple of hours after it, and everything happened and everything.
Speaker 1: You know, it's they just need they need to calm down.
Speaker 1: And you know you've had you know, notice that this
Speaker 1: is one of the problems. You also see, you know
Speaker 1: the fact that so many conservatives, i mean so many
Speaker 1: people in conservative media all criticize the riot right away
Speaker 1: and said, this is not what we're about. This is bad.
Speaker 1: Didn't do what the left does it BLM, Yeah, we
Speaker 1: need to hear the voices of the oppressed or whatever. No,
Speaker 1: he said, this is stupid, it's it's hurting our side,
Speaker 1: it's breaking the law, it's helping the other side didn't.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter though, right that we have principles has
Speaker 1: never actually taken into account in these discussions because the
Speaker 1: left doesn't have principles and they don't care, so it
Speaker 1: makes things a lot easier for them. But this is
Speaker 1: the worst thing since Pearl Harbor. We're watching our democracy collapse.
Speaker 1: You know, this is the worst thing since the Civil War.
Speaker 1: You know, this constant siege mentality from people who are
Speaker 1: in charge right now and really you know, getting their
Speaker 1: way on a whole lot of issues. Where where is
Speaker 1: this sense that they're that the Democrat the left are
Speaker 1: under constant threat. I mean they're under threat of being
Speaker 1: exposed for being bad at governance. I mean they're under
Speaker 1: threat of us making fun of them because their ideas stink.
Speaker 1: But they're not under threat. Neither is our democracy. And
Speaker 1: this kind of talk is just it's it's it's meant
Speaker 1: to create an atmosphere of hysteria that then justifies actual oppression. Right,
Speaker 1: this is this is the tactic. This is what they do,
Speaker 1: and they're going to keep at it. Unfortunately, does it
Speaker 1: make sense that the same company who controls half of
Speaker 1: online retail also passively eavesdrops on your private conversations at home.
Speaker 1: What about the idea that a single company controls ninety
Speaker 1: percent of Internet searches, runs your email service, and gets
Speaker 1: to track everything you do on your smartphone. Big tech
Speaker 1: is more powerful than most countries are, and they profit
Speaker 1: by exploiting your personal data and tracking everything you do.
Speaker 1: It's time to put a layer of protection between your
Speaker 1: online activity and these tech juggernauts. That's what I do,
Speaker 1: That's why I use Express VPN. All right, Think about
Speaker 1: how much of your life is on the Internet. Every
Speaker 1: site you visit, every video you watch, every message you
Speaker 1: send is tracked and data mind. But when you use
Speaker 1: Express VPN on your device, the software they have hides
Speaker 1: your IP address. Express VPN makes your activity harder to
Speaker 1: trace and sell the advertisers. And it does all this
Speaker 1: without slowing your connection and encrypts one percent of your
Speaker 1: Internet data to keep you safe from hackers and eavesdroppers.
Speaker 1: And it's so easy to use and set up. You
Speaker 1: need Express VPN today. Stop handing over your personal data
Speaker 1: to big tech. Visit Express vpn dot com slash buck
Speaker 1: that's Express vpn dot com slash buck to get three
Speaker 1: extra months free, just go to Express vpn dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck right now to learn more. I mean, you
Speaker 1: have said that there should be a presidential Commission on democracy.
Speaker 1: I don't disagree with you. But if we can't even
Speaker 1: get a commission, and the president has said he's not
Speaker 1: going to do a blue ribbon commission of his own
Speaker 1: on January sixth, what else can be done to make
Speaker 1: sure that the full truth of January sixth comes out?
Speaker 1: In your view, well, I mean, the first part of
Speaker 1: the thing is to demonstrate that this is the most
Speaker 1: important issue of our time, and I think it's actually
Speaker 1: the most important issue in the last one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty years since the Civil War, because we're at that
Speaker 1: point in our history where this could really fall apart,
Speaker 1: our grand experiment could completely fall apart. So I think
Speaker 1: the president could start with demonstrating every single day this
Speaker 1: is the most important issue of our time. Get a grip, lib,
Speaker 1: get a grip this guy doubt I cannot. I cannot
Speaker 1: believe that this guy was ever taken seriously by anybody
Speaker 1: in the Republican Party, but he was. This guy. Ran
Speaker 1: Bush's campaign gives you a sense of how far we've
Speaker 1: come from the old GOP days. Friends, now he's a centrist.
Speaker 1: We've come to that part where we're the worst it's
Speaker 1: been in a hundred and fifty years. Give me a break,
Speaker 1: your jerk. What what are they even talking about? We
Speaker 1: already had an impeachment? Do we forget about this? Now
Speaker 1: they're saying we need to do all this fact finding?
Speaker 1: Really because they didn't want to find any They didn't
Speaker 1: want to wait and look in any facts about January sixth,
Speaker 1: when they want to rush through an impeachment against the
Speaker 1: president and try to stop him from running again. No,
Speaker 1: no need for you know, fact finding and long investigations then.
Speaker 1: But now, oh, let's kind of go with it. It's
Speaker 1: all so absurd, isn't it. I mean, after a while,
Speaker 1: and I wish we could just avoid it. I wish
Speaker 1: we didn't have to dive into it. But then we
Speaker 1: just seed the ground to the other side. Then they
Speaker 1: act like they've won. They act like we're admitting that
Speaker 1: this was every bit as horrifying as they said it was.
Speaker 1: Here is Look, I don't want to avoid this entirely
Speaker 1: on the show. I'm not going to avoid things, even
Speaker 1: when I know they can bring up some descent within
Speaker 1: the within the right. Mike penns talked about the Capitol attack,
Speaker 1: and he was there and he had to be rapidly
Speaker 1: escorted out of the building. Now remember at the time, Yes,
Speaker 1: it's true that they didn't know. If you know, these
Speaker 1: these people who were rioting, who broke into the building,
Speaker 1: broke into the Capitol, they could have been armed, They
Speaker 1: could have had more nefarious intent than they did. And
Speaker 1: a lot of them, I know, were just lunatics who
Speaker 1: were screaming stupid stuff. And some of them were screaming scary,
Speaker 1: violent things, but they didn't actually have the means nor
Speaker 1: the will to carry that stuff out. Obviously they didn't
Speaker 1: do it, they didn't try to do it. But here's
Speaker 1: here's what Mike Penn says about. You know, he was there,
Speaker 1: he is the Vice president. Here's what he says about
Speaker 1: January six play five. January sixth was a dark day
Speaker 1: in the history of the United States Capital. But thanks
Speaker 1: to the swift action of the Capitol police and federal
Speaker 1: law enforcement, violence was quelled, The capital was secured, and
Speaker 1: that same day we reconvene the Congress and did our
Speaker 1: duty under the Constitution and the laws of the United States.
Speaker 1: You know, President Trump and I have spoken many times
Speaker 1: since we left office, and I don't know if we'll
Speaker 1: ever see eye to eye on that day, but I
Speaker 1: will always be proud of what we accomplish for the
Speaker 1: American people over the last four years. And I will
Speaker 1: not allow Democrats or their allies in the media to
Speaker 1: use one tragic day to discredit the aspirations of millions
Speaker 1: of Americans. That's putting this into proper perspective. It was
Speaker 1: a bad day. Shouldn't have happened. I've said it to
Speaker 1: you so many times. I get I know I bore
Speaker 1: myself repeating it now, but I just have to go
Speaker 1: on record, keep going on record. It was a bad day.
Speaker 1: It shouldn't have happened. It wasn't Pearl Harbor, it wasn't
Speaker 1: nine to eleven, It wasn't even in the same stratosphere
Speaker 1: as those things. And to call it that is dishonest
Speaker 1: and is meant to take a minor incident and a
Speaker 1: more minor incident, I should say, than those other issues,
Speaker 1: and use it as use it as a weapon against
Speaker 1: all of the opposition to the Democrat Marxists. That's the
Speaker 1: point of it all. They're doing this intentionally. You know,
Speaker 1: I could say that somebody who crossed the street illegally
Speaker 1: jaywalking has committed a criminal act. You could even argue
Speaker 1: that person is a criminal. But if I were running
Speaker 1: around giving speeches about how the great jaywalker of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one was a vile criminal who posed a threat
Speaker 1: to all civil order and was causing mass deterioration in
Speaker 1: our society because of their jaywalking, you'd say I sound
Speaker 1: like a lunatic. There is a point at which it
Speaker 1: truly becomes crazy. I mean, the level of exaggeration, the
Speaker 1: degree of over emphasis, is just inexcusable, and it's clearly intentional.
Speaker 1: It's meant to bring about a certain outcome, and the
Speaker 1: outcomes that people will be so scared of being associated
Speaker 1: with this, They'll be so terrified at the notion that
Speaker 1: they'll be considered part of the insurrection that they give
Speaker 1: up what they really believe in, that they no longer
Speaker 1: feel like they can speak openly and freely about what
Speaker 1: they what they think. I mean, I've said to you
Speaker 1: so many times that what Pennsylvania did, what the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania did in the twenty election, strikes me as unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: Now I knew, also knew, and those of you remember
Speaker 1: what I was saying, I also knew a court at
Speaker 1: the time. I told you before the decisions came down,
Speaker 1: a court was not going to say, well, we're gonna
Speaker 1: discount all these votes because of what a state official
Speaker 1: did in order to expand voting or to you know,
Speaker 1: extend deadlines or whatever. Maybe we're not going to throw
Speaker 1: out millions of votes as a result of that. I
Speaker 1: knew that. But it doesn't mean what happened was okay.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't mean that in some of the heavily
Speaker 1: Democrat controlled precincts where we saw a lot of suspicious
Speaker 1: voting activity, there should not be recounts, and that creates
Speaker 1: faith in the process, right, trust, but verify must be
Speaker 1: the way we approach elections. And I don't understand anyone
Speaker 1: on the right who thinks that they're doing a favor
Speaker 1: to conservatism by going along with the narrative of the
Speaker 1: left that you're not even allowed to talk about the election.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, is this America or not. In fact, I'd
Speaker 1: go so far as to say that in America, you
Speaker 1: should be allowed to say that you think the election
Speaker 1: was rigged, that doesn't mean that you're right, but you
Speaker 1: should be allowed to say it. That's an opinion. But no,
Speaker 1: they want to take action, use the action of corporations,
Speaker 1: and when they can, this state itself to attack people
Speaker 1: for this, to say that it's a form of of
Speaker 1: you know, insurrection or sedition, to merely suggest that something
Speaker 1: may have been a miss in that election. Now, I
Speaker 1: know a lot of a lot of people feel very
Speaker 1: very strongly about this one way or the other. I've
Speaker 1: told you I think that they changed the rule. I
Speaker 1: think they changed rules in advance of the election in
Speaker 1: a way that violates the law and constitutional norms. But
Speaker 1: I also say that I think that Fauci and the
Speaker 1: situation of the country was such that yeah, Biden, Biden
Speaker 1: very well did win the election. Even with it's one
Speaker 1: thing to say there's cheating, was there was there enough
Speaker 1: cheating in enough places to change the course of the election.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen the proof of that yet. And by
Speaker 1: the way, don't get mad at me for this. I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you what I think. I think Biden. I
Speaker 1: think Biden won this election. I think there was cheating,
Speaker 1: but I still think Biden won the election. You can
Speaker 1: you can actually think both things. I think Democrats do
Speaker 1: cheat in elections just routinely. I think that happens. You know,
Speaker 1: that's not a big deal to them. I think they
Speaker 1: changed the rules in a way that was unfair to
Speaker 1: benefit them right when it would be you know, of
Speaker 1: maximum advantage to the Democrat Party, to Joe Biden. But
Speaker 1: I also think that because of Fauciism and the pandemic
Speaker 1: and the psychological state of the country at the time,
Speaker 1: and the media's scorched earth, lie lie lie approach about
Speaker 1: Trump too. Yeah, I think it is. It is in
Speaker 1: fact the case that Joe Biden one and I think
Speaker 1: we need to we need to deal with this and
Speaker 1: find out if I'm right or not on this point,
Speaker 1: because and be certain about it. Because if I'm right
Speaker 1: and Trump did lose divided, meaning that he really did
Speaker 1: get fewer votes in the key states, this notion that
Speaker 1: Trump should run again instead of say Ron de Santis
Speaker 1: does not help us. We need some real talk here, friends.
Speaker 1: We need to be honest with each other about this.
Speaker 1: And again I'm not saying that I know, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying I'm right. I'm telling you what I think and
Speaker 1: what we need to be prepared for going forward, because
Speaker 1: having Trump run again and lose again is not helping us. Okay,
Speaker 1: And this belief that Trump, you know, won by a lot,
Speaker 1: you know. That's so I'm out, But you know, I'm
Speaker 1: open to other points of view on this. I'm open
Speaker 1: to other evidence that people present, and and yeah, don't don't,
Speaker 1: please don't send me any emails saying buck, you don't
Speaker 1: think the Democrats cheated. I think they cheated, but I
Speaker 1: still think that they that they likely won based on
Speaker 1: the numbers I've seen in the states at issue, I
Speaker 1: still think they won, even with some cheating that went
Speaker 1: on and one of a whole bunch of states, folks,
Speaker 1: So we got it. We gotta come to grips with
Speaker 1: us and be honest about whatever. And if there's evidence
Speaker 1: to the contrary, just show it to me and I'll
Speaker 1: say I was wrong. I'll change my tune, you know,
Speaker 1: present it to me. So that's where I am on this.
Speaker 1: But I'll have other voices on the show that have
Speaker 1: a different point of view of other people on that
Speaker 1: that disagree with me on this, and that's fine, but
Speaker 1: let's hash it out. We're not the authoritarian left. We
Speaker 1: can disagree about something we can have a difference of
Speaker 1: opinion on the right and still respect each other. No,
Speaker 1: we're on the same team and know that we're trying
Speaker 1: to get to the same place. But we can only
Speaker 1: get there if we're honest. We can only get there
Speaker 1: if we deal in facts in reality. Let's leave the
Speaker 1: delusions to the left. Let's leave the absurdities. Two people
Speaker 1: that think, for example, you know, doctor Fauci did a
Speaker 1: good job played Jensaki clip two. And given that there
Speaker 1: were some things that Fauci said privately contracted contract and
Speaker 1: Putty said publicly whether it was masks, or whether or
Speaker 1: not something who had the virus you know, could have immunity,
Speaker 1: or you know, other questions as well. I mean, does
Speaker 1: he still have confidence in his NIH directors. Let's change
Speaker 1: anything at all. These was a president and the administration
Speaker 1: field that doctor Foushey has played an incredible role in
Speaker 1: getting the pandemic under control, being a voice to the
Speaker 1: public throughout the course of this pandemic. And again I
Speaker 1: would reiterate a lot of these emails are from seventeen
Speaker 1: months ago or more certainly predating this administration, but some
Speaker 1: time ago, still full confidence in Fauci. He's amazing. Why
Speaker 1: do you think that is not because he's good at
Speaker 1: the pandemic stuff, because he helped them beat Trump? All right, everybody,
Speaker 1: the man himself is with us now. Mike Lindell, the
Speaker 1: inventor and an owner of My Pillow. You all know
Speaker 1: My Pillow is a great sponsor here on the show.
Speaker 1: I've got my pillows on my bed right now. But
Speaker 1: Mike has a lot of projects he's working on. He's
Speaker 1: going to tell us about some of it now. Mike,
Speaker 1: I gotta ask, how have you been doing ever since
Speaker 1: some of the big box retailers decided they were going
Speaker 1: to try to try to do it their own version
Speaker 1: of you know, cancel culture against you. How we've been
Speaker 1: trying to get the word out here on the show
Speaker 1: as as obviously my pillows a sponsor that everyone's got
Speaker 1: to go direct. Everyone's got to get there. My pillows
Speaker 1: get their gear, support you and obviously the great products.
Speaker 1: How have you been doing since those big companies came
Speaker 1: at you? Well, they you know, and it's you know,
Speaker 1: it started when I went all in against you know,
Speaker 1: I've always backed the great President Donald Trump. But they
Speaker 1: as soon as I after I got evidence after January ninth.
Speaker 1: You're right retailers. Uh. As soon as I went after
Speaker 1: the machine people and UH and the fraud, then big
Speaker 1: retailers started dropping me. It's over twenty now, and the
Speaker 1: and the not just the box rowers, but the shopping
Speaker 1: channels all dropped us, even my local one here in Minnesota.
Speaker 1: And and then you had online marketing that I got dropped,
Speaker 1: my Twitters, my Facebook's a lot of the stuff on Facebook.
Speaker 1: And you know, we have twenty five hundred employees. They
Speaker 1: all have families and UH, and their people in both
Speaker 1: parties if you talk politics. But it's been absolutely amazing
Speaker 1: to answer your question that that everyone you're already and
Speaker 1: everyone else has been buying direct. And I think we've
Speaker 1: gotten the word out that it's not just pillows. We
Speaker 1: have over one hundred and ten products, UH, and that's
Speaker 1: growing every day. And that also we have my store
Speaker 1: connected to that, which is entrepreneurs in our country, which
Speaker 1: are hundreds more products that you can also get discounts on.
Speaker 1: And these are USA made products that over here by
Speaker 1: my store and the USA entrepreneurs. So it's people have
Speaker 1: been going. Man, I bought twenty of your pillows to
Speaker 1: support you. I'm going Hey, we got a lot of
Speaker 1: other great products, from slippers, to bathrobes, to towels, to
Speaker 1: you know, sheets, to beds. We have our new bedo
Speaker 1: now buck the new our new bed we're launching the infomercial.
Speaker 1: You'll see it in within a few days, and it's
Speaker 1: there's nothing like it. I reverse engineer It took almost
Speaker 1: two years to develop every single part of this bed
Speaker 1: because everything I do, I reverse engineer it, and so
Speaker 1: it helps you, you know, so it helps people. Mike,
Speaker 1: how do I get How do I get to my bed?
Speaker 1: I gotta you got after the show here, give me
Speaker 1: a call and we'll send one out. All right, That's
Speaker 1: what I like to hear everybody. We're speaking to Mike Lindel.
Speaker 1: You'll know that Mike obviously is the inventor, founder and
Speaker 1: the guy behind My Pillow, a great American company, all
Speaker 1: made here in America. And Mike, there's one other project
Speaker 1: I wanted to ask you about before we let you
Speaker 1: going back to running the My Pillow Empire. I am
Speaker 1: excited about those beds, by the way, that's gonna be great. Um.
Speaker 1: I've also got the I got the my slippers, folks,
Speaker 1: I'm wearing them right now is I'm doing the show,
Speaker 1: so I'm really I'm decked out. I'm like Garth and
Speaker 1: Wayne's world and he's got a Reebok head to toe.
Speaker 1: I'm a believer. But Mike, you gotta tell me this
Speaker 1: Frank Speech. You've got a rally coming up here in
Speaker 1: what is it? June twelfth, a Frank Speech rally in Wisconsin?
Speaker 1: What is Frank speech? Tell folks about this platform. Well,
Speaker 1: it's it's a it is a platform. It's absolutely amazing.
Speaker 1: We're getting all your like your Diamond and silks and
Speaker 1: you're hu. We've had Nash and Charlie Kirk and all
Speaker 1: and all the all the people that you know you're
Speaker 1: on your on your YouTube's and vimeos that have been
Speaker 1: canceled or shadow band like on like on Facebook. I
Speaker 1: was talking to Diamond and Soak. They had they have
Speaker 1: I don't know millions of followers, but they when they
Speaker 1: do when they do a broadcast, it might only reach
Speaker 1: one hundred people or not maybe a little more in
Speaker 1: that you know, maybe ten thousand, but but that's what
Speaker 1: they're doing out there. So what we did. I spent
Speaker 1: a lot of time in developing Frank Speech dot com
Speaker 1: it's a platform, Frank, it's a broadcast network thing right now.
Speaker 1: Where you go there, you're getting your news. Yesterday two
Speaker 1: million people came there and uh in page views, and
Speaker 1: it's it's a safe place where you're it's not only secure,
Speaker 1: you can't break it. I have all my own servers.
Speaker 1: They're not going to be able to take down our
Speaker 1: voice of free speech. So to get the word out,
Speaker 1: we're doing a free speech rally, you know, Frank Speech
Speaker 1: and uh. But it's basically about our freedom, our First
Speaker 1: Amendment rights of free speech. It is June twelfth in Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: and we've got like I say, Diamond of Silks for
Speaker 1: coming to Nash and Nash's daughter, Um, Chris Cox, Brandon House,
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk, myself and the h and President Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is going to come in on the JumboTron and he's
Speaker 1: gonna he's gonna speak. So it's gonna be We've already
Speaker 1: got about fifteen thousand people signed up. It's free everybody.
Speaker 1: It's free. You go to frank speech dot com. You
Speaker 1: can get free tickets. We expect, you know, tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of people. But it's a it's basically a festival
Speaker 1: it's gonna be five hours at least, and uh, music speaking,
Speaker 1: and uh we've got food trucks, We've got and this
Speaker 1: is a great place in Wisconsin where there's a lot
Speaker 1: of other camping and a lot of other things going on.
Speaker 1: So it's you can come and spend the whole weekend.
Speaker 1: But it's uh, it's basically get the word out and
Speaker 1: get our get our um our First Amendment rights of
Speaker 1: free speech to protect them and uh and that's what
Speaker 1: it's all about. Go check it out, everybody. Mike winn
Speaker 1: L the man himself behind my pillow. Remember if you
Speaker 1: go to my pillow dot com, use that promo code
Speaker 1: Buck everybody. Mike. Always great to have you, man, Thank
Speaker 1: you so much, Thanks Buck, Thanks from me. Oh she
Speaker 1: is back with us now. Always interesting, always provocative. The
Speaker 1: one and only and Culter thirteen time New York Times
Speaker 1: bestselling author. Go to and Culter dot com for her
Speaker 1: latest column, Miss Coulter, Great to have you. Good to
Speaker 1: be here, Buck Sexton. So tell everybody about what's going
Speaker 1: on with the folks at some of these companies that
Speaker 1: take your DNA and tell you you know who you
Speaker 1: who your grandparents are, and all this other stuff and
Speaker 1: why they're not they're not willing to help out on
Speaker 1: the law enforcement side. What's going on? Yes, it's odd,
Speaker 1: it's in response the strangest thing that this is like
Speaker 1: ancestry dot com. Some of them are participating UM and UM.
Speaker 1: Many of you may have heard about the the huge
Speaker 1: success when California investigators at an FBI law UM captured
Speaker 1: the Golden State Killer, this monster serial killer and massively
Speaker 1: serial rapists who terrorized California for decades. UM. They just
Speaker 1: caught him in twenty eighteen. And I kept reading all
Speaker 1: these articles, like in the New York Times about the
Speaker 1: controversy of how I think it's ged ana or something
Speaker 1: like that one of these genetic um profiling websites had
Speaker 1: had allowed that law enforcement was very clever. They put
Speaker 1: in a sample of the California the Golden State Killers
Speaker 1: DNA taken from a rape kid. Obviously that whoever seemen
Speaker 1: that was was the killer UM and and from. By
Speaker 1: putting that into the the profile, they could locate distant
Speaker 1: relatives of the Golden State Killer. They put together a
Speaker 1: family tree. It took a lot of work. UM narrowed
Speaker 1: down their search came to this guy Joseph James DeAngelo
Speaker 1: living near Sacramento, and then put them under surveillance until
Speaker 1: they could get directly hit his DNA. It's a hit Bingo.
Speaker 1: They finally got their guy. Um. And one thing I've
Speaker 1: noticed from reading about about these genealogical websites is that
Speaker 1: despite the tv adsum we've seen any of them. Um,
Speaker 1: it's it's overwhelmingly identifying people of European descent. And those
Speaker 1: are people who are very interested in ancestry. That's where
Speaker 1: you have a lot of ancestry information. And according to
Speaker 1: Israeli researchers, in a few years, ninety percent of people
Speaker 1: with European ancestry will be locatable findable on these genealogical websites. UM.
Speaker 1: So in the in the middle of of a world
Speaker 1: where we're being tracked and everything we do, when you
Speaker 1: know your Echo is spying on you, Google is spying
Speaker 1: on you, companies are selling your names and information. No,
Speaker 1: these democratic lobbyists bullied ancestry dot com and a few
Speaker 1: others into refusing to allow law enforcement to engage in
Speaker 1: this brilliance is really quite brilliant technique to find solve
Speaker 1: unsolvable cases and with absolute one hundred percent certainty. DNA
Speaker 1: is absolutely revolutionary. UM. It seems weird that that it's
Speaker 1: so scairly recent discovery, But criminals used to leave there's
Speaker 1: DNA all over the crime scene, and that's what makes
Speaker 1: a lot of these true crime stories so much fun.
Speaker 1: They end up getting the guide dead to rights. As
Speaker 1: as an active proponent of the death penalty, I've been
Speaker 1: listening to liberals for years wail about, oh, but there's
Speaker 1: always mistakes, humans are involved. We're executing the wrongment now
Speaker 1: now in at least since nineteen forty five, and it's
Speaker 1: hard to get good records pre nineteen forty five. There
Speaker 1: is no credible evidence that an innocent man has ever
Speaker 1: been put to death in this country. We ought to
Speaker 1: use it a lot more. It has a terrific deterrent effect.
Speaker 1: Well here, after all their whining about the wrong man
Speaker 1: and what if we have the wrong man, now we
Speaker 1: have Now we have DNA evidence that is one hundred
Speaker 1: percent accurate. Um. No, no disputing this. I mean if
Speaker 1: it's if it's tested on evidence that could only have
Speaker 1: come from the killer or the rapist, of which there
Speaker 1: often is. UM and ancestry dot Com, along with a
Speaker 1: few others heritage. I think UM have agreed that no, no,
Speaker 1: we're going to hamstring law enforcement now they're going to
Speaker 1: have to go get a court order. And I was
Speaker 1: just looking at this thinking, for Pete's sake, Ancestry, how
Speaker 1: many ACLU types do you have on your website? How
Speaker 1: about that that's who you're trying to get to, like you? Um,
Speaker 1: these not pro criminal groups. Um. It's a wonderful device, um,
Speaker 1: And I think quite appalling that these genealogical websites won't
Speaker 1: allow law enforcement to use it now. Obviously, especially people
Speaker 1: on our side of the fence, are worried about government
Speaker 1: overreach and misuse of things. But um, okay, complain about
Speaker 1: that when it happened. But yeah, well I also feel
Speaker 1: like Anna, I don't really want to I don't really
Speaker 1: want to hear from the ACLU types now about the
Speaker 1: need to protect privacy and civil liberties when we were
Speaker 1: just told where two you know, cloths over your face
Speaker 1: or else and don't go outside and don't go to
Speaker 1: church for over a year. I'm sorry, I feel like
Speaker 1: the civil Libertarians lost a step somewhere in there. Sorry,
Speaker 1: leave it to Buck to come up with an even
Speaker 1: better Yes, yes, Bucks, and I think they have lost
Speaker 1: a little of their street cred. Yeah, it seems like
Speaker 1: they're coming to this little a little, a little late
Speaker 1: in the game. And we're speaking to an Coulter everybody
Speaker 1: and culter dot com for her latest column. And I
Speaker 1: gotta get your your reaction to the big story this
Speaker 1: week about these these Fauci emails. And people are gonna say, oh,
Speaker 1: there's no smoking gun of a cover up here and
Speaker 1: everything else. Okay, but you look at this, and there's
Speaker 1: plenty of commentary about lab Leek, there's plenty of commentary
Speaker 1: about gain a function research. And I'm sorry I remember,
Speaker 1: and you know you were on the show We're talking
Speaker 1: about this many times that if you brought any of
Speaker 1: that stuff up until about five minutes ago, you were
Speaker 1: a crazy conspiracy theorist who should probably go to a
Speaker 1: re education camp somewhere. Yes, yes, this is yet another example.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I still think it came from
Speaker 1: the wet market. But I mean, who knows. I will
Speaker 1: say we do not know, but oh my gosh, what
Speaker 1: a lot of lying went on about this. And I mean,
Speaker 1: like the Biden Hunter Biden investigations. New York Post suspended
Speaker 1: from Twitter, I mean, our our First Amendment censors have
Speaker 1: been caught up now twice in pretty major stories that
Speaker 1: they were lying to the public about the Hunter Boden
Speaker 1: thing and and the credibility. That's certainly possible that it
Speaker 1: came from from a lab. And it turns out that
Speaker 1: these these scientists um from respectable institutions. Um. I mean,
Speaker 1: it really shows you that even you can just say, oh,
Speaker 1: you're a naive idiot, and and I am an iive idiot.
Speaker 1: But but even people like me who think that they're
Speaker 1: immune to to you know, the clarion call of experts
Speaker 1: and scientists. I certainly don't believe them on global warming. Um,
Speaker 1: but there were enough of them from serious institutions. Scripts
Speaker 1: Howard seemed to have no political political mode of saying, no,
Speaker 1: we've looked at this. It couldn't have been genetically Um,
Speaker 1: are you know, engineered in a lab? Um? And now
Speaker 1: at least it looks like um, they were getting to
Speaker 1: use the cliche a little a little far out over
Speaker 1: their skis. UM. No, that turns out that yeah, it
Speaker 1: could be, it could have come from a lot. We
Speaker 1: were lied to about that. We were lied to by scientists,
Speaker 1: We were lied to probably a lot, because Trump happened
Speaker 1: to mention it in passing one of his press confidences,
Speaker 1: which you know, it's a pretty broad basis on which
Speaker 1: to start banning theories, and Trump would ramble on about
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff. Yeah, they really think that Trump
Speaker 1: said it. Therefore we opposed it is a real defense,
Speaker 1: which is pretty remarkable when you think about the scope
Speaker 1: of what that would really entail and all that. You know,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump also said that like China is stealing
Speaker 1: our intellectual property, and you know, the Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 1: is you know, there are a lot of things he
Speaker 1: said that we're true and we all know we're true,
Speaker 1: and that sometimes people didn't want to hear. So I
Speaker 1: think that's interesting. But I want you to pull out
Speaker 1: the the culture malarkey detector for me for a second here,
Speaker 1: because one thing that I keep hearing is that the
Speaker 1: the the coronavirus lead from lab theory is racist. And
Speaker 1: I always want to just point out say, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: of the mind, I'm of the mind that thinking that
Speaker 1: this came from the very unusual practice of you know,
Speaker 1: turning civets into kebabs or bat soup or whatever. It's
Speaker 1: much more likely to create cultural misunderstanding, shall we say,
Speaker 1: but that's the one that they keep pushing. Yes, no,
Speaker 1: I mean either way, this came from China. I find
Speaker 1: it as everyone else, every normal person, I think, considers
Speaker 1: it odd. That's obsession with denying it came from China.
Speaker 1: We I mean what abola was from a river named
Speaker 1: Ebola in Africa. Lime disease from lime, Connecticut. It's a
Speaker 1: fairly natural thing to do. In fact, the only disease
Speaker 1: I can think of it was unfairly blamed, if you
Speaker 1: want to say blame. The name attached to it is
Speaker 1: the Spanish flu, which I only realized a few years ago.
Speaker 1: It was called the Spanish Leude. Didn't hit Spain at all.
Speaker 1: It was just that Spanish and newspapers were the only
Speaker 1: ones who that were writing about it because the other
Speaker 1: countries didn't want to hurt their war or censorship. There
Speaker 1: were censorship about that flew to everybody. Just remember that.
Speaker 1: But it's China's fault, one way or another. Either they're
Speaker 1: discussing wet markets which ought to be shut down in
Speaker 1: any event, or the lab leak, and they lied about
Speaker 1: what was happening as it was happening. They didn't warn
Speaker 1: the world about it. I mean, one argument against against
Speaker 1: the lab theory, at least that it was an intentional
Speaker 1: lab leak is that apparently China is doing very poorly
Speaker 1: as a result of this. So if this was, if
Speaker 1: this was a plan for them to gain the upper hand,
Speaker 1: it's certainly backfired on. But in any event, yeah, of
Speaker 1: course it came from China. The idea that that is
Speaker 1: the racist theory as opposed to the disgusting web markets. No,
Speaker 1: it makes no sense. It's come just like a reflex
Speaker 1: for liberals. And I'm also trying to I'm trying to
Speaker 1: popularize this this and for everyone to understand that that
Speaker 1: Marxism or communism, you know, either or gave us COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Here's how the reason there are wet markets now, and
Speaker 1: that's assuming I know that maybe it came from a lab,
Speaker 1: but the reason that there are wet markets where stars
Speaker 1: was traced previously a previous traced to a wet market.
Speaker 1: But they exist because of the MAO policies around farming,
Speaker 1: and there was mass starvations. We all know that was
Speaker 1: the Great Famine. So when rural parts of China, people
Speaker 1: started to actually breed and raise wild animals for food.
Speaker 1: And then this became cultural practice, and they started to
Speaker 1: imbuse some of these animals with special characteristics if you
Speaker 1: would eat them, there were special medicinal properties involved, and
Speaker 1: this then became a big cultural practice. I think they
Speaker 1: say that it even became a big monetary thing for
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party to make. So Marxism gave us
Speaker 1: wet markets, which gave us diseases like this and or
Speaker 1: perhaps COVID nineteen. That's actually true. That's very good back.
Speaker 1: Thank you should write that up. I think I will.
Speaker 1: I think, I think, I think I'm make a makeup roof.
Speaker 1: Now that I've said it to you on air, I'm like,
Speaker 1: that actually does make a lot of sense. I think
Speaker 1: you should tell everybody about this, a reminder of why
Speaker 1: Marxism is such a bad thing before before we before
Speaker 1: let you go back to writing your columns in and
Speaker 1: all the rest you got going on. Just just wondering here, Um,
Speaker 1: we have AOC complaining about Trump not sending money for
Speaker 1: her grandmother in Puerto Rico. AOC has two apartments and
Speaker 1: drives around in a seventy thousand dollars sports car. She's
Speaker 1: sharing photos of her grandmother and Puerto Rico's roof caving in.
Speaker 1: I think this is an AOC problem. Yeah, it would
Speaker 1: be nice if she'd do something for her grandmother. And
Speaker 1: another failure of of of communism or socialism it is.
Speaker 1: It is strange that it doesn't even strike her. Um,
Speaker 1: this is an embarrassing thing for her to do. Someone's
Speaker 1: my grandmother is in trouble. Therefore it's the government's fault.
Speaker 1: And I don't have to lift a finger. That level
Speaker 1: of psychotic dependency and entitlement that doesn't just emerge in
Speaker 1: the wild. No, that's the years of government running in
Speaker 1: taking the blame. Oh, we're so sorry here, let us
Speaker 1: scoop the food up and put it into her mouth.
Speaker 1: AOC everybody, she's the congresswoman from Queens. We got a
Speaker 1: culture joining us now and culture dot com and thanks
Speaker 1: as always, appreciate you being with us. Good good to
Speaker 1: talk to you about seccident of I what does former
Speaker 1: President Trump think of the latest revelations about doctor Fauci. Well,
Speaker 1: we got a statement out here from the President, an
Speaker 1: emailed statement in which he lets everybody know exactly what
Speaker 1: his feelings are. Former President Rights there are a lot
Speaker 1: of questions must be answered by doctor Fauci. The funding
Speaker 1: of WUHAN by the US was foolishly started by the
Speaker 1: Obama administration in twenty fourteen, but ended under the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: When I heard about it, I said, no way, what
Speaker 1: did doctor Fauci know about gain of research? And when
Speaker 1: did he know it? That was in the first email.
Speaker 1: The President has got to be pretty annoyed about this situation.
Speaker 1: Let's all be very clear about that. President Trump would well,
Speaker 1: see what I just did there. Former President Trump would
Speaker 1: likely still be President Trump if it were not for
Speaker 1: the little lab coat tyrant Fauci, who would you know,
Speaker 1: stand up at the press conference in the early days
Speaker 1: of COVID and he would say, you know, let's just
Speaker 1: let's just make sure everyone's maximum level freaked out, and
Speaker 1: let's undermine the President's credibility a little bit on this
Speaker 1: issue and make sure that everybody at home is going
Speaker 1: to be particularly terrified beyond reason or rationality, in order
Speaker 1: to make sure they're more compliant and therefore more likely
Speaker 1: to turn to the state and to the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: which will promise falsely to offer them protection. And Fauci
Speaker 1: is a central part of that whole equation. There was
Speaker 1: a second email that went out from Donald Trump. Quote.
Speaker 1: Now everyone, even the so called enemy, are beginning to
Speaker 1: say that President Trump was right about the China virus
Speaker 1: coming from the Wuhan lab. The correspondence between doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: and China speaks too loudly for anyone to ignore. China
Speaker 1: should pay ten trillion dollars to America and the world
Speaker 1: for the death and destruction they caused. After seeing the emails,
Speaker 1: our country is fortunate I didn't do what doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: wanted me to do. For instance, Trump writes, I closed
Speaker 1: our borders to China very early, despite his not wanting
Speaker 1: them closed. The Democrats and the fake news media even
Speaker 1: called me a xenophobe. In the end, we saw this
Speaker 1: was a life saving decision, and likewise, with closing our
Speaker 1: borders to Europe, specifically to certain heavily infected countries, I
Speaker 1: was later given credit even by Tony for saving hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of lives. Trump continues doctor Fauci also didn't
Speaker 1: put an emphasis on speed of vaccine production because he
Speaker 1: thought it would take three to four or maybe even
Speaker 1: five years to create I got it done in less
Speaker 1: than nine months with Operation Warp Speed, the President said,
Speaker 1: end quote. That's right. Operation Warp Speed was the only
Speaker 1: really successful government response to the pandemic, and that was
Speaker 1: something that occurred entirely on and was run by President Trump.
Speaker 1: It was on his watch and was in charge of it.
Speaker 1: Does the media give credit for that? Do they speak
Speaker 1: honestly about the fact that it's a near miracle that
Speaker 1: we got the vaccine in production as quickly as we did,
Speaker 1: and this was a government directed program. Now it is.
Speaker 1: It is also private sector pharmaceutical companies that should take
Speaker 1: about here. But the CDC, the health bureaucrats, places like
Speaker 1: the National Institute of Health, the NIH the CDC, they
Speaker 1: were a disaster, an absolute disaster the entire time. Okay,
Speaker 1: we need to be clear about this. We need to
Speaker 1: make sure we all understand that the CDC failed at
Speaker 1: every critical step of this pandemic. What exactly did they
Speaker 1: step up to do that save lives? They put these
Speaker 1: completely arbitrary and very destructive restrictions in place. Anyway, President
Speaker 1: Trump knows this. It's a shame that more of the
Speaker 1: fact couldn't come out in time for the election. Remember
Speaker 1: they were still saying there wasn't going to be a
Speaker 1: vaccine in twenty twenty, when there was a vaccine at
Speaker 1: the end of the year that was in distribution beginning
Speaker 1: its distribution. But Trump did not get the credit he
Speaker 1: deserved for handling the pandemic as well as he did
Speaker 1: under the circumstances. Instead, they just focused on exaggerating every
Speaker 1: little statement he made, pretending like he was a COVID denier.
Speaker 1: It was all part of what they always do, which
Speaker 1: is create massive lies to build a narrative of the
Speaker 1: evil Republicans, the evil Trumpsters that you have to vote against.
Speaker 1: It was just outrageous, the whole thing. Honestly, it was absurd,
Speaker 1: and I'm just glad that Trump has thrown some punches
Speaker 1: at little Fauci. Is the world of comic books being
Speaker 1: overrun by wokeness? Well, since we're talking about it, you
Speaker 1: probably have a pretty good guess here. But let's speak
Speaker 1: to somebody who actually knows this world inside it out
Speaker 1: and said considerable success in it. Ethan. Then Skiver is
Speaker 1: with us now. He is the owner of All Caps
Speaker 1: Comics and has the YouTube channel Comic Artist pro Secrets,
Speaker 1: and has been involved with well he'll tell us Ethan
Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining Buck Sexton. What a pleasure,
Speaker 1: what a privilege. So tell me, my man, what are
Speaker 1: some of in the old days some of the comics
Speaker 1: for the folks listening that you illustrated created were involved in.
Speaker 1: What were some of the names? I worked at DC
Speaker 1: Comics and Marvel Comics, but mostly DC for about two decades.
Speaker 1: I worked on Green Lantern and The Flash, Batman, Superman,
Speaker 1: all of the big titles. Why this is a little
Speaker 1: bit of a departure, but I have to ask. I'm
Speaker 1: curious why was the Green Lantern movie so bad? I
Speaker 1: don't know it ruined. No. See, I was working with
Speaker 1: Jeff Johns. We actually took Green Lantern and made it
Speaker 1: into DC Comics number two franchise, and then it got
Speaker 1: the movie and I don't know what happened. It killed
Speaker 1: all of our momentum. It was awful, I kind of
Speaker 1: because I always liked the Green Lantern and now I
Speaker 1: feel like he's you know been. People think of that
Speaker 1: movie with you know that, forget the handsome guy, forget
Speaker 1: his name. But it wasn't a good movie anyway. I
Speaker 1: want to ask you, though about what happened because you're
Speaker 1: you're working with some of the top the top comic
Speaker 1: book characters out there are working with them, creating them. Right,
Speaker 1: You're not like Kilding, not like hanging out with Superman.
Speaker 1: You're making Superman, but in your case, the Green Lantern,
Speaker 1: not Superman. But you're doing these things. And then well,
Speaker 1: what happened? Tell us your story? I mean, and obviously
Speaker 1: it has a happy ending, which we're gonna get to,
Speaker 1: but what happened to you? Oh? Thank goodness about Yeah.
Speaker 1: I everybody knew I was a Republican, but the entire
Speaker 1: comic book industry is made up of left wingers, and
Speaker 1: everything was okay. People kind of used to joke with
Speaker 1: me until Trump won. When Trump won the election in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, they all turned on me. It was very
Speaker 1: very strange, and I and why it was very naive.
Speaker 1: I just went, hey, it's our turn, you know, my
Speaker 1: guy won, hooray, And I wore the red Maga hat
Speaker 1: on Twitter, and the instantly, like people I thought were
Speaker 1: my friends, targeted me for utter annihilation. It was awful
Speaker 1: and basically I think like I got a few like
Speaker 1: creepy emails from people who were professionals who kind of said,
Speaker 1: how could you? How could you turn on your peers
Speaker 1: who are gay and LGBTQ and people of color. And
Speaker 1: I said, I just voted for the president. I don't
Speaker 1: understand what you're talking about. But they all teamed up
Speaker 1: and they got nineteen writers at DC Comics to sign
Speaker 1: and co sign a letter saying they'd never worked with me.
Speaker 1: They sent that to the highest executives at Warner Brothers,
Speaker 1: and my time was quickly at an end at DC Comics.
Speaker 1: How how woke is the comic book industry? Now? I mean,
Speaker 1: give us a sense. See, I grew up I like
Speaker 1: The X Men. Growing up, that was really the only
Speaker 1: comic book series that I knew a bit from actually
Speaker 1: buying some comics and everything. This is when I was
Speaker 1: a kid, maybe third, fourth, fifth grade, and it was
Speaker 1: very different then, obviously, And this is a long time ago. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't know, we're I think we're we're pretty close
Speaker 1: to the same age, a few year, a couple of
Speaker 1: years older than me. And how much has the comic
Speaker 1: book industry, which is a big industry, and especially now
Speaker 1: that people think of these billion dollar movie franchises attached
Speaker 1: to it, you know, there's big dollars involved here? How
Speaker 1: woke has it gotten even well, it's got unprogressively no
Speaker 1: pun intended, more and more woke, because I think these
Speaker 1: ideas appeal to people who just you know, who live
Speaker 1: kind of insular, quiet lives. You know, we're all alone
Speaker 1: in our little workspaces, we live on the internet, and
Speaker 1: so all of these ideas that come with the tremendous
Speaker 1: peer pressure are incredibly appealing to people who are already
Speaker 1: sort of voting democrat. And basically what happened was these
Speaker 1: feminists basically showed up in the comic book industry, took
Speaker 1: look around themselves, assessed what this male dominated space looked
Speaker 1: like to them, and just basically said, it's kind of
Speaker 1: sexist here, guys, maybe you should let us come in
Speaker 1: here and make some changes so that it's a little
Speaker 1: less offensive and oppressive to women. Now, can I just
Speaker 1: jump in? I mean, I'm assuming because you know, the
Speaker 1: women have you know, the equivalent of what would be
Speaker 1: a fourteen inch waist and a let's say a busty
Speaker 1: cup size that this was considered. This was considered either
Speaker 1: highly insensitive and feminists get enraged by this kind of thing.
Speaker 1: But having seen enough comics, whether it's sideclops or Superman
Speaker 1: or Wolverine. Those guys don't have six packs, they have
Speaker 1: like thirty two packs and are the equivalent of you know,
Speaker 1: zero percent body fat. And it'll be like they're comics, right,
Speaker 1: are there? Aren't they supposed to be an elevated ideal
Speaker 1: of human physiques that aren't supposed to be real. Of course,
Speaker 1: that's what comics have always been. That's the appeal of them.
Speaker 1: It's the idealized human form for both men and women.
Speaker 1: You know, that's why people kind of like them and
Speaker 1: have always been attracted to them. But I think feminists
Speaker 1: just thought, hey, if we kind of cover up these
Speaker 1: characters a little bit more, stop having this sort of
Speaker 1: oppressive idea that men mostly rescue women and women want
Speaker 1: to be rescued by men. Let's let's show some women
Speaker 1: rescuing men every now and then, and and things like that.
Speaker 1: Let's cover up skin. And they did this really strange
Speaker 1: thing where they started to decide that super Heroine's breasts
Speaker 1: were too big, and they started to shrink them and
Speaker 1: cover them up and change female anatomy into these really
Speaker 1: strange you have to actually see what they've done with
Speaker 1: characters like Captain Marvel characters like she Hulk. It is
Speaker 1: very very very peculiar, very strange Ethan Van Skiver. He
Speaker 1: is the owner of All Caps Comics and the YouTube
Speaker 1: channel Comic artist pro See. So you get you get
Speaker 1: the woke mob coming after you because you're a Republican
Speaker 1: and who work in the comics industry, just like this
Speaker 1: has happened to people who are actors at people who
Speaker 1: are athletes. If you don't tew the woke line, you know,
Speaker 1: somehow it never goes in the other direction, where if
Speaker 1: you're super left wing and progressive, all of a sudden
Speaker 1: a bunch of right wingers demand that you no longer
Speaker 1: can work in an industry. You're you're not allowed to
Speaker 1: pursue your life passion anymore. We all know that's just
Speaker 1: there's a huge double standard here. But then, what do
Speaker 1: you decide to do because I like the story that
Speaker 1: you have to tell here anything because you created We
Speaker 1: often talk as conservatives about making our own social media
Speaker 1: platforms and making our own look. I want conservative leaning
Speaker 1: movie studios, I want conservative leaning, more conservative leaning news
Speaker 1: channels and things like that. You did something with comics,
Speaker 1: tell us what you did. Yeah, we have to do that.
Speaker 1: We have to make our own spaces. So I realized
Speaker 1: early on that one of the big problems that comics
Speaker 1: lacks is a promote ocean, a marketing device. So I
Speaker 1: went on YouTube and I just started talking about comics.
Speaker 1: Build up a crowd of about one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: thousand subscribers, and that was my promotional vehicle. From there,
Speaker 1: I used indie goog, which is a great crowdfunding platform,
Speaker 1: to raise money to make my own comic books, and
Speaker 1: we have raised I think to date nearly four million
Speaker 1: dollars that we have used to put out comics. My
Speaker 1: book is called cyber Frog. It's been a tremendous success,
Speaker 1: and I've started to pull in other blacklisted conservative comic
Speaker 1: book creators to publish them within my company. It's been great,
Speaker 1: it really is great. But we're still, of course, we're
Speaker 1: still being targeted by leftists or hoping to stop all
Speaker 1: all caps comics from succeeding. And this is are you
Speaker 1: targeted by some of the same groups, you know, these
Speaker 1: sleeping giants and or is there a specific you know,
Speaker 1: comic book mob that comes after people. Yeah, yes, they're
Speaker 1: they're calling what this whole conflict is between the left
Speaker 1: and then you know, the right in comics, it's called
Speaker 1: comics Gate because they want to sort of remind people
Speaker 1: of Game or Gate. We adopted that. We just said, yes,
Speaker 1: we're comics Gate. That's right. We are the gate to
Speaker 1: better comics in the future. Sure, that's who we are.
Speaker 1: They've of course they're targeting us. They're saying we harass
Speaker 1: women and trans and they're using their typical leftist playbook
Speaker 1: to kind of smear and slime us and the hopes
Speaker 1: that you know, cyber Frog or any of the books
Speaker 1: that we put out and never become movies or video games.
Speaker 1: But the thing is they can't really stop us because
Speaker 1: we have built our own platform, we do have our
Speaker 1: own audience, and there's no way that they can really
Speaker 1: gate keep that. They can't really prevent us from selling
Speaker 1: and marketing to each other. So it's I don't think
Speaker 1: it's ever going to end, unfortunately, but we do need
Speaker 1: more people to actually, you know, are up video game companies,
Speaker 1: uh that keep social justice warriors out, um, you know,
Speaker 1: more movies, more television, more different platforms that are immune
Speaker 1: to this kind of uh, this kind of stuff. Ethan
Speaker 1: van Sky for everybody owner of All Caps Comics Ethan.
Speaker 1: If people want to check out your your work and
Speaker 1: and you know the Frog, tell some of the comic
Speaker 1: book titles. You gotta tell us where they can go.
Speaker 1: Oh oh, you can go on Indie Go Go. You
Speaker 1: can go on Google and just look for cyber Frog.
Speaker 1: You can look for Rainbow, the Brute, Snowman, Uh, Creed,
Speaker 1: star Blades, and we have some of the coolest titles.
Speaker 1: I think you're gonna be very very excited. Are we
Speaker 1: keep our standards very very high? Uh? And I think
Speaker 1: we're Uh. I think people are gonna be pretty pleased
Speaker 1: with our product. Ethan van Sky for everybody, Ethan, thank
Speaker 1: you so much, man, Good luck to you. Thanks Buck.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call. Well. I am excited that
Speaker 1: the weekend is upon us, my friends. I plan to
Speaker 1: curl up in a ball and just you know, just relax,
Speaker 1: watch a movie. The snow Princess has never seen Brave Hearts.
Speaker 1: I think I'm gonna watch it with her, which might
Speaker 1: be the hundredth time I've seen that movie, but I
Speaker 1: don't care. It's amazing every time. But yeah, it's it's
Speaker 1: good things. Brucer mark any anything on the docket for you,
Speaker 1: My man, There are there any sports events. I saw
Speaker 1: Lebron James lost, which a lot of conservatives are happy about.
Speaker 1: You know, Lebron takes the l Yes, I was surprised
Speaker 1: that that too. Usually whoever has the best player wins
Speaker 1: in the NBA. M So it looks like the Nets
Speaker 1: will win the championship. Congratulations to the Brooklyn Nets and
Speaker 1: winning a championship. Really, yeah, the Nets are that good.
Speaker 1: I was on a work three of the top players
Speaker 1: on Earth, Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving, and James I'll play
Speaker 1: on the same team. Oh yeah, that sounds like a
Speaker 1: very good team of basketball players. Yes, they are quite good.
Speaker 1: It's hard to be bad with that level of talent. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm in New York could use a little bit of
Speaker 1: a of a boost right now. You know, it's it's
Speaker 1: going through a tough time. You know what The thing
Speaker 1: is with the Nets, though, nobody in New York cares
Speaker 1: what the national basketball scene cares about the Nets because
Speaker 1: they're a super team in New York. It's a Knickstown.
Speaker 1: Nobody cares. That's so strange, isn't I Mean, how could
Speaker 1: you have the best team in Brooklyn, best team possibly
Speaker 1: in the country therefore in the world, and the locals
Speaker 1: don't care. Because in New York the difference of like me,
Speaker 1: Mets A Yankees are good, everyone cares, Giants are Jets
Speaker 1: are good, everyone cares. But with basketball and hockey, if
Speaker 1: the Knicks and the Rangers are good, the city buzzes.
Speaker 1: If anyone else, any of the other teams are good,
Speaker 1: nobody cares. Well. Yeah, aren't the Islanders though not play
Speaker 1: They don't play in New York City, right, They play
Speaker 1: on Long Island? Right, so that makes sense? Yeah? Sure,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm sure Long Island gets excited. Long Island's
Speaker 1: very excited right now there are on a playoff run. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there you go. Well, anyway, so I producer Mark's going
Speaker 1: to enjoy his weekend, which makes everybody very happy. He'll
Speaker 1: be a happy producer Mark on Monday. So that's going
Speaker 1: to make it for a better show. Let's get to
Speaker 1: some of your thoughts here, folks. Dennis first up here, Buck,
Speaker 1: congrats on the new Time slot. I always felt that
Speaker 1: with the content you put together, along with the definitive
Speaker 1: way you deliver it, mixed with just the right amount
Speaker 1: of humor, is by far the best to take Russia's spot,
Speaker 1: but must admit the selfish part of me was hesitant
Speaker 1: to want that and risk losing the podcast, and I'm
Speaker 1: addicted to Our country will be better off with you
Speaker 1: in that time slot. Thank you and Mark for the
Speaker 1: great work you do. Dennis, thank you. Let me just
Speaker 1: say that the podcast is going to continue. Those of
Speaker 1: you who are podcast listeners, the Buck Sexton Show does
Speaker 1: not stop. The radio show is changing. So if you're
Speaker 1: a radio listener, you can listen to me twelve to
Speaker 1: three on whatever station you're listening to be on right now.
Speaker 1: You can listen to me on that station twelve to
Speaker 1: three starting June twenty first with Clay Travis, the Clay
Speaker 1: Travis and Buck Sexton's Show. I think we're about to
Speaker 1: start calling at CNB or something like that. And the podcast, though,
Speaker 1: will continue daily as is, just be me doing exactly
Speaker 1: well what you're used to now, that's the plan. The
Speaker 1: podcast will continue. It won't be quite as long. It'll
Speaker 1: probably be about forty five minutes instead of what is
Speaker 1: current producer Mark, how long is our podcast currently? One
Speaker 1: forty five? Yeah around there, Yeah, so it'll be about
Speaker 1: half the length, but you'll get you know, the big
Speaker 1: news of the day and all that stuff, so the
Speaker 1: podcast will still be there for you. There we have it, Anthony, Hey,
Speaker 1: bucking producer Mark. I started listening to you on CBM
Speaker 1: a WCBM over here in Baltimore, and I gotta say
Speaker 1: that I was miffed you've just taken over the spot
Speaker 1: of he who sounds like an angry duck according to
Speaker 1: my wife. Then I started listening to you and realized
Speaker 1: that I only needed to listen to you and Rush.
Speaker 1: You and producer Mark are the great ones. I knew
Speaker 1: you'd be taking over Rush's time slot eventually got as
Speaker 1: great things in store for you if you continue to
Speaker 1: follow his will. By faith, I believe that part of
Speaker 1: God's will is you releasing part two of your Siege
Speaker 1: of Malta podcast before you move on to bigger and
Speaker 1: better things. Seriously, Anthony, it's happening. Siege of Malta will
Speaker 1: happen before the big show. I can assure you of that,
Speaker 1: and thank you for giving me a shot. I know
Speaker 1: that you know I replace somebody else over at WCBM
Speaker 1: a while ago in that time slot, and let's just
Speaker 1: say that it displeased that individual, from what I understand,
Speaker 1: greatly but the ratings have been very strong, and I
Speaker 1: appreciate the folks who actually listened to me were like, Oh,
Speaker 1: I actually like this so black Quark, Yeah, I just
Speaker 1: leave just let's leave it there, all right, Joe Hey
Speaker 1: Buck your producer, Mark, huge congrats on the new show.
Speaker 1: I've been listening and passing the buck nearly every day
Speaker 1: since you first debuted on Omaha's k f AB during Lockdown.
Speaker 1: One of the things that kept me going with the
Speaker 1: thought of you and Mark having post podcast post covid
Speaker 1: rather margaritas in the sidewalk in Manhattan. It's about time
Speaker 1: to celebrate. I say, how about Friday, June eighteen, send
Speaker 1: me your PayPal info. Round one is on me. Sincerely,
Speaker 1: thank you guys for all your great shows. Joel in Nebraska,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Joel, producer, Mark, I do owe you Margaritas
Speaker 1: on the street in New York now that we've reopened.
Speaker 1: So yeah, we're absolutely gonna have to make that happen. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we gotta make that happen. We'll go to a Mexican
Speaker 1: play what's your go to Mexican order at a restaurant? Like,
Speaker 1: what do you order? Depends on what I'm in the
Speaker 1: mood for But I love enchiladas, burritos or maybe a
Speaker 1: nice chimmy chonga. Yeah, stuff like that. Enchiladas get me
Speaker 1: pretty fired dat Yeah, and see this is the part
Speaker 1: of the show where I get hungry too. But yeah,
Speaker 1: enchiladas or you can't go wrong with that one. I
Speaker 1: will say, I like if they if they're soft. I
Speaker 1: like soft tacos. I do not like hard taco shell.
Speaker 1: Hard taco shell hard pass cannot accept yeah, because you
Speaker 1: take one bite and the whole thing falls apart, it breaks,
Speaker 1: you know, like, what is this And I'm stabbing my
Speaker 1: cheeks with this taco that's all cracked soft, smooth, soft taco.
Speaker 1: That's how we like it. Corn tacos, baby soft. That's
Speaker 1: for the bucks there, moy bueno or whatever. And if
Speaker 1: they're not corn, Buck will be very angry in the morning.
Speaker 1: That's correct too, Lee Buck a producer, Mark, congratulations on
Speaker 1: your well earned success and try to listen every day.
Speaker 1: And I'm deeply inspired by your show. I purchased some
Speaker 1: recreational property in northeastern Washington and built a small shed.
Speaker 1: Everyone asked me what it's called, and thanks to you,
Speaker 1: it's now known as the Freedom Hunt. That's greatly It
Speaker 1: makes me very happy to hear that. Fantastic keep up
Speaker 1: the great work. I'm happy you'll be on a much
Speaker 1: larger platform starting June twenty first Shield Time, my brother, Yeah, Lee,
Speaker 1: I think it'll be the largest radio platform, certainly in
Speaker 1: that time slot, in the country. So we're very excited
Speaker 1: about that. Number one. That's a pretty big deal. All right,
Speaker 1: everybody honored to have you with me. Have a great weekend,
Speaker 1: pass the bucks, tell people about the podcast, and then
Speaker 1: let them know it's gonna keep going. Shield Tie