WEBVTT - Impact of COVID-19 on Nursing

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're right here every day bringing you the

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>latest news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and of course Carol that's part of a team of

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts more than a hundred

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and twenty countries and Jason. You can download Bloomberg Business

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, ol Bloomberg dot com. You can

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio every weekday, or watch us on YouTube

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>by searching Bloomberg Global News. Incredible Health is a company

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that connects hospitals with nurses and other healthcare workers. So

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what our next guest has seen through

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and what the future may look like to

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>protect vital healthcare workers. Dr Iman Abusaid is CEO and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>co founder at Incredible Health. She joins us on the

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco. Dr abus Aid, nice to have

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you here with Jason and myself. So tell us a

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what you have seen through the pandemic

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and kind of where we are right now. Yeah, thanks

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Um. So, what we've seen is we

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>did a pretty in depth study of nurses throughout April

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>over fo nurses and we also analyze the data in

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>our database and what we're realizing. What we're seeing is

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that nurses are having a very difficult time with this pandemic,

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and the preexisting issues that already existed in this industry

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>like staffing, shortages, burnout, and stress are continuing to happen.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Um over to only two percent of nurses have said

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that their facility was very prepared to deal with COVID

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and so knowing this businesses as well as you do,

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>both the sort of the the practice and the logistics

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of it, as well as the economics of it. Uh, doctor,

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how did this happen? Was it just

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a matter of unpreparedness? Was it just this the size

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and scope of it? What do you owe it to?

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was both the shock. It was a

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>shock to the health system, it really was. And uh,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when of nurses are saying that they

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have the adequate personal protective equipment to practice safely,

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>you know that's that just shows a lack of preparedness

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and the shock to the system. Now, I know that

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hospital executives are scrambling to fix this UM, but it's

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>still a problem. So you're saying it's still a problem.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's still a problem. So where is the breakdown? I mean,

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you understand this world, and and you know, Jason and

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I've had a lot of conversations trying to understand, you know,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain, and everybody talked about shortages, and we

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>had federal officials saying we're doing everything we you know,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we're getting all the equipment everybody needs, and yet there

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be the case. What happened. Was it

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a case that we needed a federal initiative UM and

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it. Yeah, I mean I think all around,

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it was the hospital industry itself or government, it

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 1>was just a lack of preparedness is quite shocking here.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't just about this is not just about

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>personal protective equipment that's lacking. I mean even the section

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>control protocols that hospitals needed to put into place that

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>we're not clear guidelines coming from the CDC. So each

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hospital had to scramble to put their infection control protocols

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in place. You know, it's interesting, Dr Z. You know,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>we we've also talked a lot to you know, as

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Carol mentioned sort of the heads of hospital systems and

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of how it's going to be for consumers of

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>healthcare and how we may interact with doctors and and whatnot.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>Differently going forward. How's it going to change the nursing business?

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have a you have an MBA from Wharton,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>You've been involved in startups, you worked at McKenzie like,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you understand the business side of this really well. How

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>does the business of nursing change going forward? Okay, so

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>even before the pandemic, there was a massive nursing shortage.

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Our our health system needed another There will be we

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>will be one million nurses shorts by. It is one

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest skilled labor shortages we have in this country.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>This pandemic is expected to make it even worse because

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>our demand for healthcare as a country continues to go up.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't see that changing after the pandemic either.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This is generally a group of workers has underappreciated, overworked,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and there are simply not enough of them. And so

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll need to continue doing whatever we can to increase

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the number of nurses in this country. What does an

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>average nurse? I hate that saying an average nurse, But

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>what does a nurse make today? So the national averages

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>around eighty thousand and ninety thousand dollars for a hospital nurse.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>In states like California, it's a bit higher, like a

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten or a hunder twenty dollars average. So

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>why aren't people going into nursing Um? Number one, it's

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a very tough profession and it's it's a challenging job. Um.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>The second is that nursing schools don't necessarily have the

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>capacity to train more nurses. There are always huge weight

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>lists for entering nursing school and they're still challenging to

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>get in. Also, the training of nurses is not is inadequate.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Even after nursing school, getting appropriately trained in a specific

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>specialty has a lot of limitations because it's very expensive

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to train in nurse. And so you're obviously in the

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>business of technology and using technology to maybe help eliminate

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these bottlenecks. How does it work, how does

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it work going forward? And how can technology help us here. Yeah,

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So in our case for incredible help, we work with

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred hospitals across the country, including top academic

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>medical centers like Stanford and Cedar Sinai. And what we've

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>done is, really we've automated entire processes of hiring and

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>screening using software. So we've automated the screening of the nurses,

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>we've automated the custom matching to specific employers that meet

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>their needs. Um, and the end result is hiring happening

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>in less than thirty days instead of it taking ninety days,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the national average to fill a nurse position today. Wow.

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So how how much of an impact is that? Making

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>only have about forty seconds left here? Yeah, So what

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen, I mean, um, it's in what we've

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>seen in the survey is that for the emergency department

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and intensive care and nurses, it's they're higher getting hired

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>even faster in nineteen days these days because of the pandemic.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And so we see this acceleration continuing to happen and

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>technology and hiring continue to be adopted across health systems

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Really some great insight, Yeah, really good,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>really good, And I think under reported candidly the shortage

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about, great work. We really appreciate it.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Dr Iman I was eight is co founder and CEO

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of Incredible Health, joining us on the phone from San Francisco.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating background she has working at Mackenzie and n b

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>A and has worked for a COASTLA backed startup as well.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting, Like puls together, it comes at it from

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>so many different perspectives, right, so fascinating. You're listening to

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Jason Kelly on

0:06:55.839 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. So, Jason Kelly, don't you remember that bloom

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week cover. I think it was last October.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Everything is private equity right now. I think you had

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>some some involvement in that. I did. I do remember that.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember it quite well. It turns out it was

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>fairly pression and unbelievably powerful and important story in the

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>magazine this week. Heather pearl Berg wrote it. Max Chafkin

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>edited it. He is the features editor, of course of

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Here to tell us all about it.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>On the phone from Queen's mc hammer. What's going on,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, how's it going? This is a big story.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>This is it's a long read, um and pretty intense.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what Heather and you guys found when it

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to private equity and the medical business. So as

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you said, you know, pe private equity has you know,

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of been all over our economy. And of course,

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare industry is you know, one of the biggest

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or maybe the biggest um industry in the US, and

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so so probably woudn't surprise you that private equity investors

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are are in there. Um. What Heather did is she

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>looked at a specific field, dermatology. Um. It's it's it's

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely not the only field where there's a lot of

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>activity here, but it's one where where it's sort of everywhere. Uh.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Some people think as many as ten percent of the

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>dermatologists in America work for a private equity firm or

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>work for a company that's backed by a private equity firm.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting, you know, kind of when you get

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>into it, you start to see some of the ways

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that our healthcare system um isn't working particularly well. And

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, one thing, one of the stories we've seen

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and Heather gets into this in the in the piece,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but one of the stories we've we've seen with the

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus is you have these e R doctors who are

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>being UM either laid off or furloughed at a time

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>when everybody in America is focused on healthcare. You know,

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you think watching the news that this would be a

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>great time to be in healthcare. But it's it's it's

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of course a terrible time. And it's because of the

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>way these companies are structured. They are you know, they're

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>stretching away where they need past that and growing really fast.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them are very leverage. And when you

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>start not having um electric procedures, when when demand for

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the services goes down, that that's when things start to

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>break down. And and and there are some of these

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM stories that really seemed pretty terrible. Well,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting. So you know these dermatologists, right, dermatology practices,

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were not deemed essential correct through the shutdown. Yeah, no,

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's all very much gray area and and stayed

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in local laws. They're all they're all sorts of differences. Um.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But but the lead anecdote in the story, which is

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>very memorable, is of one of the bigger chains in

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the country. It's it's a large dermatology chain in current California,

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>which you know, right at the height of the crisis,

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.719
<v Speaker 1>was basically calling people up and telling them to keep

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>their botox appointments, among other things. And and UM. Heather

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>listened in on a sort of assume conference that was

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>held for the industry, where where the CEO of the

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>company UM sort of explained himself saying, at you know,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this is just like a grocery store where if they're

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>selling flour and meat, it's not like they're gonna stop

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>selling candy. And so the analogy would be, like, you know,

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>operating botox is like UM selling candy. And you know

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>that obviously makes sense maybe from a business point of view,

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's these these companies definitely need to keep revenue

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.479
<v Speaker 1>if they want to survive. But but of course, many doctors,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and this is a conversation that's going on everywhere I

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can talk to doctors feel very uncomfortable with this. They

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like they are being asked between sort of profits

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and UM traditional medical ethics. Well, and I think that's

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>a really important point Max that Heather dives into pretty

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>deeply into the story, which is, you know, there are

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>some workarounds, and private equity is about nothing if not

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>work arounds in terms of able to being able to

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>structure deals in certain ways. Mean, this is a business,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the health care business that the American Medical Association, I

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>believe essentially says, listen, this isn't just your regularly your

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>regular old sort of like P and L that you're

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>managing here. And yet they sort of found a way

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>through these uh managed companies to to basically buy these

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>things up. And they're only sort of getting bigger, right Yeah,

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they're they're only getting bigger, and and they probably continue

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to get bigger because because the economy is so bad

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>right now and these practices are are failing um or

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>close to failure, and you know, big private equity firm

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>comes in with a lot of money. You know that's

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>going to look perhaps more attractive than it did before.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we should say, and it's it's probably an

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>important point that they're not everything about this industry is bad.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are, and what they what they'll say

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>when you talk to them, is that they are expanding

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>access for people. You know, one one upside of growth

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>is that is that you know, these practices are fanning out.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's potentially you know, more convenient for patients. Um. Also,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people have talked about how

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>how hard it is to be a doctor in America,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, helping these doctors get paid a

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more money. You know that all sounds like

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. The problem is when you get these

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>um sort of private equity roll ups where they're they've

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>already cut a lot of costs and then all of

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a sudden they try to do like another roll up,

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking two uh two sort of large groups

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of merging them together, and you basically, you know, according

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to the sources, to talk to lots and lots of doctors.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's where you start running into problems. Well,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and I love there's a quote and they're about serving

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>two masters. You can't serve patients and investors. So it

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>gets a little tricky and complicated. It's a great read,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and as Jason mentioned, there's a lot of information here,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>so highly recommend everybody check it out in the magazine.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Max Chafkin, features editor at Business Week, joining us on

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the phones from Queens, New York. Thanks Max, you're listening

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Jason Kelly

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. All right, so let's get back to

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the world of economics. It's where we started the show

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at the top of two, with the FED releasing the

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes from its latest meeting, and those are must reads

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point as we try and discern what happens next,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to monetary policy in this crisis.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's break it down with our team, Alex Harris Pond.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>They are the Long Island Ladies, the Long Island Ladies, Guys,

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Queens Queen, the Queen's Queens, the Long Island Queens Queen.

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna do that. Alex Harris Fond, reporter

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg. She's on the phone from my island City, Queens,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Lanish electrovic and yours economist, Bloomberg Economic. She's on the

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>same island, the Island of Long So, Elena, I want

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>to start with you. What what you here? What do

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you see in those minutes today? What's the most important

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thing we need to take away? It's it's pretty close

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>actually in terms of geography. But yeah, for the for

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the minute, two things really struck me. So first is

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the economy and how much policymakers

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about the medium outlook. So this struck us

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>when the statement was released already three weeks ago. But

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the minutes provide a lot of detail about policymakers concerns

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about long term unemployment. So if people lose jobs and

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>stay away from work for quite a long time, they

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>will lose skills. So they already are talking about this

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in the minutes and about how much uncertainty there is.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>UH they're about future economic outlook, So that's one thing,

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and another thing is um UH what the policy tools discussion.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So policymakers obviously reiterated the message that we heard from

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>them in recent public remarks. The minutes noted that they

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are committed to using its full range of tools to

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>support economic growth. So that includes que policies, that includes

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>lending programs, and they and ready to adjust UH and

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>adapt those existing facilities to better tailor them to business needs.

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So what was really interesting in this set of minutes

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is how they would like to reinforce forward guidance. This

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is a very powerful tool that said UH used in

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the past. They used it extensively during the financial crisis,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and they would like to either introduce some sort of

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>outcome based approach when they tie uh, the path for

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>policy rates to some sort of macroeconomic variables such as

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate, and or they can do date based

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>approach when they just say, okay, we're gonna keep the

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>rates slow until some future date in time. So they

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>used both approaches back in the financial crisis. You know,

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>some of them were quite successful, some of them were

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>probably not. Uh So it's not very clear that you know,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>these are the ideal tools, but there's a lot of

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>discussion among policymakers about how to reinforce the message, so

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to say, open mouth operations from the fifth Alright, so

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Alex Harris. And I'm curious if you're

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>more interested in the FED or that twenty year bond auction.

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems like inventors are very happy to

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>buy up anything that the US government puts out there,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's twenty years or thirty years. Uh, you know,

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>real quick on the twenty year if you know, obviously

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the first twenty year auction we've seen in

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty four years, so it's hard to draw any sort

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of comparison. But you know, when the Treasury was debating

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about you know, fifty or a hundred year bond, and

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, dealers and other people in the community, in

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the financial community kept saying, no, no, twenty year. You

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>know this this is a good time that you're going

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to get that interest from the pension them, from the

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>life insurers. Um. In terms of the minutes, you know,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>some of it is you know, Elena mentioned uh policy,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's full range of policy tools. But I

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>think we need to just quickly mentioned what they did

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not talk about was negative interest rates. So I'm hoping,

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people in the financial

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>space are hoping that this puts the negative rates discussion

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to bed. You know, FED funds futures implied rates were

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>back in positive territories. So I think people are like, okay,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>debts over so. So the fact that there was no

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>mention of it, you know, I think it was key.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was also a brief mention of yield

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>curve control, which is where they would cap rates at

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some point on the curve at a certain level. Um.

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, and and someone had sent me some commentary

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this could be a way the FED

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>could be seen as sort of expanding committing to an

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>unlimited expansion of its portfolio. Um, you know if they

0:17:58.200 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if they do end up going that route and I

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>don't they put that that to bed yet. So so

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>there's something to it there and something to be mindful of.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>We listened to you know, members of the f MC

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>come out and speak, you know. And then the other

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is at least for the friend and those those

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>funding market wants. Um. You know, the SILMA manager Lowly Logan,

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>laid out the rationale for why they didn't feel the

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>need to move that interest in excess reserves rate higher,

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and participants were sort of split during the last meeting,

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, as to whether or not they were going

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and it seems like, um, they're like, yeah,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't, we don't feel a need to. We're okay here.

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, one of the things if I could

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>ask them anything right now in relations in regards to

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that age, okay, well, if you don't feel like you do,

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like the bottom of the range is pretty well protected.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>And why did you make them move higher? You know,

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>why did you make the tweek in January? Because something

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was not necessarily adding up for me and I would

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>be curious to know more about you know, why January

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>warranted such a move right now with rates of the

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>zero lower bounded doesn't All right, guys, listen, Thank you

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so much. Really appreciate you weighing in on some of

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the day's news, including those Fed minutes. Yolanda Slet. You

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>have a senior US economist at Bloomberg Economics on the

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>phone from Long Island, New York, along with Alex Harris

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>also weighing in on that twenty year bond auction. Bond

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News from Long Island City, Queens. You're

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Jason

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. So, Jason, it was pretty hard

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to find an investment haven, as we know, as the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>financial markets were selling off right initially because of the virus.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And yet Emily Chason writes and our weekly Bloomberg Green

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Segment that while not many s G fund managers their

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>mission was necessarily to protect investors from a global pandemic,

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it turns out maybe a lot of their funds did.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into it. In our Bloomberg Green Segment,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Emily is sustainability editor at Bloomberg New She joins us

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone in New York. So, Emily,

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit of about this story this week.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>We we often talk about E s G funds and

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>their mission, and I feel like over the last decade

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>or so, we know that you can kind of have

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>an E s G mission and also get performance. But

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you found out that even during this

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>market downturn caused by the virus, that some of these

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>E s G funds actually outperformed maybe some other investments. Yeah. Well,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's interesting because E s G portfolio managers for years,

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>if you talked to them, they say, you know, there

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was a market downturn in that quarter, and we actually

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>outperformed in it. So they've actually sort of bet on

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>resilient companies even though they were kind of planning for

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a climate crisis or finding, you know, managers they thought

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>were good and adaptable, using E s G sports as

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>a proxerty for that. They turned out that they had

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>also sort of bet for this global pandemic. So when

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at UM portfolios and indexes overall. Black Rocks

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>did a really interesting study this week where it found

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that UM in the COVID nineteen crisis, E s G

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>indexes outperformed. And if you look like eighteen when there

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>were market downturns, like of E s G in bexes

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that performed. So there seems to be a pattern here, right,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet Emily, you know there's not a lot of

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>available inventory out there for the regular old four oh

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>one K investor to really get into these investments. Why, well,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this is what you've sort of damaged it. This week

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in our screen newsletter was why the d S funds

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that are providing this downside protection are missing from your

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>four oh one k fund? And it's a little complicated. Um,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg does have an E s G fund in it's

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>four one k, but very few companies have done it

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're worried that they're compromising returns for that. But

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>now now that's not really the case anymore. If you

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, how this performed. And this is

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the first big test for a lot of the S

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>funds that only about a s G funds actually have

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a five year track record UM that are large G

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>s G funds, So UM, this is the first big test,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>and they seem to be providing some sort of economic benefits.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are going to wonder why they're

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>not in there for own plans. It's a great question, right,

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>But wasn't I felt like for a time, you know,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>especially when E s G funds were kind of newer

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on the on the environment or the investment um you know, landscape,

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't always perform as well. But we've seen

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>things change, especially as more companies, you know, your big companies,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>your sp companies have really kind of embraced E s

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>G ways. Yeah, there's kind of been a transition from

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>socially responsible investing of the days of yore that it

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of finding companies that they didn't think

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we're bad and taking them out of the portfolio, like

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tobacco or hall weapons. Right. But now E s G

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>is much more focused on risk management, which is a

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>good downside protection strategy, and then also they're more focused

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on using all this information in those new e SC

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>data to find opportunities. So a lot of U s

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>G funds are much more heavily exposed to tech and huscare,

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>which has actually outperformed in this latest crisis, and they're

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>under exposed to fassis fuel which you know, we thought

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>oil go to zero, so that was a good move.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And Emily, we're always fascinated between you know, some of

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the connective tissue in terms of what types of investors

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are drawn to these types of investments. Uh, Millennials were

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>always concerned about them. You know, I have a millennial

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>co host and Carol, and you know I worry about

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>her um, you know, not being exposed as much too

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for one case. You know, these are the things I

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>worry about. But in all seriousness, like, millennials not so

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>much into retirement savings historically, right, Yeah, I'm I'm practically

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a millennial, but they millennials are you really are a millennial.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>You're an actual millennial. But so millennials, a lot of

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>them graduated and like into the recession of two thousand

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and eight, a lot of them are you know, under

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>invested in their form. Okay, I haven't had a lot

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of money to say, have a lot of debt, you know, so,

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>but millennials who do have money, a huge portion of

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it is what's actually in their forum. Okay, that's a

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>huge portion of their household investible income are really excited

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about e s G. They would really like to invest

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in it UM, but they don't have that option in

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the Forum one K, which is the biggest pool of

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>assets that's available to them for investment in this way. Emily,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder if you wonder about this as well,

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that because you know of what we're going through right now,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this health pandemic, and we're talking a lot about some

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of the big problems that are facing the global society,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's climate change or whether it's future pandemics, whether

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>more in more companies kind of embrace E s G

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>ways and they become you know that there will be

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>more offerings for E s G funds. I wonder if

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see that kind of on the other

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>side of this virus. Just got about forty five seconds here. Yeah,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>there's been a ton of inflows actually into E s

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>G funds, so I wouldn't be surprised that at all.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.479
<v Speaker 1>And there's been a ton of news coverage, a lot

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of interest in the space. All Right, we're gonna leave

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>it there. Thank you so much. Good to catch up

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with you. Emily Chasen, Sustainability at editor at Bloomberg, part

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Green Team, The Bloomberg Green Team. UH timely

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>launch of that earlier this year, because I do think

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>we are to your point here, We're thinking about this

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>much more holistically. We're thinking about our world as you

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like to say, um in all in all facets in

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>many ways, right, and just some of the big problems.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And you do wonder you know we we just talked

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about was it the bite yesterday about Unlearn A bunch

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of other companies that are saying, come on, we've got

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>to work together public private partnerships to tackle some of

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>these inequalities that are in our world. Check out all

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of their work at Bloomberg dot com, slash Green Broom

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a journal. Yeah but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>no please, I want to drive all Just drive baby,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the questions drying job. This is the drive to the globe.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Give me thanks, we'll drying us on Bloomberg Radio. It

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>is time for the drive to the close back with

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>us as Joanna Barton, she is co director of Growth

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Equities at Eaton Vance, and she joins us on the

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>phone from Boston, and I'm nice to have you here

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. How's it going. It's going well, it's there's

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.239
<v Speaker 1>some sun outside. I'm seeing a lot more green on

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>my screen. Life is good. Life is good. You know.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you something because one of the

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>big stories that Jason I've been talking about and then

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into because we love to be able to

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>talk stocks with you, but we're hearing a lot of

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>financial firms, UM, whether it's JP Morgan and other city

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>group you know, thinking about moving a lot of folks

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>out to the suburbs. And I'm just curious what's the

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>talk in Boston about. Because of the virus UM and

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>nervousness about commuting to big cities, you know that companies

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>are rethinking where their offices are, and I'm just curious

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're hearing about, UH in Boston and particularly maybe

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>among the financial sector. Well, a majority of our employees

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>are obviously working from home right now. There isn't any

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>talk of having alternative location outside of Boston right now.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think UM, many of those conversations I've certainly

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>taken place, and perhaps the answer is UM, not one

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>or the other, but maybe a hybrid of UM or

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe a sort of a three case scenario where you

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>still have headquarters that are central for your investors, for

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your clients corporate access, but also have the flexibility of

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>working from home and having alternative sort of satellite offices. So, um,

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I think many of these options are on the table

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure being discussed as to speak and Jana,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as an investor, as you look at companies, many of

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>which I think you're invested in and they sort of

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>work through this, does it change like do you have

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to model differently? I mean, or is it just sort

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of one of the sort of softer factors that you

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>work in. I mean, I do wonder how we think

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>about because you guys do I'm sure sort of intensive

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>work on all of your portfolio, Like do you think

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>about companies differently in terms of, you know, how aggressive

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they are on this, what their cost structures end up being,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.239
<v Speaker 1>How radical does it need to be in for it

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to enter into your analysis here. Oh, that's a great question.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I think depending on the industry, the real estate cost

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is a different input, um. So for retailers obviously it's

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a very different input than for someone um like an

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Amazon or Google. Right, So I think it's more of

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a question of the overall cost structure and firms that

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>do have the flexibility and variable cost structure because of

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the model of their own business and that agility that's

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a long term tail wind. So the more flexibility you

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>have in your model, um better it is for you.

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's part of the reason why the

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>profitability stream of companies within tech and perhaps the next

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>gen secular winners is so much more attractive because the

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of embedded costs a less of an overhang on them.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of where we are in

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the markets? And I'm just curious what what if any

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>buying have you been either suggesting or looking at right now,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>especially since you know we're you know, seeing a little

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rally again, uh this week. But it

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>depends on the week, you know, in terms of the

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>tone of the market. So where do you think we are?

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious about anything you might have been buying

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>into right now. It's interesting because I was looking at

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>my notes. The last time you and I spoke was

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the midst of the most severe drawdown

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that we saw in the marketplace, and we were doing

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton of buying then, which felt very uncomfortable, and

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember we had a lot of conversations about that.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But the reason why I bring that up is because

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this unevenness that we're seeing both in terms of reopening

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for business and different states doing their own thing. That's

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing we're seeing in the marketplace. So while

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on the surface you see the market, albeit it's still

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>down here today, the average company is underperforming a cap

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>weighted index almost two times. As I look at the

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>market here, not inclusive of the rally we had today,

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we have SMB down just shy of nine percent, but

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the average stock is down seventeen percent. And more importantly,

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at specific sectors like consumer discretion and

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got one outlier, which is Amazon, up over thirty percent,

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>without which that sector would be down four Again, the

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>reason why I'm providing this context is on the surface

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that looks like there's a lot of green, but not

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>everything has recovered to the extent that we might believe

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it has. So like specialty retail, area of the market

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that was bruised during the downturn is still recovering. So

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that's an area where we're interested in an unnimbling here

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and there um and help Gere's also an area that

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>has been in the headlines where biotech and farma has

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>done really well, but other companies like met Devices and

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>life sciences have been left behind. So that's also an

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>area where we're sort of playing the laggards. And so

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you look for in this specialty retailer at

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this point, Yanna, because I feel like we are starting

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to see some very distinct winners and losers, or we

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>were before the pandemic set in. And I wonder how that,

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how this experience or sort of looking at who's done

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what and how everybody has handled this changes your opinion

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>or do you look at different things? How does the

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic change that calculus? Well, um, apologies for my dog

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there by the way, Um, I've had my two year

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>old daughter scream on air, so that don't know. Apologies,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's good, it's good. I think home improvement is an

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>area that's obviously topical because we had reports today of

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>lows and yesterday of home depot and all of us

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is stuck at home. I don't know about you, but

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a ton of nesting. So when you see

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the results from loads that are coming in where you're

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not only seeing positive comps, but double digit comps that

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they haven't seen since I think back in two thousand seven,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some durability to that. Right, So there's

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some company specific things that they're doing in terms of

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>their constructor and margin improvements, but also sort of do

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it yourself is um. You know, buyers coming back and

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a lot more buying for outdoor spaces and such.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So UM again, home Deepot versus Lows we have a

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>position and Lows because it's less expensive than home Depot

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and has lagged Home Deeper year to do. UM. So

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a company specific story. We're also intrigued by the

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>off price retailers as well. UM. Again, all of those

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>stores are closed. UM. I'm certainly waiting for the opening.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you how much, but that story is

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not going away. And if anything, I think those guys

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>will have the upper hand in terms of the inventory

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that will be stuck in the chee in US and

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>will wait to be moved. So tjs of the world

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and others I think will be just fine because they

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have the liquidity, the scale, and the infrastructure. So there

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are just two examples of what is intriguing to us.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But they'll be doing it differently, right, They're going to

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be with social distancing and so on. Right,

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I assume it's going to be a little trickier going back. Absolutely,

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the point that you're bringing up is an

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>important one, which is we really need to focus on

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>multi channel, right retailer meaning you know, and maybe have

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>showcase and demonstrated the strength you can have from having

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the digital presence. So ordering online is picking up at

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a curbside pick and whatever it is. So yeah, we

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta run, but you're absolutely right, the multi channel is

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be important. Thanks so much for listening to

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, south Cloud,

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Blueberg dot com, or wherever you get your podcasts, And

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of course you can always listen to our radio show

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Eastern Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News