WEBVTT - Best NFL Week 6 Bets + Favorite Props (Ep. 17)

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everyone, and welcome back to the Betting Pros

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL podcast, brought to you by bet MGM. I'm your host,

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris. You can find me on Twitter at Dan

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Harris Adi. It is time to break down some of

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>our favorite and our least favorite bets for the Week

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>six NFL slate. With me to talk about it all

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is Jared Smola, a senior editor over at Draft Sharks

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can find him on Twitter at smola

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>ds now. Jared is the nineteenth most accurate sports better

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>over at Bettingpros dot com, and that is out of

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty eight experts. Guys, he is no

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>joke now. Full disclosure, I'm thirty first, So if you

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sense a little bad blood on the show, it's because

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't particularly like people who are purportedly better at

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>things than I am. Nevertheless, Jared and I have agreed

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to bury the hatchet for the next forty or forty

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or so and to try to offer some

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>solid betting advice for Week six. Jared, thanks a lot

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the show. How's it going?

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me on. It's going good. We're only

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>five weeks into the season. So there's still plenty of

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>time for me to fall down those rankings.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I haven't been following your rankings closely obviously, but

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have you like just been up there from the entire beginning.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a couple of good weeks, a couple

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of bad weeks or what.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I actually had a really good week last week. I

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>think that boosts me up like twenty or so spots.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the last couple of weeks have been really, really,

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really difficult. So I mean for you to come out

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead there is good. So full disclosure, you and I

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>need to write the ship here, okay, because we had

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a raging hot week on this show for the first

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, but we have slowly sunk into mediocrity.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Last week, I missed on both the over in the

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Broncos Chargers game and the under in the Cowboys Packers game.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just gonna lay this out there. I believe

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I went over on every single over under that I

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>picked last week and on bettingbros dot Com. And that's

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>funny because I actually had rarely missed them at any

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>point before last week. I just did not have a

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>good sense for the amount of points that We're going

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to be scored in Week five, Jared, But thankfully I

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>told everyone to bet their mortgage on Minnesota Lane five

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants, and a late garbage time DeAndre Hopkins

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>catch won me the over under eighty six and a

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>half yard prop bet, which means I do not have

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this entire show with a British accent like

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I had agreed to do had I lost our guest

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Smith had a rougher week, so Jared, you've got

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to get us back on track. It is a big task.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling pretty good about this slate, so let's do

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>it all right.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>As always, we're gonna get started with Pick six, where

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>both Jared and I are going to give three of

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>our favorite bets for this weekend, either against the spread

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>or on the over under. And as always, I'm going

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to note that we're recording this shortly before the Thursday

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>night game between the Patriots and the Giants, so we

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>are not going to be making any picks on that game.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But I have to be honest, I think the Pats

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna pull it out, so it's just one of

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>those gut feelings I've got tonight. So Let's hope that

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, and if not, you'll know that I was

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 1>wrong on that one. Anyway, if you want to see

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>how I or Jared pick that game, you can go

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to betting pros dot com. That's gonna show you how

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>basically every betting expert who makes picks on the site

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>made their picks for that and every other game. We're

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>also going to be using the bettingpros dot com consensus

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>odds in making our picks. Those are the aggregate odds

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna find available in the market. All right, Jared,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>start us off. What's your first pick here?

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going Falcons Cardinals over fifty one, and you know,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>really they they couldn't have made this over under high

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>enough for me.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna hit the over no matter what.

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So when looking at over unders, obviously you're gonna look

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>at the quality of the offenses and the defenses in

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the game, but that stuff is baked into the numbers set, you.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Know, by Vegas.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>So the stuff I like to look at for over

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>unders is the offensive pace of the two teams, you know,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 2>how fast they play, and also the passing rates, because

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>first of all, we know passing is more efficient leads

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to more points. It also helps too, because if you

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>throw the ball, you're either gonna gain yards or if

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 2>it's incomplete, it's gonna stop the clock. So when you're

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at, you know, games to bet over, I think

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to bet fast paced teams that throw the

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>ball a lot. And that describes the Falcons and Cardinals perfectly.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>These teams both rate rank top six in seconds per snap.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>They're both top five Football Outsider situation neutral pass rate. Sorry,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>they're both top five in situation neutral pace, and they're

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>both top ten in situation neutral pass rate. So I

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 2>think you're gonna get a lot of snaps, a lot

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>of passing, and a lot of points in this game.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So a couple things here. First of all, how we

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>do the podcast is I tell the guests to forward

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>me their bets shortly before the show to make sure

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that I do not pick the same ones, just because

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I as much as I could say, well

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll do a draw, you pick one, I pick one,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, let the guests pick whatever they want. This

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly would have been one of my picks. I just

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>want to put that out there. I think it's a

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>great bet, and I you know, first of all, everybody

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty much is on board. When you look at the

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>betting pros dot com break down, sixty six percent are

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>on the over. But I believe I can't be sure.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I look the lines when they first open. I mean,

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this opened at like forty seven or forty

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>eight or something there, so it has moved dramatically up.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So you would have loved it. I'm sure if you

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten in there. From everyone I've talked to,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>all the money is coming in here on the over,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>so I agree. I think I think it's a great bet.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the Falcons are also desperate for

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>a win. I think they're gonna pull out all the stops.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>They just don't have the talent on defense right now

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>once Can O'Neil went out. They always have the injuries,

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course we know especially I think this is

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the last game without Patrick Peterson for the Cardinals. I

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>think he had a six game suspension. So I agree.

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a shoot out, and I

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>love the bet. I'm a little annoyed that you stole it,

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna come up with something that's equally as compelling,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and that is the Jaguars and the Saints under forty

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. I'm kidding, that's not in any

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>way compelling full disclosure. I obviously made my picks a

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier in the day, and when I made this pick,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the line was actually at forty four and a half,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not forty three and a half. So I'm a little

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>less bullish on this now that it's under forty three

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half. But shop around there are still some

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>forty four's on it, and I locked in my pick

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on bettingpros dot Com at forty four. Now, first of all,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for now I'm banking on Jalen Ramsey playing here. It's

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit up in the air, but it kind of

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like things are trending in that direction. And it's

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>not as if I think he's just gonna be able

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to completely shut down Michael Thomas single handedly or anything,

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think that his presence drastically improves that defense.

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And even if he doesn't, I would still take the

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>forty three under forty three and a half because in

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, I think this comes down to two relatively

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>strong defenses against two relatively mediocre offenses. I mean, you

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>look at the Saints last week Bridgewater edited that aired

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it out completely, but that was basically just Sean Payton

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>attacking a glaring weakness in his opponent. The Bucks are

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>strong against the run, they cannot in any way stop

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the pass. That is not the case with the Jaguars.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Bridgewater is gonna go back to what he

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>usually does here with an extraordinarily low average depth of target,

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Jaguars are particularly good at defending receivers after

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the catch on the ground. I know Christian McCaffrey tore

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>up the Jaguars last weekend, but overall they've generally been

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>solid against the run. And I watched that game closely

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because I had a lot of action on the Panthers

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>laying three and a half, but it looked more to

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>me like breakdowns in communication, poor gaptis by the linebackers

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and the safeties. I didn't really see, all of a sudden,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>some glaring weaknesses in their run defense, so I expect

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that to kind of be cleaned up. And of course

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>news broke shortly before we were coming on that. Alvin

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Kamara popped up on the injury report today with an

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury. So that's never good when you see somebody

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>come up. He's purportedly going to be fine, but either way,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a little limited. Now the Jaguars

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>are coming back home here after a few road games.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They're still an exciting team with Garterer Minshew leading the way,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and the crowd's going to be into it, and I

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>expect them to put up a solid defensive performance. And

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they're also getting a lot of money by being a

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>small underdog here with the spread, so I think that

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sharpbetters probably expect them to come ahead, and I think

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that probably means that they expect a low scoring game.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Now on the other side, we know the Saints defense.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>They're excellent against the run. Marshaun Lantimore basically takes out

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>your number one wide receiver. James O'Shaughnessy is out for

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the year with his ACL tear, and he had become

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a reliable option for Minshew. So that's one

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>peg down on the offensive side. This just strikes me

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as a hard hitting, close game that's going to be

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively low scoring, kind of closer to what the Saints

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys put on. So I'm going to roll

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>here with the under forty three and a half.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I love that call. I'll add one thing. I talked

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>about the Falcons and Cardinals both being fast paced teams.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>The Saints and the Jags are both slow paced teams.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>They ranked twenty fifth and twenty ninth in situation. Now

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 2>shrall pay so I think I think you know the

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>play volume is going to be down in this game.

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Already we are completely on the same page as this

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>fantastic I'm gonna love whatever your second pick is. I

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>love it already.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Chiefs minus four versus the Texans at home

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Texans importantly, and the Lion seems to be

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 2>moving against me here this I think this line opened

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>at like five.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 3>And a half.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, no. Just to be clear,

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this opened at eight, at eight eight, because I did

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it on Monday and we looked at it eight and

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it dropped to five almost immediately after that Sunday night,

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it opened at eight and boom, they hit it down

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to five.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, five, eight eight is too much.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'd take Houston plus eight, but I think

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, especially now, and it's down to four, which

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>is a pretty key number. I just think this is

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a recent and see bias.

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Bet.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean we all just saw the Tuxan smash, Atlanta

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>put up that huge offensive performance, and then we all

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>just watched the Chiefs lose at home in prime time

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to the Colts. Prior to last week, though the Chiefs

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>were nine and two in their last eleven home games

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 2>dating back to the start of last season, they outscored

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>their opponents by an average of twelve points per game

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 2>in those home games. So I'm just gonna bet on

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs bouncing back at home. I don't think they're

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 2>going to lose two games in a row, especially at home.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think, you know, minus four, with that offense,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they can cover that four points.

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe this has dropped to minus four. I mean,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a ridiculous drop from the fact that it opened

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>up at minus tate. Now, let me ask you, I

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen anything today. We were talking before this. I've

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>been really busy on the day. Is Hill cleared to play?

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Does he look? I know he was limited in practice.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe yesterday. I didn't see anything about today.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was limited again on Thursday. So as far

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>as we know, you know, he hasn't got that final

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>clearance to play. Sammy Watkins miss practice again on Thursdays.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no way Sammy Watkins is going to play in

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this game after essentially being a zero in the last

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>game out of curiosity. If He'll can't suit up and

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Watkins can set it up, because I'm pretty sure Watkins

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be able to. Does that at all

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>damper your enthusiasm for this bet?

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>It would make me think twice about it. Who knows,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe the line drops to three if that happens. I'm

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>just betting on Patrick Mahomes, Andy Reid and just how

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 2>good the Chiefs have been at home really for a

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>while now, and.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Especially you know, dating back to the start of last season.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Sunday Night was pretty shocking. I think

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the book's probably won a crazy amount given that Indy

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>one outright let alone, you know, covering the betters are

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with you sixty seven percent on betting pros dot com,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the experts are going with you, and you know, we

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have a breakdown between the general betting experts that we

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have and the top twenty percent most accurate, which of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>course Jared is part of as am I and they're

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>with you too, is sixty four percent. So this looks

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>like something that's generally going to be thought of. I agree.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>My one concern, honestly, above the wide receivers is whether

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is fully healthy. I know he hanged up his

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>ankle a little bit again in the last game. But

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with you, man. This is something where

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, before last week, nobody was that excited about

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, right, and they come out and they destroy

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a team that has no defense whatsoever. I mean, the

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are laughable at this point given all their injuries.

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think people got a little too excited about it. Arrowhead,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>despite the Sunday night dud is still one of the

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>toughest places to play. So I'm with you as it's four.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I was a little concerned at five and a half

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>when it was there. Certainly eight I was. I was

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Texans. But once it's down to four now,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>which actually I didn't even see until shortly before because

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>when I checked before it was five, that's a good bet.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm back in you there. I'm gonna stick with

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the over unders, considering I need to get back on

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the train after last week, and I'm going to go

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys and my Jets over forty four. And

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>again this is one where earlier in the day when

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I took the bet, it was at forty three. Now

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's at forty four. I'm again not quite as bullish

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>as I was, but I'm still going to take the

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>over here now. As I said, I'm a jetsman by nature,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I am pessimistic. I am more than willing to kill

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this team as I do with my cousins on an

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ongoing four year tech string. But I mean, you throw

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>out every single thing that you have seen from the

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Jets offense right now, throw it all out. Luke Falk

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is not an NFL quarterback. I am a full believer

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in Sam Darnold, and although I don't think he's going

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to be at full strength here. It takes a while

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to be clear from Mono. Even after your quote unquote cleared,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it takes a while to be recovered. And Chris Herndon

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is down. But I think Darnold has shown chemistry with

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>both Jameson Crowder and Robbie Anderson in the past, and

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys in particular. They let up a lot of

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>completions and a lot of yards after the catch. They're

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not a team that you can usually throw deep on

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but they do allow a ton of underneath stuff, and

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that works well for the offense that m.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Gase wants to run, and particularly with the presence of Crowder.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>As a general matter, the Cowboys achilles heel in general

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is pass catching running backs. That's basically what we're looking

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>at here with Le'Veon Bell. The Cowboys just struggled as

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>a tackling team as a general matter, like Bell is

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to get fed and he's probably going

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to do some damage. And look, the Jets have an

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>abysmal offensive line, like one of the worst in the NFL,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but the Cowboys rarely blitz just seventeen point six percent

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the time, and even when they do break through,

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which they will, of course, Darnold has some elusiveness so

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he can extend plays even when the line breaks down. Plus,

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas plays the Eagles next week, and I think they

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be looking past this game now. On the

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>flip side, the Jets defense is getting a little healthier.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They're still down CJ. Moseley, and it sounds like Tyron

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Smith is probably going to be back here, which really

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is a huge difference maker on the Dallas offensive line.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Now Collins may miss another game, so the offensive line

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>isn't at full strength, but the Jets have six sacks

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>all season. They're not exactly going to be pressuring Dak

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter who is up there. They're actually pretty stout

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>against the run, but when you look at their secondary

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>with Tremaine Johnson and Daryl Roberts, they're really soft in coverage.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a believer in this Kellen More led offense.

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that last weekend they just kind of outsmarted themselves.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They going way more pass heavy than they needed to.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>They should have just pounded the ball on the ground

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>against the weak Green Bay run defense. I expect a

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>more balanced attack here and for them to be able

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to score in the end. This overbet is really comes

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>down to that. I expect the Jets to be able

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to put up points here. I think Dallas is likely

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>going to match them. I expect them to win the game.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So I will take the over at forty four, and

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking it, but I kind of would lean

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jets plus seven. I'm not making that one of

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>my picks, but for me, I do expect the Jets

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to put up points here and I Expectdoas to win

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and put up points right with them. So I'll take

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the over on the forty four.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm convinced. And my third pick here is the Jets

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 2>plus seven at the Cowboys. Oh, I think you know,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>home underdogs never a bad idea, especially when you're getting

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a full seven points. I mean, you know that that's

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a key number. So we look at the Cowboys here.

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>They look to like world beaters. Those first three weeks,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>they beat the Giants, the Redskins, and the Dolphins, and

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>they come back the last two weeks and they you know,

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>lose to the Saints and the Packers, and those aren't

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>bad losses. Those are two good teams. But I think

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>we need to dock them a bit for just you know,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the team, say, beat those first three weeks. So I

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 2>think these teams are closer than that spread would indicate,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>especially with Sam Donald back as you mentioned. I mean,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Sam Donald advocate too, even if you're not,

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>though you have to admit he's a massive, massive upgrade

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 2>over Luke Falalks. I think, you know, seven points at

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>home for the Jets is too much for them to

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 2>be getting.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You would be a massive upgrade over lukewal Just to

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be clear, Yeah, no, I agree, And I'm now rechecking

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>my email and I see that you made that pick.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad I didn't take that back because I

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>actually mest that in your email. Yeah, I just think

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this was eight and a half when it

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>first opened, and I feel like I should have jumped

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on it because you know, I'm not that I'm all

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that plugged in, but as a Jets fan, I'm following

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the situation pretty closely, and it certainly looked like Darnald

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was on track here to play. I mean, he was

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>almost cleared last week, and I'm really bullish on the kid,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, And I like the offense. I know that

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't put up a ton of points against Buffalo

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in Week one, but you're seeing that Buffalo offense defense

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, right they're legit. So the fact that they

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>were pretty much in control, I really think this is

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good game. So I would have felt

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>better about it had the Cowboys won last weekend. You know,

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I could see them being a little bit salty here

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>as they're coming off back to back losses. But again,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they've got Philly next week. That's gonna be kind of

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the game. I could then a bye after that, so

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I could see them kind of looking past us a

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So I like it. Jets minus seven one

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent agree. I'd be all over that as well.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I didn't accidentally pick that one, though, but

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we both like I guess I like a high scoring game.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You like the Jets getting seven. Here. Now, my last

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pick is something that I I don't even want to say,

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna say it because I have to, because

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the whole point of the show. I'm taking the

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins getting three and a half from the Redskins. And yes,

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel gross about it, but I also feel gross

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>after I order steak with a side of steak, and

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm still doing that this weekend at Peter Luger's. So

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what this line is. This line is bookmakers

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>saying we want people to bet on this game, because

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody is betting on this game if it's at three

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>or two and a half or anything like that. They

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to make this line that you look at

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and you go, wow, hmm, that's kind of interesting. And

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the betting breakdown when you look is pretty even overall,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and both Jason Logan who's on the Monday Show, and

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I had the same exact reaction, and that is that

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I am not positive that the right team is favored here.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I get it, the Dolphins have a negative

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty seven point differential, so that's not great.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But the Redskins are a disaster. I mean, they just

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>fire their head coach, and the Dolphins are an equal disaster.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But Josh Rozen actually hasn't been all of that terrible,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and they've played some games pretty close, particularly in the

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>first half, like they did against Dallas. Now, there are

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of warning signs here. First, the Redskins defensive

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>front is not terrible. Deron Paine, John Allen, Ryan Kerrigan.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They can all get to the quarterback, and that's especially

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>true when you have a line like the Dolphins that

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>make the Jets look like the best offensive line in

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. Second, the Redskins are starting case Keenum this week,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>which in my opinion, gives them the best chance to win.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>And if that doesn't tell you all you need to

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>know about why I like the Dolphins here, then I

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know what. Well, now, there's these reports that have

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>come out today about how Adrian Peterson is saying, how wow,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they remind me of the Saints, and our practice is

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so good. You hear stuff like that all the time. Overall,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I just think the Dolphins either pull this one out

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or they at least keep this close in a home game.

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, Rosen has not been terrible. Preston Williams

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>has been a nice surprise. Devonte Parker, as always, has

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>shown the occasional flash. I think Albert Wilson is on

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>track to return here. And the Redskins just don't stop quarterbacks.

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They're worse than the league in third down QB completion

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>percentage and passing yards allowed on third down. The Dolphins

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have had to buy the game plan around the defense here,

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and yes they are tanking, but Brian Flores can't really

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be okay, which is going over sixteen right? I mean?

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>The variable? Really, the only thing that makes me even

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a little sort of hesitant about this one is the

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that there is the coaching change that is just

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a variable that you can never know how a team's

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna respond. Now, he loves to run the ball. He's

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>been in charge of the run game all year, and

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins allow four point seventy five yards per carry.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible that this coach change energizes the team

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and they just run Adrian Peterson into the ground. But

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're past that key number of three

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is really what does it for me? And Jason brought

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this out on Monday, by the way, but I do

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>want to reiterate this in case you missed the show.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>If you don't want to take the Dolphins here because

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they're the Dolphins, I understand consider at least taking them

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in the first half because they do absolutely nothing in

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the second half, but they keep games really really close

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, So at least for me, I

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>would go for it on the first half. But I

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>am going to throw up in my mouth a little

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>bit and take the Dolphins getting three and a half.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>So I think the fact that Kalahan is talking about,

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, running Adrian Peterson twenty times is good news

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>for the Dolphins because I just don't think Adrian Peterson

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>has anything left. So I think, you know, it, as

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>crazy as it sounds. Case Keenum to Terry McLaurin, is

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Redskins best chance of moving the ball.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I definitely would not be the Redskins as road favorites.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>That seems insane, but I just can't put money on

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 2>Miami after what I've seen the first four weeks. So

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 2>for me, that game and avoid.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's totally understandable. And the idea here, I'm

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>not kidding that I'm saying, you know what, I really

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Dolphins getting any amount of point to anyone.

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>But really, realistically, honestly, the Dolphins are terrible, but the

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Redskins are equally terrible, and the Dolphins are at home

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're getting more than the key number. That's really

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what it is. This is why I think, like, honestly,

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this was just the bookmaker saying, can we just get

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>some action on this game somehow, whatever we need to do,

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>throw it out there and see what happens. Because if

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's two and a half, you're just like, eh, I

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want any of this at all. But right now

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with this, it's getting a fair amount of action. From

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what I can see, it's roughly split down the middle,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they want. So I am going to really

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>just feel grotesque all week and long, but I am

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>going to hear take the Dolphins getting three and a half.

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's recap here before we move on. You've got

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons and Cardinals. I believe it was at fifty one.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that writers fifty one and a half?

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Yep, fifty one last.

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But as you said, you would take it over sixty

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>right here, all about it, right, there's no number that

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>could scare you off that.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, honestly, fifty four. I'd still feel good betting

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 2>the over.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, all right, pour all your money into that

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and blame Jared when you lose Falcons of Cardinals over

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>fifty one, the Chiefs who are now laying four to

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, and the Jets plus seven against the Cowboys,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.959
<v Speaker 1>which I heartily endorse. All right. As for me, I

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>am taking the Jaguars and Saints under forty three and

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a half, the Jets and the Cowboys over forty four,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins getting three and a half from the Redskins. Now,

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>before we move on, I want to tell everyone about

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the sponsor of today's show, bet MGM. Now you know

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>about bet mgm already, and in particular the betmgm sports app,

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>because it's the easiest and best way to place a

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>bet if you're in the state of New Jersey. Just

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>search for and download the Betmgmsports app on your phone

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or visit betmgm dot com. You sign up for an

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>account and you can place a bet right from your home.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And once you sign up for an account, you'll want

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention because bet mgm offers boosted bets and

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>promotions across all major sports. So you could be looking

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at VIGs at like minus three hundred or minus four

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred or something, but with a boosted bet you can

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>get even money. They also let you track your bet

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>in real time, and they offer early cashouts where you

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can actually settle a bet before the game ends. That

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lets you lock in your winnings or cut your losses early.

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you sign up right now, you can get

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a free five hundred dollars bet. Here's the deal. When

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you download the bet mgm Sports app and you sign

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>up using our promo code Harris. That's my last name, Harris,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>then your first bet of up to five hundred dollars

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is risk free. If you lose, bet mgm is going

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to credit you the amount you've lost up to five

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars for future waiters. Just download the app and

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>use the promo code. Harris to claim the promotion, and

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go to betmgm dot com for further details.

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>You must be twenty one years or older. And although

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you can sign up an easily deposit money anywhere, you

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>must be in the state of New Jersey to place

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a sports bet. Visit betmgm dot com for the full

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>list of terms and conditions. And if you got a

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem, gambler, All right, Jared, let's move on here too.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a trap where we list the line we are

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>avoiding this weekend. Now you already mentioned the Dolphins, but

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't choose that one, obviously, go ahead, what else

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you got.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm really tempted to take Carolina minus two. You know

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>they they they lost to Tampa in that Week two game,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 2>but you know they were, you know, a yard away

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>from that touchdown that would I think gave them the lead,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>and Cam Newton was playing on you know, one foot

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 2>in that game. My concern here is that this game

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 2>is in London. I mean, if this game was in

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay, I take Carolina minus too. But these London games,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like there's always something funky going on.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>We saw last week the Raiders beating the Bears. I

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 2>think if that if that game is anywhere in the

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>in the US, the Bears win that game. But you

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>know something about London, I think add some volatility to

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 2>these games. I'm just gonna avoid Panthers Box, even though

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I do think the Panthers come out with a win there.

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh so that's interesting. So you would feel better about

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers if they were actually in Tampa Bay as

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>opposed to playing in London.

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 3>I would, yeah.

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on, the Bucks don't have much of

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 2>a home field advantage anyways.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Boy, my best friend is a Bucks fan. He is

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be mad when we listen to this. And

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I will say that again, this is what I like

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in tracking these lines. The line has moved. It's now

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay plus two and a half. I assume that

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't do anything for you, considering you like Carolina.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting when you look at the breakdown on

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>betting pros dot com. And this is what I love

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to do, because I gotta be honest. We've had to

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>run a fantastic guess on the show. You included buddy,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.479
<v Speaker 1>You're You're great. It's fifty one percent Tampa Bay forty

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. Carolina. So the betting experts are basically split

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>right down the middle, which I always think is perfect

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about a game to avoid, because nobody

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really knows what's going on. So I'm fine with that.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. By the way, London certainly adds

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a variable to it, and you never really know what

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to expect. London's oddly, you know interesting. I've been over

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>there when the Jets played the Dolphins, and whoever is

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the home team, they really do come out to support,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's almost quasi like a home game for the

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Bucks over there, and as you said, their regular home

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>field advantage hasn't been all that great, Lily. But I

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really good pick for me. I'm gonna

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>avoid the Broncos laying two to the Titans now, I

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think probably I can skip this segment altogether at this

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>point in any future episode and say that I am

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>always avoiding the Titans no matter what, because I don't

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>know what I am going to see from the Titans. Ever.

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>They have a really strong defense, but they are the

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>most frustrating team I've had to watch in a while. Meanwhile,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos are much better than their record and they've

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>lost several close games. I think Tennessee is probably the

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>slightly better team here overall, but I have absolutely no

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>confidence and who is going to win this game in Denver.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally out on it, and I'm sorry sportsbooks, if

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you're listening. I'm advising people probably never to bet on

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a Titans game either way, because I feel like you

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what you're gonna get.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm with it there.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've gotten Marcus Mariota right from a

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 2>fantasy perspective all year. I agree with you that Tennessee

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is a better team. Denver tends to play well at

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 2>home that I know. They've lost a couple of heartbreakers

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 2>at home so far. I kind of think Denver pulls

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>out the win there. But I'm with you, I'm staying

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 2>away from that game.

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, if the Broncos were getting a couple

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of points, because you can see them right, they're in

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the end a team that can like they did with

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars right dominating the game and they just find

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to kind of let it go. They didn't

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>against Los Angeles this weekend. But they're just not a

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>team that you can feel confident and at home. It's

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a tough place to play. It always has been. But

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>really that's the thing you don't Sometimes Mariota shows up

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, wow, look at this. This is a

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this offense looks fantastic. But at this point

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like it's a complete shot in the dark.

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm avoiding them. So I am avoiding the Titans

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>getting to from the Broncos, and you are avoiding the

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Panthers who are actually laying two and a half to

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks in London. Now, real quick, before we get

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to our final segment, I do want to remind everyone

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>about our contest where we're giving away a signed Alvin

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Kamara Helme and courtesy of our good friends over at

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Pristine Auction. You got a couple more weeks to enter. Actually,

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point that's not true. You have a few

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>more days to enter, so go ahead and do so.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Just leave a review for the show on iTunes or

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Stitcher and send a screenshot of that review to contest

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at betting pros dot com. If you entered last month's contest,

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you're already in, so no worries there, all right, Jared,

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it is time for Top prop where we list our

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>top player prop of the week. As I said, I

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>won the DeAndre Hopkins bet last week on a garbage

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>time toss, so I am feeling very confident in mine.

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You can go first, though.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm going back to that Falcons Cardinals game,

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 2>which I love. I'm going Matt Ryan over three hundred

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 2>and fifty passing yards. I'm getting plus one forty six

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>on it. Obviously a big number, three hundred and fifty yards.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Ryan's already averaging three hundred and thirty one yards per

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>game this season. He's tied for the lead league with

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and twenty two pass attempts. And I really

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's a fluke. I mean, this Falcons team

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 2>is a pass heavy offense. They're fifth in situation neutral

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 2>pass right, So that that's you know, when when the

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 2>game is within one score, when the game flow is

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 2>in dictating play calling, that the Falcons are throwing it

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 2>at the fifth fifth highest rate. I think there should

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>be another pass heavy game against the Cardinals, who, like

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>we've said, are still missing Patrick Peterson. They're still missing

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Robert all for two, their number two cornerback who's on

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>IR right now. So lots of plays, lots of passing.

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Good matchup for Matt Ryan. I think he goes over

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 2>three fifty.

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean three plus one forty six. When you're over

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>three fifty, you know, when you don't think about the situation,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or you don't think about the quarterback, or you don't

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think about all the stats. Sounds crazy, right, You're like

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>three fifty. Geez, what are you going to do there?

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe I think last week Greg Smith might have

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>taken Kyler Murray over three fifty, which was at like

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>plus four hundred or something crazy, right, which he didn't

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>win unfortunately. But yeah, that's the thing. I mean, Ryan

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>basically does that. You know every other game. This game

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be high scoring, as you said, So

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I like that one actually a lot.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>When you first said it, I thought of the one

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>forty six, so I was like, three point fifty that's

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just not enough. But really it, particular with Matt Ryan

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and in this game, I do like it a lot.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good one for me. I'm going to

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>go a little more conservative and I'm going to take

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs over fifty nine and a half yards at

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>minus one fourteen. Now, Diggs did not have a great

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>game last week, and he has topped this total just

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>one time this season. But the bottom line is that

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Eagle strength is really their run defense. So I

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>expect the Vikings to need to go to the air

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on Sunday. So why Digs over Thilan? Well, first,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Thelan's number is higher, It's somewhere in the seventies. But basically,

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Diggs has seen seven targets in two games this year.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Every other game he's maxed out at four. He's seen

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the seven targets in games against the Packers and against

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, and in both games, Cousins was pressured and

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>needed to get rid of the ball really quickly. And

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that is what I see happening here. I see Diggs

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of targets, most of them quick as

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles pass, russ is going to be able to

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>get to Cousins. With Minnesota's weak offensive line, neither Russell

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Douglas nor Craig James can really hang with Diggs at

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this point. I don't think we're gonna see one hundred

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>yard game necessarily or anything like that, but something in

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the seventy to eighty range, especially given that Feelan got

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the squeaky wheel treatment last week. I think the squeaky

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>wheel treatment is probably coming digs way anyway this week,

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>but especially I think this game, in particular because of

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the pass rush, sets up well for him, because I

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think he excels when Cousins needs to get the ball

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>out quick. So I will buy something in the seventy

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to eighty range, which means I'm taking Stefan Diggs over

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine and a half yards M minus one fourteen.

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Diggs over under is fifty nine and

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a half yards against the Eagles is just very sad.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's just getting wasted in that offense. He

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 2>is such a good player. I mean, I if I'm

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings, and I know they want to be a

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>run first offense, but in this matchup, the Eagles are

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>so good against the run and so bad against the pass,

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings really should throw up more than we've seen

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 2>over the past, you know, the first five weeks of

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>this season.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So I like that bat with Diggs over fifty nine

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>and a half.

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in the end, I think they're gonna be a

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>little more of a balanced team. I get that they

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>want to run. I get that that's what they want

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to do and lean on their defense, and I don't

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>really have a ton of faith in the Philadelphia offense.

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if people are taking a ton

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of positives from last week's game against the Jets, I

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's crazy because I did not think they look

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.719
<v Speaker 1>good whatsoever. Again, you know, anybody could go out there

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and beat the Jets with Luke Falk starting. I think

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it was on their defense. I don't

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>really love their you know, offense really at all, especially

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.239
<v Speaker 1>against a tough defense like the Vikings. So I'm a

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>little worried about the game flow in this game being

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>something where well, it could just be sort of a close,

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>low scoring game and they still will rely on the

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>run the Vikings because that's kind of what they like

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. But in the end, I think last week

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>what we saw and look, I get that it was

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a super soft matchup against the Giants, But I think

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they look better when they're a little more balanced and

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they throw a little bit more. And I think they

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>know that. And I think Diggs is not getting traded

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's just not not with that contract. They

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>need him. He's a great player, as you said, and

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think in the end, not only are they going

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to make a little bit more of an effort to

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get him the ball, but I think in particular this

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>game sets up really well for him, so hopefully the

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fact I agree the number is preposterously low, but again,

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he's topped it once once this entire season, so it

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't something that's a short thing by any means. But

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I definitely feel that given the game flow, it's going

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a winner. So you are taking Matt Ryan

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred and fifty passing yards at plus one

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>forty six, which I also really like, and I'll take

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs over fifty nine and a half yards at

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>minus one fourteen. Well, that is going to do it

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for today's show. Thanks for joining me, Jared. Can you

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>remind everyone where they can find more of you and

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>your work.

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can check out my fantasy football stuff over

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 2>at draft Sharks dot com and then you can follow

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 2>me on Twitter at smola DS. It's smola DS.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Awesome. Well, thanks again for coming on. I hope we

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>can talk again soon later in the season.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>It'd be great. Thanks for having me, all.

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, I want to remind everyone about bet MGM, where

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you can place your first wager of up to five

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars risk free. And don't forget to leave a

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>sort review on iTunes or Stitcher and send it screenshot

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of that review to be entered into our Alvin Kamara

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>signed helmet giveaway. It ends in just a few days.

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with your wagers this week, and my friends,

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back breaking down the early lines next week.