WEBVTT - Ig Nobel Prizes 2018: Part 1

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and our yearly tradition returns. We always end up covering

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the ig Nobel Prizes, and that's what we're gonna do

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>today in part one of our ig No Bells series.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We we generally pick up with the ig

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Noo Bells after October is finished because the Ignoble Prizes,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it tends to happen, uh right at the end of September.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Terrible timing for us, like we're just getting going for

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Monster season and then they throw these in our past.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think it works out too because then for us,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>because everybody can sort of read the initial press releases

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if you're if you're paying attention to them,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to the science to science media, you'll probably pick up

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on on what one and then you can eventually check

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>back in with us and hear us chat about it

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now, these spirit of the Ignoble Prizes, if

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not familiar is they would say they follow the

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>ethos of Professor Frank Right, Professor Frank, Professor Frank. He'll

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>make you laugh, He'll make you think, Yeah, yeah, the Simpsons, Yeah,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>very very much. So, Uh, I have to we have

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to point out, as I think we usually do ignobles.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, they rub some people the wrong way.

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Some people don't see the humor in it. They maybe

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think that science should, uh should be a humorist affair

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and that we and or they think that that in

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>some cases, uh, the honorees are being made fun of.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think for the vast majority of individuals honored

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>by the ignobles, uh, they get it, They get the joke,

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they see the value of it, and they realize that, yes,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it's about having fun, but it's also about honoring legitimate

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>research as well. Yeah. I mean, so these are real studies,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and it tends to focus on studies that are funny

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>when you first look at them, but they usually do

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>reveal something at least pretty interesting. I mean not always.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I kindaman, well, that's just pretty silly, But most

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of the time there's at least some kind of really

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting tidbit in there. It either moves the field forward

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>in some unexpected way, or it gives you something to

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>think about. Uh, they do that, they Professor Frank. Professor Frank.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So these have been awarded every year since by the

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Annals of Improbable Research, a humorous science publication that looks

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>at various studies and whatnot. The purpose of this award,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>according to the editors of Improbable Research, is to quote

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>honor achievements that first make people laugh and then make

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>then make them think. Furthermore, they stressed that the ten

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>prizes aren't necessarily meant to pass judgment on the winners. Instead,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as they they tend to emphasize that the prizes quote

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative, and spur people's interests

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in science, medicine, and technology. And by the way, the

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>principal individual here is editor Mark Abram's, editor of the

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Animals of Improbable Research. Um, and I think that's important

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to the idea about spurring people's interests, because a lot

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of times do manage to highlight studies and papers and

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>achievements in science then otherwise don't really rise, uh, you know,

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>up in the headlines, or if they do, they only

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>rise in the headlines because they're funny. And so one

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that we like to do when we look at

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the ignobles is find Okay, are are there some of

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>these that are actually kind of interesting when you start

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about them? Do they give you something to ponder? Yeah?

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And in always we ask the question why is it important?

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And why is it funny? The second question is generally

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>just very obvious and the kid go except for the

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>ones that aren't actually all that funny, which occasionally happens. Yeah,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes sometimes, but generally you're like, oh, yeah, I see

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>why they honored that one. And in some cases I

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think we've mentioned on the show, a new study will

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>come along and we'll realize, oh, that one that's going

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to get an ignoble at some point. Yeah, any study

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about like butts or bending over or something that's just

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just a shoe, and then it just naturally Nobell bait. Yes, exactly.

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, now that we've established the ig Nobel

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Prizes and what they are for anyone it wasn't familiar,

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start jumping into some of the winners for

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eighteen. Okay, Now, obviously we're not going

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to cover all of the winners in the same depth.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Some we're going to engage with pretty deeply. Some we'll

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just sort of talk about pretty quickly. But I think

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the first thing we should look at is maybe medicine prize. Yes,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so this one honors Mark Mitchell and David Wartener for

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>for using roller coaster rides to try to hasten the

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>passage of kidney stones. Does this have practical utility? Well yeah,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just just you wait. This was an October publication and uh,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wardinger was the individual who accepted the honors at

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the ceremony. So this one obviously links into an episode

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that you and I recorded years back, The Stone of Madness,

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>which my name is Lubert nas because the episode dealt

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in part with the passing of kidney stones and bladder

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 1>stones and what wait is it the Bosch painting? Is

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>it Bosch? Yes, the removing of the Stone of Madness

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not from the bowels but from the cranium. Right, But

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the the idea is that there was like a removal

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of stone surgeries in the early modern period. Was was

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of dicey, right, literally, like people were diced and

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>sliced and then died horrible deaths on the operating table.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's this painting by Herono Spash that makes fun

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of this guy who's going to try to get a

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>stone and alleged stone cut out of his head, and

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like, please cut the stone. Master. My name is

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Lubert Doss, So I often think about that when I

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>see somebody behaving foolishly in public. I'm just like, my

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>name is Lupert Doss. All right, Well I've I I

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, Joe, but I've been fortunate enough

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to avoid kidney stones thus far in my life. If

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you've ever had a kidney stone, now I have not. Okay, Well, basically,

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're we're talking about here are hard deposits made

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of minerals and salts. They form, They can form inside

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>your kidneys, and they often form when the urine becomes concentrated,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing the minerals to crystallized and stick together. Uh if

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they If they form, then your body tries to pass them,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>which can be painful. In some cases, doctors can simply

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>give you a pain killer and instruct you to drink

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of water to help pass it. But in

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>other cases, especially if it becomes lodged in your urinary tract,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>surgery may be required to it. That's just I'm shivering

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>over here. So there's no dud, you know, definite single

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>cause for kidney stones, but dehydration can certainly lead to

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>their formation. Again the concentration of urine. Remember now, as

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the authors of this paper point out, some three hundred

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand US patients seek emergency care for kidney stones each year.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And in addition to hydration saying you know, drink a

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of water or the administration fluids to other things

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that are sometimes used are positional inversion and external application

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of force. WHOA, so what does that mean getting upside

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>down or something getting upside down getting thrown around a

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit, And so I think everyone can can can

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>realize here while why we're getting into the domain of

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>roller coasters, uh, They point out that there have been

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>reports of spontaneous kidney stone passage associated with both the

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster riding and bungee cord jumping. So somebody had

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>kidney stones and then they're like time to go bungee jumping. Well,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was a little unclear the weather. It was

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation where if the individual knew they had the stones,

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I assume they knew, um, given the discomfort that is

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>generally reported, but attached the bungee cords. My name is

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Lubert Dass. The problem though, is, they said, these these

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>accounts they tend to be reported in like non peer

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>reviewed publications or it's just kind of like word of mouth.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh. In particular, uh, they noted that they had

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>heard numerous stories about people passing kidney stones after riding

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Big Thunder Mountain Railroad, a roller coaster at Walt disney

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>World's Magic Kingdom thing part in Orlando, Florida. Uh. Yeah,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they they had turned apparently heard various accounts of folks

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>spontaneously passing the stones after writing it, Have you ridden

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this roller coaster? Joe? No, I'm not really a roller

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>coaster person, and I haven't wait. Which one is that

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Magic Kingdom? Oh? Yeah, I've been to that one, but

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>not since I was a kid. I was probably too

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>short to ride to it. Anyway, when I was there,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like it has like a mining theme. I wrote

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it just like what last year the year before. I

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote it with my son and my niece, and it's

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a fun roller coaster. I'm not really a roller coaster

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>person myself, but I enjoyed some of the roller coasters

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at Disney because they're just like really phenomenal productions, especially

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that has a YETI in it. Did you

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>get the black lung? The black light? The black long

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>was not a featured add on when I was at Disney.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But but this, this is a roller coaster that does

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>move you around. It's it's not like one of those

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>just crazy, um you know, one of those just insane

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>rides that does that some people go for. It doesn't

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>look like it's a design and to get a confession

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>out of you, but it's still it takes you for

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a ride. So they wanted to test it out. They said, well,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>let's go there and let's see what happens to some

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>kidney stones. Brilliant, I'm in now. They didn't take individuals

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with kidney stones on board, so there were no human

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>test subjects here. What they did is they took three

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>kidney stones of different sizes, suspended them in urine, and

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>then placed them in adult uteroscopy and reino scopy simulators,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they took them for twenty rides, so sixty

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>rides in total. Okay, so they what basically got them

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in some kind of fake kidney kind of contraption. Yeah,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there were some pictures of these in the paper and

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they one of them looks kind of like a prop

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>from a David Cronenberg film, and the other looks like

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a it's like a crystal tree looking, you know device.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it kind of looks like an award

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you might win for, you know, achievements in Kidney Stone,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Remove Horse something. So do you know if they had

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to have any kind of arrangements to negotiate these organs

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>onto the roller coaster, like are they arguing with the

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>ticket guy or what? They pointed out specifically that that

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>care was taken to preserve guests, employ entertainment, joinment. Um. So,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>so I believe they had them inside of something hidden

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>out of the way because they also mentioned specifically, uh,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is an exact quote. Uh. Bovine

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and poor sign renal models were deemed impractical as patients

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>surrogates for study, owing to ambient temperature and the inappropriate

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>display of such material in a family friendly amusement park. Okay,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>so you couldn't bring like pig kidneys onto the roller

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>coaster because that might upset some people. Yeah, and Disney

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was apparently they were gracious hosts for this study, but

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they knew there were limits it's kind of a delicate

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>situation when you're carrying out your kidney stone research on

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>an active amusement park ride. But then again, you might

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>have some science loving kids there. They get their you know,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>their picture hugging Mickey, and then they get their picture

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hugging some pig kidneyst opportunity. That's maybe, so maybe maybe

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for the next study. So what did they find out, Well,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they found that it did seem to prove helpful, but

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>mostly only if you're seated towards the back of the coaster.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So for front coaster passage, right, we're talking four of

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. Rear coaster passage rate twenty three or thirty six. Hey,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not bad. Yeah, I mean it's like, like everybody knows,

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you said at the back of the coaster, you're gonna

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>get a bump, your more hillacious ride, and if you

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have a lacious kidney stone, well it's going this is

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>going to help knock it out of you just a

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit easier. So the author is actually like suggesting

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>people do this somehow, I would suspect not. No, no,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody is saying go to to Disney

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>World instead of a doctor kidney stone. Like, for one thing,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the lines for Big Thunder Mountain Railroad are pretty long,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and I cannot imagine standing in them with any kind

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of like an abdominal discomfort going on, or you know,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and enhanced necessity to urinate or anything. But how long

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they had the stand in lines total in order to

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>run the ride the thirty six times or whatever that

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to pass the stone? Maybe there's some

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of a research based fast pass you can get.

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I don't know that they mentioned that

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>specifically in the study. And then they also point out

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that their other you know, their limitations on the study.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they didn't get to use human patients. They use

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>these models, But the study is important because kidney stones

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are a legitimate health concern, and I don't think, Yeah,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>even though we're not talking about installing roller coasters in hospitals,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it does make one think what kind of what kind

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of an apparatus might be appropriate, right, Yeah, I mean

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you could probably just figure out what part of the

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster rides specifically is the most useful, like what

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, kinds of g forces on the body and

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how that's applied, and maybe just like make a chair

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that does it to you or something. Yeah, that's I

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>think that's the most logical application that I can imagine,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>short of just actually having a roller coaster at the hospital.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>That's also sounds kind of fun um. But anyway, that's

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>why it's important, why it's funny. Obviously, it's science plus

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>roller coasters. Anytime that combo was coming at you, it's

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>going to elect a few giggles. I think that's a

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good one. Okay, well let's take a quick break,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back, we will have more ignobles.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank Alright, we're back now. The next one I

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>think we should go to is Nutrition Prize. And I

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>know what you have all been thinking lately. You've been wondering,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can I lose weight by converting to a diet consisting

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>only of human flesh? The Hannibal diets, the new fad.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, Hannibal eats all kinds of other stuff. He

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>would have to go like super paleo Hannibal. Well, he

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>supplements his diet with human flesh. That's how he stays

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>so trim putting like a blueberry reduction balsamic glaze on

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this humane You know how unhealthy all that would be

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>if he wasn't throwing in some some lean human flesh

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to just really balance everything out, all right. So this

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>prize went to a researcher named James Cole for a

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>paper published in Scientific Reports in called Assessing the Caloric

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Significance of Episodes of Human Cannibalism in the Paleolithic. Who

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>attended the ceremony is James Cole, the author of this paper.

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you come across some evidence of humans

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>eating other humans, it's reasonable to ask why are they

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>doing this? Right? In fact, this is often a question

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we have to ask about the remains of Stone Age

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>humans because they're Paleolithic sites, Stone Age sites that show

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>clear evidence of human cannibalism at least as far back

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>as our hominin relatives in the early place to see

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in roughly two point five million years ago. So I

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>guess before we get to the y. Actually, a totally

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>reasonable question you might have is, if we're talking about

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hominin remains that are thousands or even millions of years old,

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>how can we tell cannibalism took place. It's just bones, right, Like,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>what would the evidence be? Well, there are a couple

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of lines of evidence for cannibalism in the Pleistocene. One

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is anthropogenic modification of human remains. That's the like polite

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>sciencey way to talk about signs of butchering on human bones.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So clear human made changes to the bones of other humans,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and these would be the same kinds of physical marks

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that we would find left on the bones of what

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are considered prey animals. Signs of butchering, cooking, and eating.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And examples would include cuts and chop marks in the

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>bone from the butchering process, like they might have been

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>made with sharp stone tools, breaks in the long bones,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>which would be presumably to access the marrow, because that's

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the good part. Evidence of cooking, such as burned ends

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of a bone, human tooth marks on a bone, quote,

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of a cranial base to get at the brain

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on otherwise complete or near complete skeleton. Well you gotta

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>suck the head. I mean, anybody who's like crayfish or

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>swamp bugs if you want to call them. So, I'm sorry,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I said crayfish crawdads is the correct terms that I'm

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with. Crawdads. I have to admit I'm a

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>little hazy. I do like swamp bugs as a as

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a kind of Cajun description though right, well, they're they

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are quite bug like, but they have delicious heads, and

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people just eat the tails, but

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>people who know what's up also take the what would

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you call it this guess this is the thoracic cavity

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>with the head there, and they just suck all the

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>fat and juices and guts out of it, get those

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>good tasty brains and uh so, yeah, there apparently there's

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some nutritional value in the brains that some people might

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get. But there's also the idea and that

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes modification of the skull is done for some kind

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of other purpose, not just purely accessing nutrition, but like

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the creation of skull cups, making skulls into like eating

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or drinking vessels. Yeah. I mean, we've we've seen more

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>recent examples of this in Tibetan customs, for instance. Yeah.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, another thing that Cole mentions is like a

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>physical sign of cannibalism in ancient human rains or ancient

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hominin remains, not necessarily just holmo sapiens uh is quote,

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the virtual absence of vertebrae due to crushing or boiling

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to get it bone marrow and grease, so like maybe

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to get that good spinal cord, you're gonna

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>have the vertebrae kind of coming apart. It's like eating

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>crab legs. Yeah, and then tool scrapes on the bones,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.239
<v Speaker 1>which there could be scrapes on the bones related to

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>butchering and accessing of meat, but there could also be

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>scrapes on the bones for ritualistic or symbolic purposes. On

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>top of that, there's some interesting genetic evidence of cannibalism

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in the in the world. In the prehistoric world, for example,

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there are diseases known as transmissible sponge iform and cephalopath

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ease or t s S, and examples of this would

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>include CURU or kreuz feld Yakob disease. And these are

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>prion diseases or pre on diseases that cause degeneration of

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>brain tissue and can be acquired often through cannibalism. When

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you might have heard of is kuru. The members of

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the for A linguistic group in Papua New Guinea have

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>often been exposed to the t SC known as kuru

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because of their practice of ritual Indo cannibalism. For religious

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and cultural reasons. Yeah, and a lot of these ideas, um,

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have to do with the passing on

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>of a departed individual, parted family member, like and you

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>consume some of their flesh and it's like their spirit

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lives on through you, that sort of thing, exactly. H

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And So an interesting thing is that there are worldwide

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>patterns of genes we find that seem to indicate our

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>species genetic history sometimes favored in the past adaptation for

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>resistance to T S S, for example meat at all.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>In a two thousand three paper, and Science wrote, quote

0:18:55.840 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>heterozygosity for common polymorphism in the human pre on protein

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.719
<v Speaker 1>gene p r n P confers relative resistance to prion diseases,

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and then later they're write worldwide p r np haplotype

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>diversity encoding alleal frequencies suggest the strong balancing selection at

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>this locust occurred during the evolution of modern humans. So

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the authors argued that the patterns of genetic resistance to

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>T S c S that we see in human populations

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>indicate that something in our evolutionary history favored people who

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>could cannibalize, who could eat human flesh without contracting fatal

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>encephalopath ez, this is a fun paper thus far. This

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>really it's kind of a nice follow up to our

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>ghoul episode, the delta impart with you know, with the

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>question you know what about the consumption of human corpses

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in in in our in our past, and in our biology.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It is an interesting subject. In fact, I'm not even

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>really getting deep into the paper yet. I'm just I'm

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just setting it up, so it's going to really get

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going in a second, okay. Like, first of all, their

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>disputes about whether individual sites actually do show evidence of

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism rather than some other form of manipulation of the dead,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>like you could have had maybe ritualistic de fleshing of

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the dead without eating. Maybe for some reason they wanted

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to get the meat off the bones of a dead person,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but not not eat it. Well, like one example that

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind, to come back to Tibet, the practice

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of sky burial, the breaking down of a corpse so

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that they flesh may be consumed by sacred animals. Uh Like,

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if you were just looking at the forensic evidence of that,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.479
<v Speaker 1>you might say, oh, well, clearly this person was butchered

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and eating, because essentially it is butchery, but it is

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not for cannibalism, but whether or not it happened in

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>individual cases, it at least does appear to be something

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that happened enough for us to have records of it.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes prehistoric humans and other related hominins were eating each

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>other at least often enough for us to have some

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>archaeological record of it. So back to the original question,

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the question of why why were these ancient humans and

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>other hominin relatives eating each other? Coal notes that there

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are multiple document and motivations for human cannibalism. So several

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of these would be like survival cannibalism. That's when you're

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not normally a cannibal, but you're about to starve to death,

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>so you eat somebody. Right. This is essentially with the

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>touch of the wind to go in in the folklore

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of native people's in the America's gets that the idea

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that is forced to uh, you may have to enact

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>cannibal cannibalism, right. And then there is of course psychotic

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>or criminal cannibalism, and aggressive cannibalism. These would be various

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>types of cannibalism that is some sort of like aggressive symbology,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>like warfare cannibalism. You you know, not only defeat your enemies,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but you defeat them so totally that you feel you

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>should eat them. There is, of course, as we've pointed out,

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>spiritual a ritual cannibalism, and then there is gastronomic or

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>dietary cannibalism, nutritional cannibalism. Basically like this is part of

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>your diet and you're eating it because it's meat. Yeah,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like that list the old school cannibalism.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>This is more in line with the biological cannibalism that

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed in the show before, right, of other organisms.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh uh, yeah, there's that. And then also he points

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>out a good a good category that often gets left

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>out medicinal cannibalism. Right, sometimes you might want to eat

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>another human because you think it does something kind of

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a vampiric cannibalism. Could the flesh of the young and

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you shall feel better wise one, Yeah, something like that.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So a couple of other relevant categories. Just to mention

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is that there's the idea of exo cannibalism versus indo cannibalism.

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Exo cannibalism would be humans eating humans who were not

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the in group, for example, eating rivals killed

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in war. And then there's indo cannibalism, which is eating

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>humans who were part of your in group, for example,

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>ritualistically eating one's own family members for religious reasons. Right,

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and you can sort of divide these up two has

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 1>been into categories of nice cannibalism and mean cannibalism. Right, So,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the majorities of studies of paleolithic cannibal sites have tended

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to deposit, Cole says, a nutritional motivation for the cannibalism,

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>while a smaller number have positive religious rich rules or

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>aggressive cannibalism associated with warfare. And Cole points out that

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's some confusing things about the ways these motivational labels

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>are applied to instances of cannibalism from prehistoric times. And

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so to help refine the discussion about the types of

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism and the role of raw nutrition in motivating prehistoric

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>cannibalistic episodes, Cole said, basically, hey, wouldn't it help to

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>know exactly how nutritious a paleolithic human was? That could

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of help us better understand whether these are purely

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>nutrition seeking events or whether there's some other kind of

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>significance to them. Right. So, ultimately the goal of this

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>paper was to construct an informed estimate on the nutritional

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>value of a human. First question, has anybody ever done

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that before? Cole says, yes, it has been done that

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it was just sort of in a short letter to

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>American Anthropologist in the year nineteen seventy, and their methodology

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>for how they came up with their number was not clear,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But in nineteen seventy Stanley M. Garn and Walter D.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Block wrote quote the limited nutritional Value of Cannibalism. In

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>this short letter to American Anthropologist, garn and Block claimed

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>that an adult male weighing fifty kilograms or about a

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten pounds, which is a reasonable estimate of

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the body mass of a stone age human, would yield

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about thirty kilograms or sixty six pounds of edible skeletal

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>muscle mass, and nutritionally, that breaks dound about four point

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>five kilograms of protein and about eighteen thousand calories. So

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>based on this, garn and Block said that if human

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is your only source of protein, that's the only meat

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you're eating and the only real protein you're getting. A

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>group of sixty people would need to eat a person

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>every day in order to get enough protein to have

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a healthy diet. Uh. And if it were rationed out,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>so you've got less out to a diet of like

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one human per week shared between sixty people, the group

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>would not be getting nearly enough protein. So, based on

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this garn and Block conclude quote, the nutritional value of

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism may therefore be viewed as questionable unless a group

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is in a position consume its own number in a year.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So basically you'd have to be eating a lot of humans.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you know, I really want to see

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>these numbers broken down and compared to the Chainsaw family

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and the Texas Chainsaw massacre, Right, is that nutritional cannibalism? Well,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I feel like it's a mix of nutritional

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and commercial because there are four individuals in the family

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and obviously they need the protein. Uh, it's commercial. This

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is not taken into account at all. I know, because

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they're running the barbecue restaurant on the side, and as

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we find out in Texas Chainsaw Masacre to they're they're

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>winning awards at regional barbecue competitions. This is prestige cannibalism. Yes.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So to follow up on Garden Block coal asks, Okay,

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is their estimate correct. They don't say how they got

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to these numbers. And to figure that out, Coal did

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a review of the existing literature on the chemical composition

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of the human body, relying on three studies from the

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Biological Chemistry in the middle of the twentieth century,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>which were drawn from analysis of four alt human males.

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So how much nutrition is there per kilogram of muscle

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>mass on a human? Well, this data yielded an average

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen thousand, nine hundred and fifty one calory calories

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>per twenty four point nine kilograms of muscle mass. So

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>garden Block weren't all that far off by estimating eighteen

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand calories in thirty ms of muscle. And so there's

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and then Coal comes up with some estimates of the

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>nutritional value of the protein and fat on a human.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is supposed to be for a roughly

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty five pound human male, So total

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>body there would be about a hundred and forty three thousand,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and seventy one calories. And it's got a

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>breakdown by body parts, right, so like the body parts

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>reasonably expected to be consumed based on ethnographic studies of cannibalism,

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>so not eating stuff like teeth and nerve tissue. That

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>would leave you with about a hundred and twenty five thousand,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and twenty two calories. And there is this

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>wonder full table in the paper where the body is

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>broken down into parts based on their nutritional value. So

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the heart it's about six hundred and fifty calories, the brain,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>spinal cord, and nerve trunks about undred calories, the four

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>arms one thousand, six hundred and sixty four calories. I'm

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>assuming this is not for a popeye, but just like

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>regular forearms. Now that hard, that's that's some that's some

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>good calories there. But that's some tough eating. That's some

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>tough tissue. Oh yeah, I think you've got to You've

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta make a stew with that. Well. Yeah, So part

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the caveats, and I'll get into

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the caveats in a minute here, but one of the

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>caveats is that this is just for raw meat. It

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it can't take into account how the nutritional value of

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>these things change when cooked. But we have discussed before

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>how cooking is thought to significantly increase the caloric value

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or nutritional value of a lot of foods. Things that

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot otherwise be digested can be digested after being cooked exactly.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to come up with some comparisons, not

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>analyzing protein ratios or anything, but just purely in terms

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of raw calories. I worked out that on this number

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>with the with the edible part being about a hundred

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and twenty two calories, human body is worth

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and thirty two Windy's bacon eaders. Now,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>what's a bacon eater. A bacon eader is a Windy

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>sandwich that has a bunch of bacon and cheese on it. Okay,

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's like a bacon cheese barker. Yes, basically, it's

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>like that there. I think they make a big deal

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about how like we don't put any lettuce on this.

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is just bacon and cheese. It's one

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of those sandwiches that uses kind of crass masculinity marketing.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of sandwich for men, like the double down

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of that kind of thing. Yeah, so it's like

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that human body is worth about a hundred and thirty

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>two Windy's bacon eaters. Or I've got another one here

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>about two hundred and ninety three slices of pizza Hut

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Meat Lover's large original stuffed crust pizza. All right, well,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's quite a lot of pizza. Well, I mean,

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a human body is somewhat nutritious, though I did I

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>want to say I arrived at those numbers using those

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>restaurants online nutrition calculators. Those numbers could be they could

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>be massively under shooting the glories in an average baconator. Now,

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously there are gonna be some caveats in this type

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of because this is just coming up with some very

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>broad est so some major caveats coal mentions. He says

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the data he used to arrive at his estimates were

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>only based on adult males in the twentieth century, and

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got a great sense of humor when he writes this,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>so quote. Ideally, nutritional templates for females and a range

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of ages would be constructed to represent the full nutritional

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>potential of hominin social groups. However, data for females and

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>subadults are not available within the published literature, and the

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>collection of primary data of this nature was outside the

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>ethical and legal scope of this study. Uh. He also

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>says that the data only pertains to basically anatomically modern humans.

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not known how different the nutritional value of other

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>species like Neanderthals or Homo erectus might be. Also, the

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>average values here are drawn from a small sample size.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Better estimates could be drawn if you had more humans

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to measure the neutra rational value of Also, these values

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>are of the nutritional value of raw me. Like we said,

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>cooking might change things. So after that coal also does

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>some estimates of the nutritional yield for body mass at

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>different Paleolithic cannibalism sites found by archaeologists. So you've got

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a Stone Age cannibalism site and you look at okay,

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what were the different people here that apparently got eaten?

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And so he like tries to add up how much

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>body mass calorie value was was being served at this site. Uh,

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and so how so the question he asks is how

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>do you humans stack up against other meat sources of

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the Paleolithic quote when compared to most other fauna, human

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>skeletal muscle has a nutritional value broadly in line with

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>those that match our size and weight, but produced significantly

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>fewer calories than most of the larger fauna such as mammoth,

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>wooly rhino, or deer species known to have been regularly

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>consumed by past hominins, So they're better meals around. Yeah, exactly. So,

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>while you could get decent nutrition from a human body,

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Cole argues that it would be much more worthwhile to

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>simply hunt the same large fauna of the time that

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you would normally be hunting mammoth, Rhinoceros RX, bison, cow, bear, horse,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>giant deer, all this stuff. So hunting and killing a

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>human for meat has a kind of wonky risk to

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>reward ratio because, you know, he points out that humans

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>are crafty and sometimes they can fight back in clever

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and dangerous ways. Is it really worth hunting humans provided

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to give you relatively low amounts of

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.719
<v Speaker 1>nutrition compared to these big, fat, bulky animals that are

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>also probably easier to hunt. So Cole asks were hominins

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>actively hunted by members of their own species in prehistoric times? Uh?

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.719
<v Speaker 1>He says quote active hunting raises the interesting question of

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>whether the relatively low calorific return for hominins would justify

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the energy expenditure in hunting an individual or group. If

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the motivation was driven was driven purely by balancing energy quotions.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It is suggested here that this would not be the

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>case when a single large fauna individual returns many more

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>calories without the difficulties of hunting groups of hominins that

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>were as intelligent and resourceful as the hunters in their

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to fight back and evade pursuit. So now he said,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have these instances of what looks like

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>prehistoric cannibalism among hominins, but it just doesn't seem like

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that is a very smart strategy for getting meat generally.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So what what's going on here? Why do we see

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this cannibalism? And he hypothesizes, well, maybe there are cases

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of occasional opportunistic nutritional cannibalism. For example, we're pretty hungry

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and a member of our group just died of natural causes,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>right or or certainly to go back to the warfare,

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and now ities like you get into some sort of

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>uh an altercation with a rival group, perhaps over access

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to fauna to fauna, and then well, I need meat.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I was hunting this thing, but I just bashed the

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>skull in of this guy, who, granted looks a lot

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like me. But is made of meat, right, So yeah,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it could be sort of occasional opportunistic cannibalism. But then

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Cole also says that quote the motivations for cannibalistic episodes

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>lay within complex cultural systems involving both intra and intergroup

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and competition. Essentially, he's saying he thinks a very

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>likely explanation for a lot of these cannibalistic episodes has

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>something to do with prehistoric culture, which we don't know

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot about. But it could involve uh, religious uses,

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>ritual uses, medicinal uses, things people believed there to be

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons to eat other humans that went beyond just the

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>nutritional value. I mean, it is very difficult to put

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>ourselves to attempt to put ourselves in the mindset of

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of such cultures. Yeah, and we don't know what they were.

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's one of the fascinating things. They're interesting

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>little tidbits, but they didn't leave written records, so we

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>don't really have descriptions of what they believed and what

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>their relationships were like, and you know, just all the

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>things that the kind of everyday texture of society that

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we know so well in our own world. It's it's

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly opaque to us what it was like this far

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>back in the past. Well, you know, even the Chainsaw

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>family from Texas, Chainsaw Masker, they they have their own

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of culture and system of beliefs that seems to

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have risen up out of this, uh, this Texan um

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>avatoir culture and their family history with the business there.

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's some intentionally or or perhaps accidentally uh,

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of ingenious ideas about like the spiritual nature of cannibalism,

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of indebted in that original motion picture. Yeah, do

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you have an example, Well, there's a sense of there's

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense of ritual to the cannibalism it's going on

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at least within the own their within the family, and

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could apply that to the barbecue restaurant as well.

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But like there's that whole scene with the uh, you know,

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>seated at the table and granted, you know they're they're

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>proba really drawing a little bit from Judeo Christian traditions there,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there's there's some something sacred going on

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with the family dinner and allowing Grandpa, the greatest killer

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that had ever ever lived, to attempt to to kill

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the victim. So that he can, uh, you know, drink

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of her blood, eat of her flesh, and grow stronger. Uh.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And then all these other sort of elements of like that,

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the little bone wind chimes and constructions that have been created.

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>It seemed it's almost like there are people that are

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so cut off from the rest of of a modern

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>society that they're kind of reinventing primordial religious concepts. That

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating. I had never thought of it that way,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Like all they do, like if if if everything that

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>they do is concerned with meat and the importance of

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>meat and the preparation of meat, um, and then what

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of ideas come out of that? It's it's it's

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>not unlike what we might try and imagine for prehistoric people.

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if your whole life is, of course

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>about the hunt, then various ideas spring out of that.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>If your whole life is about about the importance of

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>meat and blood, Uh, then you know it, who knows

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>exactly how they view the importance of our own flesh

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of powers or or or or I mean,

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we tend to put a horror show interpretation on it.

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And obviously I'm drawing in Texas chainsaw maskt right. But

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean perhaps in a way it's beautiful. Perhaps it

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 1>was like I have killed this individual in battle, and

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I must eat them like that is the the only

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>like that is how you show respect for a worthy adversary.

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're tempted to want to construct some sort

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of brutal like I have killed my enemy and now

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I must feast on their brains kind of thing. But

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it maybe in its own way it was sacred. Well.

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also possible that we frequently underestimate the

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>degree to which a lot of the strange features of

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>our culture that don't seem strange to us, because there

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are culture um are just are in traceable ways downstream

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of economics which are ultimately reducible to chemical energy economics,

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, acquiring food to eat. Uh, you can trace

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of culture back to getting food and surviving. Absolutely,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So to bring it back to the study, another thing

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine is how perhaps certain practices that were

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>originally just opportunistic nutritional practices, maybe opportunistic cannibalism, when someone

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>died and you didn't want to waste the meat, so

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you ate them. Uh, It's possible that could have turned

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.959
<v Speaker 1>into religious beliefs and rituals exactly. And that's not even

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>taking into effect like any you know, sort of abnormal

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>psychological effects that might have taken place and in certain

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>individuals and therefore influenced the overall shape of the culture.

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, like if one individual claimed and or even

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>believed that, say they consume the flesh of their departed

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>father and then heard their father's voice, then that could

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have enormous effects, you know. I mean, we're talking about

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the spread of religion. Yeah, this is always interesting territory.

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, yeah, well, not the last time we will

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the potential religious beliefs and rituals of prehistoric common ends.

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna go and take a break now. We're

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave cannibalism for now. But when we come back,

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at just a couple of more Ignoble

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Prize winners briefly before closing out part one of our

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble Prize series for this year. All right, thank thank

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're back. Robert. Do you have a shorter look

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to take it something? Oh? Sure, why don't

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the Chemistry prize? Okay, let's do some chemistry.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>This is from Romeo at all and they were honored

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for measuring the degree to which human saliva is a

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>good cleaning agent for dirty surfaces. The paper was a

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>titled human Saliva as a Cleaning Agent for Dirty Surfaces

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and it was published in Studies in Conservation back in

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>nine and and the winners delivered their acceptance speech via

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:06.720
<v Speaker 1>recorded video. So with the original title should I spit

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on it? And that got rejected that it may can't

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sound a little bit a little basically yeah, but we

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>can all relate to this, right, I mean, have you

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>ever used your own saliva to clean off, say a

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>smart smartphone screen or I know, in my case, I've

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>used it on a kid's face. Plenty of times. I

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>used my saliva as dishwashing detergent. So I don't know

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>why people buy those pods. You just spit in the

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>dishwasher a lot and then get it going. It does

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a great job. Well I I nobody's pushing it that

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that far. But there does seem to be something to

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the cleansing power of spit, at least to you know,

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a limited degree. And this is exactly what the paper

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and question looked into. They used quantitative test and chromatographic

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>techniques to isolate alpha Emily's as the key cleaning property

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in human saliva. Now you're probably wondering, well, what is

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>an Emily's Is it some sort of microbe? What is it? Well,

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>an Emilyes is a member of a class of enzymes

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that splits a starch compound via the addition of water molecule.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Now we we divide them into alpha's and betas because

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they differ in the exact way that they attack the

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>bonds of a starch molecule. But Alpha Emilyes is found

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>throughout the biological world, specifically in the digestive systems of

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 1>humans and other animals. The one in the salivary glands

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is called Thailand that begins with the P P T

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>y A l I in. So why is it important, Well,

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it concerns human biology. Obviously we're humans. We're always interested

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.919
<v Speaker 1>in that. It also concerns hygiene. And it's funny because

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it involves spit, and it involves the idea of cleaning

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>something with spit, something that on on a basic level,

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we all do this. We all have

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>probably had a situation where we use spit to quote

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>unquote clean something, and yet at the same time spit

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is considered dirty. Uh, Like someone spitting at you is gross,

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing someone spit in the street is disgusting. Well, yeah,

0:40:59.880 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can see some of the things, Like,

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I can see why this would be because the role

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>of saliva in the mouth is somewhat the same as

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the role of average cleaning liquids or detergents. Right, So

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it is a detergent mean that it's like a wedding

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and lubrication agent that helps things move around and wash off.

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And then it's also a somewhat a digesting agent, like

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>it breaks some things down and tenderizes some things. Yeah,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it is that. Our mouth, we have to remember, is

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the first stage of the digestion. You know. We masticate

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the food, we get it all cut up, we get

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it nice and wet and soaked, and then our tongue

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>helps to form it at the back of our throat

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>into a bolus that is going to pass down our throats,

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>preparing a package for shipment to the rest of the

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>digestive system. There's nothing more appetizing than thinking about the

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>lubrication of a bolus going down your throat, right, And

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>then you know, ultimately that's what a French kisses. A

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>french kiss are two individuals deciding to link uh the

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>initial stages of their digestive system and to manipulate each

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>other's um uh, you know, a oral manipulation. Limb. It's

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful moment. I just got a brilliant idea for

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>an episode in the future. It should just be called

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe ruined Kissing, and we just like we

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just destroyed. We just take it to the point where

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 1>nobody who listens will ever do it again. All right, Well,

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>coming this Valentine's Day to a stuff to blow your

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>mind episode near you? Well, I have another one here.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>This is another short one and we're not going to

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>spend much time on to kind of close out the episode.

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But their medical education prize uh, this one went to A.

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Kira hora Uchi for the medical report colin Oscopy in

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the sitting position Lessons learned from self colinoscopy self colonoscopy. Yes,

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna read the abstract on this one. Okay, Okay,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>just read it. Colin Oscopy is typically done in the

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>supine position, with the patient's position varied as needed to

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>assist instrument insertion. We found that a newly developed small

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>caliber variable stiffness colonoscope design for colonoscopy and pediatric patients

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>was especially useful in patients with difficult colonoscopy. The outside

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>diameter is ten point three millimeters, and the working length,

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the field of view, and the range of the tip

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 1>flection are similar to those of standard uh kolonoscopes. So,

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't have much to say about this one.

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It kind of calls back to our and we did

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>an entire episode on on the evolution of the anus,

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like we're shy about discussing this part

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of the human anatomy. But I think this is one

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of those studies that basically they honored it because of

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole uh self colonoscopy aspect of the title. I

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>suspect that is what set them off. Yeah, it was

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the self colonoscopy. Though at the same time it's important

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>because this is an invalid and important diagnostic method for

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>for for human health. Oh yeah, colonoscopies are important. All right. Well,

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're gonna go ahead and pinch off

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this particular episode of to to Blow Your Mind, but

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we're coming back in uh in the next episode, and

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss the remaining Ignobel Prize winners, UH,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>some of them in more detail, certainly than we than

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we spent with the colonoscopy study. There's some really good

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ones in the next episode, indeed, acording more, including morning Wood.

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So come back for that. Uh. In the meantime, if

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to check out more episodes of Stuff to

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind, head on over to stuff to Blow

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. That is the mothership. That's where

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll find all the episodes of the podcast. You'll find

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>links out to our various social media accounts. You'll find

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a link to our t public store. It's there's a

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>link for our store right at the top of the page,

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and that will give you the opportunity to buy something

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with our logo on it, like a shirt or a sticker,

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a tote bag, a throw pillow. They have all sorts

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of options there. It's a it's a cool way to

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>support the show, UH and UH we appreciate it if

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you do. And if you want to support the show

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in a way it doesn't cost you a dime and

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just simply rate and review us wherever you have the

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>power to do so big thanks as always to our

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>excellent audio producers Alex Williams and Tari hair Rison. If

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you would like to send us an email to give

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>us feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, or just to say hi, you

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can email us at blow the Mind at how stuff

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>works dot com for more on this and thousands of

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:36.399
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Does it how stuff works dot Com would

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 1>be