WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Scouting The Chargers Offense

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for a break? Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>time for the Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com. Wait

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>were with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton, Tuesday, November twenty first, twenty seventeen, Season thirteen,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Episode number seventy nine. Welcome to another edition of The Break,

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>live from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. At the start,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I really thought seventy nine was yesterday. No, it wasn't.

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>You want to go back and listen. This is the

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Chaz Green episode. I thought I thought about Chaz Green yesterday?

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You did said that. I don't think it was okay.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for you guys scoring at home, I mean

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with the notebook and stuff like that. Let us know,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But I really think this eighty You think I do well?

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The seventy ninth or eightieth edition of the thirteent of

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>The Break. You're happy now, Nick, Not really, because now

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the show is kind of derailed and it's my fault.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>But let's get it back. Driver that happens regularly, so

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you should be used to it by this. One of

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>those things. It's not derails. It's one of those things

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>where it just hits those little bumps and you're like, oh,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I better move over. You know what. We just we

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just can't start this show the right way. No, we

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>could at nine thirty. What time it's nine thirty. I

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>think if I was doing it by myself as a

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>one person show, or maybe if it was just me

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an Amber, I think we probably could. I think we

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>could get off to a good start and we could

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have great conversation. Somehow, somehow, there's something to do here

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>on this short week because of you two start again,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Episode seventy nine. Oh I hate that voice. That's okay,

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I hate when you do that. All right, let's jump in.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's we got a lot to talk about. We're gonna

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>start with some talk on injuring one of the players,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wow uh, and some of the players that that may

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>or may not be able to play on Thursday. And

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna start our talk about the Chargers. Dave's

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna give us a scoutter report, um Nick and Amber.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they'll chime in, maybe they won't we'll see never no,

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll we'll kind of dive into that. And

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I do want to spend a little time at some

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>point today talking about where the Cowboys did. I know,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>normally we take a big picture look, so I do

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit about where the Cowboys

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are relative to the other teams in the NFC, what

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>their schedule looks like down the stretch. And I want

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask the question to be honest with you. Maybe

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>this is a good time to do it. If I

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>ask you, guys the question right now, just your good

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>feel of whether you think the Cowboys can make the playoffs.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>What would you say? Let's start with you, Dave out

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>can can make it. I will make it. I'm sorry,

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>fill make the playoffs? Good feeling good? Feeling out out Amber,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you say? Um, I mean, there's always hope,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But I would say out Nick m I mean, certainly

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they're I mean, they are out there,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>and you look at the playoff picture. The only thing

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that gives me hope is their schedule, right their schedule

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>coming down the stretch here, it looks like they definitely

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have winnable games. I mean, they should win some of

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>these games. But um, well, let's just to win them all.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That's problem, right, Let's just take the conversation we just

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>had off the air to the air. Then, I mean,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there's all the reason in the world. And I pat

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>myself on the back. I said that last week you

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>lost this game. That's not ideal. You can still achieve

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>your goals. You basically, I think you have to win

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the next three. You have to win the next three.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>You probably have to win the next four. You gotta

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>win the next six. You don't now you can get

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you can get in. I'm telling you ten and six

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys is not gonna be good enough. We'll

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>see regardless. Okay, let's worry about that when we get there.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I know you have to win these next three against

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>three teams that are all below five hundred by multiple games.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to otherwise it's not even a conversation station

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>worth having. You probably need to beat the Raiders too,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously you need to beat to see how Yeah,

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you probably do need to win them all. The problem

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is no, the problem is just and I said, you know,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if they had if they had traded blows with Philly

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and come up just short, I'd have an easier time

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>having this conversation. But they've looked like garbage for two

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks. And I know, you know you'll you'll probably

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get Tyrn Smith back in the lineup one of these days,

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and Dan Bailey will be back. But the margin of

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>error is so slim. I mean, they lost games. They've

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>lost several games with Tyrann Smith in the lineup. Let's

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>not act and Zeke Elliott was there when Tyron Smith

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was in the lineup two for that matter, So let's

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>not act like that's this cure all that's suddenly going

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to turn them back into a powerhouse. That they lost.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They lost to the Eagles. They lost to the best

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>human football right now. They lost to them. So but

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the point is is that here comes the Chargers at

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>four and six. You should win. I mean, there's no

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>doubt about. I don't care they're playing well, but you

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>should win the game on Thanksgiving. You should win. You definitely.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Just I'm just do you think they're just hands down

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a better team. I mean, they're one game at being better.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, I mean, if you're gonna do anything,

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but it needs to be now. So I'm just saying,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess you definitely could win. And if they don't win,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll play it'll be because they played poorly. But I'm

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>just saying they could win. It's not like they could

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>play this great game and all. If they play their

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>best game, they should win. That's what you're saying. Yes,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>even their best game with what with their second stream

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>guys because of injuries. I'll still think if they play

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>their best game, they're same with the Redskins. Yeah, that's

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with the Redskins coming up in a

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>week at the Giants. Same thing. Those two games are,

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like they could easily lose, they could easily win because

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of those division games, but there's no excuse of why

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't win those games. Yeah. I mean, here's the thing.

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>When you look at this and I still I still

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>believe what I said last week. I believe losing that

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>game to Philadelphia put you in a situation where it's

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not likely because what I think has to happen

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I think the Cowboys have to win

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out right now. You look at the NFC. You've got

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons, you've got the PA, you've got the Rams,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and you've got the Saints, and you got the Vikings

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and Eagles. Those are all the six playoff teams, right,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and then still above the Cowboys are the Lions, the Seahawks,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers. Now you can dismiss the Packers if

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you like. The one thing I will say about the Packers'

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>schedule is they got a pretty light schedule. The rest

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way. I think they got Cleveland and there somewhere.

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they got Cincinnati and there somewhere. Like they

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>play teams that even with them not being full strength,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>they can win some of those games. But he's but

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the more important part. The Cowboys will beat the

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Bucks in twenty fifty. The more important part is the

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions, who are sitting above you, at one game

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>above you. They actually have a really easy schedule. They

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>only have one team left with a winning record of

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>their six that hurts, right, And then a lot of

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the teams in NFC South, they're gonna play each other.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>What you need is you need one of those, maybe

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>two of those teams to completely fall off. What you

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want is them to beat each other up and

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you get a win here, win there, and they're dividing

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the wins, but they all stay above you. All I'm

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>saying is, with all these teams that are sitting in

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>front of you with manageable schedules down the stretch, the

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys really got to go undefeated in my opinion, because

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>right now they're not winning any tie breaks among these

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>teams when they when you look at their tie breaks,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get the tiebreaks and you lay it out like that.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Atlanta's Atlanta looks like they're putting together a

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>little role right Carolinas there. New Orleans is still looking great,

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>which well, I think if you're a Cowboys fan, I

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>think you're rooting for the teams that are leading their

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>divisions to just win whin. I mean, you know you

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>want the Saints going fourteen and two and dropping, you know,

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 1>two losses on the Falcons and they played two games

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like they still have two games. Play what I'm saying.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing. You don't want them to split

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>those games, right, You want one of them to take

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>control and beat the other one twice. You know, you're saying,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>all those fans that were cheering for Seattle to lose

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>last night, they should have been cheering them for them

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to win. Yes, you want it. You wanted them to win,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pushing Atlanta down. In my I think that's I don't.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that that game was a wash because somebody

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in the wild card hunts getting a win either way.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Wah oh wow, wow, that's I was like Bill wallsh

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>she died a long time ago. Yeah, okay, I got it.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I got it. But if you want to if you

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>want to look at it, if you want to look

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>at the optimistic part of this, I think the thing

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to consider is of the next six games at the

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys half, think about this. Four of those games, the

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>next four games, they don't play a game a team

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>with a winning record, and they have a better record

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>than all those teams. So you've got San Diego at

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>four and six, you got Washington at four and six,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you got New York the Giants at two and eight,

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you got Oakland at four and six. Then

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you get Zeke back, right hopefully you got guys healthy

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>at that point, and you have to play the two

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>tough teams you have to play now. Mind you you'll

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>play Seattle. You'll get Zeke back, but you'll play Seattle,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle right now is without Cam Chancellor, who's out

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>for the season and Richard Sherman who's out for the season,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a big Those are big hits for them. Then

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you play Philly to end the season. If Philly, as

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we think, has wrapped up the division by the end,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>they have nothing to play what, sorry, they'll have something

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to play for. I would imagine if they have wrapped

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>up everything they can wrap up, they probably are not

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to play their their starters in the entire game,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>right I just, I just don't think they're gonna have

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>everything wrapped up. What do you think they're not? What

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think they'll still have to play for? They

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>still got to lose those two games. You gotta factor that. Well.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just they're they're two games in front of the

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>next best team in the in the league, right, So,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how many more wins they need to lock

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up home field? Like two? Three or probably probably four more?

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>On I just or out of sense? Do they play

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>anybody and they play the Vikings? I don't think they do.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Think are the Saints? They don't play the Vikings are

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the Saint They don't play anything. They do play somebody

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's in that top six. I do remember seeing that,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying even if they're a game up

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>on someone, Let's say they're just one game up and

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the tiebreaker, I mean, they're they might

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have to play just so they could lock up the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>baby seed. So it's not just a given just because

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they're four games up in the division that they don't

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>have anything to play for them because they don't need to.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to be going to the Superdome for

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game, or you know, Minnesota. I guess it's

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>a tough place to play either way, though, I think

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>if you I guess the point I'm making is, if

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>you want to be optimistic about this, there's a reason.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason to be optimistic. There's enough here that says, okay,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys can get on a roll here, which,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like you said at the beginning, Dave, there's nothing that

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you saw last week that suggests they can get on

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of role, right, but they do. It looks

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like maybe they get some of these guys back this week.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>If they get some of them back, maybe that steadies

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the ship a little bit. And playing teams that are

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lesser than us, especially from the standpoint of their record,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>during these next four weeks while you without Zeke, maybe

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you could steady this thing and you can actually get

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>some wins and get on a roll, get your guy back,

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and here you go. You know, the nice thing is

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a cliche and we roll our eyes at football players,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but like, what other way is there to look at

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it than just one game at a time. You know,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Hitchins last night in the locker room was like,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we gotta go one and oh before we can worry

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>about the rest of that. And it's a cliche for sure,

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know why even why would I waste my

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>time amping myself up about whether they can go on

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this run? Like they got to play a game in

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>two days, and if they lose it, then we can

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really probably start talking about not yeah exactly, we can

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>worry about other stuff. So you know, play this one

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>game they look good and they win and Tyron Smith

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>comes back, and not if they look good, if they win,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you're right, if they win. If they win, if they

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>win and you Tyron Smith's back, he's feeling better, that's

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>another week for Sean Lee to work on his hamstring.

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna look good and lose, Huh, They're not gonna

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>look good. Yeah you don't. You don't look good and

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>lose to a four and sixth. Right, but but but

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a way that you can look bad and still

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get a win. And right now I'm not style pointing

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>anything to win but a win. I just my point

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>being we can worry about win in five in a

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>row if they can win this one. Like, let me

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>see what they look like on a short week with

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>all these injuries and all this stuff, and we'll revisit

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that as we get ready for the Redskins. All right,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about these injuries. Yesterday, the Cowboys have

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a walk through. But during their walkthrough, it made the

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>injury report look great, like there was only one guy

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that miss practice. Everybody else was at least limited. You

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>had Dan Bailey who was limited, maliek Collins, Anthony Hitchins

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to Marcus Lawrence, Tyren Smith the only people that the

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>only person that was out with Sean Lee and then

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you had full practice for Jeff Heath who missed last

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>week with a concussion and Jeff Swain. So although it

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>was just to walk through, is that significant that those

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>guys were at least limited, particularly guys like Anthony Hitchins

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and Tyren Smith and Dan Bailey who those two have

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>been out and then Hitchins had gotten hurt in the game.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Well they what did they say on the email? It's

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>an approximation because it's a walk through, not a real practice. Yeah,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it's significant, and you know, I don't I think by

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>now we're all honest with ourselves that you know we're

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not always right. People listening to that know this. But

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we were on here yesterday morning saying like, no way

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Hitchins will be right. He looked horrible Sunday like he

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>did not look good. I mean, I think he's gonna

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>play or he's gonna try damn hard. He's they're not

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>ruling enough to do. Many football player are crazy. That's well.

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw him that that was that playoff game in

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay where he was just like he was. It

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>looked like he was just it took everything yell in

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>him to get out there, but he got out there

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to play. I mean, he said, the problem with his

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>with his groin is it's small. It's so small that

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they all right, really the muscle. I was thinking, I

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna go there, but go ahead, finish your It's

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>not it's barely a strain. That's basically it. Like, I mean,

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying he's not in any pain, but it's

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>not and you're not dealing with the type of thing

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that Tyrn and Dan Bailey are dealing with. So he's

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna give it a go. Just a pain issues. What

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, it sounds like, I mean, typically you don't

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>see guys go out there if there's risk of reaggravating it,

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at least a significant risk. So it sounds like he's

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna give it a go. Jerry Jones this morning ruled

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>out Sean Lee. That's not good, but he did say

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that hitch, Bailey and um Tyron all have a chance

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to play in this game. So are you at all

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned or do you guys get concerned about the possibility

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that a guy like Hitchens, because he is a tough guy,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>will push himself to play but may not be as effective,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in which case it's probably better for him not to play.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think the coaches would shut that down.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll you'll see, you know, a couple of

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>plays here and there, and they'll see if he can't

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if he's gonna hurt himself or hurt the team. You know,

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll pull him out of there, and it's not I

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a situation where you're gonna be sitting

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker or that should be playing, right. You know.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing, and I remember it happened into Bill

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Parcels one time. This offensive tackle said he could go,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he could go go, and then pregame he said, I'm out.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>My back hurts, and then you know, they didn't have

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody else after that. So, yeah, that can hurt you,

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think they're gonna be They're gonna say

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you sure you can go, Hitch, and then we're gonna

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sit March Lillard down and then you know, yeah, I

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>would play. I would bet everybody. Everybody's up, Lea's up

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for this game from the linebacker standpoint, all right. M

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>One other thing I wanted to make get an update

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on Bailey. It sounded like he actually did some warm

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ups and before this last game, and how did that

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>go for him? Well, I talked to him a little

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>bit in a pregame and he said I mentioned it,

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, you guys saw that. He's like, man,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I forget people are still in the building. Like, you know,

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>like before the yeah, like everyone's up there watching, you know.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>He was like, oh, well, because it went pretty went

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, and he's like, we'll see about this week.

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't feel I mean, he said it went fine,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but I don't get the sense that if he needs

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to come back and also kick off,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I think kicking off is it would probably be harder

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>than just the field goals. And so it's gonna be

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a situation where how does he kick off and how

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>does he feel doing that? Do we think that there's

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a possibility he could be back and ready to kick

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>field goals and they keep nu Gin up as well

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to kick off. I bet it's tough when you're inactive

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep two kickers active. Yeah, that's true. I mean

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounded good when I first thought the same thing,

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, we're having a hard time just

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>getting to seven and this week might be even more tough.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you get guys like Tyrn Smith back and

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you get Hitchens playing, now you got now you're the

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>number of guys that have to be an active for

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>injuries decreases, So you got some tough decisions and make

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Plus you want to protect yourself. If those guys can't

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>make it through the full game, right, I mean, Nugent

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>spend seven of nine field goals. I don't sit another

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>running back. It's fine, they did it last week. Just

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sit Keith Smith or Rod Smith or no, you can't

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>say another one. Yeah, just go with Morris. But McFadden,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely gotta sit. Like no, he's got no goot,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gotta sit. Definitely. It sucks. All right, let's ull

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>tell you what. Let's do this. Let's check our first break.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Dave's gonna give us a scouting

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>report on the charger's offense. This is an interesting butch.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into that. We come right back. This is

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com radio. It can be hard to

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>find the right resource for learning about important financial matters.

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>You search how to build savings, you end up reading

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>about the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you a taller. That's why Bank of America build Better

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Money Habits dot Com, a safe little corner of the

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet for answering your financial questions. Full of simple videos

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and tips, Better Money Habits can show you how to

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>make the most of your money. Without resorting to random

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>searches that always seem to lead to unbelievable photos of

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>childhood stars grown up. To learn more, visit better Money

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>habits dot com. What does it mean to be a

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys fan? It means you've got the passion and

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the heart to do your part supporting the Boys no

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>matter what. That's why when the game's on the line,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you're on your feet, whether you're at home or in

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the stands. Actually, you're more than a fan. You are

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a member of Cowboys Nation, and so is AT and

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>T doing their part to keep you connected to America's

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>team all season. Law AT and T is a proud

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>member of Cowboys Nations. Ice Cold, Doctor Pepper and the

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys go way back. They belong together like Texas

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and Football, Silver and Blue Shotgun Formations and Hail Mary's.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Having a Cowboys football party without Doctor Pepper is having

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving without the Cowboys. Basically, we wouldn't recommend it. So

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>next time you have a tailgate, homegate, or whatever else

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of gate, grab some ice cold Doctor Pepper for

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you and your friends to enjoy. It's a Dallas Cowboys tradition.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper the one you crave to work this big land.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You need equipment with values rooted as deep in Texas

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>soil as you are. Like John Deer compact tractors with

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a six year power train warrant to him, big features

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that help you work less so you have more time

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to do what you love. John Deer was first in

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Texas fields, and we're proud to be on the

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>field as the official agg and turf equipment of the

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals at my John Deer

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>dealer dot com. Slash football terms, conditions, exclusions, and warranty

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>limitations apply so you can loop for details. Back to

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the break. Welcome back. It's the second second of the

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>break live for the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We're about to talk about the Cowboys and the Chargers.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>They play on Thanksgiving data this year. Three five kickoff.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It's all right, I think it's three thirty five kickoff,

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So it makes you guys. Check that out. Dave, give

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>us a scouting report on this Charger offense. Well, I

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just gave you one off the air. I know, I

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>wanted to warm you up and I wanted to make

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>sure you're going to give the people good stuff. So

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's going to be good stuff, so go.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers are interesting to me just because they're like

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in that in between where you know, they have this

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame caliber quarterback who's nearing the end of

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>his career. He makes them relevant because he's so good

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and like the rest of this, it's like they're just

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>throwing up stuff to try to help him out, Like, hey,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to you know, like Dirk Navitski, you know,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>just trying to make them competitive for his last few

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>years in the league. Like they drafted, for instance, they'd

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of resources on the offensive line because

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers has gotten killed over the years. So they

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>drafted Forrest lamp who actually tours ACL and training camp,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>which I wonder how much better they'd be because he

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>got he got all of these comparis since Zach Martin

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out like he was this badass tackle from Western

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky and they were going to move him to guard

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and he was going to be a pro bowler immediately

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played this year. They also drafted Dan Feeney, who's

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick who's playing. I mean, he's starting

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and playing well for them as a rookie, they wouldn't

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>got Russell Okoom from Denver after he was like oh there.

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So they pieced together this line to help Philip Rivers

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the same vein. You know what, Philip Rivers is

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>like thirty eight years old. Thirty seven years old. I'm

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like that, like everybody else on his offense is like

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Like, they just drafted Melvin Gordon in the

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>first round. This is his third season. They drafted Keenan

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Allen in twenty thirteen, this is his fifth season. They

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>drafted Knick's guy Hunter Henry out of Arkansas, and I

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>think this is his third season as a Knicks guy

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry. Is he on your fantasy team? No, I'm asking,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, four names, there is that one person

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>or two people? Nick Eatman, ark Guy. Okay, I thought, okay,

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. You can't trust people with two first names. Yeah,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't. Uh so, Yeah, but he went to Arkansas.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the only point he's got it. It's funny because

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like Antonio Gate, like Antonio Gate, like he's going to

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the Hall of Fame. He's the guy you probably think

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>about when you think of the Chargers like Hunter Henry

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is supplanted him, like they used Antonio Gates in twelve

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>personnel and not much else. He's got one hundred and

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards. Interesting scenario though, Hall of Fame to be

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end and then they drafted another guy and he

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>actually plays in Gates is probably okay with him. I

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder how Gates feels about that. I mean, Hunter becoming

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>close to retirement, right, I mean yeah, I mean maybe

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. My Gates has been in the league longer

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>than has he longed. Yeah, I don't know if it's

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that long, but I know it seems like he's been

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the league forever. I want to say he was

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the two thousand and one NCAA tournament, I know that.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to say he came in two two thousand

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and two NCAA tournament. Maybe they got here, they came

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in at the same time. Probably, Yeah, but seems like

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been around longer. But yeah, it's just me, he's yeah,

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so regardless they drafted they drafted Mike Williams

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first round from Adda Clemson. So many Mike Williams.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I know. Then he's been injured, which one he hasn't

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>had a ton of opportunities, so it's like they're piecing

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing together, you know, like the you know, the

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys started with their offensive line and like built everything

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>behind that and then they added the running back. There's

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to find the method here. Like I just

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just like we gotta help Philip, just well year

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>by year, bringing things that we can use to help Philip.

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But like they're fine, I think mostly because Philip Rivers

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is such a good quarterback. But like you were telling

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>me off the air, like they're they're not really special

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>at anything. I mean, they're fifteenth overall. They're thirteenth in passing,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>so even with Philip Rivers, like they're not just chunking

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it away on people two hundred and forty seven yards

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a game. Melvin Gordon, he's having a decent career. I

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he's lived up to the hype of

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>being as drafted as high as he was, that he

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was the second guy taken after Gurley. I think he

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>went eighteenth ninety four rushing yards per game. They're twenty

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>fifth in the league and fifteenth in scoring offense, so

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's twenty two point one points per game. So

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna sound bad, but they remind me a

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the Falcons in the sense that, like

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of talent, but they haven't the

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>results don't bear that out and all the I mean,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously Atlanta beat the Cowboys by twenty points the other day,

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 1>but the offense like didn't blow me away in that game, right,

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they didn't just wipe him off the field

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>by any stretch. So there's the pieces there to be dangerous,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>especially when you have a guy like Philip Rivers. But

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>when we were arguing about this off the air, like,

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't see anything here that just really takes my

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>breath away in terms of like things you can't handle.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Like Keenan Allen is a very good receiver. I think

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that he's the worst number one receiver

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys have faced in the last little bit.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about I totally drew a blanket Jones,

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 1>think about Yeah, you think about Julio Jones, You think

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about al Sean Jeffrey, You think about the three or

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>four guys that Washington has Crowder dockson the tight ends

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and over there zach Ertz for Philly. I mean Hunter.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Henry's good, but he's not on that level. He's not

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Travis Kelsey level. There's not a guy here

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with speed like Tyree Hill. There's just not a guy

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that I just scares me where I'm like, oh my god,

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they just absolutely can't deal with this guy. I mean,

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I know Keenan Allen's good, but I just I don't

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>know that he's on that freakish level. He's got seven

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and five touchdowns this season. So is there

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a receiver on the Cowboys have seven hundred yards? No, right,

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking, I don't know, No, No, it's I don't

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>know what. I don't know what does has but it

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be that. I think he's at five hundred, but

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot more than that. So in lieu

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of all that, and with the fact that we know

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee's not going to play, the thing that scares

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>me is their running backs. Because Melvin Gordon is a

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>good player. I know, I just said their twenty fifth

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the league and rushing offense, but I mean that

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter when we've seen the Cowboys perform the way

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they have against some of these running games without Shawn Lee.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And the other one is this kid, Austin Eckler, who

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've been paying attention to the Chargers,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but he is having a breakout year. As like there,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's their new darren Sproles. He's he catches

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it out of the backfield, they get a runner. Yeah,

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>oh absolutely, he's that type of third down guy he had.

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got something like two hundred receiving yards

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and three receiving touchdowns, all three of which I believe

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>came in the last two games. So yeah, and if

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee was playing this game, it probably wouldn't bother

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>me a whole lot. But he won't be there. We

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>know that right now. And so that that's what I'm watching.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Between Gordon running the ball and what Brandon Oliver and

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Austin Eckler can do as receivers, that worries me a lot.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So you said that there's nothing really special about them,

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about what they did last week, because

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously last week they scored a ton of points. Keenan

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Allen had a phenomenal day with twelve catches, one hundred

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and fifty nine yards, two touchdowns. What did they do

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>last week? That you saw that made them so prolific offensively,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I can answer that without even looking at the game.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was, well, six turnovers right, well for a field.

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>In the interest of full disclosure, thank you short week.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>The all twenty two of Bill's Chargers is not up yet.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I had to watch old games of them because it

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>usually takes them like a day to turn that around.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the all twenty two of that game,

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think they were plus six and turnover differential,

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>which in the NFL helps. In the n like two

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of them were touchdowns. I mean, so at the risk

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, I mean just at the risk of

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just like explaining away something that of that magnitude. But

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, if you were plus five or six

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and turnover, almost throw that game out because that's like

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't happen and we win like that too. Yeah,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>when it does happen, the other team loses by thirty

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or forty points. So I look at I mean, I

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>look at that mainly is taking advantage of a young

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterback playing horribly in its first start. And then obviously,

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think once you get behind the ball

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like that, once a team gets behind by two or

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>three scores, then your offense is just kind of doing

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever it wants. So when you match up against this

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense and what the Cowboys defense does well front

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for what they do not so well at times, tackling

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>from the linebacker position, maybe some of the play in

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the secondary. What do you think they're matchup issues either

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>good or bad for the Cowboys? Well, I think I

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think the passing game matchups are favorable. Like I said,

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean like it's one of those things where now

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I regret saying it because I'm not trying to say

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen's not a good receiver. But I do think

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there's less here that you have to worry about than

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in other matchups. I mean they're other. You know, they

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>have Tyroll Williams, who they got as an undrafted free agent.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think they would probably prefer that Mike Williams is

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>their number two, but he's just not on that level

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>yet where he's ready for that type of snap count.

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And then and then you have Travis Benjamin who in

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the games I watched, he's their lucky whitehead, Like I

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>think that guy or a fast guy. He's like they

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>only run into rounds with him, Like that's like the

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>only thing that he does. And he's fast, so he

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>gets yards on him, which that's something to watch for.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's not like this true receiver that's running all

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>these routes. And like I said, Hunter Henry is a

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>good player, but we've seen them have success against Ertz

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and Kelsey. I think between Byron Jones and now that

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto Woozier is healthy, I think you can probably keep

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that down a little bit. Like I said, the thing

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that worries me is Melvin Gordon running and then all

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>three of these running backs catch passes. They ran a

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of screens against that Jaguars defense, which has been

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so good against the run this year since they got

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Marcel Darius in that trade. They're just aggressive. Like I

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think Gordon probably caught six screens in that game. Like

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I said, this kid Eckler goes out why like he's

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Danny Woodhead Absolutely he or Darren Sprowles when Darren Sprowles

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>was there, which was a decade ago, which is crazy.

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But all of that stuff worries me when you consider

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that Shaun Lee won't be there and Anthony Hitchins won't

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be one hundred percent. I mean, yeah, I think you're

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a hard time keeping those guys down. The

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think stood at the most to

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>me when I looked at this offense was they don't

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>get sacked very much, Philip Rivers and it doesn't get

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>sacked very much. They're third in sacks allowed in the

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL with only giving up twelve. That's a pretty good number,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and that when you look at the matchup, that's something

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that Cowboys typically do well, but may not that may

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be neutralized a bit because you're playing a team and

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that tends to not take very many sacks.

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because I don't think of their offensive line

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly isn't bad, but they're not like these road graders,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they're not just unbelievable. And Philip Rivers

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is not Tony Romo in his right, you know, but

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like he gets away from pressure, like he just kind

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of shuffles around back there and moves up in the pocket.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>He's he's I mean, he's been doing it long enough

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 1>that he just knows how the pocket works. He knows

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>how to get away from stuff. But like he doesn't

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>look amazing doing it, like he eli, Yeah, I mean good. Yeah,

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Eli doesn't take a lot of sex. Yeah, Philip Rivers

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like an old man like and I mean, you

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>know in NFL terms, like he just looks like he

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like a guy who's been playing football for a

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>long time. But he knows the little tricks of the

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>trade to help him get out of situations without having

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to be Russell Wilson. Yeah, all right, we're gonna take

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>some questions. You guys give us a call numbers two

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>one four eight seven two twenty one O two again

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>two one four eight seven two twenty one H two.

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also hit us on Twitter at Cowboys Break.

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get a question first from Twitter? What do you have? Amber? Well?

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Can I speak before the Can I throw in my

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>own call? I thought you guys didn't have one. I'm sorry. Well, no,

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say and do my homework, like I

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>knew Dave was gonna have a great details scouting report.

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But this team, it doesn't matter. Honestly, I don't. I

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the Chargers. I don't. I haven't been

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>following up with what they're doing. They're not not impressive

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to me. But aside from that, I just don't think, honestly,

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it matters whoever the Cowboys are facing at this point.

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm more concerned about themselves, what they're doing, the guys

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna have available, Are they gonna make those changes,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>those adjustments after halftime. I don't think the their defensive

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>line is gonna struggle this week. I think they'll play

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>better than what they did last weekend. David Irving, I

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>would assume they wouldn't really limit him like we saw

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>last game. He I think they're gonna connect and do

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a better job even if they're not getting sacked. I

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be able to put some pressure. But all

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in all, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter who they're facing, honestly. Welcome,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast studio, Jason Garrett. We're really happy

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to have you here, nameless faceless opponents. Hey, Control, you're saying,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's all about what we can can do, I mean,

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>get themselves fixed and then they'll be fine. It's not

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad point. I mean, it's really not a bad

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>way to look at this when you when you think

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>about the teams that they're gonna play, because again, these

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are not teams that are great. So if you do

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're supposed to do. If you take care of

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>your own business, you should be able to win them.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of these teams. I think that's a

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>logical fallacy because this team isn't great either, Like you

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to think about understood, understood, but but all these things,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And you could probably say the same thing for the Charges,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm sure the Chargers look at and say, if

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we just fix this, this and this, the Chargers, we

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>can win any one of these games. Right they've lost,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've lost sixty what sixty one did to

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen the last two weeks, Like we can beat these guys.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>They don't have it half their good players, right, that's

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's I mean maybe they get tired and and

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Bailey and Hitchings back on the but like they're not

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be fixed, Like they're not because the players

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be fixed with the teams. That team's not

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fixed. It's not gonna be the ideal version

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of what you want. I mean, they don't have Zeke,

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't have lead. They're not gonna be fixed. They're

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be trying to patch this thing together. So yeah,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and I doubt they're gonna have another game like they

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>did this past weekend talking about the Chargers, but as

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>far as turnovers, you look at the way that Dak

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is throwing and not really connecting with the receivers. If

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on him or on the receivers, it's still

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a big issue right there, and we'll see how it goes.

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But whatever the nihilistic Amber over here, something nothing matters.

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>One thing I will say about that, though, Amber is

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for me to see a scenario where the

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>offense fixes its problems on a short week exactly. So

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think if they're gonna win this game, I don't

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.479
<v Speaker 1>know if it's gonna be because they get better as

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>much as it's going to be that the things that

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing well they can to do well, and

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they do, and those things just continue. Like the running game,

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if the Running game can be a little bit better

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>than it was last game, because it was, as Day

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, it was okay, right, If it can be

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better, if the defense can actually hold

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for a full game, which you're thinking against an offense

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like this, maybe they can't hold a full game and

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>actually hold them a lot closer than what they did

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>with Philadelphia and maybe replicate what they did in the

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>first half against Philadelphia through most of the game against

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>San Diego. I think that's how they have to win.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think offensively they're going to score a ton

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>of points because that's just not what we've seen in

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. And I don't think there's anything

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going to change that right now on a short week.

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I mean, we've seen them do certain

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>things that do work and then they don't do it again.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>So that's the thing. It's like, Okay, are you gonna

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>take this time, this little amount of time that you

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>have available to actually look at go back and see

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what has been working and try to do more of

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>those things instead of That's the one thing I don't get, like,

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>if you see something working, why don't you keep trying

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that instead of switching it up? And and

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>then when you need them to switch it up, they

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>don't switch it up, so we'll see it's like they're

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just guessing wrong. Sometimes coaches do that. They overthink themselves,

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>like we're running this, they know we're gonna do this,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They're they're onto us, they know we're gonna run this.

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They know that, we know that they know, instead of

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>making them actually stop it before you stop it. Yeah,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that's true. All right, let's take our Let's take our

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>first break, our final break. I'm sorry, we'll come back.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>We will get some questions and numbers two one, four,

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>eight seven two twenty one oh two. Hit us on

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Cowboys Break. This is the breakcare. Cowboys fans

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>know that the second best of anything simply won't cut it,

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and your skincare should be no different. A long time

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>locker room favorite of the players and the official men's

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 1>skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is the number one best selling men's skincare brand in

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the country because we make products that help guys look, smell,

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys to get ten dollars off your first order of

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars or more. Jack Black Look Good, Smell good,

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Feel good, official men's skin care brand of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>with sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni,

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and cheerleaders. That's not all, though. You'll get to talk

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>x's and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay,

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Visit Cowboys Travel dot com to book your travel package today.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I hear all this talk about what it takes to

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be a cowboy. Everyone's got their ideas, but I just

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>say to myself, it's what's up top that matters. Sure,

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>you need men with the muscle and heart to get

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>her done. But if your scouts and coaches are listening

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>out there a word of advice. Pick them in with

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the most well worn stetson. That's the one most cut

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out to be a cowboy. Stetson hats are handmade right

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>here in Texas and have been on Cowboys heads for

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred fifty years. The rest of you can

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>visit stetson dot com slash cowboy to find a retail

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or nearest you. What does it mean to be a

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys fan. It means you've got the passion of

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the heart to do your part supporting the Boys no

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>matter what. That's why when the game's on the line,

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're on your feet, whether you're at home or in

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the stands. Actually, you're more than a fan. You are

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a member of Cowboys Nation. And so is AT and

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>T doing their part to keep you connected to America's

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>team all season law AT and T is a proud

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 1>member of Cowboys Nation. Back to the Break, final segment

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of The Break live from the SWBC Mortgage Studios at

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the Star, Nick, it's getting to be a holiday season.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Christmas is around the corner, and everyone loves presence. Everyone

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>loves packages. Tommy John has a way of making your

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>package look the best with their supportive underwear that's out there.

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It feels great as a way to make it look

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 1>good to shop exclusive Cowboys Underweartimmy John dot com forward

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Slash Cowboys for twenty percent off your first order Tommy

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>John dot com for Slash Cowboys Season of Giving. Thank you, Nick,

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Get your Tommy John for Christmas. Here we go.

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's let's jump into some questions. The numbers

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>two one four eighty seven two twenty one h two.

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also hit us up on Twitter at Cowboys break.

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a call from Floyd in Virginia. Floyd, what up?

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, Hey hey by Derek, Chapter seventy six. Appreciate it.

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You what I'm sorry? Alpha, Chapter seventy six. Oh all right,

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Doc Brow all right, Um, the reason we're having this

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>bad love streak is it's all Dave's fault. David has

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>been wrong, he said. Nobody watches the show. See him

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in the hoodie, he said, nobody. He said he was

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>wrong with Vic and Zeke didn't show up. But seriously, guys,

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this is you think it's the defense or the offense

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that's really our problem. Because on offense, we won't leave

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the system. We won't go George Rouse today, we won't

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>run wide. But on defense, our safety are always late.

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Byron Jones is always chasing. Jeff Heath, the fastest man

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>on the team, is always there step late. What is it?

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Offensive defense? All right? Appreciate the cough. It's I always

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>lean toward offense, and like, I don't know how many

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>times I can say it for whatever. Obviously you want

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the defense to be better, but they are what they are,

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're not a unit that's going to win you games.

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.959
<v Speaker 1>That about expectations, like, yeah, absolutely, expectation going to season

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>was offense has to carry you because that's the best

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>expectation is that your offense is a machine full of

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Pro bowlers and your defense is not. So yeah, um

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>well that's I mean, that's always have a defense with

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a philosophy of ben but don't break. And then it's

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen your Your safeties are going to

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be a step slower up to the to the stop

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the run because they're playing in you know, Fort Worth.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're they're not going to give up a

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 1>deep ball back there. So sometimes they do, but it's rare.

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean for the most part they're playing back there.

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Then when the line but I think it's more of

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a situation of miss and Shawn Lee and those linebackers

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>not being there. And now you're you're asking where your

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>safeties are, but the safeties are making sure that you're

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not getting beat deep. So I mean, I'm not I'm

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>not saying the safety play has been good. It hasn't.

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying you have to give up something, and

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys make sure they don't give up big plays.

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>When that happens, your safeties are going to be a

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit late to get up there. If your linebackers

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and defensive line are not making the plays at the

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage, how much better do you think the

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>defense would be if Barry Church was still here, like

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a real I think we had an argument

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in the spring where I I mean, he's a really

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>good player. He's not a great player. He's like as

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>good as you can be without being Pro Bowl caliber,

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, how much of a difference does that

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>guy make on this defense? Well, everybody would slide down

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>one spot, which I think makes a difference. Right, If

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Jeff heat is out there for only you know, I

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many less snaps, but let's assume thirty

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>less snaps. Like it, that's just his snaps in half.

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We know that Jeff Fith is in position and makes

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>plays when he gets limited opportunities. He can give up

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>some too, but he'll make a few plays for you,

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So you put him out there a little bit. It's

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 1>like JJ Wilcox. His final year here was his best

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>year here. He was not a guy that was out

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there every play. He was a guy that was out

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there in limited opportunities. But he made a few plays,

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's kind of the same thing with Jeffeet.

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather see Jeff eithan that kind of role, and

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>so from that standpoint, I think it makes a big difference.

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>On top of the fact that I think, you know

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they they I think they could use a little more

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 1>veteran leadership in that unit, and I think Church could

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>have provided that. I think there now, for the money,

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Cowboys for not signing him, I

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he was worth that amount of money

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for this team. He's the guy, either him or car

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>would be the guy that I would have liked to

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the most, and he was the most expensive. So like,

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at that as this missed opportunity. It's

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just like you can't afford to pay that was doable

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep far with the price that problem he got

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>up there, it was doable problem. I don't know if

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it was doable to do to keep To keep Church,

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think their run defense would be better with it,

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Like with the amount of games that Sean Lee has missed.

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it would be great, but I think

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be better. It's a good point. Barry was

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>still here too, But that's hindsight. That's like a question

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter. With the run game looking serviceable and Tyran

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially coming back, what can these offense do to improve

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the passing game? Why would you, guys? Possibly you want

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to see. What's really interesting to me is they asked

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Garrett about that, and you know, like it's a frustrating

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to figure out because i mean, even watching the tape,

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>you're like, okay, like does the receiver open? Is Dak

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not seeing that? Like it's hard to even look at

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all twenty two and be like, why exactly isn't this working?

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not as obvious as like he's just running

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>down the middle of the field wide open. Like it's

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>not that EASi, they aren't wide open, guys. He's just amazing. Oh,

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, like that has happened at points

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>during the season, but it's just it's not that obvious

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>when you're sitting down to like watch these games. But anyway,

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>we asked Garrett about this last night, and like his

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>entire answer was just about protection, was about Tyron Smith

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>not being in there. And I know Tyron Smith is great,

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but considering all the things that went wrong, in the

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 1>passing game, from drop passes to bad accuracy to bad

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>decision making. For Garrett to basically spend forty seconds saying

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that much of it as attributable to Tyron Smith was

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to me. Was that also maybe because what

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they think they saw was a quarterback who had been

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>brutalized so much the week before that last week he

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>was feeling and seeing things that maybe weren't there when

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the pass rush. Not only that, but

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I think, and you know, I don't think it's mean

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or harsh to say this, Like Dak's a second year quarterback.

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>He's not at the point where he's gonna make his

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>reads that quickly, like he needs that extra half second

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to full second that Tyron Smith gives him. And if

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to get into that barred room debate about oh,

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not elite, like, no, he's not elite. He's a

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>second year player. Like it's not it's not wrong or

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>insulting to Dak. Press got to say that he needs

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that supporting cast to be at his best in his

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>second year. Yeah, and he hasn't had it. And you know,

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>again to draw that comparison to Russell Wilson, I think

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that's really fair. Russell would so good. Well. He needed that.

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>He needed that when he was young. He needed marsha

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>On Lynch and they had a much better offensive line

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>at their defense was killer, like the defense shut people down,

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:21.879
<v Speaker 1>so he just had to knock them out. In year

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>six or seven, however long he's been in the league,

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he's out there doing that crap like he's unbelievable to watch.

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know the fact that Dak needs that right

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>now at the age of twenty four doesn't mean that

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he can't become a quarterback on that level later, but

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he needs that right now. I do think that this

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>team needs to throw the ball down the field a

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more, even if it's not the high percentage play.

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that they need to scheme plays for Bryce,

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Dez whoever get get him down the field. I mean,

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not just one of those when the play

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>breaks down, throw it down the field. I'm talking about,

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get it protected, stand up, and then let Terrence go

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>streaking down forty five yards down the field. Because what

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that'll do, even if you don't make it, what that'll do,

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it'll just push the safeties back and it will open

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>up the middle for the plays they want to throw

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Daz underneath, but they never show that they're gonna throw

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a deep ever. I mean, everybody else in the league

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is testing these corners for the Cowboys a couple of times,

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a few times during the game. They never do it.

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I know Bryce can go deep. You know Terrence can

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>go deep. So I don't know why they don't do that.

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It opens up more things in my opinion for the

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the game. Is it selective memory on my part?

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>And I know, I mean, I know what you're going

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, because you want them to get this fast receiver,

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But like, these guys don't throw the ball outside the numbers.

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not a thing that the Cowboys have been

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>doing with any real regularity this season, right, I mean,

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you saw they tried the fifty fifty balls to days

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the early going and it hasn't been working, and

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>it just seemed like they don't do it. But do

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we changed that term? But you know, because to me,

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>flipping a coin is fifty fifty. Like pulling a card

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.440
<v Speaker 1>rud or black, that's fifty fifty. But the fifty fifty

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>ball to dead like, that's no longer fifty fifty he

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:05.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get get seventy twenty five seventy five. I mean, seriously,

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not going he's not getting the ball fifty percent

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Yeah, it used to be seventy thirty

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>in his favorite right. But I'll ask answer your question

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with a question. Do they do anything in the pasting

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>game with regularity? Like there is no It seems like

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to me there's no consistency because I'll say, yeah, two

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>games ago they had that deep pass to Bryce that

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>was outside the numbers, But they don't do that consistently. Yeah, Um,

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they think you would think that maybe that dig route

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to Todays or slant route to days would be consistent.

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like they'll do it one game and

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>then another game. They don't do it as much. For

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Amber was just saying what they the Cowboys do things,

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll know and go back to him. Yeah,

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think they have any consistency in their past.

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they've only played, to my memory, maybe two

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>games where their passing game actually looked consistent. Hasn't wasn't

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. It looks it looked pretty good against Kansas City.

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>It looked pretty good against Green Bay um, there's somebody

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>else in there, well, definitely not Washington. And I'm not

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>even saying looks good or looks bad. I'm saying more

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that they do something consistently, like they say this we

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know we can do, Like there is nothing like that

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I would have this office other than the running game.

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I running game is what they do. I would argue

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that they can consistently find Daz on the slant slash

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>post dad. I mean, like, I'm just playing, Well, it's

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>funny because Das is good for six catches and sixty

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>yards like all every week. It's just it's not enough

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's not what we've gotten used to seeing, and

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not coming in the red zone. And there's not

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of plays that where he's breaking tackles action

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>turn it into more like they'll like Dack will find

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Das on a slant twice a game. It's just but

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it just hasn't It hasn't been enough to lead to

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>more or better results. He's not you know, obviously he's

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not Terrell Owens, but you know, to is the type

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of guy that would catch it over the middle like

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that and just he would just break through tackles. He

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was really good after the catch and Dez. We haven't

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>seen that out of Dez. He's lately or the last

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of years really just just really breaking tackles and

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.399
<v Speaker 1>just you know, because we say that like I'll want

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.720
<v Speaker 1>des back there in the open field for the punt return,

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, they're giving him some plays in the

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>open field here and on the offense, and he's not

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>really taking advantage. It broke my heart that he couldn't

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>get away from Derby on that like that he's been

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he's been so good at it. He scored, he's scored it,

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Lee and I watched all his touchdowns a couple of

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>summers ago. He scored at least five on that play

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of his. You know, fifty six career touchdowns, five or

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>six of them have been on just that bubble screens

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>set a corner. And Zack's got to get that ball

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 1>up too though, Yeah, for sure, because there are a

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of plays where the ball's down low, it's it's

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they're catchable balls. But he could make it a lot

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:54.720
<v Speaker 1>easier on his receiver, no doubt about it. You wonder.

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got two guys that are smurfs out there,

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, that he's got to throw are you Are

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you trying to say he's now accustomed to just throwing

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>low because he's got a little Well, I'm just saying,

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>behalf of smurfs everywhere, I don't appreciate that. I'm just saying,

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of guys on the team that

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't throw it high, you know, And there was

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:20.280
<v Speaker 1>one to Beasley. I've seen YouTube videos of him dunking

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>so he can get up in the air. Okay, the

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one where he didn't jump. Beasley can jump at all.

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But like that ball was like that was one of

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst throws of Dak's night. Like that was a

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>past to Beasley. There we go. That was you didn't

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>think so Beasley was just like, I'm not going for

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that that. I thought it was high. It was high,

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Like I didn't think he had a shot at that ball.

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I like that would like that would have been a

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>dunk of all dunks. That would have been like a

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>shock thunder dunk if he had gotten up there, and

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I know he was. There are several didn't land in

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the suits. I mean, you're making it sound like it

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was like I would I think you should go watch that.

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It was several feet above it. It was pretty high. Yeah,

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>get some effort, jump for it. You just want to

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>can jump for it just for the sake of jumping

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for it. Get your van Halen on this guy's he

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to stay off of Twitter. Yeah he's getting He's

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 1>just getting bad over there for him. Okay, here's a

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>comment from Twitter. Cowboys got rid of Clayborn because he

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stay healthy. Maybe they need to do the same

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with Shawn Lee. Thoughts on that crazy comment. That's a

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I love the fans, but that's a dumb question and

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a dumb comparison because that's not why they got

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>rid of Clayborn. It's not because he wasn't staying healthy.

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It's because he wasn't very good. He wasn't very good.

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>When he was healthy, he was okay, and he was

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>a high draft pick that you thought maybe he's gonna

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>turn it around, and his injuries hurt his consistency, but

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't playing at all world level, and when he

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in the game, you didn't see a huge difference.

0:50:56.640 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee, unfortunately for the Cowboys, is just he plays

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so great when he's out there and when he's not.

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>He has missed more than any so it's really tough

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to say we're gonna let you go because they need

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>him so bad. On top of well, just think of

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the numbers. Morris Claiborne was on his rookie deal. The

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys didn't pick up his fifth year option, probably because

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of his injury options. They let him walk away at

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>no cost to them when his rookie deal was over.

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Shaan Lee is signed through I want to say at

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>least two, if not three, more seasons, and to cut

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>him would be to hurt your salary cap and you'd

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>wind up paying him. You'd wind up paying the best

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>player on your defense not to play for you. And

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>as frustrating as it might be for him to get

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hurt often, I'd still rather have him on the payroll

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and available to play when he's healthy than pay him

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not to play. Here I need to look at these

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:44.759
<v Speaker 1>numbers again, but I think adding in this season and

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>how much he's missed already this season. Since he got

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that in contract three years ago, it was like five

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:55.240
<v Speaker 1>years it was before the twenty thirteen season, he's probably

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>lost a total of about four million dollars because of

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the way they structured it. They structured it too. If

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you're healthy, you're gonna make this. If you're not healthy

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and you miss games, you're gonna get this. And it's

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a great deal. It's not going

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to be an elite linebacker deal. He's lost or combined

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about four million dollars if not more, because he has missed.

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So the Cowboys protected themselves within this type of situation.

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>None of and for the record, none of that's to

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>say like you have to stick your head in the

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>sand about the situation. Like even with with Sean Lee

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen Smith under contract for the foreseeable future, I

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.319
<v Speaker 1>still think linebacker is a huge need for this team

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen. It's absolutely something whether you resign Anthony

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Hitchens or get another linebacker in here or draft somebody,

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely something you have to do to ensure yourself

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>against the future. But you're just creating problems for yourself

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:50.759
<v Speaker 1>from a talent standpoint and a money standpoint by trying

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of Shan Lee. Like it just doesn't

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:54.959
<v Speaker 1>make sense. Yep. Let's get a call from a horse

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.839
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta. Horse, what up? Stay? What's up? Guys? Hey?

0:52:57.880 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to take you to test Nick on a

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:03.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that you said last couple of days

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and actually last week too. Like you know, Anthony Brown

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>has been an okay, he's been a feeling he's not

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a good cornerback. He said that last week that he

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was good. Derek asked you about that. He has given

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 1>up more than half of the touchdowns that have been

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thrown to receivers. He's been the culprit, he's been the

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>person that they've picked on. And that's not a good

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>cornerback to me. Somebody who gives up half the touchdowns. Second,

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said Jack was not as good as Witch,

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think Derek was correct. They have switched their roles.

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>They lost Lane Johnson last year and you can see

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a difference in how they played versus how they played

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. And I know they lost Teeters this year,

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but they also learn from that and there tackle got

0:53:55.280 --> 0:54:00.359
<v Speaker 1>better so that when they did lose a perennial Pro

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:03.760
<v Speaker 1>bowler that they were able to adjust. The Cowboys haven't

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:08.280
<v Speaker 1>needed to adjust anybody except Free, who has always been mediocre.

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we got somebody better in Collins. But

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:16.239
<v Speaker 1>we've never had to adjust to losing the Tyrone Smith,

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>who is really arguably one of the best tackles in

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the entire NFL. So it's kind of hard to sell

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that spot. So I wouldn't say that DAK, I mean,

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you wouldn't say that Phil Simms was

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.280
<v Speaker 1>better than four Ekman when they lost those two games

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>when Emmet Smith sat out, you know, so you can't

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>say that Dak is not as good as wins. I

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that at all. But I do want to

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>know one thing. Can Charles Tapper come back? Because I'm

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really tired of seeing Taco out there? Just give me

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>one tackle a game he has him and Tapper and

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Tacco have the same amount of sacks, and Taco has

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>five more tackles than he does, and that's just ridiculous.

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks for the call, Thank you, thank you.

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't thought about Charles Tapper in a while. Yeah,

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of dismissed him within the uh within like

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like just in terms of the rules, like

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you could bring him back, But I just I don't

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think I thought he was out for that's his injury.

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 1>His injuries just he no like he could come back

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if he were healthy, but he won't be healthy in

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>time like I don't. He's done in his eight weeks

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in the IRN. He's been on ir long enough that

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 1>he could come back. He got just not ready to

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 1>come back. All right, let me let me address this

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>since I've been taken to task. Uh Anthony Brown, Um,

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that he If I said he is good,

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean he there's been times where he

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:44.799
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty good. Um, but you know, I thought

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he was good against Kansas City for sure, against against

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Tyree Hill, I thought he had a really nice game there.

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>He's a he's the fastest cornerback that you've got on

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the team. Uh. Do they need to upgrade from him? Sure,

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>if he was your fourth corner, that would be great. Um.

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that he's your third corner and that's not that's

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 1>not you know where he probably needs to be. But

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I think for his development where they drafted him, the

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 1>skill set that he has, about his speed, I mean,

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>he's good enough to be on the team. I'm not

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that you're you're set because you have Anthony Brown. Um.

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you didn't watch the game Sunday, I'm sorry.

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, wins is better than Dak. I don't know

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>how you can really say. If you want to say

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that all this stuff about who was missing, that's fine,

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:30.879
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just talking about from the skill set right now,

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz is a better quarterback than Dak. He was

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>better in the draft. That's why one guy's taken in

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round, one guy's taken second. Overall. It's just

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's just the way that that it is. I mean,

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't I love Dak. I think Dad's a really great,

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:46.760
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback, and I don't think I would even trade

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for him for for Wins. I'm just saying it's pretty

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:51.879
<v Speaker 1>obvious that I think Wins is better. And yes, he's

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 1>got he's got he's got some weapons around him, but

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Dad, I mean Dak has weapons. I mean

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Dad has some players here. These these wide receivers are

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be good. He doesn't make the throws that

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Wins does. Winz has a better thrower, and from a

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>mobility standpoint, it's not that much of a difference. Dak

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is probably a more mobile player, but it's not that

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:16.040
<v Speaker 1>much of a difference. As their pocket presence and their

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>arm strength and I mean their accuracy throwing the ball.

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's not a knock on. I mean, Dak

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay Wentz is one of the best young quarterbacks in

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Like, that was a great pick for Philadelphia.

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be there for a long time. Simson Aikman

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like like really, like that's a real comparison that they

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>never were on the same sentence ever. Ever, Sims and

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Aikman not even not even comparable. I think the point

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of what he was saying with that, though, is that

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>when Emmett was out, the fact that they didn't win

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>while Emmett was out, you can't make the claim. You

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can't Dingan. I said in a week two, I said

0:57:52.080 --> 0:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in a week two and they got beat by twenty

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>five points. I said it. I said, Dak Prescott, that's

0:57:57.360 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 1>my guy. Like this guy, he could play for me

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a day. And they got beat. They didn't play well.

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Zeke was there sort of in that game against Denver.

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, but I said it, like even with

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a loss. I'm not talking about wins and losses. I'm

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>just talking about what they did. I thought Dak showed

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you a lot that game, and I think the Cowboys

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have a great quarterback for years to come. And I

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't trade him for anybody in the division anywhere anything.

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's great. So all I'm saying is

0:58:23.280 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is that Carson Wentz at this point is a more

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>developed quarterback. And if that's not the case, thirty two

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>teams aren't gonna let him go for four full rounds

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 1>while this guy went number two overall. I mean, of

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>course he's more polished right now, but that doesn't mean

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that he can't give you some things. And you know,

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:44.000
<v Speaker 1>when you surround him with better players, I mean, it'll

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be a great battle for years to come. But I mean,

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't we all agree wins is a little bit further

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>along the deck, think for different reasons, Like I don't

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>know if the draft at this point, draft doesn't matter

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, because you get that wrong all the time.

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Quarterbacks get drafted at the top of the draft and

0:58:55.600 --> 0:58:57.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't very good. But I will say that just the

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:00.600
<v Speaker 1>way they're performing this season, you look at some of

0:59:00.640 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the throws that Wentz makes you look at you look

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at how he's able to escape pressure and create the

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:08.440
<v Speaker 1>situation where teams are even like when they get to him,

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they're still not getting him down. I think from that

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:15.320
<v Speaker 1>standpoint he went based upon that. To me right now,

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is playing better than Dak. I still don't know if

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I say one is definitively better than the other. I

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just think he's playing better this year. He's having a

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal year. He's probably gonna be League MVP if he

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 1>keeps this up. That's how good of a season he's having. Yeah,

0:59:27.240 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little bit of selective memory going

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on there, Like DA Dak has had those moments this

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 1>season as well, Like go back to and their games

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:37.959
<v Speaker 1>as consistently as wins. Probably not. And that's my point.

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And and Dak has fallen out of the MVP rate,

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know, that was an argument you could have

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>made a month ago. You can't make it anymore, especially

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>after these last two games that Dak was an MVP candidate.

0:59:47.440 --> 0:59:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think like he was trending toward being there. Yeah,

0:59:49.600 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if they had weathered this Oh yeah, if they

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>had weathered this storm better obviously, Yeah, I said a

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>month ago. Yeah, but he was. He was, absolutely he

0:59:58.120 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was playing. His numbers were right there with Dak or

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with wins when they were done beat in Kansas City.

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They really were. After that three game win, stry. Yeah,

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I got and it hasn't happened. It's been a rough

1:00:09.240 --> 1:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>month for the entire offense Dak as well. Honestly, go ahead,

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw this point out real quick about Wins,

1:00:15.440 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you all these weapons that these guys have around him.

1:00:18.080 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>These are these are guys that nobody really wanted. I

1:00:20.680 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>mean not, I mean they've kind of are somewhat cast offs.

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tory Smith wasn't a guy that was doing

1:00:26.760 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great things, and Nelson Aguilar was almost

1:00:28.880 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a bust. And you know in Alshan Jeffrey, they get

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>moved on from him from Chicago. So I'm just saying

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he is making these guys play at a better level

1:00:38.000 --> 1:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>than they were playing before. But I think it's also

1:00:39.960 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a matter of how they've been cast. Like a guy

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like Tory Smith, when he's asked to come in and

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be a third receiver versus being a number one receiver

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore, maybe you get a lot more out of

1:00:48.160 --> 1:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>him playing that role than being the number one guy. Right,

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing is really boring to me because it's

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like you're trying to ask me, like how the movie's

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna end after ten minutes, Like what like, it's way

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>too early to try to have the type of blanket

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>conversations like it's fun for fans. I think it's boring

1:01:03.640 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and lazy to try to dictate this argument after a

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>season and a half, like sense, give me some time,

1:01:09.280 --> 1:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, give them some time. We appreciate you joining us, guys.

1:01:11.880 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back tomorrow. Tomorrow, we'll get you ready for

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the game. We'll talk about the Chargers defense, and we'll

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>also give you our predictions for the game. Till then.

1:01:18.320 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>For Nick Keatman, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia, I'm Derek Eagleton.

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Com reading UL. This has been a production of Dallas

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.