WEBVTT - Blackstone's Michael Zawadzki on How Private Credit Got so Big

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I keep thinking about that Sam Altman hype cycle

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of phrase, the whole it's over and then we're

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 2>so back back thing. And obviously he was talking about

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>AI and how people you know, feel about AI, but

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you could apply it to a bunch of

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>different markets at the moment. So AI obviously, but also

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>private credit totally. Think back to the end of last year, right,

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>we had all the JP Morgan Jamie Diamond's proverbial cockroaches

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>emerging from private credit, and people started to get really worried.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Fast forward to January twenty twenty six, and a lot

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>of those concerns seem to have faded into the background.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, you wrote the thing, right, spreads everywhere are super tight,

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>and already we know that the stock market is up

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 3>for the year, but credit market is off to a

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 3>very strong start of all flavors.

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>From what I understand, right, stock markets stealing all the spotlight.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at the corporate bond market, now

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>this is the public bond market not private, but spreads

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 2>are at basically historic tights. I think the high Yield

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Index is starting at its tightest level ever in the

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 2>history of the index for the year. This is crazy,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>but it also highlights an important point, which is that

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 2>spreads and returns are all relative. Yeah, right, And so

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>if the public market is absolutely booming, that could be

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>a good thing for private credit. But also private credit

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>competes with the public market, right, so if you're getting

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 2>pretty good returns in public credit, leverage loans, something like that,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're not going into private credit as much as

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you used to.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>What if you found a house that just had one

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>cockroach that could you imagine.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>There's never one cockroach? That's the point.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>There had to have been a first cockroach that enters

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>the house. You get it really quickly in your and

0:01:58.400 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>then you don't have a cockroach problem.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Did I ever tell you I hate cockroaches so much?

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>The first of all, the first Japanese word I ever

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>relearned when I moved back to Japan as like a

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>fourteen year old was go ki bori hoihoi because I

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>had to go down to the local compini, the convenience

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>store and buy cockroach hotels because the entire apartment was infested.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And secondly, I hate cockroach is so much. I once

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>read an entire book about cockroaches just to know my enemy. Wow,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it was like three hundred pages on cockroache.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 3>Do we get the author on the podcast?

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 2>It was actually a really good book. It was a

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of like cultural and scientific study of the history

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of cockroaches. But anyway, we are getting massively off topic.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Shall I introduce our guest. We do, in fact have

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest. All right, So we're going to be

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>talking all things private credit, including how private credit is

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>relating to the AI space. At the moment, we're speaking

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>with Michael Zowatsky, also known as Ze. He is the

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>global Chief Investment Officer for Blackstone Credit and Insurance. So Z,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming on the podcast.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Wonderful to be here, Thanks for having me.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>So I am told by your lovely Blackstone representatives that

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>over the last twenty years you have grown Blackstone's credit

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 2>franchise into the largest business by assets at Blackstone. How

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>hard was that? Were you just sort of like riding

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a wave of corporate issuance.

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's talk about a few things that have happened here.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, I often get asked about this growth of

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 4>private credit, and I think there's a misconception that that

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 4>growth was driven by excess risk taking. But when you

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 4>actually step back and think about what's happened in the market,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 4>you basically had a innovative breakthrough that changed the way

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 4>business was done that was better for all market participants.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>The way I like to analogize it to is what

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 4>happened with Amazon in the retail space. Right before Amazon,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 4>if you want to go buy something, you had to

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>go to the store. But Amazon kind of took out

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 4>that middleman and brought you the consumer directly in the

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 4>manufacture and in the process created something that was simpler,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>more efficient, better for the economy, more transparent. What's private

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>credit done. It's done the same thing. It's brought the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 4>borrower right up directly to our investor's capital least. Sometimes

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>call it this farm to table model. Right, what have

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>you done in that process? You've cut out all the middlemen,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 4>all the syndication, all the trading desks, all the stuff

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 4>that led to leakage along the way, and in the

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 4>process you built something that was better for all market participants.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 4>If you're a borrower, you get to speak directly to

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 4>your lender. You get a customized solution, you get speed,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 4>certainty of execution. If you're an investor, you capture all

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 4>of that excess leakage in the form of higher returns.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 4>And that's been the case for the last twenty years.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, if you're the financial markets, you

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>have an ecosystem that is less levered. More asset liability

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 4>management brings more financial stability to the overall ecosystem. When

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 4>you have something that's really good for all market participants,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 4>it tends to grow a lot. And that's what's happened

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 4>in private credit.

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 3>What is the equivalent of like in this analogy, which

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I really like, what is the equivalent of the web?

0:04:59.720 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>So, the reason Amazon could cut out the physical bookstore

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 3>or the various other retailers, et cetera, is because the

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Internet exists and that creates solves some information problems, et cetera.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 3>How would you described the sort of like the thing

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that exists now such that so many different middleman and

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 3>so forth can be cut out? Scale okay, scale?

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 4>Right. The reason we couldn't do what we do today

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 4>twenty years ago, Yeah, is because we didn't have the

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>capital base, We couldn't write a billion dollar plus deal.

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Here's an interesting fact. Before twenty twenty one, there were

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 4>only five billion dollar plus private credit deals done. Ever

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 4>since twenty twenty one, one hundred plus, and we have

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Blackstone have done most of them. So what does that mean.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 4>We have the scale of capital to actually solve the

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 4>problems for our clients. We have the breadth of team

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 4>to go out and cover the market and bring these

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 4>solutions direct to our bart worst. And then the other

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>thing that's happened is the expansion of private credit beyond

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 4>what a lot of people think of it as, which

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 4>is middle market sponsored back back lending, into what we

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 4>call the real economy. Right, taking what is a two

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollar market today and thinking about a thirty plus

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollar addressable market when you think about areas like

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>private investment, grade real assets, asset back finans, and so

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 4>the other big piece of this is just the massive

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 4>expansion in the addressable market that's come about.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>So I take the point about you know, customized financing

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>solutions and bringing investors closer to capital and all of that,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>but at the same time, like the concern is that

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 2>as the space grows, competition for deals increases, and that's

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 2>when you start to see not just potentially lower spreads,

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 2>but also more leverage. And we have seen, you know,

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 2>some first leans that are now UNI tranches and things

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>that would normally spark a little bit of worry. Is

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 2>that something that you're seeing in the market.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 4>It's funny. Look, I've been doing private credit for two decades.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I think to the deals that we were first doing

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 4>in private credit twenty years ago, and I would tell

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 4>you I don't know that a single one of them

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 4>would pass our investment committee today. They were small, they

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 4>were cyclical, they were basically the stuff the banks wouldn't do.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Fast forward to today. Think about the average direct lending

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 4>deal we do. It's a two hundred million dollar EBITDAV business.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 4>It's forty percent loan to value. Pre GFC loan to

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 4>values on deals were sixty five percent plus. And so

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 4>when I think about the risk posture of a senior

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 4>secured loan today, it feels pretty good relative to history.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 4>And then that needs to be combined with the fact

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 4>that this opportunity in investment grade private credit, I would say,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 4>is the fastest growing opportunity we see in credit at Blackstone.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, So this is the other new thing that's happening

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>is ig private credit. So you know, private credit extended

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to companies with very good balance sheets, not junk graded,

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>has become more of a thing. It's going mainstream, and

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that is driven by AI is ands

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and tech related issuance. Talk more about what you're seeing

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>in that space.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's a big part of it. Right.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Anytime you see a significant need for capital, which we

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 4>obviously see in the data center build out, and then

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 4>connected to that all the energy, power and infrastructure that

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 4>needs to accompany that, you see huge capital needs and

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 4>markets that need that much capital need to access all

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 4>available options, and that includes public credit, but that also

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 4>includes private credit. Morgan Stanley put out a piece late

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 4>last year that estimated that eight hundred billion dollars of

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.599
<v Speaker 4>private credit alone is needed to finance the digital infrastructure

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 4>build out over the next five years. Okay, so that's

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 4>a massive number. I think what gets missed when people

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 4>think about the financing element of financing a data center,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 4>for example, is we're financing fifteen to twenty year take

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 4>er pay contracts with some take pay contract meaning think

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 4>about a triple net lease contract, matter what your usage is,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 4>no matter what your operating costs are, you're getting a

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 4>fixed sum every single month from your tenement. And they

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 4>can't get out of that contract. Okay, okay. And you're

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 4>getting that from some of the highest quality credit counter

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 4>parties in the world, right, Hyperscalers are the tenants in

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 4>most of the data centers today. And so as I

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 4>sit with my credit hat on, if I can lend

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 4>against some of the best counter parties in the world

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 4>against a known, defined stream of cash flows, and I

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 4>can do that with one hundred and fifty to two

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 4>hundred basis points of excess spread versus like rated public credit.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, so explain that. So we the most credit

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 3>worthy companies in the world are these cash flow gushers,

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 3>the big tech companies, et cetera. What is the I

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 3>still don't quite get what is the advantage for them

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of the private credit market spreads as you mentioned, are wider.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 3>They can access the bond market. They do it all

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the time, or they certainly can. So what is what

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 3>is private credit solve for the metas of the world

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and the apples of the world, such that they can't

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 3>borrow versus the public credit market.

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Customization, speed, certainty, flexibility, bringing that solution direct to the borrower.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes there's certain elements in terms of the timing or

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 4>whatever the case may be that requires a private solution.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Confidentially, you just explain that a little further, Like what

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 3>is it about these projects specifically when you say like customization.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 2>If people say customization all the time, give us a specific.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Exam Yeah, okay, Well, sometimes there's a construction element. Okay,

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 4>So you need to fund over time as opposed to

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 4>funding all of your capital day one. That's a good example, right.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes you need to structure in a certain way in

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 4>terms of the timing of the cash flows. That's another example.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 4>So there are things that are needed that don't necessarily

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 4>increase credit risk, but they don't fit the cookie cutter

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 4>mold of a straight away investment grade public on.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So this might be a difficult question to answer. But

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 2>when you look at your own portfolio, your own very

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>large portfolio, can you give like a rough estimate of

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>how much AI exposure has increased over the years.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's a fascinating question, right, because I tend to

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 4>think about AI exposure pretty broadly, Right, because I think

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 4>AI will impact not just data centers and the direct right,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, first derivative impact, but the second derivative impact,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 4>the third derivative impact.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 2>So you're looking at companies that could be disrupted as.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 4>We're looking at it all and we have been looking

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 4>at all and this is this is part of working

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 4>at Blackstone right, Like, we have unbelievable insights into what's

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 4>going on all around the globe in all of these markets,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 4>not just within our credit business that has five thousand

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 4>plus barwords, but our private equity business, our infrastructure business,

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 4>our real estate business. We happen to own a couple

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 4>of the largest data center developers in the world. We

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 4>have a huge operating team that helps companies implement AI capabilities,

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 4>help them play offense and defense when needed. And so

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 4>we leverage all of these resources. And I think about

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 4>AI impact across almost every business in our portfolio, the

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 4>varying degrees, But I think you have to be front

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 4>footed in thinking about that as an investor.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 2>What about direct exposures, I forget about I take the point,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>but like, the reason I'm asking is because there are

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>some concerns around concentration limits at places like insurers.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Look, we have over five hundred billion dollars of

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 4>assets and credit at Blackstone, and I would tell you,

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 4>like the amount of direct data center exposure is a

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 4>small minority that it would not rise to the level

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 4>of something where any of our clients would feel like

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>they have concentration.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>What about in terms of I guess said like formal

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 3>concentration limits. Just in terms of like on a day

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 3>to day business right now or over the last year,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 3>how much of new new activity would you say is

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 3>related to either sort of data centers or maybe some

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 3>of the power the power financing that is also needed

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 3>for data centers.

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Look, I would tell you it's a material portion of

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 4>what we're doing because it is such a capital intensive,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 4>credit intensive part of the market. But when I think

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 4>about everything we're doing across our business and credit, it

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 4>doesn't it doesn't screen as something that's you know, significantly overweight.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 4>Like if I think about what we're doing in our

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>private investment grade business, that's a real asset strategy broadly

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 4>defined right that includes obviously digital infrastructure and includes energy

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 4>and power, but it includes residential mortgages, which is a

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 4>massive asset class. It includes equipment, finance. We just announced

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 4>a deal recently to do an aircraft engine partnership, and frankly,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I'd say the single biggest thing that it includes is

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 4>what we call corporate solutions, and these are large scale,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 4>customized private credit partnerships with public investment grade companies. And

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 4>so recently we did a deal with Rogers up in

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Canada where we did a five billion dollar financing for

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 4>them against their network infrastructure back haul. We then did

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 4>a deal late last year with Cempra Infrastructure to help

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 4>them build out an LENNG project. And we're seeing that

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 4>not just in the US, we're seeing that globally. We

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 4>announced the deal yesterday in fact, with Ahold, the European

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 4>supermarket company, to help expand their logistics footprint. And so

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 4>I would tell you the biggest theme I see across

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 4>our private investment grade business is this notion of what

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 4>we call corporate solutions.

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 2>What's it like sourcing deals at the moment? So Blackstone

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 2>obviously very big, So I imagine people are coming to you constantly.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, I'm one of the things

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>we heard when the private credit market was very, very hot,

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>was there's a lot of competition for deals, right, and

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone wants in on certain financing transactions. So what's it like?

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 4>You got to ticket market by market, right, we were

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 4>just talking about private investment, great corporate solutions, some of

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 4>these big infrastructure credit areas. I would tell you in

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 4>that market there is more demand for capital. Then there

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 4>are players like Black Zone with the scale to actually

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 4>meet those needs. And so that is a market where

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I would tell you we have robust deal activity, and

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 4>that is a market where I see a lot of

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 4>excess spread. I know you mentioned earlier that spreads are tight.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 4>That's an area where I would say spreads are actually

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 4>quite attractive. Right. If you think about public IG spreads

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>today are eighty basis points, if you can make two

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty basis points it like for like credit

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 4>rated risk like, that's a lot of relative excess spread.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 4>And that's happening because the demand for capital relative to

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 4>the supply of capital is quite attractive, and that's showing

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 4>up for us as lenders. I'd say in the direct

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 4>line market, that's a market where spreads have tighten in

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 4>sympathy with the liquid subinvestment grade markets, but the excess

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 4>spread remains. Right, that excess spread of a couple hundred

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 4>basis points persists. I think what is helping is you

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 4>are seeing this increase in deal activity. We saw very

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 4>strong M and A activity in the back half of

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 4>last year. If I look at our Q four pipeline,

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 4>it's actually up twenty five percent versus what it was

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 4>at this time last year, and so I think we

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 4>are optimistic about a strong recovery and deal activity that

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 4>will help on your point in terms of sourcing deals

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 4>in that market specifically, I think the other thing that's

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>really important, and you asked this question around how do

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 4>we scale a business. Part of it is not just

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 4>waiting and sitting for the phone touring. A huge part

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 4>of what we do is think about the thematic areas

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 4>within all of Blackstone, not just credit that we want

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 4>to deploy capital in and digital, infra, energy and power.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Those are good examples in the investment grade space, but

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 4>there are also examples in the subinvestment grade space life sciences,

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 4>utility services. And what our team does is we proactively

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 4>identify these companies and pitch them customized solutions. And because

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 4>we have the scale of capital to actually solve that problem,

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 4>we can do that. We did a deal late last

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 4>year with a company called Signant Health in a life

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 4>sciences space. The billion dollar plus transaction that we led.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 4>How did we do that? Well, we had financed their

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 4>number one competitor. We had followed this loan because we

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 4>had held it in our liquid book, and so we

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 4>had the idea, Hey, let's call this company and say

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 4>you should do a private loan. And that's where the idea,

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>aation comes, and that's where the differentiation in the market comes.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people can pick up the phone, not

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people can create their own ideas and

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 4>actually effectuate them. And I think that's something we're uniquely

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 4>good at.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 3>Everything is just sort of like scale empower laws and

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 3>compounding return from having grown and having that network the

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 3>big get bigger. It's really such an extraordinary thing and

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>we see in tech, but we also clearly see it

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 3>in finance. I think with like you know, the percentage

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 3>of market share, that a cruise to the biggest players

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 3>clearly an advantage. Obviously, want to talk more about the

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>industry overall, going back to you know, Tracy mentioned, we're

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>so it's so over we're so back, we're so so cycleed.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 3>So at the end of last year, there were two

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 3>things there were like two like kind of blow ups

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 3>in but both were both related to auto. So tree clore,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I'm pronouncing it.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Try That's one of those words where I feel like

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 2>very stupid pronouncing it the right way.

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I M yeah, And I'm like, should I just

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 3>say try color?

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>So there was a pre color and then first brands,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>which I'm pretty sure pronouncing correctly, and then there was

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>like so that was like in the auto space, and

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 3>then there was all this stuff that went viral for

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 3>about five minutes, something about the chips and maybe they're

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 3>going to depreciate faster than people expected. Bunch of people

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to be holding the bag and I want

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to back get that out aside, you get those blow

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 3>ups in the auto area. Jamie Diamond comes out with

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the cockroaches. What was your read on that moment? Was

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>there reason to think that there are more Creek colors?

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say that, I like saying you

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 3>do well, thank you, more three colors out there.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 4>I would tell you when all of that was going down,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>we were scratching our heads. And the biggest reason we

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 4>were scratching our heads were all of those examples were

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 4>bank led BEG syndicated bag underwritten deals that somehow got

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 4>confused with private credit. And this is the biggest frustration

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 4>for us, because we looked at those deals and we said, hey,

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 4>one of the advantages of private credit is you can

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 4>actually do private level due diligence, you can get access

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 4>to management team, you can do weeks of work, you

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 4>can get private access to information. And so one of

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 4>our observations there was there was this misconception, and that's

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 4>why we think it's so important to continue to educate

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 4>on the distinctions between public credit and private credit, and

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 4>those situations were public credit. I think the other thing

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 4>that I think people maybe don't appreciate is while private

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 4>credit has gotten a lot of attention recently, private credit

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 4>has been around for a long time. You can look

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 4>at twenty year returns in private credit and you can

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 4>see that they've outperformed liquid credit by several hundred basis

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 4>points over twenty years through cycles. Also, you can look

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 4>at the fact that realize losses over that twenty year

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 4>period for the industry have been one percent. And so

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 4>I think we look to the data, we look to

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 4>the clarification, But then I think the last thing That's

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 4>also important to highlight here is defaults happen in some

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 4>the best bit great credit. And I think this is

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 4>the other thing that I think gets missed. People see

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 4>a headline about a credit issue. We have thousands of

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 4>credit in our portfolios. Some of them are going to

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 4>have issues. That is normal. If you look at the

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 4>long term default rate in the leverage loan market, in

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the public high yield market, it's three percent. These things happen.

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 4>We account for them in our underwriting, we account for

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 4>them in how we mark our portfolio, and most importantly,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 4>we have the resources to deal with those situations. We

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 4>have operating people, We've got a big workout team, and

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 4>if we do have challenges in our book, I think

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 4>to your point on scale, Joe, having the strength of Blackstone,

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 4>the resource and intellectual capital of Blackstone to actually support

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 4>those companies and drive good outcomes for our investors overturn,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 4>that's what matters.

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 3>I take your point about the twenty year returns, but

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, twenty years ago the private credit industry barely existed, right,

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and then we've basically had a seventeen year bullmarket except

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 3>for five minutes and twenty twenty eight a seventeen year

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 3>bull market in risk assets. So I don't think it's

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.479
<v Speaker 3>crazy to say, like, yes, the returns the real they deliver,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the faults are low. Defaults happen, but I don't think

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 3>it's totally crazy to wonder if you're at turning points,

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 3>because there's to some extent you can only take a

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty year track record so far if seventeen years of

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 3>them were in more or less a NonStop bull market.

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 4>So here's what I see. First off, what I think

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 4>will happen in the market is that you will continue

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to see private credit grow, and you will continue to

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 4>see strong private credit performance. That said, you're right, if

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 4>I look forward versus looking back, I think it's reasonable

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 4>to believe that you will see more dispersion in the

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 4>asset class. You will see some players underperform, you will

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 4>see some players have higher losses. I don't think that

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 4>means the entire asset class will face challenges because the model,

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 4>like we started with that Amazon analogy that still persists,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the excess spread versus liquid markets, that is durable, the

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 4>way our clients access private credit, and all of these

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 4>new areas beyond direct lending. We're at the very very

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 4>beginning of that very, very long road, and so I

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 4>think the long term thesis for private credit is intact.

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 4>By the way, you don't see massive ways of defaults

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 4>outside of recessions, and it doesn't feel like to me

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 4>we're headed into a recession. When I look at corporate

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 4>earnings growth, when I look at where consumers are, when

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 4>I look at fiscal and monetary stimulus, none of that

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 4>points to recession to me. And so when I look forward,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't see I don't see this big turning point

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 4>for the industry. I see continued growth in the industry.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 4>But what I do see is more dispersion, which is

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 4>a good thing. If you think about all established asset classes,

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 4>you have top growd tile managers and you have bottom

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 4>quartile managers, And so I think the asset class will

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 4>be a lot more about who is better at originating deals,

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 4>who is better at managing challenges in their portfolio, Who

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 4>has the broadest aperture to identify areas within credit broadly

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 4>defined where clients can deploy, where there is excess spread,

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 4>where there is better risk adjusted returns. I think that's

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 4>the era we're heading into, and I would say we

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>strongly embrace that era.

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you don't see lots of defaults coming up,

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>But what about liability management exercises or just restructuring debt,

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 2>because this is something that comes up occasionally. If you

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 2>look at default rate for private credit, I think officially

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 2>it's below two percent something like that, But if you

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 2>add back in the liability management exercises that we've seen

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 2>at places like First Brands, it goes higher. I think

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>it goes to like five percent or something like that.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Would you expect more companies to be restructuring debt as

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 2>this dispersion effect maybe feeds through well.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 4>I think there's two pieces I want to unpack there. One,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 4>this whole notion of liability management. It really is a

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 4>public market phenomenon, and it exists in the public markets

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 4>because public credit documents are really weak, right. They don't

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 4>have the same covenant protections that you have in private credit,

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 4>and so you can have debt layered in front of you,

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 4>you can have collateral strip That's what's happened in a

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of these situations in the public markets. Fortunately, in

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 4>private credit, the documents are more protective, and so I

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 4>think you will see less of that aggressive behavior in

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 4>the private credit markets certainly versus the public credit markets.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 4>The second thing I would say, Tracy, is the default

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 4>is just the beginning. What really matters to clients are losses,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 4>right because the strength of a private credit document allows

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 4>you to get to a table and negotiate with the

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 4>owner for maybe more equity. Sometimes we have to take

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 4>control of the company and we can use all of

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 4>the resources of Blackstone to improve that company and actually

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 4>deliver a strong outcome for our clients. And so I

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 4>think those are the two points I would focus on. Yes,

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 4>you will see defaults, but the question is over time,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 4>what is the loss experience for investors? And that's something

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 4>I think we have a lot of conviction in.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the other thing, besides the first brand and

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>first brands and three color blow ups you just want

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 3>to keep saying more times, was this anxiety about you know,

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the quality of some of these data sunderfining, like, oh,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the chip's going to be as valuable as people think,

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 3>and you know, actually it was just looking up, like

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>from the credit default swabs on Oracle actually basically continuing

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 3>to hit new highs. Core Weave, which is another one

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>that people are watching a lot that's actually come in

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 3>a bit, So maybe I don't know, people are chilled

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 3>out a little bit. But from the capital provider the lenders,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 3>what is the appetite right now for AI or related

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure financing in the wave of some of these hiccups,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 3>and what we see in the CDs market for what

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 3>might be some proxies for this kind of stuff.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think the nature of the risk matters, right.

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to paint it with a broad brush,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 4>because you hit it. The type of collateral matters, who

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 4>your counterparty matters. For us, whether we're financing chips, we're

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 4>financing a data center, we don't want to take residual

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 4>value risk, right, I don't view that as credit risk.

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.239
<v Speaker 4>So if I can invest in chips, if I can

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 4>invest in a data center that has investment grade counterparty risk,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 4>and my debt will fully be repaid inside of that

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 4>contractual agreement, whether it's triple net or whatever, and I

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 4>don't have to take residual value risk. I don't care

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 4>what that data center's worth in year twenty five. I

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 4>don't care with those chips are worth in year seven.

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 4>That's really good risk. I think when you confine it

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 4>to that which is what we are doing. I think

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 4>that's quite attractive. Will folks take that next layer of risk?

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 4>They might, but you need to make it.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 3>See any pullback like some of the you know, the

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.959
<v Speaker 3>less triple net whatever they like, could say okay January

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six versut January twenty twenty five, any anxiety

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 3>because we know that there is still incredible demand for

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the buildout. Right it's this multi year, multi trillion dollar thing.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 3>From your perspective right now, how strong is the capital

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 3>base for that buildout? Has it changed at all?

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I think when you have the contractual protections that I'm highlighting,

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I think the demand is there now.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Might there been some change to twenty twenty five?

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I would tell you that because the demand for capital

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 4>is so significant, okay, and bigger than the supply of

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 4>available capital. When you see that happen, you see spread

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 4>sent to widen. That's a healthy thing. That's a good

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 4>thing for the markets. And I think some of those

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 4>deals that don't have the protections that I highlight, they

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 4>have a harder time getting done in the credit markets,

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 4>and you see them get funded in the equity markets.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 4>I think both of those things are healthy. I think

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 4>when I take a big step back. There is a

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of chatter about this market, but we are firm

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 4>believers in the impact of AI SURE, and I think

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 4>the bigger risk is underestimating the impact of it on

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 4>your broader portfolio. Like I was alluding to before, what.

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 2>Was the fourth quarter actually like for you? And what

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 2>sort of questions were you getting from investors? Because we

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>know some other private credit players like Blue Oul got

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of redemptions, did you see similar pressures?

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Look, anytime you tend to see some of the press

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 4>that you highlighted, it's natural to get questions, and we

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 4>embrace those questions and we address them with the facts

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 4>that I just highlighted. I think for us, we continue

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 4>to see very strong demand for credit. I was around

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the world I think twice in the fourth quarter, meeting

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 4>with our clients around the world, and I would tell you,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 4>in aggregate, they want more private credit right our institutional clients,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I think year to day through nine thirty, inflows were

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 4>up over fifty percent versus where they were a year prior.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 4>We held a forum with many of our big clients

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 4>late last year to discuss relative value and risks in

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 4>the credit market, and Actually it was great for me

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 4>because it was a way I could actually survey our

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 4>clients on their views, and I would tell you they

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 4>continue to be very bullish on private credit. If anything,

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 4>they feel under allocated to private credits and asset class

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 4>and so I think the momentum will continue.

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 3>This sort of touches on one of my favorite things

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>to talk about, like sort of portfolio construction. But for

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 3>these mega clients, yeah, they say, okay, we're under allocated

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 3>more of this. What is it that in their broad

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 3>portfolio allocation, the characteristics of private credit are solving for

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 3>them right now?

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, look yield.

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, especially everyone loves yield.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, everybody loves yield. And I think even with spreads

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 4>tighter and with rates coming off a little bit, even

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 4>with that, the yield and credit relative to the earnings

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 4>yield of the S and P is as attractive has

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 4>been over a very long period of time. So credit

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 4>remains attractive. I think when valuations are expensive like they

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 4>are across the world today in most asset classes, being

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 4>defensive at the top of the capital structure really matters diversification, right,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 4>most of our clients have a lot of credit risk.

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Corporate credit risk. Excuse me, corporate risk in their portfolio,

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 4>whether it's private equity or on the credit side. What

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>about real assets. That's why asset back finance, That's why

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 4>investment grade have been so convincing for you know, so

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 4>high conviction for our clients, because it offers that diversification,

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 4>It offers that access to real hard assets that are

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 4>downside protected versus corporate risk. And then I would say,

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the other big theme for our clients around the world

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 4>is something we call multi asset credit. It is this

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 4>notion that credit as a whole is a place I

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 4>want to be deployed into. However, I'm also recognizing the

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>fact that markets EBB and flow. Where one market within

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 4>credit is attractive, one might be less attractive. How do

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 4>I partner with someone like Blackstone across everything we do

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 4>over a dozen different asset classes within credit to build

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 4>a diversified, resilient, higher yielding portfolio that allows me to

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 4>pivot to the best opportunities in the market wherever they

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 4>may be.

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Setting aside some of the cockroach phenomenon of late twenty

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, there was another thing that happened that was

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty big for the credit market, and that was the

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>withdrawal of the leverage lending guidelines for banks, basically making

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 2>it easier for them to do broadly syndicated loans. Would

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>you expect that to increase competition between the banks and

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the you know, BDCs so to speak.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Look, that one's gotten a lot of attention. I've spoken

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 4>to a lot of my friends at the banks recently.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 4>I think the reality is on new direct lending deals

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 4>the market, and by the market I mean the private

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 4>equity sponsors. They've largely spoken right like speed, certainty, flexibility, customization,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 4>all the stuff I hit on. That's a really good

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 4>thing for them, especially when they're buying a company and

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 4>they're in a competitive auction process. Even deals that met

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 4>the leverage loan lending guidelines that were in place over

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 4>the last two years, eighty five percent of them were

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 4>financed privately, right, So even when you had complying deals,

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 4>they were borrowers were still choosing private credit. I'd say today,

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 4>our partnership opportunities with the banks, particularly on the investment

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 4>grade side of what we do, it is more. It

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 4>is bigger than anything I would say that we've seen

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 4>over the last several years. The banks desire to partner

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 4>with us where they keep the client arrangement, they keep

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 4>the servicing, we keep the asset. We are seeing that

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 4>as a global dynamic, especially around some of these longer

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 4>duration asset classes, these hard asset asset classes, and those

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 4>are the exact things that our investors want, and so

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 4>I think that partnership opportunity will continue to grow.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 2>This is the front of me dynamic that we've spoken

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>about before, right, So private lenders are in competition with

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the public lenders, the banks, but at the same time

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing more partnerships.

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 3>No, and there's a lot of into something intuitive there

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 3>about you know, wanting to keep that relationship, but also

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 3>this element of like okay, the speed and customization and

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the financing. I have a question actually about management, internal

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 3>management and the art of growing a business. You mentioned

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 3>being proactive, so you're gonna have people on the phone

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and they're like, we did this thing, would you be

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>interested in this solution and so forth? If this big

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 3>company you're building it over time, I'm curious, like, how

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 3>do you design a system such that you have lots

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 3>of people working the phones but wanted to grow their

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 3>own books but not lower standards and led garbage into it,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 3>and how do you think, like, how do you build

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 3>those systems into it so that the person on the

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 3>phone isn't, you know, yeah, bringing in a bunch of

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 3>garbage just to grow volume.

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 4>I love this question. So as I think back at

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.879
<v Speaker 4>the history of our business at Blaspheming Credit, obviously we've

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 4>seen tremendous growth. We've seen tremendous success. A big turning

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 4>point for me personally was COVID, because up until that

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 4>point in time, we ran each of our businesses almost

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 4>as verticals, right we whether it was direct lending or

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 4>asset back finance or liquid credit. We had pms and

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 4>each of those businesses and they ran each of their

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 4>businesses from raising the capital to investing the capital, to

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 4>manage the team almost as a vertical entity. We had

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 4>no horizontal layer. But what COVID taught us when we

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 4>were all at home and our pajamas and the markets

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 4>were going walky, that we needed that connectivity. It would

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 4>be really valuable if one piece of our business was

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 4>really connected with the other piece of our business. And

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 4>so we started building out our CIO office, which I lead,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 4>as a horizontal layer to connect all of the dots

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 4>and bring tremendous consistency across our teams. And five years on,

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 4>that team is now one hundred and twenty plus people.

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 4>And what that team does day in, day out is

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 4>unifying the fabric of every single one of our investment businesses.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 4>And so we have a single investment committee that whether

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 4>you are a direct lending deal or an asset back

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 4>dealer or a liquid deal, you go to that same

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 4>investment committee, same underwriting standards, same memo, but most probably

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 4>the same people hearing the deals from all the different

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 4>parts of the Blackstone credit ecosystem to know where are

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 4>the best opportunities. By the way, that investment committee also

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 4>includes Senior represented as a Blackstone outside of credit. What

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 4>are we learning in private equity? What are we learning

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 4>an infrastructure that might influence this decision? The way we

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 4>aggregate and monitor data. We now have one centralized portfolio

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 4>company reporting system, and so at any time we see

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 4>weaknesses in an area, instantly the entire team knows them

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 4>and say, okay, let's pull back origination in this sector

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 4>and let's lean into origination in this other sector. And

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 4>so systemaizing our data, centralizing our processes, being even more

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 4>plugged into the themes we see more broadly at Blackstone.

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 4>That has been a critical part of our journey and

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 4>I think a huge competitive advantage for us going forward.

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I just want to go back to where we started

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the conversation, and I mean really the beginning of the conversation.

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Your job title so CIO for Blackstone Credit and Insurance.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.959
<v Speaker 2>I think this is really important and underappreciated in many ways.

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 2>But the partnership between insurers and private credit has been phenomenal.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Like a lot of the private credit growth that we

0:36:55.640 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 2>are seeing is coming directly from insurers. How important is too,

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess be an insurance company if you're in the

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 2>private credit space or have access to that pool of capital.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 4>Sure. Well, a couple points I want to really hit here.

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 4>One is our business model an insurance because it is

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 4>different than some others. Right, we don't have a captive

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 4>insurance balance sheet. We don't originate insurance liabilities directly at Blackstone.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 4>All we do is act as a third party asset

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 4>manager on behalf of insurance clients. That's what we do best,

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 4>That's all we want to do. Brick bry Brick. We

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 4>built our client base. It's a fully open architecture model.

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 4>All of our clients sit shoulder to shoulder, and so

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 4>I think that business model is critical. Right. We don't

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 4>want to compete with our clients, and we want to

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 4>make sure that every single one of them gets a

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 4>great experience with us. I think that's a business model question,

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's an important part of how we

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 4>set up that franchise. The second piece is of the

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 4>why why are insurance companies seeking private credit capital. Well,

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 4>in the case of a life insured, you're writing a

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 4>forty life insurance policy. In case of writing an annuity,

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 4>you're writing a set contract. The best way to manage

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 4>assets against those liabilities are safe, cash paying contractual assets.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Those assets are exactly what we originate in private credit

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 4>and that excess spread that we've been talking about throughout

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 4>this discussion one hundred and fifty to two hundred basis

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 4>points for investment grade life for light credit that is

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 4>extraordinarily valuable for insurance companies versus just buying traditional liquids

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 4>on the screen. And we've seen US insurance companies adopt

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 4>that in scale with a ton of success. And one

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 4>of the big themes I see going forward is that

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 4>same idea expanding to Europe, expanding to Asia because it

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 4>is such a strong fit for insurance company balance sheets,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 4>high quality, safe contractual, LNG duration, investment grade assets.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>So I've never worked in insurance private credit, but I've

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 3>worked in the media industry and the digital media industry.

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 3>And one of the phenomenons that you see is company

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 3>starts and they buy various third party solutions off the shelf, like, Oh,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to buy a piece of software to run

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 3>my content management system for the website. Then you grow

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 3>and then you grow and you're like, you know what,

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 3>this third party solution doesn't work. I need to build

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 3>my own software for managing my content, et cetera. Does

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 3>what happens, Like, do insurance companies hit a point where

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 3>it's like, you know what, We've enjoyed doing business with you,

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 3>but we actually want to launch our own private credit

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 3>arm and we know that there are some of course,

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 3>there are insurers who are joined at they do all.

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Is there a point where it just makes sense for

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 3>them to have their own private credit shop or is

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 3>it sort of case by case whether that makes sense

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 3>for them?

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the direction of travel broadly is the

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 4>other way, right. The reason why our business has grown

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 4>so much is because insurance companies have said, hey, lack So,

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 4>you're really good at this. You've got huge, dedicated team,

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 4>You've got tons of expertise. We can't replicate it. But

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 4>that is company by company, and some continue to do

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 4>some things in house. Some have certain strategies where they

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 4>have that expertise and they'll continue to do that in house.

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 4>And we're happy to complement in the areas where we

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 4>can be additive. But I would say the overall direction

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of travel is a realization that we have built out

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 4>this infrastructure, this origination team, this CIO portfolio management franchise,

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 4>this asset allocation framework, and clients want to benefit from that.

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 2>You've mentioned excess spreads throughout this conversation, and I take

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the point that everything is relative. I think I mentioned

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that in the intro. But it is also true that

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:44.479
<v Speaker 2>spreads on direct lending have fallen over the past years.

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I think we went below ten percent for the first

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 2>time in three years something like that. They used to

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 2>be in the mid to low teens. What do you

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 2>see happening to spreads next year or this year? I

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 2>should say, because it seems kind of concerning to me

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 2>if we're getting more supply but spreads are grinding tighter.

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, look, I think there's a couple of things there. First,

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned it, right, bowers do have choice, right, and

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 4>so there is going to be some connection to where

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 4>the liquid markets are. And over time, that two hundred

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 4>basis points spread for privates versus liquids has held, and

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 4>it holds today, and so I think that's one thing

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 4>to watch. And I think that relative value point you

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 4>made is the critical point. I think the second thing is, yes,

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 4>you are starting to see more m and a supply,

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 4>but we're still well off where we were five years ago,

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 4>and so I think there's still a lot more room

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 4>to run. And when I kind of step back and

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 4>I look at the simple math of private equity dry

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 4>powder versus private credit dry powder, private equity dry powder

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 4>outstrips it five to one, Okay, And so I think

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 4>there's still a lot more room to run in the

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 4>supply equation. I think spreads today are pretty stable, and

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 4>I think our clients earning that excess spread versus liquids

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 4>earning that absolute return, it still feels quite good, even

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 4>though it's not the same as it was three years

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 4>ago still feels quite good relative to where equities are

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 4>valued today and other things in their portfolio.

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 3>In private assets in general, one of the popular critiques

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 3>is that, you know, people call volatility laundering. It's like, oh, look,

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I had a rough quarter INCK in my stock portfolio

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 3>and my whatever, but my credit portfolio is flat this quarter.

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 3>And because there were no trades, there were no marks,

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and that makes me feel sleep easier at night. And

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 3>the accusation is, as an industry, you build to some

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 3>extent on this notion of like, here's this asset class

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 3>that just like helps me sleep better at night, it

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't doesn't move, et cetera. You what's the response to

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the volatility laundering claim in private assets generally?

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, A couple of things there. First, I look to

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.439
<v Speaker 4>a twenty year loss ratio, right, like, you can't hide

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:54.720
<v Speaker 4>that over twenty years, and I think those stats speak

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:58.720
<v Speaker 4>for themselves. Second, you're right, like this question around valuations

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 4>have have been out there and private assets and blacks

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 4>One's been around for forty years. We use a best

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 4>in class process with third party valuation provider. We mark

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 4>our book every single quarter, and those third parties are

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the ones that are doing it, and we mark that

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 4>to market company fundamentals, market moves. That all shows up.

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 4>What's funny to me is, you know when we do

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 4>see underperformance in an asset and we mark it down,

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 4>which we do on our watchless assets, we get questions

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 4>about that. People are paying attention to that, yet they

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 4>are also asking us out of the same breath, are

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 4>you actually marking your assets? And so I think if

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 4>you actually look at our portfolio, you will see a

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 4>small subset of the book that isn't doing what we

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 4>expected to do when we mark those accordingly. I think

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 4>that's healthy. I think that's good. I think that provides

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 4>some buffer for our clients, and we'll continue to use

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 4>our third party, well established process to continue to do so.

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned dry powder earlier, and this is a truism

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 2>of markets, which is dry powder always seems to be

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 2>waiting in the wings, Like no matter where we are

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 2>in the credit cycle, one's talking about dry powder. I'm

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of surprised to hear that much the number you

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>cited in the private credit space because again we have

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 2>seen phenomenal growth and they're still cash lying around that

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 2>needs to be deployed.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Look, we continue to see strong flows into the market. Right,

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 4>the product is doing what it's supposed to do, which

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 4>is generate strong, consistent outperformance for clients relative to liquids.

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 4>I think as long as you see that continue, you're

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 4>going to continue to see strong flows across all of

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 4>our client types, whether it's insurance institutions, individuals.

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Question I ask a lot of people today in January

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six, within your organization, are you finding productive

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 3>applications of generative AI tools that make your life easier

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and reduce free up working hours from people who to

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:53.879
<v Speaker 3>do other things.

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, this is a huge focus for us, and

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.040
<v Speaker 4>I think I would be lying if I say we

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 4>have the golden ticket today, but we have a lot

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 4>of focus on this area. How do we make our

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 4>business more efficient, how do we make it easier on

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 4>our teams, whether it's building models, knowing what questions to

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 4>ask in their due diligence process, data aggregation and analysis.

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 4>All of this stuff is in motion. It's at various

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 4>stages of development, and I think you will continue to

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 4>see us lean into that significantly. It can never replace

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 4>the investment decision, right, That's still going to be central

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.959
<v Speaker 4>to our process. But I think anytime. We can use

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 4>AI to drive efficiency, and like I said, we have

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 4>tools that allow that to create the start of an

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 4>investment companye memo, the start of a model, aggregate data

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:47.879
<v Speaker 4>so we can help our team see trends earlier. All

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 4>of these things are in process, and I think more

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 4>and more you'll see higher adoption.

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Could you imagine a future where valuation is done more

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 2>by AI? Because I think about the third party valuation services,

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 2>they're doing matrix pricing, which is basically inferring the market

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 2>value from you know, other clues they can get. Inference

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 2>is like you know, that's AI.

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Basically, I think using AI to support that process. You know,

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 4>where have market spreads moved? Okay, this company's performance was x.

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 4>How does that translate into a mark? I think you

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 4>will see, just like I highlighted on the investment process,

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 4>I think you will see adoption of support tools, driving efficiency,

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 4>driving accuracy, driving scale. At the end of the day,

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 4>you still need a human at the end of that

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 4>to make the decision, but I do think you'll see

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 4>it incorporating more and more into our workfloaws.

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 3>What skills are you looking for when you think about

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 3>recruiting in twenty twenty six and twenty twenty seven, a

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of people anxious about what they should what they

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 3>should know, what they should be studying, et cetera. What

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 3>are the skills that today are still clearly valuable and

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 3>will be valuable that you would want to see in

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 3>a new recruit.

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, first and foremost, the people we look to

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:06.879
<v Speaker 4>hire upatone, incredibly hard working, genuinely good people motivated by

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, taking on more growing Some of these like

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 4>fundamental traits like yeah, that is universal and I think

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 4>that will never change. I think in an environment where

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 4>you're using more and more productivity tools, how do you

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 4>interact with people? People want to you know, do deals

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 4>with folks that they feel like they can trust, they

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 4>develop good relationships. How do you think forward around corners?

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 4>These are the types of critical thinking and communication skills

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 4>that I think are going to be even more valuable

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.400
<v Speaker 4>to layer on to all like the basic stuff we

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 4>have always looked for and the people we bring into

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 4>the firm.

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're going to have to leave it there,

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But thank you so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate it.

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 4>It was my absolute pleasure.

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:48.839
<v Speaker 3>Thank you guys so much. It was a lot of fun.

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I learned a lot, Thank.

0:47:49.920 --> 0:48:03.760
<v Speaker 5>You, Joe.

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm a journalist or podcast hosts. You know, there's a difference.

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 3>No, there's no no word journalists. People always make parties there,

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you do? I say, I'm a journalist, all right.

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 2>The natural tendencies of journalists is to be a little

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 2>bit more pessimist than an investor. I mean, if you're

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 2>an investor, almost by definition, you have to be optimist.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 3>I agree, I'm paranoid optimist, that's right.

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 2>But I do see some signs of worry in the

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 2>private credit market. So beyond the cockroaches that we talked about,

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have more companies doing liability managements. The

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 2>documentation point I found kind of surprising because in our

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 2>previous conversations, certainly in some of the research that I see,

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 2>people say that documentation is declining, so investor protections are

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 2>basically going down, and there's more convergence with the public

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 2>market and things like that. So I take the point

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 2>that like every private credit investor that we have on

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the show is going to say that they're different and

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 2>they're more selective and things like that, and it may

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 2>be true, but overall, if you're seeing documentation go down

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:14.439
<v Speaker 2>and leverage go up and supply increasing, that seems kind

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of bad.

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean look, I think the thing that I guess,

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, all of that sounds very intuitive to me,

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and the attentions. The other thing that, and it's sort

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of related to this, is like how do you maintain

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Like Okay, you think about the fundamental service, right, you

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:37.320
<v Speaker 3>think about the fundamental service of like speed and customer

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:42.800
<v Speaker 3>customizability and so forth. And then the tension that exists

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 3>is like, okay, you want to like turn this around, yeah,

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 3>right away, et cetera. And the tension between that and

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 3>like robust documentations and I mean again, twenty year business

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 3>to some extent speaks for itself. But on the other hand,

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 3>like you could see how these things over time would

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 3>come in to especially come into tens such a competitive

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.479
<v Speaker 3>environment exactly. I want to you know what, you place

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 3>a phone call to me because you need money. I

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.879
<v Speaker 3>want to be able to give you an answer right away.

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say yes very quickly.

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 3>I want to be able to say yes to you

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 3>to maintain your business, To maintain that line and the

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 3>tensions that could potentially emerge between like our relationship as

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the lender to the borrower versus you know, my relationship

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to my people who want protections, et cetera. You could

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:30.439
<v Speaker 3>see how those would emerge, for sure.

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there.

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 2>All right? This has been another episode of the Odd

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alloway and.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Arman, dash O

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Bennett at Dashbot and Kiale Brooks at Kilbrooks. More odd

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 3>We have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes,

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:54.919
<v Speaker 3>and you can shed about all of these topics twenty

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.240
<v Speaker 3>four to seven in our discord Discord dot gg slash

0:50:58.320 --> 0:50:58.840
<v Speaker 3>out lots.

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoys, if you like it when we

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about private credit, then please leave us a positive

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 2>review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:09.840
<v Speaker 2>are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.799
<v Speaker 2>our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to do

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the instructions there. Thanks for listening.