WEBVTT - TechStuff Enters the Singularity

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how Stuff,

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>What's dot Com? Hey there everyone, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>My name is Jonathan Strickland, Host Extraordinary and I'm Lauren

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>vocal Bam host Extraordinary or that's very true. And uh,

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and today we wanted to talk about the future. The future. Yeah, really,

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about kind of a science fiction future. We're

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>talking about the singularity and uh, long time listeners to

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff and I'm talking about folks who listen way

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>back before we ever talked out at thirty minutes, let

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>alone an hour. May remember that we did an episode

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about how Ray Kurtzwild works. And Ray Kurtzwild is a

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>futurist and one of the things he talks about extensively,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly if you corner him at a cocktail party, is

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the singularity. And so we wanted to talk about what

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the singularity is, why this idea, you know, we really

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kind of dig down into it, and why

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is this a big deal? And how realistic is this

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>vision of the future. Yeah, because some people would take

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of h would would argue with your

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>concept of it being science fiction. They take it extremely serious.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, they say it's science fact, science fact, it's

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>science inevitability. Yeah, the time. The term was actually coined

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>by a mathematician, John von Newman in the nineteen fifties. Um,

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was popularized by a science fiction writer. Yeah,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also Ah, there are a lot of different concepts

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that are tied up together, and it all depends on

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>upon whom you ask what it means by the singularity.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>For instance, there's some people who when you hear the

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>term the singularity, what they say is, Okay, that's a

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>time when we get to the point where technological advances

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are coming so quickly that it's impossible to have a

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>meaningful conversation of what the state of technology is because

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it changes. It changes five the milliseconds. So that's one version.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But most of the versions that that we're familiar with

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that the futurists talk about incorporate an idea of superhuman

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence or the intelligence explosion, right, a kind of combination

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of of human and technological development that just dovetails into

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>this gorgeous you know, space baby from two thousand one

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of that's an excellent way of putting it. The

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>documentary two thousand one. I remember specifically when the space

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>baby looked at Earth. Okay, but that documentary example doesn't

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>work at all. He usually does, but not this time. Yeah,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>not this time. Sorry. Space babies are a poor example

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in this in this one instance. But but metaphorically speaking, yes,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you're right on track, because the intelligence explosion. That was

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a term introduced by someone known as Irving John Good,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or if you want to go with, his birth name

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>is a door Ja cub Gudak. I can see why

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he changed it. Yeah he uh. He actually worked for

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a while at Bletchley Park with another fellow who who

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>made sort of a name for himself in computer science,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>a fellow named Alan Turing. I guess I've heard of him. Yeah.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Touring will come up in the discussion a little bit later,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but but for right now, So Irving John Good just

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>just a little quick anecdote that I thought was amusing.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So Good was working with Touring to try and help

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>break German codes. I mean, that's what Bletchley Park was

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>all about, right, So Good apparently one day drew the

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>ire of touring when he decided to take a little

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>cat nap because he was tired and he was It

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>was Good's philosophy that being tired did not mean that.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>He meant that he was not going to work at

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>his best, and he might as well go ahead and nap, exactly,

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>take a nap, get refreshed, and then tackle the problem again,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're more likely to solve it. Whereas touring was

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>very much a workhorse, you know he was he was

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>no rest, no rest, let's do it. So touring, when

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he discovered that Good had been napping, decided that that

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this was the Good was not so good um and

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and touring Touring sort of treated him with disdain. He

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>began to essentially not speak to Good. Good meanwhile, began

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about the letters that were being used to

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in Enigma codes to code German messages, and he began

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to think, what if these letters are not completely random?

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>What if the Germans are relying on some letters more

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>frequently than others, And he began to look at frequency

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of these letters being used. He made up a table

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and mathematically analyze the frequency that certain letters were used

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and discovered that there was a bias. Yeah, so he said, well,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>with this bias, that means that we can start to

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>narrow down the possibilities of these codes. And in fact

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>he was able to demonstrate that this was a way

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to help break German codes, and Touring, when he saw

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Good's work, said the sword, I tried that, but but

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly that showed that it worked well. And then Good

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and another point apparently went to sleep one day and

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they've been working on a code that they just could

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not break, and while he was sleeping, he dreamed that

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps when the Germans were encoding this particular message, they

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>used the letters in reverse of the way they were

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>actually printed, and so he tried that when he woke up,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out he was right. And so then

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>his argument was Touring, I need to go to bed.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, what the moral of the story here

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is that naps are good and no one should talk

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to you, right, yeah, yeah, that's how I live my life.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so so Good's point anyway, he came up

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with this term of the intelligence explosion, and it was

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this this sort of idea that we were going to

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>reach a point where we are increasing either our own

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>intelligence or some sort of artificial intelligence so far beyond

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what we are currently capable of understanding, that life as

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we know it will change completely. And because it's going

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to go beyond what we know right now there's no

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>way to predict what our life will be like because

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it's beyond our because it is by definition, out of

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>our comprehension. Yes, as the Scots would say, it's beyond

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 1>our ken are we going to be doing accents this episode?

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That was a terrible one. I actually regret doing it

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. I already knew I couldn't do Scottish and

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>yet there I went. Anyway, your trail placing again, So

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to kind of backtrack a bit before we really get

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>into the whole singularity discussion, that was just a brief overview.

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>A good foundation to start from is the concept of

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law. You know, originally Gordon Moore, who, by the way,

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a co founder of a little company called Intel.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh he he originally observed back in nineteen sixty five

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in a paper it I'm going to I'm gonna with this,

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but it was called something like cramming more components onto

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>integrated circuits something like that. That was that was actually

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>cramming was definitely one of the words used um and

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>circuit probably was to Anyway, he noticed that over the

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>course of I think originally it was twelve months, but

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>today we consider it two years, uh eight twenty four months,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think is the official unofficial right right right? Yeah,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that that the number of discrete components on a a

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>square inch silicon wafer would double due to improvements in

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing and efficiency. So that, uh, in effect, what this

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>means to the layman is that our electronics and particularly

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>our computers get twice as powerful every two years. So

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>if you bought a computer in and then bought another

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>computer in two thousand, in theory, the computer in two

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand would be twice as powerful as the one fro.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>This is exponential growth. Uh. That's an important component, this

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of exponential growth. And it goes without saying that

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>if you continue on this path, if this, if this

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>continues indefinitely, then you know, you quickly get to computers

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of almost unimaginable power just a decade out certainly, although

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I still don't really understand what a gigabyte

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>means because when when I first started using computers, we

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>were not counting in that. I mean, I mean I

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was still impressed by kilobytes at the time. So yeah, now,

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember the first time I got a hard drive,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it had like a two fifty megabyte hard drive,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, who needs that much space? Now? Gad,

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's space we're talking about, not even processing pis.

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it's it's one of those things where

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the older you are, the more incredible today, is right,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because you start looking at computers and you think, I

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>remember when these things came out and they were essentially

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of a of a really good desktop calculator.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So but Moore's law states that this advance will continue

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>indefinitely until we hit some sort of fundamental obstacle that

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we just cannot engineer our way around, right, you know,

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And people that that's why it's it's kind of in

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>contention right now, because people are saying that, well, there's

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there's only so much physical space that you can fit

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>onto with with silicone, there's there's there's a physical limitation

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to the material in which there's only so much you

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>can do about it, And so does more It's law

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>still apply if we're talking about other materials, and what's

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, and and how small can you get

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>before you start to run into quantum effects that are

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>impossible to work around? Uh? And then do you change

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the geometry of a chip. Do you go three dimensional

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of two dimensional? Would that help? And yeah, there

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of engineers are working on this, and frankly,

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every couple of years, someone says, all right,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the year Moore's law, and it's good to end.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>It's over, it's done with. Five years later, you're still

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>going strong, and then someone else is gonna end. It's

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a self fulfilling prophecy. I think

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of companies a to to keep it going,

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep it going, Oh sure, yeah, yeah, yeah. No

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>one wants to be the ones to say, uh, guys,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>guess what, we can't keep up with More's law anymore.

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to do that, so it is a

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>good motivator. Also, if I can putting out myself real quick,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that I just pronounced silicon is silicone,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and I would like I would like to stay for

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the record that I know that those are two different substances. Okay,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Anyway, I was I was going to ask

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you about it, but by the time you're you were

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>finished talking, I thought, let's just go Yeah, that's cool,

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it's all right. If you knew how many times I

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>have used that particular pronunciation to to hilarious results. Um.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So moving on with this, this whole idea about Moore's law,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the reason this plays into the singularity is

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with the technological advances, you start to be able to

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:53.359
<v Speaker 1>achieve pretty incredible things, and uh, even within one generation

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of Moore's law, which is kind of a meaningless term.

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's say, let's say you arbitrarily pick a date

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and then two years from date you look and see

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what's possible with the new technology and getting to twice

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as much power however you wanted to. Fine, it doesn't

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean that you've only doubled the amount of things

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you can do with that power. You may have limitless

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>things you can do. So with that idea, you're talking

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about being able to power through problems way faster than

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you did before. And there's lots of different ways of

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>doing that. For example, um, grid computing. Grid computing is

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>when you are linking computers together to work on a

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>problem all at once. Now, this works really well with

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>certain problems, parallel problems we call them. Uh. These are

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>problems where there are lots of potential solutions and each

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>computer essentially is working on one set of potential solutions,

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and that way you have all these different computers working

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on it at the same time. It reduces the overall

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>time it takes to solve that parallel problem. Uh and so,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>um like if you've ever heard of anything like folding

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>at home or the set project where you could dedicate

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:06.119
<v Speaker 1>your computer's idle time. So the problem the idle processes,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the processes that are not being used while you're serving

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the web or writing how the singularity works, or I

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, uh, building a architectural program in in in

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>some sort of CAD application. Anything that you're not using

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>can be dedicated to one of these projects. Same sort

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of idea that, uh, you don't necessarily have to build

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a supercomputer to solve complex problems if you use a

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of computers, whole bunch of small ones. Large

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider does this, although they use very nice advanced computers,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but they do a lot of grid computing as well.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So uh So, just using those kind of models, we

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>see that we're able to do much more sophisticated things

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>than we could if we were Certainly, Yes, networks, as

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, are pretty cool. Yeah, and networks play

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a part in this idea of the singularity. Um. Actually,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess now is a good time. We'll we'll kind

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of transition into Verner Vengees And honestly, I don't know

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how to say his last name. I say venge and

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it could end up being Vinghi. But I just went

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>with what you said. So that's great, that's fine. What

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll say that Vench says everything is silicone. Uh, so

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Verner though he Verne, I call him Verne. Ah he

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>He suggested four different potential pathways that humans could take,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or really that the world could take to arrive at

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the technological singularity. Okay, the four ways are we could

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>develop a superhuman artificial intelligence, So computers suddenly are able

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to think on a level that's analogous to the way

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>humans think and can do it better than right. Uh,

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that means computers are conscious, that's debatable.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into that too. Computer networks could somehow become

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>self aware. That's number two. So yes, sky net so

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>like like the grid computing. We were just talking about

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that somehow using these grid computers, the network itself having

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>enough cycles and enough pathways and enough loops back around

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it starts going like, hey, I recognize this, starts thinking

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>about like like like thinking about IBM S Watson. But

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's distributed across a network. So computers, you can think

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of computers is all being super powerful neurons in a brain,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and that the network is actually neural pathways. And it's

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely a science fiction a e way of looking at things.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean it won't happen, but stranger things, my friends.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It feels like a matrix kind of thing to me.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Then we have the idea that computer human interfaces are

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>so advanced and so intrinsically tied to who we are,

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that humans themselves evolved beyond being human, we become trans human.

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is an idea that we almost merge with

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>computers that on some level via kind of nanobot technology,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff stuff running through our bloodstream, stuff in

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>our yea, or we have just brain interfaces where our consciousness,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness is connected to so so for example, we

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>might have it where instead of connecting to the Internet

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>via some device like a smartphone or a computer, yeah,

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's right there in our our meat brains, so that

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know you're sitting there having a conversation with someone.

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Then you're like, oh, wait, what movie was that guy in?

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me just look up I am dB in my brain.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you you know, depending on how good your

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>connection is, which means, by the way, if you are

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a journalist and you attend ce s, you will automatically

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be dumber because all the all the internet connectivity will

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>be taken up and so you'll be sitting there trying

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask good questions and drool will come out of

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>your mouth, which to me is a typical c E S.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I can I can only assume that that wireless technology

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>would advance also at this point, but one can only

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hope fingers problems. There are certain technologies that are not

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>advancing at the exponential rate of Moore's lave, which is

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>another problem. We'll talk about that. And then the fourth

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and final method that Werner had suggested the world may

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>go would be that humans would advance so far in

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>biological sciences that they would allow us to engineer human

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence so that we could make ourselves as smart as

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to be. This is sort of that Gattica

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>future where we've got all the another another great documentary,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>where we we engineer ourselves to be super smart. So

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the four pathways artificial intelligence, computer networks become

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>self aware, computer human interface has become really really awesome,

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>or we have biologically engineered human intelligence and uh, and

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>all four of these lead to a similar outcome, which

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is this intelligence explosion. And this is the idea that

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>some form of superhuman intelligence is created, either artificially or

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>within our elves, and that at that point we will

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer be able to predict what our world will

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>will be like because by definition, we will have a

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>superhuman intelligent entity involved. And and because that's superhuman, it's

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>beyond our ability to predict which is you know, which,

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which makes thought, experience experiments about it a little bit

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>uh philosophical, that's the kind way of putting it, uh, pointless.

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Would be another way of putting up like we could,

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we could, you know, sit there and and and spitball

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of possible futures. But that's the thing,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they're possible. We don't know which one could come out.

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't even know if these four pathways are inevitable.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>We have futurists who truly believe that this is something

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that will happen at some point there are other people

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>who are more skeptical, but we'll talk about them in

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit. So one of the outcomes that Werner was

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about, uh, and it's it's a fairly popular one

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in futurist circles is the idea of the robo apocalypse. Essentially,

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this is where you've got the humans are bad, destroy

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>all humans idea. Essentially the the ideas that humans would

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>become extinct, either through definition because we've evolved into something

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>else or because whatever the super human intelligence is in besides,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>we are a problem. Yeah, and a lot a lot

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of futures are a lot more positive about that. They're

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>they're more looking forward to it than being scared of it.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's less of oh, no, big scary robots are coming

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>to take over our society, and more of a robots

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are coming to take over society like free day, Yeah exactly. Yeah, Yeah,

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to work anymore, and and I don't

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>because robots are are supplying all the things we need.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no need for anyone to work anymore. There's no

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>need for money anymore, because the only reason you need

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>money is so you can buy stuff. But if everything

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is free, then you don't need you, So it becomes

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek and we all, you know, run around in

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>jumpsuits and punch people. And if you're Kirk, you make

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>out a lot. I mean a lot that dude. Every week,

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Piccard and Ryker, if you add them together, make one

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Kirk and yes, in this documentary series Star Trek. I

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know about Archer because I never watched Enterprise, So

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys have to get back to me on that. Yeah, sorry,

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that. It's also a gap in my personal understanding.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I just took one look at that decontamination chamber and said, yep,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm out um anyway. So that's that's Werner Avenge. Uh.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It's he's sort of popularized this idea, but he's there

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are other people who have kind of I think their

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>names are synonymous with it, and we will talk about

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>them in just a minute, but for now, let's take

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a moment to thank our sponsor and now back to

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the show. So Verner Venge again very much associated with

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the singularity. But there's another name that

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>comes up all the time, right, Kurtswile, r Kurtswile. And

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>this is a fellow who has been referred to in

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>various circles, as as the Thomas Edison of Modern Technology

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>or um or or, perhaps more colorfully, the Willy Wonka

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of Technology that was by Jeff Duncan of Digital Trends,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just wanted to shout out because that was great, Um,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but you get nothing. I shared a remix of Willy

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Wonka earlier today and it's still playing through my head.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>We're fans, we might be fans of the Gene Wilder

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Willy Wonka. Everyone, everyone, homework assignment. Go watch that. It

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with the singularity singularity at all.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know there's some chocolate singularity in their chocolate singularity.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I want episode on that band. If I were better

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at cover band names, I totally would have said something

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>witty right there. Yeah, all right, well, fair enough, we'll

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>say it's the archiese for sugar Sugar, Oh dear, Oh

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>my goodness. Okay, So Ray hurts while Ray hurts, while

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Um is the kind of cat who you know. When

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he was in high school, UM invented a computer program.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is in the mid nineteen sixties. This isn't

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>like last year or something. In the mid nineteen sixties

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>created a computer program that listened to classical music, found

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>patterns in it, and then created new classical music based

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>on that. So it's a computer that composed classical music

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>following the rules of classical music that other composers had created. Yes,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of cool. That's just that's just something he did,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, And yeah, dudes get credentials. Yeah, it's He

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>also kind of invented flatbed scanners, has done a whole

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of stuff in speech recognition, and which that's interesting

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>because well, and we'll talk about that in a second.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But but one of Kurt's Well's big points is that

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that by and this all depends upon which

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>interview you read of kurts Well, but in various interviews

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he said that essentially, by twenty th we will reach

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a point where we will be able to make an

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>artificial brain. Well, we'll we'll have reverse engineered the brain

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be able to create an artificial one. Uh.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of debate in in Uh, in smarter

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>circles than the ones I move in. Uh, that's not

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a that's not a slap against my friends. They're pretty bright,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but none of us are neuro cheologically gifted at that point. UM,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I include myself in that in that circle. So, but

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there there's some very bright people who debate about this point,

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not will be able by the year twenty

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty to reverse engineer the brain and design an artificial one.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>And I think the debate is not so much on

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>whether or not will have the technological power necessary to

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to uh simulate a brain. And we can simulate brains

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on a certain superficial level today. I mean hypothetically we

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>could connect enough computers that we could make it go.

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, we could probably get the computer horsepower,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>especially by twenty thirty to simulate a human brain. The

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>question is whether we will understand the human brain enough exactly.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So uh, that's that sort of where the debate lies.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much on the technological side of things

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as it is the biological side of things, which is

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting. Um. I've read a lot of critics

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>who who have really jumped on Kurtswil for this. Particularly PZ.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Myers has written some pretty um yeah, strongly worded, strongly

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>worded criticisms to Kurtzwild's theories, saying that that Kurtzwild simply

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>does not understand neurological development and activities, and that you know,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the nature between the environment and are are the way

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>our brains develop over time versus the you know, nurture

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>versus nature, all of this stuff with hormonal changes, electrochemical reaction,

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>saying that there's there's so many little bits that make

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>up our brains, so many hormones, so many processes, and

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we understand such a small fraction of what they do.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>This is why a lot of psychiatric drugs, for example,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>are kind of like, oh, well, we invented this thing,

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and we guess it. Does this thing? Take it and

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>see what happens? We stuff don't it tends to make

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you happy. H It also makes you perceived the color

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>red as having the smell of oranges, like you know

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's we don't. We don't understand it fully. And

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact, there are other people like Stephen Novella, who

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is uh he's the author of the Neurological Blog, and

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>he also is a host on a wonderful podcast called

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Skeptics Guide to the Universe. If you guys haven't listened

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to that, you should try that out if you especially

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>if you like skepticism, and critical thinking. But he's he's

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a doctor and a proponent of evidence based medicine, and

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he talks about how, uh, you know, we don't know

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>how much we don't know about the brain, Like we

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we have no way of knowing where the endpoint is

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>as far as the brain is concerned, and therefore we

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>cannot guess at how long it will take us to

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>reverse engineer it simply because we don't know where the

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>finish line is, right, right, Yeah. Kurt Kurt Swile Church

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of Ball has a new book new as of we're

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>recording this in January. It just came out in November

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>called How to Create a Mind. The Secret of Human

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Thought Revealed, and and in the book he theorizes that, um, okay,

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if you'll follow me for a second, atoms are tiny

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>bits of data DNA. It's a form of a program.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>The nervous system is a computer that coordinates bodily functions,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and thought is kind of simultaneously a program and the

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>data that that program contains. This is another problem that

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>some scientists have, is reducing the human brain to the

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>model of a computer, right because it's you know, it's

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a very it's a very elegant, interesting proposition and

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of sexy like that because you go like, oh,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>well that's that that sort of makes sense. Man Like,

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go get a pizza and talk about this more.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me get a program that will allow

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>me to suddenly know all kung fu. And when you're

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a programmer, that's a great plan. I mean that sounds

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that sounds terrific. But yeah, there's um one one specific

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>guy found, Jarren Lanier wrote a terrific thing called one

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Half of a Manifesto, which is a really entertaining read

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>if you guys like this kind of thing. Where and

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he was saying that what futurists are talking about when

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they talk about this the singularity is basically a religion.

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>He was calling it cybernetic totalism. Uh, you know, like

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>like a fanatic ideology. He compares it to Marxism at

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>some point. Yeah. Um, and he was saying that that,

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's this, this theory is a terrific theory

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get into the philosophy of who

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 1>we are and what we do and what technology is.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But that you know, cybernetic patterns aren't necessarily the best

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>way to understand reality, and that they're not necessarily the

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>best model for how people work, for how culture works,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>for how intelligence works. And that's saying so isn't gross

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>over simplification. That's a good point, and uh, we should

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>also point out that it all depends on how you

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>define intelligence as well, because Kurt Swell himself has worded

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>his own predictions in such a way that that some

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>would argue. Novella argues, for example, that he has given

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>himself enough room where he's going to be right no

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>matter what, like saying that by we will be able

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to reverse engineer basic brain functions, and novellasis will technically,

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that now, so that kind of gives

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of room. Yeah. But um, but whether

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>or not it means total brain function, that's that's a

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>totally different question. And so the other point is that

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>we could theoretically create an artificial intelligence that does not

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily reverse engineer the brain. It doesn't follow the human

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligence model. I mean, that's IBM S. Watson again, a

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>good example of artificial intelligence that you know, in some

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ways it mimics the brain because it kind of has to.

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, are coming at this human beings are the

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>ones creating this technology, and so as human beings creating

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this technology, it's going to follow the rules that as

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we understand them. So there's going to be some imgree there.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But but IBM S Watson, you know, you think about that.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really understand necessarily the data that's passing through it.

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's looking for the connections and making just making making

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>connections and recognizing patterns and spitting out useful information. Yeah,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's looking for whatever answer is most likely the

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>right one. It's all probability based, right, So, and if

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't reach a certain threshold, it doesn't provide the answer.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So if arbitrarily speaking, I don't know what the threshold is,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm just making a number. Let's say it has

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to be certain or higher for it to give that answer.

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>If that if the if a certainty falls below that threshold,

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>no answer is given. That's essentially how it worked when

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Watson was on jet right. It would analyze the the

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the the answer in jeopardy terms, and then come up

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with what it thought was probably the most accurate question

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>for that answer, and occasionally it was wrong to hilarious results,

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but it did sort of seem to kind of mimic

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the way humans think, at least on a superficial level.

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And I mean the thing about humans is that they're

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they're wrong a lot more than a lot more than

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what that fifteen percent at the time something. Yeah, it's

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's we've we've got well, we give answers

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>even if we're not short the question. I certainly do,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>because we all know from going to trivia nights m. Yeah.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And and there's there's a lot of I've read a

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>lot on online about arguments of how it's our deficiencies

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are memory biases, are rational behavior? Are weird hormonal stuff

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going on? Or what makes us human? And that you

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>can't teach a computer to be irrational. That's true. Uh,

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>although you can't teach you to swear, you can. We

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just we read a story last week, yeah, where where

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>IBM allowed Watson to read the Urban Dictionary and then

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I Watson got a little bit of a potty mouth.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It got it got kind of fresh. It did it

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>did it started it started to say that, Uh, oh

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>see what was it? Oh, I'm going to say something

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be bleaped out right. Tyler Tyler

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyler just said so. Uh. Anyway, So there's one point

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>where a researcher asked a question of Watson, and Watson

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>included within the answer the word so. Since I was

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bleeped out, you probably don't know what it was, so

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>go look it up. It was funny. It was really funny. Yes,

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and then and then they basically nuked that part of

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Watson from orbit. They were like, you know what, never mind,

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it was the only way to be sure. They wiped

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>out the Urban Dictionary from Watson's memory. They also said

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>that a very similar thing happened when they let Watson

0:30:55.520 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>read Wikipedia. No judgments here, just saying what what IBM said. Anyway, Again,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the computer was unable to determine when, when, when it

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was appropriate. What's the appropriate context for dropping a swear word?

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It didn't know, so it just started to speak kind

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of like my wife does. So, uh, yeah, it was

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pay for that later. Uh So, anyway,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that that that's an interesting point though. Again you're you're

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>showing how machine intelligence and human intelligence are different because

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the machine intelligence doesn't have that context. Sure, and of course,

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know we're talking about about science fiction or science future. However,

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to term it so that you know, we

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>might very well come up with a fancy little program

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>script that lets you that lets you introduce that kind

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of bias. But you know, yeah, but again from that

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>documentary Star Trek, I mean data never figured out those contractions.

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Touring actually had a great uh mental exercise really and

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's called the Touring test. And this this applies to

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. Tourings point and we've talked about the train

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>test in previous episodes of tech Stuff. But just as

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a refresher, Touring had suggested that you could create a

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>test and that if a machine could pass that test

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same level as a human in other words, uh,

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were unable to determine that the person who

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>took that test was human or machine, the machine had

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>passed the touring test and had had essentially simulated human

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and h It usually works as an interview, so

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you have someone who's who's conducting an interview, and you

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have either a machine answering or a human answering, and

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a barrier up so that of course the person

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>asking the questions cannot see who is responding, and of

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>course they're responding through you know, text usually because if

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they're responding through a voice and it's like, I think

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the answer as far you know, you'd be like, well,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>either it's a robot or the most boring person in

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. Uh. The idea being you would ask these

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>questions over a computer monitor, get text responses, and if

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you were unable to to answer with a certain degree

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of accuracy whether or not it was a machine or

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a person, then you would say the machine passed the

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tour and uh and and you could argue, well, that

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>could just mean that the machine is very good at

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>mimicking human intelligence. It does not actually possess human intelligence.

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Touring's point is, does that matter? Because I know that

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I am intelligent. I speak with someone like Lauren, who

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I assume is also intelligent based upon the responses she gives,

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But she could just be simulating intelligence. However, I have

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I have already bestowed in my mind the the feature

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of intelligence upon Lauren, because what she does is very

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>much akin to what I do. So Touring said, if

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you extend the courtesy to your fellow human being that

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they are intelligent based on the fact that they act

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like you do, why would you not do the same

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>thing for a machine. Does it matter if the machine

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>can actually think, If the machine simulates thought well enough

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>for it to pass as human, then you're giving it

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the same benefit of doubt that anyone else. This is

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of science fiction movies are about. Actually, Yeah,

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of philosophy, and a lot of philosophy,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Isaac Asthma, of a lot of Blade

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Runner and and and that's a sorry, well no, but

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know Philip K. Dick look him up. So anyway

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>than you do Android's dream of electric Sheep, I won't

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I won't spoil it for you. Uh. They to kind

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of wrap this all up, getting back into the discussion

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy. Uh, we had very recently we did a

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast about are we living in a computer simulation? And

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of plays into this idea of the singularity,

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>because that argument stated that if the singularity is in

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 1>fact possible, if it's inevitable, if we are going to

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>reach this level of trans humanism where we are no

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>longer able to really predict what the present will be

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like because it will be beyond our understanding, then why

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thing we would expect to do is create simulations of

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>our past to kind of study ourselves and to see

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>what happens play around variables. Yeah, they like good experiments. Yeah,

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and we could we could, if we're that advanced, we could,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in theory, create such a realistic simulation that the inhabitants

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of that simulation would be incapable of knowing that they

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>were artificial and would be completely you know, self aware

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of themselves. You know, that was totally redundant, self aware

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and uh, but unable to know that they were a simulation. Uh.

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 1>He said that if those things are possible, then there's

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>no way of knowing that, you know, the the overwhelming

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>uh possibility is that we are in a computer simulations

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>computer simulation right now, because yeah, if that's if that's

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen, then there's no way of saying with

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>certainty that we are not in fact the product of that.

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>And so, uh, the point being not necessarily that we

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are in fact living in a computer simulation, but that

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the single larry this transhumanism thing might not be realistic.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It might not be the future that we're headed to.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it ends up being a pipe dream that's not

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>really possible for us to attain, or maybe we'll wipe

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ourselves out through some terrible war or catastrophic accident. Um,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we create a biological entity that wipes us out

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 1>all of the stand h we create a black hole

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at the LHC. Which come on, people don't write me.

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I already know about that, and how tiny and and

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and almost non existent they are because it lasted so quickly.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that they do that thing where you look

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>at that one website where the black hole forms in

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the parking lot outside the LHC, and you just see

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole picture go um, which funny video. Anyway, that's

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that argument plays back into this. So I don't know.

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we're going to ever see a

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>future where the singularity becomes a thing. Oh and we

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>never really talked about it. But one of the big

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 1>points that kurts Well really punches in his Singularity talks

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of digital immortality, right right. And he's

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>been obsessed with this I and and obsessed is probably

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>a judgmental word. I apologize that's but he's been very

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>focused on this concept. His father died when he was

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>about twenty four, and he's been exploring theories on life

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>extension ever since then. And uh and supposedly takes all

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of supplements and sells them as well to extend life,

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>has all kind of kinds of health plans, dietary plans

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that he has exercise all this the idea that the

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>idea being that if he can preserve his own last

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>long enough that we hit the singularity, then he can

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>become immortal. Right and either that, you know, we attain

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>immortality through one of a thousand different ways. For example,

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we end up uploading our own intelligence into the cloud

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 1>and then we become part of a group asciousness, so

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we are no longer really individuals. Or we merge with

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>computers in some other way so that we are technically

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>immortal that way. Or we just conquer the genes that

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all guide a the aging process and we stop it

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and we stop disease, you know, we we take like

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in transmant you just take a cancer pill and then

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.479
<v Speaker 1>you don't get cancer because that's what you do. Yeah,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So again the singularity. That's kind of why I think

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of critics also point to it as being

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>more of a religion, because it's kind of this sort

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of utopian pipe dream in their minds. There's the former

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Lotus, Mitch Kapor Kappa, I'm not sure how

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you say it. Once called called it the intelligent design

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for the i Q one for people. Yeah. Ouch, well, well,

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 1>kurtz Wild's kind of laughing all the way to the bank.

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I hear that a company that rhymes with Schmoogle hired

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>him a little little people. I mean, we're you probably

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have heard of him, Yeah, but yeah, they just

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hired him on to be I have it in my

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>notes at the official title. I think it's the director

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of engineering. Yeah, a director of engineering over there. Um,

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they get they get some big names. I mean, they

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>had vent Surf as the chief evangelists, and of course

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 1>he was one of the fathers of the Internet. So

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Google's Google's gotta They're known for for getting some really

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>smart people. And and to be fair, while the singularity

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>may or may not ever happen, I think it's important

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have optimists in the field of technology who

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are really pushing for our development to try and make

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the world a better place for people. Now, you know,

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so, even if we're even if we never reach

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the point of digital immortality in our lifetimes or any

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>other it's I mean, if if someone wants to think

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so big that that they want to put in nanobots

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to make my body awesomer. I mean, and and not

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that that came out that came out possibly crude. I

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly means that I don't get cancer and die, um

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. That's that's terrific. I can I can't

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>argue with any part of that. Yeah, I'm gonna be

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on video so much this year that I definitely need

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.919
<v Speaker 1>my body to be awesomer, So I'm all for that.

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Well either way, yes, and and and Google. You know,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Google looks forward so much to two augmented reality, augmented reality.

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm I can't pronounce anything today. I am

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on a non role in the Internet of Things and

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>all of that wonderful future tech that it seems like

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>a terrific fit. Yeah. Yeah, so we'll see how how

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it goes. I mean, obviously, the nice thing about this

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 1>is that all we have to do is live long

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>enough to see it happen or not happen. And most

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>predictions have the singularity hitting somewhere between twenty and that

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out. Yeah, it all depends on upon which

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>futurists you're asking. And also it's one of those kind

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of I think it's one of those rolling goal posts

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know how how certain technologies are always

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty years away, or five years away or ten years away.

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. Maybe maybe by we'll be saying, all right,

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>we've revised our figures seven days definitely, but but who

0:40:59.880 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>know us, We'll see. Guys. If you have any suggestions

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for future episodes of tech Stuff, well here's what you

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>can do. You can write us an email. And a

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have been asking about our email address.

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I do say that every episode, but in case you've

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>missed it, listen carefully. Our email address is tech Stuff

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at Discovery dot com. Send an email. I'll prove it

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>by writing back, or drop us a line on Facebook.

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Our Twitter are handled there at both of us. Is

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff hs W and Lauren and I will talk

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to you again in the future. For more on this

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics. Is it hastaff works dot com.