WEBVTT - Guyana Update: Gas to Energy for Guyana, or Problem to Profit for Exxon?

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westerveldt. I know we're

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a new season on the criminalization

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of protest that I'm bringing you an update today on

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>an earlier season, Light Sweet Crude, our season about the

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>creation and expansion of a new oil and gas industry

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in Guyana. When we were working on that season, it

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was very hard to get any information at all about

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>what was being called the Gas to Energy project. This

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>was a plan to pump excess gas from the oil

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>drilling offshore onshore to a facility and then use it

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>either for export or for fuel in Guyana. A new

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>report has come out from the Institute for Energy and

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Economic Analysis AIFA, and Tomsonzillo, the author of that report,

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>spoke to me about what he has found about this project.

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>In a nutshell, seems to be a way for Exxon

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to turn what was a problem for them access gas

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that they couldn't flare without being fined into a new

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream, gas that is technically free for Guyana, but

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're spending an awful lot of money.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Paying Exxon to get to shore.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 1>And back with more details on that after this quick break.

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, tell me what you looked into here.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>So what we did is we took a look at

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the gas to energy project that's being proposed in Guyana,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and a couple things came out of the study. Maybe

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the most important one was that the need for the

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>project is really questionable. It's kind of a risky bet,

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's because the grid system in Guyana really doesn't

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 3>need something of this size three hundred mega posal. As

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>we reviewed the documentation and all, what we came up

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 3>with was if they build this, given the current capacity

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>that they have and some other new things that they're

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>planning to do in addition, that they would wind up

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the best way to talk about oversupply is that the

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 3>reserve margin would be enormous. And the reserve margin is

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 3>effectively whatevery utility has. If you need one hundred megawatch,

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>you're going to build one hundred and fifteen, because that's

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 3>basically how the systems work escially, as a professional standard.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>If they build in either scenario, we have a lower

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I case scenario, the reserve margin will be fifty eight

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 3>percent one hundred and ninety six percent for the low load,

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 3>which is if it is a sort of a slower

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>economy and then the high load it would be twenty

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 3>four to one hundred and thirty two percent reserve. So

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>no matter how you look at it, it's significantly oversupplied.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>That's unfortunate that they look to build a gas project

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>or anything. But that wasn't the only thing that we

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 3>found in that they historically get this wrong. The estimation

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>for electricity, and there we basically looked at their past

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>practice and they were consistently overestimating the amount of electricity

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>they were going to use. That's pretty significant over like

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>a ten year period. Would they sort of missed it

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>every year?

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>And this is this is the government of Guyana, or this.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Is power and light.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, okay.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 3>That's the utility. And then the other problem that we

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>that we uncovered is that when they made the announcement,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 3>they were working with one assumption. They then revised the

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>analysis and then very shortly after that and they revised

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>it by a significant amount downward. So the stuff that

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at, which is already you know, an over assumption,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>they had it much higher that justified the gas plant.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Then they reduced it afterwards, and they didn't reduce any

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 3>sense of that they still needed a three hundred megawatt plant.

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like it's a very awkwardly done resource

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 3>plan and they don't have a kind of resource planning

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 3>like we have in the US that you might be

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 3>familiar with. The other problem they have there, and I'm

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>going into some length on this because I know they'll

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 3>say I don't know. What I'm talking about is that

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 3>they have about one hundred megawatts actually off the system

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of an entity, mostly industrial and commercial, that are supplying

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>their own energy right now because the system is so unreliable.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 3>They think that's coming back on when they put up

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>this new plant, but it probably won't because they're not

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 3>planning for any new system upgrades.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Transit, right, That's what I was going to ask you about,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, is there any kind of transmission distribution?

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 3>No. The problem is is that they don't have a

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>planning process that gives you that comprehensive sense. But we

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 3>went into it and don't see any numbers or any

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, thought that they are consistently working to improve

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 3>their reliability. But it's like in the US averages four

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty minutes a year of outages. In Guyana,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>it's fifty one hundred minutes, so you get a sense

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>of just how unreliable. And it's a it's a major

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 3>item in the newspapers there all the time, and a

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 3>major item people's daily existence. So they have a long

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 3>way to go on that. And it's unlikely that the

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 3>businesses are going to come back in simply because they

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 3>buy a gas plant that they don't particularly need. It

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't improve the system delivery. Right, Those are those are

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 3>the kinds of things we're looking at in terms of necessity.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask you, like if this has any impact

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>on because I know one of the big promises that

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 2>the government and Exon has made is that like this

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>project is going to make electricity cheaper for people in Guyana.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, the only way it's going to do that, I

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 3>was going to get to that next is that it

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 3>is essentially a system that's unaffordable and not necessarily to

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 3>the rate payer, but to the taxpayer. What they've decided

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>to do is there's no rate information in any of this. Incidentally,

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to be calling for the Commission to

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 3>do their job. But the plan is that they're going

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 3>to provide a fifty percent subsidy for rates after this

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>is done, and that'll be obviously an annual disbursement from

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the Guyanese government to GPL to offset the rate that'll

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>be out of profit oil future profit oil essentially going

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 3>to get to a shot in a minute which explains this.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 3>And so the affordability issue may be minimal to the ratepayer,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>but it's going to be a significant burden on the

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>budget every year, so you know you have an issue

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 3>there as to whether or not it's affordable for the taxpayer.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that, as I said to you, the

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>system remains unreliable. And then what they're proposing in terms

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>of money being spent in the grid system is when

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 3>you build a gas plant, particularly when you're going to

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 3>borrow to build a gas plant, you are you're going

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>to be first of all using foreign labor for the

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>most part, because you're going to have all of these

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>professional engineers and construction coming in. The money is going

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to come from Exon lending as well as the ExM Bank,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 3>and so you're going to have a lot of the

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>money in paying debt off that's not going to stay

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 3>in the Guyana. And then there may be and I

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 3>we'll get into that in a minute. There may be

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that the government has to pay for the gas. That's

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 3>a contented matter right now. And if they do, then

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.559
<v Speaker 3>the fuel cost, of course gets paid to Exon, which

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>is not money in Guyana. When you do solar, you're

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be employing, because what we're proposing is a

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 3>solar investment of significant nature. When you do solar, you're

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be hiring local people. They're going to be

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 3>building things in the neighborhoods, in the communities, in the

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 3>towns and villages and the rural areas, and people will

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>see that construction going on and it will be an

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 3>economic benefit to each family who gets the panels, and

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to cover everybody, and then that will lower

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>utility costs, which allows them, of course, some extra money

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>in their pocket. So you have here a series of

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 3>direct benefits to the Guinese people, and frankly, the Guinees

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>people haven't seen much benefit at all from this oil

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 3>money yet. They see some construction projects and all, but

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 3>as for specific benefits, there really haven't been any like this.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, Alaska, for instance, gives out cash to every

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>citizen in Alaska because of their oil surpluses. Here they're

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 3>doing you know, they're doing more generalized so called benefits.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 3>So those economic issues are also very important. So we

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>summarize it as being unnecessary, unaffordable, unreliable and uneconomic. And

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 3>so we propose a solar plan, which would be probably cheaper.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>We're looking to get for the first part of this

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent of the residents in Guyana with solar panels.

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that can be done probably by twenty forty.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 3>We find it to be probably around the same course,

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>but probably cheaper. Obviously it's a more predictable energy supply.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 3>If you do it with batteries, which we're building into

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the system, you could probably have twenty four to seven service. Again,

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 3>direct benefits with low electricity bills and the greater likelihood

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 3>of employment and greater likelihood of activity and local stores

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 3>and what have you when you do the when you

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 3>do a solar investment.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to ask you one thing about the press

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>release before we get into the chart, which is this

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>line that says Exonmobile would profit the most from the

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 2>gast entergy.

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah's talk about So what you see in the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>left hand side of the chart is financial lender. Exon

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 3>will be one of the lenders. They will be lending

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the money to Guyana, I believe for the pipeline, although

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>this is unspecified, but Exon has acknowledged that this. They

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>will be making an investment and it will have to

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>be paid back. That's about the sum of it that

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 3>I can see. Then they are going to build the pipeline,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>second source of profit for them. Then what we have

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 3>here is two other things that aren't necessarily on the chart,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>but I want to give you the idea. There is

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 3>a contention. Jack Deo, the vice president, has said that

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the gas is free and that they will not be

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>charged for it. Right so, and if you read the

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>contract then we go into some length in the report

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 3>on this. If you read the contract, there's specific way

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>in which Guyana would get free gas, and no matter

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>how we look at it, that would be a very

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>limited amount, if any. And what Exxon is saying is

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 3>that they are going to be winding up selling the

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>gas to Guyana and they will also be producing so

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 3>plus gas. And I don't know how that's going to

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 3>be settled because there's no no public plan put out,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 3>no contracts put out, So there's a disagreement. You know,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Guyana seems to be saying it's free and Exon says no, no, no,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 3>we're selling it to Guyana. So where if you assume

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 3>that they pay for the gas, then you're going to

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 3>have and that dotted line that says debt bail out

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 3>you should probably put in there. And I'm thinking of

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>doing this when I at least the report debt bailout

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 3>and potential gas sale. Each of them are likely, but

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 3>they're not certain. And we're trying to separate those things

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 3>through that that you when you settle, when you look

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>at risk, you sort of look at the levels of it. Right,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 3>So this looks like Exceon would benefit if there was

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 3>a gas sale. That would be three forms of profit.

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 3>The fourth form of profit. They currently are in court

0:12:55.840 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 3>still on the permit case on the flaring, and the

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 3>essence of that case is Exon had permit requirements to

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>do zero flaring. They failed to meet that. They've been

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 3>fined already, but we have it in court. And what

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>this does is it gets rid of that problem for

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Exon because there's not going to be flaring anymore. They're

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 3>flaring because they're burning excess gas. If they're going to

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 3>be moving the gas into Guyana, then the flaring problem

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 3>is no longer an issue and is no longer any

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>costs associated with attempts to comply with that permit term,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 3>and so they benefit that way. So we see at

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 3>least four forms of profit for Exon, and we're not

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>seeing a whole lot of gain obviously for the taxpayers ratepayers,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>because what will happen is they're going to have to

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 3>pay it back, and the way the government has said

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 3>they want to pay it back is with power subsidies.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Now that would be and that's the line that goes

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 3>from the Guinese government up to over by the rate pays.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>That's a subsidy that would be annually, and we don't

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 3>know they say fifty percent that potential subsidy. And then

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the Utility Commission has warned GPL the inn of Power

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Life that they're borrowing too much. We agree. And the

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>likelihood when they start adding on the debt that we're

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>thinking about for this particular project, you're looking at a

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 3>very serious financial situation, and the likelihood, again it's a

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 3>risk matter, there is a likelihood of a need for

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>a debt bailout of some kind, in which case that

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 3>would benefit Excell again because they would get paid immediately

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and in advance for the money that they've lent to

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the project. So we're looking at that and saying, well,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>this is sort of another way they get it coming

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 3>and going. But the government is going to have a

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 3>problem having to stand behind this deal because if you

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>over build on your power and you're unlikely to use

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the facility at one hundred percent or ninety five percent

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>capacity because you're going to have other things, other assets

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 3>that you're going to be using. So as we look

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 3>at it, we say, well, how are they going to

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, how's this going to work? And the answer is,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, they may wind up with a stranded asset

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 3>where they're not able to really use it beyond the

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent sixty five percent capacity. And so we're saying

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>to ourselves, well, you know that's another problem for that's

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, power subsidy, because that that'll be more that'll

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 3>make it more expensive if they run it less. So

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>you have a real set up here for a high

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 3>risk venture that is likely to you know, be a problem.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And what happens then is a lot of the oil

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 3>profits then have to go back into something that they

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 3>don't need in the first place. Right whereas if you

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 3>take the oil profits and the gain these government and

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 3>you invest that and you provide solar panels to families,

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you have a correct benefit. You don't have the borrowing.

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, you have a local economic activity, you have

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 3>lower costs over time, you don't have to worry about

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 3>GPL turning the lights on and off. You know, you

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>have definitely a better improvement here that's more efficient and

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 3>stable financially for Guyana. It's money that they can invest

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>in Guyana and it stays in Guyana, so instead of

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 3>the two billion or whatever it is. That's another thing

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>that's a problem that we point down the report. There's

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 3>really no clear estimate of what it's going to cost.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Some are saying two billion.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 2>And right. I know that Keana, our reporter in Guyana,

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>was saying it like they've been asking over and over

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 2>for some kind of transparency around the cost of this

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 2>project and it's just not coming, not coming.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>It's there's a lot of things in that hear that

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>lack transparency. I mean, that's our ongoing problem. So what

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>we were able to do here, I think, and if

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 3>you look at it from that angle, is we kind

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 3>of piece together a really poor disclosure system on the

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>utility system and an even worse disclosure system on the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 3>capital part of the pipeline, and then that weak disclosure

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 3>of the utility makes it very hard to do a

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>solar power analysis, although we did our best with some

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 3>I level numbers, and we are starting to see other

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 3>places invest heavily in solar and so we have a

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 3>little feel for what a system of this size would

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 3>actually cost. And you know, we're just seeing it in

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 3>a very sort of different light. And we think that

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 3>if they also, if they do this gas project the

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 3>way they're talking about, given what they have, they don't

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 3>need to solar then and so it's going to be

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 3>unlikely that people are going to be you know, using

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>it in any great numbers, you know, particularly you're going

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to have a subsidy in there, so the rates will

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 3>be you know, might be reasonable to the households, but

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the government and will have a lot of problems. So

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>that's really kind of what we're looking at. And we see,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 3>as I said, you know, we don't see a whole

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of benefit for the public, but we do see

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.959
<v Speaker 3>very clear articulated benefits for Excellon and it seems to

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>be at a recurring theme.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would imagine that that the renewables thing would

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>would also have a like a workforce training component too, right,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that there would be some kind of local training and

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 2>jobs and all that stuff as well.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Where we've where I've seen them try to do these

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 3>mass renewable stuff, renewable projects. That is what happens. I

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 3>live in Upstate New York, and a number of years

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 3>ago the state government put place a program for solar

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 3>installations and energy efficiency for houses, and the local contractors,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 3>many of them, took a risk in doing it, and

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the things they did was they put together

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 3>a little group schools and that training center was put

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 3>together by the merchants, by the contractors. So I think

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 3>you are pretty confident that if you did that in Guyana,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 3>you would have some form of training that would go on,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 3>and you know, and all the work is done locally.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>If you're looking at it, you know, if this is

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>a ten or fifteen year undertaking, if you do that,

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>you might even get some kind of production, if not

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>in Guyana, at least you know, in closer proximity than

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in the US mainland or China. Nevertheless, the parts and

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 3>what have you are all serviceable locally, so you have

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>a real you have a local economic benefit here that

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>does not compare with what happens when you put in

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 3>a gas plant.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't one of the things that jackdo promised about this

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>partnership with Exxon was that basically the oil money was

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>going to fund climate adaptation.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, in terms of the oil profits, there's

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 3>non observable or publicly available capital plan that is laying

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 3>out how they're going to do this. It looks to

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>me like they have it the money. They're highly liquid,

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>as in it's just sitting in an account and it's

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 3>like in the billions now, which is another question that

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you and I some day should talk about. And then

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>they're able to use that in any given budget year

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 3>for whatever amount of money they want to pull out

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 3>of it, you know, and they've been doing that, you know,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>since twenty nineteen. So you don't have a plan as

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 3>to how the money is going to be used. And

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 3>so I don't see any evidence of adaptation plans. You know,

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 3>we see roads. I guess you could argue that it

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 3>fast they get off of the game if there's climate events,

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>and it's not. It's not an articulated use of the money.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 3>It seems to be more of a budget matter, and

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 3>it's used as oil revenue for the annual budget, and

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>it's enhancing those expenditures pretty handsomely in the last couple

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 3>of years.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmmm hm. Is there any concern that, I mean,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I know what we've seen in other places in the

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 2>world when there is excess gas that's not being used

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>for energy, that the next step is building petrochemical facilities.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 2>So is there a sense that that might happen here?

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you hear little things as to what,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, what might be next in terms of new building.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Let's tossed around that there's going to be opportunities for

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 3>additional industrial activity, and nothing's been articulated yet, but that

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 3>seems used to be a very you know, logical possibility.

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>The pet CAEM markets. I guess if they started now

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to build six or seven years from now,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 3>there's a potential that there would be some market. Right now,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 3>all the markets in single use plastics are over oversupplied,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 3>and that's going to be likely till pretty much twenty

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine, and then I hope, you know, hopefully we

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>have some broader intervention into the economy so that it's

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 3>more sternly regulated in that natural gas is not the

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 3>only go to for the petrochemical business. You might, you know,

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of emphasis in Europe, for instance, on

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 3>moving fossil fuels out of petrochemicals and looking to replace

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 3>it with biofuels and other kind of recyclables and what

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>have you. There should be some ability to curb demand

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 3>for gas, you know, in six or seven years, and

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 3>so you may not have the kind of demand the

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 3>model that we're currently using. So that's a very very

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 3>risky proposition to think that this gas will be deployed

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 3>and it will be significant. I think maybe we're saying

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 3>fifty to sixty percent of the gas would be used

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 3>by this plant that maximum, and we're probably not going

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to be at maximum, and then the rest of the

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 3>guess they have to figure out what to do with

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 3>it now. Currently I guess it could be sold into

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the market. The way I read it, the current contract

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 3>might actually be applying, which case, you know, Gayana once

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 3>again gets short change. But if there's going to be

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 3>a new contract for the sale of that gas, that

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 3>will be another potential revenue stream for Guyana. What you get.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, well, I forgot if you're going to do this,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.479
<v Speaker 3>and I don't advocate it, they'd be better off if

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 3>they're going to sell gas to little and use the

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>profits for a longer term, more stable component to their economy,

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 3>which is solar. I don't think anybody would disagree with that.

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 3>If you're looking at building the economics for the future, it.

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like this project is more about Exxon dealing with

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a gas problem than Guyana looking for a way to

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 2>fix its its electricity.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, I think in terms of what the choices

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 3>are the choices for the electricity system, I mean, they're

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>claiming there's going to be a massive increase in the

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 3>amount of electricity used in Guyana, and we just can't

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 3>see that. We're not seeing any particular need for this,

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 3>And I mean, so that's kind of how we're just

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 3>looking at the whole thing.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 2>Are they basing that on like the idea that you know,

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>business is booming in Guyana and.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 3>You know, hear they're basic in on a GDP formula,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>which I don't think they have that right either, but

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 3>and they're saying that because of course the GDP is expanding,

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, with the gas. But they're claiming that there's

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be a commensurate you know, increase in the

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 3>in the electricity usage. And there may be, and we've

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 3>accounted for our Our view is that it's going to

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 3>be somewhere between their low model and the high model,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's not going to be as high as I say.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>So you're going to have some increase in demand, and

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at about a oh, I don't know, five

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 3>to six percent increase in demand. They're looking at a

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 3>fourteen or fifteen percent increase, and you know, the consultants

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 3>even told them that it's three to five percent, you know,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>going forward, even with everything. So you know, I could,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, if it really took off. I'm still not

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 3>sure that they would need a gas plant, but I

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>guess they could then shut down a lot of their

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 3>current capacity, which of course would be just lost assets

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 3>there in order to make this thing a go. So

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the planning is poor and the transparency is zero, and

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 3>so whereas normally you would have hearings and what have you,

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you don't have any of that. It's not mandated by law.