WEBVTT - Tesla Plans Additional $25 Billion in Spending

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and EVA though in San Francisco.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Tesla plans for twenty five billion dollars in additional spending

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>this year to support Elon Maask's AI ambitions.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 4>And Intel shares jump out of the company pledges to

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 4>support Musk's advanced chip manufacturing project terror Fat.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 3>And we'll bring on more tech earnings and tech news.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 3>We'll hear from the CEOs of Lift, Service Now and

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>IBM and First.

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 5>For the last day this week together in New York, Ed.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 4>We look at what these markets are up to, and

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 4>we're actually managing to cling on to some sort of

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 4>green in the Nasdaq one hundred less so for the

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 4>NASDAK more broadly, and that we are seeing pressure more

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 4>on the investor mindset with oil climbing up again five

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>times set high. We're above one hundred and two on rent.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 4>The geopolitical context remains. It impacts certain earnings like with

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Service Now for example, but we're all tracked on earnings today.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's been exhausting, frankly, being on Eastern time and

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>covering Tesla's earnings in particular, right, really simple, storing massive

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>commitment to spending a lot of money to actually get

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 3>going on the two big projects, rob Taxi and Optimus,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the humanoid robot. The headline capex twenty five billion dollars

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 3>for this year, but actually the shares it down significantly,

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>not just because of that, but because of the commentary

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 3>they will enter negative free cash flow for the balance

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>of this year. That's a lot of money stuff, but

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>there's some execution as well. Let's get to Bloomberg's Crage Trudel,

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>who leads our coverage of auto's around the world.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>That's where we probably start.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Right in the quarter, things look really good, and then

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Tesla told us Craig we are going to spend in

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>a multi year investment cycle, and things got a little

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>bit sour.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think, you know, part of what you know

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 6>made the numbers look so good was maybe there was

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 6>a moment where everyone wondered whether or not Tesla was

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 6>actually going to go forward with this sort of high

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 6>wire act of you know, spending the twenty billion dollars

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 6>plus in capex that was outlined just a few months ago,

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, for them to actually only have you know,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 6>roughly two and a half billion dollars of CAPEX in

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 6>the first quarter, that that sort of sent a signal

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 6>potentially that spending wasn't going to be quite at the

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 6>pace that was flagged. Instead, a Musk hops on the

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 6>call and says, oh, no, we're going ahead with that,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 6>and then some and I think that does give some

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 6>people pause when you have a car business that, yes,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 6>is looking a little bit better than it was a

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 6>year ago, but a year ago it was really in

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 6>a brutal place.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Hold that's graphic on the screen. Just let me say

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 2>something real quick.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Carry The reason at first thing looks so rosy is

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that CAPEX in the quarter was basically not trending toward

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the twenty billion for the full year.

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, everyone was like, oh, they're underspending.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 3>And then it got confusing because they were like, wrong,

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>going to spend a lot more to take it.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Away, And I Musk really tried to articulate Craig why

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 4>that spending is necessary. We're going to get to terra

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>fab and chips in a moment, but with you, I

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 4>want the underlying fundamentals of where he's spending on cybercab

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>what about the humanoid robot focus. I mean, this is

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 4>what investors care about, less about car sales, more about AI.

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 6>I think that's right, and I think there's been honestly

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 6>a lot of patients with being able to sort of

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 6>look past the idea that a lot of these projects

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 6>have not earned meaningful return and you know, may not

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 6>for the time being. But you know, we've gotten to

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 6>a place now where this is a company that you know,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 6>is primarily a car business where a couple of years

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 6>now they have actually seen decline in their sales and

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 6>decline in their position in their most important segment. And

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 6>we don't have clear indications of when exactly, you know,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 6>this robo taxi project is actually going to be meaningful.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 6>We had, if anything, a bit of incremental indication that

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 6>maybe next year, but that's you know, a bit far off.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 6>And then also some indications too that the to miss

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 6>robot may not be you know ready, I'm the timelineers

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 6>as previously flagged, so some negative indicators from that perspective.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 4>As well, shock me create Trudell slower timeline Bloomberg's crety Dow.

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 4>We thank you so much on all things, cars, fundamentals,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 4>robots more in Tesla, though.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 5>When in La.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 4>Mosk has planned to spend three billion dollars to build

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 4>a research facility in Texas part of that ambitious chip

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing project dubbed Terrifat bringing Intel along for the ride.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloombgs I King in San Francisco could really articulate why

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 4>three billion?

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 5>Is this some sort of like pilot that.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 4>They do to see whether they can actually make the chips?

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah? I mean this is a long established practice in

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 8>the semikinductor industry where you make what's called a pilot line,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 8>and this is your way of showing, well, does my

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 8>manufacturing technology work and do my designs work? And you're

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 8>kind of doing it on the cheap three billion dollars,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 8>you know. I know that's a lot to me and

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 8>maybe not much to you, But in the chip industry

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 8>it really isn't very much at all. It's about ten

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 8>percent of what it would cost to build, you know,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 8>a leading edge, full sized fab.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Last night, the news about Elon Musk's ship ambitions came

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 3>in the Q and a portion of the earnings call

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and I needed some help. I turned to you for

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 3>that help to understand the pilot line bit that you

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 3>just explained, but he.

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Dropped a big piece of news.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>He said that the initiative will use Intel's fourteen A process.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 3>What is Intel's fourteen A process? Why did Intel shares

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 3>jump when that headline hit?

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this process that we're talking about, this is basically

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 8>the recipe that they used to create semiconductors, and they're

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 8>looking for outside users of that. Basically, they don't have

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 8>enough of their own work, their own demand for their

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 8>own designs to be able to fill the factory, so

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 8>they need outside customers. So this raised the possibility that

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 8>guess what, you know, Elon Inc. Is going to be

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 8>a customer of Intel in some way. We don't know

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 8>whether he's just going to license that and do it himself,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 8>or whether he's going to actually help Intel fill its fabs.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 8>And I hopefully we'll find out later today when Intel.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Zy and King again really jumped in and helped

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>with understanding that when the news broke in Tesla surnings

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 3>call last night, there's a by the way coming the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia Semiconductor Index or SOCKS, that's the main gauge of

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 3>chip stocks in the United States and actually around the world.

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 3>But the US sister Shares is up for a sixteenth

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 3>straight session, sixteen straight days of games, which is a record,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 3>and that's astonishing when you think about the direction of

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 3>travel in newsflow the war in Iran. We've talked about

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 3>how the war in Iran has impacted the chip supply chain.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Carrow, but it's not even slowing down. We're up almost

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>three percent in the session.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 4>That is just a phenomenal piece of data analysis that

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 4>you bring time and time again from Bloomberg. But what's

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 4>more important is also just how we navigate this and

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 4>what it means for the likes of Tesla and Intellers.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 4>They try to bring chips into just about everything. This

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 4>is about AI and the use cases. Pierre Ferugu of

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 4>New Street Research says Tesla has a strong advantage versus

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 4>peers to quote win in order on robot taxing humanoid robots.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>He maintains a BIKE rating on the stock for the

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 4>six hundred dollars price target.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 5>You join us.

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Now, how important is terrifab to that vision you have

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 4>on winning the AI race for Tesla.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 7>It's a good question, Caroline.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 9>The tarafab is like an enhancer for Tesla and so

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 9>SpaceX it's really like a player that is I would

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 9>say five to ten years out and probably closer to

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 9>ten than five. And the idea is that now that

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 9>we know compute is everything, you can achieve miracles with compute,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 9>the key is going to become how can you deploy

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 9>compute faster than your competitors and at a lower unique costs?

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 9>And what he LEARNMSK is doing today with Tesla and SpaceX,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 9>it's real project.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 7>Sitting between the.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 9>Two, he gets started to be in a position to

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 9>manufacture in how so you know, vertico like integration is

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 9>actually a major factor of course savings in an industry

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 9>where everybody has very high gorss margins. And he's going

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 9>to control the space at which he can actually build

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 9>chips and as he's planning to throw them into space

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 9>and to deploy data centers in space, and he has

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 9>like a pretty large rocket to do.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's j.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And forgive me for interrupting you, but what you're saying

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>doesn't match what Elon Musk is saying, right because he

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>got asked this on the call, are you doing terror fab?

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>The initiative to manufacture chips at scale because of unit economics,

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>and his response was no. He consistently says, because I

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 3>don't believe that TSMC and Samsung can match the supply

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>that Elon Inc. Needs to fulfill those long term ambitions.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it's okay to say that today. But

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 9>the unity going to of TSMC probably ter a FAB

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 9>is never going to beat them. But TSMC is now

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 9>charging on average sixty five and growing person ghost margins.

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 9>So if you have your own manufacturing capabilities in a house,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 9>whether you work magic against TSMC on you need economics

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 9>or not, you are actually working magic on your own

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 9>unit economics.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Therefore the efficiency gain. Look, all of this needs to

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 4>eventually be put to work. We need to vindicate a

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 4>twenty five billion dollar CAPEX expenditure.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Yet is it vindicated?

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 4>How if we're already seeing Optimus perhaps behind schedule. If

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 4>we're already questioning, really how quickly regulators can allow cyber

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>cab and the autonomous vision on the road, Does it

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 4>match the spending in the here and now?

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 9>It all depends, Caroline, on the timeframe you set for

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 9>yourself to put into perspective. Twenty five billion dollars of

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 9>CAPEX if you include FAB, about half that money is

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 9>going to be spent. I think on compus to be

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 9>in the same league as the frontier players in.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 7>AI, and you need AI for FSD, you need.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 9>AI for Optimus, and on top of that you have

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 9>the partnership with Grog of course with XAI. Then the

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 9>second aspect is Teslas this year is set to generate

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 9>but fifteen billion dollars of firm operating cash throw so

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 9>you know, the negative fakesue of Tesla this year might

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 9>be ten billion dollars if they manage to spend fast

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 9>and of the twenty five billion, which might be a challenge.

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 9>And they have a balance a cash balance studio of

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 9>about forty five billion dollars, So we're talking thing that

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 9>at the scale of Tesla is actually very reasonable. Then,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 9>in terms of how do you get a return on

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 9>that robot XI, there is a broad consensus that once

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 9>it is you know, really scaled out, it's a multi

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 9>trillion dollar opportunity. So I mean, if the cost to

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 9>get into the race and win it is twenty five

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 9>million dollars, answer, it's a good price. Yeah, And then

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 9>you have Optimus a million optimists a year. How much

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 9>value is there in that? Another thing is that it's

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 9>going to take many years before we get right. So

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 9>it's a long it's a long duration investment.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five billion dollars is the big number, and later

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>in the show will explain why it's the big number. Pierre,

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>did you wake up this morning in the camp of

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 3>which some of your colleagues are in that there is

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 3>further evidence now that eventually SpaceX will merge with Tesla.

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 7>I won't tell you.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 9>I think it's going to become more and more challenging

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 9>not to do it. For sure, a terrafab project like

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 9>the pilot line at Tesla in the first large scale manufacturing,

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 9>the faber at SpaceX, the cross accounting and you know

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 9>pricing between the two is going to become difficult. Yesterday

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 9>learn explained how you know optimist Roberts will remain connected

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 9>to the cloud. If they remain if they need very

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 9>large cloud blow it might be sphase data and third eployments, right,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 9>and so there would be a question on how much

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 9>to slapez for like space on on Starship. So there

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 9>are a lot of good reasons for the merger to happen. Now,

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 9>you know, does that mean it's going to happen. I

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't bridge that gap yet.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, fair good of New Street research or is a

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 4>joy having you on the show. Thank you for the analysis.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Now we are also watching shares of other earnings that

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 4>become thick and.

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 5>Fast over in Europe.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Look how noc here our performs that more than five

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 4>percent again, and AI an infrastructure story in many ways

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 4>for Nokia that manages to see European stocks on the

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 4>higher side for its particular play.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 5>But boy are we in the eye of the software

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 5>storm right now.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Nouchi I'm the.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 4>M eight percent Service now down the most in its history,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>and that's after we once again have to our CEOs

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 4>to prove a negative and they're finding it very hard

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 4>to do so. They had twenty two percent growth in

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 4>subscription and still the stock dives. We're going to be

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 4>hearing more from the CEO of service now later this hour.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Let's around with all of that. But ed what else

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 4>we got coming up?

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's going to talk about k Hinnicks posting a

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 3>sharp jump in quorly profit on booming AI memory demand.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>But how long is that going to last?

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's look at Korean trading now, sk Heinex flat, but

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 4>the South Korean semiconductive manufacturer actually reported.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 5>A fivefold jump in quarterly profit.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 4>But the results are instead leaving investors questioning actually the

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 4>longevity of the AI boom. Bloomberg Asia stocks reporter who's

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 4>here in New York with SCFPN Lee can articulate why

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 4>the stock was under pressure with such a phenomenal set

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 4>of profit.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, it was an absolutely stunning quarter. But also

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 10>you have to note that the shares have rise in

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 10>ninety percent so far just here, and if you look

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 10>at the past here the share has rose more than

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 10>the rise of more than five four on. The position

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 10>is pretty crowded. So even even the strong earnings can

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 10>trigger sell on the news. But I think investors wants

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 10>more evidence to see that earning is more structural than cyclical,

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 10>and that's going to take more than a couple of months.

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 10>So if you look at the memory ship in the past,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 10>there has been bloom and bus cycle and even though

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 10>people agree that this is the supercycle that's percent unprecedented,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 10>this is still subject to the could be subject to

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 10>the downtren This is a trillion dollar question. When that

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 10>downturn could start.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about the lucrative market for high bandwidth memory.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 3>I always think about it as the funnel. It allows

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the GPU to take the data quickly and process it quickly.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>So you got sk Heinex, You've got Samsung and then

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Micron in the United States. Beyond the numbers, was there

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>evidence that sk is winning a little bit in that

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>market of HBM.

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Actually, esk Heinezys, that's just the biggest, the supplier

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 10>of the HPM. It has about sixty percent market share

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 10>last year. But the rivals Samsung and Micron are catching up,

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 10>especially Samsung. But what's interesting is that because a lot

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 10>of these memory names have been diversifying, reallocating their production

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 10>resources to HBM, we're seeing stortages in the traditional M

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 10>and NAN that's giving pricing power to dis memory makers

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 10>and that's why we're seeing the strong numbers this quarter

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 10>for s k heinezin.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Those of you.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Only great to have you on Blombo Tech. Thank you

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 3>very much. A lot of news out there today, Cara.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Now is a lot from Asia. In fact, let's go there.

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 4>It's time for talking tech. First up, soft Bank is

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 4>seeking a ten billion dollar loan secured by its shares

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 4>in OPENINGI. It'scording to sources, the Japanese conglomerate has been

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 4>piling on debt as Fano Massiosti's son seeks the position

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 4>himself really is a lynchpin in the global AI boom

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 4>because of insuring SoftBank's debt.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's jumped after that news came out.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Plus ten Cent has unveiled a major upgrade to its

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 4>foundational AI model, with major advances in areas from complex

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 4>musing in particular to coding.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 5>It's the first big test for the.

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Company since it recruited a top researcher from Openingi. The

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 4>model has been made available via a suite of ten

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Cent products, and TSMC plans to hold off on adopting

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 4>ASML's most cutting edge machine for chip production until twenty

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine because it looks to save money. That's a

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 4>major blow the Dutch maker of some inconductive manufacturing equipment.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Now TSMC is its largest customer, according to Bloomberg supply

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 4>chain data. And by the way, look, each of these

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 4>advanced lithography machines cost over four hundred million dollars a

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 4>piece if you're looking at the top end.

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 3>At the top end, a lesson we learn on the

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>show the other day. A lot of people are out

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 3>shopping right now and coming up. Lift is claiming its

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>territory in London, Europe's largest righte hailing market. David Risher,

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 3>he's the CEO of Lyft. He's been shopping and buying

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 3>up some interesting companies. We're going to discuss that next.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Lift is doubling down on this international expansion with a

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 4>deal to acquire gets UK business. This marks Lift's third

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 4>acquisition in just a year in a move to really

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 4>catch up with its large arrival Uber. David Rischer, CEO

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 4>of Lyft, joins us to share more in the company's

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 4>growth strategy. The growth strategy is international growth day and

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 4>what was it about gets UK optionality here that you liked?

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 11>So it is the big guy when it comes to

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 11>London's black cabs, and London's black cabs are awesome. I suspect, Carolyn,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 11>you've taken one or two in your life and you

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 11>know they're amazing, right, So it's the best way to

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.239
<v Speaker 11>get around London. And that's the idea is we are

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 11>a customer obsess company. We wanted to make sure that

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 11>we could increase our footprint in London. This roughly doubles

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 11>the size of our rides in London, which is wonderful.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 11>And I think some like seventy five to eighty percent

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 11>of London cabs who have an app are going to

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 11>have access to Lift customers over time. So it's a

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 11>great win win.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Now, David, you know, I think the best way to

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 4>get around any city is to bike, and I'm pleased

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 4>that you're also doing the bike optionality the suntime they're

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 4>bikes you have in London. Just what does this mean

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 4>in terms of capital intensiveness? What does this mean in

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 4>terms of investment you need to make in these new cities.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so it's not a very big capital raise. I

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 11>mean a nice thing about the sort of let's say

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 11>traditional ride share business, the one that we're in is

0:17:57.960 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 11>we don't own a lot of assets, right, the London

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 11>cabbes own their own cars. So really what this does

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 11>is it allows caves taxi cab drivers who are as

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 11>you know, brilliant, to sort of make even more of

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 11>their time. Right, They're going to have more customers thanks

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 11>to the Lift app and our promotion of the get

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 11>by Lift app. So anyway, that'd be great. They also

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 11>have a big business to business audience. They actually do

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 11>work with a VBC, they do work with the economists,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 11>they do work with the Royal Albert Hall. So they've

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 11>got a really nice stable base that we can build on.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 11>And then as mobility changes over time, becomes more autonomous

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 11>and so forth, it just gives us a bigger footprint

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 11>in the UK.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to understand, David, how this works in practice.

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 3>In Western Europe, the taxi cab is part of the culture,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 3>and in London, of all places, the black cab is

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 3>at the heart of what it is to be a

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Londoner or a visitor to that city. So how does

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 3>the consumer respond to a big American tech company coming

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 3>in and bringing a brand like get into its fold?

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I hope, well, right, what we hope to

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 11>do is bring the same customer obsession that we bring

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 11>here every single day in North America, you know, all

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 11>across the world. As you guys know, we acquired Free

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 11>Now last year. They also have a significant presence in London,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 11>across all of Europe really and we've seen great growth

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 11>with that brand and with our writers there because they're

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 11>now seeing you know, an even better experience. So look,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 11>that's our general strategy is you know, customer obsessions with

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 11>drives profitable growth. And I just love to your point

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 11>the fact that we're going to be with the London

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 11>cab system in such a deep way because it's frankly

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 11>going to teach us something about great service. London cabies

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 11>are amazing in that way, and hopefully it'll allow us

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 11>to bring even better technology and sort of invest more

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 11>in the whole marketing of the idea of taking a

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 11>taxi when you're in London.

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 3>David, you've joined us regularly on Bloomberg Tech, and you've

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 3>been generous with your time in explaining how you've come

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 3>into Lyft over now almost three years. I think right

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 3>and put your print on it. The first part of

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the story was getting to be a cash flow positive,

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 3>but you are in this kind of m and a

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 3>strategy and so could you just explain how going shopping

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 3>and acquiring companies in different markets is going to impact

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the final financial health of the business and free cash

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>flow in particular for sure.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 11>So yeah, it was actually my three year anniversary just

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 11>last week, ed, so three years, congratulation and thank you,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 11>loving every minute of it. Look, if you think of

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 11>the stages, you're right. At first we were losing money.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 11>We were losing cash. Now we're making money. We're profitable

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 11>quarter after quarter after quarter. We're throwing off over a

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars in cash. So what that allows us to

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 11>do now is to grow through acquisition, exactly to your point.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 11>We can take that cash and put it to use.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 11>How are we growing We're growing largely internationally. Why because

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 11>that improves our sort of footprint and over time improves

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 11>our economics because this is a scale business. And then

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 11>if you look at the next stage, of course, with

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 11>self driving cars, you know, again having a large footprint

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 11>and having a large scale, frankly, is going to matter

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 11>even more. So this is the sort of journey we're on.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 11>It's a step by step journey. But I love where

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 11>we're going, and I love the fact that both our

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 11>financial results and our customer results are improving every day

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 11>as a result.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 4>How does the profitability focus fit into the robotaxi and

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 4>autonomous focus. I mean, I can tell you Black Cavies

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 4>aren't going to love that in many ways.

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 2>David, Well, so I think you're talking about two things.

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 11>I think you're right anytime you've got a big shift,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 11>you have a set of people who are doing something

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 11>today and maybe they're worth they won't be doing that tomorrow.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 11>That's something we're very very focused on in LYFT. I

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 11>can give you a very specific example. We're now rolling

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 11>out autonomous cars in Nashville with our partner, Weimo over

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 11>the course of this year, and we just announced that

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 11>half of the employees in our very large new depot

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 11>in Waimo. That will excuse me, in Nashville are drivers.

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 11>Half the employees are drivers, right, So part of it

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 11>is we have to help that transition happen when it

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 11>comes to profitability. Look, self driving cars over time, frankly,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 11>should improve the economics of bride share.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 7>It should lead to.

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 11>Because you know, they don't have a lot of the cast,

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 11>they don't have the same insurance cast and so forth.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 11>But that's going to take a long long time. I

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 11>think right now it's really kind of early days for that.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 11>We're just trying to figure out a way to kind

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 11>of make the transition in a very very thoughtful way.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 3>David Rischer, CEO of Lyft, back in San Francisco. I'm

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>here in New York. We're grateful to have you all

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the same. They're coming up. We're going to get back

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 3>to today's big story, and that is Tesla. The stock

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 3>is down because of the massive commitment to spend money

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 3>on the big projects, AI, robotics and Robotaxi, all of

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 3>which we just discussed a little bit with Lift CEO.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 3>So my last day in New York City, but there's

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 3>so much more to do. We'll be right back. It

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>is halftime. This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Our top story is Tesla's earnings. It's a story about

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 3>a massive investment cycle, and it's time for the big number.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 3>The big number is twenty five billion dollars. That is

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's capex commitment for the full fiscal year twenty twenty six.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 3>So you're asking why is it a big number and

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 3>why are the shares down? Well, the most that Tesla's

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 3>ever spent in a full year is about eleven billion dollars.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 3>That was in twenty twenty four. But now we know

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>about the robot line, the Optimist line going up in Fremont,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the bigger one going up in Texas, how they're going

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 3>to expand cybercab production, they're going to need the funds,

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and when it comes to chips, A lot of people's

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 3>reaction to this was that twenty five billion is a

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 3>big number, but it's a drop in the ocean for

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the industry.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>What's up?

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Have a quick look at what's happening with Microsoft.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 4>There are some news that they're going to be offering

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 4>voluntary retirement some seven percent of the workforce on the

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 4>US workforce.

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 5>As it currently stands.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 4>It's voluntary buyouts to just a small percentage. The coustock

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 4>is currently under pressure by two and a half percent.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 4>But once again, this is going to fit into an

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 4>AI narrative where people can do more with AI productivity tools,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 4>and therefore, how does that affect the labor market as

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 4>of now, Microsoft saying they're going to be offering voluntary

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 4>retirement to seven percent United States workforce ed.

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 5>But let's go back to Tesla as well.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Within all of this, because that is the earnings we're

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 4>focusing on. Investors maybe betting less on EV sales and

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 4>on AI and robotics these days, but vehicles are still

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 4>for the moment, the company's bread and butter.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 5>So side back into.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Testla's quarterly performance from that angle. Jessica Coltell's hit this

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Edmund's head of insights, so actually better return to some

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of growth, particularly I was interested to see in

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Europe as well as in US and Asia.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean that really is their core business. And

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 12>I mean I think what we're seeing as an EV market,

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 12>it's not very you know, it's not very linear in

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 12>terms of growth. We're going to see starts and stops

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 12>and all those type of things like we've seen here

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 12>in the US, especially in regards to the federal tax credit.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.479
<v Speaker 12>But this market is going to continue to grow, So

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 12>it's not as if it's hit the end of a

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 12>runway or even close to the end of the runway.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 12>It's just beginning. But it's gonna look a little lumpy,

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 12>like to get to full electrification, which I think most

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 12>automakers are on the same page thinking that is really

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 12>the end goal here.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 4>I think the end goal as well in the stops

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 4>and the starts. How much has that to do with

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 4>the will.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 12>Well, right now, it's tricky. I mean, we're not necessarily

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 12>seeing a massive consumer just push to interest right now

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 12>because of gas prices. And it's interesting because in twenty

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 12>twenty two and Russia and via to Ukraine. We actually

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 12>saw a much stronger traffic push towards EV's online then

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 12>we're seeing right now. And I think a lot of

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 12>that has to do in general affordability. Because gas prices

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 12>are high, especially markets where Tesla does very well, like California,

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 12>It's not high enough to make people want to buy

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 12>forty fifty thousand dollars vehicle. So it's a bit of

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 12>a different paradigm right now than we've seen in past

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 12>gas spikes in twenty twenty two and even in two

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 12>thousand and.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 3>So this is the difficulty in understanding, Jessica. This is

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 3>what the CFO Vi Bettanaya has said. Whilst the recent

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 3>increasing gas prices has had a positive impact on the

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 3>order rate, this improvement started before the uptrending gas prices.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 3>And basically what he goes on to say is that

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Tesla credit themselves with having a broader.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Offering and a more affordes offering.

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Try and wag through the data and see if you

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>agree with Tesla's CFO.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 12>Well, they have an affordable offering and as far as

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 12>EV's go, right, I mean, and they have I think vehicles,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 12>particularly the model why that match a lot of consumer preferences.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 12>It's not a random sports car or you know, large

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 12>sedan or anything like that that matches up. And Tesla

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 12>hasn't been pretty elastic in terms of pricing. They've drop prices,

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 12>they have raised prices. They do a lot to match demand,

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 12>so I wouldn't necessarily say that their you know, sales

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 12>were skyrocketing before it gas prices. But I think what

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 12>they do well is they're well known. They saw increases

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 12>share in California sales in the first quarter. It was

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 12>a smaller pie, but they got a bigger part of

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 12>it because I think people also know their brand too,

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 12>so I mean they're synonymous with evs, so people just

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 12>looking for an EV's they think of Tesla, so they

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 12>have an advantage there.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 3>I was talking a minute ago about the big number,

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 3>which was capital expenditures guide for the year. The small

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 3>number for me was the FSD subscription take right, So

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 3>they ended last year with one point one million FST

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 3>subscribers and it's gone up a little bit to one

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 3>point two eight million. It's only available in the United

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 3>States and some limited parts of Europe. But if you

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 3>think about how many Teslas there are on the roads

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>around the world. That does to me seem like the

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 3>small number.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it really is, and I think a part

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 12>of it is the consumer acceptance and understanding of what

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 12>it is, the safety of it all. I think it's

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 12>something that's exciting that people like it. They're thinking, oh,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 12>this card pubs can help me drive.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 2>That's fantastic.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.239
<v Speaker 12>I can focus on other things, but it really still is.

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's largely unknown to I did the majority

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 12>of consumers, and Tesla does have a lot of more

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 12>mainstream consumers. They sure they had some early adopters, but

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 12>now they're getting mainstream books that are maybe not as

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 12>TechEd forward as you know, as we all think, yeah.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 5>Just how does Elol must tackle that?

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Because look, his huge pay package is actually linked to

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 4>adoption of FSD, and in many ways you sort of

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 4>apologize for the small numbers and tells us about.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I think it's something that it's going to

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.239
<v Speaker 12>take time, it's going to have to grow. I mean,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 12>they have a lot of hands in different parts at

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 12>this point, so I'm not sure how he's going to

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 12>accomplish it all. But I think, you know, obviously education

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 12>is important thing. How this is going to fit the

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 12>regulation because there's any time there's any sort of crash,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 12>I mean, the news is definitely more proportionate than what

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 12>you'd see any place else. And I just think that

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 12>you're going to have to work on the public acceptance

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 12>of these type of technologies. I mean, people are very weary.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 12>We just heard about AI replacing jobs. It just all

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 12>becomes a bit of a not a scary black box.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 12>There's something to that effect to a lot of consumers.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I guess the last headline that we can give our

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>audience is that must said that by the end of

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>this year in the us FSD unsupervised. In other words,

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 3>eyes off the road, hands off the road. We'll see

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 3>if that happens. Jessica cole Well, head of Inside at Evans,

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much. Another top story, and we're turning

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 3>to another of Musk companies. SpaceX is playing a bigger

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 3>role in President Trump's Golden Dome project previously known. According

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 3>to sources, SpaceX is among a group of companies developing

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the operating system underpinning the Missile Defense System. Let's get

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the latest with Bloomberg's Mike Shepherd, who's in DC. Let's

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 3>start just with the details Bloombergs reporting because this is

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 3>an important.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Story it is.

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 14>It's important because Golden Dome is one of the President's

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 14>signature initiatives when it comes to protecting the US against

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 14>the ballistic missile attack.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>It's worth one hundred and.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 14>Eighty five billion dollars over the course of the program

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 14>so far, and SpaceX will be providing, together with other companies,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 14>a critical component in of it. Think of it as

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 14>the glue that holds all these networks together. It will

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 14>be essentially the operating system that helps the govern military

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 14>operations once this thing gets up off the ground. And

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 14>it is an expansion of the role that SpaceX had

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 14>already been playing in the project. It had been building

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 14>satellites through its Starlink platform, and it had also been

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 14>developing a military communications network through it star Shield technology,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 14>and that is a classified version of Starlink that offers encryption,

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 14>especially for military use.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 4>At MIKE, Where are we with the vision and then

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 4>the action towards Golden Dome, and really what the other

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 4>puzzle pieces are that need to be put in place, Well.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 14>Caara, if you want to think of it as a puzzle,

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 14>there's still a lot of pieces to the side looking

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 14>to be placed in the right spots. There is a

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 14>long way to go before this thing actually becomes in

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 14>place and an effective defense against the kinds of missile

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 14>threats that have been warned about for years from China,

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 14>from Russia, and now even from Iran. There are questions

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 14>about the extent to which US adversaries could try to

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 14>strike the homeland here. And this is the reason why

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 14>the US has moved in this direction, and it has

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 14>turned to one of its most reliable space contract director

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 14>of SpaceX, to really help get this up off the ground.

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 14>And SpaceX is working with a couple of other signature

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 14>names who have taken on increased roles working with the

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 14>government that includes indoorial industries and palunteer technologies as well

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 14>on developing this communications and this operating system that we've

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 14>been reporting on today.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 3>You know that that last point is so crucial. SpaceX

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 3>has this legacy with the US government which is about

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 3>ten to fifteen years in duration, hundreds of millions billions

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>in contracts NASA and the Defense apparatus. But if you

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 3>look at those other names and orill Impulse, we're talking

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 3>much smaller contracts. Right in the context of this broader story.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 14>They are much smaller contracts, and yet they are part

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 14>of this larger ecosystem ed And when you turn the

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.959
<v Speaker 14>focus back to SpaceX also we do see this company

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 14>on the move. They are getting ready for an IPO

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 14>later this year that could value the venture at almost

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 14>two trillion dollars, and they are also making moves in

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 14>other directions to shore up other parts of the product

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 14>line that could help in.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>This venture too.

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 14>They have reached an agreement or at least to have

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 14>the rights to acquire Cursor AI for up to sixty

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars, and the idea would be to use its

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 14>coding and debugging ability to help the XAI segment of

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 14>SpaceX in its development and advancing its products. And you

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 14>could see very easily integrating those artificial intelligence capabilities as

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 14>well into this kind of operating system we've just been

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 14>talking about.

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Mergs. Mike Shepherd from Golden don't we appreciate it? Thank you?

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up easier to use AI tools.

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, they've sparked an increase in abusive imagery online. That's

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 4>according to the difficulties of investigators. More on that research next,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 4>this to bring back tech child pornography, and it's always

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 4>been a major scooch of the but a surge of

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 4>abusive material created with AI tools, it's making it hard

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 4>for investigators to pass the real from the fake, and

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 4>that can be the difference in knowing which cases need

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 4>urgent attention Nimos. Kurt Wagner, one of the report reporters

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 4>on Today's Big Take, joins us, now is a difficult

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 4>read whether you're a parent or not, Kurt, But really

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 4>this is about prioritization. This is about a lack of

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 4>resource for many who are trying to understand which child

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 4>to go out there and help and which one is

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 4>actually an AI generated piece of content.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Caroline. We spent six months working on this.

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 15>We talked to dozens of law enforcement officials who are

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 15>at the frontline specifically of child's safety crimes, and what

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 15>they told us is that because of AI, the number

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 15>of reports and tips they have to sift through is

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 15>jumping exponentially. And when you are sifting through, as you

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 15>point out, and not sure whether the image or the

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 15>video you're looking at depicts a real child in physical

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 15>danger or something that has been totally fabricated by an

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 15>LA or some other generative AI tool. They spend a

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 15>lot of time basically tracking down leads that don't lead

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 15>to actually helping a child endanger. And the fear is

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 15>that the more this happens, the more there is a

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 15>risk that a real child who's being harmed is going

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 15>to get overlooked because everyone's busy focused on the AI

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 15>generated stuff.

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 3>There is a mechanism here, so when a technology company

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 3>or a social media company finds that content that we're

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 2>They report it.

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 3>They are required to report it to the National Center

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 3>for Missing and Exploited Children NCMEC, and from that there

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 3>is other data available. What does the data tell that

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 3>organization curve.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 15>So ideally, when a big tech or media company finds

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 15>this and reports it ed, they would include a lot

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 15>of detail about the image or video, right, maybe an

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 15>IP address, a location, you know, how it was created,

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 15>or what types of tools were used, and then Nick

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 15>make that organiation you mentioned, They receive all of these

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 15>from all around the country and then redistribute them out

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 15>to state experts state investigators.

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 2>The problem is that a lot.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 15>Of the tips that are coming into Nickmick, especially those

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 15>that are AI related, do not have any of that

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 15>necessary data to actually go do anything right, there is

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 15>no IP address, there is maybe no location, and so

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 15>Nick Mick is being flooded with these tips and doesn't

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.959
<v Speaker 15>have anything to do with them. And so we've seen

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 15>Congress actually make a big deal about this. There is

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 15>just an investigation by Senator Grassley of Iowa where he's

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 15>trying to challenge these companies to report more useful information

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 15>to Nickmick, because if they just get a video or

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 15>photo but nothing else with it, there's no way that

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 15>they can go and actually try to stop a crime.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Kurt, I think the numbers are important here and they're astounding.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Last year the Clearinghouse received one and a half million

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 4>reports or suspected see some with ties to AI tools.

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 4>But the previous year it had just been sixty seven

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 4>thousand reports, and in twenty twenty three it's four thousand,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 4>seven hundred, which is all too many, but one and

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 4>a half million to just talk us through the sun

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 4>exponential growth that you're talking about and the ways in

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 4>which people are trying to tackle it, Yeah.

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 15>I mean less than five thousand two years ago, now

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 15>one point five million in just two years, and growing

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 15>and expected to continue to grow.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 2>And when you think about why that is.

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 15>I mean, you just have to look around at the

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 15>ease of use of these AI tools that have come up. Right,

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 15>all of these companies are spending tens of billions of

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 15>dollars on data centers and products, trying to move as

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 15>fast as humanly possible to get these AI tools, the

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 15>generative AI tools, into the hands of everyday consumers. Of course,

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 15>the downside being that that also helps the bad guys.

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 15>And so while AI related reports are still a small

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 15>sliver of the total number of reports that people get,

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 15>you can see Caroline how it's growing exponentially and expected

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 15>to continue.

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 3>So Oka, you said at the beginning of our conversation,

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 3>you spent six months reporting this as part of the

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 3>reporting course, had responses from a range of technology and

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 3>actually in particular AI companies. We've been showing those responses

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 3>on air throughout the conversation. But how would you summarize

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 3>the industry's response, either directly to your reporting or to

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the issue that you that you are talking about.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 15>A lot of the big companies are telling us that, hey,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 15>we have safeguards in place, right, we don't allow if

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 15>someone goes to chat GPT and tries to role play

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 15>with a child, which is something that now happens. They

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 15>say that they have alert setup that they can detect

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 15>that report it, get it taken down. I think the issue,

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 15>ed is when you think about open source models. What

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 15>we've heard is that some of the open source technology

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 15>gets used. People download it to their personal device and

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 15>then they train it to create more child abuse material.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 15>And that is where the technology can get really dangerous

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 15>because people are able to tailor it towards a specific

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 15>thing that they want to create without any oversight from

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 15>the companies themselves.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 7>And so when you're.

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 15>Using a mainstream product owned and operated by the company,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 15>there tends to be more guardrails. But when people are

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 15>able to kind of take the stuff, put it on

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 15>the personal device, and manipulate it themselves, that's where you know,

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 15>these tools can become very powerful in a bad way.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Kirtwagner, thank you. Now.

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Warner Brothers shareholders approved the one hundred and

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 3>ten billion dollar sale to Paramount, but they don't sign

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 3>off on everything. We have the details from the investor meeting.

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Next this is Bloomberg Tech. Texas Instruments is up almost

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent, on track for its best day since two

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 3>thousand at a record high, the biggest maker of analog chips,

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.959
<v Speaker 3>massive demand from all the industrial machinery that goes into

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 3>building a data center. That's the story. That's one of

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the best performers today.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I've got the reverse, the worst performer on the S

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and P five hundred, in fact, the worst Perforeman's ever

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 4>for service.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 5>Now after its earnings, we caught up with the CEO,

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Bill McDermott.

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 4>As he tries to push back on the negativity around software.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Just take a listen to what he had to say.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Even though subscription growth is still twenty two percent, you

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 4>beat on revenue.

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 5>What more can you telemarket? Right now?

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 13>Bill, I think it's very important to deal with facts.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 13>We're fifteen billion dollar enterprise software company, the fastest to

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 13>ever get they're growing at more than twenty percent. We

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 13>had a beaten raised quarter and we reiterated our full

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 13>year guidance. So that's the baseline for the conversation. And

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 13>we are a growth company, and I'll take the interview

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 13>anywhere you wanted to go.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about geopolitical headwinds, Let's talk about acquisition integration expenses.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there's some of the areas that investors and the

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 4>analysts have said. Look, it made for a bit more

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 4>of a messy quarter than perhaps would have been easier

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 4>for you to tell the story on what is the

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 4>underlying growth rate of AI at the moment of adoption

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 4>of the service now products.

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, what you have to realize is AI is the product,

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 13>it's the whole platform. So the platform is fully autonomous.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 13>So when a customer buys our AI platform, it is

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 13>enabling every function of their company to be a native

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 13>AI company. So it's all AI now. And that's another thing.

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.959
<v Speaker 13>We said we would do twenty and twenty twenty six

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 13>a billion of net new annual contract value on pure

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 13>AI additive to the platform. Yesterday we uped it to

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 13>a billion and a half and I think we'll run

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 13>through that. So if there's anything that the investors wanted,

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 13>they probably wanted a bigger beat. So we're beating every quarter,

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 13>maybe they wanted a bigger beat. And then the second

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 13>thing is, and it is true we acquired a couple

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 13>of companies.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 3>That was Service Now CEO Bill McDermott. Sticking with software,

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at IBM at one point in this session

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 3>having its biggest lowest level since a year ago eight

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Pril twenty twenty five. Software AI, same story.

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 4>It is, and also similarly for IBM, it's a macro uncertainty.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 4>That meant they didn't upgrade their revenue full year expected,

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 4>so they held it.

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 5>They held it, and that seemed cautious. Look.

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I spoke with having Krishna just yesterday after the amid

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 4>the earnings, and he looked said.

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 5>I got better margins, better profit, better cash.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 4>But he did see that there's a macroeconomy concern and

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 4>so he wasn't going to raise his guidance. But look,

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 4>he's talking about AI as well. It infiltrates all of it.

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 4>It's not just a model. They see tailwinds. The market

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 4>doesn't yet believe it. At the moment, there is angst

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 4>ed about these software businesses being disrupted by.

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Them to say in the future, we will make more money.

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 3>This is the timeline, that's.

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 5>All, And for now they can't.

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 4>But for now we talk about what's happening with a

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 4>deal WBD as we know it, Warner Brothers, Discovery and

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Paramount both down. Paramount down by five percent. But we

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 4>got that approval of the deal one hundred and ten

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar acquisition of the company BI Paramount's guide outs,

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 4>let's turn our attention to what comes next. Bloemberg's media

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 4>reporter Hannah Miller. The investors okay with it? Now, we've

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 4>got to see if the regulators are yes.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 16>That's the next step is to overcome any regulatory obstacles

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 16>that crop up, including anti trust reviews in both the

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 16>US and Europe.

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Senator Elizabeth Warren has posted on x in the last

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 3>couple of minutes that the Paramount Warner Brothers deal is

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 3>an antitrust nightmare? Is that how the world feels about this, Hannah?

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 16>I think that's certainly how Hollywood feels about this. That

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 16>we've had a lot of celebrities, actors, writers, directors come

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 16>forward and actually sign an open letter protesting the deal,

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 16>arguing that this will affect jobs, it'll lower production, it'll

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 16>mean higher costs. They think that this consolidation, it would

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 16>have too much power in Hollywood.

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's getting personal.

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 4>If you go on TikTok, there's Jane Fonder and pretending

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 4>to be CBS news anchors that are being disrupted in

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 4>the future. Just what is the tactics that Hollywood now deploys.

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 4>What is it that we're likely to expect in terms

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:00.080
<v Speaker 4>of the time.

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 16>I think we've already seen them really, you know, make

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 16>a big fuss about it in the press. This open

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 16>letter was a great move. We've seen a lot of

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 16>celebrities post on social media. Politicians have also come forward

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 16>and you know, expressed concern about the deal. So you

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 16>know there is going to be this sort of public

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 16>relations battle that'll be on the hurt.

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 2>At some point, we'll talk about the tech story.

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Remember ViacomCBS Paramount plus HBO Max. That will be discussed

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 3>at some point. Bloomberg's Ala Miller, Thank you very much.

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 5>It has been such fun. Haven't you sat next to me?

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 2>It's been great. It's been a hell of a week.

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, newsflow wise, markets wise, earnings wise.

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 2>But I think we've we've been across it all.

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 4>You have, you're going to jet back to the West coast.

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 5>Don't forget to check out the podcast.

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 4>You can find on the terminal as well as online

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 4>on Apple, Spotify and iHeart from New York.

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 5>For this Thursday. This is Bloomberg Tech