WEBVTT - Why Are Kids So Attracted to Shel Silverstein's Poetry?

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, mango? What's that? Will? So I know we're

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>both big fans of Shell Silverstein, But do you remember

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this poem that was called Prayer of the Selfish Child?

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know that name sounds so familiar, but I don't

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>actually remember the exact words. How how to go? All right?

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of my favorites. But it goes. Now.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I lay me down to sleep, I pray the Lord

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>my soul to keep, and if I die before I wake,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I pray the Lord my toys to break so none

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other kids can use them. Amen. I love it.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So I've spent countless hours over the years reading Silverstein

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>with both of my kids, and I'll never forget probably

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe like seven or eight years ago,

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>reading this poem with my daughter and just seeing her

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>get this little smirk on her face when I read

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it to her, and it was as though she was thinking, Okay,

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I know that's wrong, but I also get it and

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty darn funny. Yeah. I think most kids can

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>identify with that feeling in some way, Like there's something

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>about Shell Silverstein's writing that allows us to be a

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>little dark or maybe a little naughty, But also really

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>silly at the same time. That's exactly it. So you

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>know what we we thought it was time to dedicate

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>an episode to one of our favorite children's authors to

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about his fascinating and successful career well before he

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>was ever pushed into writing for kids, to hear what

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he thought kids wanted to hear, and also how he

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>felt about happy endings. So let's dive ina. Hey there,

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast listeners, Welcome to part time genius sim Will Pearson,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And as always, I'm joined by my good friend Manges Ticketer.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Mango is joining me today from the always

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>friendly Mouth Media Studios in New York City. And Mango,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you're missing this, but on the other side of the

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>soundproof glass building a sailboat with the wood from his

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>childhood apple tree. And I'm actually I'm kind of getting

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>choked up as I say this. That's our friend and

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>producer Tristan McNeil. And you know, I'm not sure what

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>far off place he plans on going with that, but

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>it must be a pretty important trip because I know

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>how much Tristan loved his old family apple. Excuse me,

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm just getting choked up again. So I'm

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>wondering about this because I asked him a little earlier,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like he just plans to tool around

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the coast on the weekends, you know, like assuming he

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>ever gets this boat finished. Oh well, that that that

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of took a dark turn from what I thought

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it might be. But you know what, that that actually

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>might be appropriate for today's episode because Shell Silverstein was

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly not your average Sachran sweet children's author. Now, most

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>people know him for his tongue twisting rhymes he penned

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for childhood classics like Where the Sidewalk Ins and A

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Light in the Attic, but they were also long and

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>varied parts of his career where most people they don't

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>really know what he was up to, including some fairly

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>unsavory stints as a playwright and a raunchy songwriter and

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a cartoonist for Playboy of all places. So with these

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>different sides of the artists in mine, I thought we

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>should check out some of the lesser known stories from

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Silverstein's life and you know, try to get a sense

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of how he became one of the most beloved and

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>even most controversial writers of the twentieth century. Yeah, so,

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>once he became famous as a children's author, details of

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>his earlier life and his other work kind of faded

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from public consciousness. And another big reason why those stories

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't so well known is that Shell Silverstein was also

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty private guy. Like he rarely gave interviews. He

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>never wrote a memoir or sat down with a biographer

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. And as a result, we really

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know much about Shell's childhood, which is kind of

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>ironic given what he's known for. I mean, we know

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the basics, right, like, we know he was born in

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty to middle class Jewish family in Chicago, but

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>things actually get kind of hazy beyond that. Well, there's

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at least one other thing we know for sure about

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the young Shell Silverstein, and that is that he was

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>positively obsessed with the Chicago White Sox. In fact, in

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a rare nineteen interview with Publishers Weekly, Silverstein said, when

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid twelve to fourteen around there, I

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>would much rather have been a good baseball player or

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a hit with the girls. But I couldn't play ball,

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't dance. Luckily the girls didn't want me. Not

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>much I could do about that, so I started to

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>draw and write well. I mean, you've got to appreciate

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>his honesty, right, Like, not very many authors would admit

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that a career writing was their plans c. I mean,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously after playing baseball and being a professional casanova. I guess. Well,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>while Silverstein was a little too unathletic to turn pro

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at either of those things, he did have one early

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gig in professional sports, or at least in the same ballpark.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's because he actually spent five years selling beer

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and hot dogs at the Chicago Cubs and Chicago White

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Sox stadiums. And not only did that gig help pay

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>us way through school, it actually also gave him some

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>valuable life lessons. So, just as one example of this,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>when a reporter asked him what he learned about people

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>from his time time as a hot dog vendor, Silverstein replied,

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I learned they like mustard and that they like a

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>hot bond. Did you know that if you steam the

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bond first, they'll really like it? I mean, that's the

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of wisdom you can't vibe. But speaking of Shell's schooling,

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he actually had a pretty tough go of things. So first,

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he attended the University of Illinois, but was quickly kicked

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>out due to his bad grades. And then he tried

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the Art Institute of Chicago, where he wound up dropping

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>out after about a year. And lastly he went to

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt University, which is also in Chicago. I guess he

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>studied English for a full three years there. And this

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>last attempt at college life at Roosevelt was probably the

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>most crucial for Shell because it was actually where he

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>first started writing and cartooning for the school paper. And

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, his flair for flaunting authority and you know,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>all those established norms was even there in his earliest work.

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So we found the first cartoon he ever published, and

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>it shows this naked student smoking a cigarette in front

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of this angry professor, and the caption just reads, what

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do you mean no smoking? I thought this was a

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>liberal school. I do kind of like that. There's that

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>hint of his absurd ast slant, you know, right there,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>from the very beginning. But I'm curious though. It sounds

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like Silverstein finally found a decent fit or a home

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there at Roosevelt. So did he eventually get his degree there? No,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he never did. Actually, Uh, it wasn't his fault this time,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like before, Shell had the chance to finish he was

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>drafted into the Korean War. This was in a I

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think in nineteen three, and of course Shell being Shell,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no guarantee he would have finished college anyway.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>He implied at one point that you probably wouldn't have.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But his time in the army actually proved just as formative.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It gave him the chance to earn his first art

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>based paycheck. And this is while working as a cartoonist

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Stars and Strips military newspaper. Actually, you know

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>what I remember reading about this. What wasn't he like

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>court martialed or something for his work on that paper? Yeah?

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Almost so. Apparently one of the cartoons he did for

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the paper implied that officers were clothing their families with

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of like stolen uniforms, and of course the

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>higher ups didn't find it very funny. And in the

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>end Shell actually just narrowly avoided the court martial. He

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't by agreeing that the future strips would only lampoon

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>civilians and animals and not as fellow soldiers. And that

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>makes sense because you know, if you think about if

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody needs to be taken down a peg, it's animals.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you feel about this, but I

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>do feel the same way, right, So all right, So

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so now we're getting to the point where Silverstein's career

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>really begins to take shape. So he was discharged in ninetive.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>He goes back to Chicago and he starts working as

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a freelance cartoonist and and it actually goes pretty well

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for a while. So he lands a few gigs at

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>places like Sports Illustrated and Look magazine. But from this

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really get a whole lot of acclaim for

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>these jobs, and you know, none of its steady work.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But then in nineteen fifty seven, Silverstein catches his big

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>break and he becomes the resident cartoonist for Playboy. Now

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the magazine had premiered just a couple of years before,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Silverstein was really able to get in

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on the ground floor. But it actually wasn't some sort

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of short lived stint on his way to, you know,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like later fame as a children's author. In fact, Silverstein's

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>cartoons appeared in every single issue of Playboy from nineteen

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven all the way through the mid seventies. So

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking almost a couple of decades. That's crazy. So

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I knew he worked at Playboy, and I just assumed,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, like he's from Chicago. Playboy got his start

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, so so that makes sense. But I had

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>no idea that his adults only phase in his career

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>actually overlapped with his children's face. I mean, the Giving

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Treaty was published in the sixties, so it's wild to

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>think he was still a Playboy employee during this time. Yeah.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And actually there's even more overlapped than that, because in

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty one, the adult magazine published its first ever

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>children's work, and I say that in Quotations, which was

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>called Uncle Shelby's a b Z Book, and soon after

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it appeared in Playboy. Silverstein actually published this separately as

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>his first book. So something tells me this wasn't really

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a kid's book right now. It definitely wasn't. I mean,

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the tagline claimed it was quote a primer for young minds,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but you wouldn't get too far into it before realizing

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it was anything but that. So the idea is that,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was one of these children's Learned the

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet books where every page gives you a letter and

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>then an ad collustration and like this little mnemonic device

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to help kids learn the letters and how they're used.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But that really wasn't the goal in Uncle Shelby's case,

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and instead the book to use associations that targeted the

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>insecurities and gullibility of children and kind of tried to

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>spur them into all kinds of mischief. So just just

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to give a couple examples of this, you know, one

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>entry encouraged kids to hurl eggs at the ceiling in

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>order to feed the magic genie Ernie who lives there,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And another one advised kids to pretend to

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>drink lie if they were ever craving candy, because you know,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>after the doctor pumps their stomach, he'll give you a

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>nice red lollipop. But anyway, but one of my favorites

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is probably the entry for the letter B, and it

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>includes the lines see the baby play play baby, play

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty baby. Mommy loves the baby more than she

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>loves you. I mean, it's obviously horrible, and you know

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly satire, and and the book wasn't meant

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for kids in the slightest, but you just have to

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>know that some clueless parents bought this book for their

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>kids at some point, right, Oh, absolutely, And in fact,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>those misunderstandings happen often enough that from onward. The print

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>edition of the book actually includes a stamp right on

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the front cover and what it says is a primer

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for adults only. I love that, Like, instead of taking

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it out in circulation, they just put a stamp on it.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting to me is that, you know what

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a tongue in cheek book like this says about Shell's

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>view of children's literature. I mean, it's no secret that

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he hated the way most children's authors condescended to their audience.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Like he sometimes spoke about the way that the scarier

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>elements and classic fairy tales are toned down to make

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the stories I guess like fluffier and more kid friendly.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And he actually saw this as a form of censorship,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a viewpoint that seems to have informed this

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 1>a b C book. Well, if you think about it,

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what better way to push against the status

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>quote of children's books than to just write your own

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and do what you want with it. But you know,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>according to Silverstein, it was actually a friend and fellow

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>illustrator named Tomy Unger who helped him do just that.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.479
<v Speaker 1>And by helped, I really mean forced, because, as Silverstein

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>later said that his friend quote practically dragged me kicking

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and screaming and to editor Ursula Nordstrom's office, and Nordstrom

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>convinced me that Tomy was right. I could do children's books.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And so for his first book, Silverstein made kind of

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a bold move and stuck to the Uncle Shelby persona

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>he had created for Playboy. It's just so strange what

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he did, but he called it Uncle Shelby's story of Lofcadio,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lion who Shot Back, And it was an appropriately

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>twisted tale about this marshmallow loving lion who becomes a

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>famous marksman and as kind of an identity crisis as

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a result of all this, saying, you know, you know,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the standard children's stuff about life crisis

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is and things like that. Sure, so look, Kadya is

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>one of Shell's lesser known works. But it doesn't predate

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The Giving Tree by all that much, right, Like, I'm

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure it came out just like a year later

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or something. Well, you're you're half right about that. So

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>silver Team did write The Giving Tree a year after

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>his first book, along with a third title that's called

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 1>A Giraffe and a Half. But you know what, while

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the story of This Generous Apple Tree would eventually become

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>his most popular book, at the time it was written,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>actually no publisher would touch it. It was a full

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>year until somebody finally came around, and this was HarperCollins.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're familiar with the book, you can

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of see why this was. You know, it's not

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a very happy story, and in fact, it's downright sad

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in some places. And if you're looking for a moral

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to the story, it's pretty ambiguous at best. I would say, no,

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that's true. And and when you think about it, that's

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>totally aligned with Shells m o. Right, like as this

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>new kind of children's author, like he ever wanted to

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>talk down to child readers or sugarcoat the world for them,

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.599
<v Speaker 1>and instead he was kind of trying to bridge the

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gap between adult and children's writing. Well that's a good point,

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, from the publisher's perspective, though, the story

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>was sort of stranded somewhere in the middle of that bridge.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, for example, it was kind of interesting to

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>just to see how different editors reacted to it. So

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>there was one from Simon and Schuster who rejected the book,

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and he said, it's not a kid's book. It's too sad,

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and it isn't for adults either, it's too simple. And

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know this other editor that just kind of went

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>straight to the chase here in his response, and he

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>said that Tree is sick neurotic. Well, I mean, plenty

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of people would probably agree with that take, but we'll

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>save the controversy for later. For now, I do think

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that Shell definitely got the last laugh.

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. Uh, if you fast forward to today, the

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Giving Tree has actually become one of the all time

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>children's classics. And not only is it sold nearly ten

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>million copies, it's also been translated into no fewer than

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty different languages. Thirty different languages. I mean, not too

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>shabby for this sick neurotic Apple Tree, Really not at all.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And I do want to spend some time on the

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>psychology behind Shell's writing and how that relates to the

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>controversy we touched on. But I also think we'd be

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>doing our listeners a real disservice if we didn't talk

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at least a little bit about Silverstein's bizarre stint as

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a songwriter. Alright, one with you on that, So let's

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. But before we get to it, let's take

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. You're listening to Part Time Genius and

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the strange life and times of Shell's Silverstein,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you ask me, one of the strangest times

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in his life by far, was this period between nineteen

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine in the mid nineteen seventies when he actually

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed a pretty successful music career. I mean, particularly as

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a songwriter. And I don't I don't think most people

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>know this. Yeah, I'd have to agree. I mean, it

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that his knack for poetry would translate a songwriting,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's still amazing just how well he pulled off

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that transition. I mean, as a singer, he didn't have

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>much success. His voice was, I guess too raspy and

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>jarring for most people's ears, even though he actually does

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have a dozen albums. But when he committed to songwriting,

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>things really took off for him, and by the end

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of his life he'd written more than eight hundred songs.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, many of these were recorded and performed by

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some pretty famous artists. Like Willie Jennings, Willie Nelson, Jerry Lewis,

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>even Johnny Cash. That's a pretty incredible lineup. And actually

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he even won a Grammy for the song he wrote

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>for Johnny Cash, which was a boy named who. You've

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>heard this song right now? Yeah, of course, but I

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't know Shell Silverstein wrote it until recently. Like, it

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>makes perfect sense in hindsight, right, Like, it's such a

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>deeply silly song and it still has a sense of

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>danger to it, so it really fits right into Shell's repertoire. Yeah,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's true for anybody who might not have heard it before.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>The song is about a boy who was named Sue

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>by his absentee father, and he gets picked on all

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>his life for having a girl's name, so much so

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that one day Sue tracks down his dad and threatens

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to kill him. And at that point, that's when the

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>dad reveals that he only named his son Sue because

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to make him tough, I guess, by forcing

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>him to stand up for himself, you know, whenever somebody

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>made fun of him. Anyway, Sue gets on board with

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this explanation and all is forgiven between he and his dad,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. But the thing that most people don't know

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is that Silverstein actually wrote a sequel to the song

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. It was called Father of a Boy Named Sue.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But you will not find this song on a Johnny

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Cash album. I mean, the darkness of this song it

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of eclipses the silliness and the other one.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So Silverstein wound up singing it himself, which which probably

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>explains why so few people actually know about So I'm

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a little afraid to ask me. You can't just

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>leave us hanging like that. So what makes it so

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>much darker? Well, first of all, the sequel is told

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>from the dad's point of view, and it's basically him

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>setting the record straight on what happened in the first song. So,

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, he reveals that he actually named his son Sue,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not to toughen him up, but his revenge for all

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>those times the boys screamed and cried and all these

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>fits is a baby, which you know, of course, seems

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fair, right yeah, it feels like a totally appropriate

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>response to like a baby acting like a baby, right right, Well,

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it gets decidedly inappropriate from there, So I'm not going

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to go into details. You can track down the song

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>for yourself if you dare to do so. But let's

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just say the character's relationship goes from unhealthy to something

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>much much worse. Oh no, I mean you can kind

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of see why Johnny Cash might have taken a pass

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on that, right, Oh yeah, for sure. And I mean

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>it really is sort of a weird thing to think

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 1>about something that dark coming from the mind of a

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>celebrated children's author. But honestly, I mean that kind of

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>black humor pops up a lot on the poems he

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>wrote for kids. I was just looking at some examples

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of this, and you know, one of the best is

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>probably the poem called Dreadful. And this comes from where

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the sidewalk ins. And it's pretty short, so I'll just

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>read it real quick. Here it goes, someone ain't the

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>baby baby? What a frightful thing to eat? Someone ate

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the baby though she wasn't very sweet, It was a

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>heartless thing to do. The policeman haven't got a clue.

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I simply can't imagine who would go and burp eat

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the baby. I mean, I do understand why some parents

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 1>might not approve that one. You know, most of us

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to frown on baby eating, after all, but on

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, like the poem is clever, it's funny,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty harmless on and all. And you know, I,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I know people have accused Silverstein's poetry of being a

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>bad influence, but like, does anyone really think their kids

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go cannibal after hearing them? I mean, I know

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.719
<v Speaker 1>what you mean, but it did get me wondering, like

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is about Silverstein's poetry that kids find so

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>inherently appealing, you know, despite how dark it can get sometimes.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 1>And what I found is that it partly comes down

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to how kids respond to poetry in general. All kinds

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of psychological studies have shown that connection between music and

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>an infant's development of their language, and according to this

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>article from Frontiers and Psychology, quote the further removed a

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>feature of languages from music the later it is learned.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that kids respond so well the poetry

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's the most musical of the language based arts,

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>it just just kind of makes sense. That's really fascinating,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, if it's the musicality they're responding to,

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>then a lot of the appeal is probably in the

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>sounds that are voices make, rather than the words themselves.

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that makes sense, given how like children's

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>poetry usually plays up these acoustical aspects like rhythm or rhyme.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly more than most adult poetry does, I guess. Yeah.

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think most children's poets have to know that

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their work will be read aloud, so it makes sense

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that they try to craft these highly musical verses, since

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are the most fun, both both to

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hear and to to listen to. Yeah, and obviously shel

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Silverstein did just that. But you know, I don't think

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just the musicality of his writing that's endeared him

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to so many generations of young readers, like silliness and cleverness.

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that has a lot to do with it. But

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me, the thing that really wins kids

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>over are those hints of menace and sadness that underlines

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so much of his work. Like Where the Sidewalk Ins

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>is such a melancholy poem, and even as a concept,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds sort of foreboding. Yeah, and is that what

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you think kids like about it? I mean, I know

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>kids get a kick out of scaring themselves, just like

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>adults too, you know, And of course, as long as

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the right amount of scare and they don't feel

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>like they're in danger or anything. But but why would

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>something sad or upsetting be that appealing to them? I mean,

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's what you're saying about the right amount, right, Like,

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think kids will kind of appreciate and react to

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the honesty of something like that, Like maybe even if

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just on a subconscious level, they recognize that even

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>though the author is writing for them, he isn't really

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>treating them like kids. And actually, to go along with that,

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there's this great quote I want to read from The

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beast, and it's this article I found it. It's

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about why the less than sunny worlds of some children's

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>books resonate so deeply with kids. So it says, uh,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>small and effectively powerless against the whims of adults contested bedtimes. Notwithstanding,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>children are buffeted by the currents of a large world,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they often do not understand A book without fear is

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable book, sounding a dull note that soon fades.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that does make a lot of sense, And

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about other authors like Maury Sindac or Rold Doll,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>even Dr Seuss. I mean, they were all kind of

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>keyed into that idea, you know, that not having to

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>pretend the world is this completely safe and happy all

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the time place when when they were writing for kids.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And actually even that Tony Unger that we talked about earlier,

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the one who helped convince Silverstein to try his hand

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>at kids writing, he was famous in France for his

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>own unsettling children's fiction. You know, I'm actually glad you

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>brought him up again because Hunger was also a big

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>inspiration behind Maury sindex work, and he doesn't get nearly

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as much credit as he should. Also, speaking of Sindac,

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>did did you know that he and Silverstein shared the

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>same long time time editor. That yeah, that that woman

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Ursula Nordstrom you mentioned She worked with both of them

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>for decades, which makes sense because you know, apparently her

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>self stated mission was to publish quote, good books for

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>bad children. Oh I love that. Well, you know, given that,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>now seems like a good time to talk about the

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.239
<v Speaker 1>controversy Silverstein's writing is kicked up over the years, as

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as his legacy in general. That sounds great,

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>But but first I do want to read another quick

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>poem from sidewalk, because it really goes a long way

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>towards explaining how Silverstein approach writing for children. It's called

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the Land of Happy, and it goes quote, have you

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>been to the land of Happy? Where everyone's happy all day?

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Where they joke and they sing the happiest things, and

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone's jolly and gay. There's no one unhappy and happy.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>There's laughter and smiles galore. I have been to the

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>land of Happy? What a bore? Well, I can't argue

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with that. All right, well, we do want to talk

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about that controversy. But before we get to that, let's

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>take one more quick break. Okay, mango, So let's get

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to the controversial and talk about why a growing number

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of parents are banning Shells Silverstein from their children's bookshelves.

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, is it still just the idea that

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>his books promote bad behavior or is there more to

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it than this? Well, I I do think that's part

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think some parents still have this old

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>school approach to children's lit where they they expected to

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>be completely edifying or you know, not really have those

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>sharp edges. And of course they're going to have this

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>negative reaction to an author who has no bones about

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>presenting these grown up ideas or all these problems in

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>ways that are I guess approachable to kids. And then

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>there are the folks who take offense to specific poems

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>from a light in the attic or where the sidewalk ends,

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know that baby eating one you read earlier.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, people's biggest beef with silver

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>scene is usually the message or even the potential lack

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of one in the giving tree. All right, Well, on

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the off chance that there's somebody listening that isn't familiar

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with this story, I feel like we should give a

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>quick rundown of what happened. So it's basically the story

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of a little boy who grows up with this sentient

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>tree for a companion, and at different stages in the

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>boy's life, the tree gives him whatever he needs to

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have this safer, easier life. You know that. That's leaves

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>or branches or apples, pretty much all the things a

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>tree could realistically provide to someone. And the whole time,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the tree is personified as sort of a weary, kind

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of like a put upon woman. And I say woman

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's referred to with female pronouns, and she's constantly

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>nurturing him, with little concern for her own happiness or

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>well being. She keeps giving, the boy keeps taking, and

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, his lot improves as a result of all

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>these interactions, but the trees really doesn't. So in the

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>end there's nothing left of the giving tree but this stump.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even then, it's offered up to the boy,

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>who's now an old man at this point, as a

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>place to sit and rest. Yeah. I mean, it's obviously

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a feel good story all around. I mean that description

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>alone probably says a lot about why some people are

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>so put off by this book. And at a glance,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you might think it's a simple story of unconditional love,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>which could easily make the tree in allegory for lots

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of things. It could be like friendship for marriage, parenthood, god,

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever. But then you remember that like love

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is meant to go both ways, you know, ideally, it's

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 1>never supposed to be one party, always taking into other,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>always giving. I mean, even for parents, where so much

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of your time and energy are devoted to your kids,

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not like we get nothing in return for all

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that effort. Yeah. I was actually reading this cracked article

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that claimed the story's message was one of two things.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So the first one they said that it might be

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is your parents exist only to serve you and then die,

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>So that's the first And then or or if the

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tree doesn't symbolize the parent, then the message amounts to

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>eventually something will come along that bleeds you dry. And

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that's just how it is. And of course neither of

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>those are very good messages for children or for adults

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>for that matter. No, definitely not. And and give it

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>all that, it's easy to see why people might worry

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that the book more or less glorifies an abusive relationship.

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think the mistake is to assume that Silverstein

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>overlooked that reading, or that he might have intended as

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a way to mislead kids into either accepting or I guess,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>inflicting that kind of one sided relationship. So I mean,

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about do you think Silverstein intended the story

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to be upsetting on some level, like kind of a

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>cautionary tale or something. Yeah, I mean, I think it's

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>highly possible. But whatever the case, I don't think he

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>meant it as this straightforward story about selflessness or that

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we're meant to approve of the boy's actions, or feel

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>happy that the tree is reduced to a stump by

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the book. I mean, people have always

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>grasped that there's something off about this story. I mean,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just think about that publisher whose first reaction was that

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the tree was not behaving in a healthy way or heck,

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I and look at Bart Simpson. You know how there's

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that running gag on the show where he has to

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>write something repeatedly on the chalkboard is like punishment of course. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean in one episode he writes, the giving tree

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a chump. So even someone as disinterested as

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bart Simpson is in reading knew something weird

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was going on there. Yeah. Well, you know, it's funny

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>because we've mostly been talking about parents reactions to the book,

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and in a lot of cases there are people who

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have returned to the book after reading it as kids themselves,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly they're finding it maybe wasn't this clear cut

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>story of sacrifice that they remember from childhood. So, for instance,

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I read this article on the Huffington Post about a

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>woman who reread the story as a parent, and it

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>just launched her into this existential crisis, and she was

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>asking you know, am I the tree? Am I the boy?

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, And she's just panicked about this. But

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's the thing I found remarkable. You know

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that that while the book left this mother with a

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>million heavy questions about herself and the way of the

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>world and responsibility to one another and all these different things,

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.160
<v Speaker 1>her children seemed to grasp the stories lessons just instinctually.

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So as she writes about it, she says, they knew

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it was wrong to keep asking without offering in return.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>They thought the boy was selfish, they thought he was careless.

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>They were heartbroken over lost things, the trees, sad remains.

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they cried for the impossible, far off promise that

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>endings were inevitable, that in the end, all were reduced

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to or judged by are the people we love and

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the people who loved us. Now I don't get it,

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But even though they can't put it into words, my

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>children do. Hm. I mean, that's really beautiful. And it

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>does say so much about the innocence of kids that

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a story that seems so morally ambiguous to adults like

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>would just make perfect sense to them. Oh. Absolutely. And

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also important that these kids not only

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>recognized that the story has this sad ending, but you know,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they accepted that and still enjoyed the story regardless. Like

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just just a nice piece of validation for Silverstein.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And he actually went on record with The New York

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Times about how much he disliked happy endings in these

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>children's stories. He told the reporter that happy endings, quote,

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>create an alienation. The child asked, why don't have this

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>happiness thing you're telling me about and comes to think

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>when his joy stops that he has failed, that it

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>won't come back. Yeah, I mean, I guess it goes

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>back to that revolutionary idea of his about being honest

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with children. I mean, of course, our gut reaction is

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to try and spare our kids the pain of sad

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>unhappy endings whenever possible, But in practice that just leaves

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>them with this incomplete view of the world, which is

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>way worse than a few tears in the long run. Yeah,

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that sounds right to me. But you know,

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>let's give Shell himself the last word on the matter.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So his family released the posthumous collection of some of

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>his unpublished poems back in two thousand eleven, and here's

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>one poem in particular that really says it all. It's

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>called happy Ending, and it goes, there are no happy endings.

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Endings are the saddest part. So give me a happy

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>middle and a very happy start. I love that. But

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you say we put Chelse Silverstine's theory to

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the test and try to close the show with the

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>happiest fact off we can muster? All right, I'm getting

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for that. I mean, it might not be a happy ending,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but but it has worked for us so far. So

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one of his most famous poetry collections, and one of

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>my favorites of his work, A Lad in the Attic,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was actually one of the hundred most challenged materials in

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the nineties according to the American Library Association. And it's

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>funny because some critics felt that in the book he

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>quote glorified Satan suicide, cannibalism, and also encouraged children to

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>be disobedient. Man, he really accomplished a lot in one.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think it's interesting that one of his

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>cartoons has supposed have been used in the psychological tests,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, to test how optimistic someone is. That's cartoon.

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You may have seen it before, but it's the cover

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of a collection of his comments that he created over

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the years, and these were mostly for Playboy. Now, in

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the comic, you see two prisoners shackle to the wall,

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're not doing well, and it doesn't look like

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>there's any hope of them getting out. And there's this

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly high ceiling where you see the only window to

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the outside world, but even that is heavily barred. But

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the only words you see are from one prisoner looking

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>at the other end, saying, now here's my plan. So

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean. The book was actually called that now Here's

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>my Plan, a book of futilities. And when Silverstein was

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>asked about how so many people have used the cartoon

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to interpret different things, he said, you do something, you

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>make it simple, and everybody else starts loading it up

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>with deep meanings, which is okay by me if they

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. Everybody loves Roor Scheck tests well.

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Shell did not love to be pinned down. He never

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>owned a are and and for many years one of

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the main homes he lived in was a house boat,

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and speaking in an interview with Publishers Weekly, he said, quote,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm free to leave go wherever I please, do whatever

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I want. I believe everyone should live like that. Don't

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be dependent on anyone else, man, woman, child or dog.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to go everywhere, look at and listen to everything.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You can go crazy with some of the wonderful stuff

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there is in life. All right. Well, Shell never read

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>reviews about his books or any of his other works,

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And here's what he had to say about that quote.

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're a creative person, you should just

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>go about your business, do your work, and not care

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>how it's received. I never read reviews because if you

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>believe the good ones, you have to believe the bad

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ones too. Not that I don't care about success. I do,

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but only because it lets me do what I want.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's fun that over the years we've

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>used a Shell Silverstein poem to describe our philosophy on

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>making fun things like whether that was metal floss or

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>board games or books or whatever. And it's a poem

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>called put something in it goes, Draw a crazy picture,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>write a nutty poem, sing a mumble gumble song, whistle

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>through your comb, do a loony, goony dance, cross the

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>kitchen floor. Put something silly in the world that ain't

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been there before. You beat me to it Mango. I

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was actually going to share that poem, so I've got

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to give you today's fact Off trophy because that's one

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.959
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites of his. Oh, thank you so much. Well,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And I do want to say today's show and and

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>My Farm particular was recorded at Mouth Media Network Studio

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, which is powered by Sennheiser. You

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>can learn more about Mouth Media at Mouth Media Network

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. So, listeners, I'm sure we've forgotten some great

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>facts about shel Silverstein and we would love to hear

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>those from. You can always email us part Time Genius

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff Works dot com or call us on

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>our seven fact hot line that's one eight six pt Genius,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or you can hit us up on Facebook or Twitter.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But thanks so much for listening. Yeah, thanks again for listening.

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Part Time Genius is a production of How Stuff Works

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and wouldn't be possible without several brilliant people who do

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the important things we couldn't even begin to understand. Tristan

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>McNeil does the editing thing. Noel Brown made the theme

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 1>song and does the MIXI mixy sound thing. Jerry Rowland

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>does the exact producer thing. Gabe Bluesier is our lead researcher,

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with support from the Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Lucas Adams and Eve Jeff Cook gets the

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>show to your ears. Good job, Eves. If you like

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what you heard, we hope you'll subscribe, And if you

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>really really like what you've heard, maybe you could leave

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.919
<v Speaker 1>a good review for us. Do we do we forget Jason?

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Jason who