WEBVTT - The Cycle: News Updates, Second Half Bold Predictions, and HR Derby Draft (Ep. 1086)

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle. I am Ryan Warmley,

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>joined as always by Mike Mayor Mayor. We are here

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at almost the All Star break, and in fact, it

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>might even be the All Star break for some people

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>listening to this if they waited a couple of days

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 1>after it gets released. We are just doing one episode.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>We always do kind of one quote unquote episode of

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. We're doing only one part today rather than

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>breaking it up because there are not a lot of

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>games next week and not until next weekend. We're not

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>doing our usual you know, pitching streamers. Obviously, we can't

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>really do the two star picture contests. We've got a

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.319
<v Speaker 1>fun way to so kind of go ahead to head

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>against each other and something for next week. Anyway, we'll

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>get to you later in the show. But yeah, just

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>won't be one episode this week. You don't need to

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>look for part two, Part three for other listeners who

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>are used to seeing that on audio and video. What

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be doing today is some news and notes,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which there actually isn't really all that much. It's a

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of minor news and notes updates. We felt like

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of not very newsworthy week. We're gonna

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>do some bold predictions for the post All Star breaks,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the second half post All Star Break, however you want

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to call it. We're gonna do some bullet predictions. We've

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>got three each, and then we're gonna wrap up with

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a home run Derby draft. Now we are recording this

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, which is only a few days before the derby,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and they still have not announced the whole field. I

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>hate that Major League Baseball is waiting so long. Now.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the value in this at all. Makes

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>no sense to me. Right now, we only have seven

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>names listed, and one of the names is Byron Buckston,

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>who got hit by a pitch yesterday, and I haven't

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>seen anything that says he's not going to participate, but

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you never know with a guy like Buckston

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>and his injury history. So we're gonna do the best

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we can with this home run Derby draft and figure

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it out kind of as we go along. That'll be

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>how we wrap up this show, so stay tuned for

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that later on. Like I said, mayor just a couple

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of days here before the All Star Break. How we

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>feel and kind of at this unofficial we are past

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the halfway point, but the unofficial halfway point of the season.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling pretty good, you know, like you said, Yeah,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.279
<v Speaker 2>we normally do just the one like quote unquote episode,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>but three videos. We usually put out about one hundred

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 2>minutes of content, and so I think we agreed this

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 2>one episode's going to be one hundred minutes long?

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it, But if it goes that long, naturally

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we will allow it to do. So that's my promise.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But I cannot imagine that happening. Let's dive into the

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>news and notes. Like I said, it really didn't feel

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like there was a whole lot here. Dallas Kykeel signs

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Royals just of note because of the name brand,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not like you and I are. I mean, I assume

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>not like we were expecting any kind of fantasy value here.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Given the most recent performances we saw from Kaykel last

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>time he was on the mound, I thought it was

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting that Major League Baseball is going to be using

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the ABS system? Does the S Stanford system? Can I

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>say ABS system? Is it like pin number or ATM

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>machine where you're not supposed to says? What does the

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>S stand for? Again?

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I assume so I always.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Or is it or is it automated Balls and Strikes?

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I know what it is, but I actually forget what

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it's what it stands for.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was automated balls and strikes, So maybe

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't automated ball system.

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, Well at any rate, I you know,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>forget what that's called. But at any rate, they're using

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it during the All Star Game. Is that of interest

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to you? Do you think this is kind of a

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>fun exhibition to test it out more at the major

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>league level? Or do you not really care about this?

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 2>I care about it. I'm interested to see how they

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>do it. I think there's a lot of ways to

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>do it right and a lot of ways to do

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it wrong. I think the umpiring has been so bad

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that it's worth kind of you know, it.

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Is automated ball strike. So you can say ABS system,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>which is what I thought, but I got as soon

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as I said it, I was like, wait, is this

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like ATM machine or pin number? So I should have

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck with.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>The Garby eyes.

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, runs bat it in instead of run bad. It

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>ends run bad, it ins Ribby's as I call them.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sorry, I keep going on the ABS.

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm interested to see how it goes. I

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>know they've been playing Aroun at the minor league level.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of promise to it. I

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>think there's a lot of ways it could go wrong.

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But I also think we're at a point now in

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, with all of the advanced cameras that

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>we have and all these angles that we have, and

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing, you know, things done in other sports where

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it's like we're so exact with some of these things,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Like even in tennis, there's like an automated system where

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you can see like if a ball was across the

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 2>line from overhead and stuff that The days of Angel

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Hernandez calling a ball six inches out off the plate

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>as a strike, like those have to be over at

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>this point. Like we just have too much technology at

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>our fingertips to just let that keep happening.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 3>Even though there.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 2>Is a part of me that loves like the human

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>element of the game there.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't this isn't the way it's going to look

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>when it eventually becomes like a regular thing, which it will,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but I I kind of wish there was a way

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to say it's only for stuff that's very obvious, like

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>egregious misses. I kind of don't want it to get

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>used for borderline well, like, well, technically that caught the

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>black and you know it should have been because especially

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with like height, it's so different for every player. Like

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I know the technology is like calculating for that, but

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really that interested in it in a device

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to like steal a strike here and there. What I'm

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in it is for the stuff where it's like

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Angel Hernandez examples, right, like the okay, like

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this is such a clear miss I don't know what

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about. This is going to change the

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>entire scope of the bat. We got to fix this.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where I want it to be used. If it's

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like a borderline thing like technically by you know, a

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter of an inch, it is one way or the other.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm less interested in that. Do you feel like it

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>should be And again I know I'm not. It's not

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be what I want. But do you kind

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of get that point of you are okay with what

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm laying out its possibility or do you think it

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>should just be very exact, like even if it's by

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a hair, if the ABS system catches it, it should be

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a strike.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm okay with that.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's kind of like that gray area outside

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 2>of the strike zone, and it kind of feels like

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 2>if if a pitch hits that gray area and you

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 2>can still kind of have the human element, but if

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>it's if it's three inches outside, you know, we got

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to correct that. We can't just let you make an

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 2>atrocious call like that. I think also, you know that

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 2>would that would you know, help speed up the game

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too, Like we don't want like every time.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I know there was like a system in play where

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 2>like the way I don't know if they're still doing

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>this in minor leagues, but like an umpire would call

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 2>the game, he would hear in his ear like that

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>was a strike, and then he was allowed to say

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 2>striker ball, but he was told what the system was saying.

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>He was just allowed to override it. I don't know

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 2>if they're still trying out a system like that, but

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't I don't think it would be.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>There should be a system either where it's just like

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>every pitch is reviewed and you have to be like

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>like here's the pitch and you have to like look

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to the side to like see if yeah, you know,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>as a ball or strike. I agree, look up with

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>the scoreboard.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the challenge system too, would be nice to see.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Just like I want to see umpires put in their

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>place more because they are all terrible and I love

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to see it. Batters, you know, do the

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hand on the helmet and sorry you were wrong, Blue,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know, cook, get your eyes checked. So also,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just thinking about the upcoming weekend and the

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>All Star break, do you have any interest in the

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball Draft? Obviously we played some dynasty leagues.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>We're in one together. It's really more of a deep keeper,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know we are dynasty managers in fantasy baseball.

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>The draft is this weekend. Are you somebody who consider

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself pretty familiar with the prospects coming in? Do you

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more just kind of wait to see top one hundred

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>prospect lists? Like once these guys are into professional baseball. Also,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of note, the Nationals fired not only Dave Martinez but

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Rizzo. They're GM one week before the draft, which

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting timing. On the one hand, it's like

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>very surprising. On the other, you know, if you think

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this is not the guy for you, you don't want

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to making the number and overall pick, but you know,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>very very definitely eyebrow raising at the very least. So

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on that in general.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>So the Mike Raiso thing I thought was interesting, but

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I also agree with what you said, Like, you know,

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>if you've come to this conclusion, your solution shouldn't be

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 2>all right, let's give him one more draft and then

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll fire. I'm like, no, I don't want this guy

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 2>making this draft pick. Like so, even even though even

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>if you don't have like a perfect, you know, replacement,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>you know system in place.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 3>If you want to make the move, you make the move.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know your scouts have done all the work anyway,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 2>and you know you should have a good idea of

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>who you want to take.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 3>You just have a different, different person pulling the trigger.

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I I kind of varer from year to year with

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the MLB prospects coming in, depending on how big of

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a class it is. I'll know who the prospects are.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>This year, I'm not as familiar. I know there's another

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>holiday coming out that people are excited about, but other

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>than that, I kind of wait to see the names

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>drafted and then I'll dive in a little bit more.

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 3>But there's a bunch of names.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I've heard of, but yeah, this this is this class

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>in particular, or I haven't done like dug in too deep,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>but as they get announced and stuff, I'll start diging

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>in and you know, see who the top prospects are

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and you know what their path is. And I think

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>it's been more interesting in recent years because we're seeing

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that path to the major leagues shortened for a lot

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of these top prospects, whereas before I was like, all right,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>like we'll see this guy in four or five years.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's like Chase Burham was drafted last year. There's

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of players drafted last year in the league

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>in the league now. So that's where you know it

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>starts to get more more exciting and interesting. And uh yeah,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I wish they would to kind of like televise it

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 2>more because sometimes it's hard. It's hard to watch the

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 2>MLB draft or I would kind of sit down and

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>watch that or at least having it on the background.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I think Kate Anderson is going to be the first pick.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>It's just my guest. I don't have any inside knowledge.

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Holliday feels like, if he's not the first pick,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>feels like a lock to go to the Rockies at four,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>which would be fun because he's got more power than

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Jackson did as a as a prospect. He's a good player.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, it's not that we've had some

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>drafts in recent year where there is like, holy cow,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there are like, you know, three or four superstars at

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the top. Doesn't feel that way of me right now,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's a long way to go with these guys' career,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's something that I will be watching. I do

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>very much enjoy the draft. And the Orioles just traded

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for the thirty seventh pick by getting rid of a

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>controllable reliever who I think is pretty good what we

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>don't need to talk too much about. But they now

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have the most despite not picking early, they now have

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the most like bonus pool to spend. It's like eighteen

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or nineteen million because they have three competitive balance round picks.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>So well, I thought we were considering this the Brian

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 2>Baker Emergency Podcast, so that we're going to spend most

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>of the time on that Orioles reliever.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>See you make fun, but you admitted to me before

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the show you had never heard of Brian Baker before

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>this episode. He's a good reliever. I was surprise. The orielstrated,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's dive into a bunch of the news

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and notes that you edited in here.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So did you already mention Dallas Kickeel. I don't know

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 2>if you mentioned that. I thought you okay, So I

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 2>thought you made you just went right to ABS. So

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>John Gray is beginning a rehab assignment. He began it yesterday.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Any interest in John Gray potentially has a fantasy asset

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>in the second.

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Half, I wouldn't say a lot of interest, but I

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>mean it depends on the league espers.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another report there.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm surprised to see because I thought most of the

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 2>reports a couple of weeks ago with that Als Bragman

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>was you know, working his way back, but that we

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't seem to laughter the All Star break. Alex's course

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 2>said yesterday that he expected them back potentially before the

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>All Star break, which you know, as you already mentioned,

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>there's only a few days left. He's been on the

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 2>shelf for a while. Kind of why would you risk

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>it at this point? You know, I get like, if

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>he's ready, he's ready, but also just take a few

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>extra days and get you know, get the All Star

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>break and have him start the second half. Clark Schmidt

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 2>picture for the Yankees, is expected to need Tommy John

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 2>surgery as of this recording is getting a second opinion.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But normally when it appears you.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Need Tommy John surgery, you usually need Tommy John surgery

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>or at least the internal brace procedure that obviously the

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>type of procedure will act your recovery and kind of

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 2>like what you look like when you come back. But

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you know it's a your absence pretty much.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>No matter what.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Grayson Rodriguez, your boy is ramping up activity. It sounds

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>like he could be back in the second half. What

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>do you think any interest are you? Do you want

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the Ools to bring him back as a fantasy manager?

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you stashing him? I am stashing me seeing you

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>up by the way, I know people don't think I

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>ever do that.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I just tied you up.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I am stashing him, but I don't have really any expectations.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It's more like a lottery ticket stash because at this point,

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>by the time he is actually pitching again, you know

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to take it easy on the innings. They're

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>also not in contention. I mean, they're selling off players

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at least they started this with Baker, So I just

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>don't expect to get much out of him. Like again,

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of leagues where I am stashing

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>him as a like again, like a Highend lottery ticket.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But and I have him in the keeper leagues. But

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not expecting this to be a needle mover in

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season. I would be very

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>surprised if he pitches enough for that to like, regardless

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of how effective he is once he's back, I would

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if he pitches just enough innings between now

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and the end of the season to be relevant.

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 3>That's probably right.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 2>How about Louis Heal beginning a rehab assignment this weekend.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of been forgotten about this.

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy you love to talk about, is

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Louis Heal.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>He's the guy I wrote up as like a a

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>cell high pretty much the entirety of last year. Yeah,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I have my own thoughts of Louis Heel, but he

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 2>did have a really good year last year and could

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>be really valuable in fantasy, you know, depending on what

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 2>he looks like when he came back. I think there

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of smoke and mirrors last year, and

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll see what he looks like when he comes back.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there are worst pitchers being started by

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>fantasy managers right now and being started by the Yankees

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>right now, and so if he can work his way

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 2>back in a couple of weeks, you know, he's someone

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>who can have a lot of value in the second half.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>And then Hunter Green, your boy without a timetable for return.

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 2>I kind of wrote him up as a how high

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the year just because of like

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 2>arm injury concerns. He's pretty much injured everything but his

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>arm at this point, and he just kind of keeps

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 2>having stepbacks trying to get his way back up.

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>This one has sunk up multiple leagues for me where

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I was relying very heavily on him as somebody that

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I expected to take the leap into ace level pitcher

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and he did.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 3>He did, he looked really good.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And this extended absence is just it's killing me in

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple leagues.

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So I know, it's just such such a dagger that

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't even the arm. You know, we talked about

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>having concerned that, like, you know, he was around pitch

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and the ninth inning like hitting one two,

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>one oh three, and I was like, I gotta be

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I got to be honest, I'm concerned about that arm.

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 2>And then he just you know, he's had other injuries

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 2>like unrelated to the arm. And then the other update

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 2>is that Massa Takta Yoshida is back for the Red Sox.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>He was in the lineup yesterday.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Not a huge ceiling for him in fantasy, but all

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a pretty high floor, as you know, someone who should

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>play mostly every day. The Roadsacks have kind of a

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>log jam in their lineup right now, especially when it

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to left handed hitters. But I also imagine if

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>they continue to play well heading into the you know,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the next couple of weeks, I think we're gonna see

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 2>some trades and that that lineup is going to open

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit. And so he's someone who has

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 2>some value, especially in deeper leagues where you know, like

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have a decent batting average, driving some runs,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>but like not a high ceiling, but also you know,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>again a pretty high floor for a player like Yo Yoshida.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's an interesting one. To me as a guy

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about stashing or not stashing, but like picking

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up and what what's his availability? Actually, I meant to

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>look that up before the show. I can put it

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>up now. If you don't have it, I don't have it,

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll pull it up. He is. I assume it's obviously

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>very low. Yeah, it's five percent on Yahoo, three percent

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on ESPN. So it's pretty much available everywhere.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I wonder what I wonder what CBS and CBS

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 3>is probably like forty percent, twelve percent, not even close

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>twelve percent.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say CBS is definitely higher. Forty would

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>be a lot higher. I would have been surprised by that.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I'll probably go up this weekend though, especially

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 3>for the weekly leagues. He wouldn't have been out of this.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a he's a good person to flag. I'm glad

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you brought him up. All right, let's dive into our

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>bold predictions here. Uh, we've got three each. Did you

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>go into a particular order for years or just pick three?

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I just picked three. I tried to I Actually you

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>know you got to the sheet first. I you know,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I will admit I liked yours. I thought you had

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>some pretty good ones that one of them I would

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>have been one of mine.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>To think if you didn't have.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It, I'm interesting on the movie. Don't tell me, tell

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>me when we get to it, but I'm curious to

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>find out which that is. Did you try to go

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly bold with yours or more just like because I

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to do just like regular predictions. I wanted

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a degree of bold, but also like unlike

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>our because we did a preseason episode of bold predictions.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And then it's a little more fun because you can

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of amend any scenario. It's harder to imagine that

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>when you have a more just just shorter timeframe to

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 1>be working with. And also we've seen these players, so

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we know more about what to expect. So I tried

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to be bold with it, and you know, sort of

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>tow that line, strike that balance. Did you try to

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be particularly bold or just try to be more accurate?

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I tried to think of predictions that I would feel

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 2>good about, and then like see if I felt they

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 2>were bold enough, and if they weren't, I moved on,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>or if they if I thought they were close, maybe

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 2>I added a you know, a second piece to it

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 2>to make it seem bolder, and so I tried to

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>lean bold because I agree, just a regular like medium

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>bold prediction, you know, not the most fun but hopefully

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 2>minor bold.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Enough years are more like minor all very players specific

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>years are more like X number of players are going

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to do this for a couple of years. So we'll

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>dived also go ahead, not.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>To really spoil the whole thing, but I did also,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>like you know, you did yours first, and I tried

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to kind of do different types of bold predictions since

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want to just copy your format.

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>All right. I will start off with my first one,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Junior Cameraro, who at the time I put this in

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the here only had twenty one home runs. He now

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it is twenty two because he hit another one yesterday.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Junior Cameronarow will finish the season with over forty home

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>runs and will be a consensus top three third baseman

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six drafts. And mayor we have talked

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how third base is a very difficult

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>position and it's not a deep position, but there is

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of star talent and power at the top,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So finishing top three even though it's a weaker position

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>further down, I do still thinking is difficult to crack into.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought forty home runs was going to come across

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as bold, but if he keeps hitting pretty much every days,

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to look less and less bold by the week.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about this one? Cameronaro forty

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>plus homers a consensus top three third basement in twenty

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty six drafts.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>When I first read it, I thought you were saying

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>consensus top three pick, and I was.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Like, WHOA that is bold?

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Would be very insanely I would I wouldn't have led

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with that one, and.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 3>That would be your closer. Yeah.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I I forget exactly what I said about junior Cameron

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Aro coming into the year, but I know I was

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 2>below consensus because I thought, you know, I always talk

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 2>about drafting at your ceiling, and I thought he was

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>being drafted at a ceiling, and he's hitting his ceiling,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 2>maybe even going above what we thought a ceiling is.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm gonna have to eat crawl a little

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 2>bit on that one unless he falls off, which it

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look like he's going to. He already has twenty

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 2>two home runs, as you said. His stackcast page is

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 2>a little bit interesting. He has elite elite, elite bat speed,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percentile bat speed. He's like sweet spot and

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>squared up numbers aren't ideal for someone you want to

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>hit forty home runs, but he's already got twenty two,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>so he's obviously you.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Know, working around that.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 2>And so if he can hit twenty two home runs

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 2>despite really poor numbers at sweet spot and squared our percentage,

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 2>if he improves those even a little bit, he can

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 2>be even better. And then a lot of his other

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 2>metrics are like average to above average, except for like

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, chase percentage, which is fine because his k

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>percentage is above average and so there's a lot to

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>like in his profile. The other thing about his home

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 2>runs is they're sprayed all across the field. There he's

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 2>not just pulling everything. It's pretty much evenly distributed between

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>like pull straight away and right field, which is really

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 2>impressive for a young hitter, especially a young power hitter

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>like that. To be able to have that kind of

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 2>elite approach and that elite power to all fields at

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 2>such a young age is really impressive.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Also, just the fact that the ballpark he plays in,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I figured would maybe get him a few extra homers,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know in the second half of the season. What

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do you less about the forty homers? What do you

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>think about him as a top three third basement because

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't say number one right because of Jose Ramirez.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It felt like I could have maybe said he'd be

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the number one third basement off the board besides Jose

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Ramirez as a bullet prediction. But there's a lot of

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>names in that conversation. I don't know who you think

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the obvious guy is. You know, of that group of Devers, Machado, Riley,

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>all those guys that are behind Jose Ramirez, where you

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>see Camerono fitting into that for twenty twenty six drafts.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, guy like Machado's a little older, Devers

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>now in San Francisco, you know, likely to hurt his power.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Aro on the upswing, still a really young guy.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's a bold enough spot or do

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you think that will end up being you know the case.

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he will be a top three third baseman.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's bold, but I don't think it's unachievable,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>especially so he's already according to Finnispurs VBR so he's

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 2>four right now in terms of value inter you know,

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>value this so far this season. But number two is

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 2>j Haino Suarez, who, no matter what he does the

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 2>second half, he's not going to be a top three

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>third basement going into next year.

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>He just is who he is, and so.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>As Jose Ramirez, Juannio Suarez, Mana Machado, Cameronaro, Mikel Garcia.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I also don't think, even though he's having a good year,

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to be top three. And then Devers

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>is six, Austin Riley is seven. It feels like Devers

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 2>will be an interesting one. Austin Riley could be an

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 2>interesting one. He didn't have a great first half, but

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the Braves have a really light schedule in the second half,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>including a lot of staffs. I was reading. I was

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 2>reading a piece on ESPN about second half schedules and

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 2>they have the Braves have one of the easiest schedules

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and also are protected to face not one of the

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 2>easiest schedules, but I think a very favorable pitching second

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 2>half schedule for hitters like Austin Riley because they're supposed

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 2>to face a lot of like soft lefties. Obviously, anything

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>could change, so we could see Austin Riley have a

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 2>really big second half, which you know could further lock

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 2>him into that top three. But you know it's fair

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to say, especially at his age, that it could be Josierramirez.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 2>He could be number two, Junior cam An Aaroneck next year.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 2>But like top top three I think is pretty bold

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>because he has to overcome.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>A few nails that are pretty Goodea, not.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Jose Ramirez, but like Machado, Devers and Riley, you know,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 2>at least to get into that top three.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, let's go to your first Bowl A prediction.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>My first Bowl prediction is that Hunter Brown makes a

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 2>serious run at the Al say Young Award and enters

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six as a top twenty pick. I considered

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>making this wins the say Young Award as an even

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Boulder prediction. I do think Terry scouobl is going to

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 2>win the award, and the sportsbooks right now agree.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, they have.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 2>School as an overwhelming favorite. He's the best odds you

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>can get. Our minus two sixty at DraftKings Fanjul has

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>it almost at like they have it at minus four twenty.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 2>They're the most aggressive and not only do they have

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 2>it at minus four twenty, they don't have anyone else

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>better than plus eight to fifty, which is Garrett Crochet.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>And they have Hunter Brown at plus twelve hundred, who

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>they have tied with de Gram and so they're considering

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that a long shot. So in that sense, it's really

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 2>bold that we can think that he would win the award.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 2>But I do think there's a path there for Hunter Brown.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think for a couple of reasons, or a

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 2>few reasons. One, I think he's.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Really really good.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Two, the Astros have the second easiest schedule in the

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>second half, and three the Tigers are cruising in the

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 2>easiest division in baseball right now, and there's a really

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>good chance that comes September they just start resting Schooble

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and maybe skipping a start, maybe limiting his his you

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 2>know how deep he goes into games. And you know,

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 2>while the Astros have a decent lead in their division, two,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>I do expect their division to be more competitive in

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the second half, and we could see Hunter Brown close

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the gap on some of those counting stats. And so

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 2>if the Astros, you know, cruise to a division and

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are really close, I could see voters maybe

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 2>leaning Hunter Brown, who's like anchoring the staff, even though

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be hard to unseat Schooble giving the

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>first half that he had.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is bold enough.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 3>You don't think not even top twenty going in next

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>year two?

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>No, because I mean right now, rest of season he's

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>SP five. I mean, technically he's six, but that's what

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Shohey is listed as number one in UR the way

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we do our rankings, so he's really SP five, and

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Scooble who will go ahead of him, Skins who

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think will go ahead of him. But I mean,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>if people are really worried, they gonna keep not getting

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>wins Crochet, who, even though he is totally not suggested

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to happen, it's hard for me

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to not still just feel like a little nervous about

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>injury with him and Wheeler, who's going to be I

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>yet another year older, and who's still really good. But

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>is you know, Hunter Brown again again one of these

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>guys more on the upswing Wheeler another year older. So

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're already a top five pitcher, maybe he goes

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of like Wheeler, and maybe Crochet next year two.

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That feels like at least a second round pick, and

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that gets in the top twenty four, so

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>top twenty is not that far off. And ifool, if

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Scooble were to get hurt, which obviously we don't want

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but let's say he does. I think Brown

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would be the favorite for SYNG. Like, I know he's

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like in that range with Crochet into Gram right now,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but like he would get my vote if Schooble was

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>off the board right now. So it's not that it's

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>like not bold at all, but I don't think it's

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>bold enough. I actually think like I would expect him

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>as of right now today if we were if I

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>had to draft my twenty twenty six team for whatever

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>reason nine months early, Hunter Brown would be inside my

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>top twenty. Actually, like I'm just really impressed. I don't

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>need to see anything else. I am a total believer

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in him, and I think he will finish second in

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>cy Young, you know, with only schools dominance standing in

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the way of him winning the award.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'll push back on two reasons. I will.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I will concede your point that maybe it's not bold

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>enough because I did. I did struggle, you know, to

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 2>see how bold it is. I thought it was bold

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 2>enough for a couple of reasons. One school is such

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>an overwhelming favorite for this time right now, and so

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 2>that's why I made like I wrote that he's going

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>to make a serious run, or we can even make

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>it bolder and say he's going to win the AlSi young.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>The other reason is going into the draft next year

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>as a top twenty pick. I looked at where he

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 2>went last year. He was going outside the top one hundred.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>He was sp thirty two going in the next year.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking about a thirty pitcher jump and an

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>eighty pick jump in just one year.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 3>And but but I.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Do agree you feel like that's reason, Like do you

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>need to see anything else to feel like he belongs

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>among the fantasy aces. I don't.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I need to see the second half match the first half,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 2>which it should the numbers say that it should. But

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 2>also like if he just comes out and has like

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>an okay second half, is a fourth round pick next year?

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, well let me ask you this, where do you

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think the fifth best starting pitcher is going in pick

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>in drafts next year? Because I look at the guys

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>behind him, I don't really expect like so in terms

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of our rest of season rankings right now, the guys

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>immediately behind Brown, I already mentioned the guys in front

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of him. The guys immediately behind him, Logan Webb, Jacob deGrom,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>who I'm still not going to trust health wise, Yamamoto,

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>who has been really inconsistent the last month, Max Freed,

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Franber Valdez, Logan Gilbert, Joe Ryan, and Spencer Strider maybe

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>like if he has a kind of a dominant return

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to form second half. Makenzie Gore has been good, but

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it still feels like, you know, the team

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna win a lot of games. And he's

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>also making this huge jump year over year along with

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Brown, you know, Kirby coming back from injury, Dilon

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>See has been bad. Like outside of Strider, which of

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>those names do you think is gonna go higher than Brown?

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So if we're talking about Brown, let's let's call him

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>SP five going into next season. Let's say he goes

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Wheeler because of age, but you know Stryder's better,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So just in that range SP five, that feels like

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a second round pick, or do you think SP five

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is going in the fourth round.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 2>I think it'd probably go in the third round, but

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>we could see. I guess if it would depend on

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>what the hitters look like. But I feel like a

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of the you know, in a lot of leagues,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>you'll see one to two pitchers go in the first round,

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and then another two in the second round, and then

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe that fifth is the third.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Couples going in the first round in every league. Next year,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Skens just maybe if somebody is like, this guy's a stud,

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna get more wins this year. Crochet

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and Wheeler.

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>See that's where that's where we're getting into. Like we're

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about one pitcher in the first round, and then

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 2>we're already talking him we're already in the second round

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 2>talking about Skens.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like I if I'm building a team

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>next year, I'll be very happy to get a stud

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>hitter in the first and any of those four guys

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the second and be very happy with the start

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of my team. It's how I feel about it right now.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>There also have been a lot of hitters, like Gunnar

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Henderson is kind of disappointed who was a first round

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>pick last year. You know, Jackson Churio has been good.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Did he elevate into the first round so far? I

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he has. You know, there's been guys

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. I mean there's been people who've elevated too,

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>though from much lower like Peaker Armstrong and James Wood.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not saying there's no good hitters, but I

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like there's an opportunity there. If Hunter Brown

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>finishes the way he started this season, I will be

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable ranking him in the second round. I'll just

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>put it like that.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he's currently thirty three overall the rest of

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>season ranking, so he needs thirt to jump thirteen spots.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>An he will for me at least. Maybe not And

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe this is bold from the consensus perspective, but

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>from my personal rankings is where I guess maybe I

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>find it a little less.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 4>But I'll concede that it's not a bad I'm not

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 4>saying it's a bad best over here.

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's a bad pick by you, or

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's not bold. I just don't think it's bold enough.

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Is like I would have said, like, oh he wins

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the cy Young or something he'd like to make it

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>really feel like whoa Like you're going out on a limb.

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Here, But I just need to win the next three

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 3>cy youngs.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I do think it's a good pick. I don't

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>want to I don't want to sound too negative on

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and He's been a really fun story this year, so

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we mentioned him. I want to also mentioned

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to everybody that we are giving away a Wan Gonzales

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>signed Rangers jersey courtesy of our friends at Pristineauction dot com.

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>All you have to do to enter is to subscribe

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel right now, drop a

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>comment below on any video, and that is it. We

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>will be announcing one lucky winner right here on the channel,

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so make sure to turn on those notifications so you

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can know when new videos are up and to claim

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>your prize. All right, My next pick is I didn't

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>do this on purpose, but another ray because I had

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Camonaro is my first one. I'm going to double down.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I picked this something similar to this before the season,

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to run it back before the season.

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I said Chandler Simpson would lead

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball and stolen bases despite not starting the

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 1>season in the big leagues. I didn't actually look it up.

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what the official prediction was. I am

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>now saying that he is going to win the Major

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball Stolen based title and no one will be

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>within fifteen stolen bases of his final total. And that

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is despite the fact that he missed multiple stretches at

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season due to them sending him

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>back down surprisingly in the middle of the spring. So

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's going to win the title and no one

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>will be within fifteen stolen bases of his final If

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the rankings right now, which I had

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>up and they're now reloading for me, he is tied

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for fourth, behind only Caballero, O'Neil, crue Oz, and Pieker Armstrong,

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>who have thirty one, twenty eight, and twenty seven respectively.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Simpson is tied with Jose Ramirez and Bobby Wit

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>with twenty five, so he's six off the leader. And

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this is in way fewer games the number of games

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>played for all the guys around him seventy three, eighty two,

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, eighty eight, ninety four, ninety one, ninety three.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>He's played fifty and he is in this spot. All

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he has to do is get on base often enough

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to steal, and he is zamabase percentage is over three forty,

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>his batting average three ten. He's been caught six times.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised by but they let him keep running.

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>He's going he's going to no pun intend to run

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>away with this thing, and I think, just blow everybody

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>else out of the water. What do you think about

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this one?

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>So your bold prediction in the preseason was that he

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>would lead MLB and stolen bases. I do think you

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 2>need the fifteen number there to make it bold enough.

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I think if you just say leads the league and

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases, I don't think it's bold enough.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree. That's what I was trying to decide

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>what the right number was. Is like, originally I wanted.

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 3>To go at least ten.

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I originally I got crazy with it, and

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>now I was like twenty. But I was like, no,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually like, there's it only takes one other person

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to run a lot. Twenty's probably too much.

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Ten.

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, that feels right. I was considered maybe twelve,

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to be really like, again, this is

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be bold, so I had I thought fifteen

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was it was a number I landed on, but I.

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Think twenty would have to be the preseason number. There's

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>not enough.

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's enough time left to get twenty

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>up on someone who're already behind.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 3>The copyer is running a.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Lot too, so yeah, but I mean he's he steals

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>a base ever the other day except whenever he if

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>whenever I bet on him, he does not steal a base.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>So you can just follow along with me on the

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 2>betting pros app to know when he's not going to

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>steal a base.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I need I need him to help me overtake

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>fits in the steels category and our playoff matchup in

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>our work league. So if you could stop betting on him,

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be great.

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll see what I can do.

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so do you think this one like you?

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So you agree it's bold? Do you think it'll happen?

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 2>I think he will as long as he stays up.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 2>I think he'll lead the league and selling bass. I

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 2>don't know that he'll get fifteen up on cabrierro or PCA.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, it's supposed to be bold, so we'll see

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>how that one plays out. I've obviously been a big

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Simpson fan from since the spring, and I've been

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>really happy with how it's paid out when he's been

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>actually up in the big leagues.

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 2>So the biggest I think this is how we got

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 2>into our one of our many Simpsons conversations with you

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 2>being such a Chandler Simpson fan but not actually watching

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the Simpsons.

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's another thing this just came up on

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The Football Show with Jake Seely and Tom Strachan, is

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's not Simpsons, but it's not a very classic

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that I have no knowledge or experience of. It

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>came up on the show earlier this week that I've

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>never had taco bell in my life, and we're now

0:34:56.320 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>asking listeners to tell me what menu item I should

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>try at taco Bell from my first I've never even been.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I've never said foot inside of a taco bell? Is

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that to you more surprising and like a bigger you

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>know gap in my experience? Is it? Is it never

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>getting taco bell or never seeing the Simpsons.

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Definitely never seeing the Simpsons, because here is a shocking

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 2>thing for you.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Neither have I. So I've never been inside of one

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 3>or had taco.

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's definitely then get the listeners to let us know

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>on this show what menu. Maybe at our next team

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>trip we'll try. Although now at this point it's like

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm in my thirties, I might as well just keep

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>not going. And you know, well that's having what I.

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Always say for me. I don't know if you know

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 2>this fun fact about me. I've never had a soup

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 2>or a salad in my life and I'm approaching forty,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 2>and so I'm like, why start now?

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Seeh Actually I don't believe that you've never had like

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>remain lettuce.

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 3>With ask my mom and my wife.

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>They'll confirm, like a side salad at a steakhouse.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 3>Never I wouldn't even I don't play hear it.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>There's no way that's true. The soup I believe, even

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>though it's it is surprising, but I believe. I don't know.

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Everyone else can't believe the soup. They believe the salad,

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 3>not the soup.

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You've never like been out of barbecue and there's like

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a bowl of salad that you just like had a

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>very small, like one tongs worth of picking it up

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the bowl. You've never have you ever had

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>romaine lettuce.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 3>No, that's it.

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm an incredibly picky eater.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't eat.

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm an incredibly picky eater, and I've had salad. I

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just take stuff out of it that I don't want.

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have like, you know, cherry tomatoes in it

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and other stuff that's gross to me. But I'll have

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>lettuce and croutons and caesar dressing, which is very tasty

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, It's not like a gross thing if

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>you put the right dressing on it.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't like to find a topic for me and

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you to launch a different podcast all about these things

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 2>that like we like or don't like it. You know,

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 2>it's got to be something that's like all encompassing that

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 2>we can have a wide array of topics but also.

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Not just vague enough that no one will listen to it.

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 1>But no, yeah, it's weird. The podcast has got to

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>be something about like just our gaps and knowledge. Like

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>every week it's like you've never seen this movie, you've

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>never watched the show, you've never had a salad Like

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that is I think the show. I still don't believe you,

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I will never believe you that you've never had

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a salad. So we can move on.

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Call my wife and get her on air.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Heir, Yeah, what's your next bold prediction?

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>That worm will step inside a taco bell in twenty

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty five?

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Where are we in the sheet?

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So my next bullep is it prediction is that five

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 2>players will finish with fifty plus home runs this season

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 2>and ten we'll finish with. I wrote this backwards with

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 2>forty plus home runs.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I wrote our age.

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask pretty what our h diood for?

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that a new age?

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 3>It's like, have you ever seen the movie Hook?

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, probably when I was younger, but I don't

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>remember it well. But I think so.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>When he's playing baseball with the pirates, they're, you know,

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>obviously he's away from home and he's you know, he's

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 2>been kidnapped and he's playing baseball with the pirates and

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to say home run jack, but in the

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 2>outfield they spell out run.

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Home jack, run home jack. Run home jack. Just makes

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 3>them more homesick.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 2>So it's forty plus run homes and so in twenty

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, two players hit fifty plus home runs and

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>four hit forty plus, So I'm predicting a jump from

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 2>two to five and four to ten.

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Is that bold enough for you?

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Where? Do you have names in mind? I do, because

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>like I already picked a player here today. To me,

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the forty home run it is bold.

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's not bold. I don't think. I

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>think the fifty home run more bold, the fifty bold.

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 1>The fifty. Yeah, the fifty home run one I think

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is more bold than the forty one. Like ten finishing

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.919
<v Speaker 1>with forty is bold, five finishing with fifty is like, oh,

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a bold prediction. To me, I need to name

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>all the forties. But do you have it? Do you

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>have a picks in mind for the fifties?

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I did.

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I actually thought the forty was Boulder because bolder, more bold, Boulder.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess, just like growing up the era of baseball

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I did, forty was more dual. I know it's a

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>different era in now, but it's sort of still ingrained

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in me that like forty is doable in a good year,

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty feels special.

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 2>So here, I do have the names in mind, and

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 2>I was looking at the stats when I came up

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 2>with and that's why I came up with these exact numbers.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I came up with five for fifty because three players

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 2>already have thirty. So cal Raley has thirty six, Aaron

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Judge has thirty four, and Otani has thirty one. I

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 2>think those three are locks for fifty. Kylee Schwarber already

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 2>has twenty nine. He's he could definitely within Chatney distance

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.439
<v Speaker 2>of fifty. You Hano Suarez has twenty nine as well,

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 2>and so Suarez can go hot and cold. He may

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 2>not get there, But I think those are just five

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>players already on pace for fifty who who could realistically

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 2>get there that are power hitters after them, say a

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Suzukise twenty five. I think he's unlikely to get to fifty,

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 2>but he's at least not that far off the pace.

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>If he has a hot month, he's within shot existence.

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 2>After there, it's James Wood and Peter Armstrong at twenty

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 2>four and twenty three.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Would it totally unlike? Would it totally stun you if

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>cow Raley falls off a bit in the second half,

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just like catching every day like this is so like

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Judge and know Tani, this isn't surprising. It's so surprising

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for him like, I mean, he could have ten in

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the second half and he's still finished with forty six

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>this season. But you know, it wouldn't shock me if

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he falls short. I don't think you would predict he

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>makes it.

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's what I was thinking. Even if he falls short,

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he gets fourteen and hits fifty. Yeah, okay,

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 2>not falls short.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 3>If he falls yeah, yeah, I think.

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You know it regresses. Yeah, I assume yeah.

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Because he's already got thirty six. He's already so close

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and he doesn't look like someone who's going to fall off.

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Although you know we'll get to the home run Derby draft,

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 2>but I don't love him being in the home run Derby. Well,

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>and so those are the players.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, go ahead, No, you can finish your thought.

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So those are the players I think that are

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.879
<v Speaker 2>within fifty. And I think fifty is more like lee

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 2>than the forty number hitting because forty. So we have

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.399
<v Speaker 2>those five Raley, Judge, Otani, Scherbert Suarroz. I think are

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 2>their locks for at least forty looking at the forty

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 2>number and then could realistically get to fifty, and then

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 2>to get to ten for forty, we have, say Sezuki

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 2>A twenty five, James war at twenty four, Pika Romstrom

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, Riley Green twenty two, your Boy Junior Camerenero

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 2>at twenty two.

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that gives us one, two.

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Three, four, five, six, seven, eight nine ten. So those

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>players all have twenty two or more home runs, which

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 2>means they're just about on pace for forty. After that

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 2>at Swan Sodo Pete A Lonzo could get realistically get

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to forty. Coryman, Carroll Spencer, Torklesen Byron buckson no shot.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 2>But there's not a whole lot of leeway there in

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>terms of players who are like on base for forty

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 2>or within shouting distance of forty that if two or

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 2>three of those fall off pace, we're not getting ten.

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 2>Whereas you know for the for the fifty, there's five

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 2>players well on pace for fifty that I think could

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 2>all get there.

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>So the reason I was about to move on was

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>just a transition to my next pick is actually about

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>cal Raley, so it kind of ties in nicely. I

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 1>have him winning American League MVP, so clearly I don't

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to fall off too much. He's currently

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is the one, by the way that you agreed with

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>m h He's currently plus six hundred. Judge is a

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>minus fourteen hundred. This is as of when I looked yesterday,

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and you can see consensus betting odds on bettingpros dot

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>com if you want to check him out for all

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>these types of awards. I am taking this for a

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons. Number one, I think the fact that

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 1>he's a catcher matters like and a good catcher, right,

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like a good catcher.

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 3>He's not just a catcher, he's a really good.

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Kitcher, so that matters like he is adding more value

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>defensively than Judge, even though Judge is good in the outfield.

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's also I just think fun for voters, Like

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think if it's not close, they're not just going

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to hand it to them. But if it's really close,

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I think voters will be excited and interested to give

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>cal Raley an MVP as opposed to just another one

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for Judge. Judge is having such a great season that

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>it is really hard to go against him, So I

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>get why the I think the odds are too there's

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>too big of a gap, But I get why there

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is a big gap, Like Judge is having a great year.

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>But if cal Rally finishes with more home runs than

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Judge as a good defensive catcher and is close enough

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in the other categories, not only do I think he's

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a chance of winning, like he would get my vote

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>even if Judge has the better overall offensive season, I

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just think what he's doing as a catcher is so

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>impressive and I kind of hope he wins. So I

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do think this is bold given what the odds currently

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>look like. Again, Judge of minus fourteen hundred saying he

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>won't win is something. Now, if Judge were to get hurt,

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>which has happened before, cal Raley's odds, I mean, if

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:00.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a serious injury to Judge all of a sudden,

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>cal Raley is like, you know, minus three thousand or something,

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.919
<v Speaker 1>So like this is a little bit that could help

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>if that happens in terms of prediction, but also even

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if they both stay healthy, like if Judge merely has

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>a great season and not in all times you know,

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive season, and Raleigh continues the way he started this year. Again,

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think the gaps too wide.

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's bold because the gaps wide I

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 2>was interested to see when I was looking at this

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 2>that Aaron Judge is more of a favorite to win

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 2>MVP than Scooble is to win the Cy Young, which

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought was pretty interesting. I thought Scooble would be

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty well ahead there, even though he's got a couple

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 2>people at his heels in the AL. The MVP race

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 2>is Aaron Judge and Cal Raley and then nobody well.

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like, to your point, Raleigh is a

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>better second option right now than the second best pitcher

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in the American League behind Schooble, Like whether it's Crochet

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>or Hunter Brown or de Gram, I think Raleigh is

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>better for MVP than those guys are for cy Young

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>as of right now.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I agree.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I also think we and I don't want to like

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 2>come up as a hater and downplay the year that

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Judge is having, but we are kind of just

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about like he's having this incredible year because he

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 2>came out of the gate. He had four hundred for

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 2>two months and no one's ever done this with this

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of power before.

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 3>He did kind of take a step back in June.

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 2>He had a two fifty three in June, and we

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 2>just saw him have a really tough you know, week

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 2>and a half as also, the Yankees are falling off.

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 2>So there's the other thing. Not that it like is

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.280
<v Speaker 2>always the end all be all, but for a while

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 2>he was a lock to win MVP because the Yankees

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>look like they were cruising to the American League East title.

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 2>Now they're falling back and it's almost it's a you know,

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 2>three or four team race in the American League East.

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 2>When it looks like the Blue Jays are the favorite,

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a world. I don't think they will, but this

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>is a world with the Yankees fall out all the

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>way out of the playoffs. And if if the Yankees

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of fall of the playoffs or maybe just squeak

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in as like the last wild card and the Mariners

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 2>also get in as a wildcard carried by cal Rawley,

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that carries a lot of weight with voters too,

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:11.959
<v Speaker 2>and so and you know, I agree with what you said.

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the biggest overlooked factors is that

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 2>cal Rawley is a really good catcher. On top of this,

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, incredible offensive season, Like no one's ever had

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 2>an offensive season as a catcher like this before.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 3>It's just never happened.

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 2>And so I do think we you know, if Judge's

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>numbers like he's he was batting four hundred, he's now batting,

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna star ridiculous to say like he's no batting

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 2>all the way down to three sixty, Like, oh, god forbid,

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 2>he's betting three sixty, expect the batting average three sixteen.

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>What if his batting average comes down to like three fifteen,

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 2>three twenty and cal Rawley hits three or three eighty

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 2>two eighty, and those numbers all of a sudden look

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>much more similar, and cal raleys a catcher, and Judge

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 2>already is one MVP, and we know all about voter fatigue.

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a realistic shot that cal Rally wins

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 2>this award, even though the odds say no way right now.

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>One interesting thing is that I don't think War does

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a great job of capturing the value of catchers, and

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so like Judge's War is like one and a half

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to two wins higher depending on where you're looking, I

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's reflective of the actual value they're bringing

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to the team. Like I do think the fact that

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Rally's a catcher means that should be way closer, if

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>not even like slightly in Col's favor. Truthfully, I agree. Yeah,

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 1>we're agreement on that one. Give me your last bulletpdiction here.

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 2>My last one is that we get no twenty plus

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 2>win pitchers for the second year in a row. And

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I will add the caveat for that that if we

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you just heard that thunder behind.

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Me, but it actually I usually don't. Usually when I'm

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>on shows and somebody says, oh, did you hear that

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>behind me, I'm like, no, I actually didn't. You're good,

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I did hear that one.

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 2>There are crazy storms here in Georgia. That's when I

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 2>mean you were talking before you may have seen me,

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 2>like look behind me. I think as you were talking,

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, I just heard like like it

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 2>just started like pouring out of nowhere.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And that the Norfolk Tides the Oriol Striple a affiliate.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>A picture got called for a bock because there was

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a crazy clap of thunder and lightning. I don't think

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it was lightning because they would have paused the game.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But it was like mid uh, you know, in his

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 1>pitching rotation, he like mid delivery. Sorry, I was having

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>a brain from mid delivery. There was this huge like

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>rolling thunder and everybody you can see in the video

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like stops. But technically speaking it was a

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>box and the umpire called it and a runner on

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>third scored because of it.

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 3>That's wild.

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we get some crazy storms down here, especially because

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I live kind of at higher elevation, not like your elevation,

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:51.879
<v Speaker 2>but like you know, in terms of the surrounding area

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 2>I've you know, I live kind of like on like

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 2>a hill mountain kind of area, and so we get

0:48:56.719 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 2>crazy storms that like waiting the jump me out of bed. Anyway,

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 2>back to the prediction, the predictions that no, we get

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 2>no twenty plus web pitchers for the second year in

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 2>a row, and not including twenty twenty. We had at

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 2>least one in every season since twenty seventeen until last year,

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>and so I'm predicting it to not happen again for

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the second year in a row.

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you attribute that to? Is it something with

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:20.839
<v Speaker 1>modern approaches to pitching? I mean, obviously guys aren't going

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to step into games and all that stuff, but you know,

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>even within the last five years, it feels like maybe

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a trend. If it's two in a row after having

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>one for so many years in a row. Do you

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>attribute that to anything in particular.

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be you know, it's got to be

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 2>usage pictures, not you know, getting more time off, not

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:44.399
<v Speaker 2>going to steep into games. You know, you don't want

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to say it's like the openers, because you know, like

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the bulk relievers get wins and stuff, but like that's

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 2>also you know, just like one fewer start for you know,

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 2>for the kind of like mid level pitchers, or we're

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 2>not going to see like the Rick Porcellos of the

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 2>world win twenty two games anymore. But even going back

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 2>when when I was looking back at previous years, in

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 2>recent years, we've had like exactly one. And then when

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I started getting back to twenty seventeen and earlier, it

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 2>was like, okay, now there's three, now there's two, Now

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.720
<v Speaker 2>there's three, and there were more, and now we're getting

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 2>like one or none. And then for last year we

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 2>got none, and I think it's possible this you know

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 2>this year we get none again. And just to give

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you an idea of where we are in terms of wins,

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Max Freed has eleven, Scooble has ten. But I'm also

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of thinking again if their cruising at the Division

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 2>in September. Maybe he you know, they skip him a

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 2>few times and they really pull back on his innings

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 2>because the Tigers aren't in the playoffs every year, and

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 2>so they want this almost automatic win pitcher to be

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 2>as fresh as he can go to in the postseason.

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>So Scooble is the interesting one because of the point

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I was about to make, which is there's also not

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of elite teams there. I believe the Tigers

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are the only team with a winning percentage over six

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred right now. So like your team needs to be

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>winning games a lot for you to get twenty wins

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>in a season. But Scooble is the best pitcher in

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>baseball is also on the best team in baseball by

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 1>winning percentage right now, So he is the clear in

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>my opinion choice. Like, if somebody is going to ruin

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this prediction for you, it will certainly be Scooble. I

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>would think we talked about before the season two the

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 1>lack of two hundred inning pitchers, and that plays into

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this as well.

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we have that was I was looking at that

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit when when I got into the wins.

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 2>This is a fun one and I will admit, maybe

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 2>you'll get it because I've thrown some trivia your way

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 2>and you've nailed them recently. But if you asked me

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 2>this question and gave me fifty guesses, I don't think

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I would get it right. I would probably get one

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 2>of them right, but not two of them. So are

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 2>you able to tell me who the last two twenty

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 2>wins starting pitchers were? There was one in twenty twenty

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 2>three and one in twenty twenty two.

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess no. I'm back for whatever reason, I

0:51:58.200 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm better at order trivia than im recent trivia. Yeah,

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you said one in twenty you say so, but the

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>ones in the twenties basically is what you're asking and

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it was two different people, right and people. I'm sure

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an obvious name that is. I'm just like, oh crap, duh,

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that was definitely it, and I'm just forgetting nothing comes

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to mind off the top of the dumb I'm trying

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to run through all the teams quickly in my head,

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like who I would be overlooking here?

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 3>So I'll give you a hint.

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 2>One of them is like a top ten guy that

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 2>you would say like, okay, that makes sense, like this

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 2>guy is you know, the other guy is a deep cut.

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely not gonna pull the deep cut. I mean

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>like I'm trying to think, like, did did Wheeler get

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to it? Or did Free to get to it with

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the Braves? No, I don't think, Well Gilbert didn't when

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he had his two hundred innings because I was last year.

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I need to have more hints? Did Strider Strider twenty

0:53:06.680 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty three? So Strider did? Who's a deep cut? I'm

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to get it? Well, do you want to

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>give me a hinter.

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.879
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you another hand. This it's such a deep

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:18.720
<v Speaker 2>cut that this might still not do it. So Spencer

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Strider was one. They're both braves. Twenty twenty three was

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 2>a Brave, twenty twenty two was a Brave.

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two Brave and it wasn't Freed No or Strider.

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know where this guy's pitching now. If

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 2>he is pitching, maybe he's hurt.

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Let me see.

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I am struggling to I'm going to get my

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>brain as I've gotten older. Like I said, long term trivia,

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a pretty good memory for, but anything recent

0:53:45.120 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>like just doesn't stick in my brain. Anymore as I've

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>gotten into my servies.

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 3>This pitcher.

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 2>He's now twenty nine, he's now on the Royals. He's injured.

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 2>He was recently injured at Triple A further Royals at

0:53:59.840 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 2>eight twenty nine.

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, as soon as you say it, I'm

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, oh, duh, I should have gotten that.

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 1>But who is it?

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 2>No, I think you're gonna be like, really, he won

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty First, let me see how many games he won.

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:13.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm spending way too much time on this, but it's

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 2>so fun that it's we.

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Do have a whole home run derby draft to get to.

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's gay.

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 2>So he won twenty one games in twenty twenty two.

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Wright won twenty one game twenty two.

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Kyle Wright.

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no recollection of that at all. I mean

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a recollection of Kyle Right. I have no

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:34.760
<v Speaker 1>recollection of him getting twenty one wins. That's just completely

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>directly out.

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Of twenty one and five with a three point one

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 2>nine years the.

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Braves was really good, So like, I'm not surprised it's

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a brave, but holy cow, do I not remember that?

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That's hilarious.

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 2>That's why I want to be like, I got to

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 2>bring this up, Kyle Wright.

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>No way, that's great. All right, you have some bonus

0:54:51.719 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>bold trade predictions. I do want to make sure we

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have time for our home run derby draft. So do

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to quickly run through these?

0:54:58.520 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we get to say real coup. We don't have

0:54:59.840 --> 0:55:00.440
<v Speaker 3>this up on them.

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 2>But I just I was looking while I was making

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 2>my bold predictions, I wanted to I was looking at

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 2>like trade ideas for bold predictions, and I was like,

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 2>these are all so specific. I don't want to spend

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 2>time talking about them, but I throw it on bonus

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 2>bold trade predictions that we can just run through. I

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 2>had Jared duran Is involved in a three team trade.

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Sandiel contre Is traded to the Blue Jays, Johanno Suarez

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 2>traded to the Yankees, Seth Lugo traded to the Astros.

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Zach Gallen also traded to the Blue Jays, Ryan O'Hearn

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to the Mariners, Marcelo Zuna to the Tigers, and then

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Emmanuel Class to the Phillies. Those are my bold trade predictions.

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully they all come back, or they all come to

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 2>fruition and we come back to this video like this

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 2>guy is a legend.

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:46.280
<v Speaker 3>He just nailed all these predictions.

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I really liked the Lugo one to the Astros.

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:51.279
<v Speaker 2>He felt like a fit for them as the kind

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 2>of picture they would want to go out.

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Class to the Phillies obviously too, just you know,

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>elite closer, good team. It will be fun. But yeah,

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>those are good. I also wanted to do or you

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do World Series predictions, so you put yours

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in first, I'll let you go first.

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, throw back only, but goodie Phillies versus Blue Jays.

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the Phillies have a real shot. Is one

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:14.359
<v Speaker 2>of the better teams in the West, and I think

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 2>that the are in the NL, and I think the

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 2>AL is wide open, and I think the Blue Jays

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:22.280
<v Speaker 2>could get hot, especially if they add a couple of pitchers.

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:26.320
<v Speaker 1>The AL being wide open definitely was like very apparent,

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and trying to come up with us, I went with

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the Astros just obviously the organization has been there a bunch.

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a degree of trust in how they're going to

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>perform in October, as opposed to teams that really haven't

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 1>been there before. I don't like both of us didn't

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pick the Tigers. It feels like I don't know that

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I would call them again. No pun intended a paper Tiger,

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't look at this team and feel like, oh,

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season, they're going to be the

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>clear best team in baseball like they have in the

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>first half. So I wanted to get away from picking them,

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and there wasn't a really clear other choice, like the

0:57:00.920 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays are really hot right now. The Yankees. I

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:06.720
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in the Astros. It's more like organizational trust.

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Hunter Brown has become an ace really

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:12.240
<v Speaker 1>helps in my opinion. And again like guys like Cozl

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>TV have been there before. So I didn't love any

0:57:16.920 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 1>American League pick. And then the Dodgers, Like I know,

0:57:19.760 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we're all disappointed by the Dodgers relative to expectation before

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the season. This is still the outside the Tigers. This

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is the best record in baseball right like it's even

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 1>despite the struggles and guys underperforming and getting injured. This

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is an excellent organization that has so much talent they

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.320
<v Speaker 1>can easily add more at the trade deadline if they want.

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna get healthier, like you know, the Cubs are.

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think legitimately good. The Phillies are really good. Phillies

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>probably would have been my pick if I didn't go Dodgers.

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I like other teams than NL. There's a few teams

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the NL that would have been my choice in the AL,

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but I just couldn't get away from the Dodgers. Like

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I just and it's boring right to say Astros Dodgers.

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this recently, but I I just kind of

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:01.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's what it's gonna end up being.

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just didn't want to pick Dodgers. I, you know,

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was more chalking. And I think the

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Phillies have the right kind of balance to pull it up,

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 2>especially if they add like a right handed bat at

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the deadline. They have a really good rotation, you know.

0:58:17.960 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 2>If they can just roll Wheeler out there, you canad

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 2>he can go toe to toe with anyone in the playoffs.

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. If you're struggling with lineup decisions, our lineup assistant

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.920
<v Speaker 1>recommends optimal lineup suggestions to maximize your team's performance each

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>day or week. Just sink your league for tailored guidance

0:58:31.680 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>based on your roster. In league settings, download the Fantasy

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Baseball My Playbook app or visit fantasypros dot com slash

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 1>MLB my playbook to set your winning lineup today. All right, Mayor,

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wrap things up with our home run Derby draft.

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We did this last year. I forget one. Actually was

0:58:44.840 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it me? Actually I genuinely don't remember who won.

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it was you.

0:58:49.000 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But what we're gonna do pretty sure is we're going

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to count this towards our two start picture contest because

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't really do one this week because nobody's making

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 1>two starts with only half a week of games. So

0:58:58.080 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to make this count because that's I believe

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we did that last year. H Garrett Crochet obviously crushed

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>crushed Chase Perns the last completed week. So it's all

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 1>tied up at five five and one. We have one tie.

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>We each have five wins. I assume you're not going

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to push back too hard on the Crechet beating Chase

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>pers given that terrible start.

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually have.

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to make this any longer, but I

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>actually have a confession to make what so I believe

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:26.919
<v Speaker 2>last year we also counted their home on derby towards

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the two start picture competition as well right, yeah, So

0:59:30.400 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm also pretty sure that you won. And I think

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 2>when I was recalculating everything at the end, there was

0:59:36.320 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 2>no note about you winning their home on derby, and

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that was the extra point that was miscalculated.

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So I think you won last year's competition.

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think definitely. I told you from the beginning that

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I won. I said this all off season and the

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:51.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this season that I didn't know what you

0:59:51.600 --> 0:59:53.800
<v Speaker 1>were talking about that I so I.

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Was just looking at like the starts and I was like, no,

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 2>it's dead even but the extra point is the home

0:59:58.120 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 2>run derby contest.

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you don't watch YouTube, I was

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>just clapping. That's what that noise was. If you can't

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tell through audio, I don't know how well it comes through.

1:00:04.040 --> 1:00:05.680
<v Speaker 3>But was it more thunder on my own?

1:00:05.800 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Oh man, yea, we got to get like a

1:00:08.480 --> 1:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>championship belt or something. I told you that I won

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that I I knew it because I was I thought

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I had clinched it with like a week left. I

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, there's no way you can catch up. But

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's really really excellent.

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what happened.

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that that makes total sense. That

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>totally adds up. So, by the way, I didn't read

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the comments to see people called me out on this

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>because I was afraid they were going to Paul Skeen's

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>not a two start pitcher this week. I usually look

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at fan tracks just because it's really easy in one

1:00:35.120 --> 1:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of my leagues to see when they've highlighted two start pictures.

1:00:37.640 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>He was listed as one for this week for some reason.

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>He made a start on Sunday, so clearly he was

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a two start pitcher this week.

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So I pivoted off the air, and I messaged before

1:00:46.400 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody had made start mayor about this that I pivoted

1:00:49.280 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to Christopher Sanchez, so he has my pick for this

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>current week that we're in, not Paul Skeen's, because again,

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, fan tracks had it listed wrong, and

1:00:58.240 --> 1:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I did zero effort to corroper right that they were

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be correct.

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:05.200
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, your mistake not using the Fantasy pros tools.

1:01:05.280 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is my mistake. Christopher Sanchez vers Hunter Brown.

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Is this current week that we're in all tied up

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:13.439
<v Speaker 1>five to five and one, and yes this will count

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>towards it. And I think what we did last year

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is total homers? Or did we just give it to

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>whoever picked the winner?

1:01:23.720 --> 1:01:24.960
<v Speaker 3>I gotta be honest, I don't remember.

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a preference what we do? Would you?

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather go total home runs drafted or something

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:36.439
<v Speaker 1>where like, you know, you get a point for making

1:01:36.440 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to the semis, three points for winning it at all or

1:01:38.680 --> 1:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that. What would you rather do?

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>I think I think maybe we did total home runs.

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's just do total home runs because if your players advance,

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get there.

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:47.919
<v Speaker 1>You're going to get more rons anyway. Yeah, I agree,

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll do total home runs now super annoyingly,

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the full field, so the surprise final

1:01:55.400 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>person will be drafted. So we each have a team

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of four. But you're just getting to take a sing.

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't know who it's gonna be, So that baby

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that'll be the last pick or baby you say, I

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, be bold, this is a bold

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>predictions episode and take a chance so we can we

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>can really do whatever you want with it. I think

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>since I won last year, I should get to go first.

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel strongly about that. If you feel differently,

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay going second, But do. Are you okay with that?

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>That's fine by me, but real quick, so we we

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>know seven contestants with an asterix on Buckston.

1:02:26.120 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, yes, So the contestants are eight total, Ronald Acunya,

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>James Wood, O'Neil Cruz Junior, Cameronaro, cal Rawley, Byron Buckston

1:02:33.120 --> 1:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with an asterisk because of the hit by pitch Brent

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Rooker announced today. And then one more, well we'll get announced.

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>So the one more we're going to guess who the

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>one more is there?

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I think we just say mystery final

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>contestant is the pick, and it's like it's like the

1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>mystery box, you know, and call duty. Just you get

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what you get.

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought maybe there was gonna be like two or

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>three names we don't know, and we would just draft

1:02:58.480 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of guys and hopefully know.

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you okay with me going first? I mean,

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's that's fair. Like whoever wins gets

1:03:05.640 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to go.

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:07.480
<v Speaker 3>We're just going back and forth. We snake out.

1:03:07.920 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we just go back and forth, okay to

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>man draft, all right, I am going to go with

1:03:14.680 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't really have a clear number one, so

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know I'll go with Ronald o'cunya. Best player

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on the list has hit home run since coming back

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>hometown for this you know, uh, this event, and I

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>could just I can just more than anybody else in

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this in this lineup. I can picture him hitting like

1:03:33.720 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>eight in a row on eight swings like and just

1:03:35.720 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>going on like a real heater. I can visualize it.

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'll go with a Kunya for my pick.

1:03:42.440 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I was really hoping you would go somewhere else because

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>that was going to be my first pick last year.

1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Didn't you take Gunnar Henderson from me now that I'm remembering,

1:03:50.360 --> 1:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and he hit like two?

1:03:52.280 --> 1:03:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I played the heel in last year's draft.

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>It didn't work out.

1:03:56.920 --> 1:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Oh but by the way, just to let everybody know,

1:04:01.520 --> 1:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so if you look at the number

1:04:03.560 --> 1:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of home runs hit this season for these guys, Cal

1:04:06.560 --> 1:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Raley thirty six, James Wood twenty four, Junior Cameronaro twenty two,

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Byron Buxton twenty, Brent Rooker nineteen, O'Neil Cruz sixteen, and

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Acunya eleven. Obviously, Kunya not played the full season,

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's hit the fewest of the seven are now

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so far.

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Wonderful. So second pick, I'm going to go. Let me

1:04:26.880 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 3>just give cal Rally. You know, I'll just go with it.

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't know if that's going to be

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the right pick or not, but let's do it.

1:04:34.680 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting one. I wasn't sure what to do

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with it. Obviously he's been awesome this year. I don't

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like a home run Derby is maybe

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the best fit. I know he's talked about always wanting

1:04:43.640 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to participate, and obviously he's really good, so it might be.

1:04:46.600 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Look a guy who would have the endurance for home

1:04:48.160 --> 1:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>run Derby does it?

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's fair. I'm between two players here, and

1:04:54.120 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried you're gonna take the one. I don't take

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>whichever direction I go. I'm gonna go with man I

1:05:05.040 --> 1:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>really I really like two of these is a clear

1:05:06.880 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>top too. I wonder if you have the same too.

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with O'Neil Cruz just light tower power.

1:05:18.600 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, people talk about his his batting practices as

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of homers, and I could see

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>him being a really fun and participant in this. So

1:05:28.360 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Cruse. Would he have been your next pick

1:05:30.080 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else.

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I actually don't know. I think Cruise would have been

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>my next pick.

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly, I have taken the two guys with the fewest

1:05:37.400 --> 1:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>home runs on the list so far.

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I might be changing that. I I like Caimanara. I'm

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna go Brett Rooker. I'm gonna go with Britton Rooker.

1:05:48.960 --> 1:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I like Rooker. But my pick was it

1:05:51.880 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was between Cruz and Camonaro. So I'll go cam and Aro.

1:05:55.040 --> 1:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Camanara was the other guy. I wasn't going

1:05:57.400 --> 1:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>to pick either of the other two, but I didn't

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>think you were.

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I have a Kunya Cruz and Cameron Aro.

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You have cal Raley, Brent Rooker. You're on the clock

1:06:09.160 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>remaining Byron Buxton, James Wood and mystery Box. If you

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just want to take the bold, maybe it turns out

1:06:16.440 --> 1:06:17.439
<v Speaker 1>being somebody really good.

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, you know what.

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I would go mystery Box, but game three tells me

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I should not, so I'm not going to.

1:06:23.800 --> 1:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I could see mystery Box being awesome, like they're saving

1:06:27.560 --> 1:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody right for this final announcement. I I like Cesme's

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>family Barbecue was talking about like maybe it's Julio Rodriguez.

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's Jazz Chisholm, maybe it's Suarez, maybe it's Kyle Tucker.

1:06:39.960 --> 1:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to name guys that are already going to

1:06:41.560 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be in Atlanta, but you have no idea. Also, by

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, I should say, if Buckston ends up leaving,

1:06:48.480 --> 1:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>whoever he is, replacement is, we'll go to that person. Clearly,

1:06:54.080 --> 1:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is a really fun field. By the way, Yeah, yeah,

1:07:00.800 --> 1:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what mystery box James Wood or Byron Buxton slash.

1:07:03.880 --> 1:07:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Buyer mystery box. Mystery Box would be anything James would.

1:07:07.520 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I was definitely going to take mystery Box over Buxton.

1:07:13.080 --> 1:07:13.880
<v Speaker 3>That's why I thought.

1:07:13.920 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I was like Originally in my mind, I was like,

1:07:16.240 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll take Wood, he'll take Box, and I'll get mystery Box.

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 2>But then I was like, wait, he's definitely not going

1:07:20.200 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 2>to take box.

1:07:21.000 --> 1:07:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I would not have taken Buxton. But I mean bucks

1:07:24.000 --> 1:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>In again, if he doesn't participate, that's also a mystery box, right, Like,

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it could be a good replacement, so it's not necessarily

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad pick. The thing that I worry about with

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Wood is I wonder almost he has a lot of power, clearly,

1:07:35.840 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if he's more of like an in

1:07:37.080 --> 1:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>game power type of guy.

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what I think.

1:07:41.120 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>He does have the second most home runs on this list.

1:07:42.920 --> 1:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I really like James Wood the player, and I was,

1:07:45.600 --> 1:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I got I'm going to take Wood and

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not Bucks and Slash Mystery Player because I've been all

1:07:50.120 --> 1:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in on Wood this whole season, like as a you know,

1:07:52.680 --> 1:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite picks and a guy planning my

1:07:54.520 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>flag on. So I feel like I got to continue

1:07:56.240 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that and stick with with the guy who kind of

1:07:58.640 --> 1:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>got me here.

1:07:59.080 --> 1:08:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Good because I already wrote that on the she So

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I have.

1:08:02.160 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Acunya, O'Neil Cruz, Junior Camonaro, and James Wood. You

1:08:05.040 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have Col Raley, Brent Rooker Mystery box Player A, and

1:08:08.760 --> 1:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Byron Buxton Slash Mixed three box Player B. If there's

1:08:13.200 --> 1:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a replacement.

1:08:15.560 --> 1:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, so we have the one thing about James Would,

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:20.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think we both love James Would is

1:08:20.720 --> 1:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>half of his home runs are the opposite field, so

1:08:22.640 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 2>he's not necessarily this like huge pole power guy. I

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 2>think he might be just a real in in game

1:08:28.520 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>really good and of course, like now that I say that,

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:31.760
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna like hit fifty home runs and win this thing.

1:08:31.840 --> 1:08:33.759
<v Speaker 1>No, but that is that's why I had him below

1:08:34.000 --> 1:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like Junior cameronaro O'Neil Cruz like same, that's why he

1:08:37.479 --> 1:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was a little lower on the list despite his great season.

1:08:39.560 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>So we're we're in agreement on that. I might have

1:08:43.560 --> 1:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>taken Buxton over him if not for the injury in

1:08:46.400 --> 1:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the mystery Box elements. Basically, what it is is I

1:08:50.720 --> 1:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have my four players, you have two, and you just

1:08:53.240 --> 1:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>whoever the other two are, whether it's Buxton, whether it's

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>whoever the mystery boxes, they're on your team. So we'll

1:08:58.960 --> 1:08:59.599
<v Speaker 1>see how those.

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 4>I hope it's Kotani or something that would be amazing,

1:09:04.160 --> 1:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>like yeah, you get just like the absolute best like

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:11.599
<v Speaker 4>option that would be a judge, Yeah, judge.

1:09:11.640 --> 1:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Alonso actually backtracks and says, you know what, I will

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'm like, oh, this that's a professional home

1:09:16.960 --> 1:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>run derbyus, Like yeah, all right.

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Give me, give me judges the mystery box, and then

1:09:22.080 --> 1:09:24.839
<v Speaker 2>Buxton gets scratched for Otani and then I just dominate.

1:09:25.120 --> 1:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I will feel like you will probably win if that's

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:30.519
<v Speaker 1>if that pants out that way, all right, we'll go

1:09:30.520 --> 1:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and wrap things up there. Everybody, let us know

1:09:32.880 --> 1:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>who you thought the first pict should have been in

1:09:35.000 --> 1:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the home run derby draft and kind of what direction

1:09:37.520 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you would have gone? Whose team you think is gonna

1:09:39.320 --> 1:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>win again? A Kunya Cruz Cameronara Wood versus Raleigh Rooker

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>mystery box player and Buxton Slash mystery box player. Let

1:09:46.880 --> 1:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>us know whose team you like better. We'll go ahead

1:09:49.320 --> 1:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and wrap things up there by the way. By the way,

1:09:50.840 --> 1:09:53.479
<v Speaker 1>one other news and note that I wanted to quickly mention, uh,

1:09:54.040 --> 1:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Backyard Baseball two thousand and one now available on Steam.

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I will be downloading it. This is It's not. I

1:10:03.920 --> 1:10:05.519
<v Speaker 1>just want to say it because I'm so excited about it.

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Like truthfully, I like that was the computer game I

1:10:08.400 --> 1:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>probably played most the most hours in my life as

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a kid growing up, specifically the one version of Backyard Baseball.

1:10:14.400 --> 1:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like so excited to play as cal Ripkin again.

1:10:18.760 --> 1:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Ken Griffey Junior was always one of

1:10:20.960 --> 1:10:24.639
<v Speaker 1>my top choices and just an all time, all time

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>great game. And uh, in case anybody missed it and

1:10:27.200 --> 1:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>loves baseball, I want to shout it out. Backyard Baseball,

1:10:29.600 --> 1:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh one back and available to play so again not

1:10:32.360 --> 1:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>an ad Red, definitely not.

1:10:33.640 --> 1:10:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I just maybe they'll sponsor the show that they say.

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>What I love that. I we got to get Jimmy

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on that. I'm very excited to say about that possibility.

1:10:43.600 --> 1:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Also, a friend of the show, Brendon Tuma, a huge

1:10:45.880 --> 1:10:48.799
<v Speaker 2>fan of backyard Baseball, is in his I forget.

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Profile picture on Twitter still like Pablo Sanchez.

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what I was going.

1:10:52.920 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't remember the name. I wanted to say, Pablo Lopez.

1:10:55.080 --> 1:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a real picture and not Pablo Sanchez, who's the

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:00.479
<v Speaker 1>best player in the backyard sports is his birthday is

1:11:00.479 --> 1:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a day before mine. So I used to like totally.

1:11:04.040 --> 1:11:06.479
<v Speaker 3>Irrelevant avatar for like a decade.

1:11:06.760 --> 1:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean he's a stunt, he's he's a great

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>If you get that's gonna be your avatar. It's a

1:11:10.320 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>go one and a half. So shouts to Pablo Sanchez,

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:17.599
<v Speaker 1>shouts to Tuma, Shouts to the mayor and all the listeners.

1:11:17.640 --> 1:11:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuning in for you know, we're kind of

1:11:19.479 --> 1:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up the first half of the season, so we

1:11:21.320 --> 1:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>will have some fun in the second half post All

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Star Break. Everybody, enjoy the All Star Break and the

1:11:25.280 --> 1:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>home Run Derby and we'll see you next time. Thanks

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. If

1:11:31.120 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you love the show, the best freeway to support us

1:11:33.560 --> 1:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify,

1:11:37.280 --> 1:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros,

1:11:41.000 --> 1:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com

1:11:43.680 --> 1:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>slash Fantasy Pros MLB