WEBVTT - Surveillance: Coronavirus Treatments With Sharfstein

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg johnic

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is now pleased to say it's Charles Cantas, Celia, portfolio

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>manager at New Burger Berman. Charles, Great to have you

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with us on the program. I know you've been thinking

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about the following and I've been thinking about it too. Privilege,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the privileged companies that have the access to the liquidity

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to get through this particular crisis. Walk me through your

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking at the moment. Look, I think we're in unprecedented times.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It's all about duration and when we restart the economy

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and the businesses that survived that lull in activity UM

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to end and benefit thereafter. So for us, privileged,

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>our companies that you thrill to own UM when the

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>markets going down, because you know that the strength of

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the business model, the brand, the distribution system, the technology,

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the customer engagement makes them a much stronger company over

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>time and they'll end up with higher revenues and higher

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>profits to do three years from now as you enter

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the negative of low activity. So you're excited to earn

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>them on the way down, and you always want them

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in your portfolio when when when normalcy returns to the environment.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>These are businesses that have the duration, the balance shee

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>flexibility UM to get us through this time UM. And

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's going to matter. We think it's going

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a really really difficult time for weak companies

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and for weak countries. And we think, UM, those that

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>are privileged, those that have flexibility UM will end up stronger,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger and better. I guess that defines JP morget in

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>four other banks out there. I'll let you decide which

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ones they are. But are you predicting them bank consolidation

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>because the smaller, the weaker can't survive. You know, bank

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>consolidation hasn't really happened for for a for a very

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>long time. The large banks themselves can't actually aggregate UM

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>any longer. I just feel that it's an environment. You know,

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard UM to run a business with leverage

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>if your revenues go to zero. And so this question

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>or duration is fundamental to the help of our economy

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and fund it mental to to to to the nature

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of the recovery we see when when when at some

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>point this nation is blessed with with with better help UM,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's going to take a herculean effort UM

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to get this economy restarted. And so the risk of

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a policy mistake right now is large. But I would

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>never bet against the innovation entrepreneurial spirit of this fine country.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately, very polish on America, Charles, I want to

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>go to that point, Thomas, referencing JP Morgan Jamie Diamond

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out in the shareholder letter saying that he's expecting

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad recession ahead with financial stress similar to the

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight crisis. Do you agree? Look, I

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think we're there right now. Economic activity UM has plummeted

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to two levels unimaginable UM a month ago at speeds

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that are unprecedented. Output across this economy for the vast

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>majority of sectors, UM is down, you know, dramatically, first

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>six and ultimately UM that stressfuls all the way back

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to the financial system. And the question is UM the

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>time it takes for it to fall back, and so

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the longer UM the amount of time one ultimately waits.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>UM is not a linear function, it's an expert antial function.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Meaning for every ten days we wait to restart the economy, UM,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it will take fifty days or so to get us

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to to get us where we need to be. So

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the banks ultimately bear all the liabilities of those that

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>don't get paid, whether you're not paying your commercial rant,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>whether you're not paying your supplies or your inventory providers UM.

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And it becomes amount of time. And so they're more

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>than well capitalized. They've got more than enough UM federal

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>federal stimulus UM and monetary support for now. But it

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>becomes a question of of of of when UM, and

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the longer the when is, the harder it will be

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for our financial system. Well, chance, let's think about that

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further. Someone said to me recently, the

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>unlike two thousand and eight, banks are being seen as

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>part of the solution now, not part of the problem.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying that's a mistake. No, I don't think so.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The banks are lending right now. There was no real

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lending taking place post two thousand and eight. I don't

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is comparable to two thousand and eight. I

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>think the volatility is I think, I think the range

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of outcomes possibly. But in two thousand and eight, when

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I was in the markets, we sat there and wondered

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>whether the world, the economic system as we knew it

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to come to an end. Yeah, this is

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a question of of of innovation, entrepreneurial spirits, um and time.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And so it's very very different, very very different. So, Charles,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if there is financial stress equivalent to the two thousand

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and eight crisis, where do you expect to see it

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the most? Where it hasn't necessarily been reflected yet in pricing. Look,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>you always see financial stress UM in credit markets. That's

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>where it shows up. That's our leading indicator, and and

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and and there was tremendous stress in the credit markets

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>um regardless of acid class um over the last two

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>two and a half weeks. But but what's the FED

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>now done in terms of their purchases of investment grade credit?

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>UM is unprecedented and massively helpful to stabilize in credit

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>markets and ultimately stabilizing how yield market. So you would

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>expect it to see it in credit spreads. Credit spreads

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>blew out over a thousand basis points and have now

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>slowly started to close that gap, but very slowly. Charles,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you're involved in the Whole Foods Amazon transaction. Can you

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>get the three of us deliveries from Whole Foods? Yes,

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're to thank you Tom. You're gonna need a

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>little duration. H I was always great to catch up.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>You appreciate your time this morning, Charles Cancer, their senior

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at New Burger Berman. Let's bring a Joyce

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>change share we Jake Morgan, Chair of Global Research Joyce.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>If we got our hands around just how much damage

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we're about to see the dividends worldwide, particularly in the

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>United States. Well, I think you're going to continue to

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>see revisions on dividends and on earnings, and I think

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the buy backs UM you are going to be off

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, considerably. So I don't think that this is

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>over yet. I mean, we have the second quarter contracting

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US by and we're looking at initial claims

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for you know, to come out over seven million. So

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think some of these revisions are going to continue.

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We've already done three you know, macro revisions over the

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>last month. UM and even though you're seeing some tipid

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>recovery UM in UM China, right now. We still think

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that you have worst numbers to come for the second

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the year. One thing that's been a question

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just going to the question of share buy backs, given

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that share buy backs have been one of

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the only sources of net demand for US equities, Given

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're off the table, how much of

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a technical is that that's going to push valuations lower?

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Has that already been priced in? Well, A lot of

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the technical mis sell off we think um you did occur.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of why you had the bounce back

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>off of the month and rebalancing at the end of

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the month. So our estimate is if you could take

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a look at aggregate at retail flows that could go

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>into the bond and equity markets, you still have one

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half trillion that could go in over a

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 1>period of time, but some of those sources of support

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>like the buybacks will not be there. And you've got

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the earnings revisions downwards and you have the retail money

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably not going to come in as rapidly as

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these flows that we saw that stabilize the

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>market at month. Then around the rebalancing, Joyce I read

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>carefully this weekend not only your research, but the compendium

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that you write on international economics. What's the level of

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>belief we have now, what's the level of conviction? And

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>all the really hard thinking that's going on, like the

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>situation and emerging markets is really dire. They have neither

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the health care systems or the resources or really some

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of the fall back that they've had is usually going

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to the developed markets countries for assistance. So it's really

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>all on the International arry Fund. Now. The said came

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>back with the swap lines, but that's where I think

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of downside risk in many countries

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that have really under reported the figures. And even in China,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they changed the methodology here, um. And I

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think the real test in China is whether they reopen

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the schools at the end of May, UM and the

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>beginning of June on whether they can contain a second wave.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>So this is all very fragile right now. With all

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the support from the government. The government the said

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that you haven't seen, Um, You've seen some tipid stability

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in the financial markets from the very lows that we hit,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>but I think on the economic data you continue to

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>see the revisions come downwards. Um. In particular, the labor

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>markets have really been in free fall here Joyce less transition,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit to a delicate conversation. You've touched

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>on it. The under reporting. There have been accusations, in

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fact reports according to an Intel report to the to

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the White House, that China is still under reporting the

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of cases and the amount of deaths as well.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if we can fault that in what

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is happening with emerging markets at the moment. There are

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of countries that can't deal with this,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>can't afford to deal with this, And I just wonder

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the tension that emerges on the other end of this

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>between the countries that are drowning in debt and can't

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>afford to pay it back and the accusations being thrown

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out at China that they covered it up and didn't

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>deal with it well enough. Well, I mean, you have

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>seen China change the methodology and they now are including

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the asymptomatic cases. That's raising questions on whether they are

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of containing this curve. Why did they

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>change the methodology right now? But you take a look

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>at some other countries like India, which is going under

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>containment right now, and there are estimates that there's only

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen tests for every one million residents. So you have

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>that many of these emerging markets countries are very densely populated,

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the containment measures are harder to enforce, and the health

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>care systems are weaker. So we've seen the first statements

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>from the I M S calling out for debt relief

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for the frontier emerging markets, um the poorest emerging markets countries.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is the debate you're going to

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>see from the fall out of this, whether it's the

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets or some of the debate that you're seeing

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, It's going to be about burden sharing and

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>risk sharing and how this has really sort of changed

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the metric um you know, for the way we need

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, you know, the level of death that

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>will be sustainable. Well, Joyce, let me follow up on

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that just a little bit and make it a little

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more pointed. Do you expect these emerging market countries,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just as far as burden sharing is concerned, to put

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>China on the spot to shoulder a lot of that burden.

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, China is trying very hard

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>to as the source of the contagion, and also as

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the country that has sort of a deeper understanding of

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this because they were the first in they are trying

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to provide some support. So if you look at fifty

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>four countries in Africa, they've provided hundred testing kits apiece. UM.

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, we hear that they're also fast tracking them

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>leaders to Mexico where there has been a real shortage.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think China is trying to see which ways

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it can actually UM try to get out its medical

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>expertise you as a first step in UM trying to

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>assist other countries and book they've even been sending medical

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>supplies to the United States. But I do think that

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you will have UM a discussion on which official debt

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>China developed markets as well can be forgiven for these

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets countries that are the poorest emerging markets. Joyce

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>appreciates on This Morning Joyce Change that JP Morgan Chant

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of Global Research better news on this pandemic. There's no

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>question about that, but still very grim. The sirens here

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>off of Central Park in New York City are really

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>something to hear. It is persistent and just a drone

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that's out there is uh. The first responders do. What

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they do is many others try to go on with

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>their lives. Some of the people looking at this are

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in public health. There's any number of great institutions around

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this nation, and one of them is that Johns Hopkins University,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, with their engineering long ago and far away.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Mr Oberg was an engineering student at Johns Hopkins and

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>he's endowed their School of Public Health. Here is their

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>weiss Stein. Mr Joshua Scharstein Dr Scharstein on the state

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the peak of this pandemic. I think that there's a

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a misunderstanding about this concept of the peak.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think people, um, I think you know,

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for where we are now, there will be a peak.

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But the only reason it's peaking is because we have

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>shut everything now. So I think some people think when

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you're on the other side of the peak, it just

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>goes down and we can open everything back up again.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But if the reason it's peaking is because we've shut

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>everything down, as soon as we'd open things up, it's

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>going to go up. And so we have to use

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the time um that we have that we're buying to

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>strengthen our healthcare system to get more protective equipment to

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers, and to build a stronger public health response.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So we have another set of tools besides just shutting

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>everything down. Star to Charstein, we're flattening the curve. It's

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>been successful in certain geographies. There's no question about that.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think of let's say the Baltimore Orioles. They're gonna

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have a big game here against the Boston Red Sox.

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna pack cal ripkin Field, no question about that.

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to be safe to go to a

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>baseball game with all those people crammed in? Well, certainly

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not safe at the moment um. And uh, you know,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Oil Park at Sandy Yards is a wonderful ballpark. But

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think people realize that helps comes first, and you know,

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>right now that's not possible. I think what's going to

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>happen is we're gonna have to And I like the

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>tonality that other people have made. Maybe we've flipped off

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the light on our kind of world very quickly, but

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>when we turn it back on, it's going to be

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>more like a dimmer switch, you know. I mean, absent

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a miraculous treatment or vaccine, we're gonna have to move

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>very slowly. We're gonna have to make sure that we're

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>not you know, having the cases searched so I that

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>they put our healthcare system in jeopardy again. So I

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you it won't be baseball games or football matches

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that are going first. It's going to be um it

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>send more more people going to work, you know, UM

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in particular industries, probably not bars in restaurants. So it's

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know, a slow increase and we

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>may have to dial it back. If you look at

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what Singapore has been doing. Singapore has you know, kept

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the number of things open, They have encouraged social distancing.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>They do not have large gatherings like you know, sporting events, UM.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And they've been using a very robots public health response

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep it in check, you know, isolation, contact tracing, quarantine.

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But they recently had an increase in cases, so they've

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>dialed up in their social distancing. So I think it's

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be most likely a period where we're going

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like a dimmer switch until we can really get

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to light all the way on. Dr Charston and let

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>us turn to JOHNS. Hopkins and public health. I look

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at it like infrastructure where the nation as a tradition

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of being grievously underfunded. There's no question we've been that way.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>When we look at this emergent moment is pandemic. What

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is the first order condition to better public health in America? Well,

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm first we need people. You know, public health and

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States is law within fifty thou workers. Over

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the last decade or so, um, it's it's very been

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>very underfunded and neglected. It's very important that you know,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly now urgently, there people to do some of the

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>poor public health task. We're going to need partnerships because

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>even with more people, we still won't have the reach. Um.

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to really have to have the private

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>sector mobilized behind public health in different areas, provide resources

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like hotel space and dorms for people to stay when

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>they're sick. Um And I think, you know, you know,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for the future, we're gonna need to rethink our priorities.

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had so little attention paid to preventtion

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of different kinds, including preventing the harm that a pandemic

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and caught Joshua Sharfstein, he is at Johns Hopkins in

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg School of Public Health, that was just wonderful.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He's Vice Deein and Paul. You know, everyone we talked

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to in the metal community. Medical community is so holistic.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>They all have specialties, and of course Dr Scheffstein working

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with FDA and working with the State of Maryland and

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>public health. But it's amazing how they can span across

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic and and really inform about what's going on

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and what the trend is. Ted Alden joining us with

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Council on Foreign Relations TED Foreign Affairs Magazine provided

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>great leadership this weekend, clearly with my read of the

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>week at a wonderful essay on China and on the

0:17:55.200 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>path forward for the government, very controversial essay about the

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>strength of the Communist Party, the future for Mr g

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. How fragile do you perceive trade is with

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>with Mr? G? Well, I mean, I think I think

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>trade is tremendously fragile. I mean already before the current crisis,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously you have the trade war that you've been following

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>very closely, So trade relations between the US and China

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty fragile going into this. Now. You've just got

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of incentives for countries to pursue more nationalist

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>policies of various sorts in terms of you know, export controls,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>hoarding medical supplies, bringing back home critical supply chains. So

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the you know, the current crisis and accelerating

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>what we saw before, which was a migration of supply

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>chains out of China to other places in Asia, even

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>back to the United States to some extent. So trade

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is pretty fragile, but the Chinese have a big incentive

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep it, keep it flowing. So I think, you know,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>coming out of this crisis, they've been behaving pretty responsibly.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the positive in all of this. So

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>ted since the end of World War two, globalism has

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>generally been the theme of trade. How big of a

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>blow as globalism taken just in the last several years

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and then punctuated by this virus, well, I mean, I

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's taken an enormous blow. You know, it's hard

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for us to remember where we were two or three

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago. With this you know, really sort of world

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>system set up under the w t O and a

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>variety of other regional trade agreements, companies very confident that

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>they could locate portions of their production and wherever in

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. It made most economic sense to do so

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>good services moving very freely. We're in a much more

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>fragmented world already. The question really is how companies are

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to adjust and how much of a hit that

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is on the cost side. And and you know, the

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>good news again is that companies are extraordinarily adaptable. We

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>won't have these very lean, long supply chains that we

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>had a kind of the height of the of the

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of the globalism era. But but we may have more

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>redundant systems that work almost as well. So it's a

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>very different rule, but it may function quite well anyway.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>What what to multinationals? What a company seed? Frankly, what

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a mid size and small businesses need on trade? Right now?

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>From the Trump administration, I think they need more predictability.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've gone through one shock after another in

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of the tariffs, in terms of various security related restrictions,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>now obviously the shock coming from the pandemic. I just

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think they need some predictability about you know, here's where

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the administration is going to keep the rules stable, here's

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to change. I mean, you look at

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole tariff process. It's become this free for all

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with certain companies like Apple getting exemptions, other companies not exemptions.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That's really hard for smaller companies. They can't play that game.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>They know if the rules are gonna be I gotta

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>rip up the script here, and it's just real simple,

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Ted Alden, have you been surprised that the President hasn't

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>looked like a hero and just come out and said,

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>effective pandemic, We're taking the tariffs off and we'll put

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>them back on when the pandemic is over. I think

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a good call. I mean, you know,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been urging that, a lot of other people have

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>been urging that. But you know, the tariffs are so

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>much a part of his political identity. Right again, it's

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to think in the middle of this crisis, but

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you go back even a few months, and he was

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>talking every day about what a great thing that tariffs

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>have been for the U. S. Economy, how much money

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is flowing into the United States as a result of

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs. So politically, that's a big U turn for

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the president, even though he's pretty good at making you

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>turns Um. I think it would have been a good gesture.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as you know, they flirted with with

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>some reduction of tariffs on some products, and then backed

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>away from that because they said it's too complicated. Manufacturers

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>are getting a double whammy from the you know, the

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>collapse and demand, the challenge in maintaining their supply chains

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and paying the harriss on top of that, they're still there.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So ted could it be made that President Trump was

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the curve with the you know, America first

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and with unilateral trade agreements. You know, you you could

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>make that argument. This will be an interesting one for

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the history books, right, you know, to what extent has

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>American policy caused some of this retrenchment caused some of

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this pulling back caused some of the shortening of supply chains,

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>or to what extent was it really inevitable? I mean

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, um, yeah, you look at a book

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like Barry Lynn's End of the Line almost fifteen years

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ago saying companies are very vulnerable by the extent of

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>these supply chains, by the heavy reliance. Kind of you

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can make it argument and stuff, what's going to happen anyway?

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And then that's been the President Trump really was a

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>bit out of the curve. It'll be interesting. Yeah, he's

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously observated it with his policies, but I'm not sure

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>caused that he may have seen it come and actually

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>really impression and a shout out to Kenneth Rogoff of

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Harvard University is a way out front on the fragility

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of those lines as well. It sounds like Napoleon on

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his way to Moscow. Ted Alden, thank you so much.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough, folks about Mr Alden's failure to adjust.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>It is a dense book, but hugely readable on trade.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just a really extraordinary effort from the Council on

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Relationship. Martin Ratz Morgan Stanley joins as their globile

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>oil strategist. Martin, what is Mr Putin's play here? I

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was confused by his headline where I think basically he

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to talk to anyone. Am I wrong on

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that welcome? I think we are all a little into

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>dark on what executive is going on here. I have

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to say we are now discussing production cuffs that could

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be as much as ten to fifty million barrels a day.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That has taken us well outside of the range of

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>anything that has happened in the bost So we're truly

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>an uncharged care story. UM. Given the demands instruction that

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>has taken place, it will be inevitable that there will

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be some supply culture curtailment. But whether that will be

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>through um, just market prices doing its work and falling

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>two levels which are so low that it that it

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>forces some shut ins, or whether that will happen almo

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>somewhat negotiated basis with all the main producers in one room,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>UM remains remains to be seen. UM. It is definitely

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the case though that if you listen to the rhetoric

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the US administration, the Russian administration to a certain extent,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>all this also the Southeast, you're starting to see that

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the that this level of oil price is creating real,

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>real challenges to domestic oil industries, the government budgets and

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>so from the prospective Yeah, it comments like the ones

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen also from Mr. Putting perhaps are enterprising

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>distress in the oil industry is is very, very real.

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>At the stage, I'm struggling to understand the optimism that

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw in markets and oil markets on Friday from

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of Russia and Saudi Arabia getting together to

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly agree on a ten percent output cut, especially when

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the I e. A says a much bigger cut needs

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to happen in order to stabilize markets. Can you give

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>us some light around that? Yeah? Sure, Um, you're not

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>alone struggling with this. I think many of us also

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of stretching their heads. So from reprospective, Um, you're yea,

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>as I said, you're You're not alone there. There's a

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really interesting divergence at the moment between the painful oil

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>market the futures market, which is with most people trade

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for the physical markets the market or you know, oil

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>companies selling cargoes to each other, and the paper oil

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.239
<v Speaker 1>market is now on brent um in the in the

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>low thirties, about thirty four dollars about, but the physical

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>oil market is still trading at an unusually deep discounts

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to this. So on Friday, for example, physically delivered brands

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as a daily price assessment, which was sussessed that just

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three dollars a barrel. So you're seeing a near

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>near pendle or gap between where the paper market is

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for the physical market is. And I think this placed

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to your confusion that we're all kind of struggling with,

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, us on the barrel counting side of the market,

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>just adding barrels to supply and demands. We're looking at

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the market meaning, well, piece, there's still an awful of

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>oil inventories are going to fill. I is there reason

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to be so oplimistic? And there are little signals in

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the physical markets that we shouldn't be But what you're

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the paper market is then positioning go very

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>very one sided. We all drew the same conclusions that

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be huge oversupply in the physical and the

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>paper market. People goes very very short. And when you

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have these these these tweets and other things where you

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>send like jeez, maybe things are moving, then the paper

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>market can move very very quickly. Nobody wants to be

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>called short. And then you get these wild moves. But

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they've moved to such an extended now the they've overdone

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. Well, let's keep it focused on

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the physical market, Martin, because I think this is important

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and I come up this from just the perspective of

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>just the alignment. So forgive me. But if we're very

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>close to breaching storage capacity, it doesn't really matter what

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they do on the supply side, because it's not gonna

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be enough to offset the amount of demand that has collapsed.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And if we are that close to breaching storage capacity,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then is inevitable that we actually do breach it Martin,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking about crude at least on the physical side,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and aggressively lower from here. Look, this is well possible

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at a global level. We're probably not yet at the

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>level of what in the industry is often called tank tops,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at the point where we reach maximum storage spacity. But regionally,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I've already seeing anecdotal evidence suggest investigations Soldan a big,

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>big storage facility in South Africa allegedly close to being fooled,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Gyra big storage facility in the UEI allegedly close

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to being foolish, and high some facility single word facility

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to operators saying we're getting very full levels. You're seeing

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>floating storage on tankers rising quite strongly. Um, that's typically

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>um that's expensive storage. Or if floating storage goes up,

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that's indicating that on shore storage is is getting close

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to being full. And yeah, the amount of total storage

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>capacity in the world is not entirely known. It's a

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a moving target. UM, but it's broadly

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thought to be in the order of a billion barrels

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>um that can be stored from here on. We could

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>well reach that by the end of April or sometime

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>during eight that type of time frame. And what happens

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to all prices then, yeah, is um is untested, but

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>theoretically you will oil prices should fall to levels where

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it backs out supply already producing fields too short of

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>visit Martin Ross, thank you so much. He's with Morgan

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanley their global oil strategy. Thanks for listening to the

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast US, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You can

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.