WEBVTT - Strong Jobs Report, Remembering Jimmy Carter

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week, Insight from the reporters and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>editors that bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's get two it. As we keep saying, Stock's initially

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 3>getting a bit hammered, bond yields jumping with traders slashing

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>their bets for FED rate cuts this year after data

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>showed a solid jobs market and an increase in consumer

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>inflation expectations. So let's dig into all of it a

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 3>round table Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 3>McKee to my left and to our right is Bloomberg

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>News Rates reporter Michael McKenzie. Michael McKay, Let's start with

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>you first. I want to ask you about today's jobs

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>and you mish sentiment numbers laid out for us and

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 3>what it says about the US economy.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 4>I always love Jobs Day because Carol bakes cookies and

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, didn't get Tim decorates the tree.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 5>It's once a month.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Now you must be thinking of a different holiday.

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Payrolls were obviously very strong. We have to take it

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 4>with a little bit of a grain of salt because

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 4>there's probably some still some hurricane and strike catchup in that.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 4>And also we had the very late Black Friday, which

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 4>appears to have delayed the hiring of retail employees because

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 4>we saw twenty seven thousand decline in retail in November,

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 4>when normally you'd expect all those people to come on,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 4>and we saw forty three thousand additional people hired for

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>retailers in December, and also forty seven thousand hired in

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the category that includes basically the delivery drivers, the ups

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 4>and FedEx people who are bringing you all those packages.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Dudes to deliver it before the porch bandit stealer from

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>my pirates.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>There was there, There was good news in there, but

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 4>it maybe there may be some payback next week or

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 4>next month orrather. But the good news for the FED

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>is that the unemployment rate went down, massive increase in

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 4>the household survey in terms of people hired after a

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 4>big decrease the month before, and everybody said, oh, labor

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 4>market is falling apart, and it's not. That's the bottom

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 4>line here. Which can keep the Fed on the sidelines,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 4>which will bring Mike mackenzie in to explain all the

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 4>joy that was found in the market.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I listened to I think you know, we're all listening

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to surveillance this morning when the numbers passed, and it

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 3>was like, I mean, man, the market reaction was pretty swift, Michael.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Indeed it was. This has been a really tough week

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 5>for the bond markets, right. Fact, what was interesting about

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 5>today was longer day to bondes have been signing off

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 5>the most. So much of this week today is all

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 5>about the front end because the market saying, oh, the Fed,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 5>he's really going to go on extended pause. Now we've

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 5>pushed out the first rate cut for this year from

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 5>around June. Now we're flirting with a September October timeframe.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Bank of America come out today and say no, we

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 5>don't see any more rate cuts now for the cycle.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Goldman City pushing it back. So the real problem now

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 5>is that you've got a series of forces all combining

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 5>to really hurt bonds because there's no really place here

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 5>nowhere here to hide really, because a Frinda yd is

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 5>going to get whacked because if the economy keeps trundling

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 5>along at this kind of pace, and you've also got

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 5>that uncertainty coming from the Trump administration coming in who

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 5>they want to keep the economy going. The FED is

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 5>also going to have to look at inflation a lot

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 5>more closely now, and we've got a really important inflation

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 5>report coming out next Wednesday. So everything's pushing us towards

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 5>the world where the FED is basically done. The December

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 5>expectations for rates where the FED rate will be is

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 5>now above four percent, So four percent is now your flaw,

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 5>and that means the longer end is still going to

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 5>sell off. It hasn't sold off as much today, but

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 5>it's sold off a lot this week. And we did

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 5>test five percent on the thirty year. The twenty year

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 5>bond is already above five percent. Tens when above four

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 5>seventy five where everyone has been saying, oh, that's going

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 5>to be where the buyers turn up, we're not really

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 5>seeing it.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Ten years right now.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So does that mean we get to five for

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 6>our folks talk that you talked to Michael McKenzie saying

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 6>we could see five percent on.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think you've got a pretty good chance of that.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 5>We'll see. I mean, inflation next week is expected to

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 5>show the third consecutive monthly rise and the headline rate,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 5>so we're not trending in the right way. And then

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Scott Besson's going to sit down for the Senate confirmation

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 5>hearing on Thursday, and everyone in the bond market wants

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 5>to hear what he's going to say about what's happening

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 5>in terms of fiscal policy. How do you square this

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 5>incoming administration's efforts to keep on spending bring in tax

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 5>cuts with being fiscally disciplined. And that's what's got people

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 5>worried as well.

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>But you guys keep reminding both of you do that. Listen,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot that happens, you know, from FED meeting

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>to FED meeting, whether it's more reads on inflation, more

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 3>reads on jobs. And then we'll see, Mike, in reality,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 3>what we get out of this administration that ultimately might

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>impact things.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what Michael was talking, I was like, we're all dated.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking, you want to pat the bond traders

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 4>on the head and go, you guys are so cute,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, changing their views like this, and we all

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 4>know in a couple of weeks it'll all change again,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 4>because yes, CPI is very important next week, but after that,

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>the big one is Inauguration Day and the hundred executive

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 4>orders he's going to put out, and then whatever plans

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 4>they go through. I think the only safe bet is

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 4>that we don't know what the FED is going to

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 4>be doing this year, and the FED doesn't know either,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>and they're very happy to go sit in the shade

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>and wait this out for a little bit because they

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 4>don't want to be on the wrong side, you know,

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 4>slow the economy or goose it too much, given what

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 4>we don't know about what's going to happen.

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 6>So January twenty ninth is the consensus on the twenty

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 6>ninth than the idea is the consensus says maybe the

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 6>next move comes all the way in the fall summer.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, the consensus for January. You look at the WRP

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 4>page and I think it's written down there.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 7>We'd be gobsmacked.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 6>If the let's see WRP moved greats oh it does

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 6>say that, yeah, twenty nine.

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 7>But after that, who knows.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean by March, first of all, we've got the

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>dead ceiling hanging over everybody's head. We're going to have

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 4>a government has to be funded in.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 7>March by March, right, And so you have that little thing.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Just those two little things alone, let alone any new

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 4>policies to throw people out of the country or imposed

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 4>tariffs or things like that.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I want to throw two things into it. First of all,

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 3>isn't it great that the job market's doing well and

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>this growth is happening, So where's that aspect of it?

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is, and I heard this on surveillance

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 3>this morning, like what is really behind the growth and rates?

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 3>Is it inflation? Is it that the economies growing?

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Do we really know what is truly behind the move

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 3>up in rates.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 5>It's a combination of factors. But clearly, if you look

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 5>at term premium measures from the New York Fed model,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 5>it's risen a lot. I mean, it was barely above

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 5>zero a month ago. It's now above sixty basis points.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 5>So it's moved a lot. And that tells you that

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 5>investors are going to demand a higher premium to own

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 5>longer day to debt rate. You've then got the front

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 5>end of the curve where everybody was really telling me

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 5>for the last month of just stay in the two year.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 5>That's going to be fine because the Fed's still going

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 5>to cut this year. Well, now that's now kind of

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 5>in question, and in fact, we now have a situation

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 5>is quite rare. The two year yield is now above

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 5>the Fed Fund's effective rate of four thirty three. Now,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 5>before everyone saying, oh that's got the Fed effective is

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 5>a really tough level to break for the two year,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 5>well that's just been broken. So you're in an environment

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 5>right now where there's a lot of uncertainty.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>So is it uncertainty that's just moving rates up? Like

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>that's what I'm trying to get to do, Like we

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>do we really understand why we've seen it?

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think there's another element to this is and

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 5>if you talk to a lot of us, talking to

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 5>on Greg Peter's at PGA Meda this week, he says,

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 5>we're is going back to where we were before the

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 5>financial crisis, that's when real us were above two percent.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Inflation is running in a sort of two and a

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 5>half three percent zip code, which means bond yields are going.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>To be at five percent. So back to normal.

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of back to normal, back.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 7>To the old normal, the old normal of the new normal.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 4>But what's funny is you look at the actual cost

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 4>of borrowing, not the FED funds rate, because you're not

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 4>a bank. But if you look at mortgage rates, and

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 4>if you look at credit card rates, and you look

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 4>even look at the prime rate for the best business borrowers,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 4>none of them have come down since the FED cut

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 4>rates one hundred basis points. And yet the economy is,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 4>like I said, is just still roaring along, which tells

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>you a that the Fed's probably not restrictive enough and

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 4>b that the neutral rate has clearly moved up at

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 4>this point. Now the feds concern is how long does

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 4>it stay up? Do we revert or are we back

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 4>at the old normal? And it stays that.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 6>Way, Mike, When it comes to the estimate, economists, apart

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 6>from our own Ana Wong here at Bloomberg Economics, they

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 6>got this wrong in terms of the figure that we

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 6>got this morning. Why is that so hard to get.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's a lot of moving parts in all of this,

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 4>and then there's some group thing too, and so people

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 4>are looking at what's happened in the past and extrapolating that.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Some people may have missed the change in the holiday

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 4>and the seasonal effect of that, and it's been for

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 4>months and months, really hard to get a handle on

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 4>what's happening with the labor market. Remember, it was only

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 4>a couple of months ago that the labor market was

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 4>so bad that we had to start cutting interest rates

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 4>to save it. And now you've got this reversal, And

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 4>does that last or is this just a quickie.

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Thing too, like just to kind of wrap up here though, So, Michael,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 3>is that like we just have to think about folks.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 3>We're just going back to the way it maybe used

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>to be it should be.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 5>I think you have to because let's face it, so

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 5>many people in this country have locked in very low

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 5>mortgage costs. So even though the thirtieth fixed today is

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 5>going to be above seven percent when we get the

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 5>new numbers next week, it doesn't really affect the majority

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 5>of people. And as long as the job market stays

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 5>tight and potentially could give you tight if you start

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 5>to see people being deported this year, if you don't

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 5>lose your job and you've locked in really low borrowing rates,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 5>and look, a lot of companies did the same as well.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 5>And we still have all the fiscal stimulus from the

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 5>Biden administration still flowing through the economy. So again, it's

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 5>very hard to see what's going to knock this economy

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 5>off course. The only silver lining for the bomb market

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 5>right now, The only reason you'd be buying ten year

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 5>yields at these levels and thirties at five percent, is

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 5>that if you think there's going to be enough. We're

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 5>moving into a sort of in a sort of an

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 5>environment where good economic news becomes bad news for the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 5>equity market. You get a tumble in stock folk and

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 5>you get a back up and credit, then treasuries will

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 5>probably show some haven support. Right But again, it's going

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>to be interesting to see how that works, given again

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 5>at the US fiscal position.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Mike, twenty seconds left here, though, I mean, is there

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 3>enough growth out there in the US economy to keep

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>things going?

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Appears to be back right now, and it looks like

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe only something that would come from the administration at

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 4>this point, or some exogenous event, some war we didn't anticipate,

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 4>or something would knock it off its pins at the moment.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, Cookies and Christmas tree next time around. All right, guys,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much. Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>correspondent Michael McKee, along with Bloomberg News Rates reporter Michael McKenzie. Guys, thanks,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 3>have a great weekend.

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Our next guest has spent a decade and a half

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of public service, serving three US administrations, including former Presidents

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Joining US right now is

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Stuart Eisenstadt. He's former Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, Undersecretary

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 3>of State for Economic Affairs, former Undersecretary of Commerce for

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 3>International Trade, and former US Ambassador to the European Union.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>He understands a lot of how the world works, certainly

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 3>from a US perspective when it comes to policy and

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 3>geopolitics and more. He was President Jimmy Carter's Chief White

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 3>House Domestic policy advisor and wrote a biography of him

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 3>entitled President Carter The White House Years, and gave a

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 3>eulogy at the state funeral yesterday for former President Carter. Today,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Ambassador Eisenstadt a senior council member at Covington and Burling,

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 3>and he joins US from Washington. D c Ambassador Eisenstadt,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for being with us, and we

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 3>are very sorry for your loss.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 8>Thank you very much. As you've known Jimmy Carter for

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 8>fifty five years. I was his policy director when he

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 8>ran for governor of Georgia, then when he ran for president,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 8>and then four years in the White House as his

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 8>chief domestic advisor. So it was a personal loss. But

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 8>he lived a long life and he in many ways

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 8>taught us how to live a life of purpose, a

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 8>life of faith, a life of determination, of honesty. And

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 8>one of the things that I really tried to stress

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 8>in my eulogy was that we shouldn't only look at

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 8>him as the greatest former president, which he was forty

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 8>three years, curing two African diseases, monitoring over one hundred elections,

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 8>building houses for habitat. Rather, we should later rest the

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 8>myth that his greatest achievements came only as former president.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 8>And I believe that as we look back at what

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 8>was actually accomplished, that we will see that he was

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 8>one of the most consequential one term presidents in American history.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 8>And I say that I wasn't nominating him for Mount Rushmore,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 8>but he belonged in the foothills other presidents who have

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 8>really made the country stronger and the world safer. And

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 8>he did. And I tried to lay out in my

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 8>eulogy what major things he had accomplished.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, maybe not Mount Rushmore, but you did call

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 3>him a renaissance man for all these different things that

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>he had done. You mentioned that in your eulogy. I

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>want to say that I'm glad you went there in

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>terms of his first term or his only term, in

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 3>terms of what he accomplished, because I do feel like

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>so much of the narrative and conversation since his passing

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 3>about is all that he achieved once he left. But

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>it's remarkable. And in listening to the eulogies yesterday, yours

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 3>and others about the issues that he worked on in

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the White House, whether it was the Middle East, whether

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 3>it was inequalities, whether it was the environment, these are

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:50.359
<v Speaker 3>things that are with us today and pressing and challenging issues.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 3>And I think about the environment, and here we are

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 3>watching the fires out on the West Coast. I want

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to kind of go there because obviously this was something

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 3>that President Carter thought about. What is wrong and why

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 3>hasn't our US policy maybe on the environment and climate

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 3>change specifically, why aren't we maybe better?

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 8>And he was I think the greatest environmental president since

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 8>Theodore Roosevelt. He literally double the size of our national

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 8>park system with the Alaska Lands built. He had strong

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 8>amendments to the Clean Air and Clean Water ract But

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 8>interestingly he did the super fun to clean up chemical

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 8>waste and all of these our major accomplishments, and in fact,

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 8>we put out a report in nineteen eighty called the

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 8>Global two thousand Report, which forecast climate change on energy.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 8>Really did everything together. He deregulated oil and gas, that is,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 8>ended the price controls, which led to a huge upsurge

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 8>in production, so we're now the number one producer in

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 8>the world of both. But he also had the first

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 8>incentives for conservation like installation, and the first incentives for

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 8>renewable energy like solar and even put symbolically solar panels

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 8>on the White House. I mean this was done like

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 8>in the nineteen seventy eight seventy nine period, so he

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 8>already envisioned that is being a really critical thing for

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 8>the United States. He really inaugurated the whole clean.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 6>Energy euro Ambassador you talk about all these accomplishments, and look,

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 6>I think it's important for us to look at historical

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 6>context here. Why then do you think voters this didn't

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 6>resonate with voters, and he lost in the election of

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 6>nineteen eighty so badly to Ronald Berry.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 8>That's that's a good a good question. And all the

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 8>op eds that I've written on his life in the

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 8>Wall Street Journal and elsewhere, I mentioned that I hope

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 8>we don't end by the way before going to deregulation,

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 8>which even Senator Graham or Republican Senator said transformed the

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 8>whole US economy. Let me answer your direct question. I

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 8>call it the three eyes that were against them. First,

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 8>inter party warfare with the liberal wing of the Democratic Party,

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 8>hitted by Ted Kennedy. It divided the convention in nineteen eighty.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 8>Kennedy never really reconciled and worked for him, and that

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 8>was a huge disability. Second, the second eye is inflation.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 8>We had inherited high inflation. It was part of the

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 8>nineteen seventies with Nixon who had double digit inflation and

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 8>Ford and we had double digit inflation, but that was

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 8>largely powered as was Nixon's by the way, by the

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 8>oil shock. It was the Opeic embargo against the US

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 8>in nineteen seventy three. It was the Iranian Revolution and

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 8>shock in nineteen seventy nine nineteen eighty that just hugely

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 8>increased the pressures. But here is one of the most

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 8>courageous things he did, and it makes the point that

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 8>much of what he accomplished only blossomed after he left.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 8>So let's put ourselves in July of nineteen seventy nine.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 8>Inflation is roaring, gas prices are going up, gas lines

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 8>are occurring, and he decides over the objection, and I'm

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 8>not exaggerating of all of his advisers to appoint Paul

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 8>Voker to head the Federal Reserve, knowing in advance because

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 8>Paul told him in the Oval office that if I'm

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 8>appointed the head of the BED, I'm going to have

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 8>to take drastic actions on interest rates that are going

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 8>to make it very difficult for you in an election.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 8>You're in nineteen eighty in terms of a potential recession,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 8>our unemployment, And he said, Paul, I cannot make mon

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 8>legacy leaving this kind of inflation. You take care of

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 8>the economy, I'll take care of the politics. Well, the

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 8>fact is inflation dropped like a rock right for Paul's

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.479
<v Speaker 8>but only in Reagan's first two years, after Carter had

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 8>already left. And third is Iran. The Iran hostage crisis

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 8>four hundred and forty four days was so unbelievably debilitating

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 8>and humiliating. Carter made a choice early on that he

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 8>was going to save the lives of the hostages rather

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 8>than take dramatic military action which would risk their lives.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 8>All of them did come back, all of them came

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 8>back safe, but he paid a huge political price.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, Ambassador Eisenstadt, you know one of the

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>things I think someone said during one of the eulogesus

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 3>that he was far sighted. In other words, he thought

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 3>about longer term impact, not on only the current generation, but

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 3>generations to come. We only have about unfortunately, about three

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 3>and a half minutes or so left here. I do

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 3>think about policies today that he seemed to have some insights,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 3>some foresight, some foresightedness, whether it was the Middle East,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 3>whether it was China, whether it was equality in the environment.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the divisiveness today and the political

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>swings that we are saying and extremes, Americans are looking

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>for something else, and maybe they don't feel represented. How

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 3>do you think about the environment today. President Carter tried

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 3>to represent everybody.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, let me give you three answers to that. First

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 8>of all, we had much more backpartisanship then much of

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 8>our legislation. We had almost seventy percent of our legislation passed.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 8>We had regular meetings with Republican leadership, regular breakfasts as

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 8>well as Democratic. Second, he had a major role in

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 8>ending the Cold War. Reagan gets the credit for it,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 8>and he deserves credit. But all the weapons systems which

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.959
<v Speaker 8>Reagan implemented, the MX mobile missile, the cruise missile, the

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 8>stealth bomber, and intermediate nuclear forces in Europe, every single

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 8>one of them he started. And Brennan, the longtime Soviet

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 8>ambassador and his memoirs, said that Jimmy Carter's human rights

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 8>policy played a major role in undermining Soviet Union. And last,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 8>he said, I'm going to do the right thing, regardless

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 8>of politics. And let's take deregulation, which would be an

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 8>important subject for Bloomberg. When we came into office, there

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 8>was tight regulation on roots and prices for all of

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 8>our surface and air transportation, no new entrance, rigid prices,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 8>administered by government agencies. Jimmy Carter deregulated every single one

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 8>of those deregulated air lands, which made it possible for

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 8>competitors to come in. Right today, ninety percent of the

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 8>public flas only less than fifty percent did. Then, trucks

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 8>and rail deregulation made a more efficient supply chain. Deregulation

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 8>of telecommunications allowed the cable era to occur, and even

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 8>deregulated beer industry, which led to the growth of.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 3>He're here on a Friday beer industry. I'm in on that. Hey, listen,

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 3>we only do have about thirty five to forty seconds,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So forgive me for asking you to be brief if

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 3>you could, But I do think about those major initiatives

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 3>that you were laying out as you talk about the

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 3>former president's legacy thirty seconds. Do you think the country

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 3>is moving in the right direction when it comes to

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 3>laying out those long term plans? And again, I just

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>asked that you'd be very brief.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 5>I do not.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 8>I think we're very short term focused. I don't think

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 8>we're looking around the corner at the real challenges of

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 8>climate change, the real challenges that will come from China

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 8>and how to combat it. So I really think we're

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 8>looking at a very shortsighted, narrow political way of attacking

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 8>these problems, and we're doing it without the back parisanship

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 8>that Jimmy Carter was able to foster.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I so appreciate that, and I so appreciate you reminding

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 3>us of all the things that happened during the Carter administration.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I think history always teaches us right, the things that

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 3>go right, the things that go wrong. But it's an

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 3>important way in terms of our way forward. Ambassador Eisenstadt,

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much. Stewart Eisenstadt, former US ambassador, and

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>so much more in terms of his public service currently

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 3>at Covington and Berlin.

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car Play

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Gave you an update on the wildfires out there in

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the Los Angeles area, looking at it from a couple

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 3>of different perspectives on the ground and what we are seeing,

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 3>but also you know, we do think about the business

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 3>and financial impact. In the meantime, you continue to see

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of organizations that are rolling to help out

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>those affected by the LA wildfires, including some to help

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 3>find shelter. So let's get into what airbnb dot org

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 3>is doing. Their executive director, Christoph Gorder, is with us.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>He joins us from Salt Lake City. Christoph, nice to

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>have you here with us. First of all, what can

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 3>you tell us about what you are hearing about operations there,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 3>your teams in the area when it comes to the fires.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 9>Great, thanks for having me on, and you know, our

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 9>hearts go out to the thousands of families that are

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 9>just going through the most traumatic events right now. Airbnb

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 9>dot org we're a nonprofit. We're founded by arenb a

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 9>few years ago, and we provide free housing in times

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 9>of crisis like this. So we've been working in LA

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 9>since the fire started on Tuesday. Housed our first guest yesterday,

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 9>and now I think we're probably the last numbers I have.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 9>We've housed. We've provided housing support for about six five

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 9>hundred people in the last twenty four hours. But the

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 9>need is just enormous.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 6>How does that housing support manifest and what's the relationship

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 6>that you have currently with Airbnb. Are you taking airbnbs

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 6>that are available and then essentially fronting the cost covering

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 6>the cost for those affected exactly.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 9>The way we work is we partner with a local nonprofit.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 9>In this case, it's a nonprofit called La two one one,

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 9>which covers all of La City in La County. They

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 9>are very connected into the community. They identify and vet

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 9>the families who are going to stay with us. Once

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 9>they've approved them, we issue them a credit to book

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 9>the airbnb that works best for them and their needs

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 9>where they want to be, if they need wheelchair accessibility

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 9>or it needs to be pet friendly, and so they're

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 9>able to just sort of pick the airbnb that's going

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 9>to be most communient for them, and then we work

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 9>with hosts to get a discount on that and the

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 9>balance is paid for by Arianbe dot org.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>You said about sixty sixty five hundred people you've already

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 3>helped out, but you said the demand is incredible. Can

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>you give us an idea of how many people are

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 3>reaching out and looking for your assistance, so.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 9>It's really fast moving. I mean the number the sixty

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 9>five hundred numbers from last night, and you know, I'm

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 9>just waiting for some updates today, but you know, will

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 9>be thousands more will have gotten help just this morning

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 9>in terms of the need, you know, immediately right after

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 9>we open the program on Wednesday, you know, we had

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 9>thousands and thousands of requests and so we've got a

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 9>backlog right now and you know, working our way through it.

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 9>But the situation is still evolving, and there are more

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 9>areas you know, opening up for evacuation, and so it's

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 9>still you know, I think unfortunately, very early days.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 7>So it's hard to.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 9>Get a you know, a number really nailed down because

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 9>it's moving so fast.

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 6>One thing that I'm trying to understand is how long

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 6>some of these folks are going to be displaced. I mean,

0:26:58.320 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 6>think about it from the perspective of how long it

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 6>takes to rebuild something. Factor in not just the insurance issues,

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 6>but also the fact that getting building materials and folks

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 6>to actually do that work. Those people are going to

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 6>be in a very short supply because of the scale

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 6>of this devastation. How long do you plan to be

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 6>housing people in the wake of this disaster.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, we've committed in this immediate emergency, We've committed and

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 9>aremb is there to support us to provide emergency housing

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 9>to twenty five thousand people, and so we're going to

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 9>do as much as we can. We sort of look

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 9>at this in a couple phases as this evolves. The

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 9>first phase is the evacuation phase, and they're the stays

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 9>that we're providing are very short, so it's about a

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 9>week now. Most of the people we're hoping are going

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 9>to be able to go back to their homes in

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 9>these evacuation areas, but of course they're going to be

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 9>thousands and thousands of people. We're going to need a

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 9>long term stay and so then we will move into

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 9>phase two, will extend to stay out to about a month,

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 9>and we're sort of an emergency stop gap while people

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 9>figure out their other options. So think of us sort

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 9>of like as the ambulance that gets you to the hospital.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 9>And then there'll be other options FEMA, insurance, etc. That

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 9>people will need to do. But it's a long, long

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 9>road to recovery.

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we can only imagine. Christoph. You guys have been

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 3>doing this, you know, in other either natural disasters. Tell

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 3>us about, you know, kind of what you guys have

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 3>learned about this process to where you are today.

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, the idea has been around for a while.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 9>It goes back to actually twenty twelve when Hurricane Sandy

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 9>hit in New York City and there was an EVERYB

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 9>and B host in Brooklyn who called in and said, Hey,

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 9>I see all these people displaced. Can I open up

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 9>my home for free? And that's where the idea started,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 9>and very quickly they were over a thousand hosts in

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 9>New York City who opened up their homes for Hurricane

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 9>Sandy victims. And you know, that went along for a

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 9>few years. But by twenty twenty we realized it was

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 9>a really big idea and so everybb dot org was formalized.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 9>It was created as a separate nonprofit and now we

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 9>respond around the world to disasters. So, you know, unfortunately

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 9>in southern California, we were just down in that same

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 9>area in December and Malibu working on a fire there.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 9>And it's continuous for us around the world and throughout

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 9>the year.

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Before you go, just got about twenty seconds, thirty seconds.

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>How can people find out more information about this organization?

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 9>Hop on our website Airbnb dot org. There's two ways

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 9>you can help. If you make a donation every penny

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 9>will go to pay for a family and need for

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 9>a stay because EVERYMB covers all of our operating expenses.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 9>So if you want to help people in LA, it's

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 9>a great direct way to do that. You'll help us

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 9>help more people. If you're in the LA area and

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 9>you've got a place that you can host a family,

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 9>you can learn about how to sign up to a

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 9>host and we also need your help there.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 3>And if somebody needs a place to stay, how do

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 3>they do that real quickly?

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 9>So you reach out to two one one LA two

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 9>one one, either on their website or call them. There's

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 9>a very easy intake form and they'll take you through

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 9>the process. There's a little bit of a delay right

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 9>now because we've got so many people in the system,

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 9>but be patient. Will help you.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Good luck with your efforts, Christoph, Thank you so much.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Christeph Gorder joining us executive director of at Airbnb dot org.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Listen litening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five these during Listen

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 6>Carol the fire affecting so many case in point We

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 6>were actually set to interview Corey Clipston, the CEO at

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 6>swan Bitcoin, about crypto, but he let us know a

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 6>little earlier today that he now has to evacuate due

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 6>to fires in southern California, so he's unable to make

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 6>the interview.

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Joining us instead is John Harai, swan Bitcoin's managing director.

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Swan Bitcoin, in case you don't remember, it's a platform

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>that offers a host of services, including allowing people to

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 3>buy bitcoin in personal, business and retirement accounts. John joining

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 3>us from New York City. John, first of all, thank

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 3>you for jumping in and talking with us. First up, Corey. Okay,

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 3>what do we know about any of your team that

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe had exposure to the LA wildfires.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, great to be here with you guys and standing

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 10>in for Corey. So far, Corey and his family and

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 10>his house appear to be okay, but he is quite

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 10>close to the danger zone and I believe he is

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 10>helping some people who may have lost their home or

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 10>at least had to evacuate. So it's pretty hectic over

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 10>there right now, and it's one of those things where

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 10>every day brings new updates. So yeah, definitely thinking about

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 10>Corey and all of my other colleagues and everyone who

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 10>is in that area right now.

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 6>It's hard to transition to talking about something like crypto

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 6>when we spent so much time talking about the wildfires

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 6>and the devastation out in LA affecting so many people.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 6>But nonetheless we are going to do that because it

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 6>is one area of green today in a market where

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing a lot of selling. Bitcoin up by three

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 6>percent right now, though it's down about eleven percent from

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 6>that all time high last month, down this week by

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 6>a little more than four percent. John, what's the outlook

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 6>as we head into the new year, especially as we

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 6>get the new administration in office. What's priced in right now?

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and today is an interesting day. I agree with you.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 10>To see bitcoin be up a few percent while stocks

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 10>are down, while bond yields are up. That's interesting. I

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 10>don't want to read too much into one day, but

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 10>it is noteworthy. Looking forward outlook wise, I typically highlight

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 10>three things that I think will support Bitcoin's price going forward.

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 10>One is continued relatively easy fiscal policy. Number two is

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 10>continued relatively easy monetary policy, and then third is continued adoption.

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 10>And if we double click on that adoption, I would

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 10>say it's going to come from many places, but there's

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 10>two big ones. One is potential nation state adoption. And here,

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 10>of course, i'm talking about a new administration, Trump administration

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 10>coming in. They're talking about what's being known as the

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 10>SBR Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Some are calling it a stockpile,

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 10>but either way, it would be the US government proactively

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 10>and consciously adding and holding bitcoin, which would be a

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 10>a big deal. And then the other leg of that

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 10>adoption story is basically what micro Strategy is doing, and

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 10>it's corporate adoption. And they have bought just a ton

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 10>of bitcoin in the past several months here, and the

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 10>pace of their accumulation is really increasing. I don't believe

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 10>we're going to see micro strategy, you know, they're in

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 10>a class of their own, but I think it is

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 10>going to be a big story for twenty twenty five

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 10>what nation states do, primarily driven by the US in

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 10>terms of bitcoin accumulation, and what corporations do you know,

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 10>call it copycats of the micro Strategy playbook. We're actually

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 10>calling it lbe at SWAN or leveraged Bitcoin Equity. It's

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 10>a little bit of a nod to the old LBO

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 10>leveraged buyout. But that's what we're calling the micro strategy playbook,

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 10>the LBE playbook, and I think there's going to be

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 10>more companies that do that.

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Can I just say, John, I'm listening to you, and

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>so might say and I'm waiting for the emails to

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 3>come in that both of those, forgive me, are maybe

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a little flimsy. First of all, well, I think the

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 3>strategic reserves, I don't know, it's a long ways to

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 3>get that. I think there are a lot of folks

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 3>that say that that makes absolutely no sense.

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 6>Including some prominent bitcoin investors like Nick Carter of Castle Island,

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 6>who came on our show and got a lot of

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 6>flak for saying he doesn't think the US should.

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Do that right, And I mean as taxpayers, I think

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of us would be like, wait, what is

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 3>our money being used for? And the other hand is

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the micro strategy. I get that supply demand equation and

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 3>why that is supportive of bitcoin, but again it doesn't

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 3>go to what is bitcoin, what is it really being

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 3>used for? What is that long term usage that to

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 3>me really then would help put in a floor that

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 3>lasts around for a long time.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's great points you guys bring up and I

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 10>am familiar with Nick Carter's views.

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 7>I think his views were nuanced.

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 10>He was particularly against bitcoin being accumulated by a state government,

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 10>particularly the US, using the word reserve and the language

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 10>that some people were using, that it would be a

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 10>monetary asset, that it would somehow back the dollar provide

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 10>stability to the dollar. That is specifically what Nick was

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 10>against my and he in his article he said that

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 10>he's okay with a bitcoin stockpile, so he made that distinction.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 10>My summary view is that regardless of what they call it,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 10>it's going to act like a stockpile, even if they

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 10>call it a reserve. I don't think we are anywhere

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 10>close to a world where bitcoin held by the US

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 10>government is actually backing the dollar or providing stability to

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 10>the dollar. So I guess you could say I kind

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 10>of understand Nick's argument, but I think there is a

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 10>world where the US owns bitcoin as a stockpiled asset,

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 10>and I think there is a relatively easy way for

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 10>them to do that, and that's just them saying, Hey,

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 10>the roughly two hundred thousand bitcoin that we hold, we're

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 10>just going to hold onto it. And personally, I think

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 10>that would be massive if the wealthiest, most powerful country

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 10>in the world says, hey, we are accumulating a big

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 10>we're just holding a bit bitcoin as a strategic asset.

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we need to tell our deficit first before we

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 3>start doing that and spending money on it. I guess

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 3>my point is I just am trying to understand, Like,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 3>if that doesn't happen, you pull the rugout. That doesn't happen.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 3>If micro strategy starts to back off, you know what

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally is there to support bitcoin?

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so the micro strategy piece, I would say bitcoin

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 10>is the primary use case for Bitcoin is a store

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 10>of value monetary asset that is distinct from bitcoin being

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 10>used as payments or medium of exchange. I think all

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 10>of that will come, but that's many years down the road.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 10>So I think corporations, individuals, Nation States, financial advisors, family

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 10>offices will continue to use bitcoin as a store of

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 10>value monetary asset in twenty twenty five and beyond. I

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 10>think that is ultimately what provides some sort of stability

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 10>or a floor for bitcoin. But I actually think it

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.760
<v Speaker 10>will be pretty significant appreciation in the coming twelve months.

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Appreciation is certainly helpful when folks are long bitcoin, or

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 6>they're making leverage bets on bitcoin, such as Michael Sailor

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 6>at micro Strategy. But if we see a significant decline,

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 6>then it starts to really hurt and be painful.

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 7>What happens, then, yeah, that's for sure true.

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 10>If you're going to execute this micro Strategy playbook or

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 10>the LBE playbook as we're calling it, it does require

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 10>that Bitcoin goes up on a longer term time horizon.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 10>I would point people to twenty twenty when Sailor and

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 10>micro Strategy made their first buys. Bitcoin did not go

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 10>upright after that. It actually went down very quickly in

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 10>the weeks after his purchases. But the way you execute

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 10>that strategy is you do it prudently.

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 7>You do it.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 10>If you're going to do it with debt, you do

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.399
<v Speaker 10>it with debt that doesn't have a maturity for four

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 10>to five years. If you're going to do it with equity,

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 10>you tap the equity markets when your stock is trading

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 10>at a hefty multiple to your bitcoin holdings. Those are

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 10>just some of the ways, And you think about the

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 10>ratio of the outstanding debt you have to your bit

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 10>coin market value. So I think as long as people

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 10>are getting that those companies will be okay.

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 3>Got it run John, Thank you so much for jumping in.

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate this. John Harry Swanpitcoin's managing director.

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and Android

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 3>Mcle I'll bet you let me drive.

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 7>Oh no, no, no no, this is not a toy's.

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Honey.

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Please, how do the gravels? Let's wat I want to

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>try it.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 11>It's a good question. Good try.

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 2>This is the Drive to the Clothes.

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 8>Dot songs for me thic Well driver Ja.

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody, just about eighteen nineteen minutes to go

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 3>until we wrap up the trading day. Charlie Bill Maloney

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 3>there breaking down the trade on this Friday, and we

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 3>were definitely off our best levels of the session, but

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we've seen some definite reaction to the day's economic news,

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 3>expectations about the FED and maybe pushing out at least

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 3>based on what we see in the trade. The first

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>rate cut out until maybe October, so but a lot

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 3>can happen.

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 6>Hey, what a parlor game we play?

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.399
<v Speaker 3>We do, indeed don't we. I mean it's like day

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to day, week to week, day to day week.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Everything's different when it comes to what investors think the

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 6>Fed's going to do.

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, it's kind of like why do we

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 3>even bother because the Fed's going to do what it's

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 3>gonna do, what it means.

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 6>Pretty much laughed at me when I asked if January

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 6>it was in play.

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 3>It's like Tim steadeveek, No, I know, but you know

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you never know, Like I mean, month things happen, right,

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if anything we found in our look are

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 3>year ahead pieces, I think about talking with Tim O'Brien

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 3>from our opinion team who oversees that Sam Potter on

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the Markets and Stocks team, is that there's just so

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 3>so many things in last year that we just weren't

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of expecting and that happened. So things come out

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 3>of anywhere, so that will change the market environment.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's see what Dana Duoria has to say about that.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 6>Dana is the co chief investment officer over at invest Net.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 6>It's the tech provider to banks and registered investment advisors.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 6>The investment platform has more than six point eight trillion

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 6>dollars in assets on it, managed by many different folks

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 6>out there. Dana, good to have you with us.

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 7>How are you good to be here?

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 11>I'm great, thank you.

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 6>So, so, what do you make of the way that

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 6>this Job's report changes the outlook for the FED this year?

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, certainly predictable. How the reaction to it, I mean,

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 11>really wants a blowout report?

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 12>This was not you know, just a little bit more

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 12>in terms of the non farm payrolls.

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 11>This was pretty much one hundred thousand more than what

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 11>was expected.

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 12>So not surprising that the reaction that the market had interesting.

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 12>I guess from the standpoint that the market had already,

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 12>of course, from the last foe C meeting, been pricing

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 12>you know, lower expectations for rate cuts, and you know,

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 12>those lower expectations, I think, to a certain extent, we're

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 12>all you could argue, we're already sort of taking account

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 12>of the fact that unemployment was still low, you know,

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 12>jobs market was still strong, and that the Fed certainly

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 12>didn't have to move anytime soon.

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 11>So I could argue this is a bit of an overshoot.

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 12>You know that you had what the information you had before,

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 12>we were down to fifty basis points, and now you know,

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 12>the market reacts again, whereas this report blowout as it is,

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 12>I think is you know, kind of confirmation of what

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 12>maybe we knew.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 11>Was a possibility, which is that the FED really isn't

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 11>going to want to move. I think we all know

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 11>the FED at this point.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 12>You know, the failure here is letting inflation take hold again, and.

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 11>So they're probably going to air. I think we all

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 11>kind of recognize.

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 12>Right to a certain extent, they're gonna err on the

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 12>side of staying higher for longer.

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 11>This just kind of you know, confirms it.

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, what does it mean though for valuations currently on

0:41:57.600 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the equity side of things. I mean, if I just

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 3>do I look at the price to earning, so just

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 3>doing really basic on like something like the NASTAQ one hundred,

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 3>it's about thirty two. If I look at the S

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred, it's just about twenty four. So

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 3>if we are indeed going to live in this higher

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 3>rate environment, valuations they've got to come down.

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, look one hundred percent, right, multiples are not multiples.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 11>Uh, you know, work inversely. So if you have higher rates,

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 11>you would expect multiples to come down.

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 12>And we're already, as you you know, just quoted, we're

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 12>pretty high on multiples, right. I mean, if there's you know,

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 12>a flying the ointment around the expectation that equities do

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.720
<v Speaker 12>well this year, it's where we sit from a multiple's perspective.

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 11>We have a very concentrated market.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 12>We have, you know, a series of very large stocks

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 12>that are you know, you just read it, rate very high.

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 12>The S and P five hundred is very high, and

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 12>that's driven even more by you know, kind of bigger names.

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 12>So valuations do matter.

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I'm certainly of the school that you can't

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 11>you can't keep ignoring that forever.

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 12>And you know, higher rates does work against price multiples

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 12>being a continued driver of expansion in the market. So

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 12>that's one hundred percent of fly in the ointment.

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 6>If US stocks are expensive by some measures, many measures,

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 6>I think it's fair to say, is it time to

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 6>look to emerging markets?

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 9>To Europe?

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean from a tactical perspective, if I was

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 12>going to look right now at you know, what what

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 12>we see in the market in terms of a strong

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 12>dollar expectation you know, a FED that's not going to

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 12>cut rates as fast as maybe overseas economies will will

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 12>more likely cut rates more quickly. That strong dollar is

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 12>a headwind to the emerging market story for sure. So

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 12>if you're thinking about it in terms of, hey, tactically,

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 12>what do I think is the case? I mean, I

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 12>think you have to include that, and you have to,

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 12>you know, think about within emerging markets maybe where you.

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 8>Want to be.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 12>But if you're looking at it, where I think your

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 12>question is, and it's a very valid one, which is, Hey, look,

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 12>at the end of the day, the market is valuing

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 12>all those things that they've priced in everything that I

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 12>just said, and having some diversification in that portfolio, particularly

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 12>when the US market is so concentrated, probably makes sense,

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 12>particularly for long term investors.

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 3>How do you define diversification then.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 12>So it's interesting you say that, right, if you look

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 12>at the academic research, theoretically, the most diverse byed portfolio

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:24.280
<v Speaker 12>is the total market.

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 11>Right, It's the market clearing portfolio. It's everything you can own.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:31.439
<v Speaker 11>But in the if you look at.

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 12>The total market, that's pricing everything at the value in

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 12>the market, and you're getting back to that place where okay,

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 12>but I've got some by other measures, I've got some

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.879
<v Speaker 12>concentration risk there because I've got a lot of money

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 12>if I'm sitting in market or anything that's low tracking

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 12>error to market, I've got a lot of money in

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 12>those big stocks. And so I think, you know, if

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 12>you're thinking about it from that perspective, think about diversifying

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 12>into smaller parts of the market. Think about diversifying, as

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 12>you said, into international economies.

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 6>Okay, international economies one where one area we could look

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 6>private markets though, for retail investors, something that's on your radar.

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.800
<v Speaker 6>I know that the I know that the private equity

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 6>folks would like more people to be investing in the

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 6>private markets. But what yeah, you know, more money out there,

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 6>they want to wear more one K two. Is this

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 6>something that you could see moving away from the ultra

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.240
<v Speaker 6>high net worth folks and actually going to regular people.

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, yeah, for sure. It's it's very much a trend.

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 11>We expect the trend to get a good trend.

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 3>I think it can be.

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 12>You know, yes, I think it absolutely can be, because

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 12>you're seeing a lot of the innovation that maybe was

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 12>available in public markets now take place in private markets.

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 12>And you know, if you're a believer in democratizing those

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 12>types of those.

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 11>Return streams, then yes, the devil in the details of courses.

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 11>What is the vehicle?

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 12>Am I really getting access to these returns and cannot

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 12>live with the ill equis that comes with it? But

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 12>I think the alternatives managers are seeing that, you know,

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 12>they're looking at Hey, dB plans are just not going

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 12>to be the source anymore.

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 11>It's called d C.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:10.800
<v Speaker 3>How do we come down.

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 11>Market to more of a retail audience.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.879
<v Speaker 12>And they're innovating in their structures, interval funds in particular, right,

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 12>so semi liquid structures that are maybe more palatable to

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 12>the audience in that high net worth and even you know,

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:24.760
<v Speaker 12>getting into the mass.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 11>Apple one area.

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 3>Hey we get to run. Happy New Year. Good to

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 3>check in with you, Danna Dioria. She's Chief investment Officer

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 3>of Investment. It's the tech provider to banks and rias.

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 3>The platform has more than six point eight trillion dollars

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 3>in assets.

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com.

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 2>The iHeartRadio app tune In and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and always on the bloom Very terminal

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 3>M