WEBVTT - The Variable Man with Gary Goldman and Angus Fletcher | Development Hell

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:23.556 --> 0:00:28.356
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to episode two of Development Hell, our revisionist history

0:00:28.396 --> 0:00:31.876
<v Speaker 2>series based on the radical notion of the best Hollywood

0:00:31.916 --> 0:00:34.676
<v Speaker 2>stories are the ones that never got made into movies.

0:00:35.556 --> 0:00:37.756
<v Speaker 2>Last time, we kicked out the series with the story

0:00:37.796 --> 0:00:39.796
<v Speaker 2>of how my book Blink failed to make it under

0:00:39.796 --> 0:00:42.476
<v Speaker 2>the big screen. If you haven't heard that one yet,

0:00:42.516 --> 0:00:46.636
<v Speaker 2>you really really should, because it explains why failed stories

0:00:46.876 --> 0:00:55.076
<v Speaker 2>have such meaning for me. Anyway, this episode is a

0:00:55.196 --> 0:00:58.876
<v Speaker 2>wildly convoluted tale, full of big plot twists and huge

0:00:58.916 --> 0:01:03.396
<v Speaker 2>moral questions, a story so much about right now that's

0:01:03.436 --> 0:01:10.396
<v Speaker 2>going to get a little uncomfortable. Allow me to introduce

0:01:10.436 --> 0:01:14.356
<v Speaker 2>guests Number one, Angus Fletcher. He's a screenwriter.

0:01:14.636 --> 0:01:18.116
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a screenwriter, and I've never really wanted to

0:01:18.116 --> 0:01:20.156
<v Speaker 3>be a screenwriter. Have no aptitude in screenwriting.

0:01:20.436 --> 0:01:23.996
<v Speaker 2>Don't listen to Angus. Angus is in fact a screenwriter,

0:01:24.236 --> 0:01:28.076
<v Speaker 2>as you'll hear, he's also an author, researcher, and professor

0:01:28.076 --> 0:01:32.476
<v Speaker 2>of story science at Ohio State and a longtime friend

0:01:32.556 --> 0:01:36.236
<v Speaker 2>of Revision's history. Some of you will remember him as

0:01:36.276 --> 0:01:39.676
<v Speaker 2>the person who provided the intellectual scaffolding for our memorable

0:01:39.716 --> 0:01:44.436
<v Speaker 2>revision of The Little Mermaid. Remember this so you think

0:01:44.476 --> 0:01:46.756
<v Speaker 2>we should be able to we should fix Ursula.

0:01:47.716 --> 0:01:49.676
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think we should just stop her from doing

0:01:49.676 --> 0:01:51.516
<v Speaker 3>whatever she's doing. We should have a conversation with her

0:01:51.556 --> 0:01:52.996
<v Speaker 3>about maybe why this isn't helpful.

0:01:53.476 --> 0:01:58.876
<v Speaker 4>Do you, Prince Eric, take Ursula to have and to

0:01:59.036 --> 0:02:02.836
<v Speaker 4>hold in sickness and in health for as long as

0:02:02.836 --> 0:02:03.996
<v Speaker 4>you both shall live.

0:02:04.996 --> 0:02:08.596
<v Speaker 3>Eric looks deep into Ursula's eyes, hypnotized.

0:02:08.636 --> 0:02:08.916
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:02:11.716 --> 0:02:15.916
<v Speaker 2>If you haven't heard that Little Mermaid series, listen to it. Anyway,

0:02:16.396 --> 0:02:18.116
<v Speaker 2>back to today's story.

0:02:17.996 --> 0:02:21.236
<v Speaker 3>I'm just fascinated by this problem that Hollywood has, that

0:02:21.276 --> 0:02:22.796
<v Speaker 3>it keeps selling the same story over and over and

0:02:22.836 --> 0:02:25.916
<v Speaker 3>over again. And so you know, back when I was

0:02:25.956 --> 0:02:29.316
<v Speaker 3>actually a Shakespeare professor up at Stanford, I placed this

0:02:29.356 --> 0:02:31.116
<v Speaker 3>folk all the Pixar and I was basically like, how

0:02:31.196 --> 0:02:32.716
<v Speaker 3>is it you guys who were able to make stuff

0:02:32.716 --> 0:02:35.116
<v Speaker 3>that's like better? This is when they're making movies like

0:02:35.196 --> 0:02:39.316
<v Speaker 3>Up which had just these totally berserk narrative structures. And

0:02:39.356 --> 0:02:41.076
<v Speaker 3>so the anyway they let me inside, I learned all

0:02:41.076 --> 0:02:44.076
<v Speaker 3>this stuff. I thought it was totally fascinating. I realized

0:02:44.076 --> 0:02:45.916
<v Speaker 3>that they were making stories in a totally different way

0:02:45.916 --> 0:02:47.796
<v Speaker 3>than Hollywood was. So I went down to Hollywood to

0:02:47.796 --> 0:02:52.076
<v Speaker 3>advise Hollywood, and that led to me basically trying to

0:02:52.076 --> 0:02:54.996
<v Speaker 3>convince Hollywood by writing a series of screenplays the Pixar way,

0:02:55.676 --> 0:02:57.076
<v Speaker 3>because I thought that they would then allow me to

0:02:57.076 --> 0:02:59.116
<v Speaker 3>consult on movies. Instead, No, they just hired me to

0:02:59.116 --> 0:03:02.076
<v Speaker 3>write screenplays, and that's how I got an agent. And

0:03:02.076 --> 0:03:04.596
<v Speaker 3>then one day my agent called me up and because

0:03:04.596 --> 0:03:06.796
<v Speaker 3>he knew I'm just obsessed with the original Total Recall,

0:03:07.116 --> 0:03:10.196
<v Speaker 3>which had destroyed my mind when I was young, and

0:03:10.316 --> 0:03:12.116
<v Speaker 3>he was like, how would you like to work with

0:03:12.156 --> 0:03:14.396
<v Speaker 3>the writer of Total Recall, Gary Goldman?

0:03:14.556 --> 0:03:18.196
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how we got together. Gary.

0:03:18.196 --> 0:03:21.596
<v Speaker 2>Wait, Gary, you wrote Total Recall. Meet Guests number two,

0:03:22.236 --> 0:03:26.876
<v Speaker 2>Gary Goldman. He's also a screenwriter, but unlike Angus, has

0:03:26.916 --> 0:03:27.996
<v Speaker 2>no trouble admitting it.

0:03:28.556 --> 0:03:30.956
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I was the last writer on Total Recall. On

0:03:30.996 --> 0:03:32.396
<v Speaker 1>the first Total Recall.

0:03:32.276 --> 0:03:37.996
<v Speaker 2>Total Recall amazing movie, Arnold Schwarzenegger Sharon Stone, directed by

0:03:38.036 --> 0:03:38.796
<v Speaker 2>Paul Verhoven.

0:03:39.036 --> 0:03:39.196
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:39.236 --> 0:03:41.476
<v Speaker 1>So it was about a milk toast character who finds

0:03:41.516 --> 0:03:43.996
<v Speaker 1>out that he's not who he thinks he is, which

0:03:44.036 --> 0:03:45.876
<v Speaker 1>is that he's a kind of a super spy.

0:03:45.996 --> 0:03:46.596
<v Speaker 2>But how real?

0:03:46.636 --> 0:03:47.356
<v Speaker 1>Does it seem?

0:03:47.556 --> 0:03:50.596
<v Speaker 2>As real as any memory in your head? Come on,

0:03:50.876 --> 0:03:51.756
<v Speaker 2>don't bullshit me.

0:03:51.996 --> 0:03:54.036
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm telling you, Doug, your brain will not know

0:03:54.156 --> 0:03:56.436
<v Speaker 4>the difference, and that's guaranteed or your money back.

0:03:56.996 --> 0:04:00.116
<v Speaker 1>What about the guy you lobottomized? Did he get the refund?

0:04:00.476 --> 0:04:04.316
<v Speaker 2>Came out in nineteen ninety blockbuster tons of awards total

0:04:04.356 --> 0:04:06.916
<v Speaker 2>recall has a number of It has a genealogy. It's

0:04:06.956 --> 0:04:09.396
<v Speaker 2>not just to me. I mean, it has a short story.

0:04:09.436 --> 0:04:11.756
<v Speaker 2>The source material is from Philip K.

0:04:11.876 --> 0:04:17.076
<v Speaker 1>Dick. And then there was a fantastic original screenplay by

0:04:17.156 --> 0:04:21.556
<v Speaker 1>Dan O'Bannon and Ron Schussette that everybody loved from the beginning,

0:04:21.916 --> 0:04:25.236
<v Speaker 1>and this launched the project. In fact, this is sort

0:04:25.236 --> 0:04:29.676
<v Speaker 1>of the prime example of this idea of development hell,

0:04:30.076 --> 0:04:32.756
<v Speaker 1>which is that you sell something for a lot of

0:04:32.796 --> 0:04:35.756
<v Speaker 1>money and everybody's very excited about it, and they tell

0:04:35.796 --> 0:04:39.276
<v Speaker 1>you it's going to be a movie right away, and

0:04:39.316 --> 0:04:44.796
<v Speaker 1>then it goes into a process of development where everybody

0:04:44.876 --> 0:04:50.116
<v Speaker 1>has a hand in revising it and reconceptualizing it and

0:04:50.156 --> 0:04:53.276
<v Speaker 1>making it in their image and in the middle. Depending

0:04:53.276 --> 0:04:56.796
<v Speaker 1>on your involvement, you can be in development hell along

0:04:56.836 --> 0:05:00.636
<v Speaker 1>with the project, or you can be a bystander pushed

0:05:00.636 --> 0:05:03.196
<v Speaker 1>to the outside watching it go through the process of

0:05:03.236 --> 0:05:06.196
<v Speaker 1>development Hell with lots of other people, not including yourself.

0:05:06.996 --> 0:05:09.036
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're lucky it gets made at all.

0:05:09.236 --> 0:05:11.116
<v Speaker 1>The project had been in development for almost eight or

0:05:11.196 --> 0:05:12.596
<v Speaker 1>nine years when I got involved.

0:05:12.676 --> 0:05:16.116
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, eight or nine years. Yes, So if you go

0:05:16.276 --> 0:05:20.396
<v Speaker 2>back to the original screenplay, do you think that's a

0:05:20.436 --> 0:05:23.996
<v Speaker 2>better movie than the final screenplay?

0:05:24.836 --> 0:05:25.036
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:05:25.076 --> 0:05:25.756
<v Speaker 1>Not in my case.

0:05:28.356 --> 0:05:30.556
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying development hell is a bad thing. Accept

0:05:30.676 --> 0:05:33.796
<v Speaker 2>in the case where I'm involved in convicings, which, by

0:05:33.796 --> 0:05:37.076
<v Speaker 2>the way, a legitimate position that I would write, I'm

0:05:37.116 --> 0:05:38.716
<v Speaker 2>totally open to agree with that.

0:05:39.596 --> 0:05:41.396
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when I was starting out, I read the

0:05:41.436 --> 0:05:45.316
<v Speaker 1>original Total Recalled screenplay as a junior executor for a

0:05:45.356 --> 0:05:49.836
<v Speaker 1>producer who was considering making it and acquiring it. And

0:05:49.916 --> 0:05:52.156
<v Speaker 1>basically the problem that most people felt was that it

0:05:52.236 --> 0:05:59.676
<v Speaker 1>fell apart in the third act. So and this apparently,

0:05:59.676 --> 0:06:04.036
<v Speaker 1>it fell apart so disastrously that even though it had

0:06:04.076 --> 0:06:06.756
<v Speaker 1>many different stars and directors attached and people always wanted

0:06:06.756 --> 0:06:09.796
<v Speaker 1>to make it, it didn't cross the finish line. And

0:06:09.876 --> 0:06:11.356
<v Speaker 1>by the time it got to me it was eight

0:06:11.436 --> 0:06:14.236
<v Speaker 1>or nine years later. It had been in pre production

0:06:14.876 --> 0:06:22.276
<v Speaker 1>with Bruce Beresford and Patrick Swayzee and the producer Dino

0:06:22.356 --> 0:06:27.396
<v Speaker 1>Dilarentis in Australia, and in fact, Bruce Beresford asked me

0:06:27.476 --> 0:06:30.716
<v Speaker 1>to come over and do a rewrite on it, and

0:06:30.716 --> 0:06:32.316
<v Speaker 1>I said I couldn't because I was working with Paul

0:06:32.396 --> 0:06:36.796
<v Speaker 1>Verhovean on another project. But Dino went bankrupt. Arnold Schwarzenegger

0:06:36.836 --> 0:06:39.276
<v Speaker 1>had always loved the project and had been watching it.

0:06:39.956 --> 0:06:43.876
<v Speaker 1>He went the owners of the Carolco studio that had

0:06:43.916 --> 0:06:47.396
<v Speaker 1>done the Rambo movies and he said, you know, I

0:06:47.436 --> 0:06:50.196
<v Speaker 1>want to do this, and they bought it from Dio

0:06:50.276 --> 0:06:54.076
<v Speaker 1>Dilarentis out of bankruptcy for a humongous amount of money

0:06:55.436 --> 0:06:57.836
<v Speaker 1>and with the idea that Arnold was attached. Arnold wanted

0:06:57.836 --> 0:07:00.636
<v Speaker 1>to work with Paul Verhoven because Paul had just done

0:07:00.716 --> 0:07:03.916
<v Speaker 1>RoboCop and I was working with Paul Verhovean on a

0:07:03.956 --> 0:07:08.756
<v Speaker 1>movie called about Out of Body Travel, and Paul said

0:07:08.796 --> 0:07:11.276
<v Speaker 1>he didn't think it was ready to shoot and that

0:07:11.396 --> 0:07:13.236
<v Speaker 1>he was going to leave our project and go do

0:07:13.356 --> 0:07:15.476
<v Speaker 1>another project, and he was apologizing to me for that.

0:07:15.996 --> 0:07:18.236
<v Speaker 1>I said, what's the other project and he said Total Recall.

0:07:18.476 --> 0:07:20.236
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, that's really funny, Paul, because I turned

0:07:20.276 --> 0:07:23.236
<v Speaker 1>down totally the chance to rewrite Total Recall because I

0:07:23.276 --> 0:07:25.836
<v Speaker 1>was working with you, and he said, well, what did

0:07:25.876 --> 0:07:28.156
<v Speaker 1>you think about it? And I told him my take

0:07:28.236 --> 0:07:29.716
<v Speaker 1>and he said, well, you know, that's pretty much how

0:07:29.716 --> 0:07:31.156
<v Speaker 1>I see it too. Let me let me see if

0:07:31.196 --> 0:07:32.516
<v Speaker 1>I can get you the job to rewrite it.

0:07:32.476 --> 0:07:35.996
<v Speaker 2>Gary, Gary, Gary got worried. We want to talk with

0:07:36.116 --> 0:07:38.076
<v Speaker 2>his other project. But now I'm thinking we can come

0:07:38.116 --> 0:07:40.676
<v Speaker 2>back to total recall or is this all leading up

0:07:40.676 --> 0:07:44.236
<v Speaker 2>to the other project. Well, they're connected, yeah, So what's

0:07:44.236 --> 0:07:47.476
<v Speaker 2>the connection? The connection is I would say Philip K. Dick,

0:07:48.436 --> 0:07:52.316
<v Speaker 2>Philip K. Dick, sci Fi Master. To name just a

0:07:52.356 --> 0:07:58.716
<v Speaker 2>few other Philip K. Dick film adaptations, Blade Runner, Minority Report, Scanner, Darkly,

0:07:59.236 --> 0:08:01.956
<v Speaker 2>Philip K. Dick is probably the most important sci fi

0:08:01.996 --> 0:08:05.436
<v Speaker 2>writer ever, or at least of the last hundred years.

0:08:06.356 --> 0:08:09.516
<v Speaker 2>After working on Minority Report, Gary was becoming a bit

0:08:09.516 --> 0:08:12.596
<v Speaker 2>of a Philip K. Dick specialist, which is not a

0:08:12.596 --> 0:08:14.596
<v Speaker 2>bad thing to be in a town that loves sci

0:08:14.636 --> 0:08:19.996
<v Speaker 2>fi adaptations. When we get back, Gary and Angus go

0:08:20.116 --> 0:08:35.396
<v Speaker 2>to work on adapting another of his stories. We're back

0:08:35.556 --> 0:08:38.436
<v Speaker 2>with Angus Fletcher and Gary Goldman, who've just been set

0:08:38.516 --> 0:08:41.796
<v Speaker 2>up to work together on an adaptation of a Philip K.

0:08:41.956 --> 0:08:45.876
<v Speaker 1>Dick story. I've done four projects based on Philip K.

0:08:45.996 --> 0:08:50.556
<v Speaker 1>Dick material. This would become my calling card in Hollywood

0:08:50.596 --> 0:08:52.796
<v Speaker 1>was that I did Philip K. Dick adaptations.

0:08:53.236 --> 0:08:58.236
<v Speaker 2>So, Angus, wait, did you have a particular affection for

0:08:58.276 --> 0:09:00.676
<v Speaker 2>Philip K. Dick prior to this project?

0:09:00.996 --> 0:09:03.396
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean I loved the movie Total Reco And

0:09:03.436 --> 0:09:06.036
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to acknowledge that I was such a philistine

0:09:06.076 --> 0:09:07.596
<v Speaker 3>that I had no idea that it came from Philip K.

0:09:07.636 --> 0:09:07.876
<v Speaker 1>Dick.

0:09:08.476 --> 0:09:10.516
<v Speaker 3>And happened was the moment I got the call from

0:09:10.516 --> 0:09:13.396
<v Speaker 3>my agent. I then went and read all of Philip K.

0:09:13.556 --> 0:09:19.076
<v Speaker 3>Dick and it's surreal. I mean, he sort of went

0:09:19.116 --> 0:09:23.716
<v Speaker 3>from science fiction into religion. And I called Gary up

0:09:23.756 --> 0:09:25.076
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, well, Gary, I was like, what

0:09:25.116 --> 0:09:25.996
<v Speaker 3>do you think you know?

0:09:26.596 --> 0:09:27.956
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to work with you. And the main reason

0:09:27.996 --> 0:09:29.716
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to work with Gary is.

0:09:29.676 --> 0:09:33.036
<v Speaker 3>Because I believe that screenwriters had the ability to see

0:09:33.036 --> 0:09:35.516
<v Speaker 3>the future, because I think this is a common power

0:09:35.556 --> 0:09:40.636
<v Speaker 3>of story. I think that science fiction is always about

0:09:40.796 --> 0:09:44.436
<v Speaker 3>intuiting what's going to happen next. And so I said

0:09:44.476 --> 0:09:46.996
<v Speaker 3>to Gary, I said, Gary, what do you think the

0:09:47.036 --> 0:09:50.276
<v Speaker 3>future is? And he said, Angus, read this story, variable

0:09:50.316 --> 0:09:53.196
<v Speaker 3>man and the premise of Variable Man's very simple. It's

0:09:53.196 --> 0:09:54.836
<v Speaker 3>basically just about a future in which there are these

0:09:54.876 --> 0:09:58.836
<v Speaker 3>computers who used this histics to predict everything's going to happen.

0:10:00.436 --> 0:10:02.316
<v Speaker 3>And I said, you know, Gary, this seems weirdly like

0:10:02.356 --> 0:10:04.036
<v Speaker 3>the world we're accelerating it to now.

0:10:04.556 --> 0:10:08.076
<v Speaker 1>And he said, yeah, he said it is. And he said, and.

0:10:08.076 --> 0:10:10.236
<v Speaker 3>I have a premise or a story that I'd like

0:10:10.276 --> 0:10:12.076
<v Speaker 3>to pitch to you that I think will kind of

0:10:12.076 --> 0:10:13.996
<v Speaker 3>be as big, if not bigger, than total recall.

0:10:14.076 --> 0:10:16.796
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we got started, was with his pitch

0:10:16.876 --> 0:10:21.316
<v Speaker 1>to me. And is the So the Variable Man's Story

0:10:22.356 --> 0:10:27.196
<v Speaker 1>was written when, Oh, I don't know about nineteen fifty, probably.

0:10:26.836 --> 0:10:29.716
<v Speaker 2>Oh I see, Oh it really so. Imagining in nineteen

0:10:29.756 --> 0:10:32.916
<v Speaker 2>fifty a world in which computers predict everything is kind

0:10:32.916 --> 0:10:35.756
<v Speaker 2>of great if you're in the twenty When when did

0:10:35.796 --> 0:10:38.316
<v Speaker 2>you guys, When did you guys work together on this project?

0:10:38.356 --> 0:10:40.916
<v Speaker 2>What was the early two thousand, early two thousands? So

0:10:40.996 --> 0:10:44.596
<v Speaker 2>you have and so were you were you being faithful

0:10:44.636 --> 0:10:47.436
<v Speaker 2>to the Philip K. Dick short story or were you

0:10:47.676 --> 0:10:49.396
<v Speaker 2>were you changing it in useful ways?

0:10:49.596 --> 0:10:52.356
<v Speaker 3>We were changing it in useful ways. And there a

0:10:52.436 --> 0:10:54.956
<v Speaker 3>couple a couple of big things. So, first of all,

0:10:55.636 --> 0:10:58.196
<v Speaker 3>Gary's pitch to me was he was like, imagine a

0:10:58.276 --> 0:11:03.036
<v Speaker 3>future in which computers don't just predict things like they

0:11:03.076 --> 0:11:03.716
<v Speaker 3>do in the Philip K.

0:11:03.796 --> 0:11:05.196
<v Speaker 1>Dick story, which is who wins this war?

0:11:05.476 --> 0:11:07.036
<v Speaker 3>But he says, you know, imagine that they're able to

0:11:07.076 --> 0:11:08.916
<v Speaker 3>predict exactly.

0:11:08.516 --> 0:11:10.836
<v Speaker 1>What food you'd like to eat right now. And then

0:11:10.876 --> 0:11:12.556
<v Speaker 1>he said, and then imagine.

0:11:12.156 --> 0:11:15.396
<v Speaker 3>That they're able to predict a gift that you can

0:11:15.436 --> 0:11:18.156
<v Speaker 3>give to your best friend for their birthday. And that

0:11:18.196 --> 0:11:20.836
<v Speaker 3>gift is so good that your friend not only loves it,

0:11:20.876 --> 0:11:24.996
<v Speaker 3>but it seems perfectly like it came from you. And

0:11:25.036 --> 0:11:27.756
<v Speaker 3>then he said, imagine the computers can pick your soulmate.

0:11:28.716 --> 0:11:32.116
<v Speaker 3>Imagine the computers can pick the person that you love

0:11:32.276 --> 0:11:36.836
<v Speaker 3>so totally and so absolutely that you know that.

0:11:36.836 --> 0:11:40.596
<v Speaker 1>This computer knows you better than yourself. And I said,

0:11:40.636 --> 0:11:41.036
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:11:41.356 --> 0:11:44.076
<v Speaker 3>And then he said, and now imagine, after you've given

0:11:44.116 --> 0:11:46.836
<v Speaker 3>yourself up totally these computers, you wake up one morning

0:11:47.196 --> 0:11:49.356
<v Speaker 3>and they say to you, in twenty four hours, the

0:11:49.476 --> 0:11:52.316
<v Speaker 3>world is going to end because humanity is going to

0:11:52.316 --> 0:11:57.596
<v Speaker 3>destroy itself. And I've crunched all the variables and there's

0:11:57.676 --> 0:12:01.436
<v Speaker 3>no opportunity for you to do anything. That's the starting

0:12:01.476 --> 0:12:02.276
<v Speaker 3>point for the story.

0:12:02.596 --> 0:12:05.596
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, So wait, how far have we traveled?

0:12:06.676 --> 0:12:08.956
<v Speaker 2>We've traveled quite significantly from Philip K. Dick At this

0:12:09.676 --> 0:12:11.996
<v Speaker 2>he was just imagining a world where there were these

0:12:12.036 --> 0:12:15.116
<v Speaker 2>computers that were predicting the outcome of a war, and

0:12:15.156 --> 0:12:19.396
<v Speaker 2>the computer's run across a problem. That's basically the plot,

0:12:19.476 --> 0:12:20.396
<v Speaker 2>well right.

0:12:20.876 --> 0:12:24.156
<v Speaker 1>The title variable Man. Because the other thing that Philip K.

0:12:24.236 --> 0:12:26.556
<v Speaker 3>Dick did, which he intuited I think at a moment

0:12:26.596 --> 0:12:29.716
<v Speaker 3>of genius, was what would happen if you put a

0:12:29.836 --> 0:12:34.156
<v Speaker 3>person who the computers had no information on into the

0:12:34.196 --> 0:12:36.996
<v Speaker 3>middle of the statistical world. So these are all these

0:12:36.996 --> 0:12:39.396
<v Speaker 3>computers that are able to see the future because they

0:12:39.436 --> 0:12:41.636
<v Speaker 3>have all the data, but there's one person who they

0:12:41.676 --> 0:12:44.956
<v Speaker 3>have no data on. And so the starting point for

0:12:45.036 --> 0:12:47.956
<v Speaker 3>the screenplay that Carried and I did was humanity goes,

0:12:48.036 --> 0:12:50.156
<v Speaker 3>oh my goodness, we're going to die tomorrow. Our only

0:12:50.196 --> 0:12:53.156
<v Speaker 3>option is to bring in someone who the computer has

0:12:53.196 --> 0:12:58.476
<v Speaker 3>no data on, the variable man, the person who is unpredictable, unknown.

0:12:58.756 --> 0:13:00.356
<v Speaker 1>And so, just like in the original Philip K.

0:13:00.436 --> 0:13:04.436
<v Speaker 3>Dick's story, we reached back into time, back into history

0:13:04.716 --> 0:13:08.996
<v Speaker 3>before the computers and pluck this person into the present.

0:13:09.236 --> 0:13:11.876
<v Speaker 3>And that's basically the beginning of the screenplay is when

0:13:11.876 --> 0:13:14.276
<v Speaker 3>the variable man arrives in this world where everything has

0:13:14.316 --> 0:13:16.956
<v Speaker 3>been planned, everything has been predetermined, the computers know everything.

0:13:17.396 --> 0:13:18.196
<v Speaker 1>We're all going to die.

0:13:18.516 --> 0:13:23.356
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now the way with so many, so many wonderful uh, Gary,

0:13:23.556 --> 0:13:27.196
<v Speaker 2>tell me a little bit about your thought process in

0:13:27.356 --> 0:13:31.636
<v Speaker 2>moving from the original Philip K. Dick notion to the

0:13:31.636 --> 0:13:35.156
<v Speaker 2>one that Anglish has described. Tell me about the leaps

0:13:35.156 --> 0:13:38.356
<v Speaker 2>that you made there and why you made them?

0:13:38.756 --> 0:13:45.196
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So, I suppose I was very interested in AI.

0:13:46.036 --> 0:13:47.996
<v Speaker 1>You know, everyone's thinking about it now, but it wasn't

0:13:48.036 --> 0:13:52.556
<v Speaker 1>brand new. And I saw this idea that that of

0:13:52.596 --> 0:13:54.836
<v Speaker 1>the computer that can predict everything, and that you have

0:13:54.876 --> 0:14:00.316
<v Speaker 1>to give up control to the computer because it's it's

0:14:00.356 --> 0:14:04.276
<v Speaker 1>working so fast, uh, And I wanted to sort of

0:14:05.036 --> 0:14:11.116
<v Speaker 1>imagine this sort of trajectory of of going from where

0:14:11.116 --> 0:14:14.236
<v Speaker 1>we are now to the point where the computer is

0:14:14.276 --> 0:14:19.156
<v Speaker 1>in total control. And I was really and I remain

0:14:19.276 --> 0:14:24.116
<v Speaker 1>concerned about this question of decision making and how do

0:14:24.156 --> 0:14:26.836
<v Speaker 1>we make decisions? And if the computer can make better

0:14:26.876 --> 0:14:31.436
<v Speaker 1>decisions than we do, then what is the role of

0:14:31.476 --> 0:14:36.356
<v Speaker 1>free will? And if you spend a whole life just

0:14:36.396 --> 0:14:38.796
<v Speaker 1>simply doing what the computer tells you to do. What

0:14:38.916 --> 0:14:42.876
<v Speaker 1>is identity. So I wanted to put this hero who

0:14:42.916 --> 0:14:45.676
<v Speaker 1>comes from the past and who still is accustomed to

0:14:45.716 --> 0:14:48.316
<v Speaker 1>having free will and his power is to have free will,

0:14:48.996 --> 0:14:53.156
<v Speaker 1>and to put it in the situation where whenever he

0:14:53.236 --> 0:14:56.316
<v Speaker 1>listens to the computer, everything goes right, and whenever he

0:14:56.356 --> 0:14:57.996
<v Speaker 1>trusts his own judgment, it's wrong.

0:14:58.276 --> 0:15:01.956
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, wait, wait, so the AI, the AI is

0:15:01.956 --> 0:15:04.316
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to realize that the only way to save

0:15:04.396 --> 0:15:08.556
<v Speaker 2>the world is to bring someone in from outside AI. Yeah, oh,

0:15:08.556 --> 0:15:11.276
<v Speaker 2>the AI a little bit of self knowledge and humility

0:15:11.436 --> 0:15:12.036
<v Speaker 2>in your world.

0:15:12.076 --> 0:15:14.316
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that was one of our best things. We

0:15:14.396 --> 0:15:17.996
<v Speaker 1>created this wonderful AI, a wonderful character called We named

0:15:18.076 --> 0:15:21.596
<v Speaker 1>him Plato, and uh, he's you know, he's sort of

0:15:21.596 --> 0:15:23.356
<v Speaker 1>somewhere We're going to Butler and God.

0:15:23.716 --> 0:15:27.676
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's this is this is getting better and better.

0:15:27.756 --> 0:15:30.116
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna chime in there and uh and just

0:15:30.276 --> 0:15:33.196
<v Speaker 3>and just say that basically, in this society, there are

0:15:33.236 --> 0:15:34.876
<v Speaker 3>a few people that have tuned out and they're like,

0:15:34.956 --> 0:15:36.076
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to listen to this computer.

0:15:36.076 --> 0:15:36.996
<v Speaker 1>Where does this computer know?

0:15:37.556 --> 0:15:40.876
<v Speaker 3>And their lives are horrible and all their decisions are bad,

0:15:41.316 --> 0:15:44.436
<v Speaker 3>and they decide to choose their own soulmates, and they

0:15:44.476 --> 0:15:45.716
<v Speaker 3>have horrible marriages.

0:15:46.116 --> 0:15:46.996
<v Speaker 1>And then everyone who.

0:15:46.956 --> 0:15:50.356
<v Speaker 3>Listens to exactly what the computer says has this Instagram

0:15:50.396 --> 0:15:53.596
<v Speaker 3>life where they are actually so happy and their kids

0:15:53.636 --> 0:15:55.876
<v Speaker 3>are so perfect and everything is so amazing.

0:15:56.356 --> 0:15:58.436
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, Cole comes into this world. Our

0:15:58.476 --> 0:15:59.876
<v Speaker 1>hero comes into this world.

0:15:59.996 --> 0:16:03.316
<v Speaker 3>And he of course finds an appalling and as as

0:16:03.316 --> 0:16:05.676
<v Speaker 3>appalling as we would find it, and he's determined to

0:16:05.716 --> 0:16:08.676
<v Speaker 3>ignore Plato. He's determined to ignore the AI that has

0:16:08.716 --> 0:16:11.956
<v Speaker 3>brought into the future to save humanity from itself. So

0:16:12.036 --> 0:16:15.076
<v Speaker 3>this is another kind of unfolding paradox is humanity doesn't

0:16:15.116 --> 0:16:17.516
<v Speaker 3>want to save itself. It means listening to the computers

0:16:17.636 --> 0:16:18.716
<v Speaker 3>on how to save itself.

0:16:19.356 --> 0:16:20.836
<v Speaker 1>Wait, wait, so many questions.

0:16:21.036 --> 0:16:22.796
<v Speaker 2>First of all, tell me a little bit about so

0:16:23.596 --> 0:16:26.956
<v Speaker 2>our variable man is called as in the Philip K.

0:16:27.036 --> 0:16:30.116
<v Speaker 2>Dick story, your veryble man is called coal. Tell me

0:16:30.156 --> 0:16:34.636
<v Speaker 2>about your coal? And where does he come from? What's

0:16:34.636 --> 0:16:35.476
<v Speaker 2>his personality?

0:16:35.636 --> 0:16:35.716
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:16:35.836 --> 0:16:38.316
<v Speaker 2>Why is he? Why is he the way? Why is

0:16:38.356 --> 0:16:43.196
<v Speaker 2>he so capable of standing up to AI even if

0:16:43.236 --> 0:16:45.196
<v Speaker 2>AI has all these demonistrable advantages.

0:16:46.676 --> 0:16:49.476
<v Speaker 1>So basically he's just a classic action hero.

0:16:49.876 --> 0:16:53.556
<v Speaker 3>The idea is he embodies kind of our cowboy American

0:16:53.756 --> 0:16:58.756
<v Speaker 3>trust in our guts. And so the opening sequence, he's

0:16:58.756 --> 0:17:03.156
<v Speaker 3>sent in to stop this hacker, this hacker who's been

0:17:03.196 --> 0:17:06.476
<v Speaker 3>creating chaos across the world, who's been sort of, you know,

0:17:06.556 --> 0:17:09.436
<v Speaker 3>getting into all these top secret facilities and creating we

0:17:09.436 --> 0:17:11.436
<v Speaker 3>think he's gonna launch world War three whatever.

0:17:11.476 --> 0:17:14.156
<v Speaker 1>And so Cole goes in and he's being sort of

0:17:14.156 --> 0:17:14.836
<v Speaker 1>instructed what.

0:17:14.836 --> 0:17:16.836
<v Speaker 3>To do, and we already had these computers at this

0:17:16.916 --> 0:17:18.876
<v Speaker 3>time that are sort of running the percentages and telling

0:17:18.956 --> 0:17:20.996
<v Speaker 3>him do this, do this, do this, do this other thing,

0:17:21.676 --> 0:17:23.756
<v Speaker 3>and he's listening to the computers.

0:17:23.796 --> 0:17:24.516
<v Speaker 1>He's breaking in.

0:17:24.596 --> 0:17:27.156
<v Speaker 3>He finally gets to the heart of the layer where

0:17:27.836 --> 0:17:31.036
<v Speaker 3>this hacker is, and he kicks down the door and

0:17:31.076 --> 0:17:34.236
<v Speaker 3>he points his gun and then the hacker turns around

0:17:34.956 --> 0:17:39.956
<v Speaker 3>and it's a child, and Cole realizes, oh, my goodness,

0:17:40.356 --> 0:17:42.396
<v Speaker 3>this is the hacker. This is the person who's been

0:17:42.396 --> 0:17:45.636
<v Speaker 3>creating all this chaos. And he gets this word on

0:17:45.676 --> 0:17:49.156
<v Speaker 3>his earpiece, kill the hacker, and he says, I can't

0:17:49.196 --> 0:17:49.716
<v Speaker 3>kill the hacker.

0:17:49.716 --> 0:17:50.396
<v Speaker 1>This is a child.

0:17:50.796 --> 0:17:53.196
<v Speaker 3>And there's this long pause and they say, look, we've

0:17:53.236 --> 0:17:57.076
<v Speaker 3>run all the numbers. If you don't kill the kid.

0:17:57.836 --> 0:18:01.556
<v Speaker 3>This is going to happen again. Pull the trigger and

0:18:02.436 --> 0:18:04.396
<v Speaker 3>he stands there in the moment. Can I pull the trigger?

0:18:04.436 --> 0:18:06.276
<v Speaker 3>Can I pull the sugar? And then he doesn't do it.

0:18:06.276 --> 0:18:07.796
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't pull the trigger, He drops the gun, he

0:18:07.796 --> 0:18:10.956
<v Speaker 3>grabs a kid, and what essentially happens is he dies

0:18:11.356 --> 0:18:14.676
<v Speaker 3>saving the kid's life. There's a fireball that blows him up,

0:18:14.916 --> 0:18:16.596
<v Speaker 3>but the kid goes on and the kid lives.

0:18:16.876 --> 0:18:19.516
<v Speaker 1>And because that fireball incinerates him.

0:18:20.116 --> 0:18:22.756
<v Speaker 3>He can be brought into the future without changing time

0:18:23.796 --> 0:18:26.676
<v Speaker 3>because he was essentially eliminated from the timeline. So if

0:18:26.716 --> 0:18:29.436
<v Speaker 3>you reach into the exact moment just before he dies

0:18:29.836 --> 0:18:32.756
<v Speaker 3>and pull him into the future, time isn't changed. And

0:18:32.796 --> 0:18:35.196
<v Speaker 3>so he's the perfect person to bring back because he

0:18:35.196 --> 0:18:37.796
<v Speaker 3>has demonstrated the ability to say no to the computers,

0:18:38.316 --> 0:18:42.116
<v Speaker 3>and also because taking him doesn't change time.

0:18:42.916 --> 0:18:44.676
<v Speaker 2>Oh I see so in the Fruit, when we meet

0:18:44.756 --> 0:18:49.636
<v Speaker 2>Cole's he's part of the present, he's not. He's He's

0:18:49.636 --> 0:18:52.076
<v Speaker 2>just a guy who's standing up to the tyranny of AI.

0:18:52.596 --> 0:18:55.556
<v Speaker 2>Here's an action hero who's AI has been corrupted by

0:18:55.596 --> 0:18:59.276
<v Speaker 2>this hacker. He's started to solve the problem. He fails

0:18:59.316 --> 0:19:02.836
<v Speaker 2>as an incident. How much time passes between that initial

0:19:02.916 --> 0:19:05.196
<v Speaker 2>encounter with the hacker and then when our story is

0:19:05.196 --> 0:19:05.756
<v Speaker 2>taking place.

0:19:06.916 --> 0:19:09.916
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is part of the twist because when you

0:19:09.996 --> 0:19:12.316
<v Speaker 3>get into the future, you think that an enormous amount

0:19:12.356 --> 0:19:15.676
<v Speaker 3>of time has passed because the future is radically different

0:19:15.956 --> 0:19:19.996
<v Speaker 3>from when Cole disappeared, and it's so different that he

0:19:20.036 --> 0:19:20.836
<v Speaker 3>can't believe it.

0:19:21.996 --> 0:19:22.836
<v Speaker 1>But we start to.

0:19:22.836 --> 0:19:25.636
<v Speaker 3>Learn that actually a very small amount of time, much

0:19:25.676 --> 0:19:28.596
<v Speaker 3>more less time than you might suspect, has passed between

0:19:28.596 --> 0:19:30.916
<v Speaker 3>when he died and when he was brought back because

0:19:30.956 --> 0:19:34.316
<v Speaker 3>these computers, as Gary was saying, have accelerated human decision

0:19:34.356 --> 0:19:36.156
<v Speaker 3>making to the points that our.

0:19:35.996 --> 0:19:37.756
<v Speaker 1>Society has started to run on this.

0:19:37.796 --> 0:19:41.716
<v Speaker 3>Utopia cycle and everything is just going much faster and

0:19:41.796 --> 0:19:43.996
<v Speaker 3>much better than anyone could have imagined in our time.

0:19:44.916 --> 0:19:47.956
<v Speaker 1>And it's because of this great genius who was the kid.

0:19:48.396 --> 0:19:51.636
<v Speaker 1>The kid is is the thing that made the difference

0:19:51.876 --> 0:19:54.316
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't kill him. Because Cole didn't kill him,

0:19:54.396 --> 0:19:57.436
<v Speaker 1>he survived and he became the great genius that ushered

0:19:57.516 --> 0:20:00.276
<v Speaker 1>us into this accelerated utopia.

0:20:00.436 --> 0:20:02.916
<v Speaker 2>Now, why one thing I don't understand. If we are

0:20:02.916 --> 0:20:06.396
<v Speaker 2>in accelerated utopia, why do we need saving? Why would

0:20:06.556 --> 0:20:10.596
<v Speaker 2>utopia have a kind of expiry date. Isn't the definition

0:20:10.636 --> 0:20:12.716
<v Speaker 2>of utopia that it keeps going in perpetuity?

0:20:13.836 --> 0:20:15.236
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, so this is part of the great

0:20:15.236 --> 0:20:17.356
<v Speaker 3>middle of the beginning of the story is why is

0:20:17.396 --> 0:20:20.436
<v Speaker 3>it exactly that we're going to die? What could possibly

0:20:20.476 --> 0:20:23.756
<v Speaker 3>go wrong? Everything seems like it's perfect. What is going

0:20:23.756 --> 0:20:26.916
<v Speaker 3>to destroy the world? Well, nobody is able to identify

0:20:26.956 --> 0:20:29.236
<v Speaker 3>exactly at the beginning of the movie what's going to

0:20:29.276 --> 0:20:30.996
<v Speaker 3>go on. All they know is that the computers are

0:20:31.076 --> 0:20:33.636
<v Speaker 3>quite insistent that is going to happen in the next

0:20:33.636 --> 0:20:37.076
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hours. And what happens over the middle parts

0:20:37.076 --> 0:20:41.356
<v Speaker 3>of the screenplay is various different alternatives start to emerge.

0:20:41.396 --> 0:20:44.396
<v Speaker 3>We start to see all of these different moving pieces,

0:20:44.436 --> 0:20:46.676
<v Speaker 3>and we start to realize, oh, sure, you know it's

0:20:46.676 --> 0:20:49.276
<v Speaker 3>a utopia, but there's still humans in it, and there's

0:20:49.276 --> 0:20:52.236
<v Speaker 3>still other things going on. And I don't know how

0:20:52.236 --> 0:20:54.676
<v Speaker 3>many of the twists you want me to ruin up, Malcolm.

0:20:54.676 --> 0:20:56.956
<v Speaker 3>But one of the things that starts to become a

0:20:57.036 --> 0:21:02.076
<v Speaker 3>question that haunts the hero is is he the one

0:21:02.076 --> 0:21:05.796
<v Speaker 3>who's going to destroy the world? Is what the computers

0:21:05.836 --> 0:21:10.876
<v Speaker 3>saw that he would get brought back and that by

0:21:10.916 --> 0:21:13.476
<v Speaker 3>not listening to the computers. He was going to be

0:21:13.516 --> 0:21:14.716
<v Speaker 3>the one that blows everything up.

0:21:15.556 --> 0:21:17.916
<v Speaker 2>You know what this is, if I might reduce your

0:21:18.596 --> 0:21:22.636
<v Speaker 2>whole premise to an axiom. This is the cinematic version

0:21:23.276 --> 0:21:25.676
<v Speaker 2>of the famous adage in the Land of the Blind,

0:21:26.356 --> 0:21:30.556
<v Speaker 2>the one eyed man is king right. Yeap, your coal

0:21:30.676 --> 0:21:32.996
<v Speaker 2>is your one eyed man who is asked to be

0:21:33.076 --> 0:21:36.476
<v Speaker 2>king right. And what you're describing just there is he

0:21:36.596 --> 0:21:39.436
<v Speaker 2>knows he only has one eye right. He's wrestling with

0:21:39.436 --> 0:21:41.356
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he can't see it all. It's sort

0:21:41.396 --> 0:21:45.596
<v Speaker 2>of beautiful. Let me give you a little recap of

0:21:45.596 --> 0:21:49.836
<v Speaker 2>where we are. There's a perfect utopia where AI runs everything.

0:21:50.316 --> 0:21:52.996
<v Speaker 2>People do what computers tell them to do and are

0:21:52.996 --> 0:21:56.636
<v Speaker 2>better for it. For reasons we don't quite understand yet,

0:21:56.836 --> 0:22:00.276
<v Speaker 2>this utopia is in danger. In order to save it,

0:22:00.836 --> 0:22:04.636
<v Speaker 2>the AI named Plato no Less brings back to life

0:22:04.716 --> 0:22:11.196
<v Speaker 2>a guy who defied its commands in the past. After

0:22:11.236 --> 0:22:14.516
<v Speaker 2>the break, Gary and Angus try to get the movie made.

0:22:25.116 --> 0:22:27.596
<v Speaker 2>So tell me about your tell me more about your goal.

0:22:27.716 --> 0:22:31.956
<v Speaker 2>So does he who who do you imagine playing your goal?

0:22:32.116 --> 0:22:34.796
<v Speaker 1>So we actually had we had quite a lot of interest.

0:22:34.956 --> 0:22:38.356
<v Speaker 3>We had interest from Bradley Cooper's people.

0:22:38.396 --> 0:22:41.556
<v Speaker 1>We had interest from Mark Wahlberg's people. But the one

0:22:41.596 --> 0:22:43.276
<v Speaker 1>thing that was always common.

0:22:43.356 --> 0:22:47.836
<v Speaker 3>Was that people became increasingly disturbed about the paradox at

0:22:47.836 --> 0:22:51.316
<v Speaker 3>the center of Paul Psyche, because if you're going to

0:22:51.396 --> 0:22:54.116
<v Speaker 3>play this part, you have to wrestle with all of

0:22:54.156 --> 0:22:57.716
<v Speaker 3>these sort of profound questions, And one of the most

0:22:57.716 --> 0:23:03.076
<v Speaker 3>profound questions is that what the computers are doing is

0:23:03.076 --> 0:23:07.436
<v Speaker 3>they're saying, trust us. And the reason they get us

0:23:07.476 --> 0:23:09.716
<v Speaker 3>to trust them is by being able to predict our

0:23:09.756 --> 0:23:10.796
<v Speaker 3>most intimate choice.

0:23:11.796 --> 0:23:12.516
<v Speaker 1>They're able to.

0:23:12.436 --> 0:23:15.916
<v Speaker 3>Predict our heart. They're able to know our heart better

0:23:15.956 --> 0:23:18.276
<v Speaker 3>than we know our heart. They're able to say, you're

0:23:18.276 --> 0:23:20.836
<v Speaker 3>going to love this person, and when you meet this person,

0:23:20.876 --> 0:23:23.116
<v Speaker 3>your entire life is going to be changed. And the

0:23:23.116 --> 0:23:25.636
<v Speaker 3>computer does this to Cole when he gets into the future.

0:23:26.276 --> 0:23:29.196
<v Speaker 3>Is he picks the perfect person for Coal and they

0:23:29.236 --> 0:23:31.676
<v Speaker 3>fall in love immediately. In fact, they fall in love

0:23:31.756 --> 0:23:33.156
<v Speaker 3>so fast that they don't even know that they were

0:23:33.156 --> 0:23:34.076
<v Speaker 3>set up by the computer.

0:23:34.236 --> 0:23:36.076
<v Speaker 1>They only figure it out after the fact.

0:23:37.036 --> 0:23:42.076
<v Speaker 3>So now Cole knows that the computer has told him

0:23:42.636 --> 0:23:44.796
<v Speaker 3>this is who you're going to love, this is your soulmate.

0:23:45.596 --> 0:23:49.076
<v Speaker 3>And the computer has also told him the world is

0:23:49.076 --> 0:23:52.596
<v Speaker 3>going to end, and so essentially the existential choice facing

0:23:52.676 --> 0:23:55.396
<v Speaker 3>Coal is is my heart wrong.

0:23:56.796 --> 0:23:59.716
<v Speaker 1>And I don't love this woman and the world is

0:23:59.756 --> 0:24:01.516
<v Speaker 1>going to be fine, or.

0:24:01.436 --> 0:24:04.036
<v Speaker 3>By following my heart and accepting that I love this woman,

0:24:04.156 --> 0:24:05.116
<v Speaker 3>is everyone going to die?

0:24:06.116 --> 0:24:08.396
<v Speaker 1>And that he has to listen to the computer when

0:24:08.436 --> 0:24:12.636
<v Speaker 1>the computer gives him a mission, and the computer's mission

0:24:12.676 --> 0:24:16.036
<v Speaker 1>for him is to kill someone. Is to kill the

0:24:16.036 --> 0:24:20.876
<v Speaker 1>person who's going to trigger the singularity.

0:24:18.676 --> 0:24:22.396
<v Speaker 2>Same mission as was given him before he was incinerated.

0:24:22.916 --> 0:24:26.716
<v Speaker 1>That's right, but on a much bigger and more advanced scale. Yeah,

0:24:26.756 --> 0:24:29.436
<v Speaker 1>And the twist is that the person who he has

0:24:29.476 --> 0:24:31.276
<v Speaker 1>to kill is, of course the person that he saved

0:24:31.276 --> 0:24:35.036
<v Speaker 1>when he was a child. And the further twist is

0:24:35.076 --> 0:24:37.676
<v Speaker 1>that that person is the father of the girl he's

0:24:37.876 --> 0:24:40.796
<v Speaker 1>been matched with, who he's fallen in love with, and

0:24:40.876 --> 0:24:43.356
<v Speaker 1>that he's been set up to be with this girl

0:24:43.356 --> 0:24:45.636
<v Speaker 1>because she's going to bring him home to Daddy and

0:24:45.676 --> 0:24:48.796
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way to get through daddy's security.

0:24:49.716 --> 0:24:56.876
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, so good, it's so good. Why let's

0:24:56.876 --> 0:24:58.956
<v Speaker 2>go back. So you had the interest from these actors

0:24:59.036 --> 0:25:01.916
<v Speaker 2>in playing Cole, But why did they have when you

0:25:01.956 --> 0:25:05.276
<v Speaker 2>said they had trouble with that twist. It sounds to

0:25:05.316 --> 0:25:08.996
<v Speaker 2>me like this is an extraordinary opportunity for a skilled actor.

0:25:09.516 --> 0:25:10.836
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean they had trouble with it.

0:25:11.516 --> 0:25:14.236
<v Speaker 3>Well, so I think that when you think about why

0:25:14.276 --> 0:25:17.476
<v Speaker 3>total Recall got made, Arnold Schwarzninger has the capacity to

0:25:17.516 --> 0:25:20.236
<v Speaker 3>be himself and also be meta Ornald at the same time.

0:25:20.356 --> 0:25:22.236
<v Speaker 3>So he's the capacity to kind of laugh at himself

0:25:22.236 --> 0:25:25.276
<v Speaker 3>at the same time he's being himself. This part requires

0:25:25.316 --> 0:25:29.076
<v Speaker 3>that ability to be yourself and be outside yourself at

0:25:29.116 --> 0:25:33.676
<v Speaker 3>the same time, and it forces you also to go

0:25:33.836 --> 0:25:38.316
<v Speaker 3>against the kind of core fantasy of Hollywood, which is

0:25:38.356 --> 0:25:41.916
<v Speaker 3>that love saves the world.

0:25:42.476 --> 0:25:45.276
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to yourself, that saves the world.

0:25:45.476 --> 0:25:49.316
<v Speaker 3>And so this caused a lot of cognitive dissonance in actors,

0:25:49.316 --> 0:25:51.956
<v Speaker 3>and the same reason that Gary was talking about that

0:25:52.876 --> 0:25:57.356
<v Speaker 3>the sort of AI billionaire's daughter was caused cognitive dissonance.

0:25:57.676 --> 0:26:02.156
<v Speaker 3>And so that was a real emotional sticking point for

0:26:02.196 --> 0:26:04.276
<v Speaker 3>a lot of actors, and I think they were concerned

0:26:04.796 --> 0:26:05.676
<v Speaker 3>about the story.

0:26:06.796 --> 0:26:11.876
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you're right, Angus. Ultimately we didn't want

0:26:11.876 --> 0:26:13.436
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, yeah, trust your heart and it's all

0:26:13.516 --> 0:26:16.076
<v Speaker 1>going to work out. That's a lot of Hollywood endings

0:26:16.276 --> 0:26:19.036
<v Speaker 1>manufacture that ending, and it's the Hollywood answer is trust

0:26:19.076 --> 0:26:22.996
<v Speaker 1>your heart, and society is producing a new answer, which

0:26:22.996 --> 0:26:24.156
<v Speaker 1>is trust the AI.

0:26:25.276 --> 0:26:31.636
<v Speaker 2>Can you think of a Hollywood movie in previous to

0:26:31.676 --> 0:26:36.156
<v Speaker 2>this where not the narrow question of don't trust your heart,

0:26:36.556 --> 0:26:41.676
<v Speaker 2>but the kind of broader question of that love and

0:26:41.716 --> 0:26:48.356
<v Speaker 2>the fulfillment of a real emotional need would have catastrophic

0:26:48.396 --> 0:26:49.996
<v Speaker 2>consequences outside of it?

0:26:50.036 --> 0:26:50.116
<v Speaker 3>Is?

0:26:50.116 --> 0:26:52.956
<v Speaker 1>That is this virgin territory is what I'm asking for

0:26:52.996 --> 0:26:58.796
<v Speaker 1>a Hollywood film. One example springs to mind Casablanca. For

0:26:58.876 --> 0:27:01.916
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergmann to get together will farm

0:27:01.996 --> 0:27:06.036
<v Speaker 1>the world, and so they Humphrey Bogart makes the Rick

0:27:06.316 --> 0:27:08.876
<v Speaker 1>makes the decision not to follow his heart.

0:27:09.716 --> 0:27:11.796
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right, but you will.

0:27:13.116 --> 0:27:13.236
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:27:13.556 --> 0:27:16.516
<v Speaker 2>There's a crucial difference, though, and that is, do we

0:27:16.556 --> 0:27:18.916
<v Speaker 2>ever really believe that Rick is madly in love with

0:27:19.756 --> 0:27:22.876
<v Speaker 2>Ingrid Berkman? Not in what you've described as a situation

0:27:22.956 --> 0:27:28.916
<v Speaker 2>where the two parties are genuinely and have powerful reason

0:27:28.956 --> 0:27:32.516
<v Speaker 2>to believe that they are genuinely in love, they are soulmates.

0:27:33.156 --> 0:27:36.716
<v Speaker 2>Was Ingram Bourkman Humphrey Bogart's soulmon in Casablanca or was

0:27:36.756 --> 0:27:40.716
<v Speaker 2>it was like his heart is so kind of hardened

0:27:40.876 --> 0:27:44.676
<v Speaker 2>and covered in scar tissue, we kind of accept him

0:27:44.676 --> 0:27:47.116
<v Speaker 2>walking away because that's what he does. He walks away, right,

0:27:47.476 --> 0:27:49.596
<v Speaker 2>But you just gotta be something a very different dynamic.

0:27:50.516 --> 0:27:54.276
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about two people who are soulmates having to

0:27:54.276 --> 0:27:54.796
<v Speaker 2>walk away.

0:27:56.036 --> 0:27:57.796
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know, I will say I'm Malcolm my way.

0:27:57.796 --> 0:28:00.596
<v Speaker 3>That's a very iconoclastic reading that you just delivered of Casablanca.

0:28:00.636 --> 0:28:03.636
<v Speaker 1>But also, wait, wait, wait, wait what wait?

0:28:03.756 --> 0:28:07.396
<v Speaker 2>But they know you don't think Humphrey Bogart's heart is

0:28:07.436 --> 0:28:09.116
<v Speaker 2>covered in covered in scar tissues.

0:28:09.876 --> 0:28:13.636
<v Speaker 3>I think the point is that even though it is he,

0:28:13.636 --> 0:28:18.196
<v Speaker 3>he realizes that the romantic thing to do is to leave.

0:28:18.516 --> 0:28:21.716
<v Speaker 3>And so that's the ultimate tragedy of that movie, Malcolm,

0:28:21.756 --> 0:28:24.316
<v Speaker 3>which which you've just desecrated, is that he's a man

0:28:24.356 --> 0:28:27.276
<v Speaker 3>who is reconnected with his heart and in doing so,

0:28:27.436 --> 0:28:28.316
<v Speaker 3>walked away from it.

0:28:28.396 --> 0:28:30.676
<v Speaker 1>You know. Anyway, I think that's the Hollywood schlock reading

0:28:30.716 --> 0:28:30.956
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:28:30.996 --> 0:28:34.036
<v Speaker 3>But but the point is in that movie he walks away.

0:28:34.236 --> 0:28:37.636
<v Speaker 3>He does the heroic thing, and and you know, you're asking,

0:28:37.716 --> 0:28:40.996
<v Speaker 3>is there a movie where someone has basically willingly destroyed

0:28:40.996 --> 0:28:42.356
<v Speaker 3>the world for their own love.

0:28:43.156 --> 0:28:45.116
<v Speaker 1>Has someone willingly made that choice?

0:28:45.276 --> 0:28:45.476
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:28:46.916 --> 0:28:50.236
<v Speaker 1>And that one that one did happen in the English patient?

0:28:51.836 --> 0:28:54.036
<v Speaker 2>Oh tell me, tell me, I remember that film is

0:28:54.036 --> 0:28:55.636
<v Speaker 2>not strong enough. Tell me how that happens in the

0:28:55.636 --> 0:28:56.276
<v Speaker 2>English Patient.

0:28:56.636 --> 0:29:02.276
<v Speaker 1>Well, in the end of the hero basically is a

0:29:02.316 --> 0:29:07.796
<v Speaker 1>traitor to the allies out of love for a woman. Okay,

0:29:08.316 --> 0:29:12.396
<v Speaker 1>and usually Holly would doesn't put the hero in that position.

0:29:12.676 --> 0:29:16.436
<v Speaker 1>That's they don't decide to. I mean, what they will

0:29:16.436 --> 0:29:19.436
<v Speaker 1>either do is say there's a greater good here. I

0:29:19.476 --> 0:29:22.276
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of English movies, you know, even brief encounter,

0:29:22.356 --> 0:29:24.236
<v Speaker 1>you know, people say I'm in love, but I'm going

0:29:24.316 --> 0:29:25.876
<v Speaker 1>to do this, I'm going to stay with my wife

0:29:25.916 --> 0:29:28.636
<v Speaker 1>and kids. Yes, so there is.

0:29:28.636 --> 0:29:33.116
<v Speaker 2>There is English annoying kind of aristocratic English notion of

0:29:33.596 --> 0:29:37.156
<v Speaker 2>remembering Tale of Two Cities at the end, it's a

0:29:37.196 --> 0:29:39.116
<v Speaker 2>far far better thing than I've ever done.

0:29:39.196 --> 0:29:40.356
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah blah blah.

0:29:40.396 --> 0:29:41.996
<v Speaker 2>They love playing that role. They never play it in

0:29:42.036 --> 0:29:44.676
<v Speaker 2>real life, but they love playing it in literature. Yeah, yeah,

0:29:44.796 --> 0:29:47.076
<v Speaker 2>they're like, are you kidding me? In real life he's good, No,

0:29:47.156 --> 0:29:50.516
<v Speaker 2>he's not doing that. But no, but wait wait, I'm

0:29:50.556 --> 0:29:54.956
<v Speaker 2>still I'm not satisfied. So it doesn't. Why am I

0:29:54.956 --> 0:29:56.676
<v Speaker 2>am I wrong? Why does it seem to me like

0:29:56.756 --> 0:30:00.916
<v Speaker 2>you have described in this movie a much more complicated

0:30:02.356 --> 0:30:06.876
<v Speaker 2>and interesting as a problematic narrative scenario that exists in

0:30:06.956 --> 0:30:10.556
<v Speaker 2>say Castle Plankt. Bradley Cooper's not having a problem doing

0:30:10.596 --> 0:30:13.676
<v Speaker 2>a remake of Kazablanca. It's fine with that, but he

0:30:13.956 --> 0:30:16.716
<v Speaker 2>clearly had a problem with this. So you described to

0:30:16.796 --> 0:30:19.276
<v Speaker 2>me in your words, well, I can see how they

0:30:19.276 --> 0:30:21.836
<v Speaker 2>are analogous, but they're not. It's not perfect. Why is

0:30:21.876 --> 0:30:22.556
<v Speaker 2>it not perfect?

0:30:23.676 --> 0:30:25.556
<v Speaker 1>It's I don't think it's perfect at all. By the way,

0:30:25.596 --> 0:30:26.116
<v Speaker 1>I do, I do.

0:30:26.076 --> 0:30:27.996
<v Speaker 3>Want to get on record as saying that you've also

0:30:28.236 --> 0:30:32.436
<v Speaker 3>designated Charles Dickens, who's another sotemic figure of English literature.

0:30:33.556 --> 0:30:36.196
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, it's it's the reason that it's that,

0:30:36.316 --> 0:30:39.716
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's different, is uh.

0:30:39.996 --> 0:30:44.796
<v Speaker 3>I mean, imagine if the character chose his heart and

0:30:44.836 --> 0:30:45.676
<v Speaker 3>the Nazis won.

0:30:46.316 --> 0:30:47.796
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you you choose.

0:30:47.956 --> 0:30:50.676
<v Speaker 3>I mean, imagine the sound of music right in which

0:30:50.676 --> 0:30:53.316
<v Speaker 3>he marries Julie Andrews, and the result of that is

0:30:53.356 --> 0:30:55.636
<v Speaker 3>the Second World War is lost. I mean, you know,

0:30:55.796 --> 0:30:57.436
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's the kind of that's the kind of

0:30:57.476 --> 0:31:00.156
<v Speaker 3>crisis you're setting up. And so in order to establish

0:31:00.276 --> 0:31:03.796
<v Speaker 3>free will, he has to reject Julie Andrews. He has

0:31:03.876 --> 0:31:07.636
<v Speaker 3>to reject you know, his heart to save to to

0:31:07.876 --> 0:31:11.716
<v Speaker 3>to save the world. Accept we haven't even told you

0:31:11.756 --> 0:31:13.516
<v Speaker 3>the end of the movie, so you don't even know

0:31:13.596 --> 0:31:17.436
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen, right and when and when actors

0:31:17.436 --> 0:31:20.036
<v Speaker 3>got to the end of the movie, the dissonance became

0:31:20.116 --> 0:31:23.836
<v Speaker 3>so intense for them that, you know, I think that

0:31:23.916 --> 0:31:26.196
<v Speaker 3>they started to say, how can I, in good conscience

0:31:26.356 --> 0:31:29.356
<v Speaker 3>play this part? Because I myself don't even understand exactly

0:31:30.396 --> 0:31:31.316
<v Speaker 3>the part that I'm playing.

0:31:31.356 --> 0:31:34.316
<v Speaker 2>So you're in telling the story of why this movie

0:31:34.396 --> 0:31:37.156
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get made. You we're listing, we're going to go

0:31:37.196 --> 0:31:39.916
<v Speaker 2>through the list of culprits, but it's corporate number one

0:31:39.956 --> 0:31:42.156
<v Speaker 2>that the actors themselves couldn't handle it.

0:31:42.676 --> 0:31:44.396
<v Speaker 3>I think that's part of it. But I mean, I

0:31:44.396 --> 0:31:47.876
<v Speaker 3>think the core of it is is is.

0:31:48.756 --> 0:31:52.476
<v Speaker 1>Do we trust ourselves? Yeah, And.

0:31:54.596 --> 0:31:58.156
<v Speaker 3>That's a hard place to go in the movies because

0:31:58.196 --> 0:32:00.316
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, the movies basically no comedy,

0:32:00.316 --> 0:32:05.916
<v Speaker 3>and they know tragedy, and in a comedy, you give

0:32:05.956 --> 0:32:10.236
<v Speaker 3>yourself over to a fantasy, and in tragedy. You're like,

0:32:10.836 --> 0:32:13.836
<v Speaker 3>it's all over from the beginning, and it's a chance

0:32:13.876 --> 0:32:16.196
<v Speaker 3>for you to kind of wallow. So another way to

0:32:16.236 --> 0:32:20.676
<v Speaker 3>say this is when we're born, in our brain, there's

0:32:20.716 --> 0:32:24.036
<v Speaker 3>a kind of primordial story, and that story is that

0:32:24.116 --> 0:32:27.476
<v Speaker 3>I'm good and that life is good. And that primordial

0:32:27.516 --> 0:32:29.396
<v Speaker 3>story is so powerful that it allows us to.

0:32:29.396 --> 0:32:31.556
<v Speaker 1>Be open to the world and to explore the world.

0:32:32.156 --> 0:32:34.356
<v Speaker 3>And then what happens over time is that story runs

0:32:34.436 --> 0:32:36.836
<v Speaker 3>up against our experiences of life, many of which are negative,

0:32:37.476 --> 0:32:39.836
<v Speaker 3>and this other story starts to occur in our brain,

0:32:40.076 --> 0:32:43.316
<v Speaker 3>which is actually, life is not so good, and I'm

0:32:43.356 --> 0:32:46.316
<v Speaker 3>also not so good, and we start to believe that

0:32:46.436 --> 0:32:49.916
<v Speaker 3>story more, and that story starts to become more primordial

0:32:49.996 --> 0:32:52.716
<v Speaker 3>for us, and the good story starts to become more

0:32:52.756 --> 0:32:56.036
<v Speaker 3>superficial and fantasy for us, and we get into kind

0:32:56.036 --> 0:33:00.556
<v Speaker 3>of a dissociated place. And in that dissociated place, which

0:33:00.596 --> 0:33:03.516
<v Speaker 3>I think most humans exist most of the time, they

0:33:03.556 --> 0:33:05.396
<v Speaker 3>really believe that life is pretty bad and that they're

0:33:05.396 --> 0:33:08.556
<v Speaker 3>pretty terrible, but they're always trying to actively convince themselves

0:33:08.596 --> 0:33:10.276
<v Speaker 3>that life is good and that they're a nice person.

0:33:10.636 --> 0:33:13.356
<v Speaker 3>And this is a product of you know, mindfulness, positive

0:33:13.356 --> 0:33:15.516
<v Speaker 3>thinking all of these things which kind of infest our

0:33:16.116 --> 0:33:19.076
<v Speaker 3>society now. And when people go to the movies, they

0:33:19.116 --> 0:33:22.796
<v Speaker 3>want to indulge either the fantasy life of no, I'm

0:33:22.796 --> 0:33:25.476
<v Speaker 3>a good person and everything works out, or they want

0:33:25.516 --> 0:33:29.996
<v Speaker 3>to wallow in this negative space of no, you know what,

0:33:30.036 --> 0:33:31.556
<v Speaker 3>this is a safe space for me to admit that

0:33:31.556 --> 0:33:33.796
<v Speaker 3>everything's terrible and I'm a horrible human beings. And that's

0:33:33.796 --> 0:33:35.956
<v Speaker 3>why we have like the Dark Knights and you know,

0:33:36.116 --> 0:33:37.756
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Nolan and all this kind of stuff, you know,

0:33:37.916 --> 0:33:41.636
<v Speaker 3>kind of like the dark, sludgy stuff. And this movie

0:33:41.716 --> 0:33:44.516
<v Speaker 3>is constantly forcing you back and forth across the threshold.

0:33:46.116 --> 0:33:48.516
<v Speaker 3>This movie is not allowing you to say, you know what, yes,

0:33:48.596 --> 0:33:51.516
<v Speaker 3>everything is bad, life is bad, life is awful. Nor

0:33:51.596 --> 0:33:55.236
<v Speaker 3>is it saying there's a kind of simple easy answer here.

0:33:55.716 --> 0:33:58.316
<v Speaker 3>It's pushing you back and forth to kind of reconfront

0:33:58.836 --> 0:34:00.196
<v Speaker 3>and can you keep going?

0:34:00.636 --> 0:34:02.116
<v Speaker 1>And at the bottom of.

0:34:01.996 --> 0:34:06.396
<v Speaker 3>The movie is this idea that only intelligence is going

0:34:06.476 --> 0:34:13.476
<v Speaker 3>to solve things emotion, not wishing, not wanting, but being smart.

0:34:13.556 --> 0:34:16.196
<v Speaker 3>And are you the audience smart enough to solve this problem?

0:34:16.236 --> 0:34:18.076
<v Speaker 3>Because if you, the audience, are not smart enough to

0:34:18.116 --> 0:34:19.796
<v Speaker 3>solve this problem, the computers are going to solve it

0:34:19.836 --> 0:34:22.156
<v Speaker 3>for you. And so the existential challenge for the movie

0:34:22.236 --> 0:34:25.196
<v Speaker 3>essentially is are you smart enough to keep ahead of

0:34:25.196 --> 0:34:29.076
<v Speaker 3>the movie, in which case you know what, you're smart

0:34:29.156 --> 0:34:31.396
<v Speaker 3>enough to live into the future, or are you going

0:34:31.476 --> 0:34:34.716
<v Speaker 3>to submit and become passive and be drawn into the

0:34:34.756 --> 0:34:37.556
<v Speaker 3>engine of the story. And then that's the future of AI,

0:34:37.996 --> 0:34:40.236
<v Speaker 3>in which you no longer have any autonomy and you've

0:34:40.276 --> 0:34:42.476
<v Speaker 3>given up your will to the plot and the machinery.

0:34:42.636 --> 0:34:46.116
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's why people find the movie unnerving,

0:34:46.276 --> 0:34:48.796
<v Speaker 3>because it really does put you in that existential place

0:34:48.836 --> 0:34:52.316
<v Speaker 3>that you feel that your autonomy is being stripped. But

0:34:52.356 --> 0:34:54.996
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's also a lot of sort of funny

0:34:55.116 --> 0:34:58.356
<v Speaker 3>and sort of dire studio stories they're involved, so I

0:34:58.356 --> 0:35:02.076
<v Speaker 3>think ultimately the studios were also alarmed by this story.

0:35:02.076 --> 0:35:04.156
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a big budget movie, and the

0:35:04.196 --> 0:35:05.796
<v Speaker 3>thing is, if you're going to do a big budget

0:35:05.796 --> 0:35:08.796
<v Speaker 3>movie like Total Recall like this, you need to get

0:35:08.796 --> 0:35:11.116
<v Speaker 3>that act on board to try and secure.

0:35:12.156 --> 0:35:12.676
<v Speaker 1>The money.

0:35:13.436 --> 0:35:15.076
<v Speaker 3>And then do you want to put one hundred and

0:35:15.076 --> 0:35:17.676
<v Speaker 3>twenty million dollars into something that has this premise?

0:35:17.796 --> 0:35:21.076
<v Speaker 1>I think it was too demanding, But I think that

0:35:21.276 --> 0:35:23.676
<v Speaker 1>our main problem here was really that we didn't get

0:35:23.676 --> 0:35:27.596
<v Speaker 1>a director. We didn't get a strong director. A project

0:35:27.636 --> 0:35:30.516
<v Speaker 1>like this requires a director who with a very strong

0:35:30.596 --> 0:35:35.596
<v Speaker 1>vision and who the people with the money trust. And

0:35:36.756 --> 0:35:39.236
<v Speaker 1>I suppose I had the hubris to think that after

0:35:39.316 --> 0:35:41.756
<v Speaker 1>doing these three Philip K. Dick movies, they would trust me.

0:35:42.996 --> 0:35:46.756
<v Speaker 1>But actually that wasn't enough. The movie's fate in the

0:35:46.796 --> 0:35:52.396
<v Speaker 1>real world precisely parallels it's narrative on the page. In

0:35:52.436 --> 0:35:57.276
<v Speaker 1>other words, that actually happens. So one of.

0:35:57.276 --> 0:35:58.596
<v Speaker 3>The things that happened is after we went out to

0:35:58.636 --> 0:36:03.396
<v Speaker 3>all of these actors, I then was on another screenplay projects,

0:36:03.516 --> 0:36:06.556
<v Speaker 3>which is going well, and it was produced by Bob Shay,

0:36:06.916 --> 0:36:08.796
<v Speaker 3>who did Lord of the Rings all these big kind

0:36:08.796 --> 0:36:11.756
<v Speaker 3>of movies. And so I showed the script to Bob,

0:36:11.756 --> 0:36:13.196
<v Speaker 3>and Bob was like, Oh, the script is amazing. I

0:36:13.236 --> 0:36:14.876
<v Speaker 3>love the script. We got to get the script produced,

0:36:15.076 --> 0:36:17.756
<v Speaker 3>and so I said, okay, great. But it all culminated

0:36:18.556 --> 0:36:21.116
<v Speaker 3>in Bob calling me up one day and saying, Angus,

0:36:21.156 --> 0:36:26.436
<v Speaker 3>we've got financing for this movie. I'm almost entirely in

0:36:26.556 --> 0:36:28.196
<v Speaker 3>hisstry by financing for this this movie.

0:36:28.236 --> 0:36:30.316
<v Speaker 1>I said, oh, okay, I said, what's going on? He said, well,

0:36:30.356 --> 0:36:31.476
<v Speaker 1>there's this company in town.

0:36:32.916 --> 0:36:36.316
<v Speaker 3>They have a computer that they feed all of the

0:36:36.356 --> 0:36:41.156
<v Speaker 3>scripts into and the algorithm tells them how much money

0:36:42.036 --> 0:36:43.116
<v Speaker 3>the script is going to make.

0:36:43.996 --> 0:36:46.116
<v Speaker 1>And we've already given.

0:36:47.356 --> 0:36:49.476
<v Speaker 3>The script to the executives there and they love this

0:36:49.596 --> 0:36:51.396
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to give it to the algorithm, and

0:36:51.476 --> 0:36:53.556
<v Speaker 3>I just know that this is going to work out.

0:36:53.836 --> 0:36:55.476
<v Speaker 1>So I said, Okay, Bob, this sounds great. You know.

0:36:55.876 --> 0:37:00.796
<v Speaker 3>And this company, I should say, they very wealthy, very successful.

0:37:00.836 --> 0:37:02.316
<v Speaker 1>They've invested all these movies.

0:37:02.396 --> 0:37:06.036
<v Speaker 3>You know, they had themselves the sort of top floor

0:37:06.516 --> 0:37:10.036
<v Speaker 3>of the biggest luxury car dealership in you like, walked

0:37:10.036 --> 0:37:11.596
<v Speaker 3>in through all these luxury cars to get in their office

0:37:11.596 --> 0:37:12.836
<v Speaker 3>and sort of like typical high with stuff.

0:37:12.916 --> 0:37:13.116
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:37:14.116 --> 0:37:16.556
<v Speaker 3>So I get a call a week or two later

0:37:16.876 --> 0:37:19.396
<v Speaker 3>from Bob. He's like and he's like, I, Unfortunately, I've

0:37:19.396 --> 0:37:20.956
<v Speaker 3>got bad news for you. And I was like, oh

0:37:20.956 --> 0:37:22.556
<v Speaker 3>my god. I was like, did the computers read our

0:37:22.596 --> 0:37:25.036
<v Speaker 3>script and not like it? He goes, no, No, He's like,

0:37:25.116 --> 0:37:26.796
<v Speaker 3>that's not the problem. He's like, the problem is the

0:37:26.836 --> 0:37:29.836
<v Speaker 3>company just went bankrupt. And they went bankrupt because the

0:37:29.916 --> 0:37:33.436
<v Speaker 3>last script their computers picked was a ball and so

0:37:33.516 --> 0:37:33.996
<v Speaker 3>now they'd.

0:37:33.876 --> 0:37:34.476
<v Speaker 1>Have no money.

0:37:34.796 --> 0:37:37.836
<v Speaker 3>And so we were unable to make our scripts about

0:37:37.836 --> 0:37:42.076
<v Speaker 3>the infinitely intelligent computer because a stupid computer was unable

0:37:42.116 --> 0:37:43.516
<v Speaker 3>to pick the right scripts to make.

0:37:45.716 --> 0:37:49.556
<v Speaker 2>A stupid computer. Is it any wonder Angus has gone

0:37:49.556 --> 0:37:53.076
<v Speaker 2>on to become a pioneer in story science. In fact,

0:37:53.396 --> 0:37:56.236
<v Speaker 2>Angus has gone on to become a leading critic of AI.

0:37:56.636 --> 0:37:59.236
<v Speaker 2>He thinks only humans will ever be able to tell

0:37:59.276 --> 0:38:02.756
<v Speaker 2>good stories. One of the papers that's published is called

0:38:03.116 --> 0:38:06.436
<v Speaker 2>why computer AI will never do what we imagine it can.

0:38:08.396 --> 0:38:13.836
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading now For the abstract, computers contain a hardware

0:38:13.876 --> 0:38:18.996
<v Speaker 2>limit that renders them permanently incapable of reading or writing narrative.

0:38:19.556 --> 0:38:22.596
<v Speaker 2>This article draws upon the author's work with deep neural

0:38:22.636 --> 0:38:27.876
<v Speaker 2>networks Judaea, Pearls, do Calculus, GPT three, and other current

0:38:27.956 --> 0:38:33.356
<v Speaker 2>generation AI to logically demonstrate that no computer AI, quantum

0:38:33.436 --> 0:38:37.316
<v Speaker 2>or otherwise has ever learned or will ever learn, to

0:38:37.436 --> 0:38:40.996
<v Speaker 2>produce or process novels or any other kind of narrative,

0:38:41.036 --> 0:38:46.436
<v Speaker 2>including scripts, short fiction, political speeches, business plans, scientific hypotheses,

0:38:46.756 --> 0:38:51.636
<v Speaker 2>technology proposals, military strategies, and plots to take over the world.

0:38:54.276 --> 0:38:56.036
<v Speaker 2>So what do we have here? We have a script

0:38:56.196 --> 0:38:59.596
<v Speaker 2>about AI killed by an AI company that went bankrupt,

0:38:59.716 --> 0:39:03.156
<v Speaker 2>whose co author goes on to write the definitive debunking

0:39:03.516 --> 0:39:10.956
<v Speaker 2>of AI. Who's writing that screenplay? Guys, this has been fantastic.

0:39:12.076 --> 0:39:18.156
<v Speaker 2>If my vote is in all do all moguls out

0:39:18.156 --> 0:39:21.436
<v Speaker 2>there in our listening audience, It's clear what the people want.

0:39:21.916 --> 0:39:23.956
<v Speaker 2>The people want is did you call me with the

0:39:24.036 --> 0:39:27.236
<v Speaker 2>variable man? Yeah, the people want the variable man.

0:39:27.996 --> 0:39:30.956
<v Speaker 1>They do fingers crossed.

0:39:33.796 --> 0:39:36.516
<v Speaker 2>Next week, we'll be back with another story from the

0:39:36.556 --> 0:39:50.036
<v Speaker 2>depths of development Hell. This episode was produced by Nina

0:39:50.036 --> 0:39:54.316
<v Speaker 2>Bird Lawrence with Tali Ellmen and Bendadaf Haffrey. Editing by

0:39:54.356 --> 0:39:58.516
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Nicks, original scoring by Luisquira, engineering by Echo Mountain.

0:39:58.836 --> 0:40:03.276
<v Speaker 2>Our executive producer is Jacob Smith. I'm Malcolm Gladwell.