WEBVTT - Life or Death

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Big breaking news out of Idaho involving the death penalty

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and the man.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 2>Accused of murdering for University of Idaho students.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Prosecutors say they will pursue the death penalty for Brian Coberger.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>This is the Idaho Massacre, a production of KT Studios

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and iHeartRadio episode nine, Life or Death. I'm Courtney Armstrong,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a television producer at KT Studios, with Stephanie Leidecker, Jeff Shane,

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and Connor Powell. With less than three weeks before the

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>legal deadline to decide whether or not to seek the

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>death penalty, prosecutors announced on June twenty sixth they would

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>recommend the maximum sentence for Brian Coberger.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Calling him a continuing threat to society.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Under Idaho law, prosecutors have sixty days to formally notify

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a defendant after they enter their plea if the state

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>plans to pursue the death penalty. In a short to

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 2>the point three page court filing, Leida County Prosecutor Bill

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Thompson wrote that based on the known information, there were

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>no mitigating circumstances preventing prosecutors from pursuing the death penalty.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>He also cited a number of quote aggravating circumstances in

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 2>the brutal slayings as reasons his office was seeking the

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 2>death penalty for the former criminology student.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>The Leytaw County prosecutor says the murder of four University

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of Idaho students was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, manifesting

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>exceptional depravity.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Thompson noted that Coberger acted with reckless indifference to human

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 2>life and that the November twenty twenty two murders of

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Keighley Gonsalvez and Mogen Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>carried out during another crime like burglary. The decision was

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>months in the making, but also left the families of

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the victims divided. Under a new Idaho law, Brian Coberger

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>could be executed by firing squad if he is convicted.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty three, Idaho became the fifth state to

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>adopt execution by firing squad as an alternative to lethal injection.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 2>It was to be expected, giving what he is accused

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>of doing. The prosecution's decision to seek the death penalty

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>for Coburger was not a surprise, but it did raise

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the stakes of the upcoming trial, and the move triggered

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>a series of many legal maneuvers by both the defense

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and prosecution ahead of a pivotal motions hearing on the

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>next day. In the weeks leading up to Leeda County

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Prosecutor Bill Thompson's decision to pursue the death penalty for

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Brian Coburger, prosecutors turned over a mountain of evidence to

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the twenty eight year old's defense team as part of

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the legally required discovery period. Among the boxes of evidence

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>were thousands of pages of reports and other written material,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>ten thousand, two hundred photographs, nine thousand, two hundred tips

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that were delivered to investigators, and fifty one terabytes of audio,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>visual media, and digital materials. As the state pushed their

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>case forward against Brian Coberger, the twenty eight year old's

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>lawyer began to lay out their defense strategy ahead of

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the key June twenty seventh hearing.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>They are not conceding anything here and will fight every

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>piece of evidence.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>In recent days, Coburger added two new members to his

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>defense team, Attorney Stephen Mercer of Maryland and Bicka Barlow

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>of California. Both are experienced defense lawyers and experts in

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>criminal cases involving DNA evidence, particularly the use of the

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>new DNA field of investigative genetic genealogy. Led by Coberger's

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>chief counsel, Anne Taylor and her deputy Jay Logston, the

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 2>new team immediately began to attack that prosecution's case. These

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>new court filings offered a preview of a brewing legal

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 2>battle over DNA evidence between the defense and the prosecution.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 5>In new court documents, Coberger's attorney accusing the state of

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 5>hiding its entire case.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Defense attorney Jay Logsen tore into the prosecution's case, saying

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>there was no evidence of connection between Brian Coberger and

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the four victims. He argued that there is quote no

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>explanation for the total lack of DNA evidence from the

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>victims in Coberger's apartment, office, home, or vehicle building. Upon

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>that argument, the defense also demanded investigators provide information about

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 2>three other male DNA samples that were discovered at the

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 2>murder scene. Here's Jeff and Stephanie.

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 6>According to Coberger's defense, by December seventeenth, about one month

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 6>after the murders, lab technicians had isolated three other male

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 6>DNA samples, two of which came from inside the house

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 6>and a third pull from a black glove that was

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 6>found outside the home a week after the murders. But

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 6>get this, police investigators didn't originally find that glove. It

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 6>was found by a podcaster and a retired homicide detective

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 6>who was just sort of poking around. He saw the

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 6>glove nestled among some leaves and branches on the ground

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 6>behind a trash can near the home on King Road.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 6>He then told police about it, and they photographed the

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 6>glove before collecting it for lab tests.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 7>How is that possible? Now, Again, no one really knows

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 7>when that glove first appeared or if it had any

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 7>connection to the murders.

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 6>To me, the big question is what type of glove

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 6>is it. It was in the thirties the night of

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 6>the murder, so people very likely would have been wearing

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 6>winter gloves. But if it's a latex glove, that tells

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 6>a different story. And while we don't know what type

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 6>of glove it was or if it was even connected

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 6>to the crimes, we do know that investigators found male

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 6>DNA inside of it.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 7>Now, what the defense wants to know is what type

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 7>of testing was conducted on that glove, as well as

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 7>the other two samples.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 6>Ran short tandem repeat or STR DNA on the three samples.

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 7>But the defense is wondering if there were any other

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 7>DNA tests that were run, because look, when the information

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 7>from the str DNA test was actually submitted to the

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 7>FBI database, no male DNA profiles were identified.

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 6>So stuff to break that down. What we know is

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 6>three men's DNA was connected to these samples, but we

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 6>don't know who they are and if they have any

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 6>connection to the crime.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 7>And it doesn't appear investigators tried to do a genetic

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 7>genealogy DNA test to identify them in the same way

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 7>that they did for Brian Coburger.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>In addition to requesting information about the three unidentified male

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 2>DNA samples, the defense also challenged the prosecution's use of

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>investigative genetic genealogy to initially identify Brian Coburger from the

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 2>DNA on the knife sheath. Coburger's lawyer suggested the prosecution

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 2>is purposely withholding details of the genetic genealogy research, saying

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in a court filing, a massive investigation came to focus

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>on Coburger and Coburger alone. The state appears to be

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>trying to hide its original domino, such as he cannot

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>discover why. It is not uncommon for defense lawyers to

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 2>challenge the use of new and emerging technology like investigative

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>genetic genealogy, and Coberger's defense team has demanded access to

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 2>all of the FBI genetic genealogy data used to tie

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Coburger to the crime against Stephanie and Jeff and Now.

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 7>Remember when Idaho investigators first found the DNA on the

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 7>knife sheath, they ran it through the Combined DNA Index

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 7>System database.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 6>However, this person's DNA was not actually in the CODIS

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 6>database and investigators were unable to identify the individual, but

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 6>they didn't give up. The FBI jumped in to help

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 6>and use a rare, controversial DNA technique called investigative genetic

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 6>genealogy we talked about Traditionally, it's really only used in

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 6>cold cases. Most famously, it was used to capture the

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 6>Golden State killer Joseph DiAngelo in twenty eighteen.

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 7>It's actually rarely used in active investigations because some states

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 7>have laws discouraging it, and many public genealogy companies, for example,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 7>like ancestry dot com, they prohibit law enforcement from using

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 7>their databases for investigations, but in this case, the FBI

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 7>took the DNA sequence data from that knife sheath sample

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 7>to a private testing facility in Texas called authorm, who

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 7>then utilized public genealogy websites to identify Coburger's family tree.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 6>However, despite the defense's request, the prosecution is saying that

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 6>Coburger and his defense team have no right to the

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 6>FBI data and the paperwork from this process.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 8>Is who become a DNA case. That's what it's going

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 8>to be all about. The spushy eyebrow identifications going nowhere.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 8>But it's a battle of experts. So usually the government

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 8>has a lot of money, much more than a public

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 8>defender's office. So one of the problems for the defense

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 8>is going to be to get enough money to hire

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 8>the appropriate experts to deal with this issue of DNA,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 8>because that's really what it's going to come down to.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.479
<v Speaker 8>And I also believe that there are some serious problems

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 8>in terms of the way this thing was handled, in

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 8>terms of sending it out. I mean, I was shocked,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 8>truthfully to see that.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Greenberg is a legal expert and former federal US attorney.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 2>He spoke with Stephanie and Jeff Colberger's defense team believes

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the FBI's handling of the investigative genetic genealogy data is

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>crucial evidence and could be exculpatory.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 8>Exculpatory evidence means exactly what it sounds like. It's exculpatory

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 8>to the defendant. The Supreme Court a number of years

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 8>ago decided a case called the United States versus Brady

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 8>A long time ago. So this besides lawyers call it

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 8>Brady material, And what it means is prosecution that has

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 8>and its possession anything that in any way is helpful

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 8>of defense. It must be turned over, and if they

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 8>don't turn it over, it could be the end of

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 8>the case for them. Many times there's been a guilty

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 8>verdict and then an appeal it turned out that there

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 8>was Brady information or exculpatory information that wasn't turned over

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 8>and the guilty verdict was vacated.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 6>Is there a time when that window closes or is

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 6>it every moment up until the verdict is read.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 8>In terms of when they have to turn it over, Yeah,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 8>never ceases. Even if during the trial, let's say something

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 8>came up that all of a sudden landed in the

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 8>lap of the prosecution and it was helpful of defense.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 8>It has to turn it over. It's a constant obligation

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 8>that the prosecution has.

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Using genetic genealogy to identify a suspect is a painstaking

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>process and requires skilled researchers and analysts to put the

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 2>complicated puzzle together. During the process, it can also identify

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a huge number of people connected to a potential suspect.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie and Jeff.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 6>How exactly does DNA work. Each person's DNA comes from

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 6>roughly fifty percent of their parents and twenty five percent

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 6>of their grandparents, and with each generation you go back,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 6>the genetic similarities are reduced a quarter, meaning you share

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 6>about twelve point five percent of your DNA with your

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 6>first cousins and three point one two five percent with

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 6>your second cousins, and actually less than one percent with

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 6>your third cousins. In most public genealogy databases, it's pretty

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 6>easy to find third or second cousin matches because the

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 6>bar is so low. That's why you see headlines where

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 6>celebrities say they're related to famous dead presidents.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 7>But in this case, to narrow it down to a

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 7>specific person, genetic genealogists at Authorm that's the testing company

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 7>we were talking about, and the FBI had to do

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 7>a lot of digging through birth certificates and other genealogy

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 7>information to build the tree. And this is the important

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 7>part for the defense because they want to know the

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 7>process from start to finish.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Steph. What they're saying is that if all this

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 6>painstaking work was done, there should be a long paper

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 6>trail of how this research was executed, and you would

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 6>think AUTHRAM or the FBI would have logged it somewhere, But.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution has so far refused to provide the data

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>to Coburger's defense team, with the prosecution insisting they don't

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>have it. The prosecution also says they won't use this

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 2>information at Coburger's trial because they want to protect the

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>names and personal information of hundreds of innocent relatives on

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Coburger's family tree and the names of the publicly available

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 2>genetic genealogy services used. The question is does the FBI

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and AUTHROM have the records the defense wants, were any

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of the records kept or has all of it been destroyed? Regardless,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a potential issue for law enforcement and the

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 2>prosecution's case because of the Supreme Court mandated obligation to

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>provide all Brady evidence to a defendant, especially a defendant

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 2>and a death penalty case. Here again, former federal prosecutor

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Greenberg.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 8>The only thing that popped out to me so far is,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 8>for some reason, when the Bureau went through all the

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 8>different phases it went through in trying to match the

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 8>DNA with this defendant, and they failed, and then they

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 8>tried to build a tree and they sent it all over.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 8>They didn't keep records. There's no way to attack the

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 8>indictment that I have seen yet other than this issue.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 8>We're talking about about exculpatory or brainy material or very

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 8>simply put information that's helpful of the defense that the

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 8>prosecutor has. Why they didn't download all of these things

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 8>that bureau did makes no sense. If it's helpful of

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 8>the defense, it has to be turned over. It will

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 8>be a pre trial hearing on this issue of chain

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 8>of custody and the use of DNA, and that will

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, that will be determined because if that hearing

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 8>goes the way I think it might. I don't know

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 8>who the judge is, I don't know what his or

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 8>her particular ratings are. But if the prosecution gets whacked

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 8>on this issue, then there'll be either be a play

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 8>to a much lesser charge, be a dismissal. But that

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 8>issue will be decided long before try.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's stop here for a break. We'll be back in

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a moment. The prosecution is likely to counter the defense's

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>demand for the AUTH room and FBI's research at the

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>June twenty seventh hearing by insisting the only relevant DNA

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 2>information for a trial is the buckle swab taken from

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Coburger's mouth when he was arrested at his parents' home

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and the paternal DNA sample taken from the Coburger's trash.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Both of these DNA tests show an indisputable statistical match

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>between Brian Coburger and the DNA on the knife.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 5>Sheath, the likelihood that this is Brian Coberger's DNA, and

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 5>it is five point three seven octillion times more likely

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 5>than not that this is a match.

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 9>Jeff and Stephanie, we know the DNA profile found on

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 9>the knife sheath is at least five point three seven

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 9>octillion times more likely to be Brian Coburger's than someone else's.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 7>And that's a very big number.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 6>Correct. It's kind of impossibly big to wrap your head around.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 6>We're going to do our best to kind of explain

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 6>it in terms that we felt was helpful. Five point

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 6>three seven octilian is five point three seven followed by

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty seven zeros. And to put this number into more perspective,

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 6>there are currently about eight billion people living on planet

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 6>Earth right now, or eight followed by nine zeros. It's

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 6>estimated that about one hundred and nine billion people have

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 6>ever lived on planet Earth. And that's one hundred and

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 6>nine again followed by nine zeros. A reminder, five point

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 6>three seven octillions is five point three seven fall by

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 6>twenty seven zeros.

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 7>So that's a tremendous number, and it seems impossible that

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 7>it wouldn't be Coburger. Even the defense doesn't seem to

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 7>be arguing that the DNA found on the sheath was Coburgers,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 7>at least they're not doing that yet. But what they

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 7>are challenging is how investigators utilize DNA to conclude that

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 7>it was Coburger's DNA on the nine sheath.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 8>So in this case, the only fact so far that

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 8>we know of that the prosecution has to link this

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 8>particular defendant this awful crime is DNA evidence, that's it,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 8>and from what I've seen so far, that's not that solid.

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 8>So you know, they'll show pictures of the gruesome slaying

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 8>of these poor college kids. Defense will try to keep

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 8>it out because they'll say it's too damaging, and it's

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 8>and the judge will say, no, it's okay because it's relevant.

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 8>That will all happen, but when push comes to CHEF,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 8>so far, we're talking about a case that hinges on

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 8>d and we've all seen what preceded the taking of

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 8>the final swab and the match, and I just think

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 8>it's too early.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned like the DNA is the big thing, because

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 6>we don't have any motive. I mean, there's no connection

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 6>that we know. The defense is arguing there is no connection.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 6>That's the whole point. So does that matter.

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 8>The prosecution does not have to prove any motive at all.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 8>They have a motive, it will be helpful. The lack

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 8>of a motive will be helpful of the defense because

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 8>they will argue that there was no reason for this

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 8>particular individual. He didn't know them. There's no motive, there

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 8>was no fight, there was no money issue, there was

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 8>no girlfriend, no boyfriend. Whatever it is, there's a doctrine

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 8>called men's rea in the law, and men's rea is

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 8>very important here because they had The prosecution has to

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 8>prove beyond a reasonable doubt that not only did this

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 8>guy take it and slash them and stab them and

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 8>all this stuff, but he had an intent to do it,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 8>He had a specific intent, specific content or what they

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 8>say in Latin is men's rea, and then he's guilty

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 8>of murder one. But they have to prove intent. They

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 8>do not have to prove motive, and then the as

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 8>I said, the defense will argue, well, you know, there

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.239
<v Speaker 8>was no reason for him to do it, Then the

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 8>motive goes on that side.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 2>One potential defense that Coberger's attorneys have yet to try

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to raise is a not guilty by reason of insanity defense.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 2>In many states, a defendant can claim insanity when charged

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 2>with felony crimes if they show a lack of mental capacity,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>but Coberger's team can't make this argument. Idaho is one

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of only four states, along with Kansas, Montana, and Utah,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that does not permit insanity as a defense. The Idaho

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>state legislature removed it from the state's criminal code in

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty two, and passed a law saying that mental

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>conditions shall not be a defense to any charge of

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 2>criminal conduct. Stephen Greenberg says even if Idaho did provide

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a legal path to raise insanity as a defense, it

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 2>likely wouldn't work. For Brian Coberger, this.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 8>Guy was getting a PhD in criminology. He went back

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 8>to school after all this happened, right he went to class.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 8>So in order to succeed with an insanity defense, you

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 8>basically have to show that the guy couldn't have had

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 8>the men's rey I mentioned earlier, or the intent because

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 8>he was incapable of discerning right from wrong. Okay, in

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 8>some jurisdictions they call it an irresistible impulse. But the

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 8>longest short of this, in Layman's terms is if charged

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 8>individual was so incapable of discerning right from wrong and

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 8>didn't realize in any way what he was doing because

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 8>of that particular status of his mental capability, then you

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 8>don't have murder one because you don't have intent. Okay,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 8>so all this kind of but I don't unless there's

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 8>something I've missed, I don't see this based on the

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 8>behavior of this particular defendant as an insanity defense.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 2>The mental illness may be used Idaho as a factor

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>in sentencing. Even if the jury finds Coburger guilty and

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>sentenced him to death, his lawyers can challenge a death

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>penalty sentence by presenting mitigating evidence as to why Coburger

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 2>should be spared execution, Meaning, if Coburger is convicted of

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 2>murdering Killy Gonsalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin,

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 2>then he could be spared the death penalty if he

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 2>has proven to have a mental illness. Coburger's own words

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>as a teenager about suicide, depression, and his rare eye

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>condition visual snow may come into play in the future. However,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Leida County Prosecutor Bill Thompson said in the court filing

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>announcing his decision to seek the death penalty that the

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>state had not seen any evidence of mitigating factors such

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>as mental illness in Coburger or his family. Still, Coburger's

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>lawyers could produce evidence of past mental health issues during

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the penalty phase if Coburger is convicted of the brutal slayings.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 4>If you're not going to pursue the death penalty on

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 4>a quadruple murder, What type of case are you going

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 4>to pursue the death penalty on?

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Before Laida County Prosecutor Bill Thompson announced his decision to

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>pursue the death penalty for Brian Coberger, he met with

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the families of the four victims. While not every member

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>of the victim's immediate family have spoken publicly, there is

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 2>a divide over Thompson's decision to pursue the death penalty.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Xena Kernodle's mother, Kara, has said she doesn't support the

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 2>capital punishment for Brian Cobroger.

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in a death penalty. That's not that's

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not who I am.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 8>I don't believe in that, but I do think that

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 8>he should he should spend the rest of his days

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 8>in prison.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>In contrast, Xena Kernodle's father Jeff, said he supports the

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>death penalty for Coburger so he.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 4>Can never replace the loved ones that are lost, but

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 4>having some sort of justice case that's what the Gonzava's

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 4>family wants.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>While Madison Mogan and Kihi Gonsalvez's parents also support the

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 2>decision to pursue the death penalty for Brian Coberger. Steve

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Gonsalvez has been particularly vocal about his support for the

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>death penalty, saying it is one of the reasons he

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 2>moved to the state of Idaho.

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 9>If you come after Mike Child, I'm going to do

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 9>everything in my power to make sure that you know

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 9>we come after you.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Ethan Chapin's parents have not waited on the decision, even

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>when asked. Stacy Chapin, Ethan's mother, has said she will

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>not attend the trial and her focus is on her

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>family and keeping Ethan's memory alive.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't change the outcome, even looking at ahead at

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the trial coming up in October. Now, it does not

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 3>change the outcome of our family. And it's energy that

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 3>we need to put into healing our kids and getting

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>back to a new family dynamic and work in on that.

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>And so we let the prosecutors do their job and

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 3>we do our job in our family.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's stop here for another break. The split over whether

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 2>or not to pursue the death penalty is not the

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 2>only issue dividing the parents of Kaylee, Madison, Xana, and Ethan.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 8>Meanwhile, work crews started preparing the house where the murders

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 8>happened for demolition.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 2>In February, after Coburger was arrested, the University of Idaho

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>announced it would demolish the blood soaked house at eleven

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:42.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty two King Road. University president Scott Green called it

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>a healing step in the wake of a crime that

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>shook the community. The owner of the home donated it

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to the school, and plans were made to turn the

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 2>lot into a park with a separate memorial to be

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>built on the University of Idaho campus. But now with

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the trial of Brian Coburger is set to begin on

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>October second, some of the families of the four murdered

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 2>students are pressing the University of Idaho to halt its

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 2>plans to demolish the three story structure. Here is the

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Consolvates family attorney Shannon Gray, talking to the Law and

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Crime Network.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 4>A big piece of evidence that potentially a jury might

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 4>want to see it. I mean, there's sights and sounds

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 4>and viewpoints and angles. It's an odd shaped house where

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 4>witnesses were standing, where the potentially the defendant was standing.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>The off campus two thousand, one hundred and seventy five

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 2>square foot home has sat empty ever since the brutal murders.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>On November thirteenth, twenty twenty two. Today it is protected

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 2>by a high metal fence and its lawn is covered

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>in weeds and tall grass. Forensic investigators finished combing through

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>the house long ago. Both the defense and the prosecution

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>have said they are finished with the house, which has

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 2>been flooded by a surge of true crime tourists who

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 2>regularly come to visit. The university and the neighbors want

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.239
<v Speaker 2>the house torn down before students return to school in

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 2>August of twenty twenty three, but the family of Kili

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Gonsalvez is urging the university to wait and say that

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the school is ignoring their request.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 4>And we've just stressed just hold on, you know, wait

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 4>till the trial is over and then then do whatever

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 4>you want with the property. But they just they will

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 4>not listen, and it's frustrating. But if they think that

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 4>they're doing it on behalf of the community or the

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 4>victim's families, it's not true.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 7>Stephanie and Jeff And in the same week that there

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 7>were these legal fights over DNA evidence and the announcement

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 7>from the prosecution that they were in fact going to

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 7>pursue the death penalty, workmen began preparing the three story

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 7>house for demolition. They removed the remaining furniture and any

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 7>other personal items that were left behind after the murders,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 7>and that's the end of it. It seems so strange

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:55.719
<v Speaker 7>that they wouldn't wait until after the trial.

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, despite the prosecution and the defense saying they were

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 6>done with the home, Kaylee's family was worried that the

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 6>jury may want to see it at some point. They

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 6>said publicly they wanted it left in tax so the

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 6>jurors could walk around the property to better understand the

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 6>events of the morning of November thirteenth. The family wants

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 6>the house demolished eventually, but they're afraid that if it

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 6>happens before the trial, it may hurt the prosecution of Brankoberger.

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 7>However, despite their concerns, the community apparently wants it gone

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 7>sooner than later. According to Shannon Gray, Kaylee's family lawyer,

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 7>the university basically said that we hear you, we get

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 7>your concerns, but we are in fact going to move

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 7>forward with the demolition because it's good for the community.

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 6>I understand the feeling of wanting the site of such

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 6>a tragedy gone as soon as possible, but if even

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 6>just one juror is suayed in either direction by seeing

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 6>this house, then they need to leave it up. Justice

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 6>is the number one goal here, and it seems shortsighted

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 6>to potentially get rid of this huge part of the

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 6>case forever.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 7>We've seen this happen before. In fact, in our other podcast,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 7>The piked In Massacre, we saw that the homes where

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 7>those murders happened were also infamously moved into a warehouse,

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 7>which caused lots of controversy. Can you imagine if they

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 7>had just torn them down. It seems like they would

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 7>be destroying an active crime scene. And also in that case,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 7>the jurors all went to the location of the crimes.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 7>That was a big part of the pregame to the trial.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Steh, that's a good point because as Coburger's movements

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 6>on the night in question are very relevant, it stands

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 6>to reason that the same sort of thing might happen

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 6>for this case.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>The next hearing in the case of Idaho versus Brian

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Coburger is set for Tuesday, June twenty seventh. Many of

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 2>these issues could be settled after this important hearing, but

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the trial could also be pushed back to provide more

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 2>time to decide these issues and because Brian Coberger's life

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>is now at stake. More on that next time. For

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 2>more information on the case and relevant photos, follow us

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 2>on Instagram at kat Underscore Studios. The Idaho Masacre is

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>produced by Stephanie Leidecker, Jeff Shane, Connor Powell, Chris Bargo,

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Gabriel Castillo and me Courtney Armstrong. Editing and sound designed

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.959
<v Speaker 2>by Jeff Toi. Music by Jared Aston. The Idaho Massacre

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 2>is a production of iHeart Radio and Kat's Studios. For

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts like this, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 10>I'm Diana, you may know as Body Movin, My Friend

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 10>and I. John Green were featured in the Netflix documentary

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 10>Don't f with Cats. On our new podcast, True Crimes

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 10>of John and Deiana were turning our online investigative skills

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 10>to some of the most unexplained, unsolved, and most ignored cases.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Please say.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Thirty three year old bride Again was shot dead.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Gunned down in front of his two year old daughter.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 7>Detectives confirmed that it was at targeted attack.

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 9>It appears to be an execution style assassination.

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>This is very active, so we have to be careful.

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 7>I've heard that there's a house that has some bodies

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 7>in the basement.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I knew.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 10>I just knew something was wrong.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Maybe there's something more sinister at play than just one

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 6>young girl going missing. If you know something, heard something,

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 6>please it's never too late.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 4>To do the right thing.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 10>This is true crimes with John and Deianna, the.

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 6>Production of KT Studios and iHeartRadio.

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 9>Justice is something that takes different shapes or formed