WEBVTT - Jeff Currie on the Crazy Surge in Metals, And Why The Supercycle Has Years to Run

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway, Tracy Medals.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>That's that's that's it. It's the title.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 4>No, there's a lot happening in the metals space. So

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 4>we have gold above five five hundred announce, which is

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 4>a record. We have silver above one hundred and twenty

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 4>dollars announce, also a record, and now we have copper

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 4>at over fourteen four hundred dollars a ton.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is something that's super interesting to me,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think it is a very important to mention,

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>which is that copper is the ultimate industrial metal, right,

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and for you know, doctor Copper tells us about the

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 2>common probably a little overstated its reputation by just the

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 2>ultimate industrial metal. Gold is the ultimate medal with no

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>industrial uses, right, It's primarily a store of value, a

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of a form of money that's existing SAE for

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>thousands of years. And then silver is a little bit

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>in the middle, more of a safe haven. But we

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>know it has it's used in solar it's used in photography,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 2>not that that really exists anymore. But you know what

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying. So it's like it's interesting to see, like,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>why are they all flying at the exact same time.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was going to say the exact same thing.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.919
<v Speaker 4>So each of these medals historically would tell you something

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>very specific about the state of the economy. And copper

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>certainly would be screaming people are bullish on economic growth. Silver,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, something kind of in the middle. And gold.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Gold soaring is something that you traditionally associate with stress points,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 4>either in the financial system or the broader global economy.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>And yet here we are.

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's all happening in once and like you know,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could say, like, oh, dollar debasement, right,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and we know the dollar has been week against other currencies.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>It's not like inflation is measured, you know, is like

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>raging hot. So it's not just a simple story of

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>like the dollar becoming worthless. So the you know, the

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 2>denominator whatever going up or whatever the other way around is,

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. There's something going on with metals. Maybe they're

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>just the new memestocks, et cetera. But we have to

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 2>dig in.

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's do it all right, Well, I have.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>To say we really do have the perfect guest on

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 2>the perfect day. Again. We're recording this the morning of

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>January twenty ninth. We're going to try and get it

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 2>out asap. But there's headline Copper surging ten percent, unbelievable

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 2>headlines We've had them on multiple times in the past.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>A believer in super cycles, a vindicated man in many

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 2>respects with many of his calls, who's like Goldman a

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>long time. We're going to be speaking with the one

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>and only Jeff Curry, who is now a partner at

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Carlisle Nose Commodities, as well as anyone else we talked to. So, Jeff,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for coming back on the Oud

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Laws podcast.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Great well, thank you having me. Commodities are up and

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 3>back in favor. It was a rough last couple of years,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>to say the least.

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>What do we should just ask? Is this going to

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 4>be the peak?

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Is this the peak? Did we is?

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the question? Is this the peak?

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 4>You're back on? Everyone's going to ask, is this the did.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Odd Laws get the peak? Because they called? They ring

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Curry? So let's just get this out.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Of the way. By the way, I love that we're

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>in the foothills of the Himalayas right now. So we're

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>not even close to the real mountain peaks.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah really yes, Okay, So I'm going to ask the

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 4>obvious question, which we alluded to in the intro, but

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>why are all three of these things moving in the

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 4>same direction all at once?

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the commodity complex, you take anything

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>that has an atomic number to it, that's in the

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>periodic table, it's going up right now. Even nicol and

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>zinc have joined the party. If it is a molecule

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and it has a carbon in it, a carbon hydrogen,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 3>a CCH in it, it's been struck. So that includes

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>hydrocarbons as well as carbon hydrates like corn wheat and

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>so forth. So that space, the molecules have been struggling.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Yet you have the things that are primarily critical minerals,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>things that are in the periodic table. The atomic number

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>have all done well, and the fundamentals and copper are

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>not that much tighter than what you have in oil.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.799
<v Speaker 3>So what's going on in the metal space is hoarding

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>given the concerns over having availability of these critical minerals,

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 3>And you throw out the idea of debasement, and I

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 3>want to throw in three other d's d dollarization and

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 3>diversity to your debasement. So debasement, de dollarization, and diversity

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>is what's driving all of these different metals. And when

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 3>we think about the de dollarization, and that goes back

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>to twenty twenty two, when the US and Europeans froze

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the central bank assets of Russia, every emerging market goes uh, oh,

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be owning any dollar denominated assets

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 3>because look what happens through the Russians. And as a result,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.119
<v Speaker 3>they're movement as fast as they can out of dollar

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 3>assets into assets that cannot be seized and precious metals

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 3>and metals are part of that. And then when you

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>have the geopolitical risk as high as they are right

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>now on a global basis, whether it was US cutting

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 3>off Venezuelan oil supply to China, India and Europe, or

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>it was the Chinese cutting off critical mineral supply to

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the US and its allies, or it's Russia cutting off

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>supplies and natural gas, it's a dangerous time to be

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>dependent upon foreign commodity supply and as a result, we

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 3>have stockpiling and everybody talks about the squeeze in silver,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 3>running it up to one hundred and twenty dollars an ounce.

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>The reality is this is a squeeze by the population

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 3>of the people in China. You know, they're hoarding the

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 3>silver over concerns around export controls and things of that nature.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned China just then, and this is exactly

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 4>what we wanted to ask you about, which is, if

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 4>you've stripped out what's going on in China, how much

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 4>of the rally would disappear in something like gold.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the vast majority of it is not just China,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>but emerging market central bank buying basically reduced their holdings

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 3>of Western bonds that can be frozen, similar to what

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>happened with the Russian So you know, do not underestimate

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the impact that China's had. In fact, if anything, China

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 3>and the other emerging markets have squeezed other participants in

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the gold market out. And do you still have a

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>long ways to go? I like to point out that

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen seventy, when Nixon took the US off the

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 3>gold standard, central bank reserves and gold stood at around

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 3>forty percent. Last time I calculated late day in the

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>last year. Wasn't that twenty seven to twenty eight percent,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 3>but the run up in the last couple of days

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 3>could be as high as thirty by now. But I

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>think the key message is there's still a lot more

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 3>buying by essential banks who diversify themselves out of dollars.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm still a little bit confused. What is it about

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>silver particularly that's so desirable right now from the population

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>in China, Because just let's talk about hoarding and some

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of these issues. It's totally understandable why China wants to

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>hold certain strategic assets, right It wants to accumulate a

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of oil in part because of defense purposes, because

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>in the event of a war for whatever reason, they

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 2>may get shot out of oil, so they need a lot.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>What is it about silver in the population context that

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>makes it so desirable? And by the way, I'm looking

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>at a chart is from two days ago. But the

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Shanghai silver premium buyers in China panng more than five

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>dollars an ounce versus everyone else in the rest of

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the world. But explain what is it this driving this

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>purchase from the public in China.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, first, let's talk about its role as a critical manalk.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 3>It goes into the production solar PV and that makes it,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>as you pointed out the beginning, fifty percent an industrial

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>metal and then fifty percent of a store value like gold.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that it has these dual uses, it's

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>a critical mineral and important to the electrification process on

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>a global base. Remember, it's a superconductor. Actually, let me

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>go back to answer your question. Tracy said, what do gold, silver,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and copper all have in common? They're superconductors. I know

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>people say, well, Jeff, copper isn't exactly a definition of

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 3>a superconductor. It's not as strong as silver and gold,

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 3>but it sits up there in that electrification process. And

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 3>so when we think about silver, it's critical for the

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 3>industrial base of China given the importance of solar panels

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 3>as a part of the industrial manufacturing process in China.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, when if you're the PBOC or somebody

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>like that, you're going to be very focused on making

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 3>sure there's adequate silver supplies inside of China. So the

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 3>fact that it also then has the store of value

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>like gold and accessible by many parts of the population.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Because even at one hundred one hundred dollars an hour,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty dollars an ounce as wherever this morning,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 3>it still makes it a much more affordable a store

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>of value. So I think that two key points for

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 3>China and why silver is so important is its role

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>as a critical mineral and as a superconductor. And given

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>the importance of solar panels and other types of renewable

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 3>investments to the Chinese industrial base, having a secure supply

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>of silver is absolutely critical to the Chinese economy. Second

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>of all, is when you look at the price of silver,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 3>even at one hundred and twenty dollars an ounce, it

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>is still very affordable to many of the population as

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 3>a store of value similar to gold. And also given

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the recent price trends, people feel comfortable in holding it.

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 3>So it has those two components that make it critical

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 3>to the Chinese economy.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 4>Some people would say that, like, all right, you can

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 4>look at all these things surging and tell a story

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 4>about debasement and electrification and what the future world is

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 4>going to look like. Some other people would say, well,

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 4>you could tell an even simpler story, which is that

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 4>one of these markets is wrong. Right, So maybe copper

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 4>sees economic growth going to the moon, although it seems

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of unlikely to me, maybe silver is somewhere in between.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Maybe gold is wrong about the debasement thesis. Whatever, how

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 4>do we know that We're just not seeing investors get

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 4>this one wrong. People are just going from a mentoreame.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Clanification of pressures of metal.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I do think when we talk about a commodity

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 3>supercycle the s words, which by the way, is nothing

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>other than a commodity capac cycle or a big global

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 3>capac cycle, and we're seeing that, you know, whether it's

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 3>an investment in defend, investment into AI data centers. The

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 3>list goes on. This is a world scale capex boom

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>we're now entering. And that typically is when you see

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the big commodity supercycles. One in the seventies, one in

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the two thousands, and where I mean, just take the

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>defense spending in Europe alone, it's likely to be nine

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 3>trillion euros over the next decade. To put that in perspective,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese boom in the two thousands was ten trillion

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 3>US today it's about fifteen. So even just Europe on

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 3>a loan, we haven't even factored in data centers in AI.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So when that occurs, typically what we see is a

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>repricing and rerating towards asset heavy industries in commodities, or

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 3>another way to think about it as short duration. Strangely

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>is when interest rates are low, everybody thinks, oh, you

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>would be doing capex cycles. No, you do them when

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>their interest rates are high. Because the interest rates are high,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>they're telling you you need to put money into the ground.

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 3>And so we're moving into to one of these repricing

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 3>towards asset heavy industries, which is why it will ultimately

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 3>be sustainable across the entire commodity complex. And I just

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 3>want to take a step back and talk about these

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 3>repricings because in my career, I've lived through two. The

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 3>first one was in that call it two through like

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 3>four time period, and that's what we coined the term

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>revenge of the old economy. Old economy is asset heavy,

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>New economy is asset light. And that asset light in

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 3>the late nineties two thousands was really about the scalability

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 3>of software. You don't need to have put a lot

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 3>of money into the ground to be able to create growth,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.479
<v Speaker 3>and that was the whole asset light model. But eventually

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 3>we ran out of all of these heavy industries that

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 3>you need to make the investments in and then China

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 3>came on the scene and became clear we need to

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>make those investments. And that happened over that decade. But

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 3>that repricing, rerating was a violent process as you moved

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 3>out of new economy or into the old economy. The

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 3>next time we saw that was in fourteen fifteen, where

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 3>we moved out of the old economy and into the

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 3>new economy. Why because it was clear China was at

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the end of the track. And if you remember that

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>time period we go through there, the euro went from

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 3>like one point fourd to parody in the course of

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 3>like eighteen months. I remember the period oil was coming

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 3>down seven dollars a barrel, like every other day, everybody,

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 3>what's going on? What's going on? I want to make

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 3>a point here to get to your point about why

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 3>is this sustainable across all these commodities. And when we

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>look at I'm going to take a like a private

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>equity pitch book in twenty twelve of a Canadian oil asset.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 3>They value the asset at one hundred and ten dollars

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of barrel. The IRR of that asset that this oil

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 3>field was twenty five percent at one hundred and ten.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Now fast forward to twenty sixteen, after the macro repricing,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 3>oil was sitting around forty dollars a barrel. Now, let's

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>go reprice the IRR of that asset. What do you

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 3>think it is immediate responsibles? He would go, oh, it

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 3>was negative. Rr. No, it was around eighteen nineteen percent.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 3>It didn't come down much. Why is because the Canadian

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.479
<v Speaker 3>dollar reprice, so wages went down, you had a repricing

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 3>of the cost of capital, you had a repricing of copper,

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>iron ore. They all came down, and so your cost

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>bass came down, such as the IRR was far more

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>stable over that repricing. And that's ultimately what we're starting

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>to see happen across this space right now. And I

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>believe we're in one of these repricings. We're going to

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 3>move back into the asset heavy space. I want to

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 3>make one last point before moving on this. During this

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>it's going to make this one really different from ones

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 3>in the past. Is I want to go back to

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen sixties because it's similar to today. And that was that,

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 3>at least in the modern data the first big commodity supercycle,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the asset light space back in the sixties was companies

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>like Coca Cola. In fact, all the nifty to fifty

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 3>were brands. What do brands have similar to Let's say Microsoft,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 3>infinitely scalable at zero marginal cost. And so Coca Cola

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>was the world's darling right now, and all of the

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>big commodity producers, the miners, the oil companies were at

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the bottom. And then you had the Arab oil embargo

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>create that catalyst to reprice. Now what happened here is

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>that that's different today. So you think about that asset

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>light space was Coca Cola, and then in two thousand

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 3>it was Microsoft, and today it is Google and the hyperscalers.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Now here's where it gets really different in the power

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen now is the asset light space

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>is getting into the asset heavy space, i e. These

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 3>hyperscalers are putting steel into the ground. And by the way,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>you're no longer a asset light infinitely scalable software company,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>You're a you're an oil company, you are a commodity producer,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 3>You're multiple is going to get rerated. And so what

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>we have is the asset light space this time is

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 3>moving into the asset heavy space and putting steel in

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 3>the ground. So this is going to be a real

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 3>violent transitions. To ask about copper and silver and the

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>rest of these things. What are the restrictions on their

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 3>big CAPEX budgets? Is the availability of transformers? What are

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>transformers big chunks of copper? And so we have a

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 3>difference in this cycle than once in the past is

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the asset light space is colliding in the physical space

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 3>at the exact same time, which is what I thind

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>to think that this repricing is going to be more violent,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 3>more sustainable, and what you're going to see, and it

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>goes to a simple point that I observed in the

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>two thousands was when oil first went out because oh

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a bunch of investors buying oil, it sits at

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 3>sixty dollars a barrel, that supernatural returns. No, you actually

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 3>had capital rotate out of the asset light space and

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>into the oil space during four to five such as

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the cost basis actually rose and there was no supernatural return.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 3>So go, Tracy back to your point, how sustainable is this? Well,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 3>what we're seeing is all the capital flowing into this

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 3>asset heavy space and it's going to build the ground

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>underneath these prices and support them from a relative cost basis.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 3>And so when we think about fourteen thousand dollars a

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 3>ton comper, doesn't mean these guys are earning supernatural returns

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 3>because we see so much capital movements in the space.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely love that comparison of the software companies to

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 2>the Coca Colas and this idea that there are certain

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 2>business models that can scale incredibly with very little physical needs.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 2>And the way you framed that I thought was very

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>helpful to understand. And we've certainly talked a lot on

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the podcast about the hyperscaler is getting into the real

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>business of things and you know, going up the chain

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and in some cases getting getting into the power production,

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 2>investing in their own nuclear plants and hiring power traders.

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>So all of this feels very real. Let's just like

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 2>you say we're in a super cycle, you say we're

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>at the foothills of the Himalayas. What is history or

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 2>your work say about how big and how far this

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 2>can go?

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, historically these cycles last summer around twelve years.

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 3>The one in the seventies did, the one in the

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 3>two thousands did one of the seventies from sixty eight

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>to nineteen eighty, the one in the two thousands, from

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 3>essentially two thousand and two to twenty and fourteen. A

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of people say, oh, the world's different today than

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 3>in those other points. Time Putting steel in the ground

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 3>still takes about the same amount of time, technology or

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 3>no technology. I like to point out, where do you

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 3>get the twelve years you know, were the first three years,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 3>or getting people to believe it before they start to

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 3>really invest earnestly. And I would say this one started

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty and so the fact that we lost

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>two years in twenty three and twenty five, whether it

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 3>was copper oil and part of the reason for that

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>was the rally and prices was so steep after that

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Russian Ukrainian invasion. The policy response globally was incredibly swift.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 3>I want to point out that policy response in twenty

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>two and twenty three was not so much the rise

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in interest rates but the creation of supply. And I

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 3>say that is because you had inflation come down everywhere

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 3>in the world in a synchronous manner, and it did

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 3>it against record commodity demand and really strong GDP growth

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 3>in the United States wasn't I tell you, it simply

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 3>could not have been interest rates in the demand side.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 3>It had to come from a supply side. Where did

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 3>they get new supply? Russia, Iran, Venezuela, you know, some

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 3>of the issues that are faceing to say. They got

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 3>it through increased immigration on the labor side. There was

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ways they created supply all over the

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 3>world to be able to deal with that. Now the

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 3>point this time around, and everybody's bought into this oil

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 3>supply lot, we don't have a problem is that those

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 3>easy fixes are not going to be available next time around.

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 3>So this one's going to take longer than normal. But

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 3>I also want to go why I'm comfortable with this

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 3>being a supercycle is all of these things are all

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 3>policy driven. The one in the seventies was due to

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the lbj's War on poverty, the big defense spending sound familiar,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and then you had the air of oil embargo. If

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 3>you look at what happened in the two thousands, it

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 3>was the decision to admit China, the wto a policy decision.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Here the policy decisions is the war on free trade,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's not just the US doing everybody's doing it.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, curtailing commodity supply around the world. In fact

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 3>that the three points we laid out in twenty twenty,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 3>in fact, it was on this show we laid them out.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 3>There's still very much valid today. And they were all

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 3>policy decisions. One was deglobalization, the war on free trade.

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if anything, it's been turbo charged now from

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 3>five years ago. And when we think about it, it's

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>all policy decisions. It's not just inside the United States

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>where we're seeing this. You know, the Chinese cutting critical

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>mineral supply. You know, Europeans focused on, you know, protecting themselves,

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 3>defense spending. The list goes on. Let's go to the

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>second one at the time, decarbonization or electrification. And I

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 3>know a lot of people are going to look at, oh, well,

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 3>didn't the US backtrack on that with it, you know,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>the recent political shifts. The answer is absolutely not. The

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world is doubling down on electrification. For

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 3>both when we think about the electrification of the world,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 3>where it wasn't decarbonization was not the motivator today, it

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>wasn't then. And then going back in time, why do

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>I say that, why did China build cutting edge technologies

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>and nuclear power, solar wind batteries and the rest of it.

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 3>They did it for energy security. Kind of goes into

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the deglobalization point. They want their own secure energy supply.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Carter coined the term energy transition and want

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>to transition out of oil into renewables in nineteen seventy seven,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 3>not because they wanted to save the world, but because

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 3>of energy security. One last point on this is France

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 3>lowest carbon footprint in the world. It didn't get there

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 3>because it wanted to save the planet. It got there

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 3>because it wanted nuclear power. So it was Charles de

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 3>gaull decision to rid itself of the oil trade. So

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 3>this story, regardless of what's going on in the political pushback,

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think green was ever probably the right

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>way to phrase this. It's renewable, it's a secure source,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 3>nuclear powers, a secure source, throw data centers AI all

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 3>on top of it. It's turbocharged. From the last time

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 3>we talked about and then finally the third point was

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>redistribution of the war on income inequality kate with the

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 3>k economy. This is alive and kicking.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Wait say more about that last point.

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, when we think about commodities, and actually, Tracy, i've

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 3>seen you even make this point that I made back

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>five years ago, was that when you see inflation and

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you see commodity demand, it has to be coming from

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the low income groups. This is the point that people

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 3>get backwards. Inflation is bad for the high income groups.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 3>And the reason why is because the low.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 4>This was a great call that you made, by the way, Yeah.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 3>And the low income groups are the ones that actually

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>think about this. In corn, a high income person will

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>consume the same amount of corn at any point in time.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 3>The marginal demand has to come from the low income groups.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>And so when you give them money like fiscal transfers

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and you know, to keep the masses happy in certain situations,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 3>what are they going to do. They're going to spend it.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 3>They're going to spend it on commodities and physical goods,

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and that ends up creating that inflation, and then the

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 3>high income people suffer because the the response by policymakers

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 3>to the higher rates is wealth comes down. And another

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>way to think about all inflation is as a wealth

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 3>transfer between the high income groups and the low income groups,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 3>and then they go out and spend it. And so

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 3>when we think about the demand here is that third one,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 3>which is this war on that income inequality is just

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 3>going to demand more and more types of transfers to

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 3>the lower income groups to be able to deal with

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 3>the silvil unrest. And it's alive and kick in everywhere

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 3>in the world right now. And so I would assume

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you know that, you know, if you liked any of

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 3>these three stories back in twenty twenty, you got to

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 3>love them today.

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Just going back to the supersycle thesis and the role

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 4>of policy, how do we know that the importance of

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these metals, the strategic importance, How do

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 4>we know that that won't end up increasing supply faster

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 4>than we expect? You know, part of the story, especially

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 4>in copper, is that it's not that many people are

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 4>pulling it out of the ground anymore. It takes forever

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 4>to get a new mind started. How do we know

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 4>that government aren't just going to make it easier to

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 4>get this stuff? And so you'll see a supply response

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 4>faster than perhaps you saw previously.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Let's go back to my point. You know these are

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 3>twelve years cycles. It's just putting steel in the ground

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 3>takes a long time. Even if you got rid of

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>all of the bureaucracy and red tape. It's going to

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 3>take time. But let's go to the critical minerals. Why

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 3>does China dominate these They did it because the Soviets

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and the Americans didn't want to touch the downstream processes

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 3>because of not in my backyard, for nimby reasons. I

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>mean even the Soviets. I mean remind I say the Soviets,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 3>because this decision was made in the seventies. Remember when

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the EPA, the super fun sites and all of that.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 3>The Americans and the Soviets used to do this, they

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 3>quit doing it and farmed it out to the Chinese

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>because they didn't like doing it in their backyards. There's

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.239
<v Speaker 3>are really highly toxic processes, and so if you're going

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 3>to onshore them and bring them back, you've got to

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>figure out technology used to do this in a way

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that's going to deal with those nimby problems that people

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to deal with fifty years ago. So it's

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 3>going to be very time consuming. There's ways to get

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 3>around it. But you know, whether if I heard you know,

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 3>you can build these facilities on army land in the

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 3>United States. You don't get any of the bureaucracy around

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 3>environmental problems. But even so the last thing, you know,

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 3>this stuff you did. You know, if you didn't like

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 3>it in the seventies, you're still not going to like

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 3>it today. So it's not something that can be resolved overnight.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>It's going to take a long time. It's going to

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 3>take an enormous amount of capital, new technologies created, re

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>routing supply chains around the world. That's why I say, then,

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>where is just the tip of the iceberg on what

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>needs to be done here, which is why I think

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 3>is going to go on, you know, for at least

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>another decade. And one last point about the super cycle

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the seventies and the one in the in the two thousands,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 3>they were sequences of price spikes. They weren't a steady

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 3>upward trend. You had one in seventy three, another one

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 3>in seventy seven, seventy eight, and another one in eighty.

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 3>In the two thousands, you have one in four oh five,

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>another one in eight, and then the final finale in eleven,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 3>late ten and eleven it was with Libya and then

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 3>copper top eleven thousand. So everybody thinks they're like the

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 3>steady upward trend in prices and assets the realities there

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 3>sequence of price bikes, and this one will be more

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 3>bubbly in nature. I like to say it's a bubbling

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 3>cauldron of supply and demand imbalances. And part of this

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 3>is because of what happened with the surge in investment

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 3>around let's call it the green investment around net zero

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifty. I like to say that that investment occurred

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 3>from around twenty fifteen through about twenty one twenty two.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 3>It created an environment where you have lots of let's say,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>renewable win in places like Germany or Spain, but you

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>don't have the batteries, the grid and the rest of it.

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 3>So while that creates is these pockets where you can

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 3>see big shifts where you have negative prices of power

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>at some point explosive prices on their side. So the

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 3>one thing about this time around, it's going to create

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>much higher levels of volatility across the commodity space. Like silver,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 3>you can see you get into these pockets were it'll

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 3>go up and down. And you know whether it was

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>California power in the two thousands, and that my cycle,

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 3>which sure reminds me what silver's doing today, is you

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 3>end up with an environment in which the volatility gets higher.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 3>The volatility then scares investors away. The lack of investment

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 3>then reinforces the higher volatility. And I think that that dynamic,

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 3>in this bubbling cauldron of supply and demand imbalances is

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>just going to be that much more vicious this time

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 3>around than in the past.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Jeff, you're my favorite person to talk to about commodities.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 2>But my second favorite person to talk to about commodities

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>is the uber driver that I had in twenty twenty two,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>who when he was dropping me off at Bloomberg and

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned this on a previous episode, He's like, Oh,

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I have a thesis. I'm really long silver because it

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 2>has all these industrial uses. But silver is frequently mined

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 2>as a byproduct of copper production, and there isn't a

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of new copper production happening at this current state. Therefore,

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to see a big supply response be

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 2>elicited on the silver side, and so you're going to

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>get this mega squeeze. So here's my second favorite one

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that was twenty twenty two, now in January twenty twenty six.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, clearly the price is right, but this phenomenon

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>as he described it. Does that sound pretty accurate to you?

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? I mean with all of these by the way

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 3>that you can get the supply, it's not a scarcity

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 3>of the commodities, whether if it's critical mental even compar

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 3>it's like, it's the access. It is the political access

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 3>to where the resources. But more importantly, it's the willingness

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 3>of capital to provide the money. I like to say,

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not about the supply and demand of the molecules,

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 3>or of the metric tons or the bushels. It's about

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 3>the supply and demand of the capital used to create

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the production. Therein lies the core problem. And the capital

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 3>has not moved in. So Tracy back your point, how

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 3>long is it go? We haven't even moved the capitol

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in yet. The capital is still sitting in the new

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 3>economy or asset light world. And the returns. You know,

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>by the way I've asked people, I go like this

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 3>is in like twenty three twenty four, I go, hey,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 3>why don't you want to put money into these this space?

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 3>The answer was, Jeff, I agree with your story. The

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 3>problem is the tech space is providing such real good

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 3>returns that if I am underweight the space. I got

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 3>a problem, and I'd rather be putting the money into

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 3>what's out before me. That was a case in twenty three,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, twenty five.

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Just to be clear, since the last time we talked

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 2>to there has not been a ton of activity in

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of let's actually start digging.

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>No, because the pullback in late twenty two and early

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty three was so vicious across this entire space that

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the money they looked at it go I got beaten up.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, Curry, you told me to go in back

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 3>in twenty and twenty one work for about a year

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 3>and a half. I got absolutely cremated on the backside.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to do that again. And so they

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 3>got beaten up over that time period. Their willingness to

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 3>go back in and believe the story is not that high.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 3>They're going to have to see it. And now that's

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 3>moved so quick, so fast like it did in twenty two,

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to look at it and go, oh,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I missed it. And I think, you know, it's like

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Tracy's point is how much further this go? How sustainable

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>is it? And I think the key point there is

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>it's that volatility is discouraging them. And that's why I

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 3>tend to think what is going to force the money

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 3>into the space is you're going to have to have

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the returns in the asset light tech or whatever you

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>want to call it. World get to a point that

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>they're going looking at the old economy going I'm willing

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 3>to take that risk and go in it because that's

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the only place that has returned. And when they do that,

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 3>that's when you're going to end up seeing the rotation.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>And I also want to go back to a point

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 3>here is the market is so severely underweight all of

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 3>this stuff because it's been so hated for so long

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 3>that when the.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Money rotates, anti goldbug.

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 3>But when the money rotates, it's going to be playing ketchup.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Whether if it's you know, the two and a half

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 3>percent waiting of energy in the S and P five

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred versus what a seven or eight percent waiting on

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>revenues the market cap is too small, and what if

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 3>it's in metals and mining and critical money. These things

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 3>are just so tiny. It's like I was talking the

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 3>other day. You take FCX and let's see ivanhoe mines

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 3>and some of the other smaller copper producers, So what

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 3>is their market cap is is all together two hundred

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 3>billion versus Navidia at four and a half trillion. Now,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, you take that money out there,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and that has to go chase the space, and so

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 3>you're asking how high can it go? You can go

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 3>really high because you're talking about moving trillions of dollars

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 3>out of asset light into asset heavy when nothing's been

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 3>here for over a decade.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Jeff, very very quickly. Are there any risks to the

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 4>structural supercycle thesis? Is there any indicator that you're watching

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to suggest that, Okay, maybe it's not going to happen,

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 4>or maybe it's not going to happen at the moment

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 4>that you're currently predicting.

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I first want to talk about the difference between equities

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 3>and commodities. Commodities are driven by the real physical supply

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 3>and demand, and equities and financial markets are driven by expectations.

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Expectations can or cannot happen. Trying to figure out what

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the next person is going to do and what they're

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 3>going to buy actually can be modeled and thought through,

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 3>but it's less predictable long term supply and demand balances

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and commodities. You know, when you have a problem a way,

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 3>people don't push back. I mean when I think I

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 3>said on the last time here, copper is the best

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 3>trade I've seen in terms of fundamentals. Stan Druck of

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Miller recently he made the same comment that hey it's tight,

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it's really tight, but it may not work today, tomorrow,

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the next day. I know if I sit on the

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 3>position and hold it long enough, eventually you'll get to

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 3>that point where it does pay out. Because you know

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the physical supply and demand, the rubber meets the road

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 3>and you see the rise of prices. Now the question

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 3>is can you stay liquid long enough before that event occurs. So,

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 3>first of all, the reason why I'm so confident in

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 3>these stories is the forward on these markets are incredibly unbalanced,

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 3>whether if it is in copper, you know, the industrial metals,

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, the critical minerals, oil, all of them are

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 3>really imbalanced. Because so that's the thesis why my confidence. Now,

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 3>what is the near term risk. It's not that you

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 3>know that you're gonna because we're going to electrify the world.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 3>You don't have enough copper to electrify the world. The

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 3>risk is like the demand for in housing demand in

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 3>China collapses, but that happened in twenty three and twenty four,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 3>so you've already paid the price on that one. So

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 3>when I think about these risks that you're talking about,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 3>they might come from the demand side, because you cannot

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 3>create supply from thin air, so it has to be

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 3>demand coming down. But that demand coming down just ultimately

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 3>delays how long it'll take before you run into the province.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 3>The main reason why copper didn't perform in that twenty

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 3>three twenty four timeframe is we underestimated the severity of

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the property contraction in China, and part of that was

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the high interest rates. West forced the Chinese to keep

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 3>interest rates too high because they had to prevent capital outflow,

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 3>and as a result, it really hurt that property sector.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 3>So that would be you know, it's different than the

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 3>financial markets because the expectations can change on a moment

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 3>and they're hard to forecast. Bottom line, you need this investment.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Curry, perfect guest, Perfect day. Thank you so much

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 2>for coming back on outline.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Great, thank you for having me. It's quite enjoyable, truly.

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 4>The perfect guests. Congrats on all your structural thess that

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 4>seem to be playing out great.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Take care of y'all.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I think just the best.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 2>She's so good.

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm so glad we could get him on today. In particular,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 4>I should just mention we're recording on January twenty ninth.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 4>The price of is going up so quickly. Who knows

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 4>what it's going to be tomorrow.

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 2>I think the most. I mean, there are so many

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 2>powerful ideas and compelling notions. To my mind, one of

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 2>the strongest ideas that I think is sort of under

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 2>discussed in the debate is the intersection of the commodity

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>rally and the war on free trade. Right, and you know,

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 2>we look at things they're getting a little bit more

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 2>expensive here, people sort of look like it's the terms

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 2>being passed through, et cetera. But this deeper dynamic that

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:37.959
<v Speaker 2>if you don't have a world of sort of relatively

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 2>open trade, then that forces everyone to stockpile, and that

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 2>forces everyone to build their own version, and that'll I'm

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>going to build a chip plant here, and I'm going

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to build a chip plant there, and I'm going to

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 2>build a chip plant there. Because we're also worried you

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 2>have that duplication. That's the war on free trade that

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 2>whether it's public or private, forces all of this commodity

0:36:58.400 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 2>intensive spending.

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going to say, is it's good to hold

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 4>gold and silver coins in? Well, the problem is it

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 4>feels good. It feels good. But well, that's the thing.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know how to sell. Like I would

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 4>have to carry a bunch of gold coins through New

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 4>York and find a dealer or something.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 2>You know what, We need to take another trip through

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 2>the diamond diustry. There are plenty of signs on their

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:24.919
<v Speaker 2>windows we buy gold and so forth.

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would actually do an episode on buying physical gold.

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's do an episode on selling physical Yeah, yeah, how.

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 4>Do you actually do that? Are there certain ways to

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 4>do it that are better than others and all of that? Yeah,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 4>totally do that.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it. It sounds like you're great.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 4>I have a silver bar somewhere too. I need to

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 4>find that. I like, I'm going to bring it in

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 4>and use it as a paperweight just to annoy you.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have my I have my what's it called

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 2>not the what's that metal?

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 4>That metal that you are obsessed with?

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And now you forgot I shouldn't have asked if that's

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 2>my one. That's my main exposure to hard ass. It's

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 2>that tungsten cube. That's that copweight. I think so. I mean,

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 2>he said every element in the He said, the story

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 2>is that if it's an element in the periodic table,

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it's gone up in price. And I actually think tungsten

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 2>has gone up quite a bit in that price. But

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 2>I didn't exactly buy in size. I think my cube

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 2>cross about three hundred dollars, just something like that.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 4>But okay, shall we leave it there.

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 4>This has been another episode of the Adlots podcast. I'm

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman armand Dashel Bennett

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 2>at Dashbot and kel Brooks at Keil Brooks. For more

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 2>odd Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Were have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and you can shed about all of these topics twenty

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 2>four to seven in our discord discord dot gg slash.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.839
<v Speaker 4>Odlines and if you enjoy Oddlots, if you like it

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 4>when we talk about commodities. Then please leave us a

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 4>positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 4>you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 4>of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need to

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 4>do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 4>follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.