1 00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:09,039 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:10,039 --> 00:00:13,720 Speaker 2: Wall Street has never had a reputation for impeccable behavior. 3 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 2: Headlines and pop culture often show a cutthroat industry with 4 00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:22,599 Speaker 2: toxicity bubbling right beneath the surface, but Citygroup appeared to 5 00:00:22,640 --> 00:00:26,319 Speaker 2: be different. In twenty twenty one, the bank promoted Jane 6 00:00:26,400 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 2: Fraser to CEO, making her the first female CEO of 7 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:32,919 Speaker 2: any major Wall Street bank, and the company touted a 8 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 2: concerted effort to prioritize diversity and inclusion. But in November 9 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:40,440 Speaker 2: of last year, a managing director at the bank named 10 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:45,120 Speaker 2: Ardith Lindsay filed a lawsuit accusing Citygroup of harassment and discrimination. 11 00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:48,879 Speaker 3: The managing director painted this sort of picture of just 12 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 3: an extremely dysfunctional workplace, sort of life with discrimination and 13 00:00:54,760 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 3: sexual harassment and drug use that she says persisted over 14 00:00:58,920 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 3: a number of years. 15 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 2: My Bloomberg colleague, Page Smith covered the lawsuit in November 16 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 2: and then kept digging. She worked with finance reporter Max Abelson, 17 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,039 Speaker 2: who's covered Wall Street for years, and together they uncovered 18 00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:14,520 Speaker 2: a much bigger story about problems in Citygroup's equities division 19 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:17,880 Speaker 2: and the finance industry's long path to reckoning, with how 20 00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 2: it treats women. 21 00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:21,920 Speaker 4: The story is a reminder that questions about gender and 22 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 4: behavior like are not abstract at all, and the question 23 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:27,679 Speaker 4: of corporations and what they owe their employees is a 24 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:29,280 Speaker 4: very real thing with real consequences. 25 00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,320 Speaker 2: Today on the show, we go inside Citygroup and explore 26 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:38,720 Speaker 2: what behavior within this one unit reveals about just how 27 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:40,640 Speaker 2: far Wall Street still has to go. 28 00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:44,720 Speaker 1: This is the big take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder. 29 00:01:47,920 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 2: In November of twenty twenty three, Citygroup executive artist Lindsay 30 00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 2: filed a lawsuit against the bank, accusing it of tolerating 31 00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 2: a culture of harassment and discrimination in its equities unit. 32 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 2: Citygroup has said it will defend itself against our claims. 33 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 2: But for Bloomberg reporter Paige Smith, the legal filing opened 34 00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 2: a rare window into part of City Group's culture. She 35 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:10,880 Speaker 2: wanted to pry it all the way open. So, Paige, 36 00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 2: where did the reporting process take you next? What other 37 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:14,080 Speaker 2: questions did you want to ask? 38 00:02:14,440 --> 00:02:17,120 Speaker 3: I think the thing that we really wanted to uncover 39 00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:20,959 Speaker 3: with this piece was understanding that the lawsuit was one 40 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 3: person's experience within the equity's division, But we really wanted 41 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:30,120 Speaker 3: to learn more about how widespread the alleged behavior was 42 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:34,799 Speaker 3: how many people had experienced it over what period of time, 43 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:39,359 Speaker 3: what kinds of experiences may be extended beyond those described 44 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 3: in the lawsuit. So our reporting sort of brought us 45 00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:47,640 Speaker 3: to these interviews with these many, many people who worked 46 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 3: in or closely with the Equity's division over a long 47 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 3: period of time. 48 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,840 Speaker 2: Can you describe any more of the specific allegations that 49 00:02:54,919 --> 00:02:56,800 Speaker 2: were unearthed in these conversations. 50 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:01,160 Speaker 3: One instance that is one depiction of some of the 51 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:05,160 Speaker 3: dysfunction that we uncovered in our reporting was a client 52 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 3: party at a sort of buzzy downtown club restaurant called 53 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 3: Catch in May twenty eighteen, where there were rappers performing, 54 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 3: there were City Group employees there, there were clients there, 55 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:23,959 Speaker 3: and there were also two people linked to the Equities 56 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:27,720 Speaker 3: Division there, a young two year rotator and her roommate, 57 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 3: And at the time the night sort of progressed and 58 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:36,240 Speaker 3: one of the unit's bosses actually came up and started 59 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:40,560 Speaker 3: sort of grinding his crotch against the young two year 60 00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:41,840 Speaker 3: rotator's roommate. 61 00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 2: That's according to two people present who said they saw 62 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 2: the incident. 63 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 3: It was an instance that sort of stuck out to 64 00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 3: us as just showing that this behavior was not just 65 00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:55,480 Speaker 3: tolerated but witnessed by a number of people within the division, 66 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,800 Speaker 3: and it was not just a standalone incident, but kind 67 00:03:59,800 --> 00:04:01,840 Speaker 3: of a pattern of harassment. 68 00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:04,040 Speaker 4: And what I find impressive about pages reporting is that 69 00:04:04,080 --> 00:04:06,680 Speaker 4: it doesn't just stop there. She also has that rotator 70 00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:09,480 Speaker 4: going on to be told to like wear higher heels 71 00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:13,800 Speaker 4: to work and to wear shorter skirts. And I think 72 00:04:13,840 --> 00:04:16,480 Speaker 4: that there was a male trader who kept asking about 73 00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:21,280 Speaker 4: her love life. Pages work depicts not just these individual instances, 74 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:23,720 Speaker 4: but a pattern of a unit where all was not well. 75 00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 2: What is the culture of an equities division generally. 76 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:31,359 Speaker 4: Well, you know, Wall Street, like any high stakes corporate 77 00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:34,279 Speaker 4: environment is never perfect when there's a lot of money 78 00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:36,920 Speaker 4: to be made or to be lost. I think it's 79 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 4: completely normal to expect a certain level of intensity and competitiveness. 80 00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 4: But we're not talking about pedestrian banal competitiveness. We're talking 81 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:51,240 Speaker 4: about people who were using cocaine, and not just after hours, 82 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:54,120 Speaker 4: but at work. One person had to tell another to 83 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 4: wipe the white residue beneath their nose, you know, inside 84 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:00,600 Speaker 4: the Manhattan headquarters. And it's also so you know, it's 85 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 4: not a matter of like policing other people's drug use. 86 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:07,760 Speaker 4: There's also a pattern that she found of men raiding 87 00:05:08,080 --> 00:05:10,640 Speaker 4: their female colleagues, including very very young ones, by their 88 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:15,160 Speaker 4: looks and oggling and staring at their bodies as they 89 00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:17,920 Speaker 4: walk by. I think that if it's fair to expect 90 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:21,680 Speaker 4: a certain level of intensity and competitiveness, that's certainly fair. 91 00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:24,200 Speaker 4: But it's also fair to expect that at some of 92 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:28,239 Speaker 4: the biggest companies in the world, like people shouldn't be 93 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:31,719 Speaker 4: objectified and be stared at and sort of face a 94 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:34,360 Speaker 4: sort of an unusual degree of drug use like on 95 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:35,479 Speaker 4: a random day. 96 00:05:35,680 --> 00:05:39,120 Speaker 2: Absolutely, But what did City say about some of the 97 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:40,680 Speaker 2: specific allegations that you raise. 98 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:44,760 Speaker 3: A City spokesperson did respond to many of our questions, 99 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:47,440 Speaker 3: and one of the responses that we received was that 100 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 3: while several of the alleged incidents would have violated the 101 00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:55,480 Speaker 3: banks code of conduct, you know, some of them did 102 00:05:55,560 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 3: not receive a complaint, or others were old, or others 103 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:03,360 Speaker 3: complained allegations that the bank said were perhaps too vague 104 00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:05,960 Speaker 3: or involved people who had left the firm. So we 105 00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:10,720 Speaker 3: did get some sort of specific responses to individual incidents 106 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:12,720 Speaker 3: that we asked for comment on, but others were sort 107 00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:15,080 Speaker 3: of not commented on by the bank. 108 00:06:15,320 --> 00:06:18,679 Speaker 2: In Citygroup's response to Bloomberg, a spokesperson said, in part, 109 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:22,640 Speaker 2: quote cities values and expectations are clear. No one should 110 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 2: ever be discriminated against or harassed in the workplace. He continued, quote, 111 00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:30,520 Speaker 2: while we will not comment on individual internal matters, simply put, 112 00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:33,279 Speaker 2: where warranted, we exit employees who failed to meet our 113 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 2: high standards of respectful treatment in our workplace. 114 00:06:36,600 --> 00:06:38,919 Speaker 4: What he told us is that the attempts to be 115 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:43,279 Speaker 4: inclusive and to be equitable don't stop, and that the 116 00:06:43,279 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 4: sposures and called it a continuous and proactive process. I 117 00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 4: was interested by that. You rarely hear Wall Street banks 118 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:52,039 Speaker 4: say like, you know, we're trying to make things better 119 00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 4: and it's not necessarily making any concessions. In fact, I 120 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:57,680 Speaker 4: think it's fair to say City Group did not concede 121 00:06:57,760 --> 00:07:00,559 Speaker 4: to any of any of our reporting. But I think 122 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:03,680 Speaker 4: that the reality is, no matter what industry we're talking about, 123 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:07,360 Speaker 4: it's not easy to have thousands of employees, and it's 124 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 4: not easy to change a culture and chauvinism and misogyny. 125 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:13,680 Speaker 4: No industry has a monopoly on those things. 126 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:15,800 Speaker 2: I want to talk a little bit more about City 127 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 2: versus all these other banks, or in the context of 128 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,119 Speaker 2: these other banks before this story, how did you guys 129 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 2: think about City in terms of its culture and in 130 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:26,520 Speaker 2: terms of its progress on dealing with some of these issues. 131 00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:30,440 Speaker 4: You know, City Group has cultivated an image of inclusivity, 132 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 4: and you know, they've also had some pretty impressive benchmarks, 133 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,880 Speaker 4: and my reporting on race and especially black executives at 134 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:39,760 Speaker 4: black staffers at the big banks, City Groups numbers have 135 00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:42,360 Speaker 4: been awfully impressive, and not just in a short time span. 136 00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:44,840 Speaker 4: I think it's fair to say that over really several 137 00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 4: years now, they have been ahead of the pack Wall 138 00:07:47,480 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 4: Street when it comes to racial inclusion. On the other hand, 139 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:53,800 Speaker 4: you know, what we've seen is a bank that while 140 00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:57,120 Speaker 4: we were finishing our reporting, they put someone on leave 141 00:07:57,280 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 4: because of a verbal altercation and told investment bankers like 142 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:03,480 Speaker 4: not to embarrass the firm when it comes to drinking. 143 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,240 Speaker 4: So it's a bank that has made strides, for sure. 144 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:08,320 Speaker 4: But I think it's fair to say, what page, what's 145 00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:10,720 Speaker 4: a good phrase, inconsistent culture something like that. 146 00:08:10,560 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 3: I would say inconsistent is very accurate. And also just 147 00:08:13,920 --> 00:08:16,200 Speaker 3: these things don't exist in a vacuum, right. You can 148 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 3: make strides in hiring and representation, but also have a 149 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:27,000 Speaker 3: workplace that is very toxic, and toxic enough actually to 150 00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 3: cause people to leave because they feel their complaints are 151 00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 3: not hurt. I think it's also worth noting that Citygroup 152 00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 3: is one of the largest US banks obviously, but also 153 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 3: has a female CEO who was appointed in twenty twenty one, 154 00:08:42,840 --> 00:08:46,080 Speaker 3: the only of the largest US banks to have a 155 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:51,079 Speaker 3: female CEO. And it's also made significant efforts and set 156 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:55,000 Speaker 3: pretty intense goals for itself in terms of pay, equity 157 00:08:55,320 --> 00:09:00,439 Speaker 3: and hiring goals and representation in the workplace. But at 158 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:05,720 Speaker 3: the same time, these patterns of harassment were occurring, and 159 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:10,760 Speaker 3: the equity division, specifically within City Group was a business 160 00:09:10,800 --> 00:09:14,319 Speaker 3: that lagged Piers on Wall Street for many, many years 161 00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:18,640 Speaker 3: in terms of revenue and rankings and continues to lag peers. 162 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:22,600 Speaker 4: In fact, in a big picture, City has never really 163 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:25,839 Speaker 4: gotten things right compared to rivals. You know, their share price, 164 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 4: it's in a different ballpark than Goldman Saxes in Morgan Stanley, JP, 165 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 4: Morgan's of the world. And then when it comes to 166 00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 4: not just City Group as a global institution, but the 167 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:36,800 Speaker 4: equities business in particular, they've gone up and down. They 168 00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:39,920 Speaker 4: had a hot streak. Then there was like what we 169 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:42,280 Speaker 4: call a fat finger trade. That reminds me of Homer 170 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:44,960 Speaker 4: Simpson and one of my favorite episodes of the Simpsons 171 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:46,960 Speaker 4: when I hear the phrase fat finger. But it just 172 00:09:47,040 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 4: means that there was a mistake, and not a small mistake, 173 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,840 Speaker 4: but a big mistake that had large ramifications. And you 174 00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:55,480 Speaker 4: don't want that to happen because it does not reflect 175 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:57,280 Speaker 4: well on the unit, and if it happens at a 176 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 4: large enough scale, it doesn't reflect well on this CEO either. 177 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:04,720 Speaker 4: The equities team has lagged rivals. They've really tried to 178 00:10:04,720 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 4: figure it out. And I one reason that I've enjoyed 179 00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:09,679 Speaker 4: working on this story with Page is that it's not 180 00:10:09,840 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 4: just about culture. It's also about underperformance too well. 181 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 2: I mean, you mentioned some of these issues with a 182 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:22,000 Speaker 2: bad trade, profitability issues. Has this toxic culture that you'd 183 00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:27,160 Speaker 2: identified contributed to these broader business problems at the bank. 184 00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 4: The only thing I would add is that the reason 185 00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:31,600 Speaker 4: you don't want bad behavior inside of a company isn't 186 00:10:31,679 --> 00:10:35,400 Speaker 4: just out of morality and ethics, although morals matter too, 187 00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:38,080 Speaker 4: It's also because, like it's alienating, you don't want. 188 00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 3: To have to go distracting. 189 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 4: It's distracting, And I think that if you see bad 190 00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:46,000 Speaker 4: behavior and then you complain about it and nothing happens, 191 00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:49,080 Speaker 4: you end up leaving or just disliking your job. And 192 00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 4: in fact, we have meant several people right page who 193 00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 4: ended up leaving. 194 00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:55,600 Speaker 2: And especially if it's happening with rotators or people young 195 00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:58,360 Speaker 2: in the industry, if that's your first experience in the 196 00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 2: banking world, you're not going to continue at least not 197 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:02,840 Speaker 2: there definitely. 198 00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:05,520 Speaker 3: And we also had some reporting even before this story 199 00:11:05,640 --> 00:11:09,840 Speaker 3: was published that showed that as you sort of continue 200 00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:13,000 Speaker 3: up the corporate ladder, there are just not as many 201 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,880 Speaker 3: women represented and kind of the upper upper rechelans. 202 00:11:16,440 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 2: After the break, what does this pattern of behavior at 203 00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 2: City reveal about the rest of Wall Street? 204 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:22,960 Speaker 1: Six years after Me Too? 205 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:32,680 Speaker 2: I want to take a second to talk about the 206 00:11:32,679 --> 00:11:36,760 Speaker 2: banking industry broadly and the way that these allegations that 207 00:11:36,800 --> 00:11:41,040 Speaker 2: you've unearthed fit into this broader pattern. Max, you wrote 208 00:11:41,080 --> 00:11:43,760 Speaker 2: a story back in twenty eighteen called why Wall Street 209 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 2: hasn't had its Me Too moment yet? Why were big 210 00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:51,000 Speaker 2: banks insulated from the reckoning that was rippling across industries 211 00:11:51,160 --> 00:11:51,800 Speaker 2: at that time? 212 00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:52,520 Speaker 1: Especially? 213 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:54,400 Speaker 4: Well, if you want to go back not just a 214 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:57,839 Speaker 4: couple of years, but like decades, Wall Street really was 215 00:11:57,880 --> 00:12:01,640 Speaker 4: a bifurcated industry. There were a essentially either no women 216 00:12:01,800 --> 00:12:04,199 Speaker 4: or very very few women at the top of Wall 217 00:12:04,240 --> 00:12:06,280 Speaker 4: Street for a really long time. I think they'd have 218 00:12:06,400 --> 00:12:09,280 Speaker 4: a firm like Goldman Sachs didn't have a female partner 219 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:11,840 Speaker 4: until I think until my lifetime. And I'm old, but 220 00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:13,839 Speaker 4: I'm not that old. This is so we're talking in 221 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:16,559 Speaker 4: the nineteen eighties. Then in the nineteen nineties there were 222 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:20,960 Speaker 4: some really famous lawsuits that revealed and alleged sort of 223 00:12:21,360 --> 00:12:24,040 Speaker 4: cinematic bad behavior, the kind of things that make it 224 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:26,000 Speaker 4: into movies like The Wolf of Wall Street, but happening 225 00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 4: at big firms. So by the time the Me Too 226 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:31,360 Speaker 4: movement rolled around, I think there was an expectation among 227 00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:34,120 Speaker 4: women and men on Wall Street the world would sort 228 00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:36,960 Speaker 4: of be hearing about what happened behind closed doors. And 229 00:12:37,040 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 4: what we've reported on over the last few years is 230 00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:43,920 Speaker 4: a way that cultural and financial and legal forces have 231 00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:46,840 Speaker 4: kept a lot of allegations of bad behavior quiet. So, 232 00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:50,280 Speaker 4: for example, you have a kind of alternate system called arbitration, 233 00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:54,120 Speaker 4: which definitely applies to all sorts of corporations, including the media, 234 00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:57,240 Speaker 4: but Wallstreet has been at the forefront of using force arbitration, 235 00:12:57,360 --> 00:12:59,240 Speaker 4: which is a way of saying to someone who has 236 00:12:59,440 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 4: signed a con if something bad happens, you are not 237 00:13:02,160 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 4: going to be taking it before judge. You're going to 238 00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:07,720 Speaker 4: be going in this quieter, more shadowy system that's essentially 239 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:10,240 Speaker 4: kind of like a privatized version of justice, and that 240 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:12,559 Speaker 4: has happened a lot on Wall Street. 241 00:13:12,840 --> 00:13:16,120 Speaker 3: So if you are a worker in any workplace and 242 00:13:16,160 --> 00:13:19,960 Speaker 3: you signed any sort of arbitration agreement on your first 243 00:13:20,040 --> 00:13:23,600 Speaker 3: day of work, you essentially waive your right to appear 244 00:13:23,640 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 3: in an open court and disagree with your employer about 245 00:13:27,400 --> 00:13:31,120 Speaker 3: what happened. Wall Street has very frequently turned to these 246 00:13:31,160 --> 00:13:33,520 Speaker 3: sort of nasty tools to quiet. 247 00:13:33,160 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 4: Workers, although it has begun to change. I think Paige 248 00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 4: and I have maybe one of our first pieces of 249 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 4: reporting together was about federal legislation that changes harassment laws 250 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:46,480 Speaker 4: so that you don't have to go into arbitration. 251 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:51,560 Speaker 3: Arbitration agreements now are not binding for workers who signed 252 00:13:51,559 --> 00:13:54,400 Speaker 3: them on their first days, So workers who do come 253 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:58,560 Speaker 3: forward with allegations like the ones artist Lindsay outline in 254 00:13:58,600 --> 00:14:01,679 Speaker 3: her lawsuit against City Grew, they can appear in an 255 00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:04,319 Speaker 3: open court and disagree with their employer about what happened. 256 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:06,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it seems like this is an example 257 00:14:06,160 --> 00:14:09,360 Speaker 2: of being able to make public these allegations, which then 258 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:11,600 Speaker 2: allowed more people to come forward and speak to you. 259 00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:14,800 Speaker 2: Though you've spoken with twenty two people, but none of 260 00:14:14,800 --> 00:14:17,679 Speaker 2: them would go on the record. What did you make 261 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:20,160 Speaker 2: of that given what's changed over the past few years. 262 00:14:20,440 --> 00:14:22,800 Speaker 3: I would say that things have certainly changed over the 263 00:14:22,880 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 3: past few years, and of course artist Lindsay's lawsuit in 264 00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:28,800 Speaker 3: particular does change things in this particular division at this 265 00:14:28,840 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 3: particular bank. But I think that people are still very 266 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:36,320 Speaker 3: scared to share their experiences publicly or on the record, 267 00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:41,600 Speaker 3: either they're still in the industry or they are fearful 268 00:14:41,680 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 3: of what sort of retaliation might come down the line. 269 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:46,680 Speaker 3: I think people think of Wall Street as being this 270 00:14:47,560 --> 00:14:52,560 Speaker 3: giant conglomerate of big banks with thousands of employees. A 271 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:54,920 Speaker 3: common theme that I heard was that it is still 272 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:58,360 Speaker 3: quite small and people do hear about things, So I 273 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:00,240 Speaker 3: think that that was certainly a concern. 274 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:03,560 Speaker 4: And pages reporting shows that people do not necessarily have 275 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 4: a good experience when they speak up. This story has 276 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:10,440 Speaker 4: some really key details about talking to HR and talking 277 00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:13,640 Speaker 4: to senior executives and sharing things that happened. And then 278 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:16,440 Speaker 4: I think there's like a half a dozen people in 279 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:19,040 Speaker 4: this story who felt really dissatisfied that there was a 280 00:15:19,160 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 4: lack of change after they spoke up. And so I 281 00:15:21,880 --> 00:15:24,960 Speaker 4: feel like I can sympathize really with why. You know, 282 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:28,440 Speaker 4: one might think, well, if I go public with a journalist, 283 00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:31,320 Speaker 4: that's not going to end any better than my previous attempts. 284 00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 2: Well, so, I mean, as you were doing reporting on this, 285 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:37,840 Speaker 2: especially since twenty eighteen, does it feel like Wall Street's 286 00:15:37,880 --> 00:15:40,720 Speaker 2: me too moment has finally come? No? 287 00:15:40,960 --> 00:15:43,040 Speaker 4: I don't. I don't. I think that to watch what 288 00:15:43,160 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 4: happened with Harvey Weinstein and of Hollywood was to see 289 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:50,080 Speaker 4: an industry whose mores were completely turned on their head. 290 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:51,720 Speaker 4: I think you might be able to say the same 291 00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:55,960 Speaker 4: about politics other kinds of entertainment, But Wall Street, by 292 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:59,680 Speaker 4: and large, I don't think you can say that anyone 293 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:03,120 Speaker 4: who has accumulated vast power the way that Weinstein did 294 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:07,360 Speaker 4: has been outed and publicly revealed the way that he 295 00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:10,960 Speaker 4: had been. Wall Street is a place where things go 296 00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:13,640 Speaker 4: wrong and things go right. But by and large, we 297 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:17,960 Speaker 4: see the same executives and the same companies accumulate and 298 00:16:18,040 --> 00:16:21,000 Speaker 4: keep power. And I would say that in order to 299 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:24,320 Speaker 4: qualify as like a fast me too moment, that would 300 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 4: mean change, and I'm not so sure we've seen dramatic change. 301 00:16:30,400 --> 00:16:32,440 Speaker 1: This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. 302 00:16:32,680 --> 00:16:36,000 Speaker 2: I'm Sarah Holder. This episode was produced by Julia Press. 303 00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 2: It was edited by Aaron Edwards and Sally Bakewell. It 304 00:16:38,760 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 2: was mixed by Alex Subura. It was fact checked by 305 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 2: Thomas lu Our senior producers are Naomi Shavin and Elizabeth Ponso. 306 00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:49,080 Speaker 2: Nicole Beemster Borr is our executive producer. Sage Bauman is 307 00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:52,160 Speaker 2: our head of podcasts. Thanks for listening. Please follow and 308 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 2: review The Big Take wherever you listen to podcasts. It 309 00:16:54,720 --> 00:17:01,440 Speaker 2: helps new listeners find the show. We'll be back tomorrow