WEBVTT - Tensions Heightened Between the U.S. and China

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio, a story

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Bloomberg Today as well about US Treasury Secretary

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yellen expressing doubts about last year's trade deal with China,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the first clear statement from the body administration detailing it's

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the future of the agreement between the world's

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 1>two largest economies. That was something we talked about with

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown and Bloomberg New Economy earlier. That's on his

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>radar as well. The relationship between the two continues to

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be complicated yet inextricably linked. Someone with a keen perspective

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on all of us and back with us, as Chris Fenton,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>trustee of the US Asia Institute, author of Feeding the Dragon,

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Inside the Trillion Dollar Dilemma facing Hollywood, the NBA and

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>American Business epook out last year. He joins us on

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the phone in New York City. Hey, Chris, good to

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. How are you, Carol? Always

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure and always a lot to talk about when

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to China. Yeah, Woa is right. We talked

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>about a bunch of our Andy Brown and Bloomberg New Economy,

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>who you know lived in Asia. China specifically understands that market.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>You do as well. First of all, Uh, Janet Yellen

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out making some comments. We also had regulators specifically

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the US and elsewhere, pointing to China when

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes UH, specifically to that Microsoft exchange hack that

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happened UH and saying that they were actors affiliated with

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government, accusing the Chinese government of a broad

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>array of quote malicious cyber activities. How would you assess

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the U S. China relationship here we are on Monday,

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>July one. It's a relationship that's been fraught with strain before.

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>How does it look to you right now? Well, it's amazing.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I remember being on with you and Jason

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>back in October two thousand nineteen, and that same question

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was asked right after the Daryl Morey tweet um that

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that shocks sort of the NBA and China relationship. And

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're in the middle of the Hong Kong protests

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>at that time, and you cut it today almost two

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>years later, and I would say this relationship has only

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten more amplified as far as its tense relations, and

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems the only begetting worse. I mean, there are

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>there are signs of some green shoots out there, but

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>there are very few and far between. For the most part,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing things getting even more and more and more

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>tense and more difficult. Well, you mentioned Darryl Moury. I

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 1>mean the NBA front office grew right back in nineteen

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and basically he came out and expressed support for Hong

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Kong's pro democracy protests. And then you had Lebron James

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>come out and remind us what he did. Yeah, it's

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and it's unbelievable. And we talked about it back then

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, and here we are today. We have

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Space Jam two that came out in United States theaters

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and in markets around the world, yet China has not

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed it access to that market. And quite frankly, that

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>movie was made for the Chinese market. Both the NBA,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James and Hollywood really set its sight on that market,

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>being the largest in the world. And to date we

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>do not have a release date for it. Right, and

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>this is Lebron Lebron James. He's been involved in this

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>movie big time, obviously staring in it, but also in

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of the production of it. Yeah, no, and exactly.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And he was one of the biggest critics towards the

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>free speech rights of Darryl Morey, and there was a

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons for him to do that because he

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of skin in the game when it

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to the China market. It's very difficult for people

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that don't to say, hey, why are you speaking up

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>against what Darryl Morey was doing. But the fact is

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he's making fifty million dollars a year roughly in that

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in that market from those consumers, and he needs to

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>tread carefully. But the fact is he has been treading

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>carefully for the last two years, and we're seeing sort

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of reward for that cow towing happening

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>today with his movie not in theaters. It's always been

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>delicate for any of us who have been following UH.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Increasingly US companies, global nationals, global multinationals overall, but US companies,

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, cozy up to China specifically over the last

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades because they wanted a piece of that

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>one billion plus consumer market UH and doing whatever they

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>needed to kind of get themselves on the ground. Do

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you think that change is dramatically going forward because of

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the heightened tentions. We've been in a heightened tention situation

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>before between US and China. Look, I've been very vocal

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about it because I am hopeful. I have two kids

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that are fourteen years old and I want them growing

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>up in a more balanced global community. So I'm talking

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. But I also want to be constructive. I

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to speak out against C suite executives telling

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>them that they're doing the wrong things. It involves all

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of us. I mean, you have investors and shareholders that

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>are putting massive pressure on these C suites to essentially

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>cows out at the Chinese Communist Party and do exactly

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>as they say. And on top of it, you can't

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>just have one celebrity or one athlete like Lebron James

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>take a stand. There'll just be a lone wolf for

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a sacrificial lamb and replaced by somebody else. So this

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is a united we stand situation. We need to create

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the leverage as a nation, as an a Western alliance

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to push back against the Chinese Countunist Party and we can,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen it before. They do retreat if you

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>apply the right kind of pressure. But right now we

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have not done that. It's all been lone wolf approaches

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not going to get us anywhere. So

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>be real. You were president of DMG Entertainment, Motion Picture Group,

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>General Matter, General manager, excuse me, DMG North America. So

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>listen you you were working in China specifically when it

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>came to you know, movies and all of that, you know,

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>creative content and businesses. So I do wonder, is there

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do you expect it to change dramatically? Look, what I

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>expect to change is more and more people like myself

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>who were cogs in the wheel that believed in the

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>mission of globalism being the best interests of the American um,

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the average American citizen, and our Western allies. But the

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fact is we've done it too far. We've done it

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is detrimental to the long term

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>health of the Western Alliance and we need to wake

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>up to that. And there's lots of us that are

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's time that we start to put pressure on leadership,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>on businesses and get consumers excited about the fact that hey,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, these companies, if they take an activist

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>position against some of the things that are wrong in

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that market, they'll be rewarded with the pocketbooks of people

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>in countries around the world that will generate more revenues

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for those products and services. We just need to have

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the guts and we need to start uniting together because

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just one shot, one single entities trying to approach this

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is just never going to get us anywhere. But the

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is, I am hopeful. You're hopeful, Okay, But

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess I want to say, what's the likelihood?

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Just got about thirty seconds left here. I mean, hope

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>is a great thing, and I'm an optimist and I'm

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>with you, but I do wonder what's the likelihood. The

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>likelihood is getting better because I'm seeing a bipartisan move

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>towards it. We are seeing both left and right unify

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in Congress to push forward bills that might do it.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So I am feeling like we do have a likelihood,

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to take a lot of work. Yeah,

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. Hey, listen, good to check in

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>with you, b well. Chris Fenton, trustee of the USA

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Asia Institute, on the phone in New York City,