WEBVTT - Markets Cautious Ahead of Jackson Hole

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's direct to Michael McKee's out there in

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Hole. Hey, Michael, as we get into FED Chairman

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Pal's speech tomorrow, how have expectations been changing. What do

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 2>you think is going to drive his commentary tomorrow.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, probably people are starting to change their expectations based

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>on the minutes that were released yesterday of the July

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>thirtieth meeting, because it emphasized the fact that almost all

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>of the members of the Open Market Committee, except for

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Chris Waller and Mickey Bowman, were more focused on inflation

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>than they were on the labor market. Now, that was

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>before we got the bad revision to the July payroll report.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>But if we get another payroll report that's similar, even

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>if we're not getting a lot of hiring but the

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 3>unemployment rate stays low, then the focus really does stay

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>on inflation. So it'll be interesting to see what Powell

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>emphasizes tomorrow because today, of course, we got the Walmart

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 3>news that was mixed in terms of earnings, but they

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 3>did say prices are going up because of tariffs, and

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>then we saw the Philadelphia Fed Index prices paid rise significantly.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 3>So we are seeing some inflation effects out there in

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.279
<v Speaker 3>the economy. And if Powell leans towards inflation, then maybe

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the heavy lean in the markets towards the rate cut

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>in September backs off a little.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Mike, as far as what is the market betting

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 4>that Powell will say versus in reality what we will

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 4>likely cure him end up saying.

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, right now, when you look at the WRP function

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>on the terminal, you see we're in the eighty percent range.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Eighty and higher. Depending on the headlines of the moment

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>that people think that the Fed will cut rate wants

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty five basis points. The fifty basis points has probably

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>gone out the window. But as I say, there are

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>probably going to be some people reconsidering after what we

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 3>got yesterday in the minutes, and then of course you

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 3>read about the options trade on the fifty basis point cut.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I think if you're holding those options, you're probably sitting

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>there thinking now that we're probably they're probably going to

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 3>expire without hitting the mark.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Hey, micro starting, we do have some dissent on this FOMC.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about that. Historically, should we care? When

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>does it become problematic? How should we think about that?

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a lot going on, it's not necessarily problematic

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 3>for a while. You'd have to have a significant turnover

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 3>at the Open Market Committee to have anybody really be concerned.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 3>There is what we've called the Tinfoil Hack conspiracy theory,

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 3>but it's a little bit less of that than it

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>was that because the Board of Governors has the power

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>over the FED presidents, they can dismiss them at will.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 3>That maybe Trump could take control of the entire FOMC,

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>But that would be very difficult to do because I

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 3>don't think Chris Waller and maybe not Mickey Bowmen would

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>even go.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Along with that.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So Trump just getting a majority on the board doesn't

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 3>mean a significant change in policy. Also, I think our

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 3>friends down on Wall Street would have a conniption fit

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 3>over something like that, and that might cause the President

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 3>to back off. What he may get out of it

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>is more people on the board who are more inclined

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>to lower interest rates, but once you get in there,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>you are very afraid of inflation, and I think that

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>culture will hold for a while.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Mike, or there are other members on the board beyond

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Mickey and Chris Waller that you think potentially could also

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>be a descent voter at that's September decision.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we'll have any other descents unless you

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 3>get a Steve Myron world record confirmation from the Senate

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>and get him in there by September seventeenth. Pretty much

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>what we've heard from everybody is even the ones who

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>are looking to the possibility of September based on the data,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>if the data suggests that there's no cut in the

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>offing because inflation is rising, those people aren't going to dissent.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>They may withhold votes, they may vote with the group,

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 3>but anticipate that they will cut rates in the future.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think we'll get more than two descents

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 3>unless Myron is added to the cast.

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Mike, what's the latest scuttle butt out there in Jackson

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Hall about President Trump's campaign to ask for a Reserve

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Governor Lisa Cook?

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's nothing really new. Overnight. Cook put out her

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 3>statement at the end of the Day yesterday saying she

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 3>will not be bullied into resigning, and she noted that

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>she is gathering all the documents necessary. So unless the

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 3>President tweets something again, we're all keeping our eyes on

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>his truth social account. It's probably gets moved off to

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the side for a while until we get some more information.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 3>The FA director has gone after Senator Adam Schiff and

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the head of the Attorney General for New York State,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Letitia James, and we haven't heard much about that lately.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>The things, you know, the charges are out there. The

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department is either looking into them or not. They

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 3>don't comment, and until we get something new, it probably fades.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike, thanks so much for joining us. Appreciate

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>it out there. Let us know when there's a Tom

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Keene citing. That would be a thing to see, a

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>psyche to see. Michael McKee, international economics and policy correspondent

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 2>for Bloomberg, whose.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Apple,

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloombergs up or watch

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's get the latest what's happening down in Washington

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.559
<v Speaker 2>at DC. And for that we always turned to Wendy Schiller.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>She's a professor Brown University. Wendy, it seems like the

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>White House is turned its attention at least for the

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 2>timing over the last couple of days on the Federal

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Reserve with some allegations against Governor Lisa cookel what do

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>you think is going on here?

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, I think this is just part of

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 7>Trump's sustained attack on the Federal Reserve and trying to

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 7>sort of exert more executive and direct power over the

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 7>Federal Reserve. And in some ways for pr purposes, He's

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 7>got the advantage because I think most Americans don't know

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 7>the structure of the Federal Reserve. They don't know how

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 7>it works, they don't know why it exists, they don't

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 7>know that it was created by an Act of Congress,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 7>and they don't understand it, and they don't understand why

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 7>it is so powerful visa the elected branches of government.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 4>And talk to us about the motivation here, because to

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>your point, of resignation would create another opening for Trump

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 4>to fill the FED board as president because basically piling

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 4>on that pressure for the Central Bank to lower rates.

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and it's just curious he's targeting this member and

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 7>not any other member. And I think that's sort of

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 7>part of the Trump administration strategy.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 8>When they go after people.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 7>They tend to try to pick off the weakest links

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 7>in a lot of the organizations that they want to

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 7>exert more influence over. You know, he went after Powell,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 7>but it was clear even though he tried that in

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 7>general he can't probably can't fire Powell, and that Powell

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 7>stood his ground.

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 8>But Powell essentially only has a year left.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 7>So I think that's this is part and parcel of

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 7>what the Trump agganization does.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 8>And you know, Trump is.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 7>Exercising executive power and people can like it or not

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 7>like it. But for twenty twenty five years, Congress has

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 7>allowed presidents to do this, Democrat or Republican. It's not

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 7>just Trump, it's other presidents as well. So you know,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Congress either has to step up or other branches of

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 7>government have to step up and say no, you're you're

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 7>overstepping your power.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 8>But so far we haven't seen that.

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, it leads me to the question I always

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>ask you, Wendy, and I think we kind of get

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the same answer. But is there anybody in Congress that,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.239
<v Speaker 2>at any point in time cares to stand up against

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>President Trump for any of these types of issues? Or

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>is it just or we passed that well?

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think if you were, if you're a

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 7>remember of Congress and you're in a comment and you're

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 7>planning on running for reelection, if you're a Republican, you're

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 7>all in on Trump. That's just he's taking over the

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 7>Republican parties, and most presidents do try. Obama was a

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 7>little bit of an exception. We didn't do as much

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 7>in terms of taking over the messaging of the entire

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 7>Democratic Party, which is more diverse in general and harder

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 7>to sort of become more uniform.

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 8>But Trump has done that.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 7>So you are tagged with Trump, whether you like it

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 7>or you're not, as a Republican congressman going to twenty six.

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 8>So they're not going to revolt.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 7>But the Democrats have to figure out something other than

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 7>we're not Trump because it didn't work for them in

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty four. And we're going to see in Virginia

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 7>and in New Jersey coming up relatively soon. You know

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 7>what those meanssages do and how well they play and

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 7>if it looks good after November for the Democrats in

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 7>those states, and I expect the national Democrats will pick

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 7>up on some of that messaging.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>So what's the next big thing that you're obviously keeping

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 4>a close eye on here when it's related to these

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 4>types of issues and how this plays out on a

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 4>timetable basis?

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 8>Government shutdown?

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know, I think I said on this show,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, the election has already started for twenty twenty six.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 8>We know that with the redistricting efforts.

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 7>And by the way, you know mid ten year redustering

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 7>is not new and original. A lot of states did

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 7>this in the nineteenth century and always bringing up history,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 7>so it's not unprecedented for a state to decide mid

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 7>course that they want to redistrict. So we'll see what

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 7>the courts do with that, especially the Supreme Court. But

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 7>really I'm looking at the budget shutdown about the government, right,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 7>we got to go through this all over again. Do

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 7>we appropriate what do the Democrats want, what do the

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 7>Republicans want?

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, what does Trump want? And then the government.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 7>Still has to get US budget done by September thirtieth

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 7>October first the fiscal year, and we'll have to see

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 7>if they can do it keep the government running. And

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.239
<v Speaker 7>if there's a shutdown fight, then that's when the Democrats

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 7>have an opportunity, as Clinton did against Gingridge, to make

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 7>their points about the way the Trump administration is operating.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 8>So we'll have to see which side blinks on the shutdown.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Question real quickly. Ukraine Russia, what's the next steps here?

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 2>From your perspective, well, I mean, you.

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 8>Know, you have to say to yourself.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 7>Trump gave Putin more time to do more damage in Ukraine,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 7>which puts more pressure on Zelenski to give some territory

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 7>up for peace.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 8>And that's what Trump did. I don't think it's indefinite.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 7>I don't think Trump will just sit by and wait

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 7>indefinitely for Putin to do, you know, destroy the country.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 7>But certainly he gave Putin the opportunity to go in

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 7>and keep pounding, and that will continue to exert pressure

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 7>on Zelenski if he wants to save Ukrainian lives, And

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, is there an opening for a compromise. I

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 7>think the President is still committed to that he wants

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 7>to be the guy who ends this war.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, Wendy, thank you so much. We appreciate that.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Wendy Shoulder for us are at Brown University. Stay with us.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 6>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's check out with the next guest we always love

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>to speak with to get sense of kind of where

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 2>these markets going, where valuation may be, how we should

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>be thinking about both equities and fixed income market. And

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that's Karen Murphy. She's a CIO at Kestra Investment Management. Caro,

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 2>we've had just a phenomenally crazy ride so far here

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>to date in equities with that twenty percent sell off

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 2>in April. Then, boy, that was quick on the way down,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>but it was even quicker on the way back up here.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>What are you telling your clients here as they think

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>about equity markets going forward?

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 5>First of all, I.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 9>Would agree with you that it's been a wild ride

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 9>in the markets this year and We've described Q two

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 9>as the Rip van Winkle quarter, where if you looked

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 9>at your portfolio in the beginning of the quarter and

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 9>then went to sleep and woke up at the end

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 9>of the quarter and looked at your values, you would

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 9>have been like great.

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Great, and pat yourself on the back.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 9>But we all know that it didn't feel like that

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 9>as we went through it, and interestingly, like after this

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 9>massive rally, we have many of the same risks that

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 9>we started the year with, namely, you suggested a very

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 9>high valuations really concentrated markets. But what we've seen, especially

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 9>coming out of second quarter earnings, is that many of

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 9>those companies continue to deliver and that's really been able

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 9>to fuel this momentum. Now it sort of makes us

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 9>a bit more cautious going forward because of the very,

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 9>very high expectations in these names, But for now, signs

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 9>are looking pretty good.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Pretty good.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, those guidance momentum scores from Bluebird Intelligence for the

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 4>current third quarter for companies that are putting out quarterly guidance,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 4>it's a basically the heist in a year and second

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 4>highest in a couple of years. There, So that look

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 4>a little better than it was coming into this year.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of wondering your thoughts on when it comes

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 4>to a lot of people arguing about the run we've

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>seen since April and the mag seven. I mean, you

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 4>have stocks like Apple, which is still down close to

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 4>ten percent this year, it's obviously little bit more than

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 4>thirty percent since those April lows, but you have certain

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 4>big names that you weren't necessarily part.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 5>Of all of the rally this year.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how could people argue about anything being bubbly

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 4>when some of these big tech naus weren't necessarily all

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 4>a part of that.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think you're right.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 9>The market has distinguished, right, So in some ways we've

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 9>seen what we would call an everything rally coming off

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 9>the bottom, and that you've had really wide range of

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 9>types of stocks that have been rallying. But as you suggested,

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 9>some of the big winners of the last couple of

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 9>years haven't participated in the same way.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 5>So I think in.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 9>General what you're seeing is the market is reward like

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 9>going back taking risk off tarifs aren't going to be

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 9>as punitive as we thought. That kind of raises everything.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 9>But then the clear winners are those who are able

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 9>to demonstrate a benefit from AI and that's you start

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 9>to see some differentiation.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Is it valuation concerned for you here?

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely, but it has been for a long time

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 9>and it doesn't mean that the market's going to turn down.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 5>So what it is is we're constantly looking.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 9>For is there some sign that there's going to be

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 9>a chink in the armor of this like forward earnings picture,

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 9>and so far the momentum is pretty much up as

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 9>those like all that cap X mending that's being put

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 9>to work now. As that starts to come do in

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 9>the next year or so, I think that's when you

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 9>start to have the market take a much harder look

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 9>and saying, are we actually getting returns on all this

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 9>cap X? But for now, there's so much money going

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 9>into this, we need to give it time to actually

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 9>show those returns. So I think the market can actually

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 9>handle these high valuations for some time.

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 2>We are speaking with Kara Murphy, CIO Kestra Investment Management

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>KRA as a recovering equity analyst. Earnings matter to me,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think Corporate America is doing a great job,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>better than expected. Talk to us about kind of what

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 2>your takeaway was for second quarter earnings that we just

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>finished up and kind of maybe the outlook.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I am also a recovering equity analyst, so I

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 9>know exactly what you're talking about. And they think when

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 9>we look at the earnings reports that are coming out

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 9>of the second quarter, they're quite different than what we're

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 9>hearing on like Main Street, right, So particular, as we

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 9>look at the largest companies, we had I think earnings

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 9>expectations bottom for the second quarter around five percent.

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 5>They came in around twelve percent, so more than.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 9>Double kind of where they had bottomed at the worst

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 9>of the tariff fares. And these companies are also doing

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 9>it on better revenues, better margins, So we're seeing really

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 9>really good reports out of these. But then that stands

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 9>and start contrast to some things like we're hearing about,

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, more cautious consumer spending, more worries about a

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 9>title labor market, and of course a housing market that

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 9>remains quite frozen, partly because of affordability.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 5>So it's very much a sort of like tale of

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 5>two cities.

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 9>But if you're a large company today, chances are your

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 9>earnings picture looks pretty good.

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 4>So, Kara, what companies are you telling investors from a

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 4>stockbas is to buy or sell at this point.

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 5>So we've been calling twenty twenty five the Year.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 9>Of the diversified portfolio, which is not terribly sexy. But

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 9>what we've seen is that for the first time in

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 9>quite a while, even with the mag seven doing really

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 9>well and having this great rally, owning things outside of

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 9>those that area has actually.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Been beneficial to your portfolio.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 9>So, for instance, like non US stocks, it's been years

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 9>that the S and P five hundred has sort of

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 9>trounced non US stocks. Now so far this year we're

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 9>seeing much much better goes outside the US.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 5>And how much is of a week dollar, right?

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say, Also, when you have indexes

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 4>like the S and P five hundred coming off of

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 4>two back to back years of twenty percent gains, I mean,

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 4>even though it's up you know, eight nine percent this year,

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 4>is it just kind of just a smaller cooling off

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 4>period before potentially more gains from here?

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think that would be very healthy, right.

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 9>We can't put up twenty five percent gains every year,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 9>And even given that, as you suggested, like the returns

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 9>that we've had in the S and P five hundred

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 9>this year are.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Still pretty good.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 9>But I think what happens is that when you have

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 9>a single asset class like the S and P five

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 9>hundred doing so well year after year, a lot of

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 9>investors then sort of forget that they need to have

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 9>exposure elsewhere. And so often when we talk with investors

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 9>is like, remember these sort of like long term approaches

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 9>to investing where you want to be able to have

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 9>exposure some of these areas outside the world.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Fixed income, what's the play here, stick when the belly

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>of the treasury curve or takes some.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Credit risk, a little bit of both.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 9>So when we look at, for instance, like high yield,

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 9>if you go pretty far out on the credit curve,

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.239
<v Speaker 9>I think there we would have like a little bit

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 9>of concern only because you're not being paid to take

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 9>that much risk. Right, credit spreads are really really tight.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 9>When we look at corporate credit, that's where we have

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 9>some really nice absolute yields. Yes, like you know, spreads

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 9>are tight, but it still feels very comfortable, and we

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 9>don't see a lot of stress within corporates. So I think,

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 9>you know, we're willing to take some credit risk. And

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 9>then as you suggested, like staying within the belly of

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 9>the curve, so and sort of stay out of some

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 9>of the volatility at the very long end of the curve,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 9>and then you can find some really good absolute yields

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 9>there as well.

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Cara, thanks so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>getting a few minutes of your time. Caraen Murphy. She's

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the CIO of Kestra Investment Management, a lot of experience

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>in the investment game. We always appreciate talking to Carolyn.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 6>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal newspapers.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>But Lisa the best, Lisa, what do you have for

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>us today?

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 10>This is actually a look into the struggles that older

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 10>Americans are having because their savings accounts are starting to deplete.

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 10>So they're like, how are are going to make money

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 10>when I'm win my eighties? Okay, So Business Insider they

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 10>spoke with one couple who are in the eighties.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>They say they only have.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 10>About twenty thousand dollars left in their savings. They only

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 10>get about two thousand dollars a month in Social Security.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 10>It's not enough to cover expenses. They have a roof

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 10>repair that they need. So they've both been looking for work.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 10>You know, the husband is a truck driver, he was

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 10>a truck divery. He's eighty two. He can't get hired

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 10>for the long haul jobs and no one wants to

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 10>hire him for the short haul jobs. And then his

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 10>wife is eighty five, so she's having a similar issue

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 10>trying to find work. So basically they spoke with a

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 10>whole bunch of older Americans to just say, those who

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 10>do find it, it's usually you know, part time, retail, caregiving,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 10>nonprofit roles, and they played just above minimum wage. But

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 10>it's like this eye opener into the struggles that older

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 10>Americans are having.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, I mean, I know it's gonna be more and

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>more an issue. Yeah, that's why my personal strategies. I'm

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 2>never retiring.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 10>You said, Walmart greater right now, Walmart crea.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I can see that exactly, such a friendly blues collared

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 2>shirt on I know, I mean, are awesome. Yeah, you

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 2>got it. I think that's going to be the story

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of people going forward.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 10>Going and going back to work. Have you guys heard

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 10>of this viral ballpark challenge? It's called nine nine nine.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have no idea, Okay, so here we go.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 10>It is eating nine hot dogs drinking nine beers throughout

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 10>an entire game, nine innings.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, nine nine nine?

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 8>Can you do it? Okay?

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 10>This has been around actually, but social media, of course,

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 10>brought it back. Some are saying it's going to cost

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 10>about two hundred and thirty dollars if you add everything up,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 10>you know, to complete the challenge. But it's even going

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 10>into other sports like golf. You can do nine beers,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 10>nine club sandwiches, and nine holes.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay? Is that more your gym?

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 4>A little bit?

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 10>But the Wall Street Termalmporter gave it a try. It

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 10>was a tough start, but they finished it. They actually

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 10>got a good deal. Did you know what city field

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 10>You can get hot dogs and beers for five dollars

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 10>a pop on Tuesdays?

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, I heard about this.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 10>I didn't know that, but apparently this is like the thing,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 10>the nine to nine to nine challenge. So next time

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 10>you guys go to the ballpark, get ready and go

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 10>an empty stomach.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 2>And the writer says, you know, in the aftermath, I

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 2>lost the desire to eat for the next two days.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 8>Wow.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 5>That that sums it up, okay, and last weight.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 10>So back when I was younger, right, we would go

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 10>to the Limelight in the city, was right, and it

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 10>turned into a nightclub and it was a rave and

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 10>you know, you have a couple of cocktails and you

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 10>get home like the wee hours of the morning.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 10>But apparently that's a little bit too much for gen

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 10>z and millennials, okay, so they can't handle it. So

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 10>now business inside are saying they're joined.

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 8>This new trend. It's Macha raves.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 10>Okay. So the go it's a sober, you know, daytime

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 10>clubbing event.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>People are on a caffeine high. That's their high.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 10>Okay, still the best music, right, smoke machines, everything, but

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 10>they get to be in bed by ten pm because

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 10>the party is from four to eight, so they get

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 10>to get up and feel refreshed, no hangover. And there

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 10>you go. Try Macha and it's just no terrible for

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 10>you are it's it's too bitter.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 4>I have had sweeter versions of it, and it's I

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 4>like that but I'm all about I have to have

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 4>so much sugar with it. Even if I have coffee,

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't even really consider it coffee because I put

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 4>so much like the straw cream, and right, I need

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 4>to have something really sweet in there or else I'm

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 4>just I'm not into it.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 8>Do you do? Would you go out and do the

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 8>late night raves jest?

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Or would you?

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 8>Are you not the good.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 10>I'm not the gen z Court.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm in that generation right before it, so we don't really.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Six floor, right we do?

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 10>And you have to do like the dirty one where

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 10>you mix the coffee with the macha and it's idea

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 10>a matcha machine, a matcha machine. It's on tap. You

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 10>just pull it back like you're poring a beer.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 5>And I have seen upstairs on the sixth floor.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 10>Like different recipes sometimes posted out there. It's I'm telling you, Paul,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 10>you've got to.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Try it again, all right, I'm again give it another shot.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the Newspapers with Lisa Matteo.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on bloomberg dot com,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal