WEBVTT - Fighting Back Against the Crazy People:  Steve Hilton Talks to A&G

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>A guy who we've been wanting to talk to for

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time. It's Armstrong and Getty extra large, because

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>four hours simply usn't enough. This is Armstrong and Getty

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>extra large. You know him, you love him. Steve Hilton

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>hosts The Next Revolution with Steve Hilton on Fox News.

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>He has a brand new podcast We're Gonna tell you

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about His shirts have no collars and he joins us, Now, Steve,

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>how are you. I'm great. I'm wearing a T shirt

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just for you. That's what I was picturing you. Hey,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we we had something we wanted to play you from

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>another cable news channel and then discuss a little bit.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>This was on Morning Joe on MSNBC this morning. The

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>retail pharmacy Giant Walgreens is set to close the five

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>stores in San Francisco due to rampant shoplifting and organized

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>retail crime. It also makes me feel bad that things

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are so bad for people that they have, that this

0:00:54.760 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is happening. It's no, it's not incredibly sad. They're criminals. No, no, no,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this has been happening for some time. But we also

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>want to be alpened and and and and charitable and

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>mindful that folks are out here hurting even as ninety

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>year old men are flying into space. So Steve Hilton's

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>new podcast is California Rebel Base and Steve, when you

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 1>hear that sort of commentary from Mika Bradzynski that people

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are just steving stores to the point that the chains

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.919
<v Speaker 1>are closing because they're in need, do you have any comment.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just insane, isn't it what. It's just so typical

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of the lunacy that seems to have taken over the

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>way government works or doesn't work in California and all

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the cities, and the lunacy with which people comment on

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it and don't understand what's going on. What you've got

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>going on up and down the state is a bunch

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of people in charge who are literally pro criminal. The

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>people running the criminal justice they are on the side

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of the criminals. They are against actually doing what the

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>first responsibility of government is if you should basically keep

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>things safe, protect law and order, make it possible for

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>people to do business. But now it's so oh, we

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>have to understand that the criminals need to loot wal

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>greens otherwise how they can eat by the way in

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a state where they spend so much on welfare, and

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they said, spend sake so much money in tax and

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>waste it on all these services. And another part of

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>their plan, they they keep going on about the billions

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're spending on homelessness. Obviously that isn't enough because

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got the owners people robbing the sort. I mean,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just lunacy, all of it. And basically, this is

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>what you get when you have a one party rule,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>when you have a bunch of people in charge with

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>no political challenge, there's no accountability, no one standing up

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to them. They think they can get away with anything

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to get then they can because that's what's been happening,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they let the criminals get away with anything.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is why people are so angry. This

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually why I started the podcast us which is

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>called California Rebel Base, and the reason for their name

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is that, actually, I think up and down the state

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there are millions and millions of people fed up with this,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>rebels against this one party rule. But I don't know

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>what to do about it, because wherever you turn, the

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>crazy people are in charge. We've got to fight back

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>against it, and we've got to have a kind of

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>really concerted effort. We've got to get together, and we've

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>got to stick with it for the long term, not

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just a quick thing with a recall or whatever. We've

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>got to really go for it, because you can't go

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on like this in such a state that there is

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing we love California. I love California. I live here,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I live in the Bay Area. I'm in the middle

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of all this madness. But you know, we've got to

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>fight back. I can tell by your Valley girl accent um.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So what I've been trying to figure out though, is like,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>does the president or the California legislature do they actually

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>believe this nonsense or are they just play into the

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter crowd thinking that the Twitter crowd is much bigger

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>than it actually is. Because I just I find it

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>so hard to believe that there are grown ups that think, yeah,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the people robbing the Walgreens are just you know, they're

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just they're struggling because of the COVID and because of

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>systemic racism in the the patriarchy and all the homeless people.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just because of the bad economy. So let's let's

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>try and be charitable, okay, And let's try and assume

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 1>good intent on their partner and trying to understand what's

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>really going on. That's underlying your question, which is they

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can't just be crazy. Obviously the policies are crazy and

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes are crazy, but these people are not literally lunatic.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>What is going on? What are they trying to do?

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the heart of it is that they've been

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>completely kind of There's two things. Actually, there's the woke ideology,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and that is absolutely infecting what you see happening in

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the schools with the curriculum and a bunch of other

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff where we see that woke ideology. I've traced the

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>origins of it back on my show on Fox News

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that it goes back a hundred years. This didn't just

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>show up with AOC and her Twitter account. That kind

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>a way of thinking about the world that is all about, um,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>these kind of categories of identity that's been going on

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and it originated back in the

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>day in Europe with this Marxist school of philosophers, the

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Frankfurt School, who were asking themselves the question, why did

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the communist revolution that Marks and Angles predicted would take

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>over the world and the workers would rise up and

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>capitalism would be abolished. It didn't really happen, and in

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Russia they did it with force, but it didn't really

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>take off anywhere else. Why was that? And their answer was, actually,

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about economics, as Marks argued, there are

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>other things that keep the working class oppressed. And the

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>three that they focused on with faith, family, and culture,

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and they said, those are the things that give the

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>working people this kind of false consciousness that they could

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>should carry on with capitalism. So we have to undermine

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>those things. We have to attack faith and religion and

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>organized religion. We have to undermine family because the family

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>unit is what keeps people attached to this oppressive, working,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>oppressive capitalist system. And we have to seize the leavers

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of power in culture and make sure that that's under

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the control of our ideology as well. That's what they

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>all formulated back in the nineteen twenties in Frankfurt, and

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>over the last century that's been pushed forward and you

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>can see the fruits of that absolutely applied today. So

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>there's an ideology of work that says, actually, we do

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>want to undermine family and religion and so on, and

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see that being played out there's another part

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>of it, though. The second part of it, I would say,

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>again trying to be fair to these democrats, is that

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:45.679
<v Speaker 1>they are so consumed by the desire to appear compassionate

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and be kind to people and have compassion for people

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who are suffering, that they totally forget that real compassion

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>also includes an element of discipline. And you can't just

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>give people things and not expect anything in turn, um

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and and not demand anything returned and expect a decent outcome.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And so they just think it's all about being compassionate

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind and virtue things. We love, you know, we

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to offend anyone. And as those two things

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>going together to produce these insane policies, right well, as

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I've said many times, order without compassion is fascism. But

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>compassion without order is chaos and the dissolution of society.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And and that's what we're seeing, you know, just a

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>dovetail to that thought. We at the Arms Starring Getty Show,

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we have never spent a lot of time talking about

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the Koch brothers Boogatie Bogaty and George Soros Boogatie Bogaty,

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>because those aren't arguments. That's not a policy argument, it's

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just citing a boogeyman. But it is worth observing that

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>George Soros and types like him, who are very smart,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>hardcore far left idealogues, are very very good at manipulating

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>well meaning left leaning voters and people to the extent

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that they get as Boordine elected as the d A

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in the San Francisco area or what's his face in

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>l A, George Gascon exactly, thank you. Yeah. Um. These

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>people are hardcore Marxists. But there's nothing in the Carl

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Marks or the modified Marks point of view that you

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>were describing that says we must at all times be

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>perfectly honest about what we're trying to accomplish. No, quite

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the contrary. They're open with each other about we have

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>got to dupe the well meaning suburban bourgeoisie and to

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>going along with our plans. That's exactly right. And they

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>know that they can do that because that that's not

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>who they're going to for their votes. And as you say,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they're funded by people with unlimited amounts of money who

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>don't live in those places. They don't have to experience

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>any of this. This is what its enraging about all

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of this. If you look at someone like George Soros,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, we we talked about it on

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>my podcast, you know, the other the other week. He

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lives in probably some mansion somewhere. He doesn't actually encounter

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of this UM, this pro criminal ideology that

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he is funding UM. And that's what's so offensive about it. Actually,

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the people who suffer most, and this is true most

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of this lunacy you see being pushed by the by

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats in California, UM, the people who suffer the most,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact same people that they say they are standing

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>up for the poorest, the most vulnerable people who are

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>recent immigrants, black people and Latinos and Asian America. These

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>are the people who actually end up having to suffer that,

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the worst public schools, the worst impact from crime.

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I find so offensive about it. And

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why, you know, it's time we said that clearly,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>and don't let them paint people who reject these policies

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as people who some are uncaring or cruel or not

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>interested in social justice. It's the exact opposite. They're the

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ones who are cruel because it's their policies who hurt

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with that hurt the most vulnerable. But enjoying your commentary

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for a while, I think first became aware of you

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>whenever you'd be a guest on like the panel on

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Brett Bear Show. But how did you come to your

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>political beliefs? Do you do you have any sense of

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>why you're this direction as opposed to the other direction? Yeah,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I mean, you know, I grew up in

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the UK. My parents are both Hungarian. Um, my stepfathers

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>also Hungarian, So that's my family background. And obviously, you know,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and most of my family still is back in Hungary,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>which obviously no longer has to suffer the oppression of

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the communist regime. But I certainly grew up aware of

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that and traveling to Hungary and seeing my family and

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>just being told that. I remember as a kid, it's

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>the weird memory that sticks in your mind. I'm running

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>around on the street. I didn't really know what I

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>was doing with my two cousins, And as a kind

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of joke as a young kid, I remember um yelling

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on the street the name of the lead yo car.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Dad was the was the Communist leader of Hunger at

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that point. It wasn't, but it was. It was the

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of softer end of the communist spectrum. It wasn't.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't as bad as you got in some other countries,

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's still pretty bad. And and the

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>name of this lead. I yelled it out and said, oh,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>he's an idiot. He's an idiot, and my most totally

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to my cousins day, I don't say that. And then

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I got back home and my aunt gave me this

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>stern lecture about how you can't say things like that, Um,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>your cousins will get in trouble, will be punished as

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a family. It was really interesting. I didn't know anything

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>back in those days about obviously these these concepts we

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about now, like councel culture or whatever, but it's

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>stuck in my mind. There's this kind of absence of freedom.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't just say what you wanted. I think they are.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>The really formative thing in my life was the fact

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that my my stepfather was was you know, he run

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a small business. He was in construction. He did house

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>repairs and built small house and so and I spent

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time with him on construction sites. Um,

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we grew up in a kind of you know,

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we weren't poor, but it's kind of a sort of

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>classic kind of middle class family. And that that idea

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of working hard and doing an honest day's work and literally,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, working that kind of blue college job that

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so many people depend on. I think that really stuck

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with me. Um And for example, when I you know,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I was lucky enough to get to Oxford University, but

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>before I went there, I took a year out and

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually worked for a construction company in London and

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>learned skills as a project manage and so on. But

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that whole notion of really understanding that kind

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of basic hard work mindset. I think those two things,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the Hungarian background and then that culture of you know,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like working hard and climbing the ladder of opportunity that

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in which I've been able to do. I feel so

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>lucky and privileged to be able to have done that myself,

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and now you just see it being taken away for

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>so many other people by these terrible policies. I think

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that's where it comes from. We talk a fair amount

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>about whether it's possible to roll back some of the

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>policies and entitlements that are growing. You were director of

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>strategy for British Prime Minister David Cameron for a handful

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of years, and it's so difficult to get an honest,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>even handed account of Britain's journey through postwar socialist uh.

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Growth of those programs and then the Margaret Thatcher era. Um,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, all of the media and the

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>pop stars and all portray hers far worse than the

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>wicked Witch of the West, just an oppressive, evil person

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>who was, to my mind, just trying to recapture great

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Britain's greatness and agility as opposed to a giant, bloated

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>welfare state. Growing up, how did you see that that

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>rise and fall? Uh? What's your honest assessment of the

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Thatcher years? Oh, I mean, I I couldn't be more

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>of I mean, I was so proud that I actually

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>got to meet her and and and and work work

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the for for while I was had a junior

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>researcher job in the Conservative Party when she was Prime Minister. No,

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I I mean, and I actually growing up that was

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>part of that whole story for me because I remember,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I guess I absorbed this at the

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of kitchen table or whatever. You know, my stepfather

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and my family know, we it was very interesting. Again,

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's these things you remember, like Thatcher was on our

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>side because she was for working people and the Labor Party,

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the socially equivalent Democrats. I remember this phrase that was

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>used all the time in our household there for the layabouts,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is a pretty kind of aggressive word

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and whatever. I probably wouldn't use it now, you know,

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's people are going to call layabouts for

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of my life. Now, the lay abouts maybe

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the you know, the lay about. So look, she

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>did she I mean, she saved the country, there's no

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>question about that. And stop what was looking like a

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>really terminal decline for for Britain. And it was and

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it was and it was focused on two things, which

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is getting the government the government. I mean, it's an

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>insane level of central centralization of government power where the

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>government owned and ran pretty much everything in the country.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the airline, the railways, the phone company,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>either all the utilities, energy, everything It was owned by

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the government and run by the government and delivered with

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>no petition, no private sector investment. And everything was falling apart.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And so the great innovation was the privatization program to

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>take those assets, put them back in the public sector,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sell them to the people so people could be become

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>shareholders and get invested in the success of the economy.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Is an incredible transformation. The second part was the union reform,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the trade union reform, and you basically you couldn't do

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>anything in the UK without the permission of the unions,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not just the government unions, but unions in the private

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>sector as well. So she enabled people who started and

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>run businesses as I have. You know, I've been an

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur in the UK and here in California, and you know,

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like that just that freedom to start your business and

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and employ people, and and find a customer and find

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>customers for your your product or service, and that that

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that whole enterprise culture is what she created and revived

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the the economy and society in this in the process.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So she was a complete savior for the country as

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>far as I'm concerned. That's not to say we think

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>she said or did was perfect, but overwhelmingly, shoot, I mean,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>she saved the country. I think that's the simplest way

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of putting it. Enterprise culture. That's interesting case again back

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to where do we get our world views? And I

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>don't even know where I got mine, really, But the

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>back when I was starting out in you know, after

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>college or whatever, and struggling like so many people doing.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I had three jobs and I was broken. I was

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>sleeping on the floor in this sublet apartment because I

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a bed. I mean I didn't, But it never,

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it never crossed my mind that there should be some

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>government program or something, and just it never occurred to me.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we got you were somehow being cheated. Yeah,

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I just thought I've made some bad decisions, which I had,

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and I needed to make some better ones

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or get a better job. And so we got this

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>five trillion, another five trillion dollars worth of programs staring

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>us in the face here in a couple of weeks.

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And how do you get people out of the mindset

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's the government's got to fix my current woes

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to me. I just I don't even know

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>how you do it. Well, there's a couple of answers

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to that. I mean, first of all, and this this

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 1>is something that maybe isn't such a comfortable conversation for

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>conservatives or people on the right to have, but it's

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>important we have it. Why is there such an appetite

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>for this far left lunacy, as as we could characterize it.

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is it even being discussed? Why is it so

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the norm actually for a lot of younger people to say, yeah,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of course we need this. Of course we need the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>government to to help me with, you know, buying a

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>house or rent or whatever it may be, and and

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and every aspect of my life to be subsidized and

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>supported by the government. One of the reasons for that

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>is that they look around and their experience of the

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>free market, free enterprise capitalist system over the last couple

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of the last decade or so it has not been

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>very positive. And they said, well, hang on a second,

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>why should I buy into the market approach? Because the

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>market approach means that there's absolutely no chance are ever

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>earn enough, will be able to save enough to own

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>my own home. That's completely out of reach. Most of

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>these jobs that you look at, you know, they don't

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>pay enough to live on with all the taxes, and

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and so they what's been going on, and they say, actually,

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>there's no opportunity, that's all just bs this idea that

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>if you work hard, you get on and so on,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and that also feeds into these terrible social trends, like

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>people thinking, I can't afford to have kids, So what's

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the point of actually thinking about starting a family because

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's never going to be possible. So we've got to

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that actually there are things that have gone wrong

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with the way capitalism has worked. And this is actually

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I argue in my in my

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>book Positive Populism was actually there is there is something

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to that populous critique, um. And we've got to do

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>something about the fact that a lot of the rewards

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>in the pre enterprise system have gone to people at

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the top, which I don't begrudge for a second. As

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you start a business and you you

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>people love it and want to buy your stuff, then great,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>you know you're meeting a need. That's fantastic, and you

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>should get rich in the process as an incentive. No

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. But we need to actually look at

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the policies that, for example, have made housing so unaffordable,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>um that people look at that and thing, I'll never

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to afford a house. You've got to do

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>something about that. However, the answer to a lot of

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>these points is not to go in the kind of

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>government control left wing direction, but actually more in the

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in the opening things up direction. And then the kind

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of phrase that comes to my mind because I talked

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about it all the time, is what to me, the

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>populist thing is all about is putting power in people's hands,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and that means taking it away from the government to

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>centralize and control and regulate everything. And a good example

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in relation to housing is actually, the way you deal

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>with the problem of affordable housing is not to give

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>people more money so that you're subsidizing it, but actually

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to to reduce the amount of regulation that makes it

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>so expensive to build a house in the first place,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and to get rid of some of these zoning regulations

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that mean that it's impossible to to to create enough

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>housing to meet the demand. So the answers will often

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be more conservative and libertarian, but we've got to at

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>least acknowledge that you know why there's this appetite for

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this incredible march to the left, and give positive solution

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and not just I mean I always condemn it as

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>craziness because it is, but you've also got offer something

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>positive this says, here's our plan to help you earn

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a decent living and afford a home and so on,

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>not not massive compulsory government centralization and regulation. There's a

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>better way of doing I don't think the right has

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>been very good at that. I don't think Republicans have

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>been very good at that. They haven't been offering offering solutions.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And we need to get into that business as well.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely, I think the right has been very lazy

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>about advocating for liberty. We've just assumed for many generations

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that people understand it and value it about Yeah, that's

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a good point, you know, I was, Steve, I was

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>actually going to bring up a different book, Years More

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Human from back in twenty something like that. But I

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>know you're you're pretty critical about certain aspects of capitalism.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We've often made the ship the point on our show

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of aspects of capitalism that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people point to and say this is bad, this is ugly,

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that are the opposite of the free market, the chronic capitalism.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They are giant corporations which right the very laws which

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>paved the way for them to become a dominant and

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>ugly and abusive exactly I called them, I think I

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>can't remember now, but kind of private sector bureaucracy, that's

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what they are. They're like government bureaucracies. They happen to

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>be in the private sector, and they're very cozy with

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the the people who make the laws and and and

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you know, that's why I'm so I've been

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so focused on the corruption that we see in our

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>system because actually you literally have, but it pitly at

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the state level, where there's less scrutiny. You have the

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses who buy up the legislatures they give that you

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't need to give that much money. Actually a state

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>legislator doesn't require that much money for their campaigns. You know,

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty cheap to buy them up. And then you

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>get in the room with them and you literally send

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>around what they call model legislation and then they and

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they and they implement it. But of course we can't

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be one sided about this, I mean, particularly in California.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's also happening from the left. Never talk

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>about this. They love attacking the Koch brothers and and

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and big business and dirty you know, dart money and

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>politics and all this stuff, but they never talk about

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you've got exactly the same going on

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>with the government unions. System is such a desert. They

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>own the state because of the government unions. That's no different.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>All of it is corrupt. That's why coming back to

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what I've argued, you know, you put power in people's

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>hands so you get rid of all this corruption and

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>cronyism wherever it comes from, whether that comes from big

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>business or from the big unions, because no one should

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have too much power. It's the concentration of power that's

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there's the argument I'm made in more human and positive populism.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>When you have too much power in too few hands,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when you get problems, whether that's in the economy

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or with government and politics. You've got to take the

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>power away and put it in people's hands. And that's

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the that's the thing I've always I shout want to

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>make this point. I think it's really important for people

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>who hear the word populist. And you see commentators constantly say, well,

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got left wing populism and right wing populism, and

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got the other kind of trump be right wing populism.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.239
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren an

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>AOC and their populist of the left. I don't think

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you can be a populist on the left because what

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they're all about is taking power out of people's hands

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and putting it in the government's hands and centralizing power there.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>And actually the most incoherent on this is Elizabeth Warren,

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>who actually I think makes a pretty good case about

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>how there's too much monopoly power in the private sector.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got to break up big tech and so on.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree with her about that, but in the same

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>breath she goes on about centralizing power in the public

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>sector and having a federal government in Washington start controlling

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>everything childcare and family policy and housing and you name it.

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So she's all for breaking up power in the private sector,

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm with her on that, but in the public sector,

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>she wants to centralize power. And I think we should

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be consistent and say we want to put power in

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>people's hands right across the board. Steve Hilton's podcast is

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>California Rebel based. Steve, you've been generous with your time,

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Talget or a couple of guys. We couldn't get into

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Oxford unless we were there to clean the toilet, so

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but really enjoy the conversation. I hope we can do

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>it again. Fantastic was a great pleasure season. It is

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>remarkable the extent to which people who grew up under communism,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or are the children of people grew up under communism.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Are there practically a hundred percent conservatives. I think that

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>speaks volume. Is there a name for that accent? I

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>mean we all just called an English accent, but in America,

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got all kinds of different accents, Northeastern, southern, Midwest.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's a name for it, but

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I would describe it as educated London. Yeah, probably something

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. Huh. I mean he's not like a Manchester

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Fisher anything like that. Right now? No, not, what are

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you doing? No extra large