WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off May 19th, 2022 (Ep. 514)

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we have nice things? Let's play ball.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in everybody to fantasy pros. This is leading off.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by bet MGM, the King of sports books.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's me, Joey p Joe Pi's appeia with me. Today

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is back the Welsh, clean shaven and ready to go,

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've got some baseball stuff to talk about today.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>We got your betting stuff, we've got your prop bets,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we got your dfs.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>We've also got your fantasy baseball. We've got some history

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and a whole lot more. But Welsh, we.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Have to start here on a sour note. Unfortunately, because

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>people say to me all the time, Joe, why can't

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy what's going on with the New York Mets?

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you be happy with how well the Mets

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have done? And I inevitably respond back because I know

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's always a matter of time before things go sideways.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Max Scherzer was.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>On the mound, felt a poll in his side, left

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the game, took himself out immediately. I know they're saying,

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping it's not so bad and all these things,

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But Welsh, this is why we can't have nice things.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So I unfortunately am here sitting and just miserable because

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Max Scherzer, who had been carrying this staff here, looks

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's headed for the eye. L So what can

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you say to me to make me feel better?

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's always tomorrow, the sun. The sun will

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>come out tomorrow. It's like Byron Buxton for me. You know,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>this is actually very similar to like when Byron Buckson

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>goes down, like it's very upsetting, and when he's not

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>in the lineup. And this has been baseball though, this

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>has been baseball all year. You know, it's like, hey,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>this is fun, this is good, and he's gone, He's gone.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>The Sure's are one is.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Pretty brutal though for that entire Mets team, that is

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>the heart and soul. And I don't I don't know

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 3>what else to tell you, my friend, except the sun

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>come out.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Wait, beautiful voice. That makes me feel a little.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Bit in that thing.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>What I will say is.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Is also this that you know, from a from a

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy standpoint, in terms of our approach, I guess the

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>one solace we could take is our approach going into

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this year was Faye the top ten.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 4>Pitchers, great point. Yeah, all the other guys.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>In that next column. Look, get two of those guys.

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Get get a Pablo Lopez and a Giolito.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Get this guy, Joe.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Muskrove, Get a Joe musk Rove, and get a you

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>know you Darvish or whatever. Yeah, I don't have any

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Walker Buehlers in those struggles. Don't have any Max Suersers,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 3>don't really have many. I don't think I have any

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Shane Bieber's have kind of avoided all of that, which

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, push comes to shove. It'll be interesting to

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 3>look at the end of the year on you know,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the return, if you really if you took like, you.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Know, the top ten sps and then you take the

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 4>next ten sps, which is a little subjective.

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, how big of an overall production difference if

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 3>we did we did averages, if we average out you know,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>strikeouts and e RA and stuff like that. Like, how

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 3>big of a difference did you get drafting high high

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>starting pitchers then you did waiting a little bit. I'm

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>not sure it would be so much different. Plus, if

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 3>you add in those il stints and miss days, might

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 3>not be too big of a difference.

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>You might be correct.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll have to get that mayor Era into check.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>This actually makes me feel nice before we even get

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>into the headlines.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Look at this.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>We're closing it on seven thousand subscribers to our YouTube channel.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 2>They said it couldn't be done.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you have it already, I'm sure you subscribe

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to our YouTube channel, Fantasy Pros MLB. It's a different

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>channel again. This is the MLB channel. We do just

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>baseball here. I just did a by low Sell high

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.839
<v Speaker 1>video yesterday. Got the Waiver Wire video I think comes

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>out tomorrow morning. Some very exciting things here. We've got

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than just the leading off. We're building out,

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>We're branching out. It's an empire we're creating here. So

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>besides the miserable, horrible, terrible, no good mac schures or news,

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get to some other things that might make me

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>feel better. Nick Pavetta, how about that two hitter against

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Astros After the astrost five thousand home runs the

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>night before nine k's one earned run for Paveta. He

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is now at a four to twenty two e ra

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Kenley Jansen blew his first save of the year, with

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Keston hero walking things off for the court to run.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Just like we all Scriptedston just like scripted tested hera

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>blowing the Kenley Jansen save like we all thought, what

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 3>is this thoud.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>We're disappointing prospect Keston Hero or Jared Kelnick.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean right now it's Kelnick. Kelick's not in the majors.

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh god, I don't know. I think either handster

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>would have hurt my my soul, but.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean Kesten here hurts like that guy looked like

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 3>such a good contact hitter. The one thing I would

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>have bet on him if it would have been like

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna tap into his power.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Is he gonna run?

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd say, well, he's gonna hit, Like the guy is

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit and he's gonna make that work for him. Nope,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>not whatsoever. But you know he's starting to roll a

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit. He's getting a little groove.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, boy, oh boy, all right.

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Jared Walsholber Twice, I was telling everybody that's the perfect

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>guy to swap in the video. If you can make

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a trade for Taylor the Ward and go get Jared

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Walsh in something else, go do that.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, he made that trade yesterday. You're doing okay.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>David Bedner fans two in a save Pete Alonzo, Homers

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>plays four, and Mets win despite losing Max Scherzer, So

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>really they lost, and c J Cron becomes the first

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>nationally guy to hit the double digit mark in Homers graduation. CJ,

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>good for you. Back to the injuries here, Welsh. So

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock is going to have a second Tommy John surgery.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't really talk about this yesterday. It's it's a

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>huge bummer. I mean, the Padres really made out like

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>gangbusters on this trade. This feels like one of those

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>trades that happens in fantasy where you're like, yeah, I'll

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>give you this picture for a closer or whatever, and

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>then the picture goes on the ile a couple weeks

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>later and you go, who boy, dodge that bullet.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't that kind of all have that we've all had that.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I love person I personally love Chris Paddock.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Two. He's just like a he's a good dude.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a really great He was a great

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 3>pitcher for a time. That third pitch stuff just absolutely

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>killed him, and he was starting to find his own again.

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>He was starting to find his command. That was a

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 3>problem when you're like a basketball change up guy, You're

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>probably gonna need a little bit more, and he was

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 3>starting and also, you're gonna need like pinpoint command and

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 3>he started to find that command again.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know.

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Again, we'd have to go back and look at the

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>history of it. But how successful you know, have any

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 3>pitcher been coming off a second Tommy John Because I

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>know we have a little bit of a history on it.

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't really recall many guys coming back successfully from twodjs.

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember who they are. That's a good question,

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>A why I don't know.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like one of the Cubs guys had two

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John's.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 4>That sounds right.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>There's somebody in my brain and I cannot excuse me.

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>I cannot unlock them right now. Who had to Tommy John's.

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 3>And I believe it was like one in college or

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 3>high school or something like that, and then one right

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 3>early in their career. And I cannot unlock who that

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 3>is right now. But I just don't feel like the

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 3>success rate is super great. So I'm personally bummed for Paddock.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I definitely had shares because he was dirt, dirt cheap, but.

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what can you do?

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And he looked pretty good when he got over in Minnesota,

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he's actually pitching well the Stray.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they were working with him better.

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's been a lot of criticism on the

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Padres pitching coaches as of late, like especially with what

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 3>happened in the minors with Mackenzie Gore. They had multiple

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>DJ guys and you know, maybe the twins were doing

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>something right, but then.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Sucks too late, too little, too late, unfortunately there and

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's one of my favorite Beck songs from the nineties

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to Tommy John's and a Microphone, that's one of my favorites.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Now you know what, I loved that one too.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Mayor by the way, he pointed out Drew Rasmussen had

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 3>to Tommy Johns, so that's not relatively Yeah, I didn't either.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 3>That's a pretty good success story for him returning though.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, guy can't hit ninety pitches. If literally a

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>comment was coming to earth and it required him to

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 3>go ninety they would be like, well, it's been a

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 3>good run.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Well he's in the right place for that.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So Chris Sawyer here, one of our panists, and Jack

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Cracker Jacks has a question here, just traded Zach Gallon

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and Alec Thomas for Brandon Woodrup and Lejandro Kirk at

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a twelve team daily head to head points league. He

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>loves you, he says, he loves the Welsh. He would

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>like an input on this trade. What do you think

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>about this trade? Gallon and Alec Thomas. I'm assuming it's

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>redraft here, and I mean, look, you got Woodroff to

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.119
<v Speaker 1>me in head to head points, especially if the points

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>favor of the pitching side. I'd always have Woodroff every

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>day of the week. I think he did pretty well

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>here in this trade. I think it's a good trade

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>for both sides, which is what you want at the

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the day.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Well did he get that? He got the Gallon and

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Thomas side.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Correct, he just just traded Gallon and Thomas for Woodroff.

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So gotwood got Youah.

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's actually funny. I was just looking at

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the other day. I'm creating a sheet of just easy

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 3>finding stats and stuff. You know, sometimes you go down

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the rabbit hole, you go on fan grafts, and you're

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 3>just like, well, I'm starting to find areas I want

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>and I'm saving them. And one of them was I've

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 3>been looking at pitchers that are successful through the first

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>three innings. So I'm sorting and splitting the first three

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 3>innings by innings five and six, just to kind of

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 3>take a look and see who pops. One of the

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 3>guys that's relatively alarming, I don't have it in front

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 3>of me is Brandon Woodruff, who had I believe top

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>five worst era in baseball innings four, five and six

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 3>right now and a really horrific Xome just kind of

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>gets destroyed second time through the lineup, which I agree

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 3>with you. I was surprised because there's names in there

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 3>you would kind of expect. I really should have tried

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to pull this up. I didn't know we were going

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 3>to talk about him, but maybe yeah we can. And

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>that has me worried a little bit on Woodroff, on

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the lack of success on the back end. We've seen

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 3>him get a little bit wonky and having that much

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>of a blown up ra innings four, five and six,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about completed games. I wouldn't hate if you

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>had the Gallon side, to be honest with you, in

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that trade, Woodroff is the best player in the trade,

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 3>but Gallon has proven himself pretty solid this year.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 4>Better team for Woodroff, but.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Alec Thomas is kind of a little bit of a dude.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 3>Kirk doesn't do much for me here, Thomas does a

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I think it's a very even trade, if

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you will, and that's what you want.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>You get the best play, but the other side gets

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the best bulk, and that's a good trade. Everybody wins.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Me personally, I always want the better player. That's the

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>RPV and me. By the way, he also when the

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Penis and Cracker Jacks JP is trolling me. Two weeks

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in a row, Joey p suggested a picture of pickup

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and then they land on the IL.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's true.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So it was a couple of weeks ago, and then

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>he had Tommy John and Jacob Deerzi last week.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I said, look, pick him up two stars, let's go

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>why not car it on? And then the rest?

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Who's your next one?

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So somebody better put him in bubble wrap? Please love

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a god. Can we put that guy in bubble wrap

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and protect him? Let's go to uh some more about

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>can we talk about this? Albert Pools last night goes

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten four hits in the history of

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball at number thirty three thirteen thirty three fourteen,

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so he is now officially up there ahead of him.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Still we have let's see, do you Carl Yastremsky, Paul Molliterter,

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Hannis Wagner. So it's a lot of famous names. Derek

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is at number six, and I was scrolling through to

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>see where each hero was and this guy was like,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't remember exactly how many eachi ro hits there

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>were in the major leagues. In the major leagues, he

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>had three thousand and eighty nine.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Hits in his major league career.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Dude, it's an insurd and it started at the age

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of twenty seven. I just want to play it out

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>for it.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 4>That was the thing that got me.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Actually, it's funny because they were I was watching a

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>broadcast the other day and they were doing this bit

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 3>where they were like, they were talking about pool holes

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 3>and three thousand and they were saying, who are the

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>next guys that are going to be able to get there?

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 3>And they had shown you know, Awtuve is kind of

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 3>like thirty two years old, kind of close, and they

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>were talking about Machado and Machado's got like seventeen hundred

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>He's only twenty nine years old, and they're showing these

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>five guys who are on this list, like who could

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>be the next three thousand hitter, and they're kind of

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 3>arguing about it, and I had the same thing in

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>my head. I'm looking and I go, my god, each

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Row at twenty seven reached three thousand hits, and we're

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 3>looking at these guys who have, at twenty nine years old,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>seventeen hundred and maybe they'll get there. I was two

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>years younger, and he did what Icha did was it's

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 3>one of those like hindsight type of things. We look

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 3>back and we're like, wow, he was incredible. He really

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 3>was well.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>And Mike Marriages threw up here that Eachiro had another

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred and seventy eight hits in Japan, which is

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what I was alluding to. Next, the point is combined,

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he's at forty three sixty seven, and a lot.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Of people say, oh, it doesn't count. It was Japan.

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>You came up at eighteen years old, this guy. Okay,

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>so let's say take away the first eighty games. Let's

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 2>take away eighty hits or whatever he's got. Right after that,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>you got to realize the Japanese seasons.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Are short by thirty games practically, so you know, he's

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>playing one hundred and thirty games, one hundred and thirty

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>five games, whatever he's doing here. So even with that,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>if he had been playing in Major League baseball since

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the age of let's say twenty or twenty one, I

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have almost zero doubt in my mind, barring a catastrophic injury,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a fluke injury, that Eachiro wouldn't have the most hits

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>History of baseball, and we'd look at him differently.

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>When people say who's hit King, I know they say, well,

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Pete Rose, but I always say Echiro, And I think

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it does matter professional baseball. You have a four thousand

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hits in your career, and the people then make the

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>argument about, well, you know he's not facing, he's good

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of pitching, all this stuff. That that argument doesn't hold

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>water because when the dude came over here, he broke

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the single season hit record. So don't tell me about

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>how he couldn't hit major league pitching back now, of

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>course he could have.

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree with you.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm not going to count the the stuff

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 3>he got in Japan like as a totality and be

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 3>like he is the true I think he would have

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 3>been though, Like I'm what he did, They're awesome.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>When he thirty games in Japan every.

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Year, he would have done it for sure. I'm not

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna look at him and go, oh, well, he is

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 3>the number one hit leader, because if I add those

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>two together, it is a bit of a different game.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think it's as dramatic as people think.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>And regardless of the point, back to your point was

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 3>that had he been here from the jump, he would

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>probably have two or three hundred hits on Pete Rose

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 3>right now. And it is fascinating to look at, going

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>back to Poolholes for a second, that pool Holes is

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>definitely gonna get to ten. But the question is is

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 3>can he get past Honus Wagner. Is he gonna get

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 3>another one hundred hits? You know, because he's gonna get

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>to ten easy. He Gristremsky and Honus Wagner are within

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 3>one hit of each other. So if he can get there,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>it's either he gets to ten or he's eight. And

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>then there's a little bit of a shot at maybe

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 3>seven or something like that. That's as high as pool

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Holes is gonna get.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Trent here with some great stats here each wrote some

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of the most off the wall stats of all time

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>baseball history. Two thousand hits in less than ten seasons,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>average two hundred and twenty hits in his first ten

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>major league baseball seasons. Just absolutely stunning there. Speaking of

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>stunning a crazy baseball stories, I saw this on the

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>internets yesterday. The Yankees cut third round pick Jake Sandford

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for allegedly stealing bats and gloves from his teammates and

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>then trying to sell them online. He also allegedly scam

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fan selling autographed equipment and never delivering it.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is this the strictest story you've ever heard

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>of it?

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I told you I'm actually gonna talk a little bit

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 3>about it on another show, Prospect One. But likes many

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>people know, I really like like autograph stuff.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 4>I got all this stuff here.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm into memorabilia and I follow some groups. I had

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 3>actually seen this claim four ish months ago of people

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>being like, first it was, hey, Jake Samford is on

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 3>these groups saying he's gonna do his own signing because

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>people do private signs.

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I have a couple of friends promoter.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Of those, like Julio's done one like if they do yeah, yeah,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>people they come in.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like the yeah agents they cut deals and these

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>guys they put these signs where you can send in

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 3>and get st the autograph.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 4>So he was doing like his own and people like, hey,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 4>check this out.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Da da da, And then all of a sudden, people

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 3>started being like, hey, Samford is scamming people.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 4>He's not doing it. And I kind of watched it

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 4>from afar and I was like, this is really interesting.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 3>And then it came out that he was not only

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 3>scamming fans, he was like stealing teammates stuff. This is

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 3>a third round pick who had a really good year

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>last year, who got a signing bonus, and people really

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>like he was stealing these guys stuff, and he was

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 3>like going out and putting it on eBay or whatever

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the hell he was doing. This is wild. This is wild.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 3>He got a big signing bonus too. I don't understand it.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 3>It's a crazy story. I would love to like read

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 3>twelve more articles about what.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 4>The hell is going on.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, he just signed with the Ottawa

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Frontiers Baseball League, Like he deleted all his social media

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and stuff and then he went and signed and is

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 3>playing you know, out of the States.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, what a weird thing.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>To do.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, she's I don't know, so strange.

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to some of the stat heroes

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of the day. Obviously Nick Pivetta at the top of

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the list of pitchers. Who would have thought that against

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the Astros eight k's no walks stunning, a complete game

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for him. Zach Wheeler was very good yesterday. Nine k's

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>no walks for him, no earned seven innings. So Zach

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler clearly has found himself again. Do you think it

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was the shoulder at the beginning of the season and

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>having that delay?

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Was that the problem?

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Or I mean, do you think maybe it was just

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a fluky start to the season. What do you make

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the early struggles of Wheeler and now Wheeler looking

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>very reminiscent of the guy who was dominating last year.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it was Inurie stuff.

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 3>If you remember, I have a vivid memory of the

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 3>injuries in the preseason because in taut he had he

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 3>had just gotten hurt, and there was this kind of

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 3>like interim period of was he going to really be

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 3>able to was he gonna miss time? What was going

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>to happen? And then it was he was going to

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 3>throw in the spring training game. So I got him

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 3>at a discount, and people were moving away from him.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I think readjustments to what we saw in the off

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>season of you know, guys not being able to work

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 3>out with teams, also suffering a little bit of injury

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 3>that set him back.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you've got some weather stuff. I think all of

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 4>those play in.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I definitely am kind of tuned into the preseason injury

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 3>setting him back a little bit, and then he's just

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 3>right back at it, which I'm very happy about.

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Drew Rasmisen did not throw one hundred pitches five or

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in run seven k's Jordan Lyles was also good on

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the Yankee Gay whood have thought

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that eight k's two earned runs, Garrett Cole five Kays

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>two earned over seven shoho Atani seven k's two earned runs,

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and Josiah Gray three earned six inning seven strikeouts for him.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley was my bi loo this week, and the

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>article that I wrote or contributed to I shouldn't say wrote,

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I contributed to over on fantasypros dot com. The power

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>numbers are there. He was just struggling a little bit,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>just by Austin Riley. Anywhere you can, if you still can't.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Jazz Chisholm two for two with a dinger. He continues

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to be red hot Jared Walsh with the two home runs.

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Jazz Chishm right now. Jazz Chisholm is electric.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>He is exciting to watch. He is great for the game.

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>The different hair color, the speed, the helmet flying off

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>when he rounds second base. He is everything I feel

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>like we should be excited about for baseball. And I

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>want more. I want more publicity for Jazz Chisholm. Who

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is I gotta say, out performing a lot of our expectations.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Many of us were a little concerned they wouldn't be

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>able to do reach that level. He has done that,

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so everybody that was on Chishm has absolutely been validated

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so far. Can he maintain this pace in any way,

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>shape or form whiles.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean that was the question that my concern

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 3>and why I was fading on him this year was

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I put him in the Jave Baya's camp that he

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 3>could be streaky. You know, he doesn't. His walk rate

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 3>isn't great. He swings through a whole bunch. He can

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 3>be a big strikeout guy. That's a problem. He's always

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to pull. He is trying to pull and smash baseballs.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 3>He's got electric batspeed, just like Kave Bayas. So my

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 3>concern and sometimes you do that when you look at

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 3>these guys, you go, well, you know, you can put

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 3>two and two together and say, you know, this type

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 3>of style equals this type of style, so the results

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 3>might be the same. And it was that, well, you know,

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 3>the team context just kind of get out of it.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 3>He's been incredible. Can he maintain it?

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, that's the question here, Like this is

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 4>his problem.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Is he can get really strikeout heavy, he can get

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 3>just swinging at every single pitch. And what will pitchers

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 3>do to adjust to him? That's the other question. We

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>don't know yet what needs to be adjusted to him

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>as a hitter and how is he going to react

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 3>at this point though I'm not going to even harp

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>on that pres that I was fade.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Did we see the adjustment last year? Ready Welsh to Chisholm,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like his readjustment to the league?

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well no, And I think the beginning of this

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 3>season is he his readjustment to the league. So is

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 3>there another That's what I was saying, Is there another readjustment.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 4>And what is right now? How do you change and

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 4>attack this guy?

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one of the ways you can do it,

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>We can do it if we want to speculate is

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 3>go to you know, like a baseball savant. We could

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 3>look and see what the pitch mix is right now

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>where is he really successful and you might get analytical.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's just say as hypothetically.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm not looking at it right now, but let's

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 3>say he's, you know, hitting fastballs at a three point

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty clip right now, where last year he was hitting

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>him at two eighty. And he's not really hitting any

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 3>breaking pitches. You might see own team coaches start to

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>say they want to attack him with more off speed

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.239
<v Speaker 3>stuff out of the zone, and how is he going

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to adjust to that? All of that aside is to

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 3>be the speculation. He's incredible right now. His power speed combo,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 3>he's electric. I think he's one of the better middle

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 3>infield guys in baseball right now. I've boosted him up

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>in my redraft ranks quite a bit because I think

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>you have to, because he's a huge fantasy asset and

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 3>he's not showing any of the hobby bias swings right now.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 4>He's just mashing, Yeah he is.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Perettis two home runs against his former organization.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>That must have felt good for him.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Luis Ariz had four run scored and a steel yesterday.

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Cole Calhoun another guy I talked about in the waiver

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>wire video today, home run.

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 2>He's hot right now.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Look, he's a streaky player, and when he's running hot,

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he's rostered in less than twenty percent of

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>leagues right now. He needs some help in the outfield.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Go grab him. Ty Frantz, Well, he's been helpful. Home

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>run two, RBIs three for five.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Good and MJ. Melendez with a home run yesterday.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Any of these other guys in the stat heroes and

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the hitters stick out to.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 3>You, Welsh, I mean MJ. Melndez has kind of cleaned up.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I hate it in TGFBI to catch your league. I've

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>had Melndez roster. I him rostered, but I had him

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 3>starting when he got called up because you can play

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 3>other spots and stuff. And then of course this week

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I took him out for you know, just a solid

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 3>bat because he wasn't doing much.

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 4>And he connects with his first two major league homers.

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>He start and he you know, he's really getting the

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 3>time and he's gonna get more continued time with Salvi

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Prez on the IL.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 4>So m J.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Melndez is someone to continue watching because this is an

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 3>opportunity right here for him to stick around for the

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 3>long haul of the season. None of that was guaranteed,

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 3>and this is the chance for him to long haul

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 3>stay even when Cam Gallagher comes back. If he continues

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 3>to hit, he can hit a couple other spots. With

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 3>Salvi coming back, I think m J. Melndez could be

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>around for a bit. And you know, any of these

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 3>guys that can play more than just a catch are valuable.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's get to the stat zeros. Dalton Jeffries

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>six earned runs over four hitting, Zach Davies five earned

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>runs over four, Kirby Snead two thirds of an ending,

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>five earned runs, Jake Walsh no outs.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 2>For earned runs.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the that's the pinnacle, that's the chef's kiss of

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the stat Zeros.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Come in there, give up two hits.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Four earned runs, walk a guy and knock get it

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>out at Duardo Escobar is zero for four with three k's. Boy,

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, the Escobar experiment is going to be coming

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to a halt pretty soon. Javey or Bayez Oh for

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>four with three k's, Joey Bart Oh for four with

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>three k's, Luis Robert Oh for four with three k's,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bell over five just just a flat over five,

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>also Oh for four but no strikeouts. Jad Ya Pez,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker, fordu Goo Sigura and Robbie Grossman. What is

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going on with Robbie Grossman. Robbie Grossman had a breakout

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 1>season last year, and I know he's been a bit

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of a journeyman. I know he's bounced around a little bit.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But everything looked like the guys sort of turned a corner.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It looked like a really nice value and it is

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.719
<v Speaker 1>just completely disintegrated in people's hands this year. I have

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>no shares, but I almost feel like I should send

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a greeting card or something to people who do, because.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Send it too.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't even bring it up to him.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>The yeah now now it's his number one play Hi,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 3>even Jack in the chat Bogman, It's Bogman's fault. This

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 3>was like his number one targeted player. Every mock draft

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 3>we did loved it.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 4>Uh, I did not.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a big Tiger's outfield guy. I faded a

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 3>kil Bado, I faded Robbie Grossman, and both have have

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 3>worked out quite well for me right now. But yeah,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 3>we should all send Bogman a card or and I'm sorry,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 3>or you know, a care package of some sorts, maybe

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 3>Omaha Steaks.

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I do. I do love the Omaha Steaks. Now,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Max Meyer has not been good recently. He has been

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>injured list with a nerve issue, so I mean there's

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>something had to be up. We talked about it earlier

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>in the week. Look just hold for now. Nerve issues

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>can always be scary. I don't know how much detail

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten yet on this, uh, but I see here

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that about fourteen minutes ago wrote a wire A couple

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>other places CBS reporting, So he's on the AyL, which, again,

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to see the guy hurt, but at

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>least it explains what was going on here.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I didn't, I didn't hear the Yeah, yeah, I

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 3>mean too. And I hadn't heard about the il thing.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>I was worried because he was pretty walk heavy in

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 3>his last start and he's gotten lit up. But it

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 3>also this tells you the story. This tells you what's

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 3>going on the problem is is in what capacity he

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>do you hold? How long is this going to linger?

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 3>How long does it take him to get back? I

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 3>would say let's assume this is like a normal ish

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 3>stent of eye L and then the return period. I

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>think you're at least three weeks before there's a real

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 3>possibility that he would be called up. So if you're

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 3>just sitting him on a bench, this is your call.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 3>This is your call as a fantasy owner. You what

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>do you do? If you've got NA spots, This is fantastic,

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 3>but you know you might be upwards of a month

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 3>before you actually now get Max And I don't know

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 3>how much that's going to be worth. It's again depending

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>on your roster size or how aggressive people are, because

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 3>this could be one of those situations you dump them

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 3>and everybody swoops him up if they've got roster.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 4>That's my fear. I don't think it's definitive if you

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 4>can keep him. Yeah, I just don't think it's definitive

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 4>that you keep him at this point. It's there's context

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 4>to it.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 2>It's a roster to roster issue.

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I definitely agree with that, and if you have questions

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>about that, you can always ask. That's the perfect thing

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>on Discord to ask us when you go over to

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Discord and you join that at fanacros dot com slash chat.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>These are the kind of things we could talk it

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>out with your roster. All right, Let's go to the

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>home run board and there you go, Niking of the

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>North at fourteen, de Blum at fourteen, and all I

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>do is win at thirteen, Larry Ce up to thirteen.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Also Larry C called Mike Trout yesterday and at De

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>la Gadio with Justin Turner moved up to eleven. So

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>nice job there by, my boy adele. Let's go to

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the betting pros section here, and of course he's from

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the prop bet cheat sheet.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>But if you're gonna make a wager.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We strongly encourage you to use the promo code leading

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>off at bet mgm, the King of sports books, bet

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars win two hundred on any game, regardless of

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the outcome. When you sign up today and download the

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>bet mgm app or go to betmgm dot com. Bet responsibly,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and by betting responsibly, I mean make sure you use

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the promo code leading off, but in all seriously bet

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>responsibly it's fun, but again, have some discipline with it

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and take some free money. We're giving it to you

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>over at bet MGM with the promo code leading off.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>That coat, by the way, that crown is just what's

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 3>that clean? That crown is so clean.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 2>It's just so.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Pretty interesting point.

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>It looks good.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 3>It's completely cha Yeah, no, I can tell it's plastic,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 3>but it's just a very clean.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 4>It looks good on your head when you do the reado.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm very regal, I said, just generally speaking,

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>i have a very very regal, very kingly features.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 2>It's a very strong, ye funny looking nose.

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah you know you don't you got the nose, you

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 4>got kind of the eyebrowight, Yeah, you are very regal,

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 4>very much.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it covers up my giant bald head, which

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is also helpful. George Kirby tonight over on bet MGM.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>The strikeout prop minus one fifty six is the Jews.

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's three and a half. Three and a half.

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like an easy one to me, Aaron Judge

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at total bases one and a half, the Jews is

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>won minus one fifteen. Bryce Harper's got even money on

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the same total base prop at one and a half,

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>same with Stanton is also even Corey seeger one and

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a half total bases at plus one thirty tonight against

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fran Barvaldez in Houston. Then you got Cedric Mullins at

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>plus one twenty five at the total base prop at

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. You've got Austin Hayes at one

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half also a plus one twenty against Jordan Montgomery.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Both of those guys, and then Kyle Tucker total bases

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>against two who I believe is the bus driver from

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Simpsons at one and a half plus one ten.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Those are all I bet MGM, so go bet them today.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh Welsch, did you have anything that stuck out to

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you on this Well?

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I really like the Kirby one. That's one that I'm

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna play. I gotta tell you, Like Judge continue, I

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 3>want to play it every single day, Judge, I want

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 3>to play every single day. There is a part of

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 3>me that has this like it's gonna stop at some point,

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.239
<v Speaker 3>but he is so hot right now. I think it's

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 3>always going to stand out in any projection system. Look

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 3>for hit ones too. I actually played a that was

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 3>a really nice one. They had just singular one hit

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 3>for Stanton and Alonzo yesterday and Stanton didn't play, and

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 3>then Alonzo got the homer and I won the bet.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I didn't win a whole bunch, but I put those

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 3>two together. But it was just one hit. So look

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 3>for those on your book if they're giving it, because

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>if you take any of those two hot guys, you

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>can put those together. And I liked that one. Those

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 3>are a couple of guys Pete Alonzo I like today.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I would probably play it at one and a half

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 3>total basis. The other one is a Gallon. So Zach

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Gallen strikeouts, Cubs bottom twenty five, one of the you know,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the six or seven worst teams as far as strikeouts go.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I think they average around nine a game. Zach Gallon's

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 3>at five and a half on strikeouts. So I might

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 3>put Gallen and Kirby together in a little strikeout prop

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 3>for some extra juice and play that out.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, Jesse Elg's and foremost Melons is out today.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's very disappointing because I just look at these

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>first thing in the morning, God them up into the

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:28.959
<v Speaker 1>show sheet. But now my one's not in the lineup.

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So I hate you get scratching that one off your list.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the worst, especially when you're like, oh, that's a

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>really good one.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Nope, he's not there.

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>DFS, you could put Kirby together on DK along with

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Framber Valdez or Gallon. Valdez is just eight point five,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Kirby's just seven point eight. Rich Hill is real cheap

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>at six point five. I feel like it's a trap,

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm curious. I would stick with Framber Valdez and Kirby.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good situation there. If you want

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to go Gallon and Valdez, you can on DK on

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the single pitch your site, Kirby's eight point five on Fandal,

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Gallon is ten point six. I'd rather split the difference

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and just go rambervald Does at nine to seven, and

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>then it's stack up Houston. Speaking of Houston, that's where

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going for my home run call tonight with Jordan Alvarez,

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to what works. I'm at six

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Welsh Where you're going for your home run call? Who's

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>going yard.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mentioned it.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go with mister Pete Alonzo, who doesn't

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 3>have a big old track record against Dakota Hudson, but

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 3>he is hitting four hundred against him. He did it

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 3>last night. We go back to back, so let's see

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 3>if the team is hyper aggressive. Somebody then go card said,

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 3>can we get a prop bet on? Does Pete get

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 3>hit by a pitch? But I'm going to go with

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 3>mister Pete Alonzo today.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 2>There you go, who's Mike Mayer goot today?

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.239
<v Speaker 4>Say the same thing? Oh does hey?

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Luis Robert is where he's going today? So there you

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>have it.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>If you want to make a home run call, go

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>join our discord or at fantasypros dot com slash Chat

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>free to join, but when you're a premium subscriber, you

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>can hang out in the home Run channel and make

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>your picks. You can also be part of stages, be

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the AMA channels where Welsh is where I am,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>where we take questions from everybody and we have some

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>nice conversations about that. And don't forget bet mgm where

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the bet mgm app used that.

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Promo code leading off. And lastly, let's get this number

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>to seven k. We can do this. We've got goals here.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you haven't already subscribed to the channel, because again,

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the show now. We're doing some of

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>these other side videos for the Waiver Wire for by

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>los Hi. We're gonna start that now as a weekly thing,

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So click that little bell for notifications when you subscribe

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros MLB.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it for us, But the story of the

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>game goes on For the Welsh, I'm Joey P. We'll

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>see you next time. Kids,