WEBVTT - How Sinclair Broadcasting Is Delivering Trump's Message

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sinclair Broadcast Group is not very well known, but

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it has one hundreds and seventy three broadcast TV stations,

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly in small markets like Sioux City, uh fres No,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Little Rock, some bigger ones Pittsburgh, Salt Lake City in Washington,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>but they have increasingly taken a rather conservative band, Felix

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to let Bloomberg Business Week Reporter wrote a story about

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this that was truly fastening and Felix, first, can you

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just start with how you came to even write about this? Yeah, Well,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those fascinating companies that kind of flies

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>under the radar. Um. The way I got interested is

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>when they announced their four billion dollar acquisition of Tribune

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Media in May, and I was sitting around with a

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of my colleagues and we're like, how come we

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know much about Sinclair or who runs that are

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what the culture of the company is like. And for

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a very important and influential media company, UM, they managed

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to really keep their name out of the news as

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>much as possible. Tell us about David Smith. He's the

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the company. Him and his three brothers inherited

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the company from their father, Julian back in the who

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>started the company originally in nineteen seventies. And for the

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>first you know, a couple of decades of the company,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a really small regional business. And then the

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties David Smith really started going out and acquiring other stations,

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and they've been the most aggressive acquirer of broadcast TV

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>stations to the point where now they're not only the

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>largest station already station group already, but now, uh, you know,

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with the acquisition of a media they're going to be

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>by far in a way, the largest broadcaster in the country.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>How did they get around anti trust rules in SEC regulations. Well,

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing because you know, David Smith uh and his

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>brothers are all big supporters of Republican politicians and conservative causes. Uh.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>If Hillary Clinton had won the election, there's no way

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this Tribune Media deal would have gone through the FCC,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>H would not have allowed it. And basically what happened

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>is when Trump won his nomination to run the FCC,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon after taking over, changed a rule that limited

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ownership of local media companies. And as soon as that

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>rule was changed and this arcane rule was re emplaced, UM,

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>then that allowed UH Sinclair to buy Tribune Media and

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the biggest acquisition the company's history. Felix described for

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>people how the television business works when you own a

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>station and are an affiliate of a network, and then

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>your ability to insert local programming. Yeah, well, you know, basically,

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the station owner UM, even though the branding is from

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the network like ABC, NBC, Fox, CW, the station group

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that owns the station, like Sinclair, has a lot of

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>influence and sway over the newsroom, which is really what

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>creates the programming. So the local you know, your morning news,

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>your evening news, your local nightly news, all of that

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is controlled by a station group that you know, the

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>reports of the station group. And so what's amazing about

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Sinclair's They've really pioneered this method of injecting essentially centralized

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>conservative political punditry into all of these small stations around

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the country. So does Sinclair have any direct relationship with

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and some of his cohorts like uh Steve

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Bannon and others. Or is it just sort of a

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>tangential relationship based on the ties of the founders of Sinclair. Uh.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, Initially during the start of the two thousand

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen presidential campaign, they threw their support behind UM

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Ben Carson, who, like David Smith and his brothers UH,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is from the Baltimore area. UM. But once Ben Carson

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped out, they really threw their support behind Trump. They

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of you know, these centralized news stories

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that's were sent out to the station's criticizing Hillary Clinton. Uh.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>They've broke her to deal with Trump and his campaign

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to get more access for the reporters in exchange for

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not really criticizing uh those interviews at all and running

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>them in full. And yeah, they've basically worked pretty hard

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to UM to align themselves with Trump. UM. Most recently

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and probably most importantly, they hired Boris Epstein, who was

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a uh, you know, an aid to the president, one

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of his real surrogates on TV. Throughout the campaign, they

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>hired Boers After a brief stint in the White House,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they hired him to be their chief political analyst and

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 1>he now does you know, three uh segments a week,

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>many of which is echo White hot House talking points,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and each of those segments is then sent out to

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>every single newsroom around the country that they're called what

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the in the terms, they're called must runs and

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>even the year. And this creates a lot of tension

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at the stations, particularly in big areas. Um, you know,

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>they've had a lot of friction with for instance, Como TV,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>which is the station that they bought in Seattle area.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a very progressive city. It's a liberal viewership. And

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>when you talk to the people at these stations, they

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>think this is crazy. We're doing our local newscast and

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden we have to cut, you know,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>two minutes out of the evening news to go to

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>this you know, former Trump spokesperson to do a segment

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about how great Trump is. Of course, it only matters

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>if people watch, and real quick are people watch ching

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is listener? Is viewership going up? They have a big

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>aggregate audience. I don't think the audiences are going up.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>And typically they don't even really with their stations in

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>these markets. They don't really try and have the top

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>station ratings wise. Uh, they usually just um, you know,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>buy more stations in the market. Well, it hasn't helped

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the stock stocks up four percent so far this year.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Felix Gillette. Great story. I encourage everyone

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to read about the Sinclair Bard Broadcasting Well. I am

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>very pleased to welcome Cord Christensen. He is co founder,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer, and chairman of pet i q, the Boise,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Idaho based company that just distributes pet supplies and adjusted

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>it's I p O. It shares her up more than

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>four sent on its first day of trading. Cord, congratulations

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>on the successful I p O. I wanted just to

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of from you, first of all, before

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we get into the actual financing, about pet i Q

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and what the business model is and what the growth

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>potential is at this point that you see, yes, thank you,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we uh care a. Pet i Q are very focused

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on one thing, and that is providing better availability of

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the best pet healthcare items and by making those available

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>through major retailers across the United States, and the company

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>founded day one with that focus. We've never changed that

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>focus and ultimately it's a very large market that's growing

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>extremely well already. But there's a significant number of pets

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>out there in the country that do not get great healthcare,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and we think because all pets end up buying their

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>products through our customers, we have the best opportunity to

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>help educate consumers, bring in those those consumers that are

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not providing that, and ultimately grow the market significantly for

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>all people that participate in it. We think it's great

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for our supplier partners, for the company as shareholders, unnultimately

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>for consumers and their pet owners. Is is this gonna

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>be a shot at veterinary offices, because isn't that where

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>most people are most medication for pets is currently purchased. Yeah,

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we sure hope not. We built the company hoping that

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we would grow the total market and help everybody be

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>successful in it, and we've seen we've been in business

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>now since two thousand and nine, and as a company

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>as we've grown there definitely was early days. I think

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>some people that had the fear of the unknown and

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely thought that could be the case. But what we've

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>seen is the market's growing and we're definitely seeing those

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>new pets coming into it, and the veterinarians have grown

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>both the visits and the product business that they have

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>in their clinics every single year we've been in business,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and we hope to continue to drive this success in

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the veterinarian's office. We view them absolutely the critical part

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the partnership here at pet i Q and want

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to support at them enory and every way we can. Okay,

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I got that. But you know you've got three main

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>categories of business, right, I mean you've got the prescription medication,

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>You've got the over counter medication, and then the health

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and wellness products. Correct, That is correct? Okay, So I'm

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>looking at, let's say, the prescription medication. I mean, I

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>got to think that if it's less expensive at you know,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Walmart or pet Smarter or Kroger or whatever, that that's

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>where people are going to go, as opposed to just saying, okay,

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>give me whatever you prescribed and I'll pay for it. Yeah.

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that definitely could be the first perception. There's

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to be some people that say they're going

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to go there and buy their pet prescriptions where they

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>buy their human prescriptions. But there's been access to pet

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>prescriptions outside of the veterinarian market for a very long time.

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You have great companies like One Pet Meds that have

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>been selling in that manner for a very long time

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>with with pricing that's been very very established to be

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a saving So we think we can peacefully coexist. We

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>think we can drive a lot more people into the

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>space and and ultimately the veterinarians will gets the first meeting,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they get the opportunity to be with the patient first,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and that patient has the opportunity to buy their products there.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So more times than not they'll choose to buy at

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the veterinarian But there will be those that want to

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>come and get their pet prescriptions and they're over the

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>counter medications to our customers, and we view it as

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a very creative opportunity for everybody that's in the industry. Court.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had a guest on a couple of

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago who is saying that there have been studies

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>done that show that people love their pets more than

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>their children. Uh. You know, I have to wonder, just

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in light of the increasing love and emphasis on pets,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>whether the entire amount of spending that people uh have

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>every year on their pet healthcare, whether that's rising at

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>an exponential price. Can you can you give us a

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of that? Yeah? I think um I mentioned it

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a number of times throughout my career, but it's been

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. For two years on a row now there's

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>been more pets brought home to US households than actually babies.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And so if you just think of the trend as

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that continues to compound, as those pets year over year

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>do that we're going to see. Well, I'm just like

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to comprehend that the past two years there have

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>been more pets brought home than babies in the US

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in our history of our country.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Two years in a row. Oh my gosh, Okay, quite

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sorry now, And so I think it's it's very obvious

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that with all the new you know, really pet parents.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I think we can truly call them pet parents at

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this point when you start seeing those kind of trends

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and those kind of things going on our country. We

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have a customer base that ultimately has a dent of

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the pets in this country go to major retail outlets

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and online stores to find their pet supplies. We're at

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the front and in the very very beginning helping educate

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>them on where they can get quality healthcare. And then remember,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>every single person that's going to come back and buy

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a prescription drug at a retailer first is going to

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>go to a veterinarian's office and have that visit. And

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>so again, we think we're very balanced in providing incremental

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>growth for the manufacturers in that space, for the veterinarians,

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately just exp banning the pie and if there's

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more pets coming home than babies, we're in a very

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>good tailwind as far as the market and the market

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's already growing at a six percent KR. Who knows

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what the potential growth rate could be as we continue

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to drive that awareness. I think the estimate is for

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what about a nine billion dollar market that was in

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the SEC filing, a nine billion dollar market in for

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pet medications. Thanks very much for joining us. Cord Christensen

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is the co founder and the chief executive of pet

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>i q UH. Their stock begins trading. It is trading

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>right now on the New York Stock Exchange. Thanks very

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. And just a note, uh,

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Bramwitz. You know one of the things that you

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned having to do with the number of pets and

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so on. As part of their uh filing, they say

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>about seventy of dog owners and seventy seven percent of

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>cat owners view their pets as members of the family. Wow, well,

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>those shares are trading on the NASDAC for I beg

0:12:52.840 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>your pardon, Yes, yes, but yeah, it's just amazing. All right. Well,

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>let's let's take a look at another story that caught

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>our eye today. Y'alman owner and it is the author

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. He's a senior writer in banking and finance

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. And it was taken a look at

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the pretty incredible profits that we have seen at the

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>biggest US banks despite these regulations that have sensibly been

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>holding them back. Yellman, can you just give us a

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sense of how big these profits have been. Um, they're

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>almost as big as they were in two thousand seven,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty amazing because that was a good year

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>before everything fell apart, as you remember, and it was

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>less regulated. This is the crucial point, right because a

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of these Dodd Frank regulations had not yet been implemented.

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty much unregulated. You can say, I mean

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>they they you know, um, they tried there were people

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who tried to regulate it. There with this market, they

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>were told to be hands off. Um. Capital rules were revised,

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so basically banks could go on without any capital, meaning

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't really need that, could you just borrow as

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>much as you can so um, So their leverage ratios

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>reached you know, one to fifty at times. UM. So

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>there was hardly in the regulation and they were they

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>were making a lot of money and now there's all

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this regulation they're constantly complaining about and they're making about

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of money. So what does that tell

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you about their desire to have the chains of regulatory

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>authority loosened? So I mean we have to so no

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>put it in context, you know, as as the banker

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>um that the bank lobbyist told me who's quoted in

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this story. Well, okay, but the GDP nominal terms is

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger than it was, so the number is not one

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to one comparison. We're basically got back to the records,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's a bigger GDP. Typically, what happens with banks

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they're lending an activity goes up as GDP goes up nominally.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So if GDP grows two percent nominally regardless of realists,

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>real terms, everything in the bank's assets due too, but

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. So in a way, we're not where we

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>were in two thousand seven, but we're getting very close.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So we've heard a lot about how certain businesses have

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>become less profitable, talking about debt trading in particular some

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of their prop trading books, as well as equity trading,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which has been losing it's sort of revenue abilities for

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a while. So what's behind the growth in profits? Um? Well,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean they have been lending on like so unlike,

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>unlike the common misperception that they have been lending more

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and more. I mean, again you make comparisons to before

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, lending was growing faster, but then a lot

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of people will say, god, it was growing too fast, right,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>there were all the subprime stuff that everybody was borrowing.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But but lending is not all the same, right. I mean,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about lending and we're talking about revolving

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lines of credit and straight corporate loans or are these

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more complicated structures that could potentially have some serious problems

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that have sort of embedded leverage. I mean, are we

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about just the banks doing their function as basically

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going out there and providing capital to businesses of all

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sizes and letting them go out and create American dream.

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They are doing their function, the lending that's helped, and

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's And this is interesting because although this is this

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is something we thought about, what didn't really including in

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the story. Um the spreads, I mean, the correct credit.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>The interest rates are so low, so to be able

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to actually make decent profits in an in such a

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>horrible interest rate environment is pretty amazing too. But the

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at net interest margin compared it with

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>now and and pre crisis, the gap isn't that bad.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So despite interest rates being so low, banks have managed

0:16:55.640 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep improved. Recently, they came down because nobody was

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>borrowing for so for several years. Two thousand ten was

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>really bottom. The interesting margins really went down because when

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>there's no loan demand, you can't charge for it. You know,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't want to what interest people. If there are

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>people are in borrowing, you have to keep it low.

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But now there's demands more and more, the demand has

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>picked up. People are borrowing, companies are borrowing, and the

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>banks are now notching up that interest rate and they

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>are able to make the spread that they used to

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>make before the crisis, which is very healthy. So and

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>trading has has bombed up to I mean this this

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter was not a great quarter. Clearly its second quarter.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Everything went down because because everything is quiet. We don't

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like quiet. We want a lot of scare fear, Brexit

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and and and World War three. Now we don't want that.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, trading force for several quarters really improved.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean for some banks, five quarters in a row,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>they saw massive increases in trading. Morgan Salon was doing great. Um.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, JP Morgan has just been grabbing market share. UM.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>US banks are doing great. European banks not so. But

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that helps the US banks. Yeah, I mean I wonder

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if you could just briefly just describe the banks paying

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>out interest Let's say on CDs that you're not gonna

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>get anything on in a CD. Right, we're talking maybe

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>one percent at the current rate, not even one, not

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>even one. Now. I mean I was looking at interest

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>rates the banks paid the other day, and a chart, um,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and what happened to them? U um, and there was

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a study. UM, I forget maybe fed or something over there,

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I see, But interest rates they pay their depositors is

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>around zero. So that has been and it hasn't picked

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>up even as the FED has picked up in its

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rate, right, So it's not even connected. That's because

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>there's still no alternative. I mean, I talked about lending.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>When there's demand for borrowing, you can jack that up.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But deposits, you need to jack up the deposit rate

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>when you're competing with others. That is not there because

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>money markets are no longer in the game, so they

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. They don't feel like they have dejected out.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>No pressure for that, No pressure, Thanks very much. Yeah,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm an owner on as always senior writer banking and finance.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Checkout history at Bloomberg dot com. Well, you know, the

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration as well as Bill Schuster, he is a

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>congressman from Pennsylvania, are promoting the idea of turning the

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control system into a government well a government

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>authorized private corporation that would be responsible for the air

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>traffic control system in the United States. And here to

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us more about this topic on the airline industry

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is an expert Bob Crandall. He is the former chief

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>executive of American Airlines and uh, I want to thank

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you very much. For joining us. R Crandel, thanks for

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.239
<v Speaker 1>being I'm glad to be here, all right. So, you know,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I was going to give them your long history. You know,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you worked at t w A, you were you know,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>American Airlines and so on. I wonder if you could

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just start off by framing the conversation about the government's

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>participation in the airline industry, because we used to have

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a regulated airline industry and now we don't. Sort of, well,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Then, we used to have regulated industry in

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the sense that the the c A B control where

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>airlines could fly and how much they could charge. All

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that went away in uh. The f a A then

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>has the task of establishing safety standards and at the

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>same time as the task of physically operating the air

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>traffic control system. And what this whole thing is about

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is that around the world more than fifty countries, almost

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>every other advanced country, in particularly Canada just one north,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have taken the actual opera ration of the system out

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of government and they have put it into what are

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>called a nsps and navigation service providers, which support themselves

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>by charging fees rather than supporting it with taxes as

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States does. It has proven to be a very,

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>very beneficial change. Those systems are cheaper and they and

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, I think tim they make better use of

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the airspace, which is a limited asset. So this is

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>something that has been under discussion in the United States

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>since Bill Clinton's time. Al Gore was the first advocate

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of it, and in the meantime, virtually every other country

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>has done it, and I hope we will soon get

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on and do it. All Right, So if we were

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to do that, the board that would oversee this new corporation,

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>those members would be selected by the airlines. Correct, No, no, no, no, no, no, no,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't. In fact, uh, general aviation would have a seat,

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Airports would have a seat. Uh, the government would have that.

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>The government would have a seat that the Controllers Union

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>would have a seat. The in the board overall, there's

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>only one of the only one seat is it would

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>be the passenger airlliances, one for cargo airlines. There's one

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for charter Would they all have to be part of

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Airlines for America. That's the sort of umbrella group, right, No, no,

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the umbrella group is only the passenger airlines to him,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>So the Airlines for America and the airlines themselves was uh,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>get one seat on this board and everybody else gets

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the seat as well, which is which is I think

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>perfectly appropriate. Look, the airlines, because they operate most of

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the airplanes and most of all big airplanes, will pay

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>most of the seeds. But the system will be dramatically

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, and the consequences that the airlines are willing

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to take on the task of things. He's because they

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>will be able to operate more lanes to more places

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with fewer delays. So with this potentially new system for

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>air traffic control, do you believe that the actual service

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of passenger air aircraft will will improve? Oh? Absolutely, Now

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>not Look, we're not talking about on board service, no, no,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I understand, but just on time start. But we are

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:31.479
<v Speaker 1>listening of the delays that occurred last year were caused

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>by congestion in the in the in the air traffic

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>control system. I mean we are still using technologies that

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>there are World War technology. We use radar, for example,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of GPS to say where planes are. And because

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't use GPS to locate every airplane, airplanes have

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to remain on the equivalent think of a series of

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>highways in the sky. And the airplane. Airplanes have to

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fly down those highways to designated endpoints rather than rather

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>than keeping track of where every airplane is all the time,

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>which is both way more efficient and at the same

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>time safer. So the consequences if you could use all

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the air space in an optimal sort of way,

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>there would be fewer delays, and you could have more flights,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and they could go to more places more often. It's

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and and the real big impact of this PIM is

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to have a dramatically beneficial impact

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>on the US economy. As you know, traveling tourism is

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a big employer. If if airplanes can fly more more

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>flights and they if they can incur fewer delays, more

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>people are going to travel, More people are gonna stay

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in hotels, eating restaurants, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. So I think

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a big stimulant to the

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to the U. S economy. And again it's something we

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>ought to get on with and get done. All right, So, Bob,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I want you to turn your attention now to what

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>goes on in the plane as far as customer service

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is concerned, and also the what goes on in the airports.

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>For that, You've obviously seen many of the recent stories

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and watched maybe perhaps the videos of the treatment of

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>various passengers. What goes through your mind when you see

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that and you hear these stories? Where where are the

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>people in charge of the actual airlines? Why they're not

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>walking around like someone would walk around in office and

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>see how things are doing well? Keam You know, Look,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I I spent a long time in the industry and

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at one company that I was particularly fond of, And

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the reality is, when I see stories like that, I'm outraged.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they should not happen because you were I know

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that you were famous for Actually you would walk through

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>terminals and you would take the actual planes on a

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>regular basis, and you would make comments, and you would

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to actual passengers. Yes, absolutely, and I talked to

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time talking to employees. And in fact,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think if if more of the people who run

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the airlines they did more of that, I think there

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>would be fewer of those awful incidents. But let me

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>let me say this by way of mitigation and explanation,

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess what we've got today is an overcrowded system.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Our airports are out of date. Our air traffic control

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>system is out of date, which we've been talking about

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the consequences. As demand grows, the airports get more and

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>more crowded, the airplanes get more and more crowded, and

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>all that crowding and confusion is very unpleasant. Now the problem,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.959
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem. We used to have less crowding and

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>less confusion, and we used to have more regulation. And

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>as deregulation has occurred, people that the traveling public generally

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>has said, look, I am going to select the cheapest flight.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>That is generally what I'm going to choose. That's the

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>way I'm going to choose. And the consequence of that

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the amount of money available to accommodate passengers

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in a in a non crowded environment, in a more

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>pleasant way is very limited. So I I look, I'm

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not happy with the state of the hill and service

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>industry service and I don't think people in the industry

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are either. On the other hand, if you look at

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the number of people carried and the tremendous safety of

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the organization, I think you say, well, they're not doing

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as i'd like them to do in terms

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of service, but they're doing a pretty down good job

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of keeping people safe. Well. Thanks very much for giving

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>us a good picture of the airline industry. Bob Crandall

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is the former chief executive of American Airlines. Thanks for

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramowits

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on Brook Radio. H