1 00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:03,400 Speaker 1: Cable news is ripping us apart, dividing the nation, making 2 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:05,920 Speaker 1: it impossible to function as a society and to know 3 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: what is true and what is false. The good news 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:10,840 Speaker 1: is that they're failing and they know it. That is 5 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,840 Speaker 1: why we're building something new. Be part of creating a new, better, healthier, 6 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: and more trustworthy mainstream by becoming a Breaking Points Premium 7 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,520 Speaker 1: member today at breakingpoints dot com. Your hard earned money 8 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:23,400 Speaker 1: is going to help us build for the midterms and 9 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: the upcoming presidential election so we can provide unparalleled coverage 10 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 1: of what is sure to be one of the most 11 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 1: pivotal moments in American history. So what are you waiting for? 12 00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:37,720 Speaker 1: Go to Breakingpoints dot com to help us out. Good 13 00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: Friday morning, Welcome to Counterpoints. We got an incredibly packed 14 00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:43,960 Speaker 1: show today. I'm going to have to probably trim some 15 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 1: of the context out of my long and rambling answers today. 16 00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 1: There's so much to get to. I mean, the hurricane 17 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:53,159 Speaker 1: is still barreling its way through this country. Wishing everybody 18 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 1: in South Carolina the best at Florida recovering these apocalyptic 19 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:02,000 Speaker 1: scenes that we're seeing down there. Reports suggest death holes 20 00:01:02,040 --> 00:01:05,559 Speaker 1: already in the hundreds. Just we have no idea where 21 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:09,480 Speaker 1: that number is going to land. Just absolutely brutal. We'll 22 00:01:09,480 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 1: have we'll have more on that next week. This week, 23 00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 1: we have so much to get through in terms of 24 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:18,160 Speaker 1: both domestic and global politics. There's there's a presidential election 25 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: in Brazil we're going to talk about later. That's coming 26 00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:23,679 Speaker 1: up on Sunday. We had elections in Italy, and we 27 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:25,880 Speaker 1: have elections in the United States of America coming up. 28 00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:29,800 Speaker 1: That's right, and so start with let's start with Pennsylvania, right, 29 00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:33,800 Speaker 1: So the Fetterman Oz, the polls that were coming out 30 00:01:33,959 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: over the last several months that were showing Fetterman with 31 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 1: these double digit leads, maybe they were. They were fun 32 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:41,200 Speaker 1: to see, and I think we have an element there. 33 00:01:41,959 --> 00:01:43,680 Speaker 1: They were. They were fun to see from the left. 34 00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:46,520 Speaker 1: It's like it's always always fun to see doctor Oz 35 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,720 Speaker 1: getting owned. But I don't think anybody took them, you know, 36 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:53,400 Speaker 1: too seriously to the extent that Fetterman was actually going 37 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:56,920 Speaker 1: to win by double digits. It's it's still Pennsylvania. Now, 38 00:01:57,400 --> 00:02:00,960 Speaker 1: Shapiro the gubernatorial candidate, he may actually end up winning 39 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:03,800 Speaker 1: by ten points against Mastriano. And I'm curious for your 40 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:06,320 Speaker 1: take on this. This is a This is a case 41 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: where Republican the hardcore MAGA wing really got the guy 42 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:17,239 Speaker 1: they wanted, and the Democrats got the guy they wanted Mastriano, 43 00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 1: and it looks like he's getting utterly hammered. So I'm 44 00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:23,960 Speaker 1: wondering do you think he has any shot whatsoever? And 45 00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:26,920 Speaker 1: how do you think that race kind of influences the 46 00:02:26,919 --> 00:02:29,160 Speaker 1: Senate race. Does it lead to more ticket splitting or 47 00:02:29,160 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: does it drag Oz down? I think it probably leads 48 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:35,320 Speaker 1: to higher turnout and enthusiasm, and that's what midterm elections 49 00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 1: are really all about on both sides, right exactly, And well, 50 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:41,840 Speaker 1: oh yes, so who benefits from that is the big question? 51 00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:45,520 Speaker 1: And I can see that actually being a motivator on 52 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: both sides in a way that Oz and Fetterman aren't. 53 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:50,919 Speaker 1: Maybe Oz is a big draw. I don't know. I 54 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 1: highly doubt draw on Twitter. Yeah, But actually, what's what's 55 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,960 Speaker 1: interesting about this is over the course of the summer, 56 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: those polls were coming out with Fetterman up, and that 57 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:04,239 Speaker 1: was I think for people taking that seriously, which included 58 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:08,200 Speaker 1: the establishment wing of the Republican Party that was unhappy 59 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:11,359 Speaker 1: with the choices in the Pennsylvania primary and has been 60 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,320 Speaker 1: unhappy with certain races from Blake Masters to JdE Vance. 61 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: They took that very seriously, and it was another sort 62 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 1: of piece of this increasing tension between the establishment and 63 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 1: maybe the sort of maga wing of the Republican Party. 64 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:29,799 Speaker 1: And that was always, I think foolish because until the 65 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: money starts pouring into these races in the fall after 66 00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: Labor Day, when that starts happening, you see the messaging 67 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: on both sides start to congeal, and you see the 68 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: momentum start pushing in the direction that it will ultimately 69 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:44,640 Speaker 1: end up in. And so some of these summer analyzes, 70 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,840 Speaker 1: whether they were in Ohio or Pennsylvania, I think we're 71 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:50,480 Speaker 1: or Georgia for that matter. That's not to say, you know, 72 00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 1: I think everyone is a great candidate on the Republicans 73 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: slay it. Far from it. But I do think that 74 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 1: there was a lot of premature a lot of premature 75 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:03,560 Speaker 1: anxiety both in Republican areas and a lot of premature 76 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 1: enthusiasm in Democratic areas. And I'll add to that there 77 00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:09,200 Speaker 1: are a lot of serious polsters that I would argue 78 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:11,680 Speaker 1: our center left who are still saying that we are 79 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:17,080 Speaker 1: not gauging actual voting patterns very well. Especially in Rush 80 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:19,960 Speaker 1: Belt states that happened to be once again the critical 81 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 1: key race states going forward, right these the theory in 82 00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:28,560 Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, which seems to be borne out somewhat over 83 00:04:28,640 --> 00:04:33,680 Speaker 1: the past couple of cycles, is this silent or Trump voter, 84 00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 1: this voter who non responding to poles is just refusing 85 00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:43,360 Speaker 1: to participate in that process. And there have always been 86 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:45,839 Speaker 1: millions of people who don't want to participate in that process, 87 00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:47,719 Speaker 1: but the difference has been that there were just as 88 00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:51,719 Speaker 1: many Democrats, Independence and Republicans who didn't want to participate 89 00:04:51,720 --> 00:04:53,719 Speaker 1: in it, so it didn't mess up your numbers. Now 90 00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:57,880 Speaker 1: it does seem weighted to Republicans. In twenty twenty Pennsylvania, 91 00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:02,640 Speaker 1: Wisconsin in particular, the holes missed substantially. So it feels 92 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 1: like Fetterman to feel comfortable on election night kind of 93 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:10,039 Speaker 1: needs a five or six point lead. And again his 94 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: margin now is already down to four and two. And 95 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:17,200 Speaker 1: the we had an element that showed it that these yeah, 96 00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:20,440 Speaker 1: Nate Cone showing these big decreases, and I actually don't 97 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:23,280 Speaker 1: really know how that plays out from Astriano, but I 98 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:26,760 Speaker 1: do think it is a lot of the typical Beltway 99 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 1: horse race over the summer, that analysis jumped the gun 100 00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:33,800 Speaker 1: in big ways, knowing or it should probably should have known. 101 00:05:33,839 --> 00:05:36,039 Speaker 1: It's an interesting example of how the media tries to 102 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:39,800 Speaker 1: or can influence the way money goes into these races 103 00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:42,159 Speaker 1: and the way elections look. Because if all of the 104 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 1: chatter is like Oz is a dud, everyone in Pennsylvania 105 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 1: loves Fetterman, that totally changes the way that people in DC. 106 00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 1: Let it change the way that they look at these 107 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:55,159 Speaker 1: different races, and it conditions the consultants and all these 108 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:57,960 Speaker 1: different people to see things out of whack with what 109 00:05:58,000 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 1: they actually are. And I think the point about was 110 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 1: Johnson is a really good one. Even Mitch McConnell abandoned 111 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: Ron Johnson in his last race. Right. That's that is 112 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:13,320 Speaker 1: actually really a huge, huge sign of how badly or 113 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:15,599 Speaker 1: how bad DC is at reading tea leaves these days. 114 00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: And at the same time, the Fetterman's stroke, I think 115 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 1: played a role in this in a significant way. He 116 00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:25,480 Speaker 1: had he hasn't been able to campaign like he was 117 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:28,279 Speaker 1: able to campaign up until the primary, and that didn't 118 00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:32,520 Speaker 1: really sink in for a lot of people for several weeks, 119 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 1: you know, past the primary, and now now we are 120 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:39,600 Speaker 1: getting a real sense that you know that his recovery 121 00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:42,640 Speaker 1: is not complete yet, and you know he's he's starting 122 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:45,680 Speaker 1: to address that more head on, which I think is 123 00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 1: which I think is the right thing to do, and 124 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:50,160 Speaker 1: to emphasize, Look, this is this is a recovery process, 125 00:06:50,640 --> 00:06:53,479 Speaker 1: like this is I'm going to continue to you know, 126 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:56,000 Speaker 1: improve that. These are the things I need to do 127 00:06:56,080 --> 00:07:00,080 Speaker 1: to improve. But it is it's campaigning with the and 128 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:02,880 Speaker 1: tied behind your back. But let's go, let's go quickly 129 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 1: around the country Arizona. The conventional wisdom in DC seems 130 00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 1: to be that Kelly is in a Mark Kelly Democrat 131 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:15,320 Speaker 1: is in a very strong position. There is that how 132 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 1: are Republicans feeling about Arizona at this point? Well, that 133 00:07:17,840 --> 00:07:19,920 Speaker 1: race is one of the most contentious in terms of 134 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 1: this inner nice battle in the Republican Party because it 135 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:26,800 Speaker 1: was clear that Mitch McConnell wanted Peter TiAl to put 136 00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:29,040 Speaker 1: more of his own money into it. McConnell pulled some 137 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:32,760 Speaker 1: ads in August or those around Labor Day. McConnell pulled 138 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:35,960 Speaker 1: some planned ads for Blake Masters. Masters is sort of 139 00:07:36,080 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: championed by the new right wing of the party. We 140 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 1: interviewed him I think he's a very interesting candidate, and 141 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: I like a lot of what he says. But the 142 00:07:46,080 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 1: Mitch mcconnald's of the world are now saying this is 143 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,720 Speaker 1: not winnable. Mcconald's doing a couple of fundraisers for him, 144 00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:55,600 Speaker 1: but still quality was he was referring partly to Master's 145 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:58,280 Speaker 1: probably candidate quality right now. This is Mitch McConnell saying 146 00:07:58,320 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 1: that in August, the Senate Majority leader starting to turn 147 00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:05,680 Speaker 1: his buyer on the candidates going into the election cycle. 148 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:08,280 Speaker 1: And I think probably Ryan partially because of this incorrect 149 00:08:08,320 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 1: reading of the tea leaves. I do think Masters is 150 00:08:10,880 --> 00:08:13,000 Speaker 1: a better candidate than a lot of people in DC realized. 151 00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 1: And I do think the more that we see money 152 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:18,000 Speaker 1: going into that race on both sides of it, I'm 153 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 1: not just talking about money going into Masters, I'm talking 154 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:24,320 Speaker 1: about just in general, when you have the resources that 155 00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:26,040 Speaker 1: are actually going to look like what they look like 156 00:08:26,080 --> 00:08:28,480 Speaker 1: in the weeks before election day, so people are on 157 00:08:28,640 --> 00:08:30,480 Speaker 1: the message that they want to be running on before 158 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:32,720 Speaker 1: election day, and as we get closer to election day 159 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:36,280 Speaker 1: and people are actually voting, I think Masters is going 160 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 1: to close the gap. And I think it's going to 161 00:08:38,480 --> 00:08:42,600 Speaker 1: be a close election. I wouldn't be surprised if it's 162 00:08:42,640 --> 00:08:44,800 Speaker 1: closer than what a lot of people in DC realized. 163 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:48,280 Speaker 1: Now Masters may lose, I don't know, but at the 164 00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 1: end of the day, that is one of the most 165 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 1: like if you're looking for a race that shows all 166 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 1: of the different dynamics in the Republican Party, look at 167 00:08:56,320 --> 00:08:59,160 Speaker 1: Arizona and New Hampshire. I thought was going to be 168 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:00,920 Speaker 1: the state that was the sleeper, that was going to 169 00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:04,200 Speaker 1: be the most likely to flip Democrat to Republican. But 170 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:09,880 Speaker 1: then Republicans nominated this interesting character, retired general I forget 171 00:09:09,880 --> 00:09:13,800 Speaker 1: the guy's name, Don Baldoke. Yeah, who kind of Twitter 172 00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:19,960 Speaker 1: character followed his timeline. It's a lot of fun. I 173 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,480 Speaker 1: interviewed him once as well. Yeah, he's very charismatic. Interesting dude. 174 00:09:24,040 --> 00:09:26,640 Speaker 1: But it seems like everybody's taking New Hampshire off the 175 00:09:26,640 --> 00:09:30,839 Speaker 1: map now that it looks like Maggie Hassen went from 176 00:09:31,240 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 1: kind of either toss up to likely Republican to now 177 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:40,280 Speaker 1: like comfortable Democrat. Is it is Balduke that on appealing 178 00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:45,680 Speaker 1: to kind of swing voting New Hampshire voters that it's 179 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:47,840 Speaker 1: this race is over. Yeah, I don't know. How you're 180 00:09:47,880 --> 00:09:49,640 Speaker 1: feeling about this race. I don't know. New Hampshire is 181 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:52,080 Speaker 1: such an interesting state, and you probably would know more 182 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:54,440 Speaker 1: about this than I do. But the New Hampshire voters 183 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:56,680 Speaker 1: are not your tip, especially on the Republican side, not 184 00:09:56,800 --> 00:09:59,760 Speaker 1: your typical Republican voters at all, sorts of more libertarian leaning, 185 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:02,240 Speaker 1: which makes it an interesting test case in the kind 186 00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:06,440 Speaker 1: of maga moment, like our New Hampshire Republicans reacting to 187 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 1: more Maga Republicans. I think is actually kind of a 188 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 1: fascinating case study. So I don't know. I have absolutely 189 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:15,320 Speaker 1: no idea what's going what's happening in New Hampshire, But 190 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,240 Speaker 1: I do think the context of the economy right now, 191 00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:21,920 Speaker 1: where in the summer Democrats started to feel really good. 192 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:25,959 Speaker 1: August had passed their Inflation Reduction Act, gas prices had 193 00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 1: come down a little bit, they were still really high. 194 00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 1: All of that context I think had Democrats feeling way 195 00:10:32,160 --> 00:10:35,440 Speaker 1: better than they should have been about the fall in August. 196 00:10:35,559 --> 00:10:37,960 Speaker 1: And now that we're almost in October, I mean, we're 197 00:10:37,960 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 1: doing this block and next time we're here will be October, 198 00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 1: will be about a month away from the elections. The 199 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 1: economy is looking worse and the Inflation Reduction Act, and 200 00:10:47,840 --> 00:10:50,880 Speaker 1: the correlation between the Inflation Reduction Act and the stock 201 00:10:50,920 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 1: market is pretty bad for Democrats because you can see 202 00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:56,400 Speaker 1: it just dipping as soon as it's passed. Whether or 203 00:10:56,440 --> 00:11:00,560 Speaker 1: not you can serve part of that, yes, of course 204 00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:02,960 Speaker 1: you can part that different ways. The effect on average 205 00:11:02,960 --> 00:11:06,360 Speaker 1: Americans under a Biden administration, though, is not good for Democrats. 206 00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:08,760 Speaker 1: It's a drag on these tickets. And speaking of which, 207 00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:12,160 Speaker 1: we'll be here Wednesday next week. Well, we'll be pretaping Wednesday. 208 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 1: I think we're going to er it on Wednesday. Oh wow, okay, 209 00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:17,319 Speaker 1: because we'll both be gone for the for the weekend 210 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:20,760 Speaker 1: Columbus Day weekend. That's we're going to air it on Wednesday. 211 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:25,319 Speaker 1: There'll be old news by Friday. That's true. So I 212 00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:29,880 Speaker 1: now think the sleeper is Nevada. Tell me more that. 213 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 1: So Cortes Masstow is running for reelection. She's a Democrat 214 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:39,160 Speaker 1: in Nevada, and I think that Nevada got hit. Las 215 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:43,040 Speaker 1: Vegas in particular, got hit harder than almost anywhere in 216 00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:47,160 Speaker 1: the country by the pandemic and particularly by policies that 217 00:11:47,160 --> 00:11:50,079 Speaker 1: are associated with Democrats shutting down, shutting down the economy. 218 00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:55,200 Speaker 1: The lost, Las Vegas economy just was completely annihilated, and 219 00:11:55,360 --> 00:12:00,680 Speaker 1: as a result you have this widespread economic misery. And 220 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 1: to the extent that uh Las Vegas was the place 221 00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,440 Speaker 1: that you know, powered Democrats so that they could overcome 222 00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:10,640 Speaker 1: the rest of the state. If if they'd lose just 223 00:12:10,679 --> 00:12:16,400 Speaker 1: a small margin in Vegas, then that's that's that's enough 224 00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:19,320 Speaker 1: for them. And and with a lot of the kind 225 00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:23,559 Speaker 1: of Mexican American population down there, uh they're the abortion 226 00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:26,760 Speaker 1: issue might might not have the same kind of residents 227 00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:29,400 Speaker 1: that it would have in other parts of the country 228 00:12:29,440 --> 00:12:33,280 Speaker 1: that the voters that Democrats really rely on in Vegas. 229 00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:38,840 Speaker 1: So I I and and I believe the the Nevada 230 00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:43,040 Speaker 1: got Novada Republicans got the like kind of non scary 231 00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:46,960 Speaker 1: Republican that they wanted to right in the primary. And 232 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:50,240 Speaker 1: so you don't have you don't have the the kind 233 00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:52,199 Speaker 1: of maga effect that's going to drag a couple points 234 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:55,600 Speaker 1: off off of the Republican Although the counter the counterpoint 235 00:12:55,800 --> 00:12:59,040 Speaker 1: to that is in midterm elections, which are about energy 236 00:12:59,080 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 1: and turn out the maga Republican candidates. And if you're 237 00:13:01,960 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 1: looking at somebody like for instance, jd Vance, these are 238 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 1: people where or herschel Walker might be an example where 239 00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:12,839 Speaker 1: you actually do energize voters who actually want to go 240 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:16,160 Speaker 1: out and not vote for the milk toast, you know, 241 00:13:16,559 --> 00:13:20,280 Speaker 1: Mitt Romney Republican, but are energized to go out and 242 00:13:20,520 --> 00:13:22,600 Speaker 1: be a part of what they see has change. And 243 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:24,720 Speaker 1: that's on both sides. That's not just about Republicans. But 244 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:28,720 Speaker 1: that is what a lot of DC Republicans cannot wrap 245 00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:31,079 Speaker 1: their heads around about the magabase is that the average 246 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,880 Speaker 1: Republican voter is actually very very excited about and actually 247 00:13:34,920 --> 00:13:39,319 Speaker 1: these people do appeal to the average Republican voter. Even 248 00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:43,120 Speaker 1: if it makes Mitch McConnell uncomfortable, it can actually have 249 00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:45,559 Speaker 1: an effect on the outcome. I love that you're all 250 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:49,520 Speaker 1: in on the turnout idea because on the left, I 251 00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:53,319 Speaker 1: thousand percent believe that if you put like a Sanders 252 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:56,120 Speaker 1: wing candidate out there, you're going to inspire people to 253 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:57,880 Speaker 1: come out to the polls, give them something to actually 254 00:13:57,960 --> 00:13:59,960 Speaker 1: vote for. When I look over at the other side, 255 00:14:00,160 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 1: like nobody's going to want to come out for that. 256 00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:06,880 Speaker 1: But yeah, like I gotta go vote for Joe Crowley. 257 00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 1: So it's funny, Yeah it is. I don't know why 258 00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:11,640 Speaker 1: I can't get my head around the idea that there 259 00:14:11,679 --> 00:14:14,720 Speaker 1: could be an advantage to running some of these mega candidates. 260 00:14:14,720 --> 00:14:18,599 Speaker 1: I mean, you're from Pennsylvania, right, and and the Pennsylvania 261 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:21,680 Speaker 1: is a lot of suburbs. It's true that it's it's 262 00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:25,040 Speaker 1: true that, like the Carvil thing, you got Philadelphia one side, 263 00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:27,080 Speaker 1: Pittsburgh on the other, an Alabama in the middle. There's 264 00:14:27,080 --> 00:14:30,280 Speaker 1: still a lot of truth to that, But there's also 265 00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:35,320 Speaker 1: a like, there's a massive suburban vote in Pennsylvania that 266 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:38,680 Speaker 1: is turned off by a lot of that stuff. True, 267 00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:40,800 Speaker 1: and it would and would end is you know, would 268 00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:43,120 Speaker 1: be turned off by some of the like if AOC 269 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:45,560 Speaker 1: was like on the ticket. Yeah, oh absolutely, And both 270 00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:47,320 Speaker 1: parties know that, and that's why they start targeting these 271 00:14:47,520 --> 00:14:50,760 Speaker 1: suburban especially educated suburban women. That's become this like just 272 00:14:50,960 --> 00:14:54,560 Speaker 1: treasure trove demographic for both parties. But at the same time, 273 00:14:54,600 --> 00:14:56,920 Speaker 1: I think the other thing that factors into this, I 274 00:14:56,920 --> 00:14:59,680 Speaker 1: mean abortion clearly will I think have some effect, but 275 00:14:59,760 --> 00:15:03,720 Speaker 1: you also then have education, which totally if you look 276 00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:05,440 Speaker 1: at what happened in Virginia with Glenn Youngkin just a 277 00:15:05,480 --> 00:15:08,400 Speaker 1: year ago, favors Republicans if they run on the issue 278 00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 1: in a in an appealing and convincing way, which is 279 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:15,480 Speaker 1: a very big if. And speaking of the viability of 280 00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:19,640 Speaker 1: far right candidates. Italian voters went to the polls onto 281 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:25,280 Speaker 1: on what Tuesday and and elected Georgia Mulaney as the 282 00:15:25,320 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 1: incoming Prime Minister of Italy. A lot of a lot 283 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:33,120 Speaker 1: of debate over whether it call her fascist or not. No, 284 00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:37,280 Speaker 1: but so the party, like what the history of the party. 285 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:40,240 Speaker 1: It evolved from a party that evolved from a party 286 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 1: that evolved from Mussolini's party. Uh, you know she she 287 00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:46,640 Speaker 1: used to in the old the old days say nice 288 00:15:46,640 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 1: things about Mussolini. Recently she's been she's broken with Mussolini, 289 00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:57,200 Speaker 1: said not not not a fan of Mussolini. She's pro EU. 290 00:15:57,440 --> 00:16:02,000 Speaker 1: She's kind of pro NATO the Ukraine War or pro 291 00:16:02,080 --> 00:16:05,200 Speaker 1: the Ukraine side of the war. And there was some 292 00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:07,680 Speaker 1: jokes on Twitter. Don't know if there were jokes on 293 00:16:07,720 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 1: Twitter when when Zelenski's like congratulations, A bunch of people 294 00:16:10,840 --> 00:16:12,120 Speaker 1: on the left like, see, we told you he was 295 00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 1: a Nazi. He look, look budding up with this other 296 00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:18,920 Speaker 1: Nazi down here in Italy. And so there was another 297 00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:21,320 Speaker 1: there was another There was kind of a left wing, 298 00:16:21,400 --> 00:16:24,600 Speaker 1: working class kind of coalition that was running as well, 299 00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:27,320 Speaker 1: kind of the Five Star movement which used to be 300 00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:31,120 Speaker 1: you know, which started as kind of a post partisan, 301 00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:35,000 Speaker 1: kind of populist ish type of thing with with that 302 00:16:35,080 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 1: was mostly left coded but some right populism. Uh. They 303 00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:42,560 Speaker 1: when they got into power, they implemented a universal basic income, 304 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 1: particularly down in the down the South, and did a 305 00:16:44,520 --> 00:16:46,440 Speaker 1: bunch of other things that really had tried to appeal 306 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 1: to the material interests of the working class, Maloney really 307 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:54,640 Speaker 1: very much appealing to the cultural interests, you know, anti immigrant, 308 00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:58,200 Speaker 1: the what what you would generously call pro family, And 309 00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:01,400 Speaker 1: it seems like, by at least a three to one margin, 310 00:17:02,160 --> 00:17:07,679 Speaker 1: the working class voters were more moved by the cultural 311 00:17:08,640 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 1: elements that she was offering than than what the Five 312 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:14,560 Speaker 1: Star folks were bringing. And one of her first acts 313 00:17:14,640 --> 00:17:18,120 Speaker 1: was to just nix the universal basic income, Like done, 314 00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:21,760 Speaker 1: done with that. So we what do we draw what 315 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:25,320 Speaker 1: do we draw from this about where our confusing kind 316 00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 1: of working class material versus cultural politics are headed. It's 317 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:32,240 Speaker 1: so interesting from an American perspective, I think we try 318 00:17:32,240 --> 00:17:36,680 Speaker 1: to sometimes graft the American left right dichotomy onto elections 319 00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 1: where there are way more than the two party system. 320 00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:42,679 Speaker 1: So if your choice is Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. 321 00:17:43,119 --> 00:17:46,479 Speaker 1: The handicap there is we're suddenly acting as though the 322 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:50,080 Speaker 1: entire country loves Donald Trump or hates Hillary Clinton, and 323 00:17:50,320 --> 00:17:52,760 Speaker 1: that's just not the case. It's always more nuanced than that. 324 00:17:53,080 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 1: And this example is so instructive because of exactly the 325 00:17:55,640 --> 00:17:58,560 Speaker 1: dynamic you just said that cultural issues prove to be 326 00:17:58,600 --> 00:18:01,359 Speaker 1: more salient for how much of the vote did you 327 00:18:01,400 --> 00:18:06,880 Speaker 1: win twenty eight Yeah, that chunk of the voter base, 328 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:09,679 Speaker 1: but that's not a resounding majority, I mean far from it. 329 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:12,280 Speaker 1: Enough to win the election, but not exactly a majority. 330 00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:15,520 Speaker 1: And then when you juxtapose it side by side with 331 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:19,760 Speaker 1: the working Class Party or the Yeah, what's interesting about 332 00:18:19,800 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 1: that is it shows particularly, I think what the American 333 00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:26,359 Speaker 1: right misses, which is that and what the left really misses, 334 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,960 Speaker 1: which is that the culture war can be kind of 335 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:30,960 Speaker 1: the big tent. That's something we say at the Funderalists 336 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:35,480 Speaker 1: a lot. The culture is the big tent because people's interests, 337 00:18:35,800 --> 00:18:41,199 Speaker 1: they're sort of material financial interests. Those two things go together. 338 00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:44,720 Speaker 1: So if you can't speak your mind at work without 339 00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 1: fear of losing your job and you need the job, 340 00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,000 Speaker 1: or you can't talk about your you feel like you 341 00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:51,520 Speaker 1: can't talk about your faith. Whether or not you can 342 00:18:51,560 --> 00:18:53,280 Speaker 1: actually do it is different than whether you feel like 343 00:18:53,320 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: you can do it. So take something like Maloney talks 344 00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:59,199 Speaker 1: about people's faith or their patriotism, people feel like they 345 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 1: can't talk about without suffering financial consequences. Those two things 346 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:07,800 Speaker 1: are actually completely intertwined, and the left does a really 347 00:19:07,800 --> 00:19:12,000 Speaker 1: poor job I think of recognizing that and addressing it 348 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:17,400 Speaker 1: by also tackling the sort of really discomforting, alienating culture 349 00:19:18,119 --> 00:19:22,199 Speaker 1: and coding immigration as purely cultural. It's probably part of 350 00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:24,119 Speaker 1: that too, because in Europe you have a lot of 351 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:27,600 Speaker 1: left wing parties now the Sweden Democratic anti immigrant. Yeah, yeah, 352 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:30,080 Speaker 1: I mean this happened. I don't think people, I mean, 353 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:32,240 Speaker 1: I don't know. It's again it's difficult to like graft 354 00:19:32,280 --> 00:19:34,639 Speaker 1: the left right diconomy from America into but this is 355 00:19:34,680 --> 00:19:36,400 Speaker 1: on the heels of what happened in Sweden. It also 356 00:19:36,480 --> 00:19:38,919 Speaker 1: reminded me a lot of what we cover previously in France, 357 00:19:39,480 --> 00:19:43,440 Speaker 1: with the juxtaposition of like National Front Marine La penn 358 00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 1: And also you have a sort of far left you 359 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:49,600 Speaker 1: can't really call Bernie candidate, but kind of in that 360 00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:54,120 Speaker 1: vein doing okay at the same time, and that's really 361 00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:57,440 Speaker 1: the real competition. Macron benefits from it because you have 362 00:19:57,600 --> 00:20:01,240 Speaker 1: these two, the split between those two. But yeah, immigration, 363 00:20:01,359 --> 00:20:04,800 Speaker 1: that's exactly I think the point. It illustrates the point 364 00:20:04,840 --> 00:20:07,879 Speaker 1: so well because there are people's both cultural and my 365 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:11,480 Speaker 1: material concerns on the table, and to dismiss that as 366 00:20:11,560 --> 00:20:16,760 Speaker 1: bigotry necessarily as bigotry and not as possibly anything else 367 00:20:16,920 --> 00:20:20,720 Speaker 1: reasonable good faith disagreement. And you can disagree about the 368 00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:23,359 Speaker 1: politicians whether they're coming to it in good faith, but 369 00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:26,600 Speaker 1: voters that's a different question. And I just think the 370 00:20:26,680 --> 00:20:28,760 Speaker 1: left is struggling so much right now. In Europe is 371 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:31,160 Speaker 1: a great example. They have yet to muster a really 372 00:20:31,240 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 1: good response. And in some ways the parliamentary system allows 373 00:20:36,080 --> 00:20:38,159 Speaker 1: you to draw out a little bit more of the 374 00:20:38,200 --> 00:20:41,160 Speaker 1: texture and the distinctions in ways that are obscured here. 375 00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:45,719 Speaker 1: AOC famously said a couple of years ago, if we 376 00:20:45,720 --> 00:20:47,320 Speaker 1: were in Europe, I wouldn't be in the same party 377 00:20:47,320 --> 00:20:50,639 Speaker 1: as Joe Manchin, which was taken as like a shot 378 00:20:50,680 --> 00:20:53,760 Speaker 1: but also just a fact. That's just an objective fact. 379 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:56,639 Speaker 1: They would be in different parties. And so there was 380 00:20:56,680 --> 00:21:00,159 Speaker 1: a center left kind of technocratic party in Europe by 381 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:05,000 Speaker 1: a guy named lata who who refuse to kind of 382 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:09,000 Speaker 1: link up with the more working class left left parties, 383 00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:14,280 Speaker 1: because there was all you know, Italian politics is incredibly factional, 384 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:18,159 Speaker 1: but for our purposes, like the materialism behind it was 385 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:22,840 Speaker 1: what was related to blaming them for kind of tossing 386 00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:24,879 Speaker 1: tossing them out of power, like they blaming some of 387 00:21:24,880 --> 00:21:27,200 Speaker 1: these other factions for tossing them out of power years past, 388 00:21:27,320 --> 00:21:29,880 Speaker 1: like just you know, all just score settling and grudges. 389 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:32,159 Speaker 1: So they so they didn't team up, but it's not 390 00:21:32,359 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: clear that they could have necessarily even teamed up because 391 00:21:36,760 --> 00:21:39,320 Speaker 1: they represent the kind of winging of the Democratic Party, 392 00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:41,560 Speaker 1: what you would call the kind of upper middle class, 393 00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:46,199 Speaker 1: professional class element of it, which has which in the 394 00:21:46,359 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 1: US is married together in this one giant party. And 395 00:21:51,119 --> 00:21:54,320 Speaker 1: so it's harder for us to see the the kind 396 00:21:54,359 --> 00:21:58,159 Speaker 1: of difficult the strains on in the strains that are 397 00:21:58,160 --> 00:22:01,280 Speaker 1: trying to keep that together, where whereas in Italy you 398 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:04,040 Speaker 1: can just see it much more clearly that there's a 399 00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:08,480 Speaker 1: kind of both cultural and class distinction between these elements 400 00:22:08,520 --> 00:22:11,520 Speaker 1: of the broad left that make it very difficult for 401 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:14,760 Speaker 1: them to team up. They just don't like each other 402 00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 1: in a lot of ways. And these center left kind 403 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:21,000 Speaker 1: of and center right technocratic parties in Europe are blamed 404 00:22:21,640 --> 00:22:26,119 Speaker 1: for taking Europe from you know, it's boom period of 405 00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:30,920 Speaker 1: the sixties seventies to what it is now. Well, yeah, 406 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:33,760 Speaker 1: and I think also, yeah, that's where you're going to see. 407 00:22:33,840 --> 00:22:36,439 Speaker 1: I mean, we showed the subsidy cut right away. That's 408 00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:39,240 Speaker 1: where you're going to see this interesting like return of 409 00:22:39,280 --> 00:22:44,760 Speaker 1: maybe austerity with a super pro EU pro NATO kind 410 00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:50,520 Speaker 1: of pro like European or order basically, you know what 411 00:22:50,520 --> 00:22:55,119 Speaker 1: I mean, attached to this agenda of cultural populism, center 412 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:57,920 Speaker 1: right cultural populism. I would say, And if we could 413 00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:00,639 Speaker 1: put B five up on the screen, would be great, 414 00:23:01,359 --> 00:23:06,080 Speaker 1: because I think this is Larry summers tweet really is 415 00:23:06,119 --> 00:23:08,880 Speaker 1: the perfect tweet. He's talking about America, but he says 416 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:12,520 Speaker 1: there's some social phenomenon which I suspect explains non work, 417 00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:16,360 Speaker 1: non marriage, does of despair, general alienation, and I suspect 418 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:20,040 Speaker 1: the rise of reactionary populism. It should be a major 419 00:23:20,160 --> 00:23:24,840 Speaker 1: task of social science to understand it. Yes, thank you 420 00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:28,480 Speaker 1: Larry Summers. Ten years behind the curve on that one. 421 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,879 Speaker 1: But I think it's just fascinating to see to your 422 00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 1: point about the technocratic candidates. It's fascinating how much they 423 00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:41,320 Speaker 1: fail to come up or muster a legitimate, genuine, decent 424 00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:44,359 Speaker 1: response in terms of policy, in terms of messaging to 425 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:47,879 Speaker 1: the rise of what Larry Summers is calling reactionary populism, 426 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:52,200 Speaker 1: precisely because I mean, this week, the Maloney speech suddenly 427 00:23:52,240 --> 00:23:55,119 Speaker 1: just gets scraped from YouTube. The same thing actually happened 428 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:57,960 Speaker 1: in Bat Tayebi. He had a video demonetized yesterday that 429 00:23:58,040 --> 00:24:03,040 Speaker 1: was then restored, and then the Maloney video ultimately was 430 00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:05,800 Speaker 1: restored and said it was an error. She was called 431 00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:08,439 Speaker 1: the Steady drum Beat, a fascist, fascist fascist. I think 432 00:24:08,440 --> 00:24:09,800 Speaker 1: the New York Times had a story that used the 433 00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:11,920 Speaker 1: word fascist like twenty eight times in the story about 434 00:24:11,920 --> 00:24:15,119 Speaker 1: this woman who loves the EU and NATO. So it 435 00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:18,640 Speaker 1: just like, if that's the response is to reflexively dismiss 436 00:24:18,680 --> 00:24:22,800 Speaker 1: everybody as a fascist and bigot, the populism is not 437 00:24:22,840 --> 00:24:25,920 Speaker 1: going to go anywhere. It will only grow because that's 438 00:24:26,000 --> 00:24:29,199 Speaker 1: exactly what drives it and what animates it. And we 439 00:24:29,240 --> 00:24:31,600 Speaker 1: all laughed at the Larry Summers quote, but I'm curious 440 00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:33,080 Speaker 1: if we actually have the same mesaeder, because I think 441 00:24:33,119 --> 00:24:36,320 Speaker 1: we all think it's obvious. But to me, it's neoliberalism. 442 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,120 Speaker 1: Yeah is that what you were like when you look 443 00:24:40,119 --> 00:24:45,000 Speaker 1: at it, like, hey, yeah, yeah, it's you, Larry Absolutely, yeah. 444 00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:46,720 Speaker 1: We're all looking for the guy who did this well. 445 00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:49,640 Speaker 1: And I know people get frustrated and because the word 446 00:24:49,680 --> 00:24:52,639 Speaker 1: neoliberalism becomes us as a catch all and sort of 447 00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:58,320 Speaker 1: an easy slur for populists. But liberalism, I think properly 448 00:24:58,359 --> 00:25:02,840 Speaker 1: does encapsulate the cultural and the economic policies and the 449 00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:05,959 Speaker 1: marriage of those that people like Larry Summers sort of 450 00:25:06,119 --> 00:25:11,160 Speaker 1: just dismissed or didn't see the serious, serious concerns of 451 00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:13,640 Speaker 1: what was happening when you're hollowing out the rost belt, 452 00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:17,359 Speaker 1: when you're de industrializing, when you're opening up trade and 453 00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:21,960 Speaker 1: borders with reckless abandon and not know implementing policies that 454 00:25:22,000 --> 00:25:24,879 Speaker 1: would at least be perhaps a safeguard or would do 455 00:25:24,920 --> 00:25:28,000 Speaker 1: that more responsibly. Getting super rich and creating this huge 456 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:33,000 Speaker 1: growth of inequality. I mean, it's neoliberalism. There's no problem 457 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:38,000 Speaker 1: saying that it was a rough day for the left 458 00:25:38,040 --> 00:25:41,000 Speaker 1: in Italy this week, but on Sunday the left has 459 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:43,479 Speaker 1: a chance to gain a little bit of that ground 460 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:45,600 Speaker 1: back as Brazilian voters are going to go to the 461 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 1: polls for the first round in presidential voting, pitting Jared Bolsonarrow, 462 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:55,440 Speaker 1: the incumbent right wing president down in Brazil, against Lula 463 00:25:55,480 --> 00:25:58,720 Speaker 1: de Silva, former president, who was in prison at this 464 00:25:58,840 --> 00:26:02,160 Speaker 1: time in twenty eighteen. During the last presidential election here 465 00:26:02,200 --> 00:26:05,120 Speaker 1: in the United States, we have you know, decent number 466 00:26:05,119 --> 00:26:07,879 Speaker 1: of people who either joke or say Bernie would have 467 00:26:07,880 --> 00:26:11,359 Speaker 1: won talking about talking about twenty sixteen down in Brazil. 468 00:26:12,280 --> 00:26:15,640 Speaker 1: The line is Lula would have won. But everybody takes 469 00:26:15,720 --> 00:26:19,239 Speaker 1: that quite seriously left to right, like Lula would have 470 00:26:19,280 --> 00:26:21,919 Speaker 1: won in twenty eighteen were he not in prison. He 471 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 1: is no longer in prison. And want to pause and 472 00:26:26,280 --> 00:26:30,800 Speaker 1: recognize my colleagues at the Intercept Brazil for their work there. 473 00:26:31,520 --> 00:26:38,639 Speaker 1: Glenn's Greenwald, former colleague, got a massive cash of documents 474 00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:44,199 Speaker 1: and messages that proved that the prosecution of Lula was 475 00:26:44,480 --> 00:26:49,760 Speaker 1: entirely political, politically driven and manipulated and timed so that 476 00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:52,399 Speaker 1: he could he would be in prison during the election, 477 00:26:53,320 --> 00:26:58,600 Speaker 1: and all the messages were were you know, proved the case, 478 00:26:59,080 --> 00:27:01,919 Speaker 1: which go to actually a question we talk about a 479 00:27:01,920 --> 00:27:04,639 Speaker 1: lot hacked materials because it turned out that these were 480 00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:11,240 Speaker 1: hacked by people who by citizens who had a sense 481 00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:13,480 Speaker 1: that this was the case, hacked and then leaked to 482 00:27:13,480 --> 00:27:16,320 Speaker 1: the press. And so whenever anybody has a question of 483 00:27:16,440 --> 00:27:19,280 Speaker 1: is it okay to publish hacked documents, I would say, well, 484 00:27:19,600 --> 00:27:22,680 Speaker 1: Lula is free and potentially on his way to becoming 485 00:27:23,960 --> 00:27:27,919 Speaker 1: president of Brazil again. Polls have him at fifty one 486 00:27:27,960 --> 00:27:30,119 Speaker 1: to fifty two percent at this point was still some 487 00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:33,560 Speaker 1: ten to twenty percent undecided. On top of that, and 488 00:27:33,600 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 1: if he wins fifty percent on Sunday, there's no second round, 489 00:27:37,720 --> 00:27:41,400 Speaker 1: that's a knockout first round win. So the polls say 490 00:27:41,440 --> 00:27:43,680 Speaker 1: that he will because if he's pulling at fifty one, 491 00:27:43,920 --> 00:27:46,400 Speaker 1: and let's say he gets a quarter of the undecideds, 492 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:49,639 Speaker 1: that's pushing him to fifty five sixty percent of the vote. 493 00:27:49,720 --> 00:27:53,679 Speaker 1: Bolscenario is already saying polls are fake. I got secret 494 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:57,800 Speaker 1: Bolsonaro voters all over the place. I'm not recognizing these 495 00:27:58,480 --> 00:28:01,000 Speaker 1: this tally if it comes through, which has put the 496 00:28:01,040 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 1: United States in a fascinating position because the US has 497 00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:07,360 Speaker 1: signaled no, we are going to recognize the results of 498 00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:10,720 Speaker 1: this election, which means that maybe for the first time ever, 499 00:28:10,800 --> 00:28:13,440 Speaker 1: the US is working against a right wing coup in 500 00:28:13,560 --> 00:28:17,840 Speaker 1: South America. Well, things have changed. We're weird. But I 501 00:28:17,840 --> 00:28:22,119 Speaker 1: actually think it's part of our partisan polarization because I 502 00:28:22,160 --> 00:28:27,440 Speaker 1: think Democrats in the US associate Bolsonara with trump Ism, 503 00:28:27,520 --> 00:28:31,920 Speaker 1: yes and Trumps, and associate the social democratic left and 504 00:28:32,000 --> 00:28:37,440 Speaker 1: Luila with kind of Democrats, and so they're partisanship overwhelmed. 505 00:28:37,560 --> 00:28:42,720 Speaker 1: They're they're kind of kind of structural impulse towards supporting 506 00:28:42,760 --> 00:28:45,080 Speaker 1: right wing coups in South America. It's like, wait, the US, wait, 507 00:28:46,320 --> 00:28:49,680 Speaker 1: there have there have to be strong forces pushing back 508 00:28:50,440 --> 00:28:53,880 Speaker 1: to have this US State Department saying that they're going 509 00:28:53,960 --> 00:28:55,360 Speaker 1: to be hands off on a right wing coup like 510 00:28:55,400 --> 00:28:58,360 Speaker 1: that's and so that's I think how strong partisanship is 511 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:01,360 Speaker 1: now in this and it's and it's going global. To 512 00:29:01,360 --> 00:29:04,720 Speaker 1: be fair, we have not checked in with the CIA. 513 00:29:04,880 --> 00:29:07,280 Speaker 1: Well you know, we'll see, yeah, we'll see. No good point. 514 00:29:07,720 --> 00:29:09,880 Speaker 1: So the tweet that was just up on the screen 515 00:29:09,920 --> 00:29:12,720 Speaker 1: for everybody listening showed that Senator Bernie Sanders and Tim 516 00:29:12,800 --> 00:29:15,840 Speaker 1: Kaine had a resolution that was passed over in the 517 00:29:15,880 --> 00:29:18,200 Speaker 1: Senate to support the free and fair elections in Brazil. 518 00:29:18,240 --> 00:29:20,600 Speaker 1: I have seen media speculation that there could be political 519 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:23,560 Speaker 1: violence this weekend there will be political vines. Yeah, tell 520 00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:28,760 Speaker 1: us more about that. The intensity of our politics here 521 00:29:28,840 --> 00:29:33,400 Speaker 1: in the US just crank it up by several magnitudes. 522 00:29:33,440 --> 00:29:36,280 Speaker 1: There already has been violence right in this election. Back 523 00:29:36,280 --> 00:29:39,640 Speaker 1: in July, someone was shot, right, well, in twenty eighteen, 524 00:29:39,680 --> 00:29:44,719 Speaker 1: Bolsonaro was stabbed, like literally stabbed, almost killed during the election. 525 00:29:45,080 --> 00:29:47,920 Speaker 1: So you know, it cuts both ways. But it's mostly 526 00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:50,720 Speaker 1: Bolsonaristas who are beaten up, who are beating up people 527 00:29:51,080 --> 00:29:53,880 Speaker 1: in the streets. And Bolsonaro has been setting all sorts 528 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:59,280 Speaker 1: of signals, saying to his supporters after the election, quote, 529 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:01,720 Speaker 1: you know what to do, like that's that's the code, 530 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:04,600 Speaker 1: and it's not that's not very impressive code, like you know, 531 00:30:04,640 --> 00:30:06,480 Speaker 1: you know what to do? Is they do know what 532 00:30:06,600 --> 00:30:10,600 Speaker 1: to do. And he has stacked his administration with a 533 00:30:10,600 --> 00:30:15,160 Speaker 1: ton of military figures, and he has openly praised the 534 00:30:15,160 --> 00:30:19,760 Speaker 1: military dictatorship over his entire career. Uh he he has 535 00:30:20,720 --> 00:30:23,360 Speaker 1: said that Brazil would be better off if it went 536 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:27,920 Speaker 1: back to a military dictatorship. But just like Trump, he 537 00:30:28,120 --> 00:30:31,080 Speaker 1: there are a lot of elements within the military that 538 00:30:31,080 --> 00:30:33,680 Speaker 1: that are alienated by him, that that are not necessarily 539 00:30:33,680 --> 00:30:38,000 Speaker 1: supportive of him. And also if you're in the Brazilian military, 540 00:30:38,440 --> 00:30:41,040 Speaker 1: you take more orders from the United States than you 541 00:30:41,120 --> 00:30:44,240 Speaker 1: do necessarily from the civilian government in Brazil, and so 542 00:30:44,320 --> 00:30:46,880 Speaker 1: if they're signaling no coup, then it's going to be 543 00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:50,400 Speaker 1: much more difficult for him. He has and when he 544 00:30:50,440 --> 00:30:55,320 Speaker 1: has tried to bring massive crowds out, they've they've they've 545 00:30:55,360 --> 00:30:57,760 Speaker 1: often fallen short of what the expectations were. And so 546 00:30:59,280 --> 00:31:02,840 Speaker 1: because the less unlike the here in the US, necessarily 547 00:31:03,160 --> 00:31:06,000 Speaker 1: because they can marshal, you know, huge numbers in the 548 00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,320 Speaker 1: streets too, I think it will be more difficult for 549 00:31:08,400 --> 00:31:12,160 Speaker 1: him to seize this. It reminds me of Bolivia, where 550 00:31:13,480 --> 00:31:18,880 Speaker 1: they successfully pulled off a coup in what twenty and 551 00:31:19,680 --> 00:31:22,800 Speaker 1: kept Morales out of power for a year, but because 552 00:31:22,800 --> 00:31:25,160 Speaker 1: of massive street protests were forced to hold a new 553 00:31:25,200 --> 00:31:30,080 Speaker 1: election and then the Brazilian Left won that election by 554 00:31:30,160 --> 00:31:33,080 Speaker 1: so much that it couldn't be stolen. So we might 555 00:31:33,320 --> 00:31:35,800 Speaker 1: end up in that situation. Well, yeah, and the last 556 00:31:35,880 --> 00:31:39,040 Speaker 1: question I'll thirty you is in the context of the 557 00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:42,360 Speaker 1: so called pink wave, that's what Central and South America 558 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:45,200 Speaker 1: in recent years, and there is a real case for that. 559 00:31:45,280 --> 00:31:49,520 Speaker 1: I mean, you go from Chile to Amelou, Columbia, even Colombia, 560 00:31:49,600 --> 00:31:53,400 Speaker 1: right exactly. I'm curious what you think about that. And 561 00:31:53,880 --> 00:31:56,360 Speaker 1: to your point, which is such an interesting one about 562 00:31:56,520 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 1: coups and kind of coups from the West, is that 563 00:32:01,760 --> 00:32:04,120 Speaker 1: it speaks to how the sort of left right wing 564 00:32:04,240 --> 00:32:08,160 Speaker 1: dichotomy in populist movements is flipping in that you'll have 565 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:10,520 Speaker 1: or in some ways it's the same right, So you'll 566 00:32:10,560 --> 00:32:16,200 Speaker 1: have a Bolsonaro, who or a Georgia Maloney or someone well, 567 00:32:16,240 --> 00:32:18,360 Speaker 1: Maloney's not a good example, but somebody who's actually very 568 00:32:18,400 --> 00:32:25,120 Speaker 1: against the kind of un Davos groups that try to 569 00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:29,000 Speaker 1: push what they see as a globalist agenda. And so 570 00:32:29,040 --> 00:32:32,120 Speaker 1: then your right wing candidates are not good coup candidates, 571 00:32:32,200 --> 00:32:36,000 Speaker 1: right because they don't support the order that people like 572 00:32:36,240 --> 00:32:40,959 Speaker 1: Joe Biden and the Davos class support. So it creates 573 00:32:40,960 --> 00:32:44,400 Speaker 1: friction on that level too. And I wonder if that dynamic, 574 00:32:44,480 --> 00:32:48,080 Speaker 1: how that continues to play out in populism in Central 575 00:32:48,080 --> 00:32:50,280 Speaker 1: and South America. That's a really good point. Yes, If 576 00:32:50,320 --> 00:32:55,040 Speaker 1: these if right wing populists in Central and South America 577 00:32:55,160 --> 00:32:58,880 Speaker 1: take too seriously the kind of anti Davos like anti 578 00:32:58,920 --> 00:33:03,560 Speaker 1: globalist politics, then they're going to forget who put them 579 00:33:03,600 --> 00:33:06,080 Speaker 1: in power. In the first place, which was the GLOBALSS thing, 580 00:33:06,680 --> 00:33:10,480 Speaker 1: and the Davos like the Dullest brothers, Like you can't 581 00:33:10,840 --> 00:33:13,360 Speaker 1: run against the Dulles brothers as a as a as 582 00:33:13,360 --> 00:33:16,680 Speaker 1: a right wing tinpot, tinpot dictator. If it's the dullest 583 00:33:16,720 --> 00:33:21,239 Speaker 1: brothers that are installing you in power, and so that 584 00:33:21,360 --> 00:33:24,520 Speaker 1: I think that's that's that's an interesting point. If if 585 00:33:24,560 --> 00:33:29,080 Speaker 1: Bolsonaro was, you know, playing nicer with the United States 586 00:33:29,560 --> 00:33:32,560 Speaker 1: in the in the way that Maloney is playing nice 587 00:33:32,600 --> 00:33:36,479 Speaker 1: with the EU, perhaps you wouldn't have, you know, you, 588 00:33:36,720 --> 00:33:39,600 Speaker 1: perhaps the US would be standing signals like, look, we're 589 00:33:39,600 --> 00:33:42,200 Speaker 1: going to let things shape out. And he recognizes this. 590 00:33:43,120 --> 00:33:47,920 Speaker 1: After the election in November twenty twenty, he was doing 591 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:51,960 Speaker 1: the whole stop to steal, you know, Trump actually won. 592 00:33:52,080 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 1: Biden stole this election, like he was with Trump the 593 00:33:54,320 --> 00:33:57,840 Speaker 1: whole time. After January sixth, he's like, oh, Okay, there's 594 00:33:57,880 --> 00:34:01,240 Speaker 1: a new president's going to be in town. And he 595 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:04,880 Speaker 1: has been sending all sorts of warm signals towards the 596 00:34:04,880 --> 00:34:07,000 Speaker 1: Biden administration. But it's kind of too little, too late 597 00:34:07,640 --> 00:34:10,760 Speaker 1: at this point. And then I guess I'm curious going forward, 598 00:34:10,840 --> 00:34:14,080 Speaker 1: how global meddling when you have the I guess the 599 00:34:14,400 --> 00:34:18,960 Speaker 1: very real Davos class if their cultural priorities overcome their 600 00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:21,480 Speaker 1: economic priorities, or they can find a way to have 601 00:34:21,560 --> 00:34:24,120 Speaker 1: them work in tandem, if they start inter reading on 602 00:34:24,160 --> 00:34:26,880 Speaker 1: behalf of left populists, yeah, we'll see you got to 603 00:34:26,920 --> 00:34:29,480 Speaker 1: be I mean, more clever. But they're absolutely not going 604 00:34:29,520 --> 00:34:33,320 Speaker 1: to do that unless they're completely fake left populist, because 605 00:34:33,360 --> 00:34:40,240 Speaker 1: right left populists, you know, fundamentally challenge the entire basis 606 00:34:40,239 --> 00:34:43,520 Speaker 1: of the economic inequality and the structure that the Davos 607 00:34:43,560 --> 00:34:47,560 Speaker 1: crowd they should right, right, so they would, so they're not. 608 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:50,920 Speaker 1: You know, Lula is very good at co opting elements 609 00:34:50,960 --> 00:34:55,000 Speaker 1: of that of that kind of coalition, like getting enough 610 00:34:55,040 --> 00:34:57,239 Speaker 1: of it. When he started out as a kind of 611 00:34:57,239 --> 00:35:01,520 Speaker 1: a radical leftist the union leader, I was not able 612 00:35:01,560 --> 00:35:04,640 Speaker 1: to get to national power until he started compromising. So 613 00:35:04,640 --> 00:35:08,160 Speaker 1: there's this whole Lula is a sellout wing down down 614 00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:12,920 Speaker 1: in Brazil. Although for my podcast this week at the Intercept, 615 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:16,560 Speaker 1: I interviewed this a Sabrina Fernandez, a kind of Marxist 616 00:35:16,600 --> 00:35:21,000 Speaker 1: leftist who's part of this Marxist leftist coalition that is 617 00:35:21,040 --> 00:35:23,640 Speaker 1: saying Lula, Lula, yeah, might have been a sellout but 618 00:35:23,719 --> 00:35:26,600 Speaker 1: like he's our guy that's gonna like a like a 619 00:35:26,960 --> 00:35:29,280 Speaker 1: popular front that's going to get rid of Bolson Arrow 620 00:35:29,920 --> 00:35:34,320 Speaker 1: Marx identified how the cultural priorities of the you know, 621 00:35:34,760 --> 00:35:40,479 Speaker 1: the wealthy elite, whether it's sex, age, religion, nationality, were 622 00:35:41,080 --> 00:35:44,400 Speaker 1: to the benefit the economic benefit of the wealthy and 623 00:35:44,440 --> 00:35:47,120 Speaker 1: the elites. And so a true left populist, I think 624 00:35:47,200 --> 00:35:50,120 Speaker 1: would be out of whack with the Davos class on 625 00:35:50,160 --> 00:35:52,799 Speaker 1: the cultural issues instead of being right. You've got one 626 00:35:52,840 --> 00:35:56,840 Speaker 1: of those in uh in Peru and they're already impeaching 627 00:35:57,120 --> 00:35:59,399 Speaker 1: a bunch of times. Yeah. Right, So but I think 628 00:35:59,400 --> 00:36:03,399 Speaker 1: there's there's increasing anything awareness of how those divisions turn 629 00:36:03,480 --> 00:36:08,560 Speaker 1: people basically into cogs in this ridiculous capitalist machine. And 630 00:36:08,600 --> 00:36:11,040 Speaker 1: I say that as a conservative, but this is not real. 631 00:36:11,680 --> 00:36:15,160 Speaker 1: This is not real capitalism, not free markets. In the 632 00:36:15,440 --> 00:36:18,200 Speaker 1: same way that you would say that probably about real socialism. 633 00:36:19,960 --> 00:36:23,280 Speaker 1: We vowed to do that one short we didn't. Actually, 634 00:36:23,320 --> 00:36:26,240 Speaker 1: this is a great, great transition into the next topic 635 00:36:26,400 --> 00:36:28,880 Speaker 1: about the anti the package of anti trust legislation that 636 00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:32,719 Speaker 1: just passed the House, because Matt Stoller made just a 637 00:36:32,920 --> 00:36:38,000 Speaker 1: fantastic point about this. That's D two. So is this 638 00:36:38,040 --> 00:36:41,799 Speaker 1: package of legislation passed the House of Representatives. This is 639 00:36:42,000 --> 00:36:47,080 Speaker 1: from the Hill. It's the so this is from the Hill. 640 00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:49,960 Speaker 1: It says these this package of bills would update filing 641 00:36:50,040 --> 00:36:52,520 Speaker 1: fees for mergers to increase them for larger deals, allow 642 00:36:52,600 --> 00:36:55,320 Speaker 1: state attorneys general to select their venue when enforcing anti 643 00:36:55,320 --> 00:36:58,040 Speaker 1: trust laws, and use the merger notification process to require 644 00:36:58,040 --> 00:37:00,920 Speaker 1: parties to disclose subsidies they received from countries that pose 645 00:37:00,960 --> 00:37:04,239 Speaker 1: a risk to the US. And Matt wrote about that 646 00:37:04,320 --> 00:37:06,640 Speaker 1: over on his sub stack, which you should definitely take 647 00:37:06,640 --> 00:37:09,000 Speaker 1: a look at. But he made this really interesting point 648 00:37:09,040 --> 00:37:12,880 Speaker 1: on Twitter as well about how Zoelofgren and Jim Jordan, 649 00:37:13,560 --> 00:37:17,560 Speaker 1: we're both opposed to this package. And Jim Jordan is 650 00:37:17,560 --> 00:37:20,640 Speaker 1: someone who has tweeted, you know, break up Facebook, breakup, 651 00:37:21,120 --> 00:37:26,120 Speaker 1: someone's completely anti big tech. Zoelofgren was saying that actually 652 00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:30,360 Speaker 1: this gives She invoked January sixth in urging her colleagues 653 00:37:30,360 --> 00:37:34,000 Speaker 1: to vote against this package, saying basically that it gives 654 00:37:34,160 --> 00:37:38,560 Speaker 1: more power to Republicans who want to challenge the content moderation, 655 00:37:38,719 --> 00:37:41,080 Speaker 1: which gets to the underlying issue of how Republicans and 656 00:37:41,120 --> 00:37:44,680 Speaker 1: Democrats really can't agree on tech stuff anymore because Democrats 657 00:37:44,680 --> 00:37:48,399 Speaker 1: want more power to regulate and Republicans want to take 658 00:37:48,400 --> 00:37:51,360 Speaker 1: it away. So beneath the trust, the surface of the 659 00:37:51,360 --> 00:37:55,400 Speaker 1: anti trust consensus is something very different. Now, Mike Lee, 660 00:37:55,560 --> 00:38:02,640 Speaker 1: Tom Cotton, a Heritage Foundation, everyone supported the slate of bills, 661 00:38:02,840 --> 00:38:06,680 Speaker 1: Jim Jordan did not, and republic some Republicans voted against it. 662 00:38:06,719 --> 00:38:09,879 Speaker 1: But it really was an interesting eruption. Yeah, it's it's 663 00:38:09,880 --> 00:38:13,000 Speaker 1: a it's an amazing example of the way that politicians 664 00:38:13,040 --> 00:38:17,080 Speaker 1: on both sides use the culture war to distract from 665 00:38:17,200 --> 00:38:20,000 Speaker 1: what's actually going on. And so let's let's play the clip, 666 00:38:20,040 --> 00:38:25,000 Speaker 1: because you have Zoloftrin tapping her culture war buttons and 667 00:38:25,400 --> 00:38:27,719 Speaker 1: then you have Jim Jordan tapping his culture war buttons, 668 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:30,719 Speaker 1: saying opposite things, but both for the same purpose, which is, 669 00:38:31,200 --> 00:38:34,080 Speaker 1: don't vote for this bill that big tech doesn't want 670 00:38:34,120 --> 00:38:36,160 Speaker 1: you to vote for. Side with side with big tech, 671 00:38:36,239 --> 00:38:38,239 Speaker 1: but for these cultural reasons. So let's let's play that. 672 00:38:38,360 --> 00:38:43,880 Speaker 1: Those those those speeches of speech. Now, content moderation is important. 673 00:38:44,360 --> 00:38:48,800 Speaker 1: We have seen in the January sixth Committee a lot 674 00:38:48,880 --> 00:38:55,000 Speaker 1: of material that has spread lies, that has incided violence, 675 00:38:55,480 --> 00:38:59,080 Speaker 1: and that content should be moderated. It should not be 676 00:38:59,239 --> 00:39:03,640 Speaker 1: subject to a bogus effort by state ags to prevent 677 00:39:03,760 --> 00:39:10,200 Speaker 1: content moderation through the Anti Trust of provision. This bill 678 00:39:10,200 --> 00:39:13,840 Speaker 1: would actually give one hundred and forty million dollars to 679 00:39:13,880 --> 00:39:16,360 Speaker 1: the DOJ so they can work with continue to do 680 00:39:16,400 --> 00:39:19,560 Speaker 1: what they're already doing, work with big tech to censor 681 00:39:19,880 --> 00:39:23,319 Speaker 1: certain information from getting to we the people. And why 682 00:39:23,320 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 1: do I say that, because we know what happened just 683 00:39:26,080 --> 00:39:28,840 Speaker 1: a month ago. Mark Zuckerberg said, the FBI come and 684 00:39:28,880 --> 00:39:31,720 Speaker 1: told him not to allow this story about Hunter Biden's 685 00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:34,200 Speaker 1: laptop to be on their platform. They gave him the 686 00:39:34,200 --> 00:39:36,759 Speaker 1: old wink wink, Oh, we think this is Russian disinformation, 687 00:39:36,960 --> 00:39:40,520 Speaker 1: which we know it wasn't. So the Democrat says you 688 00:39:40,520 --> 00:39:46,279 Speaker 1: should oppose this bill because of censorship, censorship on as 689 00:39:46,320 --> 00:39:49,400 Speaker 1: she's us it. The Republican says you should oppose this 690 00:39:49,440 --> 00:39:54,480 Speaker 1: bill because of censorship, censorship of how he views it. Now, 691 00:39:54,560 --> 00:39:58,280 Speaker 1: that's how you know they're both lying, because it's completely contradictory. 692 00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:00,279 Speaker 1: But what are they both telling you you to do? 693 00:40:00,360 --> 00:40:02,920 Speaker 1: They're telling you to oppose this bill. Who wants you 694 00:40:02,960 --> 00:40:05,120 Speaker 1: to oppose this bill? Big tech wants you to oppose 695 00:40:05,120 --> 00:40:08,680 Speaker 1: this built just utterly incredible, and it's and this is 696 00:40:08,719 --> 00:40:12,880 Speaker 1: such small potatoes too. This it gives it. It's a 697 00:40:12,920 --> 00:40:17,120 Speaker 1: significant win because it gives new resources to the FTC, 698 00:40:17,600 --> 00:40:19,840 Speaker 1: and it gives new resources to the Anti Trust Division 699 00:40:19,920 --> 00:40:23,040 Speaker 1: of the Department of Justice. And it blocks big Tech 700 00:40:23,040 --> 00:40:26,640 Speaker 1: from being able to take a lawsuit from if you 701 00:40:26,680 --> 00:40:30,359 Speaker 1: file it in Texas or Oklahoma or Colorado, big Tech 702 00:40:30,440 --> 00:40:33,160 Speaker 1: likes to yankee to their their favorite judge, say in 703 00:40:33,160 --> 00:40:36,160 Speaker 1: New York or somewhere. It blocks you from being able 704 00:40:36,200 --> 00:40:38,520 Speaker 1: to do that. So it's you know, this is this 705 00:40:38,600 --> 00:40:41,680 Speaker 1: is real stuff. But it's also not the big kind 706 00:40:41,680 --> 00:40:45,080 Speaker 1: of clobachar bill. It's in the Senate the Competition the 707 00:40:45,200 --> 00:40:48,560 Speaker 1: Competition Act that would like, actually, you know, come at 708 00:40:48,560 --> 00:40:52,040 Speaker 1: Big Tech in a serious way, and they still threw 709 00:40:52,120 --> 00:40:54,239 Speaker 1: everything they had at it. And we get arguments like 710 00:40:54,280 --> 00:40:56,760 Speaker 1: this that, oh, don't do this to big Tech because 711 00:40:56,840 --> 00:40:58,160 Speaker 1: if you do, they're not going to be able to 712 00:40:58,200 --> 00:41:00,799 Speaker 1: censor like we want them to, or they're going to 713 00:41:00,840 --> 00:41:03,319 Speaker 1: do lots of censoring like we don't want them to. Right. 714 00:41:03,760 --> 00:41:07,640 Speaker 1: So culture war, cultural culture war. But just in the 715 00:41:07,760 --> 00:41:11,800 Speaker 1: end side with big Tech, right, the culture war becomes 716 00:41:11,920 --> 00:41:17,600 Speaker 1: this this disguise for anti I mean anti populist you 717 00:41:17,600 --> 00:41:21,239 Speaker 1: could say, or just like pro tech governance like that's 718 00:41:21,560 --> 00:41:24,640 Speaker 1: it's just wearing the culture war as a costume to 719 00:41:24,719 --> 00:41:30,360 Speaker 1: distract from the economic reality. And again, Lena Khan, for instance, 720 00:41:30,560 --> 00:41:33,759 Speaker 1: is not conservative, There's no question about it. Lena Khan 721 00:41:34,239 --> 00:41:36,960 Speaker 1: is like the new brand ician like in that field. 722 00:41:37,040 --> 00:41:39,880 Speaker 1: She is on the left, no question about it. But 723 00:41:40,080 --> 00:41:45,040 Speaker 1: again she is advancing the economic interests of a lot 724 00:41:45,200 --> 00:41:49,719 Speaker 1: of republic average Republican voters and a lot of averages. Yeah, 725 00:41:50,040 --> 00:41:55,480 Speaker 1: average Americans who are absolutely being railroaded by an industry that, 726 00:41:55,719 --> 00:41:59,600 Speaker 1: because of consolidation, also has cultural consolidation. And Stoller is 727 00:41:59,600 --> 00:42:02,720 Speaker 1: really good on this, but it's absolutely true that because 728 00:42:02,760 --> 00:42:06,400 Speaker 1: Facebook also owns Instagram, and because Google also owns YouTube, 729 00:42:06,600 --> 00:42:09,680 Speaker 1: that means the world views of the tiny C suite 730 00:42:09,680 --> 00:42:13,640 Speaker 1: class at all of these companies then dictate what constitutes 731 00:42:13,719 --> 00:42:18,240 Speaker 1: acceptable speech, what constitutes and to Jordan's point, actually whether 732 00:42:18,280 --> 00:42:20,960 Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden's story should be allowed to see the 733 00:42:21,080 --> 00:42:23,719 Speaker 1: light of day on their platform. Well, if they're all 734 00:42:23,760 --> 00:42:26,479 Speaker 1: going to vote for Joe Biden, they're probably all going 735 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:28,680 Speaker 1: to lean in a certain direction on something like that, 736 00:42:28,760 --> 00:42:32,040 Speaker 1: and they're probably going to listen when the FBI, which 737 00:42:32,239 --> 00:42:35,120 Speaker 1: the left has the strange new respect for or I 738 00:42:35,120 --> 00:42:37,320 Speaker 1: should say, the center left has a strange new respect 739 00:42:37,360 --> 00:42:40,200 Speaker 1: for is going to tell them, you know, be on 740 00:42:40,280 --> 00:42:43,879 Speaker 1: the lookout. And that's why it makes really no sense 741 00:42:43,920 --> 00:42:47,360 Speaker 1: to me to use it, especially from a right perspective, 742 00:42:47,360 --> 00:42:51,799 Speaker 1: a culture war, a culture war argument to vote against this. 743 00:42:51,840 --> 00:42:53,960 Speaker 1: It is such The American Conservative had a good piece 744 00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:57,000 Speaker 1: referring to it as a quote modest proposal. Even that 745 00:42:57,120 --> 00:42:59,160 Speaker 1: might be an overstatement. I mean, when it comes to 746 00:42:59,239 --> 00:43:02,600 Speaker 1: the serious emergency that is big tech, this is a 747 00:43:02,760 --> 00:43:05,080 Speaker 1: drop in the bucket, and if you can't get on 748 00:43:05,120 --> 00:43:07,560 Speaker 1: board with it, it's I don't know, I don't know 749 00:43:07,560 --> 00:43:09,759 Speaker 1: where we go from here. Yeah, and zoelofgrens aargent was 750 00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:13,000 Speaker 1: such a crazy bank shot. She's saying, we need big 751 00:43:13,040 --> 00:43:16,000 Speaker 1: Tech to be able to do its content moderation free 752 00:43:16,160 --> 00:43:20,240 Speaker 1: of these you know, anti woke Republican state attorneys general, 753 00:43:21,480 --> 00:43:24,200 Speaker 1: but the like. Even if you pretend that she's serious 754 00:43:24,239 --> 00:43:26,759 Speaker 1: about that for a second, the bill is trying to 755 00:43:26,800 --> 00:43:30,799 Speaker 1: stop lawsuits from being taken out of Texas and taken 756 00:43:30,840 --> 00:43:34,640 Speaker 1: to New York the way that a serious anti trust 757 00:43:34,960 --> 00:43:38,520 Speaker 1: piece of litigation was. That's not what happened with the 758 00:43:38,520 --> 00:43:41,359 Speaker 1: one that she's talking about. The one she's talking about 759 00:43:41,400 --> 00:43:43,080 Speaker 1: was the Fifth Circuit, which is down in the Circuit 760 00:43:43,080 --> 00:43:46,680 Speaker 1: Court down in Texas. So like, it doesn't even apply 761 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:49,520 Speaker 1: to the thing that she claims that it's it's applying 762 00:43:49,560 --> 00:43:54,160 Speaker 1: to just you know, and she represents roughly Stilicon Valley 763 00:43:54,280 --> 00:43:59,440 Speaker 1: Like so you know that's if you step back, you're like, oh, okay, 764 00:43:59,200 --> 00:44:01,879 Speaker 1: we see what's going on here. So there are still 765 00:44:01,920 --> 00:44:03,839 Speaker 1: elements of this that have to pass the Senate. It's 766 00:44:03,880 --> 00:44:09,000 Speaker 1: not completely over, but but there is support for this 767 00:44:09,040 --> 00:44:13,160 Speaker 1: in the Senate. Uh, very likely. You know, it has 768 00:44:13,200 --> 00:44:15,479 Speaker 1: a shot as long as people keep pressure on. Yeah, 769 00:44:15,560 --> 00:44:17,520 Speaker 1: I think it. I think it absolutely has a shot. 770 00:44:17,560 --> 00:44:19,640 Speaker 1: But big Tech is going to pull out all the 771 00:44:19,640 --> 00:44:22,719 Speaker 1: stops even for a quote modest proposal. They're they're going 772 00:44:22,760 --> 00:44:24,680 Speaker 1: to they have plenty of money to throw around to 773 00:44:25,080 --> 00:44:30,680 Speaker 1: block even modest proposals. On that note, Ryan, I see 774 00:44:30,680 --> 00:44:33,640 Speaker 1: you're getting your glasses, which means you're you're ready to 775 00:44:33,680 --> 00:44:38,719 Speaker 1: read your the script. No, I'm kidding. Speaking of January sixth, 776 00:44:38,719 --> 00:44:42,759 Speaker 1: actually you have a really interesting monologue today on this 777 00:44:43,040 --> 00:44:46,160 Speaker 1: this book that's coming out in a couple of weeks. Huge, 778 00:44:46,200 --> 00:44:49,160 Speaker 1: it's like six it's like six hundred pages, it's actually 779 00:44:49,160 --> 00:44:52,840 Speaker 1: it's very good. If you like kind of congressional drama, 780 00:44:53,080 --> 00:44:56,920 Speaker 1: which I do, I write called it's called Unchecked, The 781 00:44:57,000 --> 00:44:59,840 Speaker 1: Untold Story behind Congress has watched Impeachments of Donald Trump, 782 00:44:59,840 --> 00:45:01,799 Speaker 1: and I got an early copy of it, so I 783 00:45:01,800 --> 00:45:04,000 Speaker 1: have a piece of it that I can I can 784 00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:06,680 Speaker 1: do here before you do that. Does it feel almost 785 00:45:06,719 --> 00:45:09,680 Speaker 1: like Bravo when you're do you like congressional drama for 786 00:45:09,719 --> 00:45:11,719 Speaker 1: the same reason that you like the rest? It's the 787 00:45:11,719 --> 00:45:15,320 Speaker 1: same stuff. If it's done right, it definitely taps the 788 00:45:15,360 --> 00:45:18,160 Speaker 1: same buttons. Tell us what's in the book, I says, 789 00:45:18,200 --> 00:45:22,120 Speaker 1: January sixth and so. So. History often unfolds through the 790 00:45:22,160 --> 00:45:26,520 Speaker 1: collision of structural forces that operate independently of any specific 791 00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:30,080 Speaker 1: decision or decision maker. But once in a while, a 792 00:45:30,120 --> 00:45:33,280 Speaker 1: real moment of contingency arises, in which a single person 793 00:45:33,719 --> 00:45:37,680 Speaker 1: chooses to choosing between several genuinely viable options within their 794 00:45:37,719 --> 00:45:41,600 Speaker 1: reach can set history on a different course. Now, according 795 00:45:41,600 --> 00:45:44,600 Speaker 1: to the new book Unchecked, the Untold Story behind Congress's 796 00:45:44,640 --> 00:45:48,960 Speaker 1: batched impeachments of Donald Trump, Leading Democrats pushed hard to 797 00:45:49,120 --> 00:45:53,080 Speaker 1: impeach then President Donald Trump the very day of the insurrection, 798 00:45:53,160 --> 00:45:56,640 Speaker 1: but we're beaten back by a reluctant House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, 799 00:45:57,040 --> 00:45:59,960 Speaker 1: who instead decided to gabble the chamber out of session 800 00:46:00,400 --> 00:46:04,000 Speaker 1: once it had finished its business at hand. Republican tempers 801 00:46:04,000 --> 00:46:06,480 Speaker 1: were running so hot against Trump, as documented in the 802 00:46:06,520 --> 00:46:10,200 Speaker 1: new book by Rachel Baide and Karen Demergion, that forcing 803 00:46:10,239 --> 00:46:12,960 Speaker 1: them to choose sides in the Senate that week could 804 00:46:13,040 --> 00:46:17,200 Speaker 1: easily have resulted in his impeachment, removal, and disqualification from 805 00:46:17,239 --> 00:46:20,839 Speaker 1: any future run for the White House. High ranking Democrats 806 00:46:20,880 --> 00:46:23,480 Speaker 1: wanted to give Republicans that chance, and to give a 807 00:46:23,520 --> 00:46:26,319 Speaker 1: sense of how thirsty for Maga blood Republican senators were. 808 00:46:26,640 --> 00:46:28,919 Speaker 1: The book includes a scene in a Senate conference room 809 00:46:29,280 --> 00:46:32,640 Speaker 1: with protesters in the Capitol. Lindsey Graham looked over and 810 00:46:32,680 --> 00:46:35,040 Speaker 1: saw the Senate sergeant at arms in the safe room 811 00:46:35,040 --> 00:46:38,200 Speaker 1: with them. Graham yelled at them, what the hell are 812 00:46:38,239 --> 00:46:42,200 Speaker 1: you doing here? Go take back the Senate. You've got guns, 813 00:46:42,840 --> 00:46:46,600 Speaker 1: use them. Graham then called White House Attorney Pat Sippoloni. 814 00:46:46,680 --> 00:46:49,080 Speaker 1: Is it Sipoloni or Cipolone. I don't know. I'm going 815 00:46:49,120 --> 00:46:51,719 Speaker 1: to go with Cipolony, and he warned that Republicans would 816 00:46:51,760 --> 00:46:55,040 Speaker 1: remove Trump from office using the twenty fifth Amendment if 817 00:46:55,040 --> 00:46:57,680 Speaker 1: he didn't call off the mob. Now. The first member 818 00:46:57,719 --> 00:47:00,000 Speaker 1: of Congress we know of to begin drafting an article 819 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:04,200 Speaker 1: of impeachment, David Cicilini, a Rhode Island Democrat, scribbled it 820 00:47:04,239 --> 00:47:07,280 Speaker 1: on scratch paper while locked down in the Rayburn House 821 00:47:07,360 --> 00:47:11,640 Speaker 1: office building. According to the book, Representative Ted Lou because 822 00:47:11,640 --> 00:47:14,200 Speaker 1: of his office's proximity to pipe bombs that had been 823 00:47:14,200 --> 00:47:17,000 Speaker 1: discovered by the way whatever happened to those, he had 824 00:47:17,040 --> 00:47:19,719 Speaker 1: to evacuate, and he came to join Cicilini, where the 825 00:47:19,760 --> 00:47:22,640 Speaker 1: two worked on the impeachment article together in the office, 826 00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:25,920 Speaker 1: the two started lobbying other members of the Judiciary Committee, 827 00:47:25,960 --> 00:47:28,920 Speaker 1: with Lou texting other members they quote, should start drafting 828 00:47:29,000 --> 00:47:32,760 Speaker 1: articles of impeachment now, regardless of what leadership says quote. 829 00:47:33,040 --> 00:47:36,640 Speaker 1: Cicelini reached out to Representatives Jamie Raskin and Joe Negoose, 830 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:39,600 Speaker 1: and Raskin recommended going for the twenty fifth Amendment, but 831 00:47:39,640 --> 00:47:42,560 Speaker 1: if that didn't work, yes, impeachment. They worked on a 832 00:47:42,600 --> 00:47:45,279 Speaker 1: twenty fifth Amendment letter to Vice President Mike Pence, but 833 00:47:45,320 --> 00:47:48,600 Speaker 1: they kept pushing on impeachment throughout the day. They reached 834 00:47:48,600 --> 00:47:51,680 Speaker 1: out to Judiciary Committee Council Aaron Hiller for help fine 835 00:47:51,719 --> 00:47:55,560 Speaker 1: tuning the impeachment draft. Hiller called his boss, Jerry Nadler 836 00:47:55,680 --> 00:47:59,319 Speaker 1: Chief of staff Amy Rutkin, and told her, quote, I'm 837 00:47:59,320 --> 00:48:02,560 Speaker 1: about to do so something that's completely unauthorized by leadership. 838 00:48:02,920 --> 00:48:07,279 Speaker 1: Should I tell you or not? He told her, and 839 00:48:07,320 --> 00:48:12,000 Speaker 1: she said do it. After hearing about it, Hiller then 840 00:48:12,080 --> 00:48:16,320 Speaker 1: told Cicilini, go find two hundred co sponsors right now 841 00:48:16,400 --> 00:48:20,520 Speaker 1: to get it done. Don't wait for a blessing from leadership. Now. 842 00:48:20,560 --> 00:48:23,720 Speaker 1: Ilhan Omar had also been working on an impeachment article 843 00:48:23,880 --> 00:48:26,440 Speaker 1: now because she gets so many death threats, She's one 844 00:48:26,480 --> 00:48:29,360 Speaker 1: of the few members not in leadership with her own security, 845 00:48:29,600 --> 00:48:32,040 Speaker 1: and so she was huddled with both parties leaderships and 846 00:48:32,120 --> 00:48:35,040 Speaker 1: Fort McNair during the riot. The aide she brought with 847 00:48:35,120 --> 00:48:38,600 Speaker 1: her drafted an impeachment article that afternoon, and Omar publicly 848 00:48:38,640 --> 00:48:41,440 Speaker 1: called for the House to vote on it that evening. 849 00:48:41,480 --> 00:48:43,760 Speaker 1: Once the capital had been cleared and the House returned 850 00:48:43,760 --> 00:48:48,480 Speaker 1: to finish its business, Cicilini found Stenny Hoyer on the floor. Hoyer, 851 00:48:48,560 --> 00:48:53,040 Speaker 1: as majority leader, controls the House floor schedule. Cicelini handed 852 00:48:53,040 --> 00:48:56,360 Speaker 1: Hoyer the impeachment resolution and implored him to allow a 853 00:48:56,480 --> 00:48:59,640 Speaker 1: vote right then and there. He hemmed and he hawed, 854 00:48:59,719 --> 00:49:04,120 Speaker 1: but he passed the request onto Pelosi. Pelosi's staff first 855 00:49:04,120 --> 00:49:06,720 Speaker 1: tried to tell Sicilin there were technical reasons that couldn't 856 00:49:06,719 --> 00:49:09,000 Speaker 1: be done, but then just told him to move on. 857 00:49:09,760 --> 00:49:14,160 Speaker 1: Pelosi decided to gabble. The chamber closed and everybody went home. 858 00:49:14,600 --> 00:49:16,560 Speaker 1: Now there's a saying, if you come for the king, 859 00:49:16,960 --> 00:49:19,879 Speaker 1: you best not miss, because if you miss, the King 860 00:49:19,960 --> 00:49:22,080 Speaker 1: is going to make sure you never come for him again, 861 00:49:22,160 --> 00:49:24,399 Speaker 1: and that nobody thinks it's okay to come for the king. 862 00:49:25,000 --> 00:49:27,840 Speaker 1: Trump came for the king that day and missed, and 863 00:49:27,920 --> 00:49:31,160 Speaker 1: Pelosi and Hoyer just let him walk. The message was clear, 864 00:49:31,520 --> 00:49:33,640 Speaker 1: it's okay to come for the king, or in our case, 865 00:49:33,680 --> 00:49:36,399 Speaker 1: to come for democracy. If you hit it, you stay 866 00:49:36,440 --> 00:49:39,200 Speaker 1: in power. If you miss, you live to fight another day, 867 00:49:39,760 --> 00:49:42,279 Speaker 1: and we'll live with the decision Pelosi made that night 868 00:49:42,440 --> 00:49:45,440 Speaker 1: not to hold Trump accountable instantly for the rest of 869 00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:49,600 Speaker 1: our lives. And what I'm curious about from your perspective, 870 00:49:49,600 --> 00:49:54,759 Speaker 1: because you would know this even better looking forward to 871 00:49:54,760 --> 00:49:57,520 Speaker 1: what you got. One of my college jobs was working 872 00:49:57,560 --> 00:50:01,280 Speaker 1: for the dissident feminist author Christina summers as she wrote 873 00:50:01,280 --> 00:50:04,040 Speaker 1: a re release of her early pressient two thousand book 874 00:50:04,320 --> 00:50:07,920 Speaker 1: The War Against Boys, men, Christina warned were falling behind 875 00:50:08,000 --> 00:50:10,480 Speaker 1: and the results would not be good for women or 876 00:50:10,520 --> 00:50:13,799 Speaker 1: for society overall. As the women's movement pushed for some 877 00:50:14,000 --> 00:50:18,880 Speaker 1: obviously necessary correctives to American culture, especially in education, the 878 00:50:18,960 --> 00:50:22,000 Speaker 1: system came to be designed in ways that benefited girls, 879 00:50:22,280 --> 00:50:25,520 Speaker 1: but at the expense of men. After not letting us 880 00:50:25,640 --> 00:50:28,200 Speaker 1: vote or open credit cards on our own. Women didn't 881 00:50:28,239 --> 00:50:30,879 Speaker 1: find the plight of boys a terribly sympathetic cause at 882 00:50:30,880 --> 00:50:33,359 Speaker 1: the time. Plus many of the problems were happening in 883 00:50:33,440 --> 00:50:36,400 Speaker 1: real time to kids at very young ages, making it 884 00:50:36,440 --> 00:50:40,799 Speaker 1: super difficult to assess the consequences beyond projections. But now 885 00:50:40,840 --> 00:50:43,640 Speaker 1: the results of this experiment are in, and they aren't good. 886 00:50:44,040 --> 00:50:46,640 Speaker 1: Richard Reeves of the Brookings Institution released his new book 887 00:50:46,719 --> 00:50:50,160 Speaker 1: assessing those results this week in of Boys and Men. 888 00:50:50,239 --> 00:50:53,120 Speaker 1: Crystal and Sager interviewed him here on Breaking Points, and 889 00:50:53,200 --> 00:50:55,160 Speaker 1: I did about an hour with Richard last week over 890 00:50:55,160 --> 00:50:58,239 Speaker 1: on my podcast at The Federalist. David Brooks wrote about 891 00:50:58,280 --> 00:51:00,840 Speaker 1: the book at The New York Times concede I learned 892 00:51:00,840 --> 00:51:03,520 Speaker 1: a lot I didn't know Brooks boiled down this new 893 00:51:03,560 --> 00:51:07,319 Speaker 1: information to two points, one that boys are much more 894 00:51:07,400 --> 00:51:11,960 Speaker 1: hindered by challenging environments than girls, and two that policies 895 00:51:12,000 --> 00:51:15,000 Speaker 1: and programs designed to promote social mobility often work for 896 00:51:15,040 --> 00:51:18,120 Speaker 1: women but not men. Those are Brooks's words. Now, those two, 897 00:51:18,160 --> 00:51:20,759 Speaker 1: of course go hand in hand. Boys struggle more with, 898 00:51:21,000 --> 00:51:24,839 Speaker 1: for instance, poverty and single parenthood than benefit less from 899 00:51:24,840 --> 00:51:29,440 Speaker 1: the programs designed to help people overcome challenging circumstances. Christina 900 00:51:29,480 --> 00:51:32,680 Speaker 1: showed how this was manifesting in seemingly harmless ways inside 901 00:51:32,760 --> 00:51:36,319 Speaker 1: K through twelve schooling, from curtailing recess and rough and 902 00:51:36,360 --> 00:51:39,560 Speaker 1: tumble play to using emotion based teaching methodology in math 903 00:51:39,600 --> 00:51:42,600 Speaker 1: and science that helps girls but make schools a school 904 00:51:42,640 --> 00:51:46,719 Speaker 1: a little bit harder for boys. Boys end up hating school, underachieving, 905 00:51:46,840 --> 00:51:49,880 Speaker 1: and turning to drugs or crime or other bad habits 906 00:51:49,880 --> 00:51:52,720 Speaker 1: and higher numbers. They leave high school in a hole 907 00:51:52,880 --> 00:51:55,480 Speaker 1: that's then hard to dig out of, and then leave 908 00:51:55,560 --> 00:51:59,280 Speaker 1: college with debt and go right into a hookup culture 909 00:51:59,320 --> 00:52:02,920 Speaker 1: that disincent devises monogamy into a world where fulfilling work 910 00:52:03,360 --> 00:52:06,480 Speaker 1: is as hard to come by as purpose and meaning 911 00:52:07,080 --> 00:52:08,960 Speaker 1: what a lot of people don't talk about in this 912 00:52:09,120 --> 00:52:12,640 Speaker 1: context is sex and dating. But of course these variables 913 00:52:12,640 --> 00:52:15,560 Speaker 1: are very salient. A recent survey that made the rounds 914 00:52:15,560 --> 00:52:18,320 Speaker 1: this week after being covered in Psychology Today, found fifty 915 00:52:18,360 --> 00:52:22,040 Speaker 1: three percent of single men said fear of being creepy 916 00:52:22,400 --> 00:52:25,960 Speaker 1: reduces their likelihood of interacting with women. Now, some stigmas 917 00:52:26,080 --> 00:52:30,080 Speaker 1: like creepiness are obviously healthy, but this shows a widespread, 918 00:52:30,120 --> 00:52:34,279 Speaker 1: irrational fear that is seriously throwing a wrench into American communities. 919 00:52:34,640 --> 00:52:38,400 Speaker 1: Brooks's Columns column ran alongside another column in The Times 920 00:52:38,440 --> 00:52:41,320 Speaker 1: this week, one that asserted, in the headline quote dating 921 00:52:41,400 --> 00:52:44,799 Speaker 1: is broken, Going retro could fix it. This is just 922 00:52:44,800 --> 00:52:47,319 Speaker 1: one in a long long line of recent versions of 923 00:52:47,360 --> 00:52:50,839 Speaker 1: the same argument from progressive women that retro norms may 924 00:52:50,880 --> 00:52:53,520 Speaker 1: have been healthier for women. Christine Emba of The Washington 925 00:52:53,600 --> 00:52:56,680 Speaker 1: Post wrote Rethinking Sex. Luise Perry of The New Statesman 926 00:52:56,760 --> 00:52:59,719 Speaker 1: wrote the Case Against the Sexual Revolution. BuzzFeed last year 927 00:52:59,719 --> 00:53:03,120 Speaker 1: of publish a fascinating, articable article about why gen z 928 00:53:03,320 --> 00:53:07,440 Speaker 1: is quote rethinking sex positivity. The Times column published this 929 00:53:07,480 --> 00:53:09,719 Speaker 1: week cited a twenty ten study from the Journal of 930 00:53:09,719 --> 00:53:13,080 Speaker 1: Family Psychology that found quote, couples who waited until marriage 931 00:53:13,120 --> 00:53:16,120 Speaker 1: reported not just less consideration of divorce, but also higher 932 00:53:16,200 --> 00:53:20,239 Speaker 1: relationship satisfaction, better communication, and superior sex when compared with 933 00:53:20,280 --> 00:53:23,000 Speaker 1: couples who began having sex within a month of their 934 00:53:23,040 --> 00:53:26,080 Speaker 1: first date or before they started dating. The story quoted 935 00:53:26,120 --> 00:53:28,760 Speaker 1: one of the authors of that study, suggesting, quote, rapid 936 00:53:28,800 --> 00:53:32,840 Speaker 1: sexual initiation often creates poor partner selection because intense feelings 937 00:53:32,840 --> 00:53:36,120 Speaker 1: of pleasure and attachment can be confused for true intimacy 938 00:53:36,160 --> 00:53:40,080 Speaker 1: and lasting love with a few caveats. Economist Marina Adshade 939 00:53:40,120 --> 00:53:43,560 Speaker 1: said back in twenty nineteen, when you crunch the numbers quote, 940 00:53:43,560 --> 00:53:45,920 Speaker 1: married people appear to be healthier and live longer than 941 00:53:45,920 --> 00:53:48,640 Speaker 1: those who are single, separated, divorced, or widowed. They have 942 00:53:48,680 --> 00:53:52,520 Speaker 1: better mental health, fewer health conditions, and recover faster from illness. 943 00:53:52,920 --> 00:53:56,080 Speaker 1: In the past, said ad Shade, studies found that marriage 944 00:53:56,080 --> 00:53:58,719 Speaker 1: provided more health benefits to men than women, but that 945 00:53:58,760 --> 00:54:01,600 Speaker 1: effect is disappearing in more recent studies find pretty similar 946 00:54:01,600 --> 00:54:04,759 Speaker 1: outcomes for men and women. All right, So all of 947 00:54:04,800 --> 00:54:07,760 Speaker 1: that said, if men are too afraid of being creepy 948 00:54:07,840 --> 00:54:10,680 Speaker 1: to set that process in motion, women are in big 949 00:54:10,719 --> 00:54:13,640 Speaker 1: trouble too. The left is wrong about the way some 950 00:54:13,680 --> 00:54:17,080 Speaker 1: traditional norms one's built on healthy expressions of human nature 951 00:54:17,120 --> 00:54:20,760 Speaker 1: brought about more fulfilling lives. The Right, though, is wrong 952 00:54:20,840 --> 00:54:24,040 Speaker 1: about how gravely the economic hollowing out of the American 953 00:54:24,040 --> 00:54:29,319 Speaker 1: economy exacerbated the destabilization of sex, marriage, and community. Just 954 00:54:29,320 --> 00:54:31,880 Speaker 1: this week, The Times also ran an insane article on 955 00:54:31,920 --> 00:54:34,640 Speaker 1: the death of the starter home, which developers pin on 956 00:54:34,719 --> 00:54:37,800 Speaker 1: red tape that removed financial incentives for them to be built, 957 00:54:37,920 --> 00:54:40,400 Speaker 1: for those homes to be built, and left home ownership 958 00:54:40,520 --> 00:54:43,600 Speaker 1: much further out of reach for millennials. Men's wages have 959 00:54:43,680 --> 00:54:47,320 Speaker 1: remained stagnant while women's have grown. In recent decades, TVs 960 00:54:47,320 --> 00:54:51,080 Speaker 1: and phones have gotten cheaper, while homes and healthcare have 961 00:54:51,239 --> 00:54:55,719 Speaker 1: gotten more expensive. Student loan debt is skyrocketing, men are 962 00:54:55,760 --> 00:55:00,600 Speaker 1: suffering disproportionate deaths of despair at higher rates. We're more 963 00:55:00,680 --> 00:55:03,920 Speaker 1: comfortable in a material sense, but less happy, and we're 964 00:55:03,960 --> 00:55:07,439 Speaker 1: treating the biological reality of sex differences as something that's 965 00:55:07,520 --> 00:55:11,359 Speaker 1: less important when having a healthy recognition of those differences 966 00:55:11,440 --> 00:55:14,800 Speaker 1: and even those similarities is actually what would serve everyone 967 00:55:14,920 --> 00:55:17,919 Speaker 1: better instead of policies and norms that try to plug 968 00:55:17,960 --> 00:55:20,239 Speaker 1: a square peg into a round hole and a round 969 00:55:20,280 --> 00:55:26,239 Speaker 1: peg into a square hole. Ryan, we're about to talk 970 00:55:26,280 --> 00:55:30,520 Speaker 1: about an article you wrote, and I believe we have 971 00:55:30,880 --> 00:55:35,280 Speaker 1: Katie Helper joining us. This is a very very interesting 972 00:55:35,560 --> 00:55:37,719 Speaker 1: story if you want to tee it up a bit 973 00:55:37,960 --> 00:55:39,920 Speaker 1: because you wrote about it over at the Intercept, that 974 00:55:39,920 --> 00:55:42,440 Speaker 1: would be great close to home for us too. So Katie, 975 00:55:43,080 --> 00:55:46,279 Speaker 1: Katie Halper, as probably most people here know, friend of 976 00:55:46,480 --> 00:55:51,359 Speaker 1: this show, former friend of Rising on Monday, was friend 977 00:55:51,400 --> 00:55:53,960 Speaker 1: of the American people, friend of the American people, the 978 00:55:54,000 --> 00:55:58,839 Speaker 1: world's people. On Monday, she was co hosting Rising. As 979 00:55:58,840 --> 00:56:02,479 Speaker 1: folks know, you do a radar on the from the left, 980 00:56:02,480 --> 00:56:03,840 Speaker 1: a radar from the right, and then you do the 981 00:56:03,840 --> 00:56:06,400 Speaker 1: rest of your segments and then they post it and 982 00:56:06,400 --> 00:56:09,080 Speaker 1: move on. If anybody watched Rising Money, they noticed that 983 00:56:09,120 --> 00:56:12,200 Speaker 1: there was only a radar from the right, not one 984 00:56:12,400 --> 00:56:15,200 Speaker 1: from the left. Turned out that she had done hers 985 00:56:15,400 --> 00:56:17,840 Speaker 1: on a segment very similar to it was on the 986 00:56:17,840 --> 00:56:20,840 Speaker 1: same topic that we had done one, you know, very recently, 987 00:56:21,840 --> 00:56:25,680 Speaker 1: which was the controversy around Rashida Talib saying that you 988 00:56:25,680 --> 00:56:29,399 Speaker 1: can't be progressive and support Israel's apartheid government. Katie took 989 00:56:29,440 --> 00:56:32,120 Speaker 1: it actually an even deeper look at the question of 990 00:56:32,160 --> 00:56:35,399 Speaker 1: whether Israel qualifies as an apartheid government than I did 991 00:56:35,440 --> 00:56:38,440 Speaker 1: last week in my what we don't call them radars anymore. 992 00:56:38,440 --> 00:56:42,680 Speaker 1: We call them monologues, counterpoints, what we talk, we talk 993 00:56:42,719 --> 00:56:50,600 Speaker 1: at you, my rants, and they overt rising. Paused refused 994 00:56:50,640 --> 00:56:54,360 Speaker 1: to run the radar, and just recently was she was 995 00:56:54,400 --> 00:56:57,080 Speaker 1: told that not only are they not going to write it, 996 00:56:57,120 --> 00:56:59,520 Speaker 1: but she's not welcome back. And so we're going to 997 00:56:59,560 --> 00:57:02,120 Speaker 1: be joined by Katie Helper to tell the tell the 998 00:57:02,160 --> 00:57:05,080 Speaker 1: story on this in just a moment, and we are 999 00:57:05,200 --> 00:57:09,040 Speaker 1: in fact joined by friend of the show, Katie Helper. Now, Katie, 1000 00:57:09,400 --> 00:57:13,080 Speaker 1: welcome to the show. Thanks, thanks for having me and 1001 00:57:13,160 --> 00:57:17,360 Speaker 1: so and so Katie. Also send send James producer James, 1002 00:57:17,400 --> 00:57:19,800 Speaker 1: a couple of links, send them, send them the video. 1003 00:57:19,880 --> 00:57:22,000 Speaker 1: Tell people where they can go and watch your your 1004 00:57:22,040 --> 00:57:24,400 Speaker 1: full video that you've produced, and we'll and we'll make 1005 00:57:24,400 --> 00:57:26,840 Speaker 1: sure that we put that in the in the links 1006 00:57:27,160 --> 00:57:29,240 Speaker 1: at the bottom as well. Great. Yeah, we're not going 1007 00:57:29,280 --> 00:57:33,120 Speaker 1: to do a screening party right now. Well we don't 1008 00:57:33,560 --> 00:57:35,560 Speaker 1: quite have the tech capacity to do the screening party yet, 1009 00:57:35,560 --> 00:57:39,800 Speaker 1: but people can. Yeah, yeah, it's right now. It's at 1010 00:57:39,880 --> 00:57:43,640 Speaker 1: Breakthrough News. Uh, their YouTube channel. It'll be up at 1011 00:57:43,720 --> 00:57:47,480 Speaker 1: my channel shortly as well. YouTube dot com slash the 1012 00:57:47,560 --> 00:57:49,800 Speaker 1: Katie Helper Show, but definitely check out Breakthrough News. I 1013 00:57:49,800 --> 00:57:52,200 Speaker 1: want to make sure that they get, you know, a 1014 00:57:52,240 --> 00:57:55,680 Speaker 1: lot of eyes and credit. And then I did something 1015 00:57:55,720 --> 00:57:58,920 Speaker 1: at YouTube dot com slash the Katie Helper Show as well, 1016 00:57:58,920 --> 00:58:02,120 Speaker 1: where I just kind of did a little explanation not 1017 00:58:02,200 --> 00:58:07,040 Speaker 1: too detailed about what happened and so tell us. So 1018 00:58:07,480 --> 00:58:10,840 Speaker 1: so Monday, you showed up, you co hosted the show 1019 00:58:11,000 --> 00:58:15,320 Speaker 1: in the studio, you submitted your radar. What happened next? 1020 00:58:16,000 --> 00:58:18,840 Speaker 1: So I mean I submitted it, I guess the night before, 1021 00:58:18,960 --> 00:58:22,480 Speaker 1: although as you guys probably know, it's not I mean 1022 00:58:22,840 --> 00:58:25,120 Speaker 1: it's not even a submission. I mean, you just do 1023 00:58:25,200 --> 00:58:29,520 Speaker 1: it and ostensibly, unless you're reading probably like Nazi propaganda, 1024 00:58:29,640 --> 00:58:33,320 Speaker 1: that you just get the right to do it. But 1025 00:58:33,480 --> 00:58:36,320 Speaker 1: I you know, people saw that it was called you know, 1026 00:58:36,800 --> 00:58:40,560 Speaker 1: apartheid exists, you know, yes, Israel does have apartheid. Something 1027 00:58:40,600 --> 00:58:43,800 Speaker 1: like that, Yes, apartheid exists in Israel. This was not 1028 00:58:44,320 --> 00:58:48,760 Speaker 1: a piece that you couldn't tell was about Israeli apartheid. 1029 00:58:48,800 --> 00:58:51,200 Speaker 1: It was a piece that clearly made the argument that 1030 00:58:51,800 --> 00:58:55,800 Speaker 1: there was an apartheid system in Israel. I delivered it. 1031 00:58:56,280 --> 00:58:57,840 Speaker 1: I think it went well. I like to think it 1032 00:58:57,880 --> 00:59:00,800 Speaker 1: went well. I delivered it. I did some more hosting. 1033 00:59:00,880 --> 00:59:04,600 Speaker 1: There was this interesting moment, which apparently isn't that unprecedented, 1034 00:59:04,720 --> 00:59:10,240 Speaker 1: where I, you know, one of the co hosts then 1035 00:59:11,320 --> 00:59:14,200 Speaker 1: read a pickup where he kind of reiterated something that 1036 00:59:14,280 --> 00:59:16,960 Speaker 1: Jonathan green Blatt had said, Jonathan green Blatt of the 1037 00:59:17,000 --> 00:59:23,640 Speaker 1: Anti Defamation League of the ADL. And then when I left, 1038 00:59:23,760 --> 00:59:25,840 Speaker 1: I had to run off to do another show because 1039 00:59:25,960 --> 00:59:29,120 Speaker 1: I had to do a Useful Idiots taping and I 1040 00:59:29,160 --> 00:59:31,960 Speaker 1: got a call and it was very apologetic, and I 1041 00:59:32,280 --> 00:59:34,800 Speaker 1: said this in my video, and I want to make 1042 00:59:34,840 --> 00:59:37,120 Speaker 1: sure people know that the producers I was working with 1043 00:59:37,240 --> 00:59:41,040 Speaker 1: were really were like nothing but supportive. They wanted, oh 1044 00:59:41,080 --> 00:59:43,000 Speaker 1: I don't get them fired. By saying that they wanted 1045 00:59:43,000 --> 00:59:44,960 Speaker 1: their higher up to do the right thing, maybe that 1046 00:59:45,040 --> 00:59:48,680 Speaker 1: makes you firable in corporate media. I think that's a 1047 00:59:48,760 --> 00:59:50,720 Speaker 1: really important point though, Okay, because I was going to 1048 00:59:50,800 --> 00:59:53,760 Speaker 1: ask you, and that was our experience. Like when we 1049 00:59:53,800 --> 00:59:56,640 Speaker 1: submitted radars, I never had one that was pushed back. 1050 00:59:56,640 --> 00:59:58,120 Speaker 1: I don't think you ever had one that was just 1051 00:59:58,720 --> 01:00:02,880 Speaker 1: the telepropter. Yeah, it's not really a submission, yeah exactly, 1052 01:00:03,320 --> 01:00:06,680 Speaker 1: And the producers know that this is part of what 1053 01:00:06,760 --> 01:00:10,480 Speaker 1: makes the show great that you have this perspective that, 1054 01:00:10,520 --> 01:00:15,240 Speaker 1: by the way, is like fairly mainstream left perspective. I 1055 01:00:15,280 --> 01:00:20,440 Speaker 1: mean you have Amnesty internationals, it's basically international's perspective. And 1056 01:00:20,480 --> 01:00:23,680 Speaker 1: then Katie, what was your sense when you have everybody 1057 01:00:23,720 --> 01:00:25,960 Speaker 1: working on the show, again, this was our experience. They're great, 1058 01:00:25,960 --> 01:00:29,480 Speaker 1: they understand this makes what this makes the show great. 1059 01:00:29,000 --> 01:00:33,040 Speaker 1: It got moved up the chain of command, and that's 1060 01:00:33,120 --> 01:00:36,480 Speaker 1: where the problem started to become very very clear. What 1061 01:00:36,600 --> 01:00:39,000 Speaker 1: was your experience as that moved up the chain fright. 1062 01:00:39,240 --> 01:00:42,400 Speaker 1: So I was talking to producers like basically Monday through 1063 01:00:42,440 --> 01:00:44,840 Speaker 1: Wednesday about trying to figure out a way to make 1064 01:00:44,880 --> 01:00:48,720 Speaker 1: sure it would get on air again. They were really supportive, 1065 01:00:49,680 --> 01:00:53,960 Speaker 1: and then I got an email from Bob. Sorry, I 1066 01:00:54,000 --> 01:00:58,480 Speaker 1: got a phone call from Bob Quzach who in non 1067 01:00:58,600 --> 01:01:01,600 Speaker 1: certain terms told me not going to run it, not 1068 01:01:01,640 --> 01:01:04,520 Speaker 1: going to run the piece, which kind of shocked me 1069 01:01:05,080 --> 01:01:07,920 Speaker 1: just because I wasn't expecting the phone call, and I just, 1070 01:01:09,320 --> 01:01:11,520 Speaker 1: I don't know. I felt very chastised and I kind 1071 01:01:11,520 --> 01:01:13,800 Speaker 1: of put in my place, which is fine. I guess 1072 01:01:13,800 --> 01:01:15,320 Speaker 1: they have the right to do that. It kind of 1073 01:01:15,400 --> 01:01:21,120 Speaker 1: undermines their stick of being independent minded and not having 1074 01:01:21,200 --> 01:01:23,160 Speaker 1: talking points or not having I mean, their stick is 1075 01:01:23,200 --> 01:01:25,200 Speaker 1: that you don't have to stay within this certain lane. 1076 01:01:25,280 --> 01:01:28,120 Speaker 1: Right you're allowed to say things both on the left 1077 01:01:28,160 --> 01:01:29,840 Speaker 1: and on the right that you're not allowed to say 1078 01:01:29,920 --> 01:01:33,080 Speaker 1: in most corporate media. So anyway, I got the call 1079 01:01:33,120 --> 01:01:37,240 Speaker 1: from him, and then I not to get too into 1080 01:01:37,320 --> 01:01:39,400 Speaker 1: like the nitty gritty of how this show works, but 1081 01:01:39,440 --> 01:01:42,840 Speaker 1: I was then because I was told that you can't 1082 01:01:42,880 --> 01:01:46,680 Speaker 1: do Israel opinion pieces, but you could do segments. And 1083 01:01:46,720 --> 01:01:49,040 Speaker 1: I go on the show every week to do a segment. 1084 01:01:49,400 --> 01:01:51,840 Speaker 1: So I was like, okay, so can I do this 1085 01:01:51,880 --> 01:01:55,040 Speaker 1: for my segment tomorrow? And I asked the producers that, 1086 01:01:55,640 --> 01:01:58,200 Speaker 1: and then I was directed to an email that I 1087 01:01:58,240 --> 01:02:01,000 Speaker 1: got from an executive there who told me and know 1088 01:02:01,160 --> 01:02:04,840 Speaker 1: on certain terms, I wasn't needed, My services were no 1089 01:02:04,880 --> 01:02:08,240 Speaker 1: longer needed. And that's an executive at news Nation, or 1090 01:02:08,360 --> 01:02:12,400 Speaker 1: or as at not NewsNation, at Nextstar not role okay, 1091 01:02:12,440 --> 01:02:14,960 Speaker 1: because The Hill is owned by this big media company 1092 01:02:15,000 --> 01:02:17,000 Speaker 1: Next Star, which recently, by the way, I hired Chris 1093 01:02:17,040 --> 01:02:19,480 Speaker 1: Cuomo to a host of show on News Nation. But 1094 01:02:19,560 --> 01:02:23,720 Speaker 1: that but Katie's was a bridge too far for Next Star. Yeah, exactly, Yeah, 1095 01:02:23,760 --> 01:02:26,800 Speaker 1: if only I had covered up my I'm an only child, 1096 01:02:26,800 --> 01:02:28,760 Speaker 1: so sadly I didn't have the chance to cover up 1097 01:02:28,760 --> 01:02:32,160 Speaker 1: the crimes of my brother. Uh, and you know, commit 1098 01:02:32,240 --> 01:02:36,480 Speaker 1: a total uh engage in a total uh conflict of 1099 01:02:36,520 --> 01:02:39,760 Speaker 1: interest and also you know, probably grab a woman's ass 1100 01:02:39,800 --> 01:02:43,480 Speaker 1: at a party and engage in sexual harassment. But no, 1101 01:02:43,560 --> 01:02:45,240 Speaker 1: if only I'd done that, I would have gotten my 1102 01:02:45,280 --> 01:02:48,080 Speaker 1: own show, I guess. But yeah, so then I got 1103 01:02:48,080 --> 01:02:51,400 Speaker 1: that email, you know which, and that really shocked me. 1104 01:02:53,040 --> 01:02:55,240 Speaker 1: I have to admit I just didn't think I could 1105 01:02:55,280 --> 01:02:58,720 Speaker 1: read that. Kay, I read it. I haven't here, she writes, 1106 01:02:58,960 --> 01:03:00,440 Speaker 1: we wanted to let you know that we will not 1107 01:03:00,520 --> 01:03:04,480 Speaker 1: be needing you to appear on Rising tomorrow. Am. Please 1108 01:03:04,520 --> 01:03:08,080 Speaker 1: feel free to submit any unpaid invoices for your work 1109 01:03:08,120 --> 01:03:11,880 Speaker 1: on Rising. We wish you all the best. And also 1110 01:03:12,560 --> 01:03:16,200 Speaker 1: Gary Weightman, who's the chief communications officer for Next Start. 1111 01:03:16,240 --> 01:03:20,040 Speaker 1: He declined to comment for the story for the intercept 1112 01:03:20,080 --> 01:03:23,480 Speaker 1: and also presumably is declining to comment for this segment 1113 01:03:23,520 --> 01:03:26,560 Speaker 1: as well. So, yeah, so you got that email where 1114 01:03:26,560 --> 01:03:29,040 Speaker 1: you're saying, okay, well let's do it. Let's do this 1115 01:03:29,080 --> 01:03:32,040 Speaker 1: as a segment, and then a top executive rights actually 1116 01:03:32,040 --> 01:03:34,160 Speaker 1: there's not going to be a segment. Send us all 1117 01:03:34,200 --> 01:03:36,520 Speaker 1: your invoices and we wish you all the best, right, 1118 01:03:36,720 --> 01:03:39,400 Speaker 1: And I've been doing this these segments for three years. 1119 01:03:39,520 --> 01:03:41,360 Speaker 1: I mean I did it when Crystal and Saga were 1120 01:03:41,400 --> 01:03:44,880 Speaker 1: at The Hill, and I did it during this reiteration 1121 01:03:45,800 --> 01:03:48,640 Speaker 1: which you both were part of, obviously, and I really did. 1122 01:03:48,880 --> 01:03:50,680 Speaker 1: The thing I appreciate about The Hill was that you 1123 01:03:50,720 --> 01:03:54,120 Speaker 1: could say things that were taboo and other places and 1124 01:03:54,200 --> 01:03:57,160 Speaker 1: other corporate news. And you know, I knew that there 1125 01:03:57,160 --> 01:03:58,480 Speaker 1: are a lot of things that were said on that 1126 01:03:58,480 --> 01:04:00,640 Speaker 1: show that I disagreed with, but again, I was the shtick. 1127 01:04:00,680 --> 01:04:02,680 Speaker 1: It was like someone from the left, someone from the right. 1128 01:04:03,840 --> 01:04:10,080 Speaker 1: And seeing that the kind of censorship and cowardice I 1129 01:04:10,080 --> 01:04:16,280 Speaker 1: would say around issues that exists in so much corporate media, 1130 01:04:16,360 --> 01:04:18,200 Speaker 1: seeing that it existed at The Hill, which kind of 1131 01:04:18,200 --> 01:04:22,080 Speaker 1: prides itself for being outside of that censorship, was really depressing. 1132 01:04:22,120 --> 01:04:23,760 Speaker 1: And it felt, you know, I'd love to be on 1133 01:04:23,800 --> 01:04:26,160 Speaker 1: your show and be like, but I'm I'm gonna, you know, 1134 01:04:26,280 --> 01:04:29,680 Speaker 1: get back at these people, or I'm gonna persevere and 1135 01:04:29,680 --> 01:04:31,480 Speaker 1: do my own thing, and I am gonna obviously you 1136 01:04:31,480 --> 01:04:33,440 Speaker 1: can find my stuff at YouTube dot com. Plush the 1137 01:04:33,480 --> 01:04:36,440 Speaker 1: Gadie Helper Show at Useful Idiots. You can join my Patreon, 1138 01:04:36,520 --> 01:04:38,760 Speaker 1: Patreon dot complush the Katty Helper Show. But right now 1139 01:04:38,760 --> 01:04:40,960 Speaker 1: I'm just to be honest. I mean, it's just disappointing 1140 01:04:41,000 --> 01:04:43,400 Speaker 1: at saddening, and it's infuriating and it's frustrating, and you 1141 01:04:43,440 --> 01:04:46,400 Speaker 1: just feel very powerless. Now the good thing again is 1142 01:04:46,440 --> 01:04:48,840 Speaker 1: like the silver lining is that I filmed this video 1143 01:04:48,960 --> 01:04:52,920 Speaker 1: with Breakthrough News, which is an actually independent, actually independent 1144 01:04:52,960 --> 01:04:56,560 Speaker 1: media and so because I was really determined to get 1145 01:04:56,600 --> 01:04:58,240 Speaker 1: this out there, like I did, not like they could 1146 01:04:58,240 --> 01:05:00,840 Speaker 1: silence me at the Hill and they could fire me, 1147 01:05:01,400 --> 01:05:04,640 Speaker 1: but I wanted to make sure that this argument got 1148 01:05:04,680 --> 01:05:07,440 Speaker 1: out there, which was, you know, basically I defend Rashida's 1149 01:05:07,520 --> 01:05:12,000 Speaker 1: leeb from the typical attacks that she gets. I called 1150 01:05:12,040 --> 01:05:18,040 Speaker 1: out ADL for I think, just for saying that it's 1151 01:05:18,160 --> 01:05:21,000 Speaker 1: Israel it's not an apartheid state. I mean, it's just okay, 1152 01:05:21,040 --> 01:05:24,040 Speaker 1: you can say that. But unfortunately, not only does Amnesty 1153 01:05:24,080 --> 01:05:27,680 Speaker 1: International Human Rights Watch say that it's apartheid. Not only 1154 01:05:27,680 --> 01:05:31,960 Speaker 1: do obviously Palestinians say it's apartheid. Not only obviously do 1155 01:05:32,200 --> 01:05:35,320 Speaker 1: Palestinian human rights organizations say that, but you have the 1156 01:05:35,440 --> 01:05:40,280 Speaker 1: Israeli and the Israeli Jews, the Israeli Jews at Beth 1157 01:05:40,360 --> 01:05:42,600 Speaker 1: Selim say it's apartheid, and I say that, And I 1158 01:05:42,680 --> 01:05:45,480 Speaker 1: mean this is another issue kind of like the way 1159 01:05:45,520 --> 01:05:49,000 Speaker 1: you're given some protection when you're Jewish, like I'll be 1160 01:05:49,080 --> 01:05:51,320 Speaker 1: called a self loathing Jew as opposed to an anti 1161 01:05:51,360 --> 01:05:54,240 Speaker 1: semi and self loading Jew. You mean that. Look, you 1162 01:05:54,280 --> 01:05:56,560 Speaker 1: can get fired obviously over saying this, but there is 1163 01:05:56,640 --> 01:06:01,040 Speaker 1: some relative privilege you get within this conversation if you're Jewish. 1164 01:06:01,120 --> 01:06:03,400 Speaker 1: I think, like I feel more comfortable talking about this 1165 01:06:03,400 --> 01:06:05,880 Speaker 1: stuff than probably other people do. And of course this 1166 01:06:05,960 --> 01:06:09,360 Speaker 1: is a brings up a larger issue of how people 1167 01:06:09,680 --> 01:06:13,120 Speaker 1: are not allowed to report on this. I mean, obviously, 1168 01:06:14,080 --> 01:06:17,560 Speaker 1: Scherene abu Aclay is someone who literally was killed because 1169 01:06:17,560 --> 01:06:20,960 Speaker 1: she was reporting on this issue. And I'm not comparing 1170 01:06:21,000 --> 01:06:23,880 Speaker 1: myself at all, like I'm like doing op ed pieces 1171 01:06:23,880 --> 01:06:25,800 Speaker 1: from the comfort of my own home. She was there 1172 01:06:25,960 --> 01:06:29,000 Speaker 1: on the ground, and ironically I was able to talk 1173 01:06:29,000 --> 01:06:32,400 Speaker 1: about Sharene abou Aclay on the hill. That was one 1174 01:06:32,400 --> 01:06:34,320 Speaker 1: of the things I appreciated that I could talk about 1175 01:06:34,320 --> 01:06:36,600 Speaker 1: that and I could. I even said that Israel lied, 1176 01:06:37,080 --> 01:06:40,040 Speaker 1: which I guess was controversial. But it's not because we 1177 01:06:40,080 --> 01:06:42,720 Speaker 1: know they lied because they said that they had foot 1178 01:06:42,720 --> 01:06:46,360 Speaker 1: they released footage of a Palestinian shooting, pretending that that 1179 01:06:46,640 --> 01:06:49,160 Speaker 1: was Serina a Blacklaan, and then it was revealed that wasn't. 1180 01:06:49,160 --> 01:06:52,800 Speaker 1: It was physically impossible from that alley for that bullet, 1181 01:06:52,880 --> 01:06:55,240 Speaker 1: you know. So again that was so refreshing, Like I 1182 01:06:55,280 --> 01:06:58,440 Speaker 1: really appreciate that I could sit there wearing like corporate 1183 01:06:59,200 --> 01:07:02,160 Speaker 1: medium make up up and corporate media outfits and have 1184 01:07:02,360 --> 01:07:07,200 Speaker 1: all the like high production value that goes into corporate media. 1185 01:07:07,280 --> 01:07:10,040 Speaker 1: And I think it's really powerful to hear someone say 1186 01:07:10,400 --> 01:07:14,080 Speaker 1: israelied they killed Sheery and Abu Blackley. It's very powerful 1187 01:07:14,080 --> 01:07:16,880 Speaker 1: to hear that and see that in that context as 1188 01:07:16,880 --> 01:07:19,439 Speaker 1: opposed to just you know, me from my own home 1189 01:07:19,480 --> 01:07:21,800 Speaker 1: saying it. And I really do think that there was 1190 01:07:21,880 --> 01:07:24,040 Speaker 1: a value in reaching people in that way. And I 1191 01:07:24,080 --> 01:07:26,600 Speaker 1: think that that's what the Hill provides is a kind 1192 01:07:26,640 --> 01:07:30,760 Speaker 1: of air of professionalism that often because the Left doesn't 1193 01:07:30,800 --> 01:07:32,840 Speaker 1: have huge funders the way the rights does, I mean, 1194 01:07:33,040 --> 01:07:35,960 Speaker 1: we don't see this as much on the left. Yeah, 1195 01:07:36,080 --> 01:07:38,800 Speaker 1: it's it's really interesting that when you push you find 1196 01:07:39,080 --> 01:07:42,120 Speaker 1: you discover the corporate third rails and you have to 1197 01:07:42,160 --> 01:07:44,520 Speaker 1: push to do it. But this is like just such 1198 01:07:44,560 --> 01:07:48,360 Speaker 1: a good example of that. And you know, Katie, like again, 1199 01:07:48,640 --> 01:07:50,560 Speaker 1: I disagree with the argument, but it's a it's a 1200 01:07:50,600 --> 01:07:55,120 Speaker 1: reasonable argument, and it's within the bounds of reasonable debate. 1201 01:07:55,200 --> 01:07:58,760 Speaker 1: And when you weaponize identity politics to stifle it, which 1202 01:07:58,800 --> 01:08:01,440 Speaker 1: I'm assuming is what the Hill or I shouldn't even 1203 01:08:01,440 --> 01:08:03,000 Speaker 1: say that Hill, it sounds like it was Next Star 1204 01:08:04,000 --> 01:08:07,360 Speaker 1: was doing going in that direction. Then you're again, this 1205 01:08:07,520 --> 01:08:09,680 Speaker 1: is going to fester. It's not going to heal anything. 1206 01:08:09,720 --> 01:08:13,240 Speaker 1: It makes everything faster, it makes everything worse, and it's 1207 01:08:13,280 --> 01:08:15,680 Speaker 1: it's a good example of like this is just profoundly, 1208 01:08:16,120 --> 01:08:20,360 Speaker 1: profoundly sad, and yeah, it is. It's ridiculous. I just 1209 01:08:20,360 --> 01:08:22,320 Speaker 1: want to say also some of the people who I 1210 01:08:22,360 --> 01:08:24,479 Speaker 1: and I encourage people to watch the video, which is 1211 01:08:24,479 --> 01:08:27,000 Speaker 1: again I breakthrough News and will then also be at 1212 01:08:27,000 --> 01:08:32,439 Speaker 1: the Helper Show. But I quote Israeli politicians who say 1213 01:08:32,439 --> 01:08:34,640 Speaker 1: it's apartheid. I mean, an interesting thing we could do 1214 01:08:34,680 --> 01:08:36,600 Speaker 1: a whole show about this is that israelis tend to 1215 01:08:36,640 --> 01:08:40,519 Speaker 1: be much more honest about this than Americans who are 1216 01:08:40,560 --> 01:08:43,800 Speaker 1: defending Israel. Sometimes they're honest about it in a very 1217 01:08:43,880 --> 01:08:45,880 Speaker 1: kind of crude way like they don't care, like sure, 1218 01:08:46,000 --> 01:08:48,599 Speaker 1: Like you have Benny Morris, who was this historian who 1219 01:08:49,040 --> 01:08:51,640 Speaker 1: not to get too into the weeds of Israeli historiography, 1220 01:08:51,640 --> 01:08:53,880 Speaker 1: but he's someone he's part of this movement called the 1221 01:08:53,920 --> 01:08:57,960 Speaker 1: New Historians of Israel, and they really they challenge the 1222 01:08:58,040 --> 01:09:01,280 Speaker 1: Zionist narrative of history and of the founding of Israel. 1223 01:09:01,320 --> 01:09:04,760 Speaker 1: And he wrote this essential book, this really seminal work 1224 01:09:04,800 --> 01:09:08,400 Speaker 1: called nineteen forty eight, and it documents meticulously the ethnic 1225 01:09:08,479 --> 01:09:11,759 Speaker 1: lensing that was the basis of the foundation of Israel. 1226 01:09:12,360 --> 01:09:15,240 Speaker 1: And he over the years and he was of course 1227 01:09:15,240 --> 01:09:17,320 Speaker 1: persona on Grada because of that book, and over the 1228 01:09:17,360 --> 01:09:20,000 Speaker 1: years he's gotten much more conservative and very right wing 1229 01:09:20,040 --> 01:09:23,600 Speaker 1: and hawkers and people are like, Benny Morris, you documented 1230 01:09:23,640 --> 01:09:25,839 Speaker 1: that there was ethnic cleansing, and now you want Israel 1231 01:09:25,880 --> 01:09:29,080 Speaker 1: to like bomb Iran. How do you reconcile those two things? 1232 01:09:29,120 --> 01:09:31,479 Speaker 1: And he was like, yeah, there was ethnic clensing, and 1233 01:09:31,520 --> 01:09:33,400 Speaker 1: if they had been more ethnic cleansing, we wouldn't have 1234 01:09:33,400 --> 01:09:37,519 Speaker 1: a problem today, which is just like, I appreciate that honesty, right, 1235 01:09:37,760 --> 01:09:41,679 Speaker 1: I find it a this disturbing idea that to wish 1236 01:09:41,680 --> 01:09:43,720 Speaker 1: that there had been more ethnic leansing, but at least 1237 01:09:43,760 --> 01:09:46,240 Speaker 1: he admits the facts on the ground, right, and high 1238 01:09:46,280 --> 01:09:50,400 Speaker 1: profile figures too. The previous two prime ministers not Tlly 1239 01:09:50,400 --> 01:09:53,599 Speaker 1: Bennett and Benjamin Nt Yeah, who both publicly said they're 1240 01:09:53,640 --> 01:09:56,200 Speaker 1: not for a two state solution anymore, Like that's the 1241 01:09:56,840 --> 01:09:59,640 Speaker 1: that's their public posture. But if you said that in 1242 01:09:59,680 --> 01:10:02,720 Speaker 1: the United United States, right, I feel like that's outrageous. 1243 01:10:02,720 --> 01:10:05,240 Speaker 1: How could you possibly say that? But they're not. Like 1244 01:10:05,479 --> 01:10:08,760 Speaker 1: now eu laped he still pretends he's supportive of a 1245 01:10:08,760 --> 01:10:12,920 Speaker 1: two state solution, supports a Palestinian state, but because he 1246 01:10:13,000 --> 01:10:15,680 Speaker 1: kind of represents a more centris center, right, you know, 1247 01:10:15,760 --> 01:10:18,000 Speaker 1: flank of it. But back in the United States, if 1248 01:10:18,000 --> 01:10:20,080 Speaker 1: you said Donald support a Palestinian state, I don't support 1249 01:10:20,080 --> 01:10:21,960 Speaker 1: two states solutions and be like that's insane, You're crazy, 1250 01:10:22,040 --> 01:10:25,840 Speaker 1: Like that's right, right, So the divorce between the two 1251 01:10:26,320 --> 01:10:29,960 Speaker 1: discourses is fascinating. Yeah, it is fascinating. I think it's 1252 01:10:30,000 --> 01:10:32,360 Speaker 1: because we see people in the United States struggle to 1253 01:10:33,160 --> 01:10:37,160 Speaker 1: trying to fit in justifying Israel the way it exists 1254 01:10:37,280 --> 01:10:40,479 Speaker 1: and their government with a more kind of human rights. See, 1255 01:10:40,479 --> 01:10:42,400 Speaker 1: it's just a bad look in the United States in 1256 01:10:42,439 --> 01:10:44,519 Speaker 1: a way that it's not at all in Israel because 1257 01:10:44,600 --> 01:10:46,960 Speaker 1: it's being run by an apartheid government. I mean, I speak. 1258 01:10:46,960 --> 01:10:49,720 Speaker 1: I think that speaks to how apartheid ish it is 1259 01:10:49,760 --> 01:10:52,519 Speaker 1: that they don't even have to cover. And what's interesting 1260 01:10:52,600 --> 01:10:54,679 Speaker 1: is that people I quote in the video, I quote 1261 01:10:55,000 --> 01:10:59,440 Speaker 1: like literally a dozen I think, combined former Israeli officials 1262 01:10:59,439 --> 01:11:02,640 Speaker 1: and former Israeli prime ministers who either say we have 1263 01:11:02,760 --> 01:11:05,240 Speaker 1: apartheid or say we're going to have apartheid if the 1264 01:11:05,280 --> 01:11:08,559 Speaker 1: two state solution collapses. There's clearly no viable two state 1265 01:11:08,600 --> 01:11:12,720 Speaker 1: solution right now, and so that you know, definitionally they're 1266 01:11:12,800 --> 01:11:15,040 Speaker 1: they're existing in a part tid state. But that's the thing. 1267 01:11:15,080 --> 01:11:17,479 Speaker 1: And Emily, you brought up identity politics. What's so interesting 1268 01:11:17,560 --> 01:11:21,920 Speaker 1: is like I'm Jewish, Yeah, and you right away you 1269 01:11:21,920 --> 01:11:24,160 Speaker 1: invoked that in the monologue. When I was reading the transcript, 1270 01:11:24,200 --> 01:11:27,439 Speaker 1: I was like, she starts by saying that you were 1271 01:11:27,439 --> 01:11:30,720 Speaker 1: disappointed as a Jewish person. Yeah, you know, I think 1272 01:11:30,760 --> 01:11:33,320 Speaker 1: I may have cut that out from the top. So 1273 01:11:34,560 --> 01:11:36,800 Speaker 1: I had that originally, and then I think while I 1274 01:11:36,840 --> 01:11:39,080 Speaker 1: was reading it, I've decided to put it later in, 1275 01:11:39,600 --> 01:11:41,519 Speaker 1: So I should you guys can update that or whatever, 1276 01:11:41,560 --> 01:11:44,639 Speaker 1: but I put it in later and I point out, 1277 01:11:44,680 --> 01:11:47,479 Speaker 1: I say, as I'm Jewish, I was born in New 1278 01:11:47,560 --> 01:11:51,000 Speaker 1: York City. My family is from the well or fourth 1279 01:11:51,040 --> 01:11:53,719 Speaker 1: generations in New Yorkers. Not to brag, but my family 1280 01:11:53,760 --> 01:11:56,360 Speaker 1: before that was from Eastern Europe. And I could today, 1281 01:11:56,479 --> 01:11:59,400 Speaker 1: I could, today, right now, decide to move to Israel. 1282 01:11:59,479 --> 01:12:01,599 Speaker 1: I could get it job, I could build a home, 1283 01:12:02,160 --> 01:12:06,479 Speaker 1: I could walk around freely, and so could Jonathan Green 1284 01:12:06,840 --> 01:12:09,240 Speaker 1: green Blatt from the ADL, so could Jake Tapper, who 1285 01:12:09,240 --> 01:12:13,120 Speaker 1: does the segment about Rashida's leave that I react to. 1286 01:12:13,520 --> 01:12:15,759 Speaker 1: All of us would be fine, and someone like Rashida's 1287 01:12:15,800 --> 01:12:18,360 Speaker 1: leave can't even go back to her family home in 1288 01:12:18,479 --> 01:12:22,759 Speaker 1: what is now Israel. They've borrowed her from visiting. Yeah, 1289 01:12:23,439 --> 01:12:26,920 Speaker 1: so again, I really, I'm just I'm just really it's 1290 01:12:27,000 --> 01:12:29,599 Speaker 1: it's you know again, I'd like to be more, feel 1291 01:12:29,680 --> 01:12:32,120 Speaker 1: like more. Yeah, I'm free now. I can say whatever 1292 01:12:32,160 --> 01:12:34,479 Speaker 1: I want, and that's true, but you know, it is 1293 01:12:34,520 --> 01:12:37,599 Speaker 1: depressing that you can't do that at certain places, especially 1294 01:12:37,640 --> 01:12:41,080 Speaker 1: places that kind of like to go against cancel culture, 1295 01:12:41,400 --> 01:12:44,840 Speaker 1: like to go against censorship, Like you know, how much 1296 01:12:44,920 --> 01:12:47,800 Speaker 1: is that? How sincere are you in your opposition to 1297 01:12:47,880 --> 01:12:51,439 Speaker 1: censorship and cancel culture? If you're perpetuating it yourself, right, Yeah. 1298 01:12:51,439 --> 01:12:53,920 Speaker 1: If there's one next our property that they should know 1299 01:12:54,960 --> 01:12:58,320 Speaker 1: not to mess with in this sense, it would be rising. 1300 01:12:58,520 --> 01:13:01,800 Speaker 1: So it's just really really sad, and I remember we 1301 01:13:02,120 --> 01:13:03,800 Speaker 1: had some of those issues and they were like, well, 1302 01:13:03,840 --> 01:13:06,280 Speaker 1: should we give this air time? We're always air on 1303 01:13:06,320 --> 01:13:10,479 Speaker 1: the side of absolutely, Eric, let the debate happen exactly. 1304 01:13:10,479 --> 01:13:12,640 Speaker 1: That's the thing. Jonathan Green Black can come on the 1305 01:13:12,680 --> 01:13:15,040 Speaker 1: hill and make his argument. I'd be happy to be him. 1306 01:13:15,160 --> 01:13:20,759 Speaker 1: Or they could do come yeah, yeah, yeah, are stupid, 1307 01:13:21,080 --> 01:13:23,120 Speaker 1: Like we don't need to treat viewers like children like 1308 01:13:23,160 --> 01:13:25,679 Speaker 1: they're They're as smart as any executive at Next Star. 1309 01:13:26,479 --> 01:13:28,400 Speaker 1: They can listen to a debate and come out with 1310 01:13:28,600 --> 01:13:32,000 Speaker 1: an opinion. That's That's what also scares me and depresses 1311 01:13:32,040 --> 01:13:35,439 Speaker 1: me is that they were comfortable enough firing me for 1312 01:13:35,560 --> 01:13:38,760 Speaker 1: trying to get this story on air, Like they don't 1313 01:13:38,800 --> 01:13:41,360 Speaker 1: they're not afraid that this would come out. That's what's 1314 01:13:41,400 --> 01:13:43,920 Speaker 1: so disturbing to me, Like, don't you just for the 1315 01:13:43,920 --> 01:13:45,760 Speaker 1: the optics of it and not want to make it 1316 01:13:45,800 --> 01:13:49,200 Speaker 1: look like you fired someone for making a video which 1317 01:13:49,320 --> 01:13:52,800 Speaker 1: made the arguments that are made by Amnesy International Human 1318 01:13:52,880 --> 01:13:56,559 Speaker 1: Rights to watch the Israeli human rights organization bet Selim 1319 01:13:56,880 --> 01:14:02,800 Speaker 1: and countless Israeli officials, including former prime ministers. That might 1320 01:14:02,840 --> 01:14:05,960 Speaker 1: be the most demoralizing part that they just care and 1321 01:14:05,960 --> 01:14:08,400 Speaker 1: they're not going to face any consequences. Like I'm sure 1322 01:14:08,400 --> 01:14:10,640 Speaker 1: their donors are happy. I'm sure that whoever. And then 1323 01:14:10,680 --> 01:14:12,439 Speaker 1: another thing is as a Jew, can I just be 1324 01:14:12,479 --> 01:14:15,240 Speaker 1: honest as a Jew, I really don't like when things 1325 01:14:15,280 --> 01:14:18,720 Speaker 1: perpetuate the stereotype that like, you can't talk about this 1326 01:14:18,840 --> 01:14:22,160 Speaker 1: because people are gonna get mad and certain people control 1327 01:14:22,200 --> 01:14:24,000 Speaker 1: the media. And I'm not saying that's true at all. 1328 01:14:24,040 --> 01:14:25,519 Speaker 1: And you got a lot of the great thing is 1329 01:14:25,520 --> 01:14:27,640 Speaker 1: you got a bunch of Christian Zionists out there. So 1330 01:14:27,680 --> 01:14:29,280 Speaker 1: that's a great thing because then you can say you 1331 01:14:29,280 --> 01:14:33,160 Speaker 1: can criticize it with the Christian Zionist Yeah, right, exactly. 1332 01:14:33,400 --> 01:14:35,920 Speaker 1: But this is not a good look for anyone. I mean, 1333 01:14:36,080 --> 01:14:38,320 Speaker 1: and I again, as a Jew, I'm really offended. What 1334 01:14:38,400 --> 01:14:41,760 Speaker 1: about my like my free speech as a Jewish person, 1335 01:14:41,800 --> 01:14:43,640 Speaker 1: I'm just not allowed to talk about this in a 1336 01:14:43,680 --> 01:14:47,920 Speaker 1: way that goes against certain narratives. No, you're a big 1337 01:14:47,920 --> 01:14:50,680 Speaker 1: at Katie. In fact, I'm a self I've internalized I've 1338 01:14:50,680 --> 01:14:53,120 Speaker 1: internalized anti Semitism is what it is. I'm a self 1339 01:14:53,160 --> 01:14:55,120 Speaker 1: living Jew and I also want to say that, like, 1340 01:14:55,280 --> 01:14:56,800 Speaker 1: I just want to give such a shout out to 1341 01:14:56,840 --> 01:15:00,640 Speaker 1: people like Ali Abu Nima at Electronic and def and 1342 01:15:00,720 --> 01:15:03,600 Speaker 1: the people at Mondo Weiss and the people on the 1343 01:15:03,600 --> 01:15:07,240 Speaker 1: ground in Palestine and Israel who are reporting on this stuff, 1344 01:15:07,280 --> 01:15:10,519 Speaker 1: who face so many challenges and they do great work 1345 01:15:10,520 --> 01:15:13,640 Speaker 1: and everyone should check that out. Well, Katie, you know 1346 01:15:13,680 --> 01:15:16,120 Speaker 1: what you what you've done this week is not without 1347 01:15:16,160 --> 01:15:19,160 Speaker 1: some personal sacrifice, even if it's not you know, on 1348 01:15:19,520 --> 01:15:22,040 Speaker 1: the scale of you know, some of the people who 1349 01:15:22,040 --> 01:15:24,240 Speaker 1: are on the ground in Palestine. But we don't need 1350 01:15:24,280 --> 01:15:25,960 Speaker 1: to I don't think we need to compare it. I 1351 01:15:25,960 --> 01:15:28,920 Speaker 1: think it was courageous for you to come forward, and 1352 01:15:29,160 --> 01:15:31,800 Speaker 1: we really appreciate you coming on here to tell us, 1353 01:15:31,880 --> 01:15:36,040 Speaker 1: tell us the story. Thank you and happy young Kaporn, Russiashana, 1354 01:15:37,160 --> 01:15:38,800 Speaker 1: thank you, Thank you so much. I know you guys 1355 01:15:38,800 --> 01:15:46,439 Speaker 1: celebrate there you go. Katie as always one of one 1356 01:15:46,439 --> 01:15:49,720 Speaker 1: of my favorite people to talk to. Indeed, we so 1357 01:15:49,760 --> 01:15:53,080 Speaker 1: appreciate Katie helper and Katie's willingness not to give them 1358 01:15:54,040 --> 01:15:55,800 Speaker 1: and that's the good news. There are shows like this, 1359 01:15:56,320 --> 01:15:58,160 Speaker 1: and that's the importance of what Crystal and Sager has 1360 01:15:58,200 --> 01:16:00,080 Speaker 1: done and what all the viewers have helped Crystal and 1361 01:16:00,120 --> 01:16:04,519 Speaker 1: Sacer do. That like that, that Katie can have this 1362 01:16:04,600 --> 01:16:07,040 Speaker 1: issue with Next Star and come here and tell the 1363 01:16:07,080 --> 01:16:11,600 Speaker 1: true story and go to break Through News, can go 1364 01:16:11,680 --> 01:16:13,400 Speaker 1: to all of these other channels and tell the story 1365 01:16:13,400 --> 01:16:15,080 Speaker 1: and get it out to as many people as possible. 1366 01:16:15,400 --> 01:16:19,920 Speaker 1: That is made possible by what the amazing viewers and 1367 01:16:19,960 --> 01:16:22,800 Speaker 1: listeners here have have helped Crystal and Soccer build. It's 1368 01:16:22,960 --> 01:16:26,639 Speaker 1: just incredibly important. That's part of what drew us here too, Yeah, 1369 01:16:26,680 --> 01:16:28,800 Speaker 1: for sure, and it's what I'll draw us here on 1370 01:16:28,880 --> 01:16:32,479 Speaker 1: Wednesday next week, so there will be no Friday Counters 1371 01:16:32,560 --> 01:16:35,360 Speaker 1: or we'll do a Friday counter Points on Wednesday. Yeah, yeah, 1372 01:16:35,640 --> 01:16:39,200 Speaker 1: she'll be Friday counter TVD Vibe tv D. Yeah, there 1373 01:16:39,439 --> 01:16:43,000 Speaker 1: certainly will be a Friday Vibe because we're both heading 1374 01:16:43,040 --> 01:16:45,680 Speaker 1: out on trips right and then after that we'll be 1375 01:16:45,720 --> 01:16:49,120 Speaker 1: back to the regularly scheduled Fridays, your regularly scheduled programming. 1376 01:16:49,160 --> 01:16:52,800 Speaker 1: That's right, everybody, have a great weekend. Talk to you soon.