WEBVTT - Play the Record Backwards, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Seth Nicholas Johnson Joe.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>As of this recording still out on Parental Leaf. We'll

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be back soon. But in this episode, Seth and I

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are continuing our exploration of hidden messages and allegations of

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>hidden messages, secrets, and easter eggs in music. In the

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>last episode we talked a lot about back masking, about

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>reversed audio. We mentioned some other examples of of the

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>way that things can and we're hidden in music. But

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in this episode we are going to venture into the groove,

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>into the record groove, and discuss physical media and even

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>more detail. We did touch on it a bit in

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the last one. So if you if you basically know

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing about via records and how you play a record,

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to that first episode, because we

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we do talk about some of that, Because I mean,

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the background here for for this discussion is

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>as much as I admire certain vinyl records that come

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>out and I see them, you know, on a website

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or in a store, I've never purchased one and since

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a child, I've been told to avoid touching vinyl records.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Let the adults use that. Uh you don't want to

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>break the needle or scratch the record, etcetera. And so

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I've left them alone. Seth. On the other hand, UH,

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a very different relationship with records. Absolutely, I've

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>manufactured vinyl. UM. I've processed vinyl coming from UM like

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>like full blown uh pressing plants. I've been buying it

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>most of my life. UM. For me, when I was younger,

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I reached certain points where I inherited a few records

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for like my parents, but they didn't have a very

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sizable collection. But when I started going to record stores

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in my youth to to buy cd s, there was

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a point when I realized, oh wow, these other things

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>are so much cheaper than the CDs. This would have

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>been in like the nineties, And Uh that was all

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>there was to it was. I was just greedy for music,

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I was just like, all right, how am I

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>going to uh get as much music as possible. I'm

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy these used records as much as I can.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, at that stage, UM, I can give

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>some deliberate examples like, for example, Um, let's say Radiohead. Um,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I might be wrong the live recordings that record. I

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>remember holding a CD in one hand and a vinyl

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>record in the other, and the record was cheaper, so

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I went, oh, all right, I guess I'm going with

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the record. The same thing with a Widow City by

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fiery Furnaces, just like that era the late nineties

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands where it was like, oh, new vinyl

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is cheaper than new CDs. Now that is completely the opposite,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so be prepared if you're going into a record store.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But at the time it was not a very popular format.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I got into vinyl was just because

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it was the less expensive option so I could buy

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>more music. And so yeah, that that's that's kind of

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>why it started for me. Now, in looking at a

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>record and in playing a record, this is this is

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>where I really had no idea about any of this.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of had this idea that if you if

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you place a record on the turn of table, you

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>place a needle in the groove, there's there's just one

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>path that it is. Essentially, I guess it's kind of

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like the distinction between the labyrinth and a maze. If

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you if you if you have if you make that distinction,

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like a labyrinth, there's only one way through. It twists

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and turns, but you can't get lost because there there

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are no dead ends. It is a journey through complexity

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>from point A to point B. A maaze, however, can

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be different. Amaze can have different paths through the complexity.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Amaze can have dead ends, it can have traps, you

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>can have dragons and trolls and so forth, if you

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want um and based on a lot of

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>what I ended up reading here, and and and based

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on what I think we're gonna be discussing here, it

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>does seem to me like actually, vinyl records are more

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like this maze. There there's more. There's sometimes more than

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one path through the record, the good ones, I would say,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the average record. I think you're correct. There is a

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>very deliberate path, always starts in the same place out

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at the edge of the record, always ends at the

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>same place, which is the inside of the record. I

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's the most common route, but there there

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are many examples of people trying new things, people going

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>different routes with that, and this is this is so

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>just counter to like the tape culture, the DVD culture,

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the subsequent digital media culture that that that

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that I most have most of my experience with, like

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>there were there was there will get into some examples. Yeah,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you have things like hidden tracks with with CDs and

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so forth. But this is a whole different scenario. This

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>is like the it's like the record as puzzle box,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, yeah, and it's fun where you can

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hide these things. Like I said, I've I've manufactured a

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of records on my own. In particular, Um, I

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>do what's called lay the embossed records. And uh so

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>here's here's a fascinating thing I have personally done, which

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I think is is really cool. So on a compact disc, okay, uh,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the data is written from the inside, you know, towards

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>towards the center to the outside. Vinyl is the opposite

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that the information is on the outside going inside. So

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>usually on a CD there will be some blank space

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's like eighty something minutes of of of space

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on on a compact disc. If you're whatever you're doing

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't use up that much space, you have this extra

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>room on the end. So what I've done, I have

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>flipped a compact disc upside down and put a song

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>from a Vinyl you know, embossing needle onto the underside

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of the c D. And now not only is that

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a CD that can be played in a CD player,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but if you flip it upside on and put it

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on a record player, you can play a song on

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the underside of the CD itself. So like fun, things

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like that you can do with vinyl, and it's just

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not it's you know that fun isn't there in most

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of the other mediums. All right, well, let's get into

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>some specific examples here. And for this I'm gonna go

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>back to an article that I referenced in the first

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>episode that we did. This is by Jonathan Vinyl, Darryl Griffiths,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and Stuart Cunningham in Easter Eggs, Hidden Tracks and Messages

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and Musical Mediums, and they write that there are three

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>primary ways that records allow for hidden information. The first

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is something called locked grooves. So these are grooves which

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>cause the turntable to play an endless loop. And I guess,

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess you you'll have to maybe help me make

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>sense of this. But is it like if the needle

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>enters this particular groove it will just go on forever

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in a circle. I have a record here next to me. Coincidentally,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll just show you literally on it. Sorry, I won't

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>be able to show you because this is a audio medium,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pointing it out to Robert. All right, So Robert,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you see this record in front of you. The song

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>plays starting here at the outside, and then it moves

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to the inside. Like I was saying, now, when the

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>needle gets past the songs, the record needs to stop it.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It needs to stop the needle from just running into

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the paper label or anything like that. So right here,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>right next to the label, like basically a big circle

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>going around the paper label center of a record. That

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is where the traditional locked groove is. There's no sound

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on it. It's just instead of a spiral, because that's

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>basically what a groove is. It's a very elaborate, very

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>dense spiral, you know, containing different grooves and therefore vibrations

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and sound. The very very bottom of that spiral, it

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't still end as a spiral. It ends as a

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>solid circle. That way, the needle when it's finished will

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>more or less stay still. It'll just stay in at

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that central point and it won't cut into the label

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So if I'm, for instance, if I'm watching

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a film in which a record has been this is

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>my main experience of this. In a movie of a

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>record is finished playing, sometimes it'll it'll just be that

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to chunk to chunk kind of sound. That's the locked

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>groove at the end of the record. Yes, although most

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>locked grooves wouldn't make any sound at all. But yes,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>correct that that that kind of like stereotypical loop down

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there at the end. Yes, yes, well, the authors of

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this paper, they point out, quote, most records will only

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>contain a silent locked groove to prevent damage to the

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>needle when it reaches the end of the side. Like

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you explained, the presence of a locked groove that contains

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>music would be difficult to detect without prior knowledge or

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>careful visual inspection of the grooves. Therefore, a music containing

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>locked groove has a good chance of surprising the listener

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>during the performance of the recording. That's true, if you're

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from the outside, it doesn't look any difference,

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just just just like um. For the most part, if

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at groove is on a record, you can't

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>determine what's on them. Actually you can if you if

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you have very very talented eyes, eventually you can like

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>tell what the silence looks like. But that's that's that's

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just experts only. That's that's not the average person at all.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The prime example that they mentioned in the paper of

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is of of having music in the locked groove

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>brings us back to the Beatles A Day in the

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Life from Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Heart Hearts called Band. This

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>song enters a locked groove at the end of the song,

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a locked groove that contains music. And I mean, thinking

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>back on the on the song, I mean, I know

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>where this is occurring, but I only have experience with

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like the CD version of this. I had this album

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on CD when I was I think in high school. Um,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but if you were playing the record, that final tone

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of the song potentially goes on forever, Is that right? Yeah? Yeah,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>as as as long as you don't lift it, because yeah,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like I was saying, that central locked groove, it's there's

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>no data there, it's silent there, it's there's no sound.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>It's just like you're saying, like chunk chunk, chunk chunk,

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just moving in a circle. But there's no rule

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that says you can't put some some noise on those grooves.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Why not? You know, why not have that circle be

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a loop of audio? Why not? And have you experimented

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with this? Uh in creating records? I have many times

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's fun, like, why wouldn't you? You know? Uh?

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So Um. The most importantly, uh, something to keep in

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>mind when you're doing this is that it's actually a

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty small window for for to to create that loop.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So a typical record rotates at thirty three and a

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>third revolutions per minute summer forty five, but that's a

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's usually for singles. So yeah, thirty three and a

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>third revolutions per minute, which means that a single rotation

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the record, one needle going all the way around

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is one point eight seconds. So that's how long your

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>loop has to be. One point eight seconds, no more,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>no less. So so, UM, here's an example of what

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I've done. I did one where it was called it

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was a series called skip records, where what I did was,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>um oh, that's actually another good, great example. If you

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ever are listening to a record that's damaged and the

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>record starts skipping it's always the same duration. It's always

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one point eight seconds because that same fragments is going

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be playing again and again and again. That that

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why UM you can actually tell if someone is

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>faking a skipping record because it will be longer or

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>shorter than that quick just like zip a dip atep

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>up zip, but step puttep up. It's that's that one

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>point eight second loop. And in fact, when when when

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I am manufacturing records, that's the final step before I

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>finish a record is UM. So if you can picture

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it in your mind, there is basically UM an arm

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that has a cutting needle. Usually it's a a sapphire

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or a ruby, and it's pressing into the use polycarbonate.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>It's pressing into the polycarbonate and it's moving from left

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to right on on like a spiral arm. Basically, what

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you do is when you're done recording, is you stop

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that arm from moving left or fight. Then you go

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one one thousand to one thousand, and then you lift

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it up. And what you're doing by by stopping the

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>movement is you're ending that spiral in a single place

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and you wait one one thousand, two one thousand for

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it to complete that circle and end that loop. But

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are still playing audio when you do that

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one one thousand, two one thousand, what you're doing is

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>still putting data, putting information, putting sound into that loop,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can make it go forever. So, like I

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was saying, I had a series called Skip Records where

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>my whole point was I wanted it to sound like

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a record was just skipping for five minutes straight. Don't

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>ask me why it's art, you know it's fun. And

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>uh so I I did this multiple times. And the

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>fun part is is that I on these records, I

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>always ensured that the final groove was always a locked groove.

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Therefore potentially that these records loop forever, that there is

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>no end to this record and it can just play

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>until your record play or breaks, or until tell there's

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a power outage. It's just it's a it's a it's

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a forever equation. And you have favorite examples of this

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>from from from other records, from from bands and so forth.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot. And actually it's it's fun to me because,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like you said, you usually don't know when it's going

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen. So for me, if I put on a record,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's playing and it ends up in a locked

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>groove and you've never heard this record before. You might

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be off on the other side, reading or playing a

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>video game or doing the dishes, who knows, and you

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>notice that, like, wow, it's been doing this one tone

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for like forty five minutes. That's not even possible on

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a record, Like there's not that much room. What is happening?

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And you walk over and you're like, ah, this record's

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>got a locked groove. Uh. This happened to me once

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on one of my favorite records, And this is my

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>favorite example of this. The Godspeed You Black Emperor album

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>F sharp, A sharp Infinity. The final track Bleak Uncertain Beautiful.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It ends on a locked groove of playing the final

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>two notes of the song, and those last two notes

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 1>are F sharp and A sharp, and by being on

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a locked groove, they play for infinity. And yeah, I

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>still remember the first time I played that record and

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>when that needle hit that that final moment, it just

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>kept going and going and going, and I was like,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this is wonderful. Like it took me. You know, I

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>had to be active, I had I had to realize

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that something was not right, investigate and realize what they

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>had done to me and my time. It's it's it's

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a fun practice, you know. Do you maybe this doesn't occur,

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but do you. Are you ever in a position where

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>someone comes up to you and says like, I'm I

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything about records, but I'm gonna get into

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>records now, I'm gonna start buying vinyl. And then do

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to warn them, like, look, people have laid

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>traps for you. But the main one which I actually

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>will warn people about, because these things were discussing, a

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>locked groove doesn't happen that often, So some other techniques

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>were about to discuss don't happen that often. It's it's

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty rare, and they're and they're extra cool

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>because of it. One that is extremely common that actually

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>happens all the time, not just to others but to

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>me as well, is the difference between a thirty three

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and a third record and a forty five record. Because

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>forty five rpm records, I'm sure you everyone would understand this.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>A forty five rpm it's spinning faster. So therefore the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>data that's put onto it that the vibrations the grooves

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are at a different speed. You know, so if you

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if you put on a forty five rpm record at

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty three and a third, it's extremely slowed down, So

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you might have a completely incorrect view of a song

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>if you don't pay attention to what the speed is.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, there's audiophile pressings of records where they'll have

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>full twelve inch records that are printed at forty five

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>rpm because there's there's more room for the grooves so

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they can sound better. Blah blah blah, and so you

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just have to know. You have to hopefully the artist

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has labeled the record this is a forty five rpm,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or you just have to listen to and go, that's

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not right. Try it at thirty three and a third,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Try it at forty five and go, Okay, that's right.

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes you won't know. Sometimes they won't label it

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and they won't tell you, So you just have to

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>make your best guests. Like like R. E. M. For example,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>used to never label the sides of their records, like

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there was no side A, side B. It was just hey,

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you listen to one and they listen to the other.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not telling you which is which, and not until

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>c d S came around, that did. They have to

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually decide and put an actual track order for you.

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And there were a couple that I learned I had

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the wrong order, like, for example, UM, I always listened

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to Murmur by R. E. M. Side B first, then

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>side A, but I had no way of knowing that

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>until I bought a CD of it. Wow. All right,

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>well we'll get back to track ordering in a bit.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be more on that. But getting back to

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the three main methods of hiding stuff in the grooves

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>here from that two four teen paper, The next one

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned is inverse grooves. So if I'm understanding this correctly,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it is a record that it is meant to be

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>played backwards. If you play it forwards, you're playing it backwards.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yes, they think about it this way M.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>As we're discussing. When you're playing a record, you start

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the needle at the rim and you press play and

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it continues until it hits the label. That's the traditional

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>way a record plays. The grooves are set up that way,

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the spiral leading down to the drain, you know, that's

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the way it goes. These are the other way around.

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>You are supposed to start the needle in the middle

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and then it plays out to the edge, almost like

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>manga style. It's like, oh, start the other end, you know. Yeah.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So they mentioned a couple of examples of this. One

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is a this one. I don't know, were you familiar

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>with this particular um group. This is a Noma's track

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that would gorf beat one from the practice us a

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>EP and it includes the instructions to play it. One

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>must place the needle at the point where you would

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>expect the tract end. And then they also mentioned Megadeth

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>single for Sweating Bullets, which was an inverse groove pressing

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and it had a warning on the packaging that said,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>quote paranoid pressing on blue vinyl. Warning, do not attempt

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to play this record in the conventional manner. Both sides

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>reverse play from the inside groove outwards. It makes sense

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because I bet the average person they would just assume

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>their record was broken, you know, because if you did

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>put it the correct place and pressed forward, best case scenario,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting it to play backwards. More probable is that

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>because that is starting with the locked groove, it won't

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>be able to enter into that spiral, so it'll just

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>sit there and you just hear nothing so or maybe

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a little little skipping or some static. But another great

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>example of this, uh, this is found on Jack White's

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen solo album Lazaretto. Jack White and his

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>record label Third Man Records are known for doing all

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of fun gimmicky things, like they have like liquid

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>core records. They have records where like there'll be a

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>forty five inch record hidden inside of a twelve inch

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you have like cut open the record to pull out

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>another record. Like He's done a lot of really fun,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting things. He is the Willy Wonka of of of

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>record manufacturers, and I really admire him for that. Um

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for his two thousand fourteen album Lazaretto, he just wanted

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to put it all in one record. He wanted to

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be all the gimmicks all at once, so he he

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>um called this version of Lazaretto the Ultra LP And

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's got so many fun gimmicks and innovations that we

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>would need literally an entire episode just to break them down.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>But you can. You can find copies of it to

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>see online. I believe there's also a YouTube video which

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I sent you, Robert, which has Jack White just pointing

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>out every single wacky gimmick of this one single record.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But but on side one of this record, it does

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>play backwards like you're saying you have to start the

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>new needle by the label, and it plays out to

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the rim. And I wonder how many people just couldn't

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>figure that out, because know, I mean, it's um, I

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people who are just in life,

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they aren't reading instructions. Kind of people, you know, like

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if they get a piece of furniture from Ikea, they're

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to read the instructions. Is just gonna put

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it together. And I'm sure buying a record, you don't

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>even assume that there will be instructions, you know, whether

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it was Mega Death with Sweating Bullets or whether it's

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Jack White with Lazaretto, why would there be instructions, So

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you just you just play it and you're confused why

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not working. Yeah, this Lazaretto album. We when you

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>initially mentioned it to me in our chat, you listed

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>all the gimmicks it had, and I didn't even understand

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>all of them. It seems like it makes me think

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of of the book um House of Leaves. This feels

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like it it's like the House of Leaves of vinyl records. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was very popular, I believe. I know it

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>was the best selling record at the time, but I

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>think like for the year it was like the best

0:20:51.920 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>selling vinyl record for that year than Alright, moving on

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 1>to the next example that they've given this paper. Double

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>grooves or parallel grooves quote records where two grooves run

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously through a record, causing the needle to play different

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>material depending where it is initially placed. This is apparently

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes referred to as a third side. Yeah, I've also

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>heard these called three sided records, and uh yeah, there's

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>there are a few names for this, but these, these

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>are these are much more rare. These are fascinating. Yeah,

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you're you're gonna have to keep explaining this one to me. Um.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>A couple of examples that they mentioned. There's the Monty

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Python matching tie and handkerchief from three, which the packaging

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is pretty neat on this because the album is packaged

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to look like you're buying a matching tie and handkerchief,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>which is fun. But side two has two different grooves,

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so depending on where you place the needle, you'll get

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>different material. Now, I have firsthand experience because I own

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this record, and it's it's amazing. Here's the best part

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I can say about this. Uh, this one entirely worked

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on me because I didn't even know that there was

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a hidden third side until I read about it later

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and had to investigate for myself, like like like that's

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not printed on the record anywhere that there's hidden music

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>or I guess hidden comedy on this record. So so

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>here's here's I think their goal, which was so all

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>records side A, side B, the side with two parallel grooves.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>What's happening is, um, yeah, I guess picture that spiral again.

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But there are two completely different lines to that spiral

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>right next to each other, going all the way down

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to that center. So therefore, when you're putting that needle

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in that groove, you have basically a fifty chance are

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you going to be in the one groove or the

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>groove right next to it that never match up. So

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>here's the fun. The fun part is that you you

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to side A, everything sounds normal, You turn it over,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>you put on side B, listen to it, everything's normal,

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you put put away your record. Next month,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you wanna listen to it again. Side everything's normal? Put

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>it on side B. Wait, this isn't the side B

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I've heard before. What's happening? And so you listen to it.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I swear I heard this differently before, but okay, whatever, whatever, whatever.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You put it aside, pull it out, put on again.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes side as normal, Side B it's that first side again.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>You're like, wait, wait, wait, I swear last time this

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>joke was on there, or maybe you're like talking to

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>your friends, You're like, hey, what about that one part?

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>You know? Did you? Did you love? Track three? Like

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not track three? It's like no, no, what definitely is.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Come over to my house. I'll play it for you.

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>You put it on and it plays the wrong side,

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>like no, no, no, I swear like it's it's it's

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like a fun it seems like it's. It's it's

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>almost gaslighting you. You know it's it's. It's it's a

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a very fun gimmick. Now is this? I'm reminded

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of of a trophy encounter in in a lot of

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like carror and mystery TV shows and short stories where

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>someone realizes that there's a hidden compartment in a room

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>based on the fact of this room is smaller in

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the adjoining room. Is that? Would that be something? With

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this scenario, like, if you were really on the lookout

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for this sort of trick, would you notice that, like

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>one side of the record seemed shorter than the other.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You you would have to be really on your toes,

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because the side of a typical twelve inch record can

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere from like ten minutes to thirty minutes, depending

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>upon how closely you put those grooves together. But yes,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you you would be able to notice if you paid

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>very close attention to how much space was being taken

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>up by the grooves, because it's only playing half of

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>those grooves when it's going going down the line playing

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>all the audio. So like a physical investigation would be needed.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't just be like, well, that side felt this

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>long and this one feels different or something. It would

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be possible, but yeah, yeah, you would have to be

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>paying a lot of attention. And uh and for me,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I needed someone to tell me. I needed someone to

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>tell me that a record in my collection had three

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sides before I before I realized it. The other example

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that they bring up in the paper is Mr. Bungle's

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Disco of Alone te from in which Hidden Grooves contain

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the songs Secret Song and songs by quote the Secret

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Trio. And then they also mentioned that secret Song

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is said to be notoriously difficult to find with the needle,

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's another part that you can do on purpose. So,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, I believe on the matching the Monty Python record,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's more or less a fifty fifty because just when

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're creating those grooves, you just make the openings,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the same size. But let's say, for example,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you want that second song to really be a secret, well,

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>then you don't create an opening for it. You haven't

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>exist entirely cut off from that primary groove, and it

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>can just live there and no one will ever find

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out unless they deliberately not start the record at the beginning,

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>but trial and error just kind of drop it in

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the record, hoping that it lands on

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the correct group that they want to find. So technically,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you could have situations where they could be albums out

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>there with see Creek grooves with secret information in them

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that have never been discovered. That Nicolas Cage has not

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>his character in a film, or Tom Hanks's character in

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the film has not put on the record to discover yet.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Very possible, now, I would say, in all likelihood, depending

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>upon the many ways people start records. I'm sure there's

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a large percentage of the world that doesn't carefully place

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the needle at the beginning of of each record before

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they start. They do just PLoP it on wherever, So

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I bet it would be found pretty quickly, I would assume,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>just based on people's sloppy handling of their record needles.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So do you have any other fun examples of double grooves,

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>parallel grooves, and third sides. There's a couple I've heard of,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>but but I've never seen. This is This is a

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>great one that I would love to see this in

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>person someday, but I've only read about it. It's a

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>horse racing board game. So what you do is everyone

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>picks their horses, you know, standard like typical you know

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>betting forms, and you read a little description about which

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>horses what and blah blah blah, and then you start

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the record, which contains all the sound effects of you know,

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>being being at the downs and all that, and there's

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>an announcer calling the horse race. However, the record has

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple parallel grooves, each with a different result, so you

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>never know which horse is actually going to be the

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>winner when you put that groove on. So so it's

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>almost like a choose your own adventure, except you don't

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>get a choice, you know. Wow, Yeah, and yeah. I'd

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from anyone out there who knows of

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>other examples of this, because it seems like it's the

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of sort of gimmick that that people would have

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of fun with, like I don't know,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of narrative use of it, with with with

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a storytelling technique, you know, kind of

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Clue the movie where you watch it

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's got like the multiple endings kind of like that,

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and that'd be fun. Uh, here's one more example, because

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we've already mentioned it, Uh, going back again to the

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Ultra LP version of Jack Whites Lazaretto. Like I said,

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got a million gimmicks on this one. He has

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a version of parallel grooves that I've never seen before.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Track one on side BE it's a song called Just

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:07.479
<v Speaker 1>One Drink. It has two completely different intros to the

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>song that are parallel grooves, but they both feed in

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to the to the primary groove again, so the rest

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of the record plays completely normal. So it's it's it

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>starts off as two spirals and then they both funnel

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>into the one standard spiral, so it's and once again,

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>it's just luck. Wait wait when you put on that

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>needle for the first time, it's it's just a chance

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of am I going to play the like like the

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>harder version of the intro or the softer, more acoustic

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>version of the intro. It's just who knows what you're

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna get? And man, that's fun, Like you can't get

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that with other mediums. Yeah, yeah, yeah, the CD type

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>culture we never had anything like that. We'll get into

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>some examples of what we did have, but they didn't

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>create this kind of level of almost quantum uncertainty, like

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>what will happen when I start playing this song? I mean,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extend, mystery is there when you play

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a new album for the first time, But the idea

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that subsequent return to that album, that there could be

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not just things that were subjectively different, but objectively different

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>things about the listening experience. Yeah, absolutely, all right, Well,

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the c d age a little bit,

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and let's eventually get into the digital realm as well.

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about so called hidden tracks,

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>secret tracks. Uh, this is this is an area that

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I I have more familiarity with because again I was,

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I was more of a c D guy than certainly

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>than than anything like the CDs were. This was the

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>right period where I really got into like choosing my

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>own musical interests, choosing the bands that I wanted to

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>devote time too. And then also I guess at the

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>time too, it's like CDs were starting to get a

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>little pricey, so whatever you bought like this was a

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.959
<v Speaker 1>deliberate choice. Not only is this an album you wanted

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to listen to, you would you would make sure you

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>liked it, or you would really give it a chance,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>because this was gonna be your album for the you know,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for for a week or two maybe more, until you

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>could conceivably buy another album. So, you know, we get

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>into this realm of secret tracks, and I guess the

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thing about secret and hidden tracks is they ultimately really

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>weren't that well hidden. I mean, certainly nothing compared to

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the vinyl examples we've discussed, right right, I mean I

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>did enjoy sometimes, and I think this is pretty rare

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>when there was literally a hidden disc inside the CD packaging.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That was fun when that would happen on occasion, but

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, it was, yeah, you'll you'll explain.

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, it was pretty straightforward to have

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>some hidden songs. Yeah, like the main examples to come

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, or like Tools Undertow and the nine

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Inch Nails EP Broken, the versions that I had just

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of like extra blank tracks and then

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually the tracks containing the extra songs. And I believe

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know about this till I was just researching

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it again for this episode, but apparently with Nine Inch Nail,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the original c D pressing and the vinyl pressing of

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Broken had an extra smaller disc that had the bonus

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>tracks on them. That that was a very brief window

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>when Yeah, they were like these little mini CDs that

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in theory could play in any CD player, Like in fact,

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to have a CD player at home,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>especially when the kind of like a tray, you pop

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it open and you'll notice that there's actually a smaller

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>imprint inside where the bigger imprint is. That's for these

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller CDs, but that medium lasted like a blink of

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>an eye. I think they were more popular in a

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in somewhere in Asia. I want to say Japan, that

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they lasted longer, but yeah, I know that they didn't

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>last here very long at all. I remember, though, thinking

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that this was clever and cool, and there was this

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of idea that it's like, yeah, nine inch Nails,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of they're sticking it to the man. They

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have these in there. They're then they're delivering bonus content

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to us the fans that they clearly the record labels

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't want this on here, but they said, no, we insist.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna hide it at the end where the inspectors

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>won't find it first, right, Hey, hey, why not? I

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like that narrative. I I like picturing, you know, a

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Trent Resioner with these little mini CDs hiding at the

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>factory to slip them into each and every package. I mean,

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess it wouldn't be entirely out of out of care.

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>There were the like later story I forget what album

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this was, but the idea that, like some of the

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>tracks were leaked to the media by leaving a USB

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in a bathroom at a concert or something, right, right, Yeah,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's all fun stuff. Now another example for the

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>secret track. Another way the secret track hidden track was

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>often utilized would be just have a big long gap

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>after the final listed track on the album, and then

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually a hidden track starts playing. And of course the

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>reverse of that is, once you know it's there, if

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to listen to the hidden track, you just

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>fast forward through the final track to get to that content.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It's funny too, because, um, all of these examples, they're

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they're all so tied to the CD itself. And in fact,

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>do you remember, um, negative time on a CD player? Yeah,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember what I had one album in

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>particular that did this, but I can't recall what it

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was a big thing that would happen, uh that this

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>This is like not during the early days of CDs,

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but more towards the later days when basically, um, a

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>CD was really kind of being pushed to its to

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>its limits of like what it could contain and and

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe getting a bit more secretive, getting a bit weirder

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. If there was like a bit of audio

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that existed kind of between tracks, whether it be like

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bit of a skit or an intro, or

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like an in the studio outtake or something.

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>When it was playing and you could watch the time

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on the little um the digital read out, it would

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>be like, you know, five seconds, six seconds, seven seconds,

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>negative six seconds, negative five seconds, negative four seconds, and

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in that negative space would be this additional noise, little

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>little skit, little outtake, whatever, little intro. So that way,

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>when you skipped to the final to like the real song,

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it would start where the song starts. But if you

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to the album all the way through, this negative

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>space would just give a bit more context, a bit

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>more padding, a bit more like um continuity, you know.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was pretty fun. But also when

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we reached the age of digitizing our CDs and putting

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>them onto you know, our MP three players and whatever,

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>oh that that became a headache. Now I don't even

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>know how to classify this one. This one is not

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>an example that was brought up in the paper, but

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>an album that I that I had, and this is

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a great album that the Caius album from Welcome to

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Sky Valley comes to mind. This one had this weird

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>structure where it does have a hidden track at the end,

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>which is real dumb, but it also has ten tracks overall.

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The first but the I mean ten songs overall. The

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>first three songs are all one track, the next three

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>songs are all one track, and the last four songs

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>are all one track. And I'm not really clear on

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>why they did this, but I remember being more annoyed

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>by it than anything, because sometimes you want to listen

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to an album all the way through, but sometimes you

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to hear Demon Cleaner, which is really great

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>track off of that album, really great song off of

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that album, but is the third song in track number two.

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little hard to get to if you just

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>want that. I can't speak to um this specific example,

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but I can give this example UM. Just recently, I

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 1>had Joe on on my podcast Rusty Needles Record Club,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and we did uh the self titled Black Sabbath album

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and on it. The American version combined a bunch of

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the tracks into fewer tracks. So like the original European version,

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say, had ten tracks, the American version had like

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>six tracks. The albums were more or less identical. They

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>swapped out one song, but that's that's beside the point

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>more or less identical, just far fewer tracks. And when

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you look it up, like why did this happen? It

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was just a record label thing. They're like, oh, we're

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>paying them by the track, so if we give them

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fewer tracks x, we don't have to pay them as

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>many residuals, you know. And what's funny is like now

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the opposite is true. Like um, for example, let's go

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the idea of like a hidden track inside

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of a CD, where it used to be. Let's say

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>let's let's say there are ten tracks on the album

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and one hidden bonus track, so that tenth track would

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be a song, long gap and then another song, So

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven songs, ten physical tracks. In today's modern streaming age, basically,

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten they've they've more or less gotten rid of that.

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Now whenever I see something that used to have a

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>hidden track, it's just chopped off and turned into a

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>bonus track, because the opposite is true now. Now the

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>record label gets paid by these streaming services for every

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>single individual track, so they want as many tracks as possible.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>If they can, they'll cut up and do a hundred tracks,

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, And it's it's just interesting that that, like

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the opposite is true of the record label wanting more money.

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They used to force you to put it in as

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>few tracks as possible, and now they're forcing you to

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cut it into as many tracks as possible, and it's just,

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's gonna keep flip flopping forever until I

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know, until business people don't want money. So it's me. Yeah.

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>So there are plenty of examples that that you can

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>point to where if if nothing else they do the

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>whole just throw an extra hidden song there at the end,

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>after some some blink blink space, you know, a little quiet,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and then something else pops up. And and sometimes it

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.919
<v Speaker 1>was clearly they were trying to be cheeky, and maybe

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it was some sort of a track that was a

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>little cruder or a little little dumber or supposed to

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be cryptic. And other times it was like, I think

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I had a Natalie Merchant album that just had a

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>really neat folk song at the very end of things,

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's not really neat. I don't know if there's

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.959
<v Speaker 1>any logical reason to have this be a hidden track,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>but it was. It was there hidden um. But but yeah,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>nowadays you pull up the same albums, and I guess

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they're still gonna keep that together, but a lot

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of times the hidden track is just gonna be listed there. Right. Look,

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not working for Jack Whites'. I'm not getting paid

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for every time I meant in the Lazaretto Ultra LP.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna bring up one more time because get this.

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>These are a couple of examples of hidden tracks that

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>blow my mind. He hid tracks underneath the paper labels

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on the record itself, and also he put them with

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>two different um speeds revolutions per minute than the record itself.

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>The record itself is thirty three and a third. Underneath

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>one paper label it's seventy eight RPM, and then underneath

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the other one is forty five. So on this one

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>record it has three different rpm s. It's wild, And

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the way it works basically is that he did imprint

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>a song on traditional grooves under you know, in that

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>center space which reserved for the label, and then when

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you do the actual pressing pressing, what happens is that

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the label itself just kind of gets sucked into it

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, so the sound quality is not that great.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 1>And I guess, if you really wanted to you could

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like remove the label, you could like tear it off,

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but you can't. It's possible just to play it direct

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly through the label. You just place your needle directly

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 1>on top of that paper label and it will play

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the song that's underneath. Oh my goodness. Once again, not

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 1>an ad for Jack White. I like him, but he's

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>not paying me. All right. Well, there may be some

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>more examples of of hidden songs and tracks from well,

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps from vinyl, but but certainly maybe some more examples

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>from the c D age that folks can mention I

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>guess without even getting into it much. There also is

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that that late c D period. I guess it's kind

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of late CD period where you also have CDs that

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>can be placed inside in your computer's disk drive, so

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you can go to some sort of crappy website or

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like a visual thing that lines up

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>with the album. But I don't know if that has

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Jack White come back around to that. No, I think

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he's mostly an analog guy. I don't think

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>he is hiding you know, PC wallpapers on any of

0:39:52.360 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>his records yet. Now there is another really interesting area

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that that that some of you may be thinking of already.

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And this gets into the idea of having images hidden,

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not not as a PC wallpaper, not as something that's

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in the liner notes for the album or anything like that,

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but actually in the sound data itself. Uh. And the

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that, yeah, you'll have something in the

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>sound data that if you run it through a spectrogram

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>editor and synthesizer, you can produce an image, um, the

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the image that was encoded as music or encoded as

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>sound anyway inside of a musical piece or inside of

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 1>an album. These are absolutely stunning to me. I I

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do this stuff every day, and in fact, because you

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>know the programs that you use to look at these

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>images that they're the programs I used to add at

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>these shows. You know. That's that's that's that's just part

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of my repertoire. And I have actually looked into creating

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 1>these myself, and I'm still in awe even though I

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>know how they do. It's it's ridiculous. I poof the

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>most famous example of this, I think, or well, it's

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous examples, and in some circles,

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the most famous example, and this is the one that's

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in that that paper from from Wine, Old Griffiths

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and Cunningham Window Liquor by a f X twin. If

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you run this one particular part of the song the

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sound through this system, you of course get to see

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Richard James, that's APEX twin. You get to see his

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>his grinning face. It's it's amazing because first of all,

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>it looks even spookier than it always looks. You know,

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Richard D. James is always doing some kind of spooky

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>thing with his face, whether it's turning it into a

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>mask and putting on a child or whatever. But um man,

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>oh man, it's it's it's so fascinating. It too because

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like you know, uh, if you think about these these programs,

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is they're showing you, you know, the

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>visualization of the audio waves. So the way you put

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the images in there is you reverse engineers. You create

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the image first, and then you basically determine what those

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds would need to be to create that image, and

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>then you can just basically put it in your song

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and boom, you've got it. But it's so funny because

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>every example of this I've seen, it's very obvious that

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>something strange is going on in the audio because this

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is not a typical wave. It's a picture of Richard

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>James face. Yeah, it's not just a case where oh yeah,

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that's if you play this back with satanic message, like

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that something is there, and then when you

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>when you run it through, you can see the artist's

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>face or in the case of a particular track from

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Venetian Snares, that's the moniker of Aaron funk Um. There's

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a picture of his cat that when I found very

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.439
<v Speaker 1>very sweet, of course, um in part because I wasn't

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>familiar with it. I was familiar with the Aphex twin example,

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and when I heard there was a Venetian Snares, when

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I don't know what this image is

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be, but it's is just a cat. Yeah,

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's nice, it's uh, it's it's a fun way to

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>do this. And I think I particularly like these two.

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of um, I've seen people in the

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>olden days when they were computer programmers in the deep past.

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Not not not um, not in the contemporary sense, but

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that you're actually like fooling around like microchips,

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like that old style of computer programmer, the computer programs

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>would write little messages to one another on side the

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>chips when they put them in computers, than when years

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>later you come across something and it has something written

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on it that no one would read except another programmer.

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Who who is you know, fiddling around with this machine?

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And from what I understand, people who write code these

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.399
<v Speaker 1>days often do a similar thing. So I think this

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of hidden message in a song very much is

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>like one audio producer talking to another audio producer going like, hey,

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>look in this funny and it's like, yeah, it is

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a good job. There's at least one more really good

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>example of this, and this might be in some sort

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of This might be the most famous example, um, depending

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on where you're coming from. But the two thousand seven

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>nine Inch Nails album Year Zero, which which I think

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is a great album. Occasionally play this one agreed today. Yeah,

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it has I think two different spectagrams. I was only

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the first one, but the spectrogram at the

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the track My Violent Heart, and it's a

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like a hand reaching down from the sky, which is

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>also a theme of the the cover for the album.

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't imagine how many of these are

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:31.720
<v Speaker 1>unseen in the world, because I think even more so

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>than um oh a hidden song on a record or

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>a hidden song on our CD, the vast majority of

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>people will never run their audio through through a spectrogram.

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It's never going to happen. So unless you are a

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>person you know who has that background and you think

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you hear something and you happen to upload it in

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and look at it, I bet there's a lot of

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hidden stuff that's never been seen before. Now there's one

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>more example that's brought up, and that is um this

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of of black middies, which is not something I

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>was familiar with, but it's brought up in this paper

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about Easter eggs and music. And these are apparently midi

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>files that contain an absurd amount of data. They when

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>played back in a program, can produce patterns when they

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cause the program to fail. And I'm not sure I

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>completely understand this one, but it's still interesting. There's still

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>something about it almost sounds like let's take the music

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and like crash it and uh and in doing so

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll create will create these uh, these visuals. So the

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of the black midi is pretty interesting too because

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>it uh it ties into a much older idea, which is,

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>we as human beings, are limited by what we can

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>do with our hands. It's difficult for us to go

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>beyond what is physically possible. We we we we have

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>two hands for the most part, ten fingers for the

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>most part. This is what we can do. Let's say,

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on a piano, A piano can only do what the

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>human being can do. Maybe you can add other person,

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 1>but other than that, we're We're just human beings. So

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the days when people first started mechanizing musical instruments,

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>folks started experimenting with this. One of my favorites. I'm

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna get his name wrong because I don't think I've

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ever pronounced it correctly because I've heard it too many ways.

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>A guy named Conlin non car o c O N

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>l O n n A n c A r r

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>O W. He's an experimental musician. Um. Now, one of

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the things he did, which which many call him the

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>first electronic musician because of this, is he would create

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>roles for player pianos, you know, those kind of pianos

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that play themselves. And he was like, oh wait a minute,

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a human being, this is a machine. I

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>can make this thing, do whatever I want. So he

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 1>would do things that he would program for these player

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>pianos that were impossible, you know, too many hands, notes,

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>playing too quickly in succession, you know, just all these things.

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it was really really fast, and it

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:54.879
<v Speaker 1>was just it was such like a fascinating idea of like, oh,

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to create music that was meant to replicate

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>human hands, but I'm gonna make it for for nobody.

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:03.959
<v Speaker 1>This is this is completely imaginary music that nobody could

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ever play. And so so his music is really fascinating.

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend it. Look it up. But that's the

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 1>same idea behind a black midi, which is um if

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>folks don't know, a midi file is more or less

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the zeros and ones behind a digital instrument playing music.

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a kind of music that's played in most video games, etcetera, etcetera.

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>And so if you are playing a piano that turns

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it into midi data, it's documenting it and you know,

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>putting all those little pieces in place, so when you

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>play it back, it plays it back the exact same way.

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Same thing, Just like with that idea that Canlaon Nakara

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 1>was doing. You just start putting an extra data, things

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that are completely impossible, things that your hands could never do,

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>things that there there aren't there isn't enough time, there's

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there aren't enough fingers in the world to ever actually

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:50.720
<v Speaker 1>play this, and it gets to such an enormous degree

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>that it's that it's impossible and it breaks so um.

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>There's an example of this. I don't know if you

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever heard about this, but do you know

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the song rush E. I don't. I'm I'm gonna show

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this to you. Audience will be right back. WHOA that

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that was something? Uh, it's it started off rather subtle

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind of pleasant, and then it got really intense.

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess to to to describe this to anyone else

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and watch the video of presentation of this is you

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have a keyboard at the bottom and you have little

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>blocks falling and it's kind of like tetris. I guess

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>if you have blocks when they reach the bottom, they

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>just play the keys that they land on, a bit

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like a guitar hero too. Oh yeah, yeah, like guitar Hero.

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the idea is that early on we're

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>seeing things that are very possible with human hands, with

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a human piano player, but then it gets increasingly complex,

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>um to the level where no human with even like

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>four arms employed this thing. No, I mean, and I

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:54.760
<v Speaker 1>honestly commend the creator of this um I I believe

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this one is created by someone named um sheet music Boss.

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:01.399
<v Speaker 1>You can find this video online. It's very popular, It's

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>been memed to death. It's um gosh, got many many

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>millions of views, so check it out if you haven't.

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It is something to see. I really have to commend

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 1>them on like the build of this, because it starts

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>off just like mildly impossible, and then like, wow, this

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is really impossible, and by the time you reach the end,

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>it's ludicrously impossible, like like like like like the it's

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>criss crossing, it's spelling images, it's like it's it's every

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:33.879
<v Speaker 1>key being played simultaneously, and yet it still sounds pretty good,

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:38.399
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, they just like orders of magnitude though

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in complexity began to drop on you. I mean in

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a way, it's kind of like, yeah, if if Tetris

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 1>suddenly got like like huge leap and difficulty and just overwhelming,

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that feels, I mean, it was a little anxious watching

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and listening to it. So yeah, so this song is

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>called rush E. It's a it's very much a meme song. Um,

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a long backstory to how this came to be.

0:49:58.640 --> 0:50:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It has to do with Mark Apply or the YouTube

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>gamer like. It's a long history that I can't go

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>into right now. But ultimately it's just a song that's

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>so complex that not only is it impossible for humans

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to play, but it's even too complex for some computers

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to handle. And thus it's title of being a black

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Middi that it's basically it's gonna brick your computer. Uh. So,

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 1>so that that that's more or less what a black

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Midi is, and Rushi is perhaps the most famous example

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of a black Midi. Now I've said the words black

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Midi several times, so I would be completely remissed if

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention one of my favorite contemporary bands, Black Middy. Uh.

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.839
<v Speaker 1>They've released three albums so far. There two album, hell Fire,

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:40.919
<v Speaker 1>is in contention for one of my favorite albums the year.

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And I assume they picked their band name because their

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sound is very maximalist, it's very busy, it's very complex,

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's very intricate. So I'm sure they picked their

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>band name for that purpose, but a wonderful group. I

0:50:53.960 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend people check out hell Fire, one of the

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>best album two I promise you need. Let's check that

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>out now. Going in the entirely opposite direction from like

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>PC crashing um complexity, there's another just one last topic

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to to touch on here and this, but this is

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>by no means an exhaustive list of the way that

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff can be hidden in music. There may be other examples,

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and feel free to write in about them. But another

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do is simply take a sound, take

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a song, and either speed it up or stretch it

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out so time stretching is is one worth mentioning here.

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of taking sonic information and stretch stretching

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it out so that it is unrecognizable, but in doing

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps making it interesting, more interesting, certainly more ambient,

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>or in the reverse, you know you can you can

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly speed things up um. And in all of this

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that reminded me a bit of their various videos that

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>will do this online, where they'll take Alvin and the

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Chipmunk songs wit and which, of course you have human

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>voice is sped up to be the voices of of chipmunks.

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And then if you slow it down enough, the Chipmunks

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sound like normal adult human beings, and it's everything else

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like it's from the Twilight Zone in a

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>realm of monsters. It's very sludgy, very slow, very lethargic,

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's very fun to listen to a whole

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 1>album of these uh slowed down Chipmunks songs. But it's

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>also amazing how much slower and longer these songs are, like,

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, because imagine if you're listening to it at

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.879
<v Speaker 1>its regular speed, it's, what you know, half hour something

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. You slow it down and man, you've got

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like an hour and a half album, and the Chipmunks album.

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't want to be listening to it that long,

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's fun. It's always fun. Yeah, it's

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>um listening to too much audio sped up or slowed down.

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I find it kind of It was messing with me

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>after a while, Like if I'm queueing an episode and

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I have sped up too much and I feel like

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to walk outside a little bit afterwards. Now

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when I'm editing these episodes, a little peek behind the

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>curtain for our listeners. UH. Quite often I'll do it

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:05.400
<v Speaker 1>at either plus twenty five percent plus fifty and on

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>rare occasions up to plus one percent. So I'm listening

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:12.479
<v Speaker 1>at two x speed. And um, usually it does doesn't

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:14.399
<v Speaker 1>last too long because I'll have to stop to make

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>edits and stuff. But man, oh man, I am very

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.240
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the chipmunk version of Roberts and the chipmunk

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>version of Joe Wow. Point to five is pretty comfortable

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for me, and I actually, since I don't really like

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to my own voice, I find that if I

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>listened to it at point to five, I feel like

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I sound better, and maybe I sound like enough like

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a different person that I can kind of listen to

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>myself more and not judge myself. But when I'm at

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at at point five, yeah, it's it's it's already a

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:46.839
<v Speaker 1>little maddening. And I just can't do double time. It's

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just too much. And yeah, and at a certain point

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:51.359
<v Speaker 1>for me as an editor, you know, obviously I'm looking

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for things that I need to you know, synch up

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 1>or remove or whatever. At a certain point, I can't

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tell what people are saying anymore, so I have to stop.

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I have to slow it down again. But but Yeah,

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you can also of course stretch out sounds and and

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>so forth in order to to make music and create

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 1>novel sounds of Pierre Schaefer made use of time stretch stretching,

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not so much to include easter eggs or hidden information,

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but just as a part of the experimentation and music making. Um.

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure offhand if there are notable examples of this,

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but I but I I feel like I've run across

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>some examples in the past where some drone and ambient

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 1>music creators have used this effect, Like take something really,

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>slow it down, and even if the source material is

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not ambient and drone, you can create an ambient and

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>drone experience from it. Potentially. There there's been a couple

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of very again we're getting into like kind of like

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 1>meme music at this point. Again, but a very popular

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>example of this was bouncing around the internet a while ago.

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Someone took the very popular Justin Bieber song Baby, and

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they slowed it down by eight hundred percent and the

0:54:56.520 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 1>results was beautiful. It was very ambi and many people

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:03.919
<v Speaker 1>compared it to like a Sugar Ross song, and it's

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>a it's fun to listen to. And then the cool

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>part is is that that kicked off the idea of like, oh,

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I can do this to anything, you know, And so

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 1>people just started applying this slow it down by a

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>philosophy to nearly any song and it always has basically

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the same ethereal floaty sugar ross like vibe, which makes

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>me really want to speed up sugar Roast by a

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:28.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent just to see what that will sound like.

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>But I haven't done that yet. I'm sure someone has

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on the internet, so I'll have to check that out.

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But but it's fun. I in fact, I came across

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a m It was a website where they're they're The

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>website's entire purpose was just to slow down audio that

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you fed into it. That you would feed in something

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and it would slow down by a percent for you.

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:49.399
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's a fun little trick. I mean, I think,

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>just like all gimmicks, it can be overplayed and kind

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of loses its creativity. But it's fun. It's fun stuff.

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me a bit too, of all this of

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the the science fiction and satirical ideas that on one hand,

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank Herbert explored a little bit in the Dune books

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 1>with Samuda music which is a type of music that

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we would listen to while also doing the drug samuda,

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's like you could only appreciate the music while

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:22.240
<v Speaker 1>your brain was altered by this drug because of potentially

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:24.799
<v Speaker 1>because of the way it slowed down or sped things up.

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And then also the British satire series Brass Eye from

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Morris, they had an episode on drugs that was

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a parody of like anti drug hysteria in the UK,

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 1>and they had a whole bit about this made up

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:40.880
<v Speaker 1>drug called cake, and there was a whole bit in

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:42.919
<v Speaker 1>there about like this is the music that they listened

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to while they're on cake, and this is how it

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds to us. But if you're on cake, it sounds

0:56:47.680 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like this, and so it's yeah, I can't help but

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.760
<v Speaker 1>bring that up. I literally just read a book about

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the Pink Floyd debut album, Piper at the Gates of Dawn.

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I just finished it like maybe a day ago, And

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:03.759
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a big chunk in there about that too,

0:57:03.840 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 1>really really leaning into the idea of like there's an

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>audience here that is willing to put up with a

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minute song. Most of them are on acid, but

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.919
<v Speaker 1>there is an audience for this. Can can we can

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we Pink Floyd pivot from being a single based band

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>into an album based band where we can have those

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minute songs and this kind of like internal debate

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about that, and of course then you get into like

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>all the sit Barrett stuff and Roger Waters and it

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 1>goes onto a whole other world. But but hey, if

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this kind of talk, you should tun an

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Interesting Needles Record Club. Yeah yeah, yeah, tell everybody where

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they can find Rusty Needles Record Club. Se It's a

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast that I host weekly, new episode every Friday. I'm

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a big old music nerd and I just need an

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 1>outlet for talking about music. And uh, thankfully Robert and

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe are nice enough to have me on here to

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 1>do it every once in a while. But if you

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:58.160
<v Speaker 1>need it all the time, you look up any place

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:01.600
<v Speaker 1>where you find your podcasts Rusty Needles Record Club, and

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll find me, my friends, my co hosts, and we

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about music. It's like a book club, but for

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>music instead, and each episode is a different album. And

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a great way to uh, you know, have a

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>surrogate music friend. It's a great way to be introduced

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to new music, and it's a great way just to

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of get some good recommendations. It's fun because, in particular,

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the episodes we do are chosen by

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>our listeners. People were right in say hey, you gotta

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to this, and then that becomes the album of

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that week. So it's it's fun. It's just a great

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>way to open yourself up to the wide spectrum of

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>music in the world. Awesome, All right, Well we're gonna

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>go and close it out here. These two episodes on

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on hidden material and music, Easter eggs and music and

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so forth. But yeah, we'd love to hear from everyone

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:50.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. If you have thoughts on the techniques that

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we discussed in these episodes, if you have thoughts on

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the specific examples that we discussed, and if you have

0:58:56.720 --> 0:59:00.160
<v Speaker 1>new examples or new techniques that come to mind, let

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>us know we'd love to hear from you. A reminder

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a science podcast,

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and our core episodes published on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Monday's we do listener mail, on Wednesday's we do a

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 1>short form artifact or monster effect, and on Friday's we

0:59:15.120 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>do weird How cinema. That's our time to set aside

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>most serious concerns and just talk about a weird film.

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks as always to Seth for not only co hosting

0:59:23.640 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 1>these two episodes, but also producing Stuff to Blow Your

0:59:26.120 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Mind and Weird How Cinema in general, And if you

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>want to reach out to us, you can email us

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:46.080
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your

0:59:48.880 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. Please law Report PROPA