WEBVTT - NFL Draft Preview: Running Backs & Tight Ends

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, It's Wednesday, April seventeenth, twenty seed twenty four.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast, where we're trying

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to mute Aaron Rodgers. It's me

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and your man, MG Marcus Grant, joined by Michael f.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Florio and Lakwan Jones. Gentlemen, we are in the season.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We are eight sleeps away from the NFL Draft. Eight

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>sleeps away. It cannot come soon enough. Draft season is

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>too damn long. I know I probably shouldn't say that

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>as an employee of the NFL. It is too damn long.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>We should have had the draft at least two weeks ago,

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe even more.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 2>We have reached silly season. But how are you guys coping?

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to get through the next you know,

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>eight days until we actually do this thing.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I differ a little bit. I'm like, I

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>wish we had two more weeks of this time.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, gus sick.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 3>It's fun. And then when this ends like it, it

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>just it's dry for a couple of months. So I

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't mind extending draft period a little bit.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>No, no, yeah, that's gonna be a no for me.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Doug Money Okay, So honestly, okay, I'm gonna, I'm gonna,

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw this take out here. I've said it

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>like on social media before. And if the black helicopters

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>come from me and you don't see me ever again.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>You know why drafts are an American and we should

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>banish them.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh that I agree. That's a different conversation.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>You go, it is a different conversation, but drafts are

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>an American and we should banish them. In the meantime,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>let's let's preview the draft we're gonna do on this show.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Last week we talked about quarterbacks. This week we will

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about running backs and tight ends.

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had Emory Hunt on a couple of

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. We talked some running backs kind of with

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>him there, you know, and just sort of the I know,

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the pulse of draft nation right now is that this

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is not a deep or a great running back class.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are some names out there that I think

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>are interesting. It will kind of dive into some of

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 1>them there. And with side ends, I mean, there's really one,

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but we'll try to scrounge up another name or two

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that may be of interest.

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So we'll dive into that too, But.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with a mock draft that hit the interwebs yesterday.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But yesterday or Monday, it was earlier this week. Peter Schrager.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Now Peter Schrager, you know, you know him from Good

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Morning Football. You probably know him from Fox and some

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of the other things he does. Usually very plugged in

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>with NFL front offices, with general managers, et cetera. Peter

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>usually does just a mock draft the entire off season.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you're getting mock draft two point oh,

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>three point oh. He's not tweaking things. He goes and

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he talks to as many people as possible, and then

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>he puts out the mock draft. And now I think

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>a caveat that's important because I saw a lot of

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>people talking about this on Twitter, is this isn't Peter

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Schrager telling you what his draft grades are or where

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>he thinks a person will slot in the draft. This

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is a mock draft based on things he is hearing

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>from NFL front offices. This is how he believes it's

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>going to shake out, based on conversations. This is not

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about talent, This is not about fit. This is about

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what he's hearing. So some of the big highlights are

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>headlines from his mock draft top three picks not really

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a surprise Kayleb Williams at number one, Jaden Daniel's going

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>number two to Washington, Drake May going number.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Three to New England.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Four is where it gets a little bit spicy, fellas,

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is where we can start to dive in

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on this one. He has the Giants making a trade

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 1>moving up to that number four spot, switching with the

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals and taking JJ McCarthy. My first question to you,

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael f Florio, is does this mean rip Daniel Jones.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, like.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Peter's plugged in, So if he's mocking a quarterback, if

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>he's mocking them trading up to get a quarterback, I

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>think that tells us everything we need to know about

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones. But I think we could have came to

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>this conclusion on our own. Daniel Jones is arguably one

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>of the worst contracts in the NFL right now.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, and we've.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Been saying that, not just us, like the whole NFL

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>watching community since the day he signed that contract was like,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 3>how much did you give Daniel Jones? So they have

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 3>an out after this year, no money on the books

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>really with him after this season, so I think we'll

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>see Daniel Jones start if he's ready for Week one

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>for the Giants, but no guarantee he finishes the year

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>as the starter. And clearly they're thinking ahead because everything

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 3>you hear is that next year's quarterback draft class is

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 3>not nearly as talented as this one. Plus Brian Dable

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 3>probably doesn't anticipate having a pick as high as six

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>next year. So if there's ever a year where you

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>make a move to get your new quarterback, it would

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>be this one.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny you talk about that contract, right, And

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>usually when big contracts are signed, there are always people

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>out there who are trying to find silver linings in

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it and like, no, but.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 4>This give us a team flex money. I think universally

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 4>it was like what are you doing? Like why is

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 4>this happening?

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Like it's rare when everybody comes together with the same opinion. Uh,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this one seemed to be one of those things that

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>did that. So I you know, I know, we talked

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about JJ McCarthy. He has been the subject of a

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversation so far this draft season. I was

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just sort of curious and like this was just a

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>fan perspective. I talked to some friends who are are

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>huge Michigan fans who watched every game, who traveled to

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>watch them in the playoffs or whatever, and I asked

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>them just their honest opinion, like what do you think

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of JJ McCarthy, And they both immediately said he needs

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a red shirt year, that he's not a guy and like,

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>mind you, these are died in the wooll you know,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>go blue forever Michigan fans, and he's not gonna be

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy that comes in in year one and is

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the immediate starter and it's gonna lead you anywhere. That

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he needs a red shirt year, which I thought was

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a very honest and refreshing sort of take on this

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing that being said, And I think every scout

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>has said that he's a guy that has promised but

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>has flaws and needs polish. Yeah, if he does go

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to New York, lakwan and he does become the starter

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and he pushes Daniel Jones aside, or even if it's

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>just a competition, Yeah, is there anybody in this Giants

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>offense that we want this year?

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 5>No, that's the unfortunate part. Unless they bring in some

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 5>quality you know, players through the draft where you get

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 5>a little bit interesting, Like if I see a marshn

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Lloyd go there, of course I'm going to be you know,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 5>in on him in drafts, but I'm not going to

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 5>be paying a pretty penny for him based on you know,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 5>the offense just doesn't have much around as what we're

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 5>looking at on paper. But I think JJ he comes in,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 5>he puts some heat on Daniel Jones. I don't think

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 5>he comes in starting, so I don't think we'll be

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 5>talking about JJ and redraft this year. He'll be more

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 5>so behind Daniel Jones. And I think, you know, I

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 5>can see the quality that some of the scouts are

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 5>seeing in JJ. I mean, he's a guy that needs

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 5>some polish, but he has some twitch to him. He

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 5>has some calmness in the pocket about him, like he

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 5>can take off and go when when you know need be,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 5>he runs what effort And it's kind of like, you know,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 5>he's an accurate quarterback that just needs some type of polish.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 5>There's building blocks there, so you can kind of see

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 5>why he's getting pushed up in drafts. So I agree

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 5>with schreker Man, the Giants need to move up and

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 5>get aggressive because, like Floria said, they're probably not going

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 5>to have this pick is high next year, and no

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 5>guarantee that Brian de Bull will be there next year

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I also think that you know right now, the early

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>scuttle butt is that the quarterback class is not going

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to be quite as deep next year too, So I

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's why you're seeing a lot of teams itching

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to try to move up to get somebody, because I

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody wants to wait and see what's going

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to be out there next year.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's also not bury the lead here though. If

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the Giants are taking a quarterback, that leaves Malik Neighbors

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>free to go somewhere that has a quarterback that can

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>get the most out of him right away.

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Which at let's keep on rolling through Schreker's Frock draft

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>here right now.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Mind, this is just the first round draft.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So we got the Giants moving up to four to

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>take JJ McCarthy at five.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>That leaves the Chargers.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>He has them taking Marvin Harrison Junior, So hallelujah for

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert. He's gonna have at least one major target

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to throw to after they let both Keenan Allen and

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams walk. It also means what we sort of suspected,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't think Quentin Johnston is ready, you know, if

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this is really going to be the pick there, So.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>MHJ at five.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Romo Donze going to the Cardinals at number six, so

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray gets another weapon to throw to after Marquise

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Brown has left to go to Kansas City. The next

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>big fantasy relevant thing comes to number nine, where the

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Bears are currently sitting now. Cording to Peter Schrager, the

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Bears are trading out of number nine, which that sort

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of blew my mind on its own, because I think

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the prevailing thought was, hey, look, the Bears can go

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>get a quarterback at number one and then pair him

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with a wide receiver if they needed to at number nine, Like, hey,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>how great would it be if the Bears showed up

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to camp this year with Caleb Williams and you know whatever,

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Romo dud Say, Melik Neighbors whomever it might be. That

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like it would be amazing. So according to this

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>mock draft, the Bears trade out at number nine with

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts, who move up and take Malik Neighbors.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So Florida, you were talking about pairing Neighbors with a

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who can do.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Him some good. Melak Neighbors and Anthony Richardson, how you

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 2>like them apples, I this is.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 3>A match made in my heart, Like Richardson, I've been

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 3>like he's my guy for a while. Now I'm a

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 3>huge fan, huge believer of his. And then Malik Neighbors.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Like the other day I put on Twitter, I made

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 3>videos of like like today after I'm gonna be dropping

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Marvin Harrison Junior. But I said, like, Malik Neighbors is

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 3>my wide receiver one. And everyone's like, that's clickbait, that's

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>your doing this for. And I'm like, no, you can

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 3>go again. Like I'm not saying Marvin Harrison Junior is bad.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I just think Malik Neighbors is more well rounded and

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>I think he would be an excellent fit along with

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pittman Junior, because Pittman Junior is that big body,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>big catch radius, possession guy, can move the chains. Neighbors

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>can score from anywhere on the field. He could stretch

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 3>the field. He's great after the catch with the ball

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>in his hands. So now you're giving two premium weapons

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>to Shane Psychen into Anthony Richardson. I think it would

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>be tremendous for Anthony Richardson's value. It would keep him

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 3>in that QB five QB six conversation for fantasy, at

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>least in my opinion. And then Malik Neighbors goes to

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 3>a spot where there's a lot of volume. And what

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I love most about Schriggers Mack is all three of

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 3>these wide receivers go to a spot where there's a

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 3>good quarterback in place already that can get them the ball,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>and there's targets up for grabs as well. Like if

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 3>one of these three, like I kept thinking to be

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 3>a Dunes, they went to the Bears, You're like, Okay,

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 3>he could be good for real life for them, but

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 3>for fantasy, is he going to get enough volume to

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 3>live up to his ceiling? Probably not, But on these

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>these teams, all three of these guys, maybe not on

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the Colts because Michael Pittman Junior is awesome as well,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 3>but they can beat number one in targets year one.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was gonna be my question to you, Lakwan,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is there gonna be enough volume? Like we hope there's

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>enough volume with Anthony Richardson that he can sustain both

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Pittman and Malik Neighbors, or or do we just believe

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that Neighbors doesn't necessarily need a ton of volume, that

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because he is a game breaker, that he can maybe

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>do more with less, because I would think that in

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>year one he's going to be very much behind Michael

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Pittman Jr.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he'll be behind Pittman Junior. But the more difference

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 5>that I see here with them too is that Neighbors is,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 5>like you said, a game breaker where he's just elusive

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 5>and he can score anywhere on the field one slang gone.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 5>This is more like an Odell Beckham type that we're

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 5>really looking at, where he can change the game on

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 5>any time. So I think this will be an excellent

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 5>weapon for Anthony Richardson. And now just elevate the conversation

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 5>and pounding on the table with Florio of like, Anthony

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 5>Richardson is a top five fantasy quarterback in twenty twenty four,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 5>that's a lock. So if the Colts pulled this off.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>That he's the top five, a lock.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 5>If you bring in Milik Neighbors, there's no way he

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 5>falls outside the top five. I'm confident I stand on that,

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 5>and I stand on business saying that.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Does he finish in the top five whereas he drafted

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the top five beause I feel like those are

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>two different conversations.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 5>Finish in the top five the rushing nobility, if he

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 5>stays healthy, this is going to be the biggest knock

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 5>on him. If there is no injury for Anthony Richardson,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 5>he's already in top five conversation, if not top seven.

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 5>But if you add in a guy like Milik Oh,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, Milik Neighbors, that's going to be a total

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 5>change of dynamic of this offense. Where you have JT

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 5>as the running back, you have Hitman. You also have

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Josh Down's work in that slot, who's actually stepping up

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 5>somewhat to be a valuable reliable target for Anthony Richon,

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 5>even Gardner Mischew last year. So I really feel as

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 5>though you bring in Milik Neighbors in that you have

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 5>a complete wide receiver set just like Man. There's no

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 5>way he could fail with this type of offset offense.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So then that and you throwing Josh Downs

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in there too, which I think is a good note

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to add. Yeah, that feels I don't want to say

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville ish right, because last year we talked about the

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars are like, I.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't know which Jaguars receiver I want, but I know

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I want Trevor Lawrence. I mean that, I mean I

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of went that way.

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't necessarily want to put that on Anthony Richardson,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but it does sort of suggest to me that we

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can sort of count on Richardson, hopefully count on those

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>yards sort of all aggregating to him where we may

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not be able to pick out another receiver consistently, maybe

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>beyond MPJ. Yeah, all right, all right, let's let's keep

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on running down this thing, becase there are a few

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>other notable things that I saw in that draft. Brock

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Bauers at ten to the Jets, potentially, that seems great.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>The Jets have never had a Fantasy relevant tight end,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in my lifetime.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe if I dig back far enough, I can

0:13:59.240 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of come up with.

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 3>It's so bad that Nikola's dad is a huge Jet fan.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>He bought a CJ Usama jersey.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh lord, I think somebody once mentioned the name Dustin

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Keller to me, like that was one that tried to

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be a thing for a little bit. Whatever Rock Bauers

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are the Jets. I think that'd be great. I think

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that'd be awesome. Again, astrisk being Aaron Rodgers is healthy

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and actually deciding to play football this year.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Who knows.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeh, that's a whole other conversation for a completely different

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>show anyway.

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Some of the other notables though, Bo Nicks going to

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings at number twenty three, I mean, it's not

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>jaj it's not jac. Sam Darnold's not a lock right

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the starter. He is as of this moment

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as we're recording the show, he is currently the starting

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for the Minnesota Vikings.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I think Boon Knicks could challenge.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, I don't know if that means, like, I don't

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm rafting bow Knicks and redraft leagues, but

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he could challenge to be the starter. I

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>guess the question becomes, how do we feel about, say,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Addison in that situation.

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 5>Nasty uh. I'll take the first look on this. I'm

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of fading Jordan Addison this year just based on

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 5>there's other wide receivers I would like in his area

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 5>of ADP right now Underdog. It's might have changed from

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 5>the last couple of weeks when I last checked, but

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 5>I just feel as though the quarterback play is going

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 5>to be huge, huge importance there with Sam Darnold as

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 5>a starter, and you draft the guy like bo Nicks, like,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm much rather JJ being I know he'll be able

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 5>to go down the field and kind of move the

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 5>chains and have that twitchiness to him that explained before

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 5>with JJ, But with bo Nicks there's a lot of,

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, questions that we have here, is he going

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 5>to be able to get the ball downfield aggressive as

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 5>much as you know the Vikings would like being that

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 5>they have Jordan Adison, being that they have JJ, being

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 5>that they have TJ. Hockinson. I don't know that many

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 5>people know that amazing stat that my fellow research Kendall

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 5>looked up. I mean, out of the three hundred and

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 5>sixty one completions, two hundred and thirty eight of them

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 5>were within five yards of the line of scrimmage, which

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 5>is about sixty five point nine percent in his passes.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 5>So this is gonna be a lot of dump off

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 5>screens and etcetera, etcetera. So I'm not too sure that, Uh,

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, bow Knicks would be the right choice here.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 5>But for redraft, I'm not interested whatsoever. And Jordan Addison

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 5>or Bo Nicks or Sam Donald, that's fair.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>I think bo Nicks. Look, he's he's not great, and

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the screens and everything, it's it jumps out

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 3>on tape and it's why he is the most accurate

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>quarterback and all of that. Yeah, but I think I

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>think there's tools here, Like when he had to throw downfield,

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>he has a strong arm. Uh, he he can move

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 3>a little bit with his legs. So if he went

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>to a spot like I agree with Lakwan, like, I'm

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 3>not drafting bo Nicks in redraft or anything like that, right,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if Sam Donald starts Week one,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>regardless of who their rookie quarterback is that they end

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 3>up taking and we see that a switch come like

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty quickly. I don't love Jordan Addison at either. I

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>agree with all of that, But for just for bo

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Nicks's standpoint, I think going to Minnesota with great weapons

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 3>with Koc who has proven to be a really good

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 3>offensive play caller and just offensive mine like, there's tools

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>there that in time they could potentially get the most

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 3>out of him. But for redraft rookie.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 5>Year, Yeah, he's a waiver wire quarterback.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, for sure.

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Next thing, Xavi, You're Worthy number twenty four to the

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Wow, that was my exact creation reactor.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>But it feels like a Jerry Jones kind of move, right.

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you get a guy with blazing speed who

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>played at the University of Texas. I mean the only

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>other thing that would be more Jerry would be to

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>spend like a second round pick. If he comes back

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and gets like Jonathan Brooks right and makes him the

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>running back.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 3>People would knock this Worthy pick. But I Worthy and

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the other wide receiver we're about to talk next are

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 3>They're in my top five head of wide receivers heading

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>into the draft.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I think the thing with Worthy that sort

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of works in his favor. Worthy works more in this

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>current era of the NFL than he would have, say,

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifteen years ago, right, because yeah, he is fast,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but he is he is small, right, I mean he's

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a he's not a big man. And I think ten

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago, you're making him a kick returner, right,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a punt and kick returner, and that's sort of it.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>He gets on the field at wide receiver because you

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have a whole bunch of injuries or anything like that.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>This this era he worked Mark. You can find ways

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to move him around, you can find ways that you

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>can put him in the slot, you can find things

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with him to get him the ball and

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>just sort of let him work in space. This move

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>would sort of signal that the Cowboys are sort of

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all in on Dak. Whether or not they are giving

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>him a contract, that's a different conversation. But they've decided

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that this offense is fully built around Dak Prescott. They

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to throw the football a ton, yes, and

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>look there's nobody there. I mean, who's getting targets after

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb in this offense?

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 5>Insistently? Maybe maybe he brings to speedy for.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Cooks off the field.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 4>I think I think so too. So zag were ready

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty four to the Cowboys.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>This last one, I don't know if it's still is

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>valid anymore.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>When this was released, Schrager mocked Lad McConkie number thirty

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>one to the San Francisco forty nine ers.

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>The Niners went out and signed Trent Taylor on Tuesday.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, I guess that doesn't preclude them necessarily from drafting

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Lad mcconkee, but it does seem like it would be

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit harder to make sense of them drafting

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy in the first round like McConkie when you

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>just bring in Taylor.

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Although my other thought when I first saw.

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>This is does this mean there's some some smoke out

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the Niners trading Brandon Yuke? That was the other part

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that popped up to me. And I don't know the

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>answer to that right now. That saga seems to be

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth. I know people made a big

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>deal of Ayuk what he unfollowed the Niners on Instagram

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>or something like that.

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Like, I still don't know how how do people know

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that this happens?

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 5>Tracking it man, some people, I mean.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Like everybody just tracked, like people keeping track of everybody's

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>every athlete social media follows all the time, so that

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we always like, I don't know how people know this

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and come up with this all the time.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, I think players leak it.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe, but uh, I mean I'm asking you, Floryda

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>because I know you love Lad McConkey. I mean McConkie

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to the forty nine Ers does at least on paper,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>seem like a really good move.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Amazing like the forty nine Ers, the Bills, the Chiefs,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 3>anywhere in that late first round. He could fall and

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 3>be immediately Fantasy relevant. I think because he's my wide

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 3>receiver four. Worthy is my wide receiver five heading into

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the draft. But McConkey reminds me of Tyler Lockett. Like

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 3>he's so he could play out wide, he could play

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 3>in the slot. He is so explosive from the slot,

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>he could win downfield, he could win after the catch,

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 3>good hands, great cutter, like just fast, quick, anything you

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 3>want to use to describe him, like he the only

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 3>thing he lacks I would say, is like wide receiver

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 3>one size and so press coverage and stuff could be

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 3>a little tough on him. But I think he's going

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 3>to be immediate playmaker. And one thing I kept thinking

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 3>when I watched him is like wherever he ends up,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>he's quickly going to become that quarterback's best friend because

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>he is so good at finding the weakness and the

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 3>soft spot in zone coverage and everything, Like he can

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 3>get open, he's got good hands.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 2>He's just going to be one of.

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Those uber reliable wide receivers.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 4>At the next level in my opinion, and that shout

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 4>out to you for not comparing him to a white

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 4>slot receiver.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Right there for you. Bonus points for that.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, those are some of the things I thought were

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of interesting from the Peter Scheger mock draft. I

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know it was making its way around social media as

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the moment it was released to varying degrees of response

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>from people.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 2>It's like a quick break. We'll come back.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll dive into some of these running backs. It is

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>an interesting class, I think, to say the least, So

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that. We'll also get to some tight

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ends a little bit later on in the show. You're

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>listening to the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast. We continue our

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the NFL draft at leaves from a fantasy perspective.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Last week we talked quarterbacks. This week we will dive

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>into the running backs and the tight ends. And a

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>simple question, Lakwan, I will start.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 2>With you in Florida. You can follow up on it.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Who is your RB one in this draft? And bonus question,

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 2>is it different for redraft than it is for dynasty leagues?

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 5>So I looked at this question on the rundown, and

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 5>I was just like, man, I don't know who my

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 5>clear cut RB one is because I don't think there

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 5>is a guy, and I don't think, yeah, it's all

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 5>gonna come down to like landing spots. But I do

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 5>like Trey Benson as much as people don't really like him.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 5>They're like nitpicking his running style, but he gives me

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 5>like Joe Mixon vibes, like I don't I don't know

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 5>what everybody else sees, but this is what I see

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 5>out of it as a workhorse, and he looks like

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 5>a guy that can handle a backfield, catch some passes

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 5>out of backfield you sprinkle out to him, but the

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 5>dude's legs are always moving. So he's like one of

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 5>the guys that I've just been watching a little bit

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 5>more frequent to see, you know, if I'm seeing something

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 5>different from people.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh, Florida, You're And then is he is he your

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>guy in both Redraft and Dynasty?

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 5>So Redraft, yes, But how I look at Redraft and

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 5>Dynasty for running backs, Like Redraft, you're looking for guys

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 5>who have the day one opportunities obviously, guys that come

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 5>in and have the media impact and then dynasty I

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 5>look at, you know, there's some guys that you may

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 5>look at that can fit into a role to be

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 5>a contributor, but then eventually come into a spot like

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 5>the latest example that i'd just kind of been leaning

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 5>on a tub of Herbert where he had to sit

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 5>behind Avant Deonta, Deontay Foreman, and then Miles Sanders, and

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 5>then he ended up working his way into a workload.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 5>So there's like, you know, some guys in you know,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 5>the top five, top six running backs that kind of

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 5>fit into that dynasty mode where they'll eventually be somebody.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 5>But Redraft there's really only like three running backs that

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 5>I could see coming off the board and Redraft making

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.719
<v Speaker 5>a day one impact where opportunities.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's kind of kind of bleak in

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Redraft leagues right now, Florida, I mean, your your thoughts

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 4>on this.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree with Lakwan. There's no I don't think

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 3>like clear cut this guy is so like there's no Bijon,

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>there's no Jamir Gibbs in this class anything like that.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And and I'm already of the mindset that like running

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 3>back rankings comes down purely to opportunity. Like, yes, talent

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 3>is a big, big part of it. You need to

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.239
<v Speaker 3>make the most of your opportunity. But if you're not

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 3>getting it's not like at wide receiver where like, okay,

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 3>you're on the field. At least if you do your job,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 3>you can create more opportunity for yourself. Like if you're

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 3>just behind a good running back, that's that's it for

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 3>you in in redraft. But one name that I think

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>could differ is Jonathan Brooks, like the running back out

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 3>of Texas. I like him a lot. I could see

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 3>him being the Dynasty RB one depending where he falls,

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 3>but maybe not for redraft because he's coming back from

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 3>the torn ACL so not sure if he'll be ready

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>for the start of the year yet. So he's one

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 3>that I can definitely see his dynasty value differing from redraft.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think the Dynasty RB one for

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>me is Jonathan Brooks, right that. Not sure how much

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we see him or when we see him on the

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>field this year after the the ACL sort of thing,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I think he does have a lot

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of promise. I mean, his issue at Texas wasn't an

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>issue with him, it was that he was stuck behind

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>John Robinson. I mean, that was the biggest thing going

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>against him in college.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 5>But that's kind of my fear for him though, being

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 5>that he tours a c O and then maybe he

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 5>gets stuck behind abjon type running back, being that he's

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 5>falling in draft because.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Of except how many running backs are out there.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 5>I don't I don't know he look at James Connor

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 5>or Joe Mixon. I'm just naming names at this point

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 5>where guys that still have a little bit left in

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>the tank. And then he's kind of just waiting his

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 5>turn again. You know, yeah, I.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Mean, I I understand that. I just I don't know.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think he goes to a spot

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think when he's healthy, he's going to compete

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities.

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 5>He's really good. Don't think that I'm saying he's bad

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 5>or fade him or anything. He's really good. It's just

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, dans on fire.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I talked to people who look to talk to to

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Waldman, who does great work with his his RSP

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Rookie Scouting Portfolio. I mean, he for his

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>his point, he was like, look if if Jonathan Brooks

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>was in last year's draft, he's like I would have

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>put him ahead Jim or Gibbs.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean he would have had it behind behind

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 4>only Bijon.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people love Jonathan Brooks when

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy. It's just it's just when he gets healthy.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's the dynasty RB one. I think

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this year for Redraft, I don't know. I mean, Trey

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Benson seems sort of like the guy potentially on landing spot.

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna throw a name out that I know is

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 3>near and dear to your heart. I love what I

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 3>see from Marshawn Lloyd.

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I do love Marshon Lloyd. I have to I have

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>to stop myself.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about him a little bit, but I have

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like when I start to talk about him,

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I have to stop and pause and be like, Okay,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>am I watching?

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Am I looking at this through cardinal and gold colored glasses? Right?

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Am I am I? Am I talking about Marshaon Lloyd

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>with my heart? Or am I talking about him just objectively?

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I have to, like I sort of tried to

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>remove myself from a lot of Marshawn Lloyd conversations this offseason.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 3>I'll do it for you when we talk about him,

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll hype him up for you. All right, Cool, we'll

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 3>get to that in just a bit.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know we talk a lot about landing

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>spots and that having a big impact, and obviously it does,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>but landing spot notwithstanding. Have you guys seen some players

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>out there that you know, like you just love the

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>talent and you think that regardless, they're going to be

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 1>an impact player even if they're not a starter, even

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if they're not you know, a guy that we're drafting

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>highly in fantasy, just guys that like, this guy is

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>so talented he can't help but be productive.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I like ray Davis Alat. I tweeted

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 5>out him the other day and got kind of re

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 5>insurance that I'm looking at the right things that what

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 5>he has and he's kind of like the perfect balance

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 5>of a running back of what you want, Like he

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 5>could break the contact, you can sprinkle targets on him.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 5>He's one of those guys that just keeps moving the

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 5>change and he's such a hard runner. And I think,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 5>you know, the he'll be one of those guys that

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 5>will be talking about, you know, next season, like, man,

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 5>it's crazy the season he just had as a rookie

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 5>with the limited opportunities, Like I don't think he has

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 5>the workhorse ability to be a every down back in

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 5>this league, being that you know kind of just how

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 5>this running back classes.

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 4>But he's one of those guys out definitely make an impact.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Anybody you like out there, Floria. I like Braylan Allen

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 4>from Wisconsin. Two hundred and forty pounds, but he runs

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 4>like he's like two ten. He he kind of reminds

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 4>me of a less explosive Derrick Henry. But when he

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 4>gets the ball, when he gets moving in space, he

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 4>it's not like you could just outrun him or anything

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.239
<v Speaker 4>like that. And his size is why I think that

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 4>no matter where he goes, he'll have a role immediately

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 4>because he could be a really good short yard runner,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 4>could be a really good goal line runner. This wouldn't

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>be great for fantasy, and you could call me a

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 4>homer if you want, but like I feel like he

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 4>is an ideal fit for the Bills.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>You put him back there. James Cook is your lightning.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Now you get the hammer, and now you could take

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 3>some responsibility off of Josh Allen. But no matter where

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>he goes, I think that that Alan will will have

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 3>an impact in year one just because he's so big, Like,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna want him. Use that guy when when you

0:29:58.520 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 3>need a yard or two.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I like Braylan Allen. I kind of like Kendall Milton

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia. I know he's not necessarily much of a

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pass catcher. I mean, they didn't use him as a

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>pass catcher. Let me say it like that. You know,

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>there are definitely things in his game that sort of

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>need to be worked on. But I think he's a

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who can be explosive, he can show a little

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of power when he needs to.

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he has kind of a nice all around game.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a thing that sort of applies to everybody

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in this class, and it's a thing we talked about

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>with Emory Hunt, is that there are no.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Big headliners in this class. Right.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 4>There isn't a Bijon, There isn't a you know, a

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 4>sa Quon or anybody like that.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But there is there are a lot of guys who

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can come in and fill a role in a respective offense.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that alone is sort of is worth

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to feel out and figure out what's

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, all Right, so let's get into let's

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get into some dream fits here, right, So let's Jalen Wright,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>guy from tennis.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, well you sound excited, so I'm gonna let you.

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Let you jump. Do you do you have a dream

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>fit for a guy like Jalen Wright?

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 5>I could see him in Denver. I mean my micro

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 5>comp is album Kamara. I mean, the dude is just

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 5>a faster. He's a little bit side like Sizewiser, a

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 5>little bit different, but he is elite speed, like breakaway speed.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 5>And if you get him with Sean Payton and he

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 5>just gets his two point zero album, Kamara, I think

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 5>that would be a huge opportunity for him to make

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 5>some contributing to the running game asap. I mean the

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 5>run game as well, I mean the passing game as well.

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 5>So I like Jalen Wright going to Denver.

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh, do you have a spot for him? Florida?

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I like that one. I went in a little different direction.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 3>I said the Browns. I think the Browns are a sneaky,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 3>good landing spot for running backs right now. I keep

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 3>being of the mindset that like whatever they get out

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 3>of Nick Chubb this year feels like a like a bonus.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he'll be ready to start the year

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and stuff. And Jerome Ford showed last year he could

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 3>be a good backup, but they lost Kareem Hunt. Uh,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>there's some depth questions behind him. So I think Right

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 3>could step in and be an immediate one two punch,

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 3>whether it be with Chubb or Jerome Ford. Because uh,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 3>like like Elk was saying, he's got good hands, he's

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>a good pass blocker. He's also got some good speed there.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 3>So we know the Browns love to run the ball

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and they're gonna need some bodies in that backfield. So

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I thought, I think just there, whoever ends up there,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I think could be sneaky for fantasy because people are

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna probably be like, oh no, they have a lot

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 3>of running backs in Cleveland, but.

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Do they did know who?

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 5>I said there too. My other guy was Marshawn Lloyd,

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 5>and I know we're gonna talk about him, but I

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 5>said to Browns man, I like him going to the

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Browns as well. That'll be a nice spot for him

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 5>to produce interesting.

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll get to mis a second.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 3>For me.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Wright, I think Chicago might be interesting.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially if they decide that they want to

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>if this one, if they want to make this an

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive heavy draft, right, you get Caleb at the top.

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if they if they really do trade out

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>at number nine, or if they just use that opportunity

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to take another wide receiver or something like that.

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 2>But you know, deoncey Foreman was a nice piece.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I like Rashawn Johnson, you know, I mean, I know

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that they brought people in, but why not get a

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>guy in Jalen Wright who can kind of kind of

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>help you in the in the past game, help you

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with past protection.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It may be a little bit of a crowded situation

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>there in Chicago, but I think there's an opportunity for

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>him to go in and and potentially be a guy

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 1>who works his way onto the field that maybe in

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 2>So uh, you know, look, we'll see what happens.

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But I I think even with DeAndre Swift, there uh

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that that Jalen Wright could really kind of fight for opportunities.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's if there's a thing we've

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>seen about DeAndre Swift, teams don't necessarily love him the

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>way that we love him exactly.

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 5>The career shareholder of the ball he would let me.

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's let's get to the Marshawn Lloyd talk.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I am going to try and be objective, you know,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, but I think I think there are things like,

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>let me just put it out here. I think my

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>my frustration with Marshaw Lloyd is it with Lloyd. It

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was the way he would used in the sc offense

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>last year that there were times watching them, you know,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and watching pretty much every snap that it felt like

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln Riley was trying to go out of his way

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to get Caleb Williams another heisman, sometimes to the detriment

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of the offense, and sometimes it should have been a

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit more Lloyd because he had the opportunity to.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not a home run hitter necessarily, but he can

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>move the sticks. He can be a game changer. He

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>can come up with explosive big plays every so often,

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think they really used him as such.

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 4>So I get frustrated, I think when I talk about

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 4>him a little bit. But Florio, I know you're excited

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 4>about him, you love him. I will let you, you know, drive.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 2>The hype train on this one right now.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 3>When I watch him. I know you said He's like

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 3>he can move the chains and stuff, but I think

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 3>he's got bursts and explosiveness as well to bring big

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 3>to bring big plays to the NFL level. And I

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 3>think he's got good vision as well. He could quickly

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 3>cut when he sees an open lane and then he

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 3>just hits the hole and is out. Good hands could

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 3>help as a as a receiver. I think his pass

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 3>protection probably needs a little bit of work. But I

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 3>was thinking about where I think he ends up bet

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's someone that in my pre NFL Draft best balls,

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking a lot of him because I think that

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 3>he can be a contributor right away and maybe one

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of the best running backs from this draft class. But

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 3>my dream fit for him, and I think this is

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 3>the second best fit, second best landing spot for any

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 3>running back behind only of the Cowboys, is the Chargers.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I could see him making a nice one two punch

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 3>with Gus Edwards, with Gus being your short yardage guy,

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 3>being your goal line runner, and Lloyd is kind of

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 3>doing stuff on early downs, he's getting involved on passing plays,

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and then.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 2>He's just he he brings a.

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Little bit more explosiveness in a different style than Gus Edwards.

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 3>So we know that the Chargers love to run the

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 3>ball and that they're gonna use two running backs, so

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 3>why not kind of get a little thunder and lightning

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 3>of your own going here with Lloyd and Gus Buss.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's actually my landing spot for him as well, is

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers put him, put him in that uh brief

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>even in LA. You know, he'll get an upgraded apartments.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, he won't be uh, you know, living at

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Founders or you know whatever, uh you know whatever off

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>campus apartment he's probably living in right now.

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 4>But uh yeah, that was my pick for him too.

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Did you have a spot for him? Q?

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 5>No, I was we were all in the same boat

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 5>spot all right. One two punch with Gus Edwards would

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 5>be amazing and kind of give them a little bit

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 5>of interchangeable there. And I think Lloyd ends up being

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 5>the starter eventually. This is one of those situations where

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 5>you have a guy that is so talented and what

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 5>he's able to do that needs a little bit polished

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 5>in some areas that wasn't utilized properly, like how you

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 5>were saying, and to his ultimate potential, I think the

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Charges will be the perfect spot for him to be

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 5>able to flex itself to be one of those you know,

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 5>workhorse running backs for him.

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we're all unanimous on Marshaun Lloyd staying

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Last one here, Trey Benson. I know that you know, we.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Talked about him as being maybe the the guy that

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.959
<v Speaker 4>we're targeting in redrafts or maybe one of the guys

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 4>that we think could be the RB one in redrafts.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, lawand stay with you any any spot that

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 4>you see for him that you would like to see

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 4>him go?

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean Dallas. I mean I'll take the lazy

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 5>take here like he seems like the all around and

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 5>go back to you know that can take on that workload.

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, no real competition in that backfield, worse streamans

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 5>there to block. Like you know, Trey Benson. He can

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 5>come in and he's a run, harder guy, he's hard

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 5>to bring down. So he's one of those guys that

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 5>you could just see in a Dallas Cowboys jersey. And

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 5>they really need a running back, and I don't think

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 5>they should take the chance, even though they're known for

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 5>taking chances on players, you know, with injuries, but that's

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 5>more so on the defensive side. But I really feel

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 5>as though if they want to hit home run here,

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 5>just get a running back that can stand tall, break

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 5>the tackles, and be a huge red zone threat for them.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 5>So go ahead and get you at Trey Benson.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, they need a running back.

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The one thing about the Cowboys this year is that

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>whoever is back there, well, he's gonna get a lot

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of touches. Everybody's gonna draft that guy. The offensive line

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>is not what it used to be now.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 5>That's the huge question mark that that's what they need

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 5>to address in the draft as well.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Uh your thoughts, Florio, Well, I don't have him going

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 3>to Dallas. I think I think Jerry's gonna be Jerry

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 3>and and take Brooks and uh and go for the

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 3>home run swing. I had him staying in that division though.

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the Giants would be a good fit for

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 3>him because look they're there. Running back room is pretty

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 3>barren right now, and Devin Singletary is a solid NFL runner.

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy that, uh it. The changes he made to

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 3>his game a couple of years ago really worked out

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 3>for him and has led to him having a prolonged

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 3>NFL career and getting a second and third contract. Uh,

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 3>but we know who Devin Singletary is at this point,

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 3>so I think Benson would be a really nice complimentary

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 3>piece for him.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 3>He he could even be the lead back potentially here

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 3>and and he would get the goal line work, I

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 3>think for sure, because that's one area we know Singletary

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 3>can struggle. And one thing I like about Benson fourth

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 3>highest ten yards split amongst running backs in this class,

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 3>and the forty gets all the attention, but to me,

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 3>the ten yard split matters even more, especially for running backs,

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 3>because you're not always gonna get forty yards unjudged to run,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 3>but you're gonna be if you could run fast and

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 3>get that burst, you're gonna pick up yards in chunks.

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I agree with Lakwan. I like Benson and

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 3>NFC seems like a good landing spot for him.

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Giants. The Giants were my spot. That was

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>what I had for for Trey Benton. Was was going

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to Big Blue because, as you mentioned, Devin Singletary, nice piece,

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not a guy that you're gonna lean on.

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 2>They've got to figure out how to fill that Saquon hole.

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, and I don't think it's gonna take one guy,

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think Trey Benson can get them a little

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>bit closer to filling that that void.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, Devin Singletary, we know who he is. At

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 2>this point.

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see somebody come in there that

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>can get a lot of opportunity. The downside is the

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Giants are probably gonna be bad, so that's gonna have

0:39:57.760 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>an impact on his opportunities overall.

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's JJ oh yeah, my bad. Anyway.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Last thing is there is there an under the radar guy,

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe a guy that's not getting a ton of love

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that either of you are interested in right now.

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 5>TCU and Money Bailey. I've been watching him a lot.

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 5>He has some bursts to his game. Man, he's really

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 5>really quick and he's able to get outside play being

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 5>in between the tackles. He changed direction pretty quickly, and

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 5>it's like, man, he's one of those guys that you

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 5>watch and you just see him make these plays. Obviously,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 5>he needs a little bit more polishness, and you know

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 5>in past protection there's a lot of times he gets backpedaled,

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 5>so that's a little concerning, which might hurt his opportunities

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 5>to being in chances of being on the field. But

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 5>he's definitely a guy that could contribute to a passing game,

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 5>a run game like Devin Singletary type that we were

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 5>talking about. He has like the all around running back

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 5>qualities that you want in the back to give you

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of this and a little bit of that.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh, not bad. Who do you like? Floria?

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Isaiah Davis from South Dakota State. He's a good runner,

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 3>very good cutter, just doesn't have the elite speed. Killian

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Robinson had the fastest ten yards split amongst running backs.

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 3>And I believe Emory Hunt likes him. And I'm not

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 3>going to tell you I've scouted him a ton, but

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 3>if Emery likes him and he's fast, I could get

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 3>on board. The thing is, like we keep saying, landing

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 3>spot matters so much for the high end running backs

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 3>in this class.

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 4>If it matter for the lower guys. Yeah, it's all

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 4>going to come down to.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.479
<v Speaker 5>Land Guys like Bucky Irvin and stuff like these landing

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 5>spots are going to be very important for those guys.

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious to keep an eye on Isaac Garrindo.

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>He's another that I like speedstirb. It's got decent size,

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I like him.

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 4>Again, like you said, landing spy is going to have

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 4>a big impact on what his overall production is going

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 4>to be. But I think he's kind of an intriguing

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 4>prospect who at times can be a home run hitter

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 4>when necessary. So interested to see sort of where he lands.

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 4>But definitely an a name that I am keeping an

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 4>eye on over draft weekend.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, I can take a quick time out, easy

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for me to say, we'll come back. We'll talk some

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. It probably won't be a long discussion, but

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll get it in no matter what. You're listening to

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast.

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we'll talk some tight ends here.

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>The conversation, at least for fantasy, especially in the year

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of our Fantasy Football Lord's twenty twenty four starts and.

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Ends with brock Bowers.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And this is a name where if you are you know,

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a deVie person, if you have just been

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of following this for the last couple of years,

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>like you have been hearing brock Bauer's name for multiple

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>years now. Weirdly, we don't have brock Bowers prospect fatigue,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe because people just don't talk about tight ends like that.

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We know with a lot of positions, landing spot matters,

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and I guess it does with tight ends as well.

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, Florida, with a guy as talented as Bowers,

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>how much is the landing spot going to matter? Especially

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>because the draft capital spent to get him is going

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 1>to be substt Anchel, you know, short of him getting

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Smith or something like that. Like, how much does

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the landing spot actually matter for brock Bowers?

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 3>It matters a lot less with him than a lot

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 3>of like then all of the running backs that we've

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 3>been talking about, and and really I would say any

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 3>of the receivers outside of the top three as well. Like,

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to be fine. It's just a

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 3>matter of volume and that's gonna determine fantasy value. But

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I think Bowers will be able to contribute and excel

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 3>no matter where he goes. But there are some landing

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 3>spots that are clearly just a little bit more advantageous

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 3>than others. But yeah, I think he is going to

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 3>be fine regardless of where he ends up.

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 4>Uh was he a top ten tight end from week one? U?

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Possibly? It's it's again we keep hitting on the landing swatch.

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 5>I don't think people really understand how important it is

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 5>for these prospects to land in the right spot for

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 5>a team a that's going to be you know, tight

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 5>end friendly who has already a previous existence of having

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.479
<v Speaker 5>a high target share percentage going to that tight end unit.

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 5>So that's going to be one of those things that's

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:04.879
<v Speaker 5>going to be important for him where you know, talent

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 5>doesn't always overwegh you know, you know, opportunity and situation.

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 5>So it's one of those things that I hope he

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 5>goes to a team where he has, you know, the

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 5>ability to be able to open up, you know, more

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 5>in the middle for a quarterback that's been struggling in

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 5>that area or a quarterback that's already a veteran established

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 5>to be able to utilize him properly and get them

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 5>involved as well. So fantasy it's going to be very,

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 5>very spotty just based on where he's going to stay,

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, where he's going to land.

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see, Yeah, I mean I definitely think landing

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>spot has something to do with it. I mean, look

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at look at Sam Laporta last year. Right now,

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he landed in a spot where there was zero competition

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:43.959
<v Speaker 1>for him, and so he walked into a huge opportunity.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Compare that to Dalton Kincaid, who pretty much from the

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>jump was having to share opportunities with Dawson Knox in Buffalo.

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So that was I think some some landing spot does

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have you know, landsbot has something to do with it.

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like this is a guy who is

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so talented that, especially if you're using him with a

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>top ten pick, you're going to get him on the field.

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I know we said that about Kyle Pitts.

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I know we said that, like

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you spent with the number eight pick or whatever it

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>was on Kyle Pitts, Like why aren't you using him?

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>That feels like a one off, right like that just

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>rookie year was great, and his Rooki year was great.

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Down one thousand yards in his rookie year and then

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you know, there was a lot of.

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Overthinking going on in Atlanta.

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, I and I know the tight end

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is deeper than it has been in past years.

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Thing, but one is it? So like, let's look at

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 2>the guys.

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Laporte's there, Kelsey's there, we're not gonna

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>have Hockinson for much of the year, but you still

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>got what Andrews, McBride, Jittle.

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 3>Then there's like.

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a handful of guys that could sort of

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere from like you know, six to sixteen.

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Right Like for me, I would have have Kinkaid, Evan Ingram,

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 3>David and Joku, Kyle Pitt's all in my top ten

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:05.760
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Brock.

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Bowers, I believe, Okay, but that still leads a couple

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of slots for him to slide into the top ten.

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's nine because we said Mark Andrews as well,

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 3>I believe, So that's nine. So I think after I mean,

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 3>then it's like Goddard Ferguson. I think Bower slides, right,

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:23.280
<v Speaker 3>But that's like last year, I had Kincaid and Laporta

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 3>as tight ends eleven and twelve or ten and eleven,

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I believe in my ranking something like that. But I

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 3>could see Bower sliding in there. I just it's a

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 3>little bit deeper than it's been in the past, I

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 3>think because we had three breakouts in Laporta, Kincaid, and

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 3>McBride last season.

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's fair, But I also thinking you know,

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>also with the factor in that somebody is going to

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have a disappointing season where we didn't think it was

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen somebody, and not that we're wishing it,

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but somebody's gonna get hurt. That's just the reality of

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it that those are the things that happen over the

0:46:55.239 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>course of the season, which opens up more opportunities. And

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I just I really just keep leaning on the fact

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that whoever drafts Bowers is going to try and get

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the most out of him in year one, especially when

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen tight ends come in and start to be

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a little.

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Bit more productive early on.

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, I think I think he's gonna

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that you know, in in re draft league,

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be kind of an interesting option.

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Curious to see how he goes or where he.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Goes in dynasty league, especially in dynasty startup drafts. Knowing

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the uh, you know, tight end is deeper, but it's

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 1>still not super deep. And let's be honest, Travis Kelsey's

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.799
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be there forever, right, I mean, at some

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>point Travis Kelsey starts to fall off or just decides

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to retire. I mean, Mark Andrews has been a nice piece.

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of gotten beat up the last couple of years.

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle is a volatile option on a year to

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>year basis on tween bases. You know, there's there's there's

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a a an opportunity there for a new tight end

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>hero to rise up and save us.

0:47:57.719 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 2>That's all.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, any other tight end this year? We could

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 3>probably say tight end is deeper than ever.

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe until until Travis Kelsey retires and.

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:08.879
<v Speaker 5>Then we're like, okay, we're back to square one.

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>He's like, you know, he goes back to the We're

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna just gonna be a full time podcaster and game

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:12.879
<v Speaker 1>show hosts.

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 2>Like, That's what I'm gonna do. Are there any other

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 2>tight ends you guys are interested in at all?

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm not gonna get on this mic and line to people.

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 5>I haven't done anything really deep diving on tight ends.

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 5>There's really only one to really talk about. It's it's look,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at a list of tight ends. I have

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 5>never seen them before in my life, but I'm pretty

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 5>sure they they contribute to where they contribute. They have

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 5>their abilities, they have their opportunities to go out there,

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 5>show up, show out and do their thing man, but

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 5>we will be deep diving a little bit later.

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I was gonna give you. I was gonna

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 2>give you Vincennat from Kansas State. Uh.

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was gonna give you Eric All from Iowa

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 1>because tight End Iowa. See you write it down, pick

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>it up the notebook, writing it down.

0:48:55.800 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Eric All. He didn't spend his whole career at Iowa.

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 2>He was, Uh, he was.

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember where Michigan maybe I think it was,

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and then he transferred to Iowa. But tight End Iowa.

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>That alone should peak your interest and on him.

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh, this is going back NFL. The research department sent

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 3>out like comparisons after the combine, and obviously they compared

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 3>him to to Laporta, Hockinson, Kittle, the big tight ends

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:28.760
<v Speaker 3>who come out of Iowa. He is taller and weighs

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 3>more and has bigger arms than all of those guys.

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm not saying that's going to translate to him

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 3>being better than them, but he's bigger, he's coming from

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the same school. I think, I just like you, Marcus,

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 3>always got to pay attention to those and then the

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.720
<v Speaker 3>other one. I was gonna mention Trey Knox just because

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.280
<v Speaker 3>he was a former wide receiver and he's very fast

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 3>and he could be a bat guy coming out of

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina.

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>The one thing, one thing I do not know is

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there are any former basketball players

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in this list of tight ends, because that's always an

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting one, always one one right, and like the immediately

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>immediately that that guy's gonna get compared to, like Antonio

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Gates or Tony Gonzalez or.

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy shows basketball clips on Draft Night.

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 2>You know Jimmy Graamt played basketball. Are you aware of that? Wow?

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 1>No, Yeah, I'm the I'm the first person I ever

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.399
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that on a broadcast of any sort.

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:21.359
<v Speaker 3>I kind of felt bad because during March Madness, during

0:50:21.440 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 3>NC State's Final four run, the entire conversation about DJ Burns,

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 3>who was a star, was like, shoot, this guy played

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 3>football right exactly.

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Breaking him down, analyzing like he.

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Just got a quick feed.

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Here's a big body guy.

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Like no, he's playing ball, playing basketball, man, Like, let

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 2>him do his thing.

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you this. He he cooked CS in the

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 3>ACC tournament and I was like, look at this, Syracuse

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 3>is getting destroyed by a guy who has no chance

0:50:47.400 --> 0:50:50.720
<v Speaker 3>of going pro. And then he everyone in the NCAA tournament.

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>He really did cook during the tournament, so uh that

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>all that did was make the NFL scouts drool even more.

0:50:58.239 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 2>So what.

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, that's kind of our look at the running backs

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and the tight end position.

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Next week we'll have one more. It'll be the wide

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 4>receiver position, and we are I don't know if I'm

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 4>ready to say this out loud, we are working on

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 4>a very special guest, a good friend, any very special guest,

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 4>to come on next week and help us with some

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers.

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Take that as a hint if you want, I don't care.

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Any meantime, we'll be back with you, of course on

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Thursday for the NFL Fantasy Football cheat Sheet.

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Lock in.

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, keep an eye on our twitters and

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>we will let you know about when it's happening. I

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.760
<v Speaker 1>would say, tentatively look at it for about three o'clock

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 1>eastern noon Pacific. That is when we are are hoping

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to get this thing up and running. So I'll be

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sure to check that out as well. In the meantime

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for Michael F. Florio for the Kwan Jones, I'm Marcus

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 1>grant that I'll do it for this edition of the

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL Fantasy Football Podcast.

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 2>By the way, shout out to producer Susi who's back

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:49.439
<v Speaker 2>with us. Welcome back.

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We haven't harassed you about watching any fast and furious

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:53.959
<v Speaker 1>movies in a while. We'll see if you have gone

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond like what she watched, like the first two or

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>three something like that.

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it was too she got up to Tokyo.

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, here's the thing. If you can power

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>through Tokyo drift, then then you're good to go. But

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo drift like that's you know, that's that's the breaking

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>point for a lot of people.

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 2>And I understand if you don't.

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:12.839
<v Speaker 5>Make it through that one real nasty work there.

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Like I said, that'll do it for this edition

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL Fantasy Football Podcast. They happy, safe and healthy,

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>do good and live well. Enjoy the week, everybody, and

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:21.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to you again real soon.