WEBVTT - Surveillance: Don't Expect Much From Fed, Solomon Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. This

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is Blomberg Surveillance. I'm Shinnali Bassek and joining me now

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is Ken Mullis, CEO of Mullets and Company. Thank you

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Ken, great to be here.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So you've been on a world tour. You just came

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>back from Russia where you had a panel with Putin.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>What was the big takeaway? What was interesting? You know,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get good information, and you do these

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>things because my job is to get as much information

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>about the global economy as you can. So there was

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of takeaways about it, just getting up to

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>speed on on on the Moscow economy and how the

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>sanctions are affecting you know, what they're doing. UM. So

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was good to um put that information

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the back of your mind and keep it in

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.919
<v Speaker 1>mind as your advice companies. Are they the next place

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>for you to be doing the next big deal? No, No,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Russia is long. I think it's a while in the future,

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but look, it's a long life. I've been doing this

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and you know, friends last, long time, loyalties,

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you get to know people, um and and look, it's

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I think before an American company will

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be Russia will be investable. But someday maybe you are

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>also recently in spending a lot of time in Hong

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Kong with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange proposed takeover of

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the London Stock Exchange. What is the tone there right now?

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried about what's going on there. I've been

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world a lot. I haven't been to Hong

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Kong in a while, but look, what's happening in Hong

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Kong is definitely uh concerning. But again the world it's

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be uh. I think would happen with Trump and

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the China and the trade war calming down will be positive.

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Um And again, things are long. These there's a lot

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of issues you go back over. Again. I've been doing

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this forty years. There's always been major issues, but we

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>tend to get through these. And actually business is one

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of the key events that keeps peace and things moving

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. People in business want to do transactions

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with each other, want to get to know each other,

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of supersedes the cycle of almost politics.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, with so much time in Russia and

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>China right now, what does that say about where you

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>think power is shifting in the world. We don't overdue

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to Rush. I was there for a brief time to

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get some information. Um, look, it's it's

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously China is important, but you know it's interestingly

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about the United States was twenty three percent

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of world GDP ten years ago. And if you would

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>have bet that the United States would have been larger

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>or smaller, given the rise of the bricks and all

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>those economies, I think we're up to. So there's a

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of handwringing in the United States, but we went

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from twenty three of world g d P. The US

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>has great laws, it's got a great capital markets, it's

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>got innovation. It's still a tremendous place. When you listen

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to Trump speak this weekend, you know Trump, right, you've

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>worked for Donald Trump before. How our world leaders receiving

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>his message here? And Dave us, Well, look, they receive

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it in different ways. But I think the thing that

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that he did do, that President Trump did when he

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>got here was at least very carefully tell the story.

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to get it sometimes that the U. S.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Economy is booming. We do have three percent unemployment. There

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are so many good things going on. We are deregulating,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of things in the policies that are

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>generating substantial rewards for business and people and and for everybody.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And I know sometimes you can get caught up in

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the tweets and the presentations, but if you, if you really,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think he did a good job of just

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>calming that down and saying, look what we're accomplishing. And

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think the policies have been good for business.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think his prospects are? Given that you

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>called his last election, what do you think his prospects

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are for this upcoming one? Look, it's too early to tell.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a candidate. You know, in order to

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>call a good fight, you have to know who you're who,

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the who the other side is. So I'm want to

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wait on that. I think I think there's lots to

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>go in the in the primaries, and lots of stories

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be told over the next six or seven months.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll wait, wait, let's wait and see who it's between.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that everyone's talking about here in Davos,

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at least publicly, is sustainability and green initiatives. But three

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>times just today I've had bankers tell me that we're

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about green too much here, and so I'm kind

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of wondering what you're hearing. What do you think is

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity or is it realistic for the financial industry

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and black Rock, which is leading the charge here to

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>make real change. So that's a complicated question. And let

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>me say this. Look, we have to advise our clients

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on how to navigate in an environment where look, E. S.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>G and all. An environment is going to be part

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of what they're held accountable for. Now, does sometimes Davos

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>go overboard on some of the requirements things that they're

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Sure, people ask me why go to Davis,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and I say, sometimes to find out exactly what the

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>consensus is so I know what won't happen and and

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>do the opposite. Um, because you know it's an extremely

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>consensus atmosphere here and um, but look, people are gonna

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with the fact that large institutions like

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>black Rock and and like rating agencies and and government

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>institutions will be monitoring certain environmental social governance checklist and

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to we're gonna have to help our

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>clients through that. Well, you advised a romco. Where does

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that fit into the situation here? Look, the world is

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to use and need cheap energy. You know,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>there's five hundred million Europeans, there's three hundred million Americans,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>three fifty. There's six or seven billion people in the

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>world who still are are struggling, and the access to

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>cheap fossil feels it. Look, it's it's their life, you know, India, China, Africa,

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>They're not They're not gonna They're not as worried about

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the environment yet as they are about you know, making

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ends meet and and and life. So I think the

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that what worries me about this is the severe

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure on fossil fuels and the severe pressure not to

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>invest in developed countries I think might lead to a

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>shortage sooner than we think. Ken real quick, what do

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you think the next big market risk is? As we're

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting down us today. Look, I just think markets are

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>priced pretty much for perfection. And you don't have to know.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>This is on my I've learned over many years people

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time trying to predict the event. All

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is know that there probably will

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be one. I've learned you don't have to know what

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. You just have to know that one will

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>happen this year. You know, maybe this year. But look,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I was saying today, if Lehman Brothers had made it

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>through that one market that one year, they'd probably be

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty billion dollar market cap company today. So

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't get taken out. You have to know that

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>risk is possible, um and you have to plan for it.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And but you don't know exactly what the risk is.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>You just have to know you can survive it. Ken,

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Here's the evident idea.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You can talk all you want up a happy valley

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, you've got to go out there and do it.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you do it, you've got to move it.

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And the obvious most visible thing out there to move

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it is something for Liverpool football fields long and what

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is it truly a football field? Why are you speaking

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of the MAXX tripling. This would be the boat, the boats,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the ships that move all this stuff around. To me,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the most articulate voice on this and shipping and serious

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of climate change and the logistics and trade of

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, as Mr School of Marri's the chief executive

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>officers Sore and School joins us. Uh. Now we talked

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>often in London, thrilled they have you here. How do

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you respond to the visible lads are climate change who

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>don't realize you've got to get the boxes in Asia

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from point A to point B. Well, first, I always

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>say that the shipping is actually the most environmentally free

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in my mentorly way of moving any any type of good.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So the c U two emission that we have any

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>ton of good move this is quite low compared to

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>road and rail and air. But we still take on

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the channels. Are wanting to reduce our CU two footprint,

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and we have articulated more than a year ago an

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>ambusites to get to zero c U two by by

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifty, and we have solid plans for how to

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>get How do you plan to do that? Talk to

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>us about those plans. Well, we want to find it.

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the obviously is we need to find it

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of fuel, and we believe that we

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we have fuels that are probable, alcohols, ammonia, bio method

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that can be used on eternative sources. It's important because

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>it's about the field and not about a ship. Because

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you're in a really, really tough spot. You have to

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>plan a decade multi multi decades ahead from where you

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>are right now. So it's not a simplest thaying we're

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>going to build a whole load of new ships. Won't

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>me throw the strategic thinking around issues like that? Well,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we we believe first of all that we're having a

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>responsibility as a leader in the industry to drive the agenda. Secondly,

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>as you say, you know we we we we own

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>assets that have a twenty five year lifespan. I cannot

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be caught up by a regulation that tells me to

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>do something completely different when i'm when I'm when when

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we operate sim more than seven hunted ships. So so

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we need to we need to think ahead. You are

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a front and center in this new world. Someone suggested

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has moved aggressively from a multilateral, merisk world

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>where trade gets done to some form of bilateral world.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Are almost Americ until system. How is your business changed

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with not the trade war, but the many trades were

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the new trade Daniel mccows have changed well. Clearly growth

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is down up to the financial crisis twenty five years.

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Leading up to the financial crisis ten years ago, trade

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>was growing seven eight per year, trade liberalization and so on.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And since then we've seen much lower levels of growth.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And then last year we believe probably in the numbers

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>when they all said and done, will come in a

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>slightly less than two percent growth. It's a very low number.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You expect that to pick up. You seeing improving business

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in the new year. I I don't think that we

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>will see much higher trade growths. It's just going to

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>stay the same, despite the fact that we have some

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of trade trade between the United States and China

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and China, what we see in our numbers, based on

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the commodities that are being shipped, is that actually all

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer goods are holding up quite fine across

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's the capital goods that are not moving.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's because business leaders like myself are worried about

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the future and we invest list in your Denmark and folks,

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to make clear Denmark is the space of economics,

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of geography in the world. It's the best academics and

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is that there is there is the geography of the

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>South China, see of Singapore, of Indonesia, and that romantic

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>straight that you're You've got to get your boats through

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that straight at night at any time. That must be extraordinary.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Give us an update on the ability to move mayor's

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ships from point A to point B in the South

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>China see in the Pacific. Today we are seeing no no,

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>no impediments or any restrictions or anything that we need

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to be concerned about. You're right, the Malaga Strate between

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>single point Indonesia is a very narrow channel, but as

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>as of today, we don't see any problems there. You've

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>said trade is basically where it was last year done

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>when he said improving. Let's talk about rates. Contain a

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rate you speaking to your big clients, what have they

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>said so far, what a race look like, and how

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>things going to evolve in a year ahead. Freight rates

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have gone up quite substantially since the first of October

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>last year, mainly because we have switched over to a

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>cleaner fuel on the first of January and we're passing

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that onto the through the customers. Well, well, let's cut

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to the chase and we have to make some news here.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>How do your customers receive the new invoice? Well, uh,

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's always a procurement discussion. But at the

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I believe that many, many, many

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of our customers recognized that it's good for everybody that

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we go to a cleaner, cleaner fuel. Quick final question

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just before we let you go, if we can get

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the mess stock out there for people to just to

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have a look at and for our listeners on radio,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you it is several digits long.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Some people always ask me, when are they going to

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>do a stock split? What will Mess do a stock split?

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>This is getting ridiculous. Now we're gonna do a stock split.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I could just say we don't have any plans to

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>do a stock split. Okay, we'll leave it there. So

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go of MESQ the CEO. Look at the numbers

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>for our listeners on on radio. Several digits long and

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Danish kronaw we can do digits on the radio that

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>works about his plans for the future. The President of the

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States just pulling a pin and loving a

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>grenade into this conference yesterday and it was a total

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>one eighty from what we thought we heard from the

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>administration the day before. We can get real reaction from

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe now with Mark Rutter, the Dutch Prime minister. Primarister,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>great to see your annual visit, Tom and myself is

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>great to see you. How do you respond to the

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States? Positively because he also had

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a fair successful meeting Urgin Vonderlay as he's a new

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Your Your Commission president. They agreed that it was a

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>good meeting that he will continue to dialogue as soon

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>as possible. I've had myself many conversations with Trump on

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>trade and always found him very pragmatic and very practical.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>He has his irritations about Europe. We have some issues

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>with the US, but that is not a problem. That's

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>why you have to negotiate. I think we can get

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a deal done. I wonder if you're more annoyed with

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>France than you are the United States at the moment,

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's the policies of France that are causing much

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of the problems. Secretary Manuchin said the following this week,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>if people want to just arbitrarily put taxes on our

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>digital companies. We will consider arbitrarily putting taxes on car companies. Yeah,

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but that's a discussion about digital text. I think still

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be to deal with the issue digital text in the

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>context of the O E c D. It can also

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be part of the talks between the US and Europe.

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But don't forget the US is the number one economy

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the world and the most powerful country. But in terms

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of overall economic science is Europe is bigger. We have

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one a half times the science of the US. So

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>when they deal with China, it's not about first places

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>about second. But Prime Minister, you bring up a key point.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Montana has the same voice in President Trump is Mississippi.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>There are many voices of your Europe. What is the

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>most efficacious way for Europe to speak to the President

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and trade directly? And fourth ride

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with Trump? You have to be clear the Strasbourg. I mean,

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>who's the voice that's going to set across the table

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from the President that is pressident Jupean Commission, because this

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is a European theme and we are united in the

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>European Union on trades. We always have one of one

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the few very successful things we're doing. I mean,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we have very many issues in climate change, migration, but

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the consistently successful things we're dealing with this

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>European Union is trade, and we have to work in

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with bon Force if you're doing that, also with the

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>UK when they're leaving from the end from next week onwards,

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to create a new day deal. So impossible

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about it because we know what is important for Trump,

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we know what's important for it for Europe, and we

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are both pragmatical. The retoric in the run up is

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>always part of the There are amazing things to do.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>One of them is just look at the tariston autos.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>If you import a car out of the United States

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>into Europe ten percent. If you import a passenger car

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>out of Europe into the United States, the tariff is

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>two and a half percent, but one which goes back deckhead.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we address this? Can we just equalize the whole thing? Well,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I discussed it the stream myself, and and and on

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>average it is about nine percent from a car coming

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>out of out of Europe, the two and a half

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five who together is about nine percent, and a

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>car coming out of the US is ten percent. So

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it is already almost the same. This is not a

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>big issue. I think we can do with this is

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>before this morning. I want you to identify what the

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>new capitalism will be for Europe. The Dutch of letter

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on capitalism for well in access of four hundred years

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Do you sense with the solution of Brexit,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do you sense with some form of trade agreement with

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States a less multilateral approach, that there has

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a new capitalism out of Europe and not

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>an attitude, not a new capitalists. But we have so

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>learned from the past. Dutch companies like Shell you don

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>leave Phillips. Actually they're always We're both successful internationally oriented companies,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but also very much rooted in the local communities in

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the countries which they were serving. There still are. I'm

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>still very proud of these companies. Some of the companies

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>recently coming into place have less of a connection to

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the local communities, do not fully realize that next to

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>making a nice profit, there's also sociential impact as a

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>company and the good you can do in terms of

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>making sure that and the changes the environment are not

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>taking place in a role you can play there and

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe you shouldn't put more emphasised on emphasis on that.

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>John mentions the French and the challenges Mr McCraw has

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>domestically or the transition of power after the miracle era

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in Germany. What part can the Netherlands play to provide

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a center to Europe and more co co more coalessing capitalism. Well,

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>we believe that with the UK leaving, be one of

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the countries with the most international outlook, the most trade oriented,

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the most free enterprise oriented countries. We've worked very closely

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>together with the can Scandinavian EU countries, with the Baltic

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>country Stovenia, with Ireland, but also with Belgian and Luxembourg.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Within the Benelucks. That is a powerful group of countries

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>who all share this outlook on capitalism, on international trade.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we have a strong political relationship

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with Germany, which France was last week. In Italy, we

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are building a strong relationship with the Italian government, a

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>violet relationship within the EU because this is needed to

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>maintain that that outlook on the world with the UK leaving.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll pushed for time, let's get the UK leaving into

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. You're very pragmatic in fact, respectful of the

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>US administration, and that's encouraging about ultimately coming to a

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>positive outcome with the United States. Are you equally the

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>same with the UK At the moment, well, I have

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>pune warrior, and that is the time we have available

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 1>because they will leave formally next week, but basically they

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>won't leave at all. They will only leave the political structures.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>They will still be part of everything else in the

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>EU till the end of the year. And in the

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>meantime we have to solve this trade deal. But for

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this trade deal to be solved, we need to agree

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on level playing field all the other issues. It's an

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>awfully short amount of time. So I hope that coming

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>next summer June July, that Boris Johnson will at least

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>contemplate extending, if necessary, this transition face. At the moment

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>he is not. At the moment, it's not. But also

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>here I would say, let's take this step by step,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and you just think it's inconceivable that you can come

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to the trade but it's very difficult. So and then

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you and there's there's still the risk in the worst

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>case that you have a cliff at scenario like we

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>had experienced last year. This is a nightmare scenario because

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna end up with the Heathrow is Virgil

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>van Dyke is not gonna be able to go through

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>customs exactly like he can. Now, let's bring it the

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Gentleman for Britain Grandigan. He's got to get up to

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Liverpool and there he is stuck at Heathrow in the

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>new unacceptable. He will return us audience, can we explain? Well?

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I know who he is because I've been lecture greatest

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>center bank if football at the one of the great

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>players teams, the reason why we will win the European

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>champions You think you've got to absolutely not, really, no doubt.

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>A couple of injuries. This is a part of it

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and they hopefully will be back in time. This goes

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to the we're gonna have to talk about this later

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Dutch Prime Minister's next visit to New York

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and London. I just left. We have the Dutch Prime

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>stay with us and we end up talking about your

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite topic. I love watching. It's like Aaron Judge of

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the New York Game. He's not a body fantastic is

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>something else. Margaret's great to catch up with you once again,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dutch Prime Minister and damaged economic for minister does

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not wait in line when he goes through special Privately,

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I wait in line. When I would travel to Jos

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>official capacity, I would be well hovered around, But in

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the private capacity I have to wait in the same

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>lineage pharaoh with us for a good conversation of the

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>international finance but also strength of the emerging markets and

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the weaknesses. Is the chief executive of Standard Charged,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>He's Bill Winters. As always, thank you so much for

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We every time quisy on Hong Kong and

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>whether you've seen money flows, wealthy clients wanting to move

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>their bank accounts out, give us an update of First

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, it nice to be here. Uh. Hong Kong's

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in good shape, right, I mean, it was a horrific

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>six months uh and culminating in a really horrific period

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of violence in December. Uh. But while the issues are

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are as yet unresults and we know that so so

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea that this is behind us would would be hopeful,

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>but night but pieces prevailing in Hong Kong, and that's

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>very encouraging. So what we saw through the through the

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>worst of the of the period was some people, frank

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>very few on a percentage basis, made some provisions to

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>move their money someways else opening an account in some

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>plays UH, but virtually none of them actually moved their money.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>So so so so that the business activity has stayed

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>very strong in Hong Kong. So as Hong Kong is

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a as a trading hub, Hong Kong is a financial center,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and we see it from the I p O calendars

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and is very strong. And if they haven't missed a

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>beat in that regard, the hospitality of the retail sectors,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>tourism have been severely impacted. It was a big chunk

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the tourism came from mainland China. It will take

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a while for for them to come back. They had

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a bad experience when they were in Hong Kong and

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>UH and the rest of the world has has stayed

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>away while things were unsettled. Now that that pieces is

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>breaking out, as it persists, as as we hope it does,

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Hong Kong will get back to normal. And

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>over the course of this year. Moments ago, China has

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>taken steps to actually cancel some of the festivities, lunar

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>festivities because of the coronavirle is as a big chief

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>executive in the region. How do you monitor and and

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you prepare for Well, it's concerning. I mean

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>we we first start by by making sure that that

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>our on colleagues are taking the proper precautions and safe

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So you can imagine the level of anxiety is very

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>very high. If somebody gets a cold, now it's that

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a question whether whether it's something much worse, and

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that can cause the whole office to to lock down.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's uh, we start started home. Uh, we're trying

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to stay very close to our clients, help them understand

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what their exposures are. Obviously, people in the transportation and

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and tourism industry themselves are at some risk within China,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>especially coming into Chinese New Year, so trying to help

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>identify working capital needs or challenges. It will come up

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if things progress as they have for the past twenty

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>four hours. Other than that, we were watching with the

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world and hoping do you have operations

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that could be directly affected. We do. My I was

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>intending to be in Uhan next week. I mean that

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was we have we have a very substantial operation in

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Muhan and Johan Chang and Jian you know, all through

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Western China, and yes, or they're directly affected that. So

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>are you speaking with with health officials on the ground

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there or my colleagues, my colleagues in China are speaking

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with health officials continuously. But as as you've seen and

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as you've reported, it's a very fast moving set of facts.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Even even today, we've we've had material new pieces of news.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But but we we we have our own intelligence on

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the ground as well, from our clients and from our people,

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's very consistent with what we're hearing from

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the government. So I'm encouraged by this commitment to transparency.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I could only encourage it to continue. Are you encouraged

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>by US China Phase one deal or actually Phase one nothing,

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's simply an understanding that you know, things

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>won't escalate. Fun It's encouraging because it's they demonstrated that

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>they can agree on something and it has stopped the

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>cycle of escalation. That's a good thing. There's a bit

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of of of claw back in terms of tariffs and

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>protection of intellectual properties and opening up the financial services markets.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>These are all good things. And does it solve the problem? No,

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, not that the structural issues are still there,

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that the two sides have demonstrated willing

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us to agree on some things we have to take

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is encouraging. Does it help statur charger when with the

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>tariffs going up there was no particular impact on header chargers,

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so coming down there won't be either. What is what's

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>challenging is is the the prospect, the uncertainty around this

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>prospect of of a bifurcated world, with with our customers

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>and our clients not really knowing how much they have

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to reconfigure their supply chains and which you don't know

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what you need to do, you tend to prepare for

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst, which usually means a lot of wasted cost

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and investment. So so the the the increasing uncertainty was

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a problem. It's come off a little bit, but the

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty hasn't improved too much. President trumpus here yesterday. He

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>spoke to a number of business leaders. I think you

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>learned some of those meetings. What was the message coming

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>from the US administration? I mean, the key message I

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>take away from from the messages was that he's running

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>for president of the United States, so that the message

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>would seem to be quite targeted at the domestic audience. Uh,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>it was. You know, I say that the themes in

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Davos have overwhelmingly been sustainability, to the point that it's

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>probably crowded out some other very important discussions like the

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>challenges around inequality. But the traction on on sustainability has

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>been very impressive. I think, so hardcore commitments in terms

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the metrics that will be using to measure progress. Uh.

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And I say specifically, you know, what does my business

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>contribute to to this climate change dynamic and what can

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I do about it? And then specific commitments from corporations

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and willingness I SNA across the banking industry and sharing

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a session yesterday where we focused a lot of what

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the banks could do collectively to address a sustainability question. So,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are the messages coming out of Davos.

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And then there was some noise on the side. Okay,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at market, it's what is one thing

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we had to political concerns, you know regarding Iran and

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Iraq um us China trade is the forefront to US elections,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>which you kind of mentioned out of those three, what's

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest risk for the markets? I think the big

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>structural risk because it's it's very impactful and and as

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>yet unresolved. Although in a peaceful zone right now is

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the US China tentions, Iraq Iran, US Saudi has the

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>possibility to explode right now. That's that feels unlikely. I mean,

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.959
<v Speaker 1>it feels like there's been a dramatic escalation and then

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>quick de escalation. Uh. And certainly that what I can

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>pick up through the hallways, and it's just you know,

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody's got their views. Uh there there's a

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>genuine willingness on all sides to try to de escalate

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point. So, but of course have that changed

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and and an impact it all flos through the through

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the straits, then we've been a very different place. Um

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>so I So to me, it still comes back to

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>US China and getting some real progress there. We're moments

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>away from the e CD decision. Are central banks exhausted?

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Are they running out of ammunition? I think the I

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>don't thin they're running out of ammunition, but I think

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the ammunition is is a little bit as effective. So

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course that there's new rounds of quantity

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of easing, or there's new new types of assets that

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that central banks could buy to affect credit spreads or

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>even affect equity prices at a point, but it seems

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to be an exercise with diminishing returns. So I don't

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>think they're out of tools by any means, but they

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>might have to use more of those tools if they

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>feel the need to use those who's at all right,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But we've heard presidents leg out of the e CB

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to put pressure on fiscal If you were to

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>quantify twenty twenty, if we had one, you know, one

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>mondary policy or one fiscal policy, would it be, you know,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>government spending more. Does that actually give you more business?

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>If there's If there's a lesson that we've learned from

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>developing markets through the years, it's that that aggressive fiscal

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>programs targeted at things that really improve the quality of

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>an economy, so infrastructure, education, healthcare, those things are typically

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a really good use of money, especially when you're funding

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it with very low cost debt, which is what we

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have right now. Fiscal deficits that are that are being

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>used to drive consumption give you a sugar high, but

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>don't don't structurally improve the ability of the economy to

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>grow and strengthened. So I think to the extent that

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the US and Germany, so the two guys with the

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest fiscal firepower right now, step up their fiscal spending,

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>but focus on on these these structural value creators that

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 1>can be a very important complement to monitory policy. But

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a little noise that actually Germany is ready to

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>spend what what a lot of people ask of them.

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>They're under a lot of pressure. I don't know if

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they've they've internalized that yet. Okay, the negative rates, how

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>how much of I mean every bank is complaining about

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>negative rates? But actually do policy makers understand that that

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>this could not only lead to to really testing the

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>banking models even further, but actually social like unrest. I

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think policy makers have to be very careful about what

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they say. But I can't imagine that they don't know

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just bad for the banking systems, it's

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>very bad in terms of creating imbalances in the economy

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and imbalances and capital markets that when they unwind, it

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>would be quite dangerous. And since it's clearly part of

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the central banks mandate is financial stability. They know that

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this this is another kind of drug, that it's also

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>having diminishing returns, and that that is piling up quite

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a substantial problem for the future. Very quickly on your

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>turn around planned? Is it too? Is it? You know,

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>time to say mission accomplished? You never say, MISSI accomplished,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not accomplished. But but what I can say

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is that that that our bank is super strong at

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this point. We have all the foundations that we need.

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>We have all the growth momentum in the key areas

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of our our cross border corporate business, our affluent client business,

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and then then more recently our massive investments in digital banking.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>All those things are working extremely well. We just have

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to to to see them through to to fruition bills.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>As always, thank you so much for joining us. He's

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a protective of standard charge. Stacy cunning and joins us.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>She's gone a little bit better than internship as president

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Stack. Were thrilled here. Thanks because

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the American dream when you were a kid in a

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>financial family, that was like Because what was it like

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the first day when you were in turned on the floor.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually before I walked onto the Stock exchange floor.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about finance. It wasn't something I wanted

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. But those first minutes, the first fifteen minutes,

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I knew it was what I wanted to do with

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>my life. I loved it. I love the pace and

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I love the energy, and you know, I love what

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 1>capitalism delivers for this country. And I think that's what

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we should be talking about, because I think that that's

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>where we need. Do you think anyone is defending capitalism

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>at this conference, Well, no, no, And that's the point.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what I'm hearing at this conference is we

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have to tell our stories better, and I think capitalism

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>does not is not immune from that. Right, Capitalism has

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>been the engine that has been the growth of the

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, really fueling the growth of the United States,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but it needs a tune up. We need to make

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that the American dream is a story of shared success.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we gotta get companies out private, from private

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to public sooner so that others can share in their

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>wealth creation. And we need to talk about the good

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that those companies are doing by creating jobs and giving

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>back to their community. One of the great voices of

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the n Y s as a guy named Kempoll Curry.

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>He's been great, loyal, visible, smart on the markets. Great.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>He and I remember another time is that New York

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Stock has change of today anything like what you knew

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>was an intern and where's it going to be in

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>five years? Yeah. We kept the best parts of New

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange, and we brought together modernization where we

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>could automate the parts that that really just should be automated.

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And so we really believe strongly that the combination of

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>people and technology is so much more powerful. Are you

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>keeping at happy with best price? Yes? Explain that for

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>our audience that folks on radio and television, this is

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>wicked important. You here Arthur love At, the former chairman

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC with us on Bloomberg Surveillance, and he's

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>always talking about the execution. Explain why the execution now

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is different than before ken Ball carry had a beard.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you want to make sure

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is that when somebody wants to buy ourselves stock, they

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>can go out and see what is the value. And

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing values a company better than the public markets. But

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>price is an important part of that, and so the

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>exchanges are the ones that set that price. And even

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>though market trading has changed and of the market is

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>trading in dark and not contributing that price, they're actually

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>taking those prices that you the exchange is set to

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>determine where to trade, and those are the same exact

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>prices that a retail investor logging into their Fidelity each

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>trade and merrit trade. You just slipped through trading in

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the dark. Yeah, you tried in the dark. What is

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>trading in the so so what that is is if

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you are showing your prices to the world to see,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>so that when someone logs into their online trading account,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>calls they're broker on their Bloomberg terminal and they get

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>their prices. Their Bloomberg terminal is showing the best price

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Stacey, you're making the argument that companies

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.479
<v Speaker 1>should stop staying in private markets for so long income public.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people would understand the argument coming from you,

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 1>why and why a direct listening is gonna be such

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>an important part of this process. So the two great questions.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>The first one is why should they be public sooner?

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of conversations around why they're

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>staying private longer, and you can talk about that it's capital,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's regulation, it's all these things. But

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with the downsides to the fact that they're staying private

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>means there's less discipline governance in companies which are a

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>much larger company that's much more impactful. There is less

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>clarity around valuation. So are these companies worth what the

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>private markets are saying or do you need the wisdom

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and the disclosures and transparency of the public markets to

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>determine that. And it's creating a bifurcation of wealth. Let's

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about pressure, the pressure on you guys. At the moment,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we had the like of Larry Think of black Rock

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about leaning on the active management world to lean

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out of some companies. Let's say in cold the pressure

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really is going to have to be put on the

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>index providers to say to them, you need to get

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>these companies off out of the index. That's going to

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>make the most difference. The pressure is also going to

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be on the exchanges. Why allow these companies to list

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on your exchange? I think it's really important to distinction,

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that that investors have access to opportunities

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and the right to choose. And so by putting them

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on exchanges and giving them information about their disclosures is

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>helpful for them can make it informed decisions. I think

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to recognize, what are the conversations I've

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been having here in Davas over the past few days

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are from many CEOs. We're saying, we've been doing all

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the work around d s G already because it's

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>important to our employees. It's an important to our customers

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that we take a stand on these issues, even more

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so than their investors. Let me ask you this because

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I actually it's come up multiple times, not just at

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this conference, but over the last few months, maybe the

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>last few years as well. You have minimum standards to

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be listed on the New York Stock Exchange, minimum market cap,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>minimum out of shadholder as well. Why not have the

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>s G as part of that. Because our standards are

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 1>very focused on investor protections, and if those companies stay private,

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the conversations we're having are really connected. Right. If we

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>put so many standards around requirements for companies to be public,

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>they have alternatives. It's a different dynamic than it was

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago when you actually had to come to the

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>public markets to get money. Because there is money available

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>in the private market space. We don't want investors to

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be denied those opportunities entirely. This is not your remit,

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but I want your opinion on this because it's important.

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Pharaoh has just recovered from the shock of losing that

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>much money on his eight thousand Listen to this. How

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>do you respond when on your floor they do the

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>song and dance of an I p O or even

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>even a secondary but particularly initial public offerings and they

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>come out and they do the whole modern media dance

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and the thing goes down x per set. That's not

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>good for the brand, is it. I think we should

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that in a large, large IPO like that,

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they sold eight billion dollars worth of stock and it

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>opened at a price and stayed right there. Now, over time,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>investors were reacting to the valuations of companies and his

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>companies go. Your job is to get it open in

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the early minute, to make sure that investors have the information.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Did they have the information? And you'll see it's a

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>great example of private valuations versus public valuations. And so

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we need to actually make sure companies get out and

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this this this shift because they don't need capital, is

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>actually why the direct listing was innovation, an innovation that

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we delivered this year because it's actually not about raising money,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it's about in those cases you say, so you're nailing,

0:35:55.640 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a private valuation, they go public and so elected

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:04.959
<v Speaker 1>stocks tank whose responsibility is that it's not you, who

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is it who's respecting questions that they weren't asking before.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what you're gonna see is that

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>investor are profitability and valuations. And when you have limited

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>people participating in the private space, you're limning access to

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and you're also limiting access to information. Stacey, fantastic

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation one of my work you're looking for work Stacey

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>accounting of nicely President. Thank you very much from Davil,

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland for our audience worldwide. Alongside it's Tom Keane, Jonathan Pharaoh.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the countdown to the open on bloom Black

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>TV and on Bloomberg Riding Up. I can confirm then

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in Frankfurt, Germany, there is an absolute snoozer of a

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>news conference. In Christine. Everybody asking questions is asking one

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to three in a row. I don't know how she

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>does it. If you would like to follow that you

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can on the Blomberg terminal if you are a Blomberg

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 1>subscriber on Life Go. Let's get the price action. Around

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>about twenty minutes out from the opening bout in New

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>York City, we set up as follows the pain. The

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 1>epicenter of all of it is over an Asia, Chinese

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 1>equity markets down and down hard, in the United States barely.

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>And he followed through whatsoever SMP five futures coming in

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>just a tenth of one percent in the bottom market

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>yields lullaby three basis points TOM one seventy four is

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>your yield on a US tenure. What's interesting in all

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of our discussions here, and you learn this in Davos,

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and frankly you learn it on the island of Manhattan

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, that each bank is different, each executive and

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>set of executives at the banks are different, of course,

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>all different challenges at Goldman Sachs, of course, the transition.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>And they've chosen a guy they used to move ice

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>cream at Baskin Robbins. This is important, John, You don't

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>understand America. The coveted job in high school younger high school,

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, you went to McDonald's, you went to the others.

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The Glory Job was best and Robbins ice cream and

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's how you moved David Selom, a gome sex chairman,

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to see have you ever had an introduction like that before?

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I've never. First of all, thank you for having me,

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I've never had What was your favorite flavor?

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>My favorite flavor was Rocky Road. Always your favorite introduction? Okay,

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking podcast banks the Center. In the conversation

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>today with the CP and Frankfurt for the feder was

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a real conversation about what is going on with the

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. David would love your insight, just your take,

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>your opinion. Is that QI or is that not QI?

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>What is that? So the monetary policy that's been around

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and has been in place for a long time obviously

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>has been an enormous stimulus. When we when we sit

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>here today and I kind of think about, you know,

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the path forward. I think we're now in a period

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this year after three mid uh three mid cycle cuts

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for lack of a better term, that I don't expect

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot from the Fed in the context of this year. Obviously,

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheets come down a lot over the course

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of the last couple of years. UM all of this

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>supports or impacts liquidity in markets, and I think the

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>FED has done a reasonable job managing liquidity and markets

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>even with a speed bump back. So I'll ask it again, then,

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is that Q wait as they start to buy tapos

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and a balance sheet stops to expand again, any time

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the FED uses its resources to affect liquidity in some way,

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>shape or form, it's having an impact on markets. I'm

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>not going to answer the question that you're looking for

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>me to answer it because I I don't think it's

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a black and white answer. You tell me what Q

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 1>he is? Who ask Bill Dudley. But the answer here

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is we get a lot of different opinions, including the

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>former member of Golden sexually someone that drove your economics

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 1>for Mr Dudley of the New York Fed. We get

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>all these different opinions, and what our audience wants to

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>know is what you have learned from your prose on

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the desk of those reactions, the movements that you've seen

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>in the short term paper market. What have you actually

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.439
<v Speaker 1>observed in the market that gives you information about these

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet challenges? Well, I I think that everyone observed

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that the FED had a very very significant balance sheet investment,

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and it reduced that balot and cheat. There have been

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of regulatory inputs the amount of liquidity that

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>banks need to hold as the regulations have changed, and

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point you can reach a supply demand where

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for a variety of reasons, some of them can be

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>idiosyncratic around a moment time maybe tax payments, that the

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>supply demand of liquidity changes and the price for short

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 1>term liquidity rises. And we saw that the FED responded

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>appropriately by saying, we want to make sure that there's

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>enough liquidity in the system. I think all the banks also,

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I know we did. I can't speak for others. We

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 1>positioned ourselves so at the end of the year we

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 1>thought liquidity might be type. We have liquidity to contribute

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to that felic good question. Are you constrained by the

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>new set of regulations? Are you're happy with them? Or

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>do you just see I need to see amendments so

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you do finance better? Now? We we we we are

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>an adapter to the regulatory framework, and so I think

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as an organization we've adapted very well over the regular

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>over the decade to the regulatory framework. And look, the

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>regulatory framework continues to evolve, and so our job is

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to make we can serve our clients well, that we

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have the right resources and we do not see we

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>do not feel constrained to serve our clients well and

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>run our business based on the regulatory framework. We want

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>your take on the market. So the price action we've

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last couple of months, the community, the

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>investment community in the World Economic Forum pretty polarized on

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing at the moment. We've had a hole

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>range of fuse. We had Gougenheim Scott mined to say

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that it resembles someone we had boot prints of Bridgewater

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>say the boom bus cyclists, we know it is over.

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>When do you come down those two extreme views? Generally

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>not a man of extremes, so um So I'd say

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that there will be booms and bus again at some point,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>although I don't see one anytime, you know, anytime soon.

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as I've been around talking to clients

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>over the last few days, and that's one of the

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>principal things I do while I'm here, you know, i'd see,

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, I see and I hear what I call

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of a confident middle of the road view of

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the current economic environment, US economy is in good shape.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Manufacturing sector is a little bit soft. Capital spending been

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 1>lower than people would like to see, but the consumer

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>is overcompensating for that. Europe a little bit better. Headwinds

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Phase one deal helps a little, but in

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the distribution of outcomes overwhelming likely scenario is economy chugs along.

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>That well said, but the distributions of outcome And I

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>remember this and Mr Varney in August of two thousand seven,

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you get a three standard or even four point one

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>standard deviation moment is golden sas And for that matter,

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>your view of global Wall Street position better. Now boom

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bust if we get that jump condition, that abrupt movement

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as we saw in August of two thousand seven. The

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>banking systems positioned incredibly differently that it was positioned in

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven. There's been an enormous amount of

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage that's come out of the banking system. There's been

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of equity that's going into the banking system.

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I also think the risk management activities of the industry

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>have improved materially, so there will be cycles, there will

0:42:56.480 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be events um that stir markets, JE don't really they

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>repeat differently. So the last time there was a significant

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>economic recession, it affected the banks significantly. I think the

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>banks are in a different position. And when we do

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have you know, trouble um in the years ahead, which

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>at some point we will the range of things we

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>can see, but I think the banks will be more

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>resilient in the context of that, based on the way

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>they currently talk about how your position in the bank

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for the years to come best. Today, I believe it's

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>next Wednesday investerdays. Next Wednesday, Investor Day is right now,

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin, right now, come on investor Days. Investor Day's

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>next Wednesday. It's our first investor day ever since we

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>went public in twenty years. Um. I'm a big believer

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that that you know, our investors and more broadly are stakeholders,

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, deserve transparency around the way we're going to

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 1>grow the organization, expand our franchise, serve our clients, and

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimately deriver deliver higher returns for our shareholders. And so

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>we'll lay out a series of initiatives, many of which

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken about, you know, individually publicly, but with more information,

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll put out some targets with respect to returns that

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we can be held accountable to. Targets. So we're gonna

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>put out targets with respect to returns that we can

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable to, and we'll talk a little bit

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about how we intend to run the bank so we

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>can deliver for shareholders over time. Let me set up

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a scenario. Let's say a week before you're investigating, a

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>competitor comes out and says on new profitability target is

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty to seventy pace and return on equity step my laugh,

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>A little bit difficult for you next week. I We're

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>focused on running our business. I don't I don't think

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that that that that the anyone came out and said

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to seven pc return at equity. They said fifteent

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>return a tangible equity. Okay, But we're focused on our

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>business and so our returns and our messages are going

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to be rooted in what we want to do as

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:46.760
<v Speaker 1>an organization so we can deliver competition. Everybody's always benchmarked

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>against competitions. We're gonna we're gonna deliver what we think

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>we can deliver over time for our shareholders to build

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a better, bigger, stronger organization. Part of the side grilling

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you on this investor investor Day, and you've got a

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>whole team on this, and you've been very experiences. This

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is they're going to talk about strategic vision, and so

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>much of this on investor Day is explaining to investors

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>do you want to expand through acquisition of a bank

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or just small bolt on acquisitions that advanced golden Sex

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 1>intellect and technology. What you're feeling on that right now?

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Given the terrific equity markets of the last twelve months,

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>are you are you priced out of opportunities globally? Well,

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I've I've said this repeatedly that I think God and

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I come to this from my own experience as a banker.

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I think anyone, any leadership team that's running a big

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>organization always has to be aware of both or of

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 1>both organic opportunities to grow and also in organic opportunities

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to grow. We're always looking and thinking about things that

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we think can expand our franchise and allow us to

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>serve our clients more effectively and ultimately deliver for shareholders.

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But the bar for us to ever do something significant

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and organically is extremely high. But on a strategic basis,

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is that a geographic choice. Obviously it's a financial choice.

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But tell me about the Goldman Sex geography right now?

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it a gold division? Goldmen Sex Goldman Sax is

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a global firm. I think one of our competitive advantages

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is we truly are a global platform in the businesses

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that we operate in. Historically, if you look at our

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>investment banking business, if you look at our sales and

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>trading business, you look at our asset management business, we

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are a global organization and we have an ability to

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>work anywhere in the strategy and wealth management right now

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and Golden Sax asset management, what's the strategy right now?

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 1>So on wealth management or on an asset manage I'll

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>take both. You asked one and then the other. I'll

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 1>take you for two. Um, let's start with asset man um.

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>On asset management, we run one of the top three

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>global active asset management platforms. It's an advisory red lead business.

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.399
<v Speaker 1>In other words, we think our clients come to us because,

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in addition to strong investment performance over a period of time,

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>we package it around advice to help them meet their

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>long term investment needs. We think advice is differentiated and

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you can still get paid for advice and that's what

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>our asset management business focuses on. We're also very unique

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and that when you look at the three largest global

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>asset management businesses, we may be the only one that

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>really in every product category, including alternatives, is really as scale.

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, across liquidity products, across active equity

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and fixed income, across alternatives were its scale on a

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>global basis, and I think for our institutional customers that's

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>an advantageous position. So when you look at our ability

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to acquire assets over the last three or five years

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 1>long term fee based assets, we've outperformed relative to people

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we'd be benchmarked against. It. Talk to us about how

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>hard it is to make a strategy, strange strategic decision

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for the bank that will work out a ten years,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not just for now. So ten years ago the right decision,

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>some people might say, would be to beeft Wealth Management

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and scale back fixed income trading. Ten years later, that

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>might be the right strategic place to be in. But

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>as we sit here now, ten years out, how hot

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>is it to get that strategy right? To look forward

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and say what works now might not work in the future. Well, look,

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what CEO is always have to do

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>um and I think the right CEO is make investments

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that the competitive position of their franchises strengthens

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>over time. And when you get it right, your franchise

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is strengthened. And if you don't get it right, you

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>know over time, you know the evidence comes forward. So

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we are going to grow our asset management business. We

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to grow and expand our wealth management business.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And we think over the next decade those are opportunities

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that take core competencies at Goldman Sachs and we can

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:34.439
<v Speaker 1>expand on them. So if I don't want to talk

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:37.239
<v Speaker 1>about the sensitivities at the moment and this comes out,

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think of William Cohen's book on Goldman Sex, and

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>there's that a claim scene, a scene. It's Scotty's over

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Excel and sandwich, and it's Mr Weinberg and others that

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>go down to Scotty's and over lunch they do Golden

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Sex business. This is a whole new world. Now. Tell

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 1>us about the shift that you've had as a new

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer, and this is vesterday coming up. Tell

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>us internally at Golden Sex. The mood as you go

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>to your first investors to day. What's the day to

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>day mix at Goldman Sex right now is you move

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>forward with your strategic plan well, along with the rest

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of our leadership team were uh, you know, I'm very privileged,

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.799
<v Speaker 1>were very privileged to lead an organization that's filled with

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary people. And I think they're excited about the investor day,

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but I also think the organization is energized by the momentum.

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:31.799
<v Speaker 1>The firm has to serve our clients holistically through a

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>program we call one Golden Sacks to really make sure

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we're delivering as much as we can for our clients. Broadly,

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a real client service mindset in the organization that

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 1>this leadership team is really you know, pushing hard at

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>making sure we get right. And when they look at

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the areas where we're investing, whether it's transaction banking, it's uh,

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the alternatives business and asset management, it's the expansion

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of our wealth management opportunities, or it's our digital consumer

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.839
<v Speaker 1>banking platform. They're excited about the investments and excited about

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about a Goldman Sex where more of these businesses

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>make us more more new new. Is that Goldman Sex.

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not like Scotty's in the romance of Exhale and Sandwiches.

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember important I don't. I read, but I

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't remember. This is an important scene of how Goldman

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Sex operated within the mythology and legend of the company.

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I want the new Goldman Sex look like. I can't

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>speak to how Golden Sex operated historically going back that far,

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>because I wasn't there today today. Look, we have a

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>very very young, vibrant workforce that's very focused on serving

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>our clients. Um, We're very, very focused on making sure

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we continue to have the best, the brightest, the most talented, motivated,

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>driven people to serve our clients. Well, I think we're

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in that position. This management team leads with an open,

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>communicative style. I think that's what the organization wants, and

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I I feel like the organization is excited about the

0:50:57.760 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>direction we're moving it. But we have a lot of

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>work to do. When we have a lot to accomplish,

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and like any organization, we're focused and committed to getting

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that done. How do you open up to the consumer

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time maintaining that Goldman Sacks gold plates

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 1>at branding Because I'm not concerned about that. Look, we

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think a lot about about our brand and our position UM,

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But at the same point, I think there's lots that

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we can do for consumers that makes our brand and

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>our approach, especially on the digital platform, aspirational for consumers.

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And look, when you talk about consumers, there is a

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>wide swath of people that you can deal with and

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>UM and I feel good about the way our brands are.

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>One of the one of the big one of the

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>big endorsements I think of our brand is that when

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we partnered with Apple around the credit card, they wanted

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs on that credit card. And I think that

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>speaks to how you know our brand you know is

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 1>viewed by some out in the marketplace that we we

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>want to find ways to use that man effectively to

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>serve individuals for their financial needs. And there's no reason

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>if we do it well, it's differentiated. We ease their

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.399
<v Speaker 1>pain points, we give them information and resources that allow

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>them to make any decisions that that can't represent that

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 1>brand with consumers in a very effective way. Are you

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:12.320
<v Speaker 1>going to take technology at this investors and drive it forward?

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there another announcement with Apple or some there there's

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>no There's there's no there's no big review. I got

0:52:17.920 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 1>here in my ear. You're not going to You're not

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>going to make a lot of news where we we

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.760
<v Speaker 1>will talk about our technology investment. We have some new leaders,

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:29.839
<v Speaker 1>you know outside. We'll talk a little bit about some

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the technology investments were making, like all financial services

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>firms of making. You're excited about that, um, but but

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'm gonna help you make some

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:42.799
<v Speaker 1>great grand you know, curtain raising news. Um, the investor day, Well,

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>come next Wednesday. Your facing interview is so over all

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the sacks by to catch How do you thank you?

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:52:56.320 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.