WEBVTT - With Sora 2, We’re Climbing Higher on the Dystopia Scale

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:28.724
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:28.764 --> 0:00:31.164
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova and.

0:00:31.124 --> 0:00:33.684
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. Stay in the show. Look if it

0:00:33.724 --> 0:00:36.604
<v Speaker 2>looks like I'm taping this in candle lights because all

0:00:36.644 --> 0:00:39.964
<v Speaker 2>the power is out in New York City and around

0:00:39.964 --> 0:00:42.244
<v Speaker 2>the world because of the government shutdown. No, there has

0:00:42.284 --> 0:00:44.164
<v Speaker 2>been a government shut down for more than a week

0:00:44.204 --> 0:00:46.684
<v Speaker 2>now as you're hearing this less than new beecause we're

0:00:46.724 --> 0:00:48.964
<v Speaker 2>taping this. We're going to talk about how it's evolved,

0:00:49.004 --> 0:00:53.324
<v Speaker 2>what the polling says so far, and you know, do

0:00:53.404 --> 0:00:56.844
<v Speaker 2>a check in on which side if either is applying

0:00:56.844 --> 0:00:57.644
<v Speaker 2>the right strategy.

0:00:58.204 --> 0:01:01.604
<v Speaker 1>And after that, we are going to talk about one

0:01:01.684 --> 0:01:05.844
<v Speaker 1>of our pet favorite subjects here at Risky Business, which

0:01:05.884 --> 0:01:10.684
<v Speaker 1>is AI and the release of a new AI video

0:01:10.764 --> 0:01:13.244
<v Speaker 1>generation app from open Ai called.

0:01:13.284 --> 0:01:15.844
<v Speaker 2>Sora Sora Too, Sora Too.

0:01:15.724 --> 0:01:17.884
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I can I can never get it. N Yes,

0:01:18.724 --> 0:01:21.924
<v Speaker 1>the man the names of open Ai products. But the

0:01:21.964 --> 0:01:27.324
<v Speaker 1>segment will be about broader societal concerns that have to

0:01:27.364 --> 0:01:29.964
<v Speaker 1>go beyond whether it's called Sora or Sora Too.

0:01:30.524 --> 0:01:32.684
<v Speaker 2>How dystopian are We're going to answer that question for

0:01:32.684 --> 0:01:34.804
<v Speaker 2>you on a scale of zero to ten, how far

0:01:34.844 --> 0:01:40.844
<v Speaker 2>are down the lines. Are we to a dystopia?

0:01:42.604 --> 0:01:45.964
<v Speaker 1>But before we dive into AI, let's talk a little

0:01:45.964 --> 0:01:49.604
<v Speaker 1>bit about the government shutdown. So we are recording this

0:01:49.764 --> 0:01:54.044
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, October sixth, you'll be hearing it on Wednesday

0:01:54.084 --> 0:01:57.964
<v Speaker 1>the eighth. On the Sex We're still in a government shutdown.

0:01:58.004 --> 0:02:01.844
<v Speaker 1>And Nate, we know you're an advisor to Polymarket. It

0:02:01.924 --> 0:02:03.924
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that if you look at the odds,

0:02:03.924 --> 0:02:06.684
<v Speaker 1>we will probably still be in a shutdown by the

0:02:06.684 --> 0:02:09.524
<v Speaker 1>time listeners hear this episode on Wednesday.

0:02:09.684 --> 0:02:13.804
<v Speaker 2>Polymarket the prediction, Sorry, poly Market, the prediction market for everyone.

0:02:15.164 --> 0:02:20.764
<v Speaker 2>It's poly October anyway. Yeah, according to Polymarket, there's only

0:02:20.844 --> 0:02:23.484
<v Speaker 2>about a three percent chance that will look foolish by

0:02:23.564 --> 0:02:26.324
<v Speaker 2>having released this episode when the sub shutdowns already resolved.

0:02:26.724 --> 0:02:28.764
<v Speaker 2>In about a seventy five percent chance that it will

0:02:28.764 --> 0:02:31.204
<v Speaker 2>be resolved within a week and a half or later.

0:02:31.804 --> 0:02:35.724
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five percent chance for the longest shutdown in American history.

0:02:36.164 --> 0:02:39.604
<v Speaker 1>So, Nate, I am curious, what is the longest the

0:02:39.644 --> 0:02:41.084
<v Speaker 1>government has ever shut down for?

0:02:41.964 --> 0:02:45.604
<v Speaker 2>It was thirty five days in eighteen twenty nineteen.

0:02:45.884 --> 0:02:48.564
<v Speaker 1>And how did that? How did that play out? Was

0:02:48.604 --> 0:02:54.324
<v Speaker 1>the country experiencing any any really negative consequences. Could we

0:02:54.444 --> 0:02:57.444
<v Speaker 1>feel the shutdown as a nation, because I don't actually

0:02:57.484 --> 0:03:00.044
<v Speaker 1>remember what it felt like, to be perfectly honest.

0:03:00.404 --> 0:03:02.724
<v Speaker 2>Have you noticed any effects of the shutdown so far?

0:03:03.004 --> 0:03:06.284
<v Speaker 1>No, I have not gone. But if I were a

0:03:06.284 --> 0:03:09.244
<v Speaker 1>federal employee, I might write because we know that that if.

0:03:09.204 --> 0:03:12.444
<v Speaker 2>You're a federal employee, then you may get furloughed, you

0:03:12.484 --> 0:03:14.964
<v Speaker 2>may stop getting a paycheck, and if you're not furloaed,

0:03:15.204 --> 0:03:18.804
<v Speaker 2>social Security benefits may be delayed. Right. Staffing at some

0:03:18.884 --> 0:03:23.004
<v Speaker 2>agencies like the National Park Service may be limited mildly

0:03:23.204 --> 0:03:27.484
<v Speaker 2>to severely. You know all you know, you have financial

0:03:27.484 --> 0:03:29.764
<v Speaker 2>sector things about how we're making our treasury payments and

0:03:29.804 --> 0:03:32.284
<v Speaker 2>things like that. Anyway, there's a lot of stuff. It's

0:03:32.364 --> 0:03:36.844
<v Speaker 2>kind of the grab bag. The president has both the

0:03:36.964 --> 0:03:41.484
<v Speaker 2>jury and de facto power to play around with things

0:03:41.964 --> 0:03:44.004
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, right. I Mean, there's some question about

0:03:44.004 --> 0:03:47.164
<v Speaker 2>whether Trump wants to make Democrats feel the pain or

0:03:47.204 --> 0:03:50.204
<v Speaker 2>if rather that would turn around on him. But yeah,

0:03:50.324 --> 0:03:53.524
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's talk about the reasons why nobody expecting

0:03:53.524 --> 0:03:54.844
<v Speaker 2>a quick resolution.

0:03:54.724 --> 0:03:57.244
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, So there, I mean, there are two main

0:03:57.284 --> 0:04:00.124
<v Speaker 1>things the way that I understand it. Thing number one

0:04:00.164 --> 0:04:04.204
<v Speaker 1>healthcare spending, right and or it cuts to healthcare, and

0:04:04.404 --> 0:04:07.524
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are standing for them on that this is

0:04:07.564 --> 0:04:11.164
<v Speaker 1>a place where we might get some common ground with Republicans,

0:04:11.204 --> 0:04:14.884
<v Speaker 1>because obviously, if your healthcare premiums are about to get

0:04:14.924 --> 0:04:17.964
<v Speaker 1>twice as expensive, if you're going to lose healthcare coverage,

0:04:17.964 --> 0:04:20.404
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, you care whether you're

0:04:20.524 --> 0:04:23.884
<v Speaker 1>a Republican or a Democrat. So common ground there potentially.

0:04:24.604 --> 0:04:28.124
<v Speaker 1>And number two, one of the things that the Democrats

0:04:28.204 --> 0:04:31.124
<v Speaker 1>seem to be insisting on is some sort of a

0:04:31.204 --> 0:04:38.364
<v Speaker 1>curb on Donald Trump's ability to limit the appropriations stop

0:04:38.404 --> 0:04:44.324
<v Speaker 1>appropriations that Congress has already appropriated. Sorry, I'm saying appropriations

0:04:44.364 --> 0:04:47.404
<v Speaker 1>way too often that I don't know what other My

0:04:47.564 --> 0:04:50.644
<v Speaker 1>vocabulary in this particular case is limited. So they're trying

0:04:50.684 --> 0:04:54.804
<v Speaker 1>to curb executive power somewhat so that they know that, Okay,

0:04:54.844 --> 0:04:57.124
<v Speaker 1>if we allocate these funds, these funds are actually going

0:04:57.164 --> 0:05:00.524
<v Speaker 1>to be used. We want you know that to be

0:05:00.604 --> 0:05:03.364
<v Speaker 1>the case. We want to reclaim congressional power of the purse.

0:05:03.764 --> 0:05:06.204
<v Speaker 1>Did I kind of summarize it the way that you

0:05:06.244 --> 0:05:08.004
<v Speaker 1>would have Nate or Am I getting it a little

0:05:08.004 --> 0:05:08.404
<v Speaker 1>bit wrong?

0:05:08.524 --> 0:05:12.604
<v Speaker 2>I think you summarize Chuck Schumer spill that, Yeah, look,

0:05:13.164 --> 0:05:17.484
<v Speaker 2>what Democrats with their heart is really into is taking

0:05:17.524 --> 0:05:22.764
<v Speaker 2>a stand against the encroachment of all the authority of Congress,

0:05:22.884 --> 0:05:27.804
<v Speaker 2>really against authoritarianism. Put that in quotes if you want, right.

0:05:27.884 --> 0:05:30.124
<v Speaker 2>But like, if you look at kind of what Democrats

0:05:30.204 --> 0:05:33.004
<v Speaker 2>that are arguing for the shutdown the most really care about, right,

0:05:33.404 --> 0:05:35.684
<v Speaker 2>They're like, yeah, healthcare would be would be nice, right,

0:05:37.444 --> 0:05:40.444
<v Speaker 2>And they are on the right side of public opinion

0:05:40.524 --> 0:05:43.764
<v Speaker 2>on that issue. I mean, these cuts are unpopular or

0:05:43.804 --> 0:05:46.244
<v Speaker 2>failing to extend the subseas, I should say, right to

0:05:46.244 --> 0:05:48.844
<v Speaker 2>the extent that you know, you're almost doing Republicans a

0:05:48.884 --> 0:05:53.044
<v Speaker 2>favor if they agree to amend this. Potentially, Chuck Shumer

0:05:53.044 --> 0:05:56.844
<v Speaker 2>will say, Republicans are refusing to take our input on

0:05:56.964 --> 0:06:01.564
<v Speaker 2>a budget and have this negotiation over healthcare that everyone

0:06:01.604 --> 0:06:07.364
<v Speaker 2>wants to have, right, and therefore the shutdown is their fault.

0:06:07.604 --> 0:06:07.764
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:08.004 --> 0:06:12.604
<v Speaker 2>Whereas like for the past month, everyone's been arguing in

0:06:12.604 --> 0:06:15.684
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times that you know about Democrats shut

0:06:15.724 --> 0:06:18.044
<v Speaker 2>down the government to take a stand against Trump, and

0:06:18.044 --> 0:06:20.684
<v Speaker 2>we're not sure what the stand should be about. And

0:06:20.764 --> 0:06:24.404
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Schumer settled on healthcare eventually, right, But like for

0:06:24.484 --> 0:06:27.444
<v Speaker 2>all types of reasons. I suggested it should be about tariffs.

0:06:27.444 --> 0:06:30.484
<v Speaker 2>I guess anyone else like that idea. Right. Some people

0:06:30.564 --> 0:06:32.844
<v Speaker 2>just think that, hey, we cannot in good conscious vote

0:06:32.844 --> 0:06:35.564
<v Speaker 2>to fund this government. Right. And you've seen some like

0:06:35.604 --> 0:06:38.444
<v Speaker 2>seepe to that message, like Santa Chris Murphy, the santer

0:06:38.444 --> 0:06:41.444
<v Speaker 2>from Connecticut who loves to be an MSNBC. Right, but

0:06:41.484 --> 0:06:43.204
<v Speaker 2>he's saying, yeah, it's not just about health here, let's

0:06:43.204 --> 0:06:45.644
<v Speaker 2>be honest. Right. A lot of the Democratic influencers what

0:06:45.644 --> 0:06:47.604
<v Speaker 2>do you call the murdy media personnelity, are kind of

0:06:47.644 --> 0:06:50.204
<v Speaker 2>saying the same thing and so like, So it's it's

0:06:50.244 --> 0:06:54.804
<v Speaker 2>a it's a hard tight rope, yeah, to walk right,

0:06:55.164 --> 0:06:55.604
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of.

0:06:55.604 --> 0:06:57.884
<v Speaker 1>A damned if you do, damned if you don't situation

0:06:58.004 --> 0:07:00.724
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it. You know, since you referenced

0:07:01.564 --> 0:07:04.364
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer, because you remember, last time we talked about

0:07:04.404 --> 0:07:07.244
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown, it was averted because Schumer decided that it

0:07:07.284 --> 0:07:09.964
<v Speaker 1>was time to you know, compromise a vertist shut down,

0:07:10.244 --> 0:07:13.324
<v Speaker 1>and he got pillaraied for it. His approval ratings were horrific.

0:07:13.364 --> 0:07:15.684
<v Speaker 1>People are like, oh, we can't believe you caved. Now,

0:07:15.804 --> 0:07:18.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's like, okay, fine, we're going to stand strong,

0:07:18.284 --> 0:07:21.564
<v Speaker 1>we'll shut down the government, and his approval ratings still suck, right.

0:07:21.644 --> 0:07:23.844
<v Speaker 1>He now he's getting blamed for the fact that the

0:07:23.884 --> 0:07:27.124
<v Speaker 1>government shut down. So it's it is, you know, as

0:07:27.164 --> 0:07:30.884
<v Speaker 1>you say, it's a tight it's a hard tightrope, tight

0:07:30.924 --> 0:07:33.564
<v Speaker 1>tight rope. It's a hard type rope to walk, and

0:07:33.804 --> 0:07:38.284
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be little way to walk it short

0:07:38.444 --> 0:07:42.164
<v Speaker 1>of some of sides that are willing to compromise, and

0:07:42.204 --> 0:07:45.404
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem likely in the in the immediate term.

0:07:45.764 --> 0:07:47.324
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, first of all, there's some degree of

0:07:47.364 --> 0:07:49.524
<v Speaker 2>like posturing it. First. I think it was very predictable

0:07:49.524 --> 0:07:51.804
<v Speaker 2>that you'd have at least this amount of shutdown, right,

0:07:53.124 --> 0:07:58.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, poles show that more the public blames Republicans

0:07:58.964 --> 0:08:02.324
<v Speaker 2>and Democrats right now, right, but like, I'm not sure

0:08:02.324 --> 0:08:04.724
<v Speaker 2>that really tells us who's winning the shutdown. Sure, I mean,

0:08:04.764 --> 0:08:06.764
<v Speaker 2>we'll just kind of assume as a default that Republicans

0:08:06.804 --> 0:08:10.444
<v Speaker 2>are more obstructionists, I think think, right, and so like

0:08:10.484 --> 0:08:13.324
<v Speaker 2>Democrats will kind of the they kind of buy about it,

0:08:13.364 --> 0:08:15.484
<v Speaker 2>and they say, oh, we are you know, our hand

0:08:15.564 --> 0:08:17.924
<v Speaker 2>is forced right where it's like, you know, people can

0:08:17.964 --> 0:08:19.684
<v Speaker 2>read the New York Times where you argue about this

0:08:19.804 --> 0:08:23.884
<v Speaker 2>and like your ham was not forced. Now what you

0:08:23.924 --> 0:08:26.164
<v Speaker 2>could say is like, look, you know what, you got

0:08:26.204 --> 0:08:28.884
<v Speaker 2>your majorities in Congress. The majority can change the rules

0:08:28.924 --> 0:08:31.324
<v Speaker 2>that it needs to write. We have so many problems

0:08:31.364 --> 0:08:34.644
<v Speaker 2>with a the budget and b everything that Donald Trump

0:08:34.684 --> 0:08:37.244
<v Speaker 2>is doing that we're not going to fucking support anything

0:08:37.244 --> 0:08:40.124
<v Speaker 2>that Donald Trump does. It requires affirmative Democratic votes, right,

0:08:40.284 --> 0:08:42.804
<v Speaker 2>so go ahead and break the filibuster. You're insincere about

0:08:42.804 --> 0:08:45.204
<v Speaker 2>it anyway, Right, they already keep pairing away at it

0:08:45.564 --> 0:08:48.084
<v Speaker 2>as Democrats have two in some cases. Right, So you

0:08:48.124 --> 0:08:50.364
<v Speaker 2>have the votes, pass your budget, and we'll see you

0:08:50.364 --> 0:08:53.004
<v Speaker 2>at the midterms. But instead there's this like spin that

0:08:53.084 --> 0:08:55.804
<v Speaker 2>like I think is designed to like like designed to

0:08:55.844 --> 0:08:58.404
<v Speaker 2>win this pole question, like the first Washington Post pole

0:08:58.444 --> 0:09:01.764
<v Speaker 2>that comes out says, Okay, who is more blame for

0:09:01.804 --> 0:09:03.564
<v Speaker 2>the shutdown? And just that one question because the other

0:09:03.644 --> 0:09:07.044
<v Speaker 2>questions aren't necessarily so good for Democrats or Republicans, then

0:09:07.084 --> 0:09:09.764
<v Speaker 2>maybe you win that. But like you know, when you're

0:09:09.804 --> 0:09:13.284
<v Speaker 2>in a repeated game to ground this in the show

0:09:13.524 --> 0:09:17.644
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, then credibility matters. I don't mean so

0:09:17.724 --> 0:09:21.084
<v Speaker 2>much with Republicans, right, there's not very much trust there anyway.

0:09:21.084 --> 0:09:23.684
<v Speaker 2>But I mean with I mean with voters, yeah, a

0:09:23.724 --> 0:09:27.044
<v Speaker 2>little bit, right, Whereas if you had owned the shutdown,

0:09:27.044 --> 0:09:29.244
<v Speaker 2>it might have been more unpopular at first. Now look,

0:09:29.404 --> 0:09:32.204
<v Speaker 2>part of it is at Schumer's job is probably a

0:09:32.244 --> 0:09:36.764
<v Speaker 2>fair bit of risk. In fact, a plurality of Democrats

0:09:36.804 --> 0:09:39.964
<v Speaker 2>in a new pupil disapprove of Chuck Schumer have an

0:09:40.004 --> 0:09:43.444
<v Speaker 2>unfavorable view of him. Not a majority, but plurality. You know,

0:09:43.484 --> 0:09:47.084
<v Speaker 2>he is also very much threatened by AOC or other

0:09:47.124 --> 0:09:49.284
<v Speaker 2>primary candidates in twenty twenty eight when he runs in

0:09:49.324 --> 0:09:53.284
<v Speaker 2>I guess three years from now. He's also old as fuck.

0:09:53.324 --> 0:09:54.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's not old as fuck, He's just old,

0:09:55.244 --> 0:09:57.084
<v Speaker 2>not as fuck, just old Nate.

0:09:57.124 --> 0:09:59.004
<v Speaker 1>We have other we have other people for whom we

0:09:59.044 --> 0:10:00.164
<v Speaker 1>should reserve the a s.

0:10:00.204 --> 0:10:04.124
<v Speaker 2>Fuck. Yeah, he's just old. He's just old, not old

0:10:04.164 --> 0:10:09.124
<v Speaker 2>af But like so, he probably wants to like give

0:10:09.244 --> 0:10:12.404
<v Speaker 2>the annoying did I say annoying? He probably wants to give,

0:10:12.444 --> 0:10:18.124
<v Speaker 2>like the partisan Democrats a win. Right that we have

0:10:18.204 --> 0:10:20.724
<v Speaker 2>flexed our power. This keeps the base happy. We've gotten

0:10:20.804 --> 0:10:25.244
<v Speaker 2>some some token or maybe not so token concessions on

0:10:25.284 --> 0:10:28.484
<v Speaker 2>healthcare and things like that. Right, this shows it when

0:10:28.484 --> 0:10:31.924
<v Speaker 2>we stand and fight that we win right, yeah, big

0:10:32.924 --> 0:10:35.964
<v Speaker 2>morale boost. Does it provide much more than morale? I

0:10:35.964 --> 0:10:38.324
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Does it help you win the midterms? I

0:10:38.324 --> 0:10:40.764
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Right, the people that care about this are

0:10:40.804 --> 0:10:43.484
<v Speaker 2>people are gonna vote anyway for the most part. But like,

0:10:43.764 --> 0:10:47.284
<v Speaker 2>but if Schumer blows it, right, if he caves too soon,

0:10:48.404 --> 0:10:51.604
<v Speaker 2>then he's gonna look like he's weak, and then he

0:10:51.684 --> 0:10:53.724
<v Speaker 2>might be out of power. Right. If it goes on

0:10:53.804 --> 0:10:57.204
<v Speaker 2>too long, then A everybody kind of gets more egg

0:10:57.204 --> 0:10:59.244
<v Speaker 2>on their faces. B he loses control of the mestry

0:10:59.284 --> 0:11:01.284
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really have to begin with. And so like, he

0:11:01.284 --> 0:11:05.764
<v Speaker 2>would love to have that that you know early, that

0:11:05.964 --> 0:11:09.644
<v Speaker 2>October tenth to fourteenth window that probably market says one

0:11:09.684 --> 0:11:11.764
<v Speaker 2>and four chance, he would love He would love for

0:11:11.804 --> 0:11:14.484
<v Speaker 2>that window to happen. Right, the more it goes on,

0:11:14.564 --> 0:11:17.204
<v Speaker 2>and the more you already have influential Democrats saying, you know,

0:11:17.484 --> 0:11:19.964
<v Speaker 2>it shouldn't really be about healthcare, come on, right, then

0:11:21.004 --> 0:11:26.404
<v Speaker 2>it becomes this big uncertain morass. And look, you know

0:11:26.844 --> 0:11:30.284
<v Speaker 2>you already have some swing state Democrats who are worried

0:11:30.524 --> 0:11:34.564
<v Speaker 2>about this. Right, John Fetterman is not on board with

0:11:34.604 --> 0:11:38.804
<v Speaker 2>a shutdown center from Wyoming. She's not on board with it.

0:11:38.844 --> 0:11:41.804
<v Speaker 2>Angus King from Maine. Jared Golden is a representative from

0:11:41.844 --> 0:11:45.324
<v Speaker 2>main very in the Trumpy District, Independent minded, right, So, like,

0:11:46.124 --> 0:11:50.364
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Democrats feel like this is gonna be

0:11:50.404 --> 0:11:54.604
<v Speaker 2>a big win for them, right, but like, but you

0:11:54.644 --> 0:11:58.244
<v Speaker 2>know whatever, I mean whatever, have fun, you know, have fun.

0:11:58.364 --> 0:12:00.084
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of it's kind of actually not that high

0:12:00.124 --> 0:12:02.004
<v Speaker 2>stakes compared to a lot of things are going on,

0:12:02.084 --> 0:12:03.444
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of to me why it feels like

0:12:03.444 --> 0:12:07.524
<v Speaker 2>a little bit discordant. But they have to make it,

0:12:07.524 --> 0:12:09.564
<v Speaker 2>they have to make a move, right, and they like,

0:12:09.604 --> 0:12:11.204
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't do nothing or Sumer might lose his job

0:12:11.204 --> 0:12:13.004
<v Speaker 2>if he did nothing right, and they don't really have

0:12:13.044 --> 0:12:15.684
<v Speaker 2>a great hand to play. But Republicans aren't popular either,

0:12:15.764 --> 0:12:19.764
<v Speaker 2>and they're insincere in their own ways, believe me. And

0:12:19.804 --> 0:12:24.204
<v Speaker 2>what Democrats are asking for is fundamentally pretty reasonable. I think,

0:12:24.684 --> 0:12:26.964
<v Speaker 2>uh yeah, so yeah, so there we are.

0:12:27.444 --> 0:12:29.324
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I think I think this is that was

0:12:29.364 --> 0:12:32.084
<v Speaker 1>a good summary. And one other thing that I will

0:12:32.124 --> 0:12:35.844
<v Speaker 1>say is, you know, note the language that you've been using,

0:12:35.884 --> 0:12:38.684
<v Speaker 1>which is also the language that they're using, which is, oh,

0:12:38.724 --> 0:12:40.644
<v Speaker 1>we need to win. You know, we're fighting a war,

0:12:40.684 --> 0:12:42.924
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So if we couch this back in game

0:12:42.964 --> 0:12:46.564
<v Speaker 1>theoretic terms. You know, they are making this into more,

0:12:47.164 --> 0:12:49.364
<v Speaker 1>you know, of a zero sum contest than it has

0:12:49.444 --> 0:12:52.324
<v Speaker 1>to be. Right, it's like a US versus them, like

0:12:52.404 --> 0:12:55.364
<v Speaker 1>we we need to win, as opposed to Okay, let's

0:12:55.484 --> 0:12:59.604
<v Speaker 1>let's figure out this is just positive some like let's compromise,

0:12:59.804 --> 0:13:03.364
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do what's good for the country. That language

0:13:03.364 --> 0:13:06.404
<v Speaker 1>has largely disappeared right now, even though at the end

0:13:06.404 --> 0:13:08.484
<v Speaker 1>what we will need is some sort of a compromise.

0:13:08.524 --> 0:13:10.804
<v Speaker 1>And as you point out, Nate, some of the things

0:13:10.844 --> 0:13:13.844
<v Speaker 1>like healthcare, those are going to help Republicans as well

0:13:14.524 --> 0:13:19.684
<v Speaker 1>in the midterm elections. If Democrats actually can get that changed,

0:13:20.364 --> 0:13:22.324
<v Speaker 1>it'll help the general public, but it will also help

0:13:22.404 --> 0:13:24.884
<v Speaker 1>Republicans because a lot of people who will otherwise be

0:13:24.964 --> 0:13:28.324
<v Speaker 1>incredibly pissed off will no longer be pissed off. And probably,

0:13:28.364 --> 0:13:30.604
<v Speaker 1>as you say, you know, they're the people who already

0:13:30.604 --> 0:13:32.844
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to this, and then those who don't. I'm

0:13:32.884 --> 0:13:34.564
<v Speaker 1>guessing that a lot of those people who would have

0:13:34.644 --> 0:13:40.204
<v Speaker 1>lost health care coverage if we if nothing was done right,

0:13:40.444 --> 0:13:43.604
<v Speaker 1>won't even realize that this happened, right. They won't even

0:13:43.684 --> 0:13:45.884
<v Speaker 1>realize that there was a change that there was a

0:13:45.924 --> 0:13:48.484
<v Speaker 1>compromise that Democrats had anything to do with it. They'll

0:13:48.524 --> 0:13:50.324
<v Speaker 1>be like, yeah, see, we knew that Trump would never

0:13:50.364 --> 0:13:52.724
<v Speaker 1>take away our health care because if you're not paying

0:13:52.724 --> 0:13:57.004
<v Speaker 1>attention to those kinds of behind the scenes machinations, then

0:13:57.044 --> 0:13:59.324
<v Speaker 1>you might not even you might not even realize that's

0:13:59.324 --> 0:14:03.284
<v Speaker 1>the case. So that'll be a win for Republicans as well,

0:14:03.284 --> 0:14:05.604
<v Speaker 1>as you said. And so I think that it's just

0:14:05.964 --> 0:14:09.844
<v Speaker 1>very interesting to see how, you know, politics has always

0:14:09.844 --> 0:14:12.524
<v Speaker 1>been a fight to some extent, but the extent to

0:14:12.564 --> 0:14:15.924
<v Speaker 1>which the language has become kind of zero sum radicalized

0:14:15.964 --> 0:14:18.804
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a more you know, we all serve

0:14:18.884 --> 0:14:21.964
<v Speaker 1>the people type of rhetoric, which would be I think

0:14:22.004 --> 0:14:24.884
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more appropriate here, but clearly not the

0:14:24.924 --> 0:14:26.844
<v Speaker 1>stage at which we find ourselves.

0:14:27.084 --> 0:14:30.004
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's not zero someone if you're an incumbent, right,

0:14:30.044 --> 0:14:32.484
<v Speaker 2>because one sure pause block cooming is that people get

0:14:32.524 --> 0:14:36.244
<v Speaker 2>really mad at incumbents in general. And so, you know, unfortunately,

0:14:36.844 --> 0:14:38.484
<v Speaker 2>given the type of incumbents we have, you know, we're

0:14:38.484 --> 0:14:41.964
<v Speaker 2>represented in Congress by this current generation of representatives, and

0:14:42.884 --> 0:14:45.404
<v Speaker 2>if there's a pack book on other houses, then they

0:14:45.524 --> 0:14:48.484
<v Speaker 2>might lose. Where the split between the parties goes right. Yeah,

0:14:49.084 --> 0:14:52.164
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, you know, Poland shows pretty clearly that Democrats

0:14:53.124 --> 0:14:56.884
<v Speaker 2>no longer want compromise with Republicans, right, They want they

0:14:56.964 --> 0:15:00.524
<v Speaker 2>want to fight. You know, I as always am contrarian

0:15:00.604 --> 0:15:02.404
<v Speaker 2>because I thought that the spring was a better time

0:15:02.484 --> 0:15:05.724
<v Speaker 2>to shut down than now. You had Elon Musk as

0:15:05.764 --> 0:15:10.084
<v Speaker 2>a good, good scapegoat. I think I'm more salient scapegoat

0:15:10.084 --> 0:15:15.004
<v Speaker 2>slash you know, relevant excuse because he was fucking with

0:15:15.044 --> 0:15:16.924
<v Speaker 2>the budget, right, and I think they were a little

0:15:16.924 --> 0:15:19.404
<v Speaker 2>slow to move then and now it's like, I mean,

0:15:19.884 --> 0:15:23.604
<v Speaker 2>the fact is that when you're out of shut out

0:15:23.684 --> 0:15:28.084
<v Speaker 2>of Congress, shut out of of the Supreme Court, basically right,

0:15:28.604 --> 0:15:32.964
<v Speaker 2>you're shout out of the presidency. You're even losing control

0:15:33.244 --> 0:15:38.604
<v Speaker 2>over blue academic media institutions that you once controlled. I mean,

0:15:38.644 --> 0:15:43.124
<v Speaker 2>you know, Democrats are are number one very angry, right,

0:15:43.324 --> 0:15:47.364
<v Speaker 2>and number two feel like they need something, anything that

0:15:47.404 --> 0:15:48.444
<v Speaker 2>they can call a win. Yep.

0:15:48.804 --> 0:15:51.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that the optics are incredibly important. So yeah,

0:15:51.884 --> 0:15:55.204
<v Speaker 1>let's see what happens. Let's see if Chuck Schumer can

0:15:55.284 --> 0:15:59.404
<v Speaker 1>hit his magic window or not. Holymarket odds are against it,

0:15:58.924 --> 0:16:02.884
<v Speaker 1>but we shall see. On that note, let's take a

0:16:02.924 --> 0:16:05.444
<v Speaker 1>quick break and when we come back, we're going to

0:16:05.444 --> 0:16:10.284
<v Speaker 1>talk about the new open AI release sore or sorry, Nate,

0:16:10.484 --> 0:16:21.924
<v Speaker 1>Sora too. So last week, last Friday, October third, open

0:16:22.044 --> 0:16:26.044
<v Speaker 1>a I released a new app. And even if you're

0:16:26.284 --> 0:16:30.444
<v Speaker 1>you know, not terminally online, unless you're living under a

0:16:30.564 --> 0:16:32.924
<v Speaker 1>rock and you have some form of social media, you

0:16:32.964 --> 0:16:35.764
<v Speaker 1>were probably aware that Soora was released, because I don't

0:16:35.764 --> 0:16:38.684
<v Speaker 1>know about your news feed, Nate, but my newsfeed briefly

0:16:38.724 --> 0:16:43.484
<v Speaker 1>became just like completely Sora with the announcement video, all

0:16:43.524 --> 0:16:47.564
<v Speaker 1>these other videos, just people were just going crazy. So

0:16:47.764 --> 0:16:50.484
<v Speaker 1>for a good twenty four hours, Sora was my newsfeed.

0:16:50.764 --> 0:16:54.204
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of the next gen video generation

0:16:54.404 --> 0:16:58.804
<v Speaker 1>app that they've been working on. And yeah, it's as

0:16:58.844 --> 0:17:02.484
<v Speaker 1>of now invite only, but man, it's as of now

0:17:02.524 --> 0:17:05.844
<v Speaker 1>still free, even though there are you know, already murmurs

0:17:05.844 --> 0:17:08.124
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be for for much longer,

0:17:08.164 --> 0:17:12.324
<v Speaker 1>because Sam Altman said that he wasn't he wasn't prepared

0:17:12.364 --> 0:17:15.004
<v Speaker 1>for how many people would be making those those videos,

0:17:15.244 --> 0:17:19.164
<v Speaker 1>which I've seemed very strange, Like, of course, of course

0:17:19.204 --> 0:17:22.164
<v Speaker 1>you're you should be prepared for the volume that it's

0:17:22.204 --> 0:17:24.764
<v Speaker 1>going to generate at this stage, right, you seem to

0:17:24.764 --> 0:17:27.044
<v Speaker 1>be unprepared every single time you release something new.

0:17:27.124 --> 0:17:31.044
<v Speaker 2>Well, that can be a classic tactics in politics too. Absolutely,

0:17:31.084 --> 0:17:33.284
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, we have an overflow capacity here at

0:17:33.324 --> 0:17:35.724
<v Speaker 2>this tiny venue that you should pick a bigger venue. Right. Yeah,

0:17:35.724 --> 0:17:39.084
<v Speaker 2>it looks good on TV. Yeah, it generates buzz right yep.

0:17:39.884 --> 0:17:43.604
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, let's let's talk about soa. Let's talk about

0:17:43.964 --> 0:17:47.964
<v Speaker 1>you know, the good, the bad, the ugly. But first,

0:17:48.564 --> 0:17:51.364
<v Speaker 1>just a brief explanation. So, Nate, have you used Sora

0:17:51.484 --> 0:17:52.164
<v Speaker 1>yourself yet?

0:17:52.884 --> 0:17:54.484
<v Speaker 2>I am not. I don't know why I was going

0:17:54.564 --> 0:17:56.524
<v Speaker 2>to use it in preparation for this program. I don't

0:17:56.564 --> 0:18:00.244
<v Speaker 2>have any What would I do with it? Yeah?

0:18:00.284 --> 0:18:01.564
<v Speaker 1>I feel the exactly.

0:18:02.164 --> 0:18:03.844
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems it's like, oh, you can generate

0:18:03.844 --> 0:18:05.324
<v Speaker 2>in the image, and it's like, okay, I have a

0:18:05.364 --> 0:18:07.244
<v Speaker 2>good imagination, you know what I mean? Yeah, Like what

0:18:08.084 --> 0:18:09.924
<v Speaker 2>I do with it? Do I feel like the old person?

0:18:10.084 --> 0:18:12.324
<v Speaker 1>I mean no, I mean I actually feel I feel

0:18:12.364 --> 0:18:14.964
<v Speaker 1>the same way, which is that it's using a whole

0:18:15.004 --> 0:18:17.044
<v Speaker 1>lot of capacity for something that I don't know how

0:18:17.124 --> 0:18:19.244
<v Speaker 1>much of this we need. But the idea is that

0:18:19.284 --> 0:18:22.404
<v Speaker 1>you give it a text prompt and then it creates

0:18:22.884 --> 0:18:25.844
<v Speaker 1>a video from it. And the video is when I

0:18:25.844 --> 0:18:28.204
<v Speaker 1>said next, jen A, I really is. It does look

0:18:28.204 --> 0:18:32.164
<v Speaker 1>a lot better than AI generated videos did before. You

0:18:32.364 --> 0:18:37.204
<v Speaker 1>can even upload your own photograph. I would actually urge

0:18:37.244 --> 0:18:39.724
<v Speaker 1>you not to do that because this is more training

0:18:39.804 --> 0:18:43.364
<v Speaker 1>material for the apps and you kind of lose a

0:18:43.364 --> 0:18:45.444
<v Speaker 1>lot of control over it. Anyway, we can, we can

0:18:45.484 --> 0:18:48.884
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. But so you can upload your own image,

0:18:48.924 --> 0:18:52.404
<v Speaker 1>you can use historical figures. People have been making videos

0:18:52.764 --> 0:18:57.524
<v Speaker 1>of MLK. The most famous one that has been circulated

0:18:57.684 --> 0:19:03.724
<v Speaker 1>is sam Altman shoplifting from a target. So yeah, you can.

0:19:04.044 --> 0:19:06.684
<v Speaker 1>You can give it lots of prompts and it spits

0:19:06.724 --> 0:19:09.364
<v Speaker 1>out the output and as of now it is water

0:19:09.524 --> 0:19:13.604
<v Speaker 1>are marked, but the watermarks are already being removed. They're

0:19:13.644 --> 0:19:16.644
<v Speaker 1>not very sticky, it turns out. But yeah, so it's

0:19:16.684 --> 0:19:21.244
<v Speaker 1>this new frontier of video generation. And even though it

0:19:21.284 --> 0:19:24.964
<v Speaker 1>says that they have guardrails about usage, you know, consent,

0:19:25.804 --> 0:19:31.604
<v Speaker 1>celebrity usage, political violence, people have already demonstrated that Zura

0:19:31.764 --> 0:19:39.764
<v Speaker 1>is capable of creating incredibly realistic images of things like protests,

0:19:40.604 --> 0:19:46.804
<v Speaker 1>violence in the streets, you know, things that border closely

0:19:46.844 --> 0:19:50.124
<v Speaker 1>on political violence, which it says it doesn't allow, and

0:19:50.284 --> 0:19:56.124
<v Speaker 1>some experts in video AI generation and detection. So there

0:19:56.164 --> 0:20:00.604
<v Speaker 1>are people who have companies that actually are supposed to,

0:20:00.764 --> 0:20:03.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, be very very very accurate at figuring out

0:20:03.804 --> 0:20:06.804
<v Speaker 1>is a SAI generated or not? Are saying, hey, this

0:20:06.924 --> 0:20:09.244
<v Speaker 1>is really tough, right, Like, some of these are actually

0:20:09.604 --> 0:20:14.564
<v Speaker 1>quite good, and it's becoming very difficult to figure out

0:20:15.204 --> 0:20:17.684
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this is real or not, which is

0:20:17.724 --> 0:20:22.284
<v Speaker 1>scary because once we stop having that capacity, what happens

0:20:22.324 --> 0:20:25.524
<v Speaker 1>with video evidence, right, what happens with deep fakes, what

0:20:25.724 --> 0:20:29.204
<v Speaker 1>happens with kind of the ability to tell what is

0:20:29.324 --> 0:20:33.164
<v Speaker 1>real from what isn't real. We're already We're at the doorstep.

0:20:33.204 --> 0:20:36.004
<v Speaker 1>We're almost there, and I think Sarah will probably take

0:20:36.084 --> 0:20:37.244
<v Speaker 1>us over the doorstep.

0:20:38.284 --> 0:20:41.004
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, you can have a watermark, or you can

0:20:41.044 --> 0:20:44.724
<v Speaker 2>have some type of digital signature embedded, right, or you

0:20:44.724 --> 0:20:47.524
<v Speaker 2>can just say, okay, there are artifacts that suggest that

0:20:47.524 --> 0:20:51.444
<v Speaker 2>this is artificial, right. You know, I suspect we're probably

0:20:52.444 --> 0:20:55.004
<v Speaker 2>a few years away from because there's more going on

0:20:55.124 --> 0:20:57.404
<v Speaker 2>with vision than text, you know what I mean? You know,

0:20:57.764 --> 0:21:00.204
<v Speaker 2>these AI detectors for like college essays I think are

0:21:00.244 --> 0:21:04.564
<v Speaker 2>not very reliable, but like visual artifacts are like harder.

0:21:04.644 --> 0:21:10.044
<v Speaker 2>I believe to entirely eradicate potentially, right, you know, just

0:21:10.244 --> 0:21:12.084
<v Speaker 2>to be able to manipulate photos for a long time.

0:21:12.124 --> 0:21:14.724
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure it's changed things all all that much.

0:21:14.964 --> 0:21:17.564
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean everyone, like people are always

0:21:17.604 --> 0:21:23.804
<v Speaker 2>like misinformation, this misinformation that, right, Like I think it's important,

0:21:24.244 --> 0:21:27.564
<v Speaker 2>but I think that's something people will adapt to. And

0:21:27.604 --> 0:21:29.604
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean, I'm more interested in, like

0:21:30.284 --> 0:21:34.364
<v Speaker 2>what this tells us about, like what open AI wants

0:21:34.404 --> 0:21:36.804
<v Speaker 2>to be, right, and how will AI become a part

0:21:37.084 --> 0:21:39.844
<v Speaker 2>of our life. I suppose you know, this is not

0:21:41.284 --> 0:21:44.924
<v Speaker 2>what you would call a particularly high brow product, you

0:21:44.964 --> 0:21:45.484
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean?

0:21:45.684 --> 0:21:46.964
<v Speaker 1>No, it is not.

0:21:48.964 --> 0:21:51.644
<v Speaker 2>It's refined and interesting and I'm sure you'll see interesting

0:21:51.804 --> 0:21:54.244
<v Speaker 2>art produced with it, and you know, I say that

0:21:54.324 --> 0:21:57.164
<v Speaker 2>on ironically and things like that, but like this is

0:21:57.444 --> 0:22:03.924
<v Speaker 2>kind of a facebooky product, not to not to demean

0:22:04.164 --> 0:22:09.044
<v Speaker 2>our friends at meta, right, but like this is consumer focused,

0:22:09.884 --> 0:22:15.004
<v Speaker 2>middle brow, right. They seem not to be terribly concerned

0:22:15.004 --> 0:22:20.324
<v Speaker 2>about like you know, the use of copyrighted characters and

0:22:20.604 --> 0:22:22.964
<v Speaker 2>whether that falls under fair use is a legal debate, right,

0:22:24.284 --> 0:22:26.684
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, I think if they were trying

0:22:26.724 --> 0:22:28.484
<v Speaker 2>to go for a more intellectual crowd, they might have

0:22:28.884 --> 0:22:31.724
<v Speaker 2>draw more guardbrails over that. But like to me, it

0:22:31.804 --> 0:22:37.164
<v Speaker 2>seems like open ai is is turning into a more

0:22:37.244 --> 0:22:43.084
<v Speaker 2>legibly normal consumer product technology company, you know what I mean.

0:22:43.364 --> 0:22:46.644
<v Speaker 2>Now you can say they're doing that as an interim phase, right,

0:22:47.004 --> 0:22:51.684
<v Speaker 2>in order to then raise enough money to take over

0:22:51.724 --> 0:22:54.724
<v Speaker 2>the world with AI, right, or build AGI or a

0:22:55.004 --> 0:23:00.684
<v Speaker 2>SI artificial superintelligence. But like, this is not quite the

0:23:00.804 --> 0:23:07.164
<v Speaker 2>AI timeline that maybe the p Doomers feared exactly, right.

0:23:07.244 --> 0:23:14.444
<v Speaker 2>You know, I compare this with the somewhat underwhelming release

0:23:14.484 --> 0:23:16.804
<v Speaker 2>of GPT five, right, And we did an episode on

0:23:16.844 --> 0:23:19.244
<v Speaker 2>GPT five. What was it like a month or so ago, right,

0:23:19.564 --> 0:23:26.284
<v Speaker 2>Like I've remained a little bit underwhelmed by it, I

0:23:26.324 --> 0:23:28.724
<v Speaker 2>would say, right, you know, look, I pay two dollars

0:23:28.724 --> 0:23:31.724
<v Speaker 2>a month in the promode, use the pro mode, and

0:23:30.764 --> 0:23:35.204
<v Speaker 2>and it's better, right, but like you know, it still

0:23:35.404 --> 0:23:38.604
<v Speaker 2>feels very limited in capabilities, and it still feels like

0:23:38.644 --> 0:23:40.364
<v Speaker 2>I gave to tell you this to the last show.

0:23:40.684 --> 0:23:42.484
<v Speaker 2>So my friend has like I think she's like eight

0:23:42.564 --> 0:23:45.844
<v Speaker 2>years old or in second grade, right, and you know

0:23:45.924 --> 0:23:48.684
<v Speaker 2>I had chet ChiPT so there's this, you know, the

0:23:48.724 --> 0:23:51.964
<v Speaker 2>machine that can like solve math Olympia problems. Right, So

0:23:52.044 --> 0:23:56.884
<v Speaker 2>she had a Snoopy coloring book right where it's like

0:23:56.964 --> 0:23:59.764
<v Speaker 2>you have to like fill in you know, little word

0:23:59.804 --> 0:24:03.124
<v Speaker 2>puzzles that are very simple, unscramble of words and like

0:24:03.604 --> 0:24:06.684
<v Speaker 2>you know Snoopy and the people are in Charlie Brown,

0:24:06.764 --> 0:24:08.964
<v Speaker 2>Lucy whatever lineus, they're in a spaceship. You have to

0:24:08.964 --> 0:24:11.124
<v Speaker 2>like connect the cord with the person in the in

0:24:11.124 --> 0:24:14.804
<v Speaker 2>the space soup. It's designed for eight year olds. Every

0:24:14.844 --> 0:24:20.644
<v Speaker 2>single problem chat ChiPT totally fucked up. It like cheated, right,

0:24:20.684 --> 0:24:25.684
<v Speaker 2>that's amazing. Yeah, yeah, you wh when you had Snoopy,

0:24:25.764 --> 0:24:27.404
<v Speaker 2>you had you know, you're looking forward and you have

0:24:27.764 --> 0:24:29.564
<v Speaker 2>the left half is filled out with an image of

0:24:29.644 --> 0:24:34.244
<v Speaker 2>Snoopy in the profile facing the child who's filling out

0:24:34.284 --> 0:24:37.044
<v Speaker 2>this cartoon, right, and the right half is blank. So

0:24:37.044 --> 0:24:39.444
<v Speaker 2>it is we're just teaching you to mirror Snoopy on

0:24:39.484 --> 0:24:41.884
<v Speaker 2>both sides, right. So I'm like, oh, I'm not going

0:24:41.964 --> 0:24:44.124
<v Speaker 2>to even give this to chat cheepy Tea. It's too easy, right,

0:24:44.644 --> 0:24:49.284
<v Speaker 2>So I photograph Snoopy and give it the puzzle, and

0:24:49.764 --> 0:24:54.444
<v Speaker 2>instead it turns Snoopy around ninety degrees. So Snoopy is

0:24:54.444 --> 0:24:56.484
<v Speaker 2>now not excuse me, he was facing you. Now he's

0:24:56.484 --> 0:24:59.364
<v Speaker 2>in profile, right, you see his snout is facing right,

0:24:59.404 --> 0:25:02.324
<v Speaker 2>so like it totally it totally cheated and like it

0:25:02.444 --> 0:25:04.484
<v Speaker 2>gas lights you. Right, It's like you know you have

0:25:04.564 --> 0:25:06.084
<v Speaker 2>like that, you know you have to think of you like,

0:25:06.124 --> 0:25:09.044
<v Speaker 2>find the things that are different in the image, right,

0:25:09.484 --> 0:25:12.884
<v Speaker 2>will like make up things that are different in its

0:25:12.964 --> 0:25:15.284
<v Speaker 2>version of the image, but weren't different in the original image.

0:25:15.284 --> 0:25:17.684
<v Speaker 2>It just gaslights you. You know. By the way, I

0:25:17.764 --> 0:25:21.284
<v Speaker 2>don't think GPT five is like a total miss or

0:25:21.604 --> 0:25:23.844
<v Speaker 2>or anything. Right, We're getting toward the end of the year.

0:25:25.124 --> 0:25:27.764
<v Speaker 2>Some people I think predicted bigger breakthroughs this year in

0:25:27.804 --> 0:25:30.044
<v Speaker 2>terms of agentic capabilities, for example, what they'd be able

0:25:30.084 --> 0:25:32.124
<v Speaker 2>to do in terms of you know, computer usage and

0:25:32.164 --> 0:25:34.604
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that, and like, you know, this has been

0:25:35.884 --> 0:25:38.124
<v Speaker 2>as far as like core AI, you know, we have

0:25:38.204 --> 0:25:41.524
<v Speaker 2>not been We've been it's been getting better, it's been improving. Right.

0:25:42.324 --> 0:25:43.804
<v Speaker 2>This is the year where it's felt like we're not

0:25:44.004 --> 0:25:48.164
<v Speaker 2>on an exponential curve, right, It's felt more linear now

0:25:48.164 --> 0:25:50.764
<v Speaker 2>that could be some type of punctuated equilibrium where there

0:25:50.804 --> 0:25:54.324
<v Speaker 2>needs to be some some new technology, you know. I

0:25:54.364 --> 0:25:58.364
<v Speaker 2>think people mostly feel that like maybe merely adding more

0:25:58.604 --> 0:26:02.364
<v Speaker 2>compute will produced diminishing returns at some point it might

0:26:02.404 --> 0:26:05.004
<v Speaker 2>need some new techniques. Right. And by the way, if

0:26:05.044 --> 0:26:06.724
<v Speaker 2>you were at the best Urn of AI, you know

0:26:06.764 --> 0:26:09.364
<v Speaker 2>they're private company for now, right, But like I were

0:26:09.404 --> 0:26:12.084
<v Speaker 2>investor in Opening, I be fine with this. I mean,

0:26:12.124 --> 0:26:16.324
<v Speaker 2>all the big you know, Google, Facebook, et cetera. Companies

0:26:16.724 --> 0:26:21.204
<v Speaker 2>are are very profitable and have very you know, rich valuations. Right.

0:26:21.764 --> 0:26:26.804
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's becoming it's becoming a little Uh. What's

0:26:26.844 --> 0:26:28.924
<v Speaker 2>the words slop is the word that some people use

0:26:28.964 --> 0:26:30.404
<v Speaker 2>for this type of image generation. Oh?

0:26:30.404 --> 0:26:32.884
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I think slop is the right word. And I

0:26:32.924 --> 0:26:35.844
<v Speaker 1>think that I would actually go a step further and

0:26:35.924 --> 0:26:40.244
<v Speaker 1>say that as opposed to a step towards kind of

0:26:40.284 --> 0:26:43.764
<v Speaker 1>AGI or kind of bigger advancements, you know, P doom

0:26:43.764 --> 0:26:47.324
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. I phrased that poorly. It makes it seem

0:26:47.364 --> 0:26:50.524
<v Speaker 1>like P doom would be an advancement. P doom is bad, right,

0:26:50.564 --> 0:26:54.324
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's called P doom. But the advancements that

0:26:54.364 --> 0:26:59.164
<v Speaker 1>would potentially lead us to U P doom scenario. This

0:26:59.244 --> 0:27:04.484
<v Speaker 1>seems to be basically the only uses I can see

0:27:04.484 --> 0:27:06.684
<v Speaker 1>of this with some limited things. I don't want a

0:27:06.724 --> 0:27:09.404
<v Speaker 1>straw man and say like there's nothing good that comes up,

0:27:09.884 --> 0:27:12.284
<v Speaker 1>But I think that a lot of the kind of

0:27:12.404 --> 0:27:15.284
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the downstream effects of this are actually negative. Right,

0:27:15.284 --> 0:27:18.364
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing anything to be a net positive value

0:27:18.404 --> 0:27:22.044
<v Speaker 1>to society. Instead, it's creating kind of slop. It is,

0:27:22.364 --> 0:27:26.364
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking taking up your time with activities that

0:27:26.484 --> 0:27:28.924
<v Speaker 1>might dead in some of your brain cells and would

0:27:28.964 --> 0:27:32.964
<v Speaker 1>probably be better used doing something else. And it can

0:27:33.004 --> 0:27:36.324
<v Speaker 1>create really bad downstream effects if we look at the

0:27:36.324 --> 0:27:40.444
<v Speaker 1>types of videos that it is capable of generating. You

0:27:40.484 --> 0:27:44.564
<v Speaker 1>know what happens if someone, as they get more realistic, thinks, oh,

0:27:44.644 --> 0:27:47.964
<v Speaker 1>there really is violence here, There's really an uprising here, right,

0:27:48.004 --> 0:27:51.924
<v Speaker 1>there was really a bomb here. The Democrats did this,

0:27:52.164 --> 0:27:54.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Republicans did that. I think this can

0:27:54.364 --> 0:27:56.804
<v Speaker 1>go on both sides of the party line. So let's

0:27:56.804 --> 0:27:59.804
<v Speaker 1>not let's not say one party or the other. What

0:27:59.924 --> 0:28:02.524
<v Speaker 1>happens Nate. If someone can get your face and makes

0:28:02.564 --> 0:28:06.764
<v Speaker 1>it seem like Nate Silver did something very bad or

0:28:06.804 --> 0:28:10.764
<v Speaker 1>Maria konnikovid did something very bad or said something, you

0:28:10.764 --> 0:28:14.164
<v Speaker 1>could probably implicate people in crimes they did and commit.

0:28:14.644 --> 0:28:17.484
<v Speaker 1>And if you and I had exonerating evidence and we're like, hey,

0:28:17.484 --> 0:28:20.444
<v Speaker 1>we were taping the Risky Business podcast at that exact

0:28:20.444 --> 0:28:23.724
<v Speaker 1>time look at the video of it. If you can't

0:28:23.724 --> 0:28:27.684
<v Speaker 1>distinguish that right from the video that they generated, or

0:28:27.804 --> 0:28:31.484
<v Speaker 1>it can be incredibly difficult, time consuming to distinguish it.

0:28:31.484 --> 0:28:34.084
<v Speaker 1>It's not as easy as doing it immediately. That could

0:28:34.084 --> 0:28:37.804
<v Speaker 1>still upend our lives and kind of lead us into

0:28:37.964 --> 0:28:40.924
<v Speaker 1>a very uncomfortable spiral where even if at the end

0:28:40.964 --> 0:28:43.244
<v Speaker 1>of the day we are vindicated, it will still have

0:28:43.364 --> 0:28:48.524
<v Speaker 1>been you know, very long time, financial resources, emotional cost,

0:28:48.644 --> 0:28:51.484
<v Speaker 1>all of these things, and those seem to be kind

0:28:51.524 --> 0:28:56.084
<v Speaker 1>of the main uses of video generation of the sort

0:28:56.404 --> 0:28:59.724
<v Speaker 1>that or you know, disrupting Hollywood and saying okay, fine, well,

0:29:00.004 --> 0:29:03.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, create entire AI movies, which I don't think

0:29:03.084 --> 0:29:04.924
<v Speaker 1>you can do at this point with SOA in any

0:29:04.964 --> 0:29:08.724
<v Speaker 1>believable way. But that might be kind of one of

0:29:08.764 --> 0:29:11.604
<v Speaker 1>the one of the other downstream effects. But I'm more

0:29:12.004 --> 0:29:15.284
<v Speaker 1>kind of what worries me, especially as someone you know,

0:29:15.604 --> 0:29:20.084
<v Speaker 1>who studies a barent behavior con artists, et cetera, and

0:29:20.124 --> 0:29:22.564
<v Speaker 1>who's working on a book about cheating. What worries me

0:29:22.604 --> 0:29:24.764
<v Speaker 1>are kind of all of the nefarious uses of this

0:29:24.924 --> 0:29:30.084
<v Speaker 1>for scamming, for for conning, for cheating, and you do

0:29:30.324 --> 0:29:34.404
<v Speaker 1>have this thing called the liar's dividend that I think

0:29:34.884 --> 0:29:38.164
<v Speaker 1>is very prominent in something like Sore, where I mean

0:29:38.204 --> 0:29:43.004
<v Speaker 1>Trump even said it himself that basically, you know, if

0:29:43.404 --> 0:29:46.404
<v Speaker 1>you don't trust this evidence anymore, then you can just

0:29:46.524 --> 0:29:49.564
<v Speaker 1>blame AI for everything. And Trump said and this isn't

0:29:49.604 --> 0:29:52.244
<v Speaker 1>a this is a quote. If something happens that's really bad,

0:29:52.364 --> 0:29:55.644
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll have to just blame AI, right, And that's

0:29:55.724 --> 0:29:59.244
<v Speaker 1>that's the liar's dividend that like now, liars are actually

0:29:59.244 --> 0:30:02.284
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are benefiting cheaters, are the ones that

0:30:02.324 --> 0:30:05.244
<v Speaker 1>are benefiting con artists, scammers, They're the ones that are

0:30:05.524 --> 0:30:08.764
<v Speaker 1>deriving the most benefit from this. So if your stated

0:30:08.764 --> 0:30:10.364
<v Speaker 1>goal has a come he is to make the world

0:30:10.404 --> 0:30:13.924
<v Speaker 1>a better place. And all you're doing is a good

0:30:13.964 --> 0:30:15.964
<v Speaker 1>on a good day, just generating slop and on a

0:30:16.004 --> 0:30:21.284
<v Speaker 1>bad day, creating content that might actually diletoriously affect people's

0:30:21.364 --> 0:30:24.284
<v Speaker 1>lives on an individual level, on a broader level, depending

0:30:24.324 --> 0:30:27.524
<v Speaker 1>on what we're talking about, then I start to question,

0:30:27.604 --> 0:30:30.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, what, what are we even doing? Right, Like,

0:30:30.204 --> 0:30:33.044
<v Speaker 1>what's the point of this because chat GPT. You know,

0:30:33.164 --> 0:30:35.964
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a fan of GPT five, We've talked about this,

0:30:36.524 --> 0:30:38.444
<v Speaker 1>it's still you know, there are things that we don't like,

0:30:38.684 --> 0:30:40.884
<v Speaker 1>but they are good uses of it, right and large

0:30:40.964 --> 0:30:44.204
<v Speaker 1>language models. I can see like there are really great

0:30:44.284 --> 0:30:47.444
<v Speaker 1>ways that this can you know, speed scientific discoveries do

0:30:47.964 --> 0:30:50.644
<v Speaker 1>make work easier. There there are lots of really great things.

0:30:50.684 --> 0:30:53.484
<v Speaker 1>And what's sore? I'm like, well, you know at this point,

0:30:53.524 --> 0:30:56.164
<v Speaker 1>like what are give me the strong man case for

0:30:56.244 --> 0:30:59.764
<v Speaker 1>what the amazing uses of this are as opposed to

0:31:00.564 --> 0:31:05.444
<v Speaker 1>just the meh or the just dead weight on society

0:31:05.604 --> 0:31:11.604
<v Speaker 1>or the actually actively bad society societal effect. And Nate,

0:31:11.604 --> 0:31:13.484
<v Speaker 1>I can already see by your face that you know

0:31:13.924 --> 0:31:16.644
<v Speaker 1>this is you'll rise to the challenge, even though you

0:31:16.724 --> 0:31:19.884
<v Speaker 1>were you started off by by being negative on sour

0:31:19.964 --> 0:31:21.444
<v Speaker 1>and saying that you don't even see why you would

0:31:21.684 --> 0:31:24.164
<v Speaker 1>why you would want to use it. But let's I'd

0:31:24.204 --> 0:31:26.524
<v Speaker 1>actually really like to try to figure out, Okay, what

0:31:26.644 --> 0:31:30.084
<v Speaker 1>are some really great like what is the societal good

0:31:30.724 --> 0:31:33.324
<v Speaker 1>from this? What is the thing from this that might

0:31:33.404 --> 0:31:38.204
<v Speaker 1>actually be you know, medical breakthrough, don't discoveries? I don't know, Like,

0:31:38.484 --> 0:31:41.644
<v Speaker 1>let's let's try to figure out, you know, is there

0:31:41.724 --> 0:31:45.004
<v Speaker 1>a way to spend this in a more positive light

0:31:45.084 --> 0:31:50.444
<v Speaker 1>than the one that I have just recounted, which is yeah,

0:31:50.484 --> 0:31:53.644
<v Speaker 1>well exactly. Yeah, No, I mean I haven't mentioned all

0:31:53.724 --> 0:31:58.364
<v Speaker 1>the negative stuff. Yeah, please, I mean that's a huge thing. Porn, revenge, porn,

0:31:59.204 --> 0:32:01.444
<v Speaker 1>just all all sorts of things that you can do

0:32:02.004 --> 0:32:07.484
<v Speaker 1>with with this technology, and with the access to photographs

0:32:07.724 --> 0:32:14.244
<v Speaker 1>and the frankly not great protections on image likeness, and

0:32:14.364 --> 0:32:19.244
<v Speaker 1>the ability to kind of use things that are copyright protected.

0:32:19.404 --> 0:32:22.444
<v Speaker 2>And and and fanfic y, which which may also have

0:32:22.484 --> 0:32:27.244
<v Speaker 2>some commercialization that you have you're on some weird wormhole

0:32:27.244 --> 0:32:30.444
<v Speaker 2>on the internet, right, and you have something involving these

0:32:30.524 --> 0:32:34.044
<v Speaker 2>characters that's not canon, and and and now you can

0:32:34.244 --> 0:32:40.924
<v Speaker 2>create your own movie universe, cinematic universe, right, especially for

0:32:41.044 --> 0:32:43.444
<v Speaker 2>fantasy type stuff where maybe the realism is not super

0:32:43.484 --> 0:32:46.244
<v Speaker 2>super important, and some of them will be popular, some

0:32:46.284 --> 0:32:48.484
<v Speaker 2>of them will be good even, right, They'll be interesting

0:32:48.604 --> 0:32:53.764
<v Speaker 2>art produced with this tool. But but yeah, I think

0:32:53.844 --> 0:32:56.444
<v Speaker 2>large language models are fascinating. It's partly because I'm like

0:32:56.484 --> 0:32:58.964
<v Speaker 2>kind of like a language guy.

0:32:59.204 --> 0:33:01.444
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I totally totally agree.

0:33:02.124 --> 0:33:06.284
<v Speaker 2>But they're also this kind of remarkable miracle technology, you know,

0:33:06.364 --> 0:33:08.444
<v Speaker 2>I get. Look, I guess in some sense, like there

0:33:08.484 --> 0:33:10.924
<v Speaker 2>is still some like shock and all with these video models, right,

0:33:10.964 --> 0:33:14.684
<v Speaker 2>I you know, given current developments in any eye, I'm

0:33:14.724 --> 0:33:18.564
<v Speaker 2>not surprised, right, but I would have been surprised five

0:33:18.684 --> 0:33:19.884
<v Speaker 2>or ten years ago, I think.

0:33:20.084 --> 0:33:20.284
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:33:22.524 --> 0:33:24.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, and you know, and by the way, as

0:33:24.204 --> 0:33:28.364
<v Speaker 2>you get more like customized versions of whatever fanfic you're into,

0:33:28.404 --> 0:33:31.884
<v Speaker 2>that makes society more like atomized also, right, we have

0:33:31.964 --> 0:33:34.724
<v Speaker 2>like fewer and fewer focal points. You know, you'll probably

0:33:34.764 --> 0:33:37.444
<v Speaker 2>get some really cool video games out of it. Right,

0:33:37.444 --> 0:33:40.764
<v Speaker 2>if you can custom generate unique animations and that, you know,

0:33:40.804 --> 0:33:43.084
<v Speaker 2>video games will be cool. It's hard to find the

0:33:43.644 --> 0:33:48.044
<v Speaker 2>legitimate quote unquote positive use cases for it, right, Whereas

0:33:48.044 --> 0:33:50.924
<v Speaker 2>emage image generation you can see plenty of positives, right,

0:33:50.964 --> 0:33:55.684
<v Speaker 2>and certainly language generation. Right. I guess advertising advertising, okay,

0:33:55.764 --> 0:33:58.284
<v Speaker 2>that's fine, right, video games? Right, but these are they

0:33:58.284 --> 0:34:00.124
<v Speaker 2>are these things that are kind of neutral and benign

0:34:00.324 --> 0:34:03.244
<v Speaker 2>ish and then things that are bad, right, And there's

0:34:03.284 --> 0:34:06.724
<v Speaker 2>not a lot that's good. Yeah, I don't think.

0:34:07.084 --> 0:34:10.244
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so either, did you see? By

0:34:10.244 --> 0:34:13.164
<v Speaker 1>the way, Nate, just to show like how important video

0:34:13.244 --> 0:34:17.684
<v Speaker 1>gaming data is to open a last year, they offered

0:34:17.884 --> 0:34:23.244
<v Speaker 1>five hundred million dollars for a company called Metal, which

0:34:23.324 --> 0:34:29.684
<v Speaker 1>lets gamers basically upload videos of them playing these video games,

0:34:29.884 --> 0:34:33.084
<v Speaker 1>and the reason that they were willing to offer so

0:34:33.204 --> 0:34:37.644
<v Speaker 1>much is because you know you might be able to

0:34:37.724 --> 0:34:42.444
<v Speaker 1>then train its models on those videos. There was a

0:34:42.484 --> 0:34:44.724
<v Speaker 1>story in a tech site that I read a lot

0:34:44.844 --> 0:34:49.004
<v Speaker 1>the information about this if you're interested in more detail,

0:34:49.044 --> 0:34:52.124
<v Speaker 1>but I thought that this was a really interesting window

0:34:52.284 --> 0:34:55.924
<v Speaker 1>into what open a I might be thinking in terms

0:34:55.964 --> 0:34:58.724
<v Speaker 1>of the future of its video apps. So yeah, I

0:34:58.764 --> 0:35:02.084
<v Speaker 1>think that it's it's funny you say video games will

0:35:02.124 --> 0:35:05.844
<v Speaker 1>be will get better, but it's a they will use

0:35:05.964 --> 0:35:09.644
<v Speaker 1>video game video games themselves to be able to prove

0:35:09.724 --> 0:35:12.564
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of one of these basically the way that

0:35:12.644 --> 0:35:15.644
<v Speaker 1>large language models work, right where you need that feedback,

0:35:15.684 --> 0:35:17.684
<v Speaker 1>You need the good stuff to be able to then

0:35:17.804 --> 0:35:21.324
<v Speaker 1>generate things on your own, and so you need access

0:35:21.364 --> 0:35:23.444
<v Speaker 1>to that data and to that raw data.

0:35:26.324 --> 0:35:36.404
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break. Google I

0:35:36.444 --> 0:35:40.764
<v Speaker 2>think is the best cop for open AI, right, probably

0:35:40.804 --> 0:35:44.164
<v Speaker 2>better than Facebook, but that's the second most obvious, right, Yep,

0:35:45.364 --> 0:35:47.684
<v Speaker 2>they both do a lot of different shit, right, Like

0:35:47.804 --> 0:35:50.684
<v Speaker 2>Google would not even claim that like everything they do

0:35:50.804 --> 0:35:56.364
<v Speaker 2>is search or one degree removed from search. Right, they

0:35:56.444 --> 0:35:58.364
<v Speaker 2>have lots of start people, they have lots of capital,

0:35:58.764 --> 0:36:00.644
<v Speaker 2>they buy lots of stuff. Maybe they think it will

0:36:00.684 --> 0:36:04.284
<v Speaker 2>improve search originally and then and then once you're doing

0:36:04.324 --> 0:36:07.604
<v Speaker 2>something else, right, they have you know, electric vehicles and

0:36:07.644 --> 0:36:09.324
<v Speaker 2>things like that, and like I kind of predict like

0:36:09.884 --> 0:36:12.044
<v Speaker 2>this is what we're seeing, Like I don't know. I mean,

0:36:12.164 --> 0:36:15.484
<v Speaker 2>I think Sam Moulton would love to have artificial general

0:36:15.484 --> 0:36:19.884
<v Speaker 2>intelligence AGI. You know, the implications for society good or bad. Right,

0:36:20.244 --> 0:36:23.164
<v Speaker 2>But like this does not feel to me like a

0:36:23.204 --> 0:36:25.484
<v Speaker 2>company that has a lot of competence about its ability

0:36:25.484 --> 0:36:27.764
<v Speaker 2>to like develop AGI in a one to three year timeline.

0:36:27.964 --> 0:36:30.444
<v Speaker 2>They might have something they call AGI, but like, if

0:36:30.484 --> 0:36:35.484
<v Speaker 2>you were on the brink of an intelligence explosion, as

0:36:36.244 --> 0:36:38.644
<v Speaker 2>both the doomers and the optimists sometimes call it, right,

0:36:39.964 --> 0:36:47.164
<v Speaker 2>you I think would not put out this video slop product. Right, Like,

0:36:47.204 --> 0:36:49.444
<v Speaker 2>there are ways where they could have rolled it out

0:36:49.444 --> 0:36:52.404
<v Speaker 2>with like with a little bit more pretense, even though

0:36:52.404 --> 0:36:54.284
<v Speaker 2>probably would be ninety eight percent the same what you

0:36:54.364 --> 0:36:56.564
<v Speaker 2>can do with it, right, but with like it could

0:36:56.564 --> 0:36:58.924
<v Speaker 2>have got a little bit more pretense about like here

0:36:58.964 --> 0:37:02.964
<v Speaker 2>the precautions we're taking about copyright and pornography and here

0:37:03.084 --> 0:37:07.364
<v Speaker 2>are you know, and we hired whatever these artists, We

0:37:07.404 --> 0:37:09.364
<v Speaker 2>did a collab with these artists right to show you

0:37:09.524 --> 0:37:13.484
<v Speaker 2>different ways in which can be used for true creativity, right,

0:37:13.604 --> 0:37:16.124
<v Speaker 2>and here's a way it can use for medical diagnosis.

0:37:16.164 --> 0:37:19.444
<v Speaker 2>And like the marketing was kind of you know, maybe

0:37:19.484 --> 0:37:21.004
<v Speaker 2>they didn't do their market but they're usually a company

0:37:21.244 --> 0:37:23.964
<v Speaker 2>pretty savy about its marketing, right, Yeah, everything Sam Maltman

0:37:24.004 --> 0:37:27.084
<v Speaker 2>says is is savvy. But like, you know, maybe take

0:37:27.124 --> 0:37:29.524
<v Speaker 2>that back. All the different versions of names they have

0:37:29.684 --> 0:37:33.004
<v Speaker 2>for their products can be a little bit confusing, but like, yeah,

0:37:33.004 --> 0:37:37.244
<v Speaker 2>this to me says that like, you know, this company

0:37:37.404 --> 0:37:40.884
<v Speaker 2>is is Google, Facebook, Microsoft.

0:37:41.404 --> 0:37:45.164
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they know that they're they're creating something that will

0:37:45.924 --> 0:37:49.284
<v Speaker 1>potentially cause a lot of negative effects, and they don't

0:37:49.284 --> 0:37:53.684
<v Speaker 1>particularly care right now because that is something that, as

0:37:53.724 --> 0:37:55.764
<v Speaker 1>you say, in the short term, like they don't have

0:37:55.844 --> 0:38:00.524
<v Speaker 1>agi and this is something that can get people's eyeballs

0:38:00.564 --> 0:38:04.444
<v Speaker 1>for a limited amount of time, which means money, et cetera,

0:38:04.484 --> 0:38:06.804
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So it seems that, you know, we've come

0:38:06.844 --> 0:38:11.284
<v Speaker 1>a long way from Sam Altman's initial goals for the

0:38:11.324 --> 0:38:14.404
<v Speaker 1>company to now like Okay, let's just figure out a

0:38:14.444 --> 0:38:18.524
<v Speaker 1>way that we can increase immediate revenue right now. Consequences

0:38:18.604 --> 0:38:22.524
<v Speaker 1>kind of be damned, and we're going to sure, like

0:38:22.604 --> 0:38:25.244
<v Speaker 1>once we get soon and if something really bad happens,

0:38:25.324 --> 0:38:29.244
<v Speaker 1>we might start adding some guardrails on some of this stuff.

0:38:29.284 --> 0:38:32.044
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, you know, let's just put it

0:38:32.084 --> 0:38:36.204
<v Speaker 1>out there and yeah, well we'll see what happens. Nate,

0:38:36.284 --> 0:38:39.284
<v Speaker 1>have you seen the movie that came out, I think

0:38:39.324 --> 0:38:42.364
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix earlier this year, Mountainhead.

0:38:43.644 --> 0:38:47.764
<v Speaker 2>No, so this was I I have fountain Head.

0:38:48.324 --> 0:38:51.604
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, and in the movie, so they actually have

0:38:51.724 --> 0:38:57.444
<v Speaker 1>the exact same I think thought process about our intelligence

0:38:57.524 --> 0:39:00.524
<v Speaker 1>as Sam Altman does, which is that, oh, people are

0:39:00.524 --> 0:39:02.564
<v Speaker 1>going to miss this. So the movie even just like

0:39:02.604 --> 0:39:05.524
<v Speaker 1>makes a show. They're like, you called this mountain Head.

0:39:05.804 --> 0:39:08.724
<v Speaker 1>Is that supposed to be like Fountainhead? I was like, guys, guys,

0:39:08.764 --> 0:39:12.004
<v Speaker 1>we got it. You don't have to explicitly put it

0:39:12.524 --> 0:39:16.204
<v Speaker 1>in the dialogue. It's one of those cringe moments. But yes,

0:39:16.644 --> 0:39:18.964
<v Speaker 1>that is in fact a line of dialogue, which is

0:39:19.204 --> 0:39:21.844
<v Speaker 1>which is heartbreaking to me because I wanted to love

0:39:21.884 --> 0:39:25.004
<v Speaker 1>this movie. Disclaimer, I did not because it was written

0:39:25.044 --> 0:39:27.364
<v Speaker 1>by Jesse Armstrong, who was a creator and writer of

0:39:27.484 --> 0:39:30.524
<v Speaker 1>A Succession, which I think is one of the best

0:39:30.564 --> 0:39:34.244
<v Speaker 1>TV shows in recent memories. So that was it was

0:39:34.484 --> 0:39:37.964
<v Speaker 1>sad to me that I not not only did not

0:39:38.004 --> 0:39:41.404
<v Speaker 1>love this movie, but another disclaimer, turned it off probably

0:39:41.444 --> 0:39:43.764
<v Speaker 1>less than halfway through because I felt that it was

0:39:44.084 --> 0:39:47.004
<v Speaker 1>that bad. But the premise of it is that you

0:39:47.044 --> 0:39:51.004
<v Speaker 1>have all of these tech billionaires come to kind of

0:39:51.044 --> 0:39:57.524
<v Speaker 1>a house called mountain Head, like fountain Head, and they're all,

0:39:58.124 --> 0:40:01.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're all basically they're they're big dick. Contest

0:40:01.164 --> 0:40:03.604
<v Speaker 1>is you know whose net worth is hired at any

0:40:03.644 --> 0:40:06.444
<v Speaker 1>given moment, And one of the companies has just released

0:40:06.444 --> 0:40:11.724
<v Speaker 1>this AI video generation tool that is starting real world

0:40:11.964 --> 0:40:17.124
<v Speaker 1>riots as they are ensconced in their mountain retreats because

0:40:17.644 --> 0:40:21.684
<v Speaker 1>the videos content is so incredibly realistic. And one of

0:40:21.684 --> 0:40:24.444
<v Speaker 1>the other guys has a company that can actually help

0:40:24.484 --> 0:40:28.044
<v Speaker 1>people very accurately say no, this is AI and distinguish

0:40:28.524 --> 0:40:31.284
<v Speaker 1>from it, and his net worth is rising even faster,

0:40:31.444 --> 0:40:33.884
<v Speaker 1>and so he doesn't. You know, it's kind of yeah,

0:40:34.004 --> 0:40:39.964
<v Speaker 1>it's this kind of battle between morals and like letting

0:40:40.004 --> 0:40:42.204
<v Speaker 1>the world kind of go to hell because we'll be

0:40:42.244 --> 0:40:45.604
<v Speaker 1>fine because we're mega billionaires and look at our net

0:40:45.644 --> 0:40:48.844
<v Speaker 1>worth going up and up and up. But yeah, it

0:40:48.924 --> 0:40:51.444
<v Speaker 1>was very funny because when I saw Sora, I was like, wait,

0:40:51.964 --> 0:40:55.364
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of like that, you know, famous tweet

0:40:55.804 --> 0:41:00.604
<v Speaker 1>from forever ago. It was science fiction author in my book,

0:41:00.644 --> 0:41:04.084
<v Speaker 1>I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale tech

0:41:04.124 --> 0:41:07.284
<v Speaker 1>company at Long Last, we have created the Torment Nexus

0:41:07.324 --> 0:41:12.124
<v Speaker 1>from classics sci fi novel don'tate the Torment Nexus. So

0:41:12.364 --> 0:41:16.244
<v Speaker 1>this was, Yeah, this seems to be like exactly one

0:41:16.284 --> 0:41:18.404
<v Speaker 1>of those moments where I was like, wait, didn't we

0:41:18.604 --> 0:41:20.844
<v Speaker 1>just have a movie about the fact that maybe we

0:41:20.924 --> 0:41:23.564
<v Speaker 1>don't want to create a tool that does this exact thing.

0:41:24.284 --> 0:41:27.844
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that that was a pretty pretty funny

0:41:27.884 --> 0:41:28.484
<v Speaker 1>funny moment.

0:41:30.404 --> 0:41:34.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, look, I mean, for example, companies, if you know,

0:41:34.204 --> 0:41:37.244
<v Speaker 2>you can use their IP like their stock characters unless

0:41:37.284 --> 0:41:41.204
<v Speaker 2>they specifically opt out of it. Like that's kind of presumptuous, right,

0:41:41.964 --> 0:41:42.164
<v Speaker 2>Just it.

0:41:42.164 --> 0:41:43.804
<v Speaker 1>Should be the other way around, by the way, you

0:41:43.804 --> 0:41:45.444
<v Speaker 1>should have to opt in, not opt out.

0:41:46.004 --> 0:41:49.444
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they've done financial modeling and like, very few

0:41:49.444 --> 0:41:54.924
<v Speaker 2>companies have been truly crippled by by a lawsuit, right,

0:41:55.004 --> 0:41:57.604
<v Speaker 2>Like Napster was kind of like the famous exception, right,

0:41:57.644 --> 0:41:59.444
<v Speaker 2>But for the most part, if you're growing super deeper

0:41:59.484 --> 0:42:01.244
<v Speaker 2>fast and you're going to lose a few of these

0:42:01.804 --> 0:42:06.564
<v Speaker 2>big lawsuits, right, you know, we're already in an environment,

0:42:06.844 --> 0:42:12.524
<v Speaker 2>particularly on Twitter slash x where uh where you have

0:42:12.604 --> 0:42:14.644
<v Speaker 2>you collect videos from the eight billion people in the world, right,

0:42:14.684 --> 0:42:17.444
<v Speaker 2>you collect something that happens somewhere to one of those

0:42:17.484 --> 0:42:20.484
<v Speaker 2>eight billion people, and like Ela Musk tweets, Elamus tweets it,

0:42:20.884 --> 0:42:25.324
<v Speaker 2>and it creates outrage. Right, sometimes those videos are are

0:42:25.404 --> 0:42:28.244
<v Speaker 2>manipulated or even fake, but like often they're not. Right,

0:42:28.284 --> 0:42:29.844
<v Speaker 2>it's just kind of like the cherry picking that you

0:42:29.844 --> 0:42:33.444
<v Speaker 2>get in there. And I think I'm a dystopian meter.

0:42:34.324 --> 0:42:38.404
<v Speaker 2>We're at like eight point two I think, right.

0:42:38.364 --> 0:42:40.684
<v Speaker 1>A point two out of tenya yeah, yeah.

0:42:40.604 --> 0:42:43.044
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not linear. It's a long way to go

0:42:43.124 --> 0:42:44.164
<v Speaker 2>to get to a ten.

0:42:44.364 --> 0:42:46.084
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I think I think eight point two we're

0:42:46.324 --> 0:42:49.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're certainly I think I think we are

0:42:49.324 --> 0:42:52.324
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think we are as well. And that's

0:42:52.324 --> 0:42:56.004
<v Speaker 1>such a positive note on which to leave our audience

0:42:56.924 --> 0:43:00.084
<v Speaker 1>this this fine week. But yeah, let's uh. I know

0:43:00.124 --> 0:43:02.804
<v Speaker 1>we say this so frequently at the end of our episodes,

0:43:02.844 --> 0:43:06.044
<v Speaker 1>but I really do. I'm very curious to see what's

0:43:06.164 --> 0:43:09.004
<v Speaker 1>going to end up happening with SOA and whether we

0:43:09.044 --> 0:43:13.164
<v Speaker 1>look back on this and are like, holy shit, you know, Nate,

0:43:13.244 --> 0:43:16.124
<v Speaker 1>you and I were so naive or whether we think

0:43:16.804 --> 0:43:19.524
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we were very prescient about this. You know,

0:43:19.604 --> 0:43:22.404
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested to see what's going to go down,

0:43:22.844 --> 0:43:27.364
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that it's less negative than we have

0:43:27.564 --> 0:43:30.364
<v Speaker 1>envisioned it during the course of the last forty five minutes.

0:43:30.564 --> 0:43:34.524
<v Speaker 1>I hope that we don't hit at ten anytime soon,

0:43:34.644 --> 0:43:35.724
<v Speaker 1>but we shall.

0:43:35.484 --> 0:43:41.604
<v Speaker 2>See log off, log off, flog up, go to.

0:43:41.524 --> 0:43:46.044
<v Speaker 1>The bogging Nate and Maria logging off for today. We'll

0:43:46.084 --> 0:43:54.044
<v Speaker 1>see you all on Saturday. Let us know what you

0:43:54.044 --> 0:43:56.364
<v Speaker 1>think of the show. Reach out to us at Risky

0:43:56.404 --> 0:44:01.004
<v Speaker 1>Business at pushkin dot FM. Risky Business is hosted by

0:44:01.044 --> 0:44:02.764
<v Speaker 1>me Maria Kanakova.

0:44:02.484 --> 0:44:05.204
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a Cool

0:44:05.244 --> 0:44:09.204
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:44:09.204 --> 0:44:12.364
<v Speaker 2>by as At Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya gerwit

0:44:13.244 --> 0:44:16.364
<v Speaker 2>Lydia Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and

0:44:16.444 --> 0:44:20.564
<v Speaker 2>our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Brugert.

0:44:20.724 --> 0:44:22.884
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:44:22.924 --> 0:44:25.604
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:44:25.764 --> 0:44:27.564
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:44:27.604 --> 0:44:29.764
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there, Thanks for tuning in