WEBVTT - Son of Listener Mail 2014

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with text Stuff from stuff

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland, and this is the second

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of two episodes where I look at listener mail and

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>answer a bunch of questions that don't quite merit a

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>full episode. Their short answers and short questions. Uh. The

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>answers tend to be pretty long because it's me. But

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have any questions you would like me

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to answer in a similar style show, just write me

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com. I'll repeat

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that again at the end of the episode. But let's

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>get onto some of the questions that were sent into me.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>This one comes from Susan on Facebook, who says, I'm

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>not sure if this is something you can use, but

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it bugs the hell out of me. Why could you

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>only post photos to Instagram from a mobile device? Most

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>social media sites have web page access as well, but

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Instagram will only let you leave comments on their desktop interface.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Why does Instagram maintain this lack of functionality? It makes

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it much harder for those of us in social media

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to schedule and work with Instagram as a platform. The

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>answer I have for you now This is again kind

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of my opinion slash guests, because I don't work for Instagram,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know the inside story, but I think

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it mainly has to do with Instagram positioning itself as

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a mobile photo sharing service. Now that means that it

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is trying to be the photo equivalent of something like Twitter,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and a move it to the desktop world would mean

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that it would have to compete against lots and lots

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of other photo sharing uh and photo album software suites

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that are out there, and I don't think Instagram wants

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to compete in that market. They don't want to be

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>up against things like Flicker or even Facebook, um that

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. They would much prefer to have this

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>other niche area really well defined. So creating an app

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes it easy to take pictures and apply filters

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and share it to a social net work is really

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>really appealing in the mobile space. It's something that the

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>easier it is to use and the more functionality it has,

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the more likely people are going to adopt it. So

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot easier than creating a very compelling service

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on the desktop. UM that's probably why they're going that way.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It also makes it easier for them to work with

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>other existing social media if it doesn't look like they

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>are um hedging in on the perimeter of those other

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>services like Facebook. So that's my guess. I think it

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>makes it a big fish in a small pond as

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>opposed to being a small fish in a big pond.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do agree that for those of us who

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>work in social media where we're trying to schedule things

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>out and we're having to manage multiple social media UH platforms,

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really frustrating. Um I oversee Facebook and Google Plus

0:02:55.280 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and UH and Twitter and Tumbler, and every time you

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>add one then you have a new suite of problems

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that come up as a manager, So it becomes a

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>full time job just to manage the social media on

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>top of creating the content that I do. So I

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>understand the frustration from Christian on Facebook. Hey, tech stuff,

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember if I heard this from you guys

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or not. However I heard that all the new technology

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that comes out now, such as smartphones, for example, has

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>already been long and invented. In other words, there's nothing

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>really new, like warp drives or things like that. Everything

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>that is sold to the public is basically just repackaged

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>such as on the iPhone. They didn't just invent fingerprints

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>scanners or touch screens or wireless tech. These things have

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>been around forever. I didn't believe this at first and

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually started to agree. But now I'm questioning that again,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really curious what tex Stuff would have to

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>say about it. By the way, I love the podcast

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>on Elon Musk and all his business ventures. Well, you know,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I talked about this in our last episode a little bit.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The thing about inventions is again they are so it's

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a it's a work in progress. It's not a moment

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>where someone comes up with something brand new that has

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>never been seen before and that changes everything. It usually

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is an incremental improvement to some existing idea. It may

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>be taking something that only existed in the world of

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>ideas and making it a real thing that happens. That

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of happened with radio, for example. People had been

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>working with different implementations of radio, but Marconi was the

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>first one to really get one to work, especially transatlantic radio.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So these are ideas that come as the result of

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of work with lots of different people working on

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the predecessors to these inventions. So I certainly don't think

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we are at an era where we will no longer

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>see new groundbreaking technology. It may be that we just

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>witness it growing in small steps. But if you look

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>at the technology of today and compare it to stuff

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>from five years ago, it looks like a world of difference.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that five years from now, the technology we

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>have then will be even to the point where the

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff we we the bleeding edge stuff we have today

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>looks primitive in comparison. Uh, it's hard to see during

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the present, right, we just see the the incremental changes.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't see the big jumps. But those jumps are there,

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>they're just hidden by all the little incriminal steps. So

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing I've learned is that you never ever predict

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've reached the end of innovation or the end

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of invention. People have done that throughout history. Uh, you know,

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the like the head of the patent off it's saying

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>that everything worth inventing had been invented, and that was

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at the turn of the twentieth century. And certainly we've

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>seen hundreds of world changing inventions come out as after

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundreds. So never never say never, never say that

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>we're done with innovation and inventing. It may just be

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that the changes we see are so frequent and so

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>small that we can't see the big steps that define

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>different generations of products. So that's my answer for you. Next,

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Frank on Facebook says, how about a podcast on the

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>media of the tech world? How does how do tech

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>companies compete for media coverage? How do tech news sites

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>choose which ones they want to talk about? With so

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>many people wanting to make their own gizmas, how do

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they bring it to the big, bad world out there.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is a little insider baseball. Technically, if you

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are a tech news site or a show and you're

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>covering technology, you largely take your cues off what your

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>audience wants to hear. So this isn't necessarily true for

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>every single story you run, but you might see that

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps your audience really loves Apple, for example. It's an

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>easy example because generally it's true. It means that you

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>would probably spend a little more time focusing on those

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>stories than on other stories that might be interesting, but

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>your audience doesn't flock to them. You don't want to

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>put all your eggs in one basket, ever, You want

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to spread them out, but you you focus your attention

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>based upon what your audience has told you they want

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to see. Now, if you have defined yourself as a

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>company that specifically covers technology from one sector, like Android,

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>then obviously you you're going to focus on that. You

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>may end up mentioning other companies as they relate to Android,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but that that defines your experience. As far as how

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you determine which stories to cover, A lot of that

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>depends upon press releases. So tech companies send out press

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>releases all the time. Sometimes they're embargoed, which means that

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you cannot release that information until an agreed upon time.

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The embargo will lift at a certain time, and at

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that point you can post your story about whatever it

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>happens to be. If you violate an embargo, you run

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the risk of that company never are working with your

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>outlet ever again. So if I'm a reporter and I

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>get a press release that's under embargo that has an

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>amazing story about a new product, then my it's my

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>best interest to wait until the embargo is over before posting,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>so that way I don't burn that bridge. UH. Ask

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for how do companies get news out? They often will

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have a public relations department, or they will hire a

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>PR firm to handle it for them, and what that

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>department's job is is to take the stuff that the

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>company is working on, create press releases about it that

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>spin it in the most positive, exciting way possible, and

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>then send that out to every single tech journalist they

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>possibly can. I am on several of these email lists,

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>even though I do not cover tech news. I don't

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have a daily tech news show, although that's a great

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>idea someone should do one of those. Um it's a

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>joke for my friend Tom Merritt. So since I don't

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>cover it, it doesn't really apply to me. But I

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>still am on a lot of these lists. I often

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>will use those as inspiration for UH for podcast episodes

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>down the line. But generally speaking, that's how you get

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the information about your gizmo to the big bad world.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You hire somebody who can send that information out to

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>all the different outlets that might be interested in your work,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and then those outlets will take the ball and run

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>from there. Next from Nate Langson on Twitter now. Nate

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Lanson is editor of Wired dot co dot uk UH

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and as a friend of mine, so full disclosure there.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He says did you ever own a palm top computer.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>My personal favorite was the Scion Series three, which I adored.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>The three MX had a twenty eight Mega hurt CPU. Nate,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I am sad to say I have never owned any

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of palm top computer. In fact, before I got

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone, I didn't really have any kind of mobile

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>computer at all, unless you count the scientific calculator I

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had back when I was a senior in high school,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>which was programmable and you could make pictures on it,

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but that was pretty much the extent of it. So

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I was really slow to adopt cell phones in general.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It was about a year or two after I graduated

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>college before I finally got my first cell phone, and

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I graduated back in nine seven. So I've been pretty

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>slow to adopt most technologies, which might come as a

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>surprise since I host a technology show. But with the

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>exception of smart watches, I tend to hold off. I

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't jump on the bandwagon smart watches. I kind of

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>have a watch problem. I mentioned it in the previous episode.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a Pebble smart watch. I've got two other

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>crowdfunded smart watches on the way, and I'm always on

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the lookout for other really nice smart watches. Usually what

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>slows me down is I'll read the initial review and

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>if I see that the battery life is terrible, then

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll skip it. But at any rate, I've only ever

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>owned one tablet that was a Nexus seven Android tablet.

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I still have it, but I think I only use

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it to play Tiny Death Star because I'm still a

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Tiny Star Wars fan. I've had three smartphones, the G one,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the G two, both by HTC, and the next is

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for those are all Android smartphones, so you can see

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>what side I better my bread. I'm still rocking the

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Xbox three six and the p S three. I have

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>not upgraded to a new console system. Um. I follow

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>all the news about all these different devices that keep

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>coming out. I'm well informed about them, but I tend

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to be very conservative and adopting them because I have

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>very little spare time. And since I have very little

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>spare time, there are actually games that are on a

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>stack in front of my three sixty that I haven't

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>even taken out of the shrink wrap yet that I

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>need to play. I just finished Battle Block Theater. People.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I am well behind the state of the art as

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>far as games are concerned, so I tend to be

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a little slow to adopt these. I love the technologies,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I just don't go out and grab them as soon

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>as they come out. I did buy a brand new

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>desktop computer that can run current generation PC games, and

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that's got me really excited, though to be fair, I've

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly used it to play Civilization five because again I'm

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>well behind the curve. And finally, I've got a trilogy

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of questions from my good friend Ariel. Ariel and I

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have known each other for more than a decade, and

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we've done some comedy and some acting together, and we've

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>got some podcast projects together. So full disclosure, I know

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>her really well too, but she had some great questions

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because she's a fan of the show, So thank you

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>very much, Ariel. And her first question was, how often

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do you come across a tech subject that is really

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to understand? What has been the most confusing tech

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to get a handle on? To talk about? All Right,

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>so this happens frequently. I run into a lot of

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>tech topics that are difficult for me to understand. I

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I do. I'm not an engineer, I'm not a computer scientist.

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>When I went to school, I went to school studying

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>English literature with a focus on medieval English lit, so

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking Chaucer and things of that nature. But I've

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>always loved technology and I've always been interested in it,

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I would follow along from my layman's perspective, and

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I began to educate myself that way. So I'm largely

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>self taught when it comes to the ins and outs

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of technology, and I do a lot of research. So

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>while I may not understand a subject when I first

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>start looking into it, I do my best to absolutely

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>understand it the best of my ability before I podcast

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>on it. And if I don't feel comfortable about it,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>then I won't do a podcast, because I think that

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that does more harm than good to do a really

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>crappy podcast that misrepresents a technology, or a company or

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a personality. Uh. And I hope that I have managed

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to do that throughout tech stuff. I'm sure there are

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>one or two episodes that are maybe borderline because they're

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a little um, you know, they were based on things

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that I felt I had a good understanding of, and

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I might have been mistaken at any rate. I think

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that the hardest episodes have been those that deal with

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>quantum physics, because when I went to school, I studied physics,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I studied chemistry, has staid biology, but I never got

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>into quantum physics in college. I've read an awful lot

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>about them. I've read books on the leading thinkers, both

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the early thinkers of quantum physics and current thinkers, but

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it's still a largely mysterious world to me. So any

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of the UH concepts that involve quantum physics, and there

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of them in technology, are really tough

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and require a lot more work on my side to

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get a good understanding before I feel comfortable enough explaining

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>how they worked to an audience. For example, let's look

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>at microprocessors. Transistors on microprocessors are on the nanoscale, which

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>means that quantum effects come into play. UH. So this

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is something that we come into contact with all the time.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>If you have a computer, you or a smartphone or

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>mobile device of some sort, you have a processor in

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there that's got elements that are so small that quantum

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>effects have to be taken into consideration. So it's not

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's unusual for me to have to talk about

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this sort of stuff. So I have to spend a

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of time understanding the fundamentals and then building on

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that before I feel comfortable talking about them. Pretty much

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the hardest subject of them all for me is optical computers,

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so anything that has to do with photons. Photons, of course,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>are the the fundamental particle of light. They are massless.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>They have a relative relativistic mass, which means that when

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you are using them in relativistic equations, you factor in

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a mass. But in in actual physical reality we would

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>say they are massless. Uh. They behave in weird ways.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>They can interact in weird ways or not interact in

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>weird ways. And every time I do anything that has

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with optics and and it's getting down to

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that photon level description, it requires hours of extra research

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on my part um. I find it really rewarding. I

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>love learning stuff, so I'm not complaining. Don't get me wrong,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually really enjoy doing this kind of thing, but

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it is a lot of work. Next, Ariel has another question.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>She says, what episode are you most proud of and

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>do you feel what do you feel most passionately about.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I love all my episodes. They're like children. I can't

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>pick between them, but I particularly love the episodes where

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we explain how something actually works, as in the physical

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>workings of a piece of technology. I find that really satisfying.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, if you're explaining how something actually works,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a beginning, middle, and end. Uh it is it

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is there, there parameters you work inside. It's not an

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>open ended question, so it makes it really easy to

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on specifically what you need to explain. It also

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>comes with a challenge because how do you explain how

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>something works in an audio format where you don't have

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of visual aids. That means that I have

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to come up with interesting ways to explain concepts that

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>might not really be easy to imagine without some examples

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or metaphors, that kind of thing. So I really enjoy

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that that challenge. And uh also, because it isn't open ended,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about fuzzy stuff around the edges.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You can just give the specific facts of how the

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>technology works and then maybe spend some time about why

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it's important. I always think that's a good thing too,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, that's really what I'm most passionate about

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is the social impact of technology. That's it really gets

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>me fired up, and that can be anything from enabling

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>people to communicate during times of duress or turmoil, like

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what we saw with the Arab Spring, or how social

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>problems can be reflected in the technological sphere, like things

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like racism and misogyny. I mean, these are serious issues

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's we see it both just out in the

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>world old in general and within the world of technology,

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's uh, you know, people using devices for raising

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>awareness or using technology to try and suppress people from

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>being able to express themselves. These are big, big issues,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and technology plays a very fundamental role in these issues.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of times the big story isn't about

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the tech. The tech is one piece that fits inside it.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But I find that the tech is an interesting point

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of access to get into these conversations. And I do

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>expect in the future to have episodes really looking at

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>some ways that technology and social issues have have have

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>worked together or have clashed, particularly over the last couple

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of years. So I hope that my listeners will really

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>enjoy those episodes because I think it's a really important

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>part of what technology is doing today. At any rate,

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I love talking about all this kind of stuff. Like

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I've said, I love learning, So when someone gives me

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a request about something, I don't know much about that.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I get really passionate about because it means I get

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to learn stuff, and really I learned something new every

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>single week here at How Stuff Works, and it's one

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits of the job. It's one of the

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>hardest things about the job. And Ariel's final question was

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>you used to be a writer for How Stuff Works.

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>What was it like transitioning from writing to podcasting, Which

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great question because I don't know if everyone

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>out there is aware of this transformation. Um So, back

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in the day, people used to say, well, what's it

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like being a podcaster as your job and my response was,

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I podcasting is not my job. My job is a

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>writer for How Stuff Works. I also podcast on top

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of being a writer for How Stuff Works, And for

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the first six years of my career here at how

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>staff Works, that was the truth. That was what my

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>job was. I wrote articles that got published to the website,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and on top of that, I would record episodes of

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff, primarily UH and then occasionally do other things.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But then about two years ago, things changed and I

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>became a podcaster and video host and I haven't written

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a full article for the website in two years. I've

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>done some updates, but I haven't written a how blank

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>works article in two years, and it's a big change.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So to understand how big a change it is, I

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>thought it'd be fun to kind of go through what

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>my schedule would have been like way back in the day.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So when I was a writer, my week both began

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and ended on a Friday. It would end in the

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>sense that I would turn in a work assignment. Usually

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>there'll be two articles, normally one long article and one

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>shorter article would be due each week, so Friday was

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the day I would turn them in, but it was

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>also the day I would get my new assignment. So

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>originally I had two weeks to research and write an

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>article based on that assignment grant Atually that narrowed down

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>to one week, So I would get a assignment on

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Friday and it would be due the following Friday, which

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it might be harsh to cut down the

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>preparation time in half, but it turns out Parkinson's law

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is mostly right. So Parkinson's law is kind of a joke.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a tongue in cheek law, and it says that

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>work expands so as to fill the time available for

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>its completion. So, in other words, if you are given

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>a task and you're told you have five minutes to

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>complete this, and it would take a reasonable person five

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes to complete it, and you you do the job,

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>it takes you five minutes to do the job. But

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're told you have two hours to complete this,

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the work that you could complete in five minutes magically expands,

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>so it takes the full two hours before you're finished. Again,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a tongue in cheak joke, but it turns out

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of true because my time was cut

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in half, but I was still turning in articles every

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>week instead of every two weeks. In fact, I was

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>turning in twice as many, so it was um it

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was really hectic because I also had podcasts on top

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. At the time, I was also recording podcasts

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>on Friday morning, so Friday was a big day for me.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It was when I would turn in old assignments, get

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>new assignments, and record text stuff. I would get into

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the office at seven am and by nine am or

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>nine thirty we would go into the studio and record,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and then my Friday's were really pretty jam packed. Today

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>things are different, uh, now I primarily research episodes for

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff. I researched episodes for Forward Thinking UH, and

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>then I record all of those. So that's four podcasts

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>typically per week. I did UH five this week, but

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>that's unusual, So normally it's four episodes per week. I

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>record twice on Tuesdays and twice on Thursdays, and then

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, I might have to do a

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>video for the brain Stuff series, which if you guys

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't checked out, you should definitely go look at brain

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff brain stuff show dot com or go to YouTube

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and search for brain Stuff. The shows there are great.

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm just one host. A lot of the other How

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works hosts are also on that show and we

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>rotate through, so check that out. I might shoot episodes

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for how stuff Works YouTube channel, so if you haven't

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>checked that out in a while, you should go look

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>at that because there are a lot of different videos

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>coming up from again the hosts of How Stuff Works

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that cover all sorts of topics. So if you're interested

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of thing, you should check that out. UH.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>This is a lot of work. I mean, it's it's

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of research, it's a lot of recording. The

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>nice thing is that. For the Brain Stuff shows, for

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the most part, those episodes are written by someone else,

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>which makes my job so much easier. I just have

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to get in front of the camera and say what

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to say. But for Forward Thinking and for

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff, both the video series for Forward Thinking and

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the audio I do a lot of the writing, I

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>do the recording, um, and for all of Tech Stuff,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing the writing and recording. So a full week

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is mostly made up of lots of research. Also scheduling,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because now that I don't have a regular co host,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to figure out how to fill up my

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>recording times, and a lot of the fellow How Stuff

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Works hosts have been very kind to volunteer their time

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and sit in as guest hosts. You're going to hear

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>more of them in the future. UM. I have plans

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for people from Stuffy miss In History, Class, Stuff Mob

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Never Told You, and even Stuff You Should Know joining

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>me in the studio for various topics, So keep an

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ear out for that. But that, of course, scheduling takes

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of time too. I have to coordinate

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>my schedule or the studio availability with whomever is agreeing

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to be on my show. That also applies to people

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>who are outside of How Stuff Works. I've got several

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>people who have given me attentative agreement to be on

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the show, but I have to schedule all those folks

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>out That takes a lot of time too. So the

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>job is very different from what it was when I

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>accepted it eight years ago, but it's still incredibly rewarding

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and incredibly challenging. Those two things go hand in hand,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I find, so I very much enjoy it, but it

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is a totally different world. So thank you so much,

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Ariel for those questions that are fantastic. Um, I look

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>forward to getting more questions from you guys out there.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>If you ever have anything that, uh you feel it's

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just a quick interesting question, either about technology, or maybe

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's about podcasting, or maybe it's just about me, then

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and send it to me. I can't promise

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to answer all of them, who will

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>largely depend upon what you're asking, but I will certainly

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>read all of them. You can email me My address

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com, or

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you could be like a lot of the folks were

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in these two episodes, you can contact me on social

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>media site. So Facebook and Twitter and Tumbler all three

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>have the handle tech stuff HSW attached to our account.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Go and visit them. If you haven't liked the Facebook page,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you should definitely check that out because we're posting much

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>more frequently over there now and getting a lot of

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting conversations going on over there. So check that

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>out for me and I'll talk to you guys again.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Really system for more on this and thousands of other

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>topics because it has staff works dot com