Speaker 1: All right, Thanks Scott Shannon, thanks to all of you
Speaker 1: for being with us. Right down our toll free number.
Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you in the course of
Speaker 1: the program today. It's eight hundred and nine four one.
Speaker 1: Sean you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Of course, President Zippy Cup needed his cheat sheets to
Speaker 1: negotiate with Putin. You know, there was one thing a
Speaker 1: friend of mine sent this to me, pointed it out
Speaker 1: to me, and I said, there's no way this is true.
Speaker 1: So I got my team like just doing a quick
Speaker 1: double check on all of this. That Vladimir Putin in
Speaker 1: forty five minutes took more questions than Joe Biden has
Speaker 1: answered in six months. And by the way, they're not
Speaker 1: an easy press conference. I mean, look, it's so embarrassing
Speaker 1: to me. I think I think it's embarrassing. It's such
Speaker 1: a sign of weakness that Joe Biden. The reality is
Speaker 1: his team probably politically, probably in the best enswer's interest
Speaker 1: of the country. It's not good for Joe to stand
Speaker 1: on a podium and have a joint press conference with
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin, who will publicly humiliate him because he's not
Speaker 1: up to the task. The problem is they all knew
Speaker 1: that before he ever gotten this race, and it's only
Speaker 1: gotten worse, not better, over time, and that is now
Speaker 1: a real clear present problem for the United States, to
Speaker 1: say the least. Anyway, appeared to be holding another one
Speaker 1: of his cheat sheets at his summit with Vladimir, and
Speaker 1: he seemed to be hiding the notes from Putin. You know,
Speaker 1: Putin's not stupid. He's evil, but he's not stupid. It's
Speaker 1: a hostile regime. He's a hostile actor, but again, he's
Speaker 1: not stupid. President she is evil, but he's not stupid.
Speaker 1: Same with the Iranian Mullah's. I don't trust any of
Speaker 1: them as far as I can throw them. And they
Speaker 1: have long assessed Joe Biden's cognitive issues long before this
Speaker 1: shortened summit. It didn't go on as long as they
Speaker 1: said it was going to go on. And Joe just
Speaker 1: doesn't have the mental alertness and capacity to stand next
Speaker 1: to Putin and do a joint presser. And I think
Speaker 1: the other thing is there was probably a great fear
Speaker 1: among his team that Joe would probably stick to the
Speaker 1: talking points that were probably even written before they left
Speaker 1: Washington and say this happened, and this happened, and this happened,
Speaker 1: and this happened, and if it didn't happen, would he
Speaker 1: would be probably corrected immediately by Vladimir Putin, who's listening
Speaker 1: to it. So they couldn't put Joe in that position either,
Speaker 1: because you know, now we have to make every decision
Speaker 1: and filter it through the prism of Joe's, you know,
Speaker 1: cognitive weaknesses. There was a testy moment where Biden got
Speaker 1: combative with a CNN reporter, Caitlin Collins, and he wrapped
Speaker 1: up his press conference. Why are you so confident he'll
Speaker 1: change his behavior, Collins asked, And here's what happened. A
Speaker 1: confident he'll change his behavior? Mister president, I'm not changing here.
Speaker 1: What do you do all? So, what did I said?
Speaker 1: It was confident I should what I've said. Look, that's
Speaker 1: kind of straight. I said, we will change your behavior.
Speaker 1: Is the rest of the world reacts to them, and man,
Speaker 1: he's just the shading to the world. I'm not confident
Speaker 1: of anything, just stated the fact. But given his past
Speaker 1: behavior has not changed. And is that press conference after
Speaker 1: sitting down with you for several hours, he denied any
Speaker 1: involvement in Cybertec He don't play human rights, and he
Speaker 1: says he that refused to say a lesson of all
Speaker 1: his name, So how did that help to a constructing
Speaker 1: me as president? You don't understand that. If you don't
Speaker 1: understand that, you're in the wrong business. I mean, he's
Speaker 1: just a jackass. And I don't know how really standing
Speaker 1: up for the CNN reporter. I mean, that's how they
Speaker 1: treated Trump every second, every minute, every hour of every day.
Speaker 1: At one point. We'll get to this later, Biden, I
Speaker 1: actually say, oh, I don't think Putin is testing me
Speaker 1: with cyber attacks. I'm like, how stupid are you? Of
Speaker 1: course these are Russian sanctioned attacks, or else they wouldn't happen.
Speaker 1: We'll get to this later in the program. We have
Speaker 1: we have cyber experts that will join us, you know,
Speaker 1: and these guys are watching all of this and they're
Speaker 1: scared to death because they know that we have a
Speaker 1: major national security vulnerability. And now we got a president
Speaker 1: that's in denial. Our Commerce secretary is actually saying cyber
Speaker 1: attacks are here to stay and they will intensify. That's
Speaker 1: that's not an answer to what is a real problem.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's pretty unbelievable and it's now pretty
Speaker 1: clear why the press conference couldn't be held jointly, which
Speaker 1: historically usually happens, because the comparisons would be devastating. You know,
Speaker 1: But then he goes Ao. You know, Awol, He's gone.
Speaker 1: You know, Joe is two and a half hours late yesterday.
Speaker 1: Still haven't gotten a reason for that missing in action moment. Anyway,
Speaker 1: he gives Putin a clear field to attack America on
Speaker 1: the world stage again and again and again. Putin had
Speaker 1: forty five minutes to beam what was just nothing but
Speaker 1: anti American propaganda into homes and businesses all across the globe.
Speaker 1: This worked in his favor unobstructed, and not that Joe
Speaker 1: would have stood up for us anyway, not that he's
Speaker 1: capable of even standing up for us unobstructed by an
Speaker 1: opposing response. You know, somebody made a comment, well, Hannity,
Speaker 1: you know it sounds like you're not cheering for America.
Speaker 1: I said, no, I'm i'm I feel awful that this
Speaker 1: is this is the mess that this country is in
Speaker 1: right now, because weakness is not going to end well,
Speaker 1: it's not going to be good for the United States,
Speaker 1: we the American people, and it's not going to be
Speaker 1: good for the world either. So you know, not facing
Speaker 1: reality is not something that I'm capable of doing. You know,
Speaker 1: you think about this. You know, all of the three
Speaker 1: long years of Trump Russia collusion, nothing but manufactured conspiracy theories,
Speaker 1: one after another after another, the unholy Alliance, the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: the media mob, big tech. It went on for years.
Speaker 1: And what do we find out, What was the reality
Speaker 1: of it? Is? The only people in twenty sixteen that
Speaker 1: colluded with Russia and by the way, Ukraine was the
Speaker 1: DNC and Hillary Clinton. They bought the Russian disinformation dirty dossier.
Speaker 1: They they they leaked the dossier. They wanted America to
Speaker 1: believe that Donald Trump was compromised by Putin and was
Speaker 1: at the Ritz Carlton in Moscow with hookers peeing on
Speaker 1: his bed. That's the crap they peddled. And this went
Speaker 1: on for three years and they and we ever heard
Speaker 1: of correction, No, nothing, Are they ever going to correct
Speaker 1: the record? Never? And then the big Ukraine line. I
Speaker 1: couldn't believe my ears. Yesterday I hear Joe Biden literally
Speaker 1: say Ukraine is too corrupt to join NATO, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, now, we caught Joe two weeks ago,
Speaker 1: he had said I'd never had any conversations with my
Speaker 1: son Hunter about his foreign business dealings. Okay, then we
Speaker 1: have Joe on tape. You're not getting a billion unless
Speaker 1: you fire the prosecutor who's investigating zero experience Hunter and
Speaker 1: the millions that he made and son of a bee.
Speaker 1: They fired him because the Ukraine wanted the billion dollars.
Speaker 1: That's a quid in a pro in a quo. And
Speaker 1: how is it somebody with no experience gets millions of dollars.
Speaker 1: Imagine if their last name with Trump. But then we
Speaker 1: got Jazakstan and they're oligarchs feeding money to a hundreds.
Speaker 1: You know, this has a name if you don't have experience,
Speaker 1: and the only reason, by your own recognition, you have
Speaker 1: no experience oil, energy, gas or Ukraine. Why do you
Speaker 1: think they chose you Ounu because your father's in charge Ukrainian?
Speaker 1: Possibly probably, Well, yeah, that's the reason. It's called pay
Speaker 1: to play, it's called buying access. It has a name,
Speaker 1: and it's the heart of corruption. But according to Joe
Speaker 1: and the media, nothing wrong ever happened. Well, Joe denied
Speaker 1: ever talking to his son about any of his foreign
Speaker 1: business dealings. Now we got pictures, We got evidence of
Speaker 1: Joe as vice president having dinners with Hunters, foreign business
Speaker 1: associates and partners. I mean, it is unbelievable corruption. You know,
Speaker 1: the idea that Ukraine is too corrupt to join NATO,
Speaker 1: but it wasn't too corrupt for a Hunter to do
Speaker 1: business with I mean, why is that not a big deal?
Speaker 1: It was Trump, anybody with the name Trump, it would
Speaker 1: be a big deal. You know, it's this, this forty
Speaker 1: five minutes of I mean, you think about it. It
Speaker 1: is pretty profound, isn't it That Vladimir Putin took more
Speaker 1: questions and a lot of more pretty hostile actually in
Speaker 1: forty five minutes than Joe took in and all the
Speaker 1: time that he's been president in the last six months.
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin took more questions in forty five minutes than
Speaker 1: Biden has had in six months. Think about that. Putin
Speaker 1: didn't need to read from a teleprompter. Putin didn't have
Speaker 1: any Q cards that I saw. Biden always relies on him.
Speaker 1: Unlike Biden, Putin didn't require that his questions be pre screened.
Speaker 1: He could have had his aides come up with the
Speaker 1: answers for him ahead of time. Putin actually answered several
Speaker 1: hostile questions which Joe never gets old. Joe gets puffball
Speaker 1: and he still struggles, and you know, one CNN reporter
Speaker 1: mildly pushes them, and look what happens. And you never
Speaker 1: heard Putin say, oh, I'm gonna get in trouble with
Speaker 1: my staff. How many times on this trip did Joseph
Speaker 1: I can't. I'm gonna get in trouble. My staff doesn't
Speaker 1: like it when I answer questions. I'm like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: who's running the show. How did we ever get such
Speaker 1: a pathetically weak, cognitively compromise President. I blame the media,
Speaker 1: and I blame everybody around Joe because they all knew.
Speaker 1: We everybody knew, and it just is like the perfect storm.
Speaker 1: We'll hide under the guise of COVID, unbelievable, just like
Speaker 1: we'll ignore laws and state constitutions when it comes to voting.
Speaker 1: You know, partisan observers posted as supposed to watch the
Speaker 1: vote counting start to finish. That didn't happen. Laws were broken,
Speaker 1: He's supposed to have voter ID well, in some states,
Speaker 1: you only had it for in person, not mail. Embelliding.
Speaker 1: You know you're supposed to follow their state constitution, and
Speaker 1: you can't write a law to circumvent it. You have
Speaker 1: to go through the constitutional amendment process that happened in
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania and the fourth three decision in Wisconsin. You know,
Speaker 1: you didn't see putin struggle. I didn't see it ten
Speaker 1: second brain fart from Vladimir, which is plaguing Biden at
Speaker 1: almost every media encounter. Putin didn't look out of breath, tired, agitated,
Speaker 1: never lost his trend of thought. You know, there were
Speaker 1: no painful ten seconds silences like we saw Biden on Monday.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's an unmitigated design. This is scary because
Speaker 1: the world sees it. It's not just that Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: sees it and that you see it. It's that Putin
Speaker 1: sees it. President she sees it, The Iranian Mullahs see it.
Speaker 1: The rest of the world sees it. Kim Jong unsees it.
Speaker 1: You know, putent ambush's Biden at this massive military exercise
Speaker 1: near Hawaii just before the summit. That's not testing Joe.
Speaker 1: Russian warships conducting the largest military exercises since the Cold
Speaker 1: War off the coast of Hawaii. I mean, they got
Speaker 1: so close. You know, three to five hundred miles west
Speaker 1: of Hawaii that the US Air Force had to scramble
Speaker 1: hours before the start of this. You don't think that
Speaker 1: was a message. It was a message US scrambling F
Speaker 1: twenty two stealth fighters from Hawaiian response to the exercises.
Speaker 1: You think that was just an accident. It wasn't an
Speaker 1: accident in any way. You know, the summit wraps up early,
Speaker 1: and again we have no indication why, well, what happened? Whatever.
Speaker 1: Whatever they were going to tell us about how great
Speaker 1: this went, they had already written before they left Washington.
Speaker 1: I can guarantee it. Just it's the way they work,
Speaker 1: and the media's not going to ask them anytime questions.
Speaker 1: You know, if Biden decides to lift sanctions on Russia Iran,
Speaker 1: guess what they might get their first Spice satellite. How
Speaker 1: great would that be? It wouldn't on top of the
Speaker 1: Russian Navy conducting them massive drills three miles off the
Speaker 1: coast of Hawaii. And now we now discover the Washington
Speaker 1: Post reporting that Biden overrode the State Department recommendation to
Speaker 1: impose sanctions intended to block the Russian nord to pipeline
Speaker 1: that's the one that Joe gave a waiver on. Now,
Speaker 1: is that because the Biden family syndicate is compromised by Russia?
Speaker 1: Why would you, while simultaneously eliminating building a US pipeline
Speaker 1: East Keystone XL pipeline, why would you give a waiver
Speaker 1: to him? And why would you give the waiver when
Speaker 1: your own state department recommended you don't do it? What
Speaker 1: does that tell us about Joe Biden, Mike Pompey. The
Speaker 1: decision not to hold the press conference shows enormous weakness.
Speaker 1: None of this is good for anybody. And I wasn't
Speaker 1: kidding Washington pre Beacon out of piece about of sanctions
Speaker 1: prohibiting the import of US technology used in Russian satellites
Speaker 1: are lifted as part of a quid pro quo deal
Speaker 1: with Biden and putin. Yeah, that could be a major
Speaker 1: enhancement of a RAN's military. In other words, a RAND
Speaker 1: could end up with their first by satellite. That wouldn't
Speaker 1: be good either. It's it's just pretty unbelievable to watch
Speaker 1: all of this unfold and then the media doesn't get it.
Speaker 1: They're just totally dumb and clueless, And it's um it's
Speaker 1: kind of sad. You know, we didn't get any specifics.
Speaker 1: We know that nine federal agencies now have been breached
Speaker 1: by Russian hackers in the last year. We know a
Speaker 1: hundred US firms were breached by Russian solar winds and
Speaker 1: that hack. We know that a Russian link group behind
Speaker 1: the cyber attack of Colonial pipeline. We know a Russian
Speaker 1: cyber criminal group known as Revel hijacked the meat industry
Speaker 1: JBS FBI director Ray huge portions of ransomware trace right
Speaker 1: back to Russia boot and claiming, oh, the attacks are farcical,
Speaker 1: not true. Russia continues to target our infrastructure. Russia now
Speaker 1: moving for It's the lowest point ever. And what did
Speaker 1: Joe do about it? From what I can see, nothing, nothing.
Speaker 1: And the same guy that said, oh, we got to
Speaker 1: hit the reset button in two thousand and nine, a
Speaker 1: lot of good that did with Hillary John Kerry making
Speaker 1: America green. One leoget liberal flight at a time. You
Speaker 1: just can't make this stuff up. Sean Hannity is on
Speaker 1: right now, all right twenty five to the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, eight hundred and ninety four one. Sean, you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the problem. What does
Speaker 1: this mean? You know this constant um I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: in trouble. I can't answer the question. I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: in trouble. I get it. What is that? Where does
Speaker 1: that come from? I'm gonna get in trouble, you know.
Speaker 1: Joe Focus, Joe, pay attention, Joe, Like, man, this is
Speaker 1: so bad. I don't know whether the laugh or cry.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm really crying because there is a seriousness to
Speaker 1: all of this that is extraordinarily dangerous. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: so bad. And the mob, the media, they just ignore it.
Speaker 1: I promise you. The world is not ignoring it's it's
Speaker 1: just not And you can see it in the foreign press.
Speaker 1: I mean it's pretty much everywhere. In a Sky News Australia. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what's wrong with Joe's mental capacity? They're asking the question
Speaker 1: out loud. Then you've got New York Post headline bumbling
Speaker 1: Biden's G seven and NATO's summit performance only boosts US
Speaker 1: euro foes. Can you just think for one second, now,
Speaker 1: do we know the state departments that don't give the
Speaker 1: pipeline okay to Vladimir and he did it anyway? Well, now,
Speaker 1: if it was Trump, would that not raise questions of
Speaker 1: whether or not Donald Trump was compromised by Putin and Russia.
Speaker 1: Why aren't those questions raised when we know for a
Speaker 1: fact that zero experienced hunter in his firm got three
Speaker 1: and a half million dollars wired from a Russian oligarch,
Speaker 1: the former first Lady of Moscow, the mayor of Moscow's wife.
Speaker 1: Do you think that the Medium might tie Russia to
Speaker 1: Trump if it was Trump? I think they probably would
Speaker 1: if Donald Trump paid for a Russian disinformation dossier that
Speaker 1: then was leaked to the Medium mob turned out to
Speaker 1: be totally unsubstantiated and full of lies and unverifiable, and
Speaker 1: that it became without which they wouldn't have gotten. The
Speaker 1: warrants to spy on presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and god
Speaker 1: forbid if she ever became president. More evidence Biden is
Speaker 1: not doing well. Another headline. You know, nobody knows what
Speaker 1: he's trying to say half the time, Jill Biden having
Speaker 1: to rescue him when he ends up just wandering around
Speaker 1: and a reporter's shouting questions at him, come on, Joe, Joe,
Speaker 1: come on. Then having to turn around and somebody's we
Speaker 1: love you, Joe, and he just stares at the person
Speaker 1: saying I love you. You know, Joe, pay attention focus here.
Speaker 1: It's you know, then this whole thing about you know,
Speaker 1: I need permission? What do you mean? It's like is
Speaker 1: he raising his hand to go to the bathroom. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get in trouble. I'm sorry, I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: in trouble with staff. I don't know that's the right way,
Speaker 1: Jennifer Jacob Bloomberg. Yeah, I'm gonna get in trouble. That's two.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get in troubles in one trip. What was
Speaker 1: it with the ten second pause? I mean, just just
Speaker 1: for a minute here. Now he's about to meet Putin,
Speaker 1: and he had referred months ago to Putin as a killer.
Speaker 1: Now he has a chance to tell it right to
Speaker 1: his face. Now, I'm gonna be honest, if I get
Speaker 1: an interview with Vladimir Putin, I'm gonna say you're a murderer,
Speaker 1: and I'll go through the link I say it right
Speaker 1: to his face. Donald Trump wouldn't have any any problems
Speaker 1: saying it right to his face. The mob that you know,
Speaker 1: they they oh the vapors, oh. Donald Trump tweeted out
Speaker 1: bad words. Donald Trump is he's he's a little bit
Speaker 1: more crude than the average president. He's bombastic. He went
Speaker 1: into the G seven and he rocked their world, and
Speaker 1: he did it on America's behalf. He did it to
Speaker 1: make sure that NATO allies paid their fair share. He
Speaker 1: did it to get better, freer, fairer trade deals, and
Speaker 1: it worked. He did it to show that America really
Speaker 1: is back. Joe's definition of being back means America last
Speaker 1: and always last, that America will pay and pay and
Speaker 1: pay and pay and pay. And of course, you know
Speaker 1: European socialists love it. But the world's not better off
Speaker 1: with the week America. That I can promise you or
Speaker 1: a cognitatively weak and frail president either, I mean and
Speaker 1: end the disappearing act for two. Who goes disappearing for
Speaker 1: two hours and forty five minutes later for a press conference?
Speaker 1: How did that happen? With no explanation. Oh, the president
Speaker 1: had to take care of some urgent business. Sorry for
Speaker 1: the delay something. No, I'm not going to meet with
Speaker 1: Vladimir and do a joint press with Vladimir because we know, yeah,
Speaker 1: we know, Joe's gonna get his head handed to him
Speaker 1: and embarrassed on the world stage, which already happened anyway,
Speaker 1: like when Boris Johnson had to say I already introduced
Speaker 1: the South African president Joe, and then everybody laughs because
Speaker 1: they can see it. I know, the media things just
Speaker 1: because they don't talk about it, although it is pretty fascinating.
Speaker 1: I can tell you one thing, there are media mob
Speaker 1: people the back channel to me. They see it. They
Speaker 1: know they see what we see. They're just not allowed
Speaker 1: to talk about it or don't have the guts to
Speaker 1: talk about it. You know why people don't attack me
Speaker 1: over because I'll just play the hits again and again
Speaker 1: and again and again and again. And you know what,
Speaker 1: they don't don't want They don't want these hits going viral.
Speaker 1: Thank you forgetting I'm President covid Is. I know you
Speaker 1: all know, but a lot of people may not know
Speaker 1: what covid is UH and uh. In Libya, we should
Speaker 1: be opening up the area classes to be able to
Speaker 1: go through and provide provide food assistance and economic ass
Speaker 1: I mean vital assistance to a population that's in real trouble.
Speaker 1: Russia has engaged in activities which are we believe in
Speaker 1: contrary to international norms, but they have also um uh,
Speaker 1: bitten off some real problems they're going to have trouble
Speaker 1: chewing on, and for example, the rebuilding of of Syria.
Speaker 1: Of I'm sorry, I'm going to get in trouble staff,
Speaker 1: I don't do this the right way. Well, look, I
Speaker 1: mean he has made clear that H one three, one
Speaker 1: four I believe in the past, essentially acknowledge that he
Speaker 1: was he is he? Do you still think he's a killer? Joe?
Speaker 1: That was what the question was. I didn't want to
Speaker 1: answer it because he's about to meet Vladimir. You'd have
Speaker 1: to say it to him face to face. Vladimir is
Speaker 1: just doing military exercises off the coast of Hawaii. It's
Speaker 1: pretty humble and one cyber attack after another. Now do
Speaker 1: you begin to understand when you piece it together? Zero
Speaker 1: experience hunter, Ukraine, Ukraine. Joe said now that they're too
Speaker 1: corrupt to join NATO, but then wants a clear yes
Speaker 1: or no on getting into the nats A members faction pen.
Speaker 1: So what's answer depends on whether they meet there. The
Speaker 1: fact is they still have to clean up corruption. The
Speaker 1: fact is they have to meet other criteria to get
Speaker 1: into the action plan. And so it's you know, school's out.
Speaker 1: On that question, it remains to be seen. It means
Speaker 1: to be seen. Oh, he's telling them what to do.
Speaker 1: That's like a quid pro quo, right according to the media,
Speaker 1: and then Hunt what the Hunter gets to make more money,
Speaker 1: so they don't meet the criteria too. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: actually laughable. They don't meet the criteria to join NATO,
Speaker 1: but they certainly meet the criteria. They're too corrupt to
Speaker 1: join NATO, but they meet the criteria that Hunter can
Speaker 1: do business with them. Is it not now a fair question?
Speaker 1: Now that Hunter makes money from Kazakh's down Ukraine, Russia, China,
Speaker 1: that maybe the Biden syndicate crime family is corrupt and compromised,
Speaker 1: because that's what you'd be hearing if it was Donald
Speaker 1: Trump as president, make no doubt about it, you know,
Speaker 1: and it just it went down there hill from there,
Speaker 1: you know, Ukraine's too corrupt, Like did I just hear that?
Speaker 1: Perfect for the Biden's family syndicate with no experience, perfect
Speaker 1: for him to leverage a billion taxpayer dollars to fire
Speaker 1: the prosecutor investigating it at all. Now zero experienced Hunter
Speaker 1: is going to be selling his paintings at a top
Speaker 1: gallery in New York City expected to collect up to
Speaker 1: five hundred thousand dollars for each quote masterpiece. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe we'll call this, maybe we call Portraits of a
Speaker 1: crack Addict. According to the gallery, the buyers will remain anonymous.
Speaker 1: I guess a lot of Russians and Ukrainians and Chinese
Speaker 1: will be buying them. Communist Chinese. You know, the rules
Speaker 1: apply only if your last name's Trump, or you're a Republican,
Speaker 1: or if you're a conservative, you're Biden. You can get
Speaker 1: away with anything. Nothing bad's gonna happen. The medium, mob,
Speaker 1: big tech, they'll have your back the whole way, just
Speaker 1: like they did in the campaign Protection Program. Now it's
Speaker 1: the presidential Protection program. No investigations, no negative coverage. So
Speaker 1: called mob and the media journalists as they call themselves,
Speaker 1: stick together, put their heads in the sand, and allow
Speaker 1: the most flagrant hypocrisy and double standard to be as
Speaker 1: glaring as it's ever been. You know, it's it's a
Speaker 1: pretty amazing time, it really is. And I can't even
Speaker 1: believe in another way that this is even even happening,
Speaker 1: but it's happening in the United States, and it's happening
Speaker 1: every day. Yeah, you know, one of the Trump kids
Speaker 1: puts a gun in a you know what do you
Speaker 1: call it? One of those waste basket, not a waste basket,
Speaker 1: one of those dumpsters. Yeah, that's fine. That's called illegal,
Speaker 1: and I use crack illegal. All the things that's on
Speaker 1: the on Hunter's laptop. Ignore that. By the way, the
Speaker 1: economy not doing good. Wholesale prices now soaring at the
Speaker 1: fastest pace on record, and as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: wholesale prices increased their fastest annual rate ever for May,
Speaker 1: driven by rising food prices. Soaring inflation now threatening to
Speaker 1: derail the entire economy. The Producer Price Index measures inflation
Speaker 1: pressure before it reaches consumers, up point eight percent in May,
Speaker 1: annual gain of six point six percent, the biggest jump
Speaker 1: since they first thought started compiling this data in twenty ten.
Speaker 1: According to the Labor Department, food prices you through the roof,
Speaker 1: lumber prices, through the roof, meat prices, through the roof.
Speaker 1: Everything's costing more everything. One bit of good news the
Speaker 1: Biden administration suspension of new oil and gas leases on
Speaker 1: federal land, and that was blocked by a judge in
Speaker 1: Louisiana who ordered the plans be resumed to lease sales
Speaker 1: that were delayed for the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska.
Speaker 1: Some hope. By the way, Donald Trump is announced he
Speaker 1: will be going to the border on June thirtieth. We
Speaker 1: will be down there with him and with Greg Abbott.
Speaker 1: We can announce that Texas Governor Abbott, he's building his
Speaker 1: own wall. He has no other alternative. He's not allowed
Speaker 1: by law to enforce the laws of the land if
Speaker 1: Joe Biden doesn't enforce them. I know it sounds ridiculous,
Speaker 1: but that's just a fact. You know. It's it's it's
Speaker 1: pretty incredible the times we're living. And I'll tell you
Speaker 1: that I am glad about that judge's decision. I think
Speaker 1: that's going to be very helpful. Joe, by the way,
Speaker 1: got slammed by Governor Christy No him South Dakota after
Speaker 1: his administration unveiled plans they're going to have their Independence
Speaker 1: Day firework display at the White House. Why can't she
Speaker 1: have it Mount Rushmore. They went through every hoop that
Speaker 1: they need to go through environmentally to make sure it's safe.
Speaker 1: They did it when Donald Trump was there. They know
Speaker 1: how to do it anyway. It's one of another broken
Speaker 1: record or rising prices. I am just telling you these
Speaker 1: are the hidden taxes we're all gonna pain. It's only
Speaker 1: the beginning. Now it's going to be the Democratic socialist
Speaker 1: They're gonna now use the reconciliation process for this. You know,
Speaker 1: democratic infighting is real. So their only alternative is they'll
Speaker 1: trigger Schumer will trigger in the Senate reconciliation and they're
Speaker 1: going to force it down America's throat, just like they
Speaker 1: forced Obamacare down America's throat. Because they can't get it
Speaker 1: done legislatively. Now they might not even be able to
Speaker 1: get it through with reconciliation if Cinema and Joe Manchin
Speaker 1: were to hold the line and say no, we got
Speaker 1: to put together a bipartisan bill and we gotta find
Speaker 1: only work together. But they're trying to ram through four
Speaker 1: trillion in in an effort to reshape the entire economy.
Speaker 1: Embrace everything New Green Deal socialism, and the name of
Speaker 1: daycare is infrastructure. Healthcare is infrastructure. Everything is infrastructure. Axios
Speaker 1: is reporting this could cause this infrastructure by partisan talks
Speaker 1: they're breaking down. You have all these impatient New Green
Speaker 1: Deal Democrats. They want to go it alone anyway, So
Speaker 1: what's Mansion gonna do? What cinema gonna do. Politico is
Speaker 1: saying Democratic leaders to progressives, layoff Mansion because he may
Speaker 1: just switch parties on us and the fake news media
Speaker 1: they're all about every day beating up Mansion. Why because
Speaker 1: he believes in the Constitution on some level looking out
Speaker 1: for the interest of the people of West Virginia. That's
Speaker 1: his job. Our two Sean Hannity Show, thanks for being
Speaker 1: with us, eight hundred and nine for one, Shawn our number.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program. So
Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo, former Secretary Estate m He's not the guy
Speaker 1: that's going to sit in a meeting and get lectured
Speaker 1: by the communist Chinese the way that Biden's team did
Speaker 1: in Anchorage, Alaska. Nor is he gonna put up with
Speaker 1: any of Putin's crap either. And you know, it's just
Speaker 1: it's it's just a fascinating difference in terms of the
Speaker 1: utter approach. I mean, the summit wraps up early, Joe
Speaker 1: is incapable of holding a joint press conference. Uh, the
Speaker 1: US press left in the dark. They seem perfectly fine
Speaker 1: with it. Joe finally gives, gives, a presser, you know,
Speaker 1: just rambling, mumbling, bumbling, stumbling, stupidity, and it's embarrassing and
Speaker 1: there's really no other way to put it anyway. This
Speaker 1: is what Pompeo said as it relates to Putin using
Speaker 1: this as a stage for Russian propaganda, unchallenged by Sippy Cup.
Speaker 1: It's the strangest thing, right, that he was allowed to
Speaker 1: go up there and spout Russian propaganda to create the
Speaker 1: context for moral equivalence between the United States and Russia
Speaker 1: on every front, whether it was talking about BLM or
Speaker 1: protesters or our judicial system. Right, he talked about his protesters,
Speaker 1: but when we have a problem here, it goes to courts.
Speaker 1: We have a system, a constitutional foundation. They have none
Speaker 1: of that. And he got he got free reign to
Speaker 1: go on for all of that time and to the
Speaker 1: world spout this propaganda without an American standing beside. I'm
Speaker 1: saying no, that's not what we talked about, that's not right,
Speaker 1: and making the case for American interest. And the reason
Speaker 1: is is because Joe's not up to the task. It's
Speaker 1: that simple. Anybody that tells you any different is just
Speaker 1: lying to you. It's it's transparent, it's obvious. And everybody
Speaker 1: knows it. Here to weigh in on what the ramifications
Speaker 1: of all this are ultimately going to be. Rebecca Koffler
Speaker 1: as well US former Defense Intelligence Agency DA Intelligence officer,
Speaker 1: author of an upcoming book, Putin's Playbook, Russia's Secret Plan
Speaker 1: to Defeat America. Scott Yulinger is back with US retired
Speaker 1: CIA ops officer, Russian intel ops expert. Thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us now. Rebecca, you have an interesting
Speaker 1: background as it relates to Russia, and you understand Putin's
Speaker 1: mind as well as anybody. You read him as well
Speaker 1: as anybody. I am contending that Putency's right through Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: and he knows he's dealing with a cognitively weak and
Speaker 1: frail American president and it has taken full advantage. You're
Speaker 1: absolutely correct, Sean. President Biden placed America in the first
Speaker 1: place in this, as you said, embarrassing position. I agree
Speaker 1: with what you said by holding the summit in the
Speaker 1: first place with Putin, Biden going in was overmatched and
Speaker 1: outgunned with Putin, and then on top of it, to
Speaker 1: make matters worse, Biden refused to man up and to
Speaker 1: show up and hold a dual press conference where he
Speaker 1: could have challenged right then and there putting his propaganda,
Speaker 1: and he was just not capable. He's exactly, you know, inept.
Speaker 1: He doesn't understand putting. And it appears to me that
Speaker 1: the entire administration, I don't know who exactly advises him
Speaker 1: that he should show up. I don't think anybody can
Speaker 1: advise him because I don't think he can retain the information. Rebecca.
Speaker 1: I'm not even sure if he knows what day of
Speaker 1: the week it is, or or what country is in
Speaker 1: right now. It's very sad. Apparently he stumbled into a
Speaker 1: place where he ought not to have been, and his
Speaker 1: wife rescued him. And trust me, the Russians do their
Speaker 1: homework before these summits. They do what's called the profile
Speaker 1: of our national security leaders and political leaders before they
Speaker 1: show up with them. And he definitely knows what Biden's
Speaker 1: hotspots are. He really does not want to appear like
Speaker 1: the quote that like President Trump, who quote unquote was
Speaker 1: soft on Russia, nothing can be further from the truth.
Speaker 1: President Biden pretty much has erased his own negotiating leverage
Speaker 1: and given away the store even before he met with
Speaker 1: President Biden, so that meeting was doomed. He lost before
Speaker 1: even checked. He showed up. Putin took on his own
Speaker 1: forty more questions in his forty five minute press conference,
Speaker 1: and some of them were pretty aggressive questions. He didn't
Speaker 1: blink an eye and he didn't read from a teleprompter.
Speaker 1: I didn't see any Q cards that he was using.
Speaker 1: And then Biden's taken in six months. One thing Scott
Speaker 1: that I think is not been emphasized enough, especially in
Speaker 1: the media, is you know, Russian ships are conducting the
Speaker 1: largest military exercises since the Cold War off the coast
Speaker 1: of Hawaii, even sending our Air Force scrambling hours before
Speaker 1: this quote. Summit took place literally three to five hundred
Speaker 1: miles west of Hawaii. US Air Force has to scramble
Speaker 1: left twenty two stealth fighters from Hawaiian response to these exercises,
Speaker 1: and the bombers, you know, didn't enter air defense identification zones.
Speaker 1: And we're not unaccepted. But clearly Plutin wanted to send
Speaker 1: the message before today, or certainly certainly he did jump
Speaker 1: and that would be a standard, you know, that goes
Speaker 1: back to the Soviet playbook to do these sort of things.
Speaker 1: North Korea does the same sort of thing. But this
Speaker 1: is exactly the problem, as Rebecca has pointed out, is
Speaker 1: that Putin realizes that Jill Biden is not a quote
Speaker 1: as a Russian would say, a serious president, and as such,
Speaker 1: for instance, everything that Biden said to Putin about like
Speaker 1: US strength or we don't want to tolerate cyber attacks
Speaker 1: that originate from your soil, etc. It doesn't really pull
Speaker 1: any water with Putin because Prutin understands them. For instance,
Speaker 1: under the under the Joe Biden layst budget, US defense
Speaker 1: is effectively taking a cut. So at the same time
Speaker 1: that Biden is hyping up talk that America is back,
Speaker 1: what the Russians see is that the United States is
Speaker 1: not building as many ships, is not fielding as many
Speaker 1: active duty personnel as they have in the past. So
Speaker 1: he realizes that they're just empty words, and so he
Speaker 1: is positioning himself to fully take advantage of I think
Speaker 1: it's very interesting, though, that Putin did not exactly spike
Speaker 1: the football with In other words, what I think happened
Speaker 1: was Prutin observed Biden's dismal performance at the G seven
Speaker 1: and realized that Russia would really gain nothing by like
Speaker 1: pointedly humiliating the President of the United States in a
Speaker 1: press conference. So, in other words, Plutin was very happy
Speaker 1: to extol Biden's virtues, etc. And of course hurl some
Speaker 1: barbs at the progressive that's the diplomatic nicety bs. That's
Speaker 1: all that is. It's bullshifts. It's just crap. It's garbage, right.
Speaker 1: But he saw no reason to go out of his
Speaker 1: way to humiliate Biden because basically he feels that Biden
Speaker 1: has done that job for him already, sadly enough, and
Speaker 1: so he can just continue to make nice with the
Speaker 1: Biden administration at the same time where he continues his
Speaker 1: moves abroad unchecked. You know, I just there was one
Speaker 1: moment in particular, Rebecca, I'm not sure if you picked
Speaker 1: up on it. There was some in the media that
Speaker 1: picked up on it where Biden seemed to respond affirmatively
Speaker 1: to the question about whether he trusts Vladimir Putin. Now,
Speaker 1: why would you trust Vladimir Prutin? Vladimir Putin is he
Speaker 1: was right, He's a murderer. I mean, he gets asked
Speaker 1: the question just prior in the lead up to the summit.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw the ten seconds of
Speaker 1: the most uncomfortable silence by an American president. Ever, it's breathtaking, Rebecca. Now,
Speaker 1: if Putin is a hostile actor, he's evil in many ways.
Speaker 1: He's corrupt as hell, but he's not stupid, and nor
Speaker 1: is President She's stupid and as evil as the uranium
Speaker 1: mullas are, they're not stupid. And the reality is is
Speaker 1: they're studying this guy backwards and forwards, and they're gonna
Speaker 1: They're not going to be influenced by the media that
Speaker 1: ignores Joe Biden's cognitive weakness. I agree with you Putin, Yes,
Speaker 1: she's all of those things that you just said, But
Speaker 1: he also constantly reminds President Biden that he is there
Speaker 1: not to be. And this is something thing that actually
Speaker 1: what I'm about to say that I heard in the
Speaker 1: Russian press. Putin said that we are not the two
Speaker 1: lovers who are there to basically swear to each other
Speaker 1: infinite love. We are there representing the interests of our countries.
Speaker 1: So there's no such thing as trust when it comes
Speaker 1: to Putin. He's a highly trained former KGB officer. And
Speaker 1: you know how the Russians viewed this summit to begin with.
Speaker 1: They characterized it basically as an intelligence gathering opportunity. Russian
Speaker 1: Deputy Minister for an Affairs Sigator Pov said this, it
Speaker 1: is impossible to impose on your spy counterpart your own
Speaker 1: thought process and your interpretation of what he says. But
Speaker 1: what you hear from him and the conclusions you make
Speaker 1: as a result of what the counterspace spy says become
Speaker 1: food for thought. So he basically summed up, We're going
Speaker 1: in to quote unquote strength and trust and mutual understanding,
Speaker 1: which in Russian intelligence parlance. And you weigh in what
Speaker 1: that really means is a good intelligence gathering opportunity. As
Speaker 1: a former intelligence officer for DA and Russian born, I'm
Speaker 1: a native Russian speaker. This is what that lingo means.
Speaker 1: And Scott, go ahead and jump in if you want
Speaker 1: to comment. I think that's an important point. And one
Speaker 1: question I have Scott is he's now twice referred to
Speaker 1: Oh if I answer questions I'm gonna get in trouble?
Speaker 1: Who are you gonna get in trouble by Joe? Right
Speaker 1: right exactly. I mean you're gonna you're gonna get the tension, Joe.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have to sit in the corner. You're not
Speaker 1: gonna get your warmy milk and sippy cup tonight or what.
Speaker 1: And as you were saying, as you were saying, Sean, uh,
Speaker 1: you're exactly right about again, the administration and the American
Speaker 1: left in the United States, they think that they're going
Speaker 1: to get a free pass from other countries leaders in
Speaker 1: other countries the same way that they get a free
Speaker 1: passed by promoting all, you know, various lives that they
Speaker 1: put out in the United States. And that's not true.
Speaker 1: In fact, you know, to quote another Russian source, a
Speaker 1: Russian think tank was writing a few days ago and
Speaker 1: and what they were seeing, what was going to happen
Speaker 1: during the conference. And for example, they wrote that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden will not push the Ukrainian topic because of certain
Speaker 1: corruption circumstances related to his son. You got to freeze frame.
Speaker 1: What you're saying here is they're too corrupt to join NATO.
Speaker 1: But is zero experienced son the guy that went on
Speaker 1: Good Morning America and was asked, well, what experience do
Speaker 1: you have an energy and oil and gas? Non? None, none.
Speaker 1: I mean, but that's Ukraine, that's Kazakhstan, that's the former
Speaker 1: first Lady of Moscow, you know, so it's okay for
Speaker 1: one hundred to do business with Ukraine, but but it's
Speaker 1: not okay for the US to do business of them. Unbelievable,
Speaker 1: that's right. And Twitter can kick off people who want
Speaker 1: to write about Biden's, you know, the corrupt dealings of
Speaker 1: the family. But the bottom line is the Russians in
Speaker 1: Chinese are very well aware of this, and they use
Speaker 1: this and they use this knowledge as a way of,
Speaker 1: you know, suddenly intimidating Biden or the administration into doing
Speaker 1: what they want. And hence why we have to avoid
Speaker 1: these corrupting influences when we elect the president, because it
Speaker 1: compromises their ability to keep us sleep. All right, quick break,
Speaker 1: we'll come back more on the other side with our
Speaker 1: intel experts, Rebecca Koffler and Scott Yuhlinger. Then we'll get
Speaker 1: to your calls. The eight hundred and nine for one
Speaker 1: Sean our number. You want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program, And we've got a great Hannity nineties ton tonight,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump will be calling in among our many guests.
Speaker 1: Quick break, right back, we'll continue, all right, as we
Speaker 1: continue with our intelligence experts, Rebecca Koffler and Scott Yuhlinger,
Speaker 1: let me go back to Rebecca, and then I'll ask
Speaker 1: Scott the same question. So when I was in Singapore,
Speaker 1: I was warned by top intelligence officials that the Chinese,
Speaker 1: in the case of Singapore more Helsinki more the case
Speaker 1: the Russians, that it was not. Nine was one hundred
Speaker 1: percent likely that those intelligence agencies from these countries knew
Speaker 1: I had a relationship with Donald Trump, and that they
Speaker 1: said to me, I would be monitored every second I
Speaker 1: was there. Is that true, Rebecca, I would say one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty set And they said, people that work
Speaker 1: in the hotel, they will be spies. They said people
Speaker 1: They said, if you get a burner phone, they'll find it.
Speaker 1: That's what I would being told. Russian intelligence is tracks
Speaker 1: all of uf you know, sort of um people who
Speaker 1: are connected all over the world, not just in Moscow.
Speaker 1: But they watched very very closely, because that's how they
Speaker 1: developed a nuanced understanding of the American psyche and also
Speaker 1: of the relationships between our business and political leaders. All
Speaker 1: of that information is ultimately fed into the doctrine and
Speaker 1: into the strategy that was developed based on Putin's orders.
Speaker 1: That is precisely why they launched these attacks cyber attacks
Speaker 1: because they understand that we're not going to respond, because
Speaker 1: we have demonstrated unwillingly, unwillingly, obviously unintentionally to them that
Speaker 1: they're going to do nothing doing it for twenty years.
Speaker 1: And that is all based because Russian intelligence services do
Speaker 1: their job, they do their homework, and unfortunately we deprioritized
Speaker 1: Russia as an intelligence threat Russia and Russian strat has
Speaker 1: sort of fallen through the cracks. Hillary Butter Dassier from Russia.
Speaker 1: You know, I mean the great irony the Bidens got
Speaker 1: rich off Russia and Ukraine and Kazakhstan in China. But
Speaker 1: I and I would argue that probably the Biden families
Speaker 1: completely compromised and they know it. Rebecca, thank you, Scott.
Speaker 1: We love having you back on. Thank you. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: ninety four one, shaunas or number. We'll get to your
Speaker 1: calls when we get back. We'll continue twenty five to
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Eight hundred and nine four one. Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. One
Speaker 1: of the funniest things that's actually emerged this week, although
Speaker 1: it's not really funny, it's not funny at all, and
Speaker 1: it was Secret Empires and the incredible book by Peter
Speaker 1: Schweitzer that got this all out in the open and
Speaker 1: began a process culminating and Senator Ron Johnson, Senator Chuck
Speaker 1: Grassley even getting more details about how corrupt the Biden
Speaker 1: family syndicate is. It wasn't just Ukraine, it wasn't just Barisma.
Speaker 1: It isn't just Kazakhstan. It was also Russia. It was China.
Speaker 1: It was the Bank of China, which ties to the
Speaker 1: Chinese military, a Russian Chinese national hunter Biden, you know,
Speaker 1: with all his depth of experience, you know, making millions
Speaker 1: and millions and millions and millions of dollars. I mean,
Speaker 1: you think of the irony here. And I said this earlier,
Speaker 1: How how is it Hilary bought the Russian disinformation dossier.
Speaker 1: She brought that into the twenty sixteen elections. She bought
Speaker 1: and paid for it. And then the deep state took
Speaker 1: an unverifiable document and committed premeditated fraud on a FISA
Speaker 1: court to spy on a presidential candidate and a president.
Speaker 1: And they did it even when they knew from Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele himself it was not verified and from his subsource
Speaker 1: that it was all bar talk. And they did it anyway,
Speaker 1: and yet, oh, Trump is Putin's puppet. No, it was
Speaker 1: the Biden's and it was Hillary. They were the ones.
Speaker 1: The guy that stood up to Russia, China, Ukraine and
Speaker 1: other places was Donald Trump. It's unbelievable, you know, great
Speaker 1: irony is Biden actually says, yeah, Ukraine is too corrupt
Speaker 1: to join NATO. I mean, I'm sitting there and I'm like,
Speaker 1: did I just hear that Ukraine wants a clear yes
Speaker 1: or no on getting into the NATSI members faction pen
Speaker 1: So what surrounds depends on whether they meet the criteria.
Speaker 1: The fact is they still have to clean up corruption.
Speaker 1: The fact is they have to meet other criteria to
Speaker 1: get into the action plan. And so it's you know,
Speaker 1: school's out on that question. It remains to be seen.
Speaker 1: They got to clean up corruption. That sounds like a
Speaker 1: quid pro quo. That sounds like what Donald Trump said.
Speaker 1: The guy that leveraged the billion US tax dollars to
Speaker 1: protect his zero experienced son who is being investigated by
Speaker 1: a Ukrainian prosecutor, that was Joe. And then the media
Speaker 1: just runs with their phony, fake, lying narratives. You know,
Speaker 1: people saying, well, conservatives that they're cheering for Joda fail. No,
Speaker 1: we don't want America to fail. But you know we're
Speaker 1: not blind either, and we see truth. You know, what
Speaker 1: did I say when the George Floyd tape came out.
Speaker 1: Our eyes aren't lying to us. You know, I don't
Speaker 1: rush to judgment, but that can't happen what we saw
Speaker 1: on that tape. Joe Biden's on tape. You're not getting
Speaker 1: a billion, you got six hours unless you're fire Ukrainian prosecutor,
Speaker 1: which we now know was investigating a zero experience son.
Speaker 1: So Ukraine's too corrupt to join NATO, but it's not
Speaker 1: too corrupt for one hundred to make millions of dollars
Speaker 1: and Joda leverage our tax dollars to protect him from
Speaker 1: a criminal investigation. I mean it is. Everything is topsy turvy.
Speaker 1: I mean it is. It's just the information America media.
Speaker 1: The mob is just full of corruption. There's no honesty
Speaker 1: in these people whatsoever. It's all to advance the radical
Speaker 1: New Green Deal socialist agenda. And they lie and they
Speaker 1: lie daily, and the things they're guilty of, it's a
Speaker 1: conspiracy theory, Russia conspiracy, Trump Russia collusion. Three years alies
Speaker 1: quid pro quotes. That would be Joe, you know, Putin's puppet,
Speaker 1: That would be Hilary and the Biden's, the Biden syndicate,
Speaker 1: crime family syndicate making money from Russia. Wasn't the Trump
Speaker 1: kids getting three and a half million dollars from the
Speaker 1: from the First Lady of Moscow. Wasn't No, that was Hunter.
Speaker 1: It wasn't. It wasn't Don Junior or Eric Trump getting
Speaker 1: money from Kazakhstan and Oligarch's there that that was Hunter.
Speaker 1: Wasn't Don Junior or Eric getting money from Barisma. It
Speaker 1: wasn't Donald Trump threatening to withhold the billion tax dollars.
Speaker 1: That was Joe and the millions were made by Hunter.
Speaker 1: One hundred thousand dollars shopping spree with a Chinese national.
Speaker 1: That was Hunter and his family. For what Why would
Speaker 1: a Chinese national just take you on one hundred thousand
Speaker 1: dollars shopping spree. I wish I had that deal. I
Speaker 1: ever took it, I'd be in jail for the rest
Speaker 1: of my life. And it wasn't. It wasn't Donald Trump Junior.
Speaker 1: Wasn't Eric Trump that that got the billion five deal
Speaker 1: with the Bank of China. Oh Goldman Sachs isn't good enough.
Speaker 1: Deutscher Bank isn't good enough. JP Morgan Chases isn't big enough.
Speaker 1: We're gonna go to Hunter with ties to the Chinese military. Unreal?
Speaker 1: All right, I'm I can't stop myself today. Patricia's implorida. Hey, Patricia,
Speaker 1: how are you good? How are you? I'm good. I'm
Speaker 1: glad you called. So. I guess I was listening to
Speaker 1: your show and we were talking about um Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: cognitive absence during that press conference the other evening, and
Speaker 1: I I saw something in him and recognized it clearly
Speaker 1: because I had an instance where my husband and I
Speaker 1: had to go to the court to get guardianship of
Speaker 1: his elderly sister who was suffering from dementia. And when
Speaker 1: I saw that pause and him i'm just a look
Speaker 1: on his face, I immediately recognized I had seen that before,
Speaker 1: and it was with her. There were some people that
Speaker 1: were taking advantage of her financially, and they were supposed
Speaker 1: to be friends. We ended up having to go to
Speaker 1: court to get guardianship of her finances and of her.
Speaker 1: But one thing that happened in the courtroom was the judge,
Speaker 1: you know, would ask her a question, and she would
Speaker 1: be immediately like, they I don't want them to have
Speaker 1: control of my finances. I don't want them to have
Speaker 1: control of my finances. And she asked that question several times.
Speaker 1: Saint got the same answer, asked different questions, several times.
Speaker 1: I got that same answer, and it was almost like
Speaker 1: someone that had coached her. And then the judge finally said, well,
Speaker 1: well why not, and she said, I don't know her.
Speaker 1: I don't look, it's transparent, it's obvious. You know, there
Speaker 1: is this other whole question out there that we've kind
Speaker 1: of been skirting around. But you're kind of bringing up here.
Speaker 1: Who knew what about Joe's condition and when? And I
Speaker 1: would argue that everybody involved in his campaign knows, and
Speaker 1: they knew that Joe was a cognitive mess. They knew
Speaker 1: that he was weak, they knew he's frail, they knew
Speaker 1: that he's really not up to the job. You know.
Speaker 1: David Axelrod would say things at different times like if
Speaker 1: you can't cut it, you can't cut it. And this
Speaker 1: is the most important job in the in the world,
Speaker 1: it's the most demanding job in the world. And I
Speaker 1: know because I've I've interviewed presidents my entire career, Um, Patricia,
Speaker 1: and I see what that office, what it takes to
Speaker 1: do that. It's never the pressure never stops. There's no
Speaker 1: off minute of any day. All right, well he's playing golf,
Speaker 1: there really isn't off time, And especially if you're engaged.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was engaged at the highest level every single
Speaker 1: day he was there. And I know because I saw
Speaker 1: it and I heard it, and I you know, I've
Speaker 1: worked my sources around him, and I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: he never stopped. You know, I don't think Joe could
Speaker 1: do one week the way Trump does a day. It's
Speaker 1: just it's sad and it's hard to watch. It's frankly,
Speaker 1: I feel a sense of just embarrassment. It's embarrassing. You know. Democrats, socialist, mob, media, tech,
Speaker 1: big tech. I used to say, they were so offended
Speaker 1: at Donald Trump's tweeting. I'm like, this guy went into
Speaker 1: NATO and told him, hey, start paying your fair share.
Speaker 1: He went into G seven and said, no, we're changing
Speaker 1: these trade deals. They're one side and you're taking advantage
Speaker 1: of us. Any any thought for we the people. That's
Speaker 1: America first, and now Biden back to America last I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a profound distinct difference. Do I think that the
Speaker 1: mob the media were really as as outraged as they
Speaker 1: pretended not? I don't because I can tell you right now,
Speaker 1: there's nothing that any liberals ever said about me that
Speaker 1: is really that bothersome to me in any way. You know,
Speaker 1: it's they faked this phony indignation and oh oh, I
Speaker 1: get the vapors. Donald Trump tweeted something I disagree with
Speaker 1: is that what we've become woke, you know, weak Americans
Speaker 1: that words so offend us that we've got to cancel
Speaker 1: people that utter words or sentiments that we don't like.
Speaker 1: I don't think most people get that pissed off at words.
Speaker 1: You know, I have every reason to get pissed off
Speaker 1: at people. Sometimes. I'll be honest, Patricia, I don't care.
Speaker 1: I don't don't care. I care about the country. I
Speaker 1: want America to be strong, and I don't see a
Speaker 1: strong president. No, thank you. Good call alas in Florida.
Speaker 1: Al what's going on? So? Are glad you called? Hi? Sean? Well,
Speaker 1: I've been listening to you for quite a while. Unless
Speaker 1: I really appreciate you and what you're doing and trying
Speaker 1: to accomplish. But I'm going back to like that Bruins
Speaker 1: game the other night when the crowd literally shut off
Speaker 1: the talent from finishing this song. They're not great, it was.
Speaker 1: I've been to a few I don't follow sportshal heavily,
Speaker 1: but I've been to quite a few big games of
Speaker 1: various types, and I've never seen anything like that. For
Speaker 1: one thing, I hope. I'm very curious now the series
Speaker 1: is tied. They played the first two games. The Islanders
Speaker 1: now in the semifinals, heading into hopefully the finals of
Speaker 1: the Stanley Cup. They split. Home ice advantage was Tampa's,
Speaker 1: but by winning one of the games in Tampa the
Speaker 1: first game, the Islanders now have home ice advantage, which
Speaker 1: does make a difference. I am very curious if it
Speaker 1: happens again tomorrow night. Yeah all I said, gold bolts,
Speaker 1: many you want to you want to get into this now,
Speaker 1: you want to have a bet out who's going to
Speaker 1: win this series. I'm all up with you on it.
Speaker 1: I'll miss that. But I want to say, though, is
Speaker 1: that a patriotism. There's been a renewed interest in it.
Speaker 1: Gladly I'm happy about it because I'm getting older and
Speaker 1: for years though, when I didn't know half as much
Speaker 1: as what I don't know now, I still would say
Speaker 1: to people in conversation that we've lost patriotism. You don't
Speaker 1: see it, you don't feel it, you don't hear it.
Speaker 1: And well, I saw President Trump get into office, things
Speaker 1: started to change, and they changed dramatically. I see, I
Speaker 1: think this might we might look back at this game
Speaker 1: six the Islanders and the Bruins, right, I mean, you
Speaker 1: have that Boston New York rivalry thing and the crowd
Speaker 1: singing our national anthem proudly and loudly. And I would
Speaker 1: love to see this duplicated in football stadiums. I'd love
Speaker 1: to see it duplicated in baseball stadiums. I'd love to
Speaker 1: see it duplicated at you know, before NBA games. And
Speaker 1: if that ever happened, it would be basically the public
Speaker 1: taking their middle finger and saying to the woke, cancel
Speaker 1: culture mob, we love our country, We love people that
Speaker 1: protected our freedoms and were standing loudly and proudly, and
Speaker 1: you can go, h Adam schiff yourself, all right, it's
Speaker 1: it's a beautiful thing. I was its great at a concert.
Speaker 1: I was at a concert the other night, I went
Speaker 1: down locally to see some friends who play in tribute bands.
Speaker 1: One of them was for a heavy metal artist, Ronnie
Speaker 1: James Dio, and the other one was for AUSI Slash
Speaker 1: Black Sabbath. And the guitar player for the Ausy Black
Speaker 1: Sabbath tribute band when they announced the band members and
Speaker 1: he had played with other bigger bands even at one time,
Speaker 1: but he went off into a lead break and then
Speaker 1: he broke into the Jimi Hendricks version of the star
Speaker 1: Spangled Banner. Very cool and our metal metal heads you
Speaker 1: call them at a concert, and they went absolutely berserked
Speaker 1: for it. You'd be surprised. I've actually found some of
Speaker 1: these guys actually are fans of mine. I'm like, huh,
Speaker 1: it doesn't quite you know, connect with me. But they,
Speaker 1: you know, like all my all my music DJ friends,
Speaker 1: they're all talk radio fans. They don't want to listen
Speaker 1: to the same song so over and over again. They're done. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I gotta roll. Thanks. I'll appreciate you being with us.
Speaker 1: Right back to our busy phones. Tim North, Carolina, Tim,
Speaker 1: you're on the Sean Hannity Show. Glad you called. He's showing.
Speaker 1: Thanks for taking my call. Can I give a shout
Speaker 1: out to your A call screener? By the way, she
Speaker 1: was very friendly and I appreciate her. I being so,
Speaker 1: you're flirting with Katie? Is that what you're doing? You
Speaker 1: want to flirt with her? Get it, Get out of here,
Speaker 1: Get out. I'll get out of there. Okay, you know
Speaker 1: what the problem is, you know what I could see
Speaker 1: right through this, But go ahead, I'll let I'll give
Speaker 1: you a pass. Go. I was wondering how strong the
Speaker 1: legal case is against the DNC and Joe Biden's handlers
Speaker 1: for elder abuse, considering the way that they're treating him,
Speaker 1: and now obvious if you just listened to him for
Speaker 1: more than two minutes, not that. Um that that's my
Speaker 1: kind of comment, And what I was calling for was, um,
Speaker 1: I have a day job right at work in healthcare.
Speaker 1: I have a side job a big old suburban I
Speaker 1: drive people, right, I do have a little side hustle
Speaker 1: and a thousands of people, and a small percentage of
Speaker 1: them about politics. But nonetheless, I've talked to some people
Speaker 1: about politics. There are three words that describe what I've noticed,
Speaker 1: regardless of side, that people are feeling. Both before coronavirus
Speaker 1: and now okay, and it's leaves me alone. I tell
Speaker 1: you no, I think that's that that is real. Listen,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you I feel it. The Islander game one example.
Speaker 1: What you're saying is leave me a little. People have
Speaker 1: had it, and I think people watching this, this shift
Speaker 1: show and feeling I think the way a lot of
Speaker 1: us are feeling, you know, pretty awful and embarrassed. I
Speaker 1: just think it's going to result in a major wave
Speaker 1: election in twenty twenty two, which I hope and pray
Speaker 1: carries through twenty twenty four. Anyway, thanks, my friend appreciated.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine four one sewn. You want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, I News Round Up, Information
Speaker 1: Overload hour eight hundred nine four one sean. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program, we'll get
Speaker 1: to your calls bottom of a half hour. So I
Speaker 1: was right yesterday the news broke during this program, but
Speaker 1: I wasn't able to independently corroborate it. I mentioned it
Speaker 1: could be a possibility because we don't like to go
Speaker 1: out early. I mean, I mean, we take meticulous care
Speaker 1: to get things right. We really do. We work hard.
Speaker 1: It's important to us. And anyway, so It turns out
Speaker 1: that Southwest Airlines ended up grounding flights all across the
Speaker 1: country yesterday, and this was the second time this happened
Speaker 1: in twenty four hours, amid reports of nationwide computer issues
Speaker 1: and then air travelers, you know, we're all over social
Speaker 1: media with reports of what airline staff were reportedly telling
Speaker 1: them was a computer system outage had occurred. And this
Speaker 1: is hours after intermittent performance quote issues and with a
Speaker 1: third party weather app forced to a similar group stop
Speaker 1: on Monday night. We are aware of the system issue
Speaker 1: and we're working quickly to resolve. We'll share more info soon,
Speaker 1: Southwest posted on their Twitter account as of yesterday, we
Speaker 1: haven't lifted a finger to have real cyber security, and
Speaker 1: I can guarantee if the Russians are working on it,
Speaker 1: I guarantee the Chinese are working on it. I guarantee
Speaker 1: you every enemy country in the world that hates US
Speaker 1: is working on it. And there's obviously a vulnerability here
Speaker 1: and we're not doing much to take care of business now.
Speaker 1: Joey Sippy Cup, you know, is asked if he thinks
Speaker 1: Putin was testing him with these cyber attacks. Here's a
Speaker 1: short answer, is testing you? Does the government have to
Speaker 1: do more to force businesses to protect themselves and their customers.
Speaker 1: So I think the first thing we have to recognize
Speaker 1: is this is the reality, and we should assume and
Speaker 1: businesses should assume that these attacks are here to stay,
Speaker 1: and if anything will intensify, we should. That was Gina Ramondo,
Speaker 1: who's the Commerce Secretary. She's telling us we should assume
Speaker 1: that cyber attacks are here to stay, and that you
Speaker 1: you mean you're not going to stop them because that
Speaker 1: would be national security. Now that we're talking about being compromised.
Speaker 1: I can't think of anything dumber. And President Sippy Cup, Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't think Putin is testing me? No, And what
Speaker 1: was that little exercise off the coast of Hawaii yesterday?
Speaker 1: Just an accident. It's it's pretty It's beyond naive at
Speaker 1: this point anyway. Brian Finch is the co chair of
Speaker 1: the Cybersecurity practice at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. Doctor Peter
Speaker 1: Prye is with US Executive director of the Task Force
Speaker 1: on National Homeland Security, nonprofit Congressional Advisory Board, and he
Speaker 1: was also the Chief of Staff of the Congressional EMP
Speaker 1: that's Electromagnetic Pulse Commission and on the staffs of the
Speaker 1: Household Services Committee with the CIA, So these guys know
Speaker 1: they're talking about doctor PRYE will start with you, why
Speaker 1: do you believe that Putin is testing the US? Russia
Speaker 1: is testing the US. And do you agree with the
Speaker 1: Commerce Secretary that we must assume that these cyber attacks
Speaker 1: are here to stay and just accept it. These attacks
Speaker 1: are definitely from Russia, sanctioned by the Russian government, and
Speaker 1: they as much as told us that they were going
Speaker 1: to attack US about a month before Colonial Pipeline. I
Speaker 1: know Washington as a short memory, but of people remember
Speaker 1: back to the Ukraine crisis we had when Russia had
Speaker 1: mobilized supposedly an exercise, but it had mobilized enough forces
Speaker 1: so it could roll over Ukraine and possibly even attack
Speaker 1: the frontline NATO troops in Eastern Europe. Even according to
Speaker 1: our own war games in the Pentagon, Russia can overrun
Speaker 1: Ukraine and the frontline NATO troops in seventy two hours.
Speaker 1: So the Biden administration was very concerned about that, as
Speaker 1: we're our NATO allies and we're demanding that the Russians
Speaker 1: stop it and stand down. In the middle of that crisis,
Speaker 1: Martian who is a spokesman for the Russian media giants
Speaker 1: RT and Sputnik, and as a friend if Putin has
Speaker 1: gotten many awards from Putin many medals, you know, as
Speaker 1: an unofficial spokesman for the Kremlin, went on TV and
Speaker 1: said a cyber war between the United States and Russia
Speaker 1: is inevitable, that they were positioned to win it, and
Speaker 1: that they could do things to prove it, like blackout
Speaker 1: Harlem in New York City, or black out the state
Speaker 1: of Florida, or blackout the whole United States. This could
Speaker 1: literally shut down every system we have, and that means
Speaker 1: all of our national security defenses. You said something that
Speaker 1: really caught my attention, though, and that is you're saying,
Speaker 1: you know that colonial pipeline, the attack on the meat
Speaker 1: industry was sanctioned by the government. How do you know that, Well,
Speaker 1: because the administration's arguments, you know, are that these are
Speaker 1: criminal acts by criminal organizations. You know, these the Russian
Speaker 1: mafia is not independent of the Russian government. You know,
Speaker 1: it's a tool that's used by Russian military intelligence, the GRU,
Speaker 1: and by the SBR, their successor to the Russian KGB.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, we have Margarita Semonion a
Speaker 1: month before Colonial Pipeline telling us that they could win
Speaker 1: a cyber war and there were various ways they could
Speaker 1: demonstrate that they could prove that. And then there was
Speaker 1: the attack on Colonial Pipeline. Why Colonial pipeline, Well, it
Speaker 1: supplies half the petroleum products not just for the civilians
Speaker 1: in the eastern part of the United States, but for
Speaker 1: our military forces, for our military basis on the eastern
Speaker 1: coast of the United States, which are the very forces
Speaker 1: that we would need to protect power to protect Ukraine
Speaker 1: or NATO against the Russian invasion. So it's just an
Speaker 1: interesting coincidence the Colonial Pipeline happened to be the thing
Speaker 1: that got hacked. I mean, I think that that was
Speaker 1: Russia demonstrating that yes, they could win a cycle war,
Speaker 1: and that if Biden administration tried to deliver on its threats,
Speaker 1: you know, to protect Ukraine, to protect NATO, you know
Speaker 1: that they could do something about that by doing starting
Speaker 1: down the pipeline. And you know, we're paying the bulk
Speaker 1: of the frame for NATO in part to protect our
Speaker 1: Western European allies from Russia. And meanwhile, our Western European
Speaker 1: allies now are doing more business and getting the lifeblood
Speaker 1: of their economy, their energy from Putin and Joe granted
Speaker 1: the waiver to Vladimir to build the pipeline, all simultaneously
Speaker 1: shutting down the Keystone Xtil pipeline. That makes zero sense.
Speaker 1: Brian Finch, how vulnerable do you believe the United States
Speaker 1: is to the cyber attacks? Hey, Sean, always good to
Speaker 1: be here. You know, the US is pretty vulnerable. I
Speaker 1: do think it's important to note that we have been
Speaker 1: doing a lot. I mean, the US government, going all
Speaker 1: the way back to Bush two, has been focused on cybersecurity.
Speaker 1: The level of emphasis has waxed and waned depending on
Speaker 1: geopolitical events, domestic events, etc. Is certainly during COVID, for instance,
Speaker 1: the focus on cybersecurity has shifted or waited a little bit.
Speaker 1: Means a matter of record that there was funding that
Speaker 1: was meant for cybersecurity products in the federal government was
Speaker 1: shifted over to COVID. Response that we can make. We
Speaker 1: can argue all day long whether that was right or wrong,
Speaker 1: but it happened. But to the question of whether the
Speaker 1: US is vulnerable, sure, we're vulnerable. Does that mean we're
Speaker 1: the most vulnerable in the world. No, I don't think so,
Speaker 1: but it also means we can't protect everything at the
Speaker 1: same time. And I think that's the question we really
Speaker 1: need to be asking right now, which is, you know,
Speaker 1: you assume that Russian criminal gangs, whether operating either at
Speaker 1: the direction or at the knowledge and benign consent of Putin,
Speaker 1: are conducting this latest wave of ransomware attacks. You know,
Speaker 1: how does this benefit Putin? I mean, that's the question
Speaker 1: that really needs to be asked, in part because you know,
Speaker 1: now you have US law enforcement, intelligence agencies and others
Speaker 1: focusing on ransomware, and they're starting to shut down some
Speaker 1: gangs here and there, which is good. But if you're
Speaker 1: a fan like I am, in no endorsement, but I
Speaker 1: joyed Narcos for instance, watching you know all the story
Speaker 1: the drug kingpins in the eighties, you ever noticed the
Speaker 1: pattern where whenever one drug kingpin fell out of favor,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden that he got cracked down upon
Speaker 1: by the Colombian or the Mexican or whoever government and
Speaker 1: suddenly got captured. Is Putin trying to do the same
Speaker 1: thing here, all of a sudden, he's got some gangs
Speaker 1: that he doesn't like, wants the US to do his
Speaker 1: dirty work for him, or maybe be like the solar
Speaker 1: wind situation, where he's going to send out these fake
Speaker 1: messages about, oh, we're going to hack the election. There's
Speaker 1: gonna be all this disinformation. You know, there's no confidence
Speaker 1: in the election. And then in reality they didn't do
Speaker 1: very much there. They were too busy hacking the US government.
Speaker 1: So you've got to worry about the old problem of
Speaker 1: maskuoka as they call it, the Russian disinformation and misdirection campaigns.
Speaker 1: And you know, I feel reasonably confident in our intelligence
Speaker 1: and law enforce and communities are paying attention to that.
Speaker 1: But the rest of the media has got to get
Speaker 1: on board too, and not just blindly assumed that Putin's
Speaker 1: out there to make a few million bucks from shutting
Speaker 1: down a meat plane or a gasoline pipeline, because he
Speaker 1: thinks much bigger than that. He's probably he thinks billions
Speaker 1: and trillions, not millions. All right, quick break, Welcome back
Speaker 1: more with Brian Finch and doctor Peter Pry on the
Speaker 1: other side. Eight hundred and nine four one sean as
Speaker 1: our number, well gets your calls, final half hour, All right,
Speaker 1: cancel culture wokeness, indoctrination in schools, the mob is after
Speaker 1: any and all things conservative in any way. And by
Speaker 1: the way, that even applies to our friends at Tuttle
Speaker 1: Twins Books. These books are selling by the millions. Why
Speaker 1: because they reinforce values of American parents that they know
Speaker 1: their kids are not getting at school. They're amazing books
Speaker 1: and for kids toddlers through teenagers and anyway. They now
Speaker 1: they're under attack. Why because they believe in entrepreneurship, capitalism,
Speaker 1: individual responsibility, love America. Oh well think oh the vapors anyway,
Speaker 1: Socialist magazine writing a lengthy hit piece attacking the Tuttle
Speaker 1: Twins books a heap of steaming carbage. Why because they
Speaker 1: teach freedom and liberty and responsibility. I guess you know
Speaker 1: when a socialist attack you, you know you're doing something right.
Speaker 1: Millions of these books have been sold because parents love them.
Speaker 1: It is the antidote to the indoctrination that is now
Speaker 1: institutionalized in so many of our schools. Your kids are
Speaker 1: gonna love it, from toddler to teenagers. Just go to
Speaker 1: this website Old Twins Hannity dot com. That's t U
Speaker 1: T T L E Twins Hannity dot com right now.
Speaker 1: And by the way, they're running a sale. You can
Speaker 1: get pre workbooks as well. That's Tuttle Twins Hannity dot
Speaker 1: Com and your kids will love it and you will
Speaker 1: love it as well. Digging D D d D to
Speaker 1: expose how the government waste your money each and every day.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show. As we continue the
Speaker 1: threats of cyber breaches everywhere, we continue with Brian Finch
Speaker 1: and doctor Peter Prye. Listen, I'm probably the biggest technical
Speaker 1: idiot you're ever going to meet in your life. This
Speaker 1: is not my wheelhouse in any way, and I'm the
Speaker 1: first to admit it. I guess The next logical question, though,
Speaker 1: is simple, is do we have the means to quickly
Speaker 1: build up the defenses that would be necessary to prevent
Speaker 1: them from being successful with the cyber attacks? Doctor Prye, No,
Speaker 1: not quickly. You know, it can be done over time
Speaker 1: and define times. What's time year, two years, ten years?
Speaker 1: The significance, well, it depends upon the strategy that you follow.
Speaker 1: Part of the problem is that we have a grand
Speaker 1: strategy that's doomed to fail. You know, the administrat the
Speaker 1: policy that's been followed since the Bush administration and continued
Speaker 1: under Biden, and you could see it in some of
Speaker 1: the in the commentary from the Biden administration you had
Speaker 1: is that this idea of a public private partnership where
Speaker 1: the US government is the junior partner in the partnership
Speaker 1: and the national security responsibility is basically shoved over shouldered
Speaker 1: onto the private sector. That's not going to work. It
Speaker 1: was that that's not going to work, that this is
Speaker 1: a national defense issue, a national security issue. You studied
Speaker 1: and you were the chief of staff of the Congressional
Speaker 1: EMP Commission Electromagnetic Pulse Commission. How real is that threat? Well,
Speaker 1: that is related to this threat. You know, this is
Speaker 1: not about ransomware. This is about a demonstrating a new
Speaker 1: way of warfare in which cyber attacked are the tip
Speaker 1: of the spear. But in a real war, you know,
Speaker 1: it would be followed, you know, by the use of
Speaker 1: non nuclear EMP weapons as an additional means of sabotaging
Speaker 1: our cred What would that do to the country And
Speaker 1: ultimately even a nuclear EMP attack, which has been considered
Speaker 1: a dimension of cyber warfare or information warfare by Russia,
Speaker 1: China and North Korea, it's not considered a nuclear attack
Speaker 1: and it would basically destroy our electronic civilization. It would
Speaker 1: collapse the electric grids, all the life sustaining critical infrastructures,
Speaker 1: and kill millions of people. That was the conclusion of
Speaker 1: the EMP Commission. And this is the test that everybody
Speaker 1: has been expecting the Biden administration to be put to
Speaker 1: by Russia. They're putting them to the test, and he's
Speaker 1: failing the test. You know. Now, the President Biden, I
Speaker 1: will give him credit that he has is continuing to
Speaker 1: try to implement the EMP executive Order that President Trump passed. Okay,
Speaker 1: but there's another crucial executive order that has been suspended
Speaker 1: by the Biden administration, Best Executive Order one three zero,
Speaker 1: which is protecting the bulk Power System. And this executive
Speaker 1: order is designed to stop our utilities from importing transformers
Speaker 1: and skatas and other critical electronic equipment from foreign countries,
Speaker 1: particularly China. We saw back in October of last year
Speaker 1: that China was able to black out the city of Mumbai,
Speaker 1: a city of thirty people, during a border conflict with India.
Speaker 1: You know, in part because India is very dependent on
Speaker 1: China imported technology transformers and skaters. You know, if we're
Speaker 1: serious about cyber warfare. We've got to start stop comporting
Speaker 1: stuff from China that's so crucial to the operation of
Speaker 1: our electric rid and other critical infrastructure. Well, we believe Pinch,
Speaker 1: for example, that TikTok was a means that the communist
Speaker 1: Chinese were using a spy on Americans. Trump stopped it,
Speaker 1: buying open that door up. Yeah, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: TikTok is obviously a threat. I think it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's a spying threat of all the scraping of information
Speaker 1: as a pairent of teenage girls. It's also a morale
Speaker 1: threat for anybody who's ever had to listen to TikTok's
Speaker 1: and all that sort of thing. But I would say,
Speaker 1: and on top of all that, you know what the
Speaker 1: doctor is saying about investing more in critical infrastructure or cybersecurity, etc. Yes,
Speaker 1: we need to do more than that, I think. You know, Sean,
Speaker 1: I know you're a student of history and you know,
Speaker 1: like me, a fan of World War Two and all
Speaker 1: that good stuff. Yeah, what we do have to realize
Speaker 1: is that every once in a while, the enemy gets
Speaker 1: through no matter what, right. You know, even the Japanese
Speaker 1: were able to send some balloons armed with incendiary bombs
Speaker 1: that killed a few people in the United States at
Speaker 1: the end of the war. So you know where we
Speaker 1: really need to go is we need to go to
Speaker 1: a situation where companies, governments, and people understand that, Look,
Speaker 1: you know, we're never going to get to a situation
Speaker 1: where we can stop every single cyber attack. That that's
Speaker 1: just not reality. But what we can do when you
Speaker 1: were asking this question earlier, and what success success in
Speaker 1: this case means, it doesn't really matter whether they get
Speaker 1: through or not, because if we in order to have
Speaker 1: a successful cyber defense, it's one where even if the
Speaker 1: enemy gets through and causes some quote unquote damage, it
Speaker 1: doesn't really harm us that much at the end of
Speaker 1: the day. Like in the example of Colonial Sure they're
Speaker 1: able to get in and spread this ransomware which cripple systems,
Speaker 1: but in a really good cyber defense world, you would
Speaker 1: have Colonial saying, oh, we know it's only going to
Speaker 1: affect these systems. We can isolate them, we can shut
Speaker 1: them down, we can keep seventy eight the pipeline operating
Speaker 1: while we fix the rest of it, rather than just
Speaker 1: closing the whole thing. That's how you've got to look
Speaker 1: at success so that Putin looks at it and says
Speaker 1: I'm not going to get much, or the Chinese. The
Speaker 1: reality is you're both describing a level of vulnerability that
Speaker 1: is intolerable, pretty chilling. I hope our government pays attention
Speaker 1: because this is going to be our future if we're
Speaker 1: not campful. But we're just at a time. Brian Finch,
Speaker 1: thank you, Doctor Peter Pride, thank you. Eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one. Sean, you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. Eight hundred nine f one sean, you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. I want
Speaker 1: everybody to remember one thing, um And this is a
Speaker 1: pretty fascinating expose. It's sort of like a barometer of success.
Speaker 1: But this right now, the New Green Deal socialist they're
Speaker 1: trying to convince Americans everything is gonna be free. You're
Speaker 1: gonna get free childcare, free early education for your kids.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get free college. You're gonna get free student
Speaker 1: loan forgiveness. You're gonna get a guaranteed government job, guaranteed
Speaker 1: government wage, guaranteed government healthcare, guaranteed, government retirement, guaranteed government
Speaker 1: healthy food. Everything is going to be free. Everything Now,
Speaker 1: I say this all the time. Well, how have all
Speaker 1: these people making these grandiose promises? What is their track record?
Speaker 1: Teach us? Because if you look at how these states
Speaker 1: that their number one responsibilities to keep their citizens safe,
Speaker 1: law and order, safety, security, so one can pursue happiness,
Speaker 1: how have they done. Look at any blue state, look
Speaker 1: at any blue city, and the numbers speak for themselves.
Speaker 1: The violence, the crime, out of control, getting worse every
Speaker 1: single day. Then you look at well, howd that Social
Speaker 1: Security lockbox thing work out? Yeah, they rated it and
Speaker 1: it's going bankrupt. Medicare is headed towards insolvency. They didn't
Speaker 1: do good there either. Those are promises they made, same people,
Speaker 1: same socialist, same big government, radical leftists. How they make
Speaker 1: out with that Obamacare promise, keep your doctor, keep your plan,
Speaker 1: save on average twenty five hundred dollars per family per
Speaker 1: year every American. Millions lost their doctors, millions lost their plans,
Speaker 1: and we're all paying about two hundred and fifty percent
Speaker 1: more thanks to that promise. So, and then you look
Speaker 1: at the school system. I have in front of me
Speaker 1: today's edition of the New York Post, and it says
Speaker 1: right at the top of the page, black families and
Speaker 1: queens were revolts. Schools failed to US twenty seven thousand
Speaker 1: dollars spent per student for a terrible education. The article
Speaker 1: goes on, schools and queens are letting black students down.
Speaker 1: Fed up parents are protesting despite high pupil spending, per
Speaker 1: pupil spending and only six percent of kids at one
Speaker 1: elementary school proficient in math. Only six percent? How is
Speaker 1: that possible? How do you fail on that huge level?
Speaker 1: Families are playing to private charter religious alternatives who want
Speaker 1: to know why parents are putting up at the PCBs
Speaker 1: and shift, if you will, at schools like Dalton and
Speaker 1: Breeley and all these expensive private schools fifty sixty grand
Speaker 1: a year because the alternative doesn't exist, because then you're
Speaker 1: stuck in the public school system, which is an unmitigated
Speaker 1: disaster anyway. And it goes on to say that in
Speaker 1: this article, it says inside the Peace School's child neglect
Speaker 1: and it goes an exodus of African Americans over low scores.
Speaker 1: Then they have all these kids holding up signs report
Speaker 1: card Math skills D English D minus signed in Social
Speaker 1: studies D. That's what their report card is. So you've
Speaker 1: got African American parents and queens, saying that the city's
Speaker 1: Department of Education again twenty seven thousand dollars per student
Speaker 1: they're spending. It's a lot of money fueling an exodus
Speaker 1: from the public school system, fed up families in District
Speaker 1: twenty nine, primarily African American area includes Hollis, Rosedale, Cambria Heights,
Speaker 1: and the Department of Education has tolerated these abysmal math
Speaker 1: and English proficiency rates despite high per students spending. So
Speaker 1: I ask you now that they failed miserably in their
Speaker 1: promise to educate our kids. They failed miserably in law
Speaker 1: and order, in safety and security, They failed miserably on
Speaker 1: social security and saving and procuring that money, and Medicare
Speaker 1: and Mamma care. Here's my next question. Why would you
Speaker 1: trust them with anything else or believe anything else that
Speaker 1: they say? Good question. Mike is in Virginia. Mike, you're
Speaker 1: on the Sean Hannity Show. Glad you called, Sir Sean,
Speaker 1: how you're doing. I'm in Virginia now, But I like
Speaker 1: you as a Long Island boy. Are our similarities are ridiculous?
Speaker 1: If you went point by point newsday to live a
Speaker 1: dousday daily news right onto Dishwashington, and I became a
Speaker 1: cop and then they had injured and then I retired,
Speaker 1: went into education. I've been down here for twenty five years,
Speaker 1: doing that teacher for years, in principle for twelve years.
Speaker 1: I'm back in the classroom. What led me to call
Speaker 1: you today? Who was listening yesterday? The young lady from
Speaker 1: Columbia and her points about the indoctrination on the college
Speaker 1: level which my family has Conservatives we've suffered through Lord,
Speaker 1: My children have gotten penalized in school for their outspoken
Speaker 1: points of view. But I teach fourth grade here in Virginia,
Speaker 1: which is a fantastic year to teach in fourth in Virginia,
Speaker 1: primarily because of one of our curriculum points is something
Speaker 1: called Virginia Studies. Virginia Studies is like a survey course.
Speaker 1: It takes you from like Native peoples all the way
Speaker 1: through current day Virginia civil rights, goes through everything. It's
Speaker 1: a great course. And now we're being told, slowly but surely,
Speaker 1: they're dismantling it. The dismantling the time we're being given
Speaker 1: to teach it, and the dismantling the curriculum and oursar
Speaker 1: mister Northam is at the helm of this, and it's
Speaker 1: killing myself. And it's literally quite a few conservative teachers
Speaker 1: with whom I teach, you know, look at schools now
Speaker 1: at this point, I think that it's sort of like
Speaker 1: we've got to get to a point of do no harm.
Speaker 1: The best thing we could ever do a school choice.
Speaker 1: Let schools compete for the dollars. If it's twenty seven
Speaker 1: grand and District twenty nine in New York, let the
Speaker 1: parents have a check for twenty seven grand and let
Speaker 1: them figure out where they want to send their kids
Speaker 1: to school. And I'll tell you what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: You're going to see schools emerge that will take on
Speaker 1: the public schools. And these schools are going to be
Speaker 1: focused on the important stuff, you know, like reading and
Speaker 1: writing and math and computers, so that these kids get
Speaker 1: the best education. Because I'll tell you where the parents
Speaker 1: are going to flock to. They're gonna flock to the
Speaker 1: schools that do the best job educating their kids. Next
Speaker 1: thing I would do is send kids to school and uniforms,
Speaker 1: and any kid get that becomes a disciplinary problem, you're out. Goodbye.
Speaker 1: Stop interrupting the learning process of other kids I didn't
Speaker 1: still discipline, and these kids should go to school, sit
Speaker 1: up straight, learn reading, writing, math, a little bit of
Speaker 1: American history. It would be nice, but I'm not even
Speaker 1: asking for that at this point, and prepare them for
Speaker 1: what the real world requires. If you ever want to
Speaker 1: be successful. The latter to success in America is a
Speaker 1: good education. And if you know, look, I can't tell
Speaker 1: you it's actually a passion of mine to that. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm in a position financially, I've helped a lot of
Speaker 1: people out go to school, a lot of people because
Speaker 1: it's that critical, it's that important that if you want
Speaker 1: to have any competitive advantage in life, you know, And
Speaker 1: if we can't agree on sex education, and you have
Speaker 1: some people wanting to teach masturbation to six year olds
Speaker 1: and first graders, I don't have any time for this crap.
Speaker 1: If you want to bring in controversial, divisive, critical race theory,
Speaker 1: I don't have time for that either. You know, make
Speaker 1: those electives where parents can elect to let their kids
Speaker 1: stay after school and learn all about the crap that
Speaker 1: they want to they want them to learn. I don't care.
Speaker 1: But stick to the fundamentals. When you become proficient at math,
Speaker 1: reading science computers. Then talk to me. Learn the basics first. Anyway,
Speaker 1: New Jersey, Moses is standing by. What's up, Moses, How
Speaker 1: are you high from the mountaintop? Thanks for taking my
Speaker 1: call against I'm doing? How are you doing? I'm good?
Speaker 1: How are you all right? So so, Sean, So the
Speaker 1: thing I'm concerned about the most right, I'm not concerned
Speaker 1: about us taking back the Senate, taking back the White House,
Speaker 1: taking back the House. So what I'm concerned about is
Speaker 1: how a Republicans going to fight back against the machine
Speaker 1: and the processes of the Democrats have created over the
Speaker 1: last six years that is effectively sabotaging and derailing Republican presidencies.
Speaker 1: You have Adam Shift launching unconstitutional impeachments with whistle blowers
Speaker 1: who are not named, who don't even know the exact
Speaker 1: details of the stuff that they're blowing the whistle on.
Speaker 1: You also have Adam Shift leaking the phone records of lawyers, journalists,
Speaker 1: and members of Congress. Then you have a media loop
Speaker 1: that what they're doing is feeding false information that is
Speaker 1: being used in front of fisichords. You have the deep
Speaker 1: state that's getting bigger and bigger, with people like Kevin
Speaker 1: Kleinsmith that's aligned to the Fisichord and unconstitutional and illegal
Speaker 1: warrants on presidential campaigns. Not to mention, you also have
Speaker 1: on the state level all these companies basically blackmailing all
Speaker 1: the people in their states by let me say this
Speaker 1: a little bit differently. You have major institutional forces in
Speaker 1: the media, in academia and other the Democratic Party, big
Speaker 1: tech companies that are all aligned to advance an agenda,
Speaker 1: and the antidote. And the answer to me is, just
Speaker 1: like conservatives found talk radio. Just like the conservatives, some
Speaker 1: conservatives have a voice on Fox. Not everybody's a conservative.
Speaker 1: We have to also become big tech competition. We need
Speaker 1: our own Facebook, our own Twitter, our own Instagram, our
Speaker 1: own everything. Because listen Twitter, it's very interesting. We actually
Speaker 1: have put out a number of trial balloons. And the
Speaker 1: trial balloons are simple, and that is that we'll throw
Speaker 1: out a tweet. And in the past, where so many
Speaker 1: people would retweet my tweet, or follow my tweet or
Speaker 1: comment positively on my tweet, it's just the leftist, hardcore Democrat.
Speaker 1: You know, they have now successfully chased away conservatives from Twitter.
Speaker 1: And we've tested this now numerous times and we've compared
Speaker 1: it to years past, so it is what it is.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to beg them to be fair. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying that if we want, if you don't like it,
Speaker 1: we we gotta get good, smart, conservative technical minds to
Speaker 1: build an alternative. And so far people have talked about it,
Speaker 1: nobody's gotten it done. I certainly can't do it because
Speaker 1: I don't know what the hell I'm doing. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be able to build such a thing. Yeah, definitely. But
Speaker 1: you know what, the one thing you touched upon, which
Speaker 1: is the most important thing, is that I've been a
Speaker 1: Democrat all my life, but when I started paying attention
Speaker 1: after Donald Trump got elected, its voices like yours to
Speaker 1: help me understand the conservative values I've always had and
Speaker 1: basically discover my political identity and nat and I want
Speaker 1: to thank you for that, Sean. But now what my
Speaker 1: concern is is that with big tech basically shadow banning
Speaker 1: voices like yours, like Levin's, like Bongino's, that's going to
Speaker 1: be happening less and less. And what I'm concerned about,
Speaker 1: along with the previous point I made, is that Republicans
Speaker 1: are not in this fight, and once they get these
Speaker 1: gables back they need to be on day one. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you there is a battle for the heart
Speaker 1: and soul of this country. There's such a philosophical divide
Speaker 1: at this time. I don't see reconciliation. You know, you
Speaker 1: either believe in open borders amnesty or you believe in
Speaker 1: secure borders. Either believe in energy independence or you don't.
Speaker 1: You recognize that lowering the cost of energies in our
Speaker 1: best national security interest and financial interest. You either believe
Speaker 1: in constitutionalists or you want judicial activism. You believe in
Speaker 1: lower taxes, not confiscational wealth. You believe in less bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: more bureaucracy. You believe the government should create a cradle
Speaker 1: to gravee womb to the tomb. Socialist you know, Communist
Speaker 1: Marxist utopia, or you don't. You believe in strong national
Speaker 1: defense or you don't. I mean, these are very fundamental things,
Speaker 1: and the divide is great. What I've found about conservatives,
Speaker 1: once you understand it, once you and how simple it
Speaker 1: really is, once you see how corrupt the media is
Speaker 1: with their abusive and bias, you can't unsee it. Liberty, freedom,
Speaker 1: capitalism are constitution works, amitted government. Thomas Paine said, said,
Speaker 1: you know, government in its best state is a necessary evil,
Speaker 1: and it's worth state an intolerable one. But lower taxes,
Speaker 1: less bureaucracy, secure borders, school choice, energy independence, free market
Speaker 1: solutions to healthcare, law and order, safety security, constitutionalists on
Speaker 1: the bench piece through strength. That's simple. It doesn't need
Speaker 1: to get any more complicated than that. And if you
Speaker 1: have politicians, if they want to be rewarded with positions
Speaker 1: that they want, obviously, then stand and fight for those
Speaker 1: simple principles. Anyway, I appreciate the call. Eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine one shans a number you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. All right, that's gonna wrap things
Speaker 1: up for today. Hannity Tonight, nine eastern on the Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel, complete wrap up of the Biden and President's
Speaker 1: Sippy Cups summit from earlier today. Jim Jordan, Mark Meadows
Speaker 1: will join us. Ryan's previous Dan Hoffington night and then
Speaker 1: Donald Trump exclusively reacts to the summit and much more.
Speaker 1: All coming up. Say your DVR Hannity nineties, turn on Fox.
Speaker 1: We'll see you then. Thanks for being with us. You
Speaker 1: make this show possible, and we'll see you also back
Speaker 1: here tomorrow.