WEBVTT - Is the Singularity Coming?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, the podcast that looks at the future and

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>says one singular sensation. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren Pola,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe McCormick. So, you, guys, how is it

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>possible that we've gone this long with a forward thinking

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>futuristic podcast and not really touched upon the singularity. I

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>mean we we've joked about it a couple of times,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>were slacking. They say it's near. Well, yeah, depending upon

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>whom you ask, it's gonna be um like any day now.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>So we thought it's high time we actually take a

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the singularity, talk about what is this idea

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the singularity, What does it mean? What do people

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>who are super duper small aren't have to say about

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it on one side or the other, And kind of,

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess, ultimately kind of give our own opinions about

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>what we think. Keeping in mind that we are not

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>futurists in the strictest sense of the word. This is

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>more about how we kind of feel about things because

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>we're not computer scientists. Were futuri ins or future ologists

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is what we are future rangers. So um, yeah, so

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get started. Let's let's talk about what the

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>singularity is. So, what the heck is it? You know?

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think in the popular consciousness when you mentioned the singularity,

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they're aware that it has something to do with technology

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and something to do with the future. But other than that,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of this vague mental piece of stock

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>art where there's some wavy lines and a picture of

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>like a brain and some electricity. Right, yeah, maybe maybe

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>brains suddenly going up into disappearing into ones and zeros

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and joining a giant cloud of them or something. Yeah.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think the general understanding of it is fairly vague,

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and so I'd like to narrow that down and focus

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it on what does this mean in the most basic

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>technological sense, And what I'd say is that it's usually

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>used to mean a time when humans develop superhuman intelligence

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>through some means, whether by creating artificial intelligence or by

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>amplifying their own intelligence, or somehow or other stumbling on

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>an intelligence greater than that of what humans are normally capable.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And often they also go further into saying that in

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>this world where we have developed superhuman intelligence. We will

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 1>we we in the present right now, will be unable

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of predict what that future is going to

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>look like because we won't even be able to recognize it. Yeah,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>by our very nature, by our limited human intelligence, we

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>cannot conceive of what that future will be. It's impossible.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It's beyond our our what our limitations are are around us.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The idea also tends to involve not just a stasis,

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>like we reach a point of plateau of very high intelligence,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but it involves this idea of a vast acceleration in

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>learning and improvement, right, so educational specotification, Yeah, or a

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law that applies directly to how smart we are,

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so that we're constantly getting smarter than we were earlier.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And it just keeps except that instead of Moore's law,

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>which is steady you have you know, you have this

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this uh, this doubling growth, but it's a steady doubling

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>growth in the singularity, and at least some versions of it,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an exponential or or lager eithmic growth to the

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>point where, uh, you know, it's you're not only getting smarter,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>but you're getting smarter faster, right, and in that sense,

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a double impossibility for us to understand

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what it will be like. It's not only smarter than

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we can imagine now, but it's getting smarter faster than

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we can imagine now. Right, So, there are generally speaking

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>four different agreed upon ways that this singularity could come about.

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>These are are proposed by a science fiction writer and

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>mathematician and mathematician Verne Buddy Verne, I don't I don't

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>actually know Verner of into it anyway. He's a he's

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>got this idea. He had this idea where he kind

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of proposed four ways that we could reach this superhuman

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligent future. And these are four pathways that are not

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>necessarily completely um isolated from each other or compartmentalized. We

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>may see some weird um combination of different paths that

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lead us to this, assuming that the singularity is indeed

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>something we are going to hit at some point time

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or another. Okay, what are they? So you've got superhuman

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligent machines. This is the artificial intelligence route. I think

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this is like the most classic sense that people would

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine the most it's just saying, like developing computers that

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>are beyond human capabilities. Yeah, the idea of being that

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you would be able to build a computer so sophisticated

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that it could design the next generation of computers much

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>better than any human could, and that next generation of

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>computers could design the next generation of computers better than

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the predecessor could, and so on and so forth, and

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>then creating a level way beyond anything that we can

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>even understand. Right, and faster too, so that you know,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the time between generations gets to a point where there's

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>no longer you can no longer say this is generation one,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this is generation too. They'll just be meaningless to ask

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the question because it's constantly changing. Yeah, That rapid optimization

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is often called the intelligence explosion. Yes, uh. And so

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>next we have the idea about computer networks themselves gaining

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some form of sentience or intelligence. Now, this is one

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>that I've heard a few different philosophers and computer scientists

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.559
<v Speaker 1>talk about the kind of idea that with any uh,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>network of information exchanging nodes that's complex enough, you could

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>have consciousness arise. So, in other words, if you had

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>enough information exchanging nodes in a complex enough system, then

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it would end up mirroring what our brains do with

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>our neural pathways. And because uh, in the argument of

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>these people, consciousness is itself a manifestation of these physical

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>connections that our brain emergent manifestation, Yes, that that would

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact emerge in these synthetic networks. One of the

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>things here would be to consider whether or not a

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>system like this could have executive control of some kind.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if you imagine the Internet today as a brain,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>well that is a brain or a mind, whatever you

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>want to call it, that is both has more intellectual

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>capability and has more knowledge than any other thing that exists,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but it has no executive at the top of it.

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>There's nobody controlling the Internet. To say, now, think about this, well,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if you consider that the Internet is a crazy cat lady,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense. It's the question of whether a

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>flock of birds really knows where it's going, or just

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>if each individual bird is uh doing what it does.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Are a school of fish, this kind of thing where

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you see these behaviors that are are fascinating, uh, and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on the surface they start to really perplex people. It's

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what you have to really dig down to understand how

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they work. Well, next, we've got the idea of computers

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and humans getting all buddy buddy. Okay, so this is

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this is also ties into the stock art, right, it's

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like a human brain with like a computer chip on

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it and electricity shooting now a giant wind up key

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sticking out of the humans back come from a different

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>school than you guys, So uh yeah, this is the

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that we have computer and human intelligence merging into

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>some form of new entity. So a lot of not all,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the singularity models that will talk

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 1>about include this idea of trans humanism, where humans evolve

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond what we are now. We become a new species,

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>either because we've merged with machines in this way where

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>where we've incorporated machine intelligence into our human intelligence in

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a in a very organic way. I guess it's kind

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of weird to say organic, but that's kind of what

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about. Or we create something that's uh like

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a superhuman intelligent machine that then changes us so that

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we're no longer human in the way we would think

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>of now. And in that way, it's easy to see

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>how some of these different pathways could overlap. Like first,

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you design say just a classical AI, like a super

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>intelligent machine that's a computer, but that machine that's a

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>computer tells you exactly how to modify your body with

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>cybernetics that allow you to go in this hybrid state

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to the singularity exactly. And this this is also the

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>option I think where a lot of nanobots tend to

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>come in our good old buddies nano bots. Yeah, the

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>idea of like, uh, sort of fortifying your body. I'll

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure you have your vitamins, your minerals in your

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>nanobots because the nanobots will continuously upgrade you. That isn't

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those popular ideas in science fiction. It's also

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one that you know, we've talked a little bit about

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>nanotechnology in the past. We'll talk a lot more about

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it in future episodes, but it's complicated stuff. Question, all

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>these involved computers. Is there a way we could achieve

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>super intelligence without computer? This is the Frankenstein method. So yes,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>through through pure application of medicine and science, we can

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>create a superhuman. This is starting to sound a little

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>scary in a way, but yeah, we're telling bioengineering as

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the rest of them. It's sky nets was

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>totally fine with you. Look, this one is scary. I'd

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like to say that I, for one, welcome our robot overlords,

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm okay with them, all right. I have always

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>treated my room bow with respect. This is just as

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a recorded account of my philosophy. M That's all I'm

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna say now. So, the bioengineering approach is the idea

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that we find out ways to maybe genetically modify humans.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>It involves changing us on a biological level, where we

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>attain this sort of superhuman intelligence through that pathway, as

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed through some form of machine intelligence. Okay, so before

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this was a cliche on the internet, what was it?

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Where did this idea come from? Well, you know, it's

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's an old idea like we've had. We've had people

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about machines giving us the capability to to think

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>better for more than a century. So if you go

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the Industrial Revolution, there were

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>people who were saying, as machines were becoming more important

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in human activities, they were saying, look, this is allowing

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>us to extend our ability to do to complete tasks,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and just imagine a time where those tasks aren't just

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>physical but also mental. And so it was pretty early

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on that people were starting to have the very seeds

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of this idea. It wasn't so formalized as the idea

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of a singularity that would come later, but it was

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>already starting to kind of trickle into the minds of

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>people at the time. The actual term singularity, as it

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>relates to a point beyond which humanity as we know

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it will change um was coined a nineteen fifty eight

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>by John von Neuman. Okay, oh, that's kind of interesting,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like a singularity as in like a black hole, or

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as in like at the beginning of the universe, like

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>you can't point right right. That's that's where. Yeah, I'm

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just thankful they didn't call it event horizon that that

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>shows that movies had enough references on the show. So

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, so singularity as a point that we are

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not able to see beyond simply because it's it's beyond

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>what we are able to conceive of. You don't get

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>into technological singularity until about thirty years later, and that's

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when our our good buddy Verne came up with this idea.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>He wrote an essay for Omni magazine, and he predicted

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we would quote unquote soon create superhuman intelligences that would

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>transform our world in ways we can't anticipate because again,

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we have human intelligence. So if you're talking superhuman by definition,

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we cannot conceive of that. It's it's beyond our ken. Okay,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>where does Ray come in? Oh, you're talking Kurtswhile great

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>kurts Will. I mean, he's the big name in the singularity,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>at least as far as I can tell. He When

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you say singularity, who do you think of? Kurtswild, Like

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to the point that a lot of people on some

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>futurists on the Internet are kind of derisive and go like,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, other people aside from Ray Kurtzwile are working

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in this field, Thank you very much. Churtswild published a

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>very popular book about it in two thousand five. He

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote The Singularity is New, or rather he got it published,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and that book was extremely popular. It it really brought

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the singularity beyond a kind of niche audience.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, uh, my dad subscribed to Omni magazine, but

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that that many other people outside of

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the science fiction world really read that much of Omni.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly getting this into more of a kind of

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a mainstream mindset made the whole concept explode. Yeah, this

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>took this weird nerd concept and in and had TV

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>interviews and stuff about it. He's also so charismatic. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he's I mean, he travels the world giving talks about,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, futurism as well as other topics. And of

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>course he's had his own incredible career. I've talked about

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>him in the past on another show. We do text stuff,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and Kurt Swile has had a very long career in

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>uh everything from voice recognition to computer AI and it's

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool stuff. So when he talked, people listened. And

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his prediction, which as far as I know, he has

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>not amended any time recently, was that we would have

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>the singularity by twenty five. So, in other words, when

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the year gets here, we will reach a time and

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>human history where it will no longer be something we recognize. Yeah.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>The unfortunate thing about predictions and dates in the future

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is you can't really know whether they're right until you

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get there. And that's a long way off, isn't it.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>That's deep Joe, Yes, that is true. Both of those

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>things you said are true. Uh. Yeah. He actually also

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>said that we would have computers that are as intelligent

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as humans. As to me, that's that's a really tricky prediction, because,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, you can argue that there are many ways

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that computers are much better at performing certain types of

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tasks than humans are. I mean, it's it's undeniable. Yeah,

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Like sorting through an incredibly long list incredibly quickly. Computers

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to be much better than people are sequencing a genome. Yeah.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>There are other things that humans are great at that

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>computers are not so great at, like natural language. Natural

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>language is a great example, or just being able to see.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Like if I show you a cup and I teach

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you what a cup is, and then I show you

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a totally different cup, that's not that's not the same design.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's different colors, different shape, different size. You still know

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what a cup is? You still oh, that's a cup.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Computers don't necessarily know that. You have to really start

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>building in this software. It doesn't matter how powerful the

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>computer is unless the software itself is able to also

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>give the computer that that processing ability. Right. This is

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>actually one reason that scientists and engineers are trying to

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>teach computers to work like brains in terms of the

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>hardware itself, because you can take a normal computer and

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>with good facial recognition software. Like the computer being taught

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>how to recognize faces and what faces are. It can

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of, it can do a good job. It can

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>look at your face and say okay, but that's after

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you've taught it. What's a lot harder is to release

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a normal computer onto the Internet and say, learn what

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>these images are. I'm not giving you any help, right,

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Associations which are something that that humans do very naturally,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are not something it's you have to program that, and

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>programming that is one of the more difficult tasks. Very

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>even even if you build the structure, it takes a

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of time. This is why you know, we've talked

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about the semantic web and this idea of meta data

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and tagging this data and building ontologies. I mean, these

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>are very important so that a computer can understand how

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to navigate a world that we can navigate naturally. YEA.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So even though we have agreement that computers are good

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at some things and that humans are better at other things,

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the thought of the people who who propose this technological

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>singularity is that computers are rapidly going to catch up

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to the areas where humans are better at at those tasks,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're still going to be much better at the

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>other task that computers are already ideally suited to. Yeah,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the the things that the computers are good at

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>will allow them to rapidly become better at the things

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not good at. Sure, but not everyone agrees with

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the singularity. No, that We've got actually

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people on on both sides of the issue, right, right,

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some of these main figures in in

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of singularity thought or singularity studies and what they've

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>had to say about this idea because it's actually somewhat

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>controversial these days. So we've got Kurtswile we've already mentioned him,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>he's probably one of the most visible UH thinkers and

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>speakers about the singularity. Yeah, and we should make clear

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about these people that being sort of

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on the pro singularity side doesn't necessarily mean you think

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing. Oh right. A lot of these

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>people actually think that it will be very negative and

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are looking at ways of mitigating that potential. Yeah, right,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking about people who sort of think that

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna happen, and think that it's going to happen

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon, like within our lifetimes, or if not our lifetimes,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the next generation's lifetime. Okay, what about Hans Hans more

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of It. Well, Hans more of Ek is a Carnegie

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Mellon Robotics Institute adjunct professor used to be anyway, and

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>uh he says, of course that the mind is the

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>product of physical processes in the brain. So uh, you

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>know this is this is again something that's argued among

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>philosophers and uh neuro specialists as well. But his his

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>premise is that if you have enough power, enough computing power,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and enough sophistication with software, that you would be able

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to replicate what happens in our our brains and thus

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>give rise to a synthetic mind. Okay, this would sort

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of make sense if you're saying that you're starting position

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the brain doesn't have anything magic in it,

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>then why should it be that difficult to replicate what

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it does or even do better? And on one level,

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people say, yeah, that makes sense, but

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but on another level, you may be trivializing exactly how

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>complicated the brain and neurological processes actually are. Well, that's

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly why it seems like there might be something magic

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in the brain. Right, imagine that there's not something magic

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in it. Well, it's so complex physically that it seems

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>to lots of people like there is. Well, it's just

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like just like the idea of any technology sophistical enough

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>will appear as magic. Exactly, same sort of thing here,

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>any science that's complex enough and really really and that's

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a testament to the fact that the brain

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>may be a lot harder to replicate than we're giving

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>it credit for. Right, And it's and it's really big.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, don't don't let the relatively small sides of

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>our skulls fool you. There's a lot going on in there. Yeah,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at how many neurons the typical brain has,

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>how many neural pathways, the fact that neural pathways will

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>form and then start to kind of every time you

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think back on that memory, the same sort of pathway

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>starts lighting up, and then sometimes the pathway changes a

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit, which means that our memories are not entirely reliable,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>something that a lot of people depend heavily upon, Like lawyers, Um, So,

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's true, it's true. So, but it's

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it's an incredibly complex system, and it works in a

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>very different way than your classic computer system. Now, one

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to say in defensive this idea is

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that even if the brain is very complex, if we

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>can simulate the brain, I can't really see any reason

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>why a machine shouldn't go way beyond the brain. Yes,

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the brain is limited by all kinds of external factors

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the size of the head when you

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>need to give birth and things like that, and competing

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with other organs for developing resources. I think a lot

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of objections to this are not based on it's impossible.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think most people who object to the idea of

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of simulating the brain aren't saying this is something that's

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>never going to happen. They're saying this is something that

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>if it happens, it's going to happen a really long

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time from now. Yeah, the more optimistic neuroscience people that

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen talk about this have estimated at least a

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, like absolutely crazy, minimum of I don't even

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>understand what's happening anymore, is a hundred years. Because if

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>you even look at IBM S Watson, which is one

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the great examples of artificial intelligence, that we can

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about today. You know, that's the IBM computer that

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>went on Jeopardy defeated the two former Jeopardy champions. Seem

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to be really, really smart. It was relying on thousands

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of processors running at an incre dorble speed in order

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for it to even compete at that level. And it

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>was it was a fairly specific, uh kind of task.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, you had you had the wonderful idea

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of this is going to encompass all human knowledge because

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you never know what the the categories are going to be.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But it still was specifically to compete at Jeopardy, not

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to hold a conversation and try and pass the Turing

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>test for example. Um, if for us to have a

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>fully functioning mind, not just a brain, but a mind,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and looks like it's going to have to be even

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>more complicated than what Watson was. And it's not just

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the hardware that we have to worry about again, it's

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the software. If the software isn't sophisticate enough in uh,

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in the job of simulating the pathways that are in

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the brain, you can't really hope to simulate an organic mind.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You might be able to come across and create some

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>other form of mind that we have never encountered. I mean,

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>that's still a possibility, and it's it's fascinating and scary

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all at the same time. But it's not going to

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be the same as an organic mind unless you're able

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 1>to really create an insanely sophisticated piece of software running

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on an equally insane sophisticated piece of hardware. So anyway,

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's my own personal objection. So I think you already

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>see where my mind goes. But next we have a

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we have Verned again. We have our science fiction author

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and mathematician um and he said that he would be

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>surprised if the Singularity doesn't show its head around twenty thirty.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So he's even more aggressive in his timeline than Kurtswile is.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>That is sixteen years away. It's hard to imagine it

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>was only a couple of years ago that someone talked

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to him and asked him again, like do you want

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to revise that? And he says, I stand by it.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess as well. At a certain yeah, you know,

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're like, either it happens or it doesn't. I mean,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's I guess it's at some point you just say, well, well,

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll just wait and see. Although I do want to

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>say that his concepts of the singularity were largely inspired

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>by a mathematician by the name of I Jake good Um,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>who is writing a lot about the intelligence explosion back

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties. So so you know, Verner. Verner

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit on the fantastical side. The

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>arguments say aggressive, but as singularity is concerned, but his

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but his concepts are certainly based on mathematical concepts. Right though.

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>He's great fun to listen to. There's an interview that

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Wired did with him a few years back. If you

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>go and read that, he's just, uh, he seems to

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have this great fluidity talking about issues like this. A

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>published science fiction writer. I mean, all the people I

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>know who are published science fiction writers are the most

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>amazing people in the world. High dad. Uh. Then we've

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>got Alizar yet Kalski. Yeah, he's um someone that was is.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I always found it fascinating because of his thought experiment,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>which we'll talk about in another episode. Maybe we've already

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. It's our friendly AI episode. Right. He's

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>known in this field of of AI and sort of

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>cautioning in the future of AI and discussing how to

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>make it safe. Yeah. Yeah, he's particularly concerned that the singularity,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean A will occur, but but B will be

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a species extinction level event and uh, and so he's yeah,

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>working towards creating strategies for a sustainable singularity, right, which again,

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>very hard to imagine if you're talking about in a

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>point where you can't really predict what happens next, I mean,

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>just alone, how do you prepare for something that's unpredictable.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Also interested in creating the idea of friendly artificial intelligence

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is Nick Bostrom. Yeah. He also again, anyone who wants

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to prepare for a friendly kind of approach to this,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you kind of have to say this person

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>is at least somewhat convinced that it's actually gonna happen.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you wouldn't have a conversation about preparing for it.

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're it's always better to prepare for something

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and not have it happened than to not prepare and

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it happens anyway. Yeah, I'd agree with that last part.

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I could say that you could be very interested in

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>preparing for safety in the case of the singularity without

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>being especially concerned that it's very likely. I'm just not

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>sure how many people would actually put forth the effort,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just knowing just knowing humans the way

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I do. But well, anyway, he's given a prediction, right, Yeah,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a director of the Future of Humanity Institute. Boy,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a heavy burden in it if you're the director

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Future of Humanity Institute, Like, so, what's the

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>future of humanity? Look, I'm working on it, Okay, back off,

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>all right, but he was quoted as saying that there's

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>less than a fifty percent probability that will develop some

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of super intelligence by twenty thirty three. So this

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of contradicts what Werner's prediction was. Assuming that the

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>singularity also necessitates some sort of super intelligence, most of

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>our definitions do involve super intelligence, intelligence explosion. That tends

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the way we think about the singularity. I

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>guess you could argue that if you could find some

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>other means to constantly have the entire world changing so

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>quickly that's impossible to define it without using superintelligence, that

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>would also be a singularity. Yeah, and so there have

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been some people who have been sort of pro singularity

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in terms of thinking, it's very likely to happen, but

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>at the same time very against it in terms of

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>what should happen. Like Bill Joy, co founder of Sun Microsystems.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>He got famous in this line of thinking when he

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>published an article in two thousand and Wired magazine called

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>why the Future Doesn't Need Us, and it was very

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic about the role of technology in the future of humanity. Yeah,

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>he specifically was worried that we would develop technology that

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>would be incredibly destructive and yet really easy to use.

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So imagine the equivalent of the button, right, the whole

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of that, the button that you press and it

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>launches a nuclear strike against another country. Now imagine that

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially a sizeable percentage of the human population has access

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to something that's it's equivalent in being dangerous. Does necessarily

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>have to be nuclear, it could be whatever. Saying that,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as technology gets more advanced, it's giving more

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>power to people, and with that, with great power becomes

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>great responsibility, and so we have to be very cautious.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And so he's he's advocated, let's not build those technologies.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's back off and just build the stuff that's going

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to help people, and not the stuff that's gonna white

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>people out, which is easy to say exactly. I mean,

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff that you build with the

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>goal of helping people could eventually be used by accident

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to cause problems. I've built this death scorpion too health

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>humanity and not destroy it or you know. I mean,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you create an AI that wants to make

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>people happy, um, but as it turns out, what makes

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people happy is exploding other people's skulls. Uh,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>got problems. That would be a bad example of technology

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to push. Let's just say you create an

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>AI that's designed to maximize the output of penicillin, but accidentally,

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what it does by maximizing the output of penicillin is

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it harvests people's bodies in order to turn them into

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the constituents it needs to make penicilla. So this is

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like Outbreak plus the matrix. I got it. Okay, Well,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>those are the folks, they're they're more obviously, there are

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who fall on the side of

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Singularity is a thing. It's definitely gonna happen. It

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>may be good, it may be bad, but it's coming.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But they're not the only ones in this discussion. Oh yeah,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole list of critics who say that either

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible at all or that it's very, very

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>not near. Let's talk about the skeptics. So so, we

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>had the co founder of Sun Microsystems in one corner.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>In the other corner, we got a co founder of Microsoft,

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve Balmer. No, not that Steve Bomber was not a

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>co founder. He was an early employee, but he was

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the in the sales department. I can talk all about

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bomber if you really want me to know what

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. Paul Allen, Now I want to know

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what Steve Bomber. What about Bomber is a robot? Come on,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we know this. Developers, developers, developers. He was on that

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>loop for a long time. Took a while to get

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>him out of that. Okay, what about Paul Paul Alan

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>his argument which he made with along with another computer

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>scientists expert, He posted a an article that was kind

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of a rebuttal of of Kurtzwild. Yeah, and he said that, Yeah,

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Kurtswell ended up having a rebuttal of the rebuttal. But

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Kurtswall strikes me as someone who who rarely um rarely

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>resists the urge to have the last word. But uh,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll find out for sure podcast His Life. No,

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but Alan said that that if such a thing as

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Singularity is going to happen, it's a long, long,

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>long way off, And he made a lot of the

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>arguments that I had kind of alluded to earlier. This

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>idea that creating any kind of of machine intelligence that

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>has intelligence in the way we think of intelligence, like

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 1>on human level or beyond, is so far in the

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>future as to be kind of a meaningless discussion at

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Yeah, one thing that it brings up to

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>think about the software limitations is that it's not just computers,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you can make the most powerful computer that you

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>could ever have, and if it didn't have some kind

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of guidance, if it didn't have instructions on how to

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>create intelligence, I don't know how you would achieve intelligence.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Could just run Tetris way better than the other computers

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>could run Tetris. Yeah, now that that's kind of Paul

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Allen's argument, And in fact, there's the goofy, snarky fake

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>law saying Moore's law. You know you have right right,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law says that technology will increase, it will double

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in power, right every two years, every two years or so,

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and pages Law in in contrast says that software will

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>bloat twice as much, twice as much every two years. So,

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in other words, your performance from one computer to flash

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>forward two years in the future, the next computer ends

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>up looking the same because the software ends up expanding

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of all those up all those those

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>capabilities of your computer has, but not in a way

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that would necessarily strike you as uh as as noticeable.

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Like we just think, well, this, this computer runs this

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>program just fine, but it's not software. It gets twice

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>as slow for every unit of uh yeah, computer getting fasterware.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you preserve the stats quo. It doesn't you

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>don't end up with this world of magical computers that

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>can suddenly do everything. Although you know that's clearly a

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>very tongue in cheek approach, because if you do look

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>around us the it's it's undeniable to say that the

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>computers of today can run programs that are far more

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated than what like I mean, I think back to

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>my very first computer, which was an Apple to E,

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and it would just fizzle and explode if I were

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to show it some of the stuff I can run

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on my phone these days. But the point is kind

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of is kind of made where the software sophistication isn't

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>increasing at the same uh space as More's law and

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I and I do have to say that sometimes web

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>page is load not quite as slow as they did

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>when I was on dial up, but but approaching that

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>do to say ad software? Okay, So we had a

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sci fi author in the pro corner, do we have

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.959
<v Speaker 1>any sci fi authors in the anti corner? Charles Stross.

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>He believes that the development in a I will be

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on creating reactive technologies and environments that respond to

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>our needs, rather than intelligent environments that anticipate things make

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>decisions on its own. I mean, even these reactive environments

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>could anticipate our needs, but they're doing so in a

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote dumb way, not a smart way, right. I think?

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this sort of an argument against what's called a

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>generalized artificial intelligence or artificial general intelligence, meaning simulating the

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>whole way a human brain works, with the total freedom

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and range of thought, as opposed to a limited AI

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's really good at being like a human brain at

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Yeah, sure, Sure, it's the difference between a

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>video game character that can competently follow you around and

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>shoot your enemies versus a video game character, you know,

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>taking that same grunt and having it cookie breakfast. It's right.

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Or to put it in in terms of like a

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>smart home. You know, you might have a smart thermostat

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>which can, based upon a certain algorithm, anticipate what temperature

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna want your house, but it's not going to

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to do everything else that you need to do.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You have all these other little elements, and together they

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can create an entire environment that seems really reactive and intelligent,

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately it's not really smart. It's just all following

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>very specific sets of rules and not necessarily in a

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>coordinated way. Just integrated stupidity. Yeah, which I think that

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that should be the new industry buzz term. I think

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that they should be calling, like nest to the integrated stupidity.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Pretty sure. I pledged to a frat that had that

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>as motto. At any rate, Uh, go dogs at any rate.

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Next we have Ernest Davis, who's a computer scientist with

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>New York University, and Davis's argument is that the human

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>brain and intelligence is far more complex than computer scientists

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to give it credit, that it is something that

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is non trivial, that we have barely even scratched the surface.

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That even to have a conversation about intelligence usually requires

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you to focus in on a specific aspect of intelligence

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than just talking about general intelligence, because it's just

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>too broad a topic. Right, So this is sort of

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the coin that we already talked

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about with respect to Hans more Evc. Right, So maybe

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing magic in the brain. It's not we're not

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>unable in principle to reproduce it. It's just so hard, yeah, right, right.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>And and the fact that some a lot of futurists

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>have really good understanding of how computers work, but a

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really poor understanding of biology is is kind of an

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.479
<v Speaker 1>issue here. One. I don't think it was this guy,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but but I did read one neuroscientist who was talking

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about the genome. I mean, because you know, people have said, like,

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so we've uncoded the genome, so we know how to

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>build a brain, so therefore we can build an intelligent

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, no, no, no, that's not what that does.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>If I gave that same person just a list of

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>ingredients and say Lucky Charms cereal, and so you now

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have the ingredients needed to make Lucky Charm cereal, go

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and make it for me. I doubt that they would

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>come back with a bowl that looks anything like Lucky

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Charm cereal. It wouldn't even be ingredients. You'd be I

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>guess giving them a list of atomic ratios. That's true,

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I could go. I was, I was oversimplifying, just to

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>show the the how absurd the argument is. But true,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it's even more absurd than that you need to make

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>some carbohydrates out of them, and and and even if

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you build, even if you build that wet where Again,

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like we said earlier, the emergence of intelligence from that

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>wet where is a whole other question. Now, Joe, I

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 1>know you spent some time looking over our next our

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>next critic Lanier here who uh as, as you pointed out,

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like the villain and iron Man two. Yeah, he

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>does from certain angles. The computer scientist and and vr

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>iluminary jarn Linear looks like Mickey Rourke in Iron Man two.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>This is true. It's a white guy with dreads. I mean,

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he's he's definitely got to look going. Uh he's and

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>also really intelligent dude. Uh you know again vr illuminary

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>like this is basically the guy who popularized the term

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality. He's had a lot to do in the

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>industry down ever since. But he has some really interesting

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>things to say also about the singularity. He he calls

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire concept of it cybernetic totalism. He refers to

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>it as a fanatic ideology and compares it to Marxism

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>his His arguments here are that the idea of the

0:36:55.960 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>singularity is flawed because brains and bodies and culture are

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty unlike computers. Um. Also because Darwin's theories of

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>evolution don't apply perfectly to culture the way that a

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of futurists tend to speak of them as um.

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And then also that whole thing with Moore's law that

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about before. He He furthermore goes on

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to say that the very concept of the singularity is dangerous.

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>This goes back to his comparison to Marxism um, because

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he says that that the concept of the singularity denies

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 1>scientific skepticism, strokes the the the ego of the general

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>computer scientists and um, furthermore encourages and kind of unrealistically

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>rosy sense of predestination, which which all of which he

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thinks could lead to like possibly apocalyptic separation of the

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>haves and have not the technological and economic Yeah. Sure,

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's one of those ideas about trans humanism,

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>is that if this ever does come to pass, we

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>can easily imagine that if such a thing or is possible,

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a very elite few are going to have access to

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it initially. So assuming we've gotten past those testing stages

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>where we've had the people stop exploding when we put

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>computers in them and now they're fine, Um, then you

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>could imagine that really it's just going to be the

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>super duper rich people who are going to have access

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to this, which makes them even more further distanced from

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us. And uh, yeah, there there are

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of science fiction stories that are predicated upon this.

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there are several that movies that came out

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>over the last like twenty four months that have the

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>same premise. And I love his quote that arrogance is

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 1>always a bad strategy and science and philosophy, I suppose

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fine kind of again, a little backhanded diss saying

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that you know this, this whole concept of the singularity

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is more in the world of philosophy than science. Okay,

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.479
<v Speaker 1>speaking of philosophy, we've talked about the philosophical question before.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Then this is slightly separated from the idea of the

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>super intelligence in terms of behavior and capabilities. But is

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it possible that this machine or this set of machines

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or what where it is the super intelligent framework could

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.439
<v Speaker 1>achieve consciousness or the experience of mind and the way

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we think of it. So this is the idea of

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a machine knowing that it can think, knowing that it

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>is what it is, and it is able to make

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 1>uh decisions based upon this information. And we have John

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Searle who's another critic of the singularity. This name might

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 1>sound familiar to you guys. We talked about him about

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the in the Chinese room experiment discussion we had in

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a previous podcast. So this is the experiment where you say,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you're sitting inside a room. Uh, there's a

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>single door and it's got a little slot and it

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>occasionally someone shoves a piece of paper through the slot

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and when you pick it up, it's got a Chinese

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>character written on it, but you don't speak or read

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or understand Chinese at all. What you do is you

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>then you didn't consult an enormous book that gives instructions

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on what to do. When you get a sheet of

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>paper that has any particular Chinese character on and you

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>find the one that corresponds to the sheet of paper

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that was sent through the door, you end up scribbling

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>something else down a sheet of paper. You push that

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>back through the slot. Then the question is do you,

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>as the person inside the room, actually understand Chinese? And

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people would say, well, no, you don't understand it. You're

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>following these instructions, but you don't have any comprehension of

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what it is you're doing apart from when this happens,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do this other thing. And so his argument is that

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to extend the same thing to machines that

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand what they're doing. They're they're carrying out

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>instructions and that's it. The idea is that instruction based

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>computation can't by itself account for the idea of understanding

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. Of course, we've also talked about criticisms of

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that particular thought experiment. The idea that if you take

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the system as a whole, as opposed to just the

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>person inside the room, then would you say it understands Chinese. So,

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you're taking into consideration the book of

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>instructions and the entire apparatus that's involved. Maybe then you

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>would have a more questionable approach, like could you say

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that that understands Chinese. Maybe not in the same way

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as a native speaker would, but maybe in a way

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that is semi analogous perhaps, uh, as opposed to the

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>person in sight, because you could say, well, just think

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of the person is a microchip. That's not the full system,

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just one part of the system. Okay. Anybody else

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>critical of this consciousness question? No, everyone else loves it. Well,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Roger Penrose doesn't. He's a physicist and professor of mathematics

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at Oxford, and he's thinking that we can't duplicate consciousness

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and machines because it depends upon non computational physical processes

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>which we don't yet fully understand. So again, this is

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>another approach of saying the human brain is so complex

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and we only barely know anything about it that we

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>can't hope to simulate it or or even create another

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>mind based upon that little bit of information we have.

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We're just miles and miles away, so that if there

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>ever does come a time where we can do this,

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to require a new understanding of physics that

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we do not currently possess. And because it's going to

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>require that and we don't, you know, you can't say like, oh,

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>we've got a timeline in eight months, we're going to

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 1>understand this. You can't say that. So he says, it's

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to predict. It's probably not going to be

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in the near future. Yeah. So I think something's interesting,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.479
<v Speaker 1>which is that despite the fact that we've got lots

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of really really smart people on both sides of this debate,

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>people say the singularity, it's both possible and near, and

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>people who say possible, but not anytime soon, and then

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>people who say not possible. Despite all that, you can

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>see very clearly people are very quick to jump into

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>one camp or the other on whether or not this

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing. Have you noticed this that you

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>just dive right in, Oh, yeah, utopia, you know, just

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this kind of Curtsewile kind of it's great vision. Probably

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>even more common is the dystopian idea that oh yeah, okay,

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>it means we will be destroyed. Yeah, I I mean

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>my actual responses, there's no assuming that we really do

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in our world where we cannot predict what's going to

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>happen next, then you can't predict whether it's going to

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>be good or bad exactly. That That's my point. What

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to point out there was it's it's

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>such a hard question about whether or not it will

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>happen and what form it will take. How could you

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly predict without knowing those things, the kinds of effects

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it will have. Now, I would say that it's very

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>smart to be cautious. Sure, oh sure, sure, Well, and

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like the old joke of of you

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like that comma that you could get in

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>from a terrible accident might be the happiest time of

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>your life. Uh. And and so you should open up

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>door number three because I got door number one is

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a goat behind it. Okay, So no one else is

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of let's make a deal? All right, Fine,

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I know about the let's make a deal problem, yes,

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>which we should probably do a podcast on at some

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 1>point because it's an interesting problem future of it. It's

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an awesome it's an awesome thought experiment.

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>But the uh, you know what I was going to

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>say is that, yeah, you can't predict it. I I

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>think one safe prediction you could make, assuming again, that

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>would go to the The more fantastical version of the

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>singularity is that human beings would ultimately cease to exist

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>as we understand them today. It doesn't mean that the

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>species would be wiped out and that no, no, uh,

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>other kind of remains of humans would ever know exist.

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>It would just be machines from there on out. But

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 1>they might be transformed in some fundamental way where we

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:28.959
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really refer to them as human beings anymore. Human

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>beings would be something we would use as a term

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about those guys who lived before the singularity

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 1>A right, that whole trans human space baby, super advanced

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 1>X men kind of concept. Yeah, yeah, well yeah. People

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>take the idea of the singularity and then they attribute

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:47.720
<v Speaker 1>all different kinds of effects. You know, it'll mean immortality

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or near immortality. Oh, we'll be able to live forever.

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the next big engineering problem will be how

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>do we stop the heat death at the universe so

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to die then, or there will

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 1>be people who talk about how it means the end

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of work, say, it's going to lead to this this

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>post scarcity world where there's absolutely nothing we need, right,

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this idea of going into sort of a Star Trek

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>future where everything's idea like and no one has to

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>no one has to work, they can pursue whatever whatever

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. Not saying that it wouldn't mean

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>those things. But I do think it's interesting that people

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are using this as as almost kind of a fantasy fulfillment.

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, and I do I don't think that we

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>said earlier. But but kurtswhile UM seems very personally motivated

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from a really intense fear of mortality, of its own mortality, UM,

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's not hidden. He's fairly explicit

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that he wants to extend his life,

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely, and and that that comes from the death

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of I think his father at a relatively young age. Yeah,

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he has UM. He has spoken many times on his

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:53.919
<v Speaker 1>hope that in within his lifetime obviously that we will

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>have UH either conquered death or if not conquered it

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at least extended lie indefinitely. Uh, And that he thinks

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of breakthrough is like the Singularity right

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. Now, obviously, if that breakthrough does happen,

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or if it comes part and parcel with the Singularity,

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>then we will live to see this eventually come to pass.

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately, I would say that if the Singularity

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is indeed a possibility, it will happen. So if it

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is possible, it will happen, because there's going to be

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who's going to do that next step that pushes

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it into that world. It's only if it's not possible

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that we won't see it happen. I don't think there's

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:42.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a future we might not humans, humans not

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not we as in the three people in this room.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna see it happen because I'll be washing

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:53.720
<v Speaker 1>my hair that day. I keep it in in a box.

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>It's in my desk at home, take it out occasionally,

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>try and wiggle out of it. I know exactly what

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you had in mind. You're like Kurts of all. You

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>think that the Singularity is going to give you hair,

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, a long, beautiful hair, shining streaming. Yeah, although

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>actually that that brings up a good point. I mean,

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not like any of us are not personally motivated

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to see this kind of thing happen. It's I mean,

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a beautiful idea, and I totally understand that the

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>seduction of that idea. Sure. Yeah, now, it's just when

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you start looking at you know, it is amazing the

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff we can do today compared to the stuff that

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 1>we could do twenty years ago. But I don't know

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's so amazing that it has us on track

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for this incredibly aggressive timeline that people like Werner and

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Kurtswile have in mind of. You know, by twenty we're

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have this uh, this this world that we

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>can't even begin to describe right now. Certainly, although if

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>those kind of aggressive timelines are leading to people putting

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>real thought into it and and real caution into it,

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>then I think that it's completely worthwhile to have these

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of blowhard standing at the front of the stage.

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the caution is what we're want you to

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about in our next podcast. Yeah, yeah, nice lead in. Yeah,

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So guys, stay tuned because we're going to talk all

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 1>about superhuman intelligent artificial intelligence and how it will try

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to kill you. That will be our next episode. And

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.720
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have suggestions for future episodes of Forward Thinking,

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you should get in touch with us. Let us know

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what you think, tell us what you love about the show,

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us what excites you about the future. You can

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:28.240
<v Speaker 1>email us our addresses f W Thinking at Discovery dot com,

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on Google Plus, Twitter or Facebook.

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Our handle is f W Thinking and we will talk

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. For more on this topic

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot com.

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,