WEBVTT - Lawsuits Challenge Access to Prescription Drug Database (Audio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>States across the country maintain prescription drug monitoring programs, which

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>contained data about prescriptions for controlled substances and supports state's

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>efforts to combat prescription drug abuse. In light of the

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>opioid crisis and the increasing number of deaths across the

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>country from opiate to opioid abuse, states are struggling with

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the question of how much accent access law enforcement officials

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>should have to these databases. New Jersey is currently considering

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a bill that would allow police and process prosecutors to

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>access its database without a core order, but Governor Chris

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Christie opposes the bill. Here to talk with us about

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it and the issue more generally is Robert Mints, a

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>partner at um at Carter and English Bob, Can you

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>describe for us what is in these databases and why

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>states have them? Uh? Sure, Michael, Um. The information that

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are in these databases is really quite extensive. It would

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it requires. It contains information on every prescription for a

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled substance that is dispensed by pharmacies in the state.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So that can include everything from highly addictive prescription opioids

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>such as vigodin and OxyContin to stimulants such as Adderall

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>can It includes anti anxiety drugs, also common pain killers,

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and costs of presence with cody, and these are things

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that are all subject to becoming addictive narcotics. But at

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time, as you can see, it covers a

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>very broad spectrum of potential health issues. Bob. But we've

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>often talked about court cases getting warrants for cell phones.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Here it is the most personal of a person's records,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>their medical records, and for things they might not want

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>people to know. Why not have to get a warrant

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>for this? Well, that's a good point, and you find

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that even state medical boards and medical societies, uh surprisingly

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are coming down on the side of privacy advocates because

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>there is some concern that if individuals know that prescription

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>drugs that they may be taking for all the host

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>of issues that I just mentioned, if that information is

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be readily available to law enforcement without even

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a judge taking a look at it and determining whether

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there's probable cause, that that may drive those individuals underground

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and away from the medical care that they need. So surprisingly,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the doctors themselves who are objecting to this and

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>who are saying that we want to make sure that

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between doctor, between patients and doctors is not

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in any way tampered with, and we don't want to

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>take patients and drive them away from dealing with doctors

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>who are in the best position to help these individuals

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with their addictions. Well, on the other side, there are

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>legislators and prosecutors who think that the police and prosecutors

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should be able to get access to this information very readily.

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>What's the argument from them, Well, the argument from them

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is that there is an epidemic out there. There's no

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>question about that. Death from opioid drugs top thirty thousand

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in which was nearly double the rate from a decade ago.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's very easy in many states for individuals to

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>go doctor shopping, in other words, walk down the street

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and get the same prescription from multiple physicians, and the

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>physician who maybe the third in line, will prescribe an

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>opioid having no knowledge that two other doctors have previously

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>prescribed the same drugs, and the person then can get

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>triple the dose that there that they ought to be

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>actually taking. Bob. In California, the Supreme courts the state

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court rule recently that the state Medical Board can

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>dig through those prescription drug records without a warrant or

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a subpoena. What's the weighing process to be used to

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>determine whether or not a subpoena or a warrant is required. Well,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends June to some extent on who's

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>gaining access. In some states, the Medical Board can have

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that access. In Missouri, for example, there's a new state

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>law or an executive order I should say that gives

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the state Department of Health the information. Um, But this

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>is this law in New Jersey is taking one step

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>further saying that law enforcement can itself gather this information

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>without a warrant, and that is what has some privacy

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>advocates concerned about it. In about a minute, we have

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>left The New York Times reporting today about prosecutors charging

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>drug dealers who are selling up yards with the death

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of people who have used them. What's the theory there

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that prosecutors would follow. Well, there's two things going on here.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>There is a concern about individuals who are addicted, and

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>that's what these UH databases are designed to protect. But

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there's also situations where doctors and pharmacists are actively supplying

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>people and these prosecutions are unique because they are actually

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>going after doctors who are knowingly providing pain killers to

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>people who they know to be addicts, and prosecutors are

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to tie them in in a criminal case on

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that they're criminally responsible for these deaths. Well our

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Bob Mints, a partner at mcarter and English,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for being here to talk about the balance between privacy

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and law enforcement needs to know about prescription drug abuse.