WEBVTT - Matt Levine on the Collapse of FTX and Alameda

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. So, Tracy, we're

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>continuing to talk about the implosion of f t X

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and Alameda the Sam Bankman Freed empire. Yesterday we talked

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to two people who are involved in the story in

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>different ways, one who is a market maker who had

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>used and got caught out on the f t X site,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>another one who had attempted to blow the whistle. But

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of course we're still just sort of like beginning to

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>understand the story, right a very fast moving story. But

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that people are talking about right now,

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>with the benefit of hindsight, of course, is the infamous

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed episode of Odd Thoughts. And in that

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>episode we had him on with Bloomberg opinion columnist Matt Levine.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about how DeFi works, and of course he

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>described it as the sort of magical money making box, right,

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and so in retrospect, and at the time, of course,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people were pretty you know, in shock by those comments.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But now everyone's going back and listening to that in retrospect,

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and it also helps explain perhaps certain aspects of the

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>f t X balance sheet, particularly the tokens that it

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>used to capitalize its balance sheet. Anyway, so we have

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to have Matt Levine back on. He's been writing a

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lot about this story. It's been a must read his coverage,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course he was there with us on that episode.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So Matt Levine, thank you so much for joining us.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me start kind of with a simple question, which is,

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what is your summary or how would you describe why

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>f t X collapsed. What's the basic model of what

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>happened here? So it's a little bit unclear, but basically

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>what seems to have happened is that f t X

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>has a affiliated cryptoh called Alameda h Alameda seems to

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have made some bad bats somehow or other, it ran

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>into trouble, and to prop it up at some point

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>over the summer, probably ft X started sending a lot

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of ft X customer money to Alameda, which Alameda then

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.119
<v Speaker 1>posted to its own lenders or otherwise lost. And then

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>last week, uh, there were some doubts about fd X

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and customers started withdrawing their money from

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>fd X, and ft X realized that didn't have their money,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and it went bankrupt in about twenty minutes m um

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that it did so prior to recent events. What was

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>your impression of the relationship between f t X and Alameda.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I didn't really have much of

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>an impression one way or the other. Obviously, there are

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conspiracy theories about what ft X and

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Alimata were doing because they were run basically by the

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>same group. Would be the same people who kind of

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>were ball roommates and a big apartment in the Bahamas Um.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>They were founded by the same person. They were clearly connected,

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and there were sort of these vague representations about them

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>being separate, but like you know, not a lot of

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>necessarily enforceability to that, so I didn't really know. I

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>assume that alimated as a market maker on the Atactic exchange,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, it may or may not have

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>had some benefits from being the affiliated market maker. When

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you hear people complaining about these things, you often think

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that the essential complaint is Alameda has some advantage in

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>making markets on ft X. It makes too much money

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>by trading against FTX customers because it knows something that

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone else in the exchange doesn't know. You know, I

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I never find those stories that like, that's the story

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in in standard equity market structure, and I don't find

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it like that exciting. Might be true, but it's not

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that exciting to be like, oh, they can see the order,

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but a little bit faster than everyone else. That can

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be an advantage. But um, but I I don't know

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that those stories aren't that compelling. But it seems increasingly

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>likely that that is not at all what was happening here,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>because the basic problem here was very much not that

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>alimadd was making too much money Elamated it was losing

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>too much money. So the actual like problematic relationship here

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much that Alamada lost a bunch of money

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in fd X just bashed over its customer money to Alamada.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>There are other possible stories that are even worse, and

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to talk too much about them because

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they're all sort of, you know, speculative. But some speculations

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are basically that Alamada was more or less in the

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>business of losing money on fd X, that rather than

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Alimated being too good at trading on fd X, Alamated

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was bad at trading on ft X. And so if

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you went to FDx as someone else, as as a

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>crypto hedge fund, or even as a retail customer and

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you traded on FX, you've got really good prices because

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Alimated was making really bad prices because they were losing

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>money on every trade. And if you believe that, then

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you could tell a story that's like, well, ft X

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>became a very popular exchange and made a lot of

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>money in trading fees because it offered this really good

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>trade getting experience to customers by basically having its affiliated

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund lose money on every trade. And you know,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a great story, except that if the way that

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the affiliated hedgehund can afford to lose money on every

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>trade is by taking the customers money, then it becomes

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a really bad story, becomes you know, effectively a Ponzi scheme.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that that's what happened. There is

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly since speculation about that. But in any case, the

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of standard story of like Alameda has too many

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>advantages and makes too much money by trading on ft

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>X does not really seem to be true. I want

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to just that point is really key because when I

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>talked to sort of like professional crypto traders prior to

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>all this, like back up the summer or earlier this year.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>They really liked f t X and they you know,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the liquidation engine, which I think we talked about on

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the episodes with you and SPF was something

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they really liked it. They really liked the professional It

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>seemed very professional, worked really well for them. And so

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this idea that again we don't really know for sure,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that maybe some of this was only sustainable because of

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the loss making trading arm of the SPF empire. Again

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know, but that would sort of explain

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>many things at once at once potentially. Yeah, Like there's

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of two points there. One is is, yeah, the

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 1>liquidation engine is one possible avenue that people have pointed

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to as a way that alimated could be like losing

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>money to provide a good customer experience on ft X

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and then through the back door of taking customer money

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, that being a bad story. But the

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that like you know, investors like ft

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>X because like it had good technology and it had

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like good products, and it was you know, there's a

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of like sort of finger pointing it, like venture

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>capitalists and and and sort of everyone who dealt with

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>ft X saying like, you know, they were bamboozled by this,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but like there was something there, you know, like the

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>exchange was good. Now, part of why the exchange was

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>good might have been, you know, sort of deeply problematic

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>financial dealings, but part of it was, like, you know,

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a good exchange that I built it well.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I often find myself in crypto thinking like there

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was so much money to be made, Like why did

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to make money in bad ways when like

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you could have just taken fees and gotten super rich.

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's there's an element of that too.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So maybe now is a good time to bring in

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the infamous Box episode of All Lots, where we had

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed plus Matt Levin on talking about the business.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt asked Sam to describe yield farming to him, and

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he famously described it as basically a magic box that

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you put money into and more money comes out. And

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, all of us were there when

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he when Sam said this, and we were all pretty shocked. Um,

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we were shocked to hear someone describe defy basically as

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a pond z. But in retrospect, the really surprising thing

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about all of this was that it seems like Sam

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>was basically describing what he ended up doing with two

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>tokens so f t T and serum or SRM. Yeah.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in some ways, it's not that shocking that

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the head of a centralized exchange would say a lot

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of stuff and defies Bonzi schemes, right Like, in some

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>ways he was you know, he wasn't talking about crypto

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of broad concept. He was talking about

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a specific element of defy where you know, in some

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>loose sense, defy as a competitor to centralized exchanges like FTX,

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and he might not like them just you know, they

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>might be a you know, he might he might have

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>incentive or you know, he might have reason to talk

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to say bad things about them. So that's one thing.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I did take away from that was

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just like a sort of general level of you know,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, i'd say cynicism, but like I would have

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>said something like agnosticism about crypto, right Like, what he

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>said was not that, you know, every cryptocurrency is this

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>brilliant project that will change the world. What he said

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, look, you can abstract away from the claims

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that are made about these cryptocurrencies and just sort of

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about like their financial characteristics, and you know, at

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, the financial characteristics were kind of that they

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>went up. And so you know, as the guy running

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in exchange who is making money from crypto volatility and

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>from from interest in crypto, you know, I I interpreted

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that as sort of like this clear eyed, like I

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>am making money because people keep putting their money into

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>into this asset class and I don't fully understand it,

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna keep making money for it, which is like,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>when I put it that way, like a cynical view.

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, I also think that a lot of people

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in traditional finance are not, you know, necessarily vouching for

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the business model of every company who stocked their trade. Right.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, you know, you're a market structure guy.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't worry too much about the underlying business. So

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I sort of I was not you know, I was

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked that he said it, because it was

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>great tape, But I wasn't like, oh my god, this

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>guy is running upon the scheme, right. I sort of

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is the market structure guy. But yeah,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as you said there, you know, f t X had

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>its own token, and the token you not entirely just

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a magic money box, right, I mean, the token is

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like shares of stock and f t X.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not really f t X as a company has

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>SHOs of stocks that did raise money, but like the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>f t T token is kind of like a tokenized

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>version of, you know, a bet on the future cash

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>loose of f t X. And there's also another token

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>called Serum, which is sort of a weirder case. Sirium

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is like this decentralized finance, like a decentralized exchange protocol

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Salona blockchain that you know, it's not exactly

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>owned by f t X, but is you know, it's

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of started by f t X and Alimta and

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like clearly has ties to them, and it's sort of like,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had interpreted as kind of like FTX

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is bet on like if everyone really wants decentralized exchanges,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>then they won't want to trade on ft X, but

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like sirium will be sort of like the f t

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>X of decentralized exchanges. And fine, he started these companies

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, these you know, these entities and issued these

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>tokens because like you know, you do that in crypto.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that when he was sort of

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>shopping for a rescuer last week, he was circulating this

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet and it basically showed that, like to exaggerate slightly,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>basically everything at ft X they were all they had

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was like these tokens. So they started these companies or whatever,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>these like you know, f t X and Serum are

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>like you know, trading it to these exchanges. They issued

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>these tokens SERUM and ft T and like that's fine,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of part of the crypto business. But then

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it turned out this balance sheet that circulated last week

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when when SPF was was shopping for rescue financing for

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fd X, like most of their assets are like a

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of their assets, certainly more than their net equity,

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>were in these tokens, and at like really implausible evaluations.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Basically they would issue like a little bit of these tokens.

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>They trade a little bit in the market. It's unclear

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>if anyone other than all I made it was actually

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>trading them, but they had a market price. And then

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you take that tiny bit you know, there's like a

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred millions circulating it, and you multiply that by the

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, millions more tokens that held in reserve, and

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you say, oh, we've got like two billion dollars of

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>room token. It's very hard to imagine anyone putting a

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollar valuation on all those tokens. And so

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in some sense, like what happened at FTX was kind

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of what he described to us on that add box

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>where he got a lot of money against the box,

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and what was in the box was these tokens that

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be worthless, and now the money has come.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people in crypto who talked about

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>changing the world, and you sort of have like, you know,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's like the Bitcoin view of the world about

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, monetary disorder and the FED. I think there's

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a different world. I don't know how to articulate vitalis philosophy,

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but like crypto itself can sort of reorganize society in

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a positive way. And my interpretation of the box comment

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like yours that he saw. Basically, crypto

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is a way to make money, and of course SBF

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>has his own vision or head or his own vision

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of how to change the world through the effect of

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>altruism philosophy but that basically my read at the time

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was he more or less cynically saw a huge opportunity

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to make money from all of these de facto ponzis

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to filter money through his own causes. Now on the

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>tokens Serum and F T T here's something that I'm

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like a little confused about. But and you've written about

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>this a lot, so okay, No, there they were holding

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>these tokens of their own creation on their books at

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>these multibillion dollar evaluations, which they almost certainly couldn't get

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Who was that for? Because they're not

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a public company, so it wasn't like they needed to say,

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>show these two investors per se, Like what would what

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think the purpose of these this uh, these

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of inflated marks on a private balance sheet? Where

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>who are they trying? If the point was was it

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>self deception about the strength or balance sheet? Was about

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the auditor? Like what what what purpose did this serve? Yeah,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a good question. I don't know the answer, Um.

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think part of the answer is, like

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the place where we immediately see this is this excel

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of rough balance sheet that they circulated to rescue financers, Right,

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so that was the that's that's the audience we know

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of right where they were like, we need rescue financing.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>We actually have positive net equity, so if you rescue us,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know you'll do well. And you know, if you

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the totals on the balance sheet, it's like, yeah,

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>there's more assets than liabilities. And then you like look

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at the actual you know, entries, and you're like, oh,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>these are all just these weird tokens that you can

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>never monetize. That So the immediate audience is like the

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>people who might provide bailout financing, where the audience for

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for like these inflated numbers. But you know, that doesn't

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really answer your question because like, you know, the whole

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like they had they created these tokens before last week,

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and like presumably they were thinking before this

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like oh, you know, we have billions and billions of

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar was both of these tokens. So I do think

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that part of the answer and I don't know here,

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really speculating, but part of the answer seems to

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be that the f T T token, which is really

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing that brought this down, right, like like what

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>triggered or crisis of confidence in f t X was

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>basically coined us publishing a story about how much ft

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>T tokens Alameda had, and then CZ and Finance tweeting,

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to dump our our f t

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>T token and that kind of collapsed everything. So, like

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the ft T token was was doing some work, and

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the basic work that it was doing was

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that presumably Alameda was using it as collateral for loans,

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a reasonable guest to say that

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it was using it as collateral for loans from ft X,

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, possibly of f t X customer money, and

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, use of this inflated amount of

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>f t t is collateral was designed to sort of

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like make everyone feel a little bit better about it, right,

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you can sort of I don't know if you

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>can necessarily tell your orders we got fair value back

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in collateral, but you can, like you can tell your

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>junior employees that, you can tell yourself that you can

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of like point to that. I'm not really sure

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what going on. What's going on, but clearly like

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody is posting f tt is collateral for something and

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>having an inflated market value of FTT made that possible.

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>The serum stuff, it's less clear to me that how

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that was done, you know what what what purpose that served,

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And it might be just you know, we shopped that

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>serum around desert looking for valad financing. So, Matt, one

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you hear from crypto proponents even

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>now is this idea that, well, the f t X saga,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't show that there's necessarily a problem with crypto.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It shows that there's a problem with bad actors in

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space. And f t X wasn't a truly

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>decentralized exchange. It was a centralized one. And not only that,

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but it was performing all these different market functions all

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in one entity, so you know, brokerage, custodian um,

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>all of that. Is that like a valid excuse at

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. Is the problem here a market structure one,

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or is the problem something fundamental to the crypto business? Well,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you can completely separate those things.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Insofar as like, I think it's true that like bitcoin

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as like a concept is not really affected by this, right,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But I also think that like crypto is you know,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of refers to a broad ecosystem and it's just

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly the case that big centralized exchanges are a big

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>part of crypto, right, And certainly there are people who

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do not use centralized exchanges and who sort of self

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>custody their coins and use decentralized finance and are very

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>boulish on decentralized finance and think everyone who uses f

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>t X or coin based or binance or any other

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>centralized exchanges is a chump and is not sort of

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>true to the true meaning of crypto, And like that's fine,

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but like it is hard to imagine a world where

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto is really big and really mainstream and really you know,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>big institutional investors are putting money into crypto and there

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are no centralized exchanges and everything occurs on the blockchain.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I just think, like that is a world where you

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>can do some stuff like that, right, and where where

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>people are building stuff on that, But it's not the

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>world of sort of like mass mainstream adoption. The world

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>of mass stream mainstream adoption is like there's a company

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>with a website and you you know, you have a password,

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can trade on a centralized platform that is

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>fast and not run on the blockchain, and you have

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like allegible entity that a black rock can custody its

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>coins within all these things. And so like when one

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest and most respected and most sort of

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like compliant seeming of the big the big offshore crypto exchanges,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about that, But like when when at the

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>extra was like sort of viewed as a good actor

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be very much not a good idea,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Like you, I think that it is fair to say, like,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the crypt cryptosystem broadly needs to do some

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>introspection about that. And I think that like some of

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that is like you have these giant levered financial institutions

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that don't have public balance sheets and don't really have

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a regulator, right or like sort of have a regulator,

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but they have a million different entities and no one

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>knows which one runs the exchange, and the regulator is

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the Bahamas, and like they're like one

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger you know, contributors. You know, like there's

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like what you don't have is like

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>an ecosystem where the biggest players are headquartered in like

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US and Europe and have like a

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>regulator who has you know, fifty examiners in their offices

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>every day looking over their books, and who have capital

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>regulation and stress tests and public balance sheets and all

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>these things. And I don't. I mean, I know, Joe,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you are. You're skeptical about the future for crypto regulation.

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And I am too, because I think, like the path

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of cryptos, that these big firms have sort of grown

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>up in a sort of like you know, jurisdictional limbo,

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>where like they all live offshore and are sort of

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, get to choose their own regulation a little bit.

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>There's an advantage to a bank of being an American bank, right,

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and the advantage is like the FED, but also like

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.479
<v Speaker 1>the sort of market confidence that comes of like you're

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>an American bank, You're listed on the New York Stock

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has change, like your balance sheets are audited by American auditors,

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>like all the like US regulatory apparatus is helpful for

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>banks that want to raise money and trade and in

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto like that doesn't really exist like it is. It's

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, right, there are some you know, crypto

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>entities that make the choice of we're gonna be in

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the US, We're gonna try to be regulated by the US,

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try to be US public companies because that

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be really onerous and annoying, and I

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>think they all find that because US crypto regulation is tough,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>but also it's going to in the long run lead

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to more confidence because we are going to be more

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>trustworthy than people who form their exchanges offshore and don't

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>publish their balance. I guess it's sort of like you know,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>when any financial entity implodes, you know, you can just

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in finance, you can implode for sort of like benign reasons.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>You make bets, you thought they were going to go

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one way, they go the other way. You have to

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>close up shop, and then there's fraud. Like it is

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>weird when it's an exchange because we don't think of

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>exchanges as making bets and typically you know, they say

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>or holding our or holding your money and they don't

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>take positions, etcetera. Yeah, I do want to push back

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on that a little bit, just because like like crypto

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>exchange is not as a broker dealer. So I was

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so this is this is basically the question I was

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>going to ask, which is like, is the version of

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this story that I don't know not benign because people

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>are destroyed and like you know, they may have a

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>million people have lost money and you know, massive damage.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But is there a you know you talked earlier about

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>like there's this sort of like worse version of the

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>mainstream narrative. Is there like a better version of the

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>mainstream narrative that we perhaps aren't thinking about. It's tough.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, as I was saying, like, the

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>crypto exchanges are not just like people use the word exchange,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and so they think of like this neutral thing that

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like that just matches buys themselves, right, I mean

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the crypto exchanges are broken dealers. They hold their customers

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>money for them, They provide leverage to their customers. And

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>so if you're a futures exchange, like you're sort of

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>taking risk, right, You're taking market risk, and so there

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>are versions of the story where you get sort of

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>mismatched on that risk and then you implode and it's

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a series of understandable but bad market judgments. I think

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that the reporting about this has been pretty bad. I'm sorry,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean the reporting is bad. I mean, like

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the sort of effects that have come up seemed pretty

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bad for for fd X, right. I mean I think

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, fd X is terms of service as

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we can't use your crypto deposits for our own purposes,

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and SPF tweeted that we don't invest customer deposits even

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>in treasuries. And then it turns out, as far as

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, in fact, customer deposits a ring center

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>over to Alimata to make some sort of bets that

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>lost money, right, so that's bad. You could tele aversion

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of the story that's not so bad, right, where it's

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like Alimated as a customer on the exchange, we made

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a reason possibly biased, possibly you know, unfortunate decision to

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>extend credit to Alamada, as you know, part of our

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 1>function as a as a crypto exchange, and like you know,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the crypto exchange, that exchange that extends leverage to customers,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Alimada as a customer extended leverage to that customer, and

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it blew up and took all of you know, took

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>all the exchanges capital with it, and the exchanges capital

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is usually in some ways anonymous with the with the

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>other customer deposits, Like I don't know, in the abstract,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you can tell a story like that, but it's not

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>not the most likely explanation at this point. So I

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have one more question, and it's kind of a process question,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but with your former lawyer's hat on the complicated structure

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of the f t X empire, and I think there

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>was a sort of a diagram floating around recently that

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>showed something like a hundred thirty corporate entities, and I

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>think in the diagram they mixed up some non f

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>t X entities with actual f t X entities. But

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that just shows how confusing it all is. The fact

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's f t X U S and f t

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>X International and you know, one of them is based

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas, and Alameda itself is based in Hong Kong.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>How much does that complicate I guess the resolution and

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>potential prosecution of what we've been talking king about. It's

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a mess in terms of entertinuing. Like the thing that

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm really in the dark about is f t X

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>U S, which is like the US entity which exists

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>because U SCRIPTA regulation is really tough and so you

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>can't do it. Like a lot of the products that

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are the bread and butter of f t X, you

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>can't trade in the US because of some you know,

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>interaction with either securities law or like futures law. And

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>so fd X US offers sort of a subset of

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>ft X products and as you know, possibly more regulated

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and possibly safer. And for a while the storyline was

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that fd X dot Com was bust and bankrupt, but

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that f t X dot u S was was like

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, walled off from that. And now there's you know,

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be some trouble at ft X u

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>S two and it's just unclear like how intertwined these

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>things are financially, but like, you know, regulatorily, they were different,

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of like prosecution and in terms

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>of like like broadly speaking, like FTX dot com is

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas because it first products that would have

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>required like regulatory like let's say registration in the US,

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>like products that securities in the US and would have

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to get security registration and like require FTX to registers

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a stock exchange or products that would be like regulated futures,

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>where the ft X would have to registers the futures exchange.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>There would be and and you know, the u S

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>regulation is tough enough that it might be hard to

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>actually do those things. And so f t X didn't

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>trade those products in the U S. UM and ft

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>X dot Com is not not I think, technically open

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to US persons. But if the question is, can the

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>U s. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>York go after x ft X dot Com for wire fraud?

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Which is like kind of the question here, like the

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>answer is yeah, of course, like easy, like and I

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know the exact mechanism, but basically, like

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, at some point someone's moving dollars from a

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>bank into fd X dot com and probably a lot

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the people his money got lost at FTX dot

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>com or not, like you know, US retail invests. But

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are you know Cayman Islands crypto hedge funds that are

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>run by New Yorkers or whatever? Right, Like there's enough

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>like connection to New York that I don't think, you know,

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I think in general, like the the federal prosecutors are

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>aggressive and creative about finding US jurisdiction for foreign companies

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>doing things to foreigners abroad when they want to UM,

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think this is like this is like

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they're one of their harder challenges. Like I think there's

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be enough kind of US stuff here that if that,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like US prosecutors are gonna feel very comfortable looking into it,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>which is not to say that I'm you know, I

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to pre judge whether they'll find any crimes,

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>but like I think that they'll find jurisdiction they did.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the problem won't be it's like, oh,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>they committed these crimes, but during the Bahamas, we can't

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>do anything. If they conclude the door crimes, they'll find

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a way. Yeah, being in the Bahamas is a way

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to avoid securities registration requirements is not a way to

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>record as criminal frog law. Matt Levine, thank you so

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>much for your perspective. Great to have you back, and

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this was a very helpful conversation. Yes, thanks Matt. Obviously,

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Tracy talking to Matt is always helpful. And I want

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to start with actually just that last point. We don't

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>know as of recording this right now on November six,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>whether there is going to be criminal charges ultimately brought

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the f t X case, but it's sort of

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>useful to know that simply by virtue of technically domiciling

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>ft X. I guess not technically because that's where they

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>were based in the Bahamas that that is not some

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like escape card so to speak. Yeah, absolutely,

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems like it isn't. The other thing that's standing

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>out to me as I think back to all of

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this is, I think the f t X LaMDA relationship.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there was always a perception in the industry

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that there was something there, that there was some sort

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, beneficial relationship as Matt described it. Maybe

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they were getting like early info on tokens that we're

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about to list on f t X and then flipping

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>them and things like that. But in retrospect, in retrospect,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like what they were doing was pretty simple

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and just going massively long various coins, Like there wasn't

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really a secret sauce. There wasn't necessarily like some amazing

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>liquidation engine. It seems like they were just taking outside

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>bets on digital tokens. Yeah, you know, there's the thing

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's the James Street pedigree, Right, It's

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not just Sam, but others who he worked with who

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>had gone through this sort of like famous quant trading

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>shop Jane Street, which we talked about the same the

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>first time, and so you sort of get the impression like, okay,

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Alameda is going to recreate Jane Street in some way

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but for crypto, but I mean maybe not. And this idea,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think everyone writ is Matt was saying,

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, one way or another, it seems like

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Alameda lost a ton of money. So either they were

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to do something sophisticated and they couldn't do it,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they were taking bad directional bets, or they

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>were spending badly, or it was sort of like this

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.959
<v Speaker 1>lost leader to make the ft X platform more attractive

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to institutional investors. But whatever it is, it does not

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>seem to have been that sort of like super brilliant

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>quawn shop that you would sort of expect from like

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Jane Street alone. No, and the other thing that stands

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>out to me, and this has been a recurring theme

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast recently, but this idea of truly decentralized

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto versus centralized players and exchanges. And I've said this

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>before on Twitter, but I very much agree with Matt

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea that like everyone is going to be running

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>their own node and storing their keys in like cold storage,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and no one's ever going to need to interact with

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a centralized player, I think is unrealistic because not only

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a not only is a lot of crypto stuff still

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for people to figure out and do on

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>their own, but be people want to do stuff with

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 1>their money, right, You want to get additional credit for it,

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to trade it, you don't want it necessarily

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>just keep it on a wallet and never actually use it.

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's what a lot of the centralized entities and

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>exchanges actually did. Yeah, I mean, look, you can trade

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and speculate on a defy exchange. But I think Matt

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is right, and it's I think it's a definitely true

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that in the last few years there is no way

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto would have gotten as big had it not been

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for numerous websites where you log in and you have

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a password and you move your money onto a website like,

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which is like the idiom of normal finance, right, And

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so maybe there is like an alternate scenario in which

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone in crypto like really adhered to like these sort

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of like defy principles, and maybe that would have been better,

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that would have been more you know less.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's something, but I don't think there's

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>any way in that world it would have gotten nearly

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as big or like attracted this sort of like money

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>risk seeking behavior in such volume. Then I agree, al right,

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it there for now? Let's leave it there.

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast.

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi Isn't All. You can

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Levine. He's at matt Levine. Follow our producers Carmen

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez at Carmen Armon and Dash Bennett at Dashbot. And

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>check out all of the Bloomberg podcasts under the handle

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts, and for more Odd Lots content, go to

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where Tracy and I

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>blog to push the transcripts, and we even have a

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>once a week newsletter that you should check out and subscribe.

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.