WEBVTT - Sam Altman Shock Ouster from OpenAI

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heinde of Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Coming up.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>We take a deep dive into the shock olster of

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Sam Altman from Open Ai. What happened, what lies ahead

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>for the AI startup as most of the company's staff

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>threatened to depart and.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 3>A clear win for Microsoft shares of the tech giant rises.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Analysts see risks contained for the company's AI ambitions as

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Altman joins Microsoft to lead a new advanced AI research team.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Plus, we'll speak to developers in the field of AI

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and the venture capitalists backing them this hour to discuss

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>what the ecosystem looks like for these startups and in

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the upheaval and Open Ai.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 3>This we speak, there are hundreds of Open Ai staff

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>that are taking action. Let's break down the news with

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Rachel Metz, who is joining me on set in

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco, having stayed up with me all weekend to

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 3>break this story. What do we know about what's happening

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>inside Open AIHQ right now?

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 4>It sounds like the majority of the company's employees have

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 4>said that they will leave if their demands are not there.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 4>They are really upset about this ousting of Sam Altman

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 4>and then the subsequent resignation of Greg Brockman.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So the numbers, I think are that five hundred and

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine out of seven hundred and seventy staff. In

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>other words, the vast majority of staff have signed this letter.

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Who side did this staff on here? I mean, this

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>is hard to understand that we're talking about everyone other

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>than those that have departed already.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, pretty much. I mean this What I thought was

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 4>really interesting when I saw this letter early this morning

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 4>is that it makes it very very clear whose side

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 4>most of the employees are on. Like I think before

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 4>there was a sense that a lot of people were

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 4>on Sam Aultman's side, but it wasn't crystal clear. This

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 4>is saying, hey, we almost all of us are very angry,

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 4>so angry we're willing to leave our jobs at what

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 4>has been the world's leading independent AI company.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Rachel number twelve took my eye on the list of

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>those who have signed this letter. It's Ilia Ilia Siskeva,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>who is on the board, who.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Made the cools.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>We understand through all of your guys reporting made the

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>calls to Sam Auntlan and Gregg himself to basically let

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>them know that they're no longer going to be at

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the company.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>That's really a bit confusing, right, I mean at first

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 4>I was like, hmm, but you know, it's been a

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 4>really long day that's lasted three days, So yeah, I

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 4>mean I think there he we did. I think it

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>was this morning that he made a mistake, right and

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 4>he I mean it sounds I don't think he wants

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 4>the company to explode. Perhaps he didn't anticipate what the

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 4>consequences would be of the actions he was taking.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And no wonder we are getting so much views and

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>theories being shared ultimately about corporate governance. Will go into

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 2>that much more later in the show, Rachel, But I'm

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>interested in also ultimately who's being drafted in to replace it.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>How on earth does the new CEO of open AI

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>try to ensure that we don't have this mass departure.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 4>That is an excellent question. So the person who was

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>named very late yesterday as the new CEO by the board,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Emmett's sheer. He was a co founder of the video

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>game streaming service Twitch, which has also of course been

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 4>used to for all kinds of streaming at this point,

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 4>em it is a little bit is more on the

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 4>conservative side of tech chnology development in the sense that

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 4>he is in favor of slowing things down somewhat, which

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 4>is what Ilia had been also pushing. So sort of,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, aligned with the board members and with Ilia,

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna probably have to do a lot of convincing

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 4>to the staff if he wants to get them to

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 4>stay with him in charge. It's going to be very

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 4>interesting to see what happens over the next I was

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 4>about to say days, but let's say hours.

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's recap. It's only been forty eight hours essentially,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe more since news broke that Sam Outman have been fired.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 3>This is the timeline of what happened. You and I

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>and all of our colleagues spent most of the weekend

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>with everyone else thinking Sam's coming back. This is happening

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>based on the reporting since explained to us what actually

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>happened and the chronology of events.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 4>So it how far back do you want me to go?

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Gosh, let's say we start with Sam being fired on Friday.

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, on Friday, we were told that Sam had been

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>fired by the board, which I think came as a

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 4>shock to probably pretty much anybody except for the board.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 4>Once that happened, it was a scramble to figure out, well,

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, what happened here was did something really bad happen?

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 4>It sounded very mysterious, and information started coming from Open

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 4>Ai executives themselves in the form of memos they were

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 4>sending internally that the board has not told us of

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>any malfeasance, for instance, which I think was the word

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 4>used in a memo that bred Lightcap sent out to Yes, yeah,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 4>thank you. So then it started to sound like Mira Marati,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 4>who was named interim CEO. She had been the chief

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 4>technology officer and increasingly a prominent figure at the company

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 4>alongside Sam. It sounded like perhaps she was going to

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 4>rehire Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, who had been also

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 4>at the company and quit after Sam was ousted. Then,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 4>in a last minute twist, it sounded like Emmett Sheer

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 4>was hired, and now everybody assigned this letter, or not everybody,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 4>but most people assigned this letter saying, oh, we're going

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 4>to join this company that Microsoft is now creating, that

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Sam and Gregor are going to run. So if you

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you don't bring them back essentially So,

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about you, guys, but I keep just

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of turning left and right. I'm not really sure

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 4>what's going to happen next year.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Whiplash and a whole lot of discussion on what is

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>meant to be holiday week. Rachel Mets, We thank you

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>so much making time for us when I know you've

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 2>just been at the grindstone with your reporting. We thank

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you so much. And look we just finished where well,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Rachel was discussing where next for Microsoft as it sets

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>up this new AI focus point, what is the impact

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 2>on the publicly traded company, what of Satyr and Nadella

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and really his ability to turn this story around in

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the final few hours joining us as Jeffrey's senior Internet analyst,

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>brend Phil Brent, You've got a rating on Microsoft four

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars price target? Is this a positive as it stands.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 6>As a standard, It's a win win for Microsoft. I

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 6>mean they get the number one up, up and coming

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 6>individual and tech leading AI journey. And then secondarily, they've

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 6>been talking about this for a long time. How do

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 6>they reduce their independence on one vendor like open ai

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 6>and spread their AI bats across open source, across their

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 6>own languages, across other languages. And we think that Altman

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 6>can probably steer that chip in a really good way.

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 6>From internally at Microsoft, obviously, from a hiring perspective, if

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 6>you've got over five hundred people signing a petition that

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 6>feel this strong, I've never seen this in my coverage

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 6>at Tech in twenty years, or literally five hundred people

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 6>sign a letter.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 7>Internally, you've never seen this at Tech ever.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 6>So if they feel that strongly about him, and he says, hey,

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 6>would you like to come over here to Microsoft? Like,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 6>what's the tailent pool? Microsoft can to look like? You

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 6>know two months from now, it's going to be insane.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, friend. The question that I hear out in the

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 3>market is will Microsoft buy out the rest of open Ai?

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Can Microsoft buy out the rest of open Ai?

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if they can.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 6>They obviously have an eleven billion dollar plus stake, so

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 6>they care for the future.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 7>They want to ensure this happens.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 6>My view is actually open Ai will get eventively.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 7>That board settled down.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 6>We'll get the employee settled down and hopefully keep everyone

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 6>in place. And I don't know their incentive structure, but

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure that I'd want to lose all my

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 6>incentive comp and stock options in open Ai just because

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm upset the CEO left.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 7>I don't think that makes a lot of sense.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 6>So my sense is this ship will be calmed at

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 6>open Ai Microsoft with Via Nadella.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 7>He's the best negotiator intact.

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 6>He'll figure out a way to ensure that they keep

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 6>this intact, keep their investment preserved, but also have the

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 6>best of having you know, Sam and team there. So

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 6>I look at I think there's going to be a

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 6>better outcome, hopefully for open Ai and their employees, where

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 6>they can get SOMEDISI board members in and get them

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 6>calmed down. I understand why they're is upset, but again,

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 6>I can't recall a story in twenty years where that

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 6>many people signed a petition would walk out. I think

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 6>that you're going to end up seeing a situation where

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 6>there's a middle ground that's met and that hopefully both

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 6>camps survive peacefully and we move on and we can

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 6>of enjoy our Thanksgiving weak.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Microsoft remains the key player in AI? Therefore,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>can they remain basically still having the distance between themselves

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and ultimately the viewpoint that alphabet's behind.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 7>For example, Microsoft's crushing it.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 6>I was up at the Microsoft Developer Conference Seattle last

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 6>week and you could barely get in to see some

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 6>of these demos. The pace of innovation is like nothing

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 6>I've seen covering tech for twenty years. You talk to

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 6>product managers that are not spokespeople for Microsoft and talk

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 6>about the pace of the innovation. And we were talking

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 6>about months when they said it was go time to

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 6>launch in a product. Now the product isn't perfect, it's

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 6>not gonna it's not going to be the smoothest ride

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 6>out of the gate. But the level of innovation is

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 6>beyond anything we have seen at any any time I've

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 6>spent covering Microsoft, even as a developer of Microsoft in

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 6>the nineties. This pace of innovation is off the charts.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 6>They are so far ahead of everyone else. And we

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 6>do believe that, you know, Amazon is gonna also be

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 6>in the mix. So our thesis is Amazon and Microsoft.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 6>When the enterprise Google wins the consumer market, they're very

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 6>different markets, but all three will have a seat at

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 6>the table.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, Jeffrey, Senior Internet analyst Brent Hill on the

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft side of this story. Coming up on the program,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>we will continue the conversation on Sam Mountain and on

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>open ais one. Hundreds of employees threaten to leave the

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>company if the board doesn't reside the VC The AI

0:10:47.160 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 3>reaction is next. This is Bloomberg Technology to recap our

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 3>top story. In a letter to the open ai board

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>from hundreds of employees, the vast majority of those left

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 3>that open ai is saying they will resign from the

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 3>company and join the newly announced Microsoft subsidiary led by

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Sam Outman and Greg Brockman. If the board of open

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>ai does not resign, lots of implications joining us now,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>as someone that knows open Ai very well worked with

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 3>that company now leads his own startup, Octane. Let's bring

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a match licked Octane AI CEO. First off, what have

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 3>you heard from open ai? You are essentially a developer

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>that relies on the underlying technology. You're trying to build

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>using underlying technology. Have you had any update from open Ai?

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, Octer the I We've been around since twenty sixteen,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 8>we now are built on top of open EI's GPT four.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 9>We help entrepreneurs run AI automations.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 8>We've helped them generate over half a billion dollars and

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 8>a lot of that is because of what OPENINGI has

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 8>provided us. So this weekend has been really tumultuous. I'm

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 8>a big believer in Sam. The community is a big

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 8>believer in Sam. I know him from back when I

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 8>was my combinator in twenty twelve.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 9>But open aie we just had dev day.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 8>I was there. It was the peak of their technology.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 8>Excitement was off the church. It went really really well.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 8>Now there's a little bit of a lot of mistrust

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 8>on what's going to happen.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 9>I am hearing from open.

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 8>Ai that they are expressing support for developers. They're going

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 8>to make sure the API stay up, the technology is

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 8>not going to go down. But this weekend has been

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 8>a lot for anyone in the AI ecosystem.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's stay with your relationship with Sam and the

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 3>company from minute. You know lots of people that work there,

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 3>You're friends with people who rely on the ecosystem as well.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 3>In your minds, is there a path forward where Sam

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>comes back to open ai or were looking at a

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>new look open ai and trying to understand how you

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 3>work with them and how others work with this new

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 3>look open Ai.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 8>It's it's really unclear. I think over the weekend we

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 8>thought Sam was going to come back. Now that Satya has,

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 8>you know, announced that he's over at Microsoft, Soya also,

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, obviously has to make sure that the Microsoft

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 8>stock is performing well. I don't know if he can

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 8>flip back on that. So it's a really sticky situation.

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 8>It's it's unclear. I have no idea what's going on.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that open i employees know what's going.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 2>On, Matt. Much of this is about a concern of

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the pace of innovation. How you ever had any concern

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 2>are indeed the ability for open ai to live up

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to the amount of demand that we were seeing as well?

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 8>Open ai has treated something that literally is magic. They're

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 8>on the forefront of AI. They're the soul of no

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 8>matter what.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 9>Anybody wants to say, They're the soul of the AI

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 9>community or the movement. Right now in terms of you know,

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 9>have I thought about is ai going to go too

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 9>fast or is it going to go too slow?

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 8>I think that this disruption is definitely causing it to

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 8>go slower, and I would like it to go faster

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 8>as well as a lot of people in the AI community.

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 8>We rely on this technology. It's allowing you to put

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 8>human like intelligence inside of your code, which means that

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 8>the program can write content, it can talk like a human,

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 8>and it can make reasoning decisions like a human. It

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 8>can be autonomous, and it's just getting better at a

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 8>breakneck speed. So this disruption with Opening Eye, for myself

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 8>and for anyone building on top of this technology, means

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 8>that it isn't going to go slower. Is it going

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 8>to be pulled back? What's going to happen next? It's

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 8>this is not an ideal situation by any means.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>What do you think it means in terms of your

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>desire to work with a newly formed unit with a

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft or indeed without the competitors MAP.

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 8>I think the Opening Eye was seen as someone that

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 8>you could beats.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 9>It was too big to beats.

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 8>And one of the interesting things that is happening because

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 8>of this weekend, because of all of this chaos, is

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 8>now no matter what happens, let's say they bring back SAM,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 8>everyone everybody stays open. AI is not infallible. They are

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 8>someone you can beat now, and that actually opens up

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>a tremendous amount of opportunities for new people, whether they're

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 8>ex employees of open ai or other entrepreneurs, to go

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 8>start companies that compete with open ai. And I think

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 8>that that's going to happen. This leaves a huge open

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 8>for that. Any event that a lot of people leave

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 8>open Ai, maybe a bunch joined Microsoft and go join

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 8>Sam and Greg, a lot of the other ones are

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 8>going to start companies, and I think more capital than

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 8>ever is going to flow into AI.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 9>You know, just this year, I.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 8>Started a venture capital firm called Theory Forge Ventures with

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 8>Ben Park to do just that.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 9>And this is a sad situation with open ai.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 8>It makes me sad, but at the same time investors

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 8>are going to be clamoring in.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Mat Schicked obtain Ai CEO and indeed avention Capitalist. We

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Turning back to where we left

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>off with our open Ai conversation, the drama, the impact

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 2>on the AI landscape more broadly, Sarahgayo, founder of Conviction.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a venture firm purpose built to serve AI native

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>companies and what we were just talking to Matchlick who

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>thinks that more innovation will start ups are going to

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>come of this, Sarah, do you abide by that silver

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>lining to what feels like a cloud right now?

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean I would start by saying I have such

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 5>enormous respect for the work Sam and Greg and Illi

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 5>and the entire openI team have done over the years.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Right So before we talk about silver aligning, I think

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 5>we should talk about the contribution they've had in terms

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 5>of igniting a technology revolution. It's just very sad to

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 5>see it happen. And since your respect to Ilia for

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, a public apology for something he regrets, whatever

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 5>the outcome, this is his life's for work and he

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 5>has made a tremendous contribution to the enhancement of AI

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 5>and many of the startups that we back and partner

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 5>with open ai in like Harvey, which is legal AI

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 5>and a portfolio company for open Ai. We benefit from

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:15.959
<v Speaker 5>all of that innovation. I think that being said, the ecosystem,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 5>the landscape is much more open than it was a

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 5>week ago, which is wild to say. Opening is both

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 5>revered and feared. In its current state, it is much diminished.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Sarah, delight to have you on the show. You know

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 3>everyone you know the players. You yourself and not invested

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 3>in open ai, but the ecosystem you are so closely

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 3>connected to. Just tell me your reaction, frankly, your how

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 3>you felt this weekend watching that unfold.

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I started with sort of respect and

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 5>sadness for friends who work at open AI. I think

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 5>my secondary action is really just as champion level business people,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 5>you have to hand it to Saya and Kevin and

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 5>managing all of this. The multiple on Microsoft stocks and

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Saya took it over in twenty fourteen is up ten

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 5>x from what was already one of the largest five.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 7>Companies in the world.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 5>So I am and I'm just floored by their ability

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 5>to navigate the situation. It's incredibly hard to be this

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 5>aggressive and strategic and steering so large a ship and

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 5>anticipating the title wave and coming out so far ahead.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 5>So all roads from here are paved the gold for Microsoft.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 5>I think, going back to the first question, we are

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 5>an AI focused early stage investing firm, right and so

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 5>a part of it is a recognition that there are

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 5>opportunities at every layer, which we continue to believe, but

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 5>now even more so for the independent foundation model labs

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 5>such as mistral and inflection and anthropic, and I think

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 5>there I think there's increasing interest in open source from yes,

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 5>corporations and developers just in having more control over their

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 5>own models and running them monitor on their own infrastructure,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 5>and infrint platforms like Base ten, and so there will

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 5>be continued capital for startups making these bets from investors

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 5>like in Conviction, and of course we're full stack and

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 5>application level companies as well.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 3>You've invested in startups building your own large language models.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 3>You've interviewed on your podcast leaders some of the firms

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 3>with making bigger models with much many more billions of parameters.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 3>Does this weekend make it a more competitive marketplace for

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 3>building generative AI technology?

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 5>I think companies are. So there's sort of two dimensions, right,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 5>There's like what it takes to compete, and of course

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 5>like the reaction from the ecosystem of customers and developers.

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 5>This set of events, of course gives all of open

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 5>AI's customers and developers pause. They're making long term bets

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 5>and they want to understand the incentives and staying power

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 5>of their partners. My experienced startup founders are sometimes reluctant

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.959
<v Speaker 5>to ask for the early check or seem too profit

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 5>seeking or capitalists to their customers. But I think transparency

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 5>is key. That's a lesson from this weekend. I've heard

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 5>so many customers ask startups, how are you planning to

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 5>make money? Or even ask me as an investor in

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 5>these starts, is the business viable? I am willing to pay,

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 5>but I don't want to make the wrong bet. Well,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 5>they make it, and the nonprofit board here is explicitly

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 5>prioritizing other goals they have above customers and developers, and

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 5>so I think that I think that does change the

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 5>ecosystem in terms of other opportunities, like we should not

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 5>trivialize the work that open Ai had done has done

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 5>over the years. Right, creating foundation models is a huge effort,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 5>and so from an infrastructure, data, partnerships, pooling and talent perspective,

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 5>I think you know the ship of theseus. It's a

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 5>thought experiment, like if you rebuild a ship entirely with

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 5>new parts, is it the same ship. It's a question

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 5>of identity, and it's often applied to human consciousness and

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 5>sci fi, but it applies to organizations too.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, if okai has the.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Weights and then all of the advantages that we were

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 5>just talking about. They're huge, but an organization is also

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 5>a sera culture.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, conviction fanta serago. It's just great to have

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you on the show and get that perspective. Thank you.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Some breaking news for you right now the United States,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the Justice Department, being exact, is seeking more than four

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars from Finance, that of course being the cryptocurrency

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 2>exchange to end a criminal case. It's years long investigation

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>negotiations between the DJ and Finance, including in fact of

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 2>the plussibit that its founder cz would face criminal charges

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 2>in the United States under an agreement to resolve the

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>probe into alleged money laundering, bank forward and sanctions violations.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 2>That's some update on cryptobeded back to our key number

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>one story.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all change at open ai and my goodness, how

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 3>quickly things do change. Earlier this year, Bloomberg's Emily Chang

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>caught up with now former open Ai CEO Sam Outman's

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>talk about his relationship with Microsoft.

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this, how would you describe your relationship with

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Sacha Inadella?

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 7>How much control they have?

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've heard people say, you know.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 10>Microsoft is just going to buy open Ai you're just

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 10>making big tech bigger.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 7>Companies not for sale. Thank you. I don't know how

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 7>to be more clearer than that, we have a great

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 7>relationship with them.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 11>I think it's a these like big major partnerships between

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 11>tech companies usually don't work.

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 7>This is an example that are working really well.

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, fast forward present day. This is the latest. After

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 3>a game of musical chairs, Microsoft announces that Altman and

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 3>his co founder Greg Brockman will join the company. Will

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>join Microsoft. This announcement on literally on the heels of

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 3>a frenetic weekend in Silicon Valley following the aftermath of

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Altman's firing on Friday, Microsoft shares continuing to push higher

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 3>in the session at one point nine percent. Bloomberg's Dina

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 3>bass is our Microsoft correspondent and alongside the rest of us,

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 3>has been all over this story all weekend. Let's first

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 3>talk about this new unit within Microsoft. Setia announces it

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 3>late late late last night. What do we know?

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 9>Musical chairs and or a game of growth?

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 10>So what we what we know is you know, Microsoft

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 10>at Satiez spent the weekend trying to figure out a

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 10>way with other investors to get Sam and Gregory and

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 10>stated to the company. As of late Sunday night, there

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 10>were conversations with Mira Maratti, the interim CEO, trying to

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 10>do exactly that those with board members are conversations. Those

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 10>conversations failed, and so Nadela had to go to plan being,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 10>which was, Okay, we'll just hire Sam and brag ourselves,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 10>because the concern that Microsoft had was, you know, when

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 10>there's all this people in open ai start seeing everybody

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 10>threatening to jump ship, and you saw that mass about

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 10>pouring support Saturday night for Sam that it very much

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 10>referrels not just microsoft thirteen billion dollar investment in open

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 10>add but Microsoft's entire shredding SATA has revamped the entire

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 10>company's product line around artificial intelligence, and that artificial intelligence

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 10>depends on open Ai. If open Ai ceases to exist

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 10>in the way that Microsoft had expected, that is an

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 10>enormous problem for Microsoft.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But for now the deal brokering seems to be in

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 2>its advantage and have Acreisi saying that the hiring is

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 2>a clear win for Microsoft. It's basically an AQUAHAI. What

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>are some of the difficulties around doing this culturally and

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 2>indeed potentially even regulatory in the long term.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 10>Sure, we don't know whether regulators will look at this

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 10>that there.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 9>I heard the discussion and.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 10>Emily's question, and well, why not just have Microsoft buy them?

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 9>Microsoft both because of.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 10>The complicated and nonprofit for profits structure of open ai

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 10>and for regulatory reasons.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 9>I really could not have just outright thought open ai A.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 9>Most experts think, what are the problems?

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, Microsoft has its own artificial intelligence effort. It's been

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 10>working on in that area for more than two decades,

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 10>and there has been some tension over the last.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 9>Couple of years around the way in which.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Microsoft and Adula chose to really prioritize, both in terms

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 10>of resources and focus the work of open AI over

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 10>some of Microsoft's internal projects. Some people most concerned about

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 10>that perhaps of lust Microsoft, but there's still AI researchers there,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 10>or some question of how you integrate those things without

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 10>making you know, a real sort of you know issue

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 10>with people that.

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Are already there. Then there's just you know, there are

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 9>more mounding details.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 10>How many overayed people as Microsoft really going to hire,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 10>how do they decide to you know, how do they

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 10>compensate that people already at Microsoft who had a salary

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 10>free this year feel about that compensation, all sorts of

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 10>cultural issues. That said, people who say people from outside

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 10>Microsoft cannot do well at Microsoft, I think are potentially

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 10>thinking about a Microsoft off. Ten years ago. Satya has

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 10>acquired companies like LinkedIn, liked to get up, let them

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 10>run on their own, and had them function quite effectively

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 10>within Microsoft. He's also hired executives here. I think of

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 10>CTO Kevin Scott, who leads the AI for you know,

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 10>executives from outside who have become very senior and very

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 10>important to Microsoft in a way that perhaps was not

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 10>easy for outsiders to do in the office.

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Many noting the title of sam Alman being that of

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>a CEO internally. DNA Basqueta, thank you so much for

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>all the iterations for that publicly sarded of the company.

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>And let's just talk about what's left at open AI

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 2>for a moment, because late Sunday, Emmitt Shecher was appointed

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 2>interim CEO of open AI after the board quietly vetted

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>candidates starting on Saturday night. Now here's what we know

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 2>about the appointment. Sources tell Bloomberg that she was seen

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 2>as someone that can lead a large engineering group, but

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 2>also as someone who recognizes an insistential threat from AI,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and like some members of open AI's board, she has

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>ties to the so called effective altruism movement. She has

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 2>stepped down as CEO of Amazon's game streaming site Twitch

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 2>earlier in the year, and in May he actually joined

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 2>y Combinator as a visiting partner. Let's get a conversation

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>going with Zachary Lipton. Here's the chief technologist and scientific

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 2>officer over at a Bridge. It's a company using Generator

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 2>AI for automatic drafting of after visit clinical notes. You're

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 2>also an assistant professor of machine learning at Cannie Mellon University. Zachary,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you really focus on understanding the social

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 2>impacts of machine learning in a philosophically coherent way is

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the way it says on your website. Is that kind

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 2>of what the tension was here ultimately own open ai

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>philosophical at.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 12>That I think it's important to draw a big distinction.

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 12>There's a contingent of this community that is more focused

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 12>on the idea of AI as a potential existential risk

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 12>to humanity, and there's a bunch of us who are

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 12>more a group of social scientists, ethhysists, some maybe socially

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 12>inclined computer scientists who've looked at these problems from different angles,

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 12>more focused on near term terrestrial actual harms of AI

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 12>systems is operationalized in businesses today.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 7>So there's.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 12>A lot of work that I think very few people

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 12>disagree is like serious or real problems and important today

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 12>about understanding how we think about privacy, accountability, transparency, where

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 12>liability goes once you have a greater degree of automation

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 12>in our decision making systems. But on the other side,

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 12>there's a but people who are more focused on something

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 12>but they call it X risk or this idea that

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 12>AI is careening towards, you know, by mechanisms known or unknown,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 12>that there's this marching progress towards towards something that is

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 12>a different kind of threat that needs to be regarded

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 12>as more of like an epoch changing event, something more

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 12>analogous to nuclear weapons. And I'd say that, like my work,

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 12>sits a little bit more in what they might call

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 12>near termism and this group of affective altruisms. Their philosophical

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 12>position is that they are they think that however small

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 12>a threat, if the risk, if they're wrong, is a

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 12>wiping out of humanity, that this is the most important

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 12>priority in the world, and I'd say it's a relatively

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 12>fringe belief among technologists, among business people, but it does

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 12>have some very well heeled backers, and it does have

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 12>quite a bit of a foothold in San Francisco and

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 12>in particular in particular research labs and open AI does

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 12>have some amount of influence this existentialist thinking.

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, Zachary, Whether the existential threat is a fringe idea

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 3>or not, what is? I think we can agree on

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the events of the last weekend being monumental. I guess

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 3>within your career, both in academia and building generative AI tools,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 3>just reflect quickly on what you made of the last

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 3>forty eight to seventy two hours.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 12>Oh, it's quite wild, given that when I entered the

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 12>field ten years ago, I had to explain to my

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 12>parents what machine learning and AI were, and they were

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 12>just glad that I wasn't trying to make a living

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 12>plight in the sexophone anymore. So to go from there

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 12>through the front page of the New York Times that

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 12>there's a kervuffl in AI startup's pretty wild, you know.

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 12>I think in general, we're watching before our eyes the

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 12>maturation of an industry and a lot of how we

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 12>got here, and I think you see this all over

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 12>the economy. I think we saw this with the dot

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 12>com bubble and some amount of discord and some amount

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 12>of insanity as we went from a sort of first

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 12>generation set of companies with strange governance structures and you know,

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 12>a certain kind of velocity to a more mature environment

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 12>than followed. You know, it didn't spell the doom of

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 12>the Internet, but it certainly was a growing up period.

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 12>I think what we're watching before our eyes is us

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 12>moving from a period of this being brand new technology

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 12>and people behaving in strange ways that are sort of

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 12>exceptional by any normal standards, to a period that's going

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 12>to follow, which is going to be more robust. It's

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 12>going to involve people depending on a much wider and

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 12>more stable ecosystem of services provided by a larger set

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 12>of companies.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 3>And remind our audience that almost six hundred people representing

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the intellectual capital within open ai are currently threatening to

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>leave and go to Microsoft. So Zachary lipped in a

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>bridge Cdio Carnegie Mellon, assistant Professor of Machine Learning, breaking

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 3>it down what a weekend it has been.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, look some other news that we're following for you.

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 2>X CEO Linda Yakarino has acknowledged that some advertisers are

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 2>taking a break a pause from the platform.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 2>This pause follows some outrage over anti Semitic content and

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 2>commentary on X, some of it in fact seemingly endorsed

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 2>by the site's owner. In a musk now in a

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 2>mement of staff on Sunday, Yacarino blamed quote a misleading

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 2>a manipulated article for this pause in spending, referencing in

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>fact a Media Matters piece that said ads from big

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>brands were being placed near offensive content.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Ed coming up on Bluebow Technology, Tusk Ventures CEO Bradley

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Tusk joins us we go back to open AI, the

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 3>drama and his impact on the AI space. We have

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to ask questions about corporate governance. That's coming up next.

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Also looking at shares of General Motors pairing some of

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 3>their gain in the session up one point eight percent.

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>The news curiously timed late Sunday night, Kyle Vote resigned

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 3>as the CEO of Crew Use General Motors Autonomous Driving

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Unit GM, shuffling the debt, putting a lot of long

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 3>standing GM execs to run that unit. But goodness knows

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 3>what happens next. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 13>Of course, we.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Returned to the drama consuming open Ai and how it

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>could impact the startup space more broadly after open ai

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 2>CEO Simalmon was ousted by the company's board on Friday,

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>prompting a campaign from investors and staff to bring him back.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Well now, Microsoft has hired Samowan, while former Twitch leader

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Emitt Scheer is taking over as open AI's interim chief executive.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 2>For today's VC Spotlight, let's bring in Bradley Tusk for

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>his read on all of this. He is the CEO

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of Tusk Ventures and also the author of the upcoming

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 2>book Obvious in Hindsight, satirical behind the scenes look at

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 2>how technology and politics sort of intertwine the ways in

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>which decisions are actually being made by those in power.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Is all of this obvious in hindsight when you look

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 2>at the corporate governance.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 11>Structure, Yeah, it absolutely is. I mean, this was an

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 11>insane structure, and this one's kind of unique in that

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 11>it both you had such a big underlying company that

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 11>is for profit with this nonprofit board on top of it.

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 11>But I think it really raises questions about b corpse,

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 11>and I think about ESG to a certain extent, and

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, there are fiduciary duties and there are incentives

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 11>that need to be aligned. When you have boards that

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 11>clearly have sort of other incentives and other ideas and

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 11>that aren't about the shareholders now, aren't about the employees,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 11>and aren't about the customers, you can create a lot

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 11>of problems, which is what just happened.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's just go through ultimately what this board, how it

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 2>differs from others. It's made up of thinking about four

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 2>people now because of been there exactly gregorbin Fad, some

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>helpment had been fired, but others like Reid Hoffmann had

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 2>left over the course of the last year or so.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately this is a not for profit board where

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole thesis was that it was the mission over

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 2>profits right now, is that replicated anywhere else? And is

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 2>this something that ultimately venture should be learning from.

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so I haven't seen this specific structure anywhere else,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 11>and I can't imagine we ever will again after the

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 11>debacle that this all was. But even when you get

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 11>past that, you know the corpse, which are kind of

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 11>hybrid versions of what we're talking about, where they are

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 11>public corporations and their for profit, but they're meant to

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 11>be doing social good at least. I think, you know,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 11>vcs should be taking a hard look at the bylaws

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 11>of the boards of B corps because then, by the way,

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 11>I've got one or two of my portfolio, and I'm

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 11>we're taking a look at it right now, because I

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 11>don't want a situation where the board has a moral

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 11>stance or an ideological stance, and that really comes at

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.959
<v Speaker 11>the best interest of the company itself. Of course, there's

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 11>always room on every board to talk about morality and

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 11>ideology and everything else, but the end of the day,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 11>you have fiduciary duty to the shareholders or to the investors,

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 11>or whoever it is, and that's what's got to be met.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 11>And so while I'm sure most B corpors are okay,

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 11>it seems to me that the potential for what we

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 11>saw does exist. And what we're talking about companies like

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 11>Auburns and Warby Parker and ben and Jerry's, and we're

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 11>not just talking about kind of no name companies here.

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 11>So I know that I'm concerned, and I think other

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 11>vc should be looking at it too.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Bradley, I want to bring an update to our audience

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 3>in the private markets. I think this is important. Joshua Kushner,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 3>who's the founder of Frive Capital, has posted on x

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 3>every problem has a solution. In the background, there is

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 3>a tender offer worth hundreds of millions of dollars that

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 3>is in question here running this month, where open ai

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 3>employees were due to sell shares with Frive Capital leading

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 3>that round. I know you're not an investor in open ai,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>but is there any world in which that tender goes ahead?

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 11>I mean I think to a certain extent it has to,

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 11>because you have all of these employees who are probably

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 11>not making that much money in terms of salary, because

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 11>that's what happens when you work with a tech startup,

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 11>and the promise is the pay you know, the rainbow,

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 11>the podical at the end of the rainbow, and a

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.720
<v Speaker 11>tender offer offers liquidity for people who have been counting

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 11>on it and relying on it. And you have employees

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:14.959
<v Speaker 11>who want to move homes or pay for their kids'

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 11>school or whatever it is. And so I think, you know,

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 11>whether it's amateure, whoever's running that company, you have a

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 11>responsibility because you're going to have a really unhappy workforce.

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 11>You already have a workforce where over one hundred people

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 11>signed a letter threatening to quit, and I think this

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 11>would just exacerbate the problems. The question is at what valuations?

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 11>They were talking about an eighty billion dollar valuation on

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 11>the secondary market for the tender offer. I think that

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 11>if they can kind of get the ship righted and

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 11>just wait a few weeks, it probably goes back to normal.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 11>But if it continues to be chaos, then obviously investors

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 11>are not going to pay up at that amount, and

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 11>the shareholders, if the employees, are going to lose value.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 3>TuS Benches found an n see Brandy Tuss. Great to

0:37:55.400 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 3>have you here on Blion dye Technology. Okay, let's wrap

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 3>up our coverage of Sam Mountaman's exit from Open AI

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 3>with the Bloomberg Big Take. We're joined by Bloomberg's Max Chafkin,

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 3>who penned that monumental Business Week piece, but also Bloomberg's

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Actually vance, we have been in the trenches together for

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 3>three days uncovering everything that happened from about lunchtime Friday onwards. Actually,

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll start with you just reflect on everything that we've learned,

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.959
<v Speaker 3>but also this kind of side scoop. We had that

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 3>Sam Outman was out there trying to raise tens of

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.439
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars for a completely different chip company. What's

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that about.

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, there's just so much going on here. Sam.

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>He is a very ambitious guy. So he's out trying

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to make this new artificial intelligence chip that would compete

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 1>against Nvidia, which open a eye is buy a ton

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of Nvidia chips, and you know, just another indication of

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.959
<v Speaker 1>all these other things going on on top of open

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>AI that I think some of the board was concerned about.

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.439
<v Speaker 2>And it sort of links towards the headline of your

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 2>big take, the doomed mission behind Sam Altman's shock auster

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 2>from open ai, doomed ouster, but also perhaps a doomed

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>set of aligned or misaligned focuses coming from people who

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 2>lead open AI.

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 13>I mean you had this nonprofit board where a lot

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 13>of people were really concerned about these apocalyptic AI scenarios,

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 13>and he had Sam Altman and kind of his allies

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 13>who were sort of using the promise of a or

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 13>the potential of apocalypse to sell this new technology, and

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 13>those two things collided, right. I think Sam Maltman saw

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:39.479
<v Speaker 13>that as kind of a great way to market open AI.

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 3>But you had people who actually believed.

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 13>It and then who were getting increasingly worried over the

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 13>past few weeks.

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, Ashlely, Let's be honest. You and I had

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 3>heard pretty early in the day Sunday that the board

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.240
<v Speaker 3>was digging in that there would be a new CEO.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 3>No one believed it, And now you have ilia out

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.240
<v Speaker 3>with a tweet apologizing just your final thoughts.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, Eliot's doing you know, coup inception, a coup,

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a pot of coup. I don't think this is over.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like all these camps are still fighting to

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>break open AI back. As of right now, seven hundred

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of the seven hundred seventy employees have vowed to leave

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the company of Sam and Greg are brought back. And

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think this is done. We still got

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>another day or two of this.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just want to hear from Max the weirdest

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>line you heard this week.

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 13>I mean, the idea of a counter coup that is

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 13>taking place while the same coup is taking is going on.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 13>It's just like Ashley says, it's it's too crazy and

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 13>we're talking about Remember this is like the most important

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 13>part of one of the world's largest companies. You know,

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 13>Microsoft is totally dependent on this relationship with open Ai.

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 13>So seeing all of this chaos unfold around something that's

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 13>so critical that so much money, many billions of dollars,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 13>are baked into, is just something Max Chafkin.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 2>It was something that you wrote, Ashley Vance, it was

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>something that you broke. It was an extraordinary herculean effort

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 2>from all three of you. And that does it for

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloomberg Technology ED. I mean, we didn't

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 2>even get to talk about the door dashes being done.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Over the weekend.

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 3>They went for DoorDash, for food, to open AIHQ. There

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 3>is so much to recap from a crazy weekend on

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 3>open ai. So we have a podcast. Check it out

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcast, Apple, Spotify, iHeart and on

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 3>all the Bloomberg's from SF in New York. This is

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg