WEBVTT - Dan Wang on China's Breakneck Economic Growth

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe. Wasn't thal Joe.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>We are recording this on August twenty seventh. Did you

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>catch the Trump Cabinet meeting yesterday?

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 3>I saw your tweets and they looked like some of

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 3>the most obsequious. I mean a lot of these unusually obsequious.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 3>But even yes, I.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Saw your tweets, you could just say yes. So there

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>are a bunch of things that stood out, But one

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>in particular was Donald Trump talking about building out new

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>energy capacity and he said specifically, I'm going to quote here.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, in China they do it very quickly. They

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>have one person that says do it, and that's it.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 2>But essentially, we have one person that says do it,

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and we've given that order.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, like he's very abundance coded. He wants

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 3>to like he wants to get rid of all of

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the uh or he seems to have this impulse to

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>get rid of all of the myriad checks and balances

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 3>and all these things that stand in the way of

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 3>developing things. So it sounds like Trump is abundance pilled.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I assume that's the direction you're going on. Yes.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>If there's one thing I think you could say about

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>China's economy and it's political economy, it is that China

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>is pretty good at building things, yes, right, And we've

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 2>seen various examples of that over time. Back when I

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>was living in Hong Kong, I took the high speed

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>rail from Hong Kong to Beijing and that was absolutely amazing.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>You get to Beijing in less than a day. The

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>US is nowhere near having anything like that, and I

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>speak as someone who takes Amtrak in the Northeast regularly.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, China at various times has produced

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>too much.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>It's accused as such, right. I know that people say.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>This, okay, But for instance, you think back to the

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Ghost City, Sure bridges to nowhere.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Sure at they were bridges to nowhere at the time.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Amusement parks that no one goes to.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, although we have amusement parks here that no one

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>goes to.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Disagree or disagree hard. But this has sparked a new

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>movement in China by policymakers called involution yes, which is

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 2>basically an attempt to reduce over capacity in terms of

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 2>building things.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 3>There's definitely no question that there does seem to be

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 3>this phenomenon which the government in Beijing seems highly cognizant of,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>which is this sort of like profitless competition, much of

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it driven by the incentive structure that is borne by

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the provinces promoting their local champions, and so far as

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>much like sort of success as some of these companies

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>have on some metrics, there's no money to be made

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 3>in many cases. It sounds sort of nice from the

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 3>consumer perspective, you know, it's like Zurbier twenty tens when

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 3>we were all getting like, you know, cheap ubers and

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. But you know, there's a seems to

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 3>be a risk of certain internal imbalances on that.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the issue is you have a lot of

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 2>companies who are basically producing all the same thing and therefore,

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, racing to the bottom in terms of price,

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and no one can actually make money. And I don't

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 2>know about you, but if I was a startup founder,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I would probably want to make money right at some point.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I would not want to be locked in a forever

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>competition in terms of who could drive the absolute lowest cost.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, what if you were just a normal consumer who

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a founder?

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Sadly, that is what I am. Okay, Well, on this note,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>we have the perfect guest. We're going to be speaking

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with Dan Wong, friend of the Pod and who has

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>just written a new book called Breakneck China's Quest to

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Engineer the Future. He's also a research scholar at the

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Hoover Institution. So Dan, welcome back to the show.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much, Tracy, really glad to talk about moby

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 4>Dick with my friends.

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Why do coach trouble? Why do you coble?

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was actually wondering if you were going

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to bring up the Moby Dick reference.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 4>The problem Joe, I've been a ket for a very

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 4>long time. Maybe this is the way needs to be

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 4>getting into That's.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, okay, simple question to start. Why does China like

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>building stuff?

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 4>China likes building stuff because it is made up of

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 4>leadership that is very heavily engineering pilled. Many of them

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 4>have been engineer's trained of a very Soviet sort, hydraulic engineers,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 4>electrical engineers, thermal engineers, which is kind of a termine China.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 4>That means producing coal and processing coal, they treat the

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 4>megaproject as the solution to every problem. They are building

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>enormous dams. They're building a big new dam now that

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 4>is going to use sixty times more concrete than the

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 4>Hoover dam. They're it's going to produce I think, three

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 4>times as much power as the three gorgeous dam. But

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 4>this is a lot of their solutions to a lot

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 4>of different economic problems and social problems as well. That

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>new highways, new homes, coal plants, hyperscalers. It's what they

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 4>know how to do, and it's what they're going to do.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>First of all, Before we go any further, I just

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 3>want to say it, like, having spoken to for years,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm thrilled of all the recognition you're getting for this book.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I know we weren't like the first to discover Dan Wong.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I think Tyler Cowen got there first, but it's been

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 3>fantastic talking to you over the years, and there's sort

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of like a vindication I think of your career, et cetera,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 3>because now everyone wants to see the world through the

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Dan Wong lund. So think I just wanted to say

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>how exciting it is and happy for you that you're

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 3>getting all.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 2>This is channeling the Trump cabinet.

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow, I'm being am I Trump. Yeah, yeah, I guess, okay, good, Okay.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>As Tracy mentioned, Trump talked about you know if someone

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 3>says do it and then they do it. But I'm curious,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 3>like how much is it? Would you say, like the

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 3>political system really allows for that versus the actual like

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 3>breadth of labor and just engineering knowledge, Like how would

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>you tilt the sort of political structure versus the skills.

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's both.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 4>So China has a lot of economic ministries like the NDERC,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 4>the National Development and Reform Commission, and the MIIT, the

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 4>Ministry of Industry and Information Technologies. You have all of

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 4>these planners that are making new plans all the time,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 4>and they have exactly great plans to know where the

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>next subway station in Beijing or Shinjin or quimming On

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 4>to go. And so there's plenty of shovel ready projects

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 4>because people have already been planning for these things for years.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 4>And every time China's economy has any sort of a wobble,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 4>then the Communist Party says, okay, well we're going to

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>build another really big dam, or we're going to build

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 4>more highway systems. So you have a lot of shovel

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 4>ready projects in place, and then you have the government

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 4>thinking that while pouring more concrete is still going to

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 4>be the solution to a lot of our different problems.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 4>And on top of that, you have a very skilled

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing workforce. You have a very skilled public sector that

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 4>has been building a lot of high speed trains, that

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 4>have been building a lot of big ships, that have

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 4>been building subway systems. They know how to do this stuff,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 4>and so it just comes really naturally. You have the

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 4>system plus the politics all favoring a lot of construction.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>When you say Chinese policy makers are made up of engineers,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I have two questions. So one, how did that come

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to be? And then secondly, could you maybe give us

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 2>some specific examples of how that manifests in actual policy. So,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>for instance, does having an engineering background make you perhaps

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>better at making strategic decisions about economic priorities? Like how

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 2>does that background actually come into play?

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 4>I think China's engineering state has deep roots, but the

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 4>modern manifestation really took shape after the nineteen eighties when

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>dunzhel Peing took over from the total mayhem of the

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>mal Years and dounzheal Peing thought, well, Mao was kind

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 4>of this poet. He was a warlord, he was a romantic,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 4>he was a murderer.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 3>What is the opposite of all of that.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're going to put mechanical engineers within the polit bureau,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.119
<v Speaker 4>and that is exactly what Deng Xiaoping did. So throughout

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen eighties and the nineteen nineties, don't put a

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of engineers in the polit bureau, such that by

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>the year two thousand and two, every single member of

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>the Standing Committee, all nine people, especially Hu Jintao and

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Buen Jabal, the General Secretary and the Premier at the time,

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 4>everyone had degrees in engineering, and that.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Has fluctuated a little bit.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 4>By the time that Seizing Pain came to office, who's

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 4>undergrad was a chemical engineer, I think he saw the

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 4>light and his doctorate was Marxist economics, so you know,

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 4>we have a pseudo economist up there. By the time

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>that he came into office, his Premier, He Kutiang, was

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 4>trained in I believe law in the economics. But now

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 4>in the twentieth Party Congress after twenty twenty two, China's

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 4>engineers are really dominant again, which you have a lot

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 4>of people from the military industrial complex in the top

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 4>of the politbureau. But I also want to suggest, but

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 4>playfully and lightly, that there are ancient roots of China's

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 4>engineering state as well. This is famously the state that

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 4>administered a vast exam nation system, which people became mandarins

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>by doing these exams administered by the court.

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>You had a lot of.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Chinese emperors that didn't hesitate to conscript people to build

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 4>great walls or grand canals. So these are fortifications and

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 4>waterway systems, and so I don't want to take this

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>too literally, but you can sort of see how a

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of emperors never really hesitated to completely restructure a

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 4>person's relationship to our land. And so that's a little

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 4>bit deeper too.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, Tracy mentioned that, and I have no

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>doubt that it is true that there's you know, these

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>various like white elephant projects are things that get built

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 3>that aren't necessary. In your book talks about them. All

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 3>that being said, it seems like one of the objective

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 3>facts in the world is that Chinese living standards and

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>the economy has dramatically in the last ten twenty years,

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 3>like to an extraordinary degree. Does the success of all

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 3>these Chinese planning boards? Do you think it strikes a

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 3>heart in certain conventionalism, planning isn't supposed to work. Economists

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 3>are very skeptical of planning, the hi Ekian idea that

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>the market and prices are the best signals for these things.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>What kind of challenge does China's success opposed to some

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of these ideas.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to think that China's success strikes at

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 4>the very heart of planning in economics. I think that

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 4>China has not demonstrated the success of central planning a

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 4>large I think I would defend a narrower case that

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of construction has been good for a lot

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 4>of people. So I think that China is what other

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 4>tests is there? Well, maybe there are other tests, which

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 4>is that whether people are happy. I think that is

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 4>a decent test, whether they feel the ability to have

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 4>creative expression, whether they feel that their lives are going

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 4>to be better because they're able to save some money.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 4>I think not just about the physical living standards, although

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that is really important because I've spent plenty

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 4>of time in China's rich re zones. I was living

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>in Hong Kong, Beijing, and Shanghai, where you can see

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 4>that these cities get better and better every year. You

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 4>have new subway stations. Shanghai this year will have a

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 4>thousand parks, up from five hundred in twenty twenty. All

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>of these cities are really highly functional. I've been in

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 4>China Southwest and Gwaijo Province, China's fourth poorest province, and

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 4>you have these enormous bridges that are bridges to nowhere

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 4>when they start, but then to nowhere has become maybe

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 4>two somewhere, so after it is built, and people actually

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>feel a lot of pride about all of these things.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 4>And so I think that a lot of construction, a

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of home building, a lot of electricity production through

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 4>coal as well as hydro and solar, these things are

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 4>all really good. I think you can definitely point to

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of costs. There's a lot of material waste

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 4>and all of this concrete that's very carbon intensive. There's

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>a lot of financial problems. Squadjo can't really pay a

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of its debts right now. There's a lot of

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 4>displacement of people. Three gorgious scam display something like a

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 4>million people. I would say that physical construction is mostly

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 4>pretty good, though there are plenty of costs.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>We talk more about financial problems from all of this,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>because obviously the local government debt situation has been much discussed.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>But you point out in the book, for instance, that

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 2>you can see evidence of some of this impact in

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 2>things like Chinese stocks. So because you have all these

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>companies who are basically racing to the bottom in terms

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of price, it's difficult for them to produce a profit,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and so the stock price basically has traded sideways for

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 2>like a decade. I guess part of that would also

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>be capital controls and the impact from that. But how

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 2>does this manifest in terms of finances.

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's take a look at something like the solar industry,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 4>which I think is kind of an emblematic Chinese success.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 4>You have China producing something like ninety percent of the

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 4>solar PV modules in the world. But China isn't only

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 4>producing the final product, it is also producing all of

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 4>the polysilicon as well as all the tools to produce solar.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 4>And in the solar industry, you have basically zero differentiation

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 4>between most of the big solar producers. You know, something

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 4>like the third largest solar producer in China is not

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 4>that different from the fifteenth largest, and maybe not even

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 4>that different from the thirtieth largest. They're all making pretty

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 4>undifferentiated products. And what this has represented is kind of

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 4>a strategic trium for the Chinese government that they have

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 4>a lock on one of these critical industries of the

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 4>future that a lot of countries will need. It is

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 4>awesome for consumers everywhere. So if you are trying to

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 4>build a solar panel onto your roof, either in China

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 4>or in the US, you know, solar costs have plunged

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>something like ninety four percent since the year two thousand

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 4>or so. I think that's about the right figure. And

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 4>it's been total misery for these companies as well as

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 4>their investors. And maybe this is what socialism with Chinese

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 4>characteristics means, which is a lot of state power, a

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of consumer power, but not very much financial investor's benefit.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 3>So, speaking of her novelle this is not about Moby Dick,

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually thinking about his novella Bartleby, in which you know,

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the famous character Bartleby decides I would prefer not to.

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 3>He's working on Wall Street and then one day he

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>would prefer not to, and the people around him are

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>completely exasperated at this person. And of course we saw

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago people were talking about the live

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 3>flat movement, And so when you talk about, oh, you know,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>like perhaps it's come at the cost of happiness, Like

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 3>how wide spread is this? How much of this success

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 3>in China? I mean one of the other aspects of

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, unions aren't legal in China. I presume striking

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>isn't legal in China, and so forth, Like how much

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of this material success that everyone enjoys to some extent

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>in your view, has come down to sort of extracting

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 3>the worker surplus. And how big do you think is

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 3>there like a larger brewing impulse to fight against that.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, when I first read bartle B the Scrivener, I

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 4>saw some commentary that it's actually a lot about homo eroticism.

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 4>I thought that maybe that's where we were going to go,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 4>but maybe we'll take a look at that later. I

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 4>think that whether people in China are happy is always

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>a very interesting and excessively broad question, and I always

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 4>wonder about things like.

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 3>That, if anyone's happy in the world, but keep going.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, Bhutan, with something like four traffic lights in

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 4>the country is supposed to be super happy. We don't

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 4>really get that. Certainly, we can observe that there are

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Chinese, mostly elites, who are interested in

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 4>creative expression. Many of them have become deeply unsatisfied. So

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 4>they are moving to the Netherlands, They're moving to New York,

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 4>They're moving to Chang Mai. I've seen some of their

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 4>events here in New York. There's a feminist stand up

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 4>comedy which is, you know, having a lot of comedy

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 4>shows in Chinese. That is pretty active of a scene

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 4>here in Manhattan actually, And so there's a lot of

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 4>people journalists who have had their pieces completely censored Six

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Ways to Sunday who are pretty dissatisfied. There's plenty of

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 4>people dissatisfied in Shanghai who had a horrible time throughout

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the lockdown. And we had these astonishing numbers of something like,

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 4>at its peak, forty thousand Chinese flying to Ecuador where

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 4>they don't have to get a visa to walk up

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 4>to the southwestern border in the United States because they

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 4>are so upset with a seizing pain. But it's the

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>broader mass of Chinese unhappy, well pretty hard to say.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 4>I think there are plenty of people who are working

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 4>for state don't enterprises and you know, not really enjoying

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 4>much of their time there. You could be working for

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 4>one of these big tech companies and working nine ninety

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 4>six hours nine am to nine pm, six days a week,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's not very happy. You could be living with

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 4>your parents.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Because which, by the way, is the same Silicon Valley.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, I thought it was the same as Bloombergley, but yeah.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>It's probably nine nine to seven in Stilicon Valley.

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 2>But do you get equity in the company in return

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>for your hard work?

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 4>Maybe some of them do, but it's probably not to

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 4>the same extent in Silicon Valley. But at the same time,

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you're a young Chinese living in Shanghai,

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 4>perhaps your cause of living is not super high because

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 4>they're living with your parents. You get to save some

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 4>money by working at a state owned enterprise. You have

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 4>excellent cafes popping up all the time. A lot of

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 4>things are pretty cheap. You can get a bowl of

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 4>noodles really cheaply. And you know, for people who are

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 4>debating whether they want to try to make a career

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 4>in London or New York and try to be really

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 4>ambitious or just have a thumping lifestyle life flat lifestyle

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 4>in Shanghai. Maybe that's kind of a wash. So I

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 4>don't see simmering discontent that threatens the top older gem,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 4>but certainly there are plenty of people dissatisfied.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>There's also arguably a sort of existential dread hanging over

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 2>certain sectors or certain entrepreneurs, which is that at any time,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese government could change its mind about what industry

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>it actually wants to promote and nurture. And we saw

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 2>that happen. I think when you and I were both

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 2>in Hong Kong in twenty twenty slash twenty twenty one,

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 2>and this was a big deal. So this idea that

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 2>China all of a sudden kind of turned its back

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 2>on more consumer oriented technology companies, how big of a

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>legacy did that have or how big of an impact

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 2>did that have on the sort of entrepreneurial spirit of China.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 4>There's plenty of data to suggest that VC funds in

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 4>China are having a hard time actually raising funds and

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 4>also having a hard time deploying their capital. Certainly, it's

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 4>become pretty difficult for a lot of startups to exit

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 4>because they can't necessarily list in the US, and they

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 4>can't necessarily list very easily in China as well. China's

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 4>consumption over the last few years has been pretty limp

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 4>after the COVID crackdowns. A lot of companies had to

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 4>have pretty extensive layoffs, and they're just not having a

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 4>really easy time given the limp consumption, spending really large

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 4>in China. I think this goes to a kind of

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 4>a broader point within authoritarian systems, which is that no

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 4>one feels very safe in a lot of authoritarian systems.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 4>You can be an elite in Beijing, and what is

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 4>your life going to be? Your life could be working

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 4>in the financial industry, which is a definite elite everywhere,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 4>including in Beijing. And two years ago, Beijing announced that

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 4>it was going to have a salary cap of three

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand dollars roughly for people working in state owned banks.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 4>And if you made over that figure the last couple

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 4>of years, you may have to give some money back

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 4>to the government. Maybe you're working for a tech company

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 4>and you think that online education is going to be

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 4>totally safe, because Chinese love education and they're always going

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 4>to be spending more money on their kids, and then

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 4>that worked until the government declared everything must be a nonprofit.

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 4>If you're working for the military, if you're working for

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 4>the government, your life could be subject to either a

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 4>corruption crackdown or some sort of the political wins changing

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 4>and your patron is no longer in place, and then

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 4>your whole network of patronage has to fall. And so

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 4>this is one of these things where there is kind

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 4>of this apocalyptic sense that hangs over you if you're

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 4>living in Beijing, Shanghai, perhaps even in Hong Kong, where

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 4>a lot of your life could fall apart and there's

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 4>no one really to protect you, no lawyers that you

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 4>can turn to, the court system to really turn to.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, one of these things that comes up a lot,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and I don't really find it to be that interesting

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>with a conversation. Look, oh, is China a communist or capitalist?

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>And it seems like a very tedious conversation. I mean,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 3>it has a you know, a leninist system of government.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that fact says to say, is it going

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>in the direction of something that we could call socialist?

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I think Doung Choupang said the goal was to have

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 3>a modern socialist state by year twenty forty nine, So

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty four years from now, is it going into direction

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>that would be described this is so well, there.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Are a bunch of Marxists over there, and they would

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 4>always tell you that history is the most important and

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 4>we are marching towards socialism. So their answer is yes.

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 4>I have my doubts. I took a look at China

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 4>today and I think it is the most right wing

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 4>major country in the world. This is a country that

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 4>really prizes manufacturing above all else. It doesn't really have

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 4>much by way of immigration. You have a state that

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 4>enforces totally traditional gender roles, and you have a pretty

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 4>minimal welfare safety net. Where taxes in China are not

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 4>actually that high. It is pretty regressively funded on consumption taxes.

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 4>This is a country that arrests union organizers and that

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 4>has busted up certain Marxist reading groups in universities. And

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 4>I take a look at that, and I think, doesn't

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 4>this look kind of like Eisenhower's America? You know?

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 3>This is it certainly doesn't soun liberal.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't sound very liberal at all, and I'm not

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>even sure if it sounds very socialist. There is absolutely

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 4>a Leninist aspect in which state control of public enterprises.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, public ownership of production is very much real.

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Many important sectors telecommunications, aviation, energy are state owned, and

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 4>you have some redistribution between the provinces. But you know,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of my handy snapshot is not to think of

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 4>China as socialists or autocratic. I think these are pretty

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 4>limited terms that don't really offer much anymore. My simple

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 4>formulation of China is that it is a Lendinness technocracy

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 4>with grand Opera characteristics, pretty rational most of the time,

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 4>but then every so often we'll do something pretty preposterous

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 4>and then kind of collapse in something really ridiculous.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 2>That said, we have seen recently China make some moves

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to boost social safety nets. So they've said they're going

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to you know, do more for seniors, and they're also

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 2>going to try to boost consumer spending. One thing that

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I thought was kind of amusing was they basically rolled

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 2>out a cash for clunkers equivalent. And again, I think

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of all those things focus on consumer spending, social safety nets,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 2>though arguably in the US those are perhaps declining cash

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>for clunkers, that sort of thing. I think that is

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 2>very American in many ways in terms of the political economy.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile in the US, you know, Trump is talking

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about how he wants to be more efficient in terms

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>of controlling the economy. Like China. We've also had some

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 2>instances of the US government taking stakes in companies recently

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 2>that seems very Chinese in certain respects. Is the US

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 2>starting to emulate China and China emulate.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 4>The US tracy? When I first heard of the tariffs

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 4>on Liberation Day, I thought that liberation doesn't sound very

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 4>much like an American word. It sounds much more like

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>a Chinese word to my ears.

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Now five liberations campaign.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, right, we're going to liberate Taiwan into socialism. You know,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 4>this is what they're up to. And certainly there are

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of aspects in which the US and Trump

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 4>in particular, is copying China. We are making Intel a state,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 4>don't enterprise with American characteristics. There's a lot of questions

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 4>now with data probity and whether the unemployment figures are

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be well reported, And there is kind of

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 4>just this you visiting stochastic terror on the downtrodden, especially

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 4>undocumented immigrants, and all of these things are not very

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 4>nice things that I think that Trump is learning from

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 4>c and right now, I think what we have is

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 4>authoritarianism without the good stuff, and the good stuff of

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 4>actually building quite a lot of mass transit and clean

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 4>technology generation, clean energy generation. Rather, we don't really have

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 4>the Port Authority bus terminal being built and renovated on time.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 4>You don't have California high speed rail. We don't have

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 4>smoothly functional cities that have a lot of public order.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think that the US should try to

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 4>emulate a lot of these things. But I think there

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 4>are better things to emulate, because a lot of what

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Trump is building are gilded ballrooms and detention centers. I had,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, we're getting quite a lot of just I

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 4>think many of the worst aspects of authoritarianism.

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm curious, I say, at the beginning, you've

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>had this huge rise. Everyone is obsessed with this story

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>right now. Everyone, it's just every every day I wake up,

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it's on social media, it's coming from DC, it's et cetera.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Everyone is sort of maybe miles of gate, but the

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 3>capacity of China to build that, damn Or you know,

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 3>you open uh Instagram and it's some crazy drone show

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>or something like that that shows the technical prowess there.

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, this wasn't the case the sort of popularization

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 3>of all this when you started your book, or certainly

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>not the first time we had you on this show.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of that, Like, how has perceptions

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 3>of China changed, or maybe even your own perception of

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 3>China changed since you started really focusing on this stuff.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, Joe, maybe Chinese industrialism has been my white whale

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of time.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 4>I moved to Hong Kong at the start of twenty

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 4>seventeen from Silicon Valley, where I used to be working,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 4>in part because I was feeling that a lot of

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 4>the technologies that was important in Silicon Valley at the

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 4>time were not so interesting. It was a lot of cryptocurrencies,

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 4>was a lot of consumer platforms. We hadn't even gotten

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 4>to SaaS for business yet, and so it was just

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 4>not that interesting. And so when I had lunch with

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Arthur Kroeber and you told me about something called Made

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 4>in China twenty twenty five, I thought that ultra high

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 4>voltage transmission, electric vehicle batteries, memory trips, these were far

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 4>more interesting. But I felt that it was actually making

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 4>a distinctively popular decision among my Silicon Valley peers because

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 4>they thought that they were the center of the universe,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 4>which is a view they still hold. And what are

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 4>we doing if we're not being in San Francisco and

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 4>not pursuing some aspect of tech? And so when I

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 4>moved to China, it definitely didn't feel like the elitist

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 4>popular thing to do. But I was really glad to

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 4>go take a look at what China was building. And

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that there is a broader sense in Silicon

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Valley that tech is important, but non tech is also important.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Right now, I feel like a lot of folks in

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley, where I spend a lot of time as

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 4>a fellow at Hoover, you know, a lot of folks

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 4>are trying to build God in a box, and that

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 4>attention has shifted to AI, and I feel like that

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 4>has become a totalizing aspect once more, and I feel

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 4>like part of my task is still to remind people

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 4>that drones are important and bridges are important, and we

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 4>live in a material world, and you know, let's build

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 4>up a manufacturing base as well.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So with the focus shifting to AI, you could make

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>an argument that the US has the lead there still,

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>even though we've seen moments of panic with the deep

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Seek model early this year and things like that. But

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, I suppose you could argue that

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 2>AI also needs vast amounts of physical infrastructure, including data centers,

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 2>energy chips. Who has the upper hand when it comes

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>to AI.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 4>I don't have a super strong view on this, but

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I could outline a potential scenario in which China is

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 4>going to be leading on AI based on a few factors.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 4>First and most important, as you point out, Tracy, that

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 4>China has a lot of electrical power. So the US

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 4>may have all of the computing because it has all

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 4>of the advanced chips from Nvidium. As Howard Letnik says,

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 4>China has a best the fourth best chips in terms

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 4>of AI, and that is a pretty substantial constraint. But

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 4>what is a bigger US constraint, maybe right now going forward,

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 4>is that there just isn't enough electrical power, especially if

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Trump is taking winterbines offline and being very discriminatory about

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 4>certain types of energy. And China I think has organized

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 4>itself as a civilization to nine nothing towards heavy industry

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 4>whatever heavy industry wants it is going to get and

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 4>that could be powered by solar, could be powered by wind,

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it could be powered by coal, it could be powered

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 4>by nuclear. But China will not have this issue that

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 4>META faced earlier in the end of last year, in

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 4>which a rare species of be prevented META from building

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>a giant new power facility, and China will definitely not

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 4>do that. So China has a lot of electrical power.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 4>China may not have a lot of advanced chips, but

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 4>it has a lot of mature chips which are going

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 4>to be necessary for inference. So if we do invent

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 4>God in a box, you know, we're going to be

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 4>running queries all the time to figure out how to

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 4>automate and shop and whatever else. And that is going

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 4>to require a lot of processing power. And I think

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 4>this is where China's mature chips are going to have

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 4>a pretty good advantage. And China also has I think

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 4>another unique advantage, which is that training data might be

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 4>more strategically valuable. China has most of the manufacturing capacity

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 4>in the world, or about thirty percent of manufacturing value

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 4>add but that is quite a large chunk. And you

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 4>know what does the US have, Well, we have a

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of consulting companies and a lot of healthcare companies.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 4>So maybe the US will automate something on the scale

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of McKinsey, and China will automate something on the scale

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 4>of fox Con. And you know, they're going to have

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot more manufacturing production and we're going to have

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot more better consultants.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I suppose there's a synergy here where you could

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 2>use AI to make your manufacturing more efficient.

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, No, totally, And we talked to Cameron Johnson about that,

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 3>the diffusion of AI within it, and right, like a

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 3>factory that's monitored properly is brimming with fresh training data

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 3>all the time, and that has a compounding effect and

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the accelerating effect and so forth potentially widening that gap.

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask actually another AI question. It's not

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 3>even about US China per se, maybe more US question.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Use the word totalizing. And I've been thinking about this

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 3>exactly in a couple of different ways. Like one is,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>like I wonder about whether people have lost interest in

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 3>things like say, drug discovery in part because of this

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 3>implicit assumption, Well, once we achieve AGI in two years,

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 3>that will do all the drug discovery, So why are

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 3>we even bothering with working on that in the meantime?

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 3>And also it feels like much of culture strikes me

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in the US as sort of disappearing and other things

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 3>like that. People are just sort of losing interest in

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>lots of things because AI is crowding out in the

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 3>psychological space everything else. And I'm curious if, in your

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 3>time in Bay Area think about these things, whether that

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>rings sure or not.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Definitely, I hear the craziest when I'm in California, and

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 4>I hear, you know, I think a lot of people

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 4>are very smart Stanford kids who are very smart, and

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 4>yet they could be very narrow minded and not have

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 4>a very broad view. I heard some things like people say, well,

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 4>maybe you don't need to think so much about climate change,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 4>for example, anymore, And I say, oh, well, why don't

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 4>we have to think about climate change because AI will

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 4>figure out what we need to do with climate change

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 4>and implement everything. Maybe we don't need to be so

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 4>careful about teaching kids how to read the great books

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>or maybe even to read at all, because AI will

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 4>just help us get there. And they're trying to manifest

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 4>the eskaton in Silicon Valley. And there is also this

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 4>bit of an apocalyptic error in which maybe the world

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 4>will end in twenty twenty seven because AGI will be

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 4>out there and it's not going to be aligned, and

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 4>all of our world will kind of just end. I

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 4>really don't buy that view. I believe that we have

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 4>to have a longer term view about everything. There is

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of this sense often in DC. This is not consensus,

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 4>but every so often when we'd hear that, oh, the

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Communist Party is so weak, their legitimacy is so thin

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 4>and that might topple over at any moment, and we

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 4>don't really have to treat it serious like that feels

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 4>very much like cope. And there is also a Silicon

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Valley variant which is not really the same about China,

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 4>but there is the sense that, well, you know, we're

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 4>all going to ascend into utopia in twenty twenty seven

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 4>when we know invent all the AI and the superintelligence.

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I like how binary everything is. It's either utopia or

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, the apocalypse. On the note of potential own goals,

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the things we've had now is years and

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>years and years of US export controls on semiconductors going

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>into China, and I remember you were very early in

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>describing this as a sort of Chinese Sputnik moment, this

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 2>idea that this was the moment when China really realized

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>that it actually had to produce these things itself and

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>try to regain or get the lead over the US

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to crucially strategic technology. Now that the

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 2>dust has kind of settled, although clearly things are happening

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on the tariff side, but now that we've had years

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and years and years of export controls, does it look

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>like that spurred China's technological development.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that it definitely spurred Kina technology development. If

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 4>we take a look at some of these sanctioned companies today, Smick,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 4>which was on the entity list in twenty twenty, now

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 4>has double the revenues of that level. Huawei, which had

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 4>the most severe export controls, it was kind of like

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 4>a new export control invented specifically to heard Huawei has

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>by now recovered its revenues back to the twenty nineteen

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 4>pre sanctioned levels. And I being in China was just

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 4>this really stark reminder that US export controls really accelerated

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Chinese efforts to do better. Now Beijing

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 4>has always had this ambition to be a technology power.

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 4>It's had this ambition for a very long time, but

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 4>for the most part, it didn't have a lot of

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 4>China's most dynamic companies willing to sign on. Because a

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 4>lot of China's most dynamic companies, let's say Huawei, by

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 4>Dance Dji, they were able to say to Beijing, well,

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 4>we need to make the most efficient five G equipment,

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 4>or the most efficient drones, or the most efficient short

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 4>form video, whatever it is, products that we should export

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 4>around the world, and therefore we need to be buying

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 4>the best products in the world. And that was overwhelmingly

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 4>things like Qualcom chips or Nvidia chips or whatever else.

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 4>And what the US government did was that it recapped

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 4>their ability to access US equipment at a stroke, and

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 4>that fully aligned them into Beijing's goals of technology pursuit.

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 4>And now you have Huawei being all sweetness and light

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 4>to Chinese domestic vendors to say, well, why don't we

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 4>work together. We really have a lot of common interests here.

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Huawei was not super big into semiconductors in twenty nineteen

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 4>in terms of their production, but now Huawei is one

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 4>of the biggest spenders in semiconductors R and D, and

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 4>I believe I just saw a Bloomberg piece saying that

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Huawei's chips are now rolling off the production line, and

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 4>that was something I think entirely created by the US government,

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 4>that all of these fiercely competitive companies really were fighting

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 4>for their lives solving seven problems a day before breakfast

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 4>because they had to solve all of these problems, and

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that probably wasn't necessary. Over the broader strokes.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that causes alarm for DC regarding China.

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, it's great that countries are getting richer

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 3>and the technological frontier is being pushed, and innovation anywhere

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 3>theoretically can help anyone everywhere. But this question, and it's

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 3>more sort of political, perhaps geopolitical, than economic, is does

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 3>China have ambitions outside of its borders?

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 3>We know the US is we have military positions all

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 3>over the place, and we clearly have ambitions outside of

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 3>its borders. China has no formal alliances, I believe, with

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 3>any country, etc. But there's always this concern what do

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 3>you think about China's interest in the rest of the

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 3>world beyond sort of export destinations.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that China is very deeply interested in Taiwan

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 4>and the South China Sea, and which it defines as

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 4>within its own borders, and so that is a matter

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 4>of dispute. I think that China is very keenly interested

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 4>in dominating most of Southeast Asia, and.

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 3>What is dominating me.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that they would really like for the leaders

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 4>of Malaysia and Vietnam and the Philippines to come regularly

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 4>to Beijing, to Kawtel for the emperor's pleasure, and maybe

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 4>that is a pretty big threat to US interests. I

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 4>think that is something that we can debate. I would

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 4>be skeptical that China has broader goals to seize Japan.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that would be pretty fanciful. I think that

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 4>China's success right now is building a lot of advanced manufacturing.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 3>You're right.

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 4>I've been tracking this for a very long time. I

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 4>remember my first appearance on odd Lass in twenty seventeen

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 4>to talk about Made in China twenty twenty five, and

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I was pretty constructive that China was going to figure

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 4>out a lot of these technologies, and I think that

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 4>was fairly out of consensus at the time, and I

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 4>think that was fairly. China has made incredible strides beyond

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 4>my expectations of and I has been pretty bullish about

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of that. And something I worry about is

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 4>that I think that China's success in advanced manufacturing will continue.

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 4>I just wrote a piece with Arthur Kroeber and Foreign

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Affairs pointing out that even though China's economy is slowing,

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 4>and even though there's all sorts of problems with the

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 4>economy and the political system, they're going to keep advancing

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.240
<v Speaker 4>on manufacturing and technology because they have the manufacturing process

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 4>knowledge and they have the investments really to push them forward.

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 4>And I think that we're already seeing that China is

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 4>de industrializing Germany. Brat Setzer has great charts on this

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 4>all the time, especially in the automotive sector. I think

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 4>that China will continue to de industrialize the rest of

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 4>East Asia Europe as well, and that will move on

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 4>to the United States as well. And I don't have

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 4>too many great views about the security threat or what

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 4>is going to happen with military, but I think this

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 4>the clear and present danger is that China's technology keeps

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 4>advancing and that will further de industrialize parts of the

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 4>Midwest as well as many parts of Europe, and I

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 4>think that is going to create all sorts of political

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 4>problems in the West as well, And that is the

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 4>big danger that I'm nervous about.

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 2>What does the US need to do in order to

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 2>preserve its own manufacturing capacity, and I guess ideally build

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 2>it out.

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 4>I think there has to be a lot more investment

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 4>in manufacturing process knowledge, which is all of the TACIT

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 4>knowledge that we can't really write down that we have

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 4>to have be a lot better at producing things like

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 4>not only semiconductors, but also electric vehicle batteries and broader

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 4>sets of electronics as well. I think it would be

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 4>a good idea for the US to invite more Chinese

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 4>companies to build factories in Michigan and Ohio Wisconsin find

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 4>put some controls on them. But if China's Force technology

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 4>program worked against let's say, Apple and Tesla and all

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 4>of these other American companies, why don't we do it

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 4>to them and learn from the best. In terms of manufacturing.

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm really skeptical that everything that the Trump administration right

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 4>now is doing has been good for manufacturing. As best

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 4>as we can tell, the US has lost forty fives

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.439
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing jobs since Liberation Day, and that was the last

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 4>data reading that we have forty thousand jobs lost. I

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 4>think that it doesn't make sense to pursue technology while

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 4>decapping the NSF and the NIH, doesn't make sense tonecap

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.879
<v Speaker 4>top universities. It doesn't make sense to deport a lot

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 4>of lower skilled labor that are really important for construction

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 4>as well as manufacturing. And it doesn't make sense to

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 4>try to intimidate higher skilled people researchers to be in

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 4>the US as well. Now, maybe there's something good to

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 4>be said for energy production in the US. There's probably

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.919
<v Speaker 4>something good to be said for the deregulatory agenda under

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Trump to build a little bit more, But right now

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:44.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm not seeing much energy and further to build more

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 4>than let's say, detention centers, coal plants, skilled ballrooms, not

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 4>really the sort of you know, advanced manufacturing that America needs.

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 3>It's funny to think about coal powered electric vehicles in

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 3>the future, coal powered AI data centers or whatever, but

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>seems like a plausible thing that we'll see at one point.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 3>One area where the US is clearly dominant, and we've

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 3>already touched on this is like global Internet services, and

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 3>obviously you have what I guess now we'd call the

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.760
<v Speaker 3>legacy ones like your metas and Microsoft's and Amazon. But also,

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, open Ai is still you know, it's the

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 3>biggest in the world, and it could be on scale

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 3>and have a footprint as big as some of these

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 3>other giants. It seems like the world is very happy

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 3>to buy bid cars and other built things. But we

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 3>saw the UK di Juae itself several years ago. Will

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the world adopt Chinese core tech or

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>do you think there's still an anxiety about this, maybe

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 3>because of perceptions of the influence that the party would

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 3>have over these companies, et cetera. Does the US still

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 3>enjoy a relative advantage in the comfort that around the

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 3>world people have with using sort of US digital service.

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Certainly, I think there's a lot of governments that are

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 4>really nervous about Chinese technologies the UK, there's all sorts

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 4>of restrictions on Huawei products kind of globally, and we've

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 4>seen even countries really friendly towards China really complain about

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 4>how much it is flooding their markets. We've seen Brazil

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 4>complain about this, We've seen Russia complain about this, and

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 4>so I think governments all over the world are trying

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 4>to have some measure to block Chinese goods. On the

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 4>other hand, I think consumers really don't care, you know what.

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like for a car or you know, I

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 3>would I'd like to show me phone. No, I don't know,

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe they look they look pretty cool, or a zte

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 3>phone or.

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 4>Powerful show that's a national security threat we are reporting you.

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 4>But I think, yeah, definitely, there's a lot of people

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 4>who camera. The cameras seem great, and the BYD cars

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 4>and the Salami cars seem to be also really good

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 4>as well. People want to buy these things, and I

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 4>think the Chinese attitude is, Okay, if you want to

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 4>terrify us, we'll challenge you in wto if that's still

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 4>a thing or will you know, try to push back diplomatically,

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 4>but we're not going to restrain our own exports. What

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 4>we need to do is, you know, if you want

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 4>to block our exports and make good it's more expensive

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 4>for your consumers, that's on you. So, you know, I

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 4>think that's kind of its attitude, and I think there's

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 4>also some nervousness now among European governments from buying American Cloud.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if that is going to necessarily lead

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 4>to your purchases, but maybe.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Tracy, do you have the show me dog feeder?

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 2>No, that I wasn't even aware of that.

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's the thing. There's incredible showing with me. It's

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 3>not just oh's the phone company? Then when cars? You know,

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 3>there's a Shelby rice cooker. There's a shell me TOAs.

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 2>What does the dog feeder do?

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's like a smart dog feeder and it

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 3>knows when to release more food into the bowl using

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 3>all these centers.

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm old school. I just have a bowl that

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 3>That might be my Christmas present too, if I can

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:47.439
<v Speaker 3>acquire one.

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. You're getting an autograph copy of Herman Melville's

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 2>movie Deck if I can find one. Wait, I shouldn't

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 2>say that because people will be like, oh, don't you

0:43:55.640 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 2>know he's dead. You're getting a first edition of the

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Moby Dick if I can find.

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 3>The Rockwell Kent illustration.

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, noted, I just want to go back

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 2>to what we were talking about in the intro for

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a second, which is the new Involution campaign. Again, it

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>seems like China is trying to get a handle on

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:21.439
<v Speaker 2>some of these overcapacity issues. Is it going to work,

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.919
<v Speaker 2>and what are your general thoughts on this fresh attempt.

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 4>I was living in China when China first announced this

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 4>big supply side reform effort back in twenty seventeen, when

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I tried to reduce a lot of its expansions in steel,

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 4>and this was kind of the big effort. What's really

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 4>different right now is that China's trying to control not

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 4>really the activities of the say, own enterprise sector, is

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to control more of the activities of the private sector,

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think that is much more difficult as well.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 4>And I think, you know, it's going to be too

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 4>early to say, but there may be a future in

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 4>which China actually consolidates a lot of the solar production

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 4>to bigger firms, but then all of them become much

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 4>more capable, and they become much bigger threats to foreign

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 4>solar makers to the extent that there are any. But

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 4>consolidation is probably going to help raise quality because there

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 4>are going to be fewer firms earning more profit that

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 4>are going to be able to reinvest more in expansion

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 4>in R and D. So I think that overproduction is

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of endemic to China, which is partly why it's

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 4>the engineering state. This is what they're really good at.

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 4>They're just not thinking enough about services, and so I'm

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 4>skeptical that they're going to be able to really tamp

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 4>down overproduction a little longer run.

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, Dan Wong, The book is breakneck. It's a

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 2>fantastic read. Joe and I make a very brief appearance,

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 2>so if anyone's interested in that as well, definitely pick

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 2>it up. But d yeah, thank you so much for

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 2>coming back on and for being on the Pod repeatedly

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 2>over almost a decade.

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Now I want to be a friend of the Pod

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 4>for the next decade as well.

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Joe.

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Always good to have Dan on, and I'm so glad

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 2>he's sort of like synthesized and laid out all of

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 2>his thoughts because again, like Dan has been watching Chinese

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 2>technology and analyzing the Chinese economy for years and years

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 2>of fear was before it was cool, and really in

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 2>many respects had a front row seat do some pretty

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 2>big developments like the tech crackdown, like COVID zero policies

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 2>in China. So it's really good to read his narrative

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 2>and get his thoughts.

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 3>No, Dan's the best. I love him. You know what's

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 3>interesting I was thinking about and I saw some discussion

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 3>of this online. I forget who. But one thing we

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't talk about is, you know, there isn't the persistent

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 3>real estate slump right in China. They have not there

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 3>has not yet been a bottom. It's not the end

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:57.399
<v Speaker 3>of the world. And actually cheaper housing. Many people would

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 3>say that would be a nice problem they have in

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 3>this perspective right now. But if you think about the

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 3>combination of consolidating the private sector, if you say, okay,

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 3>there's overproduction in the private sector, what that means is

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 3>that there's a lot of people employed who shouldn't be

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 3>or who are it's unsustainable. If you think about that shrinking,

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be a contributor to a softening in

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the real estate. That's fewer people of jobs, that's fewer

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 3>people who can buy homes. See, when you think about

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 3>the internal balances, there's some real attentions because it's like, yeah,

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 3>of course, let's consolidate. But then you add to the

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 3>woes of one of the biggest sectors in the economy.

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, we have seen the youth unemployment rate

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 2>pick up recently, and I think that's where you start

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to get into some interesting questions around the social contract

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 2>that the party has with people and this you know,

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 2>expectation that living standards are going to continue to improve

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 2>forever like that is the pressure on the party right,

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 2>and to some extent, as you point out, it's intention

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 2>with the idea of having very efficient companies that are

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 2>operating at scale and at low cost.

0:47:58.840 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 3>One of the things too, it comes up I think

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of the China conversations is this sort

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 3>of uselessness of a lot of political terms that we

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 3>use here. It came up with Joseph Triggan when we

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 3>were talking about a look, what is the right, you know,

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 3>the the ultra left within the party, mean the ultra right,

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. But even hearing Dan talk about well it's

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 3>a sort of right wing Leninist country, et cetera. Like

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 3>these words that we use to describe politics, I think

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 3>they maybe they detract more than they clarify when we're

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 3>talking about China.

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe in political labels.

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Joe, No, that's good. That's good, all right. I respect that.

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the aud Thoughts podcast.

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart.

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Follow Dan Wong He's at Dan w Wong, and of

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 3>course check out his new book Breakneck. Follow our producers

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand Dashill Bennett at Dashbot and

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 3>kill Brooks at Kilbrooks. For more Odd Loots content, go

0:48:57.080 --> 0:48:59.479
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots with the daily

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 3>news letter and all of our episodes, and you can

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 3>chat about all of these topics twenty four to seven

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 3>in our discord Discord dot gg slash hotlines.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 2>when we have Dan Wong on the show, then please

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.320
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening