WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Retail, Energy and Inflation (Podcast)

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look ahead at

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming way from my Daybreak

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.079
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world, and just a hit on

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the program. How is retail holding up? Are consumers pulling back?

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>John Tucker in New York. I'm Stephen Carlin London. But

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking ahead to the results from the struggling German

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>energy giants Uniper and Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. Low

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>levels of inflation, record low interest rates and a better

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>than expected economy. What are we talking about Indonesia? I'm

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Amy Morris in Washington. We're gauging the impact of the

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>investigations in the President Trump's dealings on downballot races. That's

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg Elibam

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Free O, New York, Bloomberg one, Washington, d C, Bloomberg

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one oh six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixties, San Francisco,

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>d AB, Digital Radio London, Sirius XM one nineteen and

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and via

0:00:56.000 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Hi, everybody, I'm John Tucker, and

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>let's start today's program with retail and Bloomberg's retail reporter

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Case joining us from Dallas. We have a bunch

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>of retailers opening their books in the coming week home

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Dee Paul, Walmart, parent of t J Banks and Marshall's

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Target calls Macy's Ross Stars. So, before we get to

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the specifics, Brendan, how is the American consumer

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>holding up? I think the after that is so so.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>What you've seen so far is you've seen pretty steady,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>even sometimes robust, overall spending. But if you break that down,

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing is a consumer that is increasingly under

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stress. And what that is causing is

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a situation where people are being forced to spend a

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more on essentials, food, fuel, things like that, and

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's leaving a lot less money left over for discretionary goods.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>UM and us emerged as a big problem for Walmart, Target,

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all retailers, UM and I think that with

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the earnings reports coming out the next week and and

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and also after that, we should get a lot more

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>insight into how these companies think the consumer will hold

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>up the rest of the year. We'll get more about

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the back to school shopping season and probably get there.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of the retailer's first predictions about the holiday

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rush at the end of the year. We're already up

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to that. Yeah, we're already there. I mean, of course,

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of these retailers, they've been planning for

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that since February literally. Um, but it's it's it's it's

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>increasingly upon us. You know, last year that holiday season

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>started pretty early because of all the supply changes, ruptions,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are out shopping, you know, earlier than usual. Um.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see what happens this year. I think the

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>question boils down to whether retail spending is going to

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>end up being a lot weaker after two very strong

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>years during the pandemic. Okay, Um, we're still buying stuff,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's just the stuff that's lower margin. I mean,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to buy groceries. I gotta eat, but maybe

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spend you buy a TV or

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Yeah, that's exactly right. So if you

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>look at that through the prism of of Walmart Target,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>what that means is that people are spending a lot

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>more on groceries, which those companies make less money off of. Um,

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they make more money from general merchandise sales, you know,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like clothing, electronics, home goods, um. And they're selling a

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lot less of those more profitable items and a lot

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>more of the low margin items. And so if you

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>take a company like Walmart, they actually, you know, they're

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>actually doing fine from a revenue perspective. They actually raised

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>their revenue forecast a little bit less month. But since

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they're selling more of their less profitable you know stuff

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>their their their groceries, UM, it's really hurting profit. And

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's also causing them to mark down a lot of items,

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>which further erode their profit margins. And that's not to

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say that they're cutting all prices. I think what they're

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>doing is basically boosting the price any any place they can,

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but in some categories the sales just aren't there and

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're having to cut prices. Okay, Well that leads

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>me to the next question, as far as the inventories.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Are the inventories of these places bloated, yes, very much.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so why wouldn't they automatically have to discount then? Right, Well,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're doing to a certain extent. And the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mystery is that we don't know exactly what their inventories

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>are made up of. But if you imagine the inventories

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as being a little bit overweighted towards discretionary goods they

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.679
<v Speaker 1>thought they could sell earlier this year, that's what they're

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>having to mark down more and more aggressively. And we're

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about clothing, We're talking about kitchen appliances, we're talking

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about patio furniture, all that stuff that people are stocking

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>up on during the pandemic. You know, the retailers knew

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that spending was going to tail off on those categories,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but what they misjudged is just how fast that would happen. Um.

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But what they're not doing is they're not discounting the

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>central goods that people are increasingly, you know, using their

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>paychecks to to to die. Do these places they have

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>their own credit cards? And the reason I answered do they?

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Does that tell us much about how much debt is

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>being racked up by their customers, whether those they're paying

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>off those credit card balances? Yeah, a lot of them do.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Targets got its own credit card. A lot of the

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>department stores have their own credit cards, the Hume Gold stores, UM.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you're see being there is that

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, spending um has been very strong, and savings

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>had been going up a lot during the pandemic, in

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>large part because of the government stimulus programs and also

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>because people were not going out as much. I think

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing now is that people are increasingly kind

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of blowing through those savings. They've got um less of

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a cushion, and you know, that's really starting to eat

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>into what they're able to actually spend its stores and

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of causing this overhang on retail sales. Brendon will

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Thanks very much for joining us. We

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Bloomberg's retail reporter, Brendan Case. And just ahead

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, look at Germany's Uniper and the

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Russian energy crunch on. John Tucker. This is Bloomberg. This

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our global look ahead of the

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm John

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Tucker in New York. Up leader in the program. Indonesia's

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>economy has been homming along. Can it continue? But first,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the German energy giant Uniper will report results that will

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>be closely scrutinized this week. That firm has been at

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the center of Europe's energy crisis since it was forced

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to seek a government bail out last month. And for more,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>let's into London now and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>anchor Stephen Carroll. Stephen thanks a lot. John. Uniper is

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Germany's biggest buyer of Russian gas and was pushed to

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the brink because Vladimir Putin squeeze supplies and retaliation for

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>European sanctions against Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Germany's economy Minister

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert Habeck has warned that Russia's gas squeeze posed the

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>risk of a Lehman Brothers like contagion with universe failure

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially spilling over to the wider economy. So these are

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a set of results very keenly watched. For more, I'm

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>joined by Bloomberg's Rachel Morrison, who leads our team of

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>energy reporters here in London. Rachel, what exactly is it

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about these results that we're looking out for most importantly, Yes,

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it's going to be super interesting because a

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of what these results will cover will be the

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>period before the government bailout. So Uniper has been quite

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>upfront with updates to the market on how much money

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they were losing, so a lot of that was in

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the lead up to the bailout. But we expect to

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>see a bit more on the losses they're making on

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>having to buy gas to replace the gas and not

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>getting from Russia and those contracts that you know they

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>have to pass onto customers. So we'll see, you know,

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe an update on losses and really what their balance

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sheet is looking like. So we don't know how they

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>will factor in the government bailout, but we'll get an

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of just how quickly they're burning through money, and

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it will be interesting to see how much of a

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>problem the gas supply situation is still causing them. It's

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>because this is a company that's at the point to end,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if I can put it that way, of this crisis

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and the supply issues coming from Russian gas as well.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing governments across Europe trying to address these

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>issues with big state owned energy companies when they're dealing

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with different supply issues. Another case of that z d

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>F and France, where the French government, which already owned

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of that company, has now stepped in

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to try and buy more of it. Is this a

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>big challenge facing governments in Europe to try and manage

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>crises and energy giants. Yes, we're really seeing a time

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>when energy companies are just too big to fail. So

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the chaos that would ensue from the downfall of one

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of these big companies. So on the kind of industrial side,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>these companies by wholesale gas and sell it to industry,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and also they both have customer facing parts to the business,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not just at home but in other countries too, and

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the disruption that that would cause if they were to

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>fail just wouldn't be fathomable at this time. You know,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the past, perhaps another company could step in UM

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>and so there wouldn't be the same kind of impetus

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>from governments to bail out companies. But at the moment,

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the same pressures face most of the other companies and

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>it would be difficult to find anyone else to step in,

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly with some of the bills we've seen that UM

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>governments have picked up with the likes of Uniper and

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>e d F. You know, that's not going to be

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>something that another company can easily provide, which is really

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>why it has to be government intervention. And does that

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>mean for governments essentially, no prices too high to pay

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to save these companies In a way, that is what

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to What we were seeing with Uniper

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was the kind of discussion with Finland trying to get

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>them to help out as well, and the pushback sort

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of saying, you know, we don't because the cost obviously

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gets passed on two people. So the government, the German government,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>will pass those costs on eventually to German consumers, and

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>so they wanted to try to spread some of that

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>burden because you know it it fixes things today. But

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in a way, a lot of the costs get kicked

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>down the road, and it means the crisis could last

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>longer and longer as those costs continue to feed for

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>two bills. Indeed, there's an element of this that's quite

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>reminiscent of the Eurozone crisis as well, where we were

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about big government intervention. At the time, it was

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>more related to banks and how and exactly who pays

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for that. Further down the line as well, how much

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of a challenge is this for governments to manage these

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sorts of unruly issues around how predictable I suppose is

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that these problems would arise for governments. Yes, I think

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly that. It's a sort of short term sigh

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of relief from everybody, But then later, you know, there

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>needs it needs to be worked out, what happens and

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>how to how to pay for it, because a lot

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening in the energy markets has not gone away.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, high prices haven't changed, the Russian situation is

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>still going. Gas supply is still being curbed, so those

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>factors that were causing big problems are still there. So

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it may become to a point where the

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>government's tested on how deep their pockets are if if

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Uniper continues to need cash, what they can cut back

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on what they can do with passing on the cost

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to customers, which has been a big issue in Germany

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that they can't pass a lot of those extra costs

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>onto their industrial customers. We're in the summer in Europe now,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>so this is the period where normally we'd see demand

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for these sort of energy companies being lower. That's not

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>been the case due to some of the heat waves involved.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But how much worse could this problem get later in

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the year when we head into winter. Yes, that's right.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's that's really the most surprising thing about some of

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the sort of supply issues that we've seen from um

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the warm rivers in particular in Germany and in France,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some output cuts at power plants. And this

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is summer. As you said, demand is low, so we're

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>really seeing a kind of fear about what will happen

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if demand continues to rise, as we know that it

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>will a winter. What happens when the weather gets cold,

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you cannot find any more supply for the market,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>then the only thing you can do is cut demand.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing government starting to draw up their emergency

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>plans figure out which industries they'll cut, who who can

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>who can give back some of the demand that they

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>usually need, because we're not going to be able to

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>supply power and gas to everybody in the same way

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>as we did last winter. And of course that's not

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just a continental European problem. We're seeing the UK government

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>also prepare for that problem leading up to blackouts. Were

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>told yes, it's looking like there's a four day period

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in January that they're particularly worried about, where if the

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>weather gets cold, if supply on interconnectors, both power coming

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>from the continent and gas is limited that there wouldn't

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>be enough gas perhaps for power generation, and at that

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>point they may need to take action to cut industry

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and also households. So that's sort of likely to be

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of rolling way where they may say

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to one region at a time that you know, you

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have to have no electricity for an hour or so,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and then swap between the different regions. But I mean,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's really quite shocking to think that, you know, a

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>G seven economy can can be facing that in just

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a few months time. Are there any other i'll turnative

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>options for energy sources? So gases has been traditionally been

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the filler to pick up where other energy sources can't

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>compete either any other choices that governments have. That's really

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the reason why Europe is rushing to fill gas storage.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>So that's the best way that you know, we can

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>keep those reserves. We know how much we have, we

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>can use it. However, the problem is is that even

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>if we get those levels full, if Russia cuts off

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the gas, you know, just quite soon into the winter,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>say October November, then analysts do think that we will

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>run out of gas in storage. Okay, Rachel Morrison leading

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>our team of energy reporters here in London. Thank you

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>very much for your time. I'm Stephen Caroline, London. You

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>can catch us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>beginning at six am in London and one am on

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. John Justly Hill on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Name

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>one country where the economy has been coming along and

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation isn't a problem yet. We'll take a look at

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia and John Tucker broadcasting live from the Bloomberg Interactive

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio in New York. Bloomberg Trio to Washington, d C,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco,

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty to the country, Sirius XM Channel one

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen to London, d A B digital radio, and around

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the globe the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend. I'm John Zuckery in

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>New York with your global looking ahead of the top

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. You know, we

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about how inflation is slamming Asian countries

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and growth has been slow, but you know that's not

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>true everywhere in Asia for more. Let's go to Hong

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Kong and Bloomberg day Break Asia hosts Brian Curtis and

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>his colleague Doun Krisner, John Doug and I thought it

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>would be a good time to talk about Indonesia. Indonesia's

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>annual budget comes out on August. The economy has been

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>humming along very nicely this year, even with some of

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the extraordinary challenges of supply chain disruptions and inflation around

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. The Jakarta Composite Index is one of the

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>few global stock benchmarks to actually be in the green

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for the year, and unlike many countries, inflation in Indonesia

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is not being viewed as a major issue. Bank Indonesia's

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>core inflation measure is near the midpoint of its goal

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that between two to four percent. Even so, the central

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bank is expected to raise infest rates this month. Joining

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>us is Claire Jao, who reports on the Indonesian economy

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. So a lot, Claire is going right

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in Indonesia. It's been helped a lot, I guess by

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>high commodity prices for a big part of the first

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>half of the year. But they're also getting policy right.

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>In Indonesia, what would you say is the sweet spot

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Yeah, Indonesia has really been one of

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the few lucky countries of twenty two. As you've said, well,

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world has been worried about inflation.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia has had manageable inflation. The budget is in surplus,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and record low interest rates until now, well everyone is hiking.

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's curious because if you look at the latest

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>reading on consumer confidence for the month of July, I

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>think the index was down a little bit more than

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 1>what we saw in June. How is the Indonesian consumer faring?

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>If you look at inflation in Indonesia, the headline inflation

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>has been a pretty good number. We're still at five

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>percent uh, it's breached the central banks target of two

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to four percent. However, if you strip out all of

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the volatile items and look at just core inflation, which

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is what the central bank is looking at, it's still

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at three percent, which is still at the midpoint of

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>its target. That's really what's helped it keep interest rates

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>at record lows. However, as you mentioned, consumer sentiment is

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>going down, and the reason for that is because volatile

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>food items are surging, the prices are searching for that.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That's for important foods like so if for example, and

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>um crops like chili, garlic that have been affected by

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>bad weather. So there is there does seem to be

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a divide between what the central bank

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is tracking, which is core inflation, and what consumers really

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>feel on the ground based on what everyday items they

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>buy and what every day items they have to consume.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>What happens when commodity prices really turn. We've seen some

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>easing of commodity prices, generally a big drop in oil prices.

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>In such if there's a bigger fall off, how does

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that affect the country? I guess that's the mystery that

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>that Indonesia has to face next year. The government is

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>well aware that the commodity we've has to turn at

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some point UM and that much of what's driving price

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>pressures up to day is what's happening in supply chains

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and the war in Ukraine UM. And that's really given

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>them a lot of leeway this year. That's given them

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>record high exports, that's given them government revenues, that's allowed

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>them to pour in as much as thirty four billion

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars in subsidies and compensation to keep energy costs low

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>for ordinary Indonesians. That same situation may not happen in

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>once these coal and oil prices fall. So what they're

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>hoping for is to start to taper off UM some

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of their unnecessary spending UM. President Joco Weddo has told

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>his ministers, don't start new projects, Let's focus on just

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>finishing the existing ones. So it's very interesting that you

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>bring up the president because in the coming week, the

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief of Bloomberg News, John mickel Thwaite, will

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be sitting down in conversation with President Joco Weddo. Recently, Joco,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we ordered the cabinet to keep using the budget. Fore

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is I think the way the Finance minister described it

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as a shock absorber keeping that budget deficit below three

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of total GDP. So talk to us a little

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 1>bit about the importance of government subsidies in keeping the

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Indonesian economy in this current sweet spot. I think that's

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>how Brian described it. Yeah. So, and as we've seen

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>with many countries, inflation can be a very political issue,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and Ko we saw that earlier this year. When cocaing

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>oil prices surged and his popularity ratings fell. So this

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is something that's very very close to his heart. Um.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>He was a very firm advocate in streamlining fuel subsidies,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>energy subsidies, but that's something that they've really stepped back

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>on this year, and instead they've said, whatever money that

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we're earning from our record high exports, let's pour it

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>back into the economy through these subsidies instead. Clara, thanks

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us and for sharing your insights

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on Indonesia. Claire Joe, who reports on the Indonesian economy

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, Brian Curtis along with Doug Krisner. You

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>can catch us every weekday here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>beginning at six am in Hong Kong and six pm

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>on morste John, Brian, and Duck. Thanks a lot. Just

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to Hill of Bloomberg day Break Weekend, former President Trump

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and the g This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>look ahead of the top stories for investors in the

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>coming week. I'm John Tucker in New York. Watch for

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to either continue to try to capitalize on former

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's recent headlines or try to distance themselves from

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>them for more or let's head to our bloombergroom in

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington and Amy Morris Amy. All right, thank you, John,

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And we do have more primaries underway in the coming week,

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>more investigations unfolding as well. Joining me now to talk

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about this and to connect some dots. Bloomberg National political

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>reporter barn Naquette, Mark, thank you so much for taking

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the time with us. Good to be with you. Now,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the GOP and former President Trump and um,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans you've seen casting Trump as a victim in

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>all of this these investigations. How has this galvanized them? Well,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly the search warrant that the FBI executed at Trump's

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Morilago resort this week. Um. The Republicans have really sought

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize, I think on that rate in in a

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of ways. One by firing up the Republican base

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for the mid term elections where in control of Congress

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>will be determined. Uh. And also President Trump, I think

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to try to use it to solidify support

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>around him. Um. You know we've seen you know, Trump

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and prominent Republicans for a long time. Um, try and

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>undermine UH credibility and and and trust in major institutions,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying these institutions are broken and are after Trump

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in particular and Republicans in general, whether it's the Justice

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Department and the FBI and the media and fake news

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and big tech which censors conservatives. So this rate in Florida, UM,

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of being used to reinforce that idea

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that UM, you know, the Democrats in particular and UH

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>control of the machinery of government are are out to

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>get Trump and Republicans. This could fire up the base.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But also I think that Trump's the hoping and it's

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can sort of bolster his grip on the GOP. And

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we had seen signs that it was slipping with the

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>January six investigations. UH. And you know, some things like

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>his endorsed candidates not winning in some high profile races

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>like in Georgia, UM and Poles were showing that, you know,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were starting to feel like even if they loved Trump,

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they loved his policies, they loved his first term. You know,

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they might be opened to somebody like Governor PA Governor

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Ron de Santis, who supports saw the Trump policies, but

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the same political baggage you know, for potential run.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So again, the rates sort of I think you've seen

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Republicans rallying around Trump and you know, in

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in some ways could actually boost his support within the party.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I wondered about that. You mentioned that this would fire

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>up the base but couldn't move the needle or changed minds.

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean is those who are really entrenched

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump tend to be unflinchingly rigid. They're not

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>going to sway. Will this make them maybe have a

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>second thought? Or on the flip side of that, those

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>quote never trumpers that we've heard about, would this move

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the needle for them? Would they start thinking, Wow, they

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>really are treating him unfairly, Like does the needle move

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>either way depending on which side of the coin you're

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at. Yeah, that's a good question. I think the

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>answer is we don't know. I mean, you're right, I

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>think sort of the first impression or first instinct is

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that this, this rate in particular, is not going to

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>really change any minds. If you you know, before the rate,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know hated Donald Trump and think, you know, he

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>should be in jail. This you know, this rate will

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>just reinforce it that he's you know, um deserved ing

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of being rated. Um. But if you were, like you said,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>a Trump supporter, Um, you know, the ray will just

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>reinforce the idea that the Democrats are out to get him.

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the question is does it does it motivate

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>anybody to vote who otherwise might not be inspired to

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>vote in the mid terms, particularly Republicans? You know, does

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of get you know, a Republican voter off

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the couch he thinks, well, yeah, you know, it really

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is important that I vote in this selection because again,

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are out to get the Republicans and Donald Trump.

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a matter of winning hearts and minds

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>as it is just getting people out to the polls,

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>increasing that that appearance of the polls right in particular

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of these key midterm races, um, you know,

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>where you know, swing voters could could matter and in

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>determining the outcome of who wins and you know, ultimately

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>who controls you know, Congress. Looking ahead though, could this

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly motivate Donald Trump to announce a run for president

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later? I know there was a debate

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>amongst some of his supporters saying, no, no, no, you

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>want to wait because of the financial implications and the

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the debts that you might have to pay off. What

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>would be the advantage of announcing sooner because of the

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>search by the FBI. Yeah, you're right, there's there's some

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in his world that are calling for him to announce immediately.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon, for for one, UM, he's saying, you know,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>President should fly down to Marrow Largo today and and

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>announced he's running. Um. There's some thought that you know,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this would help him, UM by sort of capitalizing on

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>on the raid and say well, hey, I'm fighting back.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And and also you know, there's there's some thought that

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if he's a an announced candidate for president,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes it harder for um, these various investigations to

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to touch him. You know, that the idea that it

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>would be harder to prosecute a you know, uh, an

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>actual federal candidate rather than somebody who just talked about

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>running for office. But there's still you know, a big

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>push against Trump doing that. A lot of Republicans feel

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like if if Donald Trump announced that he's running in

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>today that this would actually hurt Republicans efforts to retake

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>control of the House and the Senate in the midterm elections.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans very much want to run on um skyrocketing inflation

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and crime and issues they think and they could really

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>use against Democrats and make the midterm races about that.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And if Donald Trump is running for president, the fear

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is that could just energize Democrats, you know, particularly some

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of these swinging independent voters who don't like Trump, to

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>get out and vote UM and distract from the attempts

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>by Republicans to use inflation in the economy against Democrats. So,

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Democrats would very much like the races

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be about Donald Trump and not you know, some

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the issues they're fighting. And we are talking with

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg National political reporter Mark Niquet about former President Trump's

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>legal problems and how that could impact voters. Now, Mark,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you are in Ohio. You've covered presidential campaigns, including the

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign in twenties six, and you've been tracking these investigations.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about what it looks like inside the GOP

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Is there more of a split than we're

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing publicly? Are those are those who may be laying

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork for a post Trump GOP Actually was kind

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of seeing the opposite where you know, we had, um,

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some uncertainty before the the FBI raid about you know,

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>who would actually be willing to challenge Donald Trump in

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if you ran on the Republican side. UM. You know,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we had potential Canadas like former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, UM, UH,

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Senator Tom Cotton, UM, former UN Ambassador UH, Nikki Hayley,

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, all out there sort of laying the groundwork

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for a potential run, but unclear if they would actually

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>challenge Trump if he ran. UM. And with this this raid,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you've seen sort of a rallying around Donald Trump.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, immediately after the raid, UM, you saw virtually

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the potential Republican presidential candidates, including Ronda Santis

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>UM putting out tweets and statements supporting Trump and calling

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this raid you know, politically motivated and and and the like,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>UM sort of suggesting that they feel like Trump still

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is the king of the GOP and you know they

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>needed to be out front, you know, supporting him on

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this raid. So I think it raises the question does

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this make it more difficult? UM? For any of these

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>candidates to actually challenge Trump. If Trump announces for again,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think part of what happens when we have a

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>big news event like this is a goal. We want

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to analyze it and you know, decide determinatively what what

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what it means and what the impact is going to be.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think we really have to wait to see

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what the gist of the investigation is and what evidence

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>actually does come out of this again, so they will

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>determine what the public perception of whether the UH search

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of a former president's home was justified. And looking forward,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there are more primaries ahead marked including in Wyoming. Everybody's

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>watching that one rep. Senaitive, Liz Cheney is expected to

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>lose her seat, But I don't know that it is

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a foregone conclusion. Let's just do a what if? What

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if Cheney does lose? What comes next for her? Well,

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there's some thought that she might use this as a

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>springboard to to run for president that um, you know,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>she's committed, if nothing else, to seeing that Donald Trump

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>does not get re elected president or even win the

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican nomination. Um. So you know, there's some thinking that

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, even a loss in in this Wyoming race

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>could sort of make her a martyr for the cause

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that she's defending truth and um, you know, pursuing a

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>righteous path. Um. You know, the big question I think

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we have about that race is, you know, how many

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Independence cross over to to vote for Cheney. Um.

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the polls suggests that, you know, she's gonna lose,

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 1>and she's gonna lose big, and that Republicans overwhelmingly do

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not support her and support her opponent, Harriet Hagman. But

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Wyoming is one of these states where it's a sort

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of open primary where anybody can go in and ask

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Republican ballot. And you know, there's signs that

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of Democrats and Independence are interested

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in supporting Hamen like that she's taking on Donald Trump,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and could um, you know, pull the Republican ballot and

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I could sort of skew the the outcome. And if

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there's enough of these um folks who are crossing over,

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it could make the race a lot closer than we

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think or that the polls right now are suggesting. All right, Mark,

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you for taking the time with us.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be watching those results with you, Thanks

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so much. Thank you. Mark Niquette covers Congress for Bloomberg News,

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is what is going on in the nation's capital.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>For more of our political news coverage, tune into Balance

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of Power with David Weston weekdays at noon Wall Street Time,

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and Sound On with Joe Matthew weekdays at five pm

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time. Right here on Bloomberg Radio, I'm Amy Morris.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg John, Amy Morris for hoarding from our

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg room in Washington. Thanks a lot, Amy, and that

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>us again Monday morning at five am All Street Time

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>for the latest on markets overseas and the news you

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>need to start your today. I'm John Tucker and this

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg