WEBVTT - Tail as Old as Time: Part 2

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lam and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be part two of our two

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>part episode about tales Now. Last time, we talked about

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>many of the wonderful biological mysteries of tales, about the

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>unsettled science of courtship tales and the role they play

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in p foul mating. We talked about propulsion, We talked

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>about pre intile tales, climbing, climbing and anchoring, kangaroos using

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>their tails, as as as what to become the rockham

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sock'em robots that kangaroos are. They lean back on those

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wonderful stumpy things. Talked about energy conservation, fat storage. But

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to talk about biological methods of communication

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>through tales, tales in in self mutilation for survival, and

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the question of human tales. Where are they are? Where

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they go? Are we going to get them back? Perhaps

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>when the world is is perfect, we'll grow that that

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>new utopian tail. We'll get to that too. So one

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first things that we should address is the

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>role of tales in animal communication. I remember we mentioned

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in the echo Board podcast that much of human communication

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is nonverbal. It's one of the reasons it's so easy

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to be misinterpreted over email or in a text message.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Your tone, your facial expressions, and your body language supplies

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of the shadow grammar of what you're saying. And

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for dogs, the tail can do a lot of this work.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.919
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it might be especially important for dogs because

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>dogs don't have language. They can't speak. They might be

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 1>able to communicate something roughly through barks and other vocalizations.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But but the tail is where it's at. And you

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>know this, like some of these things you already know

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>by heart, dogs tuck their tails between their legs to

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>show submissiveness. That's pretty obvious and widely accepted. You could

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>even compare this tail tucking to closed body language and humans.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We you ever thought about that? Yeah, yeah, so sort

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of even without the tail, we kind of assume that posture,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>this sort of you know, passive, helpful pronosaurus uh kind

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of positioning you can take. Yeah, or if we're if

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>we're feeling apprehensive, we can fold our arms and kind

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of shrink the way you you would when a dog

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>tucks its tail and gets low. Uh. And we we

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think that dogs wag their tails to show they're happy.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>This is sometimes the case, but not always. I read

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting National Geographic article that talked to an Oregon

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>State University animal sciences professor named Monique ou Dell. And

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>according to this article, dog's signal playfulness with a circular

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of wild, circling wag. But they can also signal

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>apprehensiveness too by a showing a slower, more controlled wag.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>That might be the case in general, but some research

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>shows it gets even more specific with what dogs communicate

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>by their wags. And I want to talk about a

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of interesting papers in current biology on dogtail wagging.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a dog at home, next time

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it starts to wag its tail, look at the directional

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>amplitude of tail wagging. And I do want to throw

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in you yourself or a dog owner? Oh yeah, yeah,

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you no a dog? No? I'm I just have

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>one horrible cat right now. Um, and they've never really

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>been a dog person. But I know that some people

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>new to the either new to the show or who

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are used to you know, previous host arrangements. Um, you

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>know it may not be familiar that we now have

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>dog owners dog people on the podcast right. Well, I

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have one dog. My wife Rachel and I have a

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>dog named Charles Darwin. Charlie and I have not yet

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to track Charlie's asymmetric tail wagging, which I'm about

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to get into, but I plan on doing that for

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the week. Anyway, there was a paper

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in March two thousand seven called asymmetric tail wagging responses

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>by Dogs two different emotive stimuli. And this, like I said,

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was in Current Biology, and here a group of researchers

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>discovered what they called quote differential amplitudes of tail wagging

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to the left or the right side associated with the

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>type of visual stimulus the animals were looking at. So

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what this means is, depending on how you visually stimulated

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the dog, what you show a dog, it would tend

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to wag to the right or to the left. Now,

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the tail. If you're picturing how a dog's tail wags,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it goes both ways. It wags back and forth, but

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the amplitude varies, so as it goes back and forth,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it might trend more to the left or trend more

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>to the right. I've never noticed that before. Yeah, And

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>so the experimenters put each dog in a special no

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>distractions box that didn't allow it to look at anything

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>else interesting, and it had one opening that the dogs

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>could see through, and it would allow them to see

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>things in one direction. And the shoal stimuli they tested

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>were the dog's owner, and then an unknown person stranger danger,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>and then a dominant unfamiliar dog, so this is a

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>dog that has been trained to be the boss and

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary, and then a cat, and then of

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>course a control of a blank panel. And they were

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very interesting results when they observed the dogs in these conditions.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>They found that when the dogs looked at their owners,

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they showed a strong right side wag bias uh, and

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the unfamiliar human got less wagging and a weaker right

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>side bias. The cat got much less wagging and a

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:40.119
<v Speaker 1>very very slight right side bias, the unfamiliar dominant dog

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>got a left side bias, and then the blank control

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>also got a slight left side wag bias. And the

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of these results actually had to do with brain lateralization,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>possibly in anticipation of motor control. They said, quote in

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>our experiment stimuli that could be expected to elicit approach tendencies,

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So the dog wanting to approach, such as seeing the

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>dog's owner, were associated with higher amplitude of tail wagging

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>movements to the right side left brain activation, and stimuli

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>that could be expected to elicit withdrawal tendencies such as

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing a dominant unfamiliar dog were associated with higher amplitude

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of tail wagging movements to the left side, and they

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>thought this meant right brain activation. So in the study

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we learned something about how the lateral bias of a

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>tailwag indicates the mindset of a dog. But the big

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>question is do other dogs notice this? Yeah? Like it?

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it would seem like they would. I mean,

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>just based on what we've studied about, you know, human

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>micro expressions and whatnot, so many things that are that

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we end up picking up either consciously or subconsciously as

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>we're observing another person's body language. And we found out

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the dogs totally do notice this. So the same authors

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the two thousand seven study, three of them, were

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>also authors on a November studying Current biology called seeing

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>left or right Asymmetric tail wagging produces different emotional responses

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and dogs. So this is dogs looking at video of

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>another dog wagging its tail to the left or right,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or also a frozen no wag posture, And then I

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thought this was really clever. They tried this both with

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>normal video of a dog wagging its tail and then

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>also just with a black silhahwett of the wagging dog

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on a white background to eliminate other possible cues from

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the dog, like eyes or facial expressions, and they discovered

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this didn't really make a difference. The silhouette wasn't It

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a big difference from looking at regular video of

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the dog, And so the researchers measured the dog's heart

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>rate and then just observe their behavior as they watched

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the different wags, and the results were that there wasn't

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>really a difference between how dogs reacted to the right

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>wagon static control, but when they saw a left wag,

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the dog started showing elevated heart rates as if they're

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>now experiencing stress or anxiety, and the behavioral observation also

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>showed that the dogs exhibited more behaviors associated with stress

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>when they saw the left wag. Curiously, both the left

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wag and the static control were more stressful than the

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>right wag according to this observation metric. So a dog

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>sees another dog with the right wag, that's cool. Dog

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>sees a dog that isn't wagging at all, It seems

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like the dog might be getting some stress reaction there,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe because it can't figure out what to make of

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this dog if it's not wagging at all. Dog sees

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a dog with a left wag. That's definitely a stress reaction.

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Something's going on here, okay, And this is definitely the

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that a human could pick up on

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>two right, Like that that it's not so uh slide

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a movement that we wouldn't be able to see it. No, no, no,

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean they were able to measure it with video. Yeah,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't sure that meant that you had to, like,

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, slow it down and all right, let's zoom

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in on the tail and see to what degree it's

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>actually moving. You know, this is something we would be

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>able to observe. Say that your local dog park. Yeah,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>from everything I could tell, I think, I mean you'd

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have to pay close attention. Okay, So maybe the dog

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>park might be too distracting a location to try to

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>stop yeah, And so they didn't want to draw too

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>many conclusions about exactly what this means about the dog's emotions.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I I might have gone a little too far if

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I said it was definitely stress a minute ago, because

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what they could look at was these these external behaviors

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and then elevated heart rate. So that could mean any

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>number of things. But at least when a dog sees

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>another dog wagging left it, it's having some kind of

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>elevated response. So in this way, dogs do communicate something

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>very relevant about their state of mind with a wag,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and they can see it in other dogs. And that

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>makes me think some interesting questions about the nature of communication. Like,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in a very different way, the idea of communication by

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>tail could also apply to something like a rattlesnake. Mean,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the rattlesnake is definitely communicating with its tail. It is

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>saying don't get near me. Yeah, And so what did

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the dog and the rattlesnake have in common if we

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>assume dogs inadvertently communicating information with tail wags, and I

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>mean inadvertently here, I'm talking about the fact that the

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary purpose of the right or left side bias isn't

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily to share information with others. It might simply be

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a totally accidental byproduct of this brain lateralization they're talking about,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like the wag might not

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>be an adaptation that was selected for because it shared information.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It might be an accident, but it's an accident that

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>does share information, and now they've learned how to make

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>something of that. So in what sense could we say

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is communication if it's just an accidental byproduct

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that we've learned how to draw information from. And to

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what extent does communication have to be deliberate? Yeah? I

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>mean that kind of underlies the complexity of communication in general,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this mix of deliberate and accidental cues and

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>then and mis cues that we have to make sense off. Yeah,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes me wonder about the origins of human language.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that's not exactly the subject today, but just

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like could human could something like human language have come

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>from originally I don't know, incidental vocalizations that were not

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>intended to communicate information, but they did, And then that

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>could develop into something where we harness that for deliberate use. Yeah,

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it could all begin with just a simple you know,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>scream when you're scared, you know, and then that the

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>various nuances involved in in in how we interpret that screen.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Now here's another topic related to tails that I think

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you've done a whole episode on before, which is when

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you pick up a bluetail lizard, you catch it, say,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>in a shoe box, and then its tail comes off

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and the children start screaming, Yes, what's going on there? Well,

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this brings us into the area of autotomy. Uh, as

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's referred this is the shedding of a tail. Nada.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You know that the animals not chewing the tail off,

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not pulling the tail off. It's just simply and

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>not a mouse in a glue trap situation here, just

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a straight up shedding of the tail. And indeed lizards

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get go skinks. H. This is where you you see

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>most of the examples of Caudle autonomy caudles and related

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to the tail. And certainly there is a there's a

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>whole episode of stuff to blow your mind that goes

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>into this in a lot more detail and draws from

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>specific studies. Uh, But for our purposes here, I just

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go over in brief what's occurring. Yeah, and uh,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned blue tailed skinks. Skilton skink, which is a

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>blue tailed skink, is a is a perfect example of

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>autotomy because the tail is bright blue, so it just

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>adds to the attractiveness of this what is essentially thought

0:12:59.920 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of as a predator bribe. So like a cat sees

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a lizard and says, I'm gonna eat that lizard, and

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the lizards might not eat it yet. Yeah, yeah, certainly

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole the I'm going to torture. Yeah, the

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>game of cat perdition is is rather complicated and cruel,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but essentially the lizard reaction is, look, I'm gonna leave,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to leave a little of me behind. Uh.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it has fat in it, it's part

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of me. You can eat it and you will get

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a meal out of it. I'm gonna leave you a meal. Uh,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be easier to catch and put up less

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of a fight. But it's also thrashing around as if

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's alive. It's also bright blue, so it's easier to see.

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So it really is in a sense of bribe. It's

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not just a decoy. It's not just something that the

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>cat gets nothing out of. You could eat the tail

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and get some nutrition. Yeah, it's like the you know,

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have some sort of like a bank heist

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>movie where I've seen this pop up in various stories before,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>where the antiheroes are the heroes have made off with

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the loot that somebody the law enforcement is chasing them.

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Then you have to say, how much money would I

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>have to drop out of the back of this truck

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>where they would stop, like they would actually pick up

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the loot and make off on their own,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, be satisfied with it. So it's it's

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a gamble that the lizard is making. Another

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>example of this kind of behavior. And this isn't certain,

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but there are arguments that a vulture vomits when threatened

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>as as a as a form of bribery as well

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>just saying you can eat me, I'm going to put

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>up a fight, or I could just barf up some

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>food here and you can eat that because delicious as

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we all know, I mean, particularly dogs of many animals,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not gonna be too picky about their food.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>If it's just because it's been in the belly of

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a vulture, it doesn't mean it can't be eaten. Fascinating.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a there's another theory about lizard autotomy, and

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this one comes to us from a two thousand nine

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>University of Michigan study of lizards in Greece that concluded

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that the are there drop their tails when bitten on

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the tail by venomous snakes. Wow. Yeah, so it's the same.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>It's they or maybe they don't know. I mean, maybe

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not a brain response, but there's some kind of

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>automated response. That's that's amazing. Yeah, I mean it's it

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>matches up rather nicely with our you know, our zombie

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>fiction where someone's bit by a zombie, you know, on

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Walking Dead, and then you have to solve that

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>limb off so that the so that that the zombie

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>juice won't seep in and affect the whole organism. But

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the great thing about that, in the zombie stories, you

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>never really know if it's gonna work. Yeah, it's true. Well,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have settled zombie science, do you. It seems

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like it always does. Like there seems to be a

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>silent rule of zombie fiction that if you go and

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>actually do the grueling hard to watch the limb amputation scene,

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>then that character has to survive. You know, I think

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I've encountered it in ways that say it buys you

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>some time, but it doesn't completely solve the problem. Maybe

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got to a smaller concentration of of zombie juice

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in the door. Then, um, so science scientist, you know,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to to go back to the cat example, Like scientists

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have long thought the tail shedding is an issue of

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>predator pressure. But and so this would mean that the

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>more predators there are for a species in a given area,

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the greater the need for an effective defense mechanism. So

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>tail dropping explodes in in any area of high lizard

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>predator pressure. But this two thousand nine study, um, you know,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>argues that the lizards of the offshore A, G, and

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>C Islands examined in the study, Um, in these cases

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to an evolutionary reaction to their

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>single most pressing predator, in this case the vipers. So

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>these are specialized lizard predators, and so you see an

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>emergence of a of a specialized uh anti predator defense. Now,

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how this adaptation affects the viper hunting strategy. Indeed, Yeah,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because any of these these areas, it's Uh, you know,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an arms race with one side trying to keep

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>up with the other. Certainly, So here's a question I've

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>never found out. Can they grow it back? They can

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>grow it back, but it's not the best way to

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think of it is it's not a full size spare.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>You'll grow back a tail that is uh less functional,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, but but also a tail that can be

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>can also be dropped again. So when they dropped the tail,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the muscles that encircle uh this particular plane of the

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>creatures of body, they constrict kind of natural tourniquet to

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep the you know, blood from from bleeding out.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And then immediately after this, the skin also contracts around

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the of the tail, forming a stub,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes out from there. In these little

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>lizards that are everywhere, that's that's science fiction. It's got

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a natural tourniquet. Yeah. And if you're wondering how it

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>even uh severs it to begin with, there's been some

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>cool studies and of this they point out that the

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>tail autonomy occurs at preformed horizontal fracture points. So essentially, um,

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a fracture plane across the vertebra. Um or the

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the the intervertebral and the lizard assists the the autatonomy

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>by by contracting the muscles around that fracture plane. And

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>here the structural integrity of the tail in its connection

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the body is maintained by the

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>adhesion force of integrated muscles, complete with micro structures that

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>mushroom out when it's time to release the tail man. Now,

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it's of course, it's it's interesting when you start thinking

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>about the costs here. You know, the cost of that

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>bribe if you're making, or the cost of losing that

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>limb to the zombie or the or the viper. Well,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a calculated risk because it sounds like

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>losing the tail isn't going to hurt the lizard, except

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's just admitting defeat on a certain front. It's saying, Okay,

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I've put a certain number of resources into the tail.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to give it up. Yeah, it's letting.

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's letting the bad money go down the drain. Yeah,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the bad money's gone down the drain. And then what

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>do you do when another cat shows up. That's it's

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful trick. But once you've you've used it. You've

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>got to regrow that tail to get to the point

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>where you can drop it again. Um. So it's a

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting strategy and and indeed a gamble, but

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>one that's been paying off for him because it's it

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>remains a staple of of a number of different reptiles.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Does anything other than a lizard drop its tail, Yes,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And that brings us back to the scorpion um. There

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there are rare there are a few rare South American

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>scorpions of the Anatrists genus who also practice coddle autotomy.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>And when they lose their tails, First of all, they

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lose it for good. There's no growing the tail back

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>in this case. Uh they have. They just drop it

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's gone. But also if they lose their tail,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they lose their anus, and that's because the scorpions anus

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is located at the end of the tail the gut.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The gut extends through the tail and opens up at

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the back of the fifth segment, just ahead of the

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>stinger segment um initially draws. You know, we're talking about

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference between tails? What are tails like? This

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is a drastically different tail structure than you find in

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 1>other creatures because the gut extends back there. I mean,

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the the anus is at the almost the end of

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the tail. That's crazy. Can you imagine if you had

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>an appendage that you pooped out of, like if you

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>could if you could reach into a hole and then

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>poop in the hole, it would it would totally change

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>our bathroom behavior, that's for sure. Now you probably wonder

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the scorpion when it's lost its tail

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's lost its anus, uh fleeing from a predator. Well,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it essentially cannot poop again for the rest of its lie.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>So it ends up just inflating like a fecal balloon

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>until it dies. That's a nightmare. Yeah, but hey, it's

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>a living nightmare as opposed to just dying. So, I mean,

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the hard truth of survival right there. And when

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got when you've got pinching claws like a scorpion,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what else really matters? Yeah, you still have your claws

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like the pinch the world. The creature is still functional.

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>As we pointed out in the last episode, um, a

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>scorpion doesn't even use its tail when it's dealing with

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a smaller or easier to handle prey, so so you

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>can keep stuffing yourself with things that you cannot poop. Ever, right,

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not game over. It just means you can't

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>staying and you can't poop. But life goes on, Life

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>finds a way, you know. One of the one more

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>thing about autotomy that I thought was interesting is that

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of certain mythological tales in these mythical creatures.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are tons of mythical creatures that are

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>amalgamations of different kinds of animals. So they've got the

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>head of a lion and the ways of an eagle

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and the beak of squid or something. But there are

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>some animals that have tails that are snake tails, but

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not just snake tails as in the tail of

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a snake like a snake's tail, but they have a

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tail that is a snake, as in the front half

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of a snake, a snake with a head. I know,

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I've seen this mentioned, and at least some versions of

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the cerberus or caraboss, smith, the chimera, and I think

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the new a creature all seem to have at least

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in some versions that I've seen mentioned the tales that

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't just snake tails but are snakes, And I don't

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>know that that seems like an interesting parallel to the

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>idea of of tales that can become separated and then

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of have a life of their own, like they

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these tales that they get cut off keep

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>wiggling right, And I wonder if stories like this could

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have been inspired by seeing tales that that can separate

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and continue to live, like is that a snake or

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a worm? Now? Huh? Well, you know. And it also

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>would seem in such a creature that it would make

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sense to have a tail that resembles a snake for

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>either defensive or predatory purposes. Oh, certainly, it reminds me

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of a particular there's a particular snake and a polotician.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Not having the details, it's in a I did a

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Monster of the Week post about Cthulhu as Cthulhu appears

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>in a particular movie from the nineties and uh, and

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in that I talked about a type of snake where

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>its tail is used to lure in other creatures. And

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the tail I believe is supposed to look a little

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>bit like, uh, a little bit like feathers, I believe.

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>So there are cases where the tail is used as

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a decoy to to lure something in. Huh, well, I

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's time to talk about Homo sapiens Robert. Yes, yes,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break and when we come back,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about the human tail. So the big question,

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>where's the human tail? Exactly? It's been god for a

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>long time. We're angry. We want our tails, you know,

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>as as individuals who were not born with them. We

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>wonder like, where where are they? Or do we have

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>ancestors that once had tails? Um? Because apart from from

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>apes um, and then that's the main area. Us and

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>our fellow great ape can we have no tails. Yeah,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can look at other mammals. So obviously our

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>vertebrate ancestors we believe had tails, but there are other

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.239
<v Speaker 1>mammals that have adapted to not have tails anymore, right

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>right there, moles, hedgehogs, guinea pigs, hamsters, bears, bats, koalas

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>sloths of goodies, uh, and a handful of other creatures.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But that we are the larger primates are certainly the

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>most outstanding examples. Right So, yeah, we're part of the

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>great apes family. When did the apes lose their tails? Well,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>it seems like this happened around twenty million years ago. Uh.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Fossil evidence points to proconsul an early fossil eight from

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen to twenty million years ago, located Eastern Africa

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>areas including Kenya and Uganda. And in this particular species,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>based on the fossil evidence, again we see a mixture

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of Old World monkey and eight characteristics. UH. And it's

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the if not the first eight species that

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we see without a tail, based again on what the

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>bones tell us. Now it still raises the question though, alright,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>so twenty million years ago, that's the timeline. But why right,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So if tails are useful, why don't we have them anymore?

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think this draws on a principle of evolution

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that that we often see, which is that over time,

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're not making use of something, you'll lose it.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>If you don't need it, it'll go away. It might

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>take some time to go away, but eventually it will

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>go away. It's just the basic economics of evolution. You know,

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>things like all these features that you have. It's like

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>explaining it to a child, right, all these fancy features

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we have in the house. These are extra and if

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not using that lightbulb, then uh, in that lamp,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to turn it off. And then that's kind

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of just the natural way that the forms constrict and

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>grow over time. But what are some major hypotheses about

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>why it's lost their tails, like why did they become useless? Well,

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about this and Reachard Richard Dawkins the

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>ancestors tail and that's t a l e. By the way,

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not all about tales, but he he points out

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that this is largely an under addressed topic and evolutionary biology,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but they're there are a couple of theories that he discusses.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>One is the hopeful monster theory. Yeah, and this this

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>has to do with this sort of random mutation. He

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>points out that that max cats have a single gene

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that makes them tail less. These are the cats that

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have tails tail as cats. And it all comes

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>down to again, do just a single gene. And it's

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>also homozygous, meaning that it's lethal if present twice, so

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's un likely to spread through evolution. But the idea

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.719
<v Speaker 1>he is here is that perhaps some form of max monkey,

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>some sort of random tail was monks monkey was an

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>exception to the rule, and this random mutation just became

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the norm. Not a very exciting theory, but it Anny

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lays it out as sort of a you know, a

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>distant possibility here, those just sort of an accident amplified, right.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The better theory the more the one with more weight

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to it. Here is the biped theory, and this is

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that uh that many tailed primates are occasional bipeds, and

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>when something like a spider monkey walks in all fours,

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the tail gets in the way. So it can be

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>surmised that tree active gibbons have no tails because they

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>project themselves to other branches from a vertical hanging position

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than the monkey's horizontal leaping posture. For the gibbon,

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the tail would be a drag rather than a steadying rudder.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>This sort of goes back to what I was talking

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about in the previous episode. When you see all these

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>New World monkeys with their pre insile tails, um you

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you often see them in these thickly forested environments where

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're swinging from trees and they're using the tails

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and in climbing situations. The more bipedal you get it

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like the less need you really have for a tail.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's also worth noting that the large vegetarian for the

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>most part, land based apes perhaps had increasingly little use

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for either fast attacks or speedy retreats from predators, you

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>know which in which case that that tail would be

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>handy and shooting up into the trees, etcetera. And as such,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>many of the primary tail uses were lost to them. Again,

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just the the economics of evolution. You can also

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>factor communication into this, because if we're using we're depending

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>more on vocalization, then maybe there's less need for that

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>communication uh device that we call a tail. If you

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>can say words, you don't need the dogs right egg

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>left wag signal. Yeah, it's really the interesting thing about

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this topic is, like all these different animal examples we've

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>brought up, we kind of had to go through all

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>those to even address this still unanswered question of where

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the tail went, because you have to think about not

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>only what a tail doesn't and you know, for one species,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but what a tail can do across the board to

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>end up with some sort of answer for why we

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have one at all. Yeah, Now this is funny

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because we're saying we don't have tails, which is true,

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but in a certain way that's not exactly true. That's right,

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because we do have tailbones. We do, and m it's

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a it's a vestigial um part of

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>our vertebrae, just sort of coiled up there, uh, you know,

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>inside our butts essentially. Uh. And it's also why it

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>hurts so much if you fall, particularly if you fall

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>into the small in your back or directly under your butt,

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>say while you're um, you know, skating or something, because

0:29:56.320 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>there's there's not enough padding for the cossacks back there. Now,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned either at the beginning of this episode

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps at the beginning of the first tail episode,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>um tales are hard coded into us enough that they

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>remain a part of our embryonic development. Right, So if

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you watch an embryo develop in the womb, you'll you

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>can see stages where it gets a tail and then

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it loses the tail again. Yeah. And we've all seen

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>comparisons between say, a killer whale embryo and a human

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>embryo and how close they are, right, because essentially you

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have this sort of uh, you know, theygue mammalian embryo

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that then develops more and more until it looks more

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and more human or more and more like a killer whale.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>During the fifth and six weeks weeks of life, the

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>human embryo has a tail with ten to twelve vertebrae,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's by eight weeks that it that it disappears completely.

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>You just suck it back in. Yeah, so it's just

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of like it comes out factory.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The factory model has the tail and then you lose it. Yeah,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting. I've definitely read about cases where tail

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>also have reappeared in babies born in the in the

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>modern world. Oh yeah, yeah, we get into the case

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of of atavism. Ativism refers to traits of distant ancestors

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that reappear in modern day and the most pressing example

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of this is the tail, probably because it's just resonates

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>more culturally. It's like the idea of like a human

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>with a tail, are they really a human? What's happening here?

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the fear that we're more beastial than than

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>enlightened human. Right, And I guess there are a couple

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of types of tails you could be born with. Right,

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that's right, there's a pseudo tail and the much rare,

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote true human tail. Uh. The pseudo tail doesn't

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have any bones or cartilage. It's just skin and fat,

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and as such it's it's easily removed. Uh. Pseudo tails,

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they just have a superficial resemblance to true tales. Uh.

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>They're also a number of growths or cysts that can

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>form right at the tip of the tailbone. Some of

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the more um, you know, unpleasant options are actually large tumors, elongations,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>elongations of existing vertebrae. Uh. And then also in cases

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of parasitic twins, there's also it can be some tissue

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that that that forms back there. So your lost twin

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>could be a tale essentially, yeah. Uh. And then there

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>are the true tales. But the human true tale is uh,

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of a controversial subject. I mean a little bit.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it written about as if it's more controversial.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But then in some sources are more firm on the matter. Um,

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it has nerves and muscles, and sometimes according to some

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll find cartilage and vertebrae. Uh. According to the two

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve paper Spectrum of Human Tales, a report of

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>six cases, they indicate that bones cartilage, uh not a

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>chord and spinal cord are lacking in even a true tale.

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>As such, a true tale is easily removed surgically without

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>residual effects. And it's only you know, rarely is it

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a family trait. There's only one case

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in recent history, uh where we where

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been reported that they were actually vertebrae in the

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>human tale. So by and large, even a true quote

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>unquote true tale in a human is not an extension

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of the vertebrate. So it's worth keeping in mind. And

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's such it's it's easily removed. So in most

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>cases this would not be something that an individual would

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>carry around with them, assuming they had adequate access to

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>medical care. So we still can't say, one ever, cent

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>for sure why we lost the tale. Um, there's some

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, convincing theories here, convincing arguments. I mean, essentially,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we lost it because we did not need it anymore.

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But that of course leads us to the question of

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are we ever going to get tales again? Right? I mean,

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just because we're rere evolved to get them back? Yeah,

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean in a way, if we still have the

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>genetic blueprints somewhere in our DNA about how to make

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a tale, and then said, we're just saying no, don't

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. What if we reverse that process and

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>said no, by all means build it? You know, yeah,

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean the to go back to the hyperion reference

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that I made earlier, an orbital environmental gravity environment. Seems

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 1>like that would be a prime example of a case

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>where humans might potentially evolve that tale. Right, But you

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have to imagine space travel to think that humans

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>might get tales again, that's right. We can find discussions

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of human tales and sort of trans human tales in

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the works of Charles Fourier, a French philosopher. He lived

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventy two through eighteen thirty seven. Uh also an

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>influential early socialist thinker who had a rather substantial impact

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>on utopian thinking, so particularly in the utopian societies of

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the mid eighteen hundreds. You know this guy. When I

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was reading about him, he gave me some very familiar vibes.

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Realized he was exciting the same st range chords in

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>my brain that I got from reading about John Murray

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Spear and our techno religion episode. Indeed, Yeah, they have

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>similar time frame as similar sort of futurist visions going

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on strange futurist utopia the people at the time thought

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was very unsettling. Yeah, I mean, and there is a

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>guy who he presented a number of ideas that were

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially unsettling to people, both in a realistic and in

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic frame, but also popular to some people. Yeah,

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>because he was advocating change, and he advocated a utopian

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>vision for humanity. He proposed radical advancements in human culture,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>advancements that would change man and his universe. So as

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>humans exist at the center of Fourier's universe, elevating ourselves

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to a state of harmony, uh causes the universe to

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>follow suit. Like we're the We're very much again the

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>center of this universe where the spoke on this wheel.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>And if we elevate ourselves, we literally change everything else.

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So along the same lines as John Murray Spear, he

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't just have in mind making a better society, like

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>improving the rules that govern how humans interact, but truly

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>making a better human being. Yeah, better human being and

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>just and like just a better world that would like

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>literally like he proposed an age uh, in which the

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>polls will have warmed and been rendered fertile by a

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>new Aurora borealis, in which wild animal like so so

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>utopian is this vision? Wild antibals will will be succeeded

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>by their antidotes, such as anti lions and anti sharks

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>instead of sharks and lions. Like. That's the level of

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>harmony this guy was talking about. Uh. We also we

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>would uh, we'd grow to a height of seven feet

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tall and we would live to be about a hundred

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and forty four years old on average. Man, if we're

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>seven ft tall, the anti lions aren't gonna stand the

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>chance against us. I mean, they're just living amongst us.

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess, you know, dogs and cats living together. But

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he also the anti lion will lay down with anti lamb. Yeah. Um.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>But you know he also apparently thought that we might

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>have tales too. And this is an area that it

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes kind of controversial in his history because his critics

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 1>love to focus on it. Uh. And you would see

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the political cartoons essentially in which you would see Fourier

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>himself with a tail, and that tail terminating and an eyeball.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a tail with an eyeball, Yes, Yeah, that's so

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>good because because that's like a D and D monster. Yeah,

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, I guess you could look around

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>corners and stuff and you know they're I mean really

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what just you can list a thousand uses for a

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>tail with an eyeball. You know, though, we we talked

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>in our Grizzly Bears from Outer Space episode about why

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we think having an eye at the end of an

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>appendage is not necessarily the best idea because it's not

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>right next to your brain and it can become injured

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>by a bodily injury. Yeah, it's not a good place

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to stow an eyeball. I mean unless you had, you know,

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>sufficient covering some sort of a sheath that goes over it.

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>But maybe Fourier didn't, didn't really think about that. Yeah. There,

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so you see two different sizes to this. So again,

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>his critics are using this to say this is a ridiculous,

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fantastic idea, this guy's a nutjob, and so at least

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>after eighteen forty and again that's after his death, but

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>but his followers are still carrying his ideas and holding

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>both high. Um. Around this time, his his followers began

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of chime in and say no, he wasn't

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>actually saying humans would have tales. It's a little more

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that, and it it seems one of the

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>more you the closer you look at it, like it's

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a little calm and a little calm b like he's

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying humans will have tales, But it does involve

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>a a richer, more elaborate mythos so um according to

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the book's selections from the works of Fourier. Fourier claims

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that he claimed that he was referring to the extra

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>terrestrial solarians quote must be endowed with brilliant faculties denied

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to us humans, so essentially gifts that God knew we

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't ready for, such as an amazing tale. So these

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>solarians factored into four as greater metaphysics, uh, in which

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so called harmoniums, which are these sort of elevated humans

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>who have who have come to terms with peace on

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Earth and utopian existence. Uh. They they enjoy multiple lives

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on Earth in addition to extraterrestrial lives beyond our planet,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in which they benefit from these various physical gifts. So

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Fourier wrote, I have remarked that this superiority is due

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>principally to a member of which we are deprived, and

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which comprehends the following properties protection and falling, powerful weapon,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>splendid ornament, gigantic stream, infinite dexterity, cooperation, and support in

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all the bodily motions. In discussing this problem, journalists devoid

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of imagination say that the Silarians resemble the demons of

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the Forest of Saint Anthony, equipped with horns, probosis, claws,

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and tales, and that I wish to create men like

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>this upon our globe. Oh so you're putting fourier and

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a anton Jessop. I guess I'm kind of

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>following into that that bit. I mean, clearly, you know,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the man that's wild, it's wonderful, but he he makes

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>some good points, right, you know, we would we might

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be better off if we had splendid ornament, gigantic strength,

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>powerful weapon. Well, it's it's it's interesting that he's referring

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to many of the things we've discussed here in this episode.

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, the all these strengths that the tale has

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>for other organisms, so why not us? And and it's

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a false argument. He's makings, he's saying,

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we'd be better off with these these things, these things

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that we evidently did not need to to ascend to

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this level of our evolution. Again, his followers tended to

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>downplay this. But according to Charles four A, The Visionary

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and His World by Jonathan Beecher for a certainly did

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>right of human tales, and in these rights, and these

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>writings were censored, you know later on quote the harmony

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in arm or arquebus is a vertebal tale, a tale

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of immense length and with one d and forty four vertebrae.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>This member is as redoubtable as it is industrious. It

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is a natural weapon. The arquebus terminates with a very small,

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>elongated hand, a hand as strong as the clause of

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an eagle or a crab. When a man is swimming,

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the arquebus will help him move as fast as a fish.

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It can stretch to the bottom of the water, carrying

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>fish nets and making them fast. With its help, a

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>man can reach a branch twelve feet high, climb up

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and down the tree, pick fruit at the very top

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:50.479
<v Speaker 1>of the tree, and put it in a basket tied

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to the archamen. It serves as a whip and a

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>rain to a man who is driving a horse drawn plow.

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It can be used to tame a wild horse. The

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>writer can tie up the horse's legs with his arcabus.

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It is infinitely useful, and in the playing of musical

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>instruments it doubles a person's manual faculties since its fingers,

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>although very small, are extremely stretchable. Hey, we were talking

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>about that earlier, were playing music. This guy was was

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>ahead of ahead of us, anticipated like every single thing

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we said in this episode. But yeah, so he's talking

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about a prehensile tale that can can do all of

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the things we would expect in an arm or a limb,

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>except it's even better. Yeah, and we would use it

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to do all these utopian things like climbing trees and

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>being a wild horse, which seems kind of counter to

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole harmonium thing, right. I think it's kind of

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>funny that one of the advantages he lists is that

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it can stretch to the bottom of the water carrying

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>fish nets. Yeah. I don't know. I guess, you know,

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of different time, I guess. Yeah. Again, I

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>guess it's kind of like an in turn return to

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Eden sort of vibe at this ride is that we

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>would in a sense, we would be we would we

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>were returning to our like pre aphe existence, only with

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>presumably a utopian human intellect. Wait, hold on, so did

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for you have an idea about why humans did not

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 1>have this amazing archibras already? I believe it's because we've

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sucked because and and again, people who are more familiar

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>with for As work can can write in and uh

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and flesh this out force a bit. But my understanding,

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>based on the sources I was looking at, is that

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially humans have a dystopian existence and therefore have

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>are not are not privy to these gifts because these

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>gifts would be squandered on war and violence and all.

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's only if we true might have a tail,

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I would only use it for war. You would you

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.280
<v Speaker 1>just go and like pick our fights and just start

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tail flapping fools left and right. It's the it's the

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>xenomorph tail again, it is. Yeah, So yeah, if humans

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>had tales, they would essentially be xenomorphs. And we see that,

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean a little look at all. You know all

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 1>of our fictional creatures that have tales, they're often using

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>miss weapons. Anyway, that's that's our fantasy, that's our dystopian fantasy.

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:11.839
<v Speaker 1>For for tale usage, Fourier thought differently, though he saw

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the utopian dream here. I can respect that, you know.

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.720
<v Speaker 1>It also brings to mind the two thousand nine novel

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The Sacred Book of the Werewolf, a novel by Russian

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>author Victor Pelvin. Are you familiar with this work? No,

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not at all. It's an interesting book. It's um. It

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it's gonna be sort of a you know,

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 1>underworld that it's actually a very very literate little work

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that speaks to the to to the heart of sort

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Russian soul at the time. Now, wait a minute,

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this isn't related to that to that werewolf spy novel

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you found at the beach that you were telling you. No, no, no,

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a different that's a far treasure um book.

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>This one. This one has more of a literal area slant,

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but it does at the heart concern a love story

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 1>between a an x KGB werewolf and a and a

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 1>two thousand year old ware fox um and the ware

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Fox in particular, she's capable of greater yogur powers since

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>she has additional chakras in her tail. Chakras are, of course,

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>are those energy points in uh in Eastern metaphysics. Um,

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that that go up and down your vertebra.

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you had more vertebra you would have more chakras.

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>So like a very long snake would have tons of chakras.

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess, so yeah, yeah, and you know by that respect,

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know many of the animals here. What would what

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>would do I mean, even though a scorpion doesn't have vertebrae,

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>what would it chakras be like? I don't know if

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it were. It's of course that a scorpion is a

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>very uh, non yogic creature. It's a very uh, it's

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a very self centered and spiteful organism. So I can't

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>imagine it engaging in a lot of meditation. Okay, So

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to finally revisit the question one more time, will humans

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>ever evolve tales again? Will we get them back? My

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>feeling is, if I'm gonna stop messing around and say

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>what I really think, I don't don't really think so,

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.919
<v Speaker 1>because why would that happen. It seems like they would

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>either have to be a selection pressure in favor of it,

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like that people who had them would be more likely

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to have more children. I don't see why that would

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be given our level of technology and our you know,

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 1>civilized technological existence. It just doesn't seem like the strong

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, survival or reproduction preference for a tale would

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>re emerge. But maybe we could get them back just

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>through genetic engineering. Yeah, if we just really wanted them

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>bad enough, then we could genetically engineer the more. Potentially,

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why we'd want that surgically augment ourselves

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to create tales. But but even then, that's yeah, the

0:46:57.760 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 1>genetic would be the only way that we would be

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>alteringing the species as opposed to individual members of that species.

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And as we discussed, it's been so long since apes

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>lost that tale, you know, twenty million years. By the

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>time something post human evolved a tail like that would

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 1>not be a human anymore. That would not be Homo sapiens.

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That would be something else. That's a great point. So

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there's that. But we'd love to hear from everyone else,

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:29.879
<v Speaker 1>what what do you think will humans ever develop a tail?

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Wherever evolve a tail? And to go back to the

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>question at the very beginning of this, uh, this two

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>parter would you choose wings or would you choose a tail?

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Which one would you acquire and why would you use it?

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say neither. Neither. Neither wasn't a choice

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to chase wings and tail. Well, then I'll go with

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the xenomorph tail because you never know when you're gonna

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>need it. You never know, all right, So there you

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>have it, uh tales. You know, if you didn't listen

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to that first the first part of this, go back

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and listen to it. There are a lot of great

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>tale uh examples in that episode as well, and you

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>can find all the episodes of the podcast that Stuff

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com that is the mothership.

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll also find blog post videos, links out to our

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 1>various social media accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, and Tumbler.

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you'd like to let us know whether you'd

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>rather have wings or a tail given all of the

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>qualifications we offered at the beginning of the first episode,

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or if you'd like to let us know an interesting

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tail fact or give us feedback on any of the

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff we talked about in this episode, you can email

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>us at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics,

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>does it, how stuff works, dot com