1
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:08,879
Speaker 1: Welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt. The House Oversight

2
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:14,520
Speaker 1: Committee has wrapped up its investigation into climate disinformation. They

3
00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:17,560
Speaker 1: haven't released their final report yet, but they have put

4
00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:20,800
Speaker 1: out a memo, and they have also published the last

5
00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:24,319
Speaker 1: batch of documents from the subpoenas that went out in

6
00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:28,160
Speaker 1: this investigation. Between the first batch and dispatch, there are

7
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:33,159
Speaker 1: about fifteen hundred pages of internal emails, strategy documents, and

8
00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:37,000
Speaker 1: memos from the oil majors and the American Petroleum Institute,

9
00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:40,559
Speaker 1: and they tell a really interesting story. For me, as

10
00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:43,080
Speaker 1: someone who spends a lot of time looking at these

11
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:46,120
Speaker 1: kinds of documents from the last one hundred years or so,

12
00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:50,320
Speaker 1: what's really striking is just how little the industry's strategy

13
00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:54,280
Speaker 1: has actually changed in the last decades. I guess if

14
00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:57,880
Speaker 1: it ain't broke, don't fix it. I've got longer analysis

15
00:00:57,880 --> 00:01:00,320
Speaker 1: of all of the details in these documents up at

16
00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:04,200
Speaker 1: Drilled podcast dot com and also in the intercept. I'll

17
00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:06,679
Speaker 1: drop links to those in the show notes. But today

18
00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:08,959
Speaker 1: I have with me one of the people who spearheaded

19
00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:13,640
Speaker 1: this investigation, Representative Rocanna. I asked him what really jumped

20
00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:17,000
Speaker 1: out at him in these documents, where the investigation might

21
00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,680
Speaker 1: lead in more. That conversation is coming up after this

22
00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:21,560
Speaker 1: quick break.

23
00:01:29,400 --> 00:01:30,720
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining me.

24
00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:31,520
Speaker 3: I appreciate it.

25
00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:34,000
Speaker 2: I'm sure lots of people are asking you questions about

26
00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:36,880
Speaker 2: this report and the new document's coming in, so I'm

27
00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:40,360
Speaker 2: curious to hear, first off, if there was anything in

28
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:43,840
Speaker 2: this latest batch of documents that particularly jumps out to

29
00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:48,200
Speaker 2: you as very interesting or surprising, or something you want

30
00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:50,240
Speaker 2: to particularly draw folks attention to.

31
00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:51,960
Speaker 3: Two things.

32
00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:59,120
Speaker 4: First, the explicit strategy that greenwashing will give them quote

33
00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:04,200
Speaker 4: a license to further operate in entrenching the fossil fuel industry.

34
00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:07,280
Speaker 4: And you saw that with the American Petroleum Institute and

35
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:10,959
Speaker 4: Chevron and an MVP and number of companies. The idea is, Okay,

36
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:16,119
Speaker 4: we'll cut in how we operate our plant, but we're

37
00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:18,760
Speaker 4: going to produce more and ultimately this is going to

38
00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:23,720
Speaker 4: be more emissions, and giving money about being a green

39
00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:27,560
Speaker 4: company actually will allow us to emit more. It's that cynical,

40
00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,919
Speaker 4: it's that explicit, it's in the documents. The second thing

41
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:35,080
Speaker 4: is the culture of bullying, the fact that they want

42
00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:38,840
Speaker 4: bedbug bugs for Sunrise kids in the last tranch of documents.

43
00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:42,080
Speaker 4: And then this tranch. We see that they are going

44
00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:46,400
Speaker 4: after a New York Times reporter, Roco, who covered the hearings,

45
00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:51,800
Speaker 4: pushing her off covering these hearings, trying to silence the

46
00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:55,040
Speaker 4: New York Times and intimidate the New York Times, and

47
00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:57,560
Speaker 4: we see that this has been their strategy with the press.

48
00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:01,960
Speaker 2: That's super interesting actually in the wake of the FTI

49
00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:06,280
Speaker 2: consulting reporting that Heroko did too, and knowing the relationship

50
00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 2: between those guys and Exxon and all of these companies.

51
00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:12,600
Speaker 4: Really Broca's not covering it anymore, so he's been taken off,

52
00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:17,359
Speaker 4: So you know, Unfortunately, the big oil succeeds sometimes when

53
00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:18,960
Speaker 4: they engage in this kind of bullying.

54
00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:21,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay. I wanted to talk a little bit about

55
00:03:21,880 --> 00:03:24,880
Speaker 2: the university funding stuff that showed up, I think in

56
00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:27,679
Speaker 2: the BP documents and just the way that they talk

57
00:03:27,720 --> 00:03:33,560
Speaker 2: about how their funding of Princeton in particular and the

58
00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:39,760
Speaker 2: carbon project there allows them to kind of gain insight

59
00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:43,840
Speaker 2: into how their opponents are thinking about these things, and

60
00:03:43,920 --> 00:03:47,720
Speaker 2: also to influence the university and the research that's coming

61
00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:51,240
Speaker 2: out of their something that is a fascination of mind.

62
00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:55,200
Speaker 2: Just why these companies invest so much in university research

63
00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:59,720
Speaker 2: and especially in not just the scientific and technical research,

64
00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:03,400
Speaker 2: but also public policy to have influence there. So I'm

65
00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:05,800
Speaker 2: curious just what you think of that and also the

66
00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:11,240
Speaker 2: extent to which university research does really influence policymaking.

67
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:18,880
Speaker 4: Well, I am concerned because the huge gifts to these

68
00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:23,440
Speaker 4: research institutions could bias the research. And what you have

69
00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:26,800
Speaker 4: is a strategy by these big old companies to fund

70
00:04:27,040 --> 00:04:30,960
Speaker 4: research both at universities and nonprofits and then have that

71
00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:35,240
Speaker 4: research be seen as quote unquote objective evidence. And we

72
00:04:35,320 --> 00:04:39,280
Speaker 4: need a whole more investigation beyond what our committee did

73
00:04:39,640 --> 00:04:43,039
Speaker 4: on what is the strategy of funding research and how

74
00:04:43,279 --> 00:04:46,680
Speaker 4: objective is that research? And how do you create the

75
00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:49,279
Speaker 4: walls of separation between the fund to get the research

76
00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:50,800
Speaker 4: many which break down.

77
00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,640
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I've heard even some of the campus activists

78
00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:58,840
Speaker 2: that are agitating for universities to not take any more

79
00:04:58,839 --> 00:05:01,560
Speaker 2: of this money are asking for step one to just

80
00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:06,800
Speaker 2: be transparency around it. You know that university should disclose

81
00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:09,320
Speaker 2: who they're taking money from and what the terms of

82
00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:10,919
Speaker 2: that money exactly.

83
00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:13,760
Speaker 4: Be a start, just who are you taking the money from,

84
00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:19,360
Speaker 4: what are the conditions? Look if they're giving money to studying,

85
00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:22,760
Speaker 4: you know Shakespearean literature, that's one thing, But if they're

86
00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:27,920
Speaker 4: giving money to have particular research on carbon and climate

87
00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:31,320
Speaker 4: that seems to be much more problematic. That needs to

88
00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:34,479
Speaker 4: at the very least be transparent with clear walls of separation.

89
00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:35,280
Speaker 3: Yeah.

90
00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:39,920
Speaker 2: Do you think that the documents saying what they do

91
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:44,200
Speaker 2: about this idea of a bridge fuel and gas will

92
00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:47,960
Speaker 2: put sort of an end to that narrative? Do you

93
00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:51,520
Speaker 2: think it makes it harder for these companies to continue saying, Oh,

94
00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:53,840
Speaker 2: it's a bridge, it's a bridge, it's a bridge. Do

95
00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:56,920
Speaker 2: you expect them to stop even trying to claim it.

96
00:05:57,200 --> 00:06:00,440
Speaker 4: Well, the documents, as you see, shows that they really

97
00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:02,080
Speaker 4: believe it's their end destination.

98
00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:04,960
Speaker 3: They internally are not even talking.

99
00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:07,240
Speaker 4: About it as a bridge. They're just talking about it

100
00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,120
Speaker 4: as this is what we're going to be moving towards.

101
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:12,280
Speaker 4: And that's why it's a wake up call. I think

102
00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:16,200
Speaker 4: for many people. If you care about moving to renewable,

103
00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:19,240
Speaker 4: if you care about moving to energy efficiency, that's in

104
00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:23,040
Speaker 4: direct contradiction with the internal goals of these big oil companies.

105
00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:25,679
Speaker 4: I guess my biggest concern with the big oil companies

106
00:06:25,760 --> 00:06:28,440
Speaker 4: is the lack of honesty, right. I mean, if they

107
00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:32,200
Speaker 4: were out there just saying, look, we are all at

108
00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:35,719
Speaker 4: gas companies. We don't care about this emission thing. That's

109
00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:38,479
Speaker 4: not our problem. This is our business model, this is

110
00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:39,240
Speaker 4: what we're going to do.

111
00:06:40,040 --> 00:06:42,560
Speaker 3: Then I would disagree strongly with it. But they're big,

112
00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:43,600
Speaker 3: honest to what they're doing.

113
00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:46,560
Speaker 4: The problem is that's not what they're representing because they

114
00:06:46,600 --> 00:06:48,880
Speaker 4: know the American public will put up with that. They

115
00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:51,080
Speaker 4: know their own shareholders won't put up with that. So

116
00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:53,960
Speaker 4: they're claiming to be something that they're not. They're claiming

117
00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:57,520
Speaker 4: to be greed what they aren't. And it's the duplicity

118
00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:01,840
Speaker 4: that is actually the most aggravate A gets shocking.

119
00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:05,520
Speaker 2: What do you think could be done on the government

120
00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:10,160
Speaker 2: side of things to not enable that duplicity? So you know,

121
00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:13,920
Speaker 2: the US government hasn't exactly been opposed to gas as

122
00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:18,280
Speaker 2: a bridge viuel itself. So to what extent could even

123
00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:21,520
Speaker 2: you know, the EPA fast treking methane rules for example,

124
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:25,800
Speaker 2: or fast treking implementation of those rules, or I don't know,

125
00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:31,080
Speaker 2: regulating greenhouse gases under TOSCA, as you know, one petition

126
00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:33,480
Speaker 2: has asked them to do. What are things that could

127
00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:37,360
Speaker 2: be done that would maybe not stop the fossil fuel

128
00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:40,080
Speaker 2: companies from claiming these things but make it harder for

129
00:07:40,160 --> 00:07:44,520
Speaker 2: them to successfully make gas the destination.

130
00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:48,840
Speaker 3: Well, we tried and build back better.

131
00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:51,680
Speaker 4: And originally, as you know, there were rules to have

132
00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:56,400
Speaker 4: penalties for methane emissions. They were taken out partly because

133
00:07:56,640 --> 00:08:00,640
Speaker 4: of API at big oils advertising where there were targeting

134
00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:04,920
Speaker 4: specific members of Congress to oppose the methane rules. So

135
00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:08,920
Speaker 4: now it's up to the agency's EPA being the primary

136
00:08:08,920 --> 00:08:13,480
Speaker 4: one to help through executive action to have rules interpreting

137
00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,080
Speaker 4: the Clean Air Act and others that give them the authority.

138
00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:19,400
Speaker 4: And I'm hopeful that we will take action on that.

139
00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,240
Speaker 4: Methane is even worse in some ways than others. And

140
00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:26,080
Speaker 4: so let's see what EPA does.

141
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:30,120
Speaker 2: Given that control of the House is shifting, what could

142
00:08:30,120 --> 00:08:33,120
Speaker 2: happen next with the information that's come out in this report?

143
00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:35,520
Speaker 2: Could the Department of Justice get involved? Could we see

144
00:08:35,559 --> 00:08:36,440
Speaker 2: something in the Senate?

145
00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:37,680
Speaker 3: Well, I can tease some news.

146
00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:41,320
Speaker 4: We're going to be sending the documents to a couple

147
00:08:41,320 --> 00:08:45,000
Speaker 4: of key places, and obviously we still control the White House,

148
00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:47,800
Speaker 4: we still control the Senate, so this isn't the last

149
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:48,719
Speaker 4: of the investigation.

150
00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:49,800
Speaker 3: Okay.

151
00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:53,559
Speaker 2: Interesting, I also wanted to know or just get a

152
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:55,760
Speaker 2: sense from you of how much do you think the

153
00:08:55,800 --> 00:09:00,120
Speaker 2: current situation with Russia, Ukraine and raising gas prices, all

154
00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:04,520
Speaker 2: of this stuff has impacted this whole conversation. Do you

155
00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:08,520
Speaker 2: get a sense that the oil companies feel like, oh, well,

156
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:11,000
Speaker 2: no one's going to be paying attention to this stuff

157
00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:14,800
Speaker 2: because we've successfully gotten people to focus on high gas

158
00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:15,760
Speaker 2: prices instead.

159
00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:18,560
Speaker 4: Well, that's definitely the big oil company strategy. But we

160
00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:21,280
Speaker 4: need to push back with the truth. Sheldon white House

161
00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:23,760
Speaker 4: and I have shown how a big oil is actually

162
00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:26,800
Speaker 4: having record profits and that what we need is to

163
00:09:26,840 --> 00:09:30,040
Speaker 4: hold them accountable with a windfall profits tax to lower

164
00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,559
Speaker 4: gas prices. And I highly recommend an op ed that

165
00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:35,719
Speaker 4: Sheldon white House wrote with Lindsay Graham saying that if

166
00:09:35,760 --> 00:09:41,720
Speaker 4: America cares about national security and independence from Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia,

167
00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:44,200
Speaker 4: Venezuela Petro states, the biggest thing we need to do

168
00:09:44,720 --> 00:09:47,160
Speaker 4: is to move to renewable energy to not be as

169
00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:50,560
Speaker 4: dependent on fossil fuelds. So I think that we have

170
00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:53,880
Speaker 4: to do a better job making the national security case

171
00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:58,840
Speaker 4: at this moment of volatility and precarity because of Ukraine,

172
00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:01,880
Speaker 4: where we could say to people Look, we don't want

173
00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:04,319
Speaker 4: to be behold in this Audi Arabia, we don't want

174
00:10:04,360 --> 00:10:06,720
Speaker 4: to be beholden to Russia, and we don't want to

175
00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:09,679
Speaker 4: be beholden to our own big oil companies. Let's really

176
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:11,880
Speaker 4: double down on renewable energy.

177
00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:15,000
Speaker 2: What's your response to folks who make the argument that

178
00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:19,400
Speaker 2: nationalizing the fossil fuel industry is also a solution to

179
00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:24,240
Speaker 2: the national security problem or reinstituting the export ban, which

180
00:10:24,240 --> 00:10:27,040
Speaker 2: I imagine would be impossible given the deal with the

181
00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:30,520
Speaker 2: EU that we currently have. But yeah, what's your answer

182
00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:32,360
Speaker 2: to those suggestions.

183
00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:35,120
Speaker 4: Well, I'm not for nationalizing it, but I am for

184
00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:38,320
Speaker 4: an export ban exempting our European allies. And that's not

185
00:10:38,440 --> 00:10:42,800
Speaker 4: something radical. That was policy until twenty fifteen, and it

186
00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:46,040
Speaker 4: seems to me we should have some policy that when

187
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:50,040
Speaker 4: there is volatility on the price of gas, that we

188
00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:54,640
Speaker 4: prioritize the domestic market, and that seems a reasonable thing

189
00:10:54,679 --> 00:10:57,760
Speaker 4: to do the long term. While I support an export ban,

190
00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:01,160
Speaker 4: the real long term solution is a moonshot on renewable energy,

191
00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:03,480
Speaker 4: and we've got to just continue to make the case

192
00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:07,079
Speaker 4: that a moonshut on renewable energy is good for American consumers.

193
00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:10,320
Speaker 4: What better way to lower gas prices than to give

194
00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:13,680
Speaker 4: people an alternative to gas. What better way they have

195
00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:17,320
Speaker 4: national security not dependent on petro states than to have

196
00:11:17,720 --> 00:11:20,240
Speaker 4: a commodity that petro states don't own.

197
00:11:20,559 --> 00:11:22,920
Speaker 3: So I think we have to just be further in

198
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:23,800
Speaker 3: making that case.

199
00:11:24,200 --> 00:11:26,920
Speaker 2: Do you think that there's a good understanding in the public,

200
00:11:27,080 --> 00:11:29,640
Speaker 2: or in the media for that matter, of how gas

201
00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:33,080
Speaker 2: pricing works, like enough to push back. The industry has

202
00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:37,080
Speaker 2: been very successful at entrenching this narrative that they have

203
00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:40,480
Speaker 2: nothing to do with gas pricing and that it's all

204
00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:44,080
Speaker 2: to do with environmental policy and pour them. Even though

205
00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:47,040
Speaker 2: I do think that the message about profits is starting

206
00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:48,880
Speaker 2: to break through. You know, people are starting to stay

207
00:11:48,920 --> 00:11:52,400
Speaker 2: wait a minute, these companies are historically profitable right now,

208
00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:55,480
Speaker 2: yet they're claiming that they can't do anything about this

209
00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,440
Speaker 2: gas price issue. How much do you think that the

210
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:03,240
Speaker 2: public and the media are are able to push back

211
00:12:03,280 --> 00:12:04,280
Speaker 2: on that narrative.

212
00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:08,719
Speaker 3: Well, I think we need to do more.

213
00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:10,600
Speaker 4: And now they've done a good job in Europe, where

214
00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:13,679
Speaker 4: the big oil companies are paying a windfall profits tax.

215
00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:16,000
Speaker 4: Even conservative governments have done that because in Europe they

216
00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,679
Speaker 4: understand that these companies are making huge profits The difference

217
00:12:18,679 --> 00:12:21,520
Speaker 4: here is big oil has big money and they can

218
00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:23,800
Speaker 4: basically have these super packs and they give a lot

219
00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:26,760
Speaker 4: of money to Congress and said it so unlike Europe,

220
00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:31,079
Speaker 4: our politics are distorted by the money and the influence

221
00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:31,720
Speaker 4: of these.

222
00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:32,680
Speaker 3: Big oil companies.

223
00:12:33,040 --> 00:12:36,120
Speaker 4: But we've got to get the facts out there that look,

224
00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:39,280
Speaker 4: we're almost at record production. By twenty twenty three, we're

225
00:12:39,280 --> 00:12:41,400
Speaker 4: gonna have record production in this country. So there's a

226
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:43,959
Speaker 4: narrative that if we just produced more, that would be

227
00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:47,199
Speaker 4: the issue. That's just not true. We have record production

228
00:12:47,280 --> 00:12:50,320
Speaker 4: on natural gas. What is the issue. The issue is

229
00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:52,199
Speaker 4: that these big oil companies have been making a lot

230
00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:54,560
Speaker 4: of money at a time that they know they could,

231
00:12:54,920 --> 00:12:57,320
Speaker 4: where the price of oil has got up because of

232
00:12:57,440 --> 00:12:58,679
Speaker 4: international markets.

233
00:12:59,080 --> 00:12:59,880
Speaker 3: What is the solution.

234
00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:03,000
Speaker 4: The solution of volatility is to have an alternative product,

235
00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:06,920
Speaker 4: you know, And it's a pretty simple. If cars cost

236
00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:08,440
Speaker 4: a lot of money and then there is a new

237
00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:10,679
Speaker 4: product to be an alternative cars, that'd be less to

238
00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:13,040
Speaker 4: bad for cars. The price would cut out. Yeah, that's

239
00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:13,720
Speaker 4: all we're saying.

240
00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:16,199
Speaker 2: Yeah, I was talking to someone in Europe the other

241
00:13:16,280 --> 00:13:20,120
Speaker 2: day about European companies that are complying with these emissions

242
00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:23,480
Speaker 2: reductions in Europe and fighting them in the US, and

243
00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:27,520
Speaker 2: his comment as well. In Europe, it's sort of like

244
00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:31,280
Speaker 2: everyone accepts the fact that climate policy is going to

245
00:13:31,320 --> 00:13:34,960
Speaker 2: happen in the US, they still think there's a possibility

246
00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:38,560
Speaker 2: that they can stop it from happening or delay it

247
00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:41,960
Speaker 2: another ten years. And I think that we see it

248
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:45,040
Speaker 2: in these documents too, there's a sense that the fight

249
00:13:45,120 --> 00:13:48,120
Speaker 2: is still on, seeing it in the response to the

250
00:13:48,160 --> 00:13:53,240
Speaker 2: IRA passage too, Like I'm seeing new reports coming out

251
00:13:53,320 --> 00:13:57,360
Speaker 2: that are kind of recycling stuff that people were arguing

252
00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:00,640
Speaker 2: twenty years ago about CO two greening the world and

253
00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:04,360
Speaker 2: how actually carbon emissions are a good thing for us.

254
00:14:04,559 --> 00:14:08,960
Speaker 2: I'm curious what you think about what might possibly put

255
00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:11,200
Speaker 2: an end to this. You know, we've been seeing kind

256
00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:14,079
Speaker 2: of the same talking points and the same strategies from

257
00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:17,760
Speaker 2: these companies for twenty thirty years now, and they don't

258
00:14:17,760 --> 00:14:19,640
Speaker 2: even need to come up with new ones because the

259
00:14:19,640 --> 00:14:22,560
Speaker 2: old ones still works. So having seen all of this

260
00:14:22,640 --> 00:14:24,680
Speaker 2: stuff from these companies, what do you think it would

261
00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:28,480
Speaker 2: take to get them to stop and actually transition.

262
00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:31,720
Speaker 3: One is accountability.

263
00:14:31,800 --> 00:14:34,480
Speaker 4: I mean, I think most people don't know how much

264
00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:38,160
Speaker 4: climate disinformation they've engaged it and there has to be

265
00:14:38,240 --> 00:14:42,600
Speaker 4: some enforcement in the agencies for proof and advertising, so

266
00:14:42,680 --> 00:14:46,400
Speaker 4: there should be requirements that they can't make misrepresentations about

267
00:14:46,400 --> 00:14:50,440
Speaker 4: these issues to their investors, to the American public. There

268
00:14:50,440 --> 00:14:54,640
Speaker 4: needs to be far more public awareness and public campaigns

269
00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:57,120
Speaker 4: to say, Okay, if you're going to claim that you're

270
00:14:57,120 --> 00:15:00,560
Speaker 4: going to meet the parisit courts, where is this, where

271
00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:04,720
Speaker 4: is the investment? And then that can be investor activists driven,

272
00:15:05,080 --> 00:15:08,360
Speaker 4: but ultimately it's going to take congressional standards and the

273
00:15:08,440 --> 00:15:12,880
Speaker 4: enforcement of that by agencies as well as investor activism.

274
00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:16,160
Speaker 2: One of the arguments that the oil companies are making

275
00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:19,840
Speaker 2: in court is a very nuanced free speech argument that

276
00:15:20,080 --> 00:15:25,479
Speaker 2: they say, in service of gaining particular policies is petitioning

277
00:15:25,560 --> 00:15:28,800
Speaker 2: speech and therefore protected by the First Amendment. And I'm

278
00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:30,720
Speaker 2: curious what you think of that argument.

279
00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:34,160
Speaker 4: That's if Exeon wants to say that we should have

280
00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:38,560
Speaker 4: less methane regulation, that's their first Amendment right. But what

281
00:15:38,680 --> 00:15:41,480
Speaker 4: is not their first Amendment right, in my view, is

282
00:15:41,520 --> 00:15:45,320
Speaker 4: to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to influence that.

283
00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:49,200
Speaker 4: Now under this current Supreme Court and Citizens United, unfortunately,

284
00:15:49,240 --> 00:15:53,160
Speaker 4: they've misinterpreted the Constitution to allow big money, but I

285
00:15:53,200 --> 00:15:54,840
Speaker 4: don't think big money is speech.

286
00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:56,960
Speaker 3: And the other thing that's not their right is to

287
00:15:57,000 --> 00:15:57,920
Speaker 3: mislead people.

288
00:15:58,280 --> 00:16:02,720
Speaker 4: So even with free speech, you can't have misrepresentation to

289
00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:07,520
Speaker 4: your investors. Under sec reporting, you can't have misrepresentation to

290
00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:13,360
Speaker 4: the American public. And whether they legally are misrepresenting, certainly

291
00:16:13,680 --> 00:16:15,280
Speaker 4: ethically they're misrepresenting.

292
00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:17,560
Speaker 3: And that's what a lot of the documents are showing.

293
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:43,200
Speaker 1: That's it for this time and for this year. Big

294
00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:47,000
Speaker 1: thanks to everyone for listening every week. Really appreciate you

295
00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:50,280
Speaker 1: taking the time and spending it with us. Also, super

296
00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:53,240
Speaker 1: big thanks to those of you who are supporting us,

297
00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:57,760
Speaker 1: either by subscribing to the newsletter or subscribing to our Patreon.

298
00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:00,720
Speaker 1: It's literally because of you that we can put this

299
00:17:00,760 --> 00:17:03,480
Speaker 1: out every week. If you would like to support our work,

300
00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:06,720
Speaker 1: go to Drilled podcast dot com sign up for the newsletter,

301
00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:11,080
Speaker 1: or patreon dot com slash drilled. In both cases you

302
00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:14,600
Speaker 1: will get a weekly rundown of climate coverage all the

303
00:17:14,680 --> 00:17:17,520
Speaker 1: stories and studies you should be paying attention to, as

304
00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:21,800
Speaker 1: well as at least monthly, if not more, deeper analysis

305
00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:26,280
Speaker 1: of things happening in the realm of climate accountability. Thanks again,

306
00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:27,840
Speaker 1: and we'll see you next year.