WEBVTT - P&L: We'll See A Massive Disruption in Society, Scaramucci Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Now we want to

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>prepare for what's to come in the world with Fica Sebzma.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>We are very pleased to have you here, CEO of

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Royal ds M with more than twenty employees, a company

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with more than ten billion dollars of market capitalization. Uh faca.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You have outlets all across the world, and I want

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about one place in particular, that's China.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a sense, given that you oversee

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>operations on the ground in one of the most uh

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>uh questionable areas, people don't have a sense of what's

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>actually going on with the economy. What's your perspective? I

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to tell what what is world s M.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me here. I indeed factor superman,

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Royal ds M, founded in an alands, operating worldwide.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>More than two and fifty locations and all continents in

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, being the biggest in nutritional ingredients in the world.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>So people who eat sometimes and many people do, half

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a chance that they eat our ingredients every single day.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Please continue to do so, including our ingredients, but also materials,

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>materials for solar panels, for second generation bio fields, new energies,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so sustainability. So sustainability and nutrition are two core areas

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>which we deliver to our customers globally. Okay, So now

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>now China and China, I think there's many elements in China,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>second largest economy of the world, still smaller than the US,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but running up more than five six annual growth? Is

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that bad? Should we be concerned? I don't think at all.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>The fundamentals I will come back on that. There is

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a there is a point. I agree with you. I

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. P please interrupret me as much as possible.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>But it is not only positive, but the fundamentals are

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not bad. I mean, there's a middle class, there is urbanization.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>There's new people every single day coming on the markets

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>who would never purchase before, and once they move from

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the rural area to the domestic area, they do purchase.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So the fundamentals in China is not bad. Two million

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>people from from universities, a big need, six percent grows.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But ask me your question about the concerns, because you

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>seem to be concerned or not well. I mean just

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're financing at all with the fastest

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 1>pace of debt creation that know everybody is seen in

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean, this is a tremendous concern for

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people in my world and focus. Yes, I know, state

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that deficit pretty low, still one of the lowest in

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. But I agree with you. The deficits on

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>companies is you and many companies are state owned and

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not counted the state deficits, So there you have

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a point. But also deficits in provinces and lower government

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>levels is pretty huge. And even the big thing is

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>unclear to everybody how big the deficit is. For me,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a bigger underlying issue is where is the gross coming

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from in China? And the gross is coming from investments,

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the growth is coming less and less from exports, and

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the growth is not coming yet enough from domestic consumption.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And there are three very clear reasons why the people

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>save money in China and do not consume, and that

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is because their concerns about education, their concerns about the

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>health care, their concerns about pensions. Later on, it sounds

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just like Americans. No, not at all. You know are Americans.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They're concerned about their pensions, they're concerned about their health care,

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and they're concerned about education. You are totally right. However,

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>having said so, you know, the afforage spent of the

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar earned of the average American, it's a little bit

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>over the dollar. And the average spent of the dollar

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>earned in China is around sixty cents. The average spent

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europe is around eighty cents of the dollar earned.

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Chinese are one of the biggest safest in

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. So maybe they're concerned about the same issues

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>as the Europeans or the Americans, but they saved much

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>more money for those occasions in pension, healthcare, and education. Well,

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to also because there is no safety net

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that has really been in place like the one that

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>exists in many European countries and also uh in the

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>United States. And I want to turn if you can

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to Europe and tell us you think that there's going

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to be another country that will vote on leaving the

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>European Union. Obviously we had Brexit in during Yes, baby Italy,

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they have a reference coming up in December. What's your

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>thought and what do you think will Europe look like

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a year from now? Please? No, please, we need to

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have a strong Europe. It's the only way. I mean,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a strong Belgium. Maybe get them to get their government together, right, yeah,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>United Belgium would already be a great step forward now

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking up even the European Treaty with Canada almost as

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a part of Belgium. But I think what we need

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>in Europe is not a split of Europe in twenty

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>seven pieces. That's the way we started. That's not the

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>direction we should go to. So we need to be

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>united to form an economic power block um compared with

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the US, compared with China, compared within the compared to

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>what it looked like tim Brazil um. So that is

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what what we need. But my big concern is if

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I look to maybe also the elections here in the country,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>if I look to the elections and the Brexit in

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>European countries, is are our leaders and maybe not only

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the political leaders, but also leaders of businesses or institutions,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are our leaders still trusted by the voters? Are the

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>leaders still trusted by the people they represent? Um? And

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that is I think a concern. And the British people

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>were just angry and they voted, and I think maybe

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they did not voted so much for stepping out to

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you being a union, but they voted for being very

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>angry and felt to be left alone. And that is

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a concern and broader than in Europe or the United States. Well,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and to that question you're saying, you know, do the

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>voters trust the politicians and the corporate leaders? I think

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>that in a lot of corners the answer is no.

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So what do the politicians and the corporate leaders

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>such as yourself do too? And gender more trust to

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>do what you stand for and to define where you

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>stand for. As a company. Should I only make money?

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Should I take care my shareholder has become as rich

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>as possible, as fast as possible? Is that the only

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>thing I stand for? Please know I ever brought a

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>purpose to serve. I of course should take care of

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>my shoulders, but it should take care of my own people.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I should take take care of my customers. I should

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>take care of society as a whole. We have a

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>big influence in the world in terms of nutrition or

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of climate change. And I see that as

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a priority, as a goal for our company, and I

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>hope that our companies do it too, because that's the

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>concern of the people, like you said, about their pensions,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>about the future, about the climate, and a few yields

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>more on your investments, and a few percentage more and

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>investing in the wrong things which kills our climate later

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on will cost our citizens later on much much more money.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's the way we should run our countries, our companies,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's the way I try to do with them.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for spending time

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with us. Figures the best money is the chief Exam Kitti,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Chairman of Royal d s M. This is Bloomberg. I

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>want to talk with someone about what the implications are

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about this latest election season. I really don't have a

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of that, but you know who does, Pim Michael Jesus.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, Michael Jesus, he knows everything

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>about this Chief municipal ready for you, and he's here

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. Michael, thank you for joining us. Hey, thanks

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. Very flattering. So I was reading

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>your your latest note, and uh, you seem to believe

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that they will not get some kind of definitive results,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>such as a president that's a Democrat as well as

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Congress that's Democratic, but the sort of split the difference,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and that there'll only be incremental changes. But even so,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>you said that even that would create a risk to

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>tax policies pro sectors like financials and commercial real estate.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain that, Yeah, well, to the extent that

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there's overlap between um, what Hillary Clinton would like to

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>do in her policy proposals and House Republicans, and we

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think the House is very likely to stay Republican. There

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is some overlap on the tax reform side, particularly on

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the corporate reform side around repatriation, and in particular around

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea of using some of that money to fund

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending. So in the devil's really in the details

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as to how you execute that, of course, but just

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>from a political standpoint, Um, if there is a path

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of lease resistance for any policy proposal on either side

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point, that's probably This is probably the area

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>where there's maximum overlap. Michaelm wondering if we could just

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of ground ourselves in a little, uh, sort of

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>yield so that we understand, you know, what you're actually

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>getting as an investor if you're let's say, buying triple

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>tax free munis State of California one point nine seven percent,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>New York one point eight oh percent, Florida flaridest different

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one point eight four Just give us a little idea

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>of of what the landscape looks like right now. Yeah, Well,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>yields are are obviously near all time lows at this point, uh,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to be the story every subsequent year.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that story is sort of divorced from what

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you get out of fixed income as a as a

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of mix of your entire asset allocation. And we

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>we've been arguing anyway that the macro economic environment is

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>such that lower for longer yield, that the yield level

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>itself isn't necessarily what you're supposed to be pointing to.

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>By the macro economic environment of low inflation and slow

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>growth is pretty good for owning fixed income, pretty good

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for owning US dollars and fixed income in particular, and

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>because of the tax advantages of munies. Uh, that's still

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a core part of your asset allocation and Uh, not

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just owning short munies, but kind of owning longer duration

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>munies paired with short meunis to have a relatively even

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>barbell across the curve to take advantage of that macroeconomic environment.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And so uh, you know how this pertains to the election,

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously is to the extent that major tax reform comes in. Um.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Is there something in the cards that either lowers the

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>value of tax exempt income because tax brackets are going

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lower like under Donald Trump's plan? Uh, and from either

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>side the idea that they might eliminate or at least

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>reduce uh tax exclusions and preference items like the fact

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to pay interest on your muni debt. Uh.

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>That is implicitly a feature of both plans the way

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we judge it at this point, though, because the divided

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>government scenario that we talked about earlier, we argue the

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>odds are still against that. Well, given that, but given that,

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, I mean, I'm trying to imagine what

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. In other words, Uh, if there is some

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of reduced taxes, then it will actually reduce the

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>allure of tax exempt bonds because you can get income uh.

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>And from other places that won't be taxed as much. Um,

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yeah, Okay, that's that's the right way

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to think about it. So I think about if you

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>want to hopefully I get too specific on it, but

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have a thousand dollars of tax exempt income

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>right now you're in and you're in the thirty tax bracket,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you're basically shielded from three d fifty of tax. If

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you if tax rates were to go down and you

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>found the percent bracket, you're only shielded from two eighty

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars of tax. So the value of that tax shield

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>goes down, and therefore the value of the bond on

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing, you know, you seem rather unfazed about the

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of political season and and the hysteria that some

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>people have worked themselves up into. But one thing that

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps is more realistic, certainly for these municipalities, is the

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>pension burden. How much do you look at the fact

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that pensions are climbing and the pension deficits are climbing

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as income goes down in this yield, low yield environment.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a this is a really important

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>part of our investment philosophy around Muni's UH state and

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>local governments. We think have historically been kind of a

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>less cyclical part of the muni market and have become

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 1>since the financial crisis, the more cyclical part of the

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>muni market. Uh. In no small way do the pension

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>issue that you're talking about. State revenue growth is really

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of flat at this point, and the claims on

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>those incoming dollars are just getting bigger from the capital side,

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it be physical capital with h deferred spending on

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>roads and bridges and schools, or the underfunded liabilities that

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. And UH, it's a situation where there

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't any easy legal um uh fixes to this and

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>where you know, over the long term, UH, you're likely

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to hit a crisis point and frankly, the market is

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>not really compensating you and most areas to uh to

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with this. So we think it's a very easy

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sector uh to underweight and um uh. And we really

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would prefer being in enterprise sectors as a consequence, transportation

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and water, sewer utilities and the like. Hey, Michael, I

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could just tell us a question that

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you would like answered from a top economic advisor to

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign, because coming up we're gonna be speaking

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with Anthony Scaramucci, who has been advising the Trump campaign

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on economic policy. Yeah, um, you know that. I'd say

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the question that we get the most from clients on

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Trump tax policy is how do they how do

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they lower the business tax rates but also eliminate the

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>carried interest loophole um. And the reason we get that

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>question a lot is because for asset managers, the question

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is are they going to be worse off or better

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>off under that? Because obviously they enjoy carried interest, but

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>if he's also offering a corporate rate, or they actually

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow better off under that scenario, even though he's been

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>touting the idea that that eliminating carried interest is a

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is something that would hurt the asset management crowd. Good question,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you. Yeah, because we're gonna be speaking with,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as I said, Anthony Scaramucci. But he also is, of course,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the founder of a Skybridge Capital, and he's got a

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>new book out called I Think It's What Hopping Over

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the rabbit Hole. Now let's turn our attention to the

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>world of politics and money. Our guest is Anthony Scaramucci.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He is the founder of Skybridge Capital, helping to manage

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>more than twelve billion dollars of customer assets. He is

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>also the author of his This is his third book.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>It is entitled Hopping Over the rabbit Hole. How Entrepreneurs

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Turn Failure into Success. Anthony, thank you very much for

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>coming in and spending time with him. It's a pleasure

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Thank you. Let's begin by talking just

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a second about hopping over the rabbit hole. Do you

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like you kind of hopped over the rabbit hole

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>during the selection season and the New kind together. I

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>can't speak for the election until after it's over. If

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>if the outcome comes out the way I think it's

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>going to come out, then I've hopped over it. But

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think all of us, in some ways, and the

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>American electorate in general, has fallen into the rabbit hole

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because at the end of the day,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>our politics is becoming too personal, it's becoming too emotionally

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>charged in an ad hominum way, and we've got to

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>discuss the policies and the issues a way more than

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we're currently doing, and that's going to be way more

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to the American people. So, um, just to stick

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>with your book for for one second, what's been your

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest failure? Well, I got so many of them. I

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, Adam of the biggest failure was my near

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>death experience with Skybridge, which is the whole genesis of

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the book. We went from a four d and fifty

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of assets under management to two hundred million,

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and we were on our way out of business, and

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so we had to literally adapt and pivot and redesign

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the business. And frankly, if I wasn't successful or we

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>weren't successful in buying City Banks alternative investment management company,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if Skybridge could have survived. So that

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>would be failure big time. Number one. I did fail

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the bar exam twice. I know my mom is listening,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so I took it the third time to eventually pass

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>it here in New York State. That was due to

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>intellectual arrogance. I wasn't studying enough for the exam. As

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a younger man, I got fired from Goldman Sachs h

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We could blame it on structural layoffs, but the truth

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the matter is I stunk at the job of

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>being an investment banker. Um. So those are a few

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>big failures, but I've got a ton more. Well, you know,

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I just want to quickly ask, how does it affect

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you to hear when people like Jamie Diamond or Warren

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Buffett come out against Donald Trump, including his economic plans. Listen.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these guys look at an enormous amount of

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>respect for them in business, but I think they're missing

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>something about what's going on in the American public right now.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what has happened, And we have to all

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>be very careful of this because of where we live

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and who we interact with. We've gotta it's a very

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>dangerous circle of elitism. We've got to be super careful

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because the working class that used to be an aspirational

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>working class is now becoming the working poor, and the

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>middle class is shrinking while the rest of us are

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting in salons talking to each other about how great

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>everything is. And so I think that's a real big fallacy.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And you can see that in the Bernie Sanders supporters,

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can see that in the Donald J. Trump supporters.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I love Jamie Diamond. I have an enormous

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of respect for him. Uh, The big corporate CEOs

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like the status quo. They like to predictability of that.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But if we're not careful in our society and we

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>don't figure out a way to solve the problems for

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the working poor and for the middle class, you're gonna

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>see a massive disruption in the society. This is a

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>minor tremor what's gone on in the two thousand and

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>sixteen election. The biggest risk, and Frank, I'll speak very candidly,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind being a little bit political here, is

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that you end up with a charismatic, good looking socialist

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that comes in and totally subverts and disrupts the American society.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And so for me, I think that I respect Warren Buffett,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>I respect Jamie Diamond. They also have boards that they

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>represent and their publicly traded companies, and I understand where

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they're coming from. But I do think that neither of

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>them have been to with Donald Trump rally, and my

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>guess is neither of them have been to a Bernie

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Sanders rally. And if you go there, you can feel

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the quiet desperation that's in the United States that we

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have to fix. I want to turn your attention to investments,

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's not often that I get to talk to

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you about where the money really is going, and you've

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>got to follow the money. Someone comes to you, let's

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>say they want to open a new account, maybe they

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>got attended. They tell you that they have a tenure

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>horizon and the uh, they don't want run of the

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>mill plane vanilla, because I can get that anywhere else.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Tell tell people a little bit about strategy and about

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>where you'd be looking right now. Well, the number one

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that we have to do in our business is

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>mental conditioning, because everybody is a long term investor until

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they have short term losses, and that's typically what happens.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So the losses come in short term, they set their

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>hair on fire and they want to change their strategy.

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And so what I tell people about Skybridge, You should

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have a stock and bond portfolio pretty much plain vanilla,

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but five to fifteen cents of your portfolio should be

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in products like what we offer. Now, what is that

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>we have a hedge fund business where we're actually taking

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>your money and we're allocating it to a group of

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and our portfolio now it's about thirty funds.

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The funds are designed to give you a non correlated

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>absolute return over a market cycle. That is above bonds,

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't even know if I'm allowed to

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about my performance or not, so I won't, but

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody can go look it up. The performance has been

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>very good, and the reason it has been very good

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we're we're we're targeting a certain lower risk

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>targeted to return, and so I tell people you're trying

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to reach an actually our real goal. The market is

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going to become more volatile as the feed is normalizing rates.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Passive indexes which have worked and so have e t s,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they may not necessarily work with the same success over

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the next five years. So diversify a little bit into

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>products like ours. Real quick to Donald Trump, give you

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 1>autonomy to come up with your own economic plans as

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you weigh in. There's no question he weighs in. I mean,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you see, this is the thing that I think that

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>has been distorted through the media prism and probably also

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>from his stump campaigning. He is a very thoughtful, very

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>methodical guy. He is a doer with a big long

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>list on a on a yellow pit. Anthony Scaramucci, thank

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Anthony Scaramuchie, founder

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of Skybridge Capital and author of his third book Hopping

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>over the rabbit Hole. Thanks for being with us. This

0:21:51.040 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bluebird and to learn more about Apple, we have

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>brought in none other than the expert Shira O Vida

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>columnists covering technology a Bloomberg gad fly, which just means

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that fast commentary section. Boy, you know, it's great to

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>have you here. My pleasure, Thank you, and I just

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>want to point out that you're followable on Twitter at

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Shira O v Day. Yes O v I D Thank you.

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Um Apple, you got this column out fast. What's been

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>going on? You're fast? Oh no no. But the reason

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I say that is is because you got it out fast.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>But you make a long term point in the piece,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe just to describe that, expand on that. So it's

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>really two points. The basic message is, look, the party's

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>over for Apple. So on the one hand, you have

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a company that was this incredible growth story for basically

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. Revenue increased annually for fifteen years, and this

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was the first time since two thousand one that fiscal

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>year revenue declined for Apple, and looking ahead, it doesn't

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>look that much better. We have a company that, I

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>mean generates incredible profits, by far the most profitable company

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But the basis of Apple has been

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a company with incredible profits and incredible growth,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and incredible growth is no longer on the horizon. So

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the big question is what's next for Apple, and they

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have an immediate answer. At the iPhone is now

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>their annual sales or so, and there really isn't a

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>product again on the near term horizon to replace the

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible sales and profit growth that the iPhone is generated.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that this is the end of the

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Party's Sorry, Apple, it's over. You've gotten to your peak size.

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for investors in the stock? I

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>mean there's still throwing off so much cash. I mean

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>they still have this fortress of money on their balance sheet, right,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's always been the bowl case on Apple, that

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>been during its most heady growth period. It still looks

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like an incredibly cheap stock. I believe it's trading right now,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or at least before today, it's something like thirteen times

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>next twelve month revenue, and for a tech stock compared

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to something like Google or Facebook, that's incredibly inexpensive. So

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if you believe that this profit machine at least continues

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future, and I do, then that's a

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.239
<v Speaker 1>reason to back the stock. But again, if you are

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 1>an investor in Apple and you want incredible growth and

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>incredible profits, um, the growth picture is probably not part

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the story anymore. But how many people really predicted

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that Apple would reach to these heights, let's say, twenty

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's a good point. I I don't think

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone did. I mean, this was a company that almost died,

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>right and has been on this incredible march, the likes

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>of which we've probably never seen in the corporate world. Well,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and the reason I say that is because I know

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that the new iPhone seven does not have let's say

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>an extension a plug for earphones. It does not have

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>an earphone plug that right, So that may change. You

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the third and fourth iteration is, specifically,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>since they have the Beats acquisition, you don't know what

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the technology is going to evolve into in order to

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>best the competition. And right now, the competition is all

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>outside the United States. So if you want a US

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>company and you believe that cell phones are going to

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to be in demand, what else is there? Yeah,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fair. It's you're right. It's not as though

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple's smartphone competitors are in much better shape, particularly Samsung

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>with this um problem with their exploding smartphones. The issue

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is that the smartphone industry is not growing anymore worldwide

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and um, Apple can't change that, probably on its own.

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So to me, the most telling moment on the earnings

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>call the Apple earnings call last night was one of

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the veteran Apple analysts asked him Cook, what's the next

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>big thing for Apple beyond the iPhone? The Apple Watch

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a blockbuster it quite yet. Apple music is

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not a blockbuster hit quite yet. You're not generating a

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of money from Apple pay. There's nothing on the

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>current product lineup that is the next growth driver. So

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do you have a vision of what that growth driver

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>is for the next generation of Apple? And Tim Cook answered,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I think rather grumpily that they have the best product

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>pipeline they've ever had, which is what Apple CEOs always

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>say from the beginning of time. And he also said,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to tell you what it is. Basically,

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the sort of trust us message from Tim Cook.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the trust us message from Apple doesn't

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>work anymore. Just real quick, did they mentioned Samsung and

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>how much market share they could end up getting. They

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>got asked that question and they punted it. I think

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it's clear they're not going to pick up huge sales

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>from Samsung. Shara over Day, thank you so much for

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe in listen to interviews

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio