WEBVTT - 2024: A Year to Remember

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Attrillians.

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bell Cheerness.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We're almost there. It's almost twenty twenty five.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but is it.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But before we do anything about twenty twenty five, we

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have to do a year in review episode.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, especially this year. It was unbelievabe.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Up, this is the most interesting, exciting, best year ever

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>for ETFs. I'm just saying that right now.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 3>There's never been a better year ever. Twenty twenty one

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 3>was right up there. This was better.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>This is remember that movie as good as it gets. Yeah,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>this is as good as it gets. So everybody, just

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 2>take a deep breath, savor it.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>It just can't be this good every year.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that makes me really worried about twenty twenty five,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but right now maybe feeling Okay.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Listen, the key to life is to enjoy the good

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 2>times and don't have your mind somewhere else.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, live in the moment. I like it.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So to help us process the moments that made up

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the year, we're going to be joined by Vildona Hirich

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg News. She's a cross asset reporter, also a

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>frequent guest on Trillians. Todd Rosenbluth, an ETF analyst at Vetify,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>also a frequent guest on Trains and rounding out our panel,

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Athanasio ser Vegas, an analyst with Eric at Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this time on Trillions a Year to Remember Dona Todd, Athan,

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Trillians. Nice to see you, Thanks for

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>having us.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 4>It's great to be back.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we've got a format for this round robin.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go around. We're gonna hear everybody suggest a

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>theme that they want to talk about that they think

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>distinguishes this year. Athan, you're in London right now. Good

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to see you on our screen. Talk to us about

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>what is your number one theme for the year.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh, it's I guess the most obvious, but probably the

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 5>most important, and that's just record flows US past the

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 5>trillion and inflows. I think we just have to appreciate

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 5>that number, right, Like when you say a trillion in

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 5>inflows this year, I think it was like high nine

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 5>hundreds and twenty twenty one. Obviously we had the market

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 5>participated in that, but what I thought was even more fascinating. Yeah,

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 5>so trillion in the US, but every region hit a

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 5>record this year. Europe Canada, Asia Pacific. So it's just

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 5>this amazing. What I love about the ETF is that

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 5>it's just hitting all over the world. It's like transcending geography.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 5>So that I think was by far the most Probably

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 5>the biggest thing to take away from this is that's

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 5>just been a record all over the world.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 2>And let me add to that with some numbers. Eight

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>and I agree, that's the story of the year. The

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 2>record was nine hundred and ten billion, give a ticket

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>called a billion depending on what data service you ask,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So a trillion is ninety you know, almost ten percent

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>over the record obviously, but here's also something interesting. If

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 2>you look globally, as Athan was alluding to, the assets

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>went from at eleven trillion to fifteen trillion. That is

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>a thirty two percent growth rate for an industry that's

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 2>thirty plus years old. Now, the growth rate when ETF

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>started out was twenty five percent because it was small

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 2>assets easy to grow those numbers when you're small. The

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>next decade was seventeen percent, and so we're predicting ten

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>percent a year going forward to get to thirty five

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>trillion in twenty thirty five. Well, thirty two percent is

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>so beyond what I would ever assume now of that

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty two percent number, about four tenths is from the flows,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>six tenths is from the market, So the market won't

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>be this good. As I said, this is as good

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>as it gets probably, but the flows, being that big

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 2>of a contributor, is really strong. That thirty two percent

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>number again astonishing if you had asked me again. We

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 2>predict ten percent a year going forward, so thirty two

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is ridiculous.

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 5>If there's something can add to that too, just at

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 5>the issuer level, right, Yeah, while it's a record for

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 5>the whole industry, it's not just Black Rock and Vanguard,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 5>but like seventy percent of the firms have had their

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 5>best year ever this year, so it's the breath is

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 5>winding out. So you have several issuers all hitting records

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 5>this year, which I thought was also really impressive.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And do you want to know, I'm gonna I'm it's

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna quiz you guys, what percentage of ETFs in the US.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 2>There's thirty eight hundred, what percent saw inflows this year?

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Get it between five percent and I'll give you a prize.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll go with eighty seventy five sixty six, So you

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>don't get the prize, but I was the prize, one

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 2>of the one of those gold coins that Todd brought

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna give you.

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>We haven't even had a chance to introduce what I

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 3>brought it.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd. I noticed that you brought some gold coins, chocolate

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>gold coins, trying to sway favor.

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 4>Listen, I don't think there's a judge and jury on this.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 4>The audience is going to decide which of us does

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the best job.

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sample your the chocolate you should.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 4>So this is an early Honkka present for those that

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 4>can't see this very visual podcast. I have a basket

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 4>of delt chocolate covered coins.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You talked about everything as baskets when you're in the

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ATF world. This is just a little bag of chocolate.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>It is when it's closed up, it is a basket.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Is that Is that a store of value? It is?

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>There's tangible diminishing because I'm eating the chocolate.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 4>There is tangibility behind this. But I would note these

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 4>come from Trader Joe's not a sponsor, I don't think.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>But they're called coins of the world because we are

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 4>taking it.

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Todd, let's do you next, what's your your theme

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 4>Well, mine piggybacking on what Athan said, but it's VU

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 4>crossing the one hundred billion dollar marked with assets for

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 4>or inflows for one individual ETF and IVV, which actually

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>got passed by VU in terms of total assets briefly

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 4>had sixty billion dollars. That would have been a new

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 4>record on its own if it wasn't for Vanguard five

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 4>hundred ETF. So those two ETFs just setting a record

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 4>is tremendous, is a great sign. Most investors probably start

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 4>their their ETF journey with a core S and P

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 4>five hundred based products, so that I think that sets

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.559
<v Speaker 4>the stage for the next thirty plus years for people

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 4>who are going to add additional products. So one hundred

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars sixty billion dollars, that's amazing.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Think about that.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>That's two billion dollars a week into one fund. Two

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 2>billion for a firm after five years.

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 3>On the market. Is good.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>So Vanguard again, we just get so bored of Vanguard,

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>we get numb to it. But the numbers they put

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>down are still just absolutely astonishing. Vanguard as a whole

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>company is taking in a billion a day into their ETFs,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>VU at one hundred. Again, that's doubling a record. I

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>had the meme of Wilt Chamberlain hold up that one hundred,

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>which to me, this is as hard to think this

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 2>will get broken, you know, like Wilt Chamberlain's record. The

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 2>only ETF I could see doing it is VU again,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 2>but absolutely extraordinary. And it reminds us that as much

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 2>as we give attention to this sort of hot sauce,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>shiny objects stuff, some of us most tooche no names, yeah, Eric,

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the bulk of the blob of money still goes to

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>cheap beta que beta is.

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the margin between VU and the runner up

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's runner up?

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's current runner up right now is IVV, which

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 4>is roughly sixty billion dollars.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Now it's fifty four, okay, so it's fifty billion dollars.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>It's double the number two basically, I mean that's it's insane.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Why well, mostly because Vanguard's brand for fifty years has

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>been cheap, so they have this strong brand, trusted brand.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>They're a boy scout in an industry that's seen a

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of corruption. Number two, it's dirt cheap. Three basis

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>points for the entire SMP the S and P kicks

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>so much butt and to get that for like basically

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 2>no fee and the frictionlessness of it. You just click

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a button. You own the entire us capitalism in one shot.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>That's why I'm so bo bearish on this direct indexing

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and tokenization that it's the best, that's the deal of

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the century. You're not going to disrupt that.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>For a while.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 4>But to me again, I got a reporter on an

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 4>editor in the room. To me, the story is in

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>VU over IVV by doubling. It's that both of them

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 4>crossed the fifty billion dollar mark.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's it. It's been a success.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going tension todd like, you know, let's talk about tension.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a little too kumbaya. I'm with you.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Where's where was Spy on that list?

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Well, okay, so Spy has these big

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>decembers because it taxles Harving. So it's rising quickly. It's

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>number five with thirty billion, but by the end of

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the month it could be fifty sixty. It's possible. It's

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>VU Spy IVV all above the last year's record. I

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>called them three amigos because they're like always they're like

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the three that are tracking the S and P. But

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I could see that, but then SPY would lose some

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>of that in the first quarter because it tax has

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>harvest thing. But okay, but by the way, one thing

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to watch next year, VU and IVV, probably both around

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the same time, are going to pass by then it's

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>like which one of those two will be the new king.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I think VU separates itself in the year after that,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 2>So I think two years from now we're having VU as.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>The the undisputed king.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>That'll be a big moment.

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Black Rock's not gonna let that happen easily though.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, tensin fil done well.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 6>I was going to add to this, you know, list

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 6>of great things for ETFs overall, which is that there

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 6>were five hundred and thirty nine active ETF launches, which

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 6>is eighty percent of the overall and it was a

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 6>year of record launches, right, so active, It was a

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 6>big year for active.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Is that your stat because no, it's not. It should be.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I was you should use that.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 6>I have some really good other stats.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, yeah, how about that'll be mine. Six hundred

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and sixty launches. That's record launches, Joel eighty percent of

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>them active. The reason launches matter, and it's part of

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 2>our support for the thirty five trillion prediction, is that

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the more launches you have, the more good ideas you have.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>If everybody is here launching products, one of those or

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>two of those is going to be the next big idea.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 2>So the innovation factor is at a record pace. And

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>this year we have an interesting group of big names

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 2>coming in. You know, Phil Back said ETFs go Hollywood.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>We had Noriel Rubini launch a ETF, Tom Lee Rick

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Reader late in twenty three but close enough, Jeremy Grantham,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and this Treasury Secretary Scott the Scent is supposed to

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 2>have an ETF coming out, but he might withdraw because

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>he's Treasury secretary, but he was going to launch one.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think we could see Bill Ackman at some

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 2>point launch one.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's the deal.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, there was a quote in the nineties Michael

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Jordan was asked about like Utah and this other team. Oh,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you're scared it UTA. He's like, look, you could hype

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 2>them up. Still got to come through Chicago. Still got

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to come through Chicago. If you want a ring badass, right,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that's ETFs. You want the assets you want, flows you want,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>customers got to come through ETFs, still got to come

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>through ETF. So everyone's going to have to come through

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>ETFs for the most part, minus maybe some hedge funds

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 2>or private equity if they want to be where the

0:10:59.320 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>people are.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 4>When you said big names, I thought you were talking

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 4>about acid managers, I mean those big individual names. But MFS,

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 4>which launched the first mutual fund ever, or has the

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 4>oldest mutual fund entered the ETF marketplace a week or

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 4>so ago, oak Mark, which is a proven manager, so

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to count. In fact, I'm not sure I

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 4>can even name an active manager that doesn't have in

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 4>the ETF presence, either directly or from a subadvisories.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 6>I can name one Ron Baron, and they're thinking about it.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Well about time.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah that's a fifty fifty some billion matager.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, you earn yourself a gold coin, Thank you

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 4>so much.

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>MFS interesting because they launched the first ever mutual fund

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>back in like nineteen twenty three or something. So for

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 2>them to finally, you know, come in is I think.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody is pretty much surrendered at this point.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple hold out's no doubt, but Morgan Stanley

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to me was the big one.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>That was last year.

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, Vildan, if that was your your that was

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>my extra nonstat stat bring the hammer. Let's hear the

0:11:58.120 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>real one.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Okay. So it was a really big gear for levered

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 6>single stock ETFs. I can't believe they haven't come up yet.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 6>This is the hot sauce or the super spicy hot sauce,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 6>the Ghost Pepper hot sauce.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, well, they're all flavors.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 2>The Ghost Pepper is the two X micro strategy because

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 2>that broke the volatility record. It's the two x micro strategy.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>JROL has a volatility of run.

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Three hundred percent.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a rolling twenty year t QQQ, which is triple leverage.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>QUES is a fifth of that, so it's five times

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 2>more volatile than three xq's think about.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the Ghost Pepper's like a new strain of ghost.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, to step back, there's two of them, right, there's

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 6>two of them. There's there's one from Defiance, there's one

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 6>from Tuttle and Rex Chairs and they were so big

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 6>that they were growing by billions in like days basically,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 6>where at one point I think Tuttle's was over three

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 6>point five billion dollars, and that was partly because micro

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 6>Strategy going up so much post election, but also people

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 6>are adding tons of money. But then overall for levered

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 6>single stock ETFs, we had forty five new launches, which

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 6>is a record, although they've only really been in the

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 6>US market for a couple of years, but forty five

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 6>new ones. Now we're starting to see fee wars there

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 6>as well.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 6>So it's really it's just I think that was one

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 6>of the really big stories of the year.

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 2>At the beginning of this year, single stock lever gtfs

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 2>had one billion dollars one point three they have twenty

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 2>now and like an NVDL two x, Navidia's six billion,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 2>that's will ryan from granite shares. That generates like fifty

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>million a year in revenue for them because these all

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 2>charge one percent, so these are lottery tickets for the issuers.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>And not only that, Let's say you get a little

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>bit of flows like I don't know, one hundred million,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and you're in a stock like Navidia or micro Strategy

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>two x, the asset accumulation starts to grow even if

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you get no new flows. So the fact that the

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>stocks are going up a lot. These managers are getting

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 2>paid even with no new customers. It's it's really gonna

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 2>draw a lot more uh competition. Now we got uh part.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>The guy was gonna call them parlay shares, whereas you go,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 2>you get two x coin plus.

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Two x Navidia, two x m M micro.

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Strategy plus two x u Tesla, so you could like

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 2>match these up. And then they have ones that battle

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>each other, so they got battle shares and like parlay shares,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna get crazy.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Cotrol.

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 6>This is going to yeah when they launch.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I know from a guy who likes the GARP. The

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>garb bts you both, you guys, listen and tom this is.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Look, there's a reason one hundred billion dollars went into

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 4>one ETF because people like simple, low cost boring.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 3>That's why we.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>See in the team sometimes it's no industry for old

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>analysts droll, Tod and tom Athan. They're they got like

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>they like the large cap growth at a reasonable price stuff.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>They this is all like crazy to them.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 3>And I understand that.

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 2>That said, I think a lot of this is a

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>result of the boringness of people's core. The more you

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 2>just marry passive and you're like, oh, I'll just wait

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty years. The more you're like, all right, well, I

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 2>don't want to sit there and watch paint try for

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty years. I want to have a little fun. We'm

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 2>not going to mess around with some you know, large

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 2>cat manager because I already owned those stocks. I want

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>something really crazy, something to get my juices flowing. And

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that's why I think hot Sauce is an ironic byproduct

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of the rise of boring passive.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Build on it. When you take away micro Strategy and Nvidio,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>what was the next single stock etf that Tesla?

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Definitely, Well, you want something the.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Whole suite, right, It's just like anything that can pop.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 6>That moves a lot, Yes, which is why it was

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 6>so interesting that somebody filed. Actually I think two issuers

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 6>filed for Berkshire Hathway, which barely moves, but they filed

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 6>for two x h.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Does that make it more fun?

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 6>No, it makes it way less fun. So you know,

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 6>the question is who if you're wanting the adrenaline, do

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 6>you really want to go for something to moose point five?

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And also two x micro Strategy in a way is

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>four x Bitcoin, so they which you can't do because

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>micro strategy is two x bitcoin.

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 3>These are two x that.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's why I also think people are trading it

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>because there's two x bitcoin ets, But why do two

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>x when you can do four? And I'll go to

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Ethan on this, They've got three x micro strategy. In Europe,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>They've got crazier stuff there, but nobody cares.

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yeah, it's just that they don't have that sort

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 5>of gambling culture that they have in They.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 4>They don't like potentially losing money.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>There's not many Degen products there.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 5>There's by the way, five x Nasdaq here that no

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 5>would They've been around for years with no as.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>If that was here, it'd be a jillion dollars.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Could you imagine five x Nasdaq? I was salivating.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I was touring around Switzerland this year and like Europe

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and stuff, and when I went over the hot Sauce part,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I was like, so, like, you know, you know how

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 2>you guys like have like a sports gambling account and

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>like nothing.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I'd see like one young dude maybe.

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Smile and I was like, all right, maybe you that's it,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>but like there was no, it did not resonate there.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>People are not into that.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 6>Speaking of the crypto stuff. This is also part of

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 6>this you know, biggest stories of the year. Eric and

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 6>James were named coin Desk's Crypto People of the Year,

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 6>James James Seffert from from Blooming Intelligence and it's just you.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Know a moment I think, so, yeah, they made you know,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>those penguin NFTs. They made a penguin n FT of

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>my face that was kind of cool.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 6>But did you buy it?

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean they called us the etf Bros. And I

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>I've enjoyed my time there. It's an interesting crowd. Like

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I said, I'm a true Bogel head, so I can't

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 2>go fully into it, but it's a little you know,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 2>there's it's a controversial area still, it's not something that's

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 2>fully accepted everywhere. But for the most part, I think

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>what was interesting about this year. I was going to

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>bring up a bitcoin but is just the Larry Fink Fidelity.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, these are people who have a lot of

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 2>trust and credibility and for them to get behind this

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 2>with products on their name is it definitely has brought

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 2>it more mainstream and made it more acceptable and exciting

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>for me and James to be part of that. But

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I'd say a year ago. It was still kind of

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 2>getting rid of that SBF stench.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 6>I mentioned it because the bitcoin ETFs were huge, really

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 6>so huge. I bit the I shares one it had

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 6>it got over fifty billion.

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, that's an info.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 6>It's a crazy.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Less than a year.

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Actually, yeah, let me drop a number on this. I'm

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna blow your mind.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Fifty billion dollars in two hundred and twenty one days

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 2>on the market. The next fastest ETF to fifty billion

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars was thirteen hundred and twenty nine days, so one

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 2>year versus four years, and that was I E MG.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that's interesting is if you have any

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>given year of ETFs, if your ETF gets one percent

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of what ibit get got, which is five hundred million,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>you would probably be in the top twenty most successful

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 2>launches of the year.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 4>Right yeah, I mean, let's just look at I'm assuming,

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 4>first of all, this was your second story.

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 6>No, I still have a really good one coming out.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 3>This one.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll call this the interlude.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 3>We'll call this stealing thunder.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, interlude.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 4>But the seventh largest bitcoin ETF, which is coin shares

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 4>pulled in, has nine hundred and thirty million dollars. The

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 4>eighth largest one from in Vesco. BTCo has nine hundred million,

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 4>the ninth largest Franklin eight hundred million. Everybody, everybody had success.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 4>This was when you guys talked about it as being

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 4>a race. It has been a race, but coming in

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 4>ninth place has still been a success for the firm.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was something some people there was. There was

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>the haters that were like, never get approved. Then they

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 2>were like, well but there'll be no demand. Then they're like,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 2>well but some of these are gonna liquidate. There's not

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 2>enough demand. Now they moved on to all kinds of

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>other stuff. But now it's not the right people, it's

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 2>it's they just keep moving the goalpost. If you if

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you hate this area, you're just going to find ways

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to hate. That's fine. I think the numbers speak for themselves.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>You can see them getting quieter and quieter. I don't

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 2>know where all this goals, Joel, but we do think

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that the bitcoin etifs are probably going to pass gold

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>ETFs and assets because they do act as a store

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of value, yet they also have that hot sauce quality

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 2>that gold doesn't.

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>When does that happen?

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>So right now, the in the US. Those ETFs have

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ten billion, and goldietfs have one twenty

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 2>eight so they're only eighteen billion dollars back.

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>I thought it would take three or four years for

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 3>them to it's tricking.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Next year it is, it's it might be. I mean,

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>at this rate, every day it's like something new happens.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 3>It's good news.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Look, who knows this is? This is very volatile, unknown stuff.

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that the ETFs brought low cost liquidity,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>no friction, and again they brought cover air cover for

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the advisors out there who are like, well, Larry Finx

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is okay, it's okay, all right.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Bil Donna, what's your official number two?

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, my official number two? Well, I was going to say,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 6>and we forgot to mention. We keep forgetting because no, no,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 6>there's just no my number two is coming up. But

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 6>we we didn't even say Bitcoin crossed over one hundred thousand,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 6>which is what's helped these ETOs.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But Trump too, yes, but Trump held yeah, of course.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 6>But but I don't.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Think any of that would have happened had that ETFs

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not happened earlier in the year, like laid this foundation

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for you know, permission, basically just a.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 6>String of really astonishing numbers and records and anyway my

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 6>number two. Yeah for real, I was trying to come

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 6>up with a topic that I was hoping none of

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 6>you would would come up with. Yeah, we had so

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 6>many executive changes at issuers this year. We had Vanguard

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 6>has a new CEO. H State treat has an Apoglia.

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 6>She's their executive business officer. I think chief business officer

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Brian Lake moved to Goldman from JP Morgan. We had

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 6>huge each turnover so global X. The list goes on.

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 6>It's just lots of changes happening some because some of

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 6>these companies are trying to be even more innovative, even

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 6>more involved, put out even more ETFs and new products.

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 6>So just trying to change our perspective a little bit

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 6>from just the record numbers.

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I like the attempt.

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's great because first of all, those

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 4>are all proven people that have taken their talents and

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>gone someplace else and likely can see the success. But

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 4>then people are getting moved up within within those respective firms.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 4>So Invesco is Brian Hartigan that's taking on an additional role.

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 4>I couldn'tame each person, but we've seen Travis Spence at

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan again fresh perspectives.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, Vell Donna, that was a good one, a

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>slightly different note than usual, and I appreciate that. We'll

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>distinguish it from you know, Athanasias. He only talks about

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>inflows all the time. Todd, what's your number two?

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? He first the everygonality on that.

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, you set me up to now I can't talk

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 4>about inflows, but yet I still will.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So take a little heat off of even there.

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Vil Donna's interlude number one was about active launches. I'm

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 4>going to just talk about active fixed income flows because

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 4>I obviously we've had success and Eric can fall asleep.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 4>But one hundred billion dollars, one hundred billion dollars went

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 4>into active fixed income ETFs. J Triple A, which is

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 4>a COLO ETF from Janis Henderson, which was relatively late

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 4>entrant into the ETF marketplace. We had Fidelity with FBND

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 4>with over ten billion dollars. We saw Capitol Group what's

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>it all about?

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Like? Why?

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 4>So we've seen investors long embrace active management within fixed income.

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 4>We have the FED that finally started cutting rates and

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 4>then now perhaps might be on pause by the time

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 4>people hear this because we're recording this before the FED

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 4>does its meeting, and they've been embracing ETFs, and that's

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 4>just the marriage of those two things plus such proven

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 4>asset managers that are now in this space. So advisors

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 4>are turning to active fixed income ETFs. I think that's

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 4>just a great opportunity for the experts to help the

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 4>investors and the advisors.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's not necessarily new, but sure. I mean

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 2>the bond ETFs I think took all that twenty percent more.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>They had a record too, and bonds haven't done that

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 2>well this year. They were kind of met, you know,

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 2>compared to stocks. So for them to have a record

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 2>that's twenty percent above the old record is pretty good

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>sign when you're not crushing it. JAAA is is a

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that really did have a good year. But like AG

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and B and D, what do they have three percent

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 2>this year or something like, But they took in thirteen

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of all the flows. People love that AG core,

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 4>But people also love trying to beat the AG. So

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 4>one hundred billion dollars for active fixed income ETFs is

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 4>a great milestone. Is a sign that we're going to

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 4>see even more success.

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and I think you'll see more managers come in

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 2>as well. They seems to be a slight the bond

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 2>managers get a little more love than stock pickers pound

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 2>for pound.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, all right, Ethan, bring us home, what's

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your what's your your last theme of the year.

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about flows again. Okay, I don't have an

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 5>actual stat but you know, we've been covering this a while,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 5>and what I thought was really interesting about this year.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Whether or not they launched this year, it's it's not

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 5>really The point is that there was a lot of

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 5>categories that came into the spotlight this year. So for example,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 5>obviously bitcoin that was one buffer ETFs, yield max ETFs,

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 5>single stock ETFs, So I can't remember.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>One credit credit.

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Credit another one that was like talked about a lot.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 5>I can't remember, Like normally this would happened like one

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 5>in like once a year like something like that. But

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 5>to have all these simultaneously come up in the same year,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 5>I thought was really interesting. So Steff, we had been

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 5>really exciting to cover because you have all these categories

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 5>that were born this year, buffers to another one like

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 5>they've been around for a while, but they really like

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 5>insurging an inflow.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>So that's really a stude observation, Like I think we

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about all of those things sort of an isolation.

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>When we step back and have a year in review episode,

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a good moment to be like, wow, look at

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>all of those things in tandem.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 3>So yours truly tried to thread all that together. And

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 3>here's what I came up with.

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>The ETF industry has gone from providing beta into solving

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>problems and even further changing your mood. So I almost

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 2>equate a little pharma action here because whether you're a

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>worried boomer buffers or a bored millennial gen zer, single

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 2>stock leveraged, they're providing things that are going to change

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>your feelings. So we think that, you know, the new

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 2>white space is your mind.

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>That's deep.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you like that. Yeah, it's a work in progress.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I got to fine tune in a little.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Bit PSYCHEDELOGYTF that was out there. That's in Canada, right.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 3>No, there's still one here.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 2>But the point being is, but the reason what Ethan

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>just said is interesting too. Besides bitcoin, they're pretty cheap.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna move those aside.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>That's like a whole new asset class, but the buffers

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and the single stocks in particular, they all charge ninety

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred basis points. So for people to come

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 2>in and out of nowhere, create a category in the

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Vanguardian era that can charge that much.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 3>You gotta study that.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Because we write to our clients a lot who are

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>in this industry like, hey, this is what worked and why,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's why we're like, maybe don't think about what

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>asset class you can cover, but maybe think about what

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 2>problem you can solve or what mood you can change.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Hmmm, twenty twenty five, be talking about moods some more.

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 2>An you think, yeah, okay, can I give my last one?

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 3>You guys hit on a little.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Bit the final interlude, final countdown?

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, mind flicks forward too. Well, there's I'll do a

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 2>quick too, fir.

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 3>Because I want to hear both your all your comments

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>on this. First is what he said. Private credit file.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Every year there is one filing or two filings that

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 2>are earthquake level, and this year it.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Was the Spider Apollo private credit filing.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 2>There was a couple other Colo private credits, but those

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>are just investing in colos that happen to have private

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>credit in it. The Apollo one is interesting because it's

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>direct private credit and Apollo is part of it. They're massive.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 2>The bridging of the gap between that world and the

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 2>public is major. The CEO of Apollo really wants to

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 2>do this. It's going to be a baby step. But

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 2>if they can pull this off and figure out how

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to make something ill liquid liquid with Apollo's help, man,

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 2>this is a big deal. This could really disrupt a lot.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 2>The private funds market is like fourteen trillion dollars. It's

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 2>bigger than ETFs M. That is going to get interesting.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think.

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 4>I think it also did spur so the products that

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 4>we now have in the marketplace bomb blocks having one

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 4>of them. I think there was a race to get

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 4>that to the market ahead of the State Street Apollo

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 4>to ride that tell wind that the market isn't The

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 4>ETF industry in the market is now focused on getting

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 4>private credit within the ETF space.

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't blame them. They they did the right thing.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 2>They moved it out. It's just not quite the same.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 2>It reminds me the bitcoin futures ETFs versus Bitcoin spot.

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, to have colo private credit, I don't know.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>You know how ETF does they want it the real deal.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>They want the stuff that they want, the real party

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>behind the party.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's see if the real party actually happens. Let's

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 4>see if yeah, we get if.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you think? Well, what do

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you think the odds are?

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 4>I think the I think it'll come to market. I

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 4>think I think Stage Street and the POLA want to

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 4>have it come to market. I think it's a focus

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 4>for them. Will it be Will it be as liquid

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 4>as we hope it will be? Taking an a liquid

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 4>asset and making liquid. I'm hopeful that that's the case.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 2>But one thing on this, let's say the private equity

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>or the private credit part isn't that liquid and the

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>fund overall is semi liquid.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>We've seen cases.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Of ETF like the Japan ETF is I liquid every

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>day because the stocks don't trade in COVID. The high

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>yield communit ETF HYD traded at a twenty nine percent

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>discount since then taken in money and has had plenty

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of volume. Like nobody cares. I think people trust the

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>ETF price and the industry, and so I think even

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>if there is like a gap between the supposed nav

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>and the price, I think ETF investor would rather have

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 2>that discounted perceive discount than go into like an interval

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>fund or some other form that's not quite as familiar

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and comfortable to them as the ETF.

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I think so too.

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>I just think it's going to require education, and it's

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 4>going to we might see a.

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Delay in the job security for us many.

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes, listen, we're approaching four thousand children we have to

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 4>take care of in this industry. That's wonderful.

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll be watching the new SEC chair and the

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>SEC conversations next year to see how this private credit land.

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>That should have been my last topic now that I'm

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>thinking of it, because there are three little sub things

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that new SEC chair you're probably going to see private

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>credit no problem, because they're going to be morebertarian and

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 2>like Genzer was pretty tight.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it's bringing me looser.

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is the ETF share classes, where you

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 2>can just like bolt on an ETF share.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Class to a mutual fund.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>M hmm.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that's gonna be like a It's gonna drain

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 2>money into the ETF.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people will switch over. It'll make switching easy.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you think is there any other take on that.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 4>No, I just don't know that the SEC is ready

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 4>to move forward on it. But we'll see with you know,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 4>with a new chair and new leadership, they seem to

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 4>be well. I would have thought by now we would

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 4>have seen approval if we had this conversation a year ago,

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 4>and we haven't. So until we see the I think

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 4>what they'll probably do is approve a couple of them

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 4>and see how they work before opening up the door

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 4>for everybody.

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Here's what this whole thing has going for it. It's

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 2>got these gigantic issues. I think there's thirty five, thirty

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 2>six that collectively managed like seven trait. These are big,

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 2>no nonsense companies.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Industry.

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>It's the industry, and they are close with the ICI,

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>who's close with Washington.

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 3>They're going to get this done. There's too much power

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 3>behind it.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 5>There's just one name, it's Blackrock. There's like once they

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 5>show up, it's just like, all right, yeah, this is happening.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 5>So is there anything more than that that we need

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 5>to know?

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, But it's the good thing is that it's not

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 4>just them, It's it's some of the large mutual fund

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 4>companies that don't have much of an ETF presence.

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 2>But he's saying that, like Blackrock filing for it helps

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody because they got so much muscle.

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 4>But if the SEC is worried about mutual funds versus ETFs,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 4>and the firms that are disproportionately tilted towards mutual funds

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 4>are comfortable with offering ETFs, I think that should make

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 4>it more palatable than the largest ETF provider saying, let

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 4>me offer ETF share classes to my existing mutual funds.

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, Vanguard did it.

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>They were to fund company, and they did it successfully,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's a precedent. The final thing from

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the new SEC chair is just when they just when

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm actual, they pull me back in. We're

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna see a ton of a coin ETFs x RP

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Solana h Bar, which I had to look up.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I was like, what even is that?

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna have a gelt et.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna there's.

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 6>Some you know, ones that we shouldn't even name.

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I say, gonna lose his mind and so am I

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was done.

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 5>You guys have no idea. I have to live in

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 5>this chat with Eric and James every day. But but

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 5>to that, if I could just add about the private

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.239
<v Speaker 5>equity thing and these now at coins, and that's what

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 5>you got to really admire about the industry. Like we're

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 5>just coming off of this fantastic year, and the industry

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 5>is not saying let's just take a break like we've had.

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 5>They're just like, let's push the next frontier, which is

0:33:58.440 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 5>private assets whatever.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you got to love about it.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 5>And I think with your new administration, I wouldn't be

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 5>surprised to see ETF. They're like completely tied to that,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 5>like TARIFFYTF, so they're very opportunistic. I think there could

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 5>be some we could maybe have another crazy year of

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 5>filings and launches. So but that's what you gotta love

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 5>about the industry. They just keep pushing the envelope.

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>There's a moment where it goes too far.

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, what would stop all of this and especially the

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>new product is just a really vicious bear market that

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 2>will cool everything down. But until that happens, I just

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>think that this the spirit of this year is going

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to just bleed into the next year.

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna it would stop the product innovation perhaps, but

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 4>it's not going to stop the flows.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 3>You see money going well, I don't think you go

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 3>to a trillion dollars.

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty two, the market was down eighteen percent

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 2>and they took in six hundred billion, So I think

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 2>you see. I think the market helps everybody just want

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 2>to put money into it. But I agree with you,

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 2>ETF will take in money.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Rainershin Athan, Phil Donna Todd. Thanks so much for joining

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>us on Trillions.

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 3>It was great.

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks, this is fun. Thanks for listening to Trillions until

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever else you'd

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. We'd love to hear from you. We're

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show. He's at Eric Altunas.

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Bye