WEBVTT -  The Next Bitcoin Shock No One Sees Coming | Pierre Rochard

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is better money than anything else out there. There

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is a speculative attack happening of people borrowing fiat currencies

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to buy bitcoin. Based on the fundamentals, bitcoin

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to surprise to be upside then to the downside.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>If you invest in a bitcoin treasury company that has

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>levers wong bitcoin and is increasing stats per share over

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the longer run, it could potentially.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Have perform Bitcoin.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But over the short run and with bad management.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>How should we as bitcoinners be thinking about and working

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 3>with government? Yes, so here, thanks for joining us.

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thanks for having me Mark, Thanks for being flexible.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Maybe kind of work around this, but I really wanted

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to sit down face to face.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 4>I think the first time I met you was I

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 4>can bit.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Block boom, they can like twenty nineteen.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that sounds all right.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you've been all in on bitcoin at least since

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteen. I want to ask about that. I started

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>buying bitcoin twenty fifteen and I was like, oh my gosh,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I have to tele a bowl world about it. And

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 3>then I found crypto and right around twenty nineteen was

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>by I foun mc kim on the other side of it,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, all right, I've done. I've done

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 3>my time in crypto, this bic one on the to

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 3>bitlock boom, I remember that. But you stayed bitcoin only

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteen. You co founded the One Institute. So how

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 3>did you one get into bitcoin and then manage to

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 3>stay firm?

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So already in high school I was really interested

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 5>in open source software and sound money, and so I

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 5>was like a golden silver bug type person reading Austrian economics,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 5>reading Murray Rothbard, thinking about like hundred center reserve banking,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 5>even thinking about how you could actually have something better

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 5>than gold that like, could we'll just have a fixed supply.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 5>But that was just kind of a thought because obviously

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I didn't think that there was any way to like.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually have that in the real world.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 5>But I was just kind of because Austrian economists will

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 5>theorize about well, what's the right amount of money, and

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 5>it's like, well, just any amount of money works well,

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 5>but ideally you want to have it fixed, and you know,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 5>to the extent that gold can can try to get there,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 5>it's better than government, you know, few currencies. But in

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 5>any case, when I first heard about bitcoin and really

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 5>went down the rabbit hole of the fixed supply twenty

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 5>one million. This is like the end of twenty twelve.

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 5>I was in grad school getting my master's in accounting,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 5>and you know, it would have been great if I

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 5>had been like, you know, mister Sailor with like five

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 5>hundred million dollars on the bouance sheet but in the conviction.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 5>But no, I was a broke college student, you know,

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 5>cruing a student loan debt, so unintelligent leverage. But in

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 5>any case, what interested in me wasn't so much the

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 5>idea of like getting rich quick. It was really about

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 5>the ideological nature of this, which is that for decades

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Liberty Harrian's had been complaining about Siah currency ever since.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Really you know, we went off the gold standard from near.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Nixon, but even before that, Roosevelt and I didn't really

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 2>they bother about.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Sure, yeah, yeah, absolutely, But I didn't really see a

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 5>path of how do we get from here to there

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 5>other than just calamity and chaos.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 6>Of like the Fiat systems that blows up, self destructs,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 6>everybody's like starving in the streets, and we finally are

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 6>back to jo Yeah, yeah, exactly, which you know, like

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm a big believer.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>In the ends.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 5>Do not justify the means and said to me, it

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 5>was like, wow, there's anything we can do to avoid

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 5>that that would be really great.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 5>And bitcoin came along, and I think that the the

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 5>key difference in my mind between bitcoin and gold was

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 5>that we could upgrade to bitcoin and it's not like

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 5>whereas with gold, like we based our downgrading to gold

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 5>because something bad has happened.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>We can upgrade to bitcoin and.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 5>Not have if something bad happen to the dollar. Now,

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 5>of course, like if something bad does happen to the dollar,

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 5>you can foresee it accelerating bitcoin adoption, but I would

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 5>actually argue that it would really accelerate gold and silver adoption.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 5>Maybe that's what we're seeing currently and that there's still

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 5>a process of education for people to realize that bitcoin

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 5>is better money than anything else out there. So yeah,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 5>that was my introduction to it, and that's what you know.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 5>I remember early twenty thirteen, we're having these conversations about bitcoin.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 5>Somebody else in our group is like, oh, have you

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 5>heard of light cooin? And then on Facebook as.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, I started hearing questions about light cooin and I

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 7>didn't have an opinion on it, so I was like, Okay, well,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to go research what's going on here, and

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 7>they're saying that the advantages that has faster confirmation lives silver.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Correct, So already that argument is silver bitcoin's gold. It

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 5>was like immediately debunked in my mind by the divisibility

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 5>of bitcoin. And so it's like, well, SATs are the

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 5>silver to beatc's gold, right that you can split it

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 5>up into a very And so I didn't like that

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 5>they used that that that Freeman because already in my

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 5>mind I was like, well, that's not even true. So

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 5>really this is just a method of almost like psychological

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 5>manipulation through metaphor. And then the faster confirmation times I

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 5>found out that actually that didn't even matter either, because

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 5>you get the same amount of finality over an hour

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 5>that you get either with either protocol and so and

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 5>then they would never come back with like a really

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 5>compelling counter argument, and that's when I started.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 8>Becoming a toxic Maximore stuff.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 5>Like, Okay, why is it that every time I come

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 5>back with an argument against their thing, they're not happy

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 5>about it, and that they're they're pumping their back, they're

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 5>not really like engaging in something you know, substantive. So

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 5>and also just from the sound money aspect of it,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 5>where it's like, none of this works if we're basically saying, oh,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 5>we're going to keep expanding the money supply throughout coins.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 5>So I just felt like a very strong bias against

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 5>that that if you The last point is really un

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 5>monetary economics, which is that there's always been this debate

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 5>about value versus utility, and so a long time ago

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 5>it was the banking school versus the currency school in

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Great Britain, and so when when thinking about the utility

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 5>of money, like Akanesians are like, it's about spending it, right,

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 5>it's about the velocity of it, and you want to

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 5>have liquidity and just money slashing around the system, and

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 5>the Austrians were very much in the mindset of no, actually,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of value in saving and holding money,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 5>and that gives you optionality. It's the option value of

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 5>money that if you try to inflate people out of

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 5>holding money, then you're yeah, you're you're creating a short

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 5>term stimulative effect, but you're actually taking away a very

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 5>important tool for investors in the economy to be able

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 5>to hold cash and to wait for good opportunities.

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting to hear that at the at the

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 3>New York unconfience where I was a week ahead to go.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>You said something online. I saw Michael Sailor a chuckle

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>from and you said. I think you said something like

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I've learned most of my stuff just from arguing online.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>You're sort or something like that. And so to your point,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>like kind of arguing or or going back forward with

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the likelying guys back then, and so you've been really

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>good at that and just sort of like hashing it

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>out online that really well, I was like more of

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>tech guy. So I built up two different tech companies

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>and had some exits on that and so but then

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and eight I wiped out and I

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 3>was like, what's this whole financial system? I have to

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>go figure that out. And I quickly found out about

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the FIAT system, the debt based system, and I'd beat

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a bullbot also. So I also got bitcoin pretty quickly

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>because I was really aware of what the problem was

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>and you know, having seening Fiat and being a bullbug.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>But then I still fell down the tech rabbit hole.

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's maybe it's maybe it is blockchain, and

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe we do need all these different ledgers and so anyway,

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>a good job on that, I think, you know, I'm

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 3>sure you would agree. A lot of times people don't

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 3>understand bitcoin because they don't understand the problems. So the

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 3>don't understand the solutions that I solved, and I came

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 3>at it from a different problem solution a little bit

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>maybe then use you a little bit more on the

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>austream monetary side, where I was more a little bit

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>on the tech side, even though we both saw FIAT

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>as the problem. So either way, but you had some

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>really early predictions, one of which was in twenty fourteen

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>calling for the speculative attack, right, and even when I

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>heard about that years ago, it was still kind of early.

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>And of course we can look through history and see,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, Hugo Stine's in Wymar Republic doing things like this.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Where did you, I guess, pick up that and think

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that was going to happen in the bitcoin space.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So it's really from hearing about I think it

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 5>was a lecture by Hans Hermann Happa where he's pointing

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 5>out that there are mechanisms by which currencies compete against

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 5>each other in the international market, and so as libertarians

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 5>like we're often like, oh, FIAT currencies are you know, uh,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 5>they're banked by the military. And you'll hear like charliston

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 5>you know kntans to say this as well, like the

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 5>value is banked by the military and some capacity, and

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, there's there's truth to that and that like

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 5>if if your country gets invaded, like your currency gainst zero,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 5>So there's truth in that. But but they can't prop

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 5>up the value of currency, and certainly not when it

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 5>comes to competing on four x markets, right, so like

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 5>you've never seen a headline of oh Trump deployed the troops,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 5>like the dollars up five percent, Like that's not a thing.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 5>The way that they compete in international money markets is

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 5>true interest rates and through capital controls and through currency reserves,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 5>and so those are kind of the three tools that

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 5>they use to coordinate devaluation amongst FIAC currencies. Unfortunately, it's

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 5>very rare that they coordinate revaluation of you know, increasing

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 5>the value of currencies.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>And that when you look then at.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 5>What are currency speculator's role in this, because ultimately all

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 5>of these levers that the currency issuer has, they only

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 5>have an effect to the extent that market participants are

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 5>on the other side of the trade. And so if

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 5>you look at the history of devaluations, there's cases like

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Southeast Asia in the late nineties and then most famously

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 5>or Soros and the Bank of England and the British

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 5>pound with where they were trying to manage the exchange

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 5>rate of the British pound to enter into a stability

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 5>of the Eurozone. And that the person on the ground

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>was Scott Bessant in London who was orchestrating, you know,

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 5>some of their their speculations, which is basically to say

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 5>that if you have a weak currency like the British

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 5>pound and a strong currency like the Deutsche Mark, that

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 5>you can borrow in the weak currency borrow pounds, sell

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 5>the pounds for Deutsche mark, so that you're shorting the pound,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 5>shorting one fiat currency against another, and that is the

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 5>deutsch mark appreciates and value. Then you can go back

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 5>and repay that pound denominated liability the borrow and have

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 5>a profit.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 5>The that that's really how currency values come into equilibrium

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 5>against each other and kind of like you get to

0:11:55.480 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 5>a point where supplying demand is reflective. Now, of course

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 5>the policymakers, they have their own agendas behind them, and

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 5>so you know, if they don't want this to happen,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 5>what they have to do in the case of the

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 5>British pound is like, for example, raised interest rates so

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 5>that borrowing British pounds becomes more expensive, and so it

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 5>undermines the economics of that trade.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Paul Krugman famously.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, obviously he's become a political hack, but a

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 5>long time ago he was a legitimate economist. Keith popularized

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 5>his term of speculative attack. I think it's pejorative because

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 5>ultimately he doesn't like speculative.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Attacks because they impose fiscal and.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 5>Monetary discipline on governments and saying like, hey, you can't

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 5>like go full Stephanie Kelton money printer. You actually have

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 5>constraints that are put on you by you know, the

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 5>bond traders and the currency speculators and these giant you know,

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 5>macro hedge funds.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>And so fast.

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 5>For today, I think that's what's happening is that in

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 5>a very interesting format, there is a speculative attack happening

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 5>of people borrowing fiat currencies in order to buy bitcoin,

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 5>and that today fiat currencies have to tighten their monetary

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 5>policy to be more aligned with bitcoin, otherwise they're going

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 5>to continue to invite this kind of trade.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 3>And now we're seeing that start to happen faster and

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 3>faster and faster. It's the arbitrage trade, it's the carry trade.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>We kind of see it play out in different different

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>areas all over the place. I want to dive into that,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 3>but before we do, I guess, you know, kind of

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>retracing some of this. So, like you came from the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>financial side of things, and you've studied the financial markets.

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>You understand the specultive attack and the way these financial

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 3>markets work. Talking about sort of like these battle of ideas.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 3>How you've been always engaging people in open debate. Good,

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't want to debate you. But it seems like today,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe it's a function of the industry growing, but

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 3>it seemed like people that came to bitcoin early maybe

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>were a little bit more principled. They came for one

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>reason or another. I lost my money, I had to

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 3>go find a solution. A sound money supply worked for me.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 3>You were censored, a cipherpunk whatever it is. Today, it

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 3>seems like we have a lot of people in that

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe don't understand how the world works. From a bunch

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 3>of different angles, specifically right now about the financialization aspect

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>of it. So a lot of bitcoiners think that bitcoin

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 3>ends financialization and like Wall Street's not necessary because we

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>can just save our money and it all goes away.

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, do you see that? And if so, how

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 4>would you counter that?

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 9>Every day we see headlines about inflation and dead and

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 9>diminishing control over.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Our own money.

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 9>That's why I always come back to bitcoin, because let's

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 9>go for generations, It's go for legacy.

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.239
<v Speaker 4>But protecting your bitcoin legacy the right way.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 9>Is not always simple. It demands discipline, focus and the

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 9>right partner. Now, that's why I personally use Unchained Signature.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 9>It's a premium private client service for serious bitcoin holders

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:10.119
<v Speaker 9>who want expert guidance, resilient custody, and the enduring partnership.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 9>Now Signature you're paired with your own dedicated account manager,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 9>someone who understands your goals helps you every step of

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 9>the way. You're going to get white glove onboarding, same

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 9>day emergency support, personalized education, reduce trading fees, and priority

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 9>access to exclusive events and features. Unchained Collaborative custody model

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 9>is designed to provide the same security as the world's

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 9>biggest bitcoin custodians.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 3>But for those who prefer to hold their own keys.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 9>Now, I've been using and recommending unchained for years. I

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 9>even got my parents to set up with them. So

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 9>if you want to get set up, check out unchained

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 9>signature at unchained dot com, slash mark Moss and as

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 9>a loyal listener, I got a discount for you. Just

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 9>use code Moss ten at checkout to get ten percent off.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Your first year.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 9>Because your bitcoin isn't just for life, it's for generations.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so bitcoin gives you that option to uh not

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 5>have to invest in stocks and bonds, or in real

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 5>estate or in small businesses like that, you have the

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 5>option to just save bitcoin. And I think that that

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 5>itself has been very attractive for me and for lots

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 5>of others out there who see stocks and bonds and

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 5>real estate and all of all these asset classes that

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 5>you know are tied in with Wall Street is.

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Basically overvalued relative to bitcoin.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 5>And so I think that thesis can be true, and

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 5>that then when you think about the financialization of bitcoin,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 5>it's like, in that set of circumstances, could you really

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 5>expect Wall Street to do anything other than try to

0:16:55.720 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 5>adopt bitcoin, like you think that they're not going to

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 5>act in.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Their self interests, right.

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is the place where like famously Gordon

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Gecko is like greed is good.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 5>If you really think that bitcoin is the best performing

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 5>asset historically and going forward, then you should fully expect

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street.

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 2>To just go all in on bitcoin. And I think

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>that there's part of it is.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 5>A concern that Wall Street is going to co opt bitcoin, right,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 5>and Blackstone is going to go in there and.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 8>They're gonna like change the rules and they're.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Gonna muck it up and and and maybe with an

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 5>neferious ultimate end of just destroying bitcoin or more benign

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 5>of like advancing their own interests and that undermining bitcoin, right,

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 5>So like trying to get everybody to custody with you know,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 5>the ETF and like try.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 8>To just clamp down on the ecosystem and control it.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I think it's the opposite.

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 5>So I think that Blackrock, Fidelity, all of the other

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 5>financial institutions that are embracing bitcoin, they are joining the

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 5>bitcoin network, and really I see it as like they

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 5>are finding how to integrate with bitcoin, not how to

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 5>integrate bitcoin into their world. And so when I look

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 5>at like, so we have to start with the idea

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 5>that like sixty one oh two executive order means that

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 5>these are giant honey pots of bitcoin that you can

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 5>get seized by the government when when the crisis arises,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 5>right when the time is right. I think that that

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 5>is a huge risk, and that the only way to

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 5>interact that risk is through lobbying. I actually don't think

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 5>that it's as effective as people think to say, oh,

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 5>if we all self custody, that we can avoid sixty

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>one oh two, because ultimately, if even if you self custody,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 5>at some point, you want to do something with us

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 5>bitcoin right, right, like you want to pay for your

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 5>kids vacation to Disney World, and you know that basically

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 5>if you take the bitcoin addicult storage, there's no exchanges

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 5>to bring them to, right.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 2>You might have like a bitcoin guy.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 5>On the street who you know could exchange, right, yeah,

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 5>but like do you really you know, want to take

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 5>out like fifty grand, you know, And so then suddenly

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 5>you're in a situation where sixty one or two affect

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 5>you even if you're self custodying. And so even if

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 5>you are a self custody MAXI, I think that you

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 5>want to be engaged in politics so that not only

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 5>did you avoid that outcome, but you create a better

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 5>outcome of Hey, no capital gains taxes on your bitcoin, right,

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 5>you don't even need a KYCML when you take the

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 5>medical storage. And so I think that we want to

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 5>be engaged with the policy making process to advocate for

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 5>the best outcome. And I think that the more financialization

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 5>of bitcoin there is that it's it's great to have

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 5>black Rock and Fidelity and micro Strategy and anybody else

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 5>hiring lobbyists and like getting bitcoiners in the room to

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 5>advocate for these policies that are good for everyone. Right,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 5>They're good for the treasury companies, they're good for the miners,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 5>they're good for the publicly traded companies, for the financial institutions,

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.959
<v Speaker 5>and for the self custodied PLB who just wants to

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, pay for his kids vacation.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the financial industry is one of the biggest

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>lobbying groups out there, so of course it is right, Well,

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 3>we can get the pharmaceutical companies to put it under.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Balance sheets that my health out too, but we won't

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 4>even about that.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 3>But so I would agree with you on that, but

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 3>it seems like maybe there's a lot of people that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 3>don't understand capitalism. Then so they think that again, right,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>all this financial stuff goes away. So you're a grifter

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to help these companies raise money?

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 4>How dare you? Don't you know? People should just go

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 4>hoddle their bitcoin on a hill?

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Right, So I think there's that, and then almost they

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 3>want to dictate how bitcoin should be used.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so okay, so I think that part of it

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 2>is just we.

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Don't need to call it any names, but you know

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 4>who we're talking about.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the CAF dependency of like a lot of OG's

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 5>saw what happened with mount Gox, and so when you

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 5>think about it probabilistically from like an actuarial table perspective,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 5>if you were really scarred by Mount Gox, like you

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 5>have a very set like list of best practices about

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 5>how you can survive with your bitcoin, and you could.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 4>Also say Tara Luna and Celsius and and all that.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 5>Yes, But then also like even if you held a coinbase,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 5>I've heard the stories of people struggling to get at

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 5>their bitcoin out of coinbase because of kycaml right of like, Okay,

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 5>now they've got additional verification all of that, and so

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 5>I completely understand and you know, like this is from

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 5>lots of secondhand, firsthand you know, sight seeing over the

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 5>past decade. We cannot undervalue the self custody, right, So

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 5>like even for somebody who's interested in just purely financial returns,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 5>you have to multiply the financial returns by the probability

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 5>of loss from not self custodying, from having to trust

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 5>the third party. Okay, So now today, I think that

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 5>with the election of Trump, there's a real, big, like

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 5>psychological problem that's facing the bitcoin community, which is that

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 5>we've had it in for the past four years. I

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 5>think we've had a really nice mindset of Joe Biden

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 5>and Kamala could they can just come in and take

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 5>our bitcoin any day?

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 2>And so, like self custody is non negotiable.

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Now it's realizing that actually, as long as we have

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 5>like some baseline amount of property rights and working institutions

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 5>here in the US, they can't undo the ETF. So

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 5>to come in and say, oh, well they could see

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 5>it's like the ETF that's basically kind of in the

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 5>same realm as saying they could come in and seize

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 5>all the four one ks and you know, all gold, ETFs,

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 5>the s and P five hundred like everything, right, And

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 5>so I think that there's there's a there's a reality

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 5>check of like a massive amount of uh, the world's

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 5>wealth is in US capital markets, and it is actually

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 5>reliant on the regulatory framework and the rule of law

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 5>US institutions. And the reason why the US continues to

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 5>be the wealthiest country in the world is, I would argue,

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 5>due to the stability of the architecture that was set

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 5>in place by the founding fathers in you know, really

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 5>divinely inspired wisdom h two hundred and fifty years ago.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 4>And that.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 5>If if if you have the view that well, that's

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 5>actually very fragile. One, we have to fight for it.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 5>So I actually agree that it is fairly fragile. But two,

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 5>you basically we will we would have to go around

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 5>door to door and fud all of that into saying

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 5>that like, you know, your your retirement account is going

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 5>to get seized by the government next year, that's why

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 5>you need to buy bitcoin and self CUSSI it.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And so we could we could.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 5>Do that, you know, like drive bitcoin marketing that way,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 5>but It goes back to like do the uns justify

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 5>the means? No, I don't think sowing panic, uh, you know,

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 5>by spreading food in the public, it's like a good

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 5>way of selling bitcoin. I think that we have to

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 5>sell bitcoin on its merits of like do you want

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 5>to have the freedom to control your own money or not?

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 5>Right like that, you know, we don't have to like

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 5>trust to strike here in people's hearts all the time

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 5>to can I give a positive vision for bitcoin?

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think we.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Really have to meet them where they're at, and honestly

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 5>where I'm at.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 5>Rule of law is like falling apart in here in

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 5>the US to such a degree that if you buy

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 5>a security, whether it's an ETF.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Or the brakes a little bit.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I mean we to the point like that

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago it was a different direction.

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 4>But I agree, yeah.

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 5>And I also think that if you look at, okay,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 5>when the rubber hits the road, like what what would

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 5>the elites tolerate. I don't think they would tolerate like

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 5>arbitrary seizure of like assets at that level you could

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 5>argue like and look at like the case of gold,

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 5>right like, why is it that they.

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 8>Were okay with Executive Order sixty one O two.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 5>And I would argue that it's because gold custody had

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 5>already centralized, because that is the equal equilibrium.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Outcome for gold custody.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 5>I think for bitcoin custody, it's all about decentralization. Having

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 5>a multi sig is something that you cannot do with gold.

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 5>And so even if they're if they're thinking like two

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 5>steps ahead of all right, well if we sixty one

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 5>O two bitcoin, what's the next step. Well, it's multi jurisdiction,

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 5>multi signature of custody right where Now sixty one oh

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.479
<v Speaker 5>two in one country doesn't mean that you see, it's

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the bitcoin.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>It just means that you're entering into years of litigation

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to try to seize the bitcoin.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I often think about that.

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I remember Ray Dalily making a big deal

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 3>about that, and in sixty one oh two, the government

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 3>had created the Federal Reserve. In nineteen thirteen printed way

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 3>too many of those fake currency units, and by nineteen

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty three.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 4>They owed gold. So they owed gold, so they needed

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 4>the gold.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>But they don't owe bitcoin to anybody, right, They owed dollars, right,

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 3>So why would they seize.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 4>They don't.

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 3>They don't have the same demand or need for the

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin like they did for the gold back then.

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 5>I think that they're going to run the playbook in reverse, right,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 5>because I think that in order to have a you know,

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 5>like ship of theseus like we're going to replace each

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 5>plank of this ship of seatt We're going to replace

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 5>it with bitcoin and or you know, like people will

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 5>talk about replacing.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 2>The jet engines mid flight, right, Like.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 5>That's basically what we have to do if we don't

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 5>want s to hit the fan from a societal perspective, Yeah,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 5>And I think that the best path to get there

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 5>is for them to print dollars to buy bitcoin until

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 5>each dollar is fully backed by bitcoin. Yeah, and that's

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 5>how you kind of get to the equilibrium mat com.

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's also probably levels to this game? Right,

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>So you started the meme, I think you started about

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 3>selling your chairs or whatever.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, the IMT started that meme?

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh is that the IMF started that meme?

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>But I think about like the plub who's just trying

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to get to one bitcoin, and it's like, just get

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to one bitcoin, don't buy anything else. Everything else is

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 3>a scam nothing's worth more than one bitcoin. But like

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I've been to Michael Saylor's house in Miami, He's got

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 3>like three outs out there, Like as you have more,

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 3>you have more money. And I think about even my

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 3>own bitcoin, A good majority of it's in multi sig

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 3>and then some's on single sig and some on some exchanges,

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>and I have a little bit on my phone, and

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 3>it's like kind of everywhere. So there's like levels to it, right,

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>and so maybe maybe it's people in different levels and

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 3>they don't understand that. But even just going back to

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the financial system for a second, like the financialization, sure,

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 3>but like there's some parts that will never go away, right,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Like we're always going to have savers and not just

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 3>individuals that can do multi sig or cold storage, but

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>like corporations, So there's gonna be some need for that

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 3>insurance services, capital formation, Like that's never going to go away.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 3>So that part, I mean, sure, maybe we don't need

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 3>to invest into a four oh one K. Yeah, but

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 3>like the Wall Street scaffolding doesn't just disappear.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's that, And then also there's people who actually

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 5>want to try to outperform bitcoin by going leverage long right,

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 5>and I actually think that that's that's maybe the purest

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 5>way of trying to perform Bitcoin is just going leverage

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 5>long and historically the challenge there has been liquidations. So

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 5>like when I worked at Kraken, like we had a

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 5>margin tating product, right, and.

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>So it was very popular.

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 5>And then it's no secret that sometimes we had to

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 5>turn it off for.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>New positions because we just ran out of dollars to

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>lend to borrowers.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 5>And so it's also no secret to anyone that whether

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 5>it's a Kraken or at bitmex or any other kind

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 5>of leverage trading platform, that Bitcoin being volatile, causing cascading

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 5>liquidations and causing increased volatility with this leverage, right, And

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 5>so I think that's what's disturbing for bitcoiners is this

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 5>idea that if you invest in a bitcoin treasury company

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 5>that has leveraged long bitcoin and is increasing SaaS for share,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 5>that over the long run it could potentially perform Bitcoin.

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 5>That's really you know, just to put it bluntly, it's

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 5>disgusting to bitcoiners because in the mindset of like, the

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 5>virtuous thing always has to be the most financially rewarding thing, right,

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 5>the virtuous thing of self cussing, right, has to be

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 5>the most rewarding and if it's not, then there's an

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 5>injustice occurring.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Right. But the reality is that it's a trade off.

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 5>It's saying, Okay, you're gonna have to trust the third part,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 5>and it could underperformed bitcoin. It could outperform bitcoin if

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 5>you look at the fundamentals, like if it's really being

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.959
<v Speaker 5>executed well over the long run, it ought to be

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 5>expected to outperform bitcoin, but over the short run and

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 5>with bad management, it could underperform right.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 2>The train off there.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Of saying okay, well that's that's that's a bitcoin treasury company,

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 5>and then you've got bitcoin called storage where you know

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 5>you're going to track the performance a bitcoin one hundred

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 5>percent like uh, and you know is assuming you trust

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 5>yourself to self custody. I think that's also something bitcoin

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.479
<v Speaker 5>is maybe tend to miss is how many people out

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 5>there don't trust themselves to self custody a lot. And

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's like the that that is we can

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 5>yell at them on social media and say like no,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 5>you need to take responsibility for your financial life. But

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 5>realistically there's also diminishing martial orts where you can say, like,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 5>all right, if I think there's a one percent probability

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 5>or ten percent in probability of sixty one or two happening,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.959
<v Speaker 5>and so I'm going to have some bitcoin and cult storage.

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 5>But I think that there's like a ninety percent chance

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 5>of the government being controlled by bitcoiners and us going

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 5>in the opposite direction of like government's voluntarily adopting bitcoin

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 5>and not doing sixty one or two.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Then I want to be leveraged long bitcoin.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 5>And so then it's just a expected value calculation based

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 5>on probability weightings of different outcomes. It's not like, oh,

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 5>I have a definite view what's going to happen in

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 5>the future.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 3>But now you're asking people to like get educated and

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>take responsibility.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so that's that's asking a lot. That's asking a lot.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 3>So speaking of leverage long the best way to make

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 3>money and the treasury companies, you had a debate with

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Jim Chinos, Yeah, talking about this this entire topic. Right,

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 3>So he's shortened micro strategy buying bitcoin. It's kind of

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 3>worked out for him so far in the short term.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I think about Simon Senek's book The Infinite Game, and

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like Bitcoin's the infinite game, and if you're playing

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 3>these short term games, these finite games, you could probably lose.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 3>But he's been righting there in the short term. In

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the long term, why is he wrong? And why do

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 3>you think these companies should outperform bitcoin?

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So this is a fantastic question.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 5>First of all, I would question whether he's right in

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 5>the short term or not, because in the first five

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 5>minutes of the debate he mentions that he's constantly having

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 5>to go buy bitcoin to maintain his head because Sailor

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 5>is increasing bitcoin per share and even.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Though the price of bitcoin, even the price of MSTR

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 4>is going down.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 5>Right, So to really short end af you have to

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 5>maintain a constant offset to the bitcoin.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Per share that Sailor has.

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Okay, And when I hear any kind of trader come

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 5>to me and say, hey, my trade makes sense as

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 5>long as I'm adding more capital to it, I'm scratching

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 5>my head of like, well, that sounds like you're losing money, right,

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 5>and that you're filling in the gap.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Isn't a short in the fiat price of MSTR, though?

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 5>Why would you have to add more bitcoin in his

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 5>bitcoin long?

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh, in the bitcoin long in order.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 5>To maintain the same ratio of long bitcoin to short bitcoin,

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 5>so that the only factor.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Is MNAV multiple.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 5>Okay, right, So over time that MV multiple is being

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 5>monetized into BTC per share, both through common stock issuance

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 5>that is a creative and through fixed income instruments, whether

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 5>it's convertible notes or preferreds and so over the short term, yes, okay,

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 5>I'll concede that you can have and I can see

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 5>that this in the debate. You can have short term

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 5>MNAV expansion and contraction. We saw it in fact in

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 5>twenty two sailors went below one x, so that without

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 5>a doubt you can have based on various market conditions, right,

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 5>namely that I think m NAV is a function of momentum,

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 5>volatility and sentiment. Right, So if bitcoin's on our ripop,

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 5>it's gonna like MNAV has an opportunity to expand Bitcoin's

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 5>going sideways and it's not volatile, then I would absolutely

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 5>expect mn AF to compress. But to me, the main

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 5>question of the debate was really about is the equally

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 5>room MNAV greater than one x? And I think it is,

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 5>and we can debate about where it should be. I

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 5>think that ultimately it actually depends on what level of

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 5>leverage the company achieves or is expected to achieve, right,

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 5>And that that's where equlibrim nab ought to be. And

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 5>then day to day it's obviously going to oscillate around

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 5>that because it's the trade off actually between like a

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 5>two x lever and ETF right, where day to day

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 5>it's going to have two x BTC performance on up

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 5>and down. But then when you start zooming out to

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 5>like monthly and yearly, there's that decay from the derivatives trading,

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 5>and so I see bitcoin treasury companies.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Being the inverse of that.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Day to day, they're not tracking two x bitcoin, but

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 5>over a long period of time, you're seeing fundamental value

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 5>correl from SATs per share increasing, Right.

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 3>And then the m NAB, as you said, is some

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 3>of it's just like a market premium, so sort of

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 3>like a pe ratio. Why is it thirty seven and

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 3>not forty two? Yeah, or thirty two, And so that's

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of like where the market sort of puts that

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 3>premium based off of that. So when you have higher

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin volatility and then they're mapping out where they think

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 3>that leverage could be over a long period of time,

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 3>people want to pay more for it, correct, right, and

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>in a time of compressing volatility or price cline, then

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 3>they're willing to pay less for it.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right.

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's really amazing because like if I

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 5>go back to like the days of margin trading at Kraken,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 5>like the idea that you could so you know, you

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 5>have a leverage long position inside of an account, the

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 5>fact that you could sell the equity in that position

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 5>or buy the equity in that position and not have

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 5>the liquidation risk, Well, I think that we're reaching a

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 5>you know, a point where that it's it's very attractive

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 5>from like thinking about the speculative attack where historically, and

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 5>this is what I wrote in twenty fourteen, is that

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 5>like people would borrow against other assets to buy bitcoin,

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 5>but the that's suboptimal because those other assets have a

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 5>lower return on an investment capital than bitcoin does. So

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 5>the ideal would always be that you're borrowing against bitcoin

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 5>to buy more bitcoin, but that hasn't been impossible up

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 5>until now.

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I would argue that, and.

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 5>There's still like inefficiencies. So for example, like ideally the

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 5>dividend payments on preferreds would be tax deductible, just like

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 5>interest expensive TAC subductible set. I still think there's like

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 5>and that we'd get rid of capital gains, Like there's

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 5>still like constraints on the on the leveraging up against bitcoin,

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 5>but it's getting better and better, and I think that

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 5>it's getting better for corporates and I think that it's

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 5>actually going to get better for individuals as well. Once

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 5>the like you can post bitcoin at JP Morgan Chase

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 5>and just get a line of credit against it like

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.720
<v Speaker 5>you would a mortgage at you know, five percent interest

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 5>rate for thirty years.

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if we think out five or ten years in

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the future, we have asset heavy businesses, so insurance companies, banks,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 3>oil companies, et cetera typically trade in a one to

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 3>two times m NAV and sometimes they'll maybe get to

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 3>a three and sometimes they go below, depend on sort

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 3>of what's going on, which is kind of what these are, right,

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 3>asset heavy businesses. Do you think that with reclassifying reclassifying income,

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 3>for example, bitcoin continues to go up, you know, hits

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars in five, six, seventy or something like that,

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 3>do you think we start to rethink what capital and

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 3>what income is and they start trading more like a

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>pe ratio maybe much higher or do you think they

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 3>stay sort of in that like one to two times

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 3>m NAV asset heavy business that we see over like

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a five tenure window.

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I think that you know, being levers wanting bitcoin,

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 5>like first of all, they're going to buy design potentially hopefully.

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 8>Maybe we'll see be more volatile than bitcoin, right, so.

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 4>We'll they are right now.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and so I think that you know, that's going

0:39:55.000 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 5>to be it's really challenging because of this like GameStop,

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 5>meme stock like uh, a time we live in where

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 5>uh there's maybe less fundamental research happening in the retail

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 5>community than there ought to be, but when it does happen, like, uh,

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 5>it's very high quality and the high signal. Right, and

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 5>so I think that the uh, there won't really be

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 5>an equilibrium on the m n AFF like it's just

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 5>gonna that's gonna be volatile. Nafs are gonna be volatile.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 5>But what's really interesting is that from a bitcoin perspective,

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 5>they're gonna sorb all the volatility and so strangely enough,

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:46.720
<v Speaker 5>like I think they were in a new new era

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 5>of bitcoin price formation where on the way up, like

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 5>bitcoin treasury companies have more resources to buy bitcoin, and

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 5>then on the way down, they're not pay ex selling.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 2>There's holding right right, they're sitting on their hands, and

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 2>which we really haven't seen yet. We haven't seen anyone

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 2>like really blow up.

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Uh you know, knock on wood that that doesn't happen,

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 5>because I want everyone to succeed in this space. But uh,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 5>you know, the even if we look at like uh

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 5>uh mstr and let's just like draw the insane argument, right,

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 5>Let's say they get to like eighty percent leverage on

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 5>the perpetual preferres uh and that bitcoin crashes and they're

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 5>like basically underwater on it.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Like, I still don't think that.

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 5>It's in their best self interest to liquidate the bitcoin.

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 5>And so I think that there's like, uh, at a

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 5>less than one XM and AF, the management team and

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 5>the board can credibly go to the public and say,

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 5>we think bitcoin is fundamentally undervalued and we're going to

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 5>continue to hold it because of that. And so I

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 5>think that there's like a countercyclical force to bitcoin treagery companies.

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Even when their stock is doing poorly and m navs

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 5>are compressing across the industry, they're actually either holding bitcoin

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 5>or continuing to accumulate it.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as long as they can hold it. I remember

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Sailor saying, we've been Prague a few months ago, and

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 3>someone said, what's the worst that can happen? He said,

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 3>the worst that can happen is we never raise any

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 3>more money ever again. And we're one hundred billion dollar

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 3>company growing at sixty percent a year. And to your point, right,

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 3>there could be these bear markets. But to your point right,

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 3>if we're not forced to sell the bitcoin, the stock

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.279
<v Speaker 3>can take a hit. Let it take a hit, give

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 3>me a year or two, and we can kind of

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 3>get it back. I think that's what you're saying, if

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 3>you're able to withstand and kind of and hold through

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 3>that period.

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 5>It also gets back to like the argument of like

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 5>and Chaino's pointing this out. I was like, Okay, so

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 5>strategy has been going to do great as long as

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin's price keeps going up.

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 4>You have to believe in that, right, And I.

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 5>Look at Bitcoin's fundamentals and they've never been stronger. And

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 5>so I'm like, the only argument against like getting back

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 5>to like one hundred percent cager that it was at,

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, five ten years ago is basically just that

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 5>it's gotten so big that now it's a two trillion

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 5>dollar asset class, and so it's going to require massive

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 5>inflows to you know, get to that. But I still

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 5>think that even if we fall short of a hundercent

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 5>cager and we land a fifty percent or forty percent

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 5>or thirty percent, that's still greater than the cost of

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 5>capital in uh FIAT markets. And so I think that

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 5>the yeah, the arb there is intact, but I think

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 5>that it's more likely based on the fundamentals, that Bitcoin

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 5>is going to surprise to the upside than to the

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:57.800
<v Speaker 5>downside going forward.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 3>So the give in the law of large numbers. The

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 3>bigger bigcoin gets, the harder it is to kind of

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 3>continue to have that explosive keg. But when you overlay

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 3>like a technology like s curve intol, you can see we're.

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Accelerating to that adoption.

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 3>And you would also say two tillion is actually still

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 3>pretty small when you're tapping into one hundred and forty

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 3>five trillion dollar fixed income market. So certainly, yes, as

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 3>it gets bigger, technically that's correct, but as we tap

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 3>these big pools of capital, things could speed up. Two

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 3>more things to ask because then we got to go

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 3>to dinner.

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 4>So One, what.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.439
<v Speaker 3>Are these extremely attractive fundamentals that you see and why

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 3>do you think potentially we could see the end of

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 3>that four year cycle in the bitcoin cycle you're talking about.

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.919
<v Speaker 5>So one is on the supply side, ninety five percent

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 5>of the bitcoin have been mined at this point, and

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 5>so with each having like the new issuance of bitcoin

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 5>entering into the market is just a smaller and smaller

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 5>percentage of the trading float out there, and so I

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 5>think that that is less and less impactful. Two, on

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 5>the demand side is the ETFs have only begun to

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 5>be rolled out, and so if you think about all

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 5>those financial advisors out there who are talking with their

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 5>clients about what percentage delllecate to bitcoin, like, all of

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 5>those conversations getting to like one to five percent are

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 5>in the future in the next ten years, not in

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 5>the past, So massive amount of demand from that. And

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 5>three on still on the demand side, from a demographic perspective,

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 5>the massive wealth transfer that's going to happen through inheritance

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 5>from boomers essentially to younger generations over the next ten

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 5>to twenty years. It's just it's astronomical trillions of dollars

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 5>and so incrementally a lot of those dollars that are

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 5>going to flow into bitcoin. And so I think that

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 5>those are the three big trends that even if you

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 5>look outside of like corporate adoption and software adoption, like

0:45:56.400 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 5>if I just look at flows from ETFs plus plus

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 5>from demographics, they were looking at a multi decade pull

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 5>market in front of us.

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would definitely agree with all those. I would

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 3>also add that I think that the four yer having

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 3>cycle just so happened to coincide with the four year

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 3>global liquidity cycle and the four year ism business cycle,

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and I think those are really.

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 4>The dog that wags the tael.

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 3>So when you look at the global liquidity cycle, I

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 3>think one we can see from the banking collapse in

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three, there's like no appetite for a drawdown

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.439
<v Speaker 3>right now. Yeah, you have yelling and now you mentioned

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Ascent earlier.

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 4>They've continued just to load the front end of the bills.

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 3>And so when you take away that debt maturity at

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 3>three to five year debt maturity and you load it

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 3>all in the one year, you start to really limit

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 3>the impact of that liquidity and then on top of that,

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 3>you have rates just started being cut now, as opposed

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one, they were behind the curb and they

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 3>are hiking.

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Now they're just starting to cut. Right. Trump is patting

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 4>the table.

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 3>He wants rates three points lower than that he gets

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 3>usually what he once. He's going to replace the FED

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 3>chair in a couple months from now. We'll probably be

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 3>cutting all the way through next year. And if the

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 3>US is cutting, that gives cover to China and every

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 3>other central bank to start cutting on top of that.

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 3>So certainly the cycle is intact.

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Intel has proven otherwise.

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 3>But when you look at the macroeconomic picture, it looks

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 3>like we can accelerate all the way through next year.

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 2>What worries me about like and.

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 5>The US dollar monetary policy situation is said, it feels

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 5>like any gains we get in bitcoin from that are

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 5>going to be offset by the price of my stake.

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 8>At the supermarket increasing.

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like that way about like COVID. You

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 2>know that COVID inflation period where it was like but no,

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 2>but no.

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Right, So from twenty twenty to now they increased in

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 3>US and two forty percent.

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and homes are up forty percent, gases.

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:53.959
<v Speaker 3>Of forty percent, oils of forty percent.

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Foods up thirty to forty percent.

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well bitcoins up what.

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if that percent so big point is

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 4>much more sensitive to that liquidity.

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 5>But I still feel like that the the the marginal

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 5>demand from people trying to avoid inflation. Yeah, that that

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 5>can that can be material. I just I hope that

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 5>that's uh maybe maybe it's just uh rose colored or

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 5>orange colored glasses of just hoping that like they don't

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 5>blow up the system, because ultimately, if we think about

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 5>it from a societal perspective, like we can't take what

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 5>we have for granted. And uh, as much as we

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 5>want to be like anarcho capitalists, the reality is that

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 5>if if the system blows up, it's going to hurt

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people that had you know, they're not

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 5>the ones who decided to go off the gold standard

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 5>or anything like that. And so, uh, but I agree

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 5>with you that we're entering into an easing things and

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 5>if we think about bitcoin versus the dollar, they arguably

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 5>should be increasing interest rates, not lowering them.

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.919
<v Speaker 3>At this point, stock markets, all time highs, low, unemployment, right,

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I would say, I mean one hundred percent. I remember

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and eight. I referenced that earlier and

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 3>how I got hammered in that. And I remember them

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 3>coming out with a billion dollar tart.

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Build and I'm like, no, you can't do that.

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 3>No, and now seven hundred billions like nothing right part

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 3>of me, and maybe it is insensitive is just like okay,

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 3>just bring it now, right. But we did see in

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and eight was we had massive asset price

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:41.919
<v Speaker 3>and it's not inflation, it's appreciation. When consumer prices stayed

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 3>actually relatively low. So we could see actually, maybe it's

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 3>hopeful thinking. But where bitcoin is that liquidy sponge and

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 3>absorbs more of that asset price inflation, So maybe you

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 3>don't see houses going up as much as you did

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and eight, So maybe houses stay down

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, maybe assets stay down little bit. Bitcoin

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 3>absorbs more of that. Consumer prices could still say relatively low. Yeah,

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe that's that's hopeful thinking, and we'll see how that

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 3>plays out. Let's jump into the last question because we're

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 3>here in Washington, d C. My first time being here

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 3>on the helm by the way in Washington, d C.

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Talking about policy. So you referenced it sort of earlier

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 3>with the A M L K y C. But you know,

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I was I was mentioned to you before we started recording.

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that we should sort of be trying to

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:29.479
<v Speaker 3>keep the government and check one of the finding fathers

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that intended the Constitution to be as opposed to working

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:35.399
<v Speaker 3>with them the past laws that allow us what to do.

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm just curious.

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 3>You spent a lot of time with regulators in Texas

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 3>and now here. What do you think is the sort

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:44.720
<v Speaker 3>of approach and how should we as bitcoorners be thinking

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 3>about and working with with with government.

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 5>So I think that first we have to kind of

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 5>have some like North Star principles, right, Okay, we would

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 5>never or support anything that undermines self custody.

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 8>Running your own note mining, you know, whether it's at

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 8>home or a large facility.

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:12.320
<v Speaker 5>And by the way, self custody whether you're a plub,

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:15.359
<v Speaker 5>you know individual, your family, or your.

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Church, or a giant mega corporation.

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 5>That you know wants or you know, a bank that

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 5>wants to be able to custody a bitcoin like, they

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 5>should be free to do that for their clients and

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 5>for themselves. And so I think that that focus on

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 5>freedom like has to guide everything within that. And then

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 5>there's questions of like, well do we what do we

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 5>prioritize on a tactical level given the game of politics, right,

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 5>And I think that we always want to be moving

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 5>the ball down the field away from banning bitcoin. And

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.760
<v Speaker 5>so I feel like that's the strongest argument, for example,

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 5>for the strategic Bitcoin reser, is that's one more thing

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 5>where we get it, you know, ten yards down further field,

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 5>where AOC or Gavin Newso or whatever Democrat gets elected

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 5>as president in the year twenty thirty two after JD

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Vance's second term and they cheat again or something anyway,

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 5>but that's get too political that yeah, they've got to undo,

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 5>they've got to undo wins rather than score goals, right,

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 5>And so I think that we also want to make

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 5>sure that the debate is debating what is the value

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 5>of bitcoin, like are we bullsh on bitcoin or not?

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:48.239
<v Speaker 5>Versus the debate of should we ban bitcoin or not?

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 5>And so it's almost like a denial of service attack

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 5>of like we want to advocate for policies proactively so

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 5>that we keep them tied up and not keep them

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 5>on their heels. Right, Right, there's there's a saying here

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 5>in d C of if you're not at the table, you're.

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 2>On the menu. And so you want to be in

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 2>those rooms. Yeah, and you want to be.

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 5>Zealously advocating for bitcoin and for the bitcoin community and

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 5>for the whole ecosystem, because if you're not telling the story,

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 5>your enemies are telling the story about you know, and

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 5>they have right, They've they spent many years talking about

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 5>the environmental devastation of bitcoin mining, all the criminal activity

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 5>happening on bitcoin, all all of this fud that we

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 5>have to push back on. Otherwise, if we take everything

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 5>for granted, it's kind of like a metaphor of like

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 5>another sports metaphor soccer name.

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so got to.

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Like him national team, like FIFA champions versus five year

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 5>old like you know, kids soccer.

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 2>And you could say, well, obviously the FIFA team's gonna win.

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 5>They don't even need to play, and then you know,

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 5>the kids score goals and then the kids win. Right,

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 5>the FIFA team still has to go out on the

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 5>field and kick the ball into the goal. It's not

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 5>enough for them to sit on the bench and say, well,

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:14.919
<v Speaker 5>we're obviously better than them on paper, so we don't

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 5>actually even need to play right. And so that's where

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 5>I think like, even though we know bitcoin's going to succeed,

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 5>that only happens by us doing things. It doesn't happen

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.479
<v Speaker 5>from us, like you know, just you know, taking cheap

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:28.240
<v Speaker 5>shots on Twitter.

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're responsible to go build the world that we want.

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 3>And I've challenged a lot of bigcoiners with that. You

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 3>think you're just going to go hoddle and the whole

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 3>world's going to get built for you and then you're

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 3>going to emerge one day. It's like not going to

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:38.359
<v Speaker 3>happen that way.

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 5>So or or they're free writing on the efforts of others,

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:44.959
<v Speaker 5>which I'm like, that's fine, Like, you know, I don't

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 5>know that you want to tell your grandkids about it,

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 5>but that's fine.

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, all right, Pierre, we're going to wrap it

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 3>up host a Bitcoin for Corporations. You talk about this

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 3>all the time. New independent director at Strive Asset Management. Again,

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 3>congratulations of that bitcoin bond co company. You don't have

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 3>anything to announce on that yet, but we're going to

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 3>keep an eye on that. Anything else people should be

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 3>paying attention to.

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh, the Satoshi knacametoans too, of course.

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I encourage everyone to go check that out and

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 5>to just go down the rabbit hole.

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's it. Thanks thanks for having me on Mark

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Cool