WEBVTT - DAO-mocracy (Alex Zhang)

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Most things don't need to live on the blockchain, most

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>things don't need to be crypto based. But in a

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>world where that technology provides real value to that organizing

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>structure that I think adao is a really great thing

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to explore in terms of how you can create fundamental

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>transparency and sort of value cruel to people who participate

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in that network. Welcome to How to Citizen with Baritune Day,

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a podcast that reimagine citizen as a verb, not a

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>legal status. This season is all about how we practice democracy,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>what can we get rid of, what can we invent,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and how do we change the culture of democracy itself.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We're leaving the theoretical clouds and hitting the ground with

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>inspiring examples of people and institutions that are showing us

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>new ways to govern ourselves. Way back in the year

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>two twenty one, I tried to buy an original copy

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the United States Constitution. Okay, me and thousands of

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>other people tried to buy the Constitution. I was part

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of this group called Constitution Doo. DOO stands for a

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Autonomous Organization, and it was formed by a few

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>dozen people who wanted to bid on the nation's founding document.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It was essentially a crowdfunding campaign where anyone who was

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>interested could pledge cryptocurrency to the bid and by doing so,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have a say in what would happen with the document

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>if we won. So very nerdy, but people got into it.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Constitution Dow raised nearly fifty million dollars in a week.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>We did get beat at the auction, and in hindsight

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty obvious. You don't enter an auction with

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody knowing how much money you're willing to pledge. But

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the energy around it was amazing and it was cool

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of this flash mobby group purchase

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of a piece of US history. And it's not just

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Constitution loving freaks who are into DAOs. They vary in use,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in membership, and in purpose, and to me, they give

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>us a way to use digital tools to structure an

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially online cooperative model of self governance. The thing that

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>makes DAOs different from your typical company or nonprofit or

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>coop is that they're built on blockchain technology. Yes, blockchain.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to have to say this word to you.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I know you've heard of it and it probably makes

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>you think of people coming to take your money. I'm

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not here to steal your money. There's no tokens, there's

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>no FTX schemes, there's nothing like that. Okay, I don't

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>believe we need to financialize all human activity or speculate

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>on fake Internet money to feel like we're making progress.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But underneath the flashy headlines of fraud, there is a

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 1>technology worth understanding. Blockchain is a form of relatively secure

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and radically transparent storage. You can think of it as

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a database that can be used to store financial transactions,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but also transactions like votes or even moves in a

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>video game. There's almost no limit to what you could

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>store in it, and when we think about citizening and

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>self governance, a DOW is an attempt to create this

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of human organizational layer on top of that blockchain

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>with some of the same principles. The blockchain creates transactional transparency,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and the participation of people through a DOW helps secure

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and increased trust in the overall operation. The code itself

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make those things happen, but it can help ensure

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Collective self governing groups like neighborhood cooperatives aren't new, but

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>given how much time we're collect actively spending in technological spaces.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's worth asking, can we design systems in the digital

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>world where we can truly practice collective decision making and

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>resource sharing better than what we've seen done in the

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>physical world. Alex Jang has been asking this question for

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a while. Alex is the mayor of Friends with Benefits now.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Friends with Benefits, or FWB for short, is a doubt

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially an online club with thousands of members. Those

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>members decide what those benefits are and how to manage

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>their collective financial resources. Basically, FWB is a chat room

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>with a bank account. Think about a subreddit you're really

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>invested in, or an old Aowell chat room. Think of

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>those structures, but this time they've got a treasury and

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>some voting mechanisms attached. And with those new features, you

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>can do so many more things than just chat activities,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like funding projects, supporting artistic innovation, and organizing events and meetups.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The list goes on. Dows like FWB are a fascinating

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>place for us to learn some of the ways we

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>might citizen in the future, and they can give us.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.799
<v Speaker 1>They give me a little hope that when it comes

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to our digital spaces, we can still define community for ourselves.

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to subject ourselves to these manipulative attention

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>extraction platforms. Investing in online spaces doesn't have to mean

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>divesting from our communities and our democracy. In fact, it

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>could mean the opposite. So I met up with Alex

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>over Zoom along with our virtual audience to learn how

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>we can upgrade our virtual citizening after the break, Alex

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Jang on the benefits of doos and the potential of

0:05:52.800 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>creating digital spaces instead of being consumed by them. We're

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about web three and dows today, and

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just very briefly, web threes, like the allegedly new version

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet which has users not just being users

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but also owners, are the platforms that we are a

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.559
<v Speaker 1>part of. Alex Jang is an advocate for how Web

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>three technology can help propel culture and large scale human

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>coordination forward. He's the de facto mayor at Friends with Benefits,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a crypto enabled cultural membership and community cited by The

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 1>New York Times as one of the most interesting uses

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of doos right now. I don't know if the time's

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>meant to rhyme like that. Formerly, he was the creative

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>director and president of Summit Series a global community and

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>evinced company, which is where Alex and I met. Alex,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to how the citizen. What's up? Super happy to

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be here and good to see you. It's good to

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>see you too, it's been a while. I want to

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get your perspective on the big picture before we dive

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into the world of FWB and possible to democracy enhancing

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>skills that we might gain through DOO activities. But by

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>some estimates there are about ten thousand dows. I want

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to know how you think this structure of ADAO compares

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to a traditional hierarchical company or to a representative democracy

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas citizens slash members, we elect decision makers to determine

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>our laws and our spending and even what's allowed in

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of our actions. What's the DAO structure offer that's

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>different from what these other structures were more familiar with offer. Yeah,

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. First off, thanks for having me.

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Love to talk everything democracy and in between. And incredible

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to see this community that you've built here. It's really

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>really fun. Yeah. I think to sort of first take

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a step back and like demist defy dows decentralized autonomous organizations,

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think there can be a lot of sort

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of baggage and different things attached to it, which really

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is an organization that has assets that live on the blockchain.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So that is my first sort of clarification point, as

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be a DOO don't interact with crypto or

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain. It is fundamentally attached to how an organization

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>holds in custodies its assets, which are primarily crypto based assets.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And then from there a DAW can be structured as

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>centrally or decentrally as possible. I call it sort of

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a spectrum of decentralization, or other writers call it, you know,

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>being progressively decentralized, no different than you can choose to

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>run your LLC or your c corp any way you want.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I've advised and supported many different DAOs that are completely

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>flat decentralized and bottoms up governed all the way to

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ones that look a little bit more in the middle.

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I would say, how f TOBB is where we operate

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as a representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you have those that are very tightly knit,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>tightly coordinated, centralized leaders, which are DAWs of four people

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and they decide which art to buy and collect and sell,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and that isn't, as say, flatly governed by its users.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would offer that there is not one fits

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>all DOW and dows are can contain a spectrum of

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>centralization or decentralization. But fundamentally, why DOW is a question

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>many people should be asking because even hearing that there's

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand of them is kind of frightening because I

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>believe many of them shouldn't be a DOO. But a

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>DOO should only exist, in my opinion, if one you

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have a cryptocurrency based sort of organization or reason for

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>existence and to the need to decide how to allocate

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>those resources should be governed via on chain decision making,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>voting and governance. And so, really, where doos become exciting

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to me as I look across five years, ten years

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>as the cryptocurrency industry continues to evolve and mature, Is

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that doos feel like a really interesting organizational structure framework

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for Internet based communities that leverage cryptocurrency as ways to trade,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>exchange and create value for its users trade exchange, change

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and create value. So one, thank you for not telling

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone to go start a doubt. I just appreciate the

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>non boosterism of that maybe right for you, maybe not

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>right for others. This common denominator that is blockchain based

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on chain, crypto held assets. I don't want to get

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>too much into the rabbit hole, but since we're on

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>the subject, now, can you, for those who are not

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>deeply enmeshed, give your ambassador translation of the value of

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>putting an organization of people like this on a blockchain? Yeah?

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Happy too. So similar to why I was saying, you know,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>not everything should be a doubt, Not everything should be

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on chain or even a crypto based organization. What is

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally interesting about cryptocurrency? And just for even the room here,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I got involved with crypto two years ago, like

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fairly recently, I met Bartunda when I still thought crypto

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>was a total scam, and I was like, this makes

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>no sense. To centralize finance component made no sense or

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>interest to me. I was formerly worked in sort of

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>art and culture and events and community building, and it

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>was only until I started to really peak a little

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bit behind the curtain when I started to see the

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>fundamental technology of cryptocurrency being interesting. The idea of a

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>decentralized monetary system that was sort of borderless was really

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me. It still boggles my mind that on

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a national holiday you can't wire money to somebody when

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they need to receive money. So things like that started

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>to became really really interesting. And then as I started

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to apply that thinking of the principles and values and

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>tenants of cryptocurrency and how they would relate to other

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>industries like culture, civics, community, I became really interested with

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of two components. One transparency. I think currently in

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>society we're all struggling with a lack of transparency, from

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate lack of transparency to governmental lack of transparency. And

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the blockchain is literally transparent. No one

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>can obfuse skate it because it is all hoarded on

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>chain and anyone who can go look for the data

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>can go find that data and query that data became

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>really really interesting to me. And perhaps a world in

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which different organizations imagine if you could see how Facebook

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is spending their money or a private companies were spending

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>their money in real time and where they were allocating

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of capital. So that became really interesting to

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>me as someone who had been in community based organizing

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>movements organizations and saying, oh, how as a community based organization,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it would be cool to see how that community is

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>actually deploying its capital, is it spending its money, who

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is it paying, how much are they paying those people?

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>What are they actually doing to One was transparency, and

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>then two is what I call value accruel. And so

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>previously I'd worked a lot in various different art and

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>culture entertainment spaces, and I was always really upset by

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>how artists seem to be creating a lot of value

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>but not capturing a lot of that value. Yes, yes,

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I want to interject all that point. So

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>many of us have heard, felt and lived with the

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>consequences of being the product in a digital perspective on

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter, Facebook, corporate owned thing, and we're just kind

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of feeding some economic machine that values not being returned

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to us in any tangible way we can connect with

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>our own friends. Yeah, but they're monetizing that and making

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>money off of that. And certainly art has been rife

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with that kind of exploitation of value, and so did

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the concentration of it. So continue with the point I

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>would just so enthusiastic I had to jump in there

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on the value point. Yeah, No, I totally agree I mean,

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that whole narrative of the platform sort of

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>monetizing it via advertising models, and I just became really

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in how creators, unlet's just use that big bucket,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's someone writing on social media and creating content,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to a visual artist or a musician, that value that

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're bringing to an organization or to a platform, how

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that value could actually accrue to the edges of that

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>network versus just the central owners of that specific platform.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And I saw that in both massive social media platforms

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but also community projects that had really great intentions, but

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing how as a community began to grow, ultimately the

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>organization the owners were capturing a majority of that value

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the actual contributors of that specific community

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>or movement. And so it became an interesting thought experiment

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning of me and my sort of partners

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.359
<v Speaker 1>where we were all exploring and cloudbrators of if cryptocurrency

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>could store financial value, could it store cultural value right,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and could that cultural value be translated financially to actually

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>reward people who are bringing them full selves and their

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and bringing value to the table as it relates to

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a social media network or as it relates to a

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>club scene in Bushwick. It was both similarly interesting to me.

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's how Friends with Benefits essentially it was created,

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was a social network that was community owned and where

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>value could accrue to the people who brought their ideas,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>their artistic expression, their connections, their full selves into a

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>membership club or network, and could that value be captured

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>equally across the board. Bravo, I am signing up for

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>no longer paying cover charges at a club, but making

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the club pay me because I'm bringing cool there, he goes,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and now who's in charge? Let me see your ID bouncer.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Friends with Benefits. It's a great transition, and FWB has

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>been called this group chat will a shared bank account,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>decentralized SOHO house, this global VIP private club with a

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of cultural influencers amongst its membership. Can you give

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>me more about the history of it and why you've

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>described it in these ways, especially on this point around

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>cultural compensation, you know, as a premise for this particular gathering. Yeah,

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so the origin stories are actually you know, quite experimental

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and accidental, as I find with most fun scenes or

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>things that weren't too serious in the beginning. I mean,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>even the name of our organization, FWB, you know, is

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all sorted as a joke. Trevor mcfederis the founder who

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been friends with for quite some time. Has been

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a really interesting sort of creator and entrepreneur,

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's always sat at the interesting intersections of sort

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of culture and new media technology, and so he was

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly interested in this concept of cultural capture in terms

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of value, and over the course of a weekend, he

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>created the FBB token as a joke and sent it

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>out to a bunch of his friends. I was one

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of those friends, and there was like twenty or thirty

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of us hanging out in this group chat that at

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the time it was tiny or minuscule. And this was

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>all during COVID, and so all of us were locked

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in at home, all of us were bored, and all

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of us were asking questions about what is crypto? What

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is Web three? What are NFTs? This was right when

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the boom of crypto started to sort of occur and evolve,

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and we were all in this room together essentially making

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>sense of what was happening together. And when we started

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to see was a couple interesting things. One we saw

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that people then began to feel a stronger sense of

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>ownership by holding the FTBB token and feeling a real

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of pride over the network, that they began to

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>propose ways to evolve and change the network. You know,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I had this early saying of like when you see

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>trash on the ground, pick it up. We started to

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>see that happened really organically. You know, Hey, let's add

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this channel, Hey, let's remove that channel. Hey, let's put

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in a code of conduct early so we can avoid

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>issues of X y Z ahead of time. And as

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>someone who's been involved in lots of different community projects

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and also social networking projects, I was like, this kind

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of behavior feels different the early adopters of an online network.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>That felt very similar, a sense of pride, a sense

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of identity attached to sort of an online cohort. But

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what felt different here was an actual sense of ownership

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, Okay, this actual token, this asset that's mine,

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is custodied by me, is actually both my entrance into

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this experience and also a thing that gets to grow

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>over time as more value is sort of being created.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And that sort of collectivism was the thing we wanted

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to experiment with in a digital space. And so then

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the story is quite you know, twenty people, thirty people,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred people, five hundred people. And then by then

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wait, this is really interesting. I sort

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of want to step into more of a leadership role

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>here because it was me and seven other people sort

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of contributing. And that was when I sort of stepped

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>into my role as the mayor sort of you know,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>elected myself and a core team into this role. And

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I'll say, which I think is a

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>fun conversation for this group here in terms of its

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>adjacency to sort of urbanism and civics, is you know,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be really clear that my role was not

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as a CEO, but was as a mayor, and then

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm here to sort of represent the people. And I

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thought that fundamental shift in that leadership role would plant

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the seeds for an online community or social network platform

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to be actually built people first as opposed to platform first.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And so that sort of kicked off. How FTERBB has

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>been sort of governed today and now it's a six

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand person, you know, membership community organization. It's a community

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>owned social network where funding projects across the network within

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the community. We've thrown hundreds of events all over the

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>world organized by community members who received tokens as compensation

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for organizing those events, from gallery tours to coffee tasting

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to club nights in Paris, to building our own social software,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>our own products, and in our own physical goods like

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>apparel and merchandise and CpG, with all of that value

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>accruing back into that shared bank account sort of no

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>different than like almost like an ip or like a franchise,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>where where value sort of flows back that shared treasury,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and that shared treasury you know, is a reflected This

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is a question and a kind of checking my own understanding.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I join, I pay to join, and I pay in

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the form of these tokens that I hold. So as

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I bring value to the community, the value of my holdings,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>my ownership stake also goes up. Is that the kind

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of mutually beneficial economic theory behind this? Yeah, why do

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you care so much about the culture part, mister mayor,

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And I want to come back to the mayor in

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the election point in just a second, But how are

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you defining it and what does that mean for you

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the currency here culture like capital c

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like at large, the community's culture. The idea that FWB

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>itself is built around music, around arts, around these cultural

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>things where there are many dows which are built just

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>around the idea of the token itself totally totally right,

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or they're organized to purchase something like that constitution dow,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>which I was also a part of because I thought

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it was weird and fun. So culture is the focus here?

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>What yeah? I mean? I think first off, community that

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>comes together organically and experimentally often has like threads that

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>connect it without it even being like an explicit manifesto

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>or mission statement. Right. I think we all came together

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>because all of us worked in cultural spaces, and I

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>think to date the crypto narrative has been heavily dominated

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>via financialization speculation and this you know ico boom and

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>by this token and number goes out initial coins offerings,

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and we were all, like, you know, a lot of

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>us also our technologist were interested in technology, not cold

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hard technology, but how technology can perhaps enhance human connection

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and human experiences. And while this crypto boom was happening,

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we all just became interested like can this actually accentuate

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>these cultural spaces that we all sort of came from.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that's sort of like one track that we're interested. Okay, fundamentally,

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.719
<v Speaker 1>how does this technology impact our industries was where this started.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And the second, I think the more sort of like

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>meta angle of it is a lot of us have

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>been frustrated because we've participated in many different cultural spaces,

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>from those early nightclubs or bar scenes in certain neighborhoods

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that then became overly gentrified once high rise commercial development

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and real estate agents came in and q the Williamsburg narrative.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>And we've all been a part of those various different

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>stories and those fifteen year movements and were interested in

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps new mechanics or ways where those early artists could

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>actually capture some of that value on that gentrification curve,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and interested in does that same curve apply in digital spaces.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And so we were really interested in, like, clearly, there's

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a role for culture in crypto. At

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that moment, there wasn't quite one yet. Everyone participating in

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>crypto was heavily financially oriented, and NFTs really became the

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>first framework where culture could enter crypto. Artists could actually

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>create digital artwork and have that be stored on chain,

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and we were just the community layer on top of that.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Movement that saw a need to connect creators, technologists, developer

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>subject knowledge experts, people who were first timers, and to

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>create a fun space of camaraderie where folks could learn,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>share and exchange knowledge together while also playing with the

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental technology itself. So yeah, so you've got a culturally

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>oriented membership club where the value of that collective is

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>more formally recognized than others and maybe more fairly distributed

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>than the historical analogies were often familiar with. Yeah, and

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll add the last point, which I think it helps

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>click it for a lot of people, is those tokens

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>beyond value cruel are also the fundamental way you vote

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the network. So it's how you're able to put

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>up a proposal to fund an artist in residency program.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It's how you're able to vote on how we want

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to change the network. Recently, community members proposed actually merging

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>two membership tiers because they were unsatisfied with one of

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the membership tiers and they said, this is actually a

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>lackluster experience, and we want to propose merging these two

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>experiences together. And that was brought up by a community

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>member that went to a very contentious debate and it

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>passed and it's been implemented, and so it's one of

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>those is where how I think about it is, imagine

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>if the first thousand users or Facebook could actually weigh

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in on the advertising model. That's how I approach and

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think about this is would that have changed the outcomes?

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And that vote not just being like a pole system

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that actually doesn't care any weight, like Elon running on

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Twitter doing polls all day. That vote is actually the

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fundamental stock or equity or value cruel of that organization

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and that entity itself, Like that became really really interesting

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to us. Yeah, and that part fascinates me as well,

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>because merely having money in the system, you know, charging

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for use of the service can give you us a

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>greater sense of one to pick up trash. But being

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>an owner is a whole other thing. So being a

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>subscriber is very different from being an owner and then

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>having say in the decision even the structure of the

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>thing itself. That's just it's distributing power in this form

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of the practice. Then, as you said, there's a big spectrum.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>What are the other ways that someone experiences that value

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or cruel. I'm a member of this thing, I get

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to propose, I get to vote, I get to launch

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>external experiments, and overall the value of my tokens might rise.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>How else there's value accumulation experience by these participants. Yeah,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I think without being corny, corny, it's okay'll be corny. Like,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, an inside joke or a meme inside of

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>our community is maybe the benefits were the friends we

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>made along the way. You know that I didn't write

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that try to warn me and I against my judgment.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I gave you the benefit of the j but you know,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>without being corny, I read and I was like, that's

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>actually true. Like I think what transcends all of this

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is it's not really about the money. The money, you know, currency, financials,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>money is a is a weird thing, and it makes

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>things interesting. It makes things dark, it makes things exciting.

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It places value on things that might not need to

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>even have value placed onto them. But we can all

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>agree money is interesting and ultimately the community currency is

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle for the conversation that ultimately drives the connection.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's interesting to me full stop, is just

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who have met and connected through friends with benefits,

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>who have become co founders, who have become business partners,

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>who have received funding for their nonprofits, to you know,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>met their life partners. It's it's been incredible to see

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and those are I think anyone who who's in movement

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>building or community building, the ultimate like aha moment is

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>always when that compounds over. You know, we've been doing

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>now for two and a half years, not a long time,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but to see now full companies that have gone on

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and built incredible things in the ecosystem because they met

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in a chat room is always really really exciting. It's

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>not an open community. There's an application process, there's a cost.

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>How does one become a friend with benefits? So right now,

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially we think about it as a citizenship and tourism. Okay,

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's citizenship as in, if you want to become

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a member, you apply, and the community read your application

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and votes on it and welcomes you in. And essentially

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all we're looking for is that you're here and you

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>want to contribute. So step one application application, then the

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>community votes, and then if that application is accepted, you're

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>then sent instructions and a welcome email, college admission vibes,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and you're onboarded and there's all these new member, welcome

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hangs and all this sort of stuff, and what's the tuition.

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>The tuition is seventy five tokens, which I fluctuates from

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>five hundred bucks to seven hundred field bucks. And once

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're in, you're able to go float around our digital city.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>There's hundreds of channels in the discord. We've actually built

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>our own mobile app and it has its own social

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.479
<v Speaker 1>feed and so there's all these digital connections. But that

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is a portal into the hundreds of events that are

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>organized by the community around the world in your city

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>to be able to interact and connect with people in

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>real life, as well as getting access to various different

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>digital and physical goods, products and sort of services from merchandise, apparel, cold,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, the community sort of making and creating.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>That's what membership looks like. That's what citizenship looks like.

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And that citizenship allows you to fundamentally vote. Let's you vote,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>have a say, put proposals up, and contribute to and

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of all the network itself. Tourism is how you participate

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in FWB. If you don't want to be a member,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you can actually participate in various different physical events, digital

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>events just by holding f TOBB tokens much lower threshold

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>one to five FWB, from ten bucks to fifty bucks,

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're able to go to various different things that

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are all organized by the community. And our hope is

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, if you like visiting our city, you'll

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>eventually want to move here. Who are these members or

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the tourists where what kind of people are signing up

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point or have signed up at this point? Yeah,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there are people who come from a whole

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>swath of different backgrounds, but mostly cultural backgrounds are music, entertainment, technology, etc.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Who are interested in how crypto might affect their industry

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or their space. It's folks who are asking these kinds

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of questions who are interested in the role that this

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>might play in it and are looking to connect with

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>other people in this space who are here for bigger

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>reasons beyond just you know, making a lot of money

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>or flipping NFTs or buying tokens. Like it's really people

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who are fundamentally interested in the technology itself and it's

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>implications for culture. That sounds very familiar, That sounds actually

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty attractive. How much money all got in the bank,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You got these tokens, You've raised money. Part of the

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is a group chat with the bank account.

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So what's the treasury like? Yeah, what's cool is the

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>treasury is all in chain, so everyone can see and

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>view all in real time. The assets that this community holds.

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about eighteen nineteen million US dollars worth

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of sort of various different assets. And you know, at

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>its peak was like fifty million dollars and you know

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>about six eight months ago. Okase on the fluctuations of

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the tokens and other tokens that we hold from ethereum

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to other community tokens that we hold for subcommunities that

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have spawned out of FWB. But yeah, the treasury probably

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>holds right about in eighteen twenty million dollars right now.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>A value in there, and what in your view are

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the coolest things to emerge from this

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>community from this environment, whether it's a product and app,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a relationship, a tool, What my dad look like? What

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>has that look like? Yeah, let's see. I mean earlier

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this summer, we threw our first community produced festival, which

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was really rad. We rented out a Liberal arts campus

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of Los Angeles. Seven hundred community members came down

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for that and we threw a three day sort of

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>symposium that featured music from James Blake, Jpeg Mafia, and

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one o Tricks Point Never to talks and discussions and

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>discourse from leading sort of experts in the community and

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of the community, with a full culinary program and

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>wellness program, And it was absolutely incredible and all the

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>community members, you know, half the lineup was community members

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>who offered up their talents or their skills and were

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>compensated in tokens for their sort of contribution. So that

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>was just a really incredible highlight of the year for

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>me to see this digital city, which can kind of

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>feel kind of alien like or foreign or sterile, to

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>then see everyone in real life and it totally felt

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>surprising and refreshing to meet someone that I had shared

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a digital experience with for the last two years to

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>spend time in person. You know, a lot of us

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>grew up on internet forums. I think that's also another

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>common threat of FWB community members is a lot of

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>us were early early you know, music forums, punk forums,

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>aol aim chat rooms. You know. Our average age breakdown

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is I would say, like mid twenties to like late

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>thirties and so a lot of folks being very familiar

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>with forum culture and sort of that now spelling into

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of IRL world is an interesting thing that's been explored.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that's been an amazing highlight. And

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the one I'm most excited about is just us actually

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>building our own social network. So we're in sort of

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>like beta mode right now. We've got about one hundred

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>community members on there who are like battle testing it

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. We're planning on releasing it Q one of

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>next year. And the idea as essentially, you know, everything

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to date has been run on top of a discord.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Discord is essentially run platform comes with its fair share

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of challenges. It's very hard to hit that learning curve

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of how do you filter through hundreds of channel yeah,

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>completely synchronous messages with no seemingly order to the chaos,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's like slack on cocaine. It's like slack on coke, Yeah, exactly,

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly with thousand and you can imagine that with thousands

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of people chatting every single day, you get

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tagged in something and you can't find it. Yeah. And

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so after serving the landscape and trying out a couple

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>different solutions, our community decided to build our own, so

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been building sort of our own mobile app experience

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that is actually primarily sort of image base for now

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and allows for the community to share almost like an

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Instagram or TikTok, share content within this community. That also

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>aggregates all the events happening in our community as well

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as all the profiles so everyone can connect and add friends,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as the governance so inside of the app

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>itself you can put proposals up to change and evolve

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the network itself, which is also such an for me.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It's an easy lead to go from what if that

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>were the experience in my other social networks and it's

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the missing piece. Those decisions are being made but by

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 1>invisible committees that I have really no sway over, more

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of a bid, every choice to join or not to join. Okay, Alex,

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you're the mayor. You've used the word city like thirty times.

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You said you elected yourself, which sounds like a dictator.

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Just frame this for me about what does it mean

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for you to be the mayor and do this facilitation

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that you've described, and how does the city metaphor apply

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>In a little bit more detailed to f TOVV. Yeah.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So it all started when this was sort of being

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>built and we were all in real time like asking

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ourselves like what is this. Every day new people were joining,

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Press loves to kind of put their stamp

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of approval or disapproval on things, and all of a sudden,

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the narrative was to centralized soho house, which you can

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly see why a lot of us were eye rolling

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to that and being like, that doesn't totally feel like

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 1>what we're trying to do here. Instead, we were interested in,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>really like, what does an online community on steroids look like?

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Like this felt more like a subreddit that had its

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>own economy than like a member's club that was like

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about eating forty dollars salmons and you know, schmoozing. We

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>were more interested in, just like, what is an online

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>community that actually builds its own economies look like? And

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>someone in the community actually said, FWB isn't actually a

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>company or a Deessentiliz solo house. FWB is a city

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that isn't physically distributed yet, and that for some reason clicked.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>We were on a town hall with hundreds of us.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>We do town halls every month. Where we talk about

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>issues in the community, and we all ask ourselves, wait,

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this totally is like a city, just abstract away the

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>physicality of it. Yeah, like we are a city in

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that if you were to ask what type of person

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 1>does New York City attract? We could all clearly, you know,

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>break down stereotypes or types of people that thrive in

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.479
<v Speaker 1>New York But you cannot pinpoint one user of New

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>York City and so people who like pain, people who

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>love pain exactly, massacists and so and so. For us,

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we were like, wait, that is totally how we want

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to steward and build FWB. We want to FVB to

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be open to everybody. Yes, New York City issive. Yes,

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>New York City is known for its culture and for

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>its food and for its art, similar to f TOVV

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>being known for its culture and its art and its

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>cultural sort of proximity. But ultimately, New York City is

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>what you make of it, as is FTVV is what

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you sort of make of it. And so once we

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>started to run through that analogy and we began to

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>really explore various different urban theory and urban planning frameworks

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to how we should grow AFTERVB, things started to make

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sense. So for example, not running AFTERBB

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like a startup or a company that seeks that's everybody else?

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Does that? Everybody? We want? Interesting? The premise is that

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>your social network, your digital gathering space, your online community

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a business totally. And you said no

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>one needs to be a city. To continue on what

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that difference feels like. Yeah, and so when you call

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>something a business, a business exists to drudge profit and

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>profit comes from hopefully your revenue is more than your expenses,

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and then that extra amount gets distributed to owners. Cooperatives

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are interesting because that surplus gets distributed to the entire pie.

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But we were really interested in a city framework because

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we thought, instead of thinking about pure profit, how do

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we actually think about GDP, How do we actually think

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about expanding economic activity of the network. How do we

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>actually think about income per individual? How can we think

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>about generating opportunities for people inside an FTVV? How do

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we think about our import and our export strategy where

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we can actually import goods and export goods and capture

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>fee on those goods that go back to the treasury

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and utilize the community as a cooperative to essentially promote

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and distribute those various different goods or products or services.

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And so we began experimenting with a couple of things

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to test that thesis out. Early on, we began to

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>create artwork in the form of NFTs. We had so

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>many artists, visual artists, graphic artists inside the community who

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we're experimenting with NFT technology. And Eric, who an amazing designer,

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>created a project called Monarchs, which were these beautiful digitally

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>generative butterflies. And you know, he had a long back.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>He was the creative director at Essence and Nike, and

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he created this amazing butterfly project that generated three million

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars in terms of primary sales, and he chose to

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.240
<v Speaker 1>give f TOWB you know, ten percent of that revenue

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the treasury in exchange for the community itself

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>supporting and uplifting that artist. That generated you know, close

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to half a million, seven hundred thousand dollars within the

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>course of that sale, which then we used to begin

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to fund various different art programs and other experiences inside

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of F TOWB. So, you know, thinking about the idea that, okay,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>how do we actually expand economic activity of a cohort

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of individuals as opposed to primary business models of communities

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>to date, which are like recurring subscriptions, were charging an

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>entry fee and monetizing explicitly on how many users come

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in to your individual network. So let me pause you there.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>The example that you gave. My first question was like,

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>why would an artist run it through FWB when they

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>can just launch their thing? But there was a value

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>exchange of the kind right promotion distribution marketing, which could

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>cost money. Your GDP analogy is really interesting to me,

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and I saw a comment from Tanya Fox and the

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>chat Hello Tanya, So I want to plug this one

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in right now. There's limits to the value of GDP,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>right Like GDP doesn't capture all sorts of things. GDP

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is a measure of planetary destruction in some ways as well.

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So how much does your city metaphor adhere to methods

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of city management that we're trying to get away from

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>versus more sustainable, regenerative ways of managing city collectively that

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we want to approach and be more like? Yeah, absolutely,

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously our city analogy is is quite theoretical.

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>We're very much not leaning exclusively on running urban infrastructure

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>play here. I think it's really just looking at really

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to running profit in businesses in terms of community

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>organized platforms. So it's really less about like, oh, everything

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we do has to follow the city analogy. It's more

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>borrowing and remixing components that feel more organic to community

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>driven projects. And so I at least believe that if

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your primary product are users and people, there should be

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a way to attribute value and grow value for those individuals,

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just purely extracting value from those individuals.

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>After the break, what elections and voting on the blockchain

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.439
<v Speaker 1>look like and what we can learn about economics from

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the club. Yes, we talk in nightclubs. It's such a

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>great episode. I'm curious about the decision making structure of FWB.

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You don't as mayor impose your will in the community.

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You've talked about people floating proposals and their tokens allow

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>them to vote, but high level of view how our

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>decisions made and how our proposals floated and voted a

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>pun So right now, I would I always say the

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>FWB runs much more like a representative democracy as opposed

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to a direct democracy. So we've had a lot of

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>roles that have been sort of put up for a vote,

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>an election, and then the community votes that person in

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>because I believe, you know, tragedy of the comments. You know,

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole notion that if you have just like thousands

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of people making thousands of decisions, you know, you kind

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of get a pretty chaotic mess. But if you have

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a thousand people sort of electing a group of decision

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 1>makers with the right sort of checks and balances put

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in place of sort of say impeachment in an extreme scenario,

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to just various different checkpoints along the way, you can

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>actually run a somewhat symbiotic, flat sort of leadership structure.

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Because the truth is also a majority of people don't

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>want to lead. A lot of people just want to

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be along for the ride. Not everyone wants to like

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily work inside of a cooperative. And so in our instance,

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, a third and a half

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of our roles have been elected in terms of like

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the community as some role where it's you know, whether

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there's the city representatives or they're in specific roles, and

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>then other roles are a little bit more evergreen, as

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of like just keeping you know,

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, like a lot of

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>this is theoretical and where we are like a two

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>year old experiment that a lot of it requires just

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>keeping the lights on, you know, our legal team, our

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>operational team, myself, like various different folks. Where if I

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was just going up for election every single year, I

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think it would get quite exhausting quite soon. But the

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>goal very much is as FTBB continues to decentralize. It

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>was started centrally by one person with a founder. It's

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>now past leadership hands multiple times. I anticipate my involvement

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of a mayoral capacity for another year

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or so before another person is able to step in.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Once we've hit a couple of key sort of legal

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>milestones and operational milestones of how it can function, that

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>f TOBB can continue to decentralize and be governed by

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 1>its token holders or its community. What does the town

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>hall feel like? How do those operate? How many people

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>show they're electric? It's I mean literally because they're on

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like a server. Yeah exactly that man figuratively. But they're fun.

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're there are a chance for us to

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>check in, me, to check in with the community. You know,

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll throw them on zoom no different like this. People

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>are chatting all day and asking questions. You know, we

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>usually have some sort of a presentation. It's almost like

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>our board meeting where we'll present to the community of

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like metrics, projects, accomplishments, areas of improvement, and then we

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>open it up for questions. And so it's a mix

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>between a town hall to an Apple keynote presentation of

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>exciting shiny products and events and things that have emerged

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>from the community. And it's very much round robin where

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we pass the mic around and allow different folks in

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>different sort of team leads who've worked on really great

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>projects to share what they're working on. You know, from

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>our editor of an editorial platform that sort of covers

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>news and essays across culture and Web three, and that

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>has a really interesting perspective. In POV, it's definitely more

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on the more critical side of Web three, which we

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>love in terms of ways it can improve. And it's

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not just crypto crypto crypto, but talking about the downsides

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>of constitution dow and how it lost its way, or

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, diversity issues of diversity and inclusion in Web

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>three and how that can be improved, all the way

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to our product team providing updates. But yeah, it's very

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>much like a fun way where we're able to check

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>in and communicate information as well as create a space

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>where people can just share how their experiences. So you've

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>used this representative democracy analogy. You even have town halls

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>like physical cities. Do I'm wondering if you also see

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>FWB as this sandbox for experiments for ways to practice

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>new methods of communal self governance. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is a massive experiment every day and

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we tell ourselves that, and within that experiment is a

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>myriad of micro experiments from like quorum based voting to

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>quadratic voting systems. Like we're really much on the forefront

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of exploring new forms of voting mechanics that are beyond

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>one person, one vote or one token one vote. But

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>instead let me Yeah, I do want to get wonky

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about that, because I think part of the spirit of

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>my question is I think so many of us feel

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>collectively uninspired by democratic small D democratic practice actually means.

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>And so we have our ritual voting experience, and we

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have our built in lack of faith and trust in

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>our representatives in our representative democracy, and we are fatigued

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>by the influence of outside money and all these things. Cool. Cool,

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:20.439
<v Speaker 1>So yes, double tap on that one. In terms of

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the decision making tools you are playing with, can you

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>define the quadratic voting, define the quorum based thing as

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>opposed to just one token, one vote, one person, one

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>vote as we know in the outside world. Yeah, totally,

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So trout voting frameworks one person, one vote, Right, you're

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a citizen's sort of registered to your identification, you can

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>cost one vote. In crypto, that's a little bit more

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>hard because of what it's called civilly resistant, meaning it's

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>actually very difficult to verify that one person is actually

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>one person, right, because it's one wallet, one vote, and

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>so someone can create hundreds of ghost wallets and be

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>able to vote because there's no real identification system in cryptocurrency. Honestly,

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>no different than being able to spin up dozens of

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>fake Facebook accounts to be able to go right, because

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you just create infinite email addresses, create up new Facebook accounts,

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and then imagine that tied to a voting heroistory. So

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that's one person, one vote, one wallet, one vote. Then

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there's one token, one vote, which obviously the red flags

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>go off of like, well, if you just have more tokens,

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you get more voting. So then they begin just how

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>your current system feels like it works exactly. So then

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>que quadratic voting, which is a way to sort of

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:32.760
<v Speaker 1>de emphasize one token, one vote while still giving power

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to people who have accumulated tokens, because ultimately accumulating tokens

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:40.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily have to be singularly a bad thing. Many

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>people enough to bebe earned their tokens for contributing and

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>working and showing up to events, and so one might

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>posit you deserve more say in the network because you

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.840
<v Speaker 1>actively have shown up and you've actively been to town halls,

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and you are a valued member of this network. So

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.280
<v Speaker 1>quadratic is essentially a way to create an add weight

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in voting of those tokens, and it allows for you

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to place a level of confidence quadratically into quadrants to

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.720
<v Speaker 1>say this is how much I actually care about this decision,

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And it condenses the level of voting so that let's

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:19.240
<v Speaker 1>say you have one token and I have one hundred

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>tokens on a one token, one vote, that would be

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>very stark, and a more quadratic format that might be

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>trunk because the weight that you're applying to yours. You

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>might your total sum exactly. You might be like, you

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>know what, I actually don't care about this that much,

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to put on a one to ten.

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to allocate ten percent to this. But you know,

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it'd be cool if it passes, but my life doesn't

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>change if it doesn't. Versus a major proposal, and like

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>everything is on the line, like you know, an election.

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>We explored quadratic polling with Audrey Tangue from Taiwan, and

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly this infrastructure, which just reveals a different level I

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 1>would say, a lower level of seeming polarization. Yes, because

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 1>when you ask by any request and did you get

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>binary answers exactly weighted questions and you get weighted and

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>nucunced answers, and so counting votes in that way is

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 1>also very interesting. Why, Alex, other than the sort of

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>potential scamming of like multiple wallets coordinating to vote attacks,

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>what is your incentive to experiment with these methods of

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>digital civic participation? Why are you messing around? I just

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's fun, you know, I think like I think

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like so much of civics is boring right now and unengaged,

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:33.799
<v Speaker 1>and like you said, we're all bored and looking for

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>new outcomes and new ways to engage with those outcomes.

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think for us, like where overall, civic participation

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>is probably waning, and the younger kids get, the less

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they even care, it seems, and ultimately we're interested in

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>shifting that narrative and that perception of civic participation to

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>not just equating to voting in a presidential election or

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 1>voting in a local, you know, district election, but insteady

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>voting in spaces you care about being one of them,

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>digital being one that our kids are probably spending eighty

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of their days and lives in. And so I

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>think creating more interesting ways for people to have a

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:15.919
<v Speaker 1>say in their digital spaces that doesn't need to feel

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>so complicated but can feel fun is something that we

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>really really care about. So a fun example for that

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>would be we started organizing these events through the community

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>all over the world, and we thought, wouldn't it be

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:29.839
<v Speaker 1>fun if we could actually elect city leads to top

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit more budget to throw bigger and

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more fun events and almost have a little bit more

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of jurisdiction over a specific city and oh yeah,

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more autonomy. And so what we ended

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>up seeing was dozens of people apply, submit campaign videos,

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>create campaign strategies to become the LA lead in the

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 1>New York lead, in a London lead, in San Francisco lead.

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And then all that was running in a massive election

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where we had people like postering and going on podcasts.

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>It was so fun to see and all of that

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to me was just like, I hope this encourages people

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>just to even go out and vote in their towns

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and their cities, because clearly you can see how fun

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>this is to just give people power and to pick

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:15.959
<v Speaker 1>your favor in a root for someone on a micro level,

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think local is important, and that local, you know,

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:21.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of just drives more engagement because it feels closer

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to home. Yo, you were singing my tune. I don't

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know that I've ever shared with you that I was

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>mayor a four square Like I won an award for

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 1>being the best mayor in the four Square universe and

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I competed with someone for the mayorship of one Venue

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York City and Nolita, and we had campaign

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>rallies and we both signs and we did. We picketed

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>each other's moments, and it just it made civics fun,

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.319
<v Speaker 1>even though that was a sandbox we were playing and

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we had no ownership over the platform plan the main

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>technology fun. I mean, that sounds so fun four square

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>back then, and like now we're left with these massive,

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>behemoth social networks that don't feel fun anymore. So I

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:01.760
<v Speaker 1>want to build on that, and I'm seeing a bridge

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that this is where it can go.

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>If more people participate in social taws like this with

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the city metaphor rather than the business growth metaphor, it's

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance to play around with democratic culture. It's a

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>chance to kind of use those muscles of not just voting,

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>even quadratically, but contributing. What you described about sort of

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>having your civic contributions recognized by attending events, by showing

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>up for town hall meetings, by bringing your offerings to

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the community, to participate even economically, and that rather than

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just keeping it to yourself, so resource distribution. I want

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to see that practice replicated beyond the discord server right,

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and beyond the FWB app. Do you see that bridge happening.

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this online civic innovation practice can

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 1>affect our offline civic innovation practice. Yeah. Absolutely. I think

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it's all modeled behavior, right. I think if people can

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>begin to see that these annas are fun and they

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>work and they can improve something, it might restore faith

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the overall system and structure itself, which then might

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>encourage more sort of ripple out effects for people to

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>get involved in their own local organizations or their own

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>local cooperatives or groups. So our focus at least is

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to really think about, you know, the role that crypto

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>can plain culture. You know, we want to be advocates

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of crypto. We know crypto has been cursed with a

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 1>case of really really bad pr and rightfully so, tons

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of scammers, tons of charlatans. It's a very muddled space,

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but for us, we care about being advocates for it.

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:35.399
<v Speaker 1>We threw an event in New York at Good Room,

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a legendary club in green Point that was really struggling

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>during COVID, a bar venue that has been a sort

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of a bedrock of Brooklyn for ten years. And we

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>threw a party, and we did an auction with all

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the proceeds to go to that venue and raised sixty

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy k in crypto and taught that venue how to

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>set up a wallet, had to custody that those assets,

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>how to earn you more of those assets that ultimately

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they said helped them achieve fifty cent of their fundraising goal,

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be a kickscharter. Things like that. We just want to

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>show people that crypto doesn't all have to be bad.

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't all have to be about gatekeeping. Isn't all

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:10.959
<v Speaker 1>have to be about scams. There's people building interesting things

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in this space. It's coming whether we like it or not.

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And we hope to be one of those corners of

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Internet that uses crypto in an interesting way to

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>show folks that it can accrue different forms of value

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond just financial and it can lead to stronger human coordination,

0:51:26.040 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>can lead to better incentive design, and can hopefully create

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.360
<v Speaker 1>new digital spaces that are more closely and sort of

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>self or community governed than our existing options. I want

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to spend three more hours with you. I can't do that.

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>What I can do, though, is reflect briefly on the

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>crypto comment as a bridge to the role of economics

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in general. You've cited Wendell Berry, this poet, novelist, environmentalist,

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>saying a community to be whole must also be an economy.

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>My cards are open, I hold some crypto assets. I'm

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a member of some dolls. I'm also deeply critical of

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we need to financialize things in order

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to innovate them, while I'm also excited by new models

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of ownership. So I'm conflicted, but informedly optimistically skeptical, and

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>hearing that quote about community to be real must also

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>be an economy that rubs me a little odd. It

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds a little controversial, and I'm like, does it though,

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at least the way we have recognized economy with infinite

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>growth and all the harm that comes along with it.

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 1>So can you just explore that a little bit with me?

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean by that? Why do you cite

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that statement, and how do you think it means we

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>should practice community truly? Yeah, I love that question. I

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:42.040
<v Speaker 1>think we need to decouple the definition of economy from

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like late stage capitalistic American economy. I think economy as

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a definition is just an exchange. And so when I

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>say that a community to be whole must also be

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>an economy, I do not mean a community to be

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:59.959
<v Speaker 1>a whole must be a late stage capitalist profit driven

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to tea. An economy doesn't even need necessarily be money.

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It can be an economy of non financial goods. You know,

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if you study sort of like who the author but

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.280
<v Speaker 1>debt the first thousand years, the first quarter of the book,

0:53:11.680 --> 0:53:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's the history of debt and how debt was created,

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and they study how most of these sort of groups

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and tribes and organizations of people existed and scaled by trading,

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, leila cloths and seashells and various different goods,

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and currency was just the most effective way to actually

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 1>create a ledger of one goat equaling you know, six

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cows or whatever. And I can only speak to the experience,

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I know, as I'm not an economist, and I you know,

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a club kid. Clubs have economies. You're trading and

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>bartering backstage tickets, drugs, drink tickets, experiences, sex, whatever it

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:51.280
<v Speaker 1>might be. There's an economy there, there's an exchange of energy,

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there's an exchange of experiences. Because I think any community

0:53:56.640 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that has actually begun to grow an identity, there is

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>always an inherent urge I believe to create, to create memes,

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and I use memes. Is the broad conceptual thing, to

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 1>create shared language, to create culture, and an economy. An

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>exchange of those components, whether the financial assets or non

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>financial assets, feel incredibly native and organic, an emergent. And

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:21.279
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, when I quote Barry, I don't mean that

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>every community needs to have a token, or every community

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>needs to be financialized or should exist to drive profit.

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Any community that has meaning, there are probably ways in

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:33.120
<v Speaker 1>which that community exchanges things between each other. Whether it's

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a potlock and they all bring you food to a house,

0:54:36.600 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a form of an exchange of value being exchanged

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>across one another. Thank you for that update. The book

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is Debt The First five Thousand Years by anthropologist David Graber.

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Y'all did a census, Mayor you did an FWB census,

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 1>and we touched on this. You know. One of the

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:58.879
<v Speaker 1>pieces of feedback was that the discord was overwhelming, said

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>it was a fire hose, And so you're trying to

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>solve that, right, you already announced this app and that's

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>going to help that out. But do you think in

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of the scale that a DOO could get how big? Right?

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you think a DOO could work at the scale

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of a nation or a major city or something in

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>between a state. Yeah. Absolutely. I mean I'm not a

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:21.400
<v Speaker 1>huge subscriber of bology network state. I think he can

0:55:21.480 --> 0:55:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit too techno utopian. But like BLOGI

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Strinivasian who wrote a book called Network State, which is

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>digital cities and digital nation states. Look, yeah, I think

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>dows could reach that scale, right. I think you're seeing

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:36.880
<v Speaker 1>dials that have now accrued sixty seventy eighty million dollars

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>worth of assets, which could probably become comparable to super

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:43.919
<v Speaker 1>super small towns. I think it's only amount of time,

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 1>our cities the only amoutter of time before some of

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>those dows begin to actually connect and trade with each other,

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>forming super dows. I think that's totally in the world

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>for But I think maybe the question under your question

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>is like, what does that actually look like? What does

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it take to get there? You know? I think ultimately

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.399
<v Speaker 1>anything that reaches the scale of a nation state will

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately become a network of dows. There will be subdows

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:07.399
<v Speaker 1>as we call them in sort of our space, where

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you have micro committees or organizations that custody their own assets,

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that trade and interoperate with the parent dow organization in

0:56:15.960 --> 0:56:19.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting ways. That ultimately that network itself, you can call it,

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know, federalist, you know, states versus

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the nation. However, people would want to structure it. Right now,

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:26.879
<v Speaker 1>it's still super early, and it's still super reflective based

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on a larger crypto economy. But I totally see a

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:31.840
<v Speaker 1>world of wunch. DOWS can reach very large sets of

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>scale that end up becoming sort of networks or nests

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of smaller organizations. One thing that I'm intrigued by is

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about a divestment from the IRL universe in

0:56:44.080 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 1>favor of online universes. I think that's what freaks me

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 1>out so much about Zuckerberg's vision of the metaverse, that

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to live with goggle strapped to our

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:56.120
<v Speaker 1>faces and as it eventually, just have like catheters and

0:56:56.239 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>feeding tubes and never leave our shelves. You know, well

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we kind of stored inside, but we'll have all this

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>rich life through the screens. I want to see the combination, right,

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to see us use digital tools to enhance

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not just our digital lives, but our whole lives. And

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so thinking about DOWS, what if we flipped it a

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit and said Okay, you're already a member of

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 1>an apartment complex or a county or a city, and

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as a part of that residential relationship or that physical relationship,

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you get a DOW membership too, to enhance your ability

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to self govern with others. And so you're not kind

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of trading one for the other, you're hopefully using one

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to inform the other. Have you seen anything like that?

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about that idea of kind of

0:57:42.120 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a complementary DOW or online governance community rather than a

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>substitution for physical community. I mean, that's by far what's

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:52.479
<v Speaker 1>most exciting to us, right. I think we all don't

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to zucks Daddy Zucks, you know, metaverse link up,

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, goggle Verse is not interesting to us either.

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We've we've always said technologies to accentuate reality and highlight

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>physicality and be a lot more high fidelity, you know.

0:58:08.080 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I always say we live in the metaverse now, right,

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Like our phones are so connected to our lives and

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I can open it at this exact moment and find

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen things to do in New York City and friends

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to connect with immediately and jump into it. And that

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to me feels like some liminal space between physical and digital,

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which is I think the actual definition of the metaverse

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Dows's applications to real world structures. Yeah,

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I think I saw someone in the

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 1>comment mentioned city doos. You know a way that DAWs

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can steward land conservation and preservation. You know, I think

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>for us we're very much coming at it from physical

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:43.640
<v Speaker 1>We're thinking about CANADAO actually govern a decentralized events network?

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, is there a way where daals can actually

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:48.680
<v Speaker 1>reward an allocate capital to people who want to throw

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>events all over the world. That's something that I'm super

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:54.760
<v Speaker 1>interested and passionate about, you know, full loop to the

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 1>beginning of like most things shouldn't be taos, I totally

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>still stand by that most things don't need to live

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain, most things don't need to be crypto based.

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:07.479
<v Speaker 1>But in a world where that technology provides real value

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to that organizing structure, that I think a DOO is

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a really great thing to explore in terms of how

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you can create fundamental transparency and sort of value cruel

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to people who participate in that network. You've mentioned many

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.600
<v Speaker 1>times that doos are not required and that crypto is

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not required. I kind of want to emphasize that point.

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 1>In season three of this series, we head on Pia

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Mancini of Open Collective, which has created this framework for

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 1>organizations to collaborate around fundraising, legal, administrative, and offer full

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>transparency around all those numbers so they can save money,

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but also show how they're using money, especially if they

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:50.919
<v Speaker 1>are kind of decentralized organizations like mutual aid societies, etc.

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And don't have the budgets to hire their own lower,

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:56.920
<v Speaker 1>their own accountant, etc. You know, to what degree is

0:59:56.920 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the token of requirement versus money of some kind? Can

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it be credit cards? Can it be US dollars? To

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>still achieve so many of the goals that you want,

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which is value, a cruel, transparency, and a sense of

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:15.439
<v Speaker 1>participation beyond some concentrated group. I mean for transparency and value, cruel,

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>those are the tenets of cryptocurrency, right, So I think, like,

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you would enforce credit card transparency

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>or you know, because those are all managed on centralized servers,

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't really look into that unless the company published

1:00:27.600 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>publishes that data, and then there's no way to even

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>verify that what they publishes. A hunters and occurate versus

1:00:32.520 --> 1:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain. No one can manipulate that. That's all

1:00:34.760 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>run through smart contracts. So that's me baritune day here

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with an explainer Tune Day. Smart contracts were conceptualized by

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>computer scientist and legal scholar Nick Zabo way back in

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety four, and they've since been incorporated into blockchain

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>networks that cryptocurrencies like ethereum and Bitcoin run on. To

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>try to be as simple as possible. A smart contract

1:00:58.600 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is a computer program written into a blockchain, and it

1:01:02.480 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>automatically executes the term of an agreement or contract when

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>certain conditions are met. In theory, this eliminates the need

1:01:09.960 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for intermediaries like my very trustworthy accountant or lawyers or notaries,

1:01:14.920 --> 1:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and help ensure that all kinds of contract terms are

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>followed transparently and accurately. Now, smart contracts do have limitations.

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be able to express your contract terms

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in computer code. In the first place. That code is

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tamper proof, which is good for security, but bad if

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you make a mistake in the code or need to

1:01:33.680 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>change the contract because you can't. And there's a lack

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of legal and regulatory clarity on how these contracts are

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>treated by existing authorities. So overall, smart contracts are a

1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>great safeguard in theory, but they're still being worked out

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in practice. Sound familiar, kind of like democracy. Oh yeah,

1:01:53.040 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Anyway back to Alex's I'm having too

1:01:55.240 --> 1:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>much fun on the blockchain. No one can manipu like that.

1:02:00.240 --> 1:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That's all run through smart contracts, So that to me

1:02:02.520 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>addresses transparency value cruel. You know, sure value cruel can

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>can be reflected in equity, which has been done in cooperatives.

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:13.439
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, yeah, that totally solves that, but it's

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>very hard to you know, I've invested in support a

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of different fractionalized equity companies. You know, we've seen

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>so many of our friends raised companies on like micro

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>equity fundraises. I think those are great and those are

1:02:22.880 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>super effective. I just think they're very non favorable to

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>non US clients, people who don't have bank accounts, people

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:32.439
<v Speaker 1>who want to engage in it. It is a little

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>bit limiting in that capacity as well. So there's a

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>large animal in the room that I want us to address,

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>which you've hinted at in terms of the scandals and

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>controversies plaguing this whole crypto space, and we've had many,

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>many collapses. The value of overall coins and tokens is

1:02:49.920 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>down sbf ftx FWTF. Right, there's it's wild with the

1:02:55.760 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>promises that were made in the mismanagement in something that

1:02:58.120 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be transparent and help people without traditional banking,

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a crew value, and the opposite has happened

1:03:04.480 --> 1:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in that case, but not just that case, many others.

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>You're in this world. FWB is a part of this world.

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>What's been the impact of the loss of trust in

1:03:14.080 --> 1:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a system that was supposed to be a solution to

1:03:17.480 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the loss of trust in the system? I mean it's

1:03:20.960 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a real shame, right. I think crypto really has been

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the subject of really really bad pr for rightful reasons.

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think in any space that's so hyper financialized,

1:03:30.880 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of people who flight it in

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to make a quick buck. That's the issue with these

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>hyper capitalist environments. It's effect on us, luckily, hasn't been massive,

1:03:40.880 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>mostly because we've always operated in more of like sort

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of a social cultural space as opposed to like a

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>purely defy financialized space. Sure, it's made people a little

1:03:50.320 --> 1:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more hesitant to be like, okay, am I about

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy this token right now? Is that actually real thing?

1:03:55.600 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You know? I've had a lot of people come up

1:03:56.720 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>between the last month and a half. Not FBB people,

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but more just like your aunt at Thanksgiving, who is

1:04:02.080 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like his crypto going to fully viscrate. Is it even

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a thing anymore? Yes, it'll still be

1:04:06.760 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a thing, you know. It is going to continue to exist,

1:04:09.640 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>just as a space for the industry to continue to

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>evolve and step up and improve transparency. It's communication because frankly,

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what SPF showed and FTX has showed that FTX is

1:04:20.920 --> 1:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>actually a case where if it were actually decentralized, that

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>would not have been possible. It would have all been transparent,

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it would have all been clear. You would have been

1:04:29.120 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>able to see the movement of funds from various different

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on chain you know accounts to different on chain accounts.

1:04:35.480 --> 1:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>The issue was he ran a decentralized company incredibly centralized

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>all around him, and so ultimately, while the whole thing

1:04:43.040 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is completely disastrous, he was an example of why more

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>decentralized exchanges like UNISWAP are literally and technically impervious to

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened. It is impossible for that to occur because

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it is decentralized. Not if the entire UNISWAP team died,

1:04:58.160 --> 1:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it would continue to run and exist and the exchange

1:05:01.000 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would continue to fulfill exchanges of currency. Like, that's really

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>exciting to me. And what do you think will keep

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>FWB on that side of things? Keep it from being

1:05:11.360 --> 1:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>phased out for the next shiny thing. We say, we're

1:05:14.240 --> 1:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>not a crypto community or a community that uses crypto,

1:05:16.840 --> 1:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think as long as we keep community at

1:05:18.480 --> 1:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the center of it, and we continue to play with

1:05:20.240 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the tools in an interesting way that enhances the community

1:05:23.320 --> 1:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and we remain culture first, then we'll be fine. Culture

1:05:27.720 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>waxes and WANs. Look at a fashion house. You'll have

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a great season and the next season it will be irrelevant,

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it'll come back. And you know, I think

1:05:34.040 --> 1:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of scenes and communities as similar. You can't be the

1:05:36.040 --> 1:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>hot community forever. And ultimately, as long as you're creating

1:05:40.640 --> 1:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>real value, people are really connecting with each other, it's

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>coming from a place of genuineness, I think will continue

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to evolve. We actually kind of love bear markets because

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you actually attract people who are here for the right reasons.

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>After we started in a bear market. We're now seeing

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>more artists join, being like, all right, it's cheaper now,

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and I can actually experiment and the stakes feel less high,

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't need to launch an art project that

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>gets me global press like all my peers, and instead

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I can make a stupid little project and share it

1:06:11.320 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and have fun with it and not be stressed out.

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what we love versus in the bull market, it

1:06:17.640 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was everyone joining to jump onto the train, which is fine,

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>but those people aren't the ones defining and creating the culture. Well,

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and my motivation and our strong motivation for having you

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>here is to talk about the value of the self governance, experimentation.

1:06:32.800 --> 1:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And if the price of experimentation is so high because

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets flooded with people who don't care at all

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about that, they just care about the financial speculation, then

1:06:42.240 --> 1:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>they're actually crowding out our ability to learn from things

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like this to improve things. Well, beyond this, how has

1:06:49.560 --> 1:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>being part of a DOO affected the way you show

1:06:52.320 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>up as a citizen, as a colleague, as a collaborator,

1:06:56.080 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>as a member of community. My leadership style and all

1:06:59.400 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the organizations I've been fortunate to lead has always been

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>much more of a facilitator. I've never been like a

1:07:05.360 --> 1:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>dictatorial do this because I say I'm the boss. Even

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in scenarios where I have been, you know, the CEO

1:07:11.560 --> 1:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatnot, I've always enjoyed being sort of one that

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>distributes power, one that uplifts and creates structures for qualify

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people to emerge into lead. Nothing makes me happier as

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a manager than when someone you're managing excels and exceeds

1:07:28.040 --> 1:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and now is really owning a specific department or category.

1:07:31.920 --> 1:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Dows is that with your users, which is so fun

1:07:34.560 --> 1:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. Dows is that with your community members where

1:07:37.400 --> 1:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's done community work, let's call a social nonprofit

1:07:42.040 --> 1:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>civil rights work knows it's about uplifting those people who

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are showing up to all the various different rallies and

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>events and empowering them and to create sort of that

1:07:50.400 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>network effect where ultimately, because of all volunteers, you're not

1:07:53.680 --> 1:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>even actually paying them. And so I think of that

1:07:56.040 --> 1:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as like something that's always just been fundamental to my

1:07:59.080 --> 1:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>leadership style, and DAWs have just now supercharged that because

1:08:02.800 --> 1:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>now it's like a lot more literal. Now I can

1:08:05.360 --> 1:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>actually compensate them in sort of this native currency. Now

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>their work can be recognized on chain through the format

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of proposals, and that's created this really interesting loop where

1:08:15.160 --> 1:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>now I show up in spaces that aren't even cryptospaces

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 1>from you know, various different communities or nonprofits that I

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:23.519
<v Speaker 1>support or advise on, and try to bring some of

1:08:23.520 --> 1:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that similar sort of consensus making between directions as opposed

1:08:28.360 --> 1:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to like, I'm the boss, let's do this, because I

1:08:30.640 --> 1:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't think that that's just not how I that's

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not a high lead. So it's giving you a place

1:08:35.400 --> 1:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to practice more of what you been preaching. Us are Alex.

1:08:41.040 --> 1:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>We title this show how to Citizen because we believe

1:08:44.240 --> 1:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>citizen is a verb, not simply a noun and a

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>legal status. It's something a lot more and it involves action.

1:08:51.120 --> 1:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>If you are to interpret citizen as a verb, how

1:08:54.400 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would you define it? What does it mean to citizen?

1:08:57.600 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>To you? I think to citizen is to have an

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion and then to feel the sovereignty to be able

1:09:03.080 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to put that opinion into action and to collaborate. Citizen

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is that translation from opinion into action and that sort

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of forward energy momentum of feeling like you can actually

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>make a difference in a structure. I think many of

1:09:16.880 --> 1:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>us have opinions about things, but we keep them to ourselves,

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or we mumble them or whisper them to a friend.

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:24.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think in so many different social structures, digital, physical,

1:09:25.000 --> 1:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the ability to have an opinion on how something could

1:09:27.040 --> 1:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>improve or change and then be able to put that

1:09:29.000 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>into action in a constructive and collaborative way. It feels

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:36.519
<v Speaker 1>like how I would citizen constructive and collaborative, because yeah,

1:09:36.560 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely no shortage of opinions, but that's for sure.

1:09:40.200 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Moving them to action is another one. Alex, thank you

1:09:43.880 --> 1:09:46.479
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining me for this conversation. Thanks for

1:09:46.520 --> 1:09:49.759
<v Speaker 1>having me. This was fun. Okay, we are shifting gears

1:09:49.840 --> 1:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>into the community. Speaking of community and an audience questions.

1:09:54.439 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>First up, Tanya Fox, you got Alex Alex today. Thank you.

1:09:58.920 --> 1:10:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tanya Fox in Montreal, Canada. With taking venture capital,

1:10:04.000 --> 1:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>how does that affect the weight of other people's voting

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and how is that distributed in terms of the profitability

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of the other two kens. So we raised venture capital

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>back in November. It was about ten percent of the supply.

1:10:19.280 --> 1:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>That was a proposal actually, so the community agreed to

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>accept venture funding. So we put together a proposal that

1:10:24.840 --> 1:10:27.479
<v Speaker 1>outlined all of the terms, and then the community actually

1:10:27.520 --> 1:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>had like counter points, which was really interesting, and then

1:10:30.200 --> 1:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we actually negotiated and I was almost like a proxy

1:10:32.320 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with the investors, and one of those counterpoints is actually

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>decreasing their voting power. So they wanted obviously the venture

1:10:37.160 --> 1:10:40.599
<v Speaker 1>conpitalists wanted more ownership in the network, but the community said,

1:10:40.600 --> 1:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't actually want you to have the equivalent amount

1:10:42.360 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of ownership to voting power, and so we actually agreed

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on a fifty percent decrease in their actual voting stake.

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So while they own ten percent of the network, their

1:10:51.320 --> 1:10:54.519
<v Speaker 1>voting powers equivalently like five percent of the network. So

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that was an example of diminishing sort of their governance

1:10:57.160 --> 1:11:00.599
<v Speaker 1>participation in terms of profitability. This is an early stage projects,

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so they're just betting on like, hey, this is the

1:11:01.960 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>most interesting project we've seen of like Dow token usage,

1:11:05.200 --> 1:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and if this is the next New York's Digital New

1:11:07.360 --> 1:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>York City. We just want to own a lot of

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate. So they bought about ten percent of that

1:11:11.160 --> 1:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate. That allowed for the capital to go into

1:11:14.120 --> 1:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the treasury to then fund all these various different community

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>projects and endeavors and so I think their perspective of

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>profitability is as FBB continues to expand, more people join,

1:11:22.800 --> 1:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>more people participate, more goods and services are being created.

1:11:25.720 --> 1:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>The Dow holds dozens of various different equities and various

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>different companies that have emerged. It's them sort of owning

1:11:30.840 --> 1:11:33.519
<v Speaker 1>a percentage in sort of that conglomerate or that holding

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of all these various different community owned assets. Thank you

1:11:36.080 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for that, Alex. We're moving on to ned hit. Your

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>question did all right? I'm ned calling him from outside Madison, Wisconsin,

1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ho Chup Nation territory. So I'd like to hear more

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about the mechanisms you have for ensuring I mean, kind

1:11:53.360 --> 1:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of like what you were seeing with the venture capital thing,

1:11:55.240 --> 1:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but more also to ensure that tokens do not equal

1:11:59.080 --> 1:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>gatekeeping into terms of who gets the sort of demographics

1:12:02.600 --> 1:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that get to be full participants. You know, that question

1:12:06.360 --> 1:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of we give tokens out to people who do earn

1:12:09.160 --> 1:12:12.479
<v Speaker 1>them can very subtly and quickly shift to we give

1:12:12.760 --> 1:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>tokens out the people we believe deserve them and that

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we believe in becomes a really tricky thing. I'm curious

1:12:19.160 --> 1:12:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to know how that's worked so far. I mean, I've

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:23.759
<v Speaker 1>got kind of maybe like a hot take in general

1:12:23.840 --> 1:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that I you know, sort of in praise of exclusivity,

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:28.519
<v Speaker 1>and then I think like exclusivity actually plays a really

1:12:28.520 --> 1:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>important role in society. I don't believe in like explicitly.

1:12:32.439 --> 1:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think all gatekeeping is necessarily bad. I

1:12:35.000 --> 1:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think if everything were inclusive, I don't think there will

1:12:36.920 --> 1:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>be anything sort of at all. I obviously believe in

1:12:39.560 --> 1:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>inclusivity inside of a community, but I believe if you

1:12:42.680 --> 1:12:45.799
<v Speaker 1>can create an organization that has vision, values and mission

1:12:45.840 --> 1:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and principles, it should turn certain people on and turn

1:12:48.040 --> 1:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>certain people off. That's how you actually create a culture.

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I think in terms of the token equaling gatekeeping,

1:12:54.800 --> 1:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we've done as best as we cant of making that

1:12:56.960 --> 1:12:59.519
<v Speaker 1>accessible to the people that we want to attract, which

1:12:59.520 --> 1:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the people want to attract our creatives, artists, technologists. Because

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>FTVB isn't for everybody, just like New York City isn't

1:13:05.840 --> 1:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>for everybody, or you know, various different towns that you

1:13:08.520 --> 1:13:11.519
<v Speaker 1>choose to live in, and so our perspective has been, like,

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, ensure that price has various different entry points,

1:13:14.600 --> 1:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ensure that there's always grant programs and scholarship programs where

1:13:17.880 --> 1:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>folks who are qualified and are a good fit but

1:13:19.960 --> 1:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the financial means can join and ensure you

1:13:22.800 --> 1:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>have transparency and where those token they're going to in

1:13:25.000 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of who's earned them and who hasn't, and sort

1:13:28.200 --> 1:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of carry oneself with humility and knowing that like will

1:13:31.240 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to evolve it based on real time feedback of

1:13:34.240 --> 1:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>how things are going. So that's sort of been our

1:13:35.920 --> 1:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>approach to date. Like I said, we've modeled a lot

1:13:38.320 --> 1:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of it after like club culture, and club culture definitely

1:13:40.280 --> 1:13:43.639
<v Speaker 1>isn't perfect, but that's sort of been was a studio

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty four quota dictatorship at the door, democracy on the

1:13:46.400 --> 1:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>dance floor is the other thing that you know, we've

1:13:48.120 --> 1:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>always kind of resonated where thanks for that, Alex, I

1:13:51.320 --> 1:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>mean in praise of exclusivity. Definitely a hot take. I

1:13:55.000 --> 1:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're advocating for illegal discrimination, of course, but

1:13:57.880 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what resonates with me is the idea that you yata

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>culture by having a vision, values, mission, and principles real quick.

1:14:05.360 --> 1:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what we're trying to do here with

1:14:07.240 --> 1:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>how to citizen to create a culture of democracy. Now

1:14:10.960 --> 1:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ned in terms of your question about who gets rewarded

1:14:13.240 --> 1:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for contributions and the fairness of that. It sounds like

1:14:16.040 --> 1:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the ability to abuse that system is going to be

1:14:18.640 --> 1:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>limited by how transparent the system is. So thanks for

1:14:22.040 --> 1:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>your question. Ned. Okay, now we have Sarah Hughes. Hello,

1:14:27.040 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Hughes here in Rochester, New York, part of the

1:14:30.400 --> 1:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>unseated Adona shown a territory. I am curious just because

1:14:35.880 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of information coming out recently about

1:14:39.120 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the environmental impacts of data mining, of crypto mining, of

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:46.839
<v Speaker 1>data farms, just all of the infrastructure required to maintain

1:14:46.920 --> 1:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>blockchain and all of these other technologies online. And I'm

1:14:50.479 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of an oldie. I'm trying to keep up with

1:14:52.600 --> 1:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the tech. But I would like to ask you if

1:14:56.040 --> 1:14:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you are others in the DOW world that you are

1:14:58.520 --> 1:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>aware of are taking that in to account in terms

1:15:01.360 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of scaling and also what the potential environmental impacts are

1:15:06.000 --> 1:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of community. Yeah, so I can't speak

1:15:09.320 --> 1:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to like bitcoin, there's tons of environmental issues with Bitcoin

1:15:13.640 --> 1:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or the dozens of other chains, but in terms of Ethereum,

1:15:17.040 --> 1:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the main currency that ours is built on top of,

1:15:19.520 --> 1:15:23.639
<v Speaker 1>has made it a top priority to address the environmental issues,

1:15:23.720 --> 1:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Ethereum community actually put up it's called the

1:15:26.960 --> 1:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>merge and it was actually the biggest system upgrade that

1:15:29.360 --> 1:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was run by decentralized group of developers that is now

1:15:32.280 --> 1:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>reduced by like ninety four percent the environmental efficiency of Ethereum,

1:15:37.080 --> 1:15:40.719
<v Speaker 1>which is really exciting for that community. Yeah, Ethereum's system upgrade,

1:15:40.960 --> 1:15:44.599
<v Speaker 1>it's changed the way they validate transactions in the merch.

1:15:44.720 --> 1:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Back in September twenty twenty two, actually reports said that

1:15:47.880 --> 1:15:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the switch reduced its energy usage by over ninety nine

1:15:52.080 --> 1:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>which is amazing. So thank you for the questions. Sarah,

1:15:55.400 --> 1:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, We've got one last question, and I'm going

1:15:57.920 --> 1:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask on behalf of this person who's in a

1:16:00.160 --> 1:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>very loudspace. Janine didn't a vice repeat contributor here, University

1:16:05.080 --> 1:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of Delaware professor, and it was circling back to the

1:16:08.920 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>questions about inclusivity. Janine wrote specifically, what does the mayor

1:16:13.280 --> 1:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think about issues of inclusion and diversity? What are the

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>demographics do you worry about that? Why or why not?

1:16:19.600 --> 1:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to tag on. I know the way

1:16:22.040 --> 1:16:26.599
<v Speaker 1>FWB grew initially was through networks, right, friends of friends,

1:16:26.600 --> 1:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it was friends with benefits and those can be exclusive

1:16:30.400 --> 1:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is biased against people who've been

1:16:34.360 --> 1:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>excluded already, Like if you're not in the network, you

1:16:36.360 --> 1:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>can never be in the network because no one in

1:16:37.600 --> 1:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the networks knows you, and vice versa. And so I'm

1:16:40.840 --> 1:16:43.639
<v Speaker 1>very curious in terms of that access point, how you're

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:46.519
<v Speaker 1>trying to get beyond the inherent bias of that kind

1:16:46.520 --> 1:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of seed community. In addition to just tacking onto a

1:16:49.479 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Janine's question about demographics overall and your own thoughts on

1:16:53.680 --> 1:16:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the diversity level and inclusion and diversity from a conceptual level,

1:16:57.680 --> 1:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we care deeply about inclusion and diversity. It's one of

1:17:02.160 --> 1:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>our core values. I agree that network growth tends to

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>be relatively homogeneous. However, we started in an artistic community,

1:17:10.439 --> 1:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>which tends to be much more heterogeneous. Trevor's a black founder.

1:17:14.080 --> 1:17:17.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm an Asian American co founder. Like our team from

1:17:17.600 --> 1:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the outset was very focused on creating a network that

1:17:21.760 --> 1:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>started with diversity built into the fundamental core of it. Unfortunately,

1:17:26.400 --> 1:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto and technology skew heavily mail. So I would say

1:17:30.520 --> 1:17:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the crypto industry at large, I would say, is like

1:17:32.520 --> 1:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent mail FWB sits probably close to like sixty

1:17:36.240 --> 1:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>forty seventy thirty, and we're constantly putting out initiatives to

1:17:40.479 --> 1:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>attract and create safety and onboarding for more diverse backgrounds

1:17:45.400 --> 1:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that aren't our traditional sort of main mix. But I

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>would say, like just at its core, we just started

1:17:50.360 --> 1:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>from a really diverse community, just from the onset. So

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>many people who join FWB it was their first ever

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency asset. In terms of diversity inclusion, you know, you

1:17:59.040 --> 1:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>can make a ton of arguments. Diversity spans obviously beyond

1:18:02.720 --> 1:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>just race, from gender, to age, to socioeconomic background. We

1:18:06.520 --> 1:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>probably haven't been great at age. We're all relatively young,

1:18:09.360 --> 1:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and we're learning really quickly, and we mostly skewed towards

1:18:12.479 --> 1:18:16.799
<v Speaker 1>late twenties, early thirties, mid thirties. Geographic regions pretty global,

1:18:17.000 --> 1:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>huge on sen in Asia and Europe. But obviously being

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a LA New York scene in community, fifty percent of

1:18:23.400 --> 1:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>our network, forty percent of our network are in those

1:18:25.360 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>key cities. We believe deeply in diversity. We're constantly improving it.

1:18:29.000 --> 1:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But I would say it's about sort of putting in

1:18:31.240 --> 1:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>those mechanisms in place and making sure that your core

1:18:33.160 --> 1:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>leadership team is diverse, which I'm really proud that ours is.

1:18:36.360 --> 1:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, mister Mayor, Thank you Janine, thank you Sarah,

1:18:39.680 --> 1:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you Med and thank you Tanya for your contributions.

1:18:43.360 --> 1:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any tokens for you, but I got

1:18:45.880 --> 1:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of love for you. Alex. Thanks for taking

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the time with us. It was really really what I

1:18:50.240 --> 1:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was hoping for. Appreciate you, bro. Thanks everybody. As promised,

1:18:59.640 --> 1:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't pitch you on any crypto tokens in this episode,

1:19:03.120 --> 1:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, I really appreciate what Alex shared about the

1:19:06.680 --> 1:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>possibilities in this space. But I want to be clear,

1:19:10.880 --> 1:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not selling you anything. This is not a call

1:19:15.479 --> 1:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to DOW or to blockchain or to crypto. This is

1:19:18.800 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a call to innovate and update our practice of citizening.

1:19:24.280 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>In the case of Alex and participation dows like friends

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with Benefits, The questions they're asking apply well beyond blockchain

1:19:32.360 --> 1:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>based communities. They're the same questions we should be asking,

1:19:36.280 --> 1:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about online communities or those offline. Are

1:19:41.280 --> 1:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we valuing people's contributions, are we fostering a collective economy?

1:19:47.200 --> 1:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And are we making decisions about the spaces we care about.

1:19:53.360 --> 1:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>We spend so much of our lives existing through online platforms,

1:19:57.800 --> 1:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and just like we care about how we show up

1:19:59.760 --> 1:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in physical communities and the systems that run them, our

1:20:03.439 --> 1:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>digital common spaces demand our citizen in two and now

1:20:13.400 --> 1:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's time for some actions. Starting with an internal reflection,

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Take a moment and think about your relationship to the

1:20:21.400 --> 1:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>digital spaces you spend time in. This could be social media,

1:20:25.040 --> 1:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>gaming or a group chat. Where do you feel like

1:20:28.920 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>an active participant, where you set the terms and the

1:20:32.360 --> 1:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>tone of the environment. Where do you feel passive like

1:20:35.720 --> 1:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>someone else is in charge? How might you change that relationship?

1:20:40.800 --> 1:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Our next action is in the category of becoming more informed.

1:20:45.360 --> 1:20:48.519
<v Speaker 1>We can create a healthier culture of democracy through Web

1:20:48.600 --> 1:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>three beyond starting and joining doubt. If you're new to

1:20:52.880 --> 1:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>this world, the New York Times has a great primer

1:20:55.560 --> 1:20:58.519
<v Speaker 1>on what Web three even is, and we've linked to

1:20:58.560 --> 1:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it in the show notes. You read that take a

1:21:01.320 --> 1:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>deep dive into the history of squads, a form of

1:21:04.360 --> 1:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>social and economic organizing that shifting power and social dynamics

1:21:09.000 --> 1:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>away from an individualistic society. And if our conversation with

1:21:13.720 --> 1:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex made you curious, check out our season three conversation

1:21:17.280 --> 1:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with Eli Pariser from New Public. We go deep on

1:21:20.439 --> 1:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>how to better design digital public spaces, and, last, but

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not least, here's what I want us to try. In

1:21:27.200 --> 1:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>terms of public participation. You're likely part of a decision

1:21:31.479 --> 1:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>making group, a tenants or homeowners association, a parents group,

1:21:36.360 --> 1:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a committee at work. I'm so sorry, I'm a committee

1:21:39.920 --> 1:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at work. By the way. Now, the next time you're

1:21:42.400 --> 1:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at one of your meetings, take note of how the

1:21:44.840 --> 1:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>group makes decisions, who speaks, who's silent, what areas are

1:21:49.760 --> 1:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>open to input, and what's considered off the table? Is

1:21:52.880 --> 1:21:56.559
<v Speaker 1>there even an agenda? See if you can identify the

1:21:56.680 --> 1:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of culture the group has chaotic, deferential, something else.

1:22:02.439 --> 1:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you find any opportunities for the group to make

1:22:05.800 --> 1:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that culture more small d democratic by rotating speaking or

1:22:10.280 --> 1:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>leadership roles, or even just openly acknowledging how decisions are

1:22:15.240 --> 1:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>made and how that might shift. We don't always need

1:22:19.080 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to find or start new groups and spaces to practice

1:22:22.720 --> 1:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this democracy thing, so let's start where we are. If

1:22:27.040 --> 1:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you take any of these actions, please brag about it

1:22:30.120 --> 1:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>online and use the hashtag how to citizen. Also tag

1:22:34.160 --> 1:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>our Instagram how to citizen. I am always online and

1:22:37.800 --> 1:22:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I really do see your messages, so send them finally.

1:22:41.240 --> 1:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>See this episode show notes for more on these actions

1:22:44.439 --> 1:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and a link to our bookshop dot org account where

1:22:47.080 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you can find all the books Alex mentioned and any

1:22:50.200 --> 1:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>others you've heard about while listening to the show. How

1:22:53.040 --> 1:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to Citizen with baritun Day as a production of iHeartRadio

1:22:56.200 --> 1:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts and Row Home Productions. Our executive producers are me

1:23:00.840 --> 1:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>barrettun Day, Thurston and Elizabeth Stewart. Our lead producer is

1:23:05.040 --> 1:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Ali Graham. Our associate producer is Donia abdel Hamid. Alex

1:23:09.800 --> 1:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Lewis is our managing producer, and John Myers is our

1:23:12.880 --> 1:23:17.559
<v Speaker 1>executive editor. Our mix engineer is Justin Berger. Original music

1:23:17.600 --> 1:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>by Andrew Eapen with additional music by Blue Dot Sessions,

1:23:21.280 --> 1:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and our audience engagement fellows are Jasmine Lewis and Gabbie Rodriguez.

1:23:26.000 --> 1:23:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to Joel Smith from iHeartRadio and Lay Labina.

1:23:37.760 --> 1:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Next time on How the Citizen, Alex believes that a

1:23:42.200 --> 1:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>community to be whole must also be an economy, but

1:23:46.439 --> 1:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't mean they need to increase wealth, inequality or

1:23:49.600 --> 1:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>drive profits at the expense of our humanity. A community

1:23:53.240 --> 1:23:56.519
<v Speaker 1>economy is just a system that acknowledges the exchange of

1:23:56.600 --> 1:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>value and it can work for all of us. No

1:24:00.000 --> 1:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one believes that more than economist Kate Rayworth. What do

1:24:03.280 --> 1:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you think is the shape of economic progress? Because if

1:24:05.840 --> 1:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you listen to an economist, if you listen to a politician,

1:24:09.800 --> 1:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the shape apparently is growth, endlessly, right, always, always more.

1:24:15.000 --> 1:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Because no amotter how rich nation already is. I'm in

1:24:17.360 --> 1:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK or in the US. We live in two

1:24:19.000 --> 1:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of the richest countries in the history of humanity, and

1:24:22.280 --> 1:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>yet our economists are politicians think that the solution to

1:24:25.800 --> 1:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>all of our problems lie in yet more growth, endlessly.

1:24:28.479 --> 1:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no end in sight. Now, there's something utterly absurd

1:24:31.160 --> 1:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about that, and I think we really need to take

1:24:33.280 --> 1:24:36.519
<v Speaker 1>seriously what is the shape of progress? Kate Rayworth, author

1:24:36.600 --> 1:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of Donut Economics, Seven Ways to Think like a twenty

1:24:39.680 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>first century economist, shares how we can create an economy

1:24:43.320 --> 1:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that works for all of us, including our planet. Yay Earth,

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>grow home productions,