WEBVTT - Best Of - Shedeur Sanders HAS ARRIVED, are Eagles BROKEN? + NFL Week 13 Predictions

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Best of the Week for What's Right

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes and moments from this

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>week on the show. Enjoy. The Eagles blew it against Dallas.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no other way to put it, and the Eagles.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Here is my takeaway. Honestly from that Eagles game. AJ

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown is not wrong. There is something wrong with Phillies offense.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Philly's offense this year has.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Eight halves. They've played twenty four.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, No, actually that's not obvious, and I think it's

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong because they've already had a buy so they've played

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two in eight of their twenty two halves, so

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>more than a third they have scored seven or fewer points.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>They have three scoreless has of football. Only the Titans

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are worse, and.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 2>There are They do not.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Have Saquon to save them this year. I know he's

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>on the team, he ain't saving them. And this was

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the most predictable year over year decline imaginable. Literally every

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>running back save one in NFL history that has had

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Saquan's type of workload last year saw a significant drop

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the following year. A lot of guys that their production

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>dropped by half. That's what we're staring at with Saquon,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and while the passing game at times looks dynamic, they

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>just can't string together a whole game. And right or wrong,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Sirianni consistently shows us with his decision making that for

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some reason or another he does not fully trust Jalen.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And the end of the half was bizarre. You have

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>eighteen seconds, you have the ball in the thirty.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>And in today's NFL.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You're twenty five yards away from field goal range. We

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>know you think Jake Elliott's got a big leg because

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>later in the game you was shoot a fourth and

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>five attempt to kick a field goal. And Sirianni's explanation

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>after the game was, well, the Cowboys kicker is such

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a big leg, we don't want to leave them time.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>There was eighteen seconds.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>There was no scenario at all except for a turnover

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>where the Cowboys were gonna touch the ball, much less

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>kick a field goal. Even if you just threw four

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>consecutive incomplete passes, that takes eighteen seconds like so that

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't make sense. And Philly is obviously in good shape

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because of the division they're in, so they're going to

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>be a good seed. They're going to be a division champion.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>They still have three games left against the Commanders and Raiders.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They're going to finish with a gaudy record. I'm not worried,

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>honestly about any of those those things, but the flashing

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>siren that's been what is up with this offense continues

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to go off. And now getting Lane Johnson back, if

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you get him back in a month or so, that

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>should help.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>But he's only been gone one game.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm Philly, here's the other thing that I

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>hate about this loss. My path to the one seed

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is now so much trickier. In fact, I'm gonna look

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the wild has got me going to this as my

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>go to But and I've always kind of actually liked this,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>but I used to use Football Outsiders or Aaron Schatz's

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>But the New York Times Playoff Predictor they have the

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Eagles at twenty six percent for the one seed, the

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Rams up to fifty. That's a big deal. The extra

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>playoff game, plus not having the huge edge of potentially

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a warm weather contender having to come to your building.

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:22.239
<v Speaker 1>And right now, the you know, projected playoff field of

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles being the two seed and hosting either the

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Lions or the Niners. I would love either of those

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>spots if I were Philly. And by the way, speaking

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>of the Niners, just real quick, I have never been

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>proven more right more times than every time the Niners

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>trot out either Mac Jones or Brock Purty or all

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of last season. For what was once such a controversy,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Marshall hot button take that Brock Party is not a

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>force multiplayer and is a Kyle Shanahan Niners amazing skill

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>position player creation. The last year seeing him without those

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>great players, this year, seeing Mac Jones outplay him, and

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>then last night seeing him throw three picks. It's just

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>every single time, and I know the arguments I've won

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because they start becoming less and less prominent on.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 2>The TV show.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, okay, the cost of being the annoying guy

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is when you just smoke, you're too much more likable

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>co hosts in a multi year argument, you just have

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to you have to take the win, but take the

0:06:55.800 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>win graciously, which I'm not always great at. So Philly,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know. And here's the other piece. It

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can't all be on the offensive coordinator in Philly. I'm

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>not saying Patullo is doing a great job. But if

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>he's doing that bad of a job, then Sirianni takeover.

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But you have an offensive minded head coach, you have

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that carries himself like Michael Jordan.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Figure it out.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You have too much talent on that offense. That's an

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 1>awful loss. And Dallas, on the other hand, I right

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>now the quinnin Williams trade is aging grat He's been excellent.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I was not a fan of that trade. I still

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>am not a fan of that trade, but right now

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it is looking really good. But the story for Dallas

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is Dak's been the second best quarterback in the NFL

0:07:52.800 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's been Stafford one, Dak two. And it

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is as simple as that. He's been that good. And

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he has a legitimate second team All Pro case. And

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in that game Sunday, he became the Cowboys all time

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>leading passer, which sounds about right. Today's show is brought

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to you by representing sponsor hard Rock Bet. Three things

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to be extra thankful this week, family, food, and football.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to hard Rock Bet, you can easily sneak in

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 1>some bets while your crazy uncle goes on his annual

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>rant about what it was like when he was a kid.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Sign up today you could feast with one hundred fifty

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Just plays a five dollars bet.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>If it hits, you get not only your winnings, but

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>also one hundred fifty dollars in extra bonus bets. That's

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>an offer you can't pass up, even when you're in

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a Turkey coma. Not sure what to place your first

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>bet on, head over to the hard Rock Bets Stats

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>hub and it'll help you out. It's loaded with trend

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Street and stats help guide your picks. Numbers don't lie

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and neither does the data in their plus. This week

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on hard rock Bet you get three fifty percent boosts,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>one for each Thanksgiving Day game. You know I'll be

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>locked in on Kansas City, so boost your same game

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>parlay or SGP max so your bets pay extra winnings.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>New promos every day. So if you're listening to this later,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>just open the app and check out what they've got.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Any day of the week, download the hard rock Bet

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>app and make your first deposit payable and bonus bets

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida.

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>In Florida offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC and

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all other states, must be twenty one plus and physically

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concern about

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight eight eight Admit it.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>In Indiana. If you are someone you know as a

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem wants help, call one eight hundred and nine

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with it. Gambling problem, Call one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. Shure Sanders got the

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>win and was named, at least for the time being,

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the starter. I thought it was noteworthy that they said

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel is cleared concussion protocol, but Shador is still the starter.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>That is obviously the right call, and I don't. I

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>find so much of the Shadore commentary to be disingenuous

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and idiotic that.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I try not.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>To swim in those waters, even though, man, oh man,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are trying, if you are basing, your Chador

0:10:50.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>takes off what gets engagement. It's it's a very hard

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>flame to avoid. So if you just I mean, this

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is anecdotal, obviously, but yesterday's uh First Thing's first clips

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, if I'm just looking at it by retweets

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>or comments, see and I'm not going to say what

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the topics were, but just see if you can guess

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which one was the short or topic. Number of retweets

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in comments total on the First Thing's first clips from

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's show clip one one hundred and ninety nine, Clip

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>two twenty six, Clip three forty four, Clip four forty nine,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Clip five thirty six, Clip seven eighty five, Clip nine

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, Clip twelve or clip ten, sorry thirty two,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Clip eleven one thousand, one hundred and fifty eight, Clip twelve,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, Clip thirteen thirty seven, Clip fourteen one hundred

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and seventy two. One of those stick out to you guys,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>gets the people going. And so I also think part

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of that the reason that that commentary has gotten so

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>snake eating its tail ish is there are a lot

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of folks who they're only outlet is their social media feed,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and so all they have to go on is reaction

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to things they put out on social media. And so

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>because of that they They're like, well, this is what

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>people want and is what people have strong opinions on.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The Chador thing. To me is very very simple, and

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I will do it as efficiently as possible. Shardoor the

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>player compared to Gabriel, and why shoudor should be the starter.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>There is absolutely no chance, none, that Dylan Gabriel is

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ever an above average NFL starter. It would be delightful

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if Dylan proves me wrong. If you know Dylan Gabriel's

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>friends or family see this clip. He uses it for motivation,

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>grows a few inches and gets a lot better, and

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>then you can be like, Nick, you idiot, that's fine.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's zero percent that he's ever an above

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>average NFL starter, and I think it's close to zero

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>percent that he's ever even just a full time starter.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that's a bad draft pick. If he

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>can just be a competent backup, stop gap quarterback, that's

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>worth a third round pick. So that's Gabriel. Schador has

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>just enough traits and just enough collegiate pedigree and just

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>enough Oh wow, look at that play that I give

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>him a five percent chance five percent one in twenty

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of being a plus starter and a ten to fifteen

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>percent chance of being a full time starter for somebody.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>The Browns are otherwise.

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That and that alone is enough to say, all right,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>let's use these last half dozen games to see what

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Shador has before we make massive decisions this offseason with

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>our multiple first round picks. So in that regard, I

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>greatly prefer Shador to Gabriel for the Browns right now

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with what they're trying to do. That's take one, Take two.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>What did I think of Shador's game?

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was fine.

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>He had one really nice chunk play over the middle,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>another potentially really nice chunk play to Jerry Judy. That

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was a really nice chunk play until Judy started celebrating

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>early and fumbled. He had one grisly interception and then

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>two swing passes, one of which went for a sixty

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown, the other of which damn near got the

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Raiders back in the game. A bit of a mixed bag,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was fine, but that being fine was the

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>most important thing. What he couldn't be was awful or

0:15:56.000 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in way over his skis, and he wasn't, and so

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's positive. And then there is the third point, which

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is Chador's disposition or personality or comments before and after

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the game. And I don't think that Chadour means any harm.

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And I do think he is a very likable guy

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and from all accounts, a really good guy. And I

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think he is handled growing up very rich and very

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>famous better than most young people would.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 2>I believe that.

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think that while I always encourage confidence, particularly

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in athletes, particularly and guys that want to be starting quarterbacks,

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>some of Shador's comments have butted up against what I

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>believe to be and maybe you'll prove me wrong.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Delusion. So Shadour really harping.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>On, imagine what it'll look like when I have a

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>full off season, Imagine what it will look like when

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I have all the practice reps assumes to get a

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>little litigious for a moment. Some facts not in evidence,

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>most notably that at any point in the near or

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>even distant future, but certainly near future, that you're going

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a team's unquestioned starter, which the only way

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you're getting all the offseason reps, all the practice reps

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is if you are the unequivocal QB one for a team.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>And I do not think that Shadoor is on the

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>doorstep of that. And I also think if I had

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to crystal ball it and say ten years out, is

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>it more likely or than not that there will ever

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be a season where Shadoor is simply a team's incumbent,

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>un no competition involved starting quarterback. I don't think that's

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. Schudor clearly does, and good for him

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for believing it. I I don't. It's not that I

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the comments he made before and after the

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>game because I thought they were air agant. I didn't

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>like the comments he made because I thought he it

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>showed that he hasn't come to grips with where he

0:19:47.960 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>is in the NFL quarterback hierarchy. So like, unless he

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely balls out in a way that would be

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>truly unprecedented for a fifth round rookie and would be

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>top five percentile for any rookie of any round at

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that position over the final six weeks, he is not

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>going to enter next year as the clearcut starter for

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>any team. And it is going to take a some

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>really special performances over this last six weeks for the

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Browns to decide we are not spending a first round

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>pick on a quarterback next year and were not trading

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for Kyler Murray or bringing in you know, this year's

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>version of Daniel Jones, whatever it is.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I I, while I find Shouldor's biggest detractors to be

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>typically bad people, and I find should Or's biggest supporters

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to be typically very annoying people.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I am rooting for.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Him, but I think, I mean, we'll see all these

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>this next month goes. But I I think that he

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>would serve himself well, if at least internally and psychologically,

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he reset his own personal expectations to where man, next year,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go into camp as the clear cut number

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>two somewhere, and then maybe by year three there I

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>will be able to compete.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>For a starting job somewhere.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>That to me is a far more realistic and achievable

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>path than imagine when I'm getting all the reps as

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the starter, buddy, I don't know that that's happening ever.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, the story of the game was

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the ten sacks from the Browns. I listen, I said

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that I thought Miles Garrett might break the sack record

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders. In their effort to make sure he didn't,

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone else you know he got gino. He had three.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna break the record, and I he the fact

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's only minus eight point fifty for Defensive Player

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Year surprises me. I think there's I actually

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>think there is value in that because I think he

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>could get hurt next week and still win it. By

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you're thinking about upgrading to the all

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone seventeen Pro, designed to be the most powerful

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>iPhone ever, but you're also thinking about the traffic on

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>your way to the store or transferring all your data,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>good news. When you order a new phone online with

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile, they'll send an expert to your home. How

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>about that or a home or work to deliver your

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>brand new iPhone Pro and get you set up on

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile within minutes, no hassle. So you get the

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone, it comes right to you and a tech

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>comes in, get all your stuff transferred to get you

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>set up on the network. Visit boostmobile dot com to

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>get started. Delivery available for select devices purchased at boostmobile

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Terms of course do apply. Reminder all lines

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>are from hard Rock Bet and the first one hard

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Rock BET's helping me out because most shops have Kansas

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>City laying three and a half. Hard Rock has Kansas

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>City laying three. I will jump on Kansas City minus

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>three at Dallas. Over the last twenty years Thanksgiving favorites

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>are fifty one and nine straight up and forty and

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty against the spread. Now, the Chiefs just played an

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>overtime game and they're on the road on a Thursday.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 2>That's typically a disaster. The counterpoint to that is the.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs overtime game ended earlier than the Cowboys game because

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys were in the late window, and the Chiefs

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>overtime game was weird because the Colts barely had the ball.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So I am I am not as concerned about that

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>trend as I maybe normally would be. But also it's this,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chiefs, whatever issues they have offensively, I

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think the Chiefs against bad secondaries still move the ball

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>at will. I think Dallas has a bad secondary. I

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>will take case minus the three Chicago getting seven at Philadelphia.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I just do not believe the Eagles deserve to be

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>more than six point favorites against good teams right now

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>because the offense is so herky jerky. Also, the lane

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Johnson's absence has been a death knell for this team

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years. Really, and Ben Johnson after

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that his hole the tush push is not an explosive play.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Jab at Philadelphia that is probably a bigger deal on

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>first things first than other shows. Knows he better have

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>something ready for Philly. I think Chicago could win the game.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I like getting the seven points. I'll take Chicago plus

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>seven Tampa minus three against Arizona. Typically, given the Baker injury,

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd stay away here, but Arizona and now am I

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mad at them for costing me.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 2>My bet this past week.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but Trevor gave them the ball four times, including

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a pick six, and they still couldn't win. Those were

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not like great defensive plays by Arizona. Those were Trevor

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>making all plays. I expect Baker to play. Uh Marvin

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Junior, we still don't know what's going on with

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>him post appendix removal. Bucky Irving finally returns, Tampa pounds

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the run Tampa minus three. I think for the second

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>straight week, my favorite bet of.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 2>The week is Cleveland.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland getting six in the snow against the Niners. That

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>defense against Brock Purty, fresh off those interceptions in the snow.

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a low scoring, low possession run

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball game and Cleveland. Cleveland's defense is so great

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that at home and inclement weather, maybe our first snow

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>game of the year. I'll take the six points, and

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll take them happily and then last.

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 2>But not least.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Cleveland's my favorite pick or this

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>one is all lay the points, even.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Though it bit me. This past weekend again.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>With Seattle Seattle laying ten and a half against Minnesota.

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings are on their third string quarterback McCarthy wins

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and now, gosh, Gosmer, what's his name, Sam Bosmer, Gosmer,

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. I don't like his chances against Mike

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>McDonald Seattle defense, and so can Seattle get to twenty one?

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That should be enough to cover against the Vikings third

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>string quarterback. I'll take Seattle at home, laying the ten

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So our five picks are as follows

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs laying three thanks to our rock bet for

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not making this lay three and a half at Dallas,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Chicago getting seven at Philadelphia, Tampa Bay laying three at

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>home against the hated Cardinals. Cleveland getting six at home

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>against Rock Party and the Niners in the snow, and

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle laying ten and a half at home against Minnesota